PENNEAST PIPELINE PROJECT
|
|
- Grant Freeman
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC PENNEAST PIPELINE PROJECT RESOURCE REPORT 10 Alternatives FERC Docket No. CP Final FERC Section 7(c) Application September 2015
2 Resource Report 10 Alternatives FERC Environmental Checklist Part 380-Appendix A Minimum Filing Requirements for Environmental Reports Company Compliance or Inapplicability of Requirement Address the no action alternative. ( (l)(1)). Section 10.1 For large project, address the effect of energy conservation or energy alternatives to the project. ( (l)(1)). Identify system alternatives considered during the identification of the project and provide the rationale for rejecting each alternative. ( (l)(1)). Identify major and minor route alternatives considered to avoid impact on sensitive environmental areas (e.g., wetlands, parks, or residences) and provide sufficient comparative data to justify the selection of the proposed route. ( (l)(2)(ii)). Identify alternative sites considered for the location of major new aboveground facilities and provide sufficient comparative data to justify the selection of the proposed site. ( (l)(2)(ii)). Sections , and Section 10.2 Section 10.3 Section 10.4 FINAL 10-i FERC Section 7(c) Application
3 Section Contents Page No-Action Alternative Energy Conservation Energy Alternatives System Alternatives Transco Leidy Line Loop Columbia Gas Texas Eastern Pipeline Key Alternatives and Pipeline Deviations Key Alternatives Pipeline Deviations New Compression Aboveground Facilities - Alternative Sites Non-PennEast System Alternatives References FINAL 10-ii FERC Section 7(c) Application
4 Tables 10-1 Data Resources for Desktop Analysis Transco Leidy Line Alternative Summary of Key Alternatives Critical Issues Analysis for the PennEast Project Alternatives Original Alternative 1 to Original with ETG Spur Alternative 2 to Original with NJ Loop (Preferred Alternative ) Preferred November Preferred January Preferred March Proposed Critical Issues Analysis for MP of the Proposed and Corresponding Segment of the Original Critical Issues Analysis for MP of the Proposed and Corresponding Segment of the Original Summary of Pipeline Major Reroutes Critical Issues Analysis for the PennEast Major Reroute Critical Issues Analysis for the PennEast Major Reroute Critical Issues Analysis for the PennEast Major Reroute Critical Issues Analysis for the PennEast Major Reroute Critical Issues Analysis for the PennEast Major Reroute Summary of Pipeline Minor Reroutes Summary of Pipeline Deviations on Prior Alternatives Critical Issues Analysis for PennEast Compressor Station Alternatives Figures PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Transco Leidy Line Alternative Northeast Pennsylvania Production Area PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Original and Alternative 1 to Original with ETG Spur PennEast Pipeline Project s Map Original and Preferred November PennEast Pipeline Project s Map Original and Preferred November PennEast Pipeline Project s Map Original and Proposed FINAL 10-iii FERC Section 7(c) Application
5 PennEast Pipeline Project s Map Original and Proposed PennEast Pipeline Project Proposed Overview Map PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Original and Proposed PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Alternative 1 to Original with ETG Spur and Proposed PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Alternative 2 to Original with NJ Loop (Initial Preferred ) and Proposed PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map - Preferred November 2014 and Proposed PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map - Preferred January 2015 and Proposed PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Preferred March 2015 and Proposed PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Major Reroute PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Major Reroute PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Major Reroute PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Major Reroute PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Major Reroute PennEast Pipeline Project Compressor Station Alternative Map FINAL 10-iv FERC Section 7(c) Application
6 10.0 PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC (PennEast) has prepared this Resource Report to support its application to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (Certificate) for the PennEast Pipeline Project (Project). PennEast designed its Project to provide a direct and flexible path for transporting natural gas produced in the Marcellus Shale play in northeastern Pennsylvania to growing natural gas markets in New Jersey, eastern Pennsylvania, southeastern Pennsylvania and surrounding states with the capability of providing approximately 1.1 million dekatherms per day (MMDth/d) of year-round natural gas transportation service. This Resource Report focuses on the Project facilities and locations that PennEast selected as of September, The Project consists of the following primary components: 114 miles of new 36-inch diameter mainline pipeline extending from Dallas Township in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania to Hopewell Township in Mercer County, New Jersey; 2.1-miles of new 24-inch diameter lateral near Hellertown, Northampton County, Pennsylvania to transport gas to an interconnection with Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC (Columbia Gas) and UGI Utilities, Inc. (UGI Utilities); 0.6-miles of new 12-inch diameter lateral near Holland Township, Hunterdon County, New Jersey to transport gas to Pivotal Utility Holdings, Inc. (d/b/a Elizabethtown Gas) (Elizabethtown Gas) and NRG REMA, LLC s Gilbert Power Station; 1.4-miles of new 36-inch diameter lateral in West Amwell Township, Hunterdon County, New Jersey to transport gas to an interconnection with Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC (Algonquin) and Texas Eastern Transmission, LP (Texas Eastern); One new compressor station in Carbon County, Pennsylvania; and Various associated aboveground facilities including interconnects, launchers, receivers, and mainline block valves to support the pipeline system. The Project will be rated for a maximum allowable operating pressure (MAOP) of 1,480 pounds per square inch gauge (psig). Figure in Resource Report 1 provides a Project Overview Map showing the locations of the proposed pipeline route and associated facilities. This Resource Report discusses the alternatives identified and evaluated during the development of the Project and effects on the desired benefits of the Project. Four principal types of alternatives are evaluated in the following sections: No-action alternative; System alternatives; alternatives; and Aboveground site alternatives. PennEast designed the Project to reflect both customer need and siting requirements. Initially, PennEast identified a potential market need for the transportation of 800,000 dekatherms per day (Dth/d) of new natural gas supply to its customers in eastern Pennsylvania, New Jersey and surrounding states. PennEast held an open season between August 11, 2014, and August 29, Following the open season, PennEast executed precedent agreements with 12 shippers for 990,000 Dth/day of capacity. As a result of this increased demand, PennEast resized the proposed mainline pipeline from 30-inch to 36-inch diameter. FINAL 10-1 FERC Section 7(c) Application
7 PennEast evaluated the Project s siting options using a variety of criteria, including environmental and stakeholder impacts, economic benefits and costs, Project timing, operational parameters and engineering and technological parameters. The primary objective in evaluating alternatives for siting was to avoid, minimize, and, if necessary, mitigate adverse effects while satisfying the customer need discussed above. A Critical Issues Analysis (CIA) was conducted as an initial step in assessing the feasibility of the overall Project. This assessment focused on a Project initiation point at an existing pipeline facility in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania at Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. s (formerly known as Regency Energy Partners LP) (Regency) Wyoming Pipeline interconnect to an end point in Mercer County, New Jersey at an interconnect with Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Company, LLC (Transco). PennEast identified two preliminary routes through the initial screening. Initially, PennEast estimated that the proposed Project would be approximately 100 miles in length with a study corridor of 400 feet in width. For the initial CIA, PennEast performed a desktop analysis across an area of consideration approximately one-half mile in width along the corridors. This allowed PennEast to get a clear understanding of potential engineering and environmental constraints within the Project area and the expanded geography encompassed the necessary area for access roads and staging areas. Desktop Analysis For the Pennsylvania portions of the Project, PennEast utilized resources such as the Pennsylvania Spatial Data Access, Pennsylvania Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Mapping Directory and the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR) map viewer. These geospatial information clearinghouses allowed PennEast to gather relevant GIS data and filter on over 1000 data categories. Similarly, for the New Jersey portions of the Project, PennEast utilized resources such as the New Jersey Geographic Information Network (NJGIN) and the i-map New Jersey DEP application. Table 10-1 provides an overview of the data resources that were used for desktop analysis. PennEast exported data from various geospatial repositories and mapping applications into a kmz file for it to review with internal software such as Google Earth. In addition, PennEast assigned mile posts to the pipeline from the Wyoming Interconnect in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania to the terminus at Transco in Mercer County, New Jersey. Mile postings were to the nearest tenth of a mile and facilitated the tabulation and analysis of critical issues. Airports (NJDOT) Cemeteries (USGS GNIS) Table 10-1 Data Resources for Desktop Analysis NJ Farmland Preservation Program (State Agriculture Development Committee) NJ Listed Historic Districts (NJDEP) Churches (USGS GNIS) NJ Wellhead Protection Areas (Tiers 1, 2, 3) Classification Exception Areas (NJ) (NJDEP) Coal Mines (PA) (PADEP) Commercial Hazardous Waste Operations (PADEP) Core Habitat (Western PA Conservancy [WPC] Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program [PNHP]) NJ Surface Water Quality Standards (SWQS) (NJDEP) NJ Wetlands (NJDEP) NRHP Building (National Register Information System - NRHP) NRHP Structure (NRIS - NRHP) FINAL 10-2 FERC Section 7(c) Application
8 County Boundaries Critical Environmental and Historic Sites (NJ) Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zones (NJDEP) Exceptional Value or High Quality Waters (PA) (PADEP, PSU) Explore PA Trails (Aug. 2013) (PA DCNR) Farmland Preservation (PSU Agricultural Security Areas) FEMA 100-yr Flood Zone (FEMA) Federal Highway Administration (FHA) National Bridge Inventory NBI Bridges (Structurally Deficient or Functionally Obsolete) Highlands Preservation Areas (New Jersey Highlands Water Protection and Planning Council) Highlands Preservation Sewer Service Areas (NJDEP) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Wetlands (PA) (USFWS, NWI) Open Space or State Park (NJDEP Open Space (State, County, Cross-Acceptance) and D&R Greenway Land Trust) PA State Forests (PADCNR, 2013) PA State Game Lands (PADCNR, 2013) Parcels Provisional species of concern sites (WPC PNHP) Public Supply Wells (NJDEP) Railroads (PA) (PADCNR) Schools (USGS GNIS) NJ Schools (NJOIT OGIS, 2003) Historic Properties (NJ) (NJDEP, NRIS - NRHP) State Parks (PA) (PADCNR, 2013) Karst/Sinkholes (PA) (Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey [PaGS]) Known Contaminated Sites (NJDEP) LiDAR slopes >30% Municipality Boundaries (New Jersey Office of Information Technology, Office of Geographic Information Systems [NJOIT OGIS], 2010) Platts POWERmap existing transmission, gas, and product utility lines Supporting Landscape (WPC PNHP) PA Streams Chapter 93 Designated Use Warm Water Fishes Waters (PA) (PADEP, PSU) Waterbodies (PA) (NHD) Wells (PA) (PAGWIS) (NJDEP) The geospatial data was used to formulate alternatives as described in Section In addition, PennEast utilized this data to identify engineering constraints and key permits and approvals that would be required No-Action Alternative The no-action alternative would result in not constructing the Project, and would therefore not meet the Project shippers need for the firm transportation capacity commencing on November 1, 2017 as reflected in their commitments in the precedent agreements. Accordingly, this option would have adverse consequences on the markets they serve. An additional supply of natural gas to the region FINAL 10-3 FERC Section 7(c) Application
9 would provide a benefit to consumers, utilities and electric generators by providing enhanced competition among suppliers and pipeline transportation providers. Constructing the Project would satisfy the needs of shippers seeking (i) additional supply flexibility, diversity and reliability; (ii) liquid points for trading in locally produced gas from the Marcellus Shale and the Utica Shale; (iii) direct access to premium markets in the northeast and mid-atlantic regions; (iv) the ability to capture pricing differentials between the various interconnected market pipelines; (iv) enhanced natural gas transportation system reliability to the region with modern, state-of-the art facilities and (v) firm access to currently the most affordable long-lived dry gas reserves. These benefits would not be realized with the no-action alternative. The no-action alternative would avoid temporary and permanent environmental impacts associated with the Project. However, the Project shippers, including local distribution companies, power generators, marketers, producers and others, would likely pursue alternate natural gas transportation projects that could potentially result in similar environmental impacts. Potential examples of these impacts include the construction of additional or greenfield natural gas pipeline facilities in other locations, dependence on alternate higher emission fuel sources, such as coal or oil, and increased demand for already limited electrical resources. The winter season demonstrated that there were constraints in the Mid-Atlantic supply system, evidenced by the dramatic regional price impacts described in Figure of Resource Report 1. The lack of a new pipeline with access to supply sources in Pennsylvania will continue to create dramatic seasonal pricing fluctuations in Pennsylvania and New Jersey with higher gas and electric rates and potential for energy shortages during peak demand, resulting in threats to business continuity, public safety and national security. While the extreme pricing events of the winter were not as significant in the winter for a number of external factors, such as lower oil prices, the sustained difference between natural gas prices in the northeastern Pennsylvania production region and the market regions served by the Project were significant and lasted longer. This is shown in Figure of Resource Report 1. Given the Project shippers need for additional pipeline capacity, the potential benefit to regional economic growth from the proposed Project, and the potential for significant increase in regional air emissions or similar or greater environmental impacts resulting from an alternate natural gas transportation project if the Project was not constructed, no further analysis of this alternative was conducted. Therefore, the no-action alternative is not considered a viable alternative to the proposed action, because it would not accomplish the stated Project purpose and need to provide the volumes of natural gas transportation services to the expanding mid-atlantic market to serve the long-term pipeline transportation needs of the companies that have subscribed capacity on the PennEast system Energy Conservation The energy conservation alternatives discussed in this section will not meet the needs of the Project shippers in the proposed timeline and, therefore, are not preferable to the proposed action. However, together with increased supply of natural gas, energy conservation will continue to contribute to meeting the overall future energy needs of the marketplace. The use of the energy conservation alternative for meeting the demands of PennEast s customers includes the following potential results: Potential for improvements in energy conservation in the residential, commercial, and industrial sectors beyond the current energy conservation measures already being practiced; and FINAL 10-4 FERC Section 7(c) Application
10 Potential for increasing the efficiency of the existing natural gas transmission systems through system optimization, which includes the use of load management techniques at both the end-use consumer and utility level and the identification and elimination of bottlenecks in the existing gas transmission system that decrease the effective capacity of the system. Energy conservation has been successful in some areas, and it continues to be encouraged in the residential, commercial, and industrial sectors. However, natural gas continues to be considered the preferred non-renewable fuel because of its inherent clean-burning properties and, because it is produced and abundant in North America, it reduces reliance on foreign-produced oil. The implementation of air quality legislation enhances fuel conservation in numerous energy use sectors. In many cases, legislation encourages the use of natural gas over other more environmentally taxing fuels, such as oil and coal. Increases in population and commercial and industrial uses of natural gas have contributed to the increased demand for natural gas. The Project will help to increase the efficiency of the current natural gas transmission system by reducing bottlenecks in the system. Furthermore, this is primarily a market-driven project that is designed to provide a pipeline transportation solution to connect Marcellus Shale production located in close proximity to major growing natural gas markets. Programs designed to encourage fuel conservation are unlikely to eliminate the need to construct new pipeline infrastructure to serve this emerging production area. In summary, natural gas demand in the marketplace is continuing to grow despite programs designed to encourage fuel conservation. Conservation alone will not address the growing demand for natural gas in the relevant markets in the Project timeframe. Fuel conservation should continue to be an ongoing alternative used in concert with the development of additional, more efficient natural gas transportation and distribution systems. The modifications proposed by the Project can be considered steps to accomplishing this part of the energy conservation alternative Energy Alternatives The alternative energy sources discussed in this section would not meet the Project s purpose and need and, therefore, would not be preferable to the proposed action. Alternative energy sources used together with natural gas could contribute to meeting the overall future energy needs of the marketplace. Potential alternative energy sources include coal, oil, nuclear energy, liquefied natural gas (LNG), and electricity generated from these sources, as well as electricity generated from renewable sources such as solar, wind, and geothermal energy. Coal, although an available option, does not burn as cleanly as natural gas, and its use may contribute to the formation/pollution associated with acid rain unless costly air pollution controls are applied to coal-burning power plants. Area states have stringent air quality regulations and thresholds for stack emissions, fugitive emissions, and particulate handling that likely preclude coal as a viable option. A large amount of oil consumed in the United States is produced and purchased from overseas sources. Therefore, the use of additional foreign oil supplies to meet future energy demands in the expanding mid-atlantic markets could further increase the reliance on overseas crude petroleum and petroleum products. This could subsequently increase the potential economic and national security risks in the event of an emergency or a supply curtailment. Moreover, if new or expanded refineries were required to process the crude oil, various additional environmental problems could result (e.g., air pollution, visual intrusion, and noise). Much of the region s oil supply is transported by rail, which is statistically not as safe as natural gas transported by pipeline. FINAL 10-5 FERC Section 7(c) Application
