Nuclear Energy Agency

Similar documents
ESTIMATING COSTS OF GEN IV SYSTEMS. Geoffrey Rothwell, PhD Nuclear Energy Agency/OECD 25 October 2017

Guidance Document for Measuring Employment Generated by the Nuclear Power Sector

VI International Forum ATOMEXPO 2014

The Economics of Nuclear Power. Steve Fetter University of Maryland

EM 2 : Nuclear Power for the 21 st Century

Nuclear power. ME922/927 Nuclear 1

Projected Costs of Generating Electricity 1

The Westinghouse Advanced Passive Pressurized Water Reactor, AP1000 TM. Roger Schène Director,Engineering Services

IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, MOST GRACIOUS, MOST MERCIFUL

Overview for a feasibility study

Nuclear Power Plant Safety Basics. Construction Principles and Safety Features on the Nuclear Power Plant Level

Nuclear Power Plant Safety Basics. Construction Principles and Safety Features on the Nuclear Power Plant Level

Draft for an Appendix O Cost Structures

Module 05 WWER/ VVER (Russian designed Pressurized Water Reactors)

Figure ES.1: LCOE ranges for baseload technologies (at each discount rate) 3% 7% 10%

The Economics of Nuclear Power

The Cost of CCS for Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants

Opportunities and limits of enhanced co-operation from MDEP experience. Lennart Carlsson Senior Advisor SSM

SMR: Opportunities and Challenges. Dr. Jaejoo HA Head, Division of Nuclear Development, OECD/NEA

Technologies of HTR-PM Plant and its economic potential

Nuclear Energy. Weston M. Stacey Callaway Regents Professor Nuclear and Radiological Engineering Program Georgia Institute of Technology

NUCLEAR BY THE NUMBERS A PRIL

LCOEs and Renewables Victor Niemeyer Program Manager, Energy and Environmental Policy Analysis and Company Strategy Program

Earth at Night Composite, Source: NASA, Astronomy Picture of the Day, Nov. 27, 2000 (

Supercritical Water-Cooled Reactor (SCWR) Development through GIF Collaboration

Nuclear Energy Revision Sheet

Westinghouse s plant for the Nuclear Renaissance : AP1000. AP1000 Advanced Passive Plant

Hao Jia (Dr.), Researcher, APERC Takashi Otsuki (Mr.), Researcher, APERC* Kazutomo Irie (Dr.), General Manager, APERC. *Corresponding author

Parametric Study of Front-End Nuclear Fuel Cycle Costs Using Reprocessed Uranium

Distributed Energy Resources

Economic Evaluation of Electrical Power Generation Using Laser Inertial Fusion Energy (LIFE)

Role of Advanced Nuclear Power In Environment Sustainability

AREVA s Vision of Global Nuclear Market

Global Perspectives on SMRs Developing Countries Expectations

Constructibility Assessment of APR1400

NUCLEAR NUMBERS BY THE HIGHEST GENERATION EVER 55.2% 92.3% Capacity Factor 19.3% Emissions-Free. Electricity. Electricity. Generation.

Basic Engineering Solutions in the VBER-500 Power Unit for Regional Power Systems

The Cost of Power Generation with CCS

SEVERE ACCIDENT FEATURES OF THE ALTERNATIVE PLANT DESIGNS FOR NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN FINLAND

Chapter 2. Comparison of Technologies. December 2015

GE Hitachi Nuclear Opportunities for Localization in RSA

AP1000 European 16. Technical Specifications Design Control Document

California Independent System Operator. Variable Operations and Maintenance Costs January 8, 2019

The Future Begins Now!

Readiness of Current and New U.S. Reactors for MOX Fuel

Global Nuclear Power Seminar. 24 Nov 2010 JOI (Japan Bank for International Cooperation) Tokyo

Nuclear Energy in France : Status, prospects and R&D strategy

Effect of Non-Condensable Gas On The Performance of Passive Containment Cooling System in VVER-1200 Design

Nuclear Power Reactors. Kaleem Ahmad

The Benefits of a Nuclear Project: A Westinghouse Pespective

Multinational Design Evaluation Programme MDEP

Rosatom Global Development, International Cooperation Perspective

Power cycle development

Economic Indicators Assessment of NPP Project in Indonesia. Suparman Centre for Nuclear Energy Development

Feasibility assessment of replacing global fossil fuel electricity production by nuclear power based on data from Sweden s nuclear program

Cost Estimates and Economics of Nuclear Power Plant Newbuild: Literature Survey and Some Modelling Analysis

Will Low Natural Gas Prices Eliminate the Nuclear Option in the US?

