Location of District. J a v a S e a LEGEND. Irrigation Scheme. Location Map of Irrigation Schemes in Pekalongan District. 50. Kaliwadas PEMALANG

Transcription

1 Location of istrict J a v a S e a N WEST JV SEMRNG 5. Kaliwadas EST JV Wirodeso PEKLONGN ENTRL JV PROVINE YOGYKRT PEMLNG ISTRIT Sragi BTNG ISTRIT LEGEN apital Town of istrict Sub-istrict Town Kalijambu Kedungwuni 45. Kosar istrict Boundary 37. Sragi Wanapringgo 36. Pesantren Kletak Sub-istrict Boundary Railway Talun Provincial Road Kayeh oro istrict Road PEKLONGN ISTRIT 38. Sudikampir River Irrigation Scheme Technical Irrigation 39. Padurekso Lebakbarang Irrigation Scheme Kandangserang Peninggaran BNJRNEGR ISTRIT Petungkriyana M. Rogojembangan M. Kendalisodo M. Kendeng The Study on omprehensive Recovery Program of Irrigation griculture Japan International ooperation gency 5 1 Km SLE Name of Scheme 36. Pesantren Kletak 37. Sragi 38. Sudikampir 39. Padurekso 45. Kosar 5. Kaliwadas T : Technical Irrigation Registered rea (Ha) 4,263 3,54 1,564 2,764 1,617 7,52 Location Map of Irrigation Schemes in Pekalongan istrict T T T T T T Subject rea (Ha) 3,636 3,539 1,55 2,764 3,243 7,722

2 36. Pesantren Kletak Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 18,18 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Pesantren Kletak (8) Water Resource River : Sengkarang (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Pekalongan & Kodia P. (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Kedungwuni (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1918/1995 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 4,263 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 3,636 3,636 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 3,636 3,636 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 3, ,635 1% ,688 24,115 Season II (dry I) 3,264 3,264 9% ,688 Season III (dry II) 2,547 2,547 7% 3,56 Total/nnual 6,528 2, ,446 26% ,376 3,56 24,115 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances achieved - ouble cropping of paddy practiced in the entire irrigated area; paddy yield levels moderate; palawija produced extensively B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Flooding - Palawija Marketing: Low marketing prices - gronomic Issues: amage caused by rat - Farmers Organizations: Economic activities are limited - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Expansion of palawija production in dry season II; productivity increase of paddy & palawija through further intensification - Strengthening of extension activities tailored to area specific needs; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 3, ,636 1% 5. 16,325 24,115 3,265 3,265 9% 5. 16,325 2,99 2,99 8% 4,73 6,53 2, ,81 27% 5. 32,65 4,73 24, %.5 3,274 1,17 IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 47 b. Established; 4 c. Not yet; 9 Registered Performance a. eveloped; 4 b. Under developing; 31 c. Not yet; 5 Not yet registered 4 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - elay in administrative procedure for WU establishment. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - cceleration of administrative process. (2) evelopment Plan - WU management training 3-141

3 36. Pesantren Kletak Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System: B (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : B Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 3 nos. i. : B b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 3 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 123 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 6. m3/s h. Inspection bridge : not provided (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined Total (m) Main 1,3 12,747 14,47 Secondary 14,139 24,16 38,155 (nos) (4) Major and onstrains Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake Inspection road (m) 9,686 2, (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) - Irrigation anal and Related Leakage from canal ollapse of canal Lower function of regulating structure on canal ifficulty on O&M (5) auses of Major and onstraints Sedimentation in front of intake - Irrigation anal and Related Improper regular maintenance of canal, settlement of canal then insufficient freeboard and overtopping Improper maintenance; insufficient nos. of cross drain, berm width, or catch drain; and/or steep slope of canal eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major redging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intake - Irrigation anal and Related Repair of leakage from canal, widen canal wide, recompaction of embankment Redesign of canal section; provision of cross drain, proper width of berm, catch drain, and/or proper slope Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : minor rehabilitation Intake, civil : minor rehabilitation Intake, mechanical : minor rehabilitation Settling basin : large rehabilitation (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) Main 26 13,787 14,47 Secondary 2,827 35,328 38,155 (nos) Main Secondary (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 3,636 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 3,636 (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 2,537 57,528 5,753 7,454 1,57 74, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) VI.1 EIRR 3.% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group III: Third priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

4 36. Pesantren Kletak Scheme (3/4) Scheme Pesantren Kletak istrict Pekalongan & Kodia Pekalongan Technical Level Technical Registered rea 4,263 ha Year of onstruction 1918/1995 Fixed Weir, ownstream B Require minor repair of civil works and to replace gate leaf by steel construction Fixed Weir, Weir Body B Require minor repair for retaining walls Settling Basin B Require provision of inspection road along basin : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-143

5 36. Pesantren Kletak Scheme (4/4) Scheme Pesantren Kletak istrict Pekalongan & Kodia Pekalongan Technical Level Technical Registered rea 4,263 ha Year of onstruction Irrigation (Main anal) Masonry Lined anal 1918/1995 B Require removal of sediments and repair of lining Irrigation (Main anal) anal and Bridge B Require removal of sediments and repair of lining Irrigation (Paddy Field) Field anal and Paddy Field B Require provision of farm road and division box on canal : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-144

6 37. Sragi Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 11,797 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Sragi (8) Water Resource River : Paingan (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Pekalongan & Kodia P. (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : 23. (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Sragi (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1974 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 3,54 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 3,539 3,539 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 3,539 3,539 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 2, ,539 1% ,482 35,295 Season II (dry I) 2,996 2,996 85% ,482 Season III (dry II) 1,921 1,921 54% 2,35 Total/nnual 5,992 1, , % ,964 2,35 35,295 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances achieved - ouble cropping of paddy practiced in the entire irrigated area; paddy yield levels moderate; palawija produced extensively B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Flooding - Palawija Marketing: Low marketing prices - gronomic Issues: amage caused by rat - Farmers Organizations: Economic activities are limited - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Expansion of palawija production in dry season II; productivity increase of paddy & palawija through further intensification - Strengthening of extension activities tailored to area specific needs; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 2, ,539 1% 5. 14,98 35,295 2,996 2,996 85% 5. 14,98 2,477 2,477 7% 3,468 5,992 2, ,12 255% 5. 29,96 3,468 35, %.5 2,996 1,163 IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 39 b. Established; 38 c. Not yet; 1 Registered Performance a. eveloped; b. Under developing; 38 c. Not yet; Not yet registered 38 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - Not so active members IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - Encouragement of member farmers to take positive action for O&M works. (2) evelopment Plan - WU O&M training

7 37. Sragi Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System : (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : - i. : b. Type of weir : Movable weir f. Intake gate : no info. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 25 m g. Settling basin : no info. functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : no info. h. Inspection bridge : provided (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m) Main 3,626 2,967 6,593 Secondary 5,73 25,33 31,6 (4) Major and onstrains Washed away of ripraps or blocks after stilling basin Problem on management for flood/scouring sluice gate(s) operation Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake - Irrigation anal and Related Leakage from canal ollapse of canal Impassable of inspection road along canal General O&M problems Lower function of regulating structure on canal (5) auses of Major and onstraints Insufficient weight of ripraps or blocks for stilling basin, insufficient length of protection work after stilling basin Improper maintenance of flood or scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks (no greasing and anti-rust painting) Sedimentation in front of intake - Irrigation anal and Related Improper regular maintenance of canal, settlement of canal then insufficient freeboard and overtopping Improper maintenance; insufficient nos. of cross drain, berm width, or catch drain; and/or steep slope of canal Improper routine O&M works due to no or narrow wide of road, slope erosion by rainfall then in flow into canal No kilo and hectometer post, no structure plate or mark on structures and no identification for repair/maintenance eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major Provision of additional ripraps or blocks after stilling basin of weir as required Replacement of control system or damaged equipment of flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks redging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intake - Irrigation anal and Related Repair of leakage from canal, widen canal wide, recompaction of embankment Redesign of canal section; provision of cross drain, proper width of berm, catch drain, and/or proper slope Provision of inspection road both main and secondary canal with pavement Provision of kilo, hect-m posts, marking to each structure with structure name Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : minor rehabilitation Intake, civil : minor rehabilitation Intake, mechanical Settling basin : replacement or new (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) (nos) Main Secondary Main Secondary (nos) Inspection road (m) 1,5 5, 6,593 31, (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 3,539 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 3,539 : large rehabilitation 6,593 31, (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 3,737 47,578 4,758 7,255 1,57 64, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) VI.1 EIRR 3.8% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group I: First priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