11 Although nuclear power is seen by some as a means of reducing GHG emissions in power plants, other stakeholders are concerned with the environmental and regulatory challenges concerning safety and security, the disposal of toxic materials, and alternations to hydrological/biological systems would need to be addressed before any new nuclear power generation facilities could be constructed. As a result, proposals and any subsequent plans to construct new or expand existing plants in the Northeast would likely involve prolonged review periods that would not meet the objectives and timing of the Project. Moreover, nuclear is not an alternative to all of the Project s shippers, which require natural gas for purposes other than power production. For these reasons, nuclear power is not currently a practicable alternative to the Project and was eliminated from further review. LNG is a developing energy alternative in the Northeast. Several LNG facilities are being proposed as a means of addressing some of the energy needs in New England, New Jersey, and New York. However, many of these projects are still in the developmental stages, and the timing for these projects to receive approvals and be constructed does not address the current purpose and need of the Project. An LNG system alternative would not only require the construction of a liquefaction and vaporization facility, but also transportation of the necessary volume of LNG to the delivery point by truck or train using existing road and railways. Given the requirement for the construction of two new facilities as well as the number of truck and train trips that would be required on a continuous basis, the transportation of the required amount of natural gas is not preferable to the proposed Project. Wind, geothermal, and solar power have not yet been developed in the eastern U.S. for large-scale application, partly because the energy sources associated with these forms of power are reliable in only certain parts of the country (such as solar and wind) or generally are not available (geothermal). These forms of energy, which usually are converted to electricity, may not substitute easily for natural gas in equipment and processes designed for using natural gas. In addition, once converted, the electricity must be transported to the consumer, which may require the addition of new power lines. Moreover, land required for wind and solar is considerably greater, and the vast majority required cannot be restored to its prior use in the same way that land used for natural gas pipelines can be restored. Given the pace of development for these resources in the eastern U.S., they will not meet the future demand for energy in the Project timeframe. Moreover, wind, geothermal and solar are not energy alternatives to all of the Project s shippers, which require natural gas for purposes other than power production. Therefore, these particular alternative energy sources do not represent viable options for replacing the natural gas that will be supplied by the Project System Alternatives PennEast investigated a number of system alternatives to the Project which are discussed below Transco Leidy Line Loop PennEast considered a loop of Transco s Leidy Line pipeline system as a system alternative to the proposed Project. A loop of Transco s Leidy Line could access the same production region that the Project accesses. However, the Transco Leidy Line does not offer the same access to specific delivery point locations provided by the Project. PennEast will offer direct delivery to UGI Central Penn Gas, Inc. and UGI Utilities, Inc., both in Pennsylvania, as well as the Gilbert Electric Generating Station and Elizabethtown Gas, both in New Jersey, that cannot be made by utilizing the Transco system. PennEast s proposed route is also uniquely capable of providing an interconnection with both Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC (Algonquin) and Texas Eastern Transmission, LP (Texas Eastern) at one location, which will provide supply for growing markets served by each transmission system in the capacity constrained Northeast. FINAL 10-6 FERC Section 7(c) Application
12 Because the Transco Leidy Line cannot make these direct deliveries to UGI Central Penn Gas, Inc., UGI Utilities, Inc., Gilbert Electric Generating Station and Elizabethtown Gas and Transco does not access Algonquin and Texas Eastern at one location, any Transco system alternative does not satisfy the purpose and need of the Project. In addition, if Transco were to loop its Leidy Line pipeline system as an alternative to the Project, there would not be an additional new pipeline in the region to deliver production from the nearby production region to the markets to be served by the Project, providing a further reason why this system alternative does not satisfy the purpose and need of the Project. In addition to the foregoing, a loop of Transco s Leidy Line is not a viable alternative in light of the current circumstances and the environmental impact associated with constructing the facilities. PennEast has performed an analysis of an alternative involving a loop of Transco s Leidy Line. PennEast agrees with Transco s own statement where it indicates that the existing line cannot be expanded: The existing Transco pipeline system is extremely capacity constrained in New Jersey and Southern Pennsylvania, operating in very densely populated areas. Because of encroachment of residential and commercial structures along the Transco system, certain areas would be nearly impossible to loop and would require other greenfield portions to be constructed, further increasing the overall impact of the project. (Transco Atlantic Sunrise FAQ at Encroachment is severe in both Pennsylvania and New Jersey, which would result in a considerable amount of greenfield construction. Table provides a Critical Issues Analysis for PennEast s Transco Leidy Line Alternative (Figure ). Table Transco Leidy Line Alternative Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Length (Miles) Municipalities Crossed (#) Stream Crossings (Total as NHD streams) PA EV Cold Water Fishes (EV-CWF, Total) 4 4 NA 4 PA HQ Cold Water Fishes (HQ-CWF, Total) 4 25 NA 25 PA Cold Water Fishes (CWF, Total) 4 16 NA 16 PA Warm Water Fishes (WWF, Total) 4 2 NA 2 PA Trout Stocking Stream (TST, Total) 4 0 NA 0 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from EV) 5 2 NA 2 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from HQ) 5 5 NA 5 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from CWF) 5 4 NA 4 Other, Non-PA Chapter 93 Designated Streams 4 13 NA 13 (NHD streams) NJDEP SWQS Category 1 Streams NA Wild and Scenic River Crossings Total Acreage of wetlands (PA NWI and NJDEP) 1 (Lower Delaware River) 1 (Musconetcong River) FINAL 10-7 FERC Section 7(c) Application 2
13 Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Wetland Crossings (of the Center Line) Total number of NHD waterbodies Total Acreage of NHD waterbodies Total # Wells (PAGWIS and NJDEP) within 200' of line Wind Turbines (USGS) Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Core Habitat (PA) Approx. Acreage of National Audubon Society Important Bird Area Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Provisional Species of Concern (PA) within Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Supporting Landscape area (PA) within Approx. Acreage of Natural Heritage Priority Sites for Rare Species and Ecological Communities (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Critical Environmental and Historic Sites (NJ) 124 NA NA NA 705 NA 0 0 NA Known Contaminated Sites (NJ) NA 4 4 Approx. Acreage of Groundwater Contamination Areas (CEA) (NJ) Approx. Acreage of NJDEP Tier 1 Well Head Protection Area (NJ) Potential NRHP Cultural Resources (unrestricted) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone A (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone B (NJ) NA 0 0 NA NA 0 0 NA 0 0 Total # of churches, cemeteries, schools, and parks Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Sewer Service Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Historic Properties (NJ SHPO) NA NA 5 5 NA Approx. Acreage of Open Space (State) (NJ) within 9 NA FINAL 10-8 FERC Section 7(c) Application
14 Approx. Acreage of State Parks (PA) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of State Forests (PA) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of State Game Lands (PA) within Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project 6 NA 6 0 NA NA 154 Length of PA Trails (miles) NA 0.43 Total Acreage of 100 Year Flood Hazard areas (FEMA) NA NA NA Total Acreage of Preserved Farmland within 200' of 11 NA line Railroad Crossings (Status Unknown) Road Crossings Bridge Crossings (all) Bridges Structurally Deficient or Functionally Obsolete (from all bridges) Product Pipeline Crossings Existing Gas Pipeline Crossings 16 NA NA NA Transmission line Crossings Karst/Sink holes (PA) (DCNR Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey) 0 NA 0 Coal Mines (PA) (DCNR) 1 NA 1 Approx. Acreage of Slopes > 30% within 200 of line NA NA NA Total Acreage of 400' Corridor Percent of Total 400' Corridor that is wetland 3.5% 9.3 % 12.8% Notes: 1 Length of pipeline for the Transco Alternative includes a potential 12-mile lateral 2 Municipality crossings based on the PennDOT and NJDOT boundaries data sets 3 Stream crossings are based on the intersect of the pipeline and the 2002 National Hydrography Dataset NHD Flowline 4 Penn State Streams Chapter 93 Designated Use 5 Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission data (Oct 2013); counts should not be summed as a crossing is already counted for other categories 6 Wetland crossing counts based on the intersect of the pipeline into a discretely mapped wetlands 7 NHD waterbodies includes only lakes and ponds and not stream areas 8 Churches, schools, and cemetery counts are based on USGS GNIS 9 NJDEP Open Space (State, County, Cross-Acceptance) 10 PA DCNR and Rails-to-Trails Conservancy 11 PA Agricultural Security Areas and NJ Farmland Parcel Preservation Program 12 PennDOT County Rail lines; NJDOT Rail Network 13 PennDOT State and Local roads; NJDOT Road Network 14 Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory 15 Structurally deficient criteria defined at 16 Platts POWERmap FINAL 10-9 FERC Section 7(c) Application
15 Figure PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Transco Leidy Line Alternative FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
16 Columbia Gas Columbia Gas owns interstate pipeline facilities in portions of eastern Pennsylvania and New Jersey. However, Columbia Gas lacks the capability to receive gas in the production region in which PennEast s receipt points will be located. In order to access the same production region that the Project will access and to deliver the production at all the same delivery points that PennEast proposes for the Project, Columbia Gas would be required to construct greenfield pipeline facilities nearly identical to the facilities that comprise the Project. Accordingly, Columbia Gas does not provide an alternative to the Project Texas Eastern Texas Eastern owns interstate pipeline facilities in portions of eastern Pennsylvania and New Jersey. However, Texas Eastern lacks the capability to receive gas in the production region in which PennEast s receipt points will be located. In order to access the same production region that the Project will access and to deliver the production at all the same delivery points that PennEast proposes for the Project, Texas Eastern would be required to construct greenfield pipeline facilities nearly identical to the facilities that comprise the Project. Accordingly, Texas Eastern does not provide an alternative to the Project. Figure shows the existing Columbia Gas and Texas Eastern pipeline systems relative to northeast Pennsylvania natural gas production in the PennEast Project area and illustrates that these existing systems lack the capability to receive and deliver gas in the production region in which PennEast s receipt and delivery points would be located. FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
17 RESOURCE REPORT 8 LAND USE, RECREATION, AND AESTHETICS Figure Northeast Pennsylvania Production Area DRAFT FERC Section 7c Application
18 10.3 Pipeline Key Alternatives and Pipeline Deviations PennEast carefully examined existing utility corridors (natural gas pipelines, liquid pipelines, electric transmission, water, and sewer) to identify potential areas where the proposed pipeline could parallel or be co-located within existing maintained ROWs. This assessment found that some of these ROWs had been encroached upon by residential and commercial development resulting in inadequate space for the staging and construction of an additional pipeline between the existing facilities and the neighboring developments. Where environmental impacts were not greater, PennEast has aligned the Project with as many existing utility corridors as possible, while ensuring a Project that can be safely constructed and operated, and satisfy the Project customers demands. PennEast worked with engineering and design to avoid and/or minimize potential direct impacts to environmental resources. The proposed construction work area has been reduced at wetland crossings to minimize impacts wherever feasible. In addition, ROW agents have worked and continue to work with individual landowners to avoid sensitive features on properties and address their concerns. The following sections address the key alternatives assessment and the more significant adjustments that have occurred Key Alternatives Since the Project was initiated in the spring of 2014, eight key alternative routes have been reviewed and evaluated using a Critical Issues Analysis. These alternatives include: 1. Original 2. Alternative 1 to Original with Elizabethtown Gas (ETG) Spur 3. Alternative 2 to Original with NJ Loop (Initial Preferred ) 4. Transco Leidy Line Alternative 5. Preferred November Preferred January Preferred March Proposed Table provides a summary of pipeline length and study corridor acreage. FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
19 Table Summary of Key Alternatives Original Alternative 1 to Original with ETG Spur Alternative 2 to Original with NJ Loop (Initial Preferred ) Transco Leidy Line Alternative Preferred Nov Preferred Jan Preferred Mar Proposed Pipeline Length (Miles) 400-Foot Study Corridor Acreage FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
20 Table Critical Issues Analysis for the PennEast Project Alternatives Original Alternative 1 to Original with ETG Spur Alternative 2 to Original with NJ Loop (Initial Preferred ) Transco Leidy Line Alternative Preferred November 2014 Preferred January 2015 Preferred March 2015 Proposed Length of Lateral (miles) Length (Miles) Municipalities Crossed (#) Stream Crossings (Total as NHD streams) PA EV Cold Water Fishes (EV-CWF, Total) PA HQ Cold Water Fishes (HQ-CWF, Total) PA Cold Water Fishes (CWF, Total) PA Warm Water Fishes (WWF, Total) PA Trout Stocking Stream (TST, Total) PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from EV) PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from HQ) PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from CWF) Other, Non-PA Chapter 93 Designated Streams (NHD streams) NJDEP SWQS Category 1 Streams Wild and Scenic River Crossings Lower Delaware River Lower Delaware River 0 Lower Delaware River Total Acreage of wetlands (PA NWI and NJDEP) Wetland Crossings (of the Center Line) FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
21 Original Alternative 1 to Original with ETG Spur Alternative 2 to Original with NJ Loop (Initial Preferred ) Transco Leidy Line Alternative Preferred November 2014 Preferred January 2015 Preferred March 2015 Proposed Total number of NHD waterbodies within Total Acreage of NHD waterbodies within Total # Wells (PAGWIS and NJDEP) within 200 of line Wind Turbines (USGS) Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Core Habitat (PA) Approx. Acreage of National Audubon Society Important Bird Area within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Provisional Species of Concern (PA) Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Supporting Landscape area (PA) Approx. Acreage of Natural Heritage Priority Sites for Rare Species and Ecological Communities (NJ) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of Critical Environmental and Historic Sites (NJ) Known Contaminated Sites (NJ) within Approx. Acreage of Groundwater Contamination Areas (CEA) (NJ) within Approx. Acreage of NJDEP Tier 1 Well Head Protection Area (NJ) within 200' of line FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
22 Original Alternative 1 to Original with ETG Spur Alternative 2 to Original with NJ Loop (Initial Preferred ) Transco Leidy Line Alternative Preferred November 2014 Preferred January 2015 Preferred March 2015 Proposed Potential NRHP Cultural Resources (unrestricted) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone A (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone B (NJ) NA NA Total # of churches, cemeteries, schools, and parks Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Sewer Service Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Historic Properties (NJ SHPO) Approx. Acreage of Open Space (State) (NJ) Approx. Acreage of State Parks (PA) Approx. Acreage of State Forests (PA) Approx. Acreage of State Game Lands (PA) Length of PA Trails (miles) Total Acreage of 100 Year Flood Hazard areas (FEMA) NA Total Acreage of Preserved Farmland Railroad Crossings (Status Unknown) Road Crossings FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
23 Original Alternative 1 to Original with ETG Spur Alternative 2 to Original with NJ Loop (Initial Preferred ) Transco Leidy Line Alternative Preferred November 2014 Preferred January 2015 Preferred March 2015 Proposed Bridge Crossings (all) Bridges Structurally Deficient or Functionally Obsolete (from all bridges) 15 Product Pipeline Crossings Existing Gas Pipeline Crossings NA Transmission line Crossings Karst/Sink holes (PA) (DCNR Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey) Coal Mines (PA) (DCNR) Approx. Acreage of Slopes > 30% within 200 of line NA Total Acreage of 400' Corridor Percent of Total 400' Corridor that is wetland 10.40% 7.00% 9.70% 9.10% 10.90% 9.30% 8.70% 6.3% Notes: 1 Length of pipeline for the Transco Alternative includes a potential 12-mile lateral 2 Municipality crossings based on the PennDOT and NJDOT boundaries data sets 3 Stream crossings are based on the intersect of the pipeline and the 2002 National Hydrography Dataset NHD Flowline 4 Penn State Streams Chapter 93 Designated Use 5 Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission data (Oct 2013); counts should not be summed as a crossing is already counted for other categories 6 Wetland crossing counts based on the intersect of the pipeline into a discretely mapped wetlands 7 NHD waterbodies includes only lakes and ponds and not stream areas 8 Churches, schools, and cemetery counts are based on USGS GNIS 9 NJDEP Open Space (State, County, Cross-Acceptance) 10 PA DCNR and Rails-to-Trails Conservancy 11 PA Agricultural Security Areas and NJ Farmland Parcel Preservation Program 12 PennDOT County Rail lines; NJDOT Rail Network 13 PennDOT State and Local roads; NJDOT Road Network 14 Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory 15 Structurally deficient criteria defined at 16 Platts POWERmap FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
24 Original The originally proposed Project alignment, or the Original, was designed to bring locally produced Marcellus Shale gas from UGI s gathering system in northeastern Pennsylvania, through 29 municipalities, to the proposed Transco Trenton-Woodbury interconnect in Mercer County, New Jersey, allowing PennEast to serve customers in metropolitan East Coast markets. PennEast considered multiple factors when evaluating potential alignments. The Original was aligned to avoid standing structures, densely populated areas and planned development projects thereby minimizing the potential cumulative impacts of the pipeline. The Original had a centerline of miles and crossed 165 streams. 214 acres of wetlands fell within 200 feet of the line, which equated to 11.1% of the total 400-foot corridor being considered a wetland. Table provides a Critical Issues Analysis for PennEast s Original. Table Original Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Length (Miles) Municipalities Crossed (#) Stream Crossings (Total as NHD streams) PA EV Cold Water Fishes (EV-CWF, Total) 3 11 NA 11 PA HQ Cold Water Fishes (HQ-CWF, Total) 3 27 NA 27 PA Cold Water Fishes (CWF, Total) 3 29 NA 29 PA Warm Water Fishes (WWF, Total) 3 3 NA 3 PA Trout Stocking Stream (TST, Total) 3 4 NA 4 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from EV) 4 2 NA 2 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from HQ) 4 12 NA 12 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from CWF) 4 7 NA 7 Other, Non-PA Chapter 93 Designated Streams (NHD streams) NJDEP SWQS Category 1 Streams NA Wild and Scenic River Crossings Lower Delaware River 1 Total Acreage of wetlands (PA NWI and NJDEP) Wetland Crossings (of the Center Line) Total number of NHD waterbodies Total Acreage of NHD waterbodies Total # Wells (PAGWIS and NJDEP) within 200' of line Wind Turbines (USGS) FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
25 Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Core Habitat (PA) Approx. Acreage of National Audubon Society Important Bird Area Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Provisional Species of Concern (PA) within Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Supporting Landscape area (PA) within Approx. Acreage of Natural Heritage Priority Sites for Rare Species and Ecological Communities (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Critical Environmental and Historic Sites (NJ) 522 NA NA NA 654 NA 0 0 NA Known Contaminated Sites (NJ) NA 0 0 Approx. Acreage of Groundwater Contamination Areas (CEA) (NJ) Approx. Acreage of NJDEP Tier 1 Well Head Protection Area (NJ) Potential NRHP Cultural Resources (unrestricted) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone A (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone B (NJ) NA 0 0 NA NA NA Total # of churches, cemeteries, schools, and parks Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Sewer Service Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Historic Properties (NJ SHPO) NA 0 0 NA 0 0 NA Approx. Acreage of Open Space (State) (NJ) within 8 NA Approx. Acreage of State Parks (PA) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of State Forests (PA) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of State Game Lands (PA) within 227 NA NA NA 429 FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
26 Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Length of PA Trails (miles) 9 NA NA NA Total Acreage of 100 Year Flood Hazard areas (FEMA) Total Acreage of Preserved Farmland within 200' of line Railroad Crossings (Status Unknown) Road Crossings Bridge Crossings (all) Bridges Structurally Deficient or Functionally Obsolete (from all bridges) 14 Product Pipeline Crossings Existing Gas Pipeline Crossings Transmission line Crossings Karst/Sink holes (PA) (DCNR Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey) 167 NA 167 Coal Mines (PA) (DCNR) 0 NA 0 Approx. Acreage of Slopes > 30% within 200 of line Total Acreage of 400' Corridor Percent of Total 400' Corridor that is wetland 3.4% 7.0% 10.4% Notes: 1 Municipality crossings based on the PennDOT and NJDOT boundaries data sets 2 Stream crossings are based on the intersect of the pipeline and the 2002 National Hydrography Dataset NHD Flowline 3 Penn State Streams Chapter 93 Designated Use 4 Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission data (Oct 2013); counts should not be summed as a crossing is already counted for other categories 5 Wetland crossing counts based on the intersect of the pipeline into a discretely mapped wetlands 6 NHD waterbodies includes only lakes and ponds and not stream areas 7 Churches, schools, and cemetery counts are based on USGS GNIS 8 NJDEP Open Space (State, County, Cross-Acceptance) 9 PA DCNR and Rails-to-Trails Conservancy 10 PA Agricultural Security Areas and NJ Farmland Parcel Preservation Program 11 PennDOT County Rail lines; NJDOT Rail Network 12 PennDOT State and Local roads; NJDOT Road Network 13 Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory 14 Structurally deficient criteria defined at 15 Platts POWERmap Alternative 1 to Original with ETG Spur PennEast s Original was reviewed to make an analysis of potential critical (environmental) issues, permitting requirements, and risks. A desktop analysis, utilizing multiple applications specific to both Pennsylvania and New Jersey, was performed in order to evaluate areas of potential impact. FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
