Drainage Report. PDC Energy Metcalf Soil Treatment Facility. OA Project No
|
|
- Reginald Boyd
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Drainage Report PDC Energy Metcalf Soil Treatment Facility OA Project No Horizon Drive, Suite 102 Grand Junction, CO TEL FAX
2
3 DRAINAGE REPORT PDC METCALF CENTRALIZED SOIL TREATMENT FACILITY GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO PREPARED FOR: PDC ENERGY, INC 1775 SHERMAN ST, STE 3000 DENVER, CO PH: (303) CONTACT: ED WINTERS PREPARED BY: OLSSON ASSOCIATES ½ ROAD GRAND JUNCTION, CO PH: (970) CONTACT: WYATT E. POPP, PE APRIL 15, 2013 OLSSON ASSOCIATES PROJECT NO
4
5
6
7 DRAINAGE REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 1 A. Background... 1 B. Project Location... 1 C. Property Description... 2 D. Previous Investigations... 2 II. DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION... 2 A. Existing Drainage Conditions... 2 B. Master Drainage Plan... 2 C. Offsite Tributary Area... 2 D. Proposed Drainage System Description... 2 E. Drainage Facility Maintenance... 3 III. DRAINAGE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA... 3 A. Regulations... 3 B. Development Criteria... 3 C. Hydrologic Criteria... 4 D. Hydraulic Criteria... 4 IV. POST-CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT... 4 A. Stormwater Quality Control Measures... 4 B. Calculations... 4 V. CONCLUSIONS... 4 A. Compliance... 4 B. Design Effectiveness... 4 C. Areas in Flood Hazard Zone... 4 VI. REFERENCES... 4 APPENDIX A: MAPS AND EXHIBITS... 1 APPENDIX B: HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS... 2 APPENDIX C: HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS... 3 PDC Metcalf Centralized Soil Treatment Facility Garfield County, CO
8
9 1 I. INTRODUCTION A. Background This Drainage Report has been prepared for PDC Energy s (PDC) Centralized Soil Treatment Facility (the SITE) by Olsson Associates. This report evaluates the SITE s historic drainage patterns, analyzes the change in stormwater quantity/quality associated with proposed development, and provides design to alleviate the impacts of increased stormwater runoff due to the proposed development. This report and plans are designed to bring the SITE into compliance with the COGCC rule stating, Surface water diversion structures, including, but not limited to berms and ditches, shall be constructed to accommodate a one hundred (100) year, twenty-four (24) hour event. The facility shall be designed and constructed with a run-on control system to prevent flow onto the facility during peak discharge and a run-off control system to contain the water volume from a twenty-five (25) year, twenty-four (24) hour storm. The design of proposed structures and associated recommendations presented herein are intended to satisfy SITE-specific storm water regulations of the COGCC. B. Project Location The SITE is located in Section 24, Township 7 South, Range 96 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, County of Garfield, State of Colorado. Refer to Figure 1 for project location. The SITE is located between Parachute and De Beque, southwest of the Parachute exit, on the south side of I-70, along CR 300 (Stone Quarry Rd). PROJECT LOCATION Figure 1: Vicinity Map PDC Metcalf Centralized Soil Treatment Facility Garfield County, CO
10 2 C. Property Description The west boundary of the SITE is the 30-foot buffer zone of an existing underground pipeline. The east boundary is formed by the toe of the steep slope on the east side of the site. Other project boundaries are formed by site constraints. D. Previous Investigations To our knowledge, no previous drainage studies have been approved for the SITE. II. DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION A. Existing Drainage Conditions The SITE drains to the Colorado River on the north side of the SITE via swales. Refer to the Location Map in Appendix A for the SITE location relative to major tributary drainage ways. The existing SITE consists of natural swales and mountainous terrain. The SITE generally slopes from east to the west with slopes varying from 2% up to 50%. The existing ground cover is primarily bare ground. The soils in the drainage area belong to the Hydrologic Soils Group B, soil that is moderately drained and has a moderate runoff potential. The Hydrologic Soils Map is in the Appendix B. The SITE consists of a total area of approximately 6.4 acres. Stormwater appears to sheetflow across the SITE to existing swales exiting the SITE un-detained. B. Master Drainage Plan To our knowledge, no master drainage studies have analyzed the SITE. C. Offsite Tributary Area For the purposes of this study, all adjacent land was assumed to remain undeveloped in the foreseeable future. In existing conditions, the area east of the SITE contributes to the flow across the site. This area is approximately acres of undisturbed land (to be known as Basin OS1). D. Proposed Drainage System Description The proposed drainage system was designed to divert existing off-site flows around the SITE in a diversion swale and to capture and contain all rainfall within the SITE. All flow from the off-site area will be conveyed in a diversion channel along the east edge of the SITE. This swale will be sized to convey the 100-year runoff from Basin OS1. New channels will be graded into the proposed SITE to convey flow to a retention pond at the north corner of the SITE. The channel along the access road at the south end of the PDC Metcalf Centralized Soil Treatment Facility Garfield County, CO
