ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS SURVEY AND LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY OLD CITY HALL 229 WALNUT STREET GREEN COVE SPRINGS, CLAY COUNTY, FLORIDA

Transcription

1 ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS SURVEY AND LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY OLD CITY HALL 229 WALNUT STREET GREEN COVE SPRINGS, CLAY COUNTY, FLORIDA PREPARED FOR: Mr. Steve Thomas Field Supervisor Public Works 900 Gum Street Green Cove Springs, Florida (904) PREPARED BY: Aerostar SES LLC St. Johns Industrial Parkway North Jacksonville, Florida (904) AES Project # M February 2, 2014

2 SIGNATURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS This is to certify that the Report for the Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM) Survey and Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Survey of the Old City Hall located at 229 Walnut Street, Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida, has been examined by the undersigned. DATE: 2/2/2015 SIGNATURE: Alexandra Jangrell-Brati Asbestos Inspector Certification No. ME8FA95A544A9D4BF DATE: 2/2/2015 SIGNATURE: Tracy Gonzo Asbestos Inspector Certification No. MEC0699E18898A49B Lead-Based Paint Risk Assessor Certification No. FL-R DATE: 2/2/2015 SIGNATURE: Paul Fitch Licensed Asbestos Consultant License No. AX64

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS SIGNATURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Site Name Name and Certificate of Inspector(s) Site Description and Activities Findings and Results Asbestos Survey Lead-Based Paint Survey INTRODUCTION REGULATORY SUMMARY Asbestos Environmental Protection Agency Occupational Safety and Health Administration State of Florida Lead Occupational Safety and Health Administration Department of Housing and Urban Development METHODS OF INVESTIGATION Asbestos Survey Lead-Based Paint Survey RESULTS Asbestos Survey Results Lead-Based Paint Survey Results LIMITATIONS CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Asbestos-Containing Materials Lead-Based Paint TABLE 1 TABLE 2 TABLE 3 FIGURE 1 FIGURE 2 FIGURE 3 FIGURE 4 TABLES Summary of Asbestos Survey Summary of XRF Survey Summary of Paint Chip Sample Results FIGURES Area Sample Locations Upper Level Area Sample Locations Lower Level XRF and Paint Chip Sample Locations Upper Level XRF and Paint Chip Sample Locations Lower Level Old City Hall, 229 Walnut Street, Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida February 2, 2015 ACM and LBP Surveys, Aerostar Project Number M Page i

4 APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDICES Certifications Laboratory Analytical Results Photographic Documentation Old City Hall, 229 Walnut Street, Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida February 2, 2015 ACM and LBP Surveys, Aerostar Project Number M Page ii

5 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Site Name Old City Hall 229 Walnut Street Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida 1.2 Name and Certificate of Inspector(s) Alexandra Jangrell-Bratli Asbestos Building Inspector Certification Number ME8FA95A544A9D4BF Tracy Gonzo Lead-Based Paint Risk Assessor Certification Number FL-R Site Description and Activities On January 26, 2015, Aerostar SES LLC (Aerostar) conducted an Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) Survey and Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Survey of the Old City Hall located at 229 Walnut Street, Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida as directed by the client for materials that would be disturbed by scheduled demolition activities. The area of the surveys included all accessible areas throughout the building s interior and exterior. The building is scheduled for demolition. 1.4 Findings and Results The following table summarizes the findings within the building and identifies material requiring special handling: Friable ACM Identified Material Requiring Special Handling Non-friable Category I ACM Non-friable Category II ACM Material Containing <1% Asbestos* LBP 1.0 mg/cm 2 or 0.5% wt. Yes* Yes* Yes* Yes* Yes * Materials must be handled in accordance with 40 CFR 61 Subpart M and 29 CFR Lead concentrations were also detected Asbestos Survey A visual reconnaissance of suspect ACMs was performed in all accessible areas throughout the building s interior and exterior. A total of 39 homogeneous areas were identified. Four homogeneous areas were found to contain greater than 1% asbestos by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis. One homogeneous area was found to contain less than 1% asbestos by PLM analysis. Three homogeneous areas were not sampled and are assumed to contain asbestos for demolition purposes until sampled. A summary of materials found or assumed to contain asbestos is as follows: Old City Hall, 229 Walnut Street, Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida February 2, 2015 ACM and LBP Surveys, Aerostar Project Number M Page 1

6 Material Description Mastic associated with Purple Carpet Green Vinyl Floor Tile (VFT) Materials Found or Assumed to Contain Asbestos Area ID 229-2A Ceiling Texture Old Wire Location Hall 1, Rooms 2, 3, 5, and 6 on the Upper Level Beneath Carpet in Room 10 on the Upper Level Rooms 11, 12, 18, and 18A on the Upper Level Throughout (T/O) building except Rooms 2-6, Hall 1, Bathroom 1, and Electric Room on the Upper Level Around the Chimney and between Asphalt and Cementitious Shingles Approximate Amount 600 SF 500 SF 340 SF Asbestos Type % <1% Chrysotile 7% Chrysotile 2% Chrysotile 400 LF Assumed Mastic SF 8% Chrysotile Cementitious Shingle T/O Roof 4,000 SF 20% Chrysotile Gaskets - Black Pump in Lower Level Room 12 5 Fittings Assumed Gaskets - Red Pump in Lower Level Room 12 1 Fitting Assumed Materials containing greater than 1% asbestos must be handled in accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency s (EPA) Standard 40 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 61, Subpart M and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Asbestos Standard for Construction 29 CFR Materials with asbestos fiber contents less than 1% are not categorized by the NESHAP regulation; however, precautions must be taken when handling the material to prevent worker exposure to asbestos in accordance with OSHA standards Lead-Based Paint Survey A LBP survey was performed throughout the building using a Niton XLp 302A series X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) portable spectrum analyzer, serial number Lead concentrations equal to or greater than 1.0 milligram per square centimeter (mg/cm 2 ) were found in 22 XRF sample locations. Wood walls, wood ceilings, wood door frames, wood window sills, wood window frames, concrete floors and metal window sills, exhibited lead concentrations greater than 1.0 mg/cm 2. Detectable concentrations of lead below 1.0 mg/cm 2 were found in 81 XRF sample locations. Wood baseboards, wood window sills and frames, wood door frames, wood ceilings, drywall walls, plaster walls and ceilings, metal rails, concrete floors, concrete walls, and concrete window sills exhibited detectable lead concentrations less than 1.0 mg/cm 2. A total of three paint chip samples were collected from paints or coatings for laboratory analysis by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (Flame AAS). Paint chip samples were collected from a wood column, a plaster wall, and a metal rail. One of the paint chip samples collected was found to contain lead concentrations above 0.5 percent by weight (% wt.) by Flame AAS. Detectable concentrations less than 0.5% wt. were found in two paint chip samples. Old City Hall, 229 Walnut Street, Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida February 2, 2015 ACM and LBP Surveys, Aerostar Project Number M Page 2

7 Paints and coatings with any detectable lead concentration should be handled in accordance with OSHA Standard 29 CFR The use of engineering controls, work practices, and personal protective equipment should be implemented to reduce or eliminate employee exposure to lead. Old City Hall, 229 Walnut Street, Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida February 2, 2015 ACM and LBP Surveys, Aerostar Project Number M Page 3

8 2.0 INTRODUCTION On January 26, 2015, Aerostar conducted an ACM Survey and LBP Survey for the Old City Hall, located at 229 Walnut Street, Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida. The area of the surveys included all accessible areas throughout the building s interior and exterior. The building is scheduled for demolition. Aerostar is a Licensed Asbestos Business Organization, recognized by the State of Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR), Asbestos Licensing Unit, License Number ZA455. The ACM survey was conducted by an Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA)-Certified Building Inspector under the direction of a DBPR-Licensed Asbestos Consultant (LAC). Aerostar is certified by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Pesticides and Toxic Substances Branch, to conduct lead-based paint activities in the State of Florida, Certification Number FL The LBP inspection was performed by an EPA-certified Lead-Based Paint Risk Assessor. Copies of our certifications are included in Appendix A. 3.1 Asbestos Environmental Protection Agency 3.0 REGULATORY SUMMARY The EPA has published a list of hazardous air pollutants and promulgated the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations. Since asbestos presents a significant risk to human health as a result of air emissions from one or more source categories, it is therefore considered a hazardous air pollutant. The Asbestos NESHAP Regulation (40 CFR 61, Subpart M) addresses milling, manufacturing and fabricating operations, demolition and renovation activities, waste disposal issues, active and inactive waste disposal sites and asbestos conversion processes. Friable ACM is defined by asbestos NESHAP regulations, as any material containing greater than 1% asbestos as determined using the method specified in Appendix E, Subpart E, 40 CFR Part 763, Section 1, PLM, that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure (Sec ). In accordance with NESHAP regulations, if friable material is found to contain <10% asbestos, the material can be a) re-analyzed using the Point Count Method to confirm asbestos content or b) assumed to contain >1% asbestos and handled as ACM. Non-friable ACM is any material containing greater than 1% asbestos as determined using the method specified in Appendix E, Subpart E, 40 CFR Part 763, Section 1, PLM, that, when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure (Sec ). EPA also defines two categories of non-friable ACM: Category I and Category II non-friable ACM. Category I non-friable ACM is any asbestos-containing packing, gasket, mastic, resilient floor covering or asphalt roofing product which contains greater than 1% asbestos as Old City Hall, 229 Walnut Street, Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida February 2, 2015 ACM and LBP Surveys, Aerostar Project Number M Page 4

9 determined using PLM according to the method specified in Appendix E, Subpart E, 40 CFR Part 763 (Sec ). Category II non-friable ACM is any material, excluding Category I non-friable ACM, containing greater than 1% asbestos as determined using PLM according to the methods specified in Appendix E, Subpart E, 40 CFR Part 763 (Sec ), that, when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Regulated Asbestos-Containing Material (RACM) is: (a) friable ACM, (b) Category I non-friable ACM that has become friable, (c) Category I non-friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading, or (d) Category II non-friable ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations. Category I non-friable ACM must be inspected and tested for friability if it is in poor condition prior to demolition to determine whether or not it is subject to NESHAP. If the ACM is friable, it must be handled in accordance with NESHAP. Asbestos-containing packings, gaskets, resilient floor coverings and asphalt roofing materials must be removed prior to demolition only if they are in poor condition and are friable. NESHAP further requires that if a facility is demolished by intentional burning, all of the facility's ACM, including Category I and II non-friable ACM, must be removed prior to burning (Sec (c)(10)). If Category I or Category II non-friable ACM is to be sanded, ground, cut, or abraded, the material is considered RACM and the owner or operator must abide by the following (Sec (c)(1)): (i) Adequately wet the material during the sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading operations; (ii) Comply with the requirements of (c)(3)(i) if wetting would unavoidably damage equipment or present a safety hazard; and (iii) Handle asbestos material produced by the sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading, as asbestos-containing waste material subject to the waste handling and collection provisions of Section Except for the following, Section (c) of the NESHAP regulations requires that each owner or operator of a demolition or renovation activity involving RACM remove all such material from a facility being demolished or renovated before any activity begins that would break up, dislodge, or similarly disturb the material or preclude access to the material for subsequent removal. ACM need not be removed before demolition or renovation if it: (i) Is a Category I non-friable ACM that has not become friable; (ii) Is on a facility component that is encased in concrete or other similarly hard material and is adequately wet whenever exposed during demolition or renovation; (iii) Was not accessible for testing and therefore was not discovered until after demolition or renovation began and, as a result of the demolition or renovation, cannot be safely Old City Hall, 229 Walnut Street, Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida February 2, 2015 ACM and LBP Surveys, Aerostar Project Number M Page 5

