Mark Kelley Battelle Environmental Technology and Restoration
|
|
- Egbert Campbell
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 !"# Mark Kelley Battelle Environmental Technology and Restoration
2 A recently closed landfill at a military facility is the focus The landfill is a source of methane and VOCs in soil gas, as shown by lab analyses of soil-gas samples collected from soil-gas probes at the landfill A military housing facility is located adjacent to the closed landfill Vapor intrusion into nearby homes is a potential exposure pathway An assessment was needed to determine if landfill gases pose a threat to residents of nearby housing facility via the vapor intrusion pathway
3 #
4 Calculate site specific soil-gas Risk-Based Screening Levels (RBSLs) to compare to measured VOC concentrations in soil-gas Definition: A soil-gas RBSL is the concentration of a compound (VOC) that can exist in soil-gas directly beneath a house without causing unacceptable risk to the occupants of the house if vapor intrusion is occurring. Use the RBSLs to calculate site-specific risks to indoor receptors via vapor intrusion using simple ratio approach (DTSC advocates screening based on risk) Risk = [(Concentrationi/RBSLi)] x 1x10-6 HI = (Concentrationj/RBSLj) DTSC advocates screening based on Risk Use assessment results to determine the need for further action, e.g., Sub-slab or indoor air sampling in homes Corrective action/mitigation
5 $ % & Generic soil-gas screening levels are available, but values vary EPA (2003) CHHSLs (Cal-EPA) ESLs (Cal Water Board) Disagreement between generic screening levels Differences in toxicity data Differences in other input assumptions Calculated values can account for site-specific factors that differ from default conditions used to calculate generic values Exposure parameters Physical parameters Concentration Relative to USEPA Value Comparison of Generic Soil Gas Screeing Levels Benzene Toluene Vinyl Chloride TCE Chemical RBSLs can be used to calculate risks using the Ratio Approach more easily/quickly than forward calculating risks using EPA or DTSC Vapor Intrusion Model (single chemical models) CHHSLs ESLs USEPA
6 # SITE FEATURES Stack Effects 28 VOCs detected in soil gas Elevation (ft msl) Air Streamlines Convection Crack Hypothetical Gas Probe Groundwater Diffusion Crack Diffusion Building Zone of Influence Wind Effects ( ft bgs) Soil Gas Probe Upward Vapor Diffusion Soil-Gas Contamination?? VOCs emanating from waste in closed landfill VOCs are migrating laterally/upward Homes located nearby Thick vadose zone (~150 ft) 60
7 %' Soil texture is fine to coarse sand with gravel Site-specific properties are similar to the default soil parameters for a sand in EPA Vapor Intrusion Model
8 ( ) Four types of military housing unit(s) Duplex Triplex Quadraplex (2 styles) Two story construction No air conditioning, forced heat Slab on grade construction Living area dimensions are the same for all four housing types (~ 1000 ft 2 per unit). Matches default house dimensions in EPA VI model.
9 # # EPA VI Model, Version 2 (April, 2003) to back calculate soil-gas RBSLs Incorporate equation for safe indoor air concentration (C Bldg ) based on specified target risk/hazard quotient Incorporate equation for soil-gas RBSL 4.5 probability functions into the model
10 * C soilgas = C Bldg Johnson and Ettinger (1991)
11 *+," Carcinogens = Risk target AT BW 365d yr 10 3 µ IR EF ED SF g mg Non - carcinogens = HQ target AT BW RfD 365 d yr 10 3 µ IR EF ED g mg EXPOSURE PARAMETERS Receptor Parameter Units Adult 30-yr Adult 10-yr Child 10-yr Exposure Duration (ED) Yrs Exposure Frequency (EF) days/yr Averaging Time for Carcinogens (AT) Yrs Averaging Time for Non-Carcinogens (AT) Yrs Target Risk (TR) unitless 1x10-6 1x10-6 1x10-6 Target Hazard Quotient (HQ) unitless Inhalation Rate (IR) m 3 /d 20** 20** 10** Body Weight (BW) Kg 70** 70** 15** ** Probabilistic Input Parameter
12 --%)-" '%$ Distribution for Inh Rate Adlt/H6 Mean= m 3 /d= % 90% 5% Distribution for Inh Rate Chld/V Mean= m 3 /d= % 90% 5% Inhalation rate, adult (m 3 /kg-d) Gamma Mean = Std Dev = Upper/Lower Limits = 0.195, Inhalation rate, child (m 3 /kg-d) Gamma Mean = Std Dev = Upper/Lower Limits = , 0.8 Source: OEHHA Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Program Risk Assessment Guidelines Part IV (Exposure Assessment and Stochastic Analysis Technical Support Document), October 27, 2000
13 = Q exp D 3 " " " $ $ ( ". L A soil crack eff crack B eff D T AB Q exp QBLT D eff D T AB D + + QBuildingLT Q soil eff crack 7 " $! # ' " ' + ) $ $ (,! & ( 3 4 $ $ ( 5 $ $ ( 6 $ $ ( ( (./ 0 1 (. 2 1, - & # + * * ) eff T Soil! " # $ % && ' Lcrack A B A B Q exp L T D * additional parameters required for Finite Source model. L A soil crack eff crack B 1 Johnson and Ettinger (1991) (infinite source) Soil, building, and chemical properties required to calculate alpha Building and chemical properties are primary input parameters Soil properties affect values of Qsoil and Deff