11 SITE will be directed under the fire access roadway through a corrugated metal pipe culvert. Refer to Sheets A-1 through A-3 in Appendix A for basin delineations and proposed drainage system layout. Basin OS1 is east of the SITE. Stormwater generated on this basin will sheet-flow from east to west and into a diversion swale that will carry the runoff around the SITE and discharge to open ground north of the SITE. Basin P1 is the southern portion of the SITE. Stormwater generated on this basin will sheet-flow from east to west into a swale along the west side of the access road. Basin P2 includes the portion of the SITE which sheet flows into the swale along the fire access road on the west side of the SITE. Basin P3 sheet flows to the north where it is collected in a swale which flows along the access roadway and delineates the retention pond maintenance area. Basin P4 includes the area which flows directly into the retention pond. For calculations, the pond is also included in basin P4. The Retention Pond at Design Point 4 is located at the north corner of the SITE. The pond was sized to hold the runoff from the 25-year, 24-hour storm event, and has a volume of 1.16 acre-feet at elevation The pond bottom is at elevation The embankment height is 9 feet to maximize available volume without becoming a jurisdictional retention pond. E. Drainage Facility Maintenance The owner shall be responsible for maintaining all on-site drainage facilities. The pond bottom should be scraped and re-graded at least every 1-3 years to remove sediment buildup. In addition, the pond should be pumped and examined after any significant rainfall event to ensure proper functionality. During construction, run-off from the SITE should be treated prior to leaving the SITE using methods described in Volume 3 of the Urban Strom Drainage Criteria Manual, including use of straw bales and/or other methods to provide temporary water quality. III. DRAINAGE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CRITERIA A. Regulations This report has been prepared in accordance with common engineering practices and the Mesa County/City of Grand Junction Stormwater Management Manual. B. Development Criteria There are no known constraints placed on the SITE due to floodplain studies, master studies or adjacent property drainage studies. The SITE will not receive any tributary flows 3 PDC Metcalf Centralized Soil Treatment Facility Garfield County, CO
12 4 from upstream land or adjacent development after development. C. Hydrologic Criteria Hydrologic calculations have been prepared in accordance with common engineering practices. Refer to Appendix B for all hydrologic calculations. D. Hydraulic Criteria Hydraulic calculations have been prepared in accordance with common engineering practices and the Mesa County/City of Grand Junction Stormwater Management Manual. Refer to Appendix C for all hydraulic calculations. IV. POST-CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT A. Stormwater Quality Control Measures The proposed riprap lined drainage swales will provide a means for stormwater to be routed around and through the SITE during all post-construction storm events. In this manner, stormwater quality control measures will not be needed because developed run-off rates are equivalent to existing condition run-off rates with little change in impervious area. B. Calculations Refer to Appendix B for developed condition hydrologic calculations. V. CONCLUSIONS A. Compliance This report has been prepared in accordance with common engineering practices and the Mesa County/City of Grand Junction Stormwater Management Manual. B. Design Effectiveness Proper implementation of the proposed measures outlined in this report will alleviate the direct impacts of stormwater run-off on adjacent, downstream lands. C. Areas in Flood Hazard Zone The SITE is not within a FEMA-designated flood hazard zone and is designated as Zone D. VI. REFERENCES 1) Mesa County/City of Grand Junction Stormwater Management Manual, December ) Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, November PDC Metcalf Centralized Soil Treatment Facility Garfield County, CO
13 PDC Metcalf Centralized Soil Treatment Facility Garfield County, CO APPENDIX A: MAPS AND EXHIBITS
14
15 TEL FAX S 95W 7S 96W PROJECT SITE drawn by: checked by: approved by: QA/QC by: project no.: drawing no.: date: 2013 REV. NO DATE 24 GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO 14 PDC ENERGY METCALF CENTRALIZED SOIL TREATMENT FACILITY REVISIONS 17 REVISIONS DESCRIPTION OLSSON ASSOCIATES ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS (HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL). THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION. IT IS HOWEVER THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. LOCATION MAP Table Mountain Drive, Suite 200 Golden, CO R 8 7 MO WP WP WP SHEET 3 of 7
16 LEGEND R P1 X Y Z TEL FAX P Table Mountain Drive, Suite 200 Golden, CO P P OLSSON ASSOCIATES ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS (HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL). THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION. IT IS HOWEVER THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. REV. NO. DATE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION REVISIONS 1 P DRAINAGE PLAN SITE PLAN PDC ENERGY METCALF CENTRALIZED SOIL TREATMENT FACILITY GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO 2013 drawn by: checked by: approved by: QA/QC by: project no.: drawing no.: date: MO WP WP WP SHEET A-1 of 7
17 TEL FAX Table Mountain Drive, Suite 200 Golden, CO R OLSSON ASSOCIATES ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS (HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL). THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION. IT IS HOWEVER THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. OS1 drawn by: checked by: approved by: QA/QC by: project no.: drawing no.: date: 2013 GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO P1 X Y Z PDC ENERGY METCALF CENTRALIZED SOIL TREATMENT FACILITY LEGEND EXISTING DRAINAGE BASIN PLAN OFF-SITE DRAINAGE REV. NO. DATE REVISIONS REVISIONS DESCRIPTION MO WP WP WP SHEET A-2 of 7
18 LEGEND R F-1 C-1 TEL FAX D Table Mountain Drive, Suite 200 Golden, CO F-2 F-3 OLSSON ASSOCIATES ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS (HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL). THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION. IT IS HOWEVER THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. REV. NO. DATE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION REVISIONS C-1 F-1 DRAINAGE PLAN TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL AND CULVERT PLAN PDC ENERGY METCALF CENTRALIZED SOIL TREATMENT FACILITY GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO 2013 drawn by: checked by: approved by: QA/QC by: project no.: drawing no.: date: MO WP WP WP SHEET A-3 of 7
19 APPENDIX B: HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS PDC Metcalf Centralized Soil Treatment Facility Garfield County, CO
20
21 Hydrologic Soil Group Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties (PDC Metcalf Land Farm) 39 25' 35'' 39 25' 21'' ' 42'' 108 3' 41'' Map Scale: 1:2,130 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet Meters Feet ' 28'' 108 3' 27'' ' 35'' 39 25' 20'' Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 2/22/2013 Page 1 of 4
