Summary Report. Methodology
|
|
- Paul Dorsey
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Summary Report Methodology In Fall 2016, Touro University California (TUC) engaged with Noel-Levitz and conducted an anonymous employee satisfaction survey (CESS TM ). The survey was sent to TUC employees through the campus employee listserv. At the time of survey deployment, the listserv included 498 addresses, of which 239 associated with a full-time TUC employee (data from TUC Information Technology Department). A total of 126 employees (115 with full-time employment status at TUC) responded to the survey with at least one valid answer, resulting in a 34% (126/373) response rate. Response rate for full-time employees was 48% (115/239). Table 1 below provides the demographics for the survey respondents. Employment Classification Years of Employment at TUC Faculty Staff Administrator No Response Total Less than 1 year to 5 years to 10 years to 20 years No Response 1 1 Total Employment Classification Employment Type Faculty Staff Administrator No Response Total Full-time Part-time No Response Total Table 1: Demographics of 2016 Survey Respondents The survey consisted of 5 sections and an item for global satisfaction (See Appendix B for the complete survey instrument). Each section included Noel-Levitz standard items and TUC specific items. Section 1: Campus culture and policies (40 statements: 30 standard + 10 TUC specific) Section 2: Institutional goals (12 goals: 9 standard + 3 TUC specific) Section 3: Involvement in planning and decision-making (10 groups: 8 standard + 2 TUC specific) Section 4: Work environment (31 statements: 21 standard + 10 TUC specific) Section 5: Demographics In Section 1 (Campus culture and policies) and Section 4 (Work environment), respondents were asked to rate the importance (IMP) of the presented statements and then to rate their satisfaction (SAT). A five-point Likert scale was used to rate both importance and satisfaction. In Section 2 (Institutional goals), respondents were presented with 12 statements each describing an institutional goal and asked to rate how important it was for TUC to pursue each of the goals. A five-point Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 1
2 Likert rating scale was used to rate the importance. Respondents were then asked to identify which of these goals should be considered as TUC s first priority, second priority, and third priority. In Section 3 (Involvement in planning and decision-making), respondents were presented with a list of types of individuals (faculty, staff, deans, students, trustees, alumni, Touro Western Division personnel, Touro College & University System personnel, etc.) and asked to rate how much involvement each group had in the TUC planning and decision-making process. A five-point Likert scale was used to rate involvement. Global satisfaction: In addition to the above sections, the survey included a global satisfaction item ( Rate your overall satisfaction with your employment here so far ) using the same 5-point Likert scale and three openended questions: 1. Please provide any additional feedback about the campus culture and policies at TUC 2. Please provide any additional feedback about TUC s goals 3. Please provide any additional feedback about the work environment at TUC Table 2 below summarizes the relationship the scale anchors in each section to the Likert scale. Value Scale Importance (IMP) Satisfaction (SAT) Involvement 5 Very important Very satisfied Too much involvement 4 Important Satisfied More than enough involvement 3 Somewhat important Somewhat satisfied Just the right involvement 2 Not very important Not very satisfied Not quite enough involvement 1 Not important at all Not satisfied at all Not enough involvement Table 2: Likert Scale Matching Values Results: the 2016 Survey Overall Satisfaction About half of the TUC respondents (46.0%) marked Satisfied or Very satisfied when responding to the item Rate your overall satisfaction with your employment here thus far, with an average rating of Faculty (M = 3.49) rated the item slightly higher than staff (M = 3.35) and administrators (M = 3.21). The ANOVA result (F (1, 2) =.772, p > 0.05) suggested no statistically significant difference among the three groups. For sections 1 & 4, means for importance and satisfaction for individual items were calculated by summing the respondents ratings and dividing by the number of respondents. Gap means were calculated by taking the difference between the importance mean rating and the satisfaction mean rating. Higher gap means suggest bigger discrepancy between importance and satisfaction. The items with the highest importance (mean scores 4.50) and highest satisfaction were considered as TUC s Strengths. Those items that were of highest importance but with lowest satisfaction (or the largest gaps) were considered as TUC s Challenges or priorities/opportunities for improvement. Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 2
3 Section 1: Campus Culture & Policies In this section, respondents rated the level of importance and their level of satisfaction on 40 aspects of TUC campus culture and policies. The average importance ratings of the 40 items ranged between 4.17 and 4.73 (See detailed item ratings in Appendix A.1). The average satisfaction ratings ranged between 1.86 and 4.07 (Appendix A.3). Table 3 below shows the top three Strengths (high importance rating and high satisfaction rating). Table 4 shows the top three Challenges (high importance rating but low satisfaction rating): decision making transparency and institutional resources in staff and budget. Additional respondents feedback about the campus culture and policies focused on the areas of more autonomy from Touro College & University System (TCUS), higher employee salary, and increasing TUC budget (See detailed word cloud picture in Appendix A.8). Item IMP SAT GAP (SAT-IMP) The institution does not discriminate on the basis of gender, age, race, ethnicity, or sexual orientation Faculty take pride in their work The academic expectations for students are consistent with the University s mission and values Table 3: The Top 3 TUC Strengths in Campus Culture & Policies Item IMP SAT GAP (SAT-IMP) This institution makes sufficient budgetary resources available to achieve important objectives This institution