Economics of Spent Nuclear Fuel Management An International Overview

EM 2 : A Compact Gas-Cooled Fast Reactor for the 21 st Century. Climate Change and the Role of Nuclear Energy

The role of nuclear power in Janne Wallenius Professor Reactor Physics, KTH

Nuclear Energy Systems Economic Evaluations: Capital Cost Operations & Maintenance Cost

The Future of Nuclear Power in the United States & SIR Branch 35. in a Carbon Constrained World

AP1000: The PWR Revisited

Javier Reig Head, Nuclear Safety Division

NUCLEAR POWER NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN 2012

Westinghouse AP1000 Nuclear Power Plant

Westinghouse AP1000. Reactor

SMR/1848-T03. Course on Natural Circulation Phenomena and Modelling in Water-Cooled Nuclear Reactors June 2007

PMAX Cycle Isolation Module Greg Alder

COGENERATION: Opportunities in Today s Power Markets

Advanced Design of Mitsubishi PWR Plant for Nuclear Renaissance

OECD/NEA Study on the Economics and Market of Small Modular Reactors

ANTARES Application for Cogeneration. Oil Recovery from Bitumen and Upgrading

Westinghouse Small Modular Reactor. Passive Safety System Response to Postulated Events

Advanced Sodium Fast Reactor Power Unit Concept

UKEPR Issue 05

AREVA Forward-looking Nuclear Energy. Karl-Heinz Poets AREVA South America

Ageing Management in TR-2 and Related Legislation and Experience in TAEK

Gas Cooled Fast Reactor

Combined Heat & Power: A Generator of Green Energy and Green Jobs

Fuel Fabrication. VP Asia Fuel Westinghouse Electric Company Dr. V.J. Esposito January 26, 2009

VVER-440/213 - The reactor core

WESTENGHOUSE AP600 ADVANCED NUCLEAR PLANT DESIGN

Next and Last Generation of Nuclear Power Plants Paul Howarth

Westinghouse SMR & Nuclear Fuel Overview

THE ROLE OF PASSIVE SYSTEMS IN ENHANCING SAFETY AND PREVENTING ACCIDENTS IN ADVANCED REACTORS

Overview on Nuclear Power in the World

EII Team meeting Brussels, 13 September

DOE Small Modular Reactor Licensing Technical Support Program Overview for National Conference of State Legislatures June 19, 2014

Assessment of High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (HTGR) Capital and Operating Costs

Nuclear Construction Summit Developing the recipe for commercial success &

HOW TO REDUCE THE COSTS OF NEW NUCLEAR?

HTR-PM Project Status and Test Program

Module 06 Boiling Water Reactors (BWR)

NPP Simulators Workshop for Education - Passive PWR NPP & Simulator Overview

NuScale Plant Market Competitiveness & Financeability

Fatigue Monitoring for Demonstrating

GE Hitachi's ABWR and ESBWR: safer, simpler, smarter

GT-MHR OVERVIEW. Presented to IEEE Subcommittee on Qualification

Transcription:

Nuclear Energy Agency Defining Plant-level Costs The Full Costs of Electricity Provision Nuclear Energy Agency International Workshop, OECD, Paris 20 January 2016 Geoffrey ROTHWELL, PhD geoffrey.rothwell@oecd.org Nuclear Energy Agency, Division of Nuclear Development geoffrey.rothwell@oecd.org 1

A Generic Power Plant Input 1: O&M System 1 Balance of Plant (BOP) System 2 Input 2: Output 2: Energy HEAT GENERATOR Waste Source Products System 3 TURBINE- System 5 GENERATOR COOLING System 4 TRANSFORMER Input 3: Coolant Output 1: MWh Output 3: Heat Emissions 2