27 PennEast also conducted an aerial reconnaissance of the study corridor on May 20, 2014 to identify potential critical issues and risks, including stream and river crossings. The overflight allowed for a clearer understanding of possible engineering and environmental constraints. Following the aerial reconnaissance, site visits were performed at publically accessible, potential road and stream crossings as well as other critical areas along the proposed alignment. Both the aerial and ground reconnaissance highlighted areas of potential concern and allowed for further investigation into solutions, such as reroutes. The areas that were focused on in the reconnaissance included: Private and public roads, railroads, bridges and trail crossings; Road crossings; Waterbody and wetland crossings; Clearing requirements; Land use (including agricultural lands); Socio-economic issues; Commercial and industrial areas; and Infrastructure The findings of the aerial and ground reconnaissance were integrated and used to propose modifications that were incorporated into Alternative 1 to the Original with ETG Spur. Alternative 1 to the Original with ETG spur was preferable to the Original because it would result in fewer impacts to various resources. Specifically, the Alternative 1 reduced the total acreage of State Game Lands (Pennsylvania) within 200 feet of the centerline by 27 acres and also avoided 58 acres of wetlands within 200 feet of the centerline that would have been affected by the Original. Table provides a Critical Issues Analysis for PennEast s Alternative 1 Original with ETG Spur. Figure shows the segment of this alternative between approximate MP 75 and 96 as compared with the Original. Table Alternative 1 to Original with ETG Spur Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Length (Miles) Municipalities Crossed (#) Stream Crossings (Total as NHD streams) PA EV Cold Water Fishes (EV-CWF, Total) 3 11 NA 11 PA HQ Cold Water Fishes (HQ-CWF, Total) 3 28 NA 28 PA Cold Water Fishes (CWF, Total) 3 25 NA 25 PA Warm Water Fishes (WWF, Total) 3 4 NA 4 PA Trout Stocking Stream (TST, Total) 3 5 NA 5 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from EV) 4 2 NA 2 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from HQ) 4 12 NA 12 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from CWF) 4 6 NA 6 Other, Non-PA Chapter 93 Designated Streams (NHD 3 31 NA 31 streams) NJDEP SWQS Category 1 Streams NA FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
28 Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Wild and Scenic River Crossings Lower Delaware River 1 Total Acreage of Wetlands (PA NWI and NJDEP) within Wetland Crossings (of the Center Line) Total number of NHD waterbodies Total Acreage of NHD waterbodies Total # Wells (PAGWIS and NJDEP) Wind Turbines (USGS) Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Core Habitat (PA) Approx. Acreage of National Audubon Society Important Bird Area Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Provisional Species of Concern (PA) Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Supporting Landscape area (PA) Approx. Acreage of Natural Heritage Priority Sites for Rare Species and Ecological Communities (NJ) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of Critical Environmental and Historic Sites (NJ) 520 NA NA NA 681 NA 3 3 NA Known Contaminated Sites (NJ) NA 0 0 Approx. Acreage of Groundwater Contamination Areas (CEA) (NJ) Approx. Acreage of NJDEP Tier 1 Well Head Protection Area (NJ) Potential NRHP Cultural Resources (unrestricted) within Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone A (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone B (NJ) NA 0 0 NA NA 0 0 NA Total # of churches, cemeteries, schools, and parks within Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Area (NJ) within Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Sewer Service Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Historic Properties (NJ SHPO) within NA 0 0 NA 0 0 NA FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
29 Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Approx. Acreage of Open Space (State) (NJ) within 200' of 8 NA line Approx. Acreage of State Parks (PA) 231 NA 231 Approx. Acreage of State Forests (PA) 0 NA 0 Approx. Acreage of State Game Lands (PA) within 200' of line 402 NA 402 Length of PA Trails (miles) 9 NA NA NA Total Acreage of 100 Year Flood Hazard areas (FEMA) Total Acreage of Preserved Farmland Railroad Crossings (Status Unknown) Road Crossings Bridge Crossings (all) Bridges Structurally Deficient or Functionally Obsolete (from all bridges) Product Pipeline Crossings Existing Gas Pipeline Crossings Transmission line Crossings Karst/Sink holes (PA) (DCNR Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey) 172 NA 172 Coal Mines (PA) (DCNR) 0 NA 0 Approx. Acreage of Slopes > 30% within 200 of line Total Acreage of 400' Corridor Percent of Total 400' Corridor that is wetland 2.3% 4.8% 7.1% Notes: 1 Municipality crossings based on the PennDOT and NJDOT boundaries data sets 2 Stream crossings are based on the intersect of the pipeline and the 2002 National Hydrography Dataset NHD Flowline 3 Penn State Streams Chapter 93 Designated Use 4 Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission data (Oct 2013); counts should not be summed as a crossing is already counted for other categories 5 Wetland crossing counts based on the intersect of the pipeline into a discretely mapped wetlands 6 NHD waterbodies includes only lakes and ponds and not stream areas 7 Churches, schools, and cemetery counts are based on USGS GNIS 8 NJDEP Open Space (State, County, Cross-Acceptance) 9 PA DCNR and Rails-to-Trails Conservancy 10 PA Agricultural Security Areas and NJ Farmland Parcel Preservation Program 11 PennDOT County Rail lines; NJDOT Rail Network 12 PennDOT State and Local roads; NJDOT Road Network 13 Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory 14 Structurally deficient criteria defined at 15 Platts POWERmap FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
30 Figure PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Original and Alternative 1 to Original with ETG Spur FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
31 Alternative 2 Original with NJ Loop (Initial Preferred ) PennEast conducted further analysis of environmental constraints, resulting in Alternative 2 to Original with NJ Loop (Initial Preferred ). In order to reduce potential environmental impacts related to the ETG Spur, PennEast eliminated the Alternative 1 to Original with ETG Spur. This elimination avoided crossing the Delaware River a second time. Along with exclusion of the ETG Spur, Alternative 2 to Original with NJ Loop shifts the alignment from MP 70 to MP 90 from Bucks County, Pennsylvania to Hunterdon County, New Jersey. Alternative 2 to Original with NJ Loop (Initial Preferred ) is preferable to Alternative 1 to Original with ETG Spur because it traversed less densely populated areas, reducing both temporary and permanent impacts and, at the same time, continued to allow the Project to deliver to all desired interconnections. Further, because of the topography, and based on aerial imagery, it is estimated that Alternative 1to Original with ETG Spur would result in greater impacts to wetlands and waterbodies. Table provides a Critical Issues Analysis for PennEast s Alternative 2 to Original with NJ Loop (Preferred Alternative ). Table Alternative 2 to Original with NJ Loop (Initial Preferred ) Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Length (Miles) Municipalities Crossed (#) Stream Crossings (Total as NHD streams) PA EV Cold Water Fishes (EV-CWF, Total) 3 4 NA 4 PA HQ Cold Water Fishes (HQ-CWF, Total) 3 28 NA 28 PA Cold Water Fishes (CWF, Total) 3 21 NA 21 PA Warm Water Fishes (WWF, Total) 3 3 NA 3 PA Trout Stocking Stream (TST, Total) 3 0 NA 0 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from EV) 4 2 NA 2 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from HQ) 4 11 NA 11 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from CWF) 4 7 NA 7 Other, Non-PA Chapter 93 Designated Streams 3 50 NA 50 (NHD streams) NJDEP SWQS Category 1 Streams NA Wild and Scenic River Crossings Total Acreage of wetlands (PA NWI and NJDEP) Wetland Crossings (of the Center Line) Total number of NHD waterbodies Total Acreage of NHD waterbodies Total # Wells (PAGWIS and NJDEP) within 200' of line FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
32 Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Wind Turbines (USGS) Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Core Habitat (PA) Approx. Acreage of National Audubon Society Important Bird Area Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Provisional Species of Concern (PA) within Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Supporting Landscape area (PA) within Approx. Acreage of Natural Heritage Priority Sites for Rare Species and Ecological Communities (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Critical Environmental and Historic Sites (NJ) 383 NA NA NA 647 NA 3 3 NA Known Contaminated Sites (NJ) NA 0 0 Approx. Acreage of Groundwater Contamination Areas (CEA) (NJ) Approx. Acreage of NJDEP Tier 1 Well Head Protection Area (NJ) Potential NRHP Cultural Resources (unrestricted) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone A (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone B (NJ) NA 0 0 NA NA 0 0 NA Total # of churches, cemeteries, schools, and parks Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Sewer Service Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Historic Properties (NJ SHPO) NA 0 0 NA 0 0 NA Approx. Acreage of Open Space (State) (NJ) within 8 NA Approx. Acreage of State Parks (PA) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of State Forests (PA) within 200' of line 230 NA NA 0 FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
33 Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Approx. Acreage of State Game Lands (PA) within 402 NA 402 Length of PA Trails (miles) NA 2.24 Total Acreage of 100 Year Flood Hazard areas (FEMA) Total Acreage of Preserved Farmland within 200' of line Railroad Crossings (Status Unknown) Road Crossings Bridge Crossings (all) Bridges Structurally Deficient or Functionally Obsolete (from all bridges) 14 Product Pipeline Crossings Existing Gas Pipeline Crossings Transmission line Crossings Karst/Sink holes (PA) (DCNR Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey) 194 NA 194 Coal Mines (PA) (DCNR) 0 NA 0 Approx. Acreage of Slopes > 30% within 200 of line Total Acreage of 400' Corridor Percent of Total 400' Corridor that is wetland 2.9% 6.8% 9.7% Notes: 1 Municipality crossings based on the PennDOT and NJDOT boundaries data sets 2 Stream crossings are based on the intersect of the pipeline and the 2002 National Hydrography Dataset NHD Flowline 3 Penn State Streams Chapter 93 Designated Use 4 Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission data (Oct 2013); counts should not be summed as a crossing is already counted for other categories 5 Wetland crossing counts based on the intersect of the pipeline into a discretely mapped wetlands 6 NHD waterbodies includes only lakes and ponds and not stream areas 7 Churches, schools, and cemetery counts are based on USGS GNIS 8 NJDEP Open Space (State, County, Cross-Acceptance) 9 PA DCNR and Rails-to-Trails Conservancy 10 PA Agricultural Security Areas and NJ Farmland Parcel Preservation Program 11 PennDOT County Rail lines; NJDOT Rail Network 12 PennDOT State and Local roads; NJDOT Road Network 13 Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory 14 Structurally deficient criteria defined at 15 Platts POWERmap 16 Slopes based USGS 30 meter DEM FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
34 Preferred November 2014 Along the Alternative 2 to Original with NJ Loop, reroutes were considered that incorporated co-location opportunities. Along the alignment, the centerline was shifted to co-locate with various utility ROWs, including gas pipeline and electric transmission. Co-location reduces the amount of clearing and environmental impacts and concentrates them into a smaller area. Between MP 10 and MP 20, which is an area through which the pipeline traverses Pennsylvania State Game Lands, the alignment was moved to co-locate with Transco s pipeline ROW. This not only decreased the amount of new permanent ROW required throughout the entire route, but also reduced the cumulative land use impacts of the corridor. Other significant co-location segments fall between MP 20 and MP 40. ROW agents worked with individual landowners to avoid sensitive features on properties, which allowed the November 2014 Preferred to take into account all of these features, as well as cultural resources that were discovered through surveying. Multiple cultural resources, including sites with both historic and prehistoric components were located throughout the proposed route, and appropriate reroutes were implemented. The November 2014 Preferred also includes the addition of the Hellertown 24-inch Lateral. This lateral permits another interconnect into the PennEast pipeline. Table provides a Critical Issues Analysis for PennEast s Preferred November Figure shows the segment of this alternative between approximate MP 10 and 37 as compared with the Original. Figure shows the segment of this alternative between approximate MP 48 and 51 as compared with the Original. Table Preferred November 2014 Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Length (Miles) Municipalities Crossed (#) Stream Crossings (Total as NHD streams) PA EV Cold Water Fishes (EV-CWF, Total) 3 4 NA 4 PA HQ Cold Water Fishes (HQ-CWF, Total) 3 24 NA 24 PA Cold Water Fishes (CWF, Total) 3 28 NA 28 PA Warm Water Fishes (WWF, Total) 3 5 NA 5 PA Trout Stocking Stream (TST, Total) 3 0 NA 0 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from EV) 4 3 NA 3 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from HQ) 4 9 NA 9 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from CWF) 5 7 NA 7 Other, Non-PA Chapter 93 Designated Streams 3 42 NA 42 (NHD streams) NJDEP SWQS Category 1 Streams NA Wild and Scenic River Crossings Total Acreage of wetlands (PA NWI and NJDEP) FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
35 Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Wetland Crossings (of the Center Line) Total number of NHD waterbodies Total Acreage of NHD waterbodies Total # Wells (PAGWIS and NJDEP) within 200' of line Wind Turbines (USGS) Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Core Habitat (PA) Approx. Acreage of National Audubon Society Important Bird Area Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Provisional Species of Concern (PA) within Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Supporting Landscape area (PA) within Approx. Acreage of Natural Heritage Priority Sites for Rare Species and Ecological Communities (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Critical Environmental and Historic Sites (NJ) 327 NA NA NA 1043 NA 3 3 NA Known Contaminated Sites (NJ) NA 1 1 Approx. Acreage of Groundwater Contamination Areas (CEA) (NJ) Approx. Acreage of NJDEP Tier 1 Well Head Protection Area (NJ) Potential NRHP Cultural Resources (unrestricted) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone A (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone B (NJ) NA 0 0 NA NA 0 0 NA Total # of churches, cemeteries, schools, and parks Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Sewer Service Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Historic Properties (NJ SHPO) NA 0 0 NA 0 0 NA FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
36 Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Approx. Acreage of Open Space (State) (NJ) within 8 NA Approx. Acreage of State Parks (PA) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of State Forests (PA) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of State Game Lands (PA) within 231 NA NA NA 212 Length of PA Trails (miles) NA 1.42 Total Acreage of 100 Year Flood Hazard areas (FEMA) Total Acreage of Preserved Farmland within 200' of line Railroad Crossings (Status Unknown) Road Crossings Bridge Crossings (all) Bridges Structurally Deficient or Functionally Obsolete (from all bridges) 14 Product Pipeline Crossings Existing Gas Pipeline Crossings Transmission line Crossings Karst/Sink holes (PA) (DCNR Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey) 197 NA 197 Coal Mines (PA) (DCNR) 0 NA 0 Approx. Acreage of Slopes > 30% within 200 of line NA Total Acreage of 400' Corridor Percent of Total 400' Corridor that is wetland 3.8% 7.1% 10.9% FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
37 Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Notes: 1 Municipality crossings based on the PennDOT and NJDOT boundaries data sets 2 Stream crossings are based on the intersect of the pipeline and the 2002 National Hydrography Dataset NHD Flowline 3 Penn State Streams Chapter 93 Designated Use 4 Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission data (Oct 2013); counts should not be summed as a crossing is already counted for other categories 5 Wetland crossing counts based on the intersect of the pipeline into a discretely mapped wetlands 6 NHD waterbodies includes only lakes and ponds and not stream areas 7 Churches, schools, and cemetery counts are based on USGS GNIS 8 NJDEP Open Space (State, County, Cross-Acceptance) 9 PA DCNR and Rails-to-Trails Conservancy 10 PA Agricultural Security Areas and NJ Farmland Parcel Preservation Program 11 PennDOT County Rail lines; NJDOT Rail Network 12 PennDOT State and Local roads; NJDOT Road Network 13 Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory 14 Structurally deficient criteria defined at 15 Platts POWERmap FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
38 Figure PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Original and Preferred November 2014 FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
39 Figure PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Original and Preferred November 2014 FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
40 Preferred Alternative January 2015 Following PennEast s filing of its initial draft Resource Reports 1 and 10 with FERC in November 2014, PennEast considered a number of additional alternatives based on input from local, county and township officials. PennEast also took into account numerous comments and concerns from individual landowners and members of the general public that were raised during Open Houses that were held by PennEast in November PennEast also made necessary adjustments to the route to account for engineering, environmental, and land use constraints that were identified during the environmental survey process. Most significantly, in New Jersey, the route was shifted for approximately 21 miles, from approximately MP 90 to the southern Project terminus near Pennington, Mercer County, New Jersey (MP 110). This new route followed existing powerline ROWs in an effort to maximize co-location opportunities. With the new route in New Jersey, the overall Project route increased in co-location from approximately 29% to 45%. The reroute in New Jersey necessitated a 1.3-mile, 36-inch lateral near Lambertville, New Jersey to transport gas to interconnections with Algonquin and Texas Eastern. In Pennsylvania, the route was shifted for approximately 2.5 miles to the north side of State 33 near Bethlehem, Pennsylvania to accommodate future expansion plans of the St. Luke s Hospital complex. Table provides a Critical Issues Analysis for PennEast s Preferred January Table Preferred January 2015 Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Length (Miles) Municipalities Crossed (#) Stream Crossings (Total as NHD streams) PA EV Cold Water Fishes (EV-CWF, Total) 3 4 NA 4 PA HQ Cold Water Fishes (HQ-CWF, Total) 3 21 NA 21 PA Cold Water Fishes (CWF, Total) 3 30 NA 30 PA Warm Water Fishes (WWF, Total) 3 3 NA 3 PA Trout Stocking Stream (TST, Total) 3 0 NA 0 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from EV) 4 3 NA 3 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from HQ) 4 8 NA 8 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from CWF) 4 7 NA 7 Other, Non-PA Chapter 93 Designated Streams (NHD streams) 3 2 NA 2 NJDEP SWQS Category 1 Streams NA Wild and Scenic River Crossings Total Acreage of wetlands (PA NWI and NJDEP) Wetland Crossings (of the Center Line) Total number of NHD waterbodies FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
41 Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Total Acreage of NHD waterbodies Total # Wells (PAGWIS and NJDEP) within 200' of line Wind Turbines (USGS) Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Core Habitat (PA) Approx. Acreage of National Audubon Society Important Bird Area Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Provisional Species of Concern (PA) within Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Supporting Landscape area (PA) within Approx. Acreage of Natural Heritage Priority Sites for Rare Species and Ecological Communities (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Critical Environmental and Historic Sites (NJ) 327 NA NA NA 1088 NA NA Known Contaminated Sites (NJ) NA 0 0 Approx. Acreage of Groundwater Contamination Areas (CEA) (NJ) Approx. Acreage of NJDEP Tier 1 Well Head Protection Area (NJ) Potential NRHP Cultural Resources (unrestricted) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone A (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone B (NJ) NA 0 0 NA NA 0 0 NA Total # of churches, cemeteries, schools, and parks Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Sewer Service Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Historic Properties (NJ SHPO) NA 0 0 NA 0 0 NA Approx. Acreage of Open Space (State) (NJ) within 8 NA FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