makes sufficient staff resources available to achieve important objectives Decision-making processes are transparent Table 4: The Top 3 TUC Challenges in Campus Culture & Policies Section 2: Institutional Goals Respondents were presented with a set of 12 institutional goals and asked to rate how important it was to them for the institution to pursue each of these goals. The following four institutional goals were rated as the most important goals at TUC. Ratings were consistent among administrators, faculty, and staff respondents, suggesting a great amount of employee agreement on TUC s top priorities. Improve employee morale (M = 4.63) Improve the quality of existing programs (M = 4.58) Improve campus support services to students (M = 4.44) Improve the appearance of campus buildings and grounds (M = 4.42) The goal Improve campus support services to students was added to the 2016 survey as one of the three TUC specific items in this section. Another TUC specific item, Increase the number of full-time faculty and staff relative to the size of the student body, received a high importance rating (M = 4.27) as well. The item Improve the quality of existing programs was rated by the most respondents (N = 33) as TUC s first priority goal. Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 3
4 While two of TUC s priority goals, increasing employee morale and improving the existing program quality, received high ratings from other schools participated in the 2016 CESS TM survey, improving the appearance of campus buildings and grounds was not rated high by other schools. This result explained itself well considering TUC s unique history and the unique needs of improving appearance of campus buildings and grounds at TUC. Section 3: Involvement in Planning and Decision-making In this section, respondents were asked to rate how much involvement each type of individuals (faculty, staff, deans, trustees, alumni, Touro Western Division personnel, TCUS personnel, etc.) had in the TUC planning and decision-making process. Trustees were the group rated by the most respondents (50%) as just the right involvement. Staff were rated by 76% of survey respondents and alumni by 73% as Not enough involvement or Not quite enough involvement. More than three quarters of the survey respondents (78%) believed that TCUS personnel had Too much involvement or More than enough involvement in TUC institution planning and decision-making. 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 76% Faculty Staff Deans or directors of administrative units Not enough or not quite enough involvement Just the right involvement More than enough or too much involvement Deans or chairs of academic units Senior administrators (VP, Provost level or above) 50% 73% Students Trustees Alumni Touro Western Division personnel 78% Touro College & University System (TCUS) personnel Chart 1: Respondents Rating on Individuals Level of Involvement in the TUC Planning & Decision-making Process Section 4: Work Environment In this section, respondents were asked to rate the level of importance for 31 statements on work environment and then to rate their satisfaction on each item. The average importance ratings ranged between 4.09 and 4.72 (Appendix A.2). The average satisfaction ratings ranged between 2.09 and 3.94 (Appendix A.4). The top three Strengths (high importance rating and high satisfaction rating) in this section were related to employees perspectives on job value and job appreciation (Table 5). The top three Challenges (high importance rating but low satisfaction rating) were about employee salary, and department staff and budget resources (Table 6). Item IMP SAT GAP(SAT-IMP) My supervisor pays attention to what I have to say The type of work I do on most days is personally rewarding The work I do is valuable to the institution Table 5: The Top 3 TUC Strengths in Work Environment Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 4
5 Item IMP SAT GAP(SAT-IMP) My department has the budget needed to do its job well My department has the staff needed to do its job well I am paid fairly for the work I do Table 6: The Top 3 TUC Challenges in Work Environment Results: Three-year Comparison TUC conducted the CESS TM survey to its employees in Spring 2014 and Spring 2011 and received 107 and 113 responses respectively. The survey instruments were the same in 2011 and 2014, but the 2016 survey included additional TUC specific items. The comparison analysis below is only for the same Noel-Levitz standard items included in the surveys for three years. Overall Satisfaction The item, Rate your overall satisfaction with your employment here thus far, received very similar average scores for three years (M = 3.39 in 2016, M = 3.42 in 2014 and M = 3.40 in 2011). The ANOVA result (F (2, 323) = 0.03, p >.05) indicated no statistically significant difference among these three scores. Section 1: Campus Culture & Policies and Section4: Work Environment Three-year results from the 51 Noel-Levitz standard items regarding campus culture & policies, and work environment were compared. Thirty-four items showed a gap mean score shape of (Appendix A.5) and 31 items showed a satisfaction mean score shape of (Appendix A.6) from 2011 to 2014 to This trend suggested that TUC respondents satisfaction level on two thirds of the items increased from 2011 to 2014, but decreased from 2014 to Moreover, the seven items with statistically significant satisfaction mean differences between 2014 and 2016 all indicated satisfaction decreases from 2014 to 2016 (Table 7). On the other hand, the 13 items with statistically significant mean differences between 2011 and 2014 indicated satisfaction increases from 2011 to Item 2014 SAT 2016 SAT t value This institution makes sufficient budgetary resources available to achieve important objectives My department has the budget needed to do its job well My department has the staff needed to do its job well This institution does a good job of meeting the needs of its faculty There are effective lines of communication between departments This institution does a good job of meeting the needs of students The reputation of this institution continues to improve Table 7: Items with Statistically Significantly Satisfaction Mean Differences between 2014 and 2016 Section 2: Institutional Goals Results from the 2011 and 2014 surveys clearly showed respondents agreement on TUC s top three priorities: I) Improve employee morale, II) Improve the quality of existing academic programs, and III) Improve the appearance of campus buildings and grounds. In the 2016 survey, the newly added TUC specific item Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 5
