2011 BIM Awards. Using BIM to Design and Build the Wounded Warrior Headquarters and Hope and Care Center. Category A: BIM Excellence

Transcription

1 Using BIM to Design and Build the Wounded Warrior Headquarters and Hope and Care Center Category A: BIM Excellence Project Description 01 Maintaining Integrity of Design 03 New Concepts Procedures and Tools 06 Team Roles and Responsibilities 09 Workflows, Data Exchanges and Standards 11 Benefits Achieved 12

2 Project Description 2010 BIM Awards This project involves the design and construction of two new buildings at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, CA, to serve as the national headquarters for the Marine s Wounded Warrior program which was developed to assist in the healing process for wounded or injured servicemen and women. The cornerstone of the complex is a 30,995-SF Hope and Care Center with an indoor therapy pool, an outdoor lap pool, climbing wall and a 1/8 mile track. It also includes space for counseling, employment support, financial management, community orientation, training, and outreach programs. The second building is a 9,354-SF Headquarters administration facility designed with demountable partitions and systems furniture to provide flexibility for any space reconfigurations needed to adapt the building for the evolving mission of the program. Rendering Aerial view of Hope and Care Center The overall plan was to develop a design which not only enhanced the healing process by creating a supportive community environment but which also complemented the community atmosphere created with a Wounded Warrior Barracks facility which was recently completed by the same design-build team. For example, the square footage of the buildings allows for the greatest flexibility in providing indoor recreation opportunities. Similarly, the site layout design places the outdoor lap pool, climbing wall and 1/8 mile track in close proximity to walkways and tranquil areas in which to rest AIA Technology in Architectural Practice (TAP) BIM Awards Competition

3 Project Description 2010 BIM Awards To complement the existing barracks facility, nearly every feature of the new buildings including building orientation, design, community spaces, color palette, furnishings, textures and aesthetics took into account the special needs of the residents of the complex. They were designed and built in a similar fashion, as multi-storied reinforced concrete masonry unit block (CMU) buildings with CMU interior walls, seismic requirements, reinforced concrete foundation and floors, and standing seam metal roof. The scope also required the team to provide comprehensive site improvements including native landscape, walking trails, covered walkways between facilities, site fountains, covered pavilions, outdoor BBQ areas at each building, covered parking for each building with photo voltaic and a two-level parking garage for the Hope and Care Center. The entire site, which is 100% accessible to provide easy access for disabled warriors without any barriers, steps, or hindrances throughout the campus, was developed to support the therapeutic functions of the entire complex. Rendering Headquarters Administration Building AIA Technology in Architectural Practice (TAP) BIM Awards Competition

4 Maintaining Integrity of Design Planning Building Information Modeling was heavily utilized as a means to collaborate during design and as a virtual field for discussion and a base for the coordination process at large. The coordination effort for this integrated design-build project involved multiple stakeholders participating from multiple locations. The process began early in the planning stages in order to effectively communicate roles and responsibilities and to determine how the team would work together in the most productive manner. Design Phase This early coordination effort gave way to the preliminary design phases to show massing, communicate intent, and to analyze the potential logistical and environmental impacts the future building would have to the client. The client took an active interest in the work through the use of BIM and participated in a number of meetings and presentations that were virtually enabled. The design team utilized the model to generate construction documents and to test the facility s envelope, structural and mechanical performance. The construction documents generated by the model were used for an internal constructability review, which enabled the team to better inform each other on the information being communicated in the drawings. Communication through Visualization Interactive models, like the two shown below, served as a tool to communicate the final outcome of the project through virtual, multidimensional models. These models increased efficiencies between the team and project stakeholders AIA Technology in Architectural Practice (TAP) BIM Awards Competition

5 BIM composite image and coordinating Systems Architectural Electrical Plumbing Fire Protection Mechanical Structural The coordination effort involved multiple disciplines from various locations, meaning information had to be accurate, up to date, and easily accessible by all team members. BIM Models, including the two examples below, could link each discipline s information together, at a single nexus point encouraging synergy in design.