22 Hydrologic Soil Group Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties (PDC Metcalf Land Farm) MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Units Soil Ratings A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Political Features Cities Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes MAP INFORMATION Map Scale: 1:2,130 if printed on A size (8.5" 11") sheet. The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: UTM Zone 12N NAD83 This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties Survey Area Data: Version 6, Mar 25, 2008 Date(s) aerial images were photographed: 8/8/2005 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Major Roads Local Roads Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 2/22/2013 Page 2 of 4
23 Hydrologic Soil Group Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties PDC Metcalf Land Farm Hydrologic Soil Group Hydrologic Soil Group Summary by Map Unit Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties (CO683) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 4 Arvada loam, 6 to 20 percent slopes D % 46 Nihill channery loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes B % 58 Potts-Ildefonso complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes B % 65 Torrifluvents, nearly level D % 72 Wann sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes B % Totals for Area of Interest % Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 2/22/2013 Page 3 of 4
24 Hydrologic Soil Group Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties PDC Metcalf Land Farm Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 2/22/2013 Page 4 of 4
25 DESCRIPTION ULTIMATE OR INITIAL DESIGNER CITY OR COUNTY PDC Metcalf Land Farm Draft Drainage Study MEO Garfield County 1 HOUR DESIGN POINT RAINFALL VALUES-NOAA ATLAS FOR COLORADO 2 YR YR YR YR YR YR HOUR DESIGN POINT RAINFALL VALUES-NOAA ATLAS FOR COLORADO 2 YR YR YR YR YR YR 2.60 PDC Landfarm 3/4/2013 4:21 PM
26 Return Period Duration 2-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr 6-hr hr hr PDC Metcalf Soil Treatment Facility
27 COMPOSITE 'C' FACTORS (DEVELOPED) LOCATION: Garfield County Draft Drainage Study BY: MEO Soil Type: B DATE: 3/4/2013 BASIN UNDEVELOPED DEVELOPED COMPOSITE C FACTOR % IMPERVIOUS DESIGNATION UNDEV DEV TOTAL 2YR 5 YR 10 YR 25 YR 100 YR 2YR 5 YR 10 YR 25 YR 100 YR 2YR 5 YR 10 YR 25 YR 100 YR Imperviousness = 2 10 P P P P OS COMPOSITE I, % TOTAL A, ac Olsson Associates 3/4/2013 PDC Metcalf Soil Treatment Facility _Hydrology and Pond Vol Calcs.xlsx
28 STANDARD FORM SF-2 TIME OF CONCENTRATION (DEVELOPED) REMARKS LOCATION: Garfield County Draft Drainage Study BY: MEO DATE: 3/4/2013 FORMULAS: SUB-BASIN DATA INIT./OVERLAND TIME (Ti) TRAVEL TIME (Tt) TOTAL Tc Check (Urbanized Basins) FINAL Tc * Ti = 1.8 (1.1-C5)L^0.5/(S^1/3) DESIGNATION C 5 AREA (AC) LENGTH (FT) SLOPE % Ti (Min.)* LAND SURFACE LENGTH (FT) SLOPE % VEL. (FPS)** Tt(Min.) Ti+Tt(Min.) LGTH. (FT) Tc = (L/180) + 10 (minutes) ** V=Cv*(S/100)^0.5 P BARE P BARE P BARE P BARE OS BARE Approx slope based on USGS Quad map Olsson Associates 3/4/2013 PDC Metcalf Soil Treatment Facility _Hydrology and Pond Vol Calcs.xlsx
29 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN (RATIONAL METHOD PROCEDURE, STANDARD FOR SF-3) DESIGN STORM: 25-YEAR DEVELOPED Calc. by: MEO Chk'd by: WEP PDC Metcalf Land Farm Draft Drainage Study Garfield County Date: 3/4/2013 DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF DITCH TRAVEL TIME REMARKS DESIGN POINT BASIN AREA (AC) COEFF. (C) Tc (Min.) C*A I (in./ hr.) Q (cfs) Sum Area Tc (min) I (in./hr.) 1 P Tt from DP1 to DP2 2 P Design point 2, P1+P2 3 P P Design point 4, P1+P2+P3+P4 Sum C*A Total Q (cfs) SLOPE % FLOW (CFS) LENGTH (FT) VEL. (FPS) TRAVEL TIME Tt OS Olsson Associates 3/4/2013 PDC Metcalf Soil Treatment Facility _Hydrology and Pond Vol Calcs.xlsx
30 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN (RATIONAL METHOD PROCEDURE, STANDARD FOR SF-3) DESIGN STORM: 100-YEAR DEVELOPED Calc. by: MEO Chk'd by: WEP PDC Metcalf Land Farm Draft Drainage Study Garfield County Date: 3/4/2013 DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF DITCH TRAVEL TIME REMARKS DESIGN POINT BASIN AREA (AC) COEFF. (C) Tc (Min.) C*A I (in./ hr.) Q (cfs) Sum Area Tc (min) I (in./hr.) 1 P Tt from DP1 to DP2 2 P Design point 2, P1+P2 3 P P Design point 4, P1+P2+P3+P4 Sum C*A Total Q (cfs) SLOPE % FLOW (CFS) LENGTH (FT) VEL. (FPS) TRAVEL TIME Tt OS Olsson Associates 3/4/2013 PDC Metcalf Soil Treatment Facility _Hydrology and Pond Vol Calcs.xlsx
31 Volume for Retention Pond Prismoidal Method Required Volume V=IA ELEV. AREA VOLUME ACCUM.VOL. ACCUM.VOL. ACCUM.VOL. ACCUM. VOL. (FT) (FT 2 ) (FT 3 ) (FT 3 ) (AC.-FT.) (GAL) (BBL) , ,273 2,984 2, , ,877 3,571 6, ,036 1, ,515 4,192 10, ,396 1, ,183 4,845 15, ,642 2, ,877 5,526 21, ,985 3,762 Basin I A V ,596 6,233 27, ,615 4,872 (in) (AC) (AC-FT) ,340 6,965 34, ,717 6,112 P ,109 7,721 42, ,481 7,488 P ,903 8,503 50, ,091 9,002 P P Total Olsson Associates 3/4/2013 PDC Metcalf Soil Treatment Facility _Hydrology and Pond Vol Calcs.xlsx
32
33 APPENDIX C: HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS PDC Metcalf Centralized Soil Treatment Facility Garfield County, CO
34
35 Normal Flow Analysis - Trapezoidal Channel Project: Channel ID: PDC CENTRALIZED SOIL TREATMENT FACILITY Diversion Swale (Maximum Discharge at Minimum Slope) Design Information (Input) Channel Invert Slope So = ft/ft Manning's n n = Bottom Width B = 0.00 ft Left Side Slope Z1 = 3.00 ft/ft Right Side Slope Z2 = 3.00 ft/ft Freeboard Height F = 0.00 ft Design Water Depth Y = 3.33 ft Normal Flow Condtion (Calculated) Discharge Q = cfs Froude Number Fr = 0.56 Flow Velocity V = 4.09 fps Flow Area A = sq ft Top Width T = ft Wetted Perimeter P = ft Hydraulic Radius R = 1.58 ft Hydraulic Depth D = 1.67 ft Specific Energy Es = 3.59 ft Centroid of Flow Area Yo = 1.10 ft Specific Force Fs = 3.37 kip _UD-Channels_v1.04_Diversion Swale.xls, Basics 3/4/2013, 3:27 PM
36 Critical Flow Analysis - Trapezoidal Channel Project: Channel ID: PDC CENTRALIZED SOIL TREATMENT FACILITY Diversion Swale (100yr Water Depth at Minimum Slope) Design Information (Input) Bottom Width B = 0.00 ft Left Side Slope Z1 = 3.00 ft/ft Right Side Slope Z2 = 3.00 ft/ft Design Discharge Q = cfs Critical Flow Condition (Calculated) Critical Flow Depth Y = 1.26 ft Critical Flow Area A = 4.73 sq ft Critical Top Width T = 7.53 ft Critical Hydraulic Depth D = 0.63 ft Critical Flow Velocity V = 4.51 fps Froude Number Fr = 1.00 Critical Wetted Perimeter P = 7.94 ft Critical Hydraulic Radius R = 0.60 ft Critical (min) Specific Energy Esc = 1.57 ft Centroid on the Critical Flow Area Yoc = 0.21 ft Critical (min) Specific Force Fsc = 0.25 kip _UD-Channels_v1.04_Diversion Swale.xls, Basics 3/4/2013, 3:27 PM
