fenix The FENIX project: Integration of Renewables and Distributed Generation in Networks through aggregation

Transcription

1 1 The FENIX project: Integration of Renewables and Distributed eneration in Networks through aggregation fenix a step towards the future of a step towards the future of electricity networks

2 Objective Enabling Distributed Energy Resources (DER) to make the EU electricity supply system cost efficient, secure and sustainable through aggregation into Large Scale Virtual Power Plant (LSVPP)

3 Project Coordinates FENIX is an European collaborative project, partly funded by the European Commission within the 6th Framework Program for Research Launched in October 2005 and its duration is 4 years (ends September 2009) 20 partners are involved The total budget is 14,7 MEuro José M. Corera Spain Round Table RT4

4 Partners The Netherlands United Kingdom Romania France Slovenia Spain ermany Austria 4

5 400 kv VPP concept 400 kv 400kV = P, Q 132kV P, Q VPP (&L) 33kV L 11kV L 11 kv/0.4 kv TVPP area 1 TVPP area 2 LV area 1 LV area 2 Characteristics of aggregated active generation and load: (1) Output (2) Reserve (3) Dynamic response (4) Cost characteristics

6 Progress We are here Specification and development Building the demonstrations Cost benefit analysis Regulatory recommendations Trade Distributed Energy Resource Sale of electricity / flexible demand services CVPP TSO Ancillary Services Market TSO Use of transmission system TAO 6 Electricity Electricity Revenue Local Network Services TVPP Connection & use of distribution system DAO

7 Key research challenges of Fenix 1. Identify potential present (and future) contribution of DER to networks that can be performed at advantageous cost. 2. Identify network needs and the way to satisfy them using DER 3. Revise regulations, incentive mechanisms and contractual relationships between the different participants (DER, aggregators, network operators and markets), to enhance DER contribution to the network with a fair economic return 4. Investigate aggregation (VPP) so the limited size of DER and their non-deterministic behaviour limitations can be overcome 5. Develop the ICT architecture to make it work: At DER level: FENIX box At VPP level: DEMS systems At system operators: revision of EMS and DMS tools 6. Two physical demonstrations: UK (hosted by EDF Energy) Spain (hosted by Iberdrola)

8 Demonstration Bilbao Valladolid Madrid Toledo Región Este Región Madrid Región Centro Región Norte Región Oeste Control Centre Valencia Alicante Alava Network Area around km Low Voltage Customers 70% Urban 12% Suburban 17% Rural MVA = Total Capacity 687 MVA Installed capacity (1775 T.C.) 547 MVA Contracted capacity (799 T.C.) Km of lines 80% aerial 20% underground

9 Prague, 8-11 June 2009 DSO 30kV/13,2kV simplified network JUNDIZ 14,4 x 2 Mvar BADAIA 50 MW ALI PUENTELARRA Transformer 220/30 kv - TSO-DSO Boundary Capacitors MVAR DER (Wind farms) MW AMARRA 14,4 x 2 Mvar TXAORRITXU 14,4 Mvar 0,5 MW BERANZO OJAIN MICHELIN 2,7 MW 1,2 MW ENVIROIL 47 MW 2,0 MW PV HOSPITAL 0,3MW HOLZLAN 2,0 MW 1,0 MW ELUEA SEARSA UASCOR 2,7 MW 12 MW 5,4 x 4 Mvar ANTOÑANA URKILLA 1,2 MW 32 MW SALINERA 7,5 MW Market (OMEL) DER (CHP) MW Small Hydro and renewable units MW Transformation 30/13,2 kv 13,2 kv ALSASUA TSO (REE) DSO(IBD) Fenix 320 MW peak demand DER 168 MVA Installed capacity ELUEA 30 MW Aggregator

