Comprehensive Asbestos & Lead Base Paint Survey

Transcription

1 Report of Comprehensive Asbestos & Lead Base Paint Survey Prepared for: Freese and Nichols, Inc International Plaza, Suite 200 Fort Worth, TX Building Surveyed: Readiness Center National Guard Armory Report Date: Thursday, August 11, 2016

2 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Comprehensive Asbestos Survey and Lead Base Paint Survey Readiness Center National Guard Armory Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction Purpose and Scope Report Organization Field Investigation Sampling Laboratory Analysis Analytical Methods Bulk Sample Results Hazard Assessment Hazard Assessment Ratings Asbestos-Containing Material Assessments Hazard Assessment Summary Response Actions Qualifications 10 Appendices Appendix A: Site Drawings Appendix B: Lab Results Appendix C: Bulk Summary Report Appendix D: Cost Estimates for Removal Appendix E: Photographs Appendix F: Lead Base Paint Report Comprehensive Asbestos Survey Freese and Nichols, Inc. - Readiness Center National Guard Armory Page 2 of 10

3 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Introduction This document is a report of a Comprehensive Asbestos Survey performed by Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc.(IHST). IHST is licensed by the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS), formerly the Texas Department of Health, as an Asbestos Consultant Agency (DSHS License # Figure 1 provides a description of the assessment described by this report. Figure 1. Comprehensive Asbestos Survey Profile Client Name: Freese and Nichols, Inc. Facility/Campus National Guard Armory Denison Building: Readiness Center National Guard Armory Survey Date(s): 7/5/2016 Inspector(s): Doug Easley - DSHS Asbestos Inspector License # Purpose and Scope The purpose of this project was to locate, identify, and assess the condition of asbestos containing material (ACM) present at the subject building, and to develop recommendations based on existing and potential asbestos related hazards. The following scope of work was used during the asbestos assessment for the subject property: A. Collecting and analyzing bulk samples of suspected asbestos-containing materials. B. Quantification of the suspected asbestos-containing material. C. Preparing a report discussing the findings and remedial recommendations. 3.0 Report Organization This report is divided into sections which discuss the review of available documentation, field investigation, laboratory analysis, hazard assessments, and recommendations. Illustrations, such as tables and figures follow the text. Other supporting documentation, such as laboratory reports are also included. 4.0 Field Investigation The survey was conducted to determine the amount of asbestos-containing materials present in the subject building. The survey included an observation of accessible areas and unusual conditions; and bulk sampling of suspected asbestos-containing materials. Bulk samples were collected of suspect materials and analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining, in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples (Method 600/R-93/116). All of the samples that tested greater than 1% by the PLM method for counting asbestos were reanalyzed using the Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) method. This technique characterizes asbestos more precisely than PLM. Laboratory reports containing sample location and results are included with this report. The survey was designed to identify the presence of both friable and non-friable asbestos- containing materials present in the surveyed area. Friable means that the material, when dry, may be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Building materials suspected of containing asbestos were grouped into "Homogeneous" sampling areas. The homogeneous areas were defined Comprehensive Asbestos Survey Freese and Nichols, Inc. - Readiness Center National Guard Armory Page 3 of 10

4 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: based on uniform texture, color, and appearance. Additionally, homogeneous areas were further defined based on building construction date(s). Each of the items sampled were classified into one of three categories: 1.) Surfacing Material: A surfacing material is a building material which has been applied to a surface (i.e., walls or ceilings) or structural members. Examples of surfacing materials which may contain asbestos are: spray-applied fireproofing, spray-applied acoustical texture, and trowel-applied textured ceilings and walls. 2.) Thermal System Insulation: All types of insulation used on a building's mechanical system are classified into the category of thermal system insulation. Examples of thermal system materials which may contain asbestos are: boilers and related piping, or duct insulation. 3.) Miscellaneous: All remaining materials which do not fall into the two above categories are placed in the miscellaneous category. Examples of miscellaneous materials which may contain asbestos are: lay-in ceiling tile, floor tile, mastic adhesives and roofing felt. An assessment was conducted for each building material sampled. The physical assessment consists of evaluating the condition of the suspect material and the potential for future disturbance. Recommendations made for a building material which contains asbestos are based on the assessments made by the inspector during the survey. The data developed during the asbestos survey is presented in the following sections of this report. Table 1 contains the Summary of Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment. This table presents specific locations, results of additional asbestos analysis, time schedules, and quantities of asbestos. 5.0 Sampling Sampling during the field investigation included the collection of bulk samples of suspected asbestos containing materials, as listed in Table 1., Summary of Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment. After sample recovery, samples were placed in secure containers, and the sampling vicinity was cleaned and sealed. Appropriate chain-of-custody protocols were initiated at that time to track handling of bulk samples. 5.1 Laboratory Analysis The samples were transported to and analyzed by the analytical laboratory specified in Figure 2., a successful participant in the Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST) National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program and licensed by the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS), formerly the Texas Department of Health. Ten percent (10%) of the bulk samples were reanalyzed independently as part of the quality assurance and quality control programs. Comprehensive Asbestos Survey Freese and Nichols, Inc. - Readiness Center National Guard Armory Page 4 of 10

5 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Figure 2. Bulk Sample Laboratory Profile Laboratory Name: Steve Moody Micro Services DSHS License Number: # NVLAP Lab ID: # Expires: 5/31/ Analytical Methods Bulk samples were analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM). This technique characterizes the materials refractive indices, fiber morphology, birefringence, extinction angle, sign of elongation, and dispersion staining colors to detect asbestos. Percentage estimates are based on approximate area compositions under a stereo-microscope. All of the samples that tested greater than 1% by the PLM method for counting asbestos were reanalyzed using the Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) method. This technique characterizes asbestos more precisely than PLM. 5.3 Bulk Sample Results The results of the sample analysis are presented in Table 1, and the laboratory analysis report is included as Appendix B. Figure 3. Materials with Asbestos Detected at 1% or Greater Mat'l Type Description Location CMU Texture on CMU Block Learning Center Flooring Matls Beige 12 x 12 Floor Tile with Black Mastic Classrooms, Administration, Supply Office, Learning Center TSI Hard Pack Fittings Drill Hall Caulking Exterior Caulk Around Windows Exterior Windows Figure 4. Materials with NO Asbestos Detected (Pursuant to EPA and DSHS Definition) Mat'l Type Description Location Cove Base 6" Cove Base & Mastic Classrooms, Administration, Supply Office, Learning Center ACT 2 x 4 Lay In Ceiling Tile Classrooms, Administration, Supply Office, Learning Center Caulking Window Glazing Windows Throughout Sheetrock Sheetrock & Joint Compound See Drawing ACT 2 x 4 Ceiling Tile - Tectum Throughout Except Vault ACT 1 x 1 Tile with Mastic Rifle Range Walls Comprehensive Asbestos Survey Freese and Nichols, Inc. - Readiness Center National Guard Armory Page 5 of 10