Long-Run Average Levelized Cost LC = [CAPITAL (OC, r, lt ) + FUEL + O&M ] / E (variables in red, parameters in black) CAPITAL is the product of Fixed Charge Rate and Total Capital Construction Costs, which depends on the Overnight costs, OC, cost of capital, r, and the lead time, lt FUEL ( F ) is the annual fuel payment and a function of the amount of fuel and price of fuel O&M ( L ) is the annual Operations and Maintenance expense and Capital Additions, CAPEX E is annual energy output equal to MW TT CF, i.e., the size of the generator in megawatts, MW, the total number of hours in a year, TT, and the Capacity Factor, CF 3

CAPITAL (OC, r, lt) OC DIR Overnight Cost Components Direct Construction Costs INDIR Indirect Construction Costs (which cannot be assigned to a specific Direct Construction Cost Account OWN SUPP C ON IDC KC Owners Costs incurred by the electric utility/owner-operator Other costs, such as spare parts, etc. Contingency, appropriate to the risk of final cost Interest During Construction, a function of the cost of capital, r, and construction lead time, lt Total Capital Investment Costs, TCIC in GIF-EMWG Code of Accounts BASE = (DIR + INDIR + OWN + SUPP) [OC without contingency] OC = BASE (1 + C ON ) = (DIR + INDIR + OWN + SUPP) (1 + C ON ) KC = OC (1 + idc) = (DIR + INDIR + OWN + SUPP) (1 + C ON ) (1 + idc) 4

Contingency = C ON Comparison of AACE and EPRI cost estimate stages AACE AACE Expected AACE EPRI EPRI End Usage Accuracy Range Contingency Designation Contingency Concept Screening Low: -20% to -50% Level of Project Definition: 0-2% High: +30% to +100% 50% NA NA Feasibility Study Low: -15% to -30% Level of Project Definition:1-5% High: +20% to +50% 30% Simplified Estimate 30% to 50% Authorization or Control Low: -10% to -20% Level of Project Definition: 10-40% High: +10% to +30% 20% Preliminary Estimate 15% to 30% Control or Bid/Tender Low: -5% to -15% Level of Project Definition: 30-70% High: +5% to +20% 15% Detailed Estimate 10% to 20% Check Estimate or Bid/Tender Low: -3% to -10% Level of Project Definition: 50-100% High: +3% to +15% 5% Finalised Estimate 5% to 10% Sources: From Rothwell (2005: table 1) with permission from AAEC International; originally from AACE (1997), updated in AACE (2011) and EPRI (1993) (the last publicly available version of EPRI s Technology Assessment Guide, later versions being proprietary, but having similar contingencies) 5

Interest During Construction = idc ( r, lt ) where IDC = Σ t (cx t OC) [(1 + m) t 1] (t = lt,, 0) cx t are construction expenditures as a percent of OC in month t, m is the monthly cost of capital during construction, (1 + m) = (1 + r) 1/12, 1 subtracts monthly expenditures in t, cx t OC, from the summation, lt is the months of construction (from pouring first concrete to operation) and 0 is the start of commercial operation with the generation of electricity and revenues. IDC (OC / lt) {Σ t [(1 + m) t 1]} (t = lt,, 0) IDC {[(lt 1) (m / 2)] + [(lt 1) (lt 2) (m 2 / 6)]} OC IDC {[(m / 2) lt] + [(m 2 / 6) lt 2 ]} OC and idc [(m / 2) lt] + [(m 2 / 6) lt 2 ] 6

KC (OC, r, lt ) KC = OC (1 + idc) = (DIR + INDIR + OWN + SUPP) (1 + C ON ) (1 + idc) ABWR Cost Estimates from NEA TVA TVA NEA TVA Cost Nuclear Energy Agency (2000) and (2000) (2005) (2005) (2000) (2005) Increase Tennessee Valley Authority (2005) $/kw $/kw $/kw $/kw $/kw $/kw Series and Title 1999$ 2004$ % 2013$ 2013$ 2013$ 10 Capitalized Pre-Construction $0 $0 0% $0 $0 $0 21 Structures & Improvements $293 $300 11% $460 $403 ($57) 22 Reactor Equipment $366 $540 20% $575 $726 $150 23 Turbine Generator Eqp. $183 $360 13% $288 $484 $196 24 Electrical Equipment $110 $150 6% $173 $202 $29 25+26 Cooling System & Misc.Eqp. $73 $70 3% $115 $94 ($21) 20 Total Direct, DIR $1,026 $1,419 53% $1,611 $1,906 $296 30 Capitalized Indirect costs, INDIR $293 $192 7% $460 $258 ($202) 40 Capitalized Owner's cost, OWN $0 $240 9% $0 $322 $322 50 Supplementary costs, SUPP $0 $0 0% $0 $0 $0 Base Overnight Cost, BASE $1,319 $1,851 69% $2,071 $2,487 $581 Contingency Rate, C ON 9% 16% 16% 9% 16% 6% Overnight Cost, OC $1,440 $2,140 80% $2,261 $2,875 $614 IDC Factor (for Series 60), idc 14% 25% 25% 14% 25% 11% Total Construction Cost, KC $1,641 $2,680 100% $2,577 $3,601 $1,023 7