14 . Mixing Within Building H B = 2.44 m L B = 10 m ER=1 per 2 hrs (0.5 hr) -1 Q building = 33,888 cm 3 /s W B = 10 m (2,033 L/min.) Diffusive Flow Advective Flow Grade L crack =10 cm L F = 15 cm Grade Z crack = 15 cm A B =10mX10m=100m 2 (1x10 6 cm 2 ) L T = cm **= (EPA) A crack = 400 cm 2 (EPA) P = 4 Pa x crack = 4,000 cm r crack = 0.1 cm (EPA) K V (soil parameter) ** Probabilistic Input Parameter
15 --%) Distribution for Crack Ratio Mean = Crack Ratio () Discrete Distribution (DTSC Default Value) (EPA Default Value) Density Dependent parameters that vary as a result of changes in crack ratio Values in Thousandths 90.0% A crack - 5,000 cm 2 (DTSC Default) cm 2 (EPA Default) r crack (DTSC Default) (EPA Default)
16 . SCS Soil Type Parameter Units unitless Deterministic Value Sand Soil bulk density g/cm ** Soil effective permeability, k v cm x10-7 Soil intrinsic permeability, k i cm x10-7 Saturated hydraulic conductivity, K s cm/hr ** Relative air permeability, k rg unitless Van Genuchten shape parameter, M unitless ** Water-filled porosity, m cm 3 /cm Residual water content, r cm 3 /cm ** Total porosity, n ** Probabilistic Input Parameter cm 3 /cm **
17 --%) Distribution for Porosity/F Mean= % 90% 5% Distribution for theta r/g7 Mean= E Values in 10^-3 Default=0.375 Default= % 90% 5% Porosity (T) Normal Distribution Mean = 0.43 Std Dev = 0.06 Upper/Lower Limits = 0.245, Residual Moisture Content (R) Lognormal Distribution Mean = Std Dev = Upper/Lower Limits = , Source: Uncertainty Analyses of Infiltration and Subsurface Flow and Transport for SDMP Sites. NUREG/CR Prepared by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA
18 --%)-. / Distribution for Ksat cm/sec/b Mean= E Values in 10^-3 5% 90% 5% Distribution for Van Genuchten N/D7 Mean= Default=0.007 Default= % 90% 5% Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) Beta Distribution Mean = 8.22E-03 Std Dev = 4.39E-03 Upper/Lower Limits = 3.5E-04, Van Genuchten shape parameter (N) Lognormal Distribution Mean = 2.67 Std deviation = Upper/Lower Limits = 1.95, 3.62 Source: NUREG/CR Prepared by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA
19 "0"12". VLOOK UP TABLE (from EPA 2003 Vapor Intrusion Model) K s (cm/h) α 1 (1/cm) N (unitless) M (unitless) n (cm 3 /cm 3 ) θ r (cm 3 /cm 3 ) Mean Grain Diameter (cm) Bulk Density (g/cm 3 ) θ w (cm 3 /cm 3 ) SCS Soil Name Clay Clay Loam Loam Loamy Sand E Sand Sandy Clay Sandy Clay Loam Silt Silty Clay Silty Clay Loam Silt Loam Sandy Loam =RiskNormal(0.43, 0.06, RiskTruncate(0.245, 0.615), RiskName("Porosity"), RiskCorrmat(NewSoilMatrix,4))
20 "0"123. INTERCALCS TABLE Vadose Enthalpy of Henry's law Henry's law Vapor zone vaporization at constant at constant at viscosity at effective ave. soil ave. soil ave. soil ave. soil diffusion temperature, temperature, temperature, temperature, coefficient, Hv,T S HT S H'T S µt S D eff V (cal/mol) (atm-m 3 /mol) (unitless) (g/cm-s) (cm 2 /s) 8, E E E E-02 EPA (2003) Vapor Intrusion Model Exponent of Infinite Average Crack equivalent source vapor effective foundation indoor flow rate diffusion Area of Peclet attenuation into bldg., coefficient, crack, number, coefficient, Qsoil D c rac k Ac rac k exp(pe f ) α (cm 3 /s) (cm 2 /s) (cm 2 ) (unitless) (unitless) 1.09E E E E E-03 =RiskOutput("ALPHA") + IF(ISERROR(G31),((H21*A21)/(I10*A10))/(((H21*A21)/(D31*A10))+1),(((H21*A21)/(I10*A10))*EXP(( D31*10)/(E31*F31)))/(EXP((D31*10)/(E31*F31))+((H21*A21)/(I10*A10))+((H21*A21)/(D31*A10))*(E XP((D31*10)/(E31*F31))-1)))
21 . ). -- Distribution for Naphthalene Cancer RBSL (10-yr Child) Distribution for Naphthalene Cancer RBSL (30-yr Adult) Relative Frequency X <= % X <= % Mean = Relative Frequency X <= % X <= % Mean = Deterministic RBSL = 10-15% Deterministic RBSL = 45-50% Concentration (µg/m3) Concentration (µg/m3) Deterministic RBSLs fit within the range of probabilistic RBSLs For child receptor, the deterministic RBSLs fall near the low end of the probabilistic distribution (10-20% for all 28 VOCs) For adult (30-yr) receptor, the deterministic RBSLs fall near the middle of the probabilistic distribution (35-55% for all 28 VOCs) Difference between child/adult probably due to difference between point-value and probabilistic inhalation rates A probabilistic RBSL that is protective of 95 percent of the population (i.e., 5th percentile value) would be lower than the deterministic value
22 . ). -- / Distribution for Naphthalene Cancer RBSL (10-yr Child) Distribution for Naphthalene Cancer RBSL (30-yr Adult) Relative Frequency X <= % X <= % Mean = Relative Frequency X <= % X <= % Mean = Calculated Qsoil = 10-20% Calculated Qsoil = 35-55% Default Qsoil = 30-60% 0.15 Default Qsoil = 70-80% Concentration (µg/m3) Concentration (µg/m3) Deterministic RBSLs calculated based on a default Qsoil value (5 L/min) are higher than deterministic RBSLs based on calculated Qsoil (10.7 L/min)
