United Nations Development Programme Country: INDONESIA PROJECT DOCUMENT 1

Transcription

1

2 KEMENTERIAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP REPUBLIK INDONESIA United Nations Development Programme Country: INDONESIA PROJECT DOCUMENT 1 Project Title: UNPDF Outcome(s): UNDP Strategic Plan Environment and Sustainable Development Primary Outcome: CPD ( ): Expected CPAP Outcome(s): Expected CPAP Output (s) Those that will result from the project and extracted from the CPAP) Executing Entity/ Implementing Partner: Implementing Entity/Responsible Partners: Third National Communication to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Strengthened climate change mitigation and adaptation and environmental sustainability measures in targeted vulnerable provinces, sectors and communities 2.1. Enhanced capacity of Government of Indonesia to manage natural resources and energy 2.2. Potential impact of climate change reflected in policy framework at all levels Outcome 2.3 National institutions and other key stakeholders are coherently and effectively addressing climate change adaptation and mitigation and ozone layer protection Output Coordinated and harmonized financing for ODS phase out and climate change, including MLF, GEF, AF, SCCF, private sector sources etc. Ministry of Environment, Republic of Indonesia Ministry of Environment/ /Project Management Unit Brief Description The project Third National communication to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is aimed to (1) enable the GoI to design public policies and measures for mitigation and adaptation to address climate change, through (a) strengthening of technical capacity and institutional arrangement at national and local levels, and (b) assessing environmental, social and economic impacts of implementing these mitigation and adaption policies, and (2) to assist the GoI to carry out all the necessary activities to prepare the TNC and BUR to comply with its commitments to the UNFCCC, in agreement with Convention s Articles 4.1 and During the implementation, in addition to GEF fund of USD 4,500,000 and UNDP grant of USD $61,000, the project will be supported by in-kind contribution and parallel activities from the Government of Indonesia in the amount of USD 14,600,000 and UNDP in the amount of USD 89,000, JICA s parallel activities in the amount of USD 6,122,040, and GIZ s parallel activities in the amount of USD 150,000 Programme Period: Total Allocated Resources: USD 4,561,000 ATLAS Award ID: Regular UNDP: USD 61,000 Project ID: Other GEF: USD 4,500,000 PIMS #: 5019 Start Date: 1 March 2014 End Date: 30 December 2016 Management Arrangement: NIM PAC Meeting Date: 4 November For UNDP supported GEF funded projects as this includes GEF-specific requirements

3

4 Table of Contents I. Situation Analysis 3 II. Strategy 11 III. Project Results Framework 25 IV. Total Budget and Work Plan 35 V. Management Arrangement 44 VI. Implementation Arrangement 54 VII. Monitoring Framework and Evaluation 56 VIII. Legal Context 61 IX. Annexes 63 Annex A: Detailed List of Project Activities and Potential Partner 63 Annex B: Risk Analysis.. 79 Annex C: Stakeholders Consultation during the Preparation of TNC Proposal. 82 Annex D: Terms of Reference 97 Annex E: Supplemental Provision of Legal Context. 102 Annex F: Country Office Support Service (COSS) Agreement. 106 Annex G: Co-Financing Letters.. 108

5 Acronyms AFOLU BAPPENAS BAU BIG BMKG BNPB BPPT BPS BUR COP CT-CC DNPI GCMs GHG Agriculture, Forestry, and Other Land Use Badan Perencanaan dan Pembangunan Nasional (National Development Planning Agency) Business As Usual Badan Informasi Geospasial (National Agency for Geospatial Information) Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi dan Geofisika (Agency of Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysics) Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana (National Agency for Disaster Management) Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi (Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology) Badan Pusat Statistik (Central Bureau of Statistics) Biennial Update Reporting Conference of the Parties Coordination Team on Climate Change Dewan Nasional Perubahan Iklim (National Council on Climate Change) General Circulation Models Greenhouse Gas GIZ Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (German International Cooperation) GOI Government of Indonesia ICA INC IPCC IPPU JICA KLH LAPAN LIPI LULUCF MRV NAMA NATCOM NPC International Consultation and Analysis Initial National Communication Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Industrial Processes and Product Use, Japan International Cooperation Agency Kementerian Lingkugan Hidup (Ministry of Environment) Lembaga Penerbangan dan Antariksa Nasional (National Institute of Aeronautics and Space) Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (Indonesian Institute of Sciences) Land Use, and Lund Use Change and Forestry Measuring, Reporting, and Verification Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Action National Communication National Project Coordinator Page 1

6 NPD NSC PDPAL QA QC RAD-GRK RAN-API RAN-GRK RPJMN SC-SIGN SIGN SNC TEC UKP4 UNFCCC V&A Assessment National Project Director National Steering Committee Perusahaan Daerah Pengolahan Air Limbah (Provincial Owned Wastewater Treatment Enterprise/ Company) Quality Assurance Quality Control Sub-national Action Plan to Reduce GHG Emissions National Action Plan for Climate Change Adaptation National Action Plan to Reduce GHG Emissions National Medium Term Development Plan National Steering Committee for National GHG Inventory System National GHG Inventory System Second National Communication Technical Expert Committee Unit Kerja Presiden Bidang Pengawasan & Pengendalian Pembangunan (President s Delivery Unit for Development Monitoring and Oversight) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation Assessment Page 2

7 I. SITUATION ANALYSIS 1.1. Project Rationale and Policy Conformity Indonesia signed the Climate Change Convention (UNFCCC, United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change) in Rio in 1992, which was then ratified in 1994 through Law no. 6/1994. Under this framework, Indonesia, which is a non-annex 1 country, is committed to fully implementing the convention. Under one of the requirements of the convention, Indonesia has to report its activities aimed at addressing the climate change to the UNFCCC through the National Communication on Climate Change. The National Communication contains information on national circumstances, GHG inventory and projection, mitigation action plan (including related cost, expected funding and relevant policies), vulnerability and adaptation assessment (including action plan for adaptation, related costs, expected funding and relevant policies), institutional arrangement, and plan for improvement of future national communication. Following the Decision 1/CP.16, paragraph 60, the Conference of the Parties decided to enhance the reporting in national communications, including inventories from non-annex I Parties, on mitigation actions and their effects, and support received. In this regards as defined in the Decision 2/CP.17, the non-annex I Parties should also submit Biennial Update Report (BUR) consistent with their capabilities and the level of support provided for reporting. The Purpose of the BUR is to provide an update to the most recently submitted National Communication. The BUR will provide: (i) updates of national GHG inventories including a national inventory report; (ii) information on mitigation actions including a description, analysis of the impacts and associated methodologies and assumptions, progress in implementation and information on domestic measurement, reporting and verification; and (iii) needs and support received. Indonesia is now proposing to prepare its First BUR and the Third National Communication (TNC). Through this proposal, Indonesia makes a request for resources from GEF to prepare its TNC and BUR fits within the described context and is prepared in accordance with UNFCCC guidance. The envisaged TNC Project, which will be implemented by UNDP Indonesia, has been endorsed by the GoI in a letter dated 03/16/ Context and Global Significance: Environmental, Policy and Institutional Environment, Geography and Demography Indonesia is an archipelago with 5 big islands (Sumatera, Java, Kalimantan, Sulawesi, and Papua) and 17,000 other small islands, located between 6 o 08 N and 11 o 15 S, from 94 o 45 to 141 o 05 E. Among the small islands, 56% are nameless and 7% are inhabited. The total population of this country is 248 million peoples in 2011, in which 59% lived in Java Island. The country comprises of 33 provinces and 497 cities/regencies, and is comprised of 7.9 mill-sq.km maritime area (81% total area, 1.9 mill-sq. km land area with 54,700 km coastline). Since 2005, the Republic of Indonesia has been divided administratively into 33 provinces. Each of these provinces has its own local government. Indonesia has a great variety of climates with distinct regional characteristics, from rainy equatorial climate in the west to semi-arid climate in the east where annual rainfall rates are low. With its vast size and geographical position, Indonesia is one of the most important repositories of the world s forests and biodiversity after Brazil. In the early 1980s Indonesia had more than 75% of the total area under forests. Due to rapid deforestation, by 2009, the forested area in Indonesia declined to about 52% and more than half of the forests are secondary forest with various level of degradation. Land use, and land use changes, forestry and agriculture make up a large share of Indonesia s GHG emissions (over 60%). Page 3

8 Data from the National Disaster Management Agency (BNPB) indicates that climate-induced disasters occur more frequently than other disasters. Historical records from this source, dating back almost two centuries ( ), show that the top four disasters in Indonesia are dominated by climate-induced incidents, notably flood (37,8%), windstorm (17,8%), landslide (17,8%), and drought (12,8%) Economy In 2005, the GDP of Indonesia was 245 billion USD or 1,751 trillion IDR at constant prices (at 2000) with a per capita income of 1,300 USD or million IDR. The major contributors of the GDP are manufacturing (28%), trade (16.7%), agriculture (15.4%), and services (10.17%). During , the GDP growth was in the range of % per year with an inflation rate of 6-7%. In 2005, Indonesia s exports were valued at 69 billion USD (oil and gas, coal, copper, textile) while imports were at 44.8 billion USD (food, chemical, consumer good). In 2010, the GDP level increased to 253 billion USD or 2,311 trillion IDR at constant prices (at 2000), with a per capita income of 3,000 USD or million IDR. The annual growth of the GDP during was 5-6%. It is expected that Indonesian economy will grow at a moderate rate of around % per year. National Climate Change Policies Prior to and after the COP13, GoI has made significant progress in addressing climate change issues. Prior to COP13 at Bali, Ministry of Environment in December 2007 issued the National Action Plan on Climate Change (RANPI), which describes climate change policies and short-medium-long term climate change program. National Development and Planning Agency (BAPPENAS) further refined the RANPI, and produced a document called National Development Planning: Indonesia responses to climate change, called Yellow Book. Following that, in 2010 BAPPENAS developed a progressive policy framework for climate change, i.e., Indonesia Climate Change Roadmap (ICCSR), which lays down the principles, approach and priorities to mainstream climate change adaptation and mitigation into development planning. This is to bridge the National Action Plan on Climate Change into a 5 year Mid- Term Development Plan (RPJMN) for , and to provide inputs for the subsequent RPJMN until In regard to climate change mitigation, GoI s has targeted to reduce GHG emissions and enhance its capacity towards sustainable development. President of Indonesia stated at the G20 Summit in September 2009 and reiterated at UNFCCC COP 15/CMP 5 in December 2009 that by 2020 Indonesia will have reduced GHG emissions by 26 percent unilaterally and up to 41 percent with international support, as compared to Business as Usual baseline. Along with a target to reduce GHG emission by 26 percent by 2020, the Government has issued Presidential Decree No. 61 Year 2011 on National Action Plan on GHG Emission Reduction (RAN-GRK), which provides the working plan document for implementing direct and indirect activities related to GHG emission reduction. RAN-GRK is a guidance to line ministries in planning, implementing, monitoring, and evaluating the national action plan of GHG emission reduction; guidance to provincial governments in formulating regional action plan for reducing GHG emission (RAD GRK), and a reference to community and private sector in planning and implementing GHG emission reduction. In the same year the Government also issued Presidential Decree No. 71 Year 2011 on preparation of National GHG Inventory that aims to provide regular information on level, status, and trend of GHG emission and removals, including carbon stock at national, provincial and municipal/regency levels; and to provide information on GHG emission reduction achievement of national climate change mitigation actions. Following this regulation, the GoI under the Ministry of Environment is in the process of establishing the National System for GHG Inventory (called SIGN). The SIGN serves as a good basis for Page 4

9 the implementation of national and sub-national GHG inventories which are necessary for the further development and especially for the development and implementation of RAN/RAD-GRK. To achieve the emission reduction target, GoI will prioritize the efforts to reduce the emission from land use change and forestry (LUCF) and peatland. As this sector will play a key role in reducing the emissions, a national strategy for reducing emission from deforestation and degradation and including role of forest conservation, sustainable forest management and sink enhancement (REDD+) has been developed by the REDD+ Taskforce under the coordination of UKP4 (called STRANAS REDD). For the implementation of REDD+, GoI received support from various bilateral development agencies, including Germany, Japan, Australia, and Norway and also from multilateral agencies. In particular, Norwegian Government set up a bilateral agreement through Letter of Intent (LoI) with the GoI to support the implementation of REDD+. As the implementation of REDD+ is cross sectoral, in 2010, President of Indonesia assigned UKP4 to form REDD+ Task Force to coordinate the implementation of REDD+. As part of GoI commitment in the LoI, during the process of preparation of REDD+ implementation, GoI agreed to evaluate forest policies, regulations and programs and suspend the issuance of permits on forest area for two years. On May 20, 2011, President of Indonesia issued Presidential Instruction No. 10/2011 to postpone the issuance of new permits and improvement of management of primary forest and peatland for a period of two years after the issuance of the instruction. The moratorium was further extended for 2 additional years pursuant to Presidential Instruction No. 6/2013. Regarding adaptation to climate change, GoI is also in the process of preparing the National Action Plan for Adaptation (called RAN API). The RAN API is aimed to provide direction for sectors and local governments in developing climate change adaptation actions and to develop synergy across sectors and other organizations (CSOs) in the implementation of adaptation actions. Consultations with local governments are still under progress for the RAN API and it is expected to be completed by the end of To support and accelerate the implementation of climate change programs, the GoI established a number of innovative arrangements to link international financial resources with national investment strategies. For example, Indonesian Climate Change Trust Fund (ICCTF) aims to be a showcase of an alternative financing mechanism for climate change mitigation and adaptation programs. GoI also used climate change loan from Japan and France to support the climate change programs. In addition, the Ministry of Finance has identified a number of short and long-term fiscal policies (Ministry of Finance, 2009) required to encourage the different sectors and local governments to develop policies and programs that lead to low carbon development, particularly for energy and land use and land use change sectors (LULUCF). The Ministry of Finance has established a Task Force with an assignment to develop, evaluate and implement fiscal policy and other financial instruments that can increase the capacity of Indonesia in mitigating and adapting to climate change in an effective and efficient manner. This Task Force is expected to formulate optimal combinations of existing fiscal policies and financing approaches that ensure the achievement of climate change programs Baseline Analysis Indonesia submitted its Initial National Communication (INC) document to UNFCCC in 1999 and the Second National Communication (SNC) in These two UNDP/GEF EA projects have made significant contribution in building capacity in the country to prepare these National Communications (NATCOMs). There were many improvements made in the SNC as compared to the INC. 2 Ministry of Finance, 2009 Page 5

10 GHG Inventory The improvements in the SNC compared to the INC include: 1. In the INC, the involvement of sectoral experts was very limited and most of the work was done by the GHG inventory consultant. In the SNC, the preparation of the GHG inventory was still largely by the consultants, however sectoral experts were actively engaged in the process of the development of the inventory. Formal Working Group on inventory represented by various related sectoral experts was formed to work with the consultant in producing the inventory. 2. The INC used revised 1996 IPCC Guideline and the SNC used 2006 IPCC Guidelines. In the INC all sectors used Tier 1 (IPCC defaults) while the SNC used both Tier 1 and 2. Tier 2 was applied for agriculture and land use change and forestry sectors. These sectors used country specific emission factors instead of IPCC default values. The SNC also provided time series estimates of GHG emissions. 3. Unlike the INC, the SNC performed key category and uncertainty analysis. However, the uncertainty analysis was performed using expert judgment. The GHG Inventories of neither the INC nor the SNC had a QA/QC system and no plan was described for the development of the QA/QC, including an archiving system. After experiencing two NATCOM documents preparation, Indonesian government officials and GHG experts become familiar with the process of preparing a national communication. However, there is still need for capacity building for human resources, particularly for the government officials. The experts involved in the previous NATCOM need to be updated with information regarding recent developments of GHG related issues, such as methodologies, procedures, reporting systems and institutional arrangements. There are several issues that need to be addressed in the next NATCOM, including more accurate activity data, coverage of key sources, emission factors, methodology, accuracy in measurement (increase from TIER 1 to higher TIER), and institutional arrangements. Addressing these issues will require continuous support, i.e. capacity building, strengthening of institutions and cooperation among these institutions, establishment of integrated systems for GHG inventory and monitoring of the achievement of GHG mitigation actions. Other issues on GHG inventory relate to the Presidential Regulations 71/2011. According to this regulation, the responsible parties in developing GHG inventory include the central government, the regional government, and also large industries (in the context of GHG emissions potential). The involvement of regional governments and also large industries makes the process of GHG inventory a bottom up process. This bottom up GHG inventory process is a positive development in encouraging regional governments and large industries to be more aware of climate change issues as well as improving the accuracy of activity data. However, the capability of regional governments and large industries is still limited and therefore require robust capacity building efforts. Otherwise, there will be a delay in the submission of the GHG inventory report and the accuracy of the inventory may vary among regions. Concerning large industries, currently the provisions that determine which industry has to report their GHG emission level is not yet available. The industry that has to report their GHG emission level will be determined based on the GHG emission thresholds. The provision concerning the thresholds is currently under preparation by the Ministry of Environment and relevant ministries. To coordinate the development of the National GHG Inventory as mandated by the regulation, KLH has established a National Steering Committee for National GHG Inventory System (SC-SIGN). The SC- SIGN will be supported by sectoral working groups. Page 6

11 Mitigation Unlike the INC, the SNC provided projection of GHG emissions for all the sectors up to 2030 under the Business as Usual (BAU) and mitigation scenarios. The related sectors through the Mitigation Working Group are actively involved in the process of developing GHG projections. However, those GHG projections, which were developed independently or through dynamic interactions among sectors, the methodology which affect the rate of emission, were not taken into account. For example, assumption on development of new agriculture areas will affect the assumption used for deforestation. This relationship was not reflected in the SNC. Based on lessons learned from the SNC, it is clear that integrated modeling for developing projection of emissions would be required to develop consistent and reliable emission projections. To coordinate and provide general direction for line ministries and local governments in the development and implementation of RAN/RAD GRK, the Minister for BAPPENAS has established the National Coordination Team for Climate Change (ST-CC), which is supported by six sectoral working groups and one of the working groups taking care of the adaptation issue. BAPPENAS also led RAN-GRK Secretariat to develop Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) guidelines for the implementation of RAN/RAD-GRK activities. Following the Durban decision, the implementation of mitigation actions have to be measured/monitored, reported and verified (MRV). The progress of mitigation actions implementation has to be reported biennially under the BUR. The MRV concept itself is relatively new for Indonesia and its national guideline has to be developed. In addition, a plan to establish an MRV agency which covers all sectors is still under discussion. To add to this, there are several new initiatives within GOI that aim to develop their own MRV systems. Therefore, a domestic MRV system, which is one of the BUR components, is not yet clearly defined. Support to address the above issues such as MRV methodology, implementation, institutional arrangement for MRV Agency, methodology to monitor the achievement of mitigation actions particularly at years before the stated target year of the commitment, etc., is required and will be discussed in the TNC. The diagram below shows the contemplated MRV institutional framework for mitigation actions in Indonesia. Page 7

12 Vulnerability and Adaptation Assessment Unlike the INC, some vulnerability assessment and adaptation options have been addressed and described in the SNC. Special attention was given to the observed climatic change and prediction by using 14 General Circulation Models (GCMs), which incorporated expected changes in temperature and precipitation, and their biophysical impacts on water availability, rice productivity, human health (malaria and dengue), coastal and forest fire. However, assessment of socio-economic implications of climate change was very limited. In addition, the basis for the assessment was at the national level, while it is important to also have an assessment at sub-national level (provincial or district or watershed or ecosystem level). The development of capacity of local stakeholders in conducting vulnerability and adaptation assessment (V&A Assessment) is very crucial and availability and accessibility of climate data and climate change scenarios for impact studies is also considerably important. In order to fulfill the objective of the proposed TNC activities, better time-space data coverage for Indonesia at national and sub-national levels is needed. This can be done by synthesizing different sources of observed data and create climate data reconstructions that could represent long temporal records as well as better representation on the resolution of spatial coverage (high horizontal resolution data). Better time-space coverage of historical data will not only help us to get a better understanding on historical climatic change but also provide a reliable baseline for the assessment of impacts, vulnerability, and adaptation policies and measures to address climate change, variability and climate extremities. In addition, to support the proposed activities and objective of TNC, a new generation of climate change scenarios (different from SRES, which was developed without considering mitigation policies) have been introduced by Moss et al. (2010). The introduction of these new scenarios opens the need to update all climate change projections studies that may complement or revise previous climate change projection studies. Through this new set of scenarios, which was developed for the preparation of the IPCC s 5 th Assessment Report that is due in 2013/2014, the IPCC has given more emphasis on the need for nearterm climate change projections that equate decadal/interdecadal climate predictions. This near-term Page 8