42 Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Approx. Acreage of State Parks (PA) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of State Forests (PA) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of State Game Lands (PA) within 231 NA NA NA 212 Length of PA Trails (miles) NA 1.52 Total Acreage of 100 Year Flood Hazard areas (FEMA) Total Acreage of Preserved Farmland within 200' of line Railroad Crossings (Status Unknown) Road Crossings Bridge Crossings (all) Bridges Structurally Deficient or Functionally Obsolete (from all bridges) 14 Product Pipeline Crossings Existing Gas Pipeline Crossings Transmission line Crossings Karst/Sink holes (PA) (DCNR Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey) 194 NA 194 Coal Mines (PA) (DCNR) 0 NA 0 Approx. Acreage of Slopes > 30% within 200 of line Total Acreage of 400' Corridor Percent of Total 400' Corridor that is wetland 3.4% 5.9% 9.3% Notes: 1 Municipality crossings based on the PennDOT and NJDOT boundaries data sets 2 Stream crossings are based on the intersect of the pipeline and the 2002 National Hydrography Dataset NHD Flowline 3 Penn State Streams Chapter 93 Designated Use 4 Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission data (Oct 2013); counts should not be summed as a crossing is already counted for other categories 5 Wetland crossing counts based on the intersect of the pipeline into a discretely mapped wetlands 6 NHD waterbodies includes only lakes and ponds and not stream areas 7 Churches, schools, and cemetery counts are based on USGS GNIS 8 NJDEP Open Space (State, County, Cross-Acceptance) 9 PA DCNR and Rails-to-Trails Conservancy 10 PA Agricultural Security Areas and NJ Farmland Parcel Preservation Program 11 PennDOT County Rail lines; NJDOT Rail Network 12 PennDOT State and Local roads; NJDOT Road Network 13 Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory 14 Structurally deficient criteria defined at 15 Platts POWERmap FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
43 Preferred March 2015 Following feedback from FERC s scoping meetings held in February 2015 and numerous conversations with landowners, state and local agencies, and other various stakeholders, PennEast revised and refined various portions of the preferred alternative route in March The most significant variations to the route were related to the location of the crossing of the Bethlehem Authority water supply mainline (MP 44 and MP 45), Appalachian Trail crossing (between MP 46 and MP 55), and accommodating future subdivision and housing development plans. Additional field data gained during environmental surveys helped make smaller adjustments related to environmental constraints and individual discussions with landowners. With the new route alignment, an additional interconnect was needed for the Gilbert Power Generation facility in Holland Township, New Jersey, which is fed by a small lateral (12 inches in diameter) to supply natural gas to the facility. The previously located interconnection with ETG was relocated so that both interconnects can be colocated within the power station s industrial property to minimize above-ground impacts. Table provides a Critical Issues Analysis for PennEast s Preferred March Table Preferred March 2015 Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Length (Miles) Municipalities Crossed (#) Stream Crossings (Total as NHD streams) PA EV Cold Water Fishes (EV-CWF, Total) 3 4 NA 4 PA HQ Cold Water Fishes (HQ-CWF, Total) 3 22 NA 22 PA Cold Water Fishes (CWF, Total) 3 31 NA 31 PA Warm Water Fishes (WWF, Total) 3 2 NA 2 PA Trout Stocking Stream (TST, Total) 3 0 NA 0 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from EV) 4 3 NA 3 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from HQ) 4 8 NA 8 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from CWF) 4 7 NA 7 Other, Non-PA Chapter 93 Designated Streams (NHD streams) 3 3 NA 3 NJDEP SWQS Category 1 Streams NA Wild and Scenic River Crossings Total Acreage of wetlands (PA NWI and NJDEP) Wetland Crossings (of the Center Line) Total number of NHD waterbodies Total Acreage of NHD waterbodies FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
44 Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Total # Wells (PAGWIS and NJDEP) within 200' of line Wind Turbines (USGS) Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Core Habitat (PA) Approx. Acreage of National Audubon Society Important Bird Area Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Provisional Species of Concern (PA) within Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Supporting Landscape area (PA) within Approx. Acreage of Natural Heritage Priority Sites for Rare Species and Ecological Communities (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Critical Environmental and Historic Sites (NJ) 288 NA NA NA 833 NA NA Known Contaminated Sites (NJ) NA 0 0 Approx. Acreage of Groundwater Contamination Areas (CEA) (NJ) Approx. Acreage of NJDEP Tier 1 Well Head Protection Area (NJ) Potential NRHP Cultural Resources (unrestricted) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone A (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone B (NJ) NA 0 0 NA NA 0 0 NA Total # of churches, cemeteries, schools, and parks Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Sewer Service Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Historic Properties (NJ SHPO) NA 0 0 NA 0 0 NA Approx. Acreage of Open Space (State) (NJ) within 8 NA Approx. Acreage of State Parks (PA) within 200' of line 231 NA 231 FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
45 Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Approx. Acreage of State Forests (PA) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of State Game Lands (PA) within 35 NA NA 239 Length of PA Trails (miles) NA 1.28 Total Acreage of 100 Year Flood Hazard areas (FEMA) Total Acreage of Preserved Farmland within 200' of line Railroad Crossings (Status Unknown) Road Crossings Bridge Crossings (all) Bridges Structurally Deficient or Functionally Obsolete (from all bridges) 14 Product Pipeline Crossings Existing Gas Pipeline Crossings Transmission line Crossings Karst/Sink holes (PA) (DCNR Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey) 171 NA 171 Coal Mines (PA) (DCNR) 0 NA 0 Approx. Acreage of Slopes > 30% within 200 of line Total Acreage of 400' Corridor Percent of Total 400' Corridor that is wetland 3.3% 5.4% 8.7% Notes: 1 Municipality crossings based on the PennDOT and NJDOT boundaries data sets 2 Stream crossings are based on the intersect of the pipeline and the 2002 National Hydrography Dataset NHD Flowline 3 Penn State Streams Chapter 93 Designated Use 4 Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission data (Oct 2013); counts should not be summed as a crossing is already counted for other categories 5 Wetland crossing counts based on the intersect of the pipeline into a discretely mapped wetlands 6 NHD waterbodies includes only lakes and ponds and not stream areas 7 Churches, schools, and cemetery counts are based on USGS GNIS 8 NJDEP Open Space (State, County, Cross-Acceptance) 9 PA DCNR and Rails-to-Trails Conservancy 10 PA Agricultural Security Areas and NJ Farmland Parcel Preservation Program 11 PennDOT County Rail lines; NJDOT Rail Network 12 PennDOT State and Local roads; NJDOT Road Network 13 Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory 14 Structurally deficient criteria defined at 15 Platts POWERmap FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
46 Proposed During the period following PennEast s filing of draft Resource Reports in April 2015, PennEast has continued to evaluate potential alternatives to the proposed pipeline alignment based on comments received during the formal Scoping process, ongoing dialogue with federal, state, regional and local agencies, landowners, and the results of field surveys and engineering analyses. As the Project design became finalized, there was a significant effort to adjust the alignment within the 400 foot survey corridor to avoid and/or minimize impacts to wetlands and waterbodies, cultural resources, preserved agricultural lands and sensitive habitats. In Pennsylvania, two major reroutes and more than 40 minor reroutes have been evaluated. The major reroutes include an alternative route for crossing the Appalachian Trail and Pennsylvania State Game Land No. 168 in Carbon and Northampton Counties, Pennsylvania and a realignment to avoid active quarrying operations near Wilkes-Barre, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. The reroute associated with the Appalachian Trail includes a new delivery interconnection with UGI Central Penn Gas, Inc. This new delivery point is shown as the Blue Mountain Interconnect in Resource Report 1 and corresponding mapping. These new alternatives and reroutes have gone through the same detailed assessment as those assessed in the April 2015 filing. Table provides a Critical Issues Analysis for PennEast s Proposed. Table Proposed Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Length (Miles) Municipalities Crossed (#) Stream Crossings (Total as NHD streams) PA EV Cold Water Fishes (EV-CWF, Total) PA HQ Cold Water Fishes (HQ-CWF, Total) PA Cold Water Fishes (CWF, Total) PA Warm Water Fishes (WWF, Total) PA Trout Stocking Stream (TST, Total) PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from EV) PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from HQ) PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from CWF) Other, Non-PA Chapter 93 Designated Streams (NHD streams) NJDEP SWQS Category 1 Streams FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
47 Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Wild and Scenic River Crossings Total Acreage of wetlands (PA NWI and NJDEP) Wetland Crossings (of the Center Line) Total number of NHD waterbodies Total Acreage of NHD waterbodies Total # Wells (PAGWIS and NJDEP) within 200' of line Wind Turbines (USGS) Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Core Habitat (PA) Approx. Acreage of National Audubon Society Important Bird Area Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Provisional Species of Concern (PA) within Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Supporting Landscape area (PA) within Approx. Acreage of Natural Heritage Priority Sites for Rare Species and Ecological Communities (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Critical Environmental and Historic Sites (NJ) Known Contaminated Sites (NJ) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of Groundwater Contamination Areas (CEA) (NJ) Approx. Acreage of NJDEP Tier 1 Well Head Protection Area (NJ) Potential NRHP Cultural Resources (unrestricted) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone A (NJ) FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
48 Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone B (NJ) Total # of churches, cemeteries, schools, and parks Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Sewer Service Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Historic Properties (NJ SHPO) Approx. Acreage of Open Space (State) (NJ) within Approx. Acreage of State Parks (PA) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of State Forests (PA) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of State Game Lands (PA) within Length of PA Trails (miles) Total Acreage of 100 Year Flood Hazard areas (FEMA) Total Acreage of Preserved Farmland within 200' of line Railroad Crossings (Status Unknown) Road Crossings Bridge Crossings (all) Bridges Structurally Deficient or Functionally Obsolete (from all bridges) Product Pipeline Crossings Existing Gas Pipeline Crossings Transmission line Crossings FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
49 Pennsylvania New Jersey Total Project Karst/Sink holes (PA) (DCNR Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey) Coal Mines (PA) (DCNR) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of Slopes > 30% within 200 of line Total Acreage of 400' Corridor Notes: 1 Length of pipeline for the Transco Alternative includes a potential 12-mile lateral 2 Municipality crossings based on the PennDOT and NJDOT boundaries data sets 3 Stream crossings are based on the intersect of the pipeline and the 2002 National Hydrography Dataset NHD Flowline 4 Penn State Streams Chapter 93 Designated Use 5 Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission data (Oct 2013); counts should not be summed as a crossing is already counted for other categories 6 Wetland crossing counts based on the intersect of the pipeline into a discretely mapped wetlands 7 NHD waterbodies includes only lakes and ponds and not stream areas 8 Churches, schools, and cemetery counts are based on USGS GNIS 9 NJDEP Open Space (State, County, Cross-Acceptance) 10 PA DCNR and Rails-to-Trails Conservancy 11 PA Agricultural Security Areas and NJ Farmland Parcel Preservation Program 12 PennDOT County Rail lines; NJDOT Rail Network 13 PennDOT State and Local roads; NJDOT Road Network 14 Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory 15 Structurally deficient criteria defined at 16 Platts POWERmap Table provides a Critical Issues Analysis for approximate MP of the Proposed compared to the corresponding segment of the Original. Figure shows the segment of this alternative between approximate MP 75 and 97 as compared with the Original. This information is being provided in response to FERC comments received on the April 2015 Draft Filing. Table Critical Issues Analysis for MP of the Proposed and Corresponding Segment of the Original Original Proposed Length (Miles) Municipalities Crossed (#) Stream Crossings (Total as NHD streams) PA EV Cold Water Fishes (EV-CWF, Total) 3 7 PA HQ Cold Water Fishes (HQ-CWF, Total) 3 0 PA Cold Water Fishes (CWF, Total) 3 4 PA Warm Water Fishes (WWF, Total) 3 1 PA Trout Stocking Stream (TST, Total) 3 4 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from EV) 4 1 FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
50 Original Proposed PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from HQ) 4 0 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from CWF) 4 1 Other, Non-PA Chapter 93 Designated Streams (NHD 3 16 streams) NJDEP SWQS Category 1 Streams 3 21 Wild and Scenic River Crossings 1 0 Total Acreage of wetlands (PA NWI and NJDEP) within 200' of line Wetland Crossings (of the Center Line) Total number of NHD waterbodies Total Acreage of NHD waterbodies Total # Wells (PAGWIS and NJDEP) 1 1 Wind Turbines (USGS) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Core Habitat (PA) Approx. Acreage of National Audubon Society Important Bird Area Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Provisional Species of Concern (PA) Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Supporting Landscape area (PA) Approx. Acreage of Natural Heritage Priority Sites for Rare Species and Ecological Communities (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Critical Environmental and Historic Sites (NJ) Known Contaminated Sites (NJ) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of Groundwater Contamination Areas (CEA) (NJ) Approx. Acreage of NJDEP Tier 1 Well Head Protection Area (NJ) Potential NRHP Cultural Resources (unrestricted) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone A (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone B (NJ) Total # of churches, cemeteries, schools, and parks within Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Area (NJ) within 0 0 FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
51 Original Proposed Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Sewer Service Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Historic Properties (NJ SHPO) within Approx. Acreage of Open Space (State) (NJ) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of State Parks (PA) Approx. Acreage of State Forests (PA) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of State Game Lands (PA) within 200' of line 0 0 Length of PA Trails (miles) Total Acreage of 100 Year Flood Hazard areas (FEMA) Total Acreage of Preserved Farmland Railroad Crossings (Status Unknown) Road Crossings Bridge Crossings (all) Bridges Structurally Deficient or Functionally Obsolete (from all bridges) Product Pipeline Crossings Existing Gas Pipeline Crossings Transmission line Crossings Karst/Sink holes (PA) (DCNR Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey) 1 0 Coal Mines (PA) (DCNR) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of Slopes > 30% within 200 of line Total Acreage of 400' Corridor Percent of Total 400' Corridor that is wetland 5% 6% Notes: 1 Municipality crossings based on the PennDOT and NJDOT boundaries data sets 2 Stream crossings are based on the intersect of the pipeline and the 2002 National Hydrography Dataset NHD Flowline 3 Penn State Streams Chapter 93 Designated Use 4 Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission data (Oct 2013); counts should not be summed as a crossing is already counted for other categories 5 Wetland crossing counts based on the intersect of the pipeline into a discretely mapped wetlands 6 NHD waterbodies includes only lakes and ponds and not stream areas 7 Churches, schools, and cemetery counts are based on USGS GNIS 8 NJDEP Open Space (State, County, Cross-Acceptance) 9 PA DCNR and Rails-to-Trails Conservancy 10 PA Agricultural Security Areas and NJ Farmland Parcel Preservation Program 11 PennDOT County Rail lines; NJDOT Rail Network 12 PennDOT State and Local roads; NJDOT Road Network 13 Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
52 Original Proposed 14 Structurally deficient criteria defined at 15 Platts POWERmap FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
53 Figure PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Original and Proposed FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
54 Table provides a Critical Issues Analysis for MP of the Proposed compared to the corresponding segment of the Original. Figure shows the segment of this alternative between approximate MP 97 and 110 as compared with the Original. This information is being provided in response to FERC comments received on the April 2015 Draft Filing. Table Critical Issues Analysis for MP of the Proposed and Corresponding Segment of the Original Original Proposed Length (Miles) Municipalities Crossed (#) Stream Crossings (Total as NHD streams) PA EV Cold Water Fishes (EV-CWF, Total) 3 PA HQ Cold Water Fishes (HQ-CWF, Total) 3 PA Cold Water Fishes (CWF, Total) 3 PA Warm Water Fishes (WWF, Total) 3 PA Trout Stocking Stream (TST, Total) 3 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from EV) 4 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from HQ) 4 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from CWF) 4 Other, Non-PA Chapter 93 Designated Streams (NHD 3 streams) NJDEP SWQS Category 1 Streams 11 8 Wild and Scenic River Crossings 0 0 Total Acreage of wetlands (PA NWI and NJDEP) within 200' of line Wetland Crossings (of the Center Line) Total number of NHD waterbodies Total Acreage of NHD waterbodies Total # Wells (PAGWIS and NJDEP) 1 0 Wind Turbines (USGS) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Core Habitat (PA) Approx. Acreage of National Audubon Society Important Bird Area Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Provisional Species of Concern (PA) Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Supporting Landscape area (PA) Approx. Acreage of Natural Heritage Priority Sites for Rare Species and Ecological Communities (NJ) FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
55 Original Proposed Approx. Acreage of Critical Environmental and Historic Sites (NJ) Known Contaminated Sites (NJ) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of Groundwater Contamination Areas (CEA) (NJ) Approx. Acreage of NJDEP Tier 1 Well Head Protection Area (NJ) Potential NRHP Cultural Resources (unrestricted) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone A (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone B (NJ) Total # of churches, cemeteries, schools, and parks within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Area (NJ) within Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Sewer Service Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Historic Properties (NJ SHPO) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of Open Space (State) (NJ) Approx. Acreage of State Parks (PA) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of State Forests (PA) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of State Game Lands (PA) 0 0 Length of PA Trails (miles) Total Acreage of 100 Year Flood Hazard areas (FEMA) within Total Acreage of Preserved Farmland Railroad Crossings (Status Unknown) Road Crossings Bridge Crossings (all) Bridges Structurally Deficient or Functionally Obsolete (from all bridges) Product Pipeline Crossings Existing Gas Pipeline Crossings Transmission line Crossings FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
56 Original Proposed Karst/Sink holes (PA) (DCNR Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey) 0 0 Coal Mines (PA) (DCNR) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of Slopes > 30% within 200 of line Total Acreage of 400' Corridor Percent of Total 400' Corridor that is wetland 6% 2% Notes: 1 Municipality crossings based on the PennDOT and NJDOT boundaries data sets 2 Stream crossings are based on the intersect of the pipeline and the 2002 National Hydrography Dataset NHD Flowline 3 Penn State Streams Chapter 93 Designated Use 4 Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission data (Oct 2013); counts should not be summed as a crossing is already counted for other categories 5 Wetland crossing counts based on the intersect of the pipeline into a discretely mapped wetlands 6 NHD waterbodies includes only lakes and ponds and not stream areas 7 Churches, schools, and cemetery counts are based on USGS GNIS 8 NJDEP Open Space (State, County, Cross-Acceptance) 9 PA DCNR and Rails-to-Trails Conservancy 10 PA Agricultural Security Areas and NJ Farmland Parcel Preservation Program 11 PennDOT County Rail lines; NJDOT Rail Network 12 PennDOT State and Local roads; NJDOT Road Network 13 Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory 14 Structurally deficient criteria defined at 15 Platts POWERmap FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