10 removed. If not removed for safety reasons, the exposed RACM and any asbestoscontaminated debris must be treated as asbestos-containing waste material and kept adequately wet at all times until disposed of; or (iv) Is a Category II non-friable ACM and the probability is low that the material will become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder during demolition or renovation Occupational Safety and Health Administration OSHA regulates asbestos exposure during all construction work including, but not limited to, the following: Demolition or salvage of structures where asbestos is present; Removal or encapsulation of materials containing asbestos; Construction, alteration, repair, maintenance, or renovation of structures, substrates, or portions thereof, that contain asbestos; Installation of products containing asbestos; Asbestos spill/emergency cleanup; and Transportation, disposal, storage, containment of and housekeeping activities involving asbestos or products containing asbestos, on the site or location at which construction activities are performed. OSHA Standard 29 CFR requires the use of engineering controls, work practices, and personal protective equipment to reduce or eliminate employee exposure to asbestos. The OSHA standard does not apply to asbestos-containing asphalt roof coatings, cements and mastics State of Florida Florida Statutes and require licensure of asbestos consultants and contractors by the DBPR. Florida Statute requires that the Department of Environmental Protection be notified in writing before a local building permit is granted for any building demolition or renovation which would disturb asbestos-containing materials. 3.2 Lead Occupational Safety and Health Administration OSHA regulates lead exposure during all construction work including, but not limited to, the following: Demolition or salvage of structures where lead is present; Removal or encapsulation of materials containing lead; Construction, alteration, repair, maintenance, or renovation of structures, substrates, or portions thereof, that contain lead; Installation of products containing lead; Old City Hall, 229 Walnut Street, Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida February 2, 2015 ACM and LBP Surveys, Aerostar Project Number M Page 6

11 Lead spill/emergency cleanup; and Transportation, disposal, storage, containment of and housekeeping activities involving products containing lead, on the site or location at which construction activities are performed. OSHA Standard 29 CFR requires the use of engineering controls, work practices, and personal protective equipment to reduce or eliminate employee exposure to lead Department of Housing and Urban Development According to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) guidelines 20 CFR Part 35, lead-based paint is defined as paint containing a lead concentration greater than or equal to 0.5 % wt by laboratory analysis or 1.0 mg/cm 2 of lead by XRF. HUD s definition of LBP cannot be used to determine safe working conditions under OSHA. OSHA s Lead in Construction Standard, 29 CFR , was intended to apply to any detectable concentration of lead in paint by laboratory analysis. OSHA s only accepted methodology for determining an employee s exposure to airborne lead contaminants is through personal air monitoring. Any paint with detectable concentrations of lead, by XRF or laboratory analysis that is subjected to cutting, abrading, welding, scraping, and/or sanding, must be handled in accordance with 29 CFR , to prevent employee exposure. 4.1 Asbestos Survey 4.0 METHODS OF INVESTIGATION Sampling protocols set forth by the EPA under 40 CFR were followed during the inspection. The asbestos survey was performed by observing, touching, and sampling accessible building materials that would be disturbed by demolition activities on the building. The purpose of this survey was to locate and identify suspect ACMs, to quantify the material, and to separate it into unique areas for further assessment. The condition and location of representative suspect materials were defined for the building. Bulk asbestos sampling procedures utilized for the collection of suspect ACMs first required the establishment of a homogeneous sampling area. A homogeneous sampling area is defined as an area of material of the same type (texture and color) which was applied during the same general time period. Each individual sampling area was then examined and representative samples of suspect materials were collected. The U.S. EPA has published guidelines and recommendations pertaining to surveying and sampling for friable ACMs. The guidelines were followed during the survey where appropriate. U.S. EPA publications and current regulations mainly address friable materials, such as surface finishes and structural fireproofing. The samples were analyzed by PLM with dispersion staining according to EPA Method 600/R-93/116. The PLM test is an EPA-approved analytical method for asbestos identification. Bulk samples were collected by an AHERA-certified Asbestos Inspector, and analyzed by a laboratory that maintains accreditation through the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for the analysis of bulk samples by PLM. The test uses the unique optical properties of mineral forms in the samples to specifically identify the various asbestos types. Old City Hall, 229 Walnut Street, Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida February 2, 2015 ACM and LBP Surveys, Aerostar Project Number M Page 7

12 Where distinct layers were present, bulk samples were collected to represent each individual layer of the suspect material. Mastic and/or other adhesive substances were included when possible. At the time of sample collection, the inspector noted material type, approximate amount, sampling locations, and condition of the materials. Samples were labeled with a unique alphanumeric identification system (xxx-yy-zz). The first set of numbers (xxx) indicates the building number assigned by the facility. The second set of numbers (yy) indicates the homogeneous area designation assigned by the asbestos inspector. The third set of numbers (zz) is the individual sample identification number. Where distinct layers were separated, a letter (A, B, C) was assigned for each additional layer analyzed by the laboratory. The surface area of the samples was adequately wetted prior to sample collection. All necessary precautions were taken to prevent visible emissions, air-borne fiber release, and debris, and to protect the facility occupants from exposure. Samples were submitted in independent sealed containers to EMSL Analytical, Inc. (EMSL), 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, New Jersey, for laboratory analysis according to EPA Method 600/R-93/ Lead-Based Paint Survey The LBP inspection was performed using Niton XLp 302A series XRF portable spectrum analyzer, serial number The Niton XLp 302A series XRF uses a Cadmium-109 radioactive source. The source undergoes a radioactive decay, in a two-step process, that releases x-rays and gamma rays with enough energy to cause both K-shell and L-shell fluorescence. During this process, if the primary x-ray emitted by the XRF has sufficient energy, electrons are ejected from the inner shells of the lead atoms, creating vacancies that cause an unstable condition for the atoms. As the atoms return to their stable condition, electrons from the outer shells are transferred to the inner shells releasing energy. The Niton XLp 302A series XRF uses dual detectors to read the K-shell and L-shell energy spectrums that are produced. XRF sampling results were obtained from each sampling area within the building. The sampling locations were determined by the color of paint, substrate, and location within the building. The sampling locations are identified by room number or description, source, substrate, feature, condition of paint, and color. The site was arbitrarily designated as follows: A north; and B, C, and D proceeding clockwise in relation to side A. The XRF sample results are reported in mg/cm 2. Calibration checks were performed immediately before, after, and every four hours during the LBP survey to ensure the sample results were within the tolerance limits of the instrument s Performance Characteristic Sheet. Paint chip samples were collected from select paints and coatings to further characterize the lead content. Paint chip samples included all layers of paint to the substrate material. Samples were submitted to an AIHA Environmental Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELLAP)- accredited laboratory for analysis by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS). Old City Hall, 229 Walnut Street, Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida February 2, 2015 ACM and LBP Surveys, Aerostar Project Number M Page 8

13 5.0 RESULTS 5.1 Asbestos Survey Results Ms. Alexandra Jangrell-Bratli, an AHERA-certified Asbestos Inspector, conducted an asbestos survey of the Old City Hall to identify the locations, quantities, and conditions of accessible ACMs that would be disturbed by demolition activities. A total of 39 homogeneous areas were identified. The homogeneous areas identified included: Carpet (2 types) Mastic associated with Carpet (2 types) Drywall Joint Compound Vinyl Sheet Flooring (VSF) (3 types) Mastic associated with VSF (3 types) Leveler beneath VSF 1 x1 Acoustical Ceiling Tiles (ACT) (2 types) Mastic associated with 1 x1 ACT Fiberboard Ceiling Tile 4 Cove Base Mastic associated with 4 Cove Base Paper Backing beneath 4 Cove Base Plaster Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Duct Mastic Vinyl Floor Tile (VFT) Mastic associated with VFT Ceiling Texture Old Wire 2 x4 ACT Fiberboard Design Mastic associated with Fiberboard Design Asphalt Shingle (2 types) Tar Paper associated with Asphalt Shingle Mastic Cementitious Shingle Vapor Barrier associated with Cementitious Shingle Window Caulk Rolled Roofing Gaskets (2 types) A total of 112 samples were collected from the 39 homogeneous areas identified and submitted to EMSL for analysis by PLM. Three homogeneous area were not sampled ( Old Wire, Black Gaskets, and Red Gaskets) and are assumed to contain asbestos for demolition purposes until sampled. Analytical results of the samples revealed that four homogeneous areas sampled were found to contain greater than 1% asbestos by PLM, and one Old City Hall, 229 Walnut Street, Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida February 2, 2015 ACM and LBP Surveys, Aerostar Project Number M Page 9

