The need for a common defence ontology. Commodore Torbjørn Sakseide Director Information Infrastructure CHOD Norway Staff

Transcription

1 The need for a common defence ontology Commodore Torbjørn Sakseide Director Information Infrastructure CHOD Norway Staff

2 What? Future of the Military Transforming Capabilities 20 th Century Static Reactive Regional Mass Attrition 20 th Century De-confliction Supply Point Logistics National Intelligence 21 st Century Agile Proactive Global Maneuver Precision Coherence Integrated Logistics Fused Intelligence

3 Why? Holistic Approach New and Broader Missions Conflict Prevention and Crisis Management Peacekeeping - Humanitarian Operations -Disaster Relief Support to Stabilization and Reconstruction Alliance Nations Instruments of Power Political Military Civil Economic

4 What? EBAO Effects-Based Approach to Operations (EBAO) Opens the door for others to participate Looks at effects of an action to achieve a desired result Harmonise efforts with Others International Organisations (IOs) National Governments Non-Government Organisations (NGOs) Industry

5 NATO UNCLASSIFIED What? 24

6 What? A Transforming NATO Force The Evolution of a Transforming NATO Force NATO Transformed Forces

7 Why? The Evolution NATO operations in the Balkans Capability Gap

8 Why? Harness emerging technology Interoperable Forces Joint and Multinational Coherent Efforts In thought In action More capable...

9 What? Transformation Fundamentals Continuous process not an End State New mindset Intellectual and cultural Innovation experimentation conceptual development Comprehensive change Organisation Processes Policy - doctrine - strategy Training and Education Interoperability

10 C2 Maturity NNEC Capability Agile C2 Transformed ( Coherent ) Operations tight control broad dissemination distribution of information edge organization Collaborative C2 Integrated Operations unconstrained tightly constrained patterns of interaction Coordinated C2 Coordinated Operations classic C2 unitary allocation of decision rights peer-to-peer De-conflicted C2 De-conflicted Operations Conflicted C2 Stand Alone Operations

11 NATO Military Transformation NATO NATO Network-Enabled Capabilities Network-Enabled Capabilities

12

13 NNEC C3 Interoperability Environment Enabler RAP MTPs Exercicses and Tests Framework NAF NISP IVV Services Policy NNEC C3 IO Policy Directive NNEC C3 IO Directive NAR IETV IST MDR - Ontology NIETI Core Team CFBL-net Guidance Strategies Guidance docs. Design rules Handbooks Patterns Building blocks

14 Semiotic Interoperability Model The usage of symbols to convey knowledge. Stamper (1992) defines 6 levels to analyse symbols. These are: Physical = Physical media and the use of physical media for transferring of symbols. Empirical = At the second interoperability level, the empirical, the communication of a signal over the physical connection is established. That means that the transmitter s signal could be re-created without errors at the receiver end. Syntactic Semantic Pragmatic Social Cognitive domain Technical domain Physical Empirical Syntactic Pragmatic Semantic Social/ Cultural Patterns, form, noise Signals, Physical differences Meaning, statements Formal structure, Language Belief, expectations Commitments, Contracts, Laws and regulations Interpretations, Communications; Conversation Message syntax Protocol Network

15 Transformation Drivers Visionary Documents Guiding Policy and Conceptual Documents Tools Process Results G Military Vision NATO Strategic Concept Political Military Guidance Effects Based Approach to Operations (EBAO) R A N D S T R A T E G I C S T Research and Technology + Concept Development & Experimentation NATO Defence Planning NATO Capability Management System Capable Forces Multinational Joint Interoperable Deployable & Sustainable Coherent Expeditionary + Concepts for Alliance Future Joint (Military) Operations (CAFJ(M)O) R A T E G I C O P E R A T Transformational Operational I Concepts Concepts O N A Define new capabilities Employ new capabilitiesl NATO Standardization Organization NATO Education& Taining Relevant Capabilities Doctrine Organisation Training Materiel Leadership Development Personnel Facilities Interoperability

16 How? Return on Investment Inputs Processes Products Return on Investment Operational Environment Technology Developments Geo-Political Changes Threat Developments Levels of Ambition Best Practices Lessons Learned Others Policy Development Concept Development & Experimentation Capability Capability Planning Planning Research Research & Technology Technology Training & Education Budget & Manpower O p e r a t i o n a l A n a l y s i s Concepts, Policy, Doctrine, Strategy Capability Requirements Technology Demonstrations and Experiments Educational Courses and Seminars Budgets and Manpower Justifications Publications and Instructions Capability Packages Exercises Advice and Recommendations Improved interoperability Common doctrine Efficient spending Operational NRF with growing capabilities Improved collaboration in in developing relevant capabilities Common aim in in defence planning Influence on on national defence planning Coherence in in thought and action Others. Success in operations

17 Conclusion Keys to Success to Transform Interoperability, Interoperability, Interoperability