13 climate change timescales covers 10 to 30 years climate change projections based on extensive simulations of climate models that produce hindcasts since 1960s and projections up to year Such specific timescales could patch existing gaps found in the AR4 and may fit more with the need of end users (policy/decision makers) in addressing climate change adaptation actions especially at local/regional levels. In the context of TNC development, the new climate change scenarios may potentially provide revisions and updates on climate change projections for Indonesia. This could raise more expectations on plausible climate change projections especially related to climate extremities. Consequently, addressing this new scenario in the next TNC report would be important. Through the revisions of historical and projection of climate data, the proposed TNC would take the process a step further and would represent a strategic tool to integrate climate change considerations into sectoral policies and programs at national and sub-national levels. The proposed project will aim at the integration of climate change policies and measures with policies, strategies and programs currently underway. The TNC would create a key tool for decision makers at all levels by providing them with in depth vulnerability and adaptation assessments and with continuous and solid climate data Barrier Analysis Since Indonesia has produced two national communications reports, no major barriers are anticipated in producing the TNC. However, there are some potential minor barriers that need to be addressed: (a) Lack of technical capacity: There is a need for improving technical capacity among the national, sectoral and provincial inventory experts and V&A experts at provincial level to adopt the most recent models, methodologies and guidelines. (b) Access to multiple and integrated models and data: During TNC preparation, it is proposed to adopt multiple downscaled GCMs at finer grid scales along with Regional Climate Models. Similarly macro-economic mitigation models and multi-sectoral models are proposed to be adopted. Access to models and data needs will be addressed during the project. (c) Coordination with National and Local Stakeholders: Indonesia is a large country with 33 provinces and thus coordination could be a challenge. However, with the establishment of Coordination Team on Climate Change (CT-CC) under BAPPENAS, the coordination may be facilitated to a certain degree. The CT-CC is responsible for providing general direction to line ministries and local governments in the implementation of RAN-GRK and RAN-API and for establishing policy and strategy recommendations in addressing climate change mitigation and adaptation. In addition, SIGN Center, established under KLH, will be responsible for coordinating GHG inventory development. The project may invite Ministry of Home Affairs to also support coordination with subnational governments. (d) Non-availability of finance: The nature and quantum of tasks is contingent upon the timely and adequate availability of finance, particularly grant for the preparation of BURs and TNC. These attributes of financial arrangement would be a significant barrier in achieving the desired outcomes/objectives of the various elements 1.5. Stakeholder Engagement The preparation of BURs and TNC will involve multi-stakeholders. The stakeholders of the project are the Government of Indonesia and the Indonesian people whom it represents, the policymakers at national and local level (provincial, districts and municipalities), local communities, the scientific community, industry, and all those who could be affected by climate change and actions to mitigate and adapt to climate change. At national level, the project will form a National Steering Committee (NSC) under the chairmanship of Deputy Minister for the Control of Environmental Degradation and Climate Change. The NSC will have members from those administrative government Ministries/Departments (i.e., KLH, BAPPENAS, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Forestry, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, Page 9

14 Ministry of Industry, Ministry of Home Affairs, BMKG, BNPB, BPPT, LAPAN, LIPI, BIG), and related national councils. The NSC also contemplates inviting representatives from civil society organizations, community based organizations, women s organization, and representatives of indigenous community and other disadvantaged groups, as appropriate (as observers) which are concerned with the various elements of information in the TNC and BUR to the National Steering Committee meetings. The NSC will oversee the preparation and implementation of the work programme of the TNC and the BUR. Technical consultations are envisaged on multi-disciplinary aspects of the information relating to GHG inventories, impacts, vulnerability and adaptation, climate scenarios, sea level rise etc. In addition to the line ministries and other government institutions relevant for climate change mitigation and adaptation, provincial/districts/municipalities decision making bodies will also be involved in the process, particularly in provinces and districts selected for the implementation of pilots related to GHG inventory, mitigation and V&A assessment. Page 10

15 II. STRATEGY The proposed Enabling Activity Project will assist the GoI to perform the activities necessary to prepare the BURs and TNC to the COP in accordance with the UNFCCC. The BUR will have four main components: A. National inventory of anthropogenic emissions by sources and removal by Sinks for for the first BUR and for the second BUR B. Mitigation actions and their effects, including associated methodologies and assumptions C. Level of support received to enable the preparation and submission of biennial update reports D. Domestic measurement, reporting and verification The TNC consist of five main components: A. Description of national circumstances and other relevant information B. National inventory of anthropogenic emissions by sources and removal by Sinks for C. General description of steps taken or envisaged to implement the Convention D. Assessment of the impacts, vulnerability and adaptation policies and measures to address climate change, variability and extreme events E. GHG mitigation policies and measures to address climate change F. Constraints and gaps, and related financial, technical and capacity needs Project goal and objectives The project Third National communication to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is aimed to enable the GoI to design public policies and measures for mitigation and adaptation to address climate change, through (a) strengthening of technical capacity and institutional arrangement at national and local levels, and (2) assessing environmental, social and economic impacts of implementing these mitigation and adaption policies. The project aims to assist the GoI to carry out all the necessary activities to prepare the TNC and BUR to comply with its commitments to the UNFCCC, in agreement with Convention s Articles 4.1 and Beneficiaries All the institutions involved in the preparation of the TNC and BUR (i.e., line ministries, subnational governments, CSOs) will benefit directly from the Project and through the proposed Technical Assistance (TA) activities. Other indirect benefits from the Project include the institutional and coordination arrangements that will be either established or reinforced during the preparation of the TNC or BUR. Environmental benefits No direct environmental benefits are associated due to the proposed Enabling Activity Project. However, the implementation of the project activities is expected to generate global environmental benefits through the studies and information which will be the basis for efforts to mitigate Indonesia s GHG emissions and enhance carbon sinks, and to reduce its vulnerability to the impacts of climate change. The updated GHG emissions inventory for the period will assist in the development of more efficient and effective policies and measures to address climate change in key sectors at the national and provincial levels. The expected outcomes of this project will improve Indonesia s capacity to respond to climate change, in conformity with sustainable development. The project development of the TNC represents the fulfilment of Indonesia s commitments as a non-annex I Party to the UNFCCC and its Kyoto Protocol. Strategy for the Implementation Page 11

16 The development of the BURs and TNC will be performed with following strategies: a. Strengthen existing working groups established in line ministries in response to the issuance of national policy guidelines on climate change for developing the BURs and TNC. b. Conduct a series of consultations and engagement of stakeholders, including consultation workshops. The stakeholder involvement in development of TNC is critical. The process for developing the TNC should be clearly defined, in particular, how the different stakeholders are engaged and are able to provide input. c. Create and lay out framework to strengthen a link between line ministries/local governments in the development of subsequent action plans for reducing GHG emission, subsequent GHG inventories, adaptation plans and actions and national communication, by defining an institutional structure and identifying the basis for future cooperation and information exchange as well as cooperation with other national and international institutions. d. Improve the capacity of technical staff of the line ministries, research institutions and local governments in the development of GHG inventory, climate modeling and statistical climate downscaling, and vulnerability and climate impact assessments. e. Improve the knowledge and understanding of the opportunities for Indonesia to use the reliable GHG inventory estimates for reducing GHG emissions and strengthen resilience to the impacts of climate change based on new studies, models, methodologies and tools. f. Perform expert consultations on a continuous basis with all the institutions involved in the preparation of the TNC, including the local government and other related stakeholders, who may also participate in reviewing the draft TNC. g. Improve the involvement of line ministries and local governments in the process of preparation of the TNC. KLH will ensure wider representation and transparency by involving, on an Ad-Hoc basis, key stakeholders, including, among others, experts from different line ministries, academic institutions, CSOs, United Nations Volunteers, and private sector. h. Strengthen technical working groups and provide resources needed for the preparation of NATCOMs to support the continuity of the process. i. Ensure integration of gender perspective into key relevant outputs, particularly V&A component. j. Assist decision makers in the designing of GHG mitigation policies and measures at national level in the context of national actions plan to address climate change and in the definition of research priorities. k. This project may also engage United Nations Volunteers, if appropriate candidates are found, as a cost effective measure to support coordination and stakeholder engagement. Project components, Outcomes and Outputs The UNDP/GEF TNC Enabling Activity in Indonesia will have the following outcomes and outputs. A detailed list of project activities and potential partners is presented in Annex A. Component A: National GHG Inventory Outcome #A1 National and local institutional arrangements for GHG inventories designed and strengthened. Output A1.1. Established quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) system for activity data and guidelines for organizing inventory Page 12

17 This project output will create and layout foundation for rigorous systems/procedures for quality control (QC) and validation of activity data and relevant parameters of GHG inventory, provide guidelines for collecting, archiving, and organizing GHG inventory data to improve TNC and subsequent inventories, and establish expert team, systems, and procedures for the implementation of quality assurance (QA) of the inventory results at national as well as local level. QA/QC comprise of several interrelated activities, i.e. data collection and archiving procedures, manpower (for data collection and quality control, emission calculation, inventory quality assurance and archiving), institutional arrangement (who is doing what), and infrastructure (for national GHG emission inventory system). In the previous system, particularly those that were implemented in developing the SNC, there were several weaknesses. For example, all activity data and other relevant parameters of GHG inventory were collected from national statistics published by relevant sector and Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS). The GHG inventory was carried out using Tier 1 approach, in which the emission factors used were default value of IPCC 2006 Guideline. Data quality control and validation were not implemented in the SNC. Limited quality control of activity data was carried out at the working group level simply by checking the data used for GHG estimation of each sector. Limited quality assurance of the SNC inventory was carried out by international expert (provided by UNDP). QA system and archiving/organization of GHG inventory are not yet available in Indonesia. Therefore, improvement of QA/QC and establishment of guideline for organizing GHG inventory are proposed for TNC development. To achieve the above mentioned improvement of QA/QC and establishment of inventory organization guideline, the following main activities are proposed: - development of data QC and validation procedures, - development of QA system and procedures, - development of guidelines for organizing GHG inventory. The procedures for data QC and validation are to be developed by KLH and then discussed in focus group discussions involving line ministries/institutions, other stakeholders (Sub-national government, BPS, private sector, university/research institutions). In developing the procedures, reference will be made to the Good Practice Guideline (IPPC 2006 Guideline). In addition, this procedure development will also consider existing practices of data collection, resources, and human resources capacity in Indonesia. Gap analysis concerning the needs and the existing situation related to data QC and validation are to be used as the basis in designing capacity building activities for the implementation of the developed data QC and validation procedures. Currently, all ministries of relevant GHG sectors have division or unit that deals with data collection and archiving, i.e. Pusdatin (Center for Data and Information) of each ministry. Therefore, for developing TNC and subsequent GHG inventory activities, Pusdatin of ministries is expected to perform the data collection, QC and validation in each ministry. These Pusdatin are expected to be actively involved in the development of procedures for data QC and validation. In order to obtain credible data QC and validation, the individuals (Pusadatin member) involved in the QC activities must hold certificate to do inventory. Mechanism regarding the certification of individuals eligible for performing GHG inventory is currently under discussion in the KLH. TNC will contribute to the process of institutionalizing the GHG inventory development currently underway by SIGN Center under the coordination of KLH by providing capacity building and implementing pilots, which will include QC of data from line ministries and local governments. Through implementation of pilots, it is expected that GHG inventory QA/QC process will be established and refined as necessary. Similarly, QA system and procedures will be drafted by KLH and then discussed in focus group discussions involving line ministries/institutions, and other stakeholders (sub-national government, private sectors, universities and research institutions). The involvement of line ministries/institutions, subnational government, private sectors in the focused group discussions is necessary as they are the parties who will develop the inventory that will be verified by the QA team. The main issue of QA system and procedure development is to identify appropriate domestic expert team that is capable to perform quality procedures of GHG inventory and evaluate (quantitative analysis or Page 13

18 expert judgement) the degree uncertainty present in the GHG inventory. Therefore, an expert team must be composed of qualified individuals who fully understand the requirement of technical as well as management aspects of internationally accepted GHG inventory. The reference of QA procedures and requirements for the TNC and subsequent inventories is IPCC 2006 Guideline. Referring to the IPCC 2006 Guideline, the QA team should be an independent third party that is not involved in the development of GHG inventory. The logical candidates for the QA team are individuals from academic and research institutions. Similar to the requirement of QC, the individuals for QA also must hold certificate to do inventory. As MRV concepts are applied in the GHG inventory, the focused group discussions on QA/QC will also address how to include QA/QC as part of MRV process of GHG inventory. The GHG inventory in TNC and subsequent activities will cover national and sub-national inventory for several sectors/sub-sectors, therefore it is necessary to establish institutional arrangement among parties that will be involved in the implementation of QA/QC systems and procedures. The arrangement will also cover mechanism of data collection, control, verification and archiving/reporting from line ministries/institutions to KLH and from sub-national governments/ institutions to KLH and line ministries. The results of the institutional arrangement for QA/QC systems and procedures will be included in the guidelines for organizing GHG inventory. The GHG inventory organization covers institutional arrangement (who is doing what) for data collection/flow, determination of GHG estimation methodology, GHG estimation, QA/QC, documentation and reporting, etc. Guideline for organizing GHG inventory is one of the activities of guidelines for developing national GHG inventory. Other activities related to the implementation of QA/QC and the use of guidelines for organizing GHG inventory, i.e. dissemination of guideline and procedures and capacity building are described in Output A.1.3 to A.1.6. Output A.1.2 Established GHG emission estimation and validation guideline This output will focus on developing mechanisms and guidelines for GHG emission estimation and validation by relevant line ministries and Departments. The elements of GHG emission estimation system comprise of (1) methodology to determine key sources of GHG emission, GHG emissions level, required data and other GHG emission related parameters, and sources of data, (2) mechanism for data access and collection, (3) roles of responsible institutions (i.e. KLH, other line ministries/institutions, sub-national government), and (4) mechanism for GHG emission estimate reporting. The elements of GHG emission validation includes (i) methodology to validate data and GHG emission estimates, and to analyse the uncertainty level, (ii) mechanism for controlling GHG emission estimation, required data and emission parameters, sources of data, and the results of GHG emission estimation, (iii) roles of responsible institutions (KLH, line ministries/institutions, sub-national government), and (iv) mechanism for validation reporting. Based on the IPCC2006 Guidelines, the GHG emission estimation will cover four main sectors, namely energy, IPPU (industrial processes and product use), AFOLU (agriculture, forestry, and other land use), and waste. Activities of Output A.1.2 will focus on the development of GHG emission estimation in these four sectors and validation mechanism within related line ministries. To achieve this output, following activities are proposed. Review of existing system for estimating and validating GHG emission will be carried out by KLH, line ministry/institution, and sub-national government/institution, supported by expert team and industries/companies. Results of the review will be used to improve GHG emission estimation and validation systems. The improvement process will be advised by the NSC (comprised of designated officials from KLH and other line ministries /institutions) supported by expert team and industries/companies. The review will also evaluate the capacity of line ministries in estimating and Page 14

19 validating GHG emissions. The result of this review will be used as a basis in designing relevant capacity building activities (if needed). Mechanism for data access, collection and control, and GHG emission estimates within related line ministries will be developed internally by line ministry/institution and sub-national government. In developing the mechanism, each line ministry and sub-national government will identify appropriate division or unit that will be responsible for data access collection and control, and GHG emission estimates. Usually, this division/unit is the Pusdatin of the line ministries. These identification processes will also include evaluation of the capacity of those divisions/units. The result of this evaluation will be used as a basis in designing relevant capacity building activities (if needed). Output A1.3. Established institutional arrangement for developing GHG inventory in two sectors (agriculture and waste). Activities under this output aims to facilitate the process of establishing institutional mechanisms and to develop capacity in GHG inventory focusing on agriculture and waste sector. The institutional arrangement of agriculture and waste sectors are needed since both areas are heavily dependent on activity data from sub-national levels. Therefore, a robust institutional arrangement between sub-national and national level is very crucial in GHG inventory development. As of now, the capacity of sub-national government manpower is still limited and there is no clear institutional arrangement required for establishing GHG inventory. Therefore, capacity building is important in developing institutional arrangement. However, the development of institutional arrangement for the overall GHG inventory covering all sectors will be coordinated by the SIGN Center under the KLH as part of the TNC project. Output A1.4. Trained at least 40 technical staff of relevant sectors in the development of GHG Inventory This output aims at enhancing capacity of technical staff from relevant sectors in developing GHG inventory at national level. The inventory training will cover methodology to estimate the GHG emission (including the determination of Tier 1, 2, 3 approach), determination of key category of sources of GHG emissions (KCA, key category analysis), determination of accuracy level (uncertainty analysis), development (collecting and compiling) of activity data, conversion factor used in the preparation of activity data, selection of GHG emission factor, institutional arrangement for GHG emission inventory as well as QA/QC procedure, reporting format and mechanism, etc. Four key sources of GHG emission will be discussed during the training, i.e. energy, IPPU, AFOLU, and waste sectors. Since the training will cover GHG inventory at national level, GHG emissions in energy sector will cover top down (reference) and bottom up (sectoral) approaches. Efforts will be made to encourage the participation of female staff in the training. Output A1.5. Established institutional arrangement (capacity and mechanism) for developing GHG inventory and its integration into national GHG system for two administrative areas (DKI Jakarta and Riau Province) It is proposed to establish institutional arrangement for developing GHG inventory at two administrative areas (DKI Jakarta and Riau Province) that contribute significantly to national emissions. Key source of emission from DKI Jakarta is energy and transportation sectors, while for Riau Province is land-based emissions dominate i.e. agriculture, forestry and land use. The institutional arrangements of these two provinces will be integrated into the National GHG Inventory System (SIGN) at KLH. Experiences from this sub-national and sub-sectoral inventory assessments will be replicated as needed for other provinces and sectors. Output A1.6. Trained at least 20 technical staff in the development of GHG inventory at the two administrative areas Proposed activities under this output aims at developing capacity of technical staff from DKI Jakarta and Riau Province in the development of GHG inventory at sub-national level. The training will focus on Page 15

20 preparing and estimating GHG inventory in energy and transportation sectors for DKI Jakarta and AFOLU for Riau Province respectively. The training will cover methodology to estimate the GHG emission (including determination of Tier 1, 2, 3 approach), determination of key category of sources of GHG emissions (KCA, key category analysis), determination of accuracy level (uncertainty analysis), development (collecting and compiling) of activity data, conversion factor used in the preparation of activity data, selection of GHG emission factor, institutional arrangement for GHG emission inventory as well as QA/QC procedure, reporting format and mechanism, etc. Four key sources of GHG emission will be discussed during the training, i.e. energy, IPPU, AFOLU, and waste sectors. Since the training is focused on sub-national level, GHG emissions in energy sector will only cover and bottom up (sectoral) approach. Efforts will be made to encourage the participation of female staff in the training. Outcome #A2. Improved accuracy of GHG inventory through improved methodologies for estimating GHG emissions. Output A2.1. Developed and implemented local emission factor database for some sectors such as waste management, agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sectors including implementation of tier II and III methodologies for estimating GHG emissions and to improve activity data quality. Proposed activities under this output will develop local emission factors for GHG inventory of selected sources and categories, i.e. waste, agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sectors. The aim of the development of local emission factors is to provide appropriate local emission factors for use to improve the accuracy of GHG emission inventory by using higher tier methodologies (Tier 2 or 3). Besides developing local emission factors, activities of output A.2.1 will also cover researches or studies to improve activity data quality. Improvement of activity data quality and the use of local emission factors will eventually improve the accuracy of the GHG emission inventory. This output will also include development of tools and guidelines to be used for training and coaching of key stakeholders to learn how to use these methodologies or understand the data so that they can utilize the information in their daily work to ensure that the capacity is developed and retained by the institution. Output A2.2 Documented and established database for all sources and categories including local emission factors developed for AFOLU and waste sectors. The activities that will be conducted to realise this output aims at documenting and creating a database that stores all sources and categories including local emission factors developed for AFOLU and waste sectors emissions. It will adopt local emission factors or tier III methodologies for database improvement of activity data. Outcome #A3 Developed National GHG inventories for series using the latest IPCC inventory guidelines Output A3.1. Documented and published GHG emissions inventory and presented to stakeholders. This output aims at producing the GHG inventory documents and presenting to all the stakeholders. The latest IPCC guidelines and good practice guidance recommended by the UNFCCC would be adopted and some of the methodological improvements suggested in the IPCC GHG Inventory Guidelines-2006 would also be adopted. The main activities covered under this output include consultations on a continuous basis among the experts participating in the preparation of the GHG inventory and presentation of preliminary results to the institutions involved in order to seek their inputs and feedback to improve the inventory. These institutions will also review the GHG inventory final draft. Through seminars and workshops, results of the GHG inventory will be presented to relevant stakeholders. Finally, the GHG inventory report for will be published in 2014 and for in Output A3.2. GHG inventory for is publicly available on the web. Page 16

21 The main activity proposed under this output aims at disseminating the GHG emissions inventory. The teams in charge of the preparation of the inventory will participate in the public events to disseminate information and present the results. In addition, the GHG emissions inventory will be posted in KLH web and in other relevant web query systems. Component B. Assessment of the impacts, vulnerability and adaptation policies and measures to address climate change, variability and extreme events Outcome # B1. Availability of historical and projection of climate data at national level with a resolution of 20 km x20 km with public access As dominant part of Maritime Continent region, Indonesia has very complex and unique weather and climate patterns. Understanding weather and climatic pattern in the region requires massive and extensive climate data that could cover better time-space resolution from high to low frequency timescales as well as a wide range of coverage from national, sub-national to local levels. A climate data produced at national level with high horizontal resolution would be very important, especially for climate variability and climate change analysis for the country. Unfortunately, there is no product with gridded climate data at national level with high horizontal resolution available in the country. Additionally, a publically available database to support the V&A assessment at national and sub-national level is not yet available. This output of TNC would involve development of a national climate database for both historical observations and climate change projections with high horizontal grid resolution with access to researchers and the public. The availability of historical and projection of climate data at national and sub-national level would be essential for climate change and impact, vulnerability, and adaptation assessment and development of policies and measures to address climate change, variability and extremes. Output B1.1. Reconstructed monthly historical rainfall and temperature data ( ), established short term climate projections ( ) and long-term climate projections ( ) with resolution of 20 km x 20 km available with public accessibility. Activities under this output will focus on the development of historical and projection of climate data at resolution of 20 km x 20 km, which will be made accessible to the researchers and policy makers to improve V&A assessment at sectoral and local level. The historical climate data would comprise of reconstructed monthly historical rainfall and temperature data for the period with 20 km x 20 km resolution. This long-period climate data will be developed based on the combination of climate data from various sources, not only from BMKG (Indonesian Meteorological, Climatological and Geophysical Agency) station records but also from other global climate datasets such as CRU TS3.1, WCRP GPCC and TRMM datasets. In the previous NATCOMs, especially in the SNC, 14 GCMs were used for the future climate change projections at national level with a low resolution. During TNC, downscaled multiple GCMs will be adopted to make reliable projections along with uncertainty estimates. The GCM outputs from CMIP5 datasets that introduce the use of new generation of climate change scenarios will be used to provide updated climate change projections. There will be four scenarios that will be used for the TNC. Those four Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios are; RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0 and RCP8.5. The datasets will be downscaled to 20 km x 20 km resolutions for short term ( ) and long-term climate projections ( ). The short-term climate predictions will be based on the near-term climate change scenarios up to year It is expected that these near-term climate change projections will meet the needs of the policy- and decision-makers in developing adaptation strategies and plans for various sectors at sub-national and local levels for the next 10 to 30 years. In addition, the RCM (higher resolution of climate models) simulations will be performed for selected Initial Condition/Boundary Condition data and scenario. It is also possible to include the CORDEX-based RCM projections when they become available. The historical and climate change projection data would be suitably converted into appropriate data formats for impact, vulnerability and adaptation assessments and a centralized database on climate change projections would be created. This output will also include the development of tools and guidelines to be used for training and coaching of key stakeholders to understand the data produced, Page 17