14 homogeneous area sampled was found to contain less than 1% asbestos by PLM. A summary of material identified and assumed to contain asbestos is outlined in the following table. Material Description Mastic associated with Purple Carpet List of Identified and Assumed Material with Asbestos Area ID 229-2A Green VFT Ceiling Texture Old Wire Location Hall 1, Rooms 2, 3, 5, and 6 on the Upper Level Beneath Carpet in Room 10 on the Upper Level Rooms 11, 12, 18, and 18A on the Upper Level T/O building except Rooms 2-6, Hall 1, Bathroom 1, and Electric Room on the Upper Level Around the Chimney and between Asphalt and Cementitious Shingles Approximate Amount 600 SF 500 SF 340 SF Asbestos Type % <1% Chrysotile 7% Chrysotile 2% Chrysotile 400 LF Assumed Mastic SF 8% Chrysotile Cementitious Shingle T/O Roof 4,000 SF 20% Chrysotile Gaskets - Black Pump in Lower Level Room 12 5 Fittings Assumed Gaskets - Red Pump in Lower Level Room 12 1 Fitting Assumed The results of the asbestos survey are detailed in Table 1. Area Sample locations are shown on Figures 1 and 2. Consultant, inspector, and laboratory credentials are provided in Appendix A. Copies of the laboratory analytical results and appropriate Chain of Custody Records are included in Appendix B. Photographic Documentation is included as Appendix C. 5.2 Lead-Based Paint Survey Results Based on the HUD guidelines, an XRF sample equal to or greater than 1.0 mg/cm 2 or 0.5% wt. by laboratory analysis is the action level at which the paint is considered to be LBP. XRF sample readings (Pbc ± Pbc Error) are reported as lead concentration (Pbc) in mg/cm 2 plus or minus the statistical deviation (Pbc Error) that allows for 95% confidence. To determine the XRF sample result to be positive or negative, the XRF sample readings (Pbc ± Pbc Error) were reported as a 95% confidence interval compared to the HUD action-level (1.0 mg/cm 2 ). A total of 22 XRF results were greater than 1.0 mg/cm 2. The building components that exhibited lead concentrations greater than 1.0 mg/cm 2 were recorded in the following: Green wood ceilings in Room 11 on the upper level and on the upper level covered porch Green concrete floor on the exterior upper level walkway Yellow concrete floors on the exterior upper level walkway White wood wall on the upper level exterior White metal window sill on the upper level exterior White wood wall on the upper and lower levels exterior White wood door frames on the upper level exterior, and Bathroom 1 and Room 11 on the lower level Green wood window frame on the lower level exterior Old City Hall, 229 Walnut Street, Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida February 2, 2015 ACM and LBP Surveys, Aerostar Project Number M Page 10

15 Beige metal window sill on the lower level exterior White wood ceilings in Rooms 1, 2, and 7, and Bathroom 2 on the lower level White wood window sill in Room 3 on the lower level White wood window frame in Room 3 on the lower level Green wood doors in Room 11 on the lower level Additionally, detectable concentrations of lead below the level which HUD defines as LBP (1.0 mg/cm 2 ) were recorded in 81 XRF results collected from the following building components: White wood baseboards in Rooms 9 and 10, and Hall 1 on the upper level, and Room 4 lower level White wood doors in Room 8 and Bathroom 2 on the upper level, and the lower level exterior Beige wood door frame in Room 8 on the upper level Wallpaper covered drywall wall in Room 8 on the upper level White wood window sills in Room 9, 11, and 15 on the upper level, and on the lower level exterior Green plaster wall in Room 9 on the upper level White plaster ceilings in Room 10 on the upper level, and Rooms 3, 12, and 14 on the lower level White wood door frames in Rooms 9 and 10 on the upper level Wallpaper covered wood walls in Bathroom 3 and the Break Room on the upper level Rust wood floor on the upper level covered porch White wood ceiling on the upper level covered porch, and Rooms 8, 9, and 16 and Bathroom 1 on the lower level Green metal rails on the upper level covered porch and exterior White concrete floors on the upper level exterior Green concrete floors on the upper exterior and Room 11 on the lower level White metal window sill on the upper level exterior White concrete window sill on the lower level exterior White concrete walls on the exterior, Rooms 1 through 3, 7, 9, and 16, and Bathrooms 1 through 3 on the lower level Green concrete walls on the exterior and in Room 11 on the lower level Green wood door on the lower level exterior Green concrete column on the lower level exterior Green wood beam on the lower level exterior White wood walls in Rooms 2, 3, and 5, and Bathrooms 1 and 2 on the lower level Beige concrete floor in Room 1 on the lower level Gray concrete floors in Rooms 4 and 5 on the lower level Beige concrete floor in Room 3 on the lower level Brown wood door frame in Room 5 on the lower level Gray wood ceiling in Room 5 on the lower level Black concrete wall in Room 7 on the lower level White concrete ceiling in Room 8 on the lower level Red concrete floor in Room 8 on the lower level Old City Hall, 229 Walnut Street, Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida February 2, 2015 ACM and LBP Surveys, Aerostar Project Number M Page 11

16 White cinder block wall in Bathroom 1 on the lower level Peach concrete floor in Bathroom 1 on the lower level White wood window frames in Bathroom 1 on the lower level Pink concrete floor in Bathroom 2 on the lower level White concrete door frame in Bathroom 2 on the lower level Blue wood door in Room 14 on the lower level Blue drywall wall in Room 14 on the lower level Blue concrete walls in Room 15 on the lower level A total of three paint chip samples were collected from select paints and coatings where XRF results showed detectable or no concentrations of lead. Paint chip samples included all layers of paint to the substrate material. Based on HUD guidelines, a laboratory analysis of a paint chip sample equal to or greater than 0.5 % wt. is the action level at which the paint is considered to be LBP. Laboratory analysis by EPA analytical method SW B/7000B for lead has a reporting limit of % wt. based upon a minimum sample weight of 0.2 grams. Laboratory analytical results showed paint chip sample XRF-117 collected from a white wood column on the upper level covered porch was found to contain a lead concentration of 0.72% wt. Laboratory analytical results showed the following paint chip samples contained detectable concentrations of lead <0.50% wt. by Flame AAS: Paint chip sample XRF-61 collected from a green plaster wall in Room 9 was found to contain a lead concentration of 0.15% wt. Paint chip sample XRF-116 collected from a green metal rail on the upper level covered porch was found to contain a lead concentration of 0.22% wt. XRF sample results are provided in Table 2. Paint chip sample results are provided in Table 3. XRF and Paint Chip Sample locations are depicted on Figures 3 and 4. Consultant, inspector, and laboratory credentials are provided in Appendix A. A copy of the laboratory analytical results and appropriate Chain of Custody Records are included in Appendix B. Photographic Documentation is included as Appendix C. 6.0 LIMITATIONS Aerostar has prepared this ACM and LBP Survey Report for Green Cove Springs Public Works Field Supervisor, hereafter referred to as the Client. No ACM or LBP survey can eliminate all uncertainty. Professional judgment and interpretation are inherent in the process and uncertainty is inevitable. Even when sampling is executed with an appropriate site-specific standard of care, certain conditions present especially difficult detection problems. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, physical limitations imposed by the location and accessibility of possible ACMs and LBP and the limitations of assessment technologies. Only reasonably accessible areas were surveyed as part of this investigation. Aerostar is not responsible for possible ACMs and LBP that were inaccessible and/or not located, or any consequential damages as a result thereof. Old City Hall, 229 Walnut Street, Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida February 2, 2015 ACM and LBP Surveys, Aerostar Project Number M Page 12

17 Measurements and sampling data only represent the site conditions at the time of the data collection. Aerostar makes no legal representations whatsoever concerning any matter including, but not limited to, ownership of any property or the interpretation of any law. Aerostar further disclaims any obligations to update the report for events taking place after the time during which the assessment was conducted. This report is not a comprehensive site characterization and should not be construed as such. The opinions presented in this report are based upon the findings derived from the samples collected. The scope of work performed herein was limited to asbestos and lead-based paint sample collection and laboratory analysis of only the samples collected at the time of inspection. Aerostar has endeavored to meet what it believes is the applicable standard of care, and, in doing so, is obliged to advise the Client of the limitations. Aerostar believes that providing information about limitations is essential to help the Client identify and thereby manage its risks. Through additional testing, these risks can be mitigated - but they cannot be eliminated. Aerostar will, upon request, advise the Client of the additional research opportunities available, their impact, and their cost. As noted above, the ACM and LBP survey conducted at the referenced site and this report was prepared for the use solely by the Client. This report shall not be relied upon by or transferred to any other party without the express written authorization of Aerostar; however, this report may be made available to perspective bidders for information purposes. 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Aerostar has completed the ACM Surveys and LBP Surveys of the Old City Hall located at 229 Walnut Street, Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida. The following table summarizes the findings and identifies material requiring special handling. Friable ACM Identified Material Requiring Special Handling Non-friable Category I ACM Non-friable Category II ACM Material Containing <1% Asbestos* LBP 1.0 mg/cm 2 or 0.5% wt. Yes Yes Yes Yes YES *Material must be handled in accordance with OSHA Standard 29 CFR Lead concentrations were also detected <1.0 mg/cm 2 or <0.5% wt. which must be handled in accordance with OSHA Standard 29 CFR Asbestos-Containing Materials A total of 36 homogeneous areas were identified and sampled. Three additional homogeneous areas were not sampled and are assumed to contain asbestos. VFT, mastic, and gaskets are NESHAP Category I non-friable ACMs. NESHAP Category I non-friable ACMs are not required to be removed prior to demolition or renovation of the building, provided that wet-demolition practices are implemented and resulting debris from the Old City Hall, 229 Walnut Street, Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida February 2, 2015 ACM and LBP Surveys, Aerostar Project Number M Page 13

18 building is properly transported to a landfill permitted for disposal of ACM. If NESHAP Category I non-friable ACMs are in poor condition or become friable during demolition, the material must be treated as a RACM and be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor and disposed of at a class one landfill prior to renovation, remodeling, or demolition of the building. Old wire and cementitious shingle are NESHAP Category II non-friable ACMs. NESHAP Category II non-friable ACMs must be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor following OSHA Class II work activities and disposed of at a class one landfill prior to renovation, remodeling, or demolition of the building. Ceiling texture is a RACM. RACMs must be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor following OSHA Class I work activities and disposed of at a Class One landfill prior to renovation, remodeling or demolition of the building. Mastic containing less than 1% asbestos is not categorized by the NESHAP regulation; however, precautions must be taken when handling the material to prevent worker exposure to asbestos in accordance with OSHA standards. The use of engineering controls, work practices, and personal protective equipment to reduce or eliminate employee exposure to asbestos are required during the handling and disposal of the material. Due to the presence of asbestos, OSHA s Asbestos Standard for the Construction Industry (29 CFR ) must be followed. Florida Statute requires that the Department of Environmental Protection be notified in writing before a local building permit is granted for any building demolition or renovation which would disturb asbestos material. Transportation of ACM should be conducted in accordance with the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) regulations outlined in 49 CFR ACM must be disposed at a facility permitted by the EPA to accept asbestos. In accordance with the OSHA Asbestos Standard for the Construction Industry (29 CFR ), demolition of a building with ACM left in place falls under the definition of removal of installed ACM. The removal of installed ACM is either Class I or Class II asbestos work, and all applicable requirements of this standard apply. Whether such demolition is Class I asbestos work or Class II asbestos work is determined by the type of ACM left in place. If any asbestos-containing thermal system insulation or surfacing material is left installed in the building, then the work being performed is Class I asbestos work. If the ACM left installed in the building does not include any thermal system insulation or surfacing material, then the work being performed is Class II asbestos work. In accordance with the OSHA Asbestos Standard for the Construction Industry (29 CFR ), when removing roofing material which contains ACM, the employer shall ensure the following: Only certified asbestos workers will be used; The roofing material is removed in an intact state to the extent feasible; Old City Hall, 229 Walnut Street, Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida February 2, 2015 ACM and LBP Surveys, Aerostar Project Number M Page 14