37 Normal Flow Analysis - Trapezoidal Channel Project: Channel ID: PDC CENTRALIZED SOIL TREATMENT FACILITY Site Swale (Maximum Discharge at Minimum Slope) Design Information (Input) Channel Invert Slope So = ft/ft Manning's n n = Bottom Width B = 0.00 ft Left Side Slope Z1 = 3.00 ft/ft Right Side Slope Z2 = 3.00 ft/ft Freeboard Height F = 0.00 ft Design Water Depth Y = 1.67 ft Normal Flow Condtion (Calculated) Discharge Q = cfs Froude Number Fr = 0.50 Flow Velocity V = 2.57 fps Flow Area A = 8.34 sq ft Top Width T = ft Wetted Perimeter P = ft Hydraulic Radius R = 0.79 ft Hydraulic Depth D = 0.83 ft Specific Energy Es = 1.77 ft Centroid of Flow Area Yo = 0.55 ft Specific Force Fs = 0.39 kip _UD-Channels_v1.04_Site Swales.xls, Basics 3/4/2013, 3:28 PM
38 Critical Flow Analysis - Trapezoidal Channel Project: Channel ID: PDC CENTRALIZED SOIL TREATMENT FACILITY Site Swale (100yr Water Depth at Minimum Slope) Design Information (Input) Bottom Width B = 0.00 ft Left Side Slope Z1 = 3.00 ft/ft Right Side Slope Z2 = 3.00 ft/ft Design Discharge Q = 5.34 cfs Critical Flow Condition (Calculated) Critical Flow Depth Y = 0.72 ft Critical Flow Area A = 1.56 sq ft Critical Top Width T = 4.32 ft Critical Hydraulic Depth D = 0.36 ft Critical Flow Velocity V = 3.43 fps Froude Number Fr = 1.01 Critical Wetted Perimeter P = 4.55 ft Critical Hydraulic Radius R = 0.34 ft Critical (min) Specific Energy Esc = 0.90 ft Centroid on the Critical Flow Area Yoc = 0.12 ft Critical (min) Specific Force Fsc = 0.05 kip _UD-Channels_v1.04_Site Swales.xls, Basics 3/4/2013, 3:28 PM
39 CIRCULAR CONDUIT FLOW (Normal & Critical Depth Computation) Project: PDC Metcalf Land Farm Pipe ID: Road Crossings Design Information (Input) Pipe Invert Slope So = ft/ft Pipe Manning's n-value n = Pipe Diameter D = inches Design discharge Q = 0.84 cfs Full-flow Capacity (Calculated) Full-flow area Af = 0.79 sq ft Full-flow wetted perimeter Pf = 3.14 ft Half Central Angle Theta = 3.14 radians Full-flow capacity Qf = 2.05 cfs Calculation of Normal Flow Condition Half Central Angle (0<Theta<3.14) Theta = 1.46 radians Flow area An = 0.34 sq ft Top width Tn = 0.99 ft Wetted perimeter Pn = 1.46 ft Flow depth Yn = 0.45 ft Flow velocity Vn = 2.48 fps Discharge Qn = 0.84 cfs Percent Full Flow Flow = 41.0% of full flow Normal Depth Froude Number Fr n = 0.75 subcritical Calculation of Critical Flow Condition Half Central Angle (0<Theta-c<3.14) Theta-c = 1.34 radians Critical flow area Ac = 0.28 sq ft Critical top width Tc = 0.97 ft Critical flow depth Yc = 0.38 ft Critical flow velocity Vc = 3.03 fps Critical Depth Froude Number Fr c = _UD-Culvert_v2.04_Road Crossings.xls, Pipe 3/4/2013, 3:09 PM
40 Channel Report Hydraflow Express Extension for AutoCAD Civil 3D 2013 by Autodesk, Inc. Tuesday, Feb <Name> Triangular Side Slopes (z:1) = 3.00, 3.00 Total Depth (ft) = 3.34 Invert Elev (ft) = Slope (%) = 0.50 N-Value = Calculations Compute by: Known Depth Known Depth (ft) = 3.33 Highlighted Depth (ft) = 3.33 Q (cfs) = Area (sqft) = Velocity (ft/s) = 4.75 Wetted Perim (ft) = Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 2.81 Top Width (ft) = EGL (ft) = 3.68 Elev (ft) Section Depth (ft) Reach (ft)
THE CITY OF THE VILLAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STATEMENT FOR MULFORD ESTATES
THE CITY OF THE VILLAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STATEMENT FOR MULFORD ESTATES Revised August 18, 2016, August 10, 2016, September 19,2016 Prepared By: Isch and Associates, Inc. 14848 Bristol Park
More informationPHYSICAL SOIL PROPERTIES
PHYSICAL SOIL PROPERTIES Physical Soil Properties Santa Cruz County, California Scotts Valley Target Physical Soil Properties This table shows estimates of some physical characteristics and features that
More informationChapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall
6.0 Introduction This chapter summarizes methodology for determining rainfall and runoff information for the design of stormwater management facilities in the City. The methodology is based on the procedures
More informationRed Barn R.V. and Boat Storage Weld County, Colorado. Final Drainage Report
Red Barn R.V. and Boat Storage Weld County, Colorado Final Drainage Report Prepared for Kevin Moore Project No. 1318-001 February 27, 2017 Prepared By: KETTERLING, BUTHERUS AND NORTON ENGINEERS, LLC. 820
More informationNEW CASTLE CONSERVATION DISTRICT. through. (Name of Municipality) PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION DRAINAGE, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL
NEW CASTLE CONSERVATION DISTRICT through (Name of Municipality) PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION DRAINAGE, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL Office use only: Received by Municipality: Received by
More informationStandards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey May 2012 STANDARD FOR SLOPE PROTECTION STRUCTURES. Definition
STANDARD FOR SLOPE PROTECTION STRUCTURES Definition Structures to safely conduct surface runoff from the top of a slope to the bottom of the slope. Purpose The purpose of this practice is to convey storm
More informationRun-On and Run-Off Control System Plan Neal North Energy Center Monofill
Run-On and Run-Off Control System Plan Neal North Energy Center Monofill MidAmerican Energy Company, Neal North Energy Center Coal Combustion Residual Rule Compliance October 10, 2016 Run-On and Run-Off
More informationHydrologic Soil Group Knowledge Matrix
Hydrologic Soil Group Knowledge Matrix Refinement Of Soils Parameter For MPCA s Minimum Impact Design Standards Calculator and Stand-Alone Hydrologic Soil Group Determination Funding for this project was
More informationAPPENDIX G HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE
Storm Drainage 13-G-1 APPENDIX G HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE 1.0 Introduction The hydraulic grade line is used to aid the designer in determining the acceptability of a proposed or evaluation of an existing storm
More informationPonds. Pond A water impoundment made by excavating a pit, or constructing a dam or an embankment.
