Frank Sperling WWF Norway November 24, 2010

Transcription

1 Michel Roggo / WWF-Canon REDD+ Frank Sperling WWF Norway November 24, 2010

2 WWF REDD+ Positions Intro Forest Carbon Initiative WWF Forest Carbon Initiative The Forest Carbon Initiative signifies a network-wide effort of WWF to address the combined challenges of forest loss & degradation and climate change in a sustainable development context. The FCI draws on the expertise and experiences of staff from its international office and country office in developing and developed countries. This allows WWF to combine international and national policy work with project activities. 26 November

3 WWF Forest Carbon Initiative working across multiple scales WWF REDD+ Positions Intro Forest Carbon Initiative Source: WWF 2010, Forest Carbon Initiative Strategy 26 November

4 REDD+ Guiding Principles WWF REDD+ Positions Intro Forest Carbon Initiative Principle 1: CLIMATE REDD+ demonstrably contributes to greenhouse gas emission reductions with national goals working toward a global objective Principle 2: BIODIVERSITY REDD+ maintains and/or enhances forest biodiversity and ecosystem services Principle 3: LIVELIHOODS REDD+ contributes to sustainable and equitable development by addressing the underlying causes of deforestation and forest degradation Principle 4: RIGHTS REDD+ recognizes and respects the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities Principle 5: FAIR & EFFECTIVE FUNDING REDD+ mobilizes immediate, adequate and predictable resources for action in priority forest areas in an equitable, transparent, participatory and coordinated manner Source: WWF 2010, first presented at OCFC2010 with Care and Greenpeace 26 November

5 Frank Sperling, WWF Norway REDD+ REDD+ within the UNFCCC: WWF Positions Frank Sperling WWF Norway September 23, 2010

6 Presentation title can go here A Global Goal for REDD+ By 2020: Zero Net Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation Note: ZNEDD recognizes that in some circumstances, the conversion of forests may contribute to sustainable development and the conversion of the wider landscape, provided that biodiversity and high value conservation forests are protected and that the net quantity, quality and carbon density of forests is maintained. Sub-goals: Reducing conversion of natural forests close to zero (i.e. 95% reduction in deforestation) 75% reduction in gross emissions from deforestation and forest degradation Maximize conservation of biodiversity Source: WWF 2010, Global Goal for Reducing Deforestation and Degradation 26 November

7 Presentation title can go here Phased Approach Phase 1: Planning and Capacity Building Elements include identifying institutional and technical capacity needs, public participation and stakeholder consultation processes, designation of national entity for REDD+ implementation Phase 2: Testing Approaches and Scaling Up National plan, national reference levels/baselines, accounting, MRV systems, safeguards Pilot activities for learning and supporting scale up to national level Phase 3: Full National Implementation Readiness for national level implementation. Compliance credits should only be given in phase 3. Source: WWF 2010, National Programmes: Proper Framework for REDD+ 26 November

8 Presentation title can go here National Programmes A UNFCCC framework for REDD+ needs to ensure national level approaches. Why? National carbon accounting promotes real emission reductions and helps to prevent leakage (i.e. shifting of deforestation activities from one area to another) National approaches help to address root causes of deforestation by promoting improved policies and measures National programmes indicate a country-wide commitment and accountability Note: This does not mean that all REDD+ activities need to start at the national level. Subnational capacity development, coordination and implementation is essential for learning and REDD+ development, but it needs ultimately needs to come under a national umbrella. Source: WWF 2010, National Programmes: Proper Framework for REDD+ 26 November

9 Presentation title can go here MRV of Safeguards REDD+ has to be a viable development choice and as such generate benefits for local livelihoods and communities. Forest are more than carbon sticks. Primary forests provide are important for maintaining ecosystem goods and services, the livelihoods of indigenous peoples, Implications for safeguards: Internationally acceptable principles and criteria for social, environmental and governance safeguards need to be included in REDD+ Safeguards must be subject to monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV), allowing for independent, third-party verification and promoting transparency Source: WWF 2010, MRV of REDD+ Safeguards 26 November

10 Presentation title can go here National Programmes A UNFCCC framework for REDD+ needs to ensure national level approaches. Why? National carbon accounting promotes real emission reductions and helps to prevent leakage (i.e. shifting of deforestation activities from one area to another) National approaches help to address root causes of deforestation by promoting improved policies and measures National programmes indicate a country-wide commitment and accountability Note: This does not mean that all REDD+ activities need to start at the national level. Subnational capacity development, coordination and implementation is essential for learning and REDD+ development, but it needs ultimately needs to come under a national umbrella. Presentation to Company Name 26 November

