Location of District N WEST JAVA. J a v a S e a LEGEND. Irrigation Scheme. Location Map of Irrigation Schemes in Kudus, Demak and Grobogan District

Transcription

1 24. Klambu Kiri JEPR ISTRIT 47. Sidorejo N WEST JV Location of istrict SEMRNG olo EST JV J a v a S e a 48. Glapan 23. Guntur Wedung KUUS awe KUUS ISTRIT Bae ekulo Lor PTI ISTRIT 49. Klambu Kanan ENTRL JV PROVINE YOGYKRT LEGEN apital Town of istrict 22. Jragung EMK EMK ISTRIT Undakan Sub-istrict Town istrict Boundary Sub-istrict Boundary Railway Mranggen Guntur Gubug Godong Brati Penawangan Kamambe GROBOGN Tawangharjo Ngaringan BLOR ISTRIT Provincial Road istrict Road River Irrigation Scheme Technical Irrigation Singen Kidul Karangrayung Panungguan Kradenan Irrigation Scheme SEMRNG ISTRIT Kedungjati Kedungombo Reservoir Toroh Gundih GROBOGN ISTRIT Suru Reservoir EST JV Name of Scheme 22. Jragung 23. Guntur 24. Klambu Kiri 47. Sidorejo 48. Glapan 49. Klambu Kanan T : Technical Irrigation Registered rea (Ha) 4,957 2,2 21,419 14,622 18,696 6,841 Subject rea (Ha) T T T T T T 4,416 1,543 2,738 5,717 18,784 11, Km SLE BOYOLLI ISTRIT The Study on omprehensive Recovery Program of Irrigation griculture Japan International ooperation gency Location Map of Irrigation Schemes in Kudus, emak and Grobogan istrict

2 22. Jragung Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 1,638 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Jragung (8) Water Resource River : Jragung (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : emak (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : 3 (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Guntur (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1989 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 4,597 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 4,416 4,416 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 4,416 4,416 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 2,333 2,81 4,414 1% 4.5 1,499 6,249 Season II (dry I) 1,4 3,16 4,416 1% 4.5 6,3 9,48 Season III (dry II) 4,416 4,416 1% 5,29 Total/nnual 3,733 9,513 13,246 3% ,799 2,587 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - Maximum irrigation performances achieved; however, intensity of paddy is limited & water shortage in dry season reported - Single cropping of paddy prevailing; paddy yield levels moderate; palawija cropped area larger then that of paddy B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: - - gronomic Issues: Farmers not following recommended practices - Farmers Organizations: Most members are not active - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Introduction of double cropping of paddy; productivity increase of paddy & palawija through further intensification - Strengthening of extension activities tailored to area specific needs; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 4,416 4,416 1% 5. 22,8 2,28 2,28 4,416 1% 5. 11,4 11,4 4,416 4,416 1% 6,182 6,624 6,624 13,248 3% 5. 33,12 17,222 2,891-2,889 2 %.5 16,322-3,365 IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 38 b. Established; 19 c. Not yet; 19 Registered Performance a. eveloped; b. Under developing; 16 c. Not yet; 3 Not yet registered 19 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - elay in administrative procedure for WU establishment. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - cceleration of administrative process. (2) evelopment Plan - WU management training 3-85

3 22. Jragung Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System : (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 1 nos. i. : b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 1 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 33 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 8. m3/s h. Inspection bridge : provided (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m) Main 7,325 7,325 Secondary 17,54 1,3 27,84 (nos) 13 9 (4) Major and onstrains Problem on management for flood/scouring sluice gate(s) operation Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake ifficulty on O&M - Irrigation anal and Related Impassable of inspection road along canal General O&M problems Lower function of regulating structure on canal ifficulty on O&M Inspection road (m) 2,391 8,482 (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) (5) auses of Major and onstraints Improper maintenance of flood or scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks (no greasing and anti-rust painting) Sedimentation in front of intake No provision of inspection/access road, no provision of inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Improper routine O&M works due to no or narrow wide of road, slope erosion by rainfall then in flow into canal No kilo and hectometer post, no structure plate or mark on structures and no identification for repair/maintenance eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major Replacement of control system or damaged equipment of flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks redging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intake Provision of inspection/access road, inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Provision of inspection road both main and secondary canal with pavement Provision of kilo, hect-m posts, marking to each structure with structure name Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : large rehabilitation Intake, civil : large rehabilitation Intake, mechanical : large rehabilitation Settling basin : replacement or new (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) Main 7,325 7,325 Secondary 27,84 27,84 (nos) Main Secondary (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 4,416 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 4,416 (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 3,698 49,752 4,975 9,53 1,57 69, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) VI.1 EIRR 15.% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group I: First priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

4 22. Jragung Scheme (3/4) Scheme Jragung istrict emak Technical Level Technical Registered rea 4,597 ha Year of onstruction 1989 Fixed Weir B Require removal of sediment in front of weir and intake Fixed Weir, Scouring Sluice B Require removal of sediment in front of weir and intake Irrigation (Main anal) Temporary Bridge B ue to broken of weir bridge, bamboo bridge is provided : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-87

5 22. Jragung Scheme (4/4) Scheme Jragung istrict emak Technical Level Technical Registered rea 4,597 ha Year of onstruction Irrigation (Main anal) Masonry Lined anal 1989 B Require major repair and removal of sediment Irrigation (Main anal) anal and ivision B Require major repair and removal of sediment Irrigation (Secondary anal) anal and ivision B Require major repair, lining and removal of sediment : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-88

6 23..I. Guntur Kiri Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 6,565 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme :.I. Guntur Kiri (8) Water Resource River : Kali K.R.I (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : emak (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : 5 (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Karang Tengah (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1979 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 2,2 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 1,543 1,543 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 1,543 1,543 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 1,543 1,543 1% 4.5 6,944 Season II (dry I) 1,543 1,543 1% 4.5 6,944 Season III (dry II) Total/nnual 3,86 3,86 2% ,887 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances achieved; however, water shortage in dry season reported - ouble cropping of paddy practiced in the entire irrigated area; paddy yield levels moderate; palawija not introduced yet B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: Low marketing prices - gronomic Issues: amage caused by rat - Farmers Organizations: Most members are not active - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Introduction of palawija production in dry season II; productivity increase of paddy & palawija through further intensification - Strengthening of extension activities tailored to area specific needs; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 1,543 1,543 1% 5. 7,715 1,543 1,543 1% 5. 7, % 648 3, ,549 23% 5. 15, %.5 1, IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 26 b. Established; 7 c. Not yet; 19 Registered Performance a. eveloped; b. Under developing; 7 c. Not yet; Not yet registered 7 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - elay in administrative procedure for WU establishment. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - cceleration of administrative process. (2) evelopment Plan - WU management training 3-89