8 37. Sragi Scheme (3/4) Scheme Sragi istrict Pekalongan & Kodia Pekalongan Technical Level Technical Registered rea 3,54 ha Year of onstruction 1974 Fixed Weir, ownstream View B Require repair / provision of stilling Intake Gate B Require replacement of intake gate from wooden to steel Irrigation (Main anal) Masonry Lined anal B Require provision of bottom lining : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-147

9 37. Sragi Scheme (4/4) Scheme Sragi istrict Pekalongan & Kodia Pekalongan Technical Level Technical Registered rea 3,54 ha Year of onstruction Irrigation (Main anal) Masonry Lined anal 1974 B Require removal of sediments at inside of canal and repair of lining Irrigation (Secondary anal) ivision Box B Require replacement of gates and provision of inspection road Irrigation (Tertiary System) Off-take / ivision Box B Require division box, farm road for tertiary canal : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-148

10 38. Sudikampir Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : 3351 (7) Number of Farmers : 7,85 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Sudikampir (8) Water Resource River : Boro (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Pekalongan & Kodia P. (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Bojong (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1931~1975 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 1,564 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 1,55 1,55 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 1,55 1,55 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 1, ,55 1% 4.5 6,21 11,5 Season II (dry I) 1,38 1,38 89% 4. 5,52 Season III (dry II) % 1,48 Total/nnual 2, ,83 245% ,73 1,48 11,5 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances achieved - ouble cropping of paddy practiced in the entire irrigated area; paddy yield levels moderate; palawija produced extensively B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Implementation of extension programs is limited - Palawija Marketing: Low competitiveness with other producing areas - gronomic Issues: Farmers not following recommended practices - Farmers Organizations: Managerial capacity of KTs are limited - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Expansion of palawija production in dry season II; productivity increase of paddy & palawija through further intensification - Strengthening of extension activities tailored to area specific needs; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 1, ,55 1% 5. 6,9 11,5 1,38 1,38 89% 4.5 6,21 1,85 1,85 7% 1,519 2,76 1, ,15 259% ,11 1,519 11, %.5 1, IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 19 b. Established; 19 c. Not yet; Registered Performance a. eveloped; b. Under developing; 19 c. Not yet; Not yet registered 19 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - Not so active members IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - Encouragement of member farmers to take positive action for O&M works. (2) evelopment Plan - WU O&M training

11 38. Sudikampir Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System : (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 1 nos. i. : b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 3 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 37 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 1.2 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : not provided (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m) Main 2,595 7,777 1,372 Secondary 4,582 7,774 12,356 (nos) 39 Inspection road (m) 3, 1,2 (4) Major and onstrains Physical operational problem on flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake ifficulty on O&M - Irrigation anal and Related Leakage from canal ollapse of canal Overage, lower strength of canal racks or partial damage on lined canal Lower function of regulating structure on canal (5) auses of Major and onstraints Improper design, installation and/or maintenance of flood/scouring sluice gate(s); breakdown of hoist, stem, guide frame or leaf Sedimentation in front of intake No provision of inspection/access road, no provision of inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Improper regular maintenance of canal, settlement of canal then insufficient freeboard and overtopping Improper maintenance; insufficient nos. of cross drain, berm width, or catch drain; and/or steep slope of canal eterioration of canal, no or insufficient rehabilitation due to budget problem Improper regular maintenance or long leave of repair, insufficient provision of budget eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major Replacement of control system or damaged equipment of flood/scouring sluice gate(s) redging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intake Provision of inspection/access road, inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Repair of leakage from canal, widen canal wide, recompaction of embankment Redesign of canal section; provision of cross drain, proper width of berm, catch drain, and/or proper slope Replace and reconstruction of canal Replace and reconstruction, provision of special treatment at cross drain to prevent settlement Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : minor rehabilitation Intake, civil : minor rehabilitation Intake, mechanical : large rehabilitation Settling basin : large rehabilitation (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) Main 1,372 1,372 Secondary 12,356 12,356 (nos) Main Secondary (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 1,55 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 1,55 (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 2,361 33,915 3,392 3,178 1,26 44, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) VI.1 EIRR.6% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group I: First priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

12 38. Sudikampir Scheme (3/4) Scheme Sudikampir istrict Pekalongan & Kodia Pekalongan Technical Level Technical Registered rea 1,564 ha Year of onstruction 1931~1975 Fixed Weir, Upstream B Require major repair of weir body and gate works, removal of debris and sediment Intake Gate B Require replacement totally from wooden to steel Intake, Rear View B Require provision of settling basin : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-151

13 38. Sudikampir Scheme (4/4) Scheme Sudikampir istrict Pekalongan & Kodia Pekalongan Technical Level Technical Registered rea 1,564 ha Year of onstruction Irrigation (Secondary anal) Masonry Lined anal 1931~1975 B Require major repair of canal lining and provision of inspection road Irrigation (Secondary anal) anal B Require major repair o canal lining and provision of inspection road Irrigation (Tertiary System) Tertiary System B Require provision of farm road and canal with related structures : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-152

14 39. Padurekso Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 13,82 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Padurekso (8) Water Resource River : Sengkarang (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Pekalongan & Kodia P. (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Kajen/Karanganyar (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1915 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 2,764 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 2,764 2,764 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 2,764 2,764 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 2, ,764 1% ,43 2,15 Season II (dry I) 2,454 2,454 89% ,43 Season III (dry II) 65 1,259 1,324 48% ,511 Total/nnual 4,973 1, , % ,346 1,511 2,15 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances achieved; however water shortage in dry season reported - ouble cropping of paddy practiced in the entire irrigated area; paddy yield levels moderate; palawija produced extensively B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: Low competitiveness with other producing areas - gronomic Issues: Farmers not following recommended practices - Farmers Organizations: Managerial capacity of KTs are limited - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Expansion of palawija production in dry season II; productivity increase of paddy & palawija through further intensification - Strengthening of extension activities tailored to area specific needs; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 2, ,764 1% 5. 12,27 2,15 2,454 2,454 89% 5. 12,27 1,658 1,658 6% 2,321 4,98 1, , % 5. 24,54 2,321 2, %.5 2, IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 28 b. Established; 28 c. Not yet; Registered Performance a. eveloped; b. Under developing; 2 c. Not yet; 8 Not yet registered 28 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - Low collection level of membership fee. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - alling attention of WU members to their obligation. (2) evelopment Plan - WU management training 3-153

15 39. Padurekso Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System : (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 2 nos. i. : b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 3 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 64 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 6.5 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : not provided (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m) Main 55 3, 3,55 Secondary 4,857 14,571 19,428 (4) Major and onstrains Physical O&M problem due to overage facility Problem on management for flood/scouring sluice gate(s) operation ifficulty on O&M - Irrigation anal and Related Leakage from canal ollapse of canal Overage, lower strength of canal racks or partial damage on lined canal ifficulty on O&M (5) auses of Major and onstraints eterioration of weir, no or insufficient rehabilitation due to budget problem Improper maintenance of flood or scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks (no greasing and anti-rust painting) No provision of inspection/access road, no provision of inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Improper regular maintenance of canal, settlement of canal then insufficient freeboard and overtopping Improper maintenance; insufficient nos. of cross drain, berm width, or catch drain; and/or steep slope of canal eterioration of canal, no or insufficient rehabilitation due to budget problem Improper regular maintenance or long leave of repair, insufficient provision of budget No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major Replace and reconstruction of weir Replacement of control system or damaged equipment of flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks Provision of inspection/access road, inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Repair of leakage from canal, widen canal wide, recompaction of embankment Redesign of canal section; provision of cross drain, proper width of berm, catch drain, and/or proper slope Replace and reconstruction of canal Replace and reconstruction, provision of special treatment at cross drain to prevent settlement Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : replacement or new Intake, civil : replacement or new Intake, mechanical Settling basin : replacement or new (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) (nos) Main Secondary Main Secondary (nos) 1 14 Inspection road (m) 3,55 7,5 3,55 19, (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 2,764 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 2,764 : replacement or new 3,55 19, (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 12,33 38,59 3,851 5,666 1,57 61, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) VI.1 EIRR 1.8% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group I: First priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