6 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Hazard Assessment Asbestos is an airborne hazard. A hazard assessment refers to the process by which we evaluate a material's potential to release fibers into the air. Fibers may be released spontaneously as part of the aging process, or as a result of sudden impact, vibration, air movement, or localized deterioration. Assessing a material's potential for fiber release, and hence its associated hazard, is based upon evaluating the material's condition and potential for further disturbance, damage, or deterioration. 6.1 Hazard Assessment Rankings Any material identified as asbestos containing that exhibits damage, should be considered a hazard to anyone who works in the area. Typically, damage is classified as minor or significant. Minor damage is characterized by small cuts, tears, scuffs, small openings, or other limited disturbance to asbestos containing materials. Areas with minor damage represent varying degrees of hazards from slight to high depending on: * The nature of the damage; * Proximity to disturbers, such as airstreams; * Location with respect to building occupants; * Activity in the immediate area; and * Frequency of maintenance in the area. Significant damage is characterized by large openings, visible flaking, loose particles, and debris on surfaces below the material. Asbestos containing materials which exhibit significant damage are either high or critical hazards, depending upon accessibility. High hazards exist where significantly damaged materials are generally inaccessible; however, where significant damage is accessible, or in the vicinity of building occupants, there is a critical hazard. The recommended action for addressing asbestos related hazards depends upon the degree of hazard. For example: * An immediate hazard or critical assessment describes a situation in which the material is exposed and friable, accessible to personnel, and is disturbed releasing fibers in the air. In this situation, immediate action should be taken. At a minimum, the area should be isolated and access restricted. * A high assessment describes a situation in which the material is in poor condition, exposed and friable, with a potential for disturbance. In this case, interim controls should be instituted, and the material should be removed when practical. Repairs should be made to the ACM if abatement is not scheduled. * A medium or moderate assessment describes a situation in which a combination of the determining factors vary, such as a material that is in good condition but has a high asbestos content and is generally accessible. In situations like this, abatement can be scheduled with future building renovation or maintenance. * A low or slight assessment describes a situation in which the material is in good condition and has a low potential for disturbance, damage, or deterioration. In this situation, an O&M program is usually all that is needed. In general, those areas that are classified as critical or high damage should be abated. These are areas where a high probability of exposure could occur. Moderately damaged areas would require an Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Program to be instituted. In addition, these areas should be considered for abatement, or at the very least repaired. Comprehensive Asbestos Survey Freese and Nichols, Inc. - Readiness Center National Guard Armory Page 6 of 10

7 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Asbestos-Containing Material Assessments Figure 5 provides a summary of the asbestos identified during the survey, along with a hazard assessment for each type and condition of asbestos-containing material. Figure 5. Hazard Assessments for Asbestos-Containing Materials Texture on Cinder Block Condition: Good, Friability: NF II, Disturbance Potential: Low The texture is in good condition presents a low potential health hazard to building occupants due to its observed good condition and intact binding matrices. Prior to building demolition, renovation or work activities that would disturb these materials, removal must be performed by a properly trained and licensed abatement contractor. The preceding hazard assessment applies to the asbestos-containing materials listed below: Area Ref# Homogeneous Area Description Quantity Location 01 Texture on CMU Block 160 s.f. Learning Center Flooring Materials Condition: Good, Friability: NF I, Disturbance Potential: Low The floor tile and mastic in good condition presents a low potential health hazard to building occupants due to its observed good condition and intact binding matrices. Prior to building demolition, renovation or work activities that would disturb these materials, removal must be performed by a properly trained and TDSHS-licensed abatement contractor. Prior to building demolition, removal of any damaged or significantly damaged floor tile and linoleum flooring should be performed by a properly trained and state-licensed abatement contractor. Currently, National Emission Standards for Hazard Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations allow Category I non-friable asbestos floor tile, sheet flooring and mastic in good condition, to be left in place during structural building demolition. Buildings subject to NESHAP regulations, require that wet demolition work be conducted with no visible emissions, and the presence of a "Competent Person" trained under the provisions of NESHAP to supervise the demolition work. The asbestos-containing materials should be placed in a management program and monitored until renovation or demolition activity occurs. The preceding hazard assessment applies to the asbestos-containing materials listed below: Area Ref# Homogeneous Area Description Quantity Location 03 Beige 12 x 12 Floor Tile with Black Mastic 3005 s.f. Classrooms, Administration, Supply Office, Learning Center Comprehensive Asbestos Survey Freese and Nichols, Inc. - Readiness Center National Guard Armory Page 7 of 10

8 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Thermal System Insulation (TSI) Condition: Good, Friability: NF II, Disturbance Potential: Low This TSI material presents a low potential health hazard to building occupants due to its observed good condition and low potential for disturbance, Prior to building renovation or work activities that would disturb any asbestos containing materials, these materials should be removed by a properly trained and state-licensed abatement contractor. The preceding hazard assessment applies to the asbestos-containing materials listed below: Area Ref# Homogeneous Area Description Quantity Location 07 Hard Pack Fittings 6 fittings Drill Hall Window Glazing, Caulking and Sealant Condition: Good, Friability: NF II, Disturbance Potential: Low At the time of the survey, this ACM was observed to be non-friable and in good condition. Please refer to the schematic drawings for specific material locations. The window glazing and caulking is in good condition and presents a low potential health hazard to building occupants due to its observed good condition and intact binding matrices. The preceding hazard assessment applies to the asbestos-containing materials listed below: Area Ref# Homogeneous Area Description Quantity Location 10 Exterior Caulk Around Windows 688 l.f. Exterior Windows Comprehensive Asbestos Survey Freese and Nichols, Inc. - Readiness Center National Guard Armory Page 8 of 10

9 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Hazard Assessment Summary In the event other building materials are discovered in addition to the materials sampled in this survey, those building materials should be presumed to contain asbestos and treated as such until proven otherwise by PLM laboratory analysis. 7.1 Response Actions Asbestos Containing Materials The identified asbestos in the building should be managed in place until such time that renovation or demolition projects may require removal because of disturbance of the material. 7.2 Explanation of Response Ratings Table 1 includes a response rating based on factors such as friability, accessibility, potential for disturbance, etc. Definitions for the response ratings are listed below: 0 = Material does not contain detectable amounts of asbestos and requires no asbestos-related abatement action. 1 = Material contains asbestos, was non-friable, and requires no abatement action unless sanded, abraded, drilled or otherwise disturbed. 2 = Material contains asbestos and was friable. Damage was not observed; no immediate abatement action is required. 3 = Material contains asbestos, was friable, and shows signs of localized damage with a potential for disturbance. 4 = Material contains friable asbestos and was significantly damaged. Comprehensive Asbestos Survey Freese and Nichols, Inc. - Readiness Center National Guard Armory Page 9 of 10

10 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Qualifications Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. has attempted to observe the existing conditions within the aforementioned building utilizing generally accepted procedures. Regardless of the thoroughness of a survey, the possibility exists that some areas containing asbestos were overlooked, inaccessible or different from those at specific locations. Furthermore, renovation and/or construction may reveal altered conditions. This report describes only the conditions present at the time of the survey, in the areas surveyed. The recommendations presented apply to the conditions that were observed during the survey. IHST policies are to not perform destructive sampling unless previously authorized by the client. Therefore, IHST does not perform core sampling of roofing materials unless previously authorized and accompanied by the owner and/or his representative. Other conditions may exist in unsurveyed or inaccessible areas such as behind walls and above permanent ceilings. In addition, the conditions of asbestos-containing materials may change gradually or suddenly depending upon use, maintenance or accident. As a result, the recommendations presented should be periodically reviewed and updated. The quantity estimates presented in this report were based upon observations during the survey as well as information from building plans provided by the owner. While it is believed that the estimated quantities are reasonable, unanticipated conditions could be present in inaccessible or unsurveyed areas. Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology, Inc. do not warrant or guarantee the quantity estimates. The use of such estimates shall be at the user's own risk and shall constitute a release and agreement to defend and indemnify Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology, Inc. from and against any liability. If you have any questions or comments regarding the content of this report, I would be glad to discuss them at your convenience. Sincerely, Doug Easley - DSHS Asbestos Inspector License # Tracy K. Bramlett President DSHS Individual Asbestos Consultant License # Comprehensive Asbestos Survey Freese and Nichols, Inc. - Readiness Center National Guard Armory Page 10 of 10