7 23..I. Guntur Kiri Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System: (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : - i. : b. Type of weir : Movable weir f. Intake gate : 3 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 3 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 3.5 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : provided (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined Total (m) Main 5 5 Secondary 3, 12,33 15,33 (4) Major and onstrains Washed away of ripraps or blocks after stilling basin Problem on management for flood/scouring sluice gate(s) operation Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake - Irrigation anal and Related Leakage from canal ollapse of canal Overage, lower strength of canal racks or partial damage on lined canal ifficulty on O&M (5) auses of Major and onstraints Insufficient weight of ripraps or blocks for stilling basin, insufficient length of protection work after stilling basin Improper maintenance of flood or scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks (no greasing and anti-rust painting) Sedimentation in front of intake - Irrigation anal and Related Improper regular maintenance of canal, settlement of canal then insufficient freeboard and overtopping Improper maintenance; insufficient nos. of cross drain, berm width, or catch drain; and/or steep slope of canal eterioration of canal, no or insufficient rehabilitation due to budget problem Improper regular maintenance or long leave of repair, insufficient provision of budget No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major Provision of additional ripraps or blocks after stilling basin of weir as required Replacement of control system or damaged equipment of flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks redging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intake - Irrigation anal and Related Repair of leakage from canal, widen canal wide, recompaction of embankment Redesign of canal section; provision of cross drain, proper width of berm, catch drain, and/or proper slope Replace and reconstruction of canal Replace and reconstruction, provision of special treatment at cross drain to prevent settlement Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : large rehabilitation Intake, civil : large rehabilitation Intake, mechanical Settling basin : replacement or new (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) (nos) Main Secondary Main Secondary (nos) , Inspection road (m) 3, (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 1,543 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 1,543 : large rehabilitation (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 3,77 2,662 2,66 3,163 1,26 3, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) , VI.1 EIRR 4.7% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group II: Second priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

8 23..I Guntur Kiri Scheme (3/4) Scheme.I Guntur Kiri istrict emak Technical Level Technical Registered rea 2,2 ha Year of onstruction 1979 Movable Weir (riven by Generator) B Require removal of sediment in front of weir and intake Movable Weir (riven by Generator) B Require removal of sediment in front of weir and intake iesel Generator B Require replacement : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-91

9 23..I Guntur Kiri Scheme (4/4) Scheme.I Guntur Kiri istrict emak Technical Level Technical Registered rea 2,2 ha Year of onstruction Irrigation (Main anal) anal and Bridge 1979 B Require major repair and removal of sediment Irrigation (Secondary anal) anal B Require provision of lining and inspection road Irrigation (Secondary anal) ivision B Require totally reconstruction including gates : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-92

10 24. Klambu Kiri Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 6,994 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Klambu Kiri (8) Water Resource River : Lusi (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : emak (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : 2,11.11 (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Karanganyar (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1992 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 21,419 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 2,738 2,738 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 2,738 2,738 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 2,738 2,738 1% 5. 13,69 Season II (dry I) 2,738 2,738 1% 5. 13,69 Season III (dry II) 12,28 12,28 58% 14,434 Total/nnual 41,476 12,28 53,54 258% 5. 27,38 14,434 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances achieved; however, water shortage in dry season reported - ouble cropping of paddy practiced in the entire irrigated area; paddy yield levels high; palawija introduced extensively B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: - - gronomic Issues: Farmers not following recommended practices - Farmers Organizations: - - Paddy Marketing - - Extension Services: - III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Productivity increase of paddy & palawija through further intensification - Extension activities toward improvement of post-harvest & marketing; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 2,738 2,738 1% ,59 2,738 2,738 1% ,59 4,148 12,443 16,591 8% 5. 2,74 17,42 45,624 12,443 58,67 28% ,858 17,42 4, ,563 22%.5 41,478 2,986 IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 17 b. Established; 67 c. Not yet; 4 Registered Performance a. eveloped; b. Under developing; 53 c. Not yet; 14 Not yet registered 67 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - elay in administrative procedure for WU establishment. - Low attention to O&M activities among farmers. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - cceleration of WU establishment and administrative process. (2) evelopment Plan - WU empowerment training. 3-93

11 24. Klambu Kiri Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System : B (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : B Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 6 nos. i. : B b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 4 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 1 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 21. m3/s h. Inspection bridge : no info. (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m) Main 34,13 34,13 Secondary 15,689 15,689 (nos) (4) Major and onstrains Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake Inspection road (m) 32, 32, (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) - Irrigation anal and Related Sedimentation or obstruction of water flow Overage, lower strength of canal racks or partial damage on lined canal Settlement or damage (breakdown) of regulating structure on canal ifficulty on O&M (5) auses of Major and onstraints Sedimentation in front of intake - Irrigation anal and Related Insufficient function of settling basin(sediments), improper management of canal (sediments, water plant) eterioration of canal, no or insufficient rehabilitation due to budget problem Improper regular maintenance or long leave of repair, insufficient provision of budget Insufficient strength of foundation, improper maintenance of regulating structure on canal No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major redging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intake - Irrigation anal and Related Removal of sediment soil and foreign materials from canal, grass cutting Replace and reconstruction of canal Replace and reconstruction, provision of special treatment at cross drain to prevent settlement Repair or extension of stilling basin length of regulating structure on canal Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : minor rehabilitation Intake, civil : minor rehabilitation Intake, mechanical : minor rehabilitation Settling basin : minor rehabilitation (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) (nos) Main Secondary Main Secondary 34,13 15, (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 2,738 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 2,738 (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 5, ,573 24,957 42,513 3,6 326, 15.7 (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) ,13 15, VI.1 EIRR 8.7% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group III: Third priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

12 24. Klambu Kiri Scheme (3/4) Scheme Klambu Kiri istrict emak Technical Level Technical Registered rea 21,419 ha Year of onstruction 1992 Movable Weir B Require minor repair for civil and gate works Movable Weir, Steel Gate (Radial Type) B Require minor repair for civil and gate works Intake B Require removal floating debris in front of intake : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-95

13 24. Klambu Kiri Scheme (4/4) Scheme Klambu Kiri istrict emak Technical Level Technical Registered rea 21,419 ha Year of onstruction 1992 Irrigation (Main anal) oncrete Lined anal B Require removal of sediment Irrigation (Secondary anal) Lined anal B Require removal of inspection road Irrigation (Paddy Field) Paddy Field B Require farm road and farm ditch : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-96

14 Location of istrict 45. Kosar N WEST JV SEMRNG 25. Kedungdowo Kramat EST JV J a v a S e a ENTRL JV PROVINE YOGYKRT BTNG mbo River LEGEN Tulis apital Town of istrict Sawangan Sub-istrict Town istrict Boundary Wonotingal Subah Sub-istrict Boundary BTNG ISTRIT Railway Talun Limpung Provincial Road Tersana istrict Road Bandar Blado Lobang KENL ISTRIT River Irrigation Scheme Technical Irrigation PEKLONGN ISTRIT Reban Bawang Irrigation Scheme Name of Scheme Registered rea (Ha) Subject rea (Ha) 25. Kedungdowo Kramat 45. Kosar 1,25 1,617 T T 1,25 3, Km T : Technical Irrigation SLE BNJRNEGR ISTRIT The Study on omprehensive Recovery Program of Irrigation griculture Japan International ooperation gency Location Map of Irrigation Schemes in Batang istrict