6 Maintaining Integrity of Design Pre-Construction Prior to construction, BIM was used to analyze logistics related to access to and from the site. The analysis was performed to help mitigate the impact site traffic would have on runoff and affecting neighboring ecosystems through GIS technology. Systems coordination was a mainstay throughout the project, and the virtual workspace (live online collaboration tools) acted as a coordination space for the subcontractors, fabricators, engineers and architects engaged in the coordination effort. The goal of this project was to have all trades signoff on the systems to be installed prior to work commencing. This sign-off has resulted in a very smooth construction process with engagement and reference to the BIM as a tool by the entire team. Implementation Wireless Tablet PCs were used to transfer real-time model updates directly to the field for construction. This tool was also vital for maintaining and distributing the most accurate, up-to-date information to team members at various locations of the project. Construction Lastly, mobile field technologies were used to coordinate construction, which were enabled by Wi-Fi. This increased efficiencies and allowed the team to stay plugged in to the project and its reference drawings. This project uses the latest in FiM linking software to bi-directionally connect the as-constructed BIM to the client s existing FM software. This allows the BIM to stay as a useable tool for the lifecycle of the structure AIA Technology in Architectural Practice (TAP) BIM Awards Competition

7 New Concepts, Procedures & Tools Design This design-build project took a unique, proactive approach to the typical clash detection process in that the idea shared among the design and subcontracting teams was to analyze as designing. This concept removed a significant amount of latency in the process of creating a model, combining the models, finding areas in conflict, and then resolving them. Instead, the project team worked with the composite model in dual screens. As systems, new equipment and design elements were being input into the design, potential issues were being mitigated prior to a formal analysis. Composite Model The composite models pictured to the left show the equipment from various disciplines in an accurate, up to date model AIA Technology in Architectural Practice (TAP) BIM Awards Competition

8 New Concepts, Procedures & Tools Construction The use of BIM is essentially ineffective if the realized physical construction doesn t reflect the hard work and analysis put into the design by the AE team. As such, one of the major project goals for this facility was to focus on field execution. While the construction of this facility involved relatively common materials, use and site conditions, the outcome for the execution of the work was exceptional in a number of ways. First, all team members were fully engaged in the creation and use of BIM to produce all construction documents related to construction. This allowed for a truly collaborative process that equated to a highly accurate field installation with very few issues in the field. Secondly, the team was challenged with the review process during construction as changes arose. The contractor dedicated staff to field issues that arose to allow for the models to be quickly analyzed and to streamline the review process with the AE team in real time. Additionally, as the project moved to the field, wireless tablet PC s were used to analyze the as-modeled condition versus the as-constructed condition onsite. This allowed for RFI s to be issued directly from the handheld devices via on-site Wi-Fi connectivity. In addition, images and dimensional references from the model were combined with field surveys to verify accurate installation of the MEP systems. These tablets were also used to track and log equipment and components delivered to the site to coordinate delivery and installation AIA Technology in Architectural Practice (TAP) BIM Awards Competition

9 New Concepts, Procedures & Tools FiM Model The FiM model allows a Facility Management Team to quickly identify the elevation of telecom lines, the diameter and height of wall penetrations for fire-stopping assemblies, and exactly where existing structures are located for future work all in ONE file. This is perhaps the most useful tool in BIM, since all of the 3D information about a building is hosted in ONE central file. This streamlines accuracy and eliminates the need to sort through endless sheets or multiple CAD files to find specific facility information. Facilities Information Management This project is undergoing a bi-directional link to a FiM solution for the client to use as a future as-built and facility management tool. These two databases - the BIM database and the FM software database - have been set up to communicate directly, which will eliminate the need for a manual input process by the client to their existing FM and CMMS software post-construction. While the 3D visualization aspect alone has significantly reduced initial costs for separate design efforts, the current proof of concepts developed for this effort is yet another exciting component of this project. It will keep the information about the facility active and useable. Facility personnel are looking forward to reducing ramp up times to become further educated about the project AIA Technology in Architectural Practice (TAP) BIM Awards Competition

10 New Concepts, Procedures & Tools Sustainability As a LEED Platinum building, one of the major challenges in this project was to eliminate as much waste and rework as possible. This challenge was addressed by utilizing BIM as a tool to look at the project holistically in order to reduce the project s footprint throughout the construction process, and to help eliminate all project waste. The first step involved looking at surrounding watersheds, wildlife areas and human spaces. The next step involved using the schematic massing model to move and position the building to optimize performance, while also considering the process of construction, views, accessibility and use. While multiple design iterations were explored To help eliminate project waste, a significant effort was made during preconstruction. Because constructing in remote areas requires prefabrication and preassembly prior to equipment delivery, it is critical that the process is done correctly - the first time. Any mistake can potentially cause serious financial and environmental impacts. By coordinating all of the components using Fabrication level models of the prefabricated steel structure, the project was prefabricated entirely offsite. This allowed for on-time deliveries and a no-issue installation process. Focus on Health The ultimate goal of the project was to provide a safe and healthy space for the wounded veterans occupying the facility, and to minimize our footprint as a team before, during and after construction AIA Technology in Architectural Practice (TAP) BIM Awards Competition