16 39. Padurekso Scheme (3/4) Scheme Padurekso istrict Pekalongan & Kodia Pekalongan Technical Level Technical Registered rea 2,764 ha Year of onstruction 1915 Fixed Weir, Upstream View B Require new construction (nearly 1 years after construction) Fixed Weir, ownstream View B Require new construction (nearly 1 years after construction) Intake, Rear View B Require new construction (nearly 1 years after construction) : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-155

17 39. Padurekso Scheme (4/4) Scheme Padurekso istrict Pekalongan & Kodia Pekalongan Technical Level Technical Registered rea 2,764 ha Irrigation (Main anal) Year of onstruction 1915 ivision B Require major repair of civil works and provision of steel gates Irrigation (Secondary anal) anal B Require total repair of lining and provision of inspection road Irrigation (Tertiary anal) Farm itch B Require division box and farm road : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-156

18 N WEST JV Location of istrict SEMRNG J a v a S e a 41. Bodri 42. Trompo EST JV Margorejo 43. Kedung Pengilon ENTRL JV PROVINE YOGYKRT 4. Kedung sem KENL Gempolsewu LEGEN apital Town of istrict BTNG ISTRIT Weleri Gumuh KENL ISTRIT Bodri River Kaliwungu SEMRNG ISTRIT Sub-istrict Town istrict Boundary Sub-istrict Boundary Railway Pageruyung Provincial Road istrict Road Sukorejo Singaraja River Irrigation Scheme Platunga Boja Technical Irrigation Irrigation Scheme Semanding Bandungan M. Perahu M. Ungaran TEMNGGUNG ISTRIT Name of Scheme 4. Kedung sem 41. Bodri 42. Trompo 43. Kedung Pengilon T : Technical Irrigation Registered rea (Ha) 3,726 8,538 1,263 3,134 T T T T Subject rea (Ha) 2,845 7,71 1,229 2, Km SLE The Study on omprehensive Recovery Program of Irrigation griculture Japan International ooperation gency Location Map of Irrigation Schemes in Kendal istrict

19 4. Kedung sem Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 5,426 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Kedung sem (8) Water Resource River : Kali Kuto (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Kendal & Kodia Semar (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : 2 (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Weleni (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 199 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 3,726 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 2,645 2,845 2 b. Rainfed paddy field 2-2 c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 2,845 2,845 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) 1/ Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 2,645 2,645 1% 5. 13,225 6 Season II (dry I) 2,645 2,645 1% 5. 13,225 Season III (dry II) 5. Total/nnual 5,29 5,29 2% 5. 26,45 6 1/: Include palawija in rainfed field (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances achieved; however water shortage in dry season reported - ouble cropping of paddy practiced in the entire irrigated area; paddy yield levels high; palawija not introduced yet B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: Low marketing prices - gronomic Issues: Farmers not following recommended practices - Farmers Organizations: Most members are not active - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Introduction of palawija production in dry season II; productivity increase of paddy & palawija through further intensification - Extension activities toward improvement of post-harvest & marketing; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 2,845 2,845 1% ,648 2,845 2,845 1% ,648 1,423 1,423 5% 1,992 5,69 1,423 7,113 25% ,295 1, ,423 1,823 5%.5 4,845 1,392 IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 28 b. Established; 14 c. Not yet; 14 Registered Performance a. eveloped; b. Under developing; 2 c. Not yet; 2 Not yet registered 14 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - Low awareness of farmers to WU activities IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - cceleration of WU establishment. (2) evelopment Plan - WU empowerment training 3-157

20 4. Kedung sem Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System : (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 1 nos. i. : b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 1 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 45 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 4.9 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : no info. (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m) Main 2,5 2,5 Secondary 28,854 28,854 (nos) (4) Major and onstrains Problem on management for flood/scouring sluice gate(s) operation Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake Overage, Lower strength of intake gate(s) - Irrigation anal and Related Impassable of inspection road along canal General O&M problems Lower function of regulating structure on canal ifficulty on O&M Inspection road (m) 2,25 9,325 (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) (5) auses of Major and onstraints Improper maintenance of flood or scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks (no greasing and anti-rust painting) Sedimentation in front of intake eterioration of intake gate(s), no or insufficient rehabilitation due to budget problem - Irrigation anal and Related Improper routine O&M works due to no or narrow wide of road, slope erosion by rainfall then in flow into canal No kilo and hectometer post, no structure plate or mark on structures and no identification for repair/maintenance eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major Replacement of control system or damaged equipment of flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks redging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intake Replace and reconstruction of intake gate(s) - Irrigation anal and Related Provision of inspection road both main and secondary canal with pavement Provision of kilo, hect-m posts, marking to each structure with structure name Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : large rehabilitation Intake, civil : large rehabilitation Intake, mechanical : large rehabilitation Settling basin : large rehabilitation (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) Main 2,5 2,5 Secondary 28,854 28,854 (nos) Main Secondary (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 2,645 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field 2 e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 2,845 (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 2,898 36,915 3,692 5,935 1,57 51, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) VI.1 EIRR 8.8% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group II: Second priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

21 4. Kedung sem Scheme (3/4) Scheme Kedung sem istrict Kendal & Kodia Semarang Technical Level Technical Registered rea 3,726 ha Year of onstruction 199 Fixed Weir, Upstream View B Require repair for civil and gate works and widening of inspection bridge Fixed Weir, ownstream View B Require repair for civil ad gate works and widening of inspection bridge Intake, Rear View B Require provision of settling basin : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-159

22 Scheme Kedung sem istrict Kendal & Kodia Semarang entral Java Province 4. Kedung sem Scheme (4/4) Technical Level Technical Registered rea 3,726 ha Year of onstruction Irrigation (Secondary anal) Earth anal 199 B Require canal lining and provision of inspection road Irrigation (Tertiary anal) Earth anal B Require division box, crossing structure, farm road, etc. Irrigation (Paddy Field) Paddy Field B Require farm ditch and road : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-16

23 41. Bodri Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 21, (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Bodri (8) Water Resource River : Kali Bodri (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Kendal & Kodia Semaran (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : 32 (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : epiring (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : - (5) Registered rea (ha) : 8,538 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 7,71 7,71 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 7,71 7,71 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 7, ,71 1% 5. 36,565 1,191 Season II (dry I) 7,313 7,313 95% 5. 36,565 Season III (dry II) Total/nnual 14, ,23 195% 5. 73,13 1,191 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances achieved; however water shortage in dry season reported - ouble cropping of paddy practiced almost in the entire irrigated area; paddy yield levels high; palawija introduced limitedly B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: Low marketing prices - gronomic Issues: Farmers not following recommended practices - Farmers Organizations: Most members are not active - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Introduction of palawija production in dry season II; productivity increase of paddy & palawija through further intensification - Extension activities toward improvement of post-harvest & marketing; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 7,71 7,71 1% ,45 7,71 7,71 1% ,45 2,313 2,313 3% 3,238 15,42 2,313 17,733 23% ,81 3, ,916 2,71 35%.5 11,68 2,47 IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 11 b. Established; 11 c. Not yet; Registered Performance a. eveloped; 3 b. Under developing; 69 c. Not yet; 38 Not yet registered 11 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - Low collection level of membership fee. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - alling attention of WU members to their obligation. (2) evelopment Plan - WU management training 3-161

24 41. Bodri Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System: (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 2 nos. i. : b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 2 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 6 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 11.3 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : provided (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined Total (m) Main 3,429 3,429 Secondary 6,499 6,499 (nos) (4) Major and onstrains Washed away of ripraps or blocks after stilling basin Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake ifficulty on O&M - Irrigation anal and Related Impassable of inspection road along canal General O&M problems Lower function of regulating structure on canal ifficulty on O&M Inspection road (m) 2,2 3, (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) (5) auses of Major and onstraints Insufficient weight of ripraps or blocks for stilling basin, insufficient length of protection work after stilling basin Sedimentation in front of intake No provision of inspection/access road, no provision of inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Improper routine O&M works due to no or narrow wide of road, slope erosion by rainfall then in flow into canal No kilo and hectometer post, no structure plate or mark on structures and no identification for repair/maintenance eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major Provision of additional ripraps or blocks after stilling basin of weir as required redging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intake Provision of inspection/access road, inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Provision of inspection road both main and secondary canal with pavement Provision of kilo, hect-m posts, marking to each structure with structure name Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : large rehabilitation Intake, civil : large rehabilitation Intake, mechanical : replacement or new Settling basin : replacement or new (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) Main 3,429 3,429 Secondary 6,499 6,499 (nos) Main Secondary (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 7,71 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 7,71 (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 6,529 78,63 7,86 15,86 2,59 11, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) VI.1 EIRR 8.1% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group I: First priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