11 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Appendix: Appendix A: Site Drawings Asbestos Survey Appendix Freese and Nichols, Inc. - Readiness Center National Guard Armory

12 NORTH 115 Vault L Locker Room Rifle Range 114 Unit Storage Food Prep Supply Room 116 Drill Hall Observation Unit Storage 109 Porch 001L 107 Janitors Closet Mens Shower Corridor 106 Mens Toilet 103 Womens Toilet 104 Womens Shower Library/Classroom L Lobby 127 Administration 126 Administration 120 Scullery 119 Classroom 121 Food Prep 122 Food Stor Learning Center L 007 NEGATIVE ASBESTOS SAMPLE POSITIVE ASBESTOS SAMPLE KEY NEGATIVE LEAD SAMPLE POSITIVE LEAD SAMPLE DRAWING TITLE: Freese & Nichols National Guard Armory Denison Readiness Center *POSITIVE ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL IS CLASSIFIED AS BEING GREATER THAN 1% ASBESTOS. *POSITIVE LEAD CONTAINING MATERIAL IS CLASSIFIED AS BEING GREATER THAN 0.5% LEAD BY WEIGHT. Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. JOB NUMBER: DRAWN BY: K. Girton DATE: 07/27/2016 Scale: None Sheet: 1 of 3

13 NORTH 115 Vault 117 Locker Room 111 Rifle Range 114 Unit Storage 118 Food Prep 113 Supply Room 116 Drill Hall 112 Unit Storage 119 Classroom 109 Porch 108 Corridor 110 Observation 107 Janitors Closet 108 Mens Shower 106 Mens Toilet 104 Womens Shower 120 Scullery 121 Food Prep 103 Womens Toilet 122 Food Stor. 102 Library/Classroom 101 Lobby 127 Administration 126 Administration 124 Learning Center KEY DRAWING TITLE: ACM Textured CMU Block Walls Freese & Nichols National Guard Armory Denison Readiness Center *POSITIVE ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL IS CLASSIFIED AS BEING GREATER THAN 1% ASBESTOS. Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. JOB NUMBER: DRAWN BY: K. Girton DATE: 07/27/2016 Scale: None Sheet: 2 of 3

14 NORTH 115 Vault 117 Locker Room 111 Rifle Range 114 Unit Storage 118 Food Prep 113 Supply Room 116 Drill Hall 112 Unit Storage 119 Classroom 109 Porch 108 Corridor 110 Observation 107 Janitors Closet 108 Mens Shower 106 Mens Toilet 103 Womens Toilet 104 Womens Shower 120 Scullery 121 Food Prep 122 Food Stor. 102 Library/Classroom 101 Lobby 127 Administration 126 Administration 124 Learning Center KEY ACM 12"x12" Biege Floor Tile with ACM Black Mastic ACM Hard Pack Fittings ACM Window Caulk DRAWING TITLE: Freese & Nichols National Guard Armory Denison Readiness Center *POSITIVE ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL IS CLASSIFIED AS BEING GREATER THAN 1% ASBESTOS. Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. JOB NUMBER: DRAWN BY: K. Girton DATE: 07/27/2016 Scale: None Sheet: 3 of 3

15 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Appendix: Appendix B: Lab Results Asbestos Survey Appendix Freese and Nichols, Inc. - Readiness Center National Guard Armory

16 2051 Valley View Lane Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) PLM Summary Report NVLAP Lab Code TDSHS License No Client : Project : Project # : Identification : Test Method : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology RC Site National Guard Armory, 1700 Loy Lake, Denison Freese&Nichols Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) EPA Method 600 / R-93 / 116 Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 07/07/2016 Sample Date : 07/05/2016 Page 1 of 3 On 7/6/2016, thirty eight (38) bulk material samples were submitted by Doug Easley of Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. The PLM Detail Report is attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Sample Number Client Sample Description / Location Asbestos Content 001 Texture on CMU Block, Rifle Range Observation Area None Detected - CMU None Detected - Paint 002 Texture on CMU Block, Classroom 119 None Detected - CMU None Detected - Paint 003 Texture on CMU Block, Locker Room 117 None Detected - CMU None Detected - Paint 004 Texture on CMU Block, Drill Hall outside Vault None Detected - CMU None Detected - Paint 005 Texture on CMU Block, Library Classroom None Detected - CMU None Detected - Mortar None Detected - Paint 006 Texture on CMU Block, Administration Office 127 None Detected - CMU None Detected - Paint 007 Texture on CMU Block, Learning Center None Detected - CMU None Detected - Mortar 2% Chrysotile - Texture 008 Six Inch Cove Base and Mastic, Corridor outside Learning Center None Detected - Cove Base None Detected - Brown Mastic 009 Six Inch Cove Base and Mastic, Classroom 119 None Detected - Cove Base None Detected - Brown Mastic 010 Six Inch Cove Base and Mastic, Administration Office 126 None Detected - Cove Base None Detected - Brown Mastic x 12 Floor Tile (Beige) with Mastic (Black), Library Classroom 12 x 12 Floor Tile (Beige) with Mastic (Black), Classroom x 12 Floor Tile (Beige) with Mastic (Black), Corridor outside Learning Center None Detected - Floor Tile 5% Chrysotile - Black Mastic None Detected - Floor Tile 5% Chrysotile - Black Mastic None Detected - Floor Tile 5% Chrysotile - Black Mastic x 4 Lay-in Ceiling Tile, Library Classroom None Detected - Acoustic Tile

17 2051 Valley View Lane Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) PLM Summary Report NVLAP Lab Code TDSHS License No Client : Project : Project # : Identification : Test Method : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology RC Site National Guard Armory, 1700 Loy Lake, Denison Freese&Nichols Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) EPA Method 600 / R-93 / 116 Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 07/07/2016 Sample Date : 07/05/2016 Page 2 of 3 On 7/6/2016, thirty eight (38) bulk material samples were submitted by Doug Easley of Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. The PLM Detail Report is attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Sample Number Client Sample Description / Location Asbestos Content x 4 Lay-in Ceiling Tile, Lobby None Detected - Acoustic Tile x 4 Lay-in Ceiling Tile, Classroom 118 None Detected - Acoustic Tile 017 Window Glazing, Outside Admin Office 125 None Detected - Window Glazing 018 Window Glazing, Outside Locker Room 117 None Detected - Window Glazing 019 Window Glazing, Outside Men's Restroom None Detected - Window Glazing 020 Sheetrock and Joint Compound, Learning Center Wall None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Joint Compound 021 Sheetrock and Joint Compound, Men's Restroom Ceiling None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Joint Compound 022 Sheetrock and Joint Compound, Men's Restroom Ceiling None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Joint Compound 023 Sheetrock and Joint Compound, Classroom 118 None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Texture 024 Sheetrock and Joint Compound, Classroom 118 None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Texture 025 Hard Pack Fittings, Drill Hall 2% Amosite - Thermal Insulation <1% Chrysotile - Thermal Insulation None Detected - Cotton Wrap 026 Hard Pack Fittings, Drill Hall None Detected - Yellow Insulation 2% Amosite - White Insulation <1% Chrysotile - White Insulation None Detected - Cotton Wrap 027 Hard Pack Fittings, Drill Hall 2% Amosite - Thermal Insulation <1% Chrysotile - Thermal Insulation None Detected - Cotton Wrap x 4 Ceiling Tile Tectum, Rifle Range None Detected - Tectum