23 % Range = 95 % - 5 % (similar to max-min) Alpha 95%-5% Range is relatively small, suggesting that alpha is not highly sensitive to soil parameters and building parameter that were evaluated in the probabilistic assessment RBSL 95%-5% Range is slightly larger, reflecting added effect of inhalation rate (inhalation rate doesn t affect alpha)!"!!"#!"$ "% "& "! "# 3.2 to to 4.4 Overall, the model was relatively insensitivity to input parameters
24 RBSLs were calculated for all 28 VOCs detected in soil-gas at the landfill VOC concentrations in probes located between the landfill and houses are below the most restrictive deterministic RBSLs 30 yr adult RBSL (carcinogens) 10 yr child RBSL (non-carcinogens) One chemical (PCE) had a maximum concentration that slightly exceeded the 5 th percentile probabilistic RBSL Cumulative risk/hazard was calculated using maximum concentrations from soil gas probes and different RBSLs Cancer risk x 10-6 (default Qsoil) x 10-6 (site-specific Qsoil) x 10-6 based on the 5th percentile probabilistic RBSL Non-cancer hazard (default Qsoil) (site-specific Qsoil) based on the 5th percentile probabilistic RBSL
25 / Regulatory agencies preferred deterministic RBSLs over probabilistic RBSLs because the deterministic values can be verified using existing vapor intrusion models (EPA, DTSC) Probabilistic assessment useful for characterizing the effect of variability in model input parameters (uncertainty analysis) Range of alpha values is smaller than range in RBSLs indicating that RBSLs are more sensitive to inhalation rate than soil and building parameters that were evaluated Probabilistic assessment helps to understand relative protectiveness of deterministic RBSLs and thus increases confidence in these values Child deterministic RBSLs ~ low end to middle Adult deterministic RBSLs ~ middle to high end
NJDEP VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE Ground Water Screening Levels: Default Values and Site-Specific Specific Evaluation
NJDEP VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE Ground Water Screening Levels: Default Values and Site-Specific Specific Evaluation Paul Sanders New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection paul.sanders@dep.state.nj.us
More information2. Appendix Y: Vapor Intrusion Modeling Requirements (Appendix to Statewide health standard VI guidance in the Technical Guidance Manual)
2. Appendix Y: Vapor Intrusion Modeling Requirements (Appendix to Statewide health standard VI guidance in the Technical Guidance Manual) DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 19 June 2014 The Department
More informationPennsylvania s Land Recycling Program. Vapor Intrusion Technical Guidance
Pennsylvania s Land Recycling Program Vapor Intrusion Technical Guidance Appendix Y: Vapor Intrusion Modeling Guidance The Department recommends the use of EPA s Johnson & Ettinger model (U.S. EPA, 2004)
More informationModeling the Vapor Intrusion Pathway: Revisions to the MCP GW-2 Groundwater Standards
Modeling the Vapor Intrusion Pathway: Revisions to the MCP GW-2 Groundwater Standards Environmental Protection One Winter Street, Boston, MA 02108 http://mass.gov/dep Paul W. Locke Bureau Waste Site Cleanup
More informationPart 3 Fundamentals. Most Common VI Bloopers. Handy Unit Conversions:
Part 3 Fundamentals Units Contaminant Partitioning Vapor Migration Bioattenuation Site Conceptual Model Attenuation (alpha) Factors Risk/Screening Levels Most Common VI Bloopers Unit Confusion Assuming
More informationTemperature and Vapor Intrusion Evaluation
Temperature and Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Evelina Morales, Ph.D. Oklahoma DEQ, Land Protection Division 405 702-5108 Evelina.morales@deq.state.ok.us Presented at: 18 th Annual AEHS Meeting and West Coast
More informationUpdated J&E Model VIAModel.xls
Updated J&E Model VIAModel.xls Helen Dawson, Ph.D. USEPA Region 8 AEHS Spring 2006 What s Different? Combines screening and advanced versions of the groundwater and soil gas spreadsheets. Provides default
More informationEric M. Nichols, PE Amy Goldberg Day
Case Study of Subsurface Vapor Intrusion at a Dry Cleaner Site Amy Goldberg Day Amy.Goldberg.Day@lfr.com Eric M. Nichols, PE Eric.Nichols@lfr.com AEHS 14th Annual West Coast Conference on Soils, Sediments
More informationSOUTHWEST DIVISION Comparing Air Measurements and Modeling Results at a Residential Site Overlying a TCE Plume October 18, 2004
SOUTHWEST DIVISION Comparing Air Measurements and Modeling Results at a Residential Site Overlying a TCE Plume October 18, 2004 Presented by: Wilson Doctor, Remedial Project Manager Ronald J. Marnicio,
More informationVadose Zone Profiling to Better Understand Processes
Vapor Intrusion 2010 Sept. 29-30 Chicago Vadose Zone Profiling to Better Understand Processes Related to Vapor Intrusion Daniel B. Carr, P.E., P.G., Laurent C. Levy, Ph.D., P.E., Allan H. Horneman, D.E.S.
