Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants
|
|
- Osborne Heath
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants CMU Seminar September 26, 2007 Julianne Klara, National Energy Technology Laboratory
2 Fossil Energy Plant Baseline Study -Report Contains- Subcritical PC Supercritical PC IGCC NGCC Consistent design requirements Up-to-date performance and capital cost estimates Technologies built now and deployed by
3 Technical Approach 1. Extensive Process Simulation (ASPEN) All major chemical processes and equipment are simulated Detailed mass and energy balances Performance calculations (auxiliary power, gross/net power output) 2. Cost Estimation Inputs from process simulation (Flow Rates/Gas Composition/Pressure/Temp.) Sources for cost estimation Parsons Vendor sources where available Follow DOE Analysis Guidelines 3
4 Study Matrix Plant Type IGCC ST Cond. (psig/ F/ F) GT Gasifier/ Boiler Acid Gas Removal/ Separation / Sulfur Recovery Cap 1800/1050/1050 Selexol / - / Claus GE (non- Selexol / Selexol / Claus 90% capture cases) F CoP MDEA / - / Claus Class E-Gas 1800/1000/1000 Selexol / Selexol / Claus 88% 1 ( capture Sulfinol-M / - / Claus Shell cases) Selexol / Selexol / Claus 90% PC 2400/1050/1050 Subcritical 3500/1100/1100 Supercritical Wet FGD / - / Gypsum Wet FGD / Econamine / Gypsum 90% Wet FGD / - / Gypsum Wet FGD / Econamine / Gypsum 90% NGCC 2400/1050/950 F Class HRSG - / Econamine / - 90% 1 capture is limited to 88% by syngas CH 4 content GEE GE Energy CoP Conoco Phillips 4
5 Design Basis: Coal Type Illinois #6 Coal Ultimate Analysis (weight %) As Rec d Dry Moisture Carbon Hydrogen Nitrogen Chlorine Sulfur Ash Oxygen (by difference) HHV (Btu/lb) 11,666 13,126 5
6 Environmental Targets Pollutant IGCC 1 PC 2 NGCC 3 SO lb/mmbtu lb/mmbtu < 0.6 gr S /100 scf NOx 15 ppmv 15% O lb/mmbtu % O 2 PM lb/mmbtu lb/mmbtu Negligible Hg > 90% capture 1.14 lb/tbtu Negligible 1 Based on EPRI s CoalFleet User Design Basis Specification for Coal-Based IGCC Power Plants 2 Based on BACT analysis, exceeding new NSPS requirements 3 Based on EPA pipeline natural gas specification and 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart KKKK 6
7 Economic Assumptions Startup 2010 Plant Life (Years) 20 Capital Charge Factor, % High Risk (All IGCC, PC/NGCC with capture) 17.5 Low Risk (PC/NGCC without capture) 16.4 Dollars (Constant) 2007 Coal ($/MM Btu) 1.80 Natural Gas ($/MM Btu) 6.75 Capacity Factor IGCC 80 PC/NGCC 85 7
8 Total Plant Cost Includes Equipment Initial chemicals and catalyst loadings Materials Labor Direct and Indirect Engineering and Construction Management Project and Process Contingencies Excludes Owner s costs Land, licensing and permitting, AFUDC Escalation to period of performance Taxes (except payroll) Site specific considerations Labor incentives in excess of 5 day/10 hour work week EPC premiums 8
9 Costs do not include Risk Wrap Contract approach assumed for study EPCM (engineering, procurement, construction management) Owner has control of project Risk is reduced with time as scope definition improves by time of contract award as opposed to.. EPC (engineer, procure, construct) Lump sum contract where contractor assumes all risk for performance, schedule, and cost If willing to accept risk, premiums applied can raise costs dramatically 9
10 Power Plant Configurations Current State-of-the-Art 10
11 Current Technology IGCC Power Plant Process Design Assumptions: Dual Train: 2 gasifiers, 2 Comb. Turbine, 1 Steam Turbine Oxygen: 95% O 2 via 2 via Cryogenic ASU, ~4-7% Air Air Extraction from combustion turbine Turbines: Advanced F-Class Turbine --232MWe N 2 dilution 2 employed to to full full extent in in all all cases Humidification/steam injection used only when necessary to to meet syngas specification of of ~120 Btu/scf LHV Steam: 1800psig/1050 F/1050 F 11
12 Pre-Combustion Current Technology IGCC Power Plant with Scrubbing Mole % (Dry) H CO Mole % (Dry) H CO Capture Advantages: High P CO2 CO2 Process Design 2. Assumptions: 2. Low Volume Syngas Stream 3. Oxygen: 95% O 2 via 2 via Cryogenic 3. Produced at ASU, No at Pressure No air air extraction from combustion turbine Steam: 1800psig/1000 F/1000 F Compression: 2,200 Psig 12
13 Post-Combustion Current Technology Pulverized Coal Power Plant with Scrubbing Steam to Econamine FG+ Power Flue Gas 2,200 Psig Steam Air Coal PC Boiler (With SCR) Bag Filter ID Fans Wet Limestone FGD Steam Ash Process Design Assumptions: Steam: Subcritical 2400psig/1050 F/1050 F Supercritical 3500psig/1100 F/1100 F * Orange Blocks Indicate Unit Operations Added for Capture Case Capture Challenges: Dilute Flue Gas (10-14% ) ) Low Pressure Million scfm ,000 ton /day removed Large Parasitic Loads (Steam + Compression) 13
14 Current Technology Natural Gas Combined Cycle* * Orange Blocks Indicate Unit Operations Added for Capture Case Natural Gas HRSG Direct Contact Cooler Air Combustion Turbine Blower Cooling Water Stack Gas Reboiler Steam Condensate Return MEA Stack 2200 psig Compressor NOx Control: LNB + SCR to to maintain % O 2 2 Steam Conditions: 2400 psig/1050 F/950 F 14
15 IGCC Power Plant Cost and Performance No capture 15
16 IGCC Performance Results No Capture GE Energy E-Gas Shell Gross Power (MW) Auxiliary Power (MW) Base Plant Load Air Separation Unit Gas Cleanup Total Aux. Power (MW) Net Power (MW) Heat Rate (Btu/kWh) 8,922 8,681 8,304 Efficiency (HHV)