18 2051 Valley View Lane Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) PLM Summary Report NVLAP Lab Code TDSHS License No Client : Project : Project # : Identification : Test Method : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology RC Site National Guard Armory, 1700 Loy Lake, Denison Freese&Nichols Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) EPA Method 600 / R-93 / 116 Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 07/07/2016 Sample Date : 07/05/2016 Page 3 of 3 On 7/6/2016, thirty eight (38) bulk material samples were submitted by Doug Easley of Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. The PLM Detail Report is attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Sample Number Client Sample Description / Location Asbestos Content x 4 Ceiling Tile Tectum, Locker Room 117 None Detected - Tectum x 4 Ceiling Tile Tectum, Classroom 119 None Detected - Tectum x 4 Ceiling Tile Tectum, Learning Center 124 None Detected - Tectum x 4 Ceiling Tile Tectum, Learning Center 124 None Detected - Tectum x 1 Tile with Mastic on Walls, Rifle Range None Detected - Acoustic Tile None Detected - Brown Mastic x 1 Tile with Mastic on Walls, Rifle Range None Detected - Acoustic Tile None Detected - Brown Mastic x 1 Tile with Mastic on Walls, Rifle Range None Detected - Acoustic Tile None Detected - Brown Mastic Exterior Caulk around Windows, Outside Admin Office 127 Exterior Caulk around Windows, Outside Women's Restroom Exterior Caulk around Windows, Outside Locker Room 117 5% Chrysotile - Old Caulking None Detected - New Caulking 5% Chrysotile - Old Caulking None Detected - New Caulking None Detected - Caulking These samples were analyzed by layers. Quantification, unless otherwise noted, is performed by calibrated visual estimate. The test report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The results relate only to the items tested. These test results do not imply endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program for Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis under Lab Code Analyst(s): Kirsten Tye Lab Manager : Heather Lopez Approved Signatory : Lab Director : Bruce Crabb Approved Signatory : Thank you for choosing Moody Labs

19 This Page Left Intentionally Blank

20 Client : Project : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology Project # : Freese&Nichols PLM Detail Report Moody Labs NVLAP Lab Code Valley View Lane Supplement to PLM Summary Report TDSHS License No Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) RC Site National Guard Armory, 1700 Loy Lake, Denison % Of Sample Number Layer Components Sample Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 07/07/2016 % of Layer Analysis Date Page 1 of CMU (Pink) 98% Aggregate 65% 07/07 KT 001 CMU (Pink) 98% Cement Binders 35% 07/07 KT 001 Paint (Cream/Grey) 2% Pigment / Binders 100% 07/07 KT 002 CMU (Pink) 95% Aggregate 65% 07/07 KT 002 CMU (Pink) 95% Cement Binders 35% 07/07 KT 002 Paint (Cream/Grey) 5% Pigment / Binders 100% 07/07 KT 003 CMU (Pink) 98% Aggregate 65% 07/07 KT 003 CMU (Pink) 98% Cement Binders 35% 07/07 KT 003 Paint (Cream/Grey) 2% Pigment / Binders 100% 07/07 KT 004 CMU (Pink) 95% Aggregate 65% 07/07 KT 004 CMU (Pink) 95% Cement Binders 35% 07/07 KT 004 Paint (Cream/Green) 5% Pigment / Binders 100% 07/07 KT 005 CMU (Pink) 5% Aggregate 65% 07/07 KT 005 CMU (Pink) 5% Cement Binders 35% 07/07 KT 005 Mortar (Grey) 90% Aggregate 65% 07/07 KT 005 Mortar (Grey) 90% Cement Binders 35% 07/07 KT 005 Paint (Cream/Grey) 5% Pigment / Binders 100% 07/07 KT 006 CMU (Pink) 90% Aggregate 65% 07/07 KT 006 CMU (Pink) 90% Cement Binders 35% 07/07 KT 006 Paint (Cream/Grey) 10% Pigment / Binders 100% 07/07 KT 007 CMU (Pink) 95% Aggregate 65% 07/07 KT 007 CMU (Pink) 95% Cement Binders 35% 07/07 KT 007 Mortar (Grey) 5% Aggregate 65% 07/07 KT 007 Mortar (Grey) 5% Cement Binders 35% 07/07 KT 007 Texture (Light Beige) <1% Chrysotile 2% 07/07 KT 007 Texture (Light Beige) <1% Calcite / Talc / Binders 98% 07/07 KT 008 Cove Base (Brown) 85% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 07/07 KT 008 Brown Mastic (Brown) 15% Glue Binders 100% 07/07 KT 009 Cove Base (Brown) 85% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 07/07 KT 009 Brown Mastic (Brown) 15% Glue Binders 100% 07/07 KT Analyst

21 Client : Project : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology Project # : Freese&Nichols PLM Detail Report Moody Labs NVLAP Lab Code Valley View Lane Supplement to PLM Summary Report TDSHS License No Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) RC Site National Guard Armory, 1700 Loy Lake, Denison % Of Sample Number Layer Components Sample Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 07/07/2016 % of Layer Analysis Date Page 2 of Cove Base (Brown) 65% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 07/07 KT 010 Brown Mastic (Brown) 35% Glue Binders 100% 07/07 KT 011 Floor Tile (Light Beige) 93% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 07/07 KT 011 Black Mastic (Black) 7% Chrysotile 5% 07/07 KT 011 Black Mastic (Black) 7% Tar Binders 95% 07/07 KT 012 Floor Tile (Light Beige) 99% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 07/07 KT 012 Black Mastic (Black) 1% Chrysotile 5% 07/07 KT 012 Black Mastic (Black) 1% Tar Binders 95% 07/07 KT 013 Floor Tile (Light Beige) 95% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 07/07 KT 013 Black Mastic (Black) 5% Chrysotile 5% 07/07 KT 013 Black Mastic (Black) 5% Tar Binders 95% 07/07 KT 014 Acoustic Tile (Light Beige) 100% Cellulose Fibers 50% 07/07 KT 014 Acoustic Tile (Light Beige) 100% Mineral Wool Fibers 30% 07/07 KT 014 Acoustic Tile (Light Beige) 100% Perlite 20% 07/07 KT 015 Acoustic Tile (Light Beige) 100% Cellulose Fibers 50% 07/07 KT 015 Acoustic Tile (Light Beige) 100% Mineral Wool Fibers 30% 07/07 KT 015 Acoustic Tile (Light Beige) 100% Perlite 20% 07/07 KT 016 Acoustic Tile (Light Beige) 100% Cellulose Fibers 50% 07/07 KT 016 Acoustic Tile (Light Beige) 100% Mineral Wool Fibers 30% 07/07 KT 016 Acoustic Tile (Light Beige) 100% Perlite 20% 07/07 KT 017 Window Glazing (Grey) 100% Calcite 60% 07/07 KT 017 Window Glazing (Grey) 100% Binders / Fillers 40% 07/07 KT 018 Window Glazing (Off-White) 100% Calcite 60% 07/07 KT 018 Window Glazing (Off-White) 100% Binders / Fillers 40% 07/07 KT 019 Window Glazing (Off-White) 100% Calcite 60% 07/07 KT 019 Window Glazing (Off-White) 100% Binders / Fillers 40% 07/07 KT Analyst