57 Figure PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Original and Proposed FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
58 Figure Proposed Overview Map FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
59 Figure PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Original and Proposed FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
60 Figure PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Alternative 1 to Original with ETG Spur and Proposed FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
61 Figure PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Alternative 2 to Original with NJ Loop (Initial Preferred ) and Proposed FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
62 Figure PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map - Preferred November 2014 and Proposed FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
63 Figure PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map - Preferred January 2015 and Proposed FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
64 Figure PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Preferred March 2015 FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
65 Pipeline Deviations A range of deviations to the proposed route have been examined to date and were developed as survey access and additional engineering and environmental information became available. Table presents a summary of the major route adjustments that were adopted during PennEast s alternatives analysis and are contributing components to the Key Alternatives described in Section above. Table presents a summary of the minor adjustments to the proposed route that were adopted or considered and the justification for either implementing the adjustment or not implementing the adjustment. Appendix P includes details on the alternative assessment for the Proposed, Alternatives Rejected (the adjustments requested, evaluated and rejected) and Prior Alternatives (the segments of the prior alternatives that were superseded by the adjustment adopted into the Proposed ). Although there are several iterations of alternatives and deviations that have been considered, PennEast has endeavored to reformat for continuity of the naming convention in Appendix P. Table Summary of Pipeline Major Reroutes Facility MP Range Reroute Type Description Alternative Implementation Date PennEast Mainline Major Reroute Constructability/ Environmental Avoided potential critical issues through aerial reconnaissance and desktop analysis Alternative to Original with ETG Spur Initial Planning PennEast Mainline Major Reroute Constructability/ Environmental Excludes ETG Spur eliminating a second crossing of the Delaware River shifted North Refined route for interconnects Alternative 2 Original with NJ Loop (Initial Preferred ) Initial Planning PennEast Mainline Major Reroute 3 PennEast Mainline Major Reroute Environmental/Agency and Stakeholder Consultations Environmental/Agency and Stakeholder Consultations Co-location with Transco and Buckeye Pipeline through PAGC Lands Co-location with power line through Mercer County, NJ Preferred November 2014 Preferred January Oct Jan-15 FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
66 Facility MP Range Reroute Type Description Alternative Implementation Date PennEast Mainline Major Reroute 5 PennEast Mainline Major Reroute ; ; Landowner Request/ Optimization Landowner Request/ Optimization Increases separation to water lines and avoids housing subdivision plans Avoids active quarry and refined route to allow for Blue Mountain Interconnection with UGI Central Penn Gas, Inc. Preferred March 2015 Proposed 30-Mar-15 September 2015 Table provides a Critical Issues Analysis for PennEast s Major Reroute 1: MP of the Alternative 1 to Original with ETG Spur compared to the entirety (MP ) of the Original. Figure shows the Alternative 1 to Original with ETG Spur between approximate MP as compared with the Original. Table Critical Issues Analysis for the PennEast Major Reroute 1 Original Alternative to Original with ETG Spur Length (Miles) Municipalities Crossed (#) Stream Crossings (Total as NHD streams) PA EV Cold Water Fishes (EV-CWF, Total) PA HQ Cold Water Fishes (HQ-CWF, Total) PA Cold Water Fishes (CWF, Total) PA Warm Water Fishes (WWF, Total) PA Trout Stocking Stream (TST, Total) PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from EV) PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from HQ) PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from CWF) Other, Non-PA Chapter 93 Designated Streams (NHD streams) NJDEP SWQS Category 1 Streams Wild and Scenic River Crossings Lower Delaware River Lower Delaware River FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
67 Original Alternative to Original with ETG Spur Total Acreage of wetlands (PA NWI and NJDEP) within 200' of line Wetland Crossings (of the Center Line) Total number of NHD waterbodies Total Acreage of NHD waterbodies Total # Wells (PAGWIS and NJDEP) 1 0 Wind Turbines (USGS) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Core Habitat (PA) Approx. Acreage of National Audubon Society Important Bird Area Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Provisional Species of Concern (PA) Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Supporting Landscape area (PA) Approx. Acreage of Natural Heritage Priority Sites for Rare Species and Ecological Communities (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Critical Environmental and Historic Sites (NJ) Known Contaminated Sites (NJ) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of Groundwater Contamination Areas (CEA) (NJ) Approx. Acreage of NJDEP Tier 1 Well Head Protection Area (NJ) Potential NRHP Cultural Resources (unrestricted) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone A (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone B (NJ) Total # of churches, cemeteries, schools, and parks within Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Area (NJ) within Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Sewer Service Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Historic Properties (NJ SHPO) within Approx. Acreage of Open Space (State) (NJ) within 200' of line FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
68 Original Alternative to Original with ETG Spur Approx. Acreage of State Parks (PA) Approx. Acreage of State Forests (PA) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of State Game Lands (PA) within 200' of line Length of PA Trails (miles) Total Acreage of 100 Year Flood Hazard areas (FEMA) Total Acreage of Preserved Farmland Railroad Crossings (Status Unknown) Road Crossings Bridge Crossings (all) Bridges Structurally Deficient or Functionally Obsolete (from all bridges) Product Pipeline Crossings Existing Gas Pipeline Crossings Transmission line Crossings Karst/Sink holes (PA) (DCNR Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey) Coal Mines (PA) (DCNR) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of Slopes > 30% within 200 of line Total Acreage of 400' Corridor Percent of Total 400' Corridor that is wetland 10.4% 7.0% Notes: 1 Municipality crossings based on the PennDOT and NJDOT boundaries data sets 2 Stream crossings are based on the intersect of the pipeline and the 2002 National Hydrography Dataset NHD Flowline 3 Penn State Streams Chapter 93 Designated Use 4 Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission data (Oct 2013); counts should not be summed as a crossing is already counted for other categories 5 Wetland crossing counts based on the intersect of the pipeline into a discretely mapped wetlands 6 NHD waterbodies includes only lakes and ponds and not stream areas 7 Churches, schools, and cemetery counts are based on USGS GNIS 8 NJDEP Open Space (State, County, Cross-Acceptance) 9 PA DCNR and Rails-to-Trails Conservancy 10 PA Agricultural Security Areas and NJ Farmland Parcel Preservation Program 11 PennDOT County Rail lines; NJDOT Rail Network 12 PennDOT State and Local roads; NJDOT Road Network 13 Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory 14 Structurally deficient criteria defined at 15 Platts POWERmap FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
69 Figure PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Major Reroute 1 and Original FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
70 Table provides a Critical Issues Analysis for PennEast s Major Reroute 2: MP of the Alternative 2 to Original with NJ Loop (Initial Preferred ) compared to the corresponding segment of the Original. Figure shows the Alternative 2 to Original with NJ Loop (Initial Preferred ) between approximate MP as compared with the Original ). Table Critical Issues Analysis for the PennEast Major Reroute 2 Original Alternative 2 Original with NJ Loop (Initial Preferred ) Length (Miles) Municipalities Crossed (#) Stream Crossings (Total as NHD streams) PA EV Cold Water Fishes (EV-CWF, Total) PA HQ Cold Water Fishes (HQ-CWF, Total) PA Cold Water Fishes (CWF, Total) PA Warm Water Fishes (WWF, Total) PA Trout Stocking Stream (TST, Total) PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from EV) PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from HQ) PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from CWF) Other, Non-PA Chapter 93 Designated Streams (NHD streams) NJDEP SWQS Category 1 Streams 0 28 Wild and Scenic River Crossings Total Acreage of wetlands (PA NWI and NJDEP) Lower Delaware River Wetland Crossings (of the Center Line) Total number of NHD waterbodies Total Acreage of NHD waterbodies Total # Wells (PAGWIS and NJDEP) within 200' of line Wind Turbines (USGS) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Core Habitat (PA) Approx. Acreage of National Audubon Society Important Bird Area FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
71 Original Alternative 2 Original with NJ Loop (Initial Preferred ) Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Provisional Species of Concern (PA) within Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Supporting Landscape area (PA) within Approx. Acreage of Natural Heritage Priority Sites for Rare Species and Ecological Communities (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Critical Environmental and Historic Sites (NJ) Known Contaminated Sites (NJ) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of Groundwater Contamination Areas (CEA) (NJ) Approx. Acreage of NJDEP Tier 1 Well Head Protection Area (NJ) Potential NRHP Cultural Resources (unrestricted) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone A (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone B (NJ) Total # of churches, cemeteries, schools, and parks Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Sewer Service Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Historic Properties (NJ SHPO) Approx. Acreage of Open Space (State) (NJ) within Approx. Acreage of State Parks (PA) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of State Forests (PA) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of State Game Lands (PA) within Length of PA Trails (miles) Total Acreage of 100 Year Flood Hazard areas (FEMA) FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
72 Original Alternative 2 Original with NJ Loop (Initial Preferred ) Total Acreage of Preserved Farmland within 200' of line Railroad Crossings (Status Unknown) Road Crossings Bridge Crossings (all) Bridges Structurally Deficient or Functionally Obsolete (from all 0 0 bridges) 14 Product Pipeline Crossings Existing Gas Pipeline Crossings Transmission line Crossings Karst/Sink holes (PA) (DCNR Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey) Coal Mines (PA) (DCNR) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of Slopes > 30% within 200 of line Total Acreage of 400' Corridor Percent of Total 400' Corridor that is wetland 2.7% 8.8% Notes: 1 Municipality crossings based on the PennDOT and NJDOT boundaries data sets 2 Stream crossings are based on the intersect of the pipeline and the 2002 National Hydrography Dataset NHD Flowline 3 Penn State Streams Chapter 93 Designated Use 4 Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission data (Oct 2013); counts should not be summed as a crossing is already counted for other categories 5 Wetland crossing counts based on the intersect of the pipeline into a discretely mapped wetlands 6 NHD waterbodies includes only lakes and ponds and not stream areas 7 Churches, schools, and cemetery counts are based on USGS GNIS 8 NJDEP Open Space (State, County, Cross-Acceptance) 9 PA DCNR and Rails-to-Trails Conservancy 10 PA Agricultural Security Areas and NJ Farmland Parcel Preservation Program 11 PennDOT County Rail lines; NJDOT Rail Network 12 PennDOT State and Local roads; NJDOT Road Network 13 Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory 14 Structurally deficient criteria defined at 15 Platts POWERmap FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
73 Figure PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Major Reroute 2 and Original FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
74 Table provides a Critical Issues Analysis for PennEast s Major Reroute 3: MP of the Preferred November 2014 compared to the corresponding segment of the Original. Figure shows the Preferred November 2014 between approximate MP as compared with the Original Table Critical Issues Analysis for the PennEast Major Reroute 3 Original Preferred November 2015 Length (Miles) Municipalities Crossed (#) Stream Crossings (Total as NHD streams) PA EV Cold Water Fishes (EV-CWF, Total) PA HQ Cold Water Fishes (HQ-CWF, Total) PA Cold Water Fishes (CWF, Total) PA Warm Water Fishes (WWF, Total) PA Trout Stocking Stream (TST, Total) PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from EV) PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from HQ) PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from CWF) Other, Non-PA Chapter 93 Designated Streams (NHD streams) NJDEP SWQS Category 1 Streams Wild and Scenic River Crossings 0 0 Total Acreage of wetlands (PA NWI and NJDEP) Wetland Crossings (of the Center Line) Total number of NHD waterbodies Total Acreage of NHD waterbodies Total # Wells (PAGWIS and NJDEP) 0 0 Wind Turbines (USGS) 0 1 Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Core Habitat (PA) Approx. Acreage of National Audubon Society Important Bird Area Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Provisional Species of Concern (PA) Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Supporting Landscape area (PA) FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
75 Original Preferred November 2015 Approx. Acreage of Natural Heritage Priority Sites for Rare Species and Ecological Communities (NJ) within Approx. Acreage of Critical Environmental and Historic Sites (NJ) Known Contaminated Sites (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Groundwater Contamination Areas (CEA) (NJ) Approx. Acreage of NJDEP Tier 1 Well Head Protection Area (NJ) Potential NRHP Cultural Resources (unrestricted) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone A (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone B (NJ) 0 0 Total # of churches, cemeteries, schools, and parks Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Sewer Service Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Historic Properties (NJ SHPO) Approx. Acreage of Open Space (State) (NJ) within 8 Approx. Acreage of State Parks (PA) Approx. Acreage of State Forests (PA) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of State Game Lands (PA) within Length of PA Trails (miles) Total Acreage of 100 Year Flood Hazard areas (FEMA) Total Acreage of Preserved Farmland within 200' of line Railroad Crossings (Status Unknown) Road Crossings Bridge Crossings (all) FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
76 Original Preferred November 2015 Bridges Structurally Deficient or Functionally Obsolete (from all 0 0 bridges) 14 Product Pipeline Crossings Existing Gas Pipeline Crossings Transmission line Crossings Karst/Sink holes (PA) (DCNR Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey) 0 0 Coal Mines (PA) (DCNR) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of Slopes > 30% within 200 of line Total Acreage of 400' Corridor Percent of Total 400' Corridor that is wetland 2.4% 3.9% Notes: 1 Municipality crossings based on the PennDOT and NJDOT boundaries data sets 2 Stream crossings are based on the intersect of the pipeline and the 2002 National Hydrography Dataset NHD Flowline 3 Penn State Streams Chapter 93 Designated Use 4 Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission data (Oct 2013); counts should not be summed as a crossing is already counted for other categories 5 Wetland crossing counts based on the intersect of the pipeline into a discretely mapped wetlands 6 NHD waterbodies includes only lakes and ponds and not stream areas 7 Churches, schools, and cemetery counts are based on USGS GNIS 8 NJDEP Open Space (State, County, Cross-Acceptance) 9 PA DCNR and Rails-to-Trails Conservancy 10 PA Agricultural Security Areas and NJ Farmland Parcel Preservation Program 11 PennDOT County Rail lines; NJDOT Rail Network 12 PennDOT State and Local roads; NJDOT Road Network 13 Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory 14 Structurally deficient criteria defined at 15 Platts POWERmap FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
77 Figure PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Major Reroute 3 and Original FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
78 Table provides a Critical Issues Analysis for PennEast s Major Reroute 4: MP of the Preferred January 2015 compared to the corresponding segment of the Original. Figure shows the Preferred January 2015 between approximate MP as compared with the Original. Table Critical Issues Analysis for the PennEast Major Reroute 4 Original Preferred January 2015 Length (Miles) Municipalities Crossed (#) Stream Crossings (Total as NHD streams) PA EV Cold Water Fishes (EV-CWF, Total) 3 0 PA HQ Cold Water Fishes (HQ-CWF, Total) 3 0 PA Cold Water Fishes (CWF, Total) 3 0 PA Warm Water Fishes (WWF, Total) 3 1 PA Trout Stocking Stream (TST, Total) 3 1 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from EV) 4 0 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from HQ) 4 0 PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from CWF) 4 0 Other, Non-PA Chapter 93 Designated Streams 3 45 (NHD streams) NJDEP SWQS Category 1 Streams Wild and Scenic River Crossings Total Acreage of wetlands (PA NWI and NJDEP) Lower Delaware River Wetland Crossings (of the Center Line) Total number of NHD waterbodies within 200' of line Total Acreage of NHD waterbodies within 200' of line Total # Wells (PAGWIS and NJDEP) within 200' of line 1 0 Wind Turbines (USGS) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Core Habitat (PA) Approx. Acreage of National Audubon Society Important Bird Area 0 0 FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
79 Original Preferred January 2015 Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Provisional Species of Concern (PA) Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Supporting Landscape area (PA) within Approx. Acreage of Natural Heritage Priority Sites for Rare Species and Ecological Communities (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Critical Environmental and Historic Sites (NJ) Known Contaminated Sites (NJ) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of Groundwater Contamination Areas (CEA) (NJ) Approx. Acreage of NJDEP Tier 1 Well Head Protection Area (NJ) Potential NRHP Cultural Resources (unrestricted) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone A (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone B (NJ) Total # of churches, cemeteries, schools, and parks Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Sewer Service Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Historic Properties (NJ SHPO) Approx. Acreage of Open Space (State) (NJ) within Approx. Acreage of State Parks (PA) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of State Forests (PA) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of State Game Lands (PA) within Length of PA Trails (miles) Total Acreage of 100 Year Flood Hazard areas (FEMA) FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
80 Original Preferred January 2015 Total Acreage of Preserved Farmland within 200' of line Railroad Crossings (Status Unknown) Road Crossings Bridge Crossings (all) Bridges Structurally Deficient or Functionally Obsolete (from all 5 0 bridges) 14 Product Pipeline Crossings Existing Gas Pipeline Crossings Transmission line Crossings Karst/Sink holes (PA) (DCNR Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey) 0 Coal Mines (PA) (DCNR) 0 Approx. Acreage of Slopes > 30% within 200 of line Total Acreage of 400' Corridor Percent of Total 400' Corridor that is wetland 7.2% 4.6 Notes: 1 Municipality crossings based on the PennDOT and NJDOT boundaries data sets 2 Stream crossings are based on the intersect of the pipeline and the 2002 National Hydrography Dataset NHD Flowline 3 Penn State Streams Chapter 93 Designated Use 4 Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission data (Oct 2013); counts should not be summed as a crossing is already counted for other categories 5 Wetland crossing counts based on the intersect of the pipeline into a discretely mapped wetlands 6 NHD waterbodies includes only lakes and ponds and not stream areas 7 Churches, schools, and cemetery counts are based on USGS GNIS 8 NJDEP Open Space (State, County, Cross-Acceptance) 9 PA DCNR and Rails-to-Trails Conservancy 10 PA Agricultural Security Areas and NJ Farmland Parcel Preservation Program 11 PennDOT County Rail lines; NJDOT Rail Network 12 PennDOT State and Local roads; NJDOT Road Network 13 Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory 14 Structurally deficient criteria defined at 15 Platts POWERmap FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
81 Figure PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Major Reroute 4 and Original FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