15 25. Kedungdowo Kramat Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 5,435 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Kedungdowo Kramat (8) Water Resource River : Lojahan (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Batang (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Batang & Tulis (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1976 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 1,25 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 1,25 1,25 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 1,25 1,25 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 1, ,147 92% 4.5 4, Season II (dry I) 1, ,145 92% 4.5 4, Season III (dry II) 1 1,63 1,73 86% ,276 Total/nnual 2,158 1,27 3, % 4.5 9,76 1,78 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances achieved; poor drainage problem reported - ouble cropping of paddy practiced in most of the irrigated area; paddy yield levels moderate; palawija introduced extensively B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Poor drainage - Palawija Marketing: Unstable marketing prices - gronomic Issues: amage caused by rat - Farmers Organizations: Managerial capacity of KTs are limited - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Expansion of double cropped area of paddy; productivity increase of paddy & palawija through further intensification - Strengthening of extension activities tailored to area specific needs; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 1,25 1,25 1% 5. 6,25 1,25 1,25 1% 5. 6,25 1,125 1,125 9% 1,575 2,5 1,125 3,625 29% 5. 12,5 1, %.5 2, IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 11 b. Established; 6 c. Not yet; 5 Registered Performance a. eveloped; b. Under developing; 5 c. Not yet; 1 Not yet registered 6 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - elay in administrative procedure for WU establishment. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - cceleration of administrative process. (2) evelopment Plan - WU management training 3-97

16 25. Kedungdowo Kramat Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System : (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 2 nos. i. : b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 1 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 5 m g. Settling basin : not provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 2.1 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : provided (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m) Main 7 2,14 2,84 Secondary 1,2 4,33 5,53 (4) Major and onstrains Problem on management for flood/scouring sluice gate(s) operation Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake ifficulty on O&M - Irrigation anal and Related Sedimentation or obstruction of water flow Leakage from canal Overage, lower strength of canal Lower function of regulating structure on canal ifficulty on O&M (5) auses of Major and onstraints Improper maintenance of flood or scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks (no greasing and anti-rust painting) Sedimentation in front of intake No provision of inspection/access road, no provision of inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related No provision of settling basin(sediments), improper management of canal (sediments, water plant) Improper regular maintenance of canal, settlement of canal then insufficient freeboard and overtopping eterioration of canal, no or insufficient rehabilitation due to budget problem eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major Replacement of control system or damaged equipment of flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks redging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intake Provision of inspection/access road, inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Removal of sediment soil and foreign materials from canal, grass cutting Repair of leakage from canal, widen canal wide, recompaction of embankment Replace and reconstruction of canal Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : minor rehabilitation Intake, civil : large rehabilitation Intake, mechanical Settling basin : replacement or new (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) (nos) Main Secondary Main Secondary (nos) 2,84 5, Inspection road (m) 932 2, (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 1,25 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 1,25 (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 4,387 12,874 1,287 2,563 1,26 22, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) : large rehabilitation 2,84 5, (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) VI.1 EIRR 9.3% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group I: First priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

17 25. Kedungdowo Kramat Scheme (3/4) Scheme Kedungdowo Kramat istrict Batang Technical Level Technical Registered rea 1,25 ha Year of onstruction 1976 Fixed Weir, Upstream B Require repair of civil and gate works Fixed Weir, ownstream B Require repair of civil and gate works Intake and Scouring Sluice B Require repair of civil and gate works : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-99

18 25. Kedungdowo Kramat Scheme (4/4) Scheme Kedungdowo Kramat istrict Batang Technical Level Technical Registered rea 1,25 ha Year of onstruction Irrigation (Main anal) Masonry Lined anal 1976 B Require minor repair for canal and provision of inspection road Irrigation (Main anal) Masonry Lined anal B Require minor repair for canal and provision of inspection road Irrigation (Tertiary anal) Tertiary anal and Paddy Field B Require division box and farm road : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-1

19 N WEST JV Location of istrict SEMRNG J a v a S e a EST JV Pasadean ENTRL JV PROVINE YOGYKRT 28. Sungapan Kiri PEMLNG Petarukan omal LEGEN apital Town of istrict mppelgading Sub-istrict Town istrict Boundary TEGL ISTRIT 27. Mejagong Rambut River Kedungsantri Waluh River Bantarbolang PEMLNG ISTRIT omal River 5. Kaliwadas 26. Sungapan Kanan Sub-istrict Boundary Railway Provincial Road istrict Road River Irrigation Scheme Moga Randudongkal PEKLONGN ISTRIT Technical Irrigation Irrigation Scheme Pulosari Belik Watukumpul Name of Scheme Registered rea (Ha) Subject rea (Ha) M. Slamet 26. Sungapan Kanan 27. Mejagong 28. Sungapan Kiri 5. Kaliwadas 1,851 1,997 5,229 7,52 T T T T 1,851 2,49 5,57 7, Km T : Technical Irrigation PURBLINGG ISTRIT The Study on omprehensive Recovery Program of Irrigation griculture Japan International ooperation gency SLE Location Map of Irrigation Schemes in Pemalang istrict

20 26. Sungapan Kanan Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 5,784 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Sungapan Kanan (8) Water Resource River : K. Waluh (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Pemalang (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : mpelgading (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 2 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 1,851 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 1,851 1,851 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 1,851 1,851 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 1,487 1,487 8% 4.5 6,692 Season II (dry I) 1, ,79 97% 4.5 5,846 31,915 Season III (dry II) Total/nnual 2, , % , ,915 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances achieved; however, intensity of paddy is limited & water shortage in dry season reported - ouble cropping of paddy introduced; paddy yield levels moderate; palawija production still limited B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: Unstable marketing prices - gronomic Issues: amage caused by rat - Farmers Organizations: Most members are not active - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Expansion of double cropped area of paddy; productivity increase of paddy through further intensification - Strengthening of extension activities tailored to area specific needs; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 1,851 1,851 1% 5. 9,255 1, ,851 1% 5. 6,8 31, % 4.5 2, , , % , , %.4 5, IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 26 b. Established; 26 c. Not yet; Registered 1 Performance a. eveloped; 15 b. Under developing; 11 c. Not yet; Not yet registered 25 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - Low collection of WU membership fee. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - alling attention of WU members to their obligation. (2) evelopment Plan - WU management training 3-11