POND SITE SELECTION AND CONSTRUCTION Uses, Planning, & Design David Krietemeyer Area Engineer USDA-NRCS June 20, 2008 Uses Considerations for Location of Commonly Used Terms Pond A water impoundment made
More informationROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Small Pond Approval. SWM MD-378 Pond Checklist Training 10/17/07. Exemptions EMBANKMENT HEIGHT. Height of Dam Weir Wall
SWM MD-378 Pond Checklist Training 10/17/07 Ken Wolfe Warren Johnson USDA, NRCS Frederick, Maryland ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Small Pond Approval MDE, WMA, Dam Safety Division Authority (COMAR 26.17.04.03)
More informationStormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia
Stormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia Adopted November 15, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. FORWARD... 1 2. GENERAL LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS... 2 2.1. DETENTION REQUIREMENTS... 2 2.1.1.
More informationSummary of Detention Pond Calculation Canyon Estates American Canyon, California
July 15, 2015 Bellecci & Associates, Inc Summary of Detention Pond Calculation Canyon Estates American Canyon, California 1. Methodology: Method: Unit Hydrograph Software: Bentley Pond Pack Version 8i
More informationPrepared for Urban Drainage and Flood Control District
BERM FAILURE TECHNICAL ANALYSES SOUTH PLATTE GRAVEL PIT EVALUATION CRITERIA Prepared for Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Wright Water Engineers, Inc. January 2013 121-030.000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More information6.0 Runoff. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Flood Control Design Runoff
October 2003, Revised February 2005 Chapter 6.0, Runoff Page 1 6.1 Introduction 6.0 Runoff The timing, peak rates of discharge, and volume of stormwater runoff are the primary considerations in the design
More informationLocation Drainage Study
Location Drainage Study PROJECT ROUTE: LIMITS: MUNICIPALITY/COUNTY: JOB NUMBER: IL 47 at Burlington Road 750ft NW to 750ft SE of IL 47(Burlington), & 1000ft S to 1000ft N of Burlington (IL47) Kane County
More informationMODEL Stormwater Local Design Manual. City of Centerville
MODEL Stormwater Local Design Manual City of Centerville Adopted December 6, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. FORWARD... 1 2. GENERAL LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS... 1 2.1. DETENTION REQUIREMENTS... 1 2.1.1. Discharge
More informationCHECKLIST FOR STREETS, INLETS, AND STORM SEWER DESIGN
CHECKLIST FOR STREETS, INLETS, I. STREET CLASSIFICATION AND DESIGN CRITERIA A. Determine drainage classification for the roadway section using Table 7-1 or Table 7-2. B. Determine the allowable flow depth
More informationCulvert Sizing procedures for the 100-Year Peak Flow
CULVERT SIZING PROCEDURES FOR THE 100-YEAR PEAK FLOW 343 APPENDIX A: Culvert Sizing procedures for the 100-Year Peak Flow A. INTRODUCTION Several methods have been developed for estimating the peak flood
More informationTable of Contents. Overview... 1
Chapter 3 Chapter 3 Table of Contents Overview... 1 Rainfall... 2 3-2-1 Rainfall Depths and Intensities... 2 3-2-2 Design Storm Distribution for Colorado Urban Hydrograph Procedure (CUHP)... 5 3-2-3 Temporal
More informationConstructed Wetland Channel T-9
Description A constructed wetland channel is a conveyance BMP that is built, in part, to enhance stormwater quality. Constructed wetland channels use dense vegetation to slow down runoff and allow time
More informationINITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROLS PLAN NORTH VALMY GENERATING STATION (ASH LANDFILL) HUMBOLDT COUNTY, NEVADA OCTOBER 2016 PROJECT NO
INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROLS PLAN NORTH VALMY GENERATING STATION (ASH LANDFILL) HUMBOLDT COUNTY, NEVADA OCTOBER 2016 PROJECT NO. 2016.R009 SUBMITTED TO: NV Energy, Inc. 6226 W. Sahara Ave. M/S 30
More informationMunicipal Stormwater Ordinances Summary Table
APPENDIX F Municipal Ordinances Summary Table Municipality Abington Bryn Athyn Borough Hatboro Borough Ordinance, SALDO Runoff equals pre post Erosion Sediment Control Water Quality Requirements Any which
More informationPre-Treatment Bioretention Cells Bioswales IOWA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL DECEMBER 16, 2015
Pre-Treatment Bioretention Cells Bioswales IOWA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL DECEMBER 16, 2015 Urban Runoff Background How we got here What Problem?? Provenance of the Problem Unified Sizing Criteria What
More informationSection 600 Runoff Table of Contents
Section 600 Runoff Table of Contents 601 INTRODUCTION...600-1 602 RATIONAL METHOD...600-1 602.1 Rational Method Formula...600-2 602.2 Time of Concentration...600-2 602.3 Intensity...600-4 602.4 Runoff
More informationE. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
E. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 1. Existing Conditions The Project Site is located within the Lower Hudson Watershed. According to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), Lower Hudson
More informationStandards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey May 2012 STANDARD FOR GRASSED WATERWAYS. Definition. Purpose
STANDARD FOR GRASSED WATERWAYS Definition A natural or constructed watercourse shaped or graded in earth materials and stabilized with suitable vegetation for the safe conveyance of runoff water. Purpose
More informationSTORMWATER RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. INDEPENDENCE PLANT CLASS 3N CCR LANDFILL
STORMWATER RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. INDEPENDENCE PLANT CLASS 3N CCR LANDFILL PERMIT NO. 0200-S3N-R2 AFIN: 32-00042 OCTOBER 12, 2016 STORMWATER RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN
More informationStormwater Management Studies PDS Engineering Services Division ES Policy # 3-01
Stormwater Management Studies PDS Engineering Services Division Revised Date: 2/28/08 INTRODUCTION The City of Overland Park requires submission of a stormwater management study as part of the development
More information4.1 General Methodology and Data Base Development
Chapter 4 METHODOLOGY 4.1 General and Data Base Development This report project utilized several computer software models and analysis techniques to create the numeric data on which decisions for this
More informationiswm TM Technical Manual Hydrology:
: 1.0 2.0 Downstream Assessment 3.0 Streambank Protection 4.0 Water Balance 5.0 Rainfall Tables 6.0 Hydrologic Soils Data Table of Contents 1.0... HO-1 1.1 Estimating Runoff... HO-1 1.1.1 Introduction
More informationAppendix B. Storm Drain System Data