22 Client : Project : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology Project # : Freese&Nichols PLM Detail Report Moody Labs NVLAP Lab Code Valley View Lane Supplement to PLM Summary Report TDSHS License No Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) RC Site National Guard Armory, 1700 Loy Lake, Denison % Of Sample Number Layer Components Sample Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 07/07/2016 % of Layer Analysis Date Page 3 of Drywall Material (Off-White) 73% Glass Wool Fibers 2% 07/07 KT 020 Drywall Material (Off-White) 73% Cellulose Fibers 1% 07/07 KT 020 Drywall Material (Off-White) 73% Gypsum / Binders 97% 07/07 KT 020 DW Paper Facing (Tan) 7% Cellulose Fibers 100% 07/07 KT 020 Joint Compound (White) 20% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 07/07 KT 021 Drywall Material (Off-White) 75% Glass Wool Fibers 2% 07/07 KT 021 Drywall Material (Off-White) 75% Cellulose Fibers 1% 07/07 KT 021 Drywall Material (Off-White) 75% Gypsum / Binders 97% 07/07 KT 021 DW Paper Facing (Tan) 5% Cellulose Fibers 100% 07/07 KT 021 Joint Compound (White) 20% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 07/07 KT 022 Drywall Material (Off-White) 75% Glass Wool Fibers 2% 07/07 KT 022 Drywall Material (Off-White) 75% Cellulose Fibers 1% 07/07 KT 022 Drywall Material (Off-White) 75% Gypsum / Binders 97% 07/07 KT 022 DW Paper Facing (Tan) 3% Cellulose Fibers 100% 07/07 KT 022 Joint Compound (White) 22% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 07/07 KT 023 Drywall Material (Off-White) 75% Glass Wool Fibers 2% 07/07 KT 023 Drywall Material (Off-White) 75% Cellulose Fibers 1% 07/07 KT 023 Drywall Material (Off-White) 75% Gypsum / Binders 97% 07/07 KT 023 DW Paper Facing (Tan) 10% Cellulose Fibers 100% 07/07 KT 023 Joint Compound (White) 10% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 07/07 KT 023 Texture (White) 5% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 07/07 KT 024 Drywall Material (Off-White) 62% Glass Wool Fibers 2% 07/07 KT 024 Drywall Material (Off-White) 62% Cellulose Fibers 1% 07/07 KT 024 Drywall Material (Off-White) 62% Gypsum / Binders 97% 07/07 KT 024 DW Paper Facing (Tan) 5% Cellulose Fibers 100% 07/07 KT 024 Joint Compound (White) 30% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 07/07 KT 024 Texture (White) 3% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 07/07 KT Analyst

23 Client : Project : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology Project # : Freese&Nichols PLM Detail Report Moody Labs NVLAP Lab Code Valley View Lane Supplement to PLM Summary Report TDSHS License No Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) RC Site National Guard Armory, 1700 Loy Lake, Denison % Of Sample Number Layer Components Sample Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 07/07/2016 % of Layer Analysis Date Page 4 of Thermal Insulation (Off-White) 80% Amosite 2% 07/07 KT 025 Thermal Insulation (Off-White) 80% Chrysotile <1% 07/07 KT 025 Thermal Insulation (Off-White) 80% Mineral Wool Fibers 25% 07/07 KT 025 Thermal Insulation (Off-White) 80% Binders / Fillers 73% 07/07 KT 025 Cotton Wrap (Off-White) 20% Cotton Fibers 100% 07/07 KT 026 Yellow Insulation (Yellow) 90% Mineral Wool Fibers 95% 07/07 KT 026 Yellow Insulation (Yellow) 90% Resin Binders 5% 07/07 KT 026 White Insulation (Off-White) 3% Amosite 2% 07/07 KT 026 White Insulation (Off-White) 3% Chrysotile <1% 07/07 KT 026 White Insulation (Off-White) 3% Mineral Wool Fibers 25% 07/07 KT 026 White Insulation (Off-White) 3% Binders / Fillers 73% 07/07 KT 026 Cotton Wrap (Off-White) 7% Cotton Fibers 100% 07/07 KT 027 Thermal Insulation (Off-White) 95% Amosite 2% 07/07 KT 027 Thermal Insulation (Off-White) 95% Chrysotile <1% 07/07 KT 027 Thermal Insulation (Off-White) 95% Mineral Wool Fibers 25% 07/07 KT 027 Thermal Insulation (Off-White) 95% Binders / Fillers 73% 07/07 KT 027 Cotton Wrap (Off-White) 5% Cotton Fibers 100% 07/07 KT 028 Tectum (Beige/Cream) 100% Wood Fibers 85% 07/07 KT 028 Tectum (Beige/Cream) 100% Binders / Fillers 15% 07/07 KT 029 Tectum (Beige/Cream) 100% Wood Fibers 85% 07/07 KT 029 Tectum (Beige/Cream) 100% Binders / Fillers 15% 07/07 KT 030 Tectum (Beige/Cream) 100% Wood Fibers 85% 07/07 KT 030 Tectum (Beige/Cream) 100% Binders / Fillers 15% 07/07 KT 031 Tectum (Beige/Cream) 100% Wood Fibers 85% 07/07 KT 031 Tectum (Beige/Cream) 100% Binders / Fillers 15% 07/07 KT 032 Tectum (Beige/Cream) 100% Wood Fibers 85% 07/07 KT 032 Tectum (Beige/Cream) 100% Binders / Fillers 15% 07/07 KT Analyst

24 Client : Project : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology Project # : Freese&Nichols PLM Detail Report Moody Labs NVLAP Lab Code Valley View Lane Supplement to PLM Summary Report TDSHS License No Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) RC Site National Guard Armory, 1700 Loy Lake, Denison % Of Sample Number Layer Components Sample Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 07/07/2016 % of Layer Analysis Date Page 5 of Acoustic Tile (Tan) 95% Cellulose Fibers 50% 07/07 KT 033 Acoustic Tile (Tan) 95% Wood Fibers 30% 07/07 KT 033 Acoustic Tile (Tan) 95% Perlite 20% 07/07 KT 033 Brown Mastic (Brown) 5% Glue Binders 100% 07/07 KT 034 Acoustic Tile (Tan) 90% Cellulose Fibers 50% 07/07 KT 034 Acoustic Tile (Tan) 90% Wood Fibers 30% 07/07 KT 034 Acoustic Tile (Tan) 90% Perlite 20% 07/07 KT 034 Brown Mastic (Brown) 10% Glue Binders 100% 07/07 KT 035 Acoustic Tile (Tan) 90% Cellulose Fibers 50% 07/07 KT 035 Acoustic Tile (Tan) 90% Wood Fibers 30% 07/07 KT 035 Acoustic Tile (Tan) 90% Perlite 20% 07/07 KT 035 Brown Mastic (Brown) 10% Glue Binders 100% 07/07 KT 036 Old Caulking (Tan) <1% Chrysotile 5% 07/07 KT 036 Old Caulking (Tan) <1% Binders / Fillers 95% 07/07 KT 036 New Caulking (Grey) 100% Calcite 50% 07/07 KT 036 New Caulking (Grey) 100% Binders / Fillers 50% 07/07 KT 037 Old Caulking (Tan) 5% Chrysotile 5% 07/07 KT 037 Old Caulking (Tan) 5% Binders / Fillers 95% 07/07 KT 037 New Caulking (Grey) 95% Calcite 50% 07/07 KT 037 New Caulking (Grey) 95% Binders / Fillers 50% 07/07 KT 038 Caulking (Grey) 100% Calcite 50% 07/07 KT 038 Caulking (Grey) 100% Binders / Fillers 50% 07/07 KT Analyst