11 Design/Construction Team Roles & Responsibilities As a company and as a team, one of the large components of our project strategy was to take a project focused approach to the design and construction efforts with a focus on execution. Much of this effort began during preconstruction where we leveraged the entire team s experience and knowledge base while better informing our client and fully utilizing the benefits of the design build delivery method. Additionally, the team used internal team goal setting, identification of best practices and enhanced owner/stakeholder involvement. We found that negotiating and planning early and as best as possible, creates tremendous value downstream and throughout the lifecycle of the project. Role Definition The success of this project hinged around the early stage planning that was critical to understanding how the team would work together. The team was structured in the roles as indicated by the table below. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Architect Engineering Construction Subcontractors Owner Manager Design management Modeling Manage client expectations Provide sustainability simulation Provide BIM derived construction Provide MEP BIM review Work with subcontractors to create a single MEP and FP model of their trade Provide system simulations Coordinate and update the models throughout construction and design Act as a gatekeeper for the model and the model manager for the project Develop solutions between all stakeholders throughout the entire design and construction process Play a critical role in executing the BIM coordinated design to construction in the field Foresee and plan potential use and updates to the models for project delivery Work with AEC team to provide input into the design in 3D and BIM Play an active role in the coordination and field review process AIA Technology in Architectural Practice (TAP) BIM Awards Competition

12 Work Flows, Data Exchanges, and Standards Work Flows and Data Exchanges Because the project Owner is a Government entity, many of the work flows tied to this project were regulated by a defined written protocol. This team had the benefit of recently completing an adjacent facility for the same Owner, which meant that the individuals on the team had already developed the best ways in which to communicate data with one another. By setting the direction and defining the processes early in the project, each team member knew the various pieces working towards the same overall goal. BIM Standards The standards implemented on this project began with COBie compliant models that would grow in levels of accuracy and detail as the project progressed according to the AIA E202 Model Outline. The team also used a hybridized approach similar to Penn State s BIM Execution Guide where it was applicable on this project in regard to deliverables and format exchange. The standards that were issued from the Contractor to the subcontractors on the project were focused on model accuracy and a very high level of detail. The project focused on delivering real results and as such the subcontractors took a high degree of ownership in their models and signed off on the BIM derived shop drawings prior to construction. Non Technical Success On this project, attitude was everything. This team took a proactive approach to fixing problems and as issues arose the team was able to effectively work with each other to resolve them quickly. However, at the core of the team was an attitude that was project focused and collaborative. Technical Success Navisworks model depicts high level of detail and is used for clash detection AIA Technology in Architectural Practice (TAP) BIM Awards Competition

13 Benefits Achieved Through the Wounded Warrior Hope & Care Center and Headquarters project, our team has leveraged BIM to realize multiple benefits including the following: Reduced design timeline - the enhanced coordination has enabled us to achieve an aggressive design schedule, inclusive of the Owner s 21 day review stipulation. The accuracy and detail of the design at each submittal milestone not only provided assurance to the Owner but also helped reduce the turn-around time initially planned for. Increased efficiency from design to installation - the subcontractors on this project were so confident in the accuracy of the design that many items were prefabricated off-site and then installed with little to no modification. Increased agility for change reaction - when unforeseen conditions arose, the team was able to accommodate new conditions and quickly react with a fully coordinated plan that maintained the quality and integrity of the design. For example, when the 4-pipe system entering the Hope & Care Center had to be rerouted, the use of BIM coordination and collaboration between with field and design team enabled the solutions to be implemented in a timely manner without affecting the construction schedule. Enhanced Confidence Because the fire sprinkler subcontractor had enhanced confidence in the design accuracy and coordination, the piping was prefabricated at an off-site location and brought to the site ready for installation. Increased speed of construction - the Contractor has been able to accelerate the original schedule due to the reduction in field changes attributed to enhanced coordination during design. Improved quality of construction - the tablet reviews of the installation provide a more accurate testament to the proximity of which the installed construction matched the virtual building. Happy Owner - both the Owner s Design Manager and Field Construction personnel are extremely pleased with the enhanced collaboration and coordination achieved on this project AIA Technology in Architectural Practice (TAP) BIM Awards Competition