17 IGCC Economic Results No Capture GE Energy E-Gas Shell Plant Cost ($/kwe) 1 Base Plant 1,323 1,272 1,522 Air Separation Unit Gas Cleanup Total Plant Cost ($/kwe) 1,813 1,733 1,977 Capital COE ( /kwh) Variable COE ( /kwh) Total COE 2 ( /kwh) Total Plant Capital Cost (Includes contingencies and engineering fees) 2 January 2007 Dollars, 80% Capacity Factor, 17.5% Capital Charge Factor, Coal cost $1.80/10 6 Btu 17
18 IGCC Power Plant Cost and Performance With Capture 18
19 Impact of Adding CCS GE Energy Capture NO YES Gross Power (MW) Auxiliary Power (MW) Base Plant Load Air Separation Unit Gas Cleanup/ Capture 4 18 Compression - 27 Total Aux. Power (MW) Net Power (MW) Heat Rate (Btu/kWh) 8,922 10,505 Efficiency (HHV) Energy Penalty Steam for WGS and Selexol in ASU air comp. load w/o CT integration Includes H 2 S/ Removal in Selexol Solvent in auxiliary load for compression to 2200 psig 1 Capture Energy Penalty = Percent points decrease in net power plant efficiency due to Capture 19
20 Impact of CCS on IGCC Capital Cost $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,813 $1,733 $1,977 $2,390 $2,431 $2,668 GEE R+Q $/kw $1,500 $1,000 CoP E-Gas Shell $500 $0 w/o CCS w/ CCS Total Plant Cost Note: 2007 (Jan) Dollars CCS = Carbon capture and sequestration CCS increases TPC by about 35 percent (or ~ $660/kW) 20
21 Impact of CCS on IGCC Efficiency % Efficiency 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 38.2% 39.3% 41.1% 32.5% 31.7% 32.0% GEE R+Q CoP E-Gas FSQ Shell w/o CCS w/ CCS Net Plant HHV Efficiency (%) CCS = Carbon capture and sequestration Average energy penalty for CCS is 7 percentage points 21
22 Impact of CCS on IGCC Cost of Electricity LCOE, mills/kwh ($2007) LCOE by Component GE GE CCS CoP CoP CCS Shell Shell CCS CO2 TS&M Plant O&M Plant Fuel Cost Plant Capital Cost CCS = Carbon capture and sequestration 22
23 PC Power Plant Cost and Performance 23
24 Pulverized Coal Performance Summary Subcritical Supercritical Coal Flow Rate 5,252 7,759 4,935 7,039 Captured (Ton/day) 0 16, ,029 Gross Power (MW) Auxiliary Power (MW) Base Plant Load Forced + Induced Draft Fans Flue Gas Cleanup Capture Compression Total Aux. Power (MW) Net Power (MW) Efficiency (%HHV) Energy Penalty (% Points) Capture decreases net efficiency by ~12 percentage points 24
25 Subcritical PC Performance Subcritical Coal Flow Rate 5,252 7,759 Captured (Ton/day) 0 16,566 Gross Power (MW) Auxiliary Power (MW) Base Plant Load Forced + Induced Draft Fans Flue Gas Cleanup 4 5 Capture - 24 Compression - 52 Total Aux. Power (MW) Net Power (MW) Efficiency (%HHV) Energy Penalty (% Points) % Increase in Coal Flow Rate Larger Base Plant MEA Scrubbing ~17,000 TPD to 2,200 Psig 25
26 Pulverized Coal Economic Results Subcritical Supercritical Capture NO YES NO YES Plant Cost ($/kwe) 1 Base Plant 1,302 1,689 1,345 1,729 Gas Cleanup (SOx/NOx) Capture Compression Total Plant Cost ($/kwe) 1,549 2,895 1,575 Capital COE ( /kwh) Variable COE ( /kwh) TS&M COE ( /kwh) Total COE 2 ( /kwh) Increase in COE (%) $/tonne Avoided Total Plant Capital Cost (Includes contingencies and engineering fees) 752 2,870 PC PC CO capture 2 capture results results in: in: Increase 6.75 Increase in in Capital Capital Cost Cost (TPC) (TPC) ~ $1,325/kW $1,325/kW Increase Increase in in COE COE ~5 ~5 cents/kwh cents/kwh 4.34 (~ (~ 83%) 83%) 2 January 2007 Dollars, 85% Capacity Factor, 16.4% (no capture) 17.5% (capture) Capital Charge Factor, Coal cost $1.80/10 6 Btu, Natural Gas cost $6.75/10 6 Btu
27 Technology Comparison IGCC, PC and NGCC 27
28 Net Plant Efficiency Efficiency, % (HHV Basis) Avg IGCC Avg IGCC CCS PC-Sub PC-Sub CCS PC-Super PC-Super CCS NGCC NGCC CCS CCS = Carbon capture and sequestration 28
29 Total Plant Cost $/kw ($2007) Avg IGCC Avg IGCC CCS PC-Sub PC-Sub CCS PC-Super PC-Super CCS NGCC NGCC CCS Total Plant Capital Cost includes contingencies and engineering fees CCS = Carbon capture and sequestration 29
30 Cost of Electricity LCOE by Cost Component CO2 TS&M LCOE, mills/kwh Plant O&M Plant Fuel Costs Plant Capital Cost Avg IGCC Avg IGCC CCS sub-pc sub-pc CCS super-pc super-pc CCS January 2007 Dollars, Coal cost $1.80/10 6 Btu, Gas cost $6.75/10 6 Btu CCS = Carbon capture and sequestration TS&M = transport, storage, and monitoring NGCC NGCC CCS 30
31 Mitigation Costs Avg IGCC Sub PC Super PC NGCC % Increase in COE $/tonne CO2 avoided 31
32 Criteria Pollutant Emissions for All Cases Hg lb/tbtu SO2 NOx PM Hg GE GE w/co2 CoP CoP Shell Shell PC-sub PC-sub PC-SC PC-SC NGCC NGCC w/co2 w/co2 w/co2 w/co2 w/co2 Emissions (lb/mmbtu) GE GE w/co2 CoP CoP w/co2 Shell Shell w/co2 PC-sub PC-sub w/co2 PC-SC PC-SC w/co2 NGCC NGCC w/co2 32
33 30 Raw Water Usage per MWnet (Absolute) 25.7 Raw Water Usage, gpm/mwnet GE GE w/co2 CoP CoP w/co2 Shell Shell w/co2 PC-sub PC-sub w/co2 PC-SC PC-SC w/co2 NGCC NGCC w/co2 33
34 Result Highlights Coal-based plants using today s technology are efficient and clean 20 year levelized COE: PC lowest cost generator IGCC total plant cost ~20% higher than PC With CCS: IGCC lowest coal-based option for CCS PC TPC > IGCC TPC PC efficiency < IGCC efficiency LCOE* equal when natural gas price is: No Capture IGCC: $7.99/MMBtu PC: $6.15/MMBtu With Capture IGCC: $7.73/MMBtu PC: $8.87/MMBtu * At baseline coal cost of $1.80/MMBtu 34