More informationHealth Consultation. South Indian Bend Wash Landfill Area TEMPE, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA. CERCLIS No. AZD
Health Consultation South Indian Bend Wash Landfill Area TEMPE, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA CERCLIS No. AZD980695969 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
More informationUPDATE TO THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (NJDEP) VAPOR INTRUSION SCREENING LEVELS (March 2013)
UPDATE TO THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (NJDEP) VAPOR INTRUSION SCREENING LEVELS (March 2013) INTRODUCTION The NJDEP has updated the March 2007 Vapor Intrusion Levels (VISL) that
More informationUnderstanding VI Screening Levels
A&WMA Specialty Conference URS Understanding VI Screening Levels Sept 29, 2010 VI Conference 1 Screening Values URS EPA and various states use screening values to decide which sites merit further investigation
More informationVapor Intrusion into Large Buildings
USEPA Workshop: Recent Advances to VI Application and Implementation- A State of the Science Update The 22 nd Annual International Conference on Soil, Water, Energy, and Air San Diego California Vapor
More informationCase Study of Modeled and Observed TCE Attenuation from Groundwater to Indoor Air. Christopher G. Lawless Johnson Wright, Inc.
Case Study of Modeled and Observed TCE Attenuation from Groundwater to Indoor Air Christopher G. Lawless Johnson Wright, Inc. October 18, 2004 Presentation Contents SITE BACKGROUND STUDY METHODS RESULTS
More informationThe Future of Vapor Intrusion (VI)
The Future of Vapor Intrusion (VI) Monitoring and Analysis National Environmental Measurement Conference Bellevue, WA Aug. 15, 2011 Presented by: Henry Schuver, DrPH USEPA Office of Resource Conservation
More informationA Rational Approach to Vapor Intrusion Preferential Pathways
A Rational Approach to Vapor Intrusion Preferential Pathways PRESENTED BY: David J. Folkes, PE Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS West Coast Conference EPA Vapor Intrusion Technical Workshop March 22, 2016
More informationOAKLAND RISK-BASED CORRECTIVE ACTION: TECHNICAL BACKGROUND DOCUMENT
OAKLAND RISK-BASED CORRECTIVE ACTION: TECHNICAL BACKGROUND DOCUMENT Prepared by: Lynn R. Spence Spence Environmental Engineering Mark M. Gomez City of Oakland Environmental Services Division May 17, 1999
More information2005 Review of Canada-Wide Standards for Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil: Report of the Model Parameter Advisory (MPA) Sub Group
2005 Review of Canada-Wide Standards for Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil: Report of the Model Parameter Advisory (MPA) Sub Group March 2006 1 Acknowledgement We would like to thank all the members of the
More informationAPPLICATION OF SUBSURFACE SOIL VAPOUR ASSESSMENT TO MANAGE HEALTH RISKS AND DEVELOP REMEDIATION CRITERIA AT HYDROCARBON IMPACTED SITES
APPLICATION OF SUBSURFACE SOIL VAPOUR ASSESSMENT TO MANAGE HEALTH RISKS AND DEVELOP REMEDIATION CRITERIA AT HYDROCARBON IMPACTED SITES By: Mitch Kenaschuk, P.Eng. and Peter Olmsted, M.Sc., P.Eng. SEACOR
More informationDEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REMEDIATION AND REDEVELOPMENT DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION RESPONSE ACTIVITY
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REMEDIATION AND REDEVELOPMENT DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION RESPONSE ACTIVITY (By authority conferred on the director of the Department of Environmental Quality
More informationH&P Breakfast Seminar
Vapor Intrusion Risk Pathway: Regulatory Updates H&P Breakfast Seminar September 25, 2012 Blayne Hartman 858-204-6170 blayne@hartmaneg.com EPA Guidance Updates (Final Out in Nov 2012) EPA (OSWER & Superfund)
More informationSouthern Cleaners & Laundry Jacksonville, North Carolina. CASE STUDY Vapor Intrusion Pathway: Evaluation and Risk Assessment
Southern Cleaners & Laundry Jacksonville, North Carolina CASE STUDY Vapor Intrusion Pathway: Evaluation and Risk Assessment October 2006 Presented By: Delonda Alexander North Carolina Dry-Cleaning Solvent
More informationVapor Intrusion - Site Characterization and Screening. NEWMOA Workshop on Vapor Intrusion Chelmsford, MA April 12, 2006
Vapor Intrusion - Site Characterization and Screening NEWMOA Workshop on Vapor Intrusion Chelmsford, MA April 12, 2006 David J. Folkes P.E. 1 What is Vapor Intrusion?! Compounds of Concern " Volatile Organics
More informationMass Flux Characterization for Vapor Intrusion Assessment
Mass Flux Characterization for Vapor Intrusion Assessment ESTCP ER 201503 Helen Dawson, Ph.D. Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. April 13, 2016 Project Team Organization Individual Responsibility/Specialization
More informationAttenuation of Hydrocarbon Vapors from LNAPL Under Residential and Commercial/Industrial Buildings
Attenuation of Hydrocarbon Vapors from LNAPL Under Residential and Commercial/Industrial Buildings Presented at: Vapor Intrusion Attenuation Workshop 14 th Annual West Coast Conference on Soils, Sediments
More informationQuantitative Decision Framework for Vapor Intrusion Evaluation in DoD Industrial Buildings - Based on an Empirical Database
Quantitative Decision Framework for Vapor Intrusion Evaluation in DoD Industrial Buildings - Based on an Empirical Database Christopher Lutes, Loren Lund, Keri Hallberg (CH2M HILL) Patricia Venable (NAVFAC
More informationCase Study of TCE Attenuation from Groundwater to Indoor Air and the Effects of Ventilation on Entry Routes
AEHS 14th Annual West Coast Conference, March 2004 EPA Vapor Intrusion Workshop Case Study of TCE Attenuation from Groundwater to Indoor Air and the Effects of Ventilation on Entry Routes Presented by:
More informationA REVIEW OF VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE BY STATE
A REVIEW OF VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE BY STATE Laurent C. Levy, Ph.D., P.E., Gradient Senior Project Manager Webinar Tuesday, August 14, 2012 Northeast Waste Management Officials' Association Gradient Gradientcorp.com
More informationProposed Changes to EPA s Spreadsheet Version of Johnson & Ettinger Model (and some new spreadsheet tools)
Proposed Changes to EPA s Spreadsheet Version of Johnson & Ettinger Model (and some new spreadsheet tools) Workshop Integrating Observed & Modeled Vapor Attenuation The 15th Annual AEHS West Coast Conference,
More informationAtlantic RBCA Guidance for Soil Vapour and Indoor Air Monitoring Assessments: Overview. December 7 th, 2006 Moncton, New Brunswick
Atlantic RBCA Guidance for Soil Vapour and Indoor Air Monitoring Assessments: Overview December 7 th, 2006 Moncton, New Brunswick Who? Outline Came up with this document Why? Soil vapour/indoor air sampling
More informationAPPLICATION OF SUBSURFACE VAPOUR ASSESSMENT AT HYDROCARBON IMPACTED SITES
APPLICATION OF SUBSURFACE VAPOUR ASSESSMENT AT HYDROCARBON IMPACTED SITES Mitch Kenaschuk, P.Eng. Peter Olmsted, M.Sc.,P.Eng. October 2004 OUTLINE Introduction Regulatory Framework and Methodology Vapour
More informationWhat is the Evidence for Long Term Stewardship (LTS)
What is the Evidence for Long Term Stewardship (LTS) (vs. Stopping All Monitoring (SAM)) for the Vapor Intrusion Pathway?* For EnviroForensics & Barnes and Thornburg Webinar Nov. 19, 2014 by Henry J. Schuver,
More informationMeasurement of BTX Vapour Intrusion into an Experimental Building
Measurement of BTX Vapour Intrusion into an Experimental Building Ian Hers Golder Associates Ltd. / University of British Columbia August 15, 2000 Sponsored by: Alberta Environmental Protection (AEP) American
More informationMethodology for Establishing Cleanup Levels for Contaminated Sites
Methodology for Establishing Cleanup Levels for Introduction: In Oklahoma, appropriate cleanup levels for a specific site are provided by the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). Achieving these
More informationUse of Crawl Space Sampling Data and Other Lines of Evidence for Evaluating Vapor Intrusion
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL Use of Crawl Space Sampling Data and Other Lines of Evidence for Evaluating Vapor Intrusion C.Y. Jeng and William Bosan
More informationFINAL. Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels and Removal Action Levels 700 South 1600 East Street PCE Plume Salt Lake City, Utah
FINAL Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels and Removal Action Levels 700 South 1600 East Street PCE Plume PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: COPIES: D. Lynne Welsh/VA Salt Lake City Health Care System Mike Bedan/CH2M
More informationProject Summary Site-Specific Protocol for Measuring Soil Radon Potentials for Florida Houses
EPA United States National Risk Management Environmental Protection Research Laboratory Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 7711 Research and Development EPA/600/SR-96/045 August 1996 Project Summary Site-Specific
More informationNew Models to Support Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design
New Models to Support Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Design USEPA Work Shop, AEHS 27th Annual International Conference on Soil, Water, Energy and Air March 23-26, 2015, San Diego, CA Dr. Ian Hers, Dr. Parisa
More informationEVALUATION OF DRINKING WATER RISKS FROM A FLOWBACK WATER SURFACE SPILL. William Rish, Ph.D. Hull Risk Analysis Center Dublin, Ohio
EVALUATION OF DRINKING WATER RISKS FROM A FLOWBACK WATER SURFACE SPILL William Rish, Ph.D. Hull Risk Analysis Center Dublin, Ohio GOAL OF THE RISK ASSESSMENT QUANTITATIVELY ASSESS DRINKING WATER RISKS
More informationTCE Fate and Transport, as Related to Vapor Intrusion
TCE Fate and Transport, as Related to Vapor Intrusion Eric Suuberg School of Engineering, Brown University Providence, Rhode Island NEWMOA/Brown SRP Workshop on TCE Vapor Intrusion: State of the Science,
More informationTCE Fate and Transport, as Related to Vapor Intrusion
TCE Fate and Transport, as Related to Vapor Intrusion Eric Suuberg School of Engineering, Brown University Providence, Rhode Island NEWMOA/Brown SRP Workshop on TCE Vapor Intrusion: State of the Science,
More informationConnecticut Remediation Criteria: Technical Support Document Proposed Revisions to the Connecticut Remediation Standard Regulations
Connecticut Remediation Criteria: Technical Support Document 2008 Proposed Revisions to the Connecticut Remediation Standard Regulations Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water
More informationAn Empirical Approach to Site Assessment for Vapor Intrusion
An Empirical Approach to Site Assessment for Vapor Intrusion Presented by: Helen Dawson, Hydrogeologist Susan Griffin, Toxicologist USEPA Region 8 Denver, CO NSAS Conference 2007 An Empirical Approach
More informationPA Vapor Intrusion Guidance
PA Vapor Intrusion Guidance Society of Women Environmental Professionals Capital Chapter November 10, 2016 Presented by: Carolyn Fair - Land Recycling Program PA Department of Environmental Protection
More informationDesign of Below Sub-slab Vapour Management System for a Commercial Building
Design of Below Sub-slab Vapour Management System for a Commercial Building Soil Contamination Chemical vapor (residual or mobile NAPL) Migration Soil Contamination Indoor Air Chemical Vapour Transport
More informationRisk Management Strategies to Address Vapor Intrusion Assessment and Mitigation Uncertainties Robert Ettinger Geosyntec Consultants