82 Table provides a Critical Issues Analysis for PennEast s Major Reroute 5: MP of the Preferred March 2015 compared to the corresponding segment of the Original. Figure shows the Preferred March 2015 between approximate MP as compared with the Original. Table Critical Issues Analysis for the PennEast Major Reroute 5 Original Preferred March 2015 Length (Miles) Municipalities Crossed (#) Stream Crossings (Total as NHD streams) PA EV Cold Water Fishes (EV-CWF, Total) PA HQ Cold Water Fishes (HQ-CWF, Total) PA Cold Water Fishes (CWF, Total) PA Warm Water Fishes (WWF, Total) PA Trout Stocking Stream (TST, Total) PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from EV) PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from HQ) PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from CWF) Other, Non-PA Chapter 93 Designated Streams (NHD streams) NJDEP SWQS Category 1 Streams Wild and Scenic River Crossings 0 0 Total Acreage of wetlands (PA NWI and NJDEP) Wetland Crossings (of the Center Line) Total number of NHD waterbodies Total Acreage of NHD waterbodies Total # Wells (PAGWIS and NJDEP) 0 0 Wind Turbines (USGS) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Core Habitat (PA) Approx. Acreage of National Audubon Society Important Bird Area Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Provisional Species of Concern (PA) Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Supporting Landscape area (PA) FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
83 Original Preferred March 2015 Approx. Acreage of Natural Heritage Priority Sites for Rare Species and Ecological Communities (NJ) within Approx. Acreage of Critical Environmental and Historic Sites (NJ) Known Contaminated Sites (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Groundwater Contamination Areas (CEA) (NJ) Approx. Acreage of NJDEP Tier 1 Well Head Protection Area (NJ) Potential NRHP Cultural Resources (unrestricted) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone A (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone B (NJ) 0 0 Total # of churches, cemeteries, schools, and parks Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Sewer Service Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Historic Properties (NJ SHPO) Approx. Acreage of Open Space (State) (NJ) within 8 Approx. Acreage of State Parks (PA) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of State Forests (PA) within 200' of line Approx. Acreage of State Game Lands (PA) within Length of PA Trails (miles) Total Acreage of 100 Year Flood Hazard areas (FEMA) Total Acreage of Preserved Farmland within 200' of line Railroad Crossings (Status Unknown) Road Crossings Bridge Crossings (all) FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
84 Original Preferred March 2015 Bridges Structurally Deficient or Functionally Obsolete (from all 0 0 bridges) 14 Product Pipeline Crossings Existing Gas Pipeline Crossings Transmission line Crossings Karst/Sink holes (PA) (DCNR Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey) 0 0 Coal Mines (PA) (DCNR) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of Slopes > 30% within 200 of line Total Acreage of 400' Corridor Percent of Total 400' Corridor that is wetland 0.9% 0.7% Notes: 1 Municipality crossings based on the PennDOT and NJDOT boundaries data sets 2 Stream crossings are based on the intersect of the pipeline and the 2002 National Hydrography Dataset NHD Flowline 3 Penn State Streams Chapter 93 Designated Use 4 Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission data (Oct 2013); counts should not be summed as a crossing is already counted for other categories 5 Wetland crossing counts based on the intersect of the pipeline into a discretely mapped wetlands 6 NHD waterbodies includes only lakes and ponds and not stream areas 7 Churches, schools, and cemetery counts are based on USGS GNIS 8 NJDEP Open Space (State, County, Cross-Acceptance) 9 PA DCNR and Rails-to-Trails Conservancy 10 PA Agricultural Security Areas and NJ Farmland Parcel Preservation Program 11 PennDOT County Rail lines; NJDOT Rail Network 12 PennDOT State and Local roads; NJDOT Road Network 13 Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory 14 Structurally deficient criteria defined at 15 Platts POWERmap FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
85 Figure PennEast Pipeline Project Alternative s Map Major Reroute 5 and Original FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
86 Table Summary of Pipeline Minor Reroutes Deviation No. July 2015 Deviation No. Pipeline Component Begin MP End MP Deviation Type Status Reason for Deviation Appendix P Page No. 1 6B Mainline Optimization Implemented 2 13 Mainline Landowner Implemented 3 50 Mainline Landowner Not Implemented 4 51 Mainline Landowner Implemented 5 72 Mainline Landowner 6 9 Mainline Optimization Not Implemented Implemented Deviation considered to avoid pond behind business and to increase distance from cemetery Deviation considered to coordinate Proposed location with planned land development initiatives by Landowner Landowner request to avoid tree clearing behind property. Not implemented due to additional land area disturbances required for construction. Deviation considered to coordinate Proposed location with planned quarry operations. The prior alternative was rejected due to RTE concerns. Landowner request to avoid potential future development. Not implemented due to majority of Proposed being located in quarry expansion setback zone. Deviation considered to improve colocation with existing utility corridors across PA State Game Lands P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-6 FINAL FERC Section7(c) Application
87 Deviation No. July 2015 Deviation No. Pipeline Component Begin MP End MP Deviation Type Status Reason for Deviation Appendix P Page No Mainline Stakeholder Not Implemented Request to evaluate route options that would avoid Bethlehem Authority watershed. Not implemented due to constructability concerns, increased parcels impacted, and overall land disturbance. P Mainline Landowner Not Implemented Landowner request to locate Proposed on east side of Buckeye Pipeline pump station. Not implemented due to safety concerns of crossing Reservoir Road underneath overhead powerlines. P-8 9 Mainline Stakeholder Not Implemented Request to evaluate route options that would avoid Bethlehem Authority watershed. Not implemented due to constructability concerns associated with crossing Beltzville Lake. P G Mainline Optimization Implemented Deviation considered to avoid crossing the Woods Campground with several areas of outdoor recreational activities. P-10 FINAL FERC Section7(c) Application
88 Deviation No. July 2015 Deviation No. Pipeline Component Begin MP End MP Deviation Type Status Reason for Deviation Appendix P Page No Mainline Landowner Not Implemented Landowner request to cross property at different location. Not implemented due to constructability concerns and requirement for ATWS for Beltzville Lake HDD crossing. P Mainline Stakeholder Implemented Stakeholder request to cross Bethlehem Authority waterline at location where vertical separation would be approximately 230 feet. P Mainline Optimization Not Implemented Deviation considered to evaluate colocating with existing utility corridors in proximity to Blue Mountain Interconnect site. Not implemented due to constructability concerns. P Mainline Optimization Not Implemented Deviation considered to evaluate colocating with existing utility corridors in proximity to Blue Mountain Interconnect site. Not implemented due to additional land disturbance for lateral to Blue Mountain Interconnect. P Mainline Optimization Not Implemented Deviation considered to evaluate colocating with existing utility corridors in proximity to Blue Mountain Interconnect site. Not implemented due to constructability concerns. P-15 FINAL FERC Section7(c) Application
89 Deviation No. July 2015 Deviation No. Pipeline Component Begin MP End MP Deviation Type Status Reason for Deviation Appendix P Page No Mainline Optimization Not Implemented Deviation considered to evaluate colocation within existing pipeline easement. Not implemented due to operational concerns working within 33' easement containing 2 operational product pipelines and additional land disturbance for lateral to Blue Mountain Interconnect. P Mainline Optimization Not Implemented Deviation considered to evaluate colocation within existing pipeline easement. Not implemented due to operational concerns working within 33' easement containing 2 operational product pipelines and additional land disturbance for lateral to Blue Mountain Interconnect. P Mainline Optimization Not Implemented Deviation considered to evaluate colocation with existing pipeline easement. Not implemented due to operational concerns working within 30' easement on an operational product line and additional land disturbance for lateral to Blue Mountain Interconnect. P-18 FINAL FERC Section7(c) Application
90 Deviation No. July 2015 Deviation No. Pipeline Component Begin MP End MP Deviation Type Status Reason for Deviation Appendix P Page No Mainline Optimization Not Implemented Deviation considered to evaluate colocation within existing pipeline easement. Not implemented due to operational concerns working within 33' easement containing 2 operational product pipelines and additional land disturbance for lateral to Blue Mountain Interconnect. P Mainline Optimization Not Implemented Deviation considered to evaluate colocation with existing electric transmission lines. Not implemented due to additional land disturbance for lateral to Blue Mountain Interconnect. P Mainline Optimization Not Implemented Deviation considered to evaluate colocation within existing pipeline easement. Not implemented due to operational concerns working within 33' easement containing 2 operational product pipelines and additional land disturbance for lateral to Blue Mountain Interconnect. P-21 FINAL FERC Section7(c) Application
91 Deviation No. July 2015 Deviation No. Pipeline Component Begin MP End MP Deviation Type Status Reason for Deviation Appendix P Page No Mainline Optimization Not Implemented Deviation considered to evaluate colocation with existing pipeline easement. Not implemented due to operational concerns working within 30' easement on an operational product line and would require a lateral to Blue Mountain Interconnect. P Mainline Optimization Not Implemented Deviation considered to evaluate colocating with existing utility corridors in proximity to Blue Mountain Interconnect site. Not implemented due to constructability concerns. P Mainline Optimization Not Implemented Deviation considered to evaluate colocating with existing utility corridors in proximity to Blue Mountain Interconnect site. Not implemented due to constructability concerns. P Mainline B Mainline Optimization Optimization Implemented Not Implemented Mainline Landowner Implemented Deviation considered to accommodate Blue Mountain Interconnect and minimizes impacts to sensitive areas. Deviation considered to reduce preserved farmland crossings. Not implemented due to increased impacts to sensitive areas. Deviation considered to avoid impacts to new home construction. P-25 P-26 P-27 FINAL FERC Section7(c) Application
92 Deviation No. July 2015 Deviation No. Pipeline Component Begin MP End MP Deviation Type Status Reason for Deviation Appendix P Page No Mainline Landowner Implemented Mainline Regulatory Not Implemented Mainline Landowner Implemented Mainline Landowner Implemented Mainline Regulatory Not Implemented Mainline Landowner Implemented Deviation considered to avoid impacts to planned residential development. Deviation considered to reduce impacts to sensitive areas. Not implemented due to deviation resulting in additional impact to sensitive areas and impact to private septic system. Deviation considered to avoid impacts to future property development. Deviation considered to avoid impacts to future property development. Deviation considered to reduce impacts to sensitive areas. Not implemented due to deviation resulting in additional impact to sensitive areas. Deviation considered to avoid impacts to future property development. P-28 P-29 P-30 P-31 P-32 P-33 FINAL FERC Section7(c) Application
93 Deviation No. July 2015 Deviation No. Pipeline Component Begin MP End MP Deviation Type Status Reason for Deviation Appendix P Page No Mainline Optimization Implemented Deviation considered to increase distance from Proposed to St. Luke s Hospital and minimize disruption to multiple businesses on west side of 33. Also improves alignment to Lehigh River trenchless crossing. P Mainline Landowner Implemented Mainline Landowner Implemented Mainline Landowner Implemented Mainline Landowner Implemented 39 35A Mainline Landowner Implemented Deviation considered to avoid impacts to future property development. Deviation considered to avoid impacts to future property development. Deviation considered to avoid impacts to future property development. Deviation considered to avoid impacts to future property development. Deviation considered to avoid impacts to future property expansion. P-35 P-36 P-37 P-38 P Mainline Stakeholder Not Implemented Deviation considered to evaluate colocation opportunities with Reliant Pipeline corridor. Not implemented due to constructability concerns with ROW encroachments and Delaware River crossing. P-40 FINAL FERC Section7(c) Application
94 Deviation No. July 2015 Deviation No. Pipeline Component Begin MP End MP Deviation Type Status Reason for Deviation Appendix P Page No Mainline Optimization Not Implemented Deviation considered to minimize forest impacts. Not implemented due to proximity of residential area. P Mainline Regulatory Implemented Mainline Regulatory Implemented 44 3 Mainline Regulatory Not Implemented 45 23A Mainline Regulatory Implemented Mainline Landowner Not Implemented Deviation considered to avoid impacts to sensitive areas and as requested by landowner. Deviation considered to avoid impacts to sensitive areas. Deviation considered to minimize impacts to sensitive areas. Not implemented due to additional impact to sensitive areas. Deviation considered to avoid impacts to sensitive areas. Landowner request to avoid crossing parcel. Not implemented due to constructability concerns. P-42 P-43 P-44 P-45 P Mainline Regulatory Not Implemented deviation requested during pre-filing phase. Not implemented due to requiring a second Delaware River Crossing for lateral to ETG/NRG REMA Interconnect. An HDD for the lateral crossing would result in high risk for failure due to terrain. P-47 FINAL FERC Section7(c) Application
95 Deviation No. July 2015 Deviation No. Pipeline Component Begin MP End MP Deviation Type Status Reason for Deviation Appendix P Page No Mainline Stakeholder 49 38B Gilbert Lateral Landowner 50 Mainline Regulatory Not Implemented Not Implemented Not Implemented 51 29A Mainline Landowner Implemented 52 17A Mainline Optimization 53 29C Mainline Landowner Not Implemented Not Implemented deviation to consider paralleling railroad for increased colocation. Not implemented due to constructability concerns. Landowner requested pipeline to be proposed on east side of Phillips Road. Not implemented due to impact to residential areas. Deviation considered to avoid crossing Gravel Hill Preserve. Not implemented due to the increased landowner impacts, installing pipeline in public road ROW, and increased integrity threat from third party damage. Deviation considered to avoid impacts to future property development. Deviation considered to avoid impacts to future property development. Not implemented due to additional land impacts. Deviation considered to avoid impacts to future property development. Not implemented due to additional land impacts. P-48 P-49 P-50 P-51 P-52 P-53 FINAL FERC Section7(c) Application
96 Deviation No. July 2015 Deviation No. Pipeline Component Begin MP End MP Deviation Type Status Reason for Deviation Appendix P Page No Mainline Landowner Not Implemented Deviation considered to avoid impacts to future property development. Not implemented due to additional land impacts. P Mainline Landowner Not Implemented Deviation considered to avoid locating pipeline close to public water well recharge. Water well is located in a paved parking lot. Not implemented due to additional land disturbance. P Mainline Optimization Not Implemented Deviation considered to minimize impacts to sensitive areas. Not implemented due to constructability concerns. P Mainline Regulatory Not Implemented Deviation considered to minimize forest impacts. Not implemented due to impact to residential area and installing pipeline in public road rightof-way (ROW), increasing threat from third party damage. P Mainline Landowner Implemented Mainline Stakeholder Not Implemented Deviation considered to avoid conflict with a subsurface private sewer system. Deviation considered to avoid multiple crossings of Lockatong Creek. Not implemented due to implementation of Deviation No. 63. P-58 P-59 FINAL FERC Section7(c) Application
97 Deviation No. July 2015 Deviation No. Pipeline Component Begin MP End MP Deviation Type Status Reason for Deviation Appendix P Page No A Mainline Stakeholder 61 40B Mainline Stakeholder 62 40D Mainline Stakeholder Not Implemented Not Implemented Not Implemented 63 40E Mainline Stakeholder Implemented Mainline Stakeholder Implemented Deviation considered to avoid multiple crossings of Lockatong Creek. Not implemented due to implementation of Deviation No. 63. Deviation considered to avoid multiple crossings of Lockatong Creek. Not implemented due to implementation of Deviation No. 63. Deviation considered to avoid multiple crossings of Lockatong Creek. Not implemented due to implementation of Deviation No. 63. Deviation considered to avoid multiple crossings of Lockatong Creek. Deviation implemented to optimize co-location opportunities and based on discussion with stakeholders to increase co-location with existing utilities. P-60 P-61 P-62 P-63 P Mainline Regulatory Not Implemented Deviation considered to minimize wetland impacts. Not implemented due to impact to residential area and installing pipeline in public road ROW, and increased integrity threat from third party damage. P-65 FINAL FERC Section7(c) Application
98 Deviation No. July 2015 Deviation No. Pipeline Component Begin MP End MP Deviation Type Status Reason for Deviation Appendix P Page No B Mainline Regulatory Implemented Mainline Regulatory Implemented To reduce preserved farmland crossings and a small private air strip (grass surface). To avoid crossing a parcel encumbered by a USDA easement. P-66 P Mainline Regulatory Not Implemented Deviation considered to minimize wetland impacts. Not implemented due to impact to residential area and installing pipeline in public road ROW, and increased integrity threat from third party damage. P Mainline Landowner Implemented Deviation considered to avoid impacts to future property development. P C Lambertville Lateral Optimization Not Implemented Not implemented due to additional land disturbance and parcels crossed. P A Lambertville Lateral Optimization Not Implemented Not implemented due to additional land disturbance and parcels crossed. P Mainline Optimization Implemented Deviation considered to optimize crossing of Alexauken Creek due to location of Lambertville Lateral. P-72 FINAL FERC Section7(c) Application
99 Deviation No. July 2015 Deviation No. Pipeline Component Begin MP End MP Deviation Type Status Reason for Deviation Appendix P Page No A Lambertville Lateral Optimization Implemented Deviation considered to avoid locating the Lambertville Lateral and launcher barrel directly under powerlines. P Mainline Optimization Implemented Deviation considered to minimize tree cutting. P Mainline Regulatory Not Implemented Deviation considered to avoid sensitive areas. Not implemented due to constructability and proximity to dam, as well as increased land required to build pipeline. P Mainline Landowner Implemented Mainline Optimization Implemented Mainline Regulatory Implemented Deviation considered to avoid impacts to future property development. Deviation considered to avoid impacts to pond on south side of powerline corridor Deviation considered to avoid crossing USDA preserved farmland. P-76 P-77 P Mainline Optimization Not Implemented Deviation considered to avoid ROW concerns. Not implemented due to proximity of sensitive areas. P-79 FINAL FERC Section7(c) Application
100 Deviation No. July 2015 Deviation No. Pipeline Component Begin MP End MP Deviation Type Status Reason for Deviation Appendix P Page No Mainline Landowner Implemented Deviation considered to accommodate landowner request to locate pipeline in northwest boundary of property. P-80 FINAL FERC Section7(c) Application
101 Table Summary of Pipeline Deviations on Prior Alternatives Deviation No. July 2015 Deviation No. Pipeline Component Deviation Type Reason for Deviation Appendix P Page No. A 50A Mainline Landowner B 37 Mainline Landowner C 6E Mainline Optimization Deviation considered to avoid tree removal along abandoned railroad corridor Deviation considered to minimize impacts to planned land development Deviation considered to avoid warmup track for casino P-A P-B P-C D 41 Mainline Optimization Deviation considered to optimize Appalachian Trail crossing P-D E 6H Mainline Regulatory F 63 Mainline Regulatory G 10 Mainline Optimization H 11 Mainline Landowner I 14 Mainline Regulatory J 38 Gilbert Lateral K 38A Gilbert Lateral L 38C Gilbert Lateral Optimization Optimization Optimization M 60 Mainline Landowner N 29D Mainline Landowner O 29B Mainline Landowner P 17C Mainline Regulatory Q 5 Mainline Landowner Deviation considered to align with PA State Game Land Property Line Deviation considered to avoid sensitive areas Deviation considered to align with PA State Game Land Property Line Deviation considered to minimize impacts to planned land development Deviation considered to avoid sensitive areas Deviation considered to route a lateral to supply the Gilbert Station Deviation considered to locate the side tap valve with the MLV east of Phillips Road Deviation considered to avoid hilly terrain for the Gilbert side valve/tap Deviation considered to address landowner feedback Deviation considered to address landowner feedback Deviation considered to route Proposed to south of property due to planned development Deviation considered to avoid preserved farm land Deviation considered to avoid Equestrian Center and persevered farm land P-E P-F P-G P-H P-I P-J P-K P-L P-M P-N P-O P-P P-Q FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