MENIFEE VALLEY CAMPUS MASTER PLAN FINAL EIR MT. SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Appendix Appendix B. Storm Drain System Data June 2017 MENIFEE VALLEY CAMPUS MASTER PLAN FINAL EIR MT. SAN JACINTO
More informationStorm Sewer Design. Bob Pitt University of Alabama and Shirley Clark Penn State Harrisburg
Storm Sewer Design Bob Pitt University of Alabama and Shirley Clark Penn State Harrisburg Major floods are dramatic and water flow routes must be recognized when minor drainage systems fail. These types
More informationPUNTA GORDA AIRPORT CONSTRUCT TAXIWAY A EXTENSION DRAINAGE REPORT
PUNTA GORDA AIRPORT CONSTRUCT TAIWAY A ETENSION DRAINAGE REPORT Prepared for the Charlotte County Airport Authority Prepared By: 7650 West Courtney Campbell Causeway Tampa, Florida 33607-1462 May 2015
More informationChapter 7. Street Drainage. 7.0 Introduction. 7.1 Function of Streets in the Drainage System. 7.2 Street Classification
7. Introduction This chapter summarizes methods to evaluate runoff conveyance in various street cross sections and curb types in the Town of Castle Rock and identifies acceptable upper limits of street
More informationTHE CROSSROADS IN WINCHESTER 4. DRAINAGE PLAN. 4. Drainage Plan. a. Drainage Plan Description
THE CROSSROADS IN WINCHESTER 4. DRAINAGE PLAN 4. Drainage Plan a. Drainage Plan Description The Specific Plan area drains naturally into two separate watersheds: approximately 6 percent of the Specific
More informationCOON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW. Spring Lake Park Schools Westwood Middle School st Avenue NE, Spring Lake Park, MN 55432
PAN 16-112, Westwood Middle School, Page 1 of 6 COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW MEETING DATE: August 22, 2016 AGENDA NUMBER: 10 FILE NUMBER: 16-112 ITEM: Westwood Middle School RECOMMENDATION:
More informationSECTION 3 DRAINAGE. 3-1 General. 3-2 Drainage Ordinances and Legal Requirements
SECTION 3 DRAINAGE 3-1 General All Drainage plans for proposed development shall be prepared by a Professional Engineer registered in Virginia, except as noted below. Further, their seal and signature
More informationSECTION STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN, GRADING, AND WATER QUALITY TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 402 STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA 400-1
CITY OF THORNTON Standards and Specifications Revised: October 2012 SECTION 400 - STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN, GRADING, AND WATER QUALITY TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 401 GENERAL PROVISIONS 400-1
More informationProject Drainage Report
Design Manual Chapter 2 - Stormwater 2A - General Information 2A-4 Project Drainage Report A. Purpose The purpose of the project drainage report is to identify and propose specific solutions to stormwater
More informationLoam Ridge Almond Orchard
AG-LAND Investment Brokers 645 Antelope Blvd., Suite 17 PO Box 896 Red Bluff, CA 96080 530-529-4400 Fax 530-527-5042 Loam Ridge Almond Orchard Contact: AG-LAND Investment Brokers Prepared by FSA Date:
More informationSediment Basin. Fe= (Depends on soil type)
3.9 Sediment Control Description: A sediment basin is an embankment with a controlled outlet that detains stormwater runoff, resulting in the settling of suspended sediment. The basin provides treatment
More informationDIVISION 5 STORM DRAINAGE CRITERIA
DIVISION 5 STORM DRAINAGE CRITERIA Section 5.01 GENERAL The following storm drainage design criteria shall apply to all storm drainage designs in the City. Additional design criteria are specified in the
More informationStandards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey May 2012 STANDARD FOR RIPRAP. Conditions Where Practice Applies
STANDARD FOR RIPRAP Definition A layer of loose rock, aggregate, bagged concrete, gabions, or concrete revetment blocks placed over an erodible soil surface. Purpose The purpose of riprap is to protect
More information2015 ANNUAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION REPORT ENTERGY INDEPENDENCE PLANT CLASS 3N LANDFILL PERMIT NO S3N-R2 AFIN:
2015 ANNUAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION REPORT ENTERGY INDEPENDENCE PLANT CLASS 3N LANDFILL PERMIT NO. 0200-S3N-R2 AFIN: 32-00042 JANUARY 15, 2016 ENTERGY INDEPENDENCE PLANT CLASS 3N LANDFILL 2015 ANNUAL ENGINEERING
More informationiswm TM Criteria Manual City of Azle Section 14 City of Azle Subdivision Ordinance DRAFT-June Chapter 1
City of Azle Section 14 City of Azle Subdivision Ordinance DRAFT-June 2010... Chapter 1 i CITY OF AZLE iswm CRITERIA MANUAL FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION Incorporating the Regional NCTCOG Integrated
More informationInflow Design Flood Control System Plan
Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan For Compliance with the Coal Combustion Residuals Rule (40 CFR Part 257) Valmont Station - CCR Surface Impoundments Public Service Company of Colorado Denver, Colorado
More informationLAWRENCE, KANSAS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA
LAWRENCE, KANSAS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA FEBRUARY 1996 CITY OF LAWRENCE, KANSAS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Pg 1.0 GENERAL 1.1 Introduction... 1 1.2 Applicability... 1 1.3 General
More informationStream Reaches and Hydrologic Units
Chapter United States 6 Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Chapter 6 Stream Reaches and Hydrologic Units Rain clouds Cloud formation Precipitation Surface runoff Evaporation
More informationENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan Bottom Ash Pond Sherburne County Generating Plant Introduction This report presents documentation and certification of the
More informationCHAPTER 3 STORMWATER HYDROLOGY. Table of Contents SECTION 3.1 METHODS FOR ESTIMATING STORMWATER RUNOFF
CHAPTER 3 STORMWATER HYDROLOGY Table of Contents SECTION 3.1 METHODS FOR ESTIMATING STORMWATER RUNOFF 3.1.1 Introduction to Hydrologic Methods...3.1-1 3.1.2 Symbols and Definitions...3.1-3 3.1.3 Rainfall
More informationTreatment Volume: Curve Numbers. Composite CN or Not? Treatment Volume: Curve Numbers. Treatment Volume: Calculation. Treatment Volume: Calculation
Stormwater Engineering Bioretention Design Bill Hunt, PE, Ph.D. Extension Specialist & Assistant Professor NCSU-BAE www.bae.ncsu.edu/stormwater Bioretention Design Six Step Process 1 Determine Volume to
More informationGonsalves Ranch, 756 +/- Total Acres Red Bluff, California
AG-LAND INVESTMENT BROKERS 275 Sale Lane, Suite 2 / P. O. Box 896 Red Bluff, CA 96080 530.529.4400 office / 530.527.5042 fax Gonsalves Ranch, 756 +/- Total Acres Red Bluff, California Listing Price: $675,000.