Risk Management Strategies to Address Vapor Intrusion Assessment and Mitigation Uncertainties Robert Ettinger Geosyntec Consultants 25 th Groundwater Resources Association Annual Meeting 2016: Groundwater
More informationABSTRACT INTRODUCTION
Vadose Zone Profiling to Better Understand Vadose Zone Processes Related to Vapor Intrusion Paper # Daniel B. Carr, P.E., P.G., Laurent C. Levy, Ph.D., P.E., Allan H. Horneman, D.E.S. Sanborn, Head & Associates,
More informationSite Specific Remediation Objectives for Soil Vapour in Alberta (Draft) Norman Sawatsky
Site Specific Remediation Objectives for Soil Vapour in Alberta (Draft) Norman Sawatsky Outline Contaminated Site Management Policy General Principles of Risk Assessment Tiered Risk Assessment Framework
More informationEvaluation of VI Data Relative to Separation Distance Screening Criteria A Michigan Case Study
GROUNDWATER & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. Evaluation of VI Data Relative to Separation Distance Screening Criteria A Michigan Case Study Chris Mulry, GES, Inc. March 19, 2014 Presentation Outline Study
More informationA Comparison of BioVapor and Johnson and Ettinger Model Predictions to Field Data for Multiple Sites
Compare to J&E? O 2 for Mitigation? A Comparison of BioVapor and Johnson and Ettinger Model Predictions to Field Data for Multiple Sites AEHS 25th Annual International Conference on Soil, Water, Energy
More informationEvaluation of Spatial and Temporal Variability in VOC Concentrations at Vapor Intrusion Investigation Sites.
Evaluation of Spatial and Temporal Variability in VOC Concentrations at Vapor Intrusion Investigation Sites. Proceeding of Air & Waste Management Association s Vapor Intrusion: Learning from the Challenges,
More informationPost-Remedy Vapor Intrusion Evaluation for the Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research (LEHR) Superfund Site
August 20 23, 2018 Grand Junction, Colorado 2018 Long-Term Stewardship Conference Post-Remedy Vapor Intrusion Evaluation for the Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research (LEHR) Superfund Site Mary
More informationVapor Intrusion in Massachusetts Gerard Martin
Vapor Intrusion in Massachusetts Gerard Martin Chief Compliance, Enforcement and Brownfields Redevelopment Section Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup, MassDEP Proposed MCP Amendments Relative to Vapor Intrusion
More informationIs this the maturation Phase of Vapor Intrusion Investigations?
Is this the maturation Phase of Vapor Intrusion Investigations? Presenter: Will Elcoate June 27 th, 2012 EPA Moves forward with Vapor Intrusion EPA plans to tear down three city businesses Columbus Telegram
More information7.0 EVALUATION OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES
7.0 EVALUATION OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES This section provides a description of the developed remedial alternatives based on viable remedial technologies and process options, as identified in Section 4.0,
More informationDEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Bureau of Land Recycling and Waste Management. Land Recycling Program Technical Guidance Manual
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Bureau of Land Recycling and Waste Management DOCUMENT NUMBER: TITLE: 253-0300-100 (partial) Land Recycling Program Technical Guidance Manual EFFECTIVE DATE: June
More informationOregon Guidance for Assessing and Remediating Vapor Intrusion in Buildings
Department of Environmental Quality Overview of Oregon Guidance for Assessing and Remediating Vapor Intrusion in Buildings Brownfields and Land Revitalization 2011 Conference Spokane, Washington May 13,
More informationGround Water Assessment. Investigating Ground Water: Discussion Topics. Leaching. Soil Impacts to Ground Water
Ground Water Assessment Investigation, Protection, Classification, and Response Requirements OAC 3745-300-10 and parts of 3745-300-07 Certified Professional 8-Hour Training Investigating Ground Water:
More informationImpacts of Low Permeability Caps on Groundwater Quality. By John A. Baker Alan Environmental,LLC
Impacts of Low Permeability Caps on Groundwater Quality By John A. Baker Alan Environmental,LLC Acknowledgements Ken Quinn- Montgomery Watson, Madison Wisconsin Mark Ankeny-DB Stephens & Associates (presently
More informationEnsuring Occupational Worker Safety At Vapor Intrusion Sites
Ensuring Occupational Worker Safety At Vapor Intrusion Sites Shukla Roy-Semmen, William Bosan, C.Y. Jeng and Frank Parr Department of Toxic Substances Control California Environmental Protection Agency
More informationStylistic Modeling of Vadose Zone Transport Insight into Vapor Intrusion Processes
March 15, 2011 Workshop, Addressing Regulatory Challenges In Vapor Intrusion, A State of the Science Update Stylistic Modeling of Vadose Zone Transport Insight into Vapor Intrusion Processes Daniel B.
More informationNEWMOA/ Brown SRP Vapor Intrusion Workshop. September 26 and 26, η T. q = k ρ g. D ig. = d i air η g. dφ = gz + 10 / 3
Overview of Vapor Intrusion and Characterization of Exposure Risks Presented by Kelly G. Pennell, PhD, PE Assistant Professor Civil Engineering - University of Kentucky J T = q C Dig C D ig = d i air η
More informationRisk Assessment Methodologies in Ranking Decontamination Actions on National and Local Level. a Hungarian Experience
Risk Assessment Methodologies in Ranking Decontamination Actions on National and Local Level a Hungarian Experience a workshop on Contaminated Lands in Accession Countries: Benchmarking Historical Heritage
More informationEPA Vapor Intrusion Update
EPA Vapor Intrusion Update by Ben Bentkowski, P.G. Scientific Support Section, R4 Superfund Presented April 29, 2016 Southeastern States Vapor Intrusion Symposium March 2016 1 What is Vapor Intrusion?