25 2051 Valley View Lane Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) PLM Summary Report NVLAP Lab Code TDSHS License No Client : Project : Project # : Identification : Test Method : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology RC Site National Guard Armory, 1700 Loy Lake, Denison Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) EPA Method 600 / R-93 / 116 Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 08/11/2016 Sample Date : 08/10/2016 Page 1 of 1 On 8/10/2016, four (4) bulk material samples were submitted by Michael Gange of Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. The PLM Detail Report is attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Sample Number Client Sample Description / Location Asbestos Content Texture on CMU Block Wall, North Wall 124 None Detected - Paint None Detected - Yellow Mastic Texture on CMU Block Wall, East Wall 124 None Detected - CMU None Detected - Paint Texture on CMU Block Wall, West Wall outside 124 None Detected - CMU None Detected - Paint Texture on CMU Block Wall, Southwest Corner 125 None Detected - CMU None Detected - Paint These samples were analyzed by layers. Quantification, unless otherwise noted, is performed by calibrated visual estimate. The test report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The results relate only to the items tested. These test results do not imply endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program for Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis under Lab Code Analyst(s): Willie Pruitt Lab Manager : Heather Lopez Approved Signatory : Lab Director : Bruce Crabb Approved Signatory : Thank you for choosing Moody Labs

26 This Page Left Intentionally Blank

27 Client : Project : Project # : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology PLM Detail Report Moody Labs NVLAP Lab Code Valley View Lane Supplement to PLM Summary Report TDSHS License No Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) RC Site National Guard Armory, 1700 Loy Lake, Denison % Of Sample Number Layer Components Sample Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 08/11/2016 % of Layer Analysis Date Page 1 of Paint (Off-White) 50% Pigment / Binders 100% 08/11 WP Yellow Mastic (Yellow) 50% Glue Binders 100% 08/11 WP CMU (Beige) 10% Aggregate 65% 08/11 WP CMU (Beige) 10% Cement Binders 35% 08/11 WP Paint (Off-White) 90% Pigment / Binders 100% 08/11 WP CMU (Grey) 50% Aggregate 65% 08/11 WP CMU (Grey) 50% Cement Binders 35% 08/11 WP Paint (Off-White) 50% Calcite 20% 08/11 WP Paint (Off-White) 50% Pigment / Binders 80% 08/11 WP CMU (Grey) 50% Aggregate 65% 08/11 WP CMU (Grey) 50% Cement Binders 35% 08/11 WP Paint (Off-White) 50% Calcite 20% 08/11 WP Paint (Off-White) 50% Pigment / Binders 80% 08/11 WP Analyst

28

29

30

31

32 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Appendix: Appendix C: Bulk Summary Report Asbestos Survey Appendix Freese and Nichols, Inc. - Readiness Center National Guard Armory

33 Table 1. Summary of Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment Freese and Nichols, Inc. Readiness Center National Guard Armory Survey Date(s): 7/5/2016 through 7/5/2016 Sample ID# Sample Description Material Location Percent & Type of Asbestos Detected (a) Estimated Quantity Type of ACM (b) Friability (c) Physical Condition Potential for Disturbance Response Rating 001 Texture on CMU Block (homogeneous area # 01) Throughout Except Exterior Vault Wall NAD - CMU NAD - Paint s.f. Surfacing NF II Good Low Texture on CMU Block (homogeneous area # 01) Throughout Except Exterior Vault Wall NAD - CMU NAD - Paint see 001 Surfacing NF II Good Low Texture on CMU Block (homogeneous area # 01) Throughout Except Exterior Vault Wall NAD - CMU NAD - Paint 2see 001 Surfacing NF II Good Low Texture on CMU Block (homogeneous area # 01) Throughout Except Exterior Vault Wall NAD - CMU NAD - Paint see 001 Surfacing NF II Good Low Texture on CMU Block (homogeneous area # 01) Throughout Except Exterior Vault Wall NAD - CMU NAD - Mortar NAD - Paint see 001 Surfacing NF II Good Low Texture on CMU Block (homogeneous area # 01) Throughout Except Exterior Vault Wall NAD - CMU NAD - Paint see 001 Surfacing NF II Good Low 0 Asbestos Survey - IHST Freese and Nichols, Inc. - Readiness Center National Guard Armory Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment Summary Page 1 of 6

34 Sample ID# Sample Description Material Location Percent & Type of Asbestos Detected (a) Estimated Quantity Type of ACM (b) Friability (c) Physical Condition Potential for Disturbance Response Rating 007 Texture on CMU Block (homogeneous area # 11) Learning Center NAD - CMU NAD - Mortar 2% CH - Texture 160 s.f. Surfacing NF II Good Low " Cove Base & Mastic (homogeneous area # 02) Classrooms, Administration, Supply Office, Learning Center NAD - Cove Base NAD - Brown Mastic 566 l.f. Misc NF II Good Low " Cove Base & Mastic (homogeneous area # 02) Classrooms, Administration, Supply Office, Learning Center NAD - Cove Base NAD - Brown Mastic see 008 Misc NF II Good Low " Cove Base & Mastic (homogeneous area # 02) Classrooms, Administration, Supply Office, Learning Center NAD - Cove Base NAD - Brown Mastic see 008 Misc NF II Good Low Beige 12 x 12 Floor Tile with Black Mastic (homogeneous area # 03) Classrooms, Administration, Supply Office, Learning Center NAD - Floor Tile 5% CH - Black Mastic 3005 s.f. Misc NF I Good Low Beige 12 x 12 Floor Tile with Black Mastic (homogeneous area # 03) Classrooms, Administration, Supply Office, Learning Center NAD - Floor Tile 5% CH - Black Mastic see 011 Misc NF I Good Low Beige 12 x 12 Floor Tile with Black Mastic (homogeneous area # 03) Classrooms, Administration, Supply Office, Learning Center NAD - Floor Tile 5% CH - Black Mastic see 011 Misc NF I Good Low x 4 Lay In Ceiling Tile (homogeneous area # 04) Classrooms, Administration, Supply Office, Learning Center NAD - Acoustic Tile see 011 Misc F Good Low 0 Asbestos Survey - IHST Freese and Nichols, Inc. - Readiness Center National Guard Armory Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment Summary Page 2 of 6