22 and learn how to use the information in their daily work to ensure that the capacity is developed and retained by the institution. Output B1.2. Validated daily and hourly historical rainfall and temperature data for some areas to support climate impact assessment case studies. The activities that will be conducted to realise this output are focused on validating daily and hourly historical rainfall and temperature data against observed data, before it is used for climate impact assessment. To validate the reconstructed rainfall and temperature data, historical data from BMKG stations will be used. The hourly increment precipitation data found at the BMKG stations in some areas will be used to verify the temporal accuracy of the model simulation. The validated daily data will be used as a basis for historical climate analysis especially for extreme events as well as a reference for statistical bias corrections of RCM simulation outputs. The outputs of RCM will be obtained from running one or more RCMs for selected regions in Indonesia. Output B1.3. Trained scientists for climate modeling and climate statistical downscaling. Lack of trained scientists in the area of climate modeling and downscaling is an existing condition in Indonesia, resulting in absence of published information on high resolution climate change projections for the country. Given the need to improve and extend climate change projections over different regions at sub-national level in the country, it is important for the TNC to conduct systematic capacity building related to the development of climate modeling and downscaling skills and knowledge. This activity is expected to train scientists to define climate scenarios using regional climate models and undertake statistical downscaling. Guideline modules will be developed to support the training activities. The scientists may come from research centers of line ministries, BMKG, universities and research institutes. These activities would also be used to identify researchers and groups that could be involved in the development of integrated climate change scenarios at different regions in Indonesia. Efforts will be made to encourage the participation of female staff in the training. Output B1.4. Implemented analysis of climate variability and climate change at National level (historical and projection) using output of B1.1 and B1.2. In this output, all of historical and climate change projections data collected and developed under outputs B1.1 and B.1.2 will be used as a standard for analyzing historical and future climate change for the TNC. The climate analysis will focus on defining historical and future climatology as well on analyzing climate variability, climate change and climate extreme events at national and sub-national level in Indonesia. The climate data will also be used to define climate threshold for climate risk assessment along with historical impact data from events such as floods, incidence of malaria, forest fire/hot spot data, tides, etc. or a result of simulation modeling. For future climate change projections, these activities will focus on uncertainty analysis, including the use of multi-model ensemble (MME) for climate change projections at sub-national and local levels. Outcome # B2. Vulnerability, climate impact analysis and adaptation assessments carried out at local level in key sectors. There were many limitations in the V&A assessment conducted in the previous NATCOMs that now need to be addressed in the TNC. The V&A assessment conducted in the SNC was limited only for a few regions in Indonesia and did not conduct spatial analysis. In addition, the assessment of climate change impact on socio-economic systems was very limited and the basis of the assessment was still at national level. Meanwhile, the analysis of climate change scenarios to assess climate extremes was still qualitative and only based on literature reviews and historical analysis. In light of this, the TNC will emphasize on a detailed assessment of climate extremes at sub-national level (provincial or district or watershed or ecosystem level). Further, climate change impacts and vulnerability will be assessed at local levels to enable development of appropriate adaptation options during TNC. Page 18

23 Output B2.1. Developed and implemented tools and methodologies for vulnerability and climate impact assessment. Vulnerability and impact assessment at sub-national level will require development and adoption of models, tools and methodologies that can be accessed and used by different parties. The activities proposed to realise this output envisages the development of models, tools and methodologies to assess vulnerability and climate impacts. A strategy will be developed for the future based on the results of the analysis of impact and vulnerability to climate change, climate variability and extreme events. Some simple tools and methods will be developed during TNC to significantly improve the direct participation and involvement of sectors and regions in vulnerability and impact assessment. The tools will have standard methodologies to assess vulnerability and climate impacts and allow comparisons and ranking of vulnerability between regions at sub-national level. Output B2.2. Trained local scientists on the use of vulnerability and climate impact assessment tools. This output will focus on capacity building in the area of vulnerability and climate impact assessment. It will be in line with activities in output B2.1. A number of local scientists will be trained to enhance capacity in using climate impact and vulnerability assessment tools and methods. The training modules will be prepared based on the tools and methodologies for vulnerability and climate impact assessment under B2.1. The local scientists who follow this capacity building may come from provincial governments, research institutes and universities. Efforts will be made to encourage the participation of female staff in the training. Output B2.3. Conducted at least 10 case studies on vulnerability, climate change impact and adaptation at local level with different focus (coastal, food crops, livestock, forest, fisheries, water resources etc.) including socio-economic impacts. The vulnerability and impact assessment studies in the previous NATCOMs and other studies were mostly performed at the level of first order impacts. While, assessment of climate change impacts and vulnerability on socio-economic conditions at sub-national level was very limited. Therefore, conducting more detailed studies will be essential. This output aims at conducting detailed case studies on climate change impacts, vulnerability, and adaptation at selected locations focusing on coastal, food crops, livestock, forest, fisheries, and water resources sectors. The studies will also analyze the socio-economic impact of climate change at the selected locations depending on local prioritization. Given the limited resources under the TNC, it is necessary to identify and select the regions and case studies as well as to prioritize sectors for detailed case studies, based on the level of vulnerability and impacts of the regions/sectors. The development of vulnerability profiles will be based on vulnerability indices for different sectors or sub sectors at sub-national level, such as cropping system or watershed level. The level of vulnerability of the sectors or the region will be depicted using GIS-based spatial mapping at sub-national level. Outcome # B3. Adaptation policies and measures to address climate change are designed at the local/sectoral level and integrated into national and local planning processes. A detailed assessment of the impacts of climate change and the development of vulnerability profiles will facilitate development of adaptation strategies and practices to enable different sectors and stakeholders to cope with the projected climate risks. Selection of adaptation strategies requires clear identification of the impacts, vulnerability and adaptive capacity as well as the knowledge about access to technology, information and finance. In the case of Indonesia where the impacts of climate change may vary at different local/sectoral level, it is necessary to develop adaptation policies and measures specifically designed at local/sectoral level and integrated into national and local planning processes. Output B3.1. Developed framework to integrate adaptation policies and measures into planning processes. A policy framework for climate change, which lays down the principles, approach and priorities to mainstream climate change adaptation in development planning, will be developed under this activity. An adaptation framework would be developed incorporating the impact assessment, Page 19

24 vulnerability profile development, adaptation capacity assessment and participation of different stakeholders. Output B3.2. Designed adaptation programs, options and measures at local/sectoral level with the participation of key stakeholders. This output envisages the development of adaptation programs, options and measures to address variability, climate change and extreme events, at national and local level, including the socioeconomic costs of adaptation measures proposed for some key sectors like agriculture and forestry. The designed adaptation programs, options and measures will be presented to relevant stakeholders during seminars and workshops to get their inputs to finalize the adaptation strategies. Output B3.3. Developed a portfolio of prioritized adaptation options by sectors and their investment requirements. This output envisages the development of a pool of prioritized adaptation options by sectors which will include the costs, feasibility, barriers and strategies for implementation, based on the results of technical studies that have been prepared and information from previous NATCOMs. Component C.GHG mitigation policies and measures to address climate change Outcome # C1. Improved understanding of GHG emissions scenarios under BAU from sources and sinks; and future GHG mitigation options including their macro-economic impacts. Output C1.1. Developed and applied integrated model for projecting GHG emissions under BAU and mitigation scenarios including macroeconomic assessment of GHG mitigation measures. The activities that will be conducted to realise this output will focus on the development of an integrated model (tool) for projecting GHG emissions under the BAU and mitigation scenarios including macroeconomic assessment of GHG mitigation policies and measures. The modelling and policy studies will be conducted to develop strategies and policies for achieving the national GHG emission reduction target. As GHG emission reduction encompasses many interrelated sectors, a comprehensive and integrated model is needed. The selection of model and required methodology will be determined through national expert consultations based on the data availability and capacity of human resources in the sectors and institutions for developing, running, and interpreting the models. It is expected that the model could also capture and simulate the relationship between mitigation actions and macro-economic indicators. The potential tools could include; System Dynamics (software: Stella, Powersym, Vensym, etc) and Dynamic CGE (Computable General Equilibrium) with GAMS (General Algebraic Modelling System). Although the final objective is to develop policy studies that integrate all relevant sectors, the assessment should begin with comprehensive assessment in each sector. Output C1.2. Completed studies for projection of GHG emission under BAU and mitigation scenarios for key sectors at the national level and the two administrative areas (see A1.2). Under this activity GHG mitigation scenario for the short and medium terms using integrated model tool will be developed. GHG mitigation scenarios will provide information on key sectors that contribute to the emissions of GHG at the national level. For the construction of these mitigation scenarios, sectoral baselines will be established. This activity will also generate GHG mitigation scenarios for the two local governments (DKI Jakarta and Riau Province). Outcome # C2. Increased capacity in measuring the achievement of GHG mitigation actions at sectoral and local level Output C2.1. Established methodologies and tools for GHG mitigation actions measurement, reporting and verification and documented GHG emissions baseline. To measure the achievement of GHG mitigation policies, a measurement and monitoring system is proposed under TNC. For GHG emission mitigation, such measurement is commonly covered under the MRV (Measurement, Reporting, and Verification) system. Several issues that still have to be addressed in Page 20

25 MRV system include (i) scope of MRV, (ii) institutional arrangement, (iii) MRV tools, (iv) GHG emission reduction target, (v) background situation of each sector and operating environment in which regulations/policies and sector development efforts will be implemented to address GHG emissions reduction, (vi) definition of the base year and baseline, (iv) description of mitigation actions and plans, and (v) coverage and progress indicators. In addition to the RAN GRK strategy, the TNC will explore alternate or additional mitigation opportunities. This may not be limited to 2020 emission target as stated in RAN GRK but could be extended to 2030 and beyond. TNC will develop alternative mitigation measures based on modeling, up to date data, trends in technology, and other relevant socio-economic issues. The assessment will also cover (i) best available technology (national and international), (ii) the needs for capacity building, technology transfer, R&D activities, (iii) barriers and limitations of mitigation actions, and (iv) cost benefit analysis of each mitigation scenario. Output C2.2. Trained technical staff at sectoral and local level in defining baseline and applying MRV for the GHG mitigation actions. A number of technical staffs from sectors and provincial governments will be trained to enhance capacity for determining baseline scenario and applying MRV of the GHG mitigation actions. The training will focus on using methodologies and tools for GHG mitigation actions developed under C.2.1. Efforts will be made to encourage the participation of female staff in the training. Outcome # C3. Designed GHG mitigation policies and measures at national level in the context of national action plans Output C3.1. Documentation of national climate change mitigation policies and performances; National Action Plan Addressing Climate Change (RAN-PI), the National Action Plan for Mitigation (RAN-GRK), and the Indonesian Climate Change Sectoral Roadmap (ICCSR). This output aims to identify and collect the relevant documents and reports needed for review of existing national climate change policies and plans. List of main documents to be reviewed are Annual Government Work and Budget Plan (RKA-K/L), Draft Strategy for Mainstreaming Adaptation into National Development Planning, National Action Plan on Greenhouse Gases (RAN-GRK), Indonesia Climate Change Sectoral Roadmap (ICCSR), National Development Planning: Indonesia responses to climate change ( Yellow Book ), and National Action Plan Addressing Climate Change (RAN-PI). Output C3.2 Report on the analysis and constraints pertaining to the implemented mitigation policies. This output aims to identify, analyze and describe mitigation policies and measures adopted by the local governments. The report also presents the responsibilities and roles of each sector in implementing the mitigation policies including constraints associated with the activities and programs. Further, the report will present how the constraints/barriers were overcome in order to achieve the objectives of the policies. Output C3.3 Analyzed and documented gap analysis in meeting the targets by the policies to be implemented between 2011 and This output aims at conducting analysis of climate change mitigation documents to identify issues and existing gaps in meeting the targets of the policies during , then use them to translate the issues into more detailed and useful guidance for stakeholders to consider, plan and implement policies. Output C3.4. Documented the technology transfer needs, and financial support needed to deploy a portfolio of prioritized mitigation options for key sectors at national and local level. Under this output the potential technology transfer needs and financial support needed will be documented by considering the macroeconomic indicators and GHG mitigation potential. This document will contribute to the Indonesian government s efforts to analyze the low carbon paths and prioritize the key emitting sectors for intervention. Page 21

26 Component D. Description of national circumstances and other relevant information Outcome # D1. Update report with the information for regarding national circumstances, national and regional development priorities, as well as key additional information, and identified needs. Output D1.1. Prepared detailed report on (a) National circumstances, national and regional development priorities, (b) additional information relevant to the implementation of the Convention such as biennial update reports, (c) needs and constrains associated with the activities, measures and programs carried out to implement the Convention, and (d) update of the financial resources and technical support received from national and international resources for activities related to climate change. This output is expected to be prepared with updated information on national circumstances, and national and regional development priorities for , as well as key additional information on capacity, constraints in implementing the convention and finally the financial needs analysis for achieving convention objectives. List of key information to be provided includes; Demographic and socioeconomic features, such as occupation patterns, rural-urban population; Land use pattern and systems, area under different crops, forest types and soil types; River basins, and irrigation systems; Climatic systems, rainfall pattern and temperature trends and climate variability and dependency on rainfall; Status of natural resources; Climate sensitive sectors and vulnerable populations and regions; Report on Indonesia s developmental policies and programs at national and provincial level; and Report covering the existing institutional arrangements relevant to the preparation of the GHG inventory on a periodic basis. These sets of information need to be generated to take stock of progress on actions towards addressing issues relating to climate change. This is indeed an important activity to guide the process of preparing the TNC especially in reporting on the developmental policies and programs at the national and provincial levels; and supporting the existing institutional arrangements relevant to the preparation of the GHG inventory. Component E. Publication and dissemination of the Third National Communication (TNC) and biennial update report Outcome # E1. Indonesian Government approved Third National Communication and biennial update reports submitted to UNFCCC and relevant documents and policy briefs published and disseminated. Output E1.1. Presented BUR and TNC to Government and relevant stakeholders. This output aims to prepare draft of TNC and BUR reports. Both drafts will be presented and discussed at a series of workshops with relevant stakeholders to seek their opinion and inputs which will be incorporated in the final version. Consultations with institutions involved in the preparation of the TNC and BUR, including local governments, will be carried out throughout the whole process. These institutions will review the final draft. Output E1.2. Prepared and submitted the 2014 and 2016 biennial update reports of Indonesia to UNFCCC. This output envisages the submission of the BURs to the UNFCCC. After a series workshops and expert consultations, the BURs would be finalized and submitted for GoI approval, and the approved document would be finally submitted to UNFCCC. Output E1.3. Published and submitted TNC of Indonesia to UNFCCC. Based on a series workshops and expert consultations, the TNC will be finalized and submitted for GoI approval, and the approved document would be finally submitted to UNFCCC. The TNC will include all the information provided under outcomes # A to D already described, and will integrate the results from studies and researches supported under this project. To disseminate technical information and present the results of the TNC to stakeholders and national and international experts, workshops and seminars will be organized. Output E1.4. Published technical reports such as GHG inventories, V&A assessments at the sectoral level and brief summaries of key policy issues relevant for decision making. A number Page 22

27 of technical reports supported by this project will be published, such as the GHG inventories, V&A assessments at the sectoral level, key policy issues relevant for decision making, brief and summaries of the key climate changes issues and findings at the provincial level. Output E1.5. All these documents are available to general public through various media outlets including ministry website. The output aims to post the TNC and BUR on the ministry website after submission, on the UNFCCC s website and on the UNDP-UNEP/National Communication Support Program (NCSP). An easy to understand document containing the information presented in the TNC or BUR will be prepared in a form accessible to the general public. The final draft of the TNC and BUR will be submitted to the GEF to finalize project activities. Output E1.6. Submitted the 2016 biennial update report, with the following information: (a) information on national circumstances and institutional arrangements relevant to the preparation of the national communications on a continuous basis, (b) the national inventory of anthropogenic emissions by sources and removal by sinks of all greenhouse gases (GHGs) not controlled by the Montreal Protocol, including a national inventory report, (c) information on mitigation actions and their effects, including associated methodologies and assumptions, (d) constraints and gaps, and related financial, technical and capacity needs, including a description of support needed and received, (e) information on the level of support received to enable the preparation and submission of biennial update reports, and (f) other information relevant to the achievement of the objective of the Convention and suitable for inclusion in its biennial update report. This output may be combined with Output E1.3. Key indicators, risk and assumptions The key indicators are included in the Project Logical Framework, and the main risks identified, assumptions and mitigation measures are presented in the Project Logical Framework and Annex B. The key risks for implementation of the TNC are as follows. - Coordination with multiple stakeholders may cause delay since a large number of actors from different economic sectors of the society are involved. - Limited technical capacity to execute the project - Technical problems in the development of the Indonesia Global Model of the Climate System. - Difficulty in hiring qualified people. - Limited political support to Climate Change issues. - Exchange rate risk The mitigation measures for each of the identified risks are outlined in Annex B. It is generally assumed that the political, financial and social conditions of the country will not experience a great variability, showing relative stability and that government regulations will not directly affect the contents, quality and preparation of TNC. Cost-effectiveness; GEF incremental reasoning The design of the TNC draws on the experiences and results of the previous NATCOMs; in particular, activities are focused on areas and sectors that have been identified as most relevant for the GHG balance in Indonesia. A central element of the strategy to enhance the cost effectiveness of the TNC Project is the capitalization on institutional networks and working relations built during the two previous NATCOMs, and on existing experiences with climate change within national institutions. GHG inventory system will build upon and strengthen the existing institutional structures and measurement capabilities. Similarly the climate modelling, sectoral and regional impact assessment capabilities developed during the two Page 23

28 previous NATCOMS will be used as baselines for in-depth and detailed sub-regional integrated assessments. In Indonesia, UNDP supports a large portfolio of climate change programmes and projects. The two previous NATCOMs of Indonesia were prepared with the support of UNDP-GEF in partnership with the KLH, Government of Indonesia. UNDP-Indonesia has been working collaboratively with many ministries of the Government of Indonesia, research organization and civil society organizations in implementing a number of projects as well as several state governments. Some of these projects include the REDD+ project and Low Emission Capacity Building project with UKP4, ICCTF with BAPPENAS, Sustainable Palm Oil with Ministry of Agriculture, Strategic Planning and Action to Strengthen Climate Resilience of Rural Communities in NTT (SPARC) with Ministry of Environment, and Climate Public Expenditure and Institutional Review (CPEIR) with Ministry of Finance. UNDP also supports the Government of Indonesia in strengthening the capacity of a number of line ministries and local governments in implementing climate change related projects (e.g. BAPPENAS, UKP4, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Finance, KLH, BPPT, Provincial Government etc.). In addition, UNDP has been engaged in disaster reduction efforts and assessing ways to minimize the impact of disaster arising from changing climate. An example of such a project is the Integrated Climate-inducted Disaster Risk Management, which will be implemented under the framework of Safer Communities through Disaster Risk Reduction (SC-DRR). Synergies among these projects and the TNC will contribute to improved capacities and better coordination among different stakeholders at the national and local governments. For examples, lessons learned from the existing UNDP projects related to climate change mitigation and adaptation, and disaster risk reduction can be incorporated into the BUR and TNC activities, and partnerships and networks of UNDP projects can also create linkage necessary for smooth implementation of TNC. In addition, this project may benefit from the country and regional expertise within and outside of UNDP on climate change issues and GHG inventory. Sustainability and Replicability The Government of Indonesia is fully committed to all the commitments made to the UNFCCC. Government of Indonesia is providing direct financial as well as indirect support to the institutions involved in the preparation of the TNC. The proposed activities will involve the existing related programs (RAN GRK, RAN API), which are wholly supported by the governments. The proposed outcomes and outputs of the TNC project will be delivered in collaboration with various line ministries, local governments, non-governmental organizations, research agencies, universities and other stakeholders. The resource base and networks established during SNC will be utilized, enhanced and strengthened during the full-scale TNC project implementation. Involvement of various stakeholders in the different project components and activities will create awareness, and sensitize and build capacity and understanding on different aspects of climate change and related issues and enable continuation of the NATCOMs preparation process. Many line ministries and local governments have already established working groups for GHG inventory preparation as well as mitigation (e.g. RAN/RAD GRK) and adaptation (e.g. RAN API). Some of these initiatives are supported by co-financing arrangements. Thus these institutions will sustain the TNC and subsequent NATCOM preparation process. The methods, models, tools and data generated during the TNC preparation process will be useful to line ministries, other stakeholder institutions to implement the climate change missions and mitigation-adaptation programmes and projects. Other sectors will also benefit from the TNC process which will further help sustain the process. Similarly, the technical capacity built for the preparation of NATCOM process is being deployed by the national governments in preparing the climate change impact assessments. Page 24