6 Improve campus support services to students received a slightly higher mean rating (0.02 more) than Improve the appearance of campus buildings and grounds and made it to the top three most important institutional goals. Section 3: Involvement in Planning and Decision-making A majority of respondents rated alumni and staff with Not enough involvement or Not quite enough involvement in TUC planning and decision-making for all three surveys. More than half of the respondents rated students with Just the right involvement in 2011 and 2014, but more respondents rated students with Not enough involvement or Not quite enough involvement in the 2016 survey. Of all survey respondents, half rated Touro Western Division personnel and more than three fourths rated TCUS personnel with More than enough involvement or Too much involvement in the 2016 survey. These last two groups were newly added in the 2016 survey. Recommended Actions The indicated institutional priority goals: increasing existing program quality and improving employee morale, campus student supports, and campus appearance are all addressed in the Strategic Action Plan. TUC needs to secure funding and resources to implement the Plan. Representatives from alumni, staff, and the student body were included in the university strategic planning committee and other planning committees. TUC needs to find ways to encourage more involvement from these groups in future planning and decision-making processes. Lack of budget and staff resources to meet needs are continuous concerns at TUC, and may be one of the factors affecting employee morale. TUC needs to seek ways for improvement. The communication with TCUS to increase TUC s autonomy in resource prioritization & application and data access to the system database should be continued. Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 6
7 Appendix A: Data summary for TUC Noel-Levitz CESS TM : 2016, 2014 and 2011 Comparison A.1. Average Importance Ratings for items in Campus Culture & Policies Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 7
8 A.2. Average Importance Ratings for items in Work Environment Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 8
9 A.3. Average Satisfaction Ratings for items in Campus Culture & Policies Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 9
10 A.4. Average Satisfaction Ratings for items in Work Environment Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 10
11 A.5. Gap Mean for Noel-Levitz standard items in Campus Culture & Policies and Work Environment Note: the highlighted items indicate statistically significant difference between 2014 and 2016 Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 11
12 A.6. Satisfaction Mean for Noel-Levitz standard items in Campus Culture & Policies and Work Environment Note: the highlighted items indicate statistically significant difference between 2014 and 2016 Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 12
13 A.7. Average Importance Ratings TUC Institutional Goals Institutional Goals I) Improve employee morale G) Improve the quality of existing academic programs H) Improve the appearance of campus buildings and grounds B) Retain more of its current students to graduation C) Improve the academic ability of entering student classes E) Increase the diversity of racial and ethnic groups represented among the student body D) Recruit students from new geographic markets A) Increase the enrollment of new students F) Develop new academic programs [J] Improve campus support services to students 4.44 [K] Increase the number of full-time faculty and staff relative to the size of the student body 4.27 [L] Improve employee engagement in campus and community activities I) Improve employee morale G) Improve the quality of existing academic programs H) Improve the appearance of campus buildings and grounds B) Retain more of its current students to graduation C) Improve E) Increase the academic the diversity ability of entering student classes of racial and ethnic groups represented among the student body D) Recruit students from new geographic markets A) Increase the enrollment of new students F) Develop new academic programs [J] Improve campus support services to students [K] Increase the number of full-time faculty and staff relative to the size of the student body [L] Improve employee engagement in campus and community activities Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 13
14 A.8. Open-Ended Comments Word Cloud Note: words with + indicate positive comments Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 14
15 Appendix B: TUC 2016 Noel-Levitz CESS TM Instrument Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 15
16 Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 16
17 Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 17
18 Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 18
19 Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 19
20 Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 20
21 Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 21
22 Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 22
23 Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 23
24 Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 24
25 Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 25
26 Office of Institutional Effectiveness Page 26
Employee Satisfaction Survey. Office of Institutional Research & Assessment
Employee Satisfaction Survey Office of Institutional Research & Assessment December, 2011 Table of Contents Page Executive Summary... 1 Appendices: Appendix A: Summary Data Figure 1: Average Importance
More informationCOLLEGE EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS Laramie County Community College - Spring 2016 Respondents. Mean
Section 1: Campus Culture and Policies IMPORTANCE SATISFACTION RATE IMPORTANCE (1 = "Not important at all" / 5 = "Very important") AND SATISFACTION (1 = "Not satisfied at all" / 5 = "Very satisfied") GAP
More informationSANTA MONICA COLLEGE 2017 College Employee Satisfaction Survey. Results and Findings
