Duct Pressure Optimization Technology

Transcription

1 1 + Duct Pressure Optimization Technology C2M Final Assessment Alejandra Mejia Dan Stotts Joshua Lich Salvador Núñez Semih Oztreves

2 + 2 $95k CEC Grant Approved Nov Dave Watson Entrepreneur Smart Grid Thought-Leader Inventor

3 + HVAC Retrofit Market Dynamics 3 Prior to Energy Consumption by Building Age After % 20% 40% 60% 19% of U.S. Consumption from Comm. Buildings 90% Consumption From <Y2000 Buildings 32% Building Consumption by HVAC $10B Annual Market By 2020 Source: DOE CBECS

4 + Breaking Adoption Barrier 4 Problem Invasive Payback Static

5 + Breaking Adoption Barrier 6 Problem Invasive Payback Static Solution Wireless Efficient Continuous Commission Bonus Demand Response Diagnostics Increased Comfort

6 + HVAC on Cruise Control: Breaking and Accelerating Simultaneously 6

7 + Status Quo 7 Sensor Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Dampers used to stop excess air flow

8 + Slice Energy Innovation 8 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Wireless real-time fan control with information.

9 + Control System 9 Control Box Algorithm Duct Static Pressure Sensors

10 + System Components: Assembly Only 10 We run better than 99.99% data reliability from the Arctic Circle to the Saudi desert. Kris Pister, Founder

11 + Cost, Cost, Cost 11 It all comes down to cost. We don t make investments in cool technology Simple Payback: Simple Lighting Complex Lighting Variable Drives HVAC Replace Cost / kwh 2 years, $.02/kwh saved Sources: ACEE, Mckinsey, Rockefeller Average utility program Commercial Lighting

12 + Use Case 12 Current Energy Costs (100,000-ft 2 * $2 / sq. ft) $200,000 * 15% Ventilation $30,000 Total Installation Costs $25,000 Annual Savings (40% Ventilation) $12,000 Slice Payback 2 ~ 1.7 /kwh saved

13 + Target Market 13 Annual Ventilation Energy Potential Energy Saving Total Available Market $542M $162M $468M 30% % Addressable Floor Space 25% Office 20% 15% Public Assembly 10% Mercantile 5% 0% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% % Ventilation Energy Source: Rockefeller EE Report

14 + Emerging Market: Demand Response 14 Sustained Growth 20,000 New Competitive Advantage for Fast Demand Response Installed MW 15,000 10,000 5, North East

15 + Comfort, Efficiency, and Demand Response 15 Status quo Fan Power (kw) Fast DR signal Building code minimum Time

16 + Emerging Market: Demand Response 16 $4,500 Available Revenues from Slice Energy with DR (100,000 square feet building) Dollars per year $4,000 $3,500 $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 Frequency regulation markets Begins to participate $500 $

17 + The Promise of Slice 17 Demand Response Wireless Maintenance Reliable Energy Efficiency

18 + Partners to Market 18 Pilot Stage Relationship Sales Market Entry Scale Measurement and Verification (M&V)

19 + Pilot Goals: Minimize Costs and Maximize Efficiency 19 55% 50% 45% 3 years Payback & 2.7 /kwh 40% 35% 30% 3 years Payback & 2.7 /kwh 25% 20% $0.23 $0.27 $0.32 $0.36 $0.41 $0.45 Total Costs ($/sqft)

20 + Funding 20 Government Grants Public Sector Sponsorship Customer Revenue Strategic Partnership Non-dilutive Less risky Relationships Non-dilutive financing Mutual commitment Established firms Integrated service delivery 1-2 Year 3-5 Year

21 + Business Model 21 Technology Fast Payback Ease-of-Install Smart Grid Connectivity Channels Public sector ESCOS Utilities Production Costs Out-the-box components OEM partnerships Economies of scale Funding Grants Sponsorship Sales Thank you

22 + Appendix: Positioning 22 Ease of Install Less Invasive More Invasive Recommission Insulation Windows Heat Recovery Trim & Respond Slice Energy Software Apps Air Balancing Leakage Repair Long Payback Fast Payback Return on Investment

23 + Appendix: A familiar parallel 23 Upfront Cost Payback Period $ / kwh Saved Ease of Install $.90 - $1.20 / sq. ft. (EPA) 1-3 years (DOE) $ $0.04 / kwh (Mckinsey) Simple install, Large # of Lights $ $0.50 / sq. ft 2 years $0.02 / kwh Simple Install Small # of Units