21 26. Sungapan Kanan Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System : B (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : B Main anal System : B Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 3 nos. i. : B b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 4 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 72 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 4. m3/s h. Inspection bridge : no info. (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m) Main 2,4 4,676 6,68 Secondary 4,828 3,219 8,47 (nos) (4) Major and onstrains Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake Inspection road (m) 6,68 5,362 B (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) - Irrigation anal and Related Leakage from canal ollapse of canal Lower function of regulating structure on canal Settlement or damage (breakdown) of regulating structure on canal ifficulty on O&M (5) auses of Major and onstraints Sedimentation in front of intake - Irrigation anal and Related Improper regular maintenance of canal, settlement of canal then insufficient freeboard and overtopping Improper maintenance; insufficient nos. of cross drain, berm width, or catch drain; and/or steep slope of canal eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works Insufficient strength of foundation, improper maintenance of regulating structure on canal No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major redging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intake - Irrigation anal and Related Repair of leakage from canal, widen canal wide, recompaction of embankment Redesign of canal section; provision of cross drain, proper width of berm, catch drain, and/or proper slope Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal Repair or extension of stilling basin length of regulating structure on canal Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : minor rehabilitation Intake, civil : minor rehabilitation Intake, mechanical : minor rehabilitation Settling basin : minor rehabilitation (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) (nos) Main Secondary Main Secondary ,28 7, (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 1,851 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 1,851 (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 1,318 14,195 1,42 3,795 1,26 21, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) 2 4 6,68 8, VI.1 EIRR 17.1% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group III: Third priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

22 26. Sungapan Kanan Scheme (3/4) Scheme Sungapan Kanan istrict Pemalang Technical Level Technical Registered rea 1,851 ha Year of onstruction 2 Fixed Weir, ownstream B Require repair of civil and gate works Intake B Require repair of civil and gate works Intake and Settling Basin B Require remove of sediment and provision of inspection road : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-13

23 26. Sungapan Kanan Scheme (4/4) Scheme Sungapan Kanan istrict Pemalang Technical Level Technical Registered rea 1,851 ha Year of onstruction Irrigation (Main anal) Lined anal 2 B Require remove of sediment, repair of lining and provision of bottom lining Irrigation (Main anal) anal and Inspection Road B Require remove of sediment, repair of lining and provision of bottom lining Irrigation (Tertiary anal) ivision Box B Require reconstruction : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-14

24 27. Mejagong Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 1,25 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Mejagong (8) Water Resource River : K. omal (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Pemalang (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : 99.2 (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Randudongkal (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1974~1992 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 1,997 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 2,49 2,49 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 2,49 2,49 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 2,49 2,49 1% 5. 1,245 Season II (dry I) 2,45 2,45 1% 4.5 9,23 Season III (dry II) 2,41 2,41 1% 4.5 9,185 Total/nnual 6,135 6, % ,632 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - Maximum irrigation performances achieved; poor drainage problem reported - Triple cropping of paddy practiced in the entire irrigated area; paddy yield levels moderate to high B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Poor drainage - Palawija Marketing: Low marketing prices - gronomic Issues: Infestation of pest & diseases - Farmers Organizations: Most members are not active - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Productivity increase of paddy through intensification - Strengthening of extension activities tailored to area specific needs; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 2,49 2,49 1% ,27 2,49 2,49 1% 5. 1,245 2,49 2,49 1% 5. 1,245 6,147 6,147 3% , %.5 3,128 IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 19 b. Established; 9 c. Not yet; 1 Registered Performance a. eveloped; 1 b. Under developing; 8 c. Not yet; Not yet registered 9 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - elay in administrative procedure for WU establishment. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - cceleration of administrative process. (2) evelopment Plan - WU management training 3-15

25 27. Mejagong Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System : (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 2 nos. i. : b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 2 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 5 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 8. m3/s h. Inspection bridge : no info. (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m) Main Secondary 1,663 16,22 17,865 (nos) (4) Major and onstrains Washed away of ripraps or blocks after stilling basin Problem on management for flood/scouring sluice gate(s) operation Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake - Irrigation anal and Related Leakage from canal ollapse of canal Lower function of regulating structure on canal ifficulty on O&M Inspection road (m) 218 9,265 (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) (5) auses of Major and onstraints Insufficient weight of ripraps or blocks for stilling basin, insufficient length of protection work after stilling basin Improper maintenance of flood or scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks (no greasing and anti-rust painting) Sedimentation in front of intake - Irrigation anal and Related Improper regular maintenance of canal, settlement of canal then insufficient freeboard and overtopping Improper maintenance; insufficient nos. of cross drain, berm width, or catch drain; and/or steep slope of canal eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major Provision of additional ripraps or blocks after stilling basin of weir as required Replacement of control system or damaged equipment of flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks redging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intake - Irrigation anal and Related Repair of leakage from canal, widen canal wide, recompaction of embankment Redesign of canal section; provision of cross drain, proper width of berm, catch drain, and/or proper slope Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : large rehabilitation Intake, civil : large rehabilitation Intake, mechanical : large rehabilitation Settling basin : large rehabilitation (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) Main Secondary 17,865 17,865 (nos) Main Secondary (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 2,49 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 2,49 (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 1,856 23,155 2,316 4,2 1,57 33, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) VI.1 EIRR 6.2% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential 1. - gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group V: cceralation of WUs establishment VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

26 27. Mejagong Scheme (3/4) Scheme Mejagong istrict Pemalang Technical Level Technical Registered rea 1,997 ha Year of onstruction 1974~1992 Fixed Weir, ownstream B Require repair for weir and intake Intake B Require repair for weir and intake Intake and Settling Basin B Require provision of stilling basin and retaining wall : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-17

27 27. Mejagong Scheme (4/4) Scheme Mejagong istrict Pemalang Technical Level Technical Registered rea 1,997 ha Year of onstruction Irrigation (Main anal) Masonry Lined anal 1974~1992 B Require remove of sediment, repair of lining and provision of bottom lining Irrigation (Secondary anal) anal B Require major repair, lining and provision of inspection road Irrigation (Tertiary anal) anal and Paddy Field B Require farm road and farm ditch : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-18

28 28. Sungapan Kiri Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 27,85 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Sungapan Kiri (8) Water Resource River : Kali Waluh (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Pemalang (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Pemalang (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1999/2 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 5,229 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 5,541 5,57 29 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 5,57 5,57 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) 1/ Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 4,654 4,654 84% , Season II (dry I) 4,356 1,185 5,541 1% ,958 77,25 Season III (dry II) % 98 Total/nnual 9, ,185 11,12 199% ,555 1,67 77,25 1/: Include palawija in rainfed field (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances achieved; however, water shortage in dry season reported - ouble cropping of paddy practiced almost in the entire irrigated area; paddy yield levels high; sugarcane & palawija introduced substantially B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: Unstable marketing prices - gronomic Issues: amage caused by rat - Farmers Organizations: Most members are not active - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Expansion of irrigated area & ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Introduction of double cropping of paddy in the entire area (excluding sugarcane area); productivity increase of through further intensification - Extension activities toward improvement of post-harvest & marketing; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 5,57 5,57 1% 6. 33,42 4,385 1,185 5,57 1% 6. 26,31 77,25 1,671 1,671 3% 2,339 9,955 1,671 1,185 12,811 23% 6. 59,73 2,339 77, ,799 31%.5 1,175 1,272 IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 4 b. Established; 4 c. Not yet; Registered Performance a. eveloped; 5 b. Under developing; 35 c. Not yet; Not yet registered 4 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - Not so active participation in O&M activities. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - Encouragement of WU members to take positive action. (2) evelopment Plan - WU O&M training. 3-19