SANTA MONICA COLLEGE 2017 College Employee Satisfaction Survey Results and Findings Prepared by Dr. Hannah Lawler, Dean of Institutional Research March 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Santa Monica College (SMC)
More informationSoutheast Tech Employee Survey Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Southeast Tech Employee Survey Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Purpose: To provide the School Board with the results of the Southeast Tech Spring 2016 Employee Survey. Every other year Southeast Tech conducts
More information2017 Merritt College Employee Satisfaction Survey
2017 Merritt Employee Satisfaction Survey Merritt Executive Summary In spring 2017, Merritt administered the Noel Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey to all faculty, staff and administrators. This survey
More informationWoodland Community College and Clear Lake Campus. College Employee Satisfaction Survey Results. Peter Cammish
Woodland Community College and Clear Lake Campus College Employee Satisfaction Survey Results Peter Cammish Table of Contents A. Executive Summary... 1 B. Respondent profile... 2 C. Campus Culture Strategic
More information2014 Employee Satisfaction Survey. New Mexico State University
2014 Employee Satisfaction Survey New Mexico State University Total number of employees at NMSU, all locations = 3,938 Total number of clicks of interest = 2,314 Number of useable responses = 1,668 Number
More informationEmployee Satisfaction
Employee Satisfaction KPI I, CAMPUS CLIMATE, MEASURE I.3 Definition The average overall satisfaction rating given by respondents to the Noel-Levitz College Employee Satisfaction Survey (CESS). Rationale
More informationNoel-Levitz Satisfaction-Priorities Surveys Interpretive Guide
Noel-Levitz Satisfaction-Priorities Surveys Interpretive Guide The Interpretive Guide is divided into multiple sections for your review. The General Interpretive Guide provides you with a general overview
More informationInstitutional Strengths. Improvement Opportunities & Implementation Suggestions. Institutional Summary
Institutional Summary As part of RMUoHP s comprehensive institutional assessment and continuous improvement process, the purpose of the annual Employee Engagement Survey is to collect institutional data
More informationCoconino Community College Employee Opinion Survey
Coconino Community College Employee Opinion Survey Summary Report Fourth Annual Opinion Survey Conducted via telephone and online Spring 2003 Survey Background 57 Questions in the survey. Includes comment
More informationNoel-Levitz Interpretive Guide Satisfaction-Priorities Surveys Interpretive Guide
Noel-Levitz 2014-15 Interpretive Guide Satisfaction-Priorities Surveys Interpretive Guide This General Interpretive Guide provides you with an overview of how to review and use the results from your administration
More information2007 Kansas State University Community and Climate Survey
2007 Kansas State University Community and Climate Survey In the Spring of 2007 the Kansas State University (K-State) Community and Climate Survey was distributed to all faculty to assess their perceptions
More informationOverview of Reports Survey Results
Overview of Reports Survey Results Metropolitan State University of Denver Campus Climate Survey Spring 2015 Prepared by: 2 Mill Road, Suite 102 Wilmington, DE 19806 Phone: 888.684.4658 Fax: 888.684.4659
More informationYSU CAMPUS CLIMATE SURVEY REPORT STAFF
YSU CAMPUS CLIMATE SURVEY REPORT STAFF June 11, 2014 1 The Staff Campus Climate Survey measured staff members views of and experiences with the YSU campus climate. The survey questionnaire included both
More informationWashington State University Employee Engagement Survey Report. Prepared by: Human Resource Services August 2014
Washington State University Employee Engagement Survey Report Prepared by: Human Resource Services August 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS WSU OVERALL SURVEY RESULTS 3 Executive Summary 3 SURVEY OVERVIEW 3 About
More informationEstrella Mountain Core Values Survey. Fall Executive Summary and Report Card
Core Values Survey Fall 2008 Executive Summary and Report Card Produced by The Office of Planning and Institutional Effectiveness February 11, 2009 3000 North Dysart Road Avondale, Arizona 85323-1000 (623)
More informationDRAFT DRAFT. 1. Campus Culture and Policies. Class Climate Employee Satisfaction Survey Spring Somewhat Satisfied Not Very Satisfied
Mark as shown: Correction: Please use a ball-point pen or a thin felt tip. This form will be processed automatically. Please follow the examples shown on the left hand side to help optimize the reading
More informationEMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY 2011 RESULTS
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY 2011 RESULTS March 2012 Office of the Senior Vice President for Finance and Administration Robert Pignatello 4th Annual JJC Employee Engagement Survey Summary Designed to obtain
More information2016 Survey of Employee Engagement Work Group Results
216 Survey of Employee Engagement Work Group Results 1 216 Survey of Employee Engagement - Work Group Results The Survey of Employee Engagement (SEE) is conducted every two years at Texas A&M University
More information2018 Employee Climate Survey
2018 Employee Climate Survey 2018 Employee Climate Survey Summary Employees were invited to take the 2018 campus climate survey between Oct. 15 and Nov. 9, 2018. The survey consisted of 79 questions. Thirty-four
More information2013 IUPUI Staff Survey Summary Report
2013 IUPUI Staff Survey Summary Report Steven Graunke Office of Student Data, Analysis, and Evaluation February 2014 Executive Summary The IUPUI Staff Survey was designed to collect representative data
More informationModernThink Employee Engagement Survey Summary Report
ModernThink Employee Engagement Survey 2018 Summary Report Prepared for the Office of the Provost Prepared by the Office of Institutional Research August 2018 Table of Contents Executive Summary.. 2 About
More information2010 UND Employer Satisfaction Survey
2010 UND Employer Satisfaction Survey Sue Erickson Carmen Williams Michael Braget Office of Institutional Research University of North Dakota Table of Contents Table of Contents... i Executive Summary...