Mapping the Direct Cost Supply Chain Source: SCANA (2011), Analyst Day Presentation, p. 6. 8

Overview of the Direct Cost Supply Chain Component Location Continent Component Location Continent Condenser Sacheon, ROK Asia Instrumentation Valves Solon, OH, USA NAmerica Containment Vessel Yokohoma, JPN Asia Integrated Head Package Blackfoot, ID, USA NAmerica Demineralizer Ansan City, KOR Asia Liquid Ring Vacuum Pump Pittsburgh, PA, USA NAmerica Heat Exchangers Ansan City, KOR Asia Pumps Brea, CA, USA NAmerica Reactor Vessel Changwon, KOR Asia Reactor Coolant Pumps Cheswick, PA, USA NAmerica Steam Generators Changwon, KOR Asia Reactor Vessel RV Flowskirt York, PA, USA NAmerica Transformers Tokyo, JPN Asia Recirculation Heaters Pittsburgh, PA, USA NAmerica Turbine Generator Tokyo, JPN Asia Selonoid Values Pittsburgh, PA, USA NAmerica Valves Cheonan, KOR Asia Seperators Neenah, WI, USA NAmerica Accumulators San Giorgo, ITA Europe SG Recirc and Drain Pumps Colchester, VT, USA NAmerica Containment Recicr Screens Winterthur, CHE Europe Spent Resin Tank Neenah, WI, USA NAmerica Core Make-up Tanks San Giorgo, ITA Europe Squib Valves McKean, PA, USA NAmerica IR Water Storage Tank IRWST Winterthur, CHE Europe Tank Demineralizers Detroit, MI, USA NAmerica Pressurizer San Giorgo, ITA Europe Valves Bolingbrook, IL, USA NAmerica PRHR Hx Heater Exchanger San Giorgo, ITA Europe Valves Rancho, St. Marg., CA, USA NAmerica Reactor Coolant Loop RCL Piping Milan, ITA Europe Valves Ipswich, MA, USA NAmerica AP1000 Modules Lake Charles, LA, USA NAmerica Valves Winchester, MA, USA NAmerica Air Operated Pump Mansfield, OH, USA NAmerica Valves Raleigh, NC, USA NAmerica Aux. Relief Values Brantford, ON, CAN NAmerica Valves Springville, NC, USA NAmerica Control Rod Drive Mech. CRDM Newington, NH, USA NAmerica Variable Freq. Drives New Kensington, OA, USA NAmerica Cranes Shoreview, MN, USA NAmerica Cooling Tower Fans Sao Paulo, BRA SAmerica Degasifiers Neenah, WI, USA NAmerica Source: NEA, Nuclear New Build: Insights into Financing and Project Management (2015), p. 223 9

Calculating Total Nuclear Fuel Costs where F = {[FC / (24 B eff)] + WASTE} E FC is the cost of nuclear fuel in US dollars per kilogram of uranium (US$/kgU), 24 is the number of thermal MWh in a thermal megawatt-day, B is the burnup rate measured in thermal megawatt-days per kgu, eff is the thermal efficiency of converting MW-thermal into MW-electric, WASTE is the interim storage cost per MWh (costs to manage used fuel from Rothwell, 2015) plus geologic disposal costs (set equal to US$1/MWh real that is, implicitly increasing with inflation, unlike contributions to the Nuclear Waste Trust Fund). where lt F FC = [NU P UF6 (1 + r) ltu ] + [SWU P SWU (1 + r) lts ] + [P FAB (1 + r) ltf ] NU is the ratio of natural uranium input to enriched uranium output, P UF6 is the price of natural uranium input plus its conversion to UF 6, lt U is the carrying time from uranium purchase to reactor loading, for example 1.0 years, SWU is the number of separative work units required in enrichment, P SWU is the price of enriching uranium hexafluoride, UF 6, lt S is the carrying time from conversion to reactor loading, for example 0.5 years, P FAB is the price of fabricating UO 2 fuel from enriched UF 6, and is the carrying time from fabrication to reactor loading, for example 0.25 years 10