29 28. Sungapan Kiri Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System : B (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : B Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 3 nos. i. : B b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 4 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 72 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 8.5 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : no info. (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m) Main 4,396 3,529 7,925 Secondary 19,539 15,988 35,527 (nos) (4) Major and onstrains Problem on management for flood/scouring sluice gate(s) operation Inflow of bed loads into canal and decrease canal flow capacity Inspection road (m) 7,925 18, (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) - Irrigation anal and Related Leakage from canal ollapse of canal Lower function of regulating structure on canal ifficulty on O&M (5) auses of Major and onstraints Improper maintenance of flood or scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks (no greasing and anti-rust painting) Insufficient function of settling basin, no proper gate operation of intake during flood - Irrigation anal and Related Improper regular maintenance of canal, settlement of canal then insufficient freeboard and overtopping Improper maintenance; insufficient nos. of cross drain, berm width, or catch drain; and/or steep slope of canal eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major Replacement of control system or damaged equipment of flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks Rehabilitation of settling basin, proper gate operation of intake during flood - Irrigation anal and Related Repair of leakage from canal, widen canal wide, recompaction of embankment Redesign of canal section; provision of cross drain, proper width of berm, catch drain, and/or proper slope Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : minor rehabilitation Intake, civil : minor rehabilitation Intake, mechanical : minor rehabilitation Settling basin : minor rehabilitation (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) Main 879 7,46 7,925 Secondary 3,98 31,619 35,527 (nos) Main Secondary (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 5,541 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field 29 e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 5,57 (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 2,22 42,988 4,299 11,433 2,59 63, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) VI.1 EIRR 13.% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group II: Second priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

30 28. Sungapan Kiri Scheme (3/4) Scheme Sungapan Kiri istrict Pemalang Technical Level Technical Registered rea 5,229 ha Year of onstruction 1999/2 Fixed Weir, ownstream B Require major repair of weir body and gate works, removal of debris and sediment Intake B Require major repair of civil and gate works, removal of debris and sediment Intake B Require major repair of civil and gate works, removal of debris and sediment : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-111

31 28. Sungapan Kiri Scheme (4/4) Scheme Sungapan Kiri istrict Pemalang Technical Level Technical Registered rea 5,229 ha Year of onstruction Irrigation (Main canal) Masonry Lined anal B Require minor repair of lining works 1999/2 Irrigation (Tertiary anal) Tertiary anal and Paddy Field B Require provision of division box, farm road and farm ditch B : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-112

32 29. Kabuyutan 32. Jengkelok 3. Babakan 46. Notog N WEST JV Location of istrict SEMRNG J a v a S e a EST JV ENTRL JV PROVINE YOGYKRT Tanjung BREBES LEGEN ENTRL JV PROVINE Karangmalang Ketanggungan Bangsi River Kec. Larangan apital Town of istrict Sub-istrict Town Provincial Boundary istrict Boundary Mahalaya Reservoir Kabuyutan River BREBES ISTRIT TEGL ISTRIT Sub-istrict Boundary Railway Provincial Road istrict Road River Irrigation Scheme M. Pojoktiga Salem Tonjong 31. Kemaron Jambe Technical Irrigation Bantarkawung Irrigation Scheme Sirampong Name of Scheme Registered rea (Ha) Subject rea (Ha) ILP ISTRIT Bumiayu 5 1 Km 29. Kabuyutan 3. Babakan 31. Kemaron Jambe 32. Jengkelok 46. Notog 4,182 2,181 1,26 6,55 27,682 T T T T T 3,867 2,528 1,483 6,173 25,54 Penjalin Reservoir SLE T : Technical Irrigation The Study on omprehensive Recovery Program of Irrigation griculture Japan International ooperation gency Location Map of Irrigation Schemes in Brebes istrict

33 29. Kabuyutan Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 2,4 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Kabuyutan (8) Water Resource River : (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Brebes (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Banjarharjo (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1986 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 4,182 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 3,876 3,876 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 3,876 3,876 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 2, ,876 1% ,43 1,695 37,44 Season II (dry I) 1,15 1, ,28 78% 5.5 6,78 4,662 23,985 Season III (dry II) 947 1,638 2,585 67% 5. 4,735 1,966 Total/nnual 4,787 3, , % ,855 8,323 61,425 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances achieved; however, intensity of paddy is limited & water shortage in dry season reported - ouble cropping of paddy introduced; paddy yield levels high; palawija production extensive B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: Low marketing prices - gronomic Issues: Infestation of pest & diseases - Farmers Organizations: Economic activities are limited - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Expansion of double cropped area of paddy; productivity increase through further intensification - Extension activities toward improvement of post-harvest & marketing; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 3, ,876 1% 6. 19,8 37,44 1,56 1, ,3 85% 6. 9,36 6,855 23, ,132 3,11 8% 5.5 5,33 2,985 5,829 3, , % ,49 9,84 61,425 1, %.5 8,635 1,517 IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 35 b. Established; 31 c. Not yet; 4 Registered 1 Performance a. eveloped; b. Under developing; 3 c. Not yet; 1 Not yet registered 31 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - Low collection of WU membership fee. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - alling attention of WU members to their obligation. (2) evelopment Plan - WU management training 3-113

34 29. Kabuyutan Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System : (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 2 nos. i. : b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 3 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 67 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 8.5 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : not provided (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m) Main 3,1 34 3,44 Secondary 3,77 12,44 43,147 (4) Major and onstrains Problem on management for flood/scouring sluice gate(s) operation Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake Overage, Lower strength of intake gate(s) - Irrigation anal and Related Leakage from canal ollapse of canal Overage, lower strength of canal Lower function of regulating structure on canal ifficulty on O&M (5) auses of Major and onstraints Improper maintenance of flood or scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks (no greasing and anti-rust painting) Sedimentation in front of intake eterioration of intake gate(s), no or insufficient rehabilitation due to budget problem - Irrigation anal and Related Improper regular maintenance of canal, settlement of canal then insufficient freeboard and overtopping Improper maintenance; insufficient nos. of cross drain, berm width, or catch drain; and/or steep slope of canal eterioration of canal, no or insufficient rehabilitation due to budget problem eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major Replacement of control system or damaged equipment of flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks redging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intake Replace and reconstruction of intake gate(s) - Irrigation anal and Related Repair of leakage from canal, widen canal wide, recompaction of embankment Redesign of canal section; provision of cross drain, proper width of berm, catch drain, and/or proper slope Replace and reconstruction of canal Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : large rehabilitation Intake, civil : large rehabilitation Intake, mechanical Settling basin : large rehabilitation (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) (nos) Main Secondary Main Secondary (nos) ,44 43, Inspection road (m) 1,614 2, (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 3,876 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 3,876 : large rehabilitation 3,44 43, (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 2,27 68,95 6,81 7,946 1,57 86, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) 3 28 VI.1 EIRR 8.4% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group I: First priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