More informationMinot State University Staff Satisfaction Report. May The Staff Satisfaction Survey was conducted in late April staff employees
Minot State University Staff Satisfaction Report May 08 The Staff Satisfaction Survey was conducted in late April 08. 7 staff employees were invited to participate. Invitations to participate were sent
More informationOffice of Planning and Institutional Effectiveness. Divisional Plan. Draft as of March 27, 2001
ESTRELLA MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE Office of Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Divisional Plan Draft as of March 27, 2001 3000 North Dysart Road Avondale, Arizona 85323-1000 (623) 935-8000 M a
More informationUnit: Learning Services Date Submitted: September 30, 2011
2010-2011 HR: Learning Services 1 of 12 EMORY UNIVERSITY 2010-2011 Assessment Report for Administrative and Educational Support Units Assessment Period Covered: September 1, 2010-August 31, 2011 Unit:
More informationOffice of the Vice President and Associate Provost for Diversity 2015 Diversity Plan Accountability Report (Due 12/08/15)
Unit: Undergraduate Studies Date: 10/30/2015 Contact Person: Arthur Watson Email: acwatson@tamu.edu Purpose: The purpose of this report is to assess the evidence for - and progress towards - respect for
More informationCampus Culture, Shared Governance, Morale and Wellness
Campus Culture, Shared Governance, Morale and Wellness Background Within the last decade, SDSU has sought to create a healthy and welcoming campus community. Students, employees, and constituents contribute
More informationDartmouth College 2008 Staff Survey
Dartmouth College 2008 Staff Survey Data Analysis Solutions Prepared for: Dartmouth College Survey Overview Revised survey allowed for new questions and comparison to results from the 2006 Dartmouth College
More informationBenchmark Data Package Report Overview
Benchmark Data Package University of Texas Pan American Prepared by: ModernThink, LLC 4519 Weldin Road Wilmington, DE 19803 Phone: 888.684.4658 Fax: 302.764.4497 www.modernthink.com Page 1 Introduction
More informationThe Head of School Evaluation Process
The Head of School Evaluation Process In an independent school, one of the primary responsibilities of the board of trustees is the hiring, nurturing, and evaluating of the head of school. The evaluation,
More informationPenn State Outreach Strategic Plan for Diversity
Penn State Outreach Strategic Plan for Diversity 2004-2009 The mission of Penn State Outreach is to increase access to Penn State s educational resources through linking the expertise of faculty in the
More informationCollege of Architecture, Design and Construction Strategic Diversity Plan to
College of Architecture, Design and Construction Strategic Diversity Plan 2012-13 to 2014-15 Vision: The College of Architecture, Design and Construction (CADC) is committed to create a diverse learning
More information1. RACE EQUALITY ACTION PLAN DECEMBER 2006 DECEMBER 2009
APPENDIX A 1. RACE EQUALITY ACTION PLAN DECEMBER 2006 DECEMBER 2009 1.1 MAINSTREAMING RACE EQUALITY Intended outcomes: The University has ensured that current and prospective staff and students are aware
More informationEMPLOYEE SURVEY FALL 2003
EMPLOYEE SURVEY FALL Barbara McNeice-Stallard Director Office of Research & Institutional Effectiveness With assistance from Pearson Reid London House, NCS Pearson February 3, 2004 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
More informationDartmouth College Employee Survey Results. April 27, 2006
Dartmouth College Employee Survey Results April 27, 2006 Goals and Objectives The Dartmouth College Employee Survey will help the administration: To better understand employees experience To identify employees
More informationE-1 End: Workforce Focus Key Performance Indicator Report
E-1 End: Workforce Focus Key Performance Indicator Report Board of Trustees February 22, 2017 Regular Session Item E-1 Background: This report addresses the key performance indicators for the End: Workforce
More informationInstitutional Climate Update
Institutional Climate Update Board of Trustees Thursday, June 1, 2017 Presented by Clyde W. Pickett, Ed.D. 1 Overview Coordination: Office of Institutional Diversity and Inclusion Office of Planning and
More informationRecruitment, Selection, and Hiring of Employees
POLICY: 6Hx28:3B-03 Recruitment, Selection, and Hiring of Employees Responsible Executive: Vice President, Organizational Development & Human Resources Policy Contacts: Director, HR Policy and Compliance
More informationCOLLEGE OF COMMUNICATIONS. A Framework to Foster Diversity at Penn State: STRATEGIC PLANNING AND REPORTING
COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATIONS A Framework to Foster Diversity at Penn State: 2010 2015 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND REPORTING December 2009 Challenge 1 Developing a Shared and Inclusive Understanding of Diversity
More information2009 Texas A&M University Staff and Management Survey Results
2009 Texas A&M University Staff and Management Survey Results Human Resources and the Mays Business School collaborated to conduct staff and management surveys in December 2009 in follow up to similar
More information2016 Employee Climate Survey
2016 Employee Climate Survey Prepared for: Campus Open Forum Assessment Group for Diversity Issues Chair: VP for Diversity, Mary Ontiveros Committee: Shannon Archibeque-Engle, Paul Doherty, Gene Gloeckner,
More informationThe Diversification of Police Departments. Megan Alderden, Amy Farrell, Wesley Skogan and Dennis Rosenbaum
The Diversification of Police Departments Megan Alderden, Amy Farrell, Wesley Skogan and Dennis Rosenbaum In the last few decades there has been a particular emphasis on diversifying the police workforce.