Calculating Fossil Fuel Costs where F CCGT/MWh = [(P NGAS HR CCGT ) / 1,000] + (P CO2 CO 2CCGT ) F CCGT is the total natural gas expense, F CCGT/MWh is the cost of natural gas per MWh, P NGAS is the price of natural gas, HR CCGT is the heat rate (in BTU/kWh) for CCGTs from Table 5.1, P CO2 is the price of tco 2 (F CCGT/MWh is calculated with and without the price of CO 2 ), and CO 2CCGT is the tonnage of CO 2 produced by the CCGT unit per MWh, known as the carbon intensity factor. 11

$ 0 $ 25 $ 50 $ 75 $ 100 Carbon Dioxide Cost (Price?) Cost of CO 2 in US$/tonne, simulated with lognormal density Lognormal( $25, $15), Mode = $16, Median = $21, Mean = $25, Min = $2, Max = $100 5.0% 4.9% $8.60/tonne 90.0% 89.8% $52.64/tonne 5.0% 5.3% Source: Mean from MIT (2009), fitted to a lognormal density with SD = $15 12

Nuclear Annual O&M Costs (U.S.) Category Changes new 2010 $ in thousands IMPLAN Descriptor IMPLAN NAISC 2010$K Labour Labour Labour $62,041 Taxes Taxes Taxes $18,260 Other basic inorganic chemical manufacturing 125 325188 $16,476 Architectural and engineering services 369 5413 $13,568 Other Federal Government enterprises 429 NA $12,623 Other nonmetallic mineral mining 27 21239 $10,823 Maintenance and repair of nonresidential buildings 40 23* $7,920 Support activities for other mining 30 213113-5 $6,300 All other miscellaneous professional and technical 380 54191, 54193, 54199 $4,763 Misc. electrical equipment and component manufacturing 275 335999 $3,872 Other State and local government enterprises 432 NA $3,275 Investigation and security services 387 5616 $3,088 Scientific research and development services 376 5417 $2,459 Environmental and other technical consulting servi 375 54162, 54169 $2,407 Power, distribution, and specialty transformer manufacturing 266 335311 $1,766 Waste management and remediation services 390 562 $1,746 Business support services 386 5614 $1,525 Civic- social- professional and similar organizati 425 8134, 8139 $1,436 Facilities support services 385 5612 $1,138 Valve and fittings other than plumbing 198 332911-2, 332919 $1,072 Securities- commodity contracts- investments 356 523 $1,011 Insurance carriers 357 5241 $975 Employment services 382 5613* $900 Pump and pumping equipment manufacturing 226 333911, 333913 $851 Power generation and supply 31 2211 $812 Management of companies and enterprises 381 55 $786 Warehousing and storage 340 493 $623 Construction of other new structures 36 23* $554 Other (less than $500,000) $10,441 Total $193,510 13