35 NETL Viewpoint Improved efficiencies and reduced costs are required to improve competitiveness of advanced coal-based systems In today s market and regulatory environment Also in a carbon constrained scenario Opportunities for Fossil Energy RD&D Improve performance and cost of clean coal power systems including development of new approaches to capture and sequester greenhouse gases 35
36 Thank You!! Report, Desk Reference & Slides Available Cost and Performance Baseline of Fossil Energy Plants, DOE/NETL- 2007/1281, May Fossil Energy Power Plant Desk Reference 2007/1282, May DOE/NETL- 36
37 Backup Slides 37
38 Removal Cost versus Avoided Cost $/tonne of CO2 captured (removed) Function of the bulk quantity of CO2 removed from the capture power plant and the increase in COE required for capture Difference in COE divided by amount of CO2 captured in the capture plant $/tonne of CO2 avoided (mitigation cost) Accounts for the extra energy (auxiliary power) spent to capture CO2, which increases total CO2 per net MWh Difference in COE divided by difference in emissions between reference plant and capture plant 38
39 Comparison of CO2 Removed and Avoided The amount of CO2 avoided is always less than the amount of CO2 captured Captured Capture Plant CO2 emissions Avoided CO2 captured Reference Plant Produced (tonne/mwh) 39
40 GE Energy Radiant Coal Slurry 63 wt.% High Pressure Steam Coal Water Radiant Syngas Cooler Quench Chamber 95% O 2 Radiant Quench Gasifier 2,500 O F 1,100 O F 419 O F Syngas 410 F, 800 Psia Composition (Mole%): H 2 26% 7% 12% H 2 O 34% Other 1% H 2 O/CO Saturated = 1.3 Syngas 398 O F Syngas Scrubber Slag/Fines To Acid Gas Removal or To Shift Design: Pressurized, single-stage, downward firing, entrained flow, slurry feed, oxygen blown, slagging, radiant and quench cooling Note: All gasification performance data estimated by the project team to be representative of GE gasifier 40
41 ConocoPhillips E-Gas Stage 2 Syngas Syngas 1,700 F, 614 psia Composition (Mole%): H 2 26% CO 37% 14% H 2 O 15% CH 4 4% Other 4% H 2 O/CO = 0.4 To Fire-tube boiler To Acid Gas Removal or To Shift Coal Slurry 63 wt. % (0.78) (0.22) Char Design: Pressurized, two-stage, upward firing, entrained flow, slurry feed, oxygen blown, slagging, fire-tube boiling syngas cooling, syngas recycle 95 % O Slag 2 Quench Stage 1 2,500 o F 614 Psia Slag/Water Slurry 41 Note: All gasification performance data estimated by the project team to be representative of an E-Gas gasifier
42 HP Steam Convective Cooler Soot Quench & Scrubber Shell Gasification Design: Pressurized, single-stage, downward firing, entrained flow, dry feed, oxygen blown, convective cooler Syngas Quench 2 Gasifier 2,700 o F 615 psia Notes: 1. All gasification performance data estimated by the project team to be representative of Shell gasifier. 2. capture incorporates full water quench instead of syngas quench. Steam HP Steam Syngas 350 F, 600 Psia 95% O 2 Dry Coal Slag 650 o F Composition (Mole%): H 2 29% CO 57% 2% H 2 O 4% Other 8% H 2 O/CO = 0.1 To Acid Gas Removal or To Shift Source: The Shell Gasification Process, Uhde, ThyssenKrupp Technologies 42
43 IGCC Performance Results GE Energy E-Gas Shell Capture NO YES NO YES NO YES Gross Power (MW) Auxiliary Power (MW) Base Plant Load Air Separation Unit Gas Cleanup/ Capture Compression Total Aux. Power (MW) Net Power (MW) Heat Rate (Btu/kWh) 8,922 10,505 8,681 10,757 8,304 10,674 Efficiency (HHV) Energy Penalty Capture Energy Penalty = Percent points decrease in net power plant efficiency due to Capture
44 IGCC Economic Results GE Energy E-Gas Shell Capture NO YES NO YES NO YES Plant Cost ($/kwe) 1 Base Plant 1,323 1,566 1,272 1,592 1,522 1,817 Air Separation Unit Gas Cleanup/ Capture Compression Total Plant Cost ($/kwe) 1,813 2,390 1,733 2,431 1,977 2,668 Capital COE ( /kwh) Variable COE ( /kwh) TS&M COE ( /kwh) Total COE 2 ( /kwh) Increase in COE (%) $/tonne Avoided Total Plant Capital Cost (Includes contingencies and engineering fees) 2 January 2007 Dollars, 80% Capacity Factor, 17.5% Capital Charge Factor, Coal cost $1.80/10 6 Btu 44
45 PC and NGCC Performance Results Subcritical Supercritical NGCC Capture NO YES NO YES NO YES Gross Power (MW) Base Plant Load Gas Cleanup/ Capture Compression Total Aux. Power (MW) Net Power (MW) Heat Rate (Btu/kWh) 9,276 13,724 8,721 12,534 6,719 7,813 Efficiency (HHV) Energy Penalty Capture Energy Penalty = Percent points decrease in net power plant efficiency due to Capture 45
46 PC and NGCC Economic Results Subcritical Supercritical NGCC Capture NO YES NO YES NO YES Plant Cost ($/kwe) 1 Base Plant 1,302 1,689 1,345 1, Gas Cleanup (SOx/NOx) Capture Compression Total Plant Cost ($/kwe) 1,549 2,895 1,575 2, ,172 Capital COE ( /kwh) Variable COE ( /kwh) TS&M COE ( /kwh) Total COE 2 ( /kwh) Increase in COE (%) $/tonne Avoided Total Plant Capital Cost (Includes contingencies and engineering fees) 2 January 2007 Dollars, 85% Capacity Factor, 16.4% (no capture) 17.5% (capture) Capital Charge Factor, Coal cost $1.80/10 6 Btu, Natural Gas cost $6.75/10 6 Btu 46
CO 2. Capture: Comparison of Cost & Performance of Gasification and Combustion-based Plants
Capture: Comparison of Cost & Performance of Gasification and Combustion-based Plants Workshop on Gasification Technologies Indianapolis, Indiana June 12-13, 2007 Jared Ciferno National Energy Technology
More informationIGCC: Coal s Pathway to the Future
IGCC: Coal s Pathway to the Future Gasification Technologies Council Conference October 4, 2006 Julianne M. Klara Senior Analyst Office of Systems Analysis and Planning National Energy Technology Laboratory