29 III. PROJECT RESULTS FRAMEWORK: This project will contribute to achieving the following Country Programme Outcome as defined in CPAP: Outcome 2.3 National institutions and other key stakeholders are coherently and effectively addressing climate change adaptation and mitigation and ozone layer protection Output Coordinated and harmonized financing for ODS phase out and climate change, including MLF, GEF, AF, SCCF, private sector sources etc. Country Programme Outcome Indicators: Outcome 2.3 Indicators 1) Existence of a strong, effective and convergent national institutional arrangement 2) Sound policies/ guidelines/ strategies and mechanism for REDD+, Ozone Layer Protection, Mitigation and Adaptation activities 3) National coordinating and harmonizing mechanism for climate change financing Output Indicators 1) Ability of Government to access and manage international climate change financing directly with strong national ownership 2) Level of coordination and harmonization of climate change initiatives 3) Extent to which country is able to mobilize multiple climate change funding sources Primary applicable Key Environment and Sustainable Development Key Result Area (same as that on the cover page, circle one): CPD outcomes 2.1. Enhanced capacity of Government of Indonesia to manage natural resources and energy 2.2. Potential impact of climate change reflected in policy framework at all levels Applicable GEF Strategic Objective and Program: Enabling Activities (CCM-6): Support enabling activities and capacity building under the Convention Applicable GEF Expected Outcomes: Adequate resources allocated to support enabling activities under the Convention (Outcome 6.1) Applicable GEF Outcome Indicators: Completed and submitted Third National Communication (TNC) and Biennial Update Report (BUR) Project Objective: Assisting the Government of Indonesia to carry out all the necessary activities to prepare the TNC and BUR to comply with its commitments to the UNFCCC, in agreement with Convention s Articles 4.1 and Indicator (A) Prepared updated National GHG Inventory for (B) Prepared reports on the impacts, vulnerability and adaptation measures to address climate change, variability and extreme events (C) Prepared a report on GHG mitigation policies and measures to address climate change (D) Prepared a report on description of national circumstances and other relevant Baseline Targets End of Project Source of verification (A) SNC (A) TNC Project evaluations, official reports to the (B) SNC (B) TNC UNFCCC. (C) SNC (D) SNC (C) TNC (D) TNC Risks and Assumptions Risks: No major risks have been identified in the implementation of this project as the Government of Indonesia is strongly committed to its obligation under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). UNDP Environmental Finance Services Page 25

30 information Indicator Baseline Targets End of Project Source of verification Risks and Assumptions (E) Publication of the Third National Communication (TNC) and biennial update report (E) SNC (E) TNC Outcome #A1 National and local institutional arrangements for GHG inventories designed and strengthened A1.1. Guidelines developed and in place for QA/QC of activity data and organizing inventory data A.1.2 Degree to which institutional mechanism for GHG emission estimation and validation is established and functioning A1.3. Degree to which institutional arrangement for developing GHG inventory in two sectors (agriculture and waste) is validation is developed and functioning Preliminary exercises on QA/QC for SNC Preliminary exercises on QA/QC for SNC No prior experience Reported QA/QC of activity data and organized inventory Functional institutional mechanism and documenting for GHG emission estimation and validation work developed by identifying focal point (or working group/special division dedicated to GHG inventory) within each relevant ministry Established functional institutional arrangement for developing GHG inventory in agriculture and waste sectors by identifying a focal point (or working group, special division dedicated to GHG inventory) in relevant ministries Report on status of GHG inventory preparation and implementation of each training and support documents, integration and analysis of the information, results included in TNC Risks: Due to many institutions involving in the preparation of the GHG inventory, coordination could be difficult and may be cause of delays Page 26

31 Indicator A1.4. Number of trained technical staff of relevant sectors on the development of GHG Inventory Baseline No prior experience Targets End of Project 40 technical staff from relevant sectors in the development of GHG Inventory trained Source of verification Risks and Assumptions A1.5. Degree to which institutional arrangement for developing GHG inventory at two administrative areas (DKI Jakarta and Riau Province) is functioning No prior experience Established functional institutional arrangement (capacity and mechanism) for developing GHG inventory at DKI Jakarta and Riau Province by identifying a focal point working group) in each province A1.6. Number of trained technical staffs of two administrative areas on the development of GHG inventory No prior experience 20 technical staff from DKI Jakarta and Riau Province in GHG inventory trained Outcome #A2. Improved accuracy of GHG inventory through improved methodologies for estimating GHG emissions A2.1. Established database for all sources and categories including local EF for waste management and AFOLU sectors is available A2.2. Prepared a report and manual on database for all sources and categories including local emission factors developed for AFOLU and waste sectors No prior experience No prior experience Database established including local emission factors for waste management, agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sectors Report for established database in A.2.1 and a manual for accessing and using the database by all stakeholders. Report on status of GHG inventory preparation and studies on local emission and database installation, integration and analysis of the information, results included in TNC Risks: Due to many institutions involved in the preparation of the GHG inventory, coordination could be difficult and may because of delays Outcome #A3 Developed National GHG inventories for series using A3.1. Developed GHG emissions inventory for and reported GHG inventory available for period (SNC) Calculated GHG inventory for each year for a period of and Report on status of preparation of each category of the inventory and support Risks: Due to many institutions involving in the estimation of the GHG Page 27

32 2006 IPCC inventory guidelines Indicator A3.2. GHG emissions inventory for is available on the web Baseline No prior experience Targets End of Project published as part of BUR GHG inventory for available in a web query system Source of verification documents, integration and analysis of the information, results included in TNC Risks and Assumptions inventory, coordination could be difficult and may be cause of delays The lack of activity data for the assessments could be a cause of delay Outcome # B1. Availability of historical and projection of climate data at national level with a resolution of 20 km x 20 km and enabled public access B1.1. Prepared a report of reconstructed monthly historical rainfall and temperature data ( ), short term climate prediction ( ) and long-term climate projections ( ) with resolution of 20 km x 20 km available with public accessibility Regional climate change scenarios generated for 100 x 100 km² through statistic methods, and assessments conducted for SNC with data up to 2080; Historical rainfall and temperature data for reconstructed, regional scenarios for and with resolution of 20 km x 20 km generated and made accessible publicly Project reports, information contained in TNC Risks: Delay to generate the regionalized climate change scenarios with a higher spatial resolution Coordination with the several research centers for the scenarios generation and the many stakeholders involving may be difficult and may be cause of delay. B1.2. Completed validation report on daily and hourly historical rainfall data and temperature for some areas to support climate impact assessment case studies No prior experience Validated hourly and daily historical rainfall and temperature data are available for some areas (some pilot sites for adaption) The lack of data for the assessments could be a cause of delay; B1.3. Number of scientists trained for climate modeling and climate statistical downscaling No prior experience 20 trained scientists on climate modeling and climate statistical downscaling B1.4. Prepared a report on profiles of climate variability and climate change at National level (historical and projection) based on reconstructed and new generation of climate change scenarios Results from climate variability and climate change reported in SNC using GCMs, low resolution of climate models, and information from Updated report on profiles of climate variability and climate change at national level using higher resolution climate data Page 28

33 Indicator BMKG Baseline Targets End of Project Source of verification Risks and Assumptions Outcome # B2. Vulnerability, climate impact analysis and adaptation assessments carried out at local level in key sectors B2.1. Number of tools and methodologies implemented for vulnerability and climate impact assessment B2.2. Number of local scientists trained on the use of vulnerability and climate impact assessment tools B2.3. Number of case studies conducted on vulnerability, climate change impact and adaptation at local level with different focus (coastal, food crops, livestock, forest, fisheries, water resources etc.) including socio-economic and gender analysis depending on local prioritization 4 Climate impact assessments reported in SNC and existing methodologies for vulnerability and climate impacts assessment No prior experience No prior experience 6 Tools and methodologies developed for vulnerability and climate impact, including specific tools and methodology to assess different impact and vulnerability to women and men 20 trained local scientist on vulnerability and climate impact assessment 10 detailed studies conducted on vulnerability, climate change impact and adaptation at local level, incorporating gender perspective to analyse different impact/vulnerability to women and men at the local level Project reports, information contained in TNC Risks: Delay to generate the regionalized climate change scenarios with a higher spatial resolution. Coordination with several research centers and sectors for vulnerability and climate impact assessment as many stakeholders involved in the evaluation of impacts, vulnerability and adaptation which is difficult and lead to cause delay. The lack of data for the assessments could be a cause of delay. Page 29

34 Outcome # B3. Adaptation policies and measures to address climate change are designed at the local/sectoral level and integrated into national and local planning processes Indicator B3.1. Prepared a brief report on framework for integrating adaptation policies and measures into planning processes B3.2. Degree to which adaptation programs, options and measures at local/sectoral level are developed with the participation of key stakeholders during 2010 to 2013 Baseline Existing documents layout integration adaptation policies and measures into planning process such as RAN-MAPI and RAN-API Results from adaptation programs, options and measures reported in SNC and information at local level Targets End of Project Improved framework to integrate adaptation policies and measures into planning processes by using new scientific climate modelling and impact studies of the TNC At least 10 adaptation programmes designed involving key stakeholders, and ensure that women and men have equal access to resources and benefits of the programmes Source of verification Project reports, information contained in TNC Risks and Assumptions Risks: Delay to generate the regionalized climate change scenarios with a higher spatial resolution Coordination with many sectors designing adaptation options and measures as many stakeholders involved in the review of adaptation programs which is difficult and lead to cause delay. The lack of data for the assessments could be a cause of delay. B3.3. Prepared a report on prioritized adaptation options by sectors and their investment requirements No prior experience Reports on prioritized adaptation options and the required investment available Outcome # C1. Improved understanding of GHG emissions scenarios under BAU from sources and sinks; and future GHG mitigation options including their macroeconomic impacts C1.1. Developed a report on integrated model for projecting GHG emissions under BAU and mitigation scenarios including macroeconomic assessment of GHG mitigation measures C1.2. Conducted studies on the projection of GHG emission under BAU and mitigation scenarios for key sectors at the national level and the two administrative areas (see No prior experience No prior experience Integrated model for projecting GHG emissions under BAU and mitigation scenarios including macroeconomic assessment of GHG mitigation measures is developed, and a report on the model is available Completed projections and reported GHG emissions under BAU and mitigation Project reports, information contained in TNC Risks: Delay to generate the mitigation and carbon sequestration scenarios; Delay in the macroeconomic analysis due to lack of data for the assessment; Coordination with the many stakeholders involved in the assessment and analysis of GHG mitigation could be cause of delay. Availability of information due to confidentiality clauses. Page 30

35 A1.2) Indicator Baseline Targets End of Project scenarios in DKI Jakarta and Riau Provinces for key sectors Source of verification Risks and Assumptions Outcome # C2. Increased capacity in measuring the achievement of GHG mitigation actions at sectoral and local level C2.1. Prepared a report on methodologies and tools for GHG mitigation actions measurement, reporting and verification and documented GHG baseline emissions C2.2. Number of trained technical staff from sectors and local level in defining baseline and applying MRV of the GHG mitigation actions Not available in previous NATCOMs No prior experience Produced a report on methodologies and tools for GHG mitigation actions, measurement, reporting and verification and GHG baseline emissions 4 trainings (in total) on defining baseline and applying MRV of the GHG mitigation actions for technical staff from sectors and local governments Project reports, information contained in TNC Risks: Delay to improve methodology and tools for MRV of mitigation actions; Coordination with the many stakeholders involved in the designing improved tools for MRV of GHG mitigation actions could be cause of delay. Availability of information due to confidentiality clauses. Outcome # C3. Designed GHG mitigation policies and measures at national level in the context of national action plans C3.1. Prepared a compilation report on national climate change mitigation policies performance, for the policies such as the National Action Plan Addressing Climate Change (RAN-PI), the National Action Plan for Mitigation (RAN-GRK), and the Indonesian Climate Change Sectoral Roadmap (ICCSR) C3.2. Prepared a report on the analysis and constraints of implementing mitigation policies Existing documents on climate change and information contained in SNC GHG mitigation policies and measures assessed for in SNC, national relevant studies on key sectors Developed a synthesis report on national climate change mitigation policies Developed report on studies and analysis for the evaluation of sectoral mitigation policies and measures, including cost-benefit and barriers Project reports, information contained in TNC Risks: Delay to compile documents of national climate change policy and complete study on evaluation and gap analysis of mitigation policies and measures; Coordination with the many stakeholders involved in the designing mitigation policies and measures could be cause of delay. Availability of information due to confidentiality clauses. C3.3. Not available in Developed report on Page 31

36 Indicator Prepared a report on gap analysis in meeting the targets by these policies to be implemented between 2011 and 2013 Baseline previous NATCOMs Targets End of Project gap analysis in meeting the targets of mitigation policies during 2011 and 2013 Source of verification Risks and Assumptions C3.4. Prepared a report on the technology transfer needs, and financial support needed to deploy a portfolio of prioritized mitigation options for key sectors at national and local level Information contained in SNC Developed report on potential technology transfer needs and financial support needed for key sectors at national and local level Outcome # D1. Update report with the information for regarding national circumstances, national and regional development priorities, as well as key additional information, and identified the needs D1.1. Prepared an update report on (a) National circumstances, national and regional development priorities, (b) additional information relevant to the implementation of the Convention such as biennial update reports, (c) needs and constrains associated with the activities, measures and programs carried out to implement the Convention, and (d) update of the financial resources and technical support received from national and international resources for activities related to climate change. Information contained in SNC Updated report consisting of information on national circumstances, and national and regional development priorities for , including key additional information on capacity, constraints associated with climate change programs and financial needs analysis for achieving convention objectives Project reports, information contained in TNC Risks: No specific risks have been identified Outcome # E1. Indonesian Government approved Third National Communication and biennial update reports submitted to UNFCCC and relevant documents E1.1. Stakeholder consultation workshop on TNC and biennial update reports and endorsed as part of consultation process SNC was presented Draft TNC report along with GHG inventory presented to and endorsed by government and relevant stakeholders Project reports, TNC, BUR, brief summaries Risks: No specific risks have been identified Page 32

37 and policy briefs published and disseminated Indicator E1.2. Submission of 2014 biennial update report of Indonesia to UNFCCC. Baseline No prior experience Targets End of Project Finalized BUR for 2014 and submitted to UNFCCC Source of verification Risks and Assumptions E1.3. Publication and submission of TNC of Indonesia to UNFCCC SNC was published Finalized TNC and submitted to UNFCCC E1.4. Prepared technical reports on GHG inventories, V&A assessments at the sectoral level, brief summaries of key policy issues relevant for decision making Technical studies contained in the SNC was made available Minimum 10technical reports supported by this project and brief summaries will be published for general public E1.5. Availability of documents of TNC and BUR via medias and available on KLH website Project reports of SNC was made public in KLH web Project reports, TNC, BUR and technical report supported by the project are made public on KLH web E1.6. Submission of the 2016 biennial update report (prepared for the years ), with the following information: (a) information on national circumstances and institutional arrangements relevant to the preparation of the national communications on a continuous basis, (b) the national inventory of anthropogenic emissions by sources and removal of sinks of all greenhouse gases (GHGs) not controlled by the Montreal Protocol, including a national inventory report, (c) information on mitigation actions and their effects, including associated methodologies and assumptions, (d) constraints and gaps, and related financial, technical and capacity needs, including a description of support needed and received, (e) information on the level of No prior experience Submitted BUR for 2016 (which may be combined with TNC) Page 33

38 Indicator support received to enable the preparation and submission of biennial update reports, and (f) other information relevant to the achievement of the objective of the Convention and suitable for inclusion in its biennial update report Baseline Targets End of Project Source of verification Risks and Assumptions Page 34

39 IV. TOTAL BUDGET AND WORK PLAN Award ID: Project ID(s): Award Title: Third National Communication to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Project Title: Third National Communication to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change PIMS no.: 5019 Implementing Partner (Executing Agency) Ministry of Environment, Republic of Indonesia GEF Outcome/ ATLAS Activity Outcome A.1. National and local institutional arrangement for GHG inventories designed and strengthened Outcome A.2. Improved accuracy of GHG inventory through improved methodologies for estimating GHG emissions Responsible Party/ Implementing Agent Fund ID Donor Name Atlas Budgetary Account Code ATLAS Budget Description Amount Year 2014 (USD) Amount Year 2015 (USD) Amount Year 2016 (USD) Total (USD) UNDP 6200 GEF International Consultants GEF Local Consultants 43,200 35,200 24, , GEF Travel 17,000 15,000 13,000 45, GEF Contractual services 40,000 40,000 40, , GEF Training and workshop 20,000 25,000 20,000 65, GEF Inform. Tech. Equipment 8,000 5,000 2,000 15, GEF Miscellaneous 3,500 2,600 1,500 7,600 sub-total GEF 131, , , ,000 Total Outcome A1 131, , , ,000 UNDP 6200 GEF International Consultants 10, , GEF Local Consultants 35,425 29,800 25,000 90, GEF Travel 10,000 10,000 10,000 30, GEF Contractual services 50,000 35,000 25, , GEF Material and Goods 7,500 5,000 5,000 17, GEF Inform. Tech. Equipment 50,000 10,000 10,000 70, GEF Miscellaneous 7,500 7,500 7,275 22,275 sub-total GEF 170,425 97,300 82, ,000 Total Outcome A2 170,425 97,300 82, ,000 See Budget Note: Page 35

40 GEF Outcome/ ATLAS Activity Outcome A.3. Developed National GHG inventories for series using 2006 IPCC inventory guidelines Outcome #A3 Developed National GHG inventories for series using 2006 IPCC inventory guidelines Outcome B.1. Availability of historical and projection of climate data at national level with a resolution of 20 km x20 km and enabled public access. Outcome B.2. Vulnerability, climate impact analysis and adaptation assessments carried out at local level in key sectors Responsible Party/ Implementing Agent Fund ID Donor Name Atlas Budgetary Account Code ATLAS Budget Description Page 36 Amount Year 2014 (USD) Amount Year 2015 (USD) Amount Year 2016 (USD) Total (USD) UNDP 6200 GEF International Consultants GEF Local Consultants 36,000 29,250 24,750 90, GEF Travel 15,000 15,000 15,000 45, GEF Contractual services 45,000 45,000 45, , GEF Material and Goods 15,000 15,000 10,000 40, GEF Inform. Tech. Equipment 10,000 5,000 5,000 20, GEF Miscellaneous 7,500 7,500 5,000 20,000 sub-total GEF 128, , , ,000 Total Outcome A3 128, , , ,000 UNDP 6200 GEF International Consultants - 10, , GEF Local Consultants 47,250 36,000 24, , GEF Travel 5,000 5,000 5,000 15, GEF Contractual services 25,000 20,000 20,000 65, GEF Material and Goods 2,500 2,500 2,500 7, GEF Inform. Tech. Equipment 20,000 12,500 5,000 37, GEF Miscellaneous 2,500 2,500 2,000 7,000 sub-total GEF 102,250 88,500 59, ,000 Total Outcome B1 102,250 88,500 59, ,000 UNDP 6200 GEF International Consultants GEF Local Consultants 140, , , , GEF Travel 20,000 20,000 20,000 60, GEF Contractual services 155, , , , GEF Material and Goods 15,000 15,000 15,000 45, GEF Inform. Tech. Equipment 10,000 10,000 10,000 30, GEF Miscellaneous 5,000 4,625 3,500 13,125 sub-total GEF 345, , ,125 1,025,000 Total Outcome B2 345, , ,125 1,025,000 Outcome B.3. UNDP 6200 GEF International Consultants See Budget Note:

41 GEF Outcome/ ATLAS Activity Adaptation policies and measures to address climate change are designed at the local/sectoral level and integrated into national and local planning processes Outcome C.1. Improved understanding of GHG emissions scenarios under BAU from sources and sinks; and future GHG mitigation options including their macro-economic impacts Outcome C.2. Increased capacity in measuring the achievement of GHG mitigation actions at sectoral and local level. Outcome C.3. Designed GHG Responsible Party/ Implementing Agent Fund ID Donor Name Atlas Budgetary Account Code ATLAS Budget Description Amount Year 2014 (USD) Amount Year 2015 (USD) Amount Year 2016 (USD) Total (USD) 6200 GEF Local Consultants 20,250 20,250 20,250 60, GEF Travel 10,000 10,000 10,000 30, GEF Contractual services 30,000 25,000 25,000 80, GEF Material and Goods 5,000 5,000 2,500 12, GEF Inform. Tech. Equipment 5,000 2, , GEF Miscellaneous 4,250 2,500 2,500 9,250 sub-total GEF 74,500 65,250 60, ,000 Total Outcome B3 74,500 65,250 60, ,000 UNDP 6200 GEF International Consultants GEF Local Consultants 61,875 50,625 32, , GEF Travel 10,000 10,000 10,000 30, GEF Contractual services 65,000 65,000 65, , GEF Material and Goods 10,000 10,000 10,000 30, GEF Inform. Tech. Equipment 10,000 10,000 10,000 30, GEF Miscellaneous 7,500 7,375 5,000 19,875 sub-total GEF 164, , , ,000 Total Outcome C1 164, , , ,000 UNDP 6200 GEF International Consultants GEF Local Consultants 20,250 24,750 20,250 65, GEF Travel 20,000 25,000 20,000 65, GEF Contractual services 55,000 60,000 55, , GEF Material and Goods 5,000 10,000 5,000 20, GEF Inform. Tech. Equipment 5,000 5,000 5,000 15, GEF Miscellaneous 5,000 5,000 4,750 14,750 sub-total GEF 110, , , ,000 Total Outcome C2 110, , , ,000 UNDP 6200 GEF International Consultants See Budget Note: 6200 GEF Local Consultants 30,375 28,125 30,375 88, Page 37

42 GEF Outcome/ ATLAS Activity mitigation policies and measures at national level in the context of national action plans Outcome D.1. Update report with the information for regarding national circumstances, national and regional development priorities, as well as key additional information, and identified the needs Outcome E.1. Indonesian Government approved Third National Communication and biennial update reports submitted to UNFCCC and relevant documents and policy briefs published and disseminated Monitoring and Reporting Responsible Party/ Implementing Agent Fund ID Donor Name Atlas Budgetary Account Code ATLAS Budget Description Amount Year 2014 (USD) Amount Year 2015 (USD) Amount Year 2016 (USD) Total (USD) 6200 GEF Travel 10,000 10,000 10,000 30, GEF Contractual services 47,500 47,500 47, , GEF Material and Goods 10,000 10,000 10,000 30, GEF Inform. Tech. Equipment 5,000 5,000 5,000 15, GEF Miscellaneous 5,000 5,000 3,625 13,625 sub-total GEF 107, , , ,000 Total Outcome C3 107, , , ,000 UNDP 6200 GEF International Consultants GEF Local Consultants 29,250 29,250 25,875 84, GEF Travel 5,000 5,000 5,000 15, GEF Training and workshop 18,500 18,500 13,625 50, GEF Inform. Tech. Equipment GEF Miscellaneous sub-total GEF 52,750 52,750 44, ,000 Total Outcome D1 52,750 52,750 44, ,000 UNDP 6200 GEF International Consultants - 10,000 15,000 25, UNDP 6200 GEF Local Consultants 18,000 18,000 24,000 60, GEF Local Consultants (Service Contract-NPC) See Budget Note: 45,000 45,000 45, , GEF Travel 15,000 15,000 15,000 45, GEF Contractual services 41,000 41,000 41, , GEF Material and Goods GEF Inform. Tech. Equipment 4,000 4,000 4,000 12, GEF Miscellaneous sub-total GEF 123, , , ,000 Total Outcome E1 123, , , , GEF Travel 5,000 5,000 5,000 15, Page 38