25 41. Bodri Scheme (3/4) Scheme Bodri istrict Kendal & Kodia Semarang Technical Level Technical Registered rea 8,538 ha Year of onstruction Fixed Weir and Intake B Require removal of sediment in front of intake, require repair of civil and gate works Fixed Weir, Retaining Wall B Require repair of retaining wall Fixed Weir, ownstream View B Require repair of stilling basin and provision of concrete blocks as protection work : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-163

26 41. Bodri Scheme (4/4) Scheme Bodri istrict Kendal & Kodia Semarang Technical Level Technical Registered rea 8,538 ha Year of onstruction Irrigation (Main anal) anal at ownstream of Intake B Require provision of settling basin and inspection road Irrigation (Secondary anal) ivision B Require repair of civil and gate works, inspection road Irrigation (Paddy Field) Paddy Field B Require division box and farm road : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-164

27 42. Trompo Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 5,426 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Trompo (8) Water Resource River : K. Bodri (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Kendal & Kodia Semar (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : 26 (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Kendal (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 199 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 1,263 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 1,229 1,229 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 1,229 1,229 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 1, ,229 1% 5. 5, Season II (dry I) 1, ,229 1% 5. 5, Season III (dry II) Total/nnual 2, ,458 2% 5. 11, (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances achieved; however water shortage in dry season reported - ouble cropping of paddy practiced almost in the entire irrigated area; paddy yield levels high; palawija introduced limitedly B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: Low marketing prices - gronomic Issues: Farmers not following recommended practices - Farmers Organizations: Most members are not active - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Introduction of palawija production in dry season II; productivity increase of paddy & palawija through further intensification - Extension activities toward improvement of post-harvest & marketing; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 1,229 1,229 1% 5.5 6,76 1,229 1,229 1% 5.5 6, % 517 2, ,827 23% , %.5 1, IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 2 b. Established; 2 c. Not yet; Registered Performance a. eveloped; b. Under developing; 2 c. Not yet; Not yet registered 2 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - Not so active members IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - Encouragement of member farmers to take positive action for O&M works. (2) evelopment Plan - WU O&M training

28 42. Trompo Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System: (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : - i. : b. Type of weir : Movable weir f. Intake gate : 2 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 15 m g. Settling basin : not provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 3.5 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : provided (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined Total (m) Main 1,2 1,2 Secondary 1,69 1,69 (4) Major and onstrains Problem on management for flood/scouring sluice gate(s) operation Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake ifficulty on O&M - Irrigation anal and Related Sedimentation or obstruction of water flow Impassable of inspection road along canal General O&M problems Lower function of regulating structure on canal ifficulty on O&M (5) auses of Major and onstraints Improper maintenance of flood or scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks (no greasing and anti-rust painting) Sedimentation in front of intake No provision of inspection/access road, no provision of inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related No provision of settling basin(sediments), improper management of canal (sediments, water plant) Improper routine O&M works due to no or narrow wide of road, slope erosion by rainfall then in flow into canal No kilo and hectometer post, no structure plate or mark on structures and no identification for repair/maintenance eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major Replacement of control system or damaged equipment of flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks redging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intake Provision of inspection/access road, inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Removal of sediment soil and foreign materials from canal, grass cutting Provision of inspection road both main and secondary canal with pavement Provision of kilo, hect-m posts, marking to each structure with structure name Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : large rehabilitation Intake, civil : large rehabilitation Intake, mechanical Settling basin : replacement or new (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) (nos) Main Secondary Main Secondary (nos) 1,2 1, Inspection road (m) 2, (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 1,229 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 1,229 (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 3,932 1,66 1,61 2,519 1,26 19, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) 3 42 : large rehabilitation 1,2 1, VI.1 EIRR 7.1% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group I: First priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

29 42. Trompo Scheme (3/4) Scheme Trompo istrict Kendal & Kodia Semarang Technical Level Technical Registered rea 1,263 ha Year of onstruction 199 Movable Weir, Upstream View B Require major repair for civil and gate works Movable Weir, Rear View B Require major repair for civil and gate works Irrigation (Main anal) Off-take B Require major repair for civil and gate works and removal of sediment : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-167

30 42. Trompo Scheme (4/4) Scheme Trompo istrict Kendal & Kodia Semarang Technical Level Technical Registered rea 1,263 ha Year of onstruction Irrigation (Secondary anal) Masonry Lined anal 199 B Require major repair and removal of sediment Irrigation (Secondary anal) Masonry Lined anal B Require major repair and removal of sediment Irrigation (Paddy Field) Paddy Field B Require farm road and ditch : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-168

31 43. Kedung Pengilon Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 11,192 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Kedung Pengilon (8) Water Resource River : Kali Blorong (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Kendal & Kodia Semar (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : 15 (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Pegandon (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : - (5) Registered rea (ha) : 3,134 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 2,686 2,686 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 2,686 2,686 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 2,686 2,686 1% 5. 13,43 Season II (dry I) 2, ,686 1% 5. 1,18 1,95 Season III (dry II) % 84 Total/nnual 4,722 1,35 6,72 226% 5. 23,61 2,79 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances achieved; however water shortage in dry season reported - ouble cropping of paddy practiced almost in the entire irrigated area; paddy yield levels high; palawija introduced substantially B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: Low marketing prices - gronomic Issues: Farmers not following recommended practices - Farmers Organizations: Most members are not active - Paddy Marketing Unstable marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Expansion of double cropped area of paddy; productivity increase of paddy through further intensification; expansion of palawija in dry season II - Extension activities toward improvement of post-harvest & marketing; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 2,686 2,686 1% ,773 2,686 2,686 1% ,773 1,343 1,343 5% 1,88 5,372 1,343 6,715 25% ,546 1, %.5 5, IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 44 b. Established; 44 c. Not yet; Registered Performance a. eveloped; b. Under developing; 44 c. Not yet; Not yet registered 44 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - Not so active members IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - Encouragement of member farmers to take positive action for O&M works. (2) evelopment Plan - WU O&M training

32 43. Kedung Pengilon Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System: (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 2 nos. i. : b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 2 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 25 m g. Settling basin : not provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 4. m3/s h. Inspection bridge : no info. (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined Total (m) Main Secondary 32,62 32,62 (nos) (4) Major and onstrains Problem on management for flood/scouring sluice gate(s) operation Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake ifficulty on O&M - Irrigation anal and Related Impassable of inspection road along canal General O&M problems Lower function of regulating structure on canal ifficulty on O&M Inspection road (m) 655 7,8 (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) (5) auses of Major and onstraints Improper maintenance of flood or scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks (no greasing and anti-rust painting) Sedimentation in front of intake No provision of inspection/access road, no provision of inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Improper routine O&M works due to no or narrow wide of road, slope erosion by rainfall then in flow into canal No kilo and hectometer post, no structure plate or mark on structures and no identification for repair/maintenance eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major Replacement of control system or damaged equipment of flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks redging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intake Provision of inspection/access road, inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Provision of inspection road both main and secondary canal with pavement Provision of kilo, hect-m posts, marking to each structure with structure name Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : large rehabilitation Intake, civil : large rehabilitation Intake, mechanical : large rehabilitation Settling basin : replacement or new (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) Main Secondary 32,62 32,62 (nos) Main Secondary (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 2,686 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 2,686 (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 5,341 26,393 2,639 5,56 1,57 41, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) VI.1 EIRR 9.2% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group I: First priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

33 43. Kedung Pengilon Scheme (3/4) Scheme Kedung Pengilon istrict Kendal & Kodia Semarang Technical Level Technical Registered rea 3,134 ha Year of onstruction Fixed Weir, ownstream View B Require new construction Fixed Weir, Intake B Require new construction Irrigation (Main anal) Masonry Lined anal at ownstream of Intake B Require provision of settling basin and inspection road : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-171