More informationReview of Published Research
VI Workshop March 22, 2016 Review of Published Research Subsurface Processes Related to VI Conceptual Modeling More Questions Real Life Data Daniel B. Carr, P.E., P.G., Principal Emeritus Sanborn Head
More informationEffect of Building-Source Separation and Preferential Pathways for Steady State Vapor Intrusion Simulations in Non-Homogenous Geologies
Submitted to Environmental Science & Technology Effect of Building-Source Separation and Preferential Pathways for Steady State Vapor Intrusion Simulations in Non-Homogenous Geologies Journal: Environmental
More informationSoBRA Generic Assessment Criteria for Assessing Vapour Inhalation Risks from Groundwater Sources
SoBRA Generic Assessment Criteria for Assessing Vapour Inhalation Risks from Groundwater Sources Eleanor Walker, Atkins Introduction Introduction to SoBRA Groundwater vapour sub-group work - objectives
More informationEstablishing Critical Protective Concentration Levels (PCLs) for Lead-Affected Soils
Establishing Critical Protective Concentration Levels (PCLs) for Lead-Affected oils Introduction Effective Date: August 2, 2001 The purpose of this document is to describe the processes for establishing
More informationAugust Vapor Intrusion Guidance FAQs
August 2017 2017 Vapor Intrusion Guidance FAQs Topics: A. General B. Effect of New Guidance on In-Process Sites C. Future Use of Site D. Modeling E. Off-Site Properties F. Preferential Pathways G. Proximity
More informationUsing Fate and Transport Models to Evaluate Cleanup Levels
Fact Sheet # 25 Voluntary Remediation Program (VRP) (307) 777-7752 http://deq.state.wy.us/volremedi/index.asp Using Fate and Transport Models to Evaluate Cleanup Levels In its 2000 session, the Wyoming
More informationPreliminary Draft Operable Unit Carbon Tetrachloride Plume Groundwater Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Former Fort Ord, California
Preliminary Draft Operable Unit Carbon Tetrachloride Plume Groundwater Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Former Fort Ord, California Volume II: Human Health Risk Assessment MACTEC Project No. 55596.001701
More informationNavy VI Web Tool: A Systematic Approach for Assessing Strength of Evidence
Navy VI Web Tool: A Systematic Approach for Assessing Strength of Evidence EPA Workshop 2012 Donna Caldwell / NAVFAC Atlantic Dr. Loren Lund / CH2M HILL Why Navy Developed VI Evaluation Tool 116 potential
More informationAppendix A Equations. Former ChlorAlkali Plant, Human Health and Environmental Risk Assessment Ref: O/13/CAPR001-A
Appendix A Equations Former ChlorAlkali Plant, Human Health and Environmental Risk Assessment - 2013 A1 Introduction This appendix presents the methodology and equations used to quantify exposures via
More informationVapor Intrusion Update: Separating the Environmental exposure from Indoor Air Quality Issues Guidance
Vapor Intrusion Update: Separating the Environmental exposure from Indoor Air Quality Issues Guidance Will Elcoate Alpha Analytical December 5 th. 2014 1 Vapor Intrusion is the migration of volatile chemicals
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 2. The effect of remediation on the distribution and mobility of both the LNAPL and water within the zone of interest.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY For many decades, the oil production industry has recognized that significant limitations exist to complete extraction of oil from geologic formations. Attempts to recover fuels and crude
More informationEPA s Vapor Intrusion Database
EPA s Vapor Intrusion Database Characterization and Evaluation of Attenuation Factors for Chlorinated VOCs in Residences Helen Dawson, PhD Rich Kapuscinski, PhD March 20, 2012 1 Acknowledgements OSWER
More informationFRANKLIN engineering group, inc. 381 Riverside Drive, Suite 200 Franklin, TN / voice 615/ fax
FRANKLIN engineering group, inc. 381 Riverside Drive, Suite 200 Franklin, TN 37064 615/591-0058 voice 615/591-8979 fax ADDENDUM TO MULTIPATHWAY HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR EXPLOSIVE DESTRUCTION
More informationIf you have any questions, please contact me at (919)
PAT MCCRORY Governor DONALD R. VAN DER VAART Secretary MICHAEL E. SCOTT Acting Director May 2, 2016 Mr. Lance Norris, Public Works Director Town of Chapel Hill 405 Martin Luther King Jr Blvd Chapel Hill
More informationVapor Intrusion from Subsurface to Indoor Air:
Vapor Intrusion from Subsurface to Indoor Air: Biodegradable d Petroleum Vapors versus Recalcitrant t Chemicals Vapor Intrusion 2010: Air & Waste Management Association (A&WMA) Conference Chicago, IL.