More information2016 Employee Climate Survey Prepared for The President s Commission for Diversity and Inclusion Assessment Group for Diversity Issues
2016 Employee Climate Survey Prepared for The President s Commission for Diversity and Inclusion Assessment Group for Diversity Issues Chair: VP for Diversity, Mary Ontiveros Committee: Shannon Archibeque-Engle,
More informationOffice of Diversity Programs
LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGES CITY EAST HARBOR MISSION PIERCE SOUTHWEST TRADE-TECH VALLEY WEST REPORT OF CLIENT SATISFACTION QUESTIONNAIRE Office of Diversity Programs July 2009 LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY
More informationDraft Faculty Mentoring
Draft Faculty Mentoring This draft document begins the conversation of how to tailor a mentoring program for our college by offering two methods along a spectrum of possible vehicles for implementation
More informationFaculty Mentoring Program Assessment AY 2011 Margaret Bailey, Renee Baker, Chance Glenn
Faculty Mentoring Program Assessment AY 2011 Margaret Bailey, Renee Baker, Chance Glenn Executive Summary In the AY2011 spring quarter, a survey was administered to all 185 tenure-track faculty at RIT
More information2015 Staff Senate Survey Results
2015 Staff Senate Survey Results Overall Results The 2015 results, for the most part, continue the increasing satisfaction levels shown in the 2014 survey results. Staff are proud to work for WCU, are
More information20% 19% 9% 11% 8% 4% 4% 5% Satisfaction with UC San Diego. Satisfaction Mean Scores by Question Dimension
HEALTH SCIENCES Staff@Work Survey Analysis, 2011-2015 2014 2015 Response 36% 35% Average of 53 Questions 6 7 This year, of the 53 attribute mean scores: 21 are in the excellent range ( & above) 11 increased
More information1 r-',~ l-1 ov-: """'<)~ ~ / 14: /JC/- Vice President or Other Cabinet-level Supervisor Date. Santa Fe Community College
Santa Fe Community College Proposed Agenda Item Governing Board Meeting Complete this form and submit it to the Office of the President by noon on the Wednesday eight days before the Thursday evening meeting
More informationProcess for University Strategic Planning Examples
1. Many universities post their strategic plans on the web for public access, but only a few of them disclose the timeline and process of how the strategic plans are developed; the inclusion of institutions
More information28% 17% Satisfaction Mean Scores by Question Dimension
ADVANCEMENT Staff@Work Survey Analysis, 2011-2015 201 2015 Response 68% 78% Average of 53 Questions 5 5 This year, of the 53 attribute mean scores: 33 are in the excellent range ( & above) 28 increased
More informationNorth Dakota State University Policy Manual
North Dakota State University Policy Manual SECTION 129 SALARY ADMINISTRATION POLICY SOURCE: NDSU President NDUS Human Resource Policy Manual, Section 5 1. Philosophy and Objectives The primary purpose
More informationThe College of William and Mary University Human Resources System. A Guide for Classified Employees
The College of William and Mary University Human Resources System A Guide for Classified Employees Core Principles At the College of William and Mary, our workforce is our greatest strength and our greatest
More informationRecruitment, Selection & Hiring Toolkit
Recruitment, Selection & Hiring Toolkit Guidance for the OSUL hiring process Recruitment, Selection & Hiring OSUL Process Outline A guide to Recruitment, Selection and On-Boarding was developed as a resource
More information2016 Employee Climate Survey: Prepared for: CVMBS: Diversity & Inclusion Committee Assessment Group for Diversity Issues
2016 Employee Climate Survey: Prepared for: CVMBS: Diversity & Inclusion Committee Assessment Group for Diversity Issues Chair: VP for Diversity, Mary Ontiveros Committee: Shannon Archibeque-Engle, Paul
More informationEVALUATION PLAN UNH UNBIASED: LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT AND POLICY CHANGE TO PROMOTE INSTITUTIONAL TRANSFORMATION
EVALUATION PLAN UNH UNBIASED: LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT AND POLICY CHANGE TO PROMOTE INSTITUTIONAL TRANSFORMATION Submitted to: Karen Graham UNH ADVANCE Program Director Professor, Department of Mathematics
More informationVirginia Tech University Human Resources Restructuring Survey
Virginia Tech University Human Resources Restructuring Survey REPORT OF RESULTS Prepared by: THE CENTER FOR SURVEY RESEARCH David E. Hartman. Ph.D. Principal Investigator Abdoulaye Diop, Ph.D. Senior Research
More informationSection 6: Observations and Recommendations
Section 6: Observations and Recommendations 42 Using the Survey Results To Improve Your Organization Here are some ideas to consider before reviewing the specific observations and recommendations that
More informationManager Report. Prepared for Sample Manager ACME Incorporated
Manager Report Prepared for Sample Manager ACME Incorporated McLean & Company is a research and advisory firm providing practical solution to human resources challenges via executable research tools and
More informationVOILAND COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE 2018
For the Employee Engagement Survey (EES) there were 103 respondents in compared to 52 respondents in 2016 who identified their department within the Voiland of Engineering and Architecture (VCEA). For,