35 29. Kabuyutan Scheme (3/4) Scheme Kabuyutan istrict Brebes Technical Level Technical Registered rea 4,182 ha Year of onstruction 1986 Fixed Weir, Upstream B Require provision of retaining wall, removal of sediment in front of intake Intake and Scouring Sluice B Require minor repair of civil and gate works Intake and Settling Basin B Require removal of sediment and redesign of settling basin : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-115

36 29. Kabuyutan Scheme (4/4) Scheme Kabuyutan istrict Brebes Technical Level Technical Registered rea 4,182 ha Year of onstruction Irrigation (Main anal) Masonry Lined anal 1986 B Require total repair of lining and provision of inspection road Irrigation (Main anal) Masonry Lined anal B Require total repair of lining and provision of inspection road Irrigation (Tertiary anal) ivision Box B Require total repair : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-116

37 3. Babakan Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 13,35 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Babakan (8) Water Resource River : (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Brebes (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Ketanggungan (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1936/1992 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 2,181 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 2,528 2,528 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 2,528 2,528 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 2, ,528 1% 5. 11, ,87 Season II (dry I) 1, ,311 91% 5. 7,3 1,974 16,55 Season III (dry II) 475 1,276 1,751 69% 4.5 2,138 1,531 Total/nnual 4,176 1, ,59 261% 4.9 2,643 3,61 28,925 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances achieved; however, water shortage in dry season reported - ouble cropping of paddy practiced in most of the irrigated area; paddy yield levels high; palawija introduced extensively B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: Low marketing prices - gronomic Issues: Infestation of pest & diseases - Farmers Organizations: Most members are not active - Paddy Marketing Unstable marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Expansion of double cropped area of paddy; productivity increase through further intensification - Extension activities toward improvement of post-harvest & marketing; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 2, ,528 1% ,815 12,87 1, ,33 92% 5.5 8,344 2,83 16, ,517 2,23 8% 5. 2,53 2,124 4,353 2, , % ,689 4,954 28, %.5 3,46 1,344 IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 38 b. Established; 38 c. Not yet; Registered Performance a. eveloped; b. Under developing; 21 c. Not yet; 17 Not yet registered 38 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - Low level of membership fee collection due to insufficient irrigation water supply. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - alling attention of WU members to their obligation. (2) evelopment Plan - WU management training 3-117

38 3. Babakan Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System : (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 2 nos. i. : b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 2 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 68 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 3.7 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : not provided (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m) Main 2,547 2,547 Secondary 7,36 17,14 24,5 (4) Major and onstrains Lower strength against design load due to rust, decay of steel materials of flood/scouring sluice gate(s) Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake ifficulty on O&M - Irrigation anal and Related Leakage from canal ollapse of canal Impassable of inspection road along canal Lower function of regulating structure on canal ifficulty on O&M (5) auses of Major and onstraints No over coating on flood/scouring sluice gate(s) to prevent rust and decay Sedimentation in front of intake No provision of inspection/access road, no provision of inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Improper regular maintenance of canal, settlement of canal then insufficient freeboard and overtopping Improper maintenance; insufficient nos. of cross drain, berm width, or catch drain; and/or steep slope of canal Improper routine O&M works due to no or narrow wide of road, slope erosion by rainfall then in flow into canal eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major Provision of overcoat or replacement of flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks redging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intake Provision of inspection/access road, inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Repair of leakage from canal, widen canal wide, recompaction of embankment Redesign of canal section; provision of cross drain, proper width of berm, catch drain, and/or proper slope Provision of inspection road both main and secondary canal with pavement Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : large rehabilitation Intake, civil : large rehabilitation Intake, mechanical Settling basin : large rehabilitation (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) (nos) Main Secondary Main Secondary (nos) ,547 24, Inspection road (m) 1,2 5, (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 2,528 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 2,528 : large rehabilitation (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 1,856 29,768 2,977 5,182 1,57 41, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) ,547 24, VI.1 EIRR 6.9% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group I: First priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

39 3. Babakan Scheme (3/4) Scheme Babakan istrict Brebes Technical Level Technical Registered rea 2,181 ha Year of onstruction 1936/1992 Fixed Weir, Upstream B Require repair for civil and gate works and removal of sediment Fixed Weir, ownstream B Require repair for civil and gate works and removal of sediment Settling Basin B Require redesign of settling basin : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-119

40 3. Babakan Scheme (4/4) Scheme Babakan istrict Brebes Technical Level Technical Registered rea 2,181 ha Year of onstruction Irrigation (Main anal) ulvert 1936/1992 B Require removal of sediment Irrigation (Main anal) Masonry Lined anal B Require removal of sediment Irrigation (Paddy Field) Farm itch and Paddy Field B Require farm ditch and road : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-12

41 31. Kemaron Jambe Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 2,52 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Kemaron Jambe (8) Water Resource River : (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Brebes (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Paguyangan (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1991 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 1,26 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 1,26 1, b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 1,483 1,483 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) 1/ Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 1,26 1,26 1% 5. 5,13 1,371 Season II (dry I) 1,26 1,26 1% 5. 5,13 Season III (dry II) 1,26 1,26 1% 4.5 4,617 Total/nnual 3,78 3,78 3% ,877 1,371 1/: Include palawija in rainfed field (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - Maximum irrigation performances achieved; poor drainage problem reported; existence of rainfed field (457ha) - Triple cropping of paddy practiced in the entire irrigated area; paddy yield levels high B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: - - Palawija Marketing: Unstable marketing prices - gronomic Issues: amage caused by rat - Farmers Organizations: Managerial capacity of KTs are limited - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation & upgrading - Triple cropping of paddy in the entire area; productivity increase of paddy through intensification - Extension activities toward improvement of post-harvest & marketing; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 1,483 1,483 1% 5.5 8,157 1,483 1,483 1% 5.5 8,157 1,483 1,483 1% 5. 7,415 4,449 4,449 3% ,728 1,371 1,371 %.5 8,851-1,371 IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 6 b. Established; 6 c. Not yet; Registered Performance a. eveloped; b. Under developing; 6 c. Not yet; Not yet registered 6 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - Low collection level of membership fee. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - alling attention of WU members to their obligation. (2) evelopment Plan - WU management training 3-121

42 31. Kemaron Jambe Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System: (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 1 nos. i. : b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 1 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 15 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 3.1 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : not provided (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined Total (m) Main 1, 1, Secondary 17,6 6, 23,6 (4) Major and onstrains Washed away of ripraps or blocks after stilling basin Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake ifficulty on O&M - Irrigation anal and Related Impassable of inspection road along canal General O&M problems Overage, lower strength of canal racks or partial damage on lined canal ifficulty on O&M (5) auses of Major and onstraints Insufficient weight of ripraps or blocks for stilling basin, insufficient length of protection work after stilling basin Sedimentation in front of intake No provision of inspection/access road, no provision of inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Improper routine O&M works due to no or narrow wide of road, slope erosion by rainfall then in flow into canal No kilo and hectometer post, no structure plate or mark on structures and no identification for repair/maintenance eterioration of canal, no or insufficient rehabilitation due to budget problem Improper regular maintenance or long leave of repair, insufficient provision of budget No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major Provision of additional ripraps or blocks after stilling basin of weir as required redging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intake Provision of inspection/access road, inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Provision of inspection road both main and secondary canal with pavement Provision of kilo, hect-m posts, marking to each structure with structure name Replace and reconstruction of canal Replace and reconstruction, provision of special treatment at cross drain to prevent settlement Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : large rehabilitation Intake, civil : large rehabilitation Intake, mechanical Settling basin : large rehabilitation (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) (nos) Main Secondary Main Secondary (nos) 1, 23, Inspection road (m) 1, 5, (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 1,26 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field 457 e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 1,483 (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 1,856 38,666 3,867 3,274 1,26 48, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) : large rehabilitation 1, 23, (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) VI.1 EIRR 11.3% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential 1. - gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group VI: evelopment by other category VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province - (High rehabilitation cost) 3-122