CCGT Variable and Fixed O&M Costs (U.S.) CCGT, Source: EIA, OC OC Variable Fixed Heat "Assumptions Year Size LT $/ 2013$/ 2013$/ 2013$/ Rate for the " Dollars MW y kw kw MWh kw/y BTU/kWh AEO 1995, Table 29 1987 400 4 $476 $853 $4.66 $48.38 7,369 AEO 1996, page 54 1987 400 4 $332 $595 $0.72 $48.38 7,300 AEO 1997, Table 33 1995 400 4 $620 $979 $0.79 $42.65 6,985 AEO 1998, Table 37 1996 400 3 $572 $883 $3.09 $21.30 6,985 AEO 1999, Table 37 1997 400 3 $575 $889 $0.79 $21.99 6,985 AEO 2000, Table 37 1998 400 3 $576 $912 $0.81 $22.55 6,985 AEO 2001, Table 43 1999 400 3 $576 $904 $0.80 $22.17 6,927 AEO 2002, Table 38 2000 400 3 $590 $875 $0.77 $21.45 6,870 AEO 2003, Table 40 2001 400 3 $608 $893 $3.00 $15.01 7,000 AEO 2004, Table 38 2002 400 3 $615 $924 $3.11 $15.55 6,928 AEO 2005, Table 38 2003 400 3 $558 $797 $2.52 $14.76 6,732 AEO 2006, Table 38 2004 400 3 $575 $772 $2.45 $14.31 6,732 AEO 2007, Table 38 2005 400 3 $594 $743 $2.35 $13.78 6,717 AEO 2008, Table 38 2006 400 3 $706 $845 $2.33 $13.61 6,752 AEO 2009, Table 8.2 2007 400 3 $947 $1,079 $2.28 $13.33 6,752 AEO 2010, Table 8.2 2008 400 3 $968 $1,059 $2.23 $13.09 6,752 AEO 2011, Table 8.2 2009 400 3 $917 $972 $3.26 $15.31 6,333 AEO 2012, Table 8.2 2010 400 3 $1,003 $1,055 $3.27 $15.37 6,430 AEO 2013, Table 8.2 2011 400 3 $1,006 $1,037 $3.31 $15.55 6,333 AEO 2014, Table 8.2 2012 400 3 $1,021 $1,031 $3.30 $15.52 6,333 MIT (2009, p. 18-22) 2007 1,000 2 $850 $968 $0.47 $26.20 6,800 OM CCGT/MWh = VOM CCGT + [(1,000 FOM CCGT ) / (CF CCGT 8,766)] where VOM CCGT FOM CCGT is variable O&M from Table and is fixed O&M from Table 14

Projected Costs of NPP Investment Net Overnight Investment cost (with Country Technology capacity cost 3% 7% 10% MWe USD/kWe USD/kWe Belgium Gen III 1 000-1 600 5 081 5 645 6 498 7 222 Finland EPR 1 600 5 250 5 832 6 714 7 463 France PWR-EPR 1 630 5 067 5 629 6 479 7 202 Hungary AES-2006 1 180 6 215 6 756 7 535 8 164 Japan ALWR 1 152 3 883 4 313 4 965 5 519 Korea APR 1400 1 343 2 021 2 177 2 400 2 580 Slovak Republic VVER 440 535 4 986 5 573 6 472 7 243 United Kingdom Mulitple PWRs 3 300 6 070 6 608 7 399 8 053 United States ABWR 1 400 4 100 4 555 5 243 5 828 Non-OECD member countries China AP 1000 1 250 2 615 2 905 3 344 3 717 CPR 1000 1 080 1 807 2 007 2 310 2 568 15

Projected Costs of Nuclear LCOEs Country Refurbishment and Fuel and O&M LCOE D&D costs waste costs 3% 7% 10% costs 3% 5% 7% 10% MWe USD/MWh $/MWh $/MWh Belgium Gen III 1 000-1 600 0.46 0.08 0.02 10.46 13.55 51.45 66.13 84.17 116.81 Finland EPR 1 600 0.44 0.06 0.01 5.09 14.59 48.01 66.52 81.83 115.57 France EPR (2030) 1 630 0.40 0.06 0.01 9.33 13.33 49.98 64.63 82.64 115.21 Hungary AES-2006 1 180 1.59 0.26 0.06 9.60 10.40 53.90 70.08 89.94 124.95 Japan ALWR 1 152 0.42 0.07 0.02 14.15 27.43 62.63 73.80 87.57 112.50 Korea APR 1400 1 343 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.58 9.65 28.63 34.05 40.42 51.37 Slovakia VVER 440 535 4.65 1.50 0.83 12.43 10.17 53.90 66.68 83.95 116.48 UK Multiple PWRs 3 300 0.54 0.09 0.02 11.31 20.93 64.38 80.88 100.75 135.72 US ABWR 1 400 1.26 0.52 0.26 11.33 11.00 54.34 64.81 77.71 101.76 Non-OECD members China Technology with 60 year life times Size USD/MWh AP 1000 1 250 0.23 0.04 0.01 9.33 7.32 30.77 34.57 47.61 64.40 CPR 1000 1 080 0.16 0.03 0.01 9.33 6.50 25.59 33.05 37.23 48.83 16