10 DER participants Main challenge Unit Location MVA Connection Type Cog. Fabrica Neumáticos Michelin Vitoria 47 Barras de 30 kv de amarra CHP Cog. uascor I+D P.T. Miñano 12 L 30 kv amarra-villarreal 1-2 CHP Cog. Hospital de Santiago Vitoria 2,06 L 30 kv Este-Oeste CHP Cog. Hospital de Txagorritxu Vitoria 0,52 L 30 kv amarra-peña 1 CHP Cog. Kraslan P.I Jundiz 1 L 30 kv Jundiz-Ali 1-2 CHP Cog. Leia BT Villarreal 0,42 L 30 kv amarra-villarreal 1-2 CHP Cog. Salinera Añana Añana 7,56 L 30 kv Jundiz-Puentelarra 1-2 CHP Cog. Secados de Madera oiain P.I. oiain 2,72 L 30 kv amarra-villarreal 1-2 CHP P.E. Badaia Sierra de Badaia 50 Barras de 30 kv de Jundiz Wind P.E. ELEA-URKILLA Sierra de Urkilla 32,3 Barras de 30 kv de Elgea Wind Cog. Searsa P.I Jundiz 2,76 L 30 kv Jundiz-Ali 1-2 CHP Cog. Biometanización Vitoria 1,2 L 30 kv Jundiz-Ali 1 2 CHP-BIOMASS Fotovoltaico amarra Menor Vitoria 0,3 L 30 kv amarra-villarreal 1-2 PV Fotovoltaico ULLIBARRI-ARRAZUAVitoria 0,3 L 30 kv amarra-alsasua 1 PV Fotovoltaico en Pobes Pobes 0,1 L 30 kv Jundiz-Puentelarra 2 PV ZIOR Vitoria 1,1 L 30 kv amarra-villarreal 1-2 Back-up C.H. Araia San Pedro de A 0,96 STR ASPARRENA CTO 5 ARA Hydro C.H. Santa Cruz de Campezo Santa Cruz de C 0,96 STR ANTOÑANA CTO 1 SANTA Hydro Cog. Fundación Estadio Vitoria 0,96 STR OLARIZU CTO 2 ARETXA CHP Cog. Vertedero de ardelegui Vitoria 0,65 STR OLARIZU CTO 1 BERAN CHP C.H. Pedruzo Vitoria 0,7 STR OLARIZU CTO 1 BERAN Hydro C.H. Antoñana Antoñana 0,44 Barras STR ANTOÑANA Hydro Huerta Solar en Legarda Legarda 0,7 STR NANCLARES CTO 3 TRES PV Huerta Solar en Treviño Treviño 0,19 STR OLARIZU CTO 1 BERAN PV FOTOVOLTAICA en Berganzo Berganzo 0,1 STR OLARIZU CTO 1 BERAN PV CH Contrasta Antoñana 0,2 STR ANTOÑANA CTO 1 SANTA Hydro FOTOVOLTAICA VALLE DE ARANAAntoñana 0,3 STR ANTOÑANA CTO 1 SANTA PV FOTOVOLTAICA SANTA CRUZ DE Antoñana 0,1 STR ANTOÑANA CTO 1 SANTA PV

11 What is demonstrated? Providing global services (TSO level) 1- Selling active power in the day ahead market 2- Tertiary reserve, balancing market 3- Selling reactive power capacity (PO7.4) Providing local services (DSO level) 4- Help maintaining voltages in lines (use case 4 ) 5- Under equipment outages, use active power generation to avoid reconfiguring the distribution network (simulated )

12 What is new? 1. Aggregating DER of different technologies 2. In Spain eneration schedules are validated only by TSO, considering the Transmission Network 3. Currently no SO is using DER capacities to give system support, eg. tertiary reserve 4. VVC optimizing Distribution networks that consider DER outputs as a control variables is non exiting (requires State Estimation in Distribution). 5. Back-up generators are not allowed to export energy into the network

13 If Current Status Quo FB - Communications CVPP - DEMS TVPP - DSO/TSO developments and operational costs Environmental benefits Energy price reduction FENIX future (Higher DER penetration) Tertiary reserve price reduction DER Losses reduction QoS improvement Benefit for society Peak reduction and consequently, network investment reduction Distribution Networks Transmission Networks Central eneration Central control Pasive control José M. Corera Spain Round Table RT4 DER Distribution and Transmission Networks Central eneration Fenix control

14 Regulatory recommendations Distribution network revenue regulation Metering and communication - Allow DNOs to benefit from active networks investments if defer capital expenditure - Unbundling of network businesses should not block cooperation among DER and network operators - Permit meters to establish real-time communications with other control devices - Request Interoperability among Europe Ancillary services -No unjustified barriers to distributed generators participation in ancillary services markets Subsidies for renewable energy generation and CHP - Support mechanisms for DER must allow to benefit from participating in ancillary service provision (ex. through Virtual Power Plants) José M. Corera Spain Round Table RT4

15 José M. Corera Spain Round Table RT4 Impact Potential impact is large, and grows with penetration ( as D becomes comparable in size to centralised generation, and hence implements more flexibility) However D was not designed technically to give support to the system. And still many barriers still exist (too many new things), and differ among countries At the end of the project an impact for the 2020 EU scenario will be released

16 We see FENIX as a forerunner to the future Smartgrids. But a lot has to be done yet. Thank you! José M. Corera Spain Round Table RT4