More informationChapter 7 Ditches and Channels
Chapter 7 Ditches and Channels TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 7 - DITCHES AND CHANNELS... 7-1 7.1 Introduction... 7-1 7.2 Design Policy... 7-2 7.2.1 Federal Policy... 7-2 7.2.2 Commonwealth of Virginia Policy...
More informationAPPENDIX C INLETS. The application and types of storm drainage inlets are presented in detail in this Appendix.
Storm Drainage 13-C-1 APPENDIX C INLETS 1.0 Introduction The application and types of storm drainage inlets are presented in detail in this Appendix. 2.0 Inlet Locations Inlets are required at locations
More informationChapter 6 Hydrology TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 6 - HYDROLOGY
Chapter 6 Hydrology TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 6 - HYDROLOGY... 6-1 6.1 Introduction... 6-1 6.1.1 Objective... 6-1 6.1.2 Definition... 6-1 6.1.3 Factors Affecting Floods... 6-1 6.1.4 Sources of Information...
More informationAPPENDIX A: STORMWATER HYDROLOGY
APPENDIX A: STORMWATER HYDROLOGY In low impact development (LID), the objective of stormwater control measures (SCMs) is to mimic or replicate the hydrologic function of a natural system. This approach
More informationOverview of NRCS (SCS) TR-20 By Dr. R.M. Ragan
Overview of NRCS (SCS) TR-20 By Dr. R.M. Ragan TR-20 is a computer program for the simulation of runoff occurring from a single storm event. The program develops flood hydrographs from runoff and routes
More informationMr. Michael Malone CPS Energy 145 Navarro Street San Antonio, Texas Project No
Environmental Resources Management January 13, 2017 Mr. Michael Malone 145 Navarro Street San Antonio, Texas 78205 Project No. 0352436 CityCentre Four 840 West Sam Houston Parkway North, Suite 600 Houston,
More informationDrop Height For Channel Erosion Control
Drop Height For Channel Erosion Control James C.Y. Guo, Professor and Director Department of Civil Engineering, U. of Colorado at Denver, Denver, Colorado 8017 E-mail: James.Guo@cudenver.edu Introduction
More informationArticle 20: Erosion Control and Stormwater Management
Article 20: Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Section 360: Purpose, Scope of Authority, Performance Guarantee and Approvals A. Purpose. The purpose of this document is to set forth minimum requirements
More informationTECHNICAL BULLETIN. Synthetic Turf Athletic Field Drainage Design Assistance
TECHNICAL BULLETIN Synthetic Turf Athletic Field Drainage Design Assistance The SportsEdge HQ geocomposite strip drain products are engineered specifically for use in synthetic turf athletic field base
More information10.0 Storm Sewer Systems
October 2003 Chapter 10.0, Storm Sewer Systems Page 1 10.0 Storm Sewer Systems 10.1 Introduction A storm sewer system consists of a system of inlets, pipes, manholes, junctions, cleanouts, outlets, and
More informationCACHE VALLEY STORM WATER DESIGN STANDARDS. As Amended by Logan City November 2010
CACHE VALLEY STORM WATER DESIGN STANDARDS As Amended by Logan City November 2010 Updated November 2010 Table of Contents A. Definitions... 3 B. Design Requirements... 5 1. Storm Event... 5 2. Allowable
More information16.0 Water Quality Management Criteria for Developed Land
October 2003, Revised February 2005 Criteria for Developed Land Page 1 16.1 Introduction 16.0 Water Quality Management Criteria for Developed Land Stormwater quality control is an integral part of any
More informationCity of Oakland. Public Works Agency Standards STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES. Engineering Design & ROW Management Division
City of Oakland PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 250 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA 4 TH FLOOR OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612 (510) 238-3437 FAX (510) 238-7227 TTD (510) 238-3254 Public Works Agency Standards STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN
More informationHARVEST PARK/ZIEGLER MIXED USE LOT 2 CITY OF FORT COLLINS, CO
EROSION CONTROL REPORT / STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR HARVEST PARK/ZIEGLER MIXED USE LOT 2 CITY OF FORT COLLINS, CO Prepared by: Interwest Consulting Group 1218 West Ash, Suite C Windsor, Colorado 80550
More informationDRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) RUNOFF
Section CONTENTS Page RO- 1.0 OVERVIEW... 1 2.0 RATIONAL METHOD... 3 2.1 Rational Formula... 3 2.2 Assumptions... 4 2.3 Limitations... 4 2.4 Time of Concentration... 5 2.4.1 Initial Flow Time... 5 2.4.2
More informationDRAINAGE PLAN OF NAU S EASTBURN EDUCATION AND GAMMAGE BUILDINGS FINAL PROPOSAL
MAY 10, 2016 DRAINAGE PLAN OF NAU S EASTBURN EDUCATION AND GAMMAGE BUILDINGS FINAL PROPOSAL Connor Klein, Jiangnan Yi, Yuzhi Zhang, Yi Yang NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY NAU Water Buffalo Engineering Table
More informationNew Castle County, DE. Floodplain Regulations
New Castle County, DE Floodplain Regulations John J. Gysling, PE CFM Department of Land Use New Castle County, DE February 26, 2009 Today s Presentation Floodplain Protection and Uses Terms and Definitions
More informationDRAFT. Jacob Torres, P.E.; Nick Fang, Ph.D., P.E.
\ Memorandum SSPEED Center at Rice University Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering 6100 Main MS-317 Houston, Texas 77005-1827 sspeed.rice.edu tel: 713-348-4977 To Andy Yung, P.E. CFM; Lane Lease,
More informationAPPENDIX IV. APPROVED METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF CONCERN (NORTH ORANGE COUNTY)
APPENDIX IV. APPROVED METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF CONCERN (NORTH ORANGE COUNTY) Hydromodification design criteria for the North Orange County permit area are based on the 2- yr, 24-hr
More informationSTORMWATER AND EROSION CONTROL PERMIT
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND EROSION CONTROL PERMIT INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION Any project that involves the disturbance of ANY quantity of land requires the applicant to receive approval for the project
More informationSOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. Question 13: Wetlands
SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Question 13: Wetlands 1. The wetland responses and topographical data provided in the ADA for the 520- acre project site are conceptual in nature. The referenced
More informationAppendix F Preliminary Flood Hazard Assessments
Appendix F Preliminary Flood Hazard Assessments Final Preliminary Flood Hazard Assessment, Regulus Solar Project REGULUS SOLAR PROJECT Kern County, California Preliminary Flood Hazard Assessment FINAL
More informationTECHNICAL CONTENT PROPOSED STEEP SLOPE REGULATION
1 TECHNICAL CONTENT PROPOSED STEEP SLOPE REGULATION Draft 2/08/10 (Revised 02-14-11,Revised 02-21-11, Revised 03-03-11, Revised 04-19-11, Revised 04-20-11, Revised 05-05-11, Revised 05-09-11). DEFINITIONS
More informationTable of Contents. 5-5 Release Rates Year Allowable Release Rate WQCV Release Rate EURV Release Rate...