43 31. Kemaron Jambe Scheme (3/4) Scheme Kemaron Jambe istrict Brebes Technical Level Technical Technical 1,26 ha Year of onstruction 1991 Fixed Weir and Intake B Require removal of sediment in front of weir and intake, require scouring sluice Fixed Weir, ownstream View B Require provision of scouring sluice Fixed Weir, ownstream View B Require provision of stilling basin : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-123

44 31. Kemaron Jambe Scheme (4/4) Scheme Kemaron Jambe istrict Brebes Technical Level Technical Registered rea 1,26 ha Year of onstruction Irrigation (Secondary anal) rop B Require inspection road 1991 Irrigation (Secondary anal) Bifurcation B Require provision of measuring facility Irrigation (Paddy Field) Paddy Field B Require farm road : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-124

45 32. Jengkelok Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 34,236 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Jengkelok (8) Water Resource River : (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Brebes (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Losari (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 199 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 6,55 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 6,173 6,173 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 6,173 6,173 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 5,112 5,112 83% 5. 25,56 Season II (dry I) 3, ,394 71% 11,874 28,34 Season III (dry II) 2,35 2,35 33% 2,442 Total/nnual 5,112 5, , % 5. 25,56 14,316 28,34 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - Irrigation water supply at on-farm level limited in dry season; water shortage in dry season reported - Single cropping of paddy prevailing; paddy yield levels high; palawija cropped area larger then that of paddy B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: Unstable marketing prices - gronomic Issues: amage caused by rat - Farmers Organizations: Most members are not active - Paddy Marketing Unstable marketing prices - Extension Services: Shortage of operation funds of PPLs III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Expansion of irrigated area & ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Introduction of double cropping of paddy; productivity increase through further intensification - Extension activities toward improvement of post-harvest & marketing; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 6,173 6,173 1% ,952 2,469 1, ,759 77% ,58 9,27 28, ,235 1,852 3% 5. 3,85 1,729 9,259 3, ,784 27% 5.5 5,616 1,999 28,34 4,147-2,94 1,243 2%.5 25,56-3,317 IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 38 b. Established; 38 c. Not yet; Registered Performance a. eveloped; b. Under developing; 21 c. Not yet; 17 Not yet registered 38 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - Low collection level of membership fee. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - alling attention of WU members to their obligation. (2) evelopment Plan - WU management training 3-125

46 32. Jengkelok Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System : (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 1 nos. i. : b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 2 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 4 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 8.6 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : not provided (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m) Main 3,1 2,1 5,2 Secondary 12,8 32,227 45,27 (4) Major and onstrains Washed away of ripraps or blocks after stilling basin Problem on management for flood/scouring sluice gate(s) operation Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake - Irrigation anal and Related Leakage from canal ollapse of canal Impassable of inspection road along canal General O&M problems Lower function of regulating structure on canal (5) auses of Major and onstraints Insufficient weight of ripraps or blocks for stilling basin, insufficient length of protection work after stilling basin Improper maintenance of flood or scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks (no greasing and anti-rust painting) Sedimentation in front of intake - Irrigation anal and Related Improper regular maintenance of canal, settlement of canal then insufficient freeboard and overtopping Improper maintenance; insufficient nos. of cross drain, berm width, or catch drain; and/or steep slope of canal Improper routine O&M works due to no or narrow wide of road, slope erosion by rainfall then in flow into canal No kilo and hectometer post, no structure plate or mark on structures and no identification for repair/maintenance eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major Provision of additional ripraps or blocks after stilling basin of weir as required Replacement of control system or damaged equipment of flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks redging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intake - Irrigation anal and Related Repair of leakage from canal, widen canal wide, recompaction of embankment Redesign of canal section; provision of cross drain, proper width of berm, catch drain, and/or proper slope Provision of inspection road both main and secondary canal with pavement Provision of kilo, hect-m posts, marking to each structure with structure name Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : large rehabilitation Intake, civil : large rehabilitation Intake, mechanical Settling basin : large rehabilitation (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) (nos) Main Secondary Main Secondary (nos) ,2 45, Inspection road (m) 5,2 3,8 (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 6,173 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 6,173 : large rehabilitation (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 2,6 81,291 8,129 12,655 2,59 17, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) ,2 45, VI.1 EIRR 14.% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group I: First priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

47 32. Jengkelok Scheme (3/4) Scheme Jengkelok istrict Brebes Technical Level Technical Registered rea 6,55 ha Year of onstruction 199 Fixed Weir, ownstream View B Require replacement of scoring sluice and intake gates, wooden to steel Scouring Sluice and Intake B Require replacement of gates, wooden to steel Intake, Rear View B Require removal of sediment and provision of inspection road along main canal : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-127

48 32. Jengkelok Scheme (4/4) Scheme Jengkelok istrict Brebes Technical Level Technical Registered rea 6,55 ha Year of onstruction Irrigation (Main anal) Settling Basin and Masonry Lined anal 199 B Require removal of sediment and provision of inspection road Irrigation (Paddy field) Paddy field B Require farm road and ditch Irrigation (Paddy field) Paddy field B Require farm road and ditch : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-128

49 Location of istrict N WEST JV SEMRNG EST JV J a v a S e a ENTRL JV PROVINE YOGYKRT TEGL 33. Gung Kemantren Suradadi LEGEN apital Town of istrict 34. Parakankidang BREBES ISTRIT 35. Kumisik Talang diwerna Slawi Tarup diwerno Pakah acaban Reservoir Lodadi TEGL ISTRIT Warurejo Sub-istrict Town istrict Boundary Sub-istrict Boundary Railway Provincial Road istrict Road Lebaksiu River Margasari Banjaranyar Balapulang Sragi River Jatinegara Irrigation Scheme Technical Irrigation Prupuk PEMLNG ISTRIT Irrigation Scheme Bumujaya Name of Scheme Registered rea (Ha) Subject rea (Ha) 33. Gung 34. Parakankidang 35. Kumisik 12,999 1,697 3,736 T T T 12,641 1,631 3, Km SLE T : Technical Irrigation The Study on omprehensive Recovery Program of Irrigation griculture Japan International ooperation gency Location Map of Irrigation Schemes in Tegal istrict