More informationStudents. Faculty Campus Climate Study Executive Summary
Students Faculty Administrators Staff 2013 Campus Climate Study Executive Summary 1 This document provides an executive summary of the findings for the WMU Campus Climate Study conducted during the 2012-13
More informationSociety of American Foresters Committee on Accreditation 5400 Grosvenor Lane Bethesda, Maryland (301)
Society of American Foresters Committee on Accreditation 5400 Grosvenor Lane Bethesda, Maryland 20814-2198 (301) 897-8720 Committee on Accreditation Summary Findings and Action New Mexico Highlands University
More informationBUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION DECEMBER BCFP Annual Employee Survey Results
BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION DECEMBER 2018 2018 BCFP Annual Employee Survey Results Introduction Interpretation of results More than 72 percent of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
More informationControl Environment Survey Results UCSD Business Process Self Assessment (BPSA) Program FY 2011 Audit & Management Advisory Services Project #
SAN DIEGO: AUDIT & MANAGEMENT ADVISORY SERVICES 0919 June 23, 2011 GARY MATTHEWS Vice Chancellor Resource Management and Planning 0057 STEVEN RELYEA Vice Chancellor External and Business Affairs 0007 PENNY
More informationThe European Charter for Researchers and The Code of Conduct for the Recruitment of Researchers (C&C)
THE CYPRUS INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGY AND GENETICS THE HUMAN RESOURCES STRATEGY FOR RESEARCHERS INCORPORATING The European Charter for Researchers and The Code of Conduct for the Recruitment of Researchers
More informationCampus Climate Initiative Action Items June 15, 2017
Campus Climate Initiative Action Items June 15, 2017 Executive Summary The primary commitment of the Campus Climate Initiative that UNC launched in fall 2015 was to complete a campus climate survey and
More informationUniversity of Virginia. Human Resources Restructuring Survey APPENDICES A-G THE CENTER FOR SURVEY RESEARCH. Prepared by:
University of Virginia Human Resources Restructuring Survey APPENDICES A-G Prepared by: THE CENTER FOR SURVEY RESEARCH David E. Hartman. Ph.D. Principal Investigator Abdoulaye Diop, Ph.D. Senior Research
More informationCATEGORY 6: SUPPORTING INSTITUTIONAL OPERATIONS
CATEGORY 6: SUPPORTING INSTITUTIONAL OPERATIONS INTRODUCTION The College s Supporting Institutional Operations processes are generally systematic. Divisions/units and departments have mission statements
More informationEast Carolina University
East Carolina University IV. Faculty and Staff Recruitment and Retention Introduction East Carolina University is experiencing a period of accelerated student enrollment growth couple with a downturn in
More informationGRADUATE SCHOOL 2018 ADVANCING THE UNIVERSITY S MISSION: ENJOY BEING PART OF THEIR DEPARTMENT
For the Employee Engagement Survey (EES) there were 20 respondents in compared to 11 respondents in who identified their department within the Graduate School. For, the survey was sent to 20 active employees
More informationWest Virginia University Compensation Strategy Non-classified Employees August, 2015
West Virginia University Compensation Strategy Non-classified Employees August, 2015 Background: Mission - West Virginia University s primary mission is to provide high-quality programs of instruction
More information2001 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RESEARCH TRACKING STUDY
2001 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RESEARCH TRACKING STUDY FINAL REPORT Prepared For: Newfoundland & Labrador Hydro Hydro Place, Columbus Drive P.O. Box 12400 St. John s, NF A1B 4K7 Prepared By: www.marketquest.ca
More information2016 Employee Climate Survey:
2016 Employee Climate Survey: Prepared for University Operations Assessment Group for Diversity Issues Chair: VP for Diversity, Mary Ontiveros Committee: Shannon Archibeque-Engle, Paul Doherty, Gene Gloeckner,
More informationAnnual Self Performance Review
Annual Self Performance Review Employee Information Name: Review Date: Title: Department: Evaluation Period: Completed By: Principles and Practices Principles and Practices is a statement of the values
More informationRichland Community College May 2009
Criterion 8: Planning Continuous Improvement Core Values: Commitment, Excellence, Accountability Strategic Plan Goals 1, 2, and 3: Enhance, Strengthen, and Advance Teaching and Learning, Collaborative
More informationStaff Survey Table Discussion / Supervisory Forum March 22, 2018
Staff Survey Table Discussion / Supervisory Forum March 22, 2018 1. What areas of opportunity were identified in your division as a result of the Staff Survey? (Please note similarities or themes across
More informationOffice of Black Student Affairs Student Job Description All positions are work study and 15 hrs/wk
2015-2016 Office of Black Student Affairs Student Job Description All positions are work study and 15 hrs/wk 1) OBSA STUDENT MANAGER FOR THE DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. ANNUAL CELEBRATION Description: Coordinate
More informationBUSINESS SERVICES PERSONNEL HIRING Board of Trustees Approval: 06/14/2017 CHAPTER 2 Date of Last Cabinet Review: 03/14/2017 POLICY 2.