More informationAdvanced Coal Power Plant Water Usage
CoalFleet for Tomorrow Advanced Coal Power Plant Water Usage Ronald L. Schoff (rschoff@epri.com) Project Manager Advanced Coal Generation Options Charlotte, North Carolina July 8 9, 2008 CoalFleet for
More informationPower Plant Water Usage and Loss
Power Plant Water Usage and Loss Workshop on Gasification Technologies Denver, Colorado March 14, 2007 Jared P. Ciferno, National Energy Technology Laboratory Disclaimer This presentation was prepared
More informationRonald L. Schoff Parsons Corporation George Booras Electric Power Research Institute
Pre-Investment of IGCC for CO 2 Capture with the Potential for Hydrogen Co-Production Gasification Technologies 2003 - San Francisco, California - October 12-15, 2003 Michael D. Rutkowski, PE Parsons Corporation
More informationEVALUATION OF INNOVATIVE FOSSIL CYCLES INCORPORATING CO 2 REMOVAL
EVALUATION OF INNOVATIVE FOSSIL CYCLES INCORPORATING CO 2 REMOVAL 2000 Gasification Technologies Conference San Francisco, California October 8-11, 2000 Michael R. DeLallo Thomas L. Buchanan Jay S. White
More informationFossil Energy. Fossil Energy Technologies. Chapter 12, #1. Access (clean HH fuel) Coal. Air quality (outdoor)
Fossil Energy Technologies Coal steam power Gasification Power Access (clean HH fuel) Coal Direct Liquefaction Gasification liquids Air quality (outdoor) Natural Gas Biomass Power/liquids Co-production
More informationGASIFICATION TECHNOLOGIES 2003
S.Francisco, California October 12-15, 2003 GASIFICATION TECHNOLOGIES 2003 COAL POWER PLANTS WITH CO2 CAPTURE: THE IGCC OPTION J.Davison - IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme L.Bressan - R.M.Domenichini -
More informationThe Future of IGCC Technology CCPC-EPRI IGCC Roadmap Results
The Future of IGCC Technology CCPC-EPRI IGCC Roadmap Results Ronald L. Schoff (rschoff@epri.com) Electric Power Research Institute Sr. Project Manager IEA CCT2011 Conference Zaragoza, Spain May 10, 2011
More informationGasification Combined Cycles 101. Dr. Jeff Phillips EPRI
Gasification Combined Cycles 101 Dr. Jeff Phillips EPRI JPhillip@epri.com Outline What is coal? What is coal gasification? What is a combined cycle? What happens when we put them together? (IGCC) IGCC
More informationAdvanced Coal Technology 101
Advanced Coal Technology 101 National Conference of State Legislators Conference November 1, 2007 Dr. Jeffrey N. Phillips Program Manager Advanced Coal Generation Options CO 2 Capture in Coal Power Systems
More informationThe Cost of Mercury Removal in an IGCC Plant
The Cost of Mercury Removal in an IGCC Plant M.D. Rutkowski, M.G. Klett, R.C. Maxwell October 1, 2002 Washington, D.C. Acknowledgments Gary J. Stiegel James R. Longanbach David L. Denton U.S. DOE/NETL
More informationBLUE OPTION White space is filled with one or more photos
Driving Innovation Delivering Results BLUE OPTION White space is filled with one or more photos Performance Baseline for Direct-Fired sco 2 Cycles Nathan Weiland, Wally Shelton NETL Chuck White, David
More informationEmerging Technologies in Emerging Economies with Emphasis on China & India. Jarad Daniels Office of Fossil Energy U.S. Department of Energy
Emerging Technologies in Emerging Economies with Emphasis on China & India Jarad Daniels Office of Fossil Energy U.S. Department of Energy 1 Coal is expected to play a key role in growth of Emerging Economies
More informationIGCC & Gasification for a Changing Marketplace
IGCC & Gasification for a Changing Marketplace Neville Holt - EPRI Technical Fellow, Advanced Coal Generation Technology MIT Carbon Sequestration Forum V11 Cambridge, MA October 31, 2006 1 Options for
More informationRequest for Proposal Technical Conference: Oregon Meeting (Following Utah Docket
Request for Proposal Technical Conference: Oregon Meeting (Following Utah Docket 05-035 035-47) April 10, 2006 Pacific Power Utah Power Rocky Mountain Power Agenda WorleyParsons Expanded IGCC Study Factors
More informationAbstract Process Economics Program Report 180B CARBON CAPTURE FROM COAL FIRED POWER GENERATION (DECEMBER 2008 REPUBLISHED MARCH 2009)
Abstract Process Economics Program Report 180B CARBON CAPTURE FROM COAL FIRED POWER GENERATION (DECEMBER 2008 REPUBLISHED MARCH 2009) The most expensive part of the overall carbon capture and storage process
More informationThermodynamic performance of IGCC with oxycombustion
Thermodynamic performance of IGCC with oxycombustion CO 2 capture G.Lozza, M. Romano, A. Giuffrida Dip. Energia, Politecnico di Milano, Italy Purpose of the study CO 2 capture from coal power plant. Configurations
More informationAvailable online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 63 (2014 ) GHGT-12
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Energy Procedia 63 (2014 ) 7598 7607 GHGT-12 Costs of CO 2 capture technologies in coal fired power and hydrogen plants John Davison a *, Luca Mancuso
More informationCarbon Capture and Storage: A Technology Solution for Continued Coal Use in a Carbon Constrained World
COAL UTILIZATION RESEARCH COUNCILSM Carbon Capture and Storage: A Technology Solution for Continued Coal Use in a Carbon Constrained World Congressional Briefing May 22, 2008 562 Dirksen Senate Office
More informationFocus on Gasification in the Western U.S.