19 Wet methods should be used to remove roofing materials that are not intact, or that will be rendered not intact during removal, unless such wet methods are not feasible or will create safety hazards; Roof cutting machines shall be continuously misted during use, unless a competent person determines that misting substantially decreases worker safety; All dust resulting from the cutting operation shall be collected by a HEPA dust collector or shall be HEPA vacuumed by vacuuming along the cut line; and Asbestos-containing material that has been removed from a roof shall not be dropped or thrown to the ground. Suspect ACMs encountered during renovation/demolition activities that are not identified in this survey should be assumed to contain asbestos or be sampled by an AHERA-certified inspector and analyzed by an accredited laboratory 7.2 Lead-Based Paint HUD guidelines state that paint containing a lead concentration greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/cm 2 of lead by XRF or 0.5% wt. by laboratory analysis is considered to be LBP. Lead concentrations equal to or greater than 1.0 mg/cm 2 were detected in 22 XRF samples collected. One paint chip sample collected was found to contain lead concentrations greater than 0.5% wt. Detectable concentrations of lead below the level which HUD defines as LBP (1.0 mg/cm 2 ) were recorded in 81 XRF samples collected. Two paint chip samples collected were found to contain detectable lead concentrations. If surfaces of building components coated with LBP or paints and coatings containing detectable concentrations of lead are subjected to cutting, abrading, welding, scraping, and/or sanding, controls should be implemented to prevent worker exposure to airborne lead concentrations. Based on OSHA s Lead in Construction Standard, worker protection controls must be implemented for coatings with any detectable concentrations of lead. HUD s definition of LBP cannot be used to determine safe working conditions under OSHA. OSHA s Lead in Construction Standard, 29 CFR , was intended to apply to any detectable concentration of lead in paint by laboratory analysis. OSHA s only accepted methodology for determining an employee s exposure to airborne lead contaminants is through personal air monitoring. Any paint with detectable concentrations of lead, by XRF or laboratory analysis, that is subjected to cutting, abrading, welding, scraping, and/or sanding, must be handled in accordance with 29 CFR , to prevent employee exposure. Old City Hall, 229 Walnut Street, Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida February 2, 2015 ACM and LBP Surveys, Aerostar Project Number M Page 15

20 TABLES

21 Sample ID Material Description Location , , Carpet - Brown A, A, A Mastic associated with Carpet - Brown , , Carpet - Purple A, A, A , , , , , , , , , , A, A, A Mastic associated with Carpet - Purple Drywall Joint Compound Vinyl Sheet Flooring (VSF) - Beige Mastic associated with VSF - Beige , , VSF - Pink with Squares A, A, A Mastic associated with VSF - Pink with Squares TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF ASBESTOS SURVEY Old City Hall 229 Walnut Street Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida Rooms 1, 7 through 9, 10-13, and on the Upper Level Rooms 1, 7 through 9, 10-13, and on the Upper Level Hall 1, and Rooms 2, 3, 5, and 6 on the Upper Level Hall 1, and Rooms 2, 3, 5, and 6 on the Upper Level Throughout (T/O) Walls on the Upper Level and Room 15 of the Lower Level. Ceilings in the Break Room on the Upper Level and Room 4 on the Lower Level T/O Walls on the Upper Level and Room 15 of the Lower Level. Ceilings in the Break Room on the Upper Level and Room 4 on the Lower Level Approximate Amount Number of Samples Collected Asbestos Type % NESHAP Category Condition 3,000 SF 3 ND - Good 3,000 SF 3 ND - Good 600 SF 3 ND - Good 600 SF 3 <1% Chrysotile - Good 4,400 SF 5 ND - Good 4,400 SF 5 ND - Good Room 4 on the Upper Level 50 SF 3 ND - Good Room 4 on the Upper Level 50 SF 3 ND - Good Bathrooms 1, 2, and 3 on the Upper Level Bathrooms 1, 2, and 3 on the Upper Level 135 SF 3 ND - Good 135 SF 3 ND - Good NF Cat. I - Non-Friable Category I ACM ND - NF Cat. II - Non-Friable Category II ACM SF - Square Feet RACM - Regulated Asbestos Containing Material LF - Linear Feet Page 1 of 4

22 TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF ASBESTOS SURVEY Old City Hall 229 Walnut Street Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida Sample ID Material Description Location , , 'x1' Acoustical Ceiling Tiles (ACT) - Large Holes , , Fiberboard Ceiling Tile Portion of the Wall in Room 5 on the Upper Level Half of the Ceiling above 2'x4' ACT - Fiberglass in Room 5 on the Upper Level Approximate Amount Number of Samples Collected Asbestos Type % NESHAP Category Condition 90 SF 3 ND - Fair 90 SF 3 ND - Fair , " Cove Base - White Around the Counter in Room 1 on the Upper Level 10 SF 2 ND - Good A Mastic associated with 4" Cove Base - White Around the Counter in Room 1 on the Upper Level 10 SF 1 ND - Good B Paper Backing beneath 4" Cove Base - White Around the Counter in Room 1 on the Upper Level 10 SF 1 ND - Good , , , , A, A A, A 1'x1' ACT - Small Holes Mastic associated with 1'x1' ACT - Small Holes Portion of the Walls in Room 1, Bathrooms 2 and 3, and the Ceiling of Rooms 16 and 18 on the Upper Level Portion of the Walls in Room 1, Bathrooms 2 and 3, and the Ceiling of Rooms 16 and 18 on the Upper Level 1,000 SF 5 ND - Good 1,000 SF 4 ND - Good NF Cat. I - Non-Friable Category I ACM ND - NF Cat. II - Non-Friable Category II ACM SF - Square Feet RACM - Regulated Asbestos Containing Material LF - Linear Feet Page 2 of 4

23 Sample ID Material Description Location , , , , , , , , , , A, A, A , , , , A, A, A B, B, B Plaster Old Wire , TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF ASBESTOS SURVEY Old City Hall 229 Walnut Street Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida T/O Ceilings in Rooms 7-10, 13, and 15-17, Bathrooms 2 and 3 on the Upper Level, and the Western Portion of the Lower Level. Walls West of Room 1 on the Upper Level Heating, Ventilation, and HVAC Ducts in the Plenum Air Conditioning of Rooms 7-9 on the Upper (HVAC) Duct Mastic - Level White Vinyl Floor Tile (VFT) - Beneath Carpet in Room 10 Green on the Upper Level Mastic Associated with Beneath Carpet in Room 10 VFT - Green on the Upper Level Ceiling Texture Rooms 11, 12, 18, and 18A on the Upper Level VSF - Tile Pattern Breakroom on the Upper Level Mastic associated with Breakroom on the Upper VSF - Tile Pattern Level Leveler beneath VSF - Breakroom on the Upper Tile Pattern Level T/O building except Rooms 2-6, Hall 1, Bathroom 1, and Electric Room of the upper level 2'x4' ACT - Fissures and Pinholes Approximate Amount Number of Samples Collected Asbestos Type % NESHAP Category Condition 8,050SF 7 ND - Fair 100 SF 3 ND - Good 500 SF 3 7% Chrysotile NF Cat. I Good 500 SF 3 ND - Good 340 SF 3 2% Chrysotile RACM Poor 50 SF 3 ND - Fair 50 SF 3 ND - Fair 50 SF 3 ND - Fair 400 LF 0 Assumed NF Cat. II Good Closet on the Upper Level 25 SF 2 ND - Good NF Cat. I - Non-Friable Category I ACM ND - NF Cat. II - Non-Friable Category II ACM SF - Square Feet RACM - Regulated Asbestos Containing Material LF - Linear Feet Page 3 of 4

24 Sample ID Material Description Location , , A, A, A Fiberboard Design Mastic associated with Fiberboard Design , Asphalt Shingle - Green , , , , A, A, A , , A, A, A , , , , Mastic TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF ASBESTOS SURVEY Old City Hall 229 Walnut Street Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida South Wall in Room 1 on the Upper Level South Wall in Room 1 on the Upper Level A Portion of the South Wall in Room 7 on the Upper Level Around the Chimney and between Asphalt and Cementitious Shingles Approximate Amount Number of Samples Collected Asbestos Type % NESHAP Category Condition 190 SF 3 ND - Good 190 SF 3 ND - Good 20 SF 2 ND - Good 130 SF 3 8% Chrysotile NF Cat. I Good Cementitious Shingle T/O Roof 4,000 SF 3 20% Chrysotile NF Cat. II Good Vapor Barrier associated with Cementitious Shingles Asphalt Shingle - Black Tar Paper associated with Asphalt Shingle - Black Window Caulk Gaskets - Black Gaskets - Red T/O Roof 4,000 SF 3 ND - Good Lower portion of the North Side Roof Lower portion of the North Side Roof Exterior Lower Level Windows 500 SF 3 ND - Good 500 SF 3 ND - Good 30 LF 3 ND - Good Rolled Roofing Lower Roof by Pool 100 SF 3 ND - Good Pump in lower level Room 12 Pump in lower level Room 12 5 Fittings 0 Assumed NF Cat. I Good 1 Fittings 0 Assumed NF Cat. I Good NF Cat. I - Non-Friable Category I ACM ND - NF Cat. II - Non-Friable Category II ACM SF - Square Feet RACM - Regulated Asbestos Containing Material LF - Linear Feet Page 4 of 4

25 TABLE 2 Summary of XRF Survey Old City Hall 229 Walnut Stree Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida XRF No. PBC PBC ERROR FLOOR SIDE ROOM COMPONENT SUBSTRATE CONDITION COLOR RESULTS (mg/cm 2 ) (mg/cm 2 ) 1 SHUTTER CAL CALIBRATE Positive CALIBRATE Positive CALIBRATE Positive CALIBRATE Negative CALIBRATE Negative UPPER B OFFICE 1 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER C OFFICE 1 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER D OFFICE 1 BASEBOARD WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER D OFFICE 1 DOOR FRAME WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER D OFFICE 1 DOOR CASING WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER A HALL 1 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER C HALL 1 BASEBOARD WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* UPPER C HALL 1 DOOR WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER B BATHROOM 1 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER D BATHROOM 1 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER D BATHROOM 1 DOOR CASING WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER A OFFICE 6 DOOR CASING WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER C OFFICE 6 WINDOW SILL WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER A OFFICE 6 BASEBOARD WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER B OFFICE 6 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER D OFFICE 6 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER D OFFICE 5 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER A OFFICE 5 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER A OFFICE 5 DOOR FRAME WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER A OFFICE 5 DOOR WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative Null = Incomplete XRF Reading * = Detectable lead concentration Page 1 of 10