102 New Compression As the Project has evolved, the need for compression has changed. Initially, PennEast considered a 30-inch pipeline with three compressor stations. With changes in location and pipeline coating, PennEast reduced the design to two compressor stations. The compressor options that PennEast initially evaluated with a 30-inch pipeline included the following: Compressor Station Option 1 o Available (ISO) = 26,733 HP o (3) Taurus 70s Compressor Station Option 2 o Available (ISO) = 7,224 HP o (2) Centaur 40s Following this analysis, as a result of the increased demand for natural gas transportation service resulting from the Open Season and the corresponding increase in the diameter of the pipeline from 30-inches to 36-inches, the requirements for compression changed and two compressor stations were no longer necessary. By installing a 36-inch mainline, only one compressor station is required to transport the gas from the major receipt interconnections Transco and gathering systems operated by Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. and UGI Energy Services, LLC, all in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, to the major delivery interconnections, including the following: UGI Central Penn Gas, Inc. in Carbon County, Pennsylvania; UGI Utilities, Inc. and Columbia Gas, in Northampton County, Pennsylvania; Elizabethtown Gas, Texas Eastern, Algonquin, and the Gilbert electric generation facility, all in Hunterdon County, New Jersey; and Transco, in Mercer County, New Jersey. PennEast evaluated two locations in Kidder Township, Carbon County, Pennsylvania for the proposed compressor station, and has identified a preferred location at approximate milepost The compressor station will include three gas turbine-driven Solar Mars 100 units rated at 15,900 hp each under ISO conditions (47,700 total ISO hp). The proposed site has been environmentally surveyed and there are no cultural or historic resources that would constrain use of the approximately 60-acre site. The latitude/longitude location coordinates for the proposed compressor station site are listed in Table (Resource Report 1). A complete alternatives analysis for the compressor station, including a map and an environmental and engineering comparison showing the two alternative compressor station sites considered can be found below. Kidder Compressor Station is the proposed location for the compressor station. Compressor Station Option 1 was an alternative site considered and not implemented. An alternate using electric compressors was evaluated (see Appendix L) but was eliminated from detailed consideration due to the greater impacts to air quality associated with generation of electricity as well as the need for backup generation should there be a power outage. FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
103 Table Critical Issues Analysis of PennEast Compressor Station Site Alternatives Compressor Station Option 1 Kidder Compressor Station Municipalities Crossed (#) Stream Crossings (Total as NHD streams) PA EV Cold Water Fishes (EV-CWF, Total) PA HQ Cold Water Fishes (HQ-CWF, Total) PA Cold Water Fishes (CWF, Total) PA Warm Water Fishes (WWF, Total) PA Trout Stocking Stream (TST, Total) PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from EV) PA Naturally Producing Trout Waters (from HQ) Other, Non-PA Chapter 93 Designated Streams (NHD streams) NJDEP SWQS Category 1 Streams Wild and Scenic River Crossings 0 0 Total Acreage of wetlands (PA NWI and NJDEP) Wetland Crossings (of the Center Line) Total number of NHD waterbodies Total Acreage of NHD waterbodies Total # Wells (PAGWIS and NJDEP) 0 0 Wind Turbines (USGS) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Core Habitat (PA) Approx. Acreage of National Audubon Society Important Bird Area Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Provisional Species of Concern (PA) Approx. Acreage of County Natural Heritage Inventory Supporting Landscape area (PA) Approx. Acreage of Natural Heritage Priority Sites for Rare Species and Ecological Communities (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Critical Environmental and Historic Sites (NJ) Known Contaminated Sites (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Groundwater Contamination Areas (CEA) (NJ) FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
104 Approx. Acreage of NJDEP Tier 1 Well Head Protection Area (NJ) Compressor Station Option 1 Kidder Compressor Station Potential NRHP Cultural Resources (unrestricted) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone A (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Review Zone B (NJ) Total # of churches, cemeteries, schools, and parks Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Highland Preservation Sewer Service Area (NJ) Approx. Acreage of Historic Properties (NJ SHPO) Approx. Acreage of Open Space (State) (NJ) 8 Approx. Acreage of State Parks (PA) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of State Forests (PA) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of State Game Lands (PA) 0 0 Length of PA Trails Total Acreage of 100 Year Flood Hazard areas (FEMA) 0 0 Total Acreage of Preserved Farmland Railroad Crossings (Status Unknown) Road Crossings Bridge Crossings (all) Bridges Structurally Deficient or Functionally Obsolete (from all bridges) Product Pipeline Crossings Existing Gas Pipeline Crossings Transmission line Crossings Karst/Sink holes (PA)(DCNR Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey) 0 0 Coal Mines (PA) (DCNR) 0 0 Approx. Acreage of Slopes > 30% 0 0 Total Acreage of 400' Corridor Percent of Total 400' Corridor that is wetland 1% 5% Notes: 1 Municipality crossings based on the PennDOT and NJDOT boundaries data sets FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
105 Compressor Station Option 1 Kidder Compressor Station 2 Stream crossings are based on the intersect of the pipeline and the 2002 National Hydrography Dataset NHD Flowline 3 Penn State Streams Chapter 93 Designated Use 4 Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission data (Oct 2013); counts should not be summed as a crossing is already counted for other categories 5 Wetland crossing counts based on the intersect of the pipeline into a discretely mapped wetlands 6 NHD waterbodies includes only lakes and ponds and not stream areas 7 Churches, schools, and cemetery counts are based on USGS GNIS 8 NJDEP Open Space (State, County, Cross-Acceptance) 9 PA DCNR and Rails-to-Trails Conservancy 10 PA Agricultural Security Areas and NJ Farmland Parcel Preservation Program 11 PennDOT County Rail lines; NJDOT Rail Network 12 PennDOT State and Local roads; NJDOT Road Network 13 Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory 14 Structurally deficient criteria defined at 15 Platts POWERmap FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
106 Figure FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
107 RESOURCE REPORT 10 PennEast Pipeline Project Compressor Station Site Map FINAL FERC Section 7(c) Application
ADELPHIA GATEWAY PROJECT
ADELPHIA GATEWAY PROJECT RESOURCE REPORT NO. 10 Alternatives ADELPHIA GATEWAY PROJECT January 2018 SUMMARY OF FILING INFORMATION INFORMATION Data Sources a Found in Section To be Filed Minimum Requirements
More informationProject Overview. November 2014
Project Overview November 2014 1 Team Introduction Alisa Harris, UGI Energy Services VP, Government and Public Affairs E-mail: aharris@ugies.com Lawrence Godlasky, UGI Energy Services Director, Government
More informationCONNECTICUT EXPANSION PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT RESOURCE REPORT 10 ALTERNATIVES. Submitted by:
CONNECTICUT EXPANSION PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT RESOURCE REPORT 10 ALTERNATIVES Submitted by: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. 1001 Louisiana Street Houston, Texas 77002 JULY 2014 RESOURCE REPORT
More informationVALLEY LATERAL PROJECT
VALLEY LATERAL PROJECT DRAFT RESOURCE REPORT 10 Alternatives FERC Docket No. PF15-23-000 June 2015 Section TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 10.0 RESOURCE REPORT 10 ALTERNATIVES... 10-1 10.1 INTRODUCTION... 10-1
More informationThe PennEast Pipeline Project
The Project About the Project AGL Resources; NJR Pipeline Company; PSEG Power; South Jersey Industries; Spectra Energy and UGI Energy Services (UGIES) comprise Company, LLC. Over $1 billion investment
More informationPLANNED ENHANCEMENTS, NORTHEAST NATURAL GAS PIPELINE SYSTEMS (as of )
PIPELINE SYSTEMS (as of 5-4-18) The Northeast Gas Association (NGA) has prepared this summary based on publicly-available information. NGA will strive to keep the information as updated as possible and
More informationNortheast Upgrade Project
INTERSTATE PIPELINES EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION Northeast Upgrade Project Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company Green Acres Public Scoping Meeting Parkland Diversion Bergen County Parkland July 28, 2011 Introductions
More informationAn Employee-Owned Company
An Employee-Owned Company October 26, 2016 Clinton Township Floodplain Administrator P.O. Box 256, Creek Road Factoryville, PA 18419 Re: Atlantic Sunrise Project Central Penn Line North Clinton Township,
More informationPLANNED ENHANCEMENTS, NORTHEAST NATURAL GAS PIPELINE SYSTEMS (as of )
PIPELINE SYSTEMS (as of 1-2-19) The Northeast Gas Association (NGA) has prepared this summary based on publicly-available information. NGA will strive to keep the information as updated as possible and
More informationPENNEAST PIPELINE PROJECT
Company, LLC PENNEAST PIPELINE PROJECT February 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations... iii 1.0 General... 1-1 1.1 Proposed Facilities... 1-1 1.1.1 Purpose and Need (for the entire Project
More informationPLANNED ENHANCEMENTS, NORTHEAST NATURAL GAS PIPELINE SYSTEMS (as of )
PIPELINE SYSTEMS (as of 1-22-18) The Northeast Gas Association (NGA) has prepared this summary based on publicly-available information. NGA will strive to keep the information as updated as possible and
More informationPLANNED ENHANCEMENTS, NORTHEAST NATURAL GAS PIPELINE SYSTEMS (as of )
PIPELINE SYSTEMS (as of 9-22-17) The Northeast Gas Association (NGA) has prepared this summary based on publicly-available information. NGA will strive to keep the information as updated as possible and
More informationThe PennEast Pipeline Project
The Project About the Project AGL Resources; NJR Pipeline Company; PSEG Power; South Jersey Industries; Spectra Energy and UGI Energy Services (UGIES) comprise Company, LLC. Nearly $1 billion investment
More informationFERC approves Transco natural gas pipeline expansion
FERC approves Transco natural gas pipeline expansion HOUSTON, Nov. 22 11/22/2013 By OGJ editors Williams Partners LP has received approval from the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for the $300
More informationOctober 12, Lenox Township Floodplain Administrator 222 S.R Nicholson, PA 18446
An Employee-Owned Company October 12, 2016 Lenox Township Floodplain Administrator 222 S.R. 2016 Nicholson, PA 18446 Re: Atlantic Sunrise Project Central Penn Line North Lenox Township, Susquehanna County
More informationPRESS KIT MEDIA CONTACT. Chris Stockton Office Number: Cell Number:
PRESS KIT MEDIA CONTACT Chris Stockton Email: Christopher.L.Stockton@williams.com Office Number: 713-215-2010 Cell Number: 713-562-2939 ABOUT WILLIAMS Williams is a nearly 110-year-old energy company that
More informationATTACHMENT P -1 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
ATTACHMENT P -1 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS Revised April 2017 1.0 Introduction... 1 2.0 No Action Alternative... 1 3.0 Transco Existing System Alternative... 2 4.0 Development of the Proposed Route... 6 4.1
More informationPLANNED ENHANCEMENTS, NORTHEAST NATURAL GAS PIPELINE SYSTEMS (as of )
PIPELINE SYSTEMS (as of 8-4-16) The Northeast Gas Association (NGA) has prepared this summary based on publicly-available information. NGA will strive to keep the information as updated as possible and
More informationSpectra Energy: Moving Ahead, Gaining Momentum
8 th ANNUAL PLATTS PIPELINE EXPANSION & DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE HOUSTON, TX SEPTEMBER 17, 2013 Spectra Energy: Greg Crisp Director, Business Development Safe Harbor Statement Some of the statements in this
More informationMay 30, Dear Mr. Buczynski:
May 30, 2016 Joseph J. Buczynski, P.E. Waterways and Wetlands Program Manager Department of Environmental Protection Northeast Regional Office 2 Public Square Wilkes-Barre, PA 18701-1915 Phone: 570.826.2511
More informationAn Employee-Owned Company
An Employee-Owned Company October 28, 2016 Conestoga Township Floodplain Administrator 3959 Main Street Conestoga, PA 17516 Re: Atlantic Sunrise Project Central Penn Line South Conestoga Township, Lancaster
More informationWilliams Transco Pipeline
open house Williams Transco Pipeline Williams Transco pipeline is a major transporter of natural gas, delivering much of the natural gas consumed in the northeastern and southeastern United States. Transco
More informationBy Mark Gallagher Princeton Hydro LLC. From FERC Leidy Line EA
By Mark Gallagher Princeton Hydro LLC. From FERC Leidy Line EA Pipelines in the Landscape Both photographs attributed to Delaware Riverkeeper Network Natural Resource Impacts Associated with Pipelines
More informationATTACHMENT A -1 PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
Atlantic Sunrise Project PA DEP Chapter 105 Joint Permit Application Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC Lancaster County ATTACHMENT A -1 PERMIT APPLICATION FORM Revised April 2017 3150-PM-BWEW0036A
More informationATTACHMENT A -1 PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
Atlantic Sunrise Project PA DEP Chapter 105 Joint Permit Application Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC Wyoming County ATTACHMENT A -1 PERMIT APPLICATION FORM Revised April 2017 3150-PM-BWEW0036A
More informationProject Report DRAFT. SPC-PENNDOT Environmental Unit Environmental Screening Project Information. Water Resources. Farmland
Project Report DRAFT SPC-PENNDOT Environmental Unit Environmental Screening Project Information MPMS: 28734 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Project Name: KOPPEL BR OVER CSX, NSRC, & BEAVER RI County Name:
More informationATTACHMENT A -1 PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
Atlantic Sunrise Project PA DEP Chapter 105 Joint Permit Application Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC Lebanon County ATTACHMENT A -1 PERMIT APPLICATION FORM Revised April 2017 3150-PM-BWEW0036A
More informationNatural Gas Pipeline Expansion Activity
Natural Gas Pipeline Expansion Activity Energy Finance 2015 March 19, 2015 John A. Rosenkranz Principal North Side Energy, LLC Upswing in Gas Pipeline Development Source: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
More informationNew Jersey Natural Gas Market Update
March 25, 2015 Mullica Hill, NJ New Jersey Natural Gas Market Update Presentation to: SNJDC Natural Gas Seminar Tom Kiley Northeast Gas Association Issues Regional Market Developments New Jersey Gas Market
More informationPublic Feedback Sought for Proposed Williams Pipeline Expansion
Northeast Supply Enhancement www.williams.com/nese Summer 2016 Public Feedback Sought for Proposed Williams Pipeline Expansion Williams is in the preliminary stages of developing an expansion of its existing
More informationFigure 1: Preservation Area
Figure 1: Figure 2: Land Use Capability Map Zones Regional Master Plan Overlay Zone Designation Zone Protection Lakes Greater Than 10 acres Conservation Existing Community Sub-Zone Existing Community Environmentally
More informationPennsylvania Pipeline Project
SUNOCO PIPELINE L.P. Joint Permit Application for a Pennsylvania Water Obstruction & Encroachment Permit and a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit Application Revised March 2016 Table of Contents
More informationIn Response to the New York Energy Highway RFI Spectra Energy Corp s Comments May 30, 2012
In Response to the New York Energy Highway RFI Spectra Energy Corp s Comments May 30, 2012 Spectra Energy Corp ( Spectra Energy ) appreciates the opportunity to provide comments to the New York Energy
More informationRoanoke County Board of Supervisors. October 14, 2014
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors October 14, 2014 Who is Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC Joint venture of EQT Corporation and NextEra Energy EQT: Leading Appalachian natural gas production and transmission
More informationInterstate 73 FEIS: I-95 to the Myrtle Beach Region Chapter 4. Public Involvement and Agency Coordination
4-65 Interstate 73 FEIS: I-95 to the Myrtle Beach Region 4-66 Comment noted. The use of existing roadways was considered during alternative development (refer to Chapter 2, Section 2.1, page 2-1 and the
More informationWQMP AMENDMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST
State of New Jersey Highlands Water Protection and Planning Council 100 North Road (Route 513) Chester, New Jersey 07930-2322 (908) 879-6737 (908) 879-4205 (fax) www.highlands.state.nj.us WQMP AMENDMENT
More informationFigure 1: Preservation Area
Figure 1: Figure 2: Land Use Capability Map Zones Regional Master Plan Overlay Zone Designation Zone Protection Lakes Greater Than 10 acres Conservation Existing Community Sub-Zone Existing Community Environmentally
More informationSt. Charles Expansion Project Montz Compressor Station to serve Entergy St. Charles May 2017
October 11, 2013 Boardwalk Annual Customer Meeting Nashville Customer Meeting Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP Boardwalk s Response to the Changing Market Kathy Kirk, Senior Vice President Marketing & Origination
More informationResponse: Eastern Shore will require additional permanent easement and temporary workspace (TWS) in the following municipalities:
2. There are multiple properties throughout the Chester County portion of the 2017 Expansion Project area which contain preservation easements on them. Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company should be aware
More informationMOUNTAINEER XPRESS. Columbia Pipeline Group
MOUNTAINEER XPRESS Columbia Pipeline Group C169566.indd 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CPG AT A GLANCE THE PLAN/PROJECT COMPONENTS COMMITMENT TO KEEPING YOU INFORMED PROJECT BENEFITS SAFETY FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
More informationExhibit A: Township Highlands Preservation Area
Exhibit A: Township Highlands Regional Master Plan Overlay Zone Designation Zone Protection Lakes Greater Than 10 acres Conservation Existing Community Sub-Zone Existing Community Environmentally Constrained
More informationBorough of Hightstown (1104) Introduction
(1104) Introduction This municipal chapter is an element of the prepared by the Planning Division in accordance with N.J.A.C. 7:15. Hightstown Borough, an established, self-governing municipality, is located
More informationCommonly Asked Transmission Pipeline Questions
Commonly Asked Transmission Pipeline Questions What is PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC? AGL Resources; NJR Pipeline Company; PSEG Power LLC; South Jersey Industries; Spectra Energy Partners; and UGI Energy
More informationResource Report 10 Alternatives
Equitrans Expansion Project Resource Report 10 October 2015 Equitrans Expansion Project Resource Report 10 Resource Report 10 Filing Requirements Information Location in Resource Report Minimum Filing
More informationPeople Are Asking Us About Our Rover Pipeline Project
People Are Asking Us About Our Rover Pipeline Project As we begin work on our Rover Pipeline Project, we know you may have a number of questions about our project and how the plans could potentially affect
More informationPOWERING THE FUTURE. Driving Change Through Clean Energy
POWERING THE FUTURE Driving Change Through Clean Energy American energy needs are changing. New infrastructure is needed to safely transport natural gas to meet customer demand for a reliable, clean energy
More informationRegional Gas Market Update
April 26, 2018 Milford, MA Regional Gas Market Update Presentation to: ISO-NE Planning Advisory Committee Tom Kiley Northeast Gas Association 1 Topic Areas Natural gas safety message. Recent market growth,
More informationState Senator Jim Ferlo & Members of Protect Our Parks Town Hall Forum Highlands Middle School Auditorium - Natrona Heights, PA
State Senator Jim Ferlo & Members of Protect Our Parks Town Hall Forum Highlands Middle School Auditorium - Natrona Heights, PA Wednesday, October 30, 2013 7 p.m. - 9 p.m. Lynda Farrell Executive Director
More informationTOWNSHIP OF KINGWOOD COUNTY OF HUNTERDON STATE OF NEW JERSEY RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION CONCERNING PENNEAST PIPELINE
TOWNSHIP OF KINGWOOD COUNTY OF HUNTERDON STATE OF NEW JERSEY RESOLUTION NO. 2014 98 RESOLUTION CONCERNING PENNEAST PIPELINE! WHEREAS, PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC, a joint project of AGL Resources, NJR
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. ) Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC ) Docket No.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC ) Docket No. CP13-499-000 ) MOTION TO INTERVENE OF CATSKILL MOUNTAINKEEPER; CLEAN AIR COUNCIL;
More informationLine N 2012 Expansion Project
Line N 2012 Expansion Project Washington County Public Meeting February 15, 2011 Extensive community involvement early on Open dialogue with the public We are here to: Answer your questions Listen to your
More informationAPPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PERMIT NOCKAMIXON PUMPED STORAGE HYDRO PROJECT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PERMIT NOCKAMIXON PUMPED STORAGE HYDRO PROJECT FERC PROJECT NO. Applicant: Merchant Hydro Developers
More informationFigure 1: Preservation Area
Figure 1: Figure 2: Land Use Capability Map Zones Regional Master Plan Overlay Zone Designation Zone Protection Lakes Greater Than 10 acres Conservation Existing Community Sub-Zone Existing Community Environmentally
More informationMunicipal Stormwater Management Plan Prepared For The Borough of Cape May Point By Van Note-Harvey Associates VNH File No.