Focus on Gasification in the Western U.S. GTC Workshop on Gasification Technologies Denver, Colorado March 14, 2007 Richard D. Boardman, Ph.D. INL R&D Lead for Gasification & Alternative Fuels (208) 526-3083;
More informationClean Coal Technology Status: CO 2 Capture & Storage
Clean Coal Technology Status: CO 2 Capture & Storage Technology Briefing for COLORADO RURAL ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION February 19, 2007 Revis James (rejames@epri.com) Director, Energy Technology Assessment
More informationCHEMICAL LOOPING COMBUSTION REFERENCE PLANT DESIGNS AND SENSITIVITY STUDIES
Driving Innovation Delivering Results CHEMICAL LOOPING COMBUSTION REFERENCE PLANT DESIGNS AND SENSITIVITY STUDIES Robert Stevens, Ph.D. US Dept. of Energy NETL September 1, 2015 Chemical Looping Combustion
More informationCarbon Reduction Options in Power Generation
Carbon Reduction Options in Power Generation Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Detroit Branch Conference on Cost-Effective Carbon Reduction Detroit, MI October 15, 2007 David K. Schmalzer, PhD, P.E. Manager,
More informationCommercial Viability of Near-Zero Emissions Oxy-Combustion Technology for Pulverized Coal Power Plants
Commercial Viability of Near-Zero Emissions Oxy-Combustion Technology for Pulverized Coal Power Plants Andrew Seltzer Zhen Fan Horst Hack Foster Wheeler North America Corp., USA Minish Shah Kenneth Burgers
More informationTechnical and Economic Evaluation of a 70 MWe Biomass IGCC Using Emery Energy s Gasification Technology
Technical and Economic Evaluation of a 70 MWe Biomass IGCC Using Emery Energy s Gasification Technology Gasification Technologies Conference October 15, 2003 San Francisco, CA By: Benjamin D. Phillips,
More informationPerspective on Coal Utilization Technology
Perspective on Coal Utilization Technology 21st Annual International Pittsburgh Coal Conference on 14-16 September, 2004 Naokazu Kimura Director, Wakamatsu Research Institute J-Power/EPDC Agenda - About
More informationCALCIUM LOOPING PROCESS FOR CLEAN FOSSIL FUEL CONVERSION. Shwetha Ramkumar, Robert M. Statnick, Liang-Shih Fan. Daniel P. Connell
CALCIUM LOOPING PROCESS FOR CLEAN FOSSIL FUEL CONVERSION Shwetha Ramkumar, Robert M. Statnick, Liang-Shih Fan William G. Lowrie Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering The Ohio State University
More informationAdvances in gasification plants for low carbon power and hydrogen co-production
Advances in gasification plants for low carbon power and hydrogen co-production IChemE New Horizons in Gasification Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 10-13 March, 2014 Luca Mancuso, Foster Wheeler Noemi Ferrari,
More information- The Osaki CoolGen Project -
Realization of Innovative High Efficiency and Low Emission Coal Fired Power Plant - The Osaki CoolGen Project - Kenji Aiso Osaki Coolgen Corporation Outline 1. Background 2. Gasification Technology 3.
More informationCO 2 Capture: Impacts on IGCC Plant Performance in a High Elevation Application using Western Sub-Bituminous Coal
CO 2 Capture: Impacts on IGCC Plant Performance in a High Elevation Application using Western Sub-Bituminous Coal Satish Gadde, Jay White WorleyParsons Ron Herbanek, Jayesh Shah ConocoPhillips Gasification
More informationChilled Ammonia Technology for CO 2 Capture. October, 2006
Chilled Ammonia Technology for CO 2 Capture October, 2006 CO 2 Mitigation Options for Coal Based Power Increase efficiency Maximize MWs per lb of carbon processed Fuel switch with biomass Partial replacement
More informationTotal Fossil Generation Mix CO 2 Forecast
Post-Combustion CO 2 Workshop Talloires, France July 11, 21 Opportunities & Challenges for Post- Combustion : US DOE Research Activities David Luebke, Research Group Leader Advanced CO 2 Total Fossil Generation
More informationsco 2 Cycle as an Efficiency Improvement Opportunity for Air-Fired Coal Combustion
March 27, 2017 sco 2 Cycle as an Efficiency Improvement Opportunity for Air-Fired Coal Combustion Charles W. White, Walter W. Shelton, Nathan T. Weiland, Travis R. Shultz 6 th International Supercritical
More informationAir Separation Unit for Oxy-Coal Combustion Systems
Air Separation Unit for Oxy-Coal Combustion Systems Jean-Pierre Tranier Richard Dubettier Nicolas Perrin Air Liquide 1st International Oxyfuel Combustion Conference, Cottbus September 9, 2009 Current state
More informationThe Outlook for Lower-Cost Carbon Capture and Storage for Climate Change Mitigation
The Outlook for Lower-Cost Carbon Capture and Storage for Climate Change Mitigation Edward S. Rubin Department of Engineering and Public Policy Department of Mechanical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University
More informationTHE NOVELEDGE IGCC REFERENCE PLANT: COST AND EMISSIONS REDUCTION POTENTIAL. Gasification Technologies 2004, Washington, DC, October 6, 2004
THE NOVELEDGE IGCC REFERENCE PLANT: COST AND EMISSIONS REDUCTION POTENTIAL Gasification Technologies 2004, Washington, DC, October 6, 2004 Dave Heaven, Fluor; William S. Rollins, NovelEdge Technologies,
More informationCapture-Ready Coal Plants - Options, Technologies and Economics
Capture-Ready Coal Plants - Options, Technologies and Economics Mark C. Bohm 1, Howard J. Herzog 1, John E. Parsons 2, Ram C. Sekar 1 1 Laboratory for Energy and the Environment, Massachusetts Institute
More informationFlexible Integration of the sco 2 Allam Cycle with Coal Gasification for Low-Cost, Emission-Free Electricity Generation