11 Presentation title can go here Drivers of Deforestation Subnational, national and international drivers of deforestation need to be addressed as part of a comprehensive approach towards ZNEDD Possible indicators of progress at different scales: Positive trends in distribution of monetary and non-monetary assets at household and/or community level Positive trends in productive employment and decent work, including women Number of REDD+ readiness plans that link REDD+ to development Volume of credibly certified timber, agricultural and bio-energy products, based on sustainability criteria Presentation to Company Name 26 November

12 Frank Sperling, WWF Norway CANCUN: Scenarios and Expectations

13 Presentation title can go here From Copenhagen (COP15) to Cancun (COP16) Prior to Copenhagen REDD+ was one of the most negotiation topics At COP15 No agreement within UNFCCC, but Copenhagen Accord calls for funding and fast-tracking REDD+ In the wake of Copenhagen: Oslo Climate Forest Conference (OCFC2010), establishment of REDD+ partnership as a platform for information sharing, improved coordination and identification of financing gaps and overlaps Presentation to Company Name 26 November

14 Presentation title can go here Three scenarios for Cancun Scenario 1 ( The Pink or Very Optimistic Scenario ): Agreement. Decisions with REDD+ are comprehensive, including a global goal, references to Safeguards, MRV, Indigenous Peoples and Local Community rights, primary forest and biodiversity conservation Scenario 2 ( The more likely scenario ): Umbrella decision including REDD+ Scenario 3 ( The Worst Case Scenario ): No agreement, no decision Norway has taken a leadership role. No adequate decisions on REDD+ would lead to further delay of moving towards REDD+ readiness and further erode public confidence. Norway needs to push hard with like minded countries towards scenario 1. No agreement on REDD+ further increases the importance of bilateral and multilateral interim REDD+ activities Presentation to Company Name 26 November

15 Frank Sperling Keeping it Cool! Conclusions and Implications for Norway s REDD+ engagement

16 Presentation title can go here Conclusions and Recommendations for Norwegian REDD+ engagement Norway has been an outstanding leader on REDD+. The current pace of progress within the UNFCCC and the REDD+ partnership process, posses a considerable reputational risk to Norway s investment in political leadership and resources. Within the UNFCCC: Norway needs to push hard for a comprehensive agreement in REDD+ (Elements: Goal, MRV, Safeguards, Indigenous People and Local Communities, Primary Forests, Biodiversity) To consider: If REDD+ decisions are tied to a larger climate change agreement and only an umbrella decision is possible, already agreed topics on REDD+ should be part of appendix to that umbrella decision (to avoid re-opening and further regression on REDD+ in future COPs) 26 November

17 Conclusions and Recommendations for Norwegian REDD+ engagement REDD+ Partnership Presentation title can go here Norway and partner countries need to re-focused the REDD+ Partnership on addressing key practical information, coordination and funding needs for advancing REDD+ readiness (as outlined in REDD+ partnership document at OCFC2010) The REDD+ partnership process should not be instrumentalized by individual countries, but promote positive, collective action The current stakeholder consultation process is inacceptable and not in the spirit of OCFC2010 The work programme for 2011 and 2012 requires an adequate time window for stakeholder consultation and should focus on immediate practical needs (rather than turning into an information gathering machine without clear applications) Key elements include improving absorptive capacity of funds in tropical forest countries/regions, identifying/strengthening technical capabilities, MRV and safeguards Furthermore the links of REDD+ and development planning need to be considered, if REDD+ should promote systemic behavioral change Presentation to Company Name 26 November

18 Conclusions and Recommendations for Norwegian REDD+ engagement Bilateral and Multilateral Investments Presentation title can go here Norway needs to continue to lead by example when engaging in REDD+ investments. Strong environmental, social and governance safeguards should be upheld and applied across all of Norway s REDD+ investments. Safeguards should be measurable, allowing for independent verification. This is particular important in the absence of a comprehensive UNFCCC agreement in light of the various multilateral and bilateral initiatives with various implementation partners. There should be a clear differentiation between primary forest and secondary forest and plantations. REDD+ needs to promote biodiversity conservation in addition to benefitting the climate and people. 26 November

19 Frank Sperling Thank you. Tusen takk.

20 Additional Information Further Reading: WWF 2010 Brief, Global Goal for Reducing Deforestation and Degradation WWF 2010 Brief, National Programmes: Proper Framework for REDD+ WWF 2010 Brief, Forests for Good with Annex 1 Measuring Progress toward Zero Net Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (ZNEDD) Contact in Norway: Frank Sperling Sr. Advisor Climate Risks, Forests and Carbon WWF Norway fsperling at wwf.no Contact in Cancun (during COP16) Gerald Steindlegger Policy Director WWF Forest Carbon Initiative WWF Austria gerald.steindlegger at wwf.at 26 November

21 Presentation title can go here WWF IN SHORT +100 WWF is in over 100 countries, on 5 continents WWF has over 5,000 staff worldwide 1961 WWF was founded In M WWF has over 5 million supporters Photo: Michel Roggo / WWF-Canon WWF Norway