Municipal Stormwater Management Plan Prepared For The Borough of Cape May Point By Van Note-Harvey Associates 2005 VNH File No. 35317-210-21 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Goals... 3 Storm water Discussion...
More informationNESE Pipeline and Compressor Station: Chokepoints and Tactics. Jeff Tittel, Director, New Jersey Sierra Club
NESE Pipeline and Compressor Station: Chokepoints and Tactics Jeff Tittel, Director, New Jersey Sierra Club We Must Oppose Entire Project! Compressor Station proposed in Trap Rock Quarry scheduled and
More informationPENNSYLVANIA S ENERGY RESOURCES Powering Communities into the Future
PENNSYLVANIA S ENERGY RESOURCES Powering Communities into the Future American Planning Association PA Chapter October 22, 2013 Session Overview Powering Communities into the Future 2 Keys to Successful
More information8. A. AQUATIC HABITATS
ENCLOSURE C S.R. 1006 SECTION 80S DELAWARE CANAL BRIDGE REHABILITATION PROJECT, TINICUM TOWNSHIP, BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA DESCRIPTION OF AQUATIC HABITAT 8. A. AQUATIC HABITATS (1) Food Chain Production-
More informationTable 1 Sterling Highway MP 45 to 60 Facts Summary
Table 1 Sterling Highway MP 45 to 60 Facts Summary Purpose and Need Criteria Sterling Highway MP 45 to 60 Alternatives PURPOSE AND NEED CRITERIA Capacity & Demand Highway Characteristics Percent of Alternative
More informationSCHMID & COMPANY INC., CONSULTING ECOLOGISTS 1201 Cedar Grove Road, Media, Pennsylvania fax:
SCHMID & COMPANY INC., CONSULTING ECOLOGISTS 1201 Cedar Grove Road, Media, Pennsylvania 19063 1044 610-356-1416 fax: 610-356-3629 www.schmidco.com 26 June 2017 Maya K. van Rossum Leah Zerbe Delaware Riverkeeper
More informationMunicipal Stormwater Management Planning
Municipal Stormwater Management Planning Christopher C. Obropta, Ph.D., P.E. Water Resources Extension Specialist with Rutgers Cooperative Extension Assistant Professor with Department of Environmental
More informationAuthor: Greg Lander For The New Jersey Conservation Foundation.
Analysis of Regional Pipeline System's Ability to Deliver Sufficient Quantities of Natural Gas During Prolonged and Extreme Cold Weather (Winter 2017-2018) Author: Greg Lander For The New Jersey Conservation
More informationEnvironmental Information Worksheet
Environmental Information Worksheet Water System Owner (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Needs and Alternatives Provide a brief narrative that describes: Current drinking water system needs. Project
More informationFigure 1: P Area. Alpha Borough. Preservation Area Municipal Boundaries. Phillipsburg Town. Greenwich Township. Alpha Borough. Pohatcong Township
Figure 1: P Area BOROUGH OF ALPHA Figure 2: Land Use Capability Map Zones Regional Master Plan Overlay Zone Designation Zone Protection Lakes Greater Than 10 acres Conservation Existing Community Sub-Zone
More informationCBIA Energy Conference Natural Gas- Coming to Your Neighborhood Soon October 10, 2013 Cromwell, Connecticut Michael Dirrane Director, Northeast
CBIA Energy Conference Natural Gas- Coming to Your Neighborhood Soon October 10, 2013 Cromwell, Connecticut Michael Dirrane Director, Northeast Marketing Spectra Energy U.S. Transmission Map Miles of Pipe
More informationRe: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC, Access Northeast Project, Docket #PF16-1
Kimberly D. Bose Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street NE, Room1A Washington, D.C. 20426 Re: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC, Access Northeast Project, Docket #PF16-1 Dear Secretary
More informationExhibit A: Land Use Capability Map Zones
Exhibit A: Land Use Capability Map Zones Regional Master Plan Overlay Zone Designation Zone Sub-Zone Protection Conservation Existing Community Existing Community Environmentally Constrained Conservation
More informationStatement of Qualifications Page 1
Statement of Qualifications Page 1 ALPINE ARCHAEOLOGY OVERVIEW Alpine Archaeological Consultants, Inc. is a respected, fullservice archaeological consulting firm established to help clients implement their
More informationTennessee Gas Pipeline. New Jersey Highlands Council April 16, 2009
Tennessee Gas Pipeline New Jersey Highlands Council April 16, 2009 Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-looking Statements This presentation includes forward-looking statements and projections, made
More informationNew Jersey Forest Stewardship Program Spatial Analysis Project Map Products And Data Layers Descriptions
New Jersey Forest Stewardship Program Spatial Analysis Project 2007 Map Products And Data Layers Descriptions 01/07 NJ Forest Stewardship Program (FSP) Spatial Analysis Project (SAP) Methodology Project
More informationFigure 1: Preservation Area
Figure 1: Figure 2: Land Use Capability Map Zones Regional Master Plan Overlay Zone Designation Zone Protection Lakes Greater Than 10 acres Conservation Existing Community Sub-Zone Existing Community Environmentally
More informationU.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY. Draft National Corridor Designations: Key Findings and Conclusions. April 26, 2007
RCC Meeting May 23, 2007 Agenda Item 8.1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Draft National Corridor Designations: Key Findings and Conclusions April 26, 2007 Designation of a National Corridor: Represents a determination
More informationNatural Resource Management of Pipeline Infrastructure
Natural Resource Management of Pipeline Infrastructure Dan Devlin Director, Bureau of Forestry www.dcnr.state.pa.us Connection between Pipelines & DCNR Commonwealth s forests Fragmentation or reduction
More informationD R A F T. SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION. INTERSTATE 73 From I-95 to the Myrtle Beach Region
D R A F T SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION INTERSTATE 73 From I-95 to the Myrtle Beach Region INTRODUCTION Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966, 49 USC 303 requires that prior to the use
More informationLETTER OF NOTIFICATION FOR THE DON MARQUIS-BIXBY 345 KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROP STRUCTURE PROJECT
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION FOR THE DON MARQUIS-BIXBY 345 KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROP STRUCTURE PROJECT PUCO Case No. 14-1397-EL-BLN Submitted pursuant to OAC 4906-11-01 AEP Ohio Transmission Company (AEP Ohio
More informationEast Nantmeal Township
East Nantmeal Township COMMUNITY INFORMATION MEETING REGARDING THE COMMONWEALTH PIPELINE JANUARY 29, 2013 Lynda Farrell Executive Director, Pipeline Safety Coalition Chester County, PA www.pscoalition.org
More informationFERC PDF (Unofficial) 10/08/2014. Environmental Impact Statement ES-1 Corpus Christi LNG
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) prepared this Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to assess the environmental issues associated with the construction
More informationExpanding Existing Pipeline Capacity to Meet New England s Energy Needs. Mike Dirrane Director, Marketing
Expanding Existing Pipeline Capacity to Meet New England s Energy Needs Mike Dirrane Director, Marketing January 27, 2015 Spectra Energy s Portfolio of Assets Based in Houston, TX with operations in 30
More information5.0 PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
5.0 PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 5.1 INTRODUCTION A preliminary environmental review was performed on the proposed freeway improvements that form Concept C, which encompasses the three freeway corridors
More informationSpectra Energy - Infrastructure Expansion Solutions
Maine International Trade Center Canada Day Program Spectra Energy - Infrastructure Expansion Solutions Greg Crisp General Manager, Business Development March 26, 2015 Safe Harbor Statement Some of the
More informationESTIMATED SAVINGS FOR CONSUMERS IN THE GREATER PHILADELPHIA REGION FROM THE ADELPHIA GATEWAY PIPELINE PROJECT
ESTIMATED SAVINGS FOR CONSUMERS IN THE GREATER PHILADELPHIA REGION FROM THE ADELPHIA GATEWAY PIPELINE PROJECT PREPARED FOR NJR PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC DECEMBER 2017 WWW.CEADVISORS.COM Concentric Energy Advisors
More informationUGI ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
UGI ENERGY SERVICES, INC. Peter Terranova Vice President, Midstream Assets & Services May 13, 2011 UGI Corporation UGI Corporation Propane Majority interest in AmeriGas (largest domestic retail propane
More informationMarcellus Shale Advisory Commission Infrastructure Work Group Meeting El Paso Corporation Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company April 11, 2011
Interstate Pipelines Exploration & Production Marcellus Shale Advisory Commission Infrastructure Work Group Meeting El Paso Corporation Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company April 11, 2011 El Paso Corporation
More informationTexas Eastern Appalachiaa to Market Expansion Project (TEAM
Texas Eastern Appalachiaa to Market Expansion Project (TEAM 2014) Moving emerging natural gas supplies from the Appalachian region to diverse market destinations along the existing Texas Eastern footprint
More informationEnergy Security, Economic & Environmental
NEW ENGLAND CANADA BUSINESS COUNCIL 11.13.15 Important Role of Natural Gas Pipelines: Energy Security, Economic & Environmental William T. Yardley President, U.S Transmission NEW ENGLAND CANADA BUSINESS
More informationUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Ill 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Ill 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., Deputy Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First
More informationMarcellus Shale Gas Development in Maryland: A Natural Resource Analysis
Marcellus Shale Gas Development in Maryland: A Natural Resource Analysis Advisory Commission Meeting February 27, 2012 Garrett County Economic Development map Catherine McCall Balancing Natural Resources
More informationEnvironmental Resource Inventories. What are ERIs? Significance of information How to use them
Environmental Resource Inventories What are ERIs? Significance of information How to use them Environmental Resource Inventory - ERI Compiled by the environmental commission Information about the natural
More informationROUTE FEASIBILITY STUDY. PUBLIC MEETING January 26, 2010
PHASE I - LUBBOCK OUTER ROUTE FEASIBILITY STUDY PUBLIC MEETING January 26, 2010 CONSTRUCTION SCHEMATIC DESIGN & ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY DETAILED DESIGN & RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS ROUTE
More informationADDISON NATURAL GAS PROJECT Phase 2 Middlebury Community Meeting. February 27, 2013 Middlebury VFW Post 7823
ADDISON NATURAL GAS PROJECT Phase 2 Middlebury Community Meeting February 27, 2013 Middlebury VFW Post 7823 0 Agenda Vermont Gas Natural Gas Economics Review of the Addison Natural Gas Project Discuss
More informationFigure 1: Preservation Area
Figure 1: Figure 2: Land Use Capability Map Zones Regional Master Plan Overlay Zone Designation Zone Protection Lakes Greater Than 10 acres Conservation Existing Community Sub-Zone Existing Community Environmentally
More informationAugust 24, Via electronic mail )
Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future 1429 Walnut Street, Suite 400 Philadelphia, PA 19102 info@pennfuture.org www.pennfuture.org August 24, 2016 Via electronic mail (RA-EPWW-SERO@PA.GOV ) Patrick McDonnell
More informationPA Game Commission No Known Impact No Further Review Required
1. PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name: Sustainable Park (Benckini Property) Date of Review: 5/22/2017 11:44:45 AM Project Category: Recreation, Other Project Area: 10.42 acres County(s): Lehigh Township/Municipality(s):
More informationFIGURE 11 ENLOW FORK MITIGATION BANK COUNTY NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY MAP WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. Feet. Miles
25 5 Feet.5.1 Miles Document Path: Y:\84\33362-RES_2WAS2_Carpent\GIS\Enlow Fork- RES\Figure - Enlow Fork MB County Natural Heritage Inventory Map.mxd Legend Core Habitat Landscape Conservation Area Provisional
More informationTownship of Washington Master Plan Highlands Element Exhibit A:
Exhibit A: Regional Master Plan Overlay Zone Designation Zone Protection Lakes Greater Than 10 acres Conservation Existing Community Sub-Zone Existing Community Environmentally Constrained Conservation
More informationAPPENDIX J: Wetlands Technical Report
APPENDIX J: Wetlands Technical Report J.1 Existing Conditions The Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) and the US Army Corps of Engineers jointly regulate wetland activities in the state. The
More informationExpert Report on the PennEast Pipeline Project Economic Impact Analysis for New Jersey and Pennsylvania
Expert Report on the PennEast Pipeline Project Economic Impact Analysis for New Jersey and Pennsylvania Presented to the New Jersey Conservation Foundation by Ian Goodman and Brigid Rowan www.thegoodman.com
More informationTranscontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC. Response to Technical Deficiency Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC to Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Atlantic Sunrise Project May 3, 2017 DEP Application No. E58-315, APS No. 878958 Lenox Township, Susquehanna
More informationThe Highlands Region:! Partnerships to Conserve Forests & Watersheds. Ramapo Mountains, NJ
The Highlands Region:! Partnerships to Conserve Forests & Watersheds Ramapo Mountains, NJ The region supplies clean drinking water for nearly 15 million people. French Creek, Berks County, PA Wanaque
More informationWestfield Gas & Electric 2017/2018 Energy Outlook October 4, 2017
Westfield Gas & Electric 2017/2018 Energy Outlook October 4, 2017 Connection of Natural Gas & Electric Power While natural gas supplies are plentiful the delivery infrastructure in the Northeast remains
More informationDEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF MINING AND RECLAMATION. Coal Refuse Disposal - Site Selection
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF MINING AND RECLAMATION DOCUMENT NUMBER: 563-2113-660 TITLE: Coal Refuse Disposal - Site Selection EFFECTIVE DATE: February 8, 1999 AUTHORITY: The Coal Refuse
More information