26 TABLE 2 Summary of XRF Survey Old City Hall 229 Walnut Stree Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida XRF No. PBC PBC ERROR FLOOR SIDE ROOM COMPONENT SUBSTRATE CONDITION COLOR RESULTS (mg/cm 2 ) (mg/cm 2 ) 27 UPPER B OFFICE 5 BASEBOARD WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER B OFFICE 5 WINDOW SILL WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER D OFFICE 4 WINDOW SILL WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER A OFFICE 4 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER C OFFICE 4 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER D OFFICE 3 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER C OFFICE 3 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER A OFFICE 3 BASEBOARD WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER C OFFICE 3 DOOR CASING WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER A OFFICE 2 DOOR WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER D OFFICE 2 BASEBOARD WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER C OFFICE 2 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER B OFFICE 2 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER CEILING OFFICE 7 CEILING DRYWALL INTACT GREEN Negative UPPER A OFFICE 7 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER B OFFICE 7 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER C OFFICE 7 BASEBOARD WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER D OFFICE 7 DOOR CASING WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER A OFFICE 7 DOOR WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER D OFFICE 8 DOOR WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* UPPER D OFFICE 8 DOOR FRAME WOOD INTACT BEIGE Detect* UPPER C OFFICE 8 BASEBOARD WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER D OFFICE 8 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WALLPAPER Detect* UPPER A OFFICE 8 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER B OFFICE 8 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER A STAIRWELL WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE Negative Null = Incomplete XRF Reading * = Detectable lead concentration Page 2 of 10

27 TABLE 2 Summary of XRF Survey Old City Hall 229 Walnut Stree Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida XRF No. PBC PBC ERROR FLOOR SIDE ROOM COMPONENT SUBSTRATE CONDITION COLOR RESULTS (mg/cm 2 ) (mg/cm 2 ) 53 UPPER D STAIRWELL WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER B OFFICE 9 WALL WOOD INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER C OFFICE 9 WALL WOOD INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER A OFFICE 9 BASEBOARD WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* UPPER A OFFICE 9 WINDOW SILL WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* UPPER D OFFICE 9 DOOR FRAME WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* UPPER D OFFICE 9 DOOR WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER D OFFICE 9 WALL PLASTER INTACT GREEN Null UPPER D OFFICE 9 WALL PLASTER INTACT GREEN Detect* UPPER B OFFICE 10 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER B OFFICE 10 WALL PLASTER INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER D OFFICE 10 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER C OFFICE 10 BASEBOARD WOOD INTACT WHITE Null UPPER C OFFICE 10 BASEBOARD WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* UPPER C OFFICE 10 DOOR WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER CEILING OFFICE 10 CEILING PLASTER INTACT WHITE Detect* UPPER B OFFICE 10 DOOR FRAME WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* UPPER D OFFICE 10 DOOR FRAME WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* UPPER D OFFICE 10 DOOR FRAME WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER C CLOSET WALL PLASTER INTACT GREEN Negative UPPER D CLOSET WALL PLASTER INTACT GREEN Negative UPPER B BATHROOM 3 WALL WOOD INTACT WALLPAPER Detect* UPPER A BATHROOM 3 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER C BATHROOM 3 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER D BATHROOM 3 DOOR CASING WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER A BATHROOM 2 DOOR WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* Null = Incomplete XRF Reading * = Detectable lead concentration Page 3 of 10

28 TABLE 2 Summary of XRF Survey Old City Hall 229 Walnut Stree Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida XRF No. PBC PBC ERROR FLOOR SIDE ROOM COMPONENT SUBSTRATE CONDITION COLOR RESULTS (mg/cm 2 ) (mg/cm 2 ) 79 UPPER B BATHROOM 2 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER D BATHROOM 2 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER A BREAK ROOM WALL WOOD INTACT WALLPAPER Detect* UPPER C BREAK ROOM WALL WOOD INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER CEILING OFFICE 11 CEILING WOOD INTACT GREEN Positive UPPER C OFFICE 11 WINDOW SILL WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* UPPER D OFFICE 11 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER A OFFICE 11 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER B OFFICE 11 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER A OFFICE 12 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER B OFFICE 12 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER C OFFICE 13 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER A OFFICE 13 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER A OFFICE 13 WINDOW SILL WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER C OFFICE 13 WINDOW FRAME WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER D OFFICE 13 BASEBOARD WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER A OFFICE 15 BASEBOARD WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER A OFFICE 15 WINDOW SILL WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* UPPER A OFFICE 15 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER D OFFICE 15 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER C OFFICE 15 DOOR FRAME WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER C OFFICE 15 DOOR WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER C OFFICE 16 DOOR WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER C OFFICE 16 WINDOW FRAME WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER D OFFICE 16 WINDOW SILL WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER B OFFICE 16 BASEBOARD WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative Null = Incomplete XRF Reading * = Detectable lead concentration Page 4 of 10

29 TABLE 2 Summary of XRF Survey Old City Hall 229 Walnut Stree Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida XRF No. PBC PBC ERROR FLOOR SIDE ROOM COMPONENT SUBSTRATE CONDITION COLOR RESULTS (mg/cm 2 ) (mg/cm 2 ) 105 UPPER C OFFICE 16 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER A OFFICE 16 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER D OFFICE 16 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER A OFFICE 18 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER D OFFICE 18 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WALLPAPER Negative UPPER A OFFICE 18 DOOR WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER A OFFICE 18 DOOR WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER FLOOR COVERED PORCH FLOOR WOOD INTACT RUST Detect* UPPER CEILING COVERED PORCH CEILING WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* UPPER CEILING COVERED PORCH CEILING WOOD INTACT GREEN Positive UPPER B COVERED PORCH RAIL METAL INTACT GREEN Negative UPPER C COVERED PORCH RAIL METAL INTACT GREEN Detect* UPPER C COVERED PORCH COLUMN WOOD INTACT WHITE Null UPPER C COVERED PORCH COLUMN WOOD INTACT WHITE Null UPPER A EXTERIOR RAIL METAL PEELING GREEN Null UPPER A EXTERIOR RAIL METAL PEELING GREEN Detect* UPPER A EXTERIOR RAIL METAL PEELING GREEN Detect* UPPER A EXTERIOR FLOOR CONCRETE PEELING GREEN Positive UPPER B EXTERIOR FLOOR CONCRETE PEELING WHITE Detect* Null = Incomplete XRF Reading * = Detectable lead concentration Page 5 of 10

30 TABLE 2 Summary of XRF Survey Old City Hall 229 Walnut Stree Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida XRF No. PBC PBC ERROR FLOOR SIDE ROOM COMPONENT SUBSTRATE CONDITION COLOR RESULTS (mg/cm 2 ) (mg/cm 2 ) 124 LOWER B EXTERIOR WALL CONCRETE PEELING WHITE Detect* LOWER B EXTERIOR WINDOW SILL CONCRETE PEELING WHITE Negative LOWER B EXTERIOR DOOR METAL PEELING WHITE Negative UPPER B EXTERIOR WALL CINDER BLOCK PEELING WHITE Negative UPPER A EXTERIOR FLOOR CONCRETE PEELING YELLOW Positive UPPER A EXTERIOR FLOOR CONCRETE PEELING GREEN Negative UPPER A EXTERIOR FLOOR CONCRETE PEELING GREEN Detect* UPPER A EXTERIOR FLOOR CONCRETE PEELING YELLOW Positive UPPER A EXTERIOR WALL WOOD PEELING WHITE Positive UPPER A EXTERIOR WINDOW SILL METAL INTACT WHITE Positive UPPER A EXTERIOR WINDOW FRAME METAL INTACT WHITE Negative UPPER A EXTERIOR WALL WOOD INTACT WHITE Positive UPPER A EXTERIOR WINDOW SILL METAL INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER D EXTERIOR WINDOW SILL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER D EXTERIOR WINDOW FRAME WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER D EXTERIOR WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER D EXTERIOR DOOR WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER D EXTERIOR DOOR FRAME WOOD INTACT WHITE Positive CALIBRATE Negative CALIBRATE Positive CALIBRATE Positive CALIBRATE Negative CALIBRATE Negative LOWER C EXTERIOR WALL WOOD INTACT WHITE Positive LOWER C EXTERIOR WALL CONCRETE INTACT GREEN Detect* Null = Incomplete XRF Reading * = Detectable lead concentration Page 6 of 10

31 TABLE 2 Summary of XRF Survey Old City Hall 229 Walnut Stree Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida XRF No. PBC PBC ERROR FLOOR SIDE ROOM COMPONENT SUBSTRATE CONDITION COLOR RESULTS (mg/cm 2 ) (mg/cm 2 ) 149 LOWER C EXTERIOR WINDOW FRAME WOOD INTACT GREEN Positive LOWER C EXTERIOR WINDOW SILL METAL INTACT BEIGE Positive LOWER C EXTERIOR DOOR WOOD INTACT GREEN Detect* LOWER C EXTERIOR DOOR FRAME METAL INTACT BEIGE Negative LOWER C EXTERIOR DOOR FRAME WOOD INTACT GREEN Negative LOWER C EXTERIOR DOOR WOOD INTACT GREEN Negative LOWER D EXTERIOR COLUMN WOOD INTACT GREEN Negative LOWER B EXTERIOR COLUMN CONCRETE INTACT GREEN Detect* LOWER C EXTERIOR COLUMN WOOD INTACT GREEN Negative LOWER A EXTERIOR BEAM WOOD INTACT GREEN Detect* LOWER CEILING EXTERIOR CEILING WOOD INTACT GREEN Negative LOWER CEILING ROOM 1 CEILING WOOD INTACT WHITE Positive LOWER A ROOM 1 WALL WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative LOWER C ROOM 1 WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER D ROOM 1 WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER A ROOM 2 WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER D ROOM 2 WALL WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER FLOOR ROOM 1 WALL CONCRETE INTACT BEIGE Detect* LOWER CEILING ROOM 2 CEILING WOOD INTACT WHITE Positive LOWER CEILING ROOM 4 CEILING PLASTER INTACT WHITE Negative LOWER B ROOM 4 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE Negative LOWER D ROOM 4 WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE Negative LOWER D ROOM 4 BASEBOARD WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER FLOOR ROOM 4 FLOOR CONCRETE INTACT GRAY Detect* LOWER FLOOR ROOM 3 FLOOR CONCRETE INTACT BEIGE Detect* LOWER CEILING ROOM 3 CEILING PLASTER INTACT WHITE Detect* Null = Incomplete XRF Reading * = Detectable lead concentration Page 7 of 10