34 43. Kedung Pengilon Scheme (4/4) Scheme Kedung Pengilon istrict Kendal & Kodia Semarang Technical Level Technical Registered rea 3,134 ha Year of onstruction Irrigation (Secondary anal) Masonry Lined anal B Require major repair of canal and removal of sediments Irrigation (Secondary anal) Masonry Lined anal B Require major repair of canal and removal of sediments Irrigation (Tertiary anal) Tertiary anal B Require tertiary development and provision of farm road : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-172

35 N WEST JV Location of istrict SEMRNG TEMNGGUNG ISTRIT EST JV ENTRL JV PROVINE YOGYKRT M. Sumbing Windusari Secang Ngablak SEMRNG ISTRIT LEGEN WONOSOBO ISTRIT M. Merbabu apital Town of istrict Sub-istrict Town Kaliangkrik MGELNG Tegalrejo Pakis Provincial Boundary istrict Boundary Karojan MGELNG ISTRIT BOYOLLI ISTRIT Sub-istrict Boundary Provincial Road Salaman Tempuran Sawangan M. Merapi istrict Road River Irrigation Scheme Borobudur Mungkit Multilan Ngablak Technical Irrigation Srumbung PURWOREJO ISTRIT 44.Pasekan Progo River Salam YOGYKRT PROVINE The Study on omprehensive Recovery Program of Irrigation griculture Japan International ooperation gency 5 1Km SLE Name of Scheme 44. Pasekan T : Technical Irrigation Irrigation Scheme Registered rea (Ha) 1,78 Location Map of Irrigation Schemes in Megelang istrict T Subject rea (Ha) 988

36 44. Pasekan Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 9,98 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Pasekan (8) Water Resource River : S. Pabelru, Kunjang, Prasung, Kuning (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Magelang dan Kodia Mag (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Mungkid (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1999/2 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 1,78 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity (GKG ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) % 4.5 3,776 Season II (dry I) % 4.5 2,718 Season III (dry II) % 4. 2,8 Total/nnual 1,963 1, % 4.4 8,574 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances achieved; however water shortage in dry season reported - ouble cropping of paddy practiced almost in the entire irrigated area; paddy yield levels high; palawija not introduced yet B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: Low marketing prices - gronomic Issues: amage caused by rat - Farmers Organizations: Most members are not active - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Introduction of triple cropped area of paddy partly; productivity increase of paddy through further intensification; introduction of palawija in dry season I - Strengthening of extension activities tailored to area specific needs; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity (GKG ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment % 5. 4, % 5. 2,965 1, % 4.5 2,223 2, ,47 25% 4.9 1,128 1, %.5 1,555 1,975 IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 11 b. Established; 9 c. Not yet; 2 Registered Performance a. eveloped; b. Under developing; 9 c. Not yet; Not yet registered 9 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - Not so active members IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - Encouragement of member farmers to take positive action for O&M works. (2) evelopment Plan - WU O&M training

37 44. Pasekan Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System: (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 2 nos. i. : b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 2 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 35 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 1.1 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : not provided (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined Total (m) Main Secondary 8,35 1,754 1,14 (nos) 191 (4) Major and onstrains Problem on management for flood/scouring sluice gate(s) operation Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake ifficulty on O&M - Irrigation anal and Related Impassable of inspection road along canal General O&M problems Lower function of regulating structure on canal ifficulty on O&M Inspection road (m) (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) (5) auses of Major and onstraints Improper maintenance of flood or scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks (no greasing and anti-rust painting) Sedimentation in front of intake No provision of inspection/access road, no provision of inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Improper routine O&M works due to no or narrow wide of road, slope erosion by rainfall then in flow into canal No kilo and hectometer post, no structure plate or mark on structures and no identification for repair/maintenance eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major Replacement of control system or damaged equipment of flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks redging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intake Provision of inspection/access road, inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Provision of inspection road both main and secondary canal with pavement Provision of kilo, hect-m posts, marking to each structure with structure name Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : minor rehabilitation Intake, civil : minor rehabilitation Intake, mechanical : large rehabilitation Settling basin : large rehabilitation (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) Main Secondary 1,14 1,14 (nos) Main Secondary (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 988 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 988 (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 1,931 16,735 1,674 2,25 1,26 23, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) VI.1 EIRR 8.8% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential 1. - gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group VI: evelopment by other category VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province - (Subject area is less than 1, ha) 3-174

38 44. Pasekan Scheme (3/4) Scheme Pasekan istrict Magelang & Kodia Magelang Technical Level Technical Registered rea 1,78 ha Year of onstruction 1999/2 Intake and Scouring Sluice B Require major repair for civil and gate works Fixed Weir, Rear View B Require major repair for civil and gate works Intake, Rear View B Require provision of settling basin and farm road : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-175

39 44. Pasekan Scheme (4/4) Scheme Pasekan istrict Magelang & Kodia Magelang Technical Level Technical Registered rea 1,78 ha Year of onstruction Irrigation (Main anal) Masonry Lined anal 1999/2 B Require repair of lining and provision of inspection road Irrigation (Secondary anal) anal B Require new construction Irrigation (Paddy Field) Paddy Field B Require tertiary development : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-176

40 Location of istrict 45. Kosar N WEST JV SEMRNG 25. Kedungdowo Kramat EST JV J a v a S e a ENTRL JV PROVINE YOGYKRT BTNG mbo River LEGEN Tulis apital Town of istrict Sawangan Sub-istrict Town istrict Boundary Wonotingal Subah Sub-istrict Boundary BTNG ISTRIT Railway Talun Limpung Provincial Road Tersana istrict Road Bandar Blado Lobang KENL ISTRIT River Irrigation Scheme Technical Irrigation PEKLONGN ISTRIT Reban Bawang Irrigation Scheme Name of Scheme Registered rea (Ha) Subject rea (Ha) 25. Kedungdowo Kramat 45. Kosar 1,25 1,617 T T 1,25 3, Km T : Technical Irrigation SLE BNJRNEGR ISTRIT The Study on omprehensive Recovery Program of Irrigation griculture Japan International ooperation gency Location Map of Irrigation Schemes in Batang istrict

41 45. Kosar Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : ~ 52-3 (7) Number of Farmers : 12,972 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Kosar (8) Water Resource River : Kupang (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Batang / Pekalongan (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Batang (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1975 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 1,617 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 3,243 3,243 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 3,243 3,243 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 3, ,243 1% , Season II (dry I) 3, ,243 1% , Season III (dry II) 2, ,243 1% 4. 9,356 1,85 Total/nnual 8, ,729 3% ,26 1,274 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - Maximum irrigation performances achieved; however water shortage in dry season reported - Triple cropping of paddy practiced almost in the entire irrigated area; paddy yield levels moderate; palawija introduced substantially B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: - - gronomic Issues: amage caused by rat - Farmers Organizations: Most members are not active - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Productivity increase of paddy through intensification - Strengthening of extension activities tailored to area specific needs; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 3,243 3,243 1% 5. 16,215 3,243 3,243 1% 5. 16,215 2, ,243 1% 4.5 1,215 1,362 8, ,729 3% ,645 1, %.5 4, IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 2 b. Established; 7 c. Not yet; 13 Registered Performance a. eveloped; 1 b. Under developing; 2 c. Not yet; 4 Not yet registered 7 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - elay in administrative procedure for WU establishment. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - cceleration of administrative process. (2) evelopment Plan - WU management training 3-177

42 45. Kosar Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System: (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 1 nos. i. : b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 3 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 37 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 6.7 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : not provided (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined Total (m) Main 1,246 4,854 6,1 Secondary 9,895 34,145 44,4 (4) Major and onstrains Physical O&M problem due to overage facility Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake ifficulty on O&M - Irrigation anal and Related Leakage from canal ollapse of canal Overage, lower strength of canal racks or partial damage on lined canal Lower function of regulating structure on canal (5) auses of Major and onstraints eterioration of weir, no or insufficient rehabilitation due to budget problem Sedimentation in front of intake No provision of inspection/access road, no provision of inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Improper regular maintenance of canal, settlement of canal then insufficient freeboard and overtopping Improper maintenance; insufficient nos. of cross drain, berm width, or catch drain; and/or steep slope of canal eterioration of canal, no or insufficient rehabilitation due to budget problem Improper regular maintenance or long leave of repair, insufficient provision of budget eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major Replace and reconstruction of weir redging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intake Provision of inspection/access road, inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Repair of leakage from canal, widen canal wide, recompaction of embankment Redesign of canal section; provision of cross drain, proper width of berm, catch drain, and/or proper slope Replace and reconstruction of canal Replace and reconstruction, provision of special treatment at cross drain to prevent settlement Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : large rehabilitation Intake, civil : large rehabilitation Intake, mechanical Settling basin : large rehabilitation (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) (nos) Main Secondary Main Secondary (nos) ,1 44, Inspection road (m) 2,66 34, (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 3,243 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 3,243 : large rehabilitation 6,1 44, (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 2,27 64,88 6,481 6,648 1,57 81, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) VI.1 EIRR 2.5% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group V: cceralation of WUs establishment VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