35 Sample ID# Sample Description Material Location Percent & Type of Asbestos Detected (a) Estimated Quantity Type of ACM (b) Friability (c) Physical Condition Potential for Disturbance Response Rating x 4 Lay In Ceiling Tile (homogeneous area # 04) Classrooms, Administration, Supply Office, Learning Center NAD - Acoustic Tile see 011 Misc F Good Low x 4 Lay In Ceiling Tile (homogeneous area # 04) Classrooms, Administration, Supply Office, Learning Center NAD - Acoustic Tile see 011 Misc F Good Low Window Glazing (homogeneous area # 05) Windows Throughout NAD - Window Glazing 1200 l.f. Misc NF II Good Low Window Glazing (homogeneous area # 05) Windows Throughout NAD - Window Glazing see 017 Misc NF II Good Low Window Glazing (homogeneous area # 05) Windows Throughout NAD - Window Glazing see 017 Misc NF II Good Low Sheetrock & Joint Compound (homogeneous area # 06) See Drawing NAD - Drywall Material NAD - Joint Compound 2001 s.f. Surfacing NF II Good Low Sheetrock & Joint Compound (homogeneous area # 06) See Drawing NAD - Drywall Material NAD - Joint Compound see 020 Surfacing NF II Good Low Sheetrock & Joint Compound (homogeneous area # 06) See Drawing NAD - Drywall Material NAD - Joint Compound see 020 Surfacing NF II Good Low 0 Asbestos Survey - IHST Freese and Nichols, Inc. - Readiness Center National Guard Armory Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment Summary Page 3 of 6

36 Sample ID# Sample Description Material Location Percent & Type of Asbestos Detected (a) Estimated Quantity Type of ACM (b) Friability (c) Physical Condition Potential for Disturbance Response Rating 023 Sheetrock & Joint Compound (homogeneous area # 06) See Drawing NAD - Drywall Material NAD - Joint Compound NAD - Texture see 020 Surfacing NF II Good Low Sheetrock & Joint Compound (homogeneous area # 06) See Drawing NAD - Drywall Material NAD - Joint Compound NAD - Texture see 020 Surfacing NF II Good Low Hard Pack Fittings (homogeneous area # 07) Drill Hall 2% AM - Thermal Insulation <1% CH - Thermal Insulation NAD - Cotton Wrap 6 fittings TSI NF II Good Low Hard Pack Fittings (homogeneous area # 07) Drill Hall NAD - Yellow Insulation 2% AM - White Insulation <1% CH - White Insulation NAD - Cotton Wrap see 025 TSI NF II Good Low Hard Pack Fittings (homogeneous area # 07) Drill Hall 2% AM - Thermal Insulation <1% CH - Thermal Insulation NAD - Cotton Wrap see 025 TSI NF II Good Low x 4 Ceiling Tile - Tectum (homogeneous area # 08) Throughout Except Vault NAD - Tectum s.f. Misc F Good Low x 4 Ceiling Tile - Tectum (homogeneous area # 08) Throughout Except Vault NAD - Tectum see 028 Misc F Good Low x 4 Ceiling Tile - Tectum (homogeneous area # 08) Throughout Except Vault NAD - Tectum see 028 Misc F Good Low 0 Asbestos Survey - IHST Freese and Nichols, Inc. - Readiness Center National Guard Armory Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment Summary Page 4 of 6

37 Sample ID# Sample Description Material Location Percent & Type of Asbestos Detected (a) Estimated Quantity Type of ACM (b) Friability (c) Physical Condition Potential for Disturbance Response Rating x 4 Ceiling Tile - Tectum (homogeneous area # 08) Throughout Except Vault NAD - Tectum see 028. Misc F Good Low x 4 Ceiling Tile - Tectum (homogeneous area # 08) Throughout Except Vault NAD - Tectum see 028 Misc F Good Low x 1 Tile with Mastic (homogeneous area # 09) Rifle Range Walls NAD - Acoustic Tile NAD - Brown Mastic 1250 s.f. Misc F Good Low x 1 Tile with Mastic (homogeneous area # 09) Rifle Range Walls NAD - Acoustic Tile NAD - Brown Mastic see 033 Misc F Good Low x 1 Tile with Mastic (homogeneous area # 09) Rifle Range Walls NAD - Acoustic Tile NAD - Brown Mastic see 033 Misc F Good Low Exterior Caulk Around Windows (homogeneous area # 10) Exterior Windows 5% CH - Old Caulking NAD - New Caulking 688 l.f. Misc NF II Good Low Exterior Caulk Around Windows (homogeneous area # 10) Exterior Windows 5% CH - Old Caulking NAD - New Caulking see 036 Misc NF II Good Low Exterior Caulk Around Windows (homogeneous area # 10) Exterior Windows NAD - Caulking see 036 Misc NF II Good Low 1 Asbestos Survey - IHST Freese and Nichols, Inc. - Readiness Center National Guard Armory Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment Summary Page 5 of 6

38 Sample ID# Sample Description Material Location Percent & Type of Asbestos Detected (a) Estimated Quantity Type of ACM (b) Friability (c) Physical Condition Potential for Disturbance Response Rating Texture on CMU Block (homogeneous area # 01) Throughout Except Exterior Vault Wall None Detected - Paint Non Detected - Yellow Mastic see 001 Surfacing NF II Good Low Texture on CMU Block (homogeneous area # 01) Throughout Except Exterior Vault Wall None Detected - CMU None Detected - Paint see 001 Surfacing NF II Good Low Texture on CMU Block (homogeneous area # 01) Throughout Except Exterior Vault Wall None Detected - CMU None Detected - Paint see 001 Surfacing NF II Good Low Texture on CMU Block (homogeneous area # 01) Throughout Except Exterior Vault Wall None Detected - CMU None Detected - Paint see 001 Surfacing NF II Good Low 0 Table Key: (a) CH = Chrysotile; AM = Amosite; CR = Crocidolite; AN = Anthophyllite; AC = Actinolite; NAD = NAD = No Asbestos Detected (b) Misc = Miscellaneous; TSI = Thermal Systems Insulation (c) F = Friable; NF I = Non-Friable Category I; NF II = Non-Friable Category II Asbestos Survey - IHST Freese and Nichols, Inc. - Readiness Center National Guard Armory Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment Summary Page 6 of 6

39 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Appendix: Appendix D: Cost Estimates for Removal Asbestos Survey Appendix Freese and Nichols, Inc. - Readiness Center National Guard Armory

40 Table 2. Approximate Cost to Remove Asbestos Freese and Nichols, Inc. Readiness Center National Guard Armory Survey Date(s): 7/5/2016 through 7/5/2016 Material Description Location(s) Approx. Quantity Unit Cost # Days to Abate Removal Cost Air Monitoring (per day) Line Item Subtotal Texture on CMU Block Wall Learning Center North and West Wall 160 s.f. $ $1, $ $2, Beige Floor Tile and Mastic See Drawings 3005 s.f. $ $7, $ $9, TSI Pipe Fittings Drill Hall 6 fittings $ $ $ $ Exterior Window Caulk Exterior Windows 688 l.f. $ $3, $ $5, Removal Costs Subtotal: $18, Abatement Specifications: $1, Total Abatement Cost: $19, The price estimates were derived from current estimates from asbestos abatement contractors. 2. Price does not include replacement costs with non-asbestos materials. 3. Air monitoring costs do not include final air clearance by Transmission Electron Microscopy. 4. Price estimates listed above are intended as a guide for budget estimating only. To determine the total abatement costs for the project, asbestos removal specifications should be prepared and the project bid by professional asbestos abatement contractors. 5. Prices could be reduced if all abatement activities are performed at one time. 6. Prices may be slightly higher for small abatement projects due to mobilization costs. 7. Prices do not include the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) fee for asbestos regulated units generated for the removal of ACM quantified in Table Time schedule includes air clearance monitoring and contractor demobilization from site. Time schedule for abatement will also vary depending on the size of the contractor's work force and the specified scope of work. Approximate Cost to Remove Asbestos Freese and Nichols, Inc. - Readiness Center National Guard Armory Page 1 of 1