43 GEF Outcome/ ATLAS Activity Project Management Unit Responsible Party/ Implementing Agent Fund ID Donor Name Atlas Budgetary Account Code ATLAS Budget Description Amount Year 2014 (USD) Amount Year 2015 (USD) Amount Year 2016 (USD) Total (USD) 6200 GEF International Consultants - 20,000 20,000 40, See Budget Note: Contractual services 3,000 3,000 4,000 10, GEF Training and workshop 15, , sub-total GEF 23,000 28,000 29,000 80,000 Total Monitoring and Reporting 23,000 28,000 29,000 80,000 UNDP 6200 GEF International Consultants Local Consultants 6200 GEF (Service Contract- part of 53,068 40,637 40, , NPC and 2 assistants) 6200 GEF Travel 3,000 2,000 2,000 7, GEF Contractual services GEF Material and Goods 7,000 5,000 4,000 16, GEF Inform. Tech. Equipment GEF Miscellaneous 1,944 1,000 1,000 3, GEF COSS/DPS 21,236 20,820 16,656 58, sub-total GEF 86,248 69,457 64, , UNDP International Consultants 11,300 22, , UNDP 7130 Local Consultants 9,000 9, , UNDP Travel 2,000 2, , UNDP Material and Goods 1,700 1, , UNDP Professional Services 1,000 1, ,000 sub-total UNDP 25,000 36, ,000 Total Outcome PM 111, ,457 64, ,000 PROJECT TOTAL 1,645,498 1,538,432 1,377,068 4,561,000 Budget Notes 1 Team leader for this outcome will be paid at the rate of $1,600 per week for 5 weeks for the first year, 22 weeks for the second and third years each, and 15 weeks for the fourth year 2 DSA and inter-island airfares, local transport, for national consultants and experts to go to DKI Jakarta, Riau Province and relevant ministry to attend meeting and workshop 3 Engage a consulting company, research institute, or university to help establish institutional arrangement, help develop the GHG inventory, and provide capacity development Page 39

44 Budget Notes 4 GHG inventory training, enhancement of capacity and mechanism for developing GHG inventory in DKI Jakarta and Riau province 5 Procurement of computer and other hardware such as external hard disk and multimedia for supporting institutional arrangement for GHG inventory 6 Engage international consultant for review of updated GHG inventory 7 Team leader s salary will be paid at the rate of $1,600 per week for 13 week for the second and third year each, and 10 weeks for the third year; energy expert will be engaged at $1,125 per week for 5 weeks for the first year, 8 weeks for the second and third year and 8 weeks for the fourth year 8 DSA and inter-island airfares, local transport, for national consultants and experts to attend meetings and workshops at line ministries, research institute, DKI Jakarta, Riau province and other provinces for discussion on developing database as well as socialization of established database for local emission factors 9 Engage research institute or consulting company to help collect, improve local emission factors and develop high tier methodology as well as to develop database system. This cost also includes cost of training and coaching of key-stakeholders capacity development to address climate change mitigation related issues in their daily work, and developing the necessary practical tools, guidelines, assessments and reports. 10 Material and good for needed to establish database 11 Hardware and software procurement to develop web-based database as well as to maintenance for the established database system 12 Energy expert will be paid at the rate of $1,125 per week for 17 weeks for the second and third year, and 12 weeks for the fourth year, and IPPU expert will be paid at the rate of $1,125 per week for 5 weeks for the first year, 10 weeks for the second year, 9 weeks for the 3 rd year and 10 weeks for the fourth year 13 DSA and inter-island airfares, local transport, for national consultants and experts in attending meetings and workshops to present and discuss updated GHG inventory 14 Engage a relevant research institute or consulting company to improve GHG methodologies and to extend activity data as well as to calculate/recalculate GHG inventory 15 Material and good procured to collect activity data, and produce documentation and publication on updated GHG inventory 16 Hardware and software procurement to update GHG inventory to prepare web-based publication of GHG inventory 17 International consultant will be hired at $2,000 per week for 5 weeks to provide technical advice on global climate change models to the development of the Indonesia 18 Vulnerability Assessment expert for Forestry will be hired at a rate of $1,125 per week for 10 weeks for the first year, 18 weeks for each for second and third year, and 8 weeks for the fourth year 19 DSA and inter-island airfares, local transport, for national consultants and experts to attend meetings and workshop on climate modelling 20 Engage research institute or consulting company to establish database for climate data, to develop and perform climate modelling and to carry out climate modeling training. This cost also includes cost of training and coaching of key-stakeholders capacity development to address climate change mitigation related issues in their daily work, and developing the necessary practical tools, guidelines, assessments and reports. 21 Material and good for providing climate data and additional support data and for climate modelling training 22 Procurement of special computer and additional hardware as well as software for computing climate modelling including maintenance 23 Vulnerability Assessment experts for other sectors (agric., water resources, health, coastal, GIS) will be hired at $1,125 for a total of 107 weeks (collectively) for each of 3 years after the first year 24 DSA and inter-island airfares, local transport, for national consultants and experts to visit 10 locations of case study on vulnerability, climate change impact and adaptation including attending meeting and workshop 25 Engage research institute, university, or consulting company to perform 10 detailed case studies on vulnerability, climate change impact and adaptation at local level, to develop tools and methodologies as well as to carry out vulnerability assessment and adaptation training 26 Material and good (attribute data, thematic and base map, satellite images) for supporting detailed case study on vulnerability, climate change impact and adaptation 27 Hardware (computer) and software procurement for supporting detailed case study on vulnerability, climate change impact and adaptation at local level 28 Vulnerability assessment expert with GIS expertise will be hired at a rate of $1,125 per week for 18 weeks each of 3 years 29 DSA and inter-island airfares, local transport, for national consultants and experts to attend the missions in designing adaptation programs/options/measures including focus group discussions, seminars, workshops and interview at sector level and local government 30 Engage a consulting company to organize focus group discussions, seminars, workshops in adaptation policies and measures as well as to support relevant ministry in developing adaptation programs and prioritized adaptation options 31 Material and good for supporting focus group discussions, seminars, workshops and interview Page 40

45 Budget Notes 32 Computer, multimedia and external hard disk procurement for supporting the missions 33 IPPU expert will be hired at a rate of $1,125 per week for 15 weeks second year, 16 weeks third year and 10 weeks the fourth year; Agriculture expert will be hired at a rate of $1,125 per week for 5 weeks the first year, 25 weeks for each of second and third year, and 20 weeks the fourth year; LUCF expert will be hired at the rate of $1,125 per week for 5 weeks first year and 4 weeks for each of second and third year 34 DSA and inter-island airfares, local transport, for national consultants and experts to attend coordination, meeting, seminar and workshop at relevant ministry, research institute and others including travel to DKI Jakarta and Riau Province as well as to relevant ministry 35 Engage research institute, university or consulting company to develop integrated model for baseline and mitigation scenario including macroeconomic assessment and to carry out study on GHG emission projection (BAU) and mitigation for key sectors at national level and DKI Jakarta as well as Riau Province 36 Material and good for supporting the development and study on GHG emission projection (BAU) and mitigation 37 Software and hardware procurement for developing a tool for integrated baseline and mitigation scenario 38 LUCF expert will be hired at a rate of $1,125 per week for 18 weeks for the second year, 22 weeks third year, and 18 weeks the fourth year 39 DSA and inter-island airfares, local transport, for national consultants and experts to attend focus group discussion and workshop in defining baseline and applying MRV at relevant ministries and provinces 40 Research institute, university or consulting company engaged to develop methodology and tools for mitigation actions MRV and carry out training on defining baseline and MRV at sectoral level (relevant ministry) and local governments 41 Material and good for developing methodology and tools for MRV and supporting training on defining baseline and MRV 42 Software or computer procurement to develop a tools for mitigation actions MRV 43 LUCF expert will be hired at a rate of $1,125 per week for 2 weeks for the second year, and 2 weeks the fourth year. Waste expert will be hired at a rate of $1,125 per week for 25 weeks for each of second, third and fourth years 44 DSA and inter-island airfares, local transport, for national consultants and experts to attend focus group discussion, meeting and workshop on designing GHG mitigation polices and measurement 45 Engage research institute, university or consulting company to perform detailed study on national mitigation policies performance (constrains and gap analysis, cost benefit, impact, needs related to transfer technology and financial support ) in coordination with the RAN-GRK secretariat and SIGN 46 Material and good for supporting the study on national mitigation policies performance and documentation the result 47 Procurement of computer and software for economic analysis and maintenance 48 A consultant will be hired at $1,125 per week for 26 weeks for the second and third year, and 23 weeks for the fourth year to prepare the national circumstances 49 DSA and inter-island airfares, local transport, for national consultants and experts to attend coordination, focus group discussion, meeting and workshop for getting national circumstances data and other relevant information as well as to go to site of activities related to climate change 50 Organize focus group discussion and workshops on updated BUR and TNC documents, and associated material and good for supporting coordination, meeting, focus group discussion and workshop 51 International consultant will be hired to review BUR and TNC documents 52 Cost of translator at the rate of $600 per week for 15 weeks each for the first two years and 20 weeks for the third year, and IT specialist at the rate of $600 per week for 15 weeks each for the first two years and 20 weeks for the third year 53 A portion of the salary for a full time National Project Coordinator as he will be overseeing the process. Salary is determined at the UNDP standard level for SC-9 post. 54 DSA and inter-island airfares, local transport, for national consultants and experts to attend coordination meeting, workshop and dissemination process 55 Engage a consulting company to translate BUR and TNC report into other languages (as necessary), to help organize workshop and to disseminate BUR and TNC information to governments and relevant stakeholders ; all related materials and goods for preparing and making all published documents of BUR, TNC and technical reports as well as for submitting BUR and TNC 56 Computer and web maintenance 57 DSA and airfare to/from pilot site, local transport for monitoring and reporting related activities 58 An international consultant will conduct mid-term (40days x $500/day) and terminal evaluations (40days x $500/day). Page 41

46 Budget Notes 59 A company will be engaged to conduct annual audit ($3000x2 years, $4000 for the last year) 60 An inception workshop and all related costs including materials, goods and venue 61 Salary for a full time National Project Coordinator (SC-9 level contract), one full time assistant and one part time assistant (SC-5 level contract) at UNDP standard rate for service contracts 62 Travel expenses related to activity coordination which includes local and out of town transportation for meetings and workshops for the PMU staff, as well as any M&E related travel costs 63 Material and good for management unit 64 Direct Project Service costs Page 42

47 Table 1: Summary of Funds Amount Year 1 (USD) Amount Year 2 (USD) Amount Year 3 (USD) Total (USD) GEF 1,559,558 1,506,182 1,434,260 4,500,000 Government of Indonesia (including cofinance) 7,000,000 7,022,040 7,000,000 21,022,040 TOTAL 8,559,558 8,528,222 8,434,260 25,522,040 Table 2: GEF budget and co-financing (in USD) Consultants National consultants* * Details to be provided in Annex C of CEO endorsement request document. Estimated person weeks 1,175 (GEF) 0 (co-financing) GEF amount ($) Co-financing ($) Project total ($) 1,436, ,436,875 International consultants* 20 45, ,000 Total 1,195 1,481, ,481,875 Cost Items National consultants* Table 3: Project management budget (in USD) Total Estimated person weeks/months 260 (GEF) 0 (co-financing) GEF amount ($) Co-financing ($) Project total ($) 121, ,912 International consultants* Office facilities, equipment, vehicles and communications* 15, ,000 Travel* 6,000 2,000 Miscellaneous 14, ,628 UNDP Direct Project Services 62, ,460 Total 220, ,000 Page 43

48 V. Management Arrangement Indonesia invited UNDP to act as the GEF Implementing Agency for the development of the TNC project. UNDP will assist Indonesia for the entire project length to implement the activities set forth on behalf of the GEF. On behalf of the Government of Indonesia (GoI), the KLH will act as the Implementing Partner to coordinate and implement project activities. The Project for Preparation of TNC and other new information to the UNFCCC will be prepared and implemented by KLH of the GoI. KLH will be responsible for the technical implementation of the project as a whole. KLH holds the responsibility for preparing the BUR and TNC to the UNFCCC in coordination with other line ministries and the National Council for Climate Change (DNPI) as focal point for climate change will be responsible for ensuring all information in the BUR and TNC meets the UNFCCC requirements. Given the size and complexity of the project, KLH will coordinate the project activities through a project management cell. Partnerships between key partners and institutions will be facilitated and new partnerships encouraged, especially in areas not sufficiently addressed by the SNC. Preparation of the Third TNC and the BUR require a comprehensive institutional, technical and administrative arrangement, in addition to stakeholders consultation/participation in the various tasks and activities. To ensure adequate attention and participation, elaborate implementation arrangements have been devised. A National Steering Committee (NSC) under the chairmanship of Deputy Minister for Control of Environmental Degradation and Climate Change (Ministry of Environment) will oversee the preparation and implementation of the work programme of the TNC and the BUR. The NSC will have members from those administrative government Ministries/Departments, UNDP, related national councils and civil society organizations (as observers) which are concerned with the various elements of information in these two reports. Technical consultations are envisaged on multidisciplinary aspects of the information relating to GHG inventories, impacts, vulnerability and adaptation, climate scenarios, sea level rise etc. A number of wide ranging consultations are envisaged for TNC, BURs and for other elements. The NSC will closely work with other multi-sectoral and multi-stakeholder teams, namely Coordination Team on Climate Change (CT-CC) which was established through a decree of Minister of National Planning and Development (BAPPENAS) Number 38/M.PPN/HK/ and National Steering Committee on National GHG Inventory (SC-SIGN). The CT-CC is responsible for providing general direction to line ministries and local governments in the implementation of national action plan on climate change mitigation and climate change adaptation and for establishing policy and strategy recommendations in addressing climate change mitigation and adaptation. The CT-CC is supported by six sectoral working groups, i.e., (i) Agriculture, (ii) Forestry and Peatland, (iii) Energy, transportation and industry, (iv) Waste Management, (v) Supporting and Cross Sectoral and (vi) Climate Change Adaptation. The SC-SIGN is responsible for providing general direction for the line ministries and local governments in the development of national GHG Inventory and monitoring the impact of the implementation of mitigation on GHG emission reduction. SC-SIGN is supported by GHG Inventory Working Groups from various line ministries. With a view to oversee and provide guidance on the implementation of the work programme for preparation of the TNC, BUR and the International Consultation and Analysis (ICA) of BURs as defined in the Decision 1/CP.17, the terms of reference for the NSC is defined as the following: (A) The NSC would oversee the implementation of the work programme of preparation of TNC and the BUR. Page 44

49 (B) Provide guidance on issues namely activity data and emission factors relating to various sectors and sources of anthropogenic GHG emissions, vulnerability, impacts and adaptation and other related matters. (C) Advice on consideration of National Mitigation Action Plan (RAN-GRK) for inclusion in the BUR. (D) Consider and provide guidance on any matter related to ICA and BUR. The terms of the Committee will be for a period of three years with effect from the date of notification. A National Project Director (NPD) supported by Project Management Unit (PMU) will implement the project. The NPD will liaise between the National Steering Committee (NSC), other committees (CT- CC, SC-SIGN, among others) and the PMU who will carry out the actual work of this project. The NPD will be responsible for communicating to the NSC, the overall management and implementation of the project. The PMU will be responsible for implementation of the work programme and coordination of the various activities. The NPD will also be responsible for the overall management and coordination of the project technical activities, providing supervision of project implementation and assisting in reviewing BUR and TNC documents. Two working groups will be established to support the NPD in the preparation on BUR and TNC. The two working groups will work closely with other existing climate change working groups such as CT-CC and SC-SIGN. To support the working groups, two technical expert committees will also be established; one for GHG inventory and mitigation and the other for vulnerability and adaptation. Technical Expert Committees (TEC) will provide technical supports for the two working groups. The main tasks of the TEC on GHG Inventory and Mitigation are to (i) assist the WG on the development of MRV system at line ministries and local governments, (ii) assist the WG for the development of GHG inventory as required, (iii) conduct technical review of works produced by the WG, (iv) strengthen sectoral working group members on GHG Inventory/Mitigation, (v) provide update on international developments related to the issues of NIR and mitigations, and (vi) assist WG in the preparation of the BUR and TNC. The main tasks of the TEC on Vulnerability and adaptation are to (i) assist the WG in designing V&A assessment methodology, (ii) assist the line ministries and agencies in deliberating methodologies and assumptions used for the V&A assessment, (iii) assist sectors and local governments in the implementation of V&A assessments at national and local level, (iv) provide inputs in the development of guidelines for monitoring and evaluation of the impact of the implementation of adaptation actions, (v) provide update on international developments related to the issues of V&A, and (vi) assist WG in the preparation of the TNC. It is expected that after the completion of the TNC, the process for the development of BURs and future National Communications will be institutionalized. A schematic representation of the implementation arrangement is provided in Figure 1. Page 45

50 Figure 1. TNC project management structure During the process of implementation of the BUR and TNC activities, the NPD with direction from the NSC and other two national steering committees (CT-CC and SC-SIGN) will establish a clear working relationship and coordination mechanism between BUR and TNC working groups and all the working groups under the CT-CC and SC-SIGN to ensure that GHG inventory system is established to cover all the sectors across in the country. The National Project Coordinator (NPC) at the PMU will assist the NPD in providing advice and reviewing institutional arrangements, work program, technical cooperation, monitoring implementation progress of various activities under BUR and TNC, the work of all consultants and experts hired under the projects and other working groups, including national workshops and consultations. The NPC will be assisted by two assistants. The first project assistant will be responsible for keeping close contact and ensuring smooth coordination and information flow between sectoral working groups under SIGN (Inventory Development) and the Working Groups under the TNC, and the other project assistant between the six working groups under CT-CC and working groups under TNC. The working relationship between TNC and other working groups are presented in Figure 2. The NPC will be a full time staff hired for the duration of the project. It is critical that a highly qualified and motivated person with vast experience and proven track record of implementing and managing similar national projects. The NPD should approve the candidate selected. Further details on the draft ToRs of NPC, and two project assistants (one full time, one part time) are presented in Annex D. Page 46

51 SC-SIGN NSC CT-CC National Project Directior (NPD) Sectoral WGs under SIGN WG for the preparation of BUR WG for the preparation of TNC Six WGs under CT-CC Figure 2. Coordination and working relationship between the working groups in the preparation BUR and TNC. Doted and solid line indicated coordination and instruction line respectively 5.1 Detail Institutional Arrangement A detailed institutional arrangement is developed which involving line ministries in expediting the process of implementation for both BUR and TNC. There are 4 (four) working groups will be established, namely Working Group I - National Inventories, Working Group II - GHG Mitigation Policies and Measures to address Climate Change, Working Group III - Assessment of the Impacts, Vulnerability, and Adaptation Policies, Working Group IV - National Circumstances, as provided in Figure 3. The coordination of working group is provided in Figure 4. Figure 3. Detail Institutional Arrangement Page 47

52 Working Group I Working Group II Working Group III Working Group IV National GHG Inventories Coordinator: Assistant Deputy Minister for Mitigation and Atmospheric Function Preservation, Ministry of Environment GHG Mitigation Policies and Measures to Address Climate Change Coordinator: Director for the Environment, Ministry of National Development Planning / BAPPENAs Assessment of the Impacts, Vulnerability and Adaptation Policies Coordinator: Assistant Deputy Minister for Adaptation of Climate Change, Ministry of Environment National Circumstances Coordinator: Assistant Deputy Minister for Mitigation and Atmospheric Function Preservation, Ministry of Environment Relevant Ministries/Agencies Relevant Ministries/Agencies Relevant Ministries/Agencies Relevant Ministries/Agencies Ministry of Forestry Ministry of Agriculture Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources Ministry of Industry Ministry of Transportation Ministry of Public Works Ministry of Environment (Waste Units) BPS Ministry of Finance Ministry of Forestry Ministry of Agriculture Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources Ministry of Industry Ministry of Transportation Ministry of Public Works Ministry of Environment BPPT Ministry of National Development Planning / BAPPENAS Ministry of Home Affairs Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Ministry of Health Ministry of Agriculture Ministry of Public Works Ministry of Forestry BMKG BNPB BPS LAPAN LIPI Ministry of Forestry Ministry of Agriculture Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources Ministry of Industry Ministry of Transportation Ministry of Public Works Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Ministry of Research and Technology BMKG BNPB BPS LAPAN BIG Component 5 (Publication and Dissemination of the TNC and BUR) will be coordinated by National Council on Climate Change (Dewan Nasional Perubahan Iklim/DNPI) Figure 4. Coordination of Each Working Group Page 48