GTC 2014 28 October 2014 1 Allam Cycle Flexible Integration of the sco 2 Allam Cycle with Coal Gasification for Low-Cost, Emission-Free Electricity Generation GTC 2014 Dr. Xijia Lu, 8 Rivers Capital GTC
More informationPolk Power Key Lessons for IGCC Gasification Technologies Conference October 15, 2015
Polk Power Key Lessons for IGCC Gasification Technologies Conference October 15, 2015 Mark Hornick Tampa Electric Company Tampa Electric Company Investor owned - NYSE Regulated rates FL PSC $2.4b Revenue
More informationEvaluating the Cost of Emerging Technologies
Evaluating the Cost of Emerging Technologies Edward S. Rubin Department of Engineering and Public Policy Department of Mechanical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Presentation
More informationEconomic Assessment of Deploying Advanced Coal Power Technologies in the Chinese Context
Economic Assessment of Deploying Advanced Coal Power Technologies in the Chinese Context Lifeng Zhao, Ph.D. Research Fellow Energy Technology Innovation Policy Belfer Center for Science and International
More informationWITH CO2 SEQUESTRATION
PROJECT DESIGNS FOR IGCC & SNG WITH CO2 SEQUESTRATION Gasification Technologies Conference October 5, 2009 Ron Herbanek, Bill Mooneyhan ConocoPhillips Company Presentation Outline Introduction Design Premise
More informationCanadian Clean Power Coalition: Clean Coal Technologies & Future Projects Presented to. David Butler Executive Director
Canadian Clean Power Coalition: Clean Coal Technologies & Future Projects Presented to David Butler Executive Director Presentation Outline Canadian Clean Power Coalition (CCPC) Overview Technology Overview
More informationReducing CO 2 Emission by Hydrogen IGCC Power Plants. Hydrogen IGCC
2002 Gasification Technology Conference Reducing CO 2 Emission by Power Plants Robert M. Jones, Joachim Wolff, Uhde GmbH (Speaker) Increasing Environmental Benefit of IGCC 1. Carbon Sequestration 2. Design
More informationCOAL POWER PLANTS WITH CO 2 CAPTURE: THE IGCC OPTION
COAL POWER PLANTS WITH CO 2 CAPTURE: THE IGCC OPTION J. Davison IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme L. Bressan - R.M. Domenichini - Foster Wheeler Italiana ABSTRACT One of the most promising technologies
More informationWRI S PRE GASIFICATION TREATMENT OF PRB COALS FOR IMPROVED ADVANCED CLEAN COAL GASIFIER DESIGN
WRI S PRE GASIFICATION TREATMENT OF PRB COALS FOR IMPROVED ADVANCED CLEAN COAL GASIFIER DESIGN SER Contract No. WY49975WRI Dr. Al Bland Western Research Institute FINAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT WRI S PRE
More informationCCES Colorado Clean Energy Solutions
CCES Colorado Clean Energy Solutions Carbon Rountable and Symposium October 1, 2009 Current CO 2 Technology Options and Advanced R&D Pathway Solutions Jared Ciferno, Technology Manager Existing Plants
More informationComparison of a New Warm-Gas Desulfurization Process versus Traditional Scrubbers for a Commercial IGCC Power Plant
Comparison of a New Warm-Gas Desulfurization Process versus Traditional Scrubbers for a Commercial IGCC Power Plant Jerry Schlather Eastman Chemical Company Brian Turk RTI International Gasification Technologies
More informationPaolo Chiesa. Politecnico di Milano. Tom Kreutz*, Bob Williams. Princeton University
Analysis of Hydrogen and Co-Product Electricity Production from Coal with Near Zero Pollutant and CO 2 Emissions using an Inorganic Hydrogen Separation Membrane Reactor Paolo Chiesa Politecnico di Milano
More informationJ-POWER s CCT Activities
J-POWER s CCT Activities Hiroto Shimizu Senior Advisor, International Business Management Department 2013. 9.6 3E + S Philosophy* *) Basis of Energy Policy Who is J POWER? Established as Government owned
More informationPerformance Evaluation of a Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycle Coal Gasification Plant
Performance Evaluation of a Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycle Coal Gasification Plant Scott Hume Principal Technical Leader The 5th International Symposium - Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycles March 28-31, 2016,
More informationStatus and Outlook for CO 2 Capture Systems
Status and Outlook for CO 2 Capture Systems Edward S. Rubin Department of Engineering and Public Policy Department of Mechanical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Presentation
More informationAvailable online at Energy Procedia 4 (2011) Energy Procedia 00 (2010)
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Energy Procedia 4 (2011) 1925 1932 Energy Procedia 00 (2010) 000 000 Energy Procedia www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia www.elsevier.com/locate/xxx GHGT-10 Evaluation
More informationPressurized Oxy-Combustion An Advancement in in Thermal and Operating Efficiency for Clean Coal Power Plants. Jan, 2013
Pressurized Oxy-Combustion An Advancement in in Thermal and Operating Efficiency for Clean Coal Power Plants Jan, 2013 Advantages of Pressurized Oxy-Combusition POXC can be retrofitted into existing plants
More informationPre-Combustion Technology for Coal-fired Power Plants
Pre-Combustion Technology for Coal-fired Power Plants Thomas F. Edgar University of Texas-Austin IEAGHG International CCS Summer School July, 2014 1 Introduction 2 CO 2 Absorption/Stripping of Power Plant
More informationWater usage and loss of power in power plants with CO2 capture