Chapter 5 Table of Contents 5-1 Introduction... 1 5-1-1 Stormwater Quality Considerations... 1 5-1-2 Stormwater Volume Considerations... 2 5-1-3 Downstream Impacts... 2 5-2 Requirements... 2 5-2-1 General
More informationLearning objectives. Upon successful completion of this lecture, the participants will be able to:
Solomon Seyoum Learning objectives Upon successful completion of this lecture, the participants will be able to: Describe and perform the required step for designing sewer system networks Outline Design
More informationConstructed Wetland Pond T-8
Constructed Wetland Pond T-8 Description A constructed wetlands pond is a shallow retention pond designed to permit the growth of wetland plants such as rushes, willows, and cattails. Constructed wetlands
More informationChatham Park Stormwater Manual
Chatham Park Stormwater Manual Table of Contents A. Introduction... 2 B. Calculation Methods... 2 C. BMP Design Standards... 3 D. Compliance Points... 3 E. Critical Environmental Resources... 3 F. Submittal
More informationAG-LAND Investment Brokers 275 Sale Lane Red Bluff, CA Fax Corning Eucalyptus Farm
AG-LAND Investment Brokers 275 Sale Lane Red Bluff, CA 96080 530-529-4400 Fax 530-527-5042 Corning Eucalyptus Farm Tehama County,, California 1 of 6 deep irrigation wells Drip tubing rolled at the edge
More informationDRAINAGE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION
June, 2017 DRAINAGE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION (An expansion of the Stormwater Management Design Report) Note: This report outline is not all-inclusive. There may be situations when information not included
More informationDecember 7, Dr. Christine Pomeroy University of Utah Civil and Environmental Engineering MCE Salt Lake City, UT. Dear Dr.
December 7, 2012 Dr. Christine Pomeroy University of Utah Civil and Environmental Engineering MCE 2042 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Dear Dr. Pomeroy, The following document is the final report of the Red Butte
More informationCity of Redwood City Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program. Drainage Guidelines for Residential Development
City of Redwood City Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program Drainage Guidelines for Residential Development General Requirements A. Plot & Finished Grading Plan must be submitted with Building Permit
More informationSection 2: Watershed Characteristics and Runoff
Section 2: Watershed Characteristics and Runoff The hydrology of the Wissahickon Creek and its tributaries varies greatly from place to place within the larger watershed. Stormwater management planning
More informationHYDROLOGY REPORT HEACOCK & CACTUS CHANNELS MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 2005 REVISED APRIL 2006 REVISED AUGUST 2006
HYDROLOGY REPORT HEACOCK & CACTUS CHANNELS MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 2005 REVISED APRIL 2006 REVISED AUGUST 2006 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationCHAPTER 2 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
CHAPTER 2 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REVISED SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 WHATCOM COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CHAPTER 2 - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1: ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS Section 201. Regulatory
More informationATTACHMENT C Design Analysis for Erosion Protection Cover for Piñon Ridge Tailing Cells
ATTACHMENT C Design Analysis for Erosion Protection Cover for Piñon Ridge Tailing Cells TAILING CELL CLOSURE DESIGN REPORT ENERGY FUELS RESOURCE CORPORATION PIÑON RIDGE PROJECT Summary The primary purpose
More informationErosion & Sedimentation Control Policy
Issue Date 10/22/2010 Page 1 of 8 Erosion & Sedimentation Control Policy Introduction: Soil erosion is the removal of soil by water, wind, ice or gravity and sediment deposition occurs when the rate of
More informationChapter 12 Storage. Contents. Overview... 1
Chapter 12 Storage Contents Overview... 1 Implementation of Regional, Sub-regional, and On-site Detention Facilities... 2 Regional Detention... 2 Subregional Detention... 5 Onsite Detention... 6 Detention
More informationCITY OF TROY DESIGN STANDARDS AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS
CITY OF TROY DESIGN STANDARDS AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS PREPARED BY: F-7587 JANUARY 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 SECTION 2 SECTION 3 SECTION 4 SECTION 5 SECTION 6 APPENDIX ROADWAY DESIGN DRAINAGE
More informationSection 1000 Culverts and Bridges Table of Contents
Section 1000 Culverts and Bridges Table of Contents 1001 INTRODUCTION... 1000 1 1002 CULVERT DESIGN STANDARDS... 1000 1 1002.1 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS... 1000 1 1002.2 MINIMUM CULVERT SIZE... 1000 2 1002.3
More informationCRITERIA FOR STORMWATER DESIGN
..CHAPTER.. CRITERIA FOR STORMWATER DESIGN 2.1 Integrated Site Design Approach 2.1.1 Introduction This chapter represents the requirements, policies and other guidance for stormwater management design
More informationSAN GORGONIO PASS CAMPUS - PHASE I
SAN GORGONIO PASS CAMPUS - PHASE I Banning, CA DRAINAGE STUDY June 16, 2010 Reference 106-195 PREPARED BY: Encompass Associates, Inc. 5699 Cousins Place Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 909-684-0093 Fax-909-586-6979
More informationNorth Domingo Baca Extension at Barstow
Modeling Report April 5, 2001 North Domingo Baca Extension at Barstow Prepared for the Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority Julie Coonrod, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Civil Engineering
More informationThe City of North Las Vegas (CNLV) does not allow valley gutters to be constructed across streets with right-of-way widths of 80 feet or greater.
Background The City of rth Las Vegas strives to provide the development community with adequate information to ensure the successful completion of any project in the City. To aid in the submittal of a
More information2A Stormwater Regulations and Permitting A. Iowa Drainage Law and Resources 1 B. Regulated Activities 1
Design Manual Chapter 2 - Stormwater Table of Contents TOC Table of Contents Chapter 2 - Stormwater 2A General Information 2A-1--------------------------------General Information A. Concept... 1 B. Informing
More informationIndex. Page numbers followed by f indicate figures.
Index Aerodynamic method, 103, 110 111 Algae, 131, 173, 175 Alternate depth, 88 Alternating block method, 132, 140 141 Attenuation, 106, 107f, 118, 120 Page numbers followed by f indicate figures. Baseflow
More informationCHAPTER 12 BRIDGE DECK DRAINAGE SYSTEMS
OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 12 BRIDGE DECK DRAINAGE SYSTEMS APRIL 2011 APRIL 2011 Page 1 Chapter Table of Contents 12.1 Policy... 12-3 12.1.1 Table 1... 12-3
More information