More informationU.S. EPA s Vapor Intrusion Database: Preliminary Evaluation of Attenuation Factors
March 4, 2008 U.S. EPA s Vapor Intrusion Database: Preliminary Evaluation of Attenuation Factors Office of Solid Waste U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 [This page intentionally
More informationNational Inventory of Potential Sources of Soil Contamination in Cyprus
National Inventory of Potential Sources of Soil Contamination in Cyprus Part 2 Risk-Based Approach to Assessment of Cypriot Contaminated Sites Eleonora Wcislo and Marek Korcz Institute for Ecology of Industrial
More informationTRANSPORT PATHWAY EVIDENCE OF A SEWER VAPOR. Findings from Work Performed at the Indianapolis USEPA Research Duplex
EVIDENCE OF A SEWER VAPOR TRANSPORT PATHWAY Findings from Work Performed at the Indianapolis USEPA Research Duplex Midwestern States Environmental Consultants Association Spring Seminar Rob Uppencamp May
More informationTier 1 Remedial Criteria Development. Alberta
Tier 1 Remedial Criteria Development in Alberta Prepared for ESAA Remediation Technologies Symposium 2002 Banff, Alberta October, 2002 Prepared by: Craig S. Harris, M.Sc., P.Geol., P. Biol. and R. Ian
More informationESTCP Research on Optimization of Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Systems in Large Military Buildings
ESTCP Research on Optimization of Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Systems in Large Military Buildings Todd McAlary, Ph.D., P.Eng., P.G., CUT Principal and Practice Leader Vapor Intrusion Services Geosyntec
More informationProposed MCP Amendments
Gerard Martin, Chief Compliance, Enforcement and Brownfields Redevelopment Section MassDEP, Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup Southeast Regional Office September 27, 2013 Proposed MCP Amendments Process Improvements:
More informationVapor-Intrusion Management Plan Lockheed Martin Middle River Complex 2323 Eastern Boulevard Middle River, Maryland
Vapor-Intrusion Management Plan Lockheed Martin Middle River Complex 2323 Eastern Boulevard Middle River, Maryland Prepared for: Lockheed Martin Corporation Prepared by: Tetra Tech, Inc. December 8, 2010
More informationINHALATION EXPOSURE PATHWAY SOIL REMEDIATION STANDARDS BASIS AND BACKGROUND
INHALATION EXPOSURE PATHWAY SOIL REMEDIATION STANDARDS BASIS AND BACKGROUND JUNE 2008 Table of Contents I. Introduction...1 II. Methodology for Developing Standards...3 A. Overview...3 B. Toxicity Factors
More informationBackground. NCP Early or Interim Actions 5/3/2017. Current Ohio EPA Response Action Levels and Time Frames for TCE at Vapor Intrusion Sites in Ohio
Current Ohio EPA Response Action Levels and Time Frames for TCE at Vapor Intrusion Sites in Ohio Carrie Rasik, Risk Assessor Ohio EPA MSECA, May 2017 Background U.S. EPA IRIS 2011 TCE Toxicity Update -
More information23 February 2017 Reference No L-Rev1-8500
23 February 2017 Reference No. David Williams Contaminated Sites Approved Professional Society (CSAP) 744 W. Hastings Street Vancouver, BC V6C 1A5 UPDATED REVIEW OF LATERAL VAPOUR ATTENUATION FACTORS FOR
More informationTotal Concentration Limits
4 Total Concentration Limits Total Concentration Limits 4.1 Introduction This section discusses issues related to the use of total as threshold concentrations for LWAC and mass loading of constituents.
More informationAttenuation Factors for Hydrocarbons Associated With a Diesel Spill
Attenuation Factors for Hydrocarbons Associated With a Diesel Spill By Lindsay Breyer, CIH and James B. Cowart, PE Walsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers, Boulder, Colorado Site Location: Mandan,
More informationCIRIA VOC remediation guidance
CIRIA VOC remediation guidance Joanne Kwan, CIRIA CIRIA Guidance CIRIA C682 The VOC Handbook: Investigating, assessing and managing risks from inhalation of VOCs CIRIA RP938: Remediation and mitigation
More informationAPPENDIX I-3 Air and Fugitive Dust Monitoring and Mitigation
APPENDIX I-3 Air and Fugitive Dust Monitoring and Mitigation (Tetra Tech 2014) MEMO To: Cc: From: Jason Han, New Urban West, Inc. Keith Walker, Cox, Castle & Nicholson, LLP Carl Lenker, Senior Project
More informationIntensive Study of VOCs and Radon in a Historical Duplex A First Look
Intensive Study of VOCs and Radon in a Historical Duplex A First Look Dr. Brian Schumacher, EPA NERL Brian Schumacher and John Zimmerman Office of Research and Development Environmental Chemistry Branch,
More informationMEMORANDUM. To: Billy Meyer. Christie Zawtocki, PE Timothy Klotz. Date: April 8, 2014
MEMORANDUM To: Billy Meyer From: Christie Zawtocki, PE Timothy Klotz Date: April 8, 2014 Project: One Hour Martinizing Site, DSCA ID 32-0013 1103 W Club Blvd, Durham, NC Subject: Monthly Update Hart &
More informationAn RT Regulatory Program Summary
An RT Regulatory Program Summary NJDEP ISSUES DRAFT VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE In mid-june, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection issued draft Vapor Intrusion Guidance, which is very important,
More informationProposed Regulatory Framework
em feature by Bart Eklund Bart M. Eklund is principal scientist with URS Corp., Austin, TX. E-mail: bart_eklund@urscorp.com. Proposed Regulatory Framework for Evaluating the Methane Hazard due to Vapor
More informationSite-Specific Characterization of Soil Radon Potentials
EPA United States National Risk Management Environmental Protection Research Laboratory Agency Cincinnati, OH 45268 Research and Development EPA/600/SR-95/161 February 1996 Project Summary Site-Specific
More informationDetermining: Stack testing of sources (normal operating condition)
class-notes-ch4_20050114, Page 1 of 8 4. EMISSION SUMMARIES 4.1 EMISSION FACTORS 4.2 EMISSION REPORTING 4. RISK ASSESSMENT 4.1 EMISSION FACTORS Definition: a representative value that attempts to relate
More information