41 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Appendix: Appendix E: Photographs Asbestos Survey Appendix Freese and Nichols, Inc. - Readiness Center National Guard Armory

42 Denison Readiness Center Denison, Texas Northside Eastside Westside Samples and

43 Denison Readiness Center Denison, Texas Samples Samples Samples Samples

44 Denison Readiness Center Denison, Texas Samples Samples Samples Samples

45 Samples Denison Readiness Center Denison, Texas 75020

46 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Appendix: Appendix F: Lead Base Paint Report Asbestos Survey Appendix Freese and Nichols, Inc. - Readiness Center National Guard Armory

47 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AND SAFETY TECHNOLOGY, INC. August 11, 2016 Mr. Parris Jones Freese and Nichols, Inc International Plaza, Suite 200 Fort Worth, Texas RE: Lead Base Paint Building Materials Survey Location: Denison Readiness Center,, Denison, Texas Sample Date: June 22, 2016 IHST Job #: Dear Mr. Nair, Mr. Doug Easley representing Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. performed a visual inspection and collected bulk samples of suspect lead based paint at address listed above. Four (4) suspect lead based painted materials were identified during the visual inspection of the structure. Table 1 list the materials sampled and the results of the lead based paint analysis. Fiberquant Analytical Services was contracted to perform the laboratory analysis. A copy of the original laboratory report is included as Appendix A to this report. The samples were analyzed utilizing EPA 7420 method for lead analysis. Table 1, Results of Lead Based Paint Testing Sample ID Material Tested Location Results 001L Brown Paint Door and Window Trim, Exterior and 3,800 ppm Interior 002L Beige Paint Interior walls locker room and storage 300 ppm room 003L Off White Paint Interior walls throughout < ppm 004L Green paint CMU block walls ppm In reviewing the results of the lead based paint sampling, all of the samples are less than the HUD guidelines of 5,000 ppm. Lead base paint is not a hazard in the facility Should you or your staff have any questions regarding the content of this report, please do not hesitate to contact our office at your convenience. Cordially, Tracy Bramlett, CIH, CSP President Appendix A Laboratory Report 2235 Keller Way Carrollton, Texas (972) FAX (972)

48 Appendix A Laboratory Report

49 Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (AAS) Analysis of Paint JobNumber: Client: IHST 2235 KELLER WY CARROLLTON, TX Office Phone: (972) FAX: (972) # Samples: 4 AA Client Job: Freese+Nichols Denison Readiness PO Number: Method and Analysis Information: Rec: 7/7/2016 Report Date: 7/12/2016 Date Analyzed: 7/12/2016 Method: Modified SW b/7420 AApw Pb in paint by weight AA Analysis Routing Number: - The received samples were analyzed for Pb (total) using "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste" (SW 846, December 1996 updates). The extraction/digestion method was SW 3050b. The analytical method is "flame atomic absorption, direct aspiration", SW Briefly the procedures are as follows. The incoming paint samples are first homogenized by mixing and crushing. A sub-sample is weighed to gm into a 50ml centrifuge tube. To the run stream are added the quality assurance samples described below. Six mls of concentrated HNO3 and one ml of 30% H2O2 are added to each container. The tubes are caped and heated for 1 hour at 95 deg. C. After cooling, the contents of the centrifuge tube are brought up to exactly 25 mls, completing the digestion/extraction. The sample and quality assurance extractions are then analyzed on a TJA M5 flame atomic absorption spectrometer. The wavelengths and other instrumental settings are set according to the manufacturer's recommendations, or as otherwise specified in the published method. Absorptions are recorded from sample and standard solutions. A calibration curve is fitted to at least three standard solutions, and the concentrations of the sample extracts are calculated from the curve. The ppm (ug/gm) and weight percent for each sample is calculated from the sub-sample weight, extract volume, and extract concentration. The results from this analysis is generally compared to either the HUD guidelines, in which a sample is positive if it contains >0.5% (5000 ppm) Pb, or the Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC) limit, in which a paint or surface coating containing greater than 90 ppm is defined as leadcontaining. The expected coefficient of variation for this method is approximately 20-30%. The results are reported to two significant figures. The Sample Reporting Limit (RL) listed below is twice the Sample Detection Limit, which is calculated for each sample from the experimentally determined Method Detection Limit. The limit of reliable quantitatiion is generally regarded as five to ten times the limit of detection. Therefore, samples smaller than 0.1 gm may give results too near the CPSC standard to be reliable. Problems in analysis or other information is provided in the "Analytical Notes" below. Blanks, if analyzed, are treated the same as samples and are not used for correcting non-blank results. The following on-going quality assurance program was followed to ensure reproducible and dependable results: All analysts are degreed chemists trained extensively in-house for at least six months prior to un-supervised runs. Blank matrix samples are analyzed at a rate of 5% (at least one per run). Reference standards are analyzed at a rate of 5% (at least one per run), and compared to statistical records via control charts. Spiked matrix samples are analyzed at a rate of 5% (at least one per run), and compared to statistical records via control charts. Duplicate samples are analyzed at a rate of 5% (at least one per run), and compared to statistical records via control charts. For each instrumental run, the spectrometer is checked for sensitivity and stability. The calibration standards are made fresh weekly, and checked each run against a calibration verification standard from another source. All calculations are performed twice - once in a calibration spreadsheet, and once during the report generation, and also checked by hand. All quality checks performed for these samples were in control except as detailed in the "Analytical Notes" below. Fiberquant participates in the Environmental Lead Proficiency Analytical Testing (ELPAT) program, is accredited by AIHA-LAP, LLC for environmental lead in paint (Lab # ), and is recognized by the National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP) for the analysis of Pb in paint. Accreditation does not imply endorsement by the EPA, any other United States governmental agency or any private agency or association. Each lab analysis refers only to the sample tested, and may not, due to the sampling process, be representative of the material sampled. This report may not be reproduced except in full, without the approval of Fiberquant Analytical Services. Job Analysis Notes: Fiberquant Internal SOP: Some results may have been calculated using client supplied data, such as volume or area sampled, for which Fiberquant assumes no liability for accuracy. Page 1 of S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona Phone: FAX: Fiberquant, Inc.

50 Calibration Curve: Pb Run # Instrument: M5-2 Standards: /11/2016 ppm avg. mabs ax bx c R ppm AA Calibration Curve abs Analysis Results: Job Number: AApw Lab Number Client Number Date Condition Weight (gm) ug/ml ml Dil Analyte wt % ppm RL(ppm) L 7/5/2016 acceptable Pb L 7/5/2016 acceptable Pb L 7/5/2016 acceptable Pb < < L 7/5/2016 acceptable Pb Analyst: MARTIN A. ESQUER Printed: 12-Jul-16 Original Print Date: 12-Jul-16 Larry S. Pierce, Approved Accreditation Signatory Page 2 of S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona Phone: FAX: Fiberquant, Inc.

51

52 Appendix B Photographs

53 Denison Readiness Center Denison, Texas Sample 001L Sample 002L Sample 003L Sample 004L