32 TABLE 2 Summary of XRF Survey Old City Hall 229 Walnut Stree Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida XRF No. PBC PBC ERROR FLOOR SIDE ROOM COMPONENT SUBSTRATE CONDITION COLOR RESULTS (mg/cm 2 ) (mg/cm 2 ) 175 LOWER C ROOM 3 WINDOW SILL WOOD INTACT WHITE Positive LOWER C ROOM 3 WINDOW FRAME WOOD INTACT WHITE Positive LOWER A ROOM 3 WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER B ROOM 3 WALL WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER A ROOM 5 WALL WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER C ROOM 5 WALL WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER B ROOM 5 DOOR FRAME WOOD INTACT BROWN Detect* LOWER FLOOR ROOM 5 FLOOR CONCRETE INTACT GRAY Null LOWER FLOOR ROOM 5 FLOOR CONCRETE INTACT GRAY Detect* LOWER CEILING ROOM 5 CEILING WOOD INTACT GRAY Detect* LOWER CEILING ROOM 6 CEILING PLASTER INTACT WHITE Negative LOWER A ROOM 6 WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE Negative LOWER D ROOM 6 WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE Negative LOWER C ROOM 6 DOOR FRAME WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative LOWER A ROOM 7 WALL CONCRETE INTACT BLACK Detect* LOWER B ROOM 7 WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER C ROOM 7 WALL CINDER BLOCK INTACT WHITE Negative LOWER CEILING ROOM 7 CEILING WOOD INTACT WHITE Positive LOWER CEILING ROOM 8 CEILING WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER FLOOR ROOM 8 FLOOR CONCRETE INTACT RED Detect* LOWER CEILING ROOM 9 CEILING WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER A ROOM 9 WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER C ROOM 9 WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER C BATHROOM 1 WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER D BATHROOM 1 WALL WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* Null = Incomplete XRF Reading * = Detectable lead concentration Page 8 of 10

33 TABLE 2 Summary of XRF Survey Old City Hall 229 Walnut Stree Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida PBC XRF PBC FLOOR SIDE ROOM COMPONENT SUBSTRATE CONDITION COLOR RESULTS No. (mg/cm 2 ERROR ) (mg/cm 2 ) CINDER 200 LOWER A BATHROOM 1 WALL BLOCK INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER FLOOR BATHROOM 1 FLOOR CONCRETE INTACT PEACH Detect* LOWER CEILING BATHROOM 1 CEILING WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER C BATHROOM 1 WINDOW FRAME WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER A BATHROOM 1 DOOR FRAME WOOD INTACT WHITE Positive LOWER CEILING BATHROOM 2 CEILING WOOD INTACT WHITE Positive LOWER FLOOR BATHROOM 2 FLOOR CONCRETE INTACT PINK Detect* LOWER A BATHROOM 2 WALL WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER B BATHROOM 2 WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER C BATHROOM 2 RAIL METAL INTACT YELLOW Negative LOWER C BATHROOM 2 DOOR FRAME CONCRETE INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER B BATHROOM 3 WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER D BATHROOM 3 WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER FLOOR BATHROOM 3 FLOOR CONCRETE INTACT PINK Negative LOWER FLOOR ROOM 11 FLOOR CONCRETE INTACT GREEN Detect* LOWER C ROOM 11 WALL CONCRETE INTACT GREEN Detect* LOWER B ROOM 11 WALL CONCRETE INTACT GREEN Detect* LOWER A ROOM 11 DOOR FRAME WOOD INTACT WHITE Positive LOWER A ROOM 11 DOOR WOOD INTACT GREEN Positive LOWER C ROOM 11 DOOR WOOD INTACT GREEN Positive LOWER CEILING ROOM 12 CEILING PLASTER INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER CEILING ROOM 12 CEILING PLASTER INTACT GREEN Negative LOWER CEILING ROOM 13 CEILING PLASTER INTACT WHITE Negative LOWER CEILING ROOM 14 CEILING PLASTER INTACT WHITE Null LOWER CEILING ROOM 14 CEILING PLASTER INTACT WHITE Detect* Null = Incomplete XRF Reading * = Detectable lead concentration Page 9 of 10

34 TABLE 2 Summary of XRF Survey Old City Hall 229 Walnut Stree Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida XRF No. PBC PBC ERROR FLOOR SIDE ROOM COMPONENT SUBSTRATE CONDITION COLOR RESULTS (mg/cm 2 ) (mg/cm 2 ) 225 LOWER C ROOM 14 DOOR WOOD INTACT BLUE Detect* LOWER B ROOM 14 WALL DRYWALL INTACT BLUE Negative LOWER D ROOM 14 WALL DRYWALL INTACT BLUE Detect* LOWER D ROOM 14 DOOR FRAME WOOD INTACT WHITE Negative LOWER A ROOM 15 WALL CONCRETE INTACT BLUE Detect* LOWER C ROOM 15 WALL CONCRETE INTACT BLUE Detect* LOWER C ROOM 16 WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER D ROOM 16 WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE Detect* LOWER CEILING ROOM 16 CEILING WOOD INTACT WHITE Detect* CALIBRATE Positive CALIBRATE Positive CALIBRATE Positive CALIBRATE Negative CALIBRATE Negative Null = Incomplete XRF Reading * = Detectable lead concentration Page 10 of 10

35 TABLE 3 Summary of Paint Chip Sample Results Old City Hall 229 Walnut Street Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida Paint Chip Sample No. FAA Results (% by weight) XRF No. XRF Results (mg/cm 2 ) Component Substrate Color Condition XRF Result FAA Result XRF Wall Plaster Green Intact Detect Detect XRF Rail Metal Green Intact Detect Detect XRF Column Wood White Intact Null POS Flame AAS - Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy POS - Positive by HUD definition of LBP ND - Detect - Lead Concentrations detected below HUD definition for LBP Page 1 of 1

36 FIGURES

37

38

39

40

41 APPENDIX A CERTIFICATIONS

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53 APPENDIX B LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS

54 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ Phone/Fax: (800) / (856) cinnasblab@emsl.com EMSL Order: CustomerID: CustomerPO: ProjectID: AERO54 Attn: Project: Miles Eckert Aerostar SES LLC St. Johns Industrial Parkway North Jacksonville, FL M / Old City Hall Phone: (904) Fax: (904) Received: 01/28/15 9:35 AM Analysis Date: 1/30/2015 Collected: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type Carpet Brown Brown 90% Synthetic 10% Non-fibrous (other) A A A A A A Mastic Yellow 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- - Carpet Brown Brown 95% Synthetic 5% Non-fibrous (other) - Mastic Yellow 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- - Carpet Brown Red 90% Synthetic 10% Non-fibrous (other) - Mastic Yellow 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- - Carpet Purple Purple 95% Synthetic 5% Non-fibrous (other) A A - Mastic Tan/Yellow Non- 100% Non-fibrous (other) <1% Chrysotile Result includes a small amount of inseparable attached material Analyst(s) Brett Poulton (33) Joseph Quiles (14) Jillian Yurick (11) Kelly Mulholland (26) Matthew Carralero (17) Tin Nguyen (3) Benjamin Ellis, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NVLAP Lab Code , AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab , NYS ELAP 10872, NJ DEP 03036, PA ID# Report Amended: 02/02/ :20:20 Replaces Report Amended: 01/30/ :05:02. Reason Code: Client-Change to Appearance Test Report PLM Printed: 2/2/2015 2:20:20 PM 1

55 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ Phone/Fax: (800) / (856) cinnasblab@emsl.com EMSL Order: CustomerID: CustomerPO: ProjectID: AERO54 Attn: Project: Miles Eckert Aerostar SES LLC St. Johns Industrial Parkway North Jacksonville, FL M / Old City Hall Phone: (904) Fax: (904) Received: 01/28/15 9:35 AM Analysis Date: 1/30/2015 Collected: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type Carpet Purple Purple 100% Non-fibrous (other) A A A A Mastic Tan/Yellow Non- 100% Non-fibrous (other) Result includes a small amount of inseparable attached material <1% Chrysotile - Carpet Purple Brown 90% Synthetic 10% Non-fibrous (other) - Mastic Yellow 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- - Drywall White 20% Cellulose 80% Non-fibrous (other) - Drywall White 25% Cellulose 75% Non-fibrous (other) - Drywall White 25% Cellulose 75% Non-fibrous (other) - Drywall White 20% Cellulose 80% Non-fibrous (other) Analyst(s) Brett Poulton (33) Joseph Quiles (14) Jillian Yurick (11) Kelly Mulholland (26) Matthew Carralero (17) Tin Nguyen (3) Benjamin Ellis, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NVLAP Lab Code , AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab , NYS ELAP 10872, NJ DEP 03036, PA ID# Report Amended: 02/02/ :20:20 Replaces Report Amended: 01/30/ :05:02. Reason Code: Client-Change to Appearance Test Report PLM Printed: 2/2/2015 2:20:20 PM 2

56 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ Phone/Fax: (800) / (856) cinnasblab@emsl.com EMSL Order: CustomerID: CustomerPO: ProjectID: AERO54 Attn: Project: Miles Eckert Aerostar SES LLC St. Johns Industrial Parkway North Jacksonville, FL M / Old City Hall Phone: (904) Fax: (904) Received: 01/28/15 9:35 AM Analysis Date: 1/30/2015 Collected: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type Drywall Brown/White 15% Cellulose 85% Non-fibrous (other) A A - Joint Compound White 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- - Joint Compound White 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- - Joint Compound White 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- - Joint Compound White 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- - Joint Compound White 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- - VSF Beige Beige 40% Cellulose 60% Non-fibrous (other) Heterogeneous - Mastic Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- Analyst(s) Brett Poulton (33) Joseph Quiles (14) Jillian Yurick (11) Kelly Mulholland (26) Matthew Carralero (17) Tin Nguyen (3) Benjamin Ellis, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NVLAP Lab Code , AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab , NYS ELAP 10872, NJ DEP 03036, PA ID# Report Amended: 02/02/ :20:20 Replaces Report Amended: 01/30/ :05:02. Reason Code: Client-Change to Appearance Test Report PLM Printed: 2/2/2015 2:20:20 PM 3