53 The link between each Working Group and Outputs of the Project is provided in Figure 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Working Group I - National GHG Inventories Coordinator: Assistant Deputy Minister for Mitigation and Atmospheric Function Preservation, Ministry of Environment Focus of Outputs: Relevant Ministries/Agencies: Established quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) of activity data and guidelines for organizing inventory Established GHG emission estimation and validation Established institutional arrangement for developing GHG inventory in two sectors (agriculture and waste) Trained technical staffs of relevant sectors in the development of GHG Inventory Established institutional arrangement (capacity and mechanism) for developing GHG inventory and its integration with national GHG system at two administrative areas (DKI Jakarta and Riau Province) Trained technical staff in the development of GHG inventory at the two administrative areas Developed and implemented local emission factor database for some sectors such as waste management, agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sectors including implementation of tier III methodologies for estimating GHG emissions and improvement in activity data quality Documented and established database for all sources and categories including local emission factors developed for AFOLU and waste sectors Documented and published GHG emissions inventory presented to stakeholders (Energy, IPPU, AFOLU,and Waste Sectors) GHG inventory for is publicly available on the web Min. of Environment, Min. of Energy MR, Min. of Transportation, Min. of Industry, Min. of Forestry, Min. of Agriculture, Min. of Public Works Min. of Environment, Min. of Energy MR, Min. of Transportation, Min. of Industry, Min. of Forestry, Min. of Agriculture, Min. of Public Works Min. of Environment, Min. of Industry, Min. of Agriculture, Min. of Public Works Min. of Environment, Min. of Industry, Min. of Agriculture, Min. of Public Works, BPS Min. of Environment, Province of DKI and Province of Riau Min. of Environment, BPS, Province of DKI and Province of Riau Min. of Environment, Min. of Industry, Min. of Agriculture, Min. of Forestry, Min. of Public Works Min. of Environment, Min. of Industry, Min. of Agriculture, Min. of Forestry, Min. of Public Works, BPS Min. of Environment, Min. of Industry, Min. of Agriculture, Min. of Forestry, Min. of Public Works Min. of Environment Figure 5. Working Group I - National GHG Inventories Page 49

54 Working Group II - GHG Mitigation Policies and Measures to Address Climate Change Coordinator: Director for the Environment, Ministry of National Development Planning / BAPPENAS Focus of Outputs: Relevant Ministries/Agencies: Developed and applied integrated model for projecting GHG emissions under BAU and mitigation scenarios including macroeconomic assessment of GHG mitigation measures Completed studies for projection of GHG emission under BAU and mitigation scenarios for key sectors at the national level and the two administrative areas Established methodologies and tools for GHG mitigation actions measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) and documented GHG emissions baseline Trained technical staff at sectoral and local level in defining baseline and applying MRV of the GHG mitigation actions Documentation of national climate change mitigation policies performance, for the policies such as the National Action Plan Addressing Climate Change (RAN-PI), the National Action Plan for Mitigation (RAN-GRK), and the Indonesian Climate Change Sectoral Roadmap (ICCSR) Report on the analysis and constraints pertaining to these implemented mitigation policies Analyzed and documented gap analysis in meeting the targets by these policies to be implemented between 2011 and 2013 Documented the technology transfer needs, and financial support needed to deploy a portfolio of prioritized mitigation options for key sectors at national and local level Dit. of the Environment BAPPENAS, Min. of Environment, Min. of Energy MR, Min. of Transportation, Min. of Industry, Min. of Forestry, Min. of Agriculture, Min. of Public Works Dit. of the Environment BAPPENAS, Min. of Environment, Province of DKI and Province of Riau Min. of Environment Min. of Environment Dit. of the Environment BAPPENAS Min. of Environment, Dit. of the Environment BAPPENAS, Min. of Energy MR, Min. of Transportation, Min. of Industry, Min. of Forestry, Min. of Agriculture, Min. of Public Works Min. of Environment Min. of Finance, BPPT Figure 6. Working Group II - GHG Mitigation Policies and Measures to Address Climate Change Page 50

55 Working Group III - Assessment of the Impacts, Vulnerability and Adaptation Policies Coordinator: Assistant Deputy Minister for Adaptation of Climate Change, Ministry of Environment Focus of Outputs: Relevant Ministries/Agencies: Reconstructed monthly historical rainfall and temperature data ( ), BMKG (Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysics Agency) established short term climate prediction ( ) and long-term climate projections ( ) from CMIP5 GCMs that will be downscaled into minimum 20 km x 20 km horizontal resolution, and will be available for public access. Validated daily and hourly historical rainfall data and temperature for some areas to BMKG (Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysics Agency) support climate impact assessment case studies. Trained scientists for climate modeling and climate statistical downscaling. This BMKG (Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysics Agency) activity is expected to train scientists to define climate scenario using regional climate models and statistical downscaling. The scientist may from research centers of line ministries, BMKG, universities and research institutes. Implemented analysis of climate variability and climate change at National level BMKG (Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysics Agency) (historical and projection) using output of B1.1 and B1.2 Developed and implemented tools and methodologies for vulnerability and climate Min. of Environment, Min. of Home Affairs, Min. of Marine impact assessment. Affairs and Fisheries, Min. of Health, Min. of Agriculture, Min.of Public Works, Min. of Forestry, BNPB, BPS, LAPAN, LIPI Trained local scientists on the use of vulnerability and climate impact assessment Min. of Environment tools. Conducted at least 10 case studies on vulnerability, climate change impact and adaptation at local level with different focus (coastal, food crops, livestock, forest, fisheries, water resources etc.) including socio-economic analysis depending on local prioritization. Developed framework to integrate adaptation policies and measures into planning processes Designed adaptation programs, options and measures at local/sectoral level with the participation of key stakeholders during 2010 to 2013 Developed a portfolio of prioritized adaptation options by sectors and their investment requirements Min. of Environment, Min. of Home Affairs, Min. of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, Min. of Health, Min. of Agriculture, Min.of Public Works, Min. of Forestry, BNPB, BPS, LAPAN, LIPI Ministry of National Planning and Development/Bappenas (Directorate for Environment) Min. of Environment, Min. of Home Affairs, Min. of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, Min. of Health, Min. of Agriculture, Min.of Public Works, Min. of Forestry, BNPB, BPS, LAPAN, LIPI Min. of Environment, Min. of Home Affairs, Min. of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, Min. of Health, Min. of Agriculture, Min.of Public Works, Min. of Forestry, BNPB, BPS, LAPAN, LIPI Page 51

56 Figure 7. Working Group III - Assessment of the Impacts, Vulnerability and Adaptation Policies Working Group IV - National Circumstances Assistant Deputy Minister for Mitigation and Atmospheric Function Preservation, Ministry of Environment Focus of Outputs: Relevant Ministries/Agencies: Update report with the information for regarding national circumstances, national and regional development priorities, as well as key additional information, and identified the needs Figure 8. Working Group IV - National Circumstances Min. of Environment, Min. of Energy MR, Min. of Transportation, Min. of Industry, Min. of Forestry, Min. of Agriculture, Min. of Public Works, Min. of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, Min. of Research and Technology, BMKG, BNPB, BPS, LAPAN, BIG Component of Publication and dissemination of the Third National Communication (TNC) and Biennial Update Report (BUR) Coordinator: National Council on Climate Change (DNPI) Focus of Outputs: Relevant Ministries/Agencies: Presented TNC and biennial update reports to Government and relevant stakeholders Prepared and submitted biennial update report of Indonesia to UNFCCC Min. of Environment National Council on Climate Change (DNPI) Published and submitted TNC of Indonesia to UNFCCC Published technical reports such as GHG inventories, V&A assessments at the sectoral level, brief summaries of key policy issues relevant for decision making All these documents are available to general public through various media including ministry website Submitted biennial update report National Council on Climate Change (DNPI) Min. of Environment Min. of Environment National Council on Climate Change (DNPI) Figure 9. Component of Publication and dissemination of the Third National Communication (TNC) and Biennial Update Report (BUR) Page 52

57 5.2 Schedule of the First Biennial Updated Report (BUR) Preparation NO ACTIVITIES A. GHG Inventory Review achievement of GHG Inventory X X Triwulan 1 Triwulan 2 Triwulan 3 Triwulan Improve GHG Inventory X X X 3 Develop Draft of GHG Inventory X X X X 4 Inter Ministerial Meetings for finalizing Draft X 5 QA/QC (Expert Panel on GHG Inventory ) X 6 Public Consultation X 7 Finalization of National GHG Inventory Report X X B. Mitigation Actions and Level of Support Received 1 Review achievement of mitigation actions X X X 2 Develop Draft of Mitigation Actions and Level of Support Received Report X X X X 3 Inter Ministerial Meetings for finalizing Draft X X 4 Public Consultation X 5 Finalization of Mitigation Actions and Level of Support Received Report X C Submission X 1 Submit BUR (A and B) from MoE to National Focal Point for UNFCCC, Coordinating Ministry for People's Welfare and Coordinating Ministry for The Economy 2 Submit BUR from National Focal Point for UNFCCC to UNFCCC Secretariat X X Page 53

58 VI. IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENT The project will be implemented under the framework of the UNDP Country Programme Action Plan (CPAP) applying the National Implementation Modality (NIM), where the KLH will act as the Implementing Partner. In line with the UNDP Executive Board decision DP/2005/3 dated 21 to 28 January 2005, UNDP s Programme and Operations Policies and Procedures (POPP) describes NIM as the overall management of UNDP programme activities in a specific programme country carried out by an eligible national entity of that country. NIM takes into consideration the technical and administrative capacity of the entity to assume responsibility for mobilizing and effectively applying the required inputs in order to achieve the expected outputs. The Implementing Partner is responsible and accountable for managing the project - including the monitoring and evaluation of project interventions - and achieving project outputs, and for the effective use of project resources. The transfer of financial resources is done in accordance with the Harmonized Approach to Cash Transfer (HACT) mechanism, which identifies the following four cash transfer modalities: 1. Direct Cash Transfers to Implementing Partners, for obligations and expenditures to be made by them in support of activities; 2. Direct Payments to vendors and other third parties, for obligations incurred by the Implementing Partners; 3. Reimbursement to Implementing Partners for obligations made and expenditure incurred by them in support of activities; 4. Direct Agency Implementation through which UNDP makes obligations and incurs expenditure in support of activities (Country Office Support Services COSS). UNDP has consulted with the Implementing Partner and agreed to adopt the Direct Agency Implementation or COSS as the most appropriate cash transfer modality for the project. Therefore, UNDP shall act as the Responsible Party to obtain goods and services required in the implementation of the project. Under the COSS arrangement, UNDP will be responsible for (i) the identification and recruitment of project and programme personnel, (ii) procurement of goods and services, (iii) the administration of donor financial contributions and, (iv) provision of other technical or administrative support required to deliver the outputs. In providing these services, UNDP will apply its rules and regulations. The Support Services and conditions attached to them are described in the Country Office Support Service Agreement in Annex F. Services provided by the UNDP Country Office, including those through the COSS modality, will be subject to audit by UNDP's external (the United Nations Board of Auditors) and/or internal auditors (UNDP s Office of Audit and Investigation). UNDP will provide technical guidance, administrative and managerial support and oversight to the project. A National Project Director will be appointed by the Implementing Partner to oversee and provide appropriate guidance to the UNDP-Project Management Unit, which will manage day to day activities of the project. However, the Implementing Partner will retain overall ownership of the programme, including authority to provide strategic guidance and to endorse the project Annual Work Plan. With respect to the Government of Indonesia s reporting procedures on grant realization, UNDP shall prepare the Minutes of Handover (Berita Acara Serah Terima BAST) of Goods and Services to be signed jointly by UNDP and the Implementing Partner s Authorized Budget Owner (Kuasa Pengguna Anggaran - KPA). This will be submitted by the Implementing Partner to the Directorate General of Debt Management (Direktorat Jenderal Pengelolaan Utang DJPU) and the State Treasury Service Page 54

59 Office (Kantor Pelayanan Pembendaharaan Negara KPPN) under the Directorate General of Treasury (Direktorat Jenderal Perbendaharaan) of the Ministry of Finance. Year Table 4: Estimate of direct project services (DPS)/COSS (US$) DPS/COSS (support for recruitments, procurement, selection & awarding of sub-contracts, approvals, etc.) Year 1 (USD) Year 2 (USD) Year 3 (USD) Total (US$) 20,820 20,820 20,820 62,460 Total (US$) 20,820 20,820 20,820 62,460 Prior obligations and prerequisites No prior obligations or prerequisites have been identified Audit Arrangements The Government will provide the UNDP Resident Representative with certified periodic financial statements, and with an annual audit of the financial statements relating to the status of UNDP (including GEF) funds according to the established procedures set out in the programming and finance manuals. The audit will be conducted by the legally recognized auditor of the Government, or by a commercial auditor engaged by the Government. Page 55

60 VII. MONITORING FRAMEWORK AND EVALUATION Project monitoring and evaluation (M&E) will be conducted in accordance with established UNDP and GEF procedures and be led by the project team and the UNDP Country Office (UNDP-CO) with support from UNDP/GEF. The Project Results Framework (PRF, see Section III) provides performance and impact indicators with their corresponding means of verification. The PRF will be the reference for monitoring the project's implementation and for (independent) evaluation of performance and impacts. The project management unit will prepare a detailed M&E plan to be presented at the Inception Workshop. This Workshop (see below) provides a platform for reviewing and fine-tuning of indicators and means of verification, in a manner consistent with the expected outcomes for the project. Monitoring and reporting Project monitoring consists of a number of day-to-day and periodic activities, including: (i) day to day monitoring by the PMU (Project Manager); (ii) periodic monitoring by UNDP-CO (Programme Officer) on a quarterly basis; and (iii) annual monitoring through Tripartite Reviews KLH, UNDP- CO, GEF). UNDP CO and the UNDP RCU will conduct visits to project and field sites on yearly basis following the agreed schedule in the project's Inception Report/Annual Work Plan to assess first hand project progress. Project monitoring and reporting involves periodic submission of standard report by the PMU to UNDP-CO including (i) Project Inception Workshop Report, to be prepared immediately after the Inception Workshop; (ii) Quarterly Progress Reports, outlining main updates in project progress; (iii) Annual Project Review/Project Implementation Reports, which is used by UNDP-CO, and UNDP/GEF RCU for review of project progress and as input for reporting at an aggregate level; (iv) Project Terminal Report, to be prepared within three months before project finalization. Project start: A Project Inception Workshop will be held within the first 2 months of project start with those with assigned roles in the project organization structure, UNDP country office and where appropriate/feasible regional technical policy and programme advisors as well as other stakeholders. The Inception Workshop is crucial to building ownership for the project results and to plan the first year annual work plan. The Inception Workshop would address a number of key issues including: a) Assist all partners to fully understand and take ownership of the project. Detail their roles, support services and complementary responsibilities including those of UNDP vis à vis the project participants. Discuss the roles, functions, and responsibilities within the project's decision-making structures, including reporting and communication lines, and conflict resolution mechanisms. The Terms of Reference for project staff will be discussed again if needed. b) Based on the project results framework and the relevant GEF Tracking Tool if appropriate, finalize the first annual work plan. Review and agree on the indicators, targets and their means of verification, and recheck assumptions and risks. c) Provide a detailed overview of reporting, monitoring and evaluation (M&E) requirements. The Monitoring and Evaluation work plan and budget should be agreed and scheduled. d) Discuss financial reporting procedures and obligations, and arrangements for annual audit. Page 56

61 e) Plan and schedule meetings of various committees of the Project. Roles and responsibilities of all project organisation structures should be clarified and meetings planned. The first such meeting should be held within the first 12 months following the inception workshop. An Inception Workshop report is a key reference document and must be prepared and shared with participants to formalize various agreements and plans decided during the meeting. Quarterly: Progress made shall be monitored in the UNDP Enhanced Results Based Management Platform. Based on the initial risk analysis submitted, the risk log shall be regularly updated in ATLAS. Risks become critical when the impact and probability are high. Based on the information recorded in Atlas, a Project Progress Reports (PPR) can be generated in the Executive Snapshot. Other ATLAS logs can be used to monitor issues, lessons learned etc. The use of these functions is a key indicator in the UNDP Executive Balanced Scorecard. Annual Review: Annual Project Review/Project Implementation Reports (APR/PIR): This key report is prepared to monitor progress made since project start and in particular for the previous reporting period (30 June to 1 July). The APR/PIR combines both UNDP and GEF reporting requirements. The APR/PIR includes, but is not limited to, reporting on the following: Progress made toward project objective and project outcomes - each with indicators, baseline data and end-of-project targets (cumulative) Project outputs delivered per project outcome (annual). Lesson learned/good practice. AWP and other expenditure reports Risk and adaptive management ATLAS Quarterly Progress Reports (QPR) Portfolio level indicators (i.e. GEF focal area tracking tools) are used by most focal areas on an annual basis as well. Periodic Monitoring through site visits: UNDP CO and the UNDP RCU may conduct visits to project sites based on the agreed schedule in the project's Inception Report/Annual Work Plan to assess first hand project progress. Other members of the Project Committees may also join these visits. A field visit report/btor will be prepared by the CO and UNDP RCU and will be circulated no less than one month after the visit to the NPD/NPA for appropriate onward distribution to project partners as deemed fit. Mid-term of project cycle: The project will undergo an independent Mid-Term Evaluation at the mid-point of project implementation (around December 2014). The Mid-Term Evaluation will determine progress being made towards the achievement of outcomes and will identify course correction, if needed. It will focus on the effectiveness, efficiency and timeliness of project implementation; will highlight issues requiring decisions and actions; and will present initial lessons learned about project design, implementation and management. Findings of this review will be incorporated as recommendations for enhanced implementation during the final half of the project s term. The organization, terms of reference and timing of the mid-term evaluation will be decided after consultation between the parties to the project document. The Terms of Reference for this Mid-term evaluation will be prepared by the UNDP CO based on guidance from the Regional Coordinating Unit and UNDP-GEF. The Page 57

62 management response and the evaluation will be uploaded to UNDP corporate systems, in particular the UNDP Evaluation Office Evaluation Resource Center (ERC). The relevant GEF Focal Area Tracking Tools will also be completed during the mid-term evaluation cycle. End of Project: An independent Terminal Evaluation will take place three months prior to the final NSC meeting and will be undertaken in accordance with UNDP and GEF guidance. The final evaluation will focus on the delivery of the project s results as initially planned (and as corrected after the mid-term evaluation, if any such correction took place). The final evaluation will look at impact and sustainability of results, including the contribution to capacity development and the achievement of global environmental benefits/goals. The Terms of Reference for this evaluation will be prepared by the UNDP CO based on guidance from the Regional Coordinating Unit and UNDP-GEF. The Terminal Evaluation should also provide recommendations for follow-up activities and requires a management response which should be uploaded to PIMS and to the UNDP Evaluation Office Evaluation Resource Center (ERC). The relevant GEF Focal Area Tracking Tools will also be completed during the final evaluation. During the last three months, the project team will prepare the Project Terminal Report. This comprehensive report will summarize the results achieved (objectives, outcomes, outputs), lessons learned, problems met and areas where results may not have been achieved. It will also layout recommendations for any further steps that may need to be taken to ensure sustainability and replicability of the project s results. Learning and knowledge sharing: Results from the project will be disseminated within and beyond the project intervention zone through existing information sharing networks and forums. The project will identify and participate, as relevant and appropriate, in scientific, policy-based and/or any other networks, which may be of benefit to project implementation though lessons learned. The project will identify, analyze, and share lessons learned that might be beneficial in the design and implementation of similar future projects. Finally, there will be a two-way flow of information between this project and other projects of a similar focus. Communications and visibility requirements: Full compliance is required with UNDP s Branding Guidelines. These can be accessed at and specific guidelines on UNDP logo use can be accessed at: Amongst other things, these guidelines describe when and how the UNDP logo needs to be used, as well as how the logos of donors to UNDP projects needs to be used. For the avoidance of any doubt, when logo use is required, the UNDP logo needs to be used alongside the GEF logo. The GEF logo can be accessed at: UNDP logo can be accessed at Full compliance is also required with the GEF s Communication and Visibility Guidelines (the GEF Guidelines ).The GEF Guidelines can be accessed at: Page 58

63 df. Amongst other things, the GEF Guidelines describe when and how the GEF logo needs to be used in project publications, vehicles, supplies and other project equipment. The GEF Guidelines also describe other GEF promotional requirements regarding press releases, press conferences, press visits, visits by Government officials, productions and other promotional items. Where other agencies and project partners have provided support through co-financing, their branding policies and requirements should be similarly applied. M&E workplan and budget Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) activities will be implemented according to UNDP-GEF guidelines. The Budget for M&E is US$ 80,000. The following table gives a tentative distribution of activities, roles of different agencies and budget. Table 5: Budget allocation M&E Item GEF funding Inception Workshop US$ 15,000 Mid-term Evaluation US$ 20,000 Terminal Evaluation US$ 20,000 Audits (total project duration) US$ 10,000 Monitoring related travels US$ 15,000 TOTAL BUDGET US$ 80,000 Type of M&E activity Inception Workshop and Report Development of M&E system Measurement of Means of Verification of project results. Measurement of Means of Verification for Project Progress on output and implementation Responsible Parties Project PMU/Project Implementation Team Project team, government executing agency NPD/NPC will oversee the hiring of specific studies and institutions, and delegate responsibilities to relevant team members. Oversight by Project Manager Project team ARR/PIR The Government, Implementing Agency (IA) Country Office, National Executing Agency, Project Manager and team UNDP CO UNDP RTA UNDP EEG Periodic status/ progress reports The Government, IA Country Office, National Executing Agency, Project Team, IA Task manager, and Target Groups, Project Manager and team Mid-term Evaluation Project management team UNDP CO and RCU External Consultants (i.e. evaluation team) Terminal Evaluation Project management team UNDP CO and RCU Budget US$ Excluding project team staff time Indicative cost: 15,000 None To be finalized in Inception Phase and Workshop. To be determined as part of the Annual Work Plan's preparation. None Part of PMU cost Indicative cost: 20,000 Indicative cost: 20,000 Time frame Within first two months of project start up At the beginning of project implementation Start, mid and end of project (during evaluation cycle) and annually when required. Annually prior to ARR/PIR and to the definition of annual work plans Annually Quarterly At the mid-point of project implementation. At least three months before the end of project Page 59

64 Type of M&E activity Responsible Parties External Consultants (i.e. evaluation team) Project Terminal Report Project manager and team UNDP CO local consultant Audit (considering total UNDP CO project duration) Project manager and team Travel related to Project manager and team monitoring Local consultants Visits to field sites UNDP CO UNDP RCU (as appropriate) Government representatives TOTAL indicative COST Excluding project team staff time and UNDP staff and travel expenses Budget US$ Excluding project team staff time None Indicative cost: 10,000 Indicative cost: 15,000 For GEF supported projects, paid from IA fees and operational budget US$ 80,000 Time frame implementation At least three months before the end of the project Yearly Yearly Yearly Page 60