Water usage and loss of power in power plants with CO2 capture Luca Mancuso Process Manager Paolo Cotone Principal Process Engineer Power Division - Foster Wheeler Italiana 14 th September 2010 2010 EPRI
More informationA Parametric Investigation of Integrated Gasification Combined Cycles with Carbon Capture
Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2012 GT2012 June 11-15, 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark GT2012-69519 A Parametric Investigation of Integrated Gasification Combined Cycles with Carbon Capture Xuewei Li and Ting
More informationCO 2 CAPTURE READY COAL POWER PLANTS
CO 2 CAPTURE READY COAL POWER PLANTS DOE/NETL-2007/1301 Final Report April 2008 Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither
More informationCOAL-FIRED POWER PLANT PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS
Northwest Power & Conservation Council BIENNIAL ASSESSMENT OF THE FIFTH POWER PLAN COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS November 2, 2006 Rising natural gas prices and the commercialization of advanced
More informationIntegrated Gasification Fuel Cell Performance and Cost Assessment
Integrated Gasification Fuel Cell Performance and Cost Assessment March 27, 2009 DOE/NETL-2009/1361 Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States
More informationThe Cost of CCS for Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants
The Cost of CCS for Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants Edward S. Rubin Department of Engineering and Public Policy Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Presentation to the Natural Gas CCS Forum
More informationMIT Carbon Sequestration Forum VII Pathways to Lower Capture Costs
MIT Carbon Sequestration Forum VII Pathways to Lower Capture Costs 1 October 1 November 2006 Royal Sonesta Hotel, Cambridge, MA Oxyfuel Pathways Rodney Allam Consultant Air Products PLC, UK Oxyfuel Technology
More informationProblematica e Tecnologie per la cattura di CO 2 Stefano Consonni Dipartimento di Energetica - Politecnico di Milano
Pianeta 3000 La ricerca scientifica per l'ambiente e il Territorio Problematica e Tecnologie per la cattura di CO 2 Stefano Consonni Dipartimento di Energetica - Politecnico di Milano Milano, 12 novembre
More informationWRITECoal Gasification of Low- Rank Coals for Improved Advanced Clean Coal Gasifier / IGCC Design
WRITECoal Gasification of Low- Rank Coals for Improved Advanced Clean Coal Gasifier / IGCC Design Alan E. Bland, Jesse Newcomer and Tengyan Zhang- Western Research Institute Kumar M. Sellakumar - Etaa
More informationCo-Production of Fuel Alcohols & Electricity via Refinery Coke Gasification Ravi Ravikumar & Paul Shepard
Co-Production of Fuel Alcohols & Electricity via Refinery Coke Gasification Ravi Ravikumar & Paul Shepard October 15, 2003 Gasification Technologies 2003 Conference San Francisco, CA Study Objectives Evaluate
More informationCO 2 Capture and Storage Economics and Technology
CO 2 Capture and Storage Economics and Technology Stuart Dalton (sdalton@epri.com) Director, Generation UN ECE Ad Hoc Group of Experts on Cleaner Electricity Production from Coal and Other Fossil Fuels
More informationRefinery Residue Based IGCC Power Plants and Market Potential
10/17/2001 page 1 Gasification Technologies 2001 Refinery Residue Based IGCC Power Plants and Market Potential Joachim Wolff (Speaker), Karsten Radtke GmbH Jürgen Karg, Werner Günster Siemens AG Power
More informationAppendix 3.C Electricity Generation Economics: Bases and Assumptions
Appendix 3.C Electricity Generation Economics: Bases and Assumptions LEVELIZED COST OF ELECTRICITY The levelized cost of electricity (COE) is the constant dollar electricity price that would be required
More informationTechno-Economic Evaluation of. with Post Combustion Capture
Techno-Economic Evaluation of Biomass Fired or Co-Fired Power Plant with Post Combustion Capture Stanley Santos IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme Cheltenham, UK Regional Workshop for the Baltic Sea and
More informationThe Progress of Osaki CoolGen Project
The Progress of Osaki CoolGen Project ~ Oxygen-blown Integrated Coal Gasification Fuel Cell Combined Cycle Demonstration Project ~ September, 2017 Osaki Coolgen Corporation 1 Outline 1. Background and
More informationTHE WABASH RIVER IGCC PROJECT REPOWERING COAL FIRED POWER PLANTS
THE WABASH RIVER IGCC PROJECT REPOWERING COAL FIRED POWER PLANTS PHIL AMICK VICE PRESIDENT, COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT GLOBAL ENERGY, INC. 1 2 Our company: Project Developer for Gasification Facilities Environmentally
More informationImpact of novel PCC solvents on existing and new Australian coal-fired power plants 1 st PCC Conference, Abu-Dhabi
Impact of novel PCC solvents on existing and new Australian coal-fired power plants 1 st PCC Conference, Abu-Dhabi Dr Narendra Dave Principal Research Engineer CSIRO Energy Technology, North Ryde, Australia
More informationChemical Looping Gasification Sulfur By-Product
Background: Coal Gasification Technology Chemical Looping Gasification Sulfur By-Product Fanxing Li and Liang-Shih Fan* Fly Ash By-Product Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering The Ohio State
More informationClean Coal Technology
Clean Coal Technology Presented to the National Conference of State Legislatures Robert G. Hilton August 5, 2012 Agenda 1st topic Combustion Page 2 2nd topic Criteria Pollutants Page 10 3rd topic CO2 Capture
More informationREPORT. I hereby declare that the work is performed in compliance with the exam regulations of NTNU.
NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology Faculty of Natural Sciences and Technology Department of Chemical Engineering REPORT TKP4170 Process Desing, Project Title: Coal Plant Svalbard (TEMP)
More informationAPPLICATION OF BGL GASIFICATION OF SOLID HYDROCARBONS FOR IGCC POWER GENERATION
APPLICATION OF BGL GASIFICATION OF SOLID HYDROCARBONS FOR IGCC POWER GENERATION 2000 Gasification Technologies Conference San Francisco, California October 8-11, 2000 Presented by: GLOBAL ENERGY INC. Richard
More informationClean Coal Technology Roadmap CURC/EPRI/DOE Consensus Roadmap
Clean Coal Technology Roadmap CURC/EPRI/DOE Consensus Roadmap http://www.netl.doe.gov/coalpower/ccpi/pubs/cct-roadmap.pdf Roadmap Goals Develop unified coal program roadmap Integrate CURC, EPRI, DOE roadmaps
More informationThe Cost of CO 2 Capture and Storage
The Cost of Capture and Storage Edward S. Rubin Department of Engineering and Public Policy Department of Mechanical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Presentation to the
More informationAppendix 3.B Electricity Generation Primer
Appendix 3.B Electricity Generation Primer Table A-3.B.1 Analysis of Illinois #6 Bituminous Coal Used in the Design Base of Each of the Green-Field Generating Technologies ILLINOIS #6 BITUMINOUS COAL FUEL
More informationAvailable online at Energy Procedia 37 (2013 ) GHGT-11
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Energy Procedia 37 (2013 ) 2397 2405 GHGT-11 Post-combustion capture on natural gas combined cycle plants: A technical and economical evaluation of retrofit, new
More informationHydrogen and power co-generation based on syngas and solid fuel direct chemical looping systems
Hydrogen and power co-generation based on syngas and solid fuel direct chemical looping systems Calin-Cristian Cormos Babeş Bolyai University, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering 11 Arany Janos,
More informationChapter 2 Coal and Coal/Biomass-Based Power Generation
Chapter 2 Coal and Coal/Biomass-Based Power Generation James R. Katzer Abstract Coal is a key, growing component in power generation globally. It generates 50% of U.S. electricity, and criteria emissions
More informationPerformance Improvements for Oxy-Coal Combustion Technology
Performance Improvements for Oxy-Coal Combustion Technology John Wheeldon Technical Executive, Electric Power Research Institute Second Oxy-Combustion Conference Yeppoon, Queensland 12 th to 15 th September
More informationNOx CONTROL FOR IGCC FACILITIES STEAM vs. NITROGEN
NOx CONTROL FOR IGCC FACILITIES STEAM vs. NITROGEN GASIFICATION TECHNOLOGIES CONFERENCE SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA OCT. 27-30, 2002 Phil Amick, Global Energy Inc. Ron Herbanek, Global Energy Inc. Robert
More informationNET Power. Truly Clean, Cheaper Energy. California Energy Commission CO 2 Capture Technology Workshop. April 16, April NET Power
16 April 2015 1 NET Power NET Power Truly Clean, Cheaper Energy California Energy Commission CO 2 Capture Technology Workshop April 16, 2015 16 April 2015 2 NET Power Introduction to NET Power NET Power
More informationIon Transport Membrane (ITM) Technology for Lower-Cost Oxygen Production
Ion Transport Membrane (ITM) Technology for Lower-Cost Oxygen Production Rob Steele EPRI (rsteele@epri.com) Phil Armstrong - Air Products and Chemicals Inc. Arun Bose DOE NETL Gasification Technologies
More informationOPTIMIZATION OF THE SHIFT CONVERSION UNIT IN A GASIFICATION PLANT
OPTIMIZATION OF THE SHIFT CONVERSION UNIT IN A GASIFICATION PLANT Gasification Technologies Council Annual Meeting 2006 Washington, DC October 1-4, 2006 Ashok Rao Akshay Verma Advanced Power and Energy
More informationDevelopment status of the EAGLE Gasification Pilot Plant
Development status of the EAGLE Gasification Pilot Plant Gasification Technologies 2002 San Francisco, California, USA October 27-30, 2002 Masaki Tajima Energy and Environment Technology Development Dept.
More informationRepowering Conventional Coal Plants with Texaco Gasification: The Environmental and Economic Solution
Repowering Conventional Coal Plants with Texaco Gasification: The Environmental and Economic Solution INTRODUCTION Coal fired power plants have been producing a significant amount of power in the United
More informationExisting Plants, Emissions and Capture Setting Water-Energy R&D Program Goals
Existing Plants, Emissions and Capture Setting Water-Energy R&D Program Goals 08 May 2009 DOE/NETL-2009/1372 Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United
More informationCoal based IGCC technology
Coal based IGCC technology Ola Maurstad, post doc Based on work during stay at Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2004-2005 1 Gasification Gasification is the conversion of a solid fuel to a combustible
More informationScott Hume. Electric Power Research Institute, 1300 West WT Harris Blvd, Charlotte NC 28262
The 5th International Symposium - Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycles March 28-31, 2016, San Antonio, Texas Performance Evaluation of a Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycle Coal Gasification Plant Scott Hume Electric
More informationPost Combustion CO 2 Capture Scale Up Study
Post Combustion CO 2 Capture Scale Up Study Prachi Singh and Mike Haines International Greenhouse Gas R&D programme 6 th International Conference on Clean Coal Technologies (CCT 2013) 12-16 th May 2013
More informationChapter 3 Coal-Based Electricity Generation
Chapter 3 Coal-Based Electricity Generation INTRODUCTION In the U.S., coal-based power generation is expanding again; in China, it is expanding very rapidly; and in India, it appears on the verge of rapid
More informationPerformance and Costs of CO 2 Capture at Gas Fired Power Plants
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Energy Procedia 37 (2013 ) 2443 2452 GHGT-11 Performance and Costs of CO 2 Capture at Gas Fired Power Plants Neil Smith a *, Geoff Miller a, Indran Aandi a, Richard
More informationCO 2 Capture. John Davison IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme.
CO 2 Capture John Davison IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme Overview of this Presentation Leading CO 2 capture technologies for power generation Descriptions Main advantages and disadvantages Examples of
More informationComparison of Nitrogen Oxides, Sulfur Dioxide, Particulate Matter, Mercury and Carbon Dioxide Emissions for IGCC and Other Electricity Generation.
Comparison of Nitrogen Oxides, Sulfur Dioxide, Particulate Matter, Mercury and Carbon Dioxide Emissions for IGCC and Other Electricity Generation. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has been
More informationHigher Efficiency Power Generation Reduces Emissions
1 Higher Efficiency Power Generation Reduces Emissions National Coal Council Issue Paper 2009 János M.Beér MIT Coal is the primary fuel for generation of electricity in the United States and many other
More informationSOME ENERGY-EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGIES IN JAPAN
SOME ENERGY-EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGIES IN JAPAN (EXECUTIVE SESSION) November, 2007 JAPAN EXTERNAL TRADE ORGANIZATION JAPAN CONSULTING INSTITUTE SOME ENERGY-EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGIES IN JAPAN 1. Power Generation
More information