57 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ Phone/Fax: (800) / (856) cinnasblab@emsl.com EMSL Order: CustomerID: CustomerPO: ProjectID: AERO54 Attn: Project: Miles Eckert Aerostar SES LLC St. Johns Industrial Parkway North Jacksonville, FL M / Old City Hall Phone: (904) Fax: (904) Received: 01/28/15 9:35 AM Analysis Date: 1/30/2015 Collected: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type VSF Beige Beige 40% Cellulose 60% Non-fibrous (other) A A A A - Mastic Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- - VSF Beige Beige 25% Cellulose 75% Non-fibrous (other) - Mastic Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non VSF Pink w/squares Pink Heterogeneous 40% Cellulose 60% Non-fibrous (other) A A - Mastic White 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non VSF Pink w/squares Pink Heterogeneous 40% Cellulose 60% Non-fibrous (other) A A - Mastic White 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- Analyst(s) Brett Poulton (33) Joseph Quiles (14) Jillian Yurick (11) Kelly Mulholland (26) Matthew Carralero (17) Tin Nguyen (3) Benjamin Ellis, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NVLAP Lab Code , AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab , NYS ELAP 10872, NJ DEP 03036, PA ID# Report Amended: 02/02/ :20:20 Replaces Report Amended: 01/30/ :05:02. Reason Code: Client-Change to Appearance Test Report PLM Printed: 2/2/2015 2:20:20 PM 4

58 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ Phone/Fax: (800) / (856) cinnasblab@emsl.com EMSL Order: CustomerID: CustomerPO: ProjectID: AERO54 Attn: Project: Miles Eckert Aerostar SES LLC St. Johns Industrial Parkway North Jacksonville, FL M / Old City Hall Phone: (904) Fax: (904) Received: 01/28/15 9:35 AM Analysis Date: 1/30/2015 Collected: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type VSF Pink w/squares Beige 20% Cellulose 80% Non-fibrous (other) A A - Mastic White 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non 'x1' ACT Large Holes Brown/White 95% Cellulose 5% Non-fibrous (other) 'x1' ACT Large Holes Brown/White 95% Cellulose 5% Non-fibrous (other) 'x1' ACT Large Holes Brown/White 90% Cellulose 10% Non-fibrous (other) Fiberboard CT Brown/White 95% Cellulose 5% Non-fibrous (other) - Fiberboard CT Brown/White 95% Cellulose 5% Non-fibrous (other) - Fiberboard CT Brown/White 90% Cellulose 10% Non-fibrous (other) Analyst(s) Brett Poulton (33) Joseph Quiles (14) Jillian Yurick (11) Kelly Mulholland (26) Matthew Carralero (17) Tin Nguyen (3) Benjamin Ellis, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NVLAP Lab Code , AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab , NYS ELAP 10872, NJ DEP 03036, PA ID# Report Amended: 02/02/ :20:20 Replaces Report Amended: 01/30/ :05:02. Reason Code: Client-Change to Appearance Test Report PLM Printed: 2/2/2015 2:20:20 PM 5

59 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ Phone/Fax: (800) / (856) cinnasblab@emsl.com EMSL Order: CustomerID: CustomerPO: ProjectID: AERO54 Attn: Project: Miles Eckert Aerostar SES LLC St. Johns Industrial Parkway North Jacksonville, FL M / Old City Hall Phone: (904) Fax: (904) Received: 01/28/15 9:35 AM Analysis Date: 1/30/2015 Collected: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type " Cove Base White White Non- 100% Non-fibrous (other) A A B B - Mastic Tan 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- - Paper Backing White 15% Cellulose 85% Non-fibrous (other) " Cove Base White White Non- 100% Non-fibrous (other) 'x1' ACT Small Holes Brown 95% Cellulose 5% Non-fibrous (other) A A - Mastic Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non 'x1' ACT Small Holes Brown 95% Cellulose 5% Non-fibrous (other) A A - Mastic Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- Analyst(s) Brett Poulton (33) Joseph Quiles (14) Jillian Yurick (11) Kelly Mulholland (26) Matthew Carralero (17) Tin Nguyen (3) Benjamin Ellis, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NVLAP Lab Code , AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab , NYS ELAP 10872, NJ DEP 03036, PA ID# Report Amended: 02/02/ :20:20 Replaces Report Amended: 01/30/ :05:02. Reason Code: Client-Change to Appearance Test Report PLM Printed: 2/2/2015 2:20:20 PM 6

60 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ Phone/Fax: (800) / (856) cinnasblab@emsl.com EMSL Order: CustomerID: CustomerPO: ProjectID: AERO54 Attn: Project: Miles Eckert Aerostar SES LLC St. Johns Industrial Parkway North Jacksonville, FL M / Old City Hall Phone: (904) Fax: (904) Received: 01/28/15 9:35 AM Analysis Date: 1/30/2015 Collected: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type 'x1' ACT Small Holes Brown 95% Cellulose 5% Non-fibrous (other) A A - Mastic Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non 'x1' ACT Small Holes Brown 95% Cellulose 5% Non-fibrous (other) A A Mastic Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- - 1'x1' ACT Small Holes Brown 95% Cellulose 5% Non-fibrous (other) No glue present in sample. - Plaster Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- - Plaster Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- - Plaster Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- Analyst(s) Brett Poulton (33) Joseph Quiles (14) Jillian Yurick (11) Kelly Mulholland (26) Matthew Carralero (17) Tin Nguyen (3) Benjamin Ellis, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NVLAP Lab Code , AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab , NYS ELAP 10872, NJ DEP 03036, PA ID# Report Amended: 02/02/ :20:20 Replaces Report Amended: 01/30/ :05:02. Reason Code: Client-Change to Appearance Test Report PLM Printed: 2/2/2015 2:20:20 PM 7

61 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ Phone/Fax: (800) / (856) cinnasblab@emsl.com EMSL Order: CustomerID: CustomerPO: ProjectID: AERO54 Attn: Project: Miles Eckert Aerostar SES LLC St. Johns Industrial Parkway North Jacksonville, FL M / Old City Hall Phone: (904) Fax: (904) Received: 01/28/15 9:35 AM Analysis Date: 1/30/2015 Collected: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type Plaster Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non Plaster Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- - Plaster Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- - Plaster Gray 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non HVAC Duct Mastic White White 10% 10% Glass Min. Wool 80% Non-fibrous (other) HVAC Duct Mastic White White 10% 10% Glass Min. Wool 80% Non-fibrous (other) HVAC Duct Mastic White White 10% 10% Glass Min. Wool 80% Non-fibrous (other) Floor Tile Green Green Non- 93% Non-fibrous (other) 7% Chrysotile Analyst(s) Brett Poulton (33) Joseph Quiles (14) Jillian Yurick (11) Kelly Mulholland (26) Matthew Carralero (17) Tin Nguyen (3) Benjamin Ellis, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NVLAP Lab Code , AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab , NYS ELAP 10872, NJ DEP 03036, PA ID# Report Amended: 02/02/ :20:20 Replaces Report Amended: 01/30/ :05:02. Reason Code: Client-Change to Appearance Test Report PLM Printed: 2/2/2015 2:20:20 PM 8

62 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ Phone/Fax: (800) / (856) cinnasblab@emsl.com EMSL Order: CustomerID: CustomerPO: ProjectID: AERO54 Attn: Project: Miles Eckert Aerostar SES LLC St. Johns Industrial Parkway North Jacksonville, FL M / Old City Hall Phone: (904) Fax: (904) Received: 01/28/15 9:35 AM Analysis Date: 1/30/2015 Collected: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type A A - Mastic Black 25% Cellulose 75% Non-fibrous (other) Floor Tile Green Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) A A Mastic Black 25% Cellulose 75% Non-fibrous (other) - Floor Tile Green Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) A A - Mastic Black 15% Cellulose 85% Non-fibrous (other) Non Ceiling Texture White Non- 98% Non-fibrous (other) 2% Chrysotile Ceiling Texture Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Ceiling Texture Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) VSF Tile Pattern Tan 20% Cellulose 75% Non-fibrous (other) 5% Glass Analyst(s) Brett Poulton (33) Joseph Quiles (14) Jillian Yurick (11) Kelly Mulholland (26) Matthew Carralero (17) Tin Nguyen (3) Benjamin Ellis, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NVLAP Lab Code , AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab , NYS ELAP 10872, NJ DEP 03036, PA ID# Report Amended: 02/02/ :20:20 Replaces Report Amended: 01/30/ :05:02. Reason Code: Client-Change to Appearance Test Report PLM Printed: 2/2/2015 2:20:20 PM 9

63 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ Phone/Fax: (800) / (856) cinnasblab@emsl.com EMSL Order: CustomerID: CustomerPO: ProjectID: AERO54 Attn: Project: Miles Eckert Aerostar SES LLC St. Johns Industrial Parkway North Jacksonville, FL M / Old City Hall Phone: (904) Fax: (904) Received: 01/28/15 9:35 AM Analysis Date: 1/30/2015 Collected: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type A A - Mastic White 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non B B A A B B A A B B - Leveler Pink 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) Non- - VSF Tile Pattern Tan 20% Cellulose 75% Non-fibrous (other) Non- 5% Glass - Mastic White 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- - Leveler Pink 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) Non- - VSF Tile Pattern Tan 20% Cellulose 75% Non-fibrous (other) 5% Glass - Mastic White 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- - Leveler Pink 10% Cellulose 90% Non-fibrous (other) Analyst(s) Brett Poulton (33) Joseph Quiles (14) Jillian Yurick (11) Kelly Mulholland (26) Matthew Carralero (17) Tin Nguyen (3) Benjamin Ellis, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NVLAP Lab Code , AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab , NYS ELAP 10872, NJ DEP 03036, PA ID# Report Amended: 02/02/ :20:20 Replaces Report Amended: 01/30/ :05:02. Reason Code: Client-Change to Appearance Test Report PLM Printed: 2/2/2015 2:20:20 PM 10

64 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ Phone/Fax: (800) / (856) cinnasblab@emsl.com EMSL Order: CustomerID: CustomerPO: ProjectID: AERO54 Attn: Project: Miles Eckert Aerostar SES LLC St. Johns Industrial Parkway North Jacksonville, FL M / Old City Hall Phone: (904) Fax: (904) Received: 01/28/15 9:35 AM Analysis Date: 1/30/2015 Collected: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type 'x4' ACT F/PH Gray 50% Cellulose 30% Non-fibrous (other) 20% Min. Wool 'x4' ACT F/PH Gray 50% Cellulose 20% Non-fibrous (other) 30% Min. Wool Fiberboard Design Brown 95% Cellulose 5% Non-fibrous (other) A A - Mastic Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non Fiberboard Design Brown 95% Cellulose 5% Non-fibrous (other) A A - Mastic Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non Fiberboard Design Brown 95% Cellulose 5% Non-fibrous (other) A A - Mastic Brown 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- Analyst(s) Brett Poulton (33) Joseph Quiles (14) Jillian Yurick (11) Kelly Mulholland (26) Matthew Carralero (17) Tin Nguyen (3) Benjamin Ellis, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NVLAP Lab Code , AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab , NYS ELAP 10872, NJ DEP 03036, PA ID# Report Amended: 02/02/ :20:20 Replaces Report Amended: 01/30/ :05:02. Reason Code: Client-Change to Appearance Test Report PLM Printed: 2/2/2015 2:20:20 PM 11