65 VIII. LEGAL CONTEXT This document together with the CPAP signed by the Government and UNDP which is incorporated by reference constitute together a Project Document. (a) The Revised Basic Agreement for Technical Assistance signed 29 October 1954 between the United Nations, the International Labour Organisation, the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation, the International Civil Aviation Organisation, and the World Health Organisation and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia, (b) The Standard Agreement on Operational Assistance signed 12 June 1969 between the United Nations, the International Labour Organisation, the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation, the International Civil Aviation Organisation, the World Health Organisation, the International Telecommunication Union, the World Meteorological Organisation, the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Universal Postal Union, the Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organisation and the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia, (c) The Agreement signed 7 October 1960 between the United Nations Special Fund and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia, and (d) all CPAP provisions apply to this document. Additionally, this document together with the CPAP signed by the Government and UNDP which is incorporated by reference constitute together the instrument envisaged in the Supplemental Provisions to the Project Document, attached hereto as Annex E. References to the Executing Agency in this Annex shall be deemed to be references to the Implementing Partner: Ministry of Environment. The Implementing partner shall not be providing training facilities, land, buildings, equipment under this project. Consistent with the above Supplemental Provisions, the responsibility for the safety and security of the implementing partner and its personnel and property, and of UNDP s property in the implementing partner s custody, rests with the implementing partner. The implementing partner shall: a) put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the project is being carried; b) assume all risks and liabilities related to the implementing partner s security, and the full implementation of the security plan. UNDP reserves the right to verify whether such a plan is in place, and to suggest modifications to the plan when necessary. Failure to maintain and implement an appropriate security plan as required hereunder shall be deemed a breach of this agreement. The implementing partner agrees to undertake all reasonable efforts to ensure that none of the UNDP funds received pursuant to the Project Document are used to provide support to individuals or entities associated with terrorism and that the recipients of any amounts provided by UNDP hereunder do not appear on the list maintained by the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1267 (1999). The list can be accessed via Page 61

66 This provision must be included in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into under this Project Document. All activities herein shall comply with UNDP National Execution (NEX) Guidelines. The following types of revisions may be made to the Project Document, with the signature of the UNDP only, provided it is assured that the other parties involved in the Project have no objections to the proposed changes: (1) Revisions which do not involve significant changes to the immediate objectives, outputs or activities of the Project, but are caused by the rearrangement of inputs agreed to or by cost increases due to inflation, etc.; and (2) Mandatory annual revisions, which re-phase the delivery of Project inputs or increased experts or other costs due to inflation or take into account expenditures flexibility. Supplemental provision of legal context is presented in Annex E. Page 62

67 IX. ANNEXES ANNEX A: Detailed List of Project Activities and Potential Partners Outcome #A1 National and local institutional arrangements for GHG inventories designed and strengthened. Output A1.1. Established quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) of activity data and guidelines for organizing inventory Activity A1.1 Activity A1.1 will focus in achieving the improvement of QA/QC and establishment of inventory organization guideline, the following tasks are proposed: - review of IPCC Good Practices Guidelines - develop and improve data QC and validation procedures, - develop and improve data verification (QA) system and procedures, - develop system for documenting process of checking quality of activity data - develop of guidelines for collecting, archiving and organizing GHG inventory data - report preparation The parties to be involved in the tasks related to the output A.1.1 include: - KLH (Ministry of Environment) and relevant ministries/institutions - Sub-national governments - Biro Pusat Statistik (BPS) and Badan Standarisasi Nasional (BSN) - Private Sector (industries, estates, forest estates, mining, association, etc) - Universities and research institutions Output A.1.2 Established GHG emission estimation and validation Activity A1.2 Activities of Output A.1.2 will focus on the development of GHG emission estimation and validation mechanism within related line ministries. To achieve this output, following tasks are proposed. - Review and improvement of existing system for estimating and validating GHG emission - Develop mechanism for data access, collection and sharing within related line ministries - Develop internal mechanism for monitoring/controlling (QC) estimation of GHG emission - Develop internal mechanism for validating (QA) GHG emission estimates - Develop system for documenting the process of GHG emission estimation and validation - Report preparation The parties to be involved in the tasks related to the output A.1.2 include: - KLH (Ministry of Environment) and relevant ministries/institutions - Sub-national governments - BPS - Private Sector (industries, estates, forest estates, mining, association, etc) - Universities and research institutions Output A1.3. Established institutional arrangement for developing GHG inventory in two sectors (agriculture and waste). Activity A1.3 The tasks under the Output A.1.3 cover: - Review existing studies or assessment concerning institutional arrangement carried out by JICA and GIZ for developing GHG inventory in waste sector as well as studies or assessment carried out by Ministry of Agriculture for developing GHG inventory in agriculture sector; - Develop institutional arrangements for developing GHG Inventory on a continuing basis in waste sector and agriculture sector, including institutional framework and capacity building; inputs for Page 63

68 the development of this institutional arrangements among others is from the results of the above review. - Development of capacity building in GHG inventory for agriculture and waste sector. - Report preparation The parties to be involved in activities related to the output A.1.3 include: - KLH - Ministry of Agriculture - Ministry of Industry - Ministry of Public Works - Sub-national Government - Private Sector (industries, estates, forest estates, association, etc.) - Universities and research institutions Output A1.4. Trained technical staffs of relevant sectors in the development of GHG Inventory Activity A1.4 Tasks: develop a systematic training program for development of GHG inventory develop training module for GHG Inventory based on IPCC Guidelines and GPG Identification of potential relevant sectors as participants on GHG Inventory Training Training technical staffs from relevant sectors in developing GHG Inventory Report preparation Involved institutions: - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions - Bappenas - Private Sector (industries, estates, forest estates, association, etc) - Universities and research institutions Indonesian IPCC Output A1.5. Established institutional arrangement (capacity and mechanism) for developing GHG inventory and its integration with national GHG system at two administrative areas (DKI Jakarta and Riau Province) Activity A1.5 Tasks: Develop institutional arrangement for developing GHG Inventory on a continuing basis in transportation and land based sector for DKI Jakarta and Riau Province, including institutional framework and capacity building. Identification and collection of relevant emission data from energy and transportation sectors for DKI Jakarta and from land-based emission and agro industry for Riau Province Integration of data and institutional arrangement of GHG inventory in DKI Jakarta and Riau Provinces into National GHG System (SIGN) at KLH Report preparation Involved institutions: - KLH - Ministry of Transportation - Ministry of Industry - Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources - Ministry of Agriculture - Ministry of Forestry - Bappenas - Ministry of Home Affairs Local government of DKI Jakarta and Riau Provinces Page 64

69 - Private Sector (industries, estates, forest estates, association, etc) - Universities and research institutions Output A1.6. Trained technical staff in the development of GHG inventory at the two administrative areas Activity A1.6 Tasks: develop a systematic training in the development of GHG inventory focus on transportation and forestry and land based sectors develop training module of GHG Inventory Identification of potential relevant sectors as participants on GHG Inventory Training Training technical staffs from DKI Jakarta and Riau Province in developing GHG Inventory in transportation and land based sector. Report preparation Involved institutions: - Local government of DKI Jakarta and Riau Provinces - Ministry of Home Affairs - KLH - Ministry of Transportation - Ministry of Industry - Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources - Ministry of Agriculture - Ministry of Forestry - Universities and research institutions Outcome #A2. Improved accuracy of GHG inventory through improved methodologies for estimating GHG emissions Output A2.1. Developed and implemented local emission factor database for some sectors such as waste management, agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sectors including implementation of tier III methodologies for estimating GHG emissions and improvement in activity data quality Activity A2.1 Tasks: Collect and compile local emission factors from line ministries, research institute, and universities; Design and preparing local emission factor database for waste management and AFOLU. Perform Tier 2 and 3 procedure Improvement in the quality of activity data Integration of results, analysis and elaboration of indicators Involved institutions: - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions - Bappenas - BPS - Ministry of Home Affairs Local governments - Private Sector (industries, estates, forest estates, mining, association, etc) - Universities and research institutions Page 65

70 Output A2.2 Documented and established database for all sources and categories including local emission factors developed for AFOLU and waste sectors Activity A2.2. Development of database for Emission Factors Tasks: Preparation of a database system for all source emission based on default emission factor (Tier 1) method and local emission factor developed for AFOLU and waste Testing of the database system Arching procedures Involved institutions: - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions - Bappenas - BPS - Ministry of Home Affairs Local governments - Private Sector (industries, estates, forest estates, mining, association, etc) - Universities and research institutions Outcome #A3 Developed National GHG inventories for series using the latest version of IPCC inventory guidelines Output A3.1. Documented and publ stakeholders thb ished GHG emissions inventory presented to Activity A Inventory for the Energy Sector Tasks: Improve information on the national energy balance; Improve and extent the bottom-up approach for GHG emissions estimation; Improve knowledge of Indonesian specific energy transformation sectors; Improve data and emissions estimation for the transportation sector using the IPCC Tier 2 or 3 Approach; and Improve methodology and obtain and extend data for estimating fugitive emissions. Perform Tier 1 and Tier 2 key GHG category analysis Perform Uncertainty Assessment Preparation of final report and results analysis Workshop to present results Involved institutions: - Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources; - Ministry of Transportation; - Ministry of Industry - Pertamina - KLH - BPS - Private Sector (industries, estates, mining, association, etc) - Universities and research institutions Activity A Inventory for the Industry Process Sector. Tasks: Improve information on the national production capacity of industries and companies that generates GHG emission from IPPU Improve and extent the bottom-up approach for GHG emissions estimation; Improve knowledge of key sources of GHG emission from IPPU, type of emissions, and type of activity data and emission factors; Page 66

71 Improve data and emissions estimation for the transportation sector using the IPCC Tier 2 Approach; and Improve methodology and obtain and extend data for estimating GHG emissions from product use. Involved institutions: - Ministry of Industry - Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources; - KLH - BPS and other statistical institutions - Large industries/companies relevant to energy activity (Pertamina, PLN and IPP, oil and gas companies, coal mining companies, large industries/manufactures, transport companies, etc.). - Universities and research institutions Activity A Inventory for the Agricultural Sector. Tasks improve activity data and assessment of livestock enteric fermentation and manure management sectors, including a regional assessment of manure management systems; improve activity data and assessment of rice cultivation by using a new paddy field map generated from high resolution satellite data, including specific emission factors and scale factors for rice in mineral soil and peat develop country-specific emission factors for N2O emissions from agricultural soils and proceed with the studies related to emission factors for rice cultivation initiated in the SNC. Improve estimation of biomass burning from cropland (paddy field). improve activity data and assessment of lands converted to cropland Improve estimation of emissions from oil palm plantation particularly in peat land, fertilizer application, and liming. Perform Tier 1 and Tier 2 key GHG category analysis Perform Uncertainty Assessment Preparation of final report and results analysis Workshop to present results Involved institutions: - Ministry of Agriculture; - Ministry of Forestry; - KLH - BPS - Universities and research institutions Activity A Inventory for the LULUCF. Tasks: define primary land use categories and selected subcategories using medium resolution satellite data in 2000 and 2010 for the entire national territory; improve activity data and assessment of five carbon pools, using in addition: a) main literature concerning biomass stocks for the other biomass; b) reference soil carbon stock map, c) peatland map, d) literature concerning peat land emission from various crop land subcategories map the changes in land use from 2000 and 2010 using geo-referenced technology; update inventory ; estimate non-co 2 emissions from forest fire and peat land Perform Tier 1 and Tier 2 key GHG category analysis Perform Uncertainty Assessment Preparation of final report and results analysis Workshop to present results Page 67

72 Involved institutions: - Ministry of Forestry; - Ministry of Agriculture; - KLH - LAPAN - BIG - BPS - Universities and research institutions Activity A Inventory for the Waste Sector. Tasks: improve data and extend estimates for solid waste disposal sector with regional evaluation of waste generation rates, waste composition and disposal practices; improve data and extend estimates for industrial waste water handling sector by type of industry; and improve the estimate the GHG emissions from waste incineration sector Perform Tier 1 and Tier 2 key GHG category analysis Perform Uncertainty Assessment Preparation of final report and results analysis Workshop to present results Involved institutions: - KLH - Ministry of Industry - Ministry of Public Work - Private Sector (industries, estates, forest estates, association, etc) - BPS - Universities and research institutions Output A3.2. GHG inventory for is publicly available on the web Activity A.3.2. Tasks: Preparation of an electronic version of the publication Involved institutions: - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions - Ministry of Communication and Information Technology B. Assessment of the impacts, vulnerability and adaptation policies and measures to address climate change, variability and extreme events Outcome # B1. Availability of historical and projection of climate data at national level with a resolution of 20 km x20 km and enabled public access. Output B1.1. Reconstructed monthly historical rainfall and temperature data ( ), established short term climate prediction ( ) and long-term climate projections ( ) from CMIP5 GCMs that will be downscaled into minimum 20 km x 20 km horizontal resolution, and will be available for public access. Activity B Climate data collections from various relevant sources that include in situ observations, satellite-based observations, reanalysis, modeling and downscaling results. Tasks: Establishment of database for historical climate data and projections for Indonesia collected from BMKG as well as from other national, regional and global sources; Historical climate data comprises datasets from reconstructed monthly historical rainfall and temperature data Page 68

73 ( ), while for projection data, the use of CMIP5 climate scenario datasets will be a priority in order to update climate change scenarios for Indonesia based on a new generation of climate change scenarios that cover near-term ( ) and long-term ( ) climate change projections. Identification of data availability in the context of their spatial and temporal coverage Development of historical climate data quality control and validation for better data quality Development of specific climate indices for Indonesia that can be used for V&A assessment, especially related to climate extremes Provide a web-based system to enabled public access to the reconstructed and modelled climate datasets Involved institutions: - BMKG - LAPAN - BPPT - PNPB - LIPI - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions - Indonesian IPCC - Universities and research institutions Activity B Development of historical climate reconstruction data as well as future climate projection data at fine-scaled 20 km x 20 km horizontal resolutions. Tasks: Evaluations on the availability of historical climate data and projections Development and utilization of methodologies on dynamical and/or statistical downscaling techniques to reproduce fine-scale climate projection datasets into minimum 20 km x 20 km horizontal resolution Development of historical climate reconstruction data with 20 km x 20 km resolutions. Establishment of regional climate model (RCM) simulations for Indonesia Development of statistical downscaling of multi-model outputs in addition to dynamical downscaling results from RCM Conducting comparative study and analysis for different climate data in order to get a range of historical and projection of climate change conditions in Indonesia Enrich the content of web-based system (developed in Activity B1.1.1) with the reconstructed and downscaled climate data for supporting V&A assessment at sectoral and local level Involved institutions: - BMKG - LAPAN - BPPT - BNPB - LIPI - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions - Indonesian IPCC - Universities and research institutions Output B1.2. Validated daily and hourly historical rainfall data and temperature for some areas to support climate impact assessment case studies. Activity B1.2. Tasks: Identify and select specific region that will be considered for climate change impact assessment studies Page 69

74 Collect daily and hourly data from the selected sites where the datasets are available. Performing quality control and validations to daily and hourly historical climate data. Verify temporal accuracy of the model simulation by using the hourly increment precipitation data recorded in several climate stations in Indonesia. Involved institutions: - BMKG - LAPAN - BPPT - LIPI - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions - Indonesian IPCC - Universities and research institutions Output B1.3. Trained scientists for climate modeling and climate statistical downscaling. This activity is expected to train scientists to define climate scenario using regional climate models and statistical downscaling. The scientist may from research centers of line ministries, BMKG, universities and research institutes. Activity B1.3. Tasks: Development of methodology and tools specifically designed for training activities on climate modeling and downscaling techniques Development of training modules in climate modeling and climate statistical downscaling Development and establishment of systematic training on climate modeling and climate statistical downscaling; this includes organization of training of trainers Involved institutions: - BMKG - LAPAN - BPPT - LIPI - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions - Indonesian IPCC - Universities and research institutions Output B1.4. Implemented analysis of climate variability and climate change at National level (historical and projection) using output of B1.1 and B1.2 Activity B1.4. Tasks: Development of analysis of climate variability and change by using reconstructed, refined and downscaled climate data to support impact studies of specific sectors, such as risk analysis of floods, incidence of malaria, forest fire/hot spot data, tides, etc. or analysis based on impact modeling results. Improvement and updates of historical and projected climate change analysis at national level for Indonesia with more detail spatial and temporal coverage. Involved institutions: - BMKG - LAPAN - BPPT - LIPI - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions Page 70

75 - Indonesian IPCC - Universities and research institutions Outcome # B2. Vulnerability, climate impact analysis and adaptation assessments carried out at local level in key sectors. Output B2.1. Developed and implemented tools and methodologies for vulnerability and climate impact assessment. Activity B2.1. Tasks: Development of methodologies for vulnerability and impact assessment in Indonesia. Development of V&A assessment tools for Indonesia to address climate change, climate variability and extreme events with an appropriate resolution. Identifying different types of basic vulnerability indices that could be used as default in conducting V&A assessment over different region in Indonesia Development of web-based vulnerability maps with user-defined features that is accessible and updatable for local governments and sectors Involved institutions: - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions - BPPT - LIPI - Indonesian IPCC - Universities and research institutions Output B2.2. Trained local scientists on the use of vulnerability and climate impact assessment tools. Activity B2.2. Tasks: Development of the training module based on developed tools and methodologies for vulnerability and climate impact assessment which is achieved in B2.1. Conducting training activities for a number of local scientists to enhance capacity in using vulnerability assessment and climate impact assessment tools. The local scientists who are followed this capacity building may come from provincial government and universities. Involved institutions: - BMKG - LAPAN - BPPT - LIPI - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions - Ministry of Home Affairs - Indonesian IPCC - Universities and research institutions - Local governments Output B2.3. Conducted at least 10 case studies on vulnerability, climate change impact and adaptation at local level with different focus (coastal, food crops, livestock, forest, fisheries, water resources etc.) including socio-economic analysis depending on local prioritization. Activity B2.3. Contents: Preparing regional scenarios with a higher spatial resolution data Selecting area of studies for V&A analysis Assess V&A of coastal sector to climate change, Page 71

76 Assess V&A of food crops sector to climate change, Assess V&A of livestock sector to climate change, Assess V&A of forest sector to climate change, Assess V&A of fisheries sector to climate change, Assess V&A of water resources sector to climate change Collections and preparations of vulnerability indices for the selected V&A assessment Performing analysis on the socio-economic impact of climate change for the selected locations Development of vulnerability maps for every case studies Involved institutions: - Ministry of Forestry - Ministry of Agriculture - Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries - Ministry of Health - Ministry of Public Work - KLH - Ministry of Home Affairs - BMKG - LAPAN - BPPT - LIPI - DNPI - Indonesian IPCC - Universities and research institutions - Local governments Outcome # B3. Adaptation policies and measures to address climate change are designed at the local/sectoral level and integrated into national and local planning processes. Output B3.1. Developed framework to integrate adaptation policies and measures into planning processes. Activity B3.1. Tasks: Identification of adaptation options for each related sector Incorporate the V&A studies conducted in B2 for the development of framework Seminar and consultation meetings with different stakeholders Development of a policy framework for climate change to mainstream climate change adaptation in development planning. Development of adaptation framework incorporating the impact assessment, vulnerability profile development, adaptation capacity assessment and participation of different stakeholders. Involved institutions: - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions - Ministry of Home Affairs - Bappenas - Indonesian IPCC - Universities - Local governments - Universities and research institutions Output B3.2. Designed adaptation programs, options and measures at local/sectoral level with the participation of key stakeholders during 2010 to Activity B3.2. Page 72

77 Tasks: Establishment of thirty years climatology information focusing on historical and future projection periods based on datasets prepared in B1.1 Conducting analysis that identify climate change, variability and extreme events and their impacts in various sectors in Indonesia at national and local level and identify options and measures for adaptation programs Development of adaptation programs, options and measures for water sector at national and local level Development of adaptation programs, options and measures for agriculture sector at national and local level Development of adaptation programs, options and measures for forestry sector at national and local level Development of assessment on the socioeconomic costs of adaptation measures for key sectors Conducting seminars and workshops, the designed adaptation programs, options and measures will be presented to relevant stakeholders to get input for improving the document. Involved institutions: - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions - Ministry of Home Affairs - Bappenas - Indonesian IPCC - Universities and research institutions - Local governments Output B3.3. Developed a portfolio of prioritized adaptation options by sectors and their investment requirements. Activity B3.3. Tasks: Collecting all the results of technical studies conducted in other sub-activities as well as collecting information from previous NC documents Collecting information about different prioritized adaptation options by sectors Conducting comparison and gaps analysis for every prioritized adaptation options in relation to the identification of costs, feasibility, barriers and requirements for implementation Development of strategic planning and socialization for the implementation of the selected adaptation options Involved institutions: - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions - Bappenas - Ministry of Home Affairs - Indonesian IPCC - Universities and research institutions - Local governments C.GHG mitigation policies and measures to address climate change Outcome # C1. Improved understanding of GHG emissions scenarios under BAU from sources and sinks; and future GHG mitigation options including their macro-economic impacts. Output C1.1. Developed and applied integrated model for projecting GHG emissions under BAU and mitigation scenarios including macroeconomic assessment of GHG mitigation measures Page 73