PERSONNEL HIRING Board of Trustees Approval: 06/14/2017 POLICY 2.02 Page 1 of 1 I. POLICY Salt Lake Community College (SLCC) strives to hire qualified individuals who are committed to serving students
More informationADVISORY COUNCIL SUMMIT
ADVISORY COUNCIL SUMMIT 9/11/18 Agenda 1. Welcome and Introductions 2. Human Resources Vision, Benefits & Philosophy 3. Project Recalibration Details 4. Job Descriptions & Compensation Infrastructure Development
More information2018 EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS
2018 EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION 100% 95% 75% 65% 55% 86% 84% 65% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 Employee Survey Results Institutional Planning, Effectiveness, and
More information2016 EMPLOYEE SURVEY RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
2016 EMPLOYEE SURVEY RESULTS AND ANALYSIS JULY 2016 Survey Administered by the Institutional Effectiveness Committee March-June 2016 Report Prepared by the Office of Institutional Advancement Data Support
More informationDecember 7, CFPB Annual Employee Survey
December 7, 2012 2012 CFPB Annual Employee Survey Introduction Interpretation of results: Approximately 74 percent of CFPB employees responded to the first annual employee survey conducted by the Consumer
More informationUAF Administrative Services Work Environment Survey. Prepared for: University of Alaska, Fairbanks Administrative Services
UAF Administrative Services Work Environment Survey Prepared for: University of Alaska, Fairbanks Administrative Services July 2009 UAF Administrative Services Work Environment Survey Prepared for: University
More informationHIRING We want to know what makes FAU attractive to job applicants, and how applicants experience the hiring process.
Thank you for your interest in the Survey of Faculty Worklife at FAU 2017. This anonymous online survey is based on the University of Wisconsin-Madison Study of Faculty Worklife Survey and was adapted
More informationRepealed. Recruitment and Selection of Employees. POLICY: 6Hx28:3B-03
POLICY: 6Hx28:3B-03 Responsible Official: Vice President, Organizational Development and Human Resources Specific Authority: 1001.64, F.S. Law Implemented: 1001.64, F.S. Effective Date: 05-28-2014 Recruitment
More informationENJOY BEING PART OF THEIR DEPARTMENT
WSU VANCOUVER For the Employee Engagement Survey (EES) there were 49 respondents in compared to 30 respondents in who identified their department within WSU Vancouver. Within WSU Vancouver, the response
More informationStrategic Planning Process
Process Oklahoma Baptist University Continuous Quality Enhancement Institutional Effectiveness Spence Spencer, AVP for IE 2017-2018 1 Table of Contents Purpose... 2 Introduction... 2 University Planning
More informationProgram Review Self-Study Guidance Administrative Units
Program Review Self-Study Guidance Administrative Units The self-study is the unit s opportunity to present its strategy, accomplishments, and challenges. It should be informative to the external reviewers
More informationCOLLEGE OF AGRICULTURAL, HUMAN & NATURAL RESOURCE SCIENCES 2018
COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURAL, HUMAN & NATURAL RESOURCE SCIENCES For the Employee Engagement Survey (EES) there were 301 respondents in compared to 247 respondents in who identified their department within of
More informationDIVERSITY AND INCLUSION
2012 Snapshot BEST PLACES TO WORK IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ANALYSIS DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION U.S. demographics are shifting, with the federal government serving a more diverse population than ever before.
More informationTHE EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT METRICS EXPLAINED
THE 10 EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT METRICS EXPLAINED Metric 1: PERSONAL GROWTH The Personal Growth Metric represents the level of autonomy employees have, whether or not they re improving their skills and if they
More informationRevised Policies and Procedures for Student Employment
PM 81-20 9/23/81 David J. Karber, Vice President, Operations Revised Policies and Procedures for Student Employment Attached is a copy of Revised Policies and Procedures for Student Employment. It is effective
More informationEMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY ATC Project March 30, 2015 on behalf of TTC TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Overall Engagement Score 12 Aspects of Employee Engagement 16 What Drives Engagement 20 Overall Organizational
More informationDiversity. EQuity and INCLUSION. Audit Report
Diversity EQuity and INCLUSION Audit Report THE CALIFORNIA ENDOWMENT AUGUST 2017 SOCIAL POLICY RESEARCH ASSOCIATES Contents Dr. Ross, on the impetus for the first Diversity Audit, conducted In 2008 Why
More informationEmployee Well-Being and Satisfaction Survey Results 2015
Employee Well-Being and Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 Dr. Terry Beehr, Alex Stemer, & Annie Simpson November 30 th, 2015 Table of Contents Employee Well-Being and Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 3
More informationResponsible Persons MIC, Dir. of IR, Dir. of IE. President, Provost, and MIC. Budget Office, MIC, Director of IR
Driving Action Thru Analytics (DATA) Strategic Plan Phase I August - : Initial Planning and Establishment of Institutional Goals and Student Risk Factors I-1. Establish I-2. Define and announce state performance
More informationBudget Request Form. Personal Information. Budget Request Information. Name of Requestor: Requestor Requestor Department:
Budget Request Form New or Expanded Positions (Personnel) Budget requests that justify the expansion of existing positions, or the addition of new positions. All technology & facility requests will be
More information