65 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ Phone/Fax: (800) / (856) cinnasblab@emsl.com EMSL Order: CustomerID: CustomerPO: ProjectID: AERO54 Attn: Project: Miles Eckert Aerostar SES LLC St. Johns Industrial Parkway North Jacksonville, FL M / Old City Hall Phone: (904) Fax: (904) Received: 01/28/15 9:35 AM Analysis Date: 1/30/2015 Collected: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type Ashphalt Shingle Green Black/Green 20% Cellulose 80% Non-fibrous (other) Ashphalt Shingle Green Black/Green 20% Cellulose 80% Non-fibrous (other) Mastic Black Non- 92% Non-fibrous (other) 8% Chrysotile Mastic Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Mastic Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) Cementitious Shingle Gray 80% Non-fibrous (other) 20% Chrysotile A A - Vapor Barrier Black 60% Cellulose 40% Non-fibrous (other) Cementitious Shingle Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) A A - Vapor Barrier Black 60% Cellulose 40% Non-fibrous (other) Analyst(s) Brett Poulton (33) Joseph Quiles (14) Jillian Yurick (11) Kelly Mulholland (26) Matthew Carralero (17) Tin Nguyen (3) Benjamin Ellis, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NVLAP Lab Code , AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab , NYS ELAP 10872, NJ DEP 03036, PA ID# Report Amended: 02/02/ :20:20 Replaces Report Amended: 01/30/ :05:02. Reason Code: Client-Change to Appearance Test Report PLM Printed: 2/2/2015 2:20:20 PM 12

66 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ Phone/Fax: (800) / (856) cinnasblab@emsl.com EMSL Order: CustomerID: CustomerPO: ProjectID: AERO54 Attn: Project: Miles Eckert Aerostar SES LLC St. Johns Industrial Parkway North Jacksonville, FL M / Old City Hall Phone: (904) Fax: (904) Received: 01/28/15 9:35 AM Analysis Date: 1/30/2015 Collected: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type Cementitious Shingle Stop Positive (Not Analyzed) A A - Vapor Barrier Black 60% Cellulose 40% Non-fibrous (other) Asphalt Shingle Black Black 20% Glass 80% Non-fibrous (other) A A - Tar Paper Black 60% Cellulose 40% Non-fibrous (other) Asphalt Shingle Black Black 20% Glass 80% Non-fibrous (other) A A - Tar Paper Black 60% Cellulose 40% Non-fibrous (other) Asphalt Shingle Black Black 20% Glass 80% Non-fibrous (other) A A Tar Paper Black 60% Cellulose 40% Non-fibrous (other) - Window Caulk White 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- Analyst(s) Brett Poulton (33) Joseph Quiles (14) Jillian Yurick (11) Kelly Mulholland (26) Matthew Carralero (17) Tin Nguyen (3) Benjamin Ellis, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NVLAP Lab Code , AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab , NYS ELAP 10872, NJ DEP 03036, PA ID# Report Amended: 02/02/ :20:20 Replaces Report Amended: 01/30/ :05:02. Reason Code: Client-Change to Appearance Test Report PLM Printed: 2/2/2015 2:20:20 PM 13

67 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ Phone/Fax: (800) / (856) cinnasblab@emsl.com EMSL Order: CustomerID: CustomerPO: ProjectID: AERO54 Attn: Project: Miles Eckert Aerostar SES LLC St. Johns Industrial Parkway North Jacksonville, FL M / Old City Hall Phone: (904) Fax: (904) Received: 01/28/15 9:35 AM Analysis Date: 1/30/2015 Collected: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance % % Non- % Type Window Caulk White 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non Window Caulk White 100% Non-fibrous (other) Non- - Rolled Roofing Black 20% Cellulose 60% Non-fibrous (other) 20% Glass - Rolled Roofing Black 20% Cellulose 60% Non-fibrous (other) 20% Glass - Rolled Roofing Black 20% Cellulose 60% Non-fibrous (other) 20% Glass Analyst(s) Brett Poulton (33) Joseph Quiles (14) Jillian Yurick (11) Kelly Mulholland (26) Matthew Carralero (17) Tin Nguyen (3) Benjamin Ellis, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NVLAP Lab Code , AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab , NYS ELAP 10872, NJ DEP 03036, PA ID# Report Amended: 02/02/ :20:20 Replaces Report Amended: 01/30/ :05:02. Reason Code: Client-Change to Appearance Test Report PLM Printed: 2/2/2015 2:20:20 PM THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT. 14

68 OrderID: Page 1 Of 2

69 OrderID: Page 2 Of 2

70 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ Phone/Fax: (856) / (856) cinnaminsonleadlab@emsl.com EMSL Order: CustomerID: CustomerPO: ProjectID: AERO54 Attn: Miles Eckert Aerostar SES LLC St. Johns Industrial Parkway North Phone: (904) Fax: (904) Received: 01/28/15 9:58 AM Collected: 1/26/2015 Project: Jacksonville, FL M Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW B/7000B)* Client Sample Description Lab ID Collected Analyzed XRF /26/2015 1/29/2015 Site: Green on Plaster Walls XRF /26/2015 1/29/2015 Site: White on Metal Porch Rail XRF /26/2015 1/29/2015 Site: White on Wood Porch Column Lead Concentration 0.15 % wt 0.22 % wt 0.72 % wt Julie Smith - Laboratory Director NJ-NELAP Accredited:03036 or other approved signatory *Analysis following Lead in Paint by EMSL SOP/Determination of Environmental Lead by FLAA. Reporting limit is % wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is available upon request. The QC data associated with the sample results included in this report meet the recovery and precision requirements established by the AIHA-LAP, unless specifically indicated otherwise. Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NELAP Certifications: NJ 03036, NY 10872, PA , AIHA-LAP, LLC ELLAP , A2LA Initial report from 01/30/ :01:59 Test Report ChmSnglePrm/nQC Printed: 1/30/ :01:59 AM Page 1 of 1

71 OrderID: Page 1 Of 1

72 APPENDIX C PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION

73 1) View of the upper level of the Old City Hall, located at 229 Walnut Street, Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida. 2) View of the upper and lower level of the Old City Hall. 3) View of the brown carpet ( area [HA] 229-1) and associated mastic (HA 229-1A), located in Rooms 1, 7 through (-) 9, 10-13, and on the upper level. No asbestos was detected.

74 4) View of the purple carpet (HA 229-2) and associated mastic (HA 229-2A), located in Hall 1, and Rooms 2, 3, 5, and 6 on the upper level. Laboratory analytical results showed <1% chrysotile asbestos in HA 229-2A. No asbestos was detected in HA ) View of drywall (HA 229-3) and joint compound (HA 229-4), located throughout (T/O) walls on the upper level and Room 15 of the lower level and on ceilings in the Break Room on the upper level and Room 4 on the lower level. No asbestos was dt td 6) View of the beige vinyl sheet flooring (VSF) (HA 229-5) and associated mastic (HA 229-5A), located in Room 4 on the upper level. No asbestos was detected.

75 7) View of VSF, pink with squares, (HA 229-6) and associated mastic (HA 229-6A), located in Bathrooms 1, 2, and 3 on the upper level. No asbestos was detected. 8) View of 1'x1' acoustical ceiling tile (ACT) with large holes (HA 229-7), located in a portion of the wall in Room 5 on the upper level. No asbestos was detected. 9) View of fiberboard ceiling texture (HA 229-8), located on half of the ceiling above fiberglass 2'x4' ACT. No asbestos was detected.

76 10) View of white 4" cove base (HA 229-9), associated mastic (HA 229-9A), and paper backing (HA 229-9B), located around the counter in Room 1 on the upper level. No asbestos was detected. 11) View of 1'x1' ACT with small holes (HA ) and associated mastic (HA A), located on the walls in Room 1, Bathrooms 2 and 3, and the ceilings of Rooms 16 and 18 on the upper level. No asbestos was detected. 12) View of plaster (HA ), located T/O ceilings in Rooms 7-10, 13, and 15-17, Bathrooms 2 and 3 on the upper level, and the western portion of the lower level and the walls west of Room 1 on the upper level. No asbestos was detected.

77 13) View of white Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) duct mastic (HA ), located on the HVAC ducts in the plenum of Rooms 7-9 on the upper level. No asbestos was detected. ` 14) View of green vinyl floor tile (HA ) and associated mastic (HA A), located beneath carpet in Room 10 on the upper level. Laboratory analytical results showed 7% chrysotile asbestos in HA No asbestos was detected in HA A. 15) View of ceiling texture (HA ), located in Rooms 11, 12, 18, and 18A on the upper level. Laboratory analytical results showed 2% chrysotile asbestos in HA

78 16) View of VSF, tile pattern, (HA ), associated mastic (HA A), and leveler (HA B), located in the Break Room on the upper level. No asbestos was detected. 17) View of old wire (HA ), located T/O building except Rooms 2-6, Hall 1, Bathroom 1, and Electrical Room of the upper level. HA is assumed to contain asbestos. 18) View of 2'x4' ACT with fissures and pinholes (HA ), located in the Closet on the upper level. No asbestos was detected.

79 19) View of fiberboard (HA ) and associated mastic (HA A), located on the south wall in Room 1 on the upper level. No asbestos was detected. ` 20) View of green asphalt shingle (HA ), located on a portion of the south wall in Room 1 on the upper level. No asbestos was detected. 21) View of mastic (HA ), located around the chimney and between asphalt and cementitious shingles. Laboratory analytical results show 8% chrysotile asbestos in HA

80 22) View of cementitious shingles (HA ) and associated vapor barrier (HA A), located T/O the roof. Laboratory analytical results show 20% chrysotile asbestos in HA No asbestos was detected in HA A. 23) View of black asphalt shingles (HA ) and associated tar paper (HA A), located on the lower portion of the north side roof. No asbestos was detected. 24) View of rolled roofing (HA ), located on the lower roof by the pool. No asbestos was detected.

81 25) View of the pump in Room 12 on the lower level. Red (HA ) and black gaskets (HA ) are assumed to contain asbestos. 26) View of the metal rail and wood column found on the covered porch on the upper level. XRF and paint chip results indicated the column was positive for lead-based paint and the rail coating contained detectable lead.