78 Activity C1.1 Tasks: Integration of group of experts Historic information compilation, processing and analysis Elaboration of a baseline and mitigation scenario based on the models such as LEAP, MARKAL and other mitigation assessment models Evaluation of emissions reduction Macroeconomic evaluation of the impacts in reducing emissions Elaboration of alternative scenarios Technical report Involved institutions: - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions - Bappenas - BMKG - Indonesian IPCC - Universities and research institutions Output C1.2. Completed studies for projection of GHG emission under BAU and mitigation scenarios for key sectors at the national level and the two administrative areas (see A1.2) Activity C1.2 Tasks: Integration of group of experts (key sector: agriculture and waste; two administrative: DKI Jakarta [transportation] and Riau Province [forestry]) Historic information compilation, processing and analysis Elaboration of a baseline and mitigation scenario Evaluation of emissions reduction Elaboration of alternative scenarios Technical report Involved institutions: - Ministry of Agriculture - Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources - Ministry of Forestry - Ministry of Transportation - Ministry of Home Affairs - KLH - Local government of DKI Jakarta and Riau Provinces - Universities and research institutions Outcome # C2. Increased capacity in measuring the achievement of GHG mitigation actions at sectoral and local level Output C2.1. Established methodologies and tools for GHG mitigation actions measurement, reporting and verification and documented GHG emissions baseline Activity C2.1 Tasks: Review of the state of the art on methodologies MRV and other related mechanisms Elaboration of proposals of methodologies and tools for GHG mitigation actions measurement, reporting and verification Documenting GHG emission baseline Involved institutions: - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions Page 74

79 - Bappenas - BMKG - Indonesian IPCC - Universities and research institutions Output C2.2. Trained technical staff at sectoral and local level in defining baseline and applying MRV of the GHG mitigation actions Activity C2.2 Tasks: Inviting line ministries and selected local government for enhancing capacity of technical staffs Training technical staffs in in defining baseline and applying MRV of the GHG mitigation actions Report preparation Involved institutions: - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions - Bappenas - BMKG - Indonesian IPCC - Universities and research institutions Outcome # C3. Designed GHG mitigation policies and measures at national level in the context of national action plans Output C3.1. Documentation of national climate change mitigation policies performance, for the policies such as the National Action Plan Addressing Climate Change (RAN-PI), the National Action Plan for Mitigation (RAN-GRK), and the Indonesian Climate Change Sectoral Roadmap (ICCSR) Activity C3.1 Tasks: identify and collect documents and report of national climate change mitigation policies performance from line ministries Archiving the documents and reports Involved institutions: - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions - Bappenas - Indonesian IPCC - Universities and research institutions Output C3.2 Report on the analysis and constraints pertaining to these implemented mitigation policies Activity C3.2 Tasks: Workshop to discuss and agree on key sectors Integration of mitigation actions, measures and programs for key sectors Evaluation of the impacts in reducing emissions by sector Cost-benefit analysis for technological aspect Identification of barriers for technological implementation Information analysis, synthesis and integration Preparation of technical report Involved institutions: Page 75

80 - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions - Bappenas - Indonesian IPCC - Universities and research institutions Output C3.3 Analyzed and documented gap analysis in meeting the targets by these policies to be implemented between 2011 and 2013 Activity C3.3 Tasks: Review and compilation of information on actions, measures and programs of line ministries, and local governments Develop indicator Information analysis, synthesis and integration Reporting and documenting the result Involved institutions: - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions - Bappenas - BPPT - - Indonesian IPCC - Universities and research institutions Output C3.4. Documented the technology transfer needs, and financial support needed to deploy a portfolio of prioritized mitigation options for key sectors at national and local level Activity C3.4 Tasks: Identify and document the potential technology transfer and financial support needs by considering macroeconomic indicators and GHGs emissions mitigation potential Workshop for definition of sectors for the documentation of mitigation technologies need and financial support. Compilation, processing and analysis for the state of the art climate change mitigation technologies Evaluation of the impacts in reducing emissions by sector Cost-benefit analysis for technological transfer need Identification of barriers for technology implementation Preparation of technical report Involved institutions: - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions - Bappenas - BPPT - Indonesian IPCC - Universities and research institutions D. Description of national circumstances and other relevant information Output D1.1. Prepared detailed report Activity D1.1 Tasks: Preparation of information contained in National Circumstances (national and regional development priorities, additional information relevant to the implementation of the Convention such as biennial update reports, needs and constrains associated with the Page 76

81 activities, measures and programs carried out to implement the Convention, and update of the financial resources and technical support received from national and international resources for activities related to climate change) Workshops on NC Integration of comments and elaboration of final draft Publication Involved institutions: - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions - Bappenas - BPPT - DNPI - Indonesian IPCC - Universities and research institutions E. Publication and dissemination of the Third National Communication (TNC) and biennial update report Output E1.1. Presented TNC and biennial update reports to Government and relevant stakeholders Activity E1.1 Tasks: Preparation of information contained in TNC and BUR Thematic workshops on TNC and BUR Integration of comments and elaboration of final draft Preparation and publication of thematic material for widely dissemination of information contained in the TNC and BUR Involved institutions: - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions - Bappenas - BMKG - BPPT - DNPI - Ministry of Home Affairs - Indonesian IPCC - Universities and research institutions - Local government Output E1.2. Prepared and submitted biennial update report of Indonesia to UNFCCC Activity E1.2 Tasks: Preparation of submitted TNC and BUR report Presentation of BUR draft and TNC draft for review and approval Integration of comments and elaboration of final document Translation of Executive Summary into English Involved institutions: - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions - Bappenas - BMKG - BPPT - DNPI - Ministry of Home Affairs - Indonesian IPCC Page 77

82 - Universities and research institutions - Local government Output E1.3. Published and submitted TNC of Indonesia to UNFCCC Activity E1.3 Tasks: Publishing of Indonesia TNC Submitting Indonesia TNC to UNFCC Involved institutions: - KLH - DNPI Output E1.4. Published technical reports such as GHG inventories, V&A assessments at the sectoral level, brief summaries of key policy issues relevant for decision making Activity E1.4 Tasks: Preparation of information contained in technical report Thematic workshop Publishing of technical report Involved institutions: - KLH and relevant ministries/institutions - Bappenas - BMKG - BPPT - DNPI - Indonesian IPCC - Universities and research institutions Output E1.5. All these documents are available to general public through various media including ministry website Activity E1.5 Tasks: Preparation of all documents Publication of all documents in popular language for widely dissemination of information contained in the TNC Involved institutions: - KLH - Minister of Communication and Information Technology - DNPI - Communication media Output E1.6. Submitted biennial update report Activity E1.6 Tasks: Publishing of Indonesia BUR Submitting Indonesia BUR to UNFCC Involved institutions: - KLH - DNPI Page 78

83 ANNEX B: Risk Analysis Project Title: Third National Communication to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Award ID: Date: June 2013 # Description 1 Coordination with multiple stakeholders may cause delay since a large number of actors from different economic sectors of the society are involved. 2 Limited technical capacity to execute the project Date Identified Type June 2013 Organizational P = 3 I = 1 June 2013 Organizational, Operational Impact & Probability: 1 (low) 5 (high) P = 3 I = 4 Countermeasures/ Mgt response This risk will be minimized by building on the inter-sector agreements and institutional collaboration established during the implementation of the Second National Communication (SNC). Commitment from all stakeholders will be also maintained through effective coordination and communication between stakeholders and Government. This risk is perceived to be medium since Indonesia has already submitted SNC, which has allowed the building and strengthening of capacities towards the evaluation and analysis of all activities related to climate change especially GHG inventory and V&A assessments. Owner National Project Director National Project Director Submitted, updated by UNDP CO UNDP CO Last Update Submission date Status No change Page 79

84 # Description 3 Technical problems in the development of the Indonesia Global Model of the Climate System. 4 Difficulty in hiring qualified people. 5 Limited political support to Climate Change issues. 6 Exchange rate risk Date Identified June 2013 Type Operational, Strategic Impact & Probability: 1 (low) 5 (high) P = 3 I = 2 June 2013 Organizational P = 3 I = 4 June 2013 Organizational, Strategic P = 1 I = 2 June 2013 Implementation P = 3 I = 3 Countermeasures/ Mgt response Indonesia s climate change strategy includes continuous efforts of research, capacity building and cooperation between different actors. Proper planning and supervision of technicalscientific development will help controlling this risk. Collaboration with institutions that have experience in global models will be a key to overcome technical problems. The project can draw on a pool of national experts. Proper preparation of ToR and contracts should help minimizing delay due to this cause. This risk is deemed very low since Indonesia has anchored its climate policy in national Law; and the NATCOMs is an integral element of a continuous process. The exchange rate between the US dollar and the Indonesian Rupiah (IDR) may decrease and/or fluctuate, potentially leading to a reduced value of GEF resources. This Owner National Project Director National Project Director National Project Director National Project Director Submitted, updated by UNDP CO UNDP CO UNDP CO UNDP CO Last Update Submission date Submission date Submission date Submission date Status No change No change No change No change Page 80

85 # Description Date Identified Type Impact & Probability: 1 (low) 5 (high) Countermeasures/ Mgt response external risk has affected the performance of SNC. For the TNC, careful financial planning should help anticipate such situation. Owner Submitted, updated by Last Update Status Page 81

86 ANNEX C: Stakeholders Consultation during Preparation of TNC Proposal Report of the Consultation Workshops for the Preparation of Third National Communication (TNC) and Biennial Update Report (BUR) to United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Jakarta, 5 November 2012 Consultation Workshop: Development of Full Size Project (FSP) Proposal for Third National Communication (TNC) and Biennial Update Report (BUR) to United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) The objectives of this workshop were: (1) to inform the progress of PIF towards Full Size Proposal for TNC; (2) to conduct GAP Analysis and proposed activities for TNC; and (3) to discuss strategy for the development of TNC. Stakeholders who participated in the workshop included the Ministry of Environment as coordinator for the development of TNC, representatives of ministries from all sector, JICA, GIZ, consultant, and other institutions. The list of institutions which attended the workshop is presented in the attachment 2. This workshop was organized by Ministry of Environment (MoE) of Indonesia. The agenda of the meeting is presented in Attachment 1 which included the opening presentation on The Development of Third National Communication from Deputy III of MoE, followed by presentation of Development of Full Size Proposal of TNC and BUR which was delivered by Prof. Rizaldi Boer, as consultant from CCROM SEAP IPB. In the opening session, Ibu Sulistyowati who is Assistant Deputy for Mitigation and Conservation of Atmospheric Function welcomed all the participants and delivered the opening presentation on The Development of Third National Communication. Introduction Session: Third National Communication (TNC) and Biennial Update Report (BUR) Ibu Listy provided an overview of the President Regulation No.61/2011, National Action Plan for GHG Emission Reduction (RAN-GRK) and President Regulation No.61/2011, Implementation of the National GHG Inventory. For the National GHG Inventory System, Indonesia has established SIGN Center with the aim of coordinating all ministries, local governments and other institutions to provide report on GHG Inventory. SIGN Center will compile all the reports and produce National GHG Inventory Report of Indonesia. The legal basis for the development of TNC and BUR was explained. Decision 1/CP.16, paragraph 60, the Conference of the Parties for submission of national communications, including inventories from non- Annex I Parties, on mitigation actions and their effects, and support received. In this regards as defined in Decision 2/CP.17, the non-annex I Parties should also submit Biennial Update Report (BUR) consistent with their capabilities and the level of support provided for reporting. Legal basis for the development of TNC was presented followed by presentation on stages of development TNC and BUR, the objectives of BUR, content of BUR, and institutional arrangement required for the development of BUR. 82

87 Session on Development of Full Size Proposal of TNC and BUR In this session, Prof. Rizaldi Boer, as Consultant for the development of TNC, outlined three main topics: (1) the progress of PIF (Project Identification Form) towards Full Size Proposal of TNC; (2) gap analysis and proposed activity for TNC; and (3) strategy for the development of TNC. The Full Size Proposal of TNC is expected to be done by December 20 th, He emphasized that BUR and National Communication (NatCom) is a way to communicate Indonesia s efforts in achieving the objectives of the convention. Therefore, commitment of all sectors in the process of preparation of BUR and NatCom is necessary to ensure that all efforts are comprehensively communicated to the UNFCCC. Brief perspective of UNDP as the GEF Implementing Agency Mr. Budhi Sayoko, as representative from UNDP first conveyed that UNDP is working as the implementing partner for the development of TNC. He highlighted the process of developing project planning draft is not easy and needed active participation of all sectors and stakeholders. He also gave an overview about the process of the submission of the proposal to UNDP. Recommendations and issues relevant to the development of TNC were discussed in the last session, guided by Ibu Listy. Key Recommendations of the Consultation Workshop on Development of Full Size Project (FSP) Proposal for Third National Communication (TNC) and Biennial Update Report (BUR) to United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Strategy and Institutional Arrangement 1) Ownership and Collaboration: The first thing that participants expressed is the need of active participation of all the sectors in order to improve the accuracy of the NC. Engagement between related line ministries, and ministry with local government or university to be considered and included in the project document proposal. 2) Capacity Building and Institutional Empowerment: The involvement of many sectors/government institutions is very important for the development of TNC, therefore capacity building for the government apparatus (at the local and national level) is required to sensitize and improve their knowledge and capability, especially regarding climate change mitigation and GHG Inventory. 3) Increase the involvement of related institutions: In the discussion session, a participant from forestry sector asked about the role of Satgas REDD in the TNC. As a response to this feedback, Ibu Listy stated that contribution of the related institution (such as Satgas REDD) is also important and need to be improved. 4) The need for legal basis and working group: A legal basis for the development of TNC is needed along with the establishment of working groups. Legal basis is required to enable the representatives from different sectors to participate in the TNC process and meetings. Regarding the working group, even though sectoral working group is already established in Sign, it is considered that specific working group for TNC is still needed. Two options considered are; (1) make use of the sectoral working group under the Sign; or (2) set up new working group, but focal point for each line ministry to be represented will be the same as the one who in charge in the existing working group. 5) General ToR for Line Ministries: To support the sustainability of the development of BUR, participants expressed the need for General Terms of Reference to be specified for each line ministry. The ToR is required in order to clarify the data needed. 83

88 6) BUR template for each sector: BUR template is needed to determine the scope of data to be reported by each sector. BUR template or Timeframe 246 also should be included in the ToR, which consists of what can be provided by the sector in 2 nd year, 4 th year and 6 th year according to Renstra (strategic planning) of each line ministry. The timeframe 246 will be useful to support the reporting cycle of each sector and to reduce the role of consultants. 7) Internal mechanism for reporting BUR: This mechanism is important to ensure the quality control of the report from each sector. There should be an arrangement to decide who s responsible for what. 8) Focal point from each sector: This consists of steering committee and technical team. Steering committee will be responsible to endorse every activity data / report provided by the institution, while technical team will be responsible to provide the data and attend the regular meetings while developing the TNC. The specification of the technical team should be decided, whether they will work for inventory or the implementation of RAN GRK. Gap Analysis 1) Enhance the documentation of activities in each sector: The need for enhancing the documentation system of activities in each sector was recommended. For instance, in health sector there are many activities related to climate change adaptation, but not well documented, and haven t been included in the NatCom document. 2) GHG concentration and increasing temperature data: A participant from BMKG suggested to use data of GHG concentration and increasing temperature, which are already available in BMKG. 3) Land transportation subsector: A large number of institutions are involved in transportation subsector. Thus collecting data for land transportation sector become difficult, especially for GHG Inventory and mitigation. An integrated body to accommodate data responsibility from land transportation subsector was suggested. 4) Domestic waste subsector: At the local level, data collection of domestic waste is very difficult, because institutions responsible in each region are diverse. For example, in some district domestic solid waste is managed by public work agency, but in other district it may be managed by environmental management agency. PDPAL is responsible for wastewater piping and treatment only in limited geographical areas within DKI Jakarta, but if it s not piping, the institution who responsible may be public work or any other agency. 5) Need to synchronize the activity data: Need for synchronization of collection of activity data by different institutions involved is necessary. Workshop Agenda Consultation Workshop: Development of Full Size Proposal of Third National Communication (TNC) and Biennial Update Report (BUR) to United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Le Meridien Hotel Jakarta, 5 November 2012 Waktu Kegiatan Keterangan Registrasi KLH dan UNDP Pengantar Third National Communicaton Biennial Update Report (BUR) Ir. Arief Yuwono,M.A. Deputi Pengendalian Kerusakan Lingkungan dan Perubahan Iklim, KLH 84

89 Paparan Perkembangan dari PIF Menuju Full Size Project (FSP) Proposal TNC Gap Analysis antara 2nd Natcom dan 3rd Natcom Strategi penyelesaian TNC Prof. Rizaldi Boer CCROM, IPB Diskusi dan Tanggapan K/L dipandu oleh Ir. Sulistyowati, M.M. Asisten Deputi Mitigasi dan Pelestarian Fungsi Atmosfer, KLH Penutup KLH List of Participants No. Name / Institution 1. Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Kesejahteraan Masyarakat 2. Kementerian Kehutanan 3. Kementerian Perhubungan 4. Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral 5. Kementerian Pertanian 6. Kementerian Perindustrian 7. Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum 8. Kementerian PPN (Bappenas) 9. Kementerian Keuangan 10. Dewan Nasional Perubahan Iklim (DNPI) 11. Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi dan Geofisika 12. Badan Pusat Statistik 13. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup 14. JICA 15. GIZ 16. Prof. Dr. N. H. Ravindranath 17. Prof. Dr. Rizaldi Boer / CCROM SEAP IPB 18. Dr. Retno Gumilang Dewi / PPE ITB 19. Dr. Budi Sayoko / Kepala Unit Lingkungan UNDP 85

90 Report of the Consultation Workshop for the Preparation of Third National Communication (TNC) and Biennial Update Report (BUR) to United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) 22 November 2012, Jakarta Indonesia submitted the Second National Communications Report to the UNFCCC on 14 January 2011 and updated it on 19 January A consultation workshop for preparation of Indonesia s Third National Communication and BUR was held in Jakarta on 22 th November The main purpose of the workshop was to consult various stakeholders about their perspectives regarding institutional coordination for BUR and TNC preparation and detailed activities of GHG inventory and mitigation to achieve outcomes of TNC, and to finalize TNC document proposal. Stakeholders who participated in the workshop included senior officers of the Ministry of Environment and Forests, which is the nodal ministry for the National Communications Project, Representatives of the Ministries, state governments, academic institutions, NGOs, donors, and consultants. In all, the workshop was attended by 30 participants. The consultation workshop Towards Preparation of Third National Communication (TNC) and Biennial Update Report (BUR) to United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was opened by Ms. Emma from (MoE). The consultation workshop consisted of morning and afternoon session. A. Morning Session The presentations and discussion on morning session included: Presentation 1 Ms. Emma (Ministry of Environment) Update information concerning achievements that have been generated from the previous meeting related to TNC preparation. There was also information about next year target (up to 2016). Submission of BUR 1 ( ) in 2014 and submission of TNC ( ) and in Discussion 1 Key question: Is there any synergy in BUR and TNC preparation activities with other related activities within your institution? Potential ongoing and proposed activities which may have common activities with TNC and BUR that emerged at the workshop include the following: - Workgroup NAMAs develop NAMAs for waste sector. Implementing agency General Working Agency and MoE. Financing from GIZ and CDKN. Status: MoU has been signed, start to implement end of SFM: GIZ and Bappenas. Status: MoU has been signed, start implementation by the end of BMU: Donor UK, executing agency Bappenas, implementing agency MoF. Expected to start beginning of Ten provinces have set agreement with Danida, ICRAF, GIZ, in coordination with Bappenas to review and improve RAN GRK and adaptation plan. 86

91 - Activities of Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources related to NAMAS has been started from 2011, while the implementation is during ESDM got support from ECM consultant (Netherland based) to develop NAMAs. - Cooperation with Japan regarding energy trade between two countries particularly LNG trade, promotion of projects in the field of oil and gas, electricity and gas network infrastructure development. - Collaboration with HIVOS for Biogas project. - For cement industry, there is a Decision of Ministry of Industry No.12/2012, which requires cement industry to reduce its emission by 3% during Up to 2015, the 3% target is still voluntary. This is related to collaboration project with French government to produce a report on potential of cement business and industry in Indonesia, potential emission reduction by 2030, and potential mitigation activities. GIZ continues this project in 2013 with specific target to make the existing target more achievable. - Collaboration between GIZ and Ministry of Transportation, namely: SUTIP project (Sustainable Urban Transportation Improvement Project) to reduce emission from transportation. The project has selected 3 cities as pilots (Medan, Batam, and Menado). - Ministry of Agriculture for generation of new data regarding peatland degradation to develop emission factor in Central Borneo, South Borneo, Jambi, Riau, and Papua. - Pilot project in 2013 in health sector (ICCPF). Up to now, MoH has established collaboration with Semarang government, related to adaptation activities. The team is assessing which activity is feasible to be implemented. - During the review of RAN GRK, it was planned to develop MONEV tool next year. Last week, there was a proposal for developing MONEV template. This activity is related to PP No.39 about MONEV for government program. It is aimed to come up with exact amount of budget needed for marginal cost or benchmark as the basis of MONEV. This is outside the indicators mentioned in PP No Ministry of Industry has collaboration with JICA, the pilot is located in South Sulawesi and North Sumatra, related to waste management. It is a pilot project to develop local capacity in executing mitigation action and institutional system of MRV While with GIZ, the location will be in Central and East Java for developing GHG inventory and its integration with national GHG system at two administrative areas. Presentation 2 Mr. Rizaldi Boer (CCROM): Institutional Arrangements for TNC and BUR 87

92 Discussion 2- Institutional Arrangements for TNC and BUR Discussion on difference in roles of advisory board and technical expert BUR is an obligation since it covers negotiations and agreements at the national and international level. Advisory will provide inputs to NSC on non-technical issues related to climate negotiations. It consists of experts who understand international climate related issues. Roles of Advisory committee: - deliberate on matters relating to development of NIR and RAN-GRK (National Mitigation Actions) with a view to enhance understanding of diversity of mitigation actions and their impacts on emission and linkage with NIR. - deliberate on assumptions and methodologies, sectors and gases covered and supports needed for implementation of RAN-GRK and outcomes. - consider and advise on general guidelines for domestic MRV of domestically supported mitigation actions. - Consider issues and devise approaches to address issues related to international MRV of RAN GRK. Roles of technical experts: - The Committee will deliberate on matters relating to the design, development of GHG inventory and implementation of mitigation actions - Assist in development of MRV system at line ministries and local governments through working groups - Assist/Involve as team of WG for the development of GHG inventory as required - Review of work produced by the WG - Part of working group (K/L) 88