43 45. Kosar Scheme (3/4) Scheme Kosar istrict Batang / Pekalongan Technical Level Technical Registered rea 1,617 ha Year of onstruction 1975 Fixed Weir, Upstream View B Require total repair or replacement Fixed Weir, ownstream View B Require total repair or replacement Irrigation (Main anal) Masonry Lined anal B Require total repair or replacement and provision of inspection road : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-179

44 45. Kosar Scheme (4/4) Scheme Kosar istrict Batang / Pekalongan Technical Level Technical Registered rea 1,617 ha Year of onstruction Irrigation (Secondary anal) Masonry Lined anal 1975 B Require total repair or replacement and provision of inspection road Irrigation (Tertiary anal) Tertiary anal and Paddy Field B Require tertiary development Irrigation (Paddy Field) Tertiary anal and Paddy Field B Require tertiary development : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-18

45 29. Kabuyutan 32. Jengkelok 3. Babakan 46. Notog N WEST JV Location of istrict SEMRNG J a v a S e a EST JV ENTRL JV PROVINE YOGYKRT Tanjung BREBES LEGEN ENTRL JV PROVINE Karangmalang Ketanggungan Bangsi River Kec. Larangan apital Town of istrict Sub-istrict Town Provincial Boundary istrict Boundary Mahalaya Reservoir Kabuyutan River BREBES ISTRIT TEGL ISTRIT Sub-istrict Boundary Railway Provincial Road istrict Road River Irrigation Scheme M. Pojoktiga Salem Tonjong 31. Kemaron Jambe Technical Irrigation Bantarkawung Irrigation Scheme Sirampong Name of Scheme Registered rea (Ha) Subject rea (Ha) ILP ISTRIT Bumiayu 5 1 Km 29. Kabuyutan 3. Babakan 31. Kemaron Jambe 32. Jengkelok 46. Notog 4,182 2,181 1,26 6,55 27,682 T T T T T 3,867 2,528 1,483 6,173 25,54 Penjalin Reservoir SLE T : Technical Irrigation The Study on omprehensive Recovery Program of Irrigation griculture Japan International ooperation gency Location Map of Irrigation Schemes in Brebes istrict

46 46. Notog Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 271,7 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Notog (8) Water Resource River : (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Brebes / Tegal (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Bumiayu (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1972 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 27,682 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 25,54 25,54 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 25,54 25,54 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 6,91 15,262 3,368 25,54 1% 5. 34,55 45, ,92 Season II (dry I) 18,625 3,73 22,355 88% 5. 93,125 11,19 Season III (dry II) ,457 18,588 73% ,148 Total/nnual 25,666 37,449 3,368 66,483 26% ,33 79, ,92 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances achieved; however, intensity of paddy is limited & water shortage in dry season reported - Single cropping of paddy prevailing; paddy yield levels high; palawija cropped area larger then that of paddy B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: Unstable marketing prices - gronomic Issues: amage caused by rat - Farmers Organizations: Managerial capacity of KTs are limited - Paddy Marketing Unstable marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Expansion of irrigated area of paddy & ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Introduction of double cropping of paddy; productivity increase through further intensification - Extension activities toward improvement of post-harvest & marketing; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 12,77 9,42 3,368 25,54 1% 6. 76,62 28,26 218,92 22,172 22,172 87% ,946 2,432 2,432 8% 28,65 34,942 29,834 3,368 68, % ,566 56, ,92 9,276-7,615 1,661 7%.7 7,236-22,313 IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 288 b. Established; 276 c. Not yet; 12 Registered 6 Performance a. eveloped; 33 b. Under developing; 227 c. Not yet; 16 Not yet registered 27 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - Low collection level of membership fee. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - alling attention of WU members to their obligation. (2) evelopment Plan - WU management training 3-181

47 46. Notog Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System : (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 4 nos. i. : b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 7 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 85 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 27. m3/s h. Inspection bridge : not provided (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m) Main 3,75 13,35 17,1 Secondary 159, , ,98 (4) Major and onstrains Problem on management for flood/scouring sluice gate(s) operation Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake ifficulty on O&M - Irrigation anal and Related Leakage from canal ollapse of canal Overage, lower strength of canal racks or partial damage on lined canal Lower function of regulating structure on canal (5) auses of Major and onstraints Improper maintenance of flood or scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks (no greasing and anti-rust painting) Sedimentation in front of intake No provision of inspection/access road, no provision of inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Improper regular maintenance of canal, settlement of canal then insufficient freeboard and overtopping Improper maintenance; insufficient nos. of cross drain, berm width, or catch drain; and/or steep slope of canal eterioration of canal, no or insufficient rehabilitation due to budget problem Improper regular maintenance or long leave of repair, insufficient provision of budget eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major Replacement of control system or damaged equipment of flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks redging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intake Provision of inspection/access road, inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Repair of leakage from canal, widen canal wide, recompaction of embankment Redesign of canal section; provision of cross drain, proper width of berm, catch drain, and/or proper slope Replace and reconstruction of canal Replace and reconstruction, provision of special treatment at cross drain to prevent settlement Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : minor rehabilitation Intake, civil : minor rehabilitation Intake, mechanical Settling basin : minor rehabilitation (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) (nos) Main Secondary Main Secondary (nos) ,1 398, Inspection road (m) 31, 25, (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 25,54 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 25,54 (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 8,359 72,66 7,261 52,357 3,6 837, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) : minor rehabilitation 17,1 398, (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) VI.1 EIRR 5.1% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential 1. - gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group VI: evelopment by other category VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province - (High rehabilitation cost) 3-182

48 46. Notog Scheme (3/4) Scheme Notog istrict Brebes / Tegal Technical Level Technical Registered rea 27,682 ha Year of onstruction 1972 Fixed Weir, Intake and Scouring Sluice B Require major repair of civil works and to replace gate leaf by steel construction Intake B Require major repair of civil works and to replace gate leaf by steel construction Overflow Weir B Require major repair : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-183

49 46. Notog Scheme (4/4) Scheme Notog istrict Brebes / Tegal Technical Level Technical Registered rea 27,682 ha Year of onstruction 1972 Irrigation (Main anal) Masonry Lined anal B Require removal of sediments and repair of lining Irrigation (Secondary anal) anal B Require removal of sediments and repair / replacement of lining Irrigation (Paddy Field) Field anal and Paddy Field B Require provision of farm road and division box on canal : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-184

50 24. Klambu Kiri JEPR ISTRIT 47. Sidorejo N WEST JV Location of istrict SEMRNG olo EST JV J a v a S e a 48. Glapan 23. Guntur Wedung KUUS awe KUUS ISTRIT Bae ekulo Lor PTI ISTRIT 49. Klambu Kanan ENTRL JV PROVINE YOGYKRT LEGEN apital Town of istrict 22. Jragung EMK EMK ISTRIT Undakan Sub-istrict Town istrict Boundary Sub-istrict Boundary Railway Mranggen Guntur Gubug Godong Brati Penawangan Kamambe GROBOGN Tawangharjo Ngaringan BLOR ISTRIT Provincial Road istrict Road River Irrigation Scheme Technical Irrigation Singen Kidul Karangrayung Panungguan Kradenan Irrigation Scheme SEMRNG ISTRIT Kedungjati Kedungombo Reservoir Toroh Gundih GROBOGN ISTRIT Suru Reservoir EST JV Name of Scheme 22. Jragung 23. Guntur 24. Klambu Kiri 47. Sidorejo 48. Glapan 49. Klambu Kanan T : Technical Irrigation Registered rea (Ha) 4,957 2,2 21,419 14,622 18,696 6,841 Subject rea (Ha) T T T T T T 4,416 1,543 2,738 5,717 18,784 11, Km SLE BOYOLLI ISTRIT The Study on omprehensive Recovery Program of Irrigation griculture Japan International ooperation gency Location Map of Irrigation Schemes in Kudus, emak and Grobogan istrict

51 47. Sidorejo Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 8,74 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Sidorejo (8) Water Resource River : Serang (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Grobogan / Boyolali (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : 63 (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Toroh (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1989/199 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 14,622 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 5,717 5,717 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 5,717 5,717 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 5,717 5,717 1% ,444 Season II (dry I) 5,717 5,717 1% ,444 Season III (dry II) 5,4 5,4 94% 6,48 Total/nnual 11,434 5,4 16, % ,887 6,48 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances achieved; however water shortage in dry season reported - ouble cropping of paddy practiced in the entire irrigated area; paddy yield levels high; palawija produced extensively B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: Unstable marketing prices - gronomic Issues: amage caused by rat - Farmers Organizations: Most members are not active - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Introduction of triple cropped area of paddy partly; productivity increase through further intensification - Strengthening of extension activities tailored to area specific needs; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 5,717 5,717 1% 6. 34,32 5,717 5,717 1% 6. 34,32 1,143 4,574 5,717 1% 5.5 6,287 6,44 12,577 4,574 17,151 3% 6. 74,891 6,44 1, %.5 12,4-76 IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 12 b. Established; 67 c. Not yet; 35 Registered 1 Performance a. eveloped; 13 b. Under developing; 45 c. Not yet; 9 Not yet registered 66 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - Limited WU supplied with irrigation water due to insufficient water resource. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - Promotion of rotation irrigation system introduction. (2) evelopment Plan - WU O&M training

52 47. Sidorejo Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System: B (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : B Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 2 nos. i. : B b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 2 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 8 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 11. m3/s h. Inspection bridge : provided (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined Total (m) Main 13,5 13,5 Secondary 2, 17, 37, (4) Major and onstrains Headworks is maintained by PLN. (nos) Inspection road (m) 13,5 37, (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) - Irrigation anal and Related Leakage from canal ollapse of canal Lower function of regulating structure on canal ifficulty on O&M (5) auses of Major and onstraints Headworks is maintained by PLN. - Irrigation anal and Related Improper regular maintenance of canal, settlement of canal then insufficient freeboard and overtopping Improper maintenance; insufficient nos. of cross drain, berm width, or catch drain; and/or steep slope of canal eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major Headworks is maintained by PLN. - Irrigation anal and Related Repair of leakage from canal, widen canal wide, recompaction of embankment Redesign of canal section; provision of cross drain, proper width of berm, catch drain, and/or proper slope Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : maintained by PLN Intake, civil : minor rehabilitation Intake, mechanical : minor rehabilitation Settling basin : not required (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) Main 13,5 13,5 Secondary 37, 37, (nos) Main Secondary (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 5,717 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 5,717 (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha ,354 1,335 11,72 2,59 128, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) VI.1 EIRR 6.3% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group III: Third priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

53 47. Sidorejo Scheme (3/4) Scheme Sidorejo istrict Grobogan / Boyolali Technical Level Technical Registered rea 14,622 ha Year of onstruction 1989/199 Fixed Weir, Upstream View (operated by PLN) B Irrigation and mini-hydro power purpose Fixed Weir, ownstream View B Irrigation and mini-hydro power purpose Irrigation (Main anal) oncrete Lined anal at ownstream of Intake B Require repair of canal lining : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-187

54 47. Sidorejo Scheme (4/4) Scheme Sidorejo istrict Grobogan / Boyolali Technical Level Technical Registered rea 14,622 ha Year of onstruction 1989/199 Irrigation (Main anal) ocrete Lined anal (slope sliding) B Require repair of canal lining Irrigation (Main anal) onstant Water Level Gate B Require minor repair of civil works Irrigation (Tertiary System) Paddy Field B Require tertiary development : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-188

55 48. Glapan Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 67,8 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Glapan (8) Water Resource River : K. Tuntang (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Grobogan / emak (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : 2 (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Tegewanu (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1977 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 18,696 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 2 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 18,784 18,784 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 18,784 18,784 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 18,784 18,784 1% ,312 Season II (dry I) 18,784 18,784 1% 5. 93,92 Season III (dry II) 13,45 13,45 71% 16,86 Total/nnual 37,568 13,45 5, % ,232 16,86 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances achieved; however water shortage in dry season reported - ouble cropping of paddy practiced in the entire irrigated area; paddy yield levels high; palawija produced extensively B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: Low marketing prices - gronomic Issues: Infestation of pest & diseases - Farmers Organizations: Most members are not active - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Expansion of palawija production in dry season II; productivity increase of paddy & palawija through further intensification - Strengthening of extension activities tailored to area specific needs; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 18,784 18,784 1% ,74 18,784 18,784 1% ,74 15,27 15,27 8% 21,38 37,568 15,27 52,595 28% ,48 21,38 1,622 1,622 9%.7 28,176 4,952 IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 162 b. Established; 99 c. Not yet; 63 Registered Performance a. eveloped; 34 b. Under developing; 61 c. Not yet; 4 Not yet registered 99 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - elay in administrative procedure for WU establishment. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - cceleration of administrative process. (2) evelopment Plan - WU management training 3-189

56 48. Glapan Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System: (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 1 nos. i. : b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 2 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 1 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 14. m3/s h. Inspection bridge : not provided (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined Total (m) Main 7,1 1,88 17,98 Secondary 14,931 36,619 51,55 (4) Major and onstrains Lower strength against design load due to rust, decay of steel materials of flood/scouring sluice gate(s) Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake ifficulty on O&M - Irrigation anal and Related Leakage from canal ollapse of canal Overage, lower strength of canal racks or partial damage on lined canal ifficulty on O&M (5) auses of Major and onstraints No over coating on flood/scouring sluice gate(s) to prevent rust and decay Sedimentation in front of intake No provision of inspection/access road, no provision of inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Improper regular maintenance of canal, settlement of canal then insufficient freeboard and overtopping Improper maintenance; insufficient nos. of cross drain, berm width, or catch drain; and/or steep slope of canal eterioration of canal, no or insufficient rehabilitation due to budget problem Improper regular maintenance or long leave of repair, insufficient provision of budget No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major Provision of overcoat or replacement of flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks redging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intake Provision of inspection/access road, inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Repair of leakage from canal, widen canal wide, recompaction of embankment Redesign of canal section; provision of cross drain, proper width of berm, catch drain, and/or proper slope Replace and reconstruction of canal Replace and reconstruction, provision of special treatment at cross drain to prevent settlement Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : large rehabilitation Intake, civil : large rehabilitation Intake, mechanical Settling basin : large rehabilitation (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) (nos) Main Secondary Main Secondary (nos) ,98 51, Inspection road (m) 17,98 16, (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 18,784 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 18,784 : replacement or new 17,98 51, (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 9,2 128,73 12,873 38,57 3,6 192, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) 5 41 VI.1 EIRR 12.6% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group II: Second priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

57 48. Glapan Scheme (3/4) Scheme Glapan istrict Grobogan / emak Technical Level Technical Registered rea 18,696 ha Year of onstruction 1977 Fixed Weir, ownstream View B Require major repair of weir body and gate works Intake Gate and Hoist B Require replacement Intake, Rear View B Require major repair of civil works and provision of settling basin : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-191

58 48. Glapan Scheme (4/4) Scheme Glapan istrict Grobogan / emak Technical Level Technical Registered rea 18,696 ha Year of onstruction 1977 Irrigation (Main anal) heck B Require major repair of civil works and gate works Irrigation (Secondary anal) Masonry Lined anal B Require major repair of canal lining and provision of inspection road Irrigation (Tertiary System) Paddy Field B Require tertiary development : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-192

59 49. Klambu Kanan Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 18,26 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Klambu Kanan (8) Water Resource River : Serang (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Grobogan / Kudus / Pat (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : 868 km km (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Klambu (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 199 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 6,841 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 11,78 11,78 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 11,78 11,78 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 9, ,688 87% 5. 46,865 2,475 Season II (dry I) 1,746 1,746 97% 5. 53,73 Season III (dry II) 4,165 4,386 8,551 77% ,743 5,263 Total/nnual 24,284 4, , % ,338 5,263 2,475 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances achieved - ouble cropping of paddy practiced almost in the entire irrigated area; paddy yield levels high; palawija produced extensively B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Poor O&M at main & 2ry canals - Palawija Marketing: Unstable marketing prices - gronomic Issues: Farmers not following recommended practices - Farmers Organizations: Most members are not active - Paddy Marketing Unstable marketing prices - Extension Services: Shortage of operation funds of PPLs III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Increasing cropping intensity of paddy through introduction of triple cropping partly; productivity increase through further intensification - Strengthening of extension activities tailored to area specific needs; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 1, ,78 1% ,197 2,475 1,763 1,763 97% ,197 4,431 4,431 8,862 8% 5. 22,155 6,23 25,957 4, ,73 277% ,548 6,23 2,475 1, ,718 16%.5 21, IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 19 b. Established; 85 c. Not yet; 24 Registered Performance a. eveloped; 55 b. Under developing; 3 c. Not yet; Not yet registered 85 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - elay in administrative procedure for WU establishment. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - cceleration of administrative process. (2) evelopment Plan - WU management training 3-193

60 49. Klambu Kanan Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System: B (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : B Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : no info. i. : B b. Type of weir : no info. f. Intake gate : no info. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : no info. g. Settling basin : no info. functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : no info. h. Inspection bridge : no info. (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined Total (m) Main 12,619 12,619 Secondary 45,57 5,533 5,59 (4) Major and onstrains No detail information is available (nos) Inspection road (m) 12, 3, (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) - Irrigation anal and Related Sedimentation or obstruction of water flow Overage, lower strength of canal racks or partial damage on lined canal ifficulty on O&M (5) auses of Major and onstraints No detail information is available - Irrigation anal and Related No provision or insufficient function of settling basin(sediments), improper management of canal (sediments, water plant) eterioration of canal, no or insufficient rehabilitation due to budget problem Improper regular maintenance or long leave of repair, insufficient provision of budget No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major No detail information is available - Irrigation anal and Related Removal of sediment soil and foreign materials from canal, grass cutting Replace and reconstruction of canal Replace and reconstruction, provision of special treatment at cross drain to prevent settlement Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : minor rehabilitation Intake, civil : minor rehabilitation Intake, mechanical : large rehabilitation Settling basin : minor rehabilitation (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) Main 12,619 12,619 Secondary 5,59 5,59 (nos) Main Secondary (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 11,78 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 11,78 (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 3,999 73,8 7,31 22,71 3,6 11, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) VI.1 EIRR 12.5% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group III: Third priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

61 49. Klambu Kanan Scheme (3/4) Scheme Klambu Kanan istrict Grobogan / Kudus / Pati Technical Level Technical Registered rea 6,841 ha Year of onstruction 199 Intake, ownstream View B Require minor repair of civil and gate works Irrigation (Main anal) Main anal at ownstream of Intake B Require minor repair of civil works Irrigation (Secondary anal) Masonry Lined anal B Require repair of lining and provision of inspection road : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-195

62 49. Klambu Kanan Scheme (4/4) Scheme Klambu Kanan istrict Grobogan / Kudus / Pati Technical Level Technical Registered rea 6,841 ha Year of onstruction Irrigation (Secondary anal) oncrete Lined anal 199 B Require repair of lining and provision of inspection road Irrigation (Tertiary anal) anal and ivision Box B Require repair of structure Irrigation (Paddy Field) Paddy Field B Require tertiary development : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-196

63 N WEST JV Location of istrict SEMRNG J a v a S e a EST JV Pasadean ENTRL JV PROVINE YOGYKRT 28. Sungapan Kiri PEMLNG Petarukan omal LEGEN apital Town of istrict mppelgading Sub-istrict Town istrict Boundary TEGL ISTRIT 27. Mejagong Rambut River Kedungsantri Waluh River Bantarbolang PEMLNG ISTRIT omal River 5. Kaliwadas 26. Sungapan Kanan Sub-istrict Boundary Railway Provincial Road istrict Road River Irrigation Scheme Moga Randudongkal PEKLONGN ISTRIT Technical Irrigation Irrigation Scheme Pulosari Belik Watukumpul Name of Scheme Registered rea (Ha) Subject rea (Ha) M. Slamet 26. Sungapan Kanan 27. Mejagong 28. Sungapan Kiri 5. Kaliwadas 1,851 1,997 5,229 7,52 T T T T 1,851 2,49 5,57 7, Km T : Technical Irrigation PURBLINGG ISTRIT The Study on omprehensive Recovery Program of Irrigation griculture Japan International ooperation gency SLE Location Map of Irrigation Schemes in Pemalang istrict

64 5. Kaliwadas Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : ~ (7) Number of Farmers : 38,65 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Kaliwadas (8) Water Resource River : Kali Genteng/omal (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Pekalogan / Pemalang (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Kesesi (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 192~1974 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 7,52 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 2 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 7,722 7,722 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 7,722 7,722 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 6,344 1,378 7,722 1% ,548 89,57 Season II (dry I) 6,344 6,344 82% ,548 Season III (dry II) 3,48 3,48 45% 4. 4,176 Total/nnual 12,688 3,48 1,378 17, % ,96 4,176 89,57 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances achieved - ouble cropping of paddy practiced in the entire irrigated area; paddy yield levels moderate; palawija produced extensively B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Flooding - Palawija Marketing: Low marketing prices - gronomic Issues: amage caused by rat - Farmers Organizations: - - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Expansion of palawija production in dry season II; productivity increase of paddy & palawija through further intensification - Extension activities toward improvement of post-harvest & marketing; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 6,344 1,378 7,722 1% 5. 31,72 89,57 6,344 6,344 82% 5. 31,72 4,633 4,633 6% 6,486 12,688 4,633 1,378 18, % 5. 63,44 6,486 89,57 1,153 1,153 15%.5 6,344 2,31 IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 65 b. Established; 64 c. Not yet; 1 Registered Performance a. eveloped; 3 b. Under developing; 49 c. Not yet; 12 Not yet registered 64 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints (Good condition) IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures (2) evelopment Plan 3-197

65 5. Kaliwadas Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System : B (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : B Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 3 nos. i. : B b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 3 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 85 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 1. m3/s h. Inspection bridge : provided (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m) Main 7,737 9,457 17,194 Secondary 38,976 31,89 7,866 (4) Major and onstrains No major problem (Functioning well) (nos) Inspection road (m) ,712 (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) - Irrigation anal and Related Overage, lower strength of canal racks or partial damage on lined canal ifficulty on O&M (5) auses of Major and onstraints No major problem (Functioning well) - Irrigation anal and Related eterioration of canal, no or insufficient rehabilitation due to budget problem Improper regular maintenance or long leave of repair, insufficient provision of budget No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major No major problem (Functioning well) - Irrigation anal and Related Replace and reconstruction of canal Replace and reconstruction, provision of special treatment at cross drain to prevent settlement Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : replacement or new Intake, civil : replacement or new Intake, mechanical : replacement or new Settling basin : replacement or new (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) Main 17,194 17,194 Secondary 7,866 7,866 (nos) Main Secondary (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 7,722 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 7,722 (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 3,216 15,497 15,5 15,83 2,59 187, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) VI.1 EIRR 1.2% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group II: Second priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

66 5. Kaliwadas Scheme (3/4) Scheme Kaliwadas istrict Pekalongan / Pemalang Technical Level Technical Registered rea 7,52 ha Year of onstruction 192~1974 Fixed Weir, Intake and Scouring Sluice B Require repair for civil and gate works Fixed Weir, ownstream View B Require repairing of stilling basin and protection work Irrigation (Main anal) Masonry Lined anal B Require minor repair of canal and widening of inspection road : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-199

67 5. Kaliwadas Scheme (4/4) Scheme Kaliwadas istrict Pekalongan / Pemalang Technical Level Technical Registered rea 7,52 ha Year of onstruction Irrigation (Main anal) Masonry Lined anal 192~1974 B Require minor repairs of canal and widening of inspection road Irrigation (Tertiary anal) Masonry Lined anal B Require division box, farm road, etc. Irrigation (Paddy Field) Paddy Field B Require tertiary development : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-2