50 33..I. Gung Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 63,39 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme :.I. Gung (8) Water Resource River : Kali Gung (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Tegal & Kodia Tegal (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Lebaksui (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1991/1998 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 12,999 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 12,641 12,641 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 12,641 12,641 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 9,734 1,517 1,39 12,641 1% 5. 48,67 4,551 9,35 Season II (dry I) 4,579 5,77 1,563 11,219 89% 5. 22,895 15,231 11,595 Season III (dry II) 46 9,572 9,978 79% 4.5 1,827 11,486 Total/nnual 14,719 16,166 2,953 33, % 5. 73,392 31, ,945 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances achieved; however, intensity of paddy is limited & water shortage in dry season reported - Single cropping of paddy prevailing; paddy yield levels high; palawija cropped area larger then that of paddy B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: Low marketing prices - gronomic Issues: Farmers not following recommended practices - Farmers Organizations: Most members are not active - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Expansion of irrigated area of paddy & ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Expansion of double cropping of paddy; productivity increase through further intensification - Extension activities toward improvement of post-harvest & marketing; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 11,251 1,39 12,641 1% ,881 9,35 6,321 3,367 1,563 11,251 89% ,766 16,835 11,595 1,113 1,113 8% 14,158 17,572 13,48 2,953 34,5 269% ,646 3, ,945 2,853-2, %.5 23, IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 131 b. Established; 129 c. Not yet; 2 Registered 7 Performance a. eveloped; 2 b. Under developing; 74 c. Not yet; 53 Not yet registered 122 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - Low collection level of membership fee. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - alling attention of WU members to their obligation. (2) evelopment Plan - WU management training 3-129

51 33..I. Gung Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System: (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 2 nos. i. : b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 2 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 65 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 19. m3/s h. Inspection bridge : no info. (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined Total (m) Main 13,5 13,5 Secondary 2, 17, 37, (nos) (4) Major and onstrains Washed away of ripraps or blocks after stilling basin Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake ifficulty on O&M - Irrigation anal and Related Leakage from canal ollapse of canal Lower function of regulating structure on canal ifficulty on O&M Inspection road (m) 8,576 37, (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) (5) auses of Major and onstraints Insufficient weight of ripraps or blocks for stilling basin, insufficient length of protection work after stilling basin Sedimentation in front of intake No provision of inspection/access road, no provision of inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Improper regular maintenance of canal, settlement of canal then insufficient freeboard and overtopping Improper maintenance; insufficient nos. of cross drain, berm width, or catch drain; and/or steep slope of canal eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major Provision of additional ripraps or blocks after stilling basin of weir as required redging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intake Provision of inspection/access road, inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Repair of leakage from canal, widen canal wide, recompaction of embankment Redesign of canal section; provision of cross drain, proper width of berm, catch drain, and/or proper slope Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : minor rehabilitation Intake, civil : large rehabilitation Intake, mechanical : large rehabilitation Settling basin : large rehabilitation (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) Main 2,7 1,8 13,5 Secondary 4, 33, 37, (nos) Main Secondary (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 12,641 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 12,641 (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 5,87 54,147 5,415 25,914 3,6 94, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) VI.1 EIRR 16.1% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group I: First priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

52 33..I Gung Scheme (3/4) Scheme.I Gung istrict Tegal & Kodia Tegal Technical Level Technical Registered rea 12,999 ha Year of onstruction 1991/1998 Fixed Weir, Bar-screen Type B Require total repair of weir body Fixed Weir, Bar-screen Type B Require total repair of weir body Settling Basin B Require provision of inspection road : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-131

53 33..I Gung Scheme (4/4) Scheme.I Gung istrict Tegal & Kodia Tegal Technical Level Technical Registered rea 12,999 ha Year of onstruction 1991/1998 Irrigation (Main anal) Main anal B Require removal of sediments at inside of canal Irrigation (Secondary anal) oncrete Lined anal B Require repair of lining Irrigation (Tertiary anal) Tertiary anal B Require tertiary development and provision of farm road : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-132

54 34. Parakankidang Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 8,25 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Parakankidang (8) Water Resource River : Kali Gintung (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Tegal & Kodia Tegal (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Margasari (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1994 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 1,697 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 1,631 1,631 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 1,631 1,631 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 1, ,621 99% 5. 7,615 6,37 Season II (dry I) 354 1, ,524 93% 5. 1,77 3, Season III (dry II) 1,213 1,213 74% 1,456 Total/nnual 1,877 2, , % 5. 9,385 4,924 7,28 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances achieved; however, intensity of paddy is limited & water shortage in dry season reported - Single cropping of paddy prevailing; paddy yield levels high; palawija cropped area larger then that of paddy B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: Unstable marketing prices - gronomic Issues: Farmers not following recommended practices - Farmers Organizations: Most members are not active - Paddy Marketing Unstable marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Expansion of irrigated area of paddy & ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Expansion of double cropping of paddy; productivity increase through further intensification - Extension activities toward improvement of post-harvest & marketing; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 1, ,631 1% 5.5 8,432 6, ,533 94% 5.5 4,488 3, ,468 1,468 9% 2,55 2,349 2, , % ,92 5,57 7, %.5 3, IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 8 b. Established; 8 c. Not yet; Registered Performance a. eveloped; b. Under developing; 8 c. Not yet; Not yet registered 8 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - Insufficient internal coordination in WU IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - Improvement of WU management system (2) evelopment Plan - WU management training 3-133

55 34. Parakankidang Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System : B (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : Main anal System : B Secondary anal System : B On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : no info. i. : b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : no info. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 23 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 3.6 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : no info. (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m) Main 1,2 51 1,71 Secondary 4,4 1,29 14,69 (nos) (4) Major and onstrains Washed away of ripraps or blocks after stilling basin Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake ifficulty on O&M - Irrigation anal and Related Leakage from canal ollapse of canal Lower function of regulating structure on canal ifficulty on O&M 5 65 Inspection road (m) 1,71 14,69 B B (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) (5) auses of Major and onstraints Insufficient weight of ripraps or blocks for stilling basin, insufficient length of protection work after stilling basin Sedimentation in front of intake No provision of inspection/access road, no provision of inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Improper regular maintenance of canal, settlement of canal then insufficient freeboard and overtopping Improper maintenance; insufficient nos. of cross drain, berm width, or catch drain; and/or steep slope of canal eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major Provision of additional ripraps or blocks after stilling basin of weir as required redging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intake Provision of inspection/access road, inspection bridge/deck - Irrigation anal and Related Repair of leakage from canal, widen canal wide, recompaction of embankment Redesign of canal section; provision of cross drain, proper width of berm, catch drain, and/or proper slope Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : large rehabilitation Intake, civil : large rehabilitation Intake, mechanical : large rehabilitation Settling basin : large rehabilitation (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) Main 24 1,47 1,71 Secondary 88 13,81 14,69 (nos) Main Secondary (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 1,631 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 1,631 (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 1,856 12,85 1,28 3,344 1,26 2, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) VI.1 EIRR 15.1% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group II: Second priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

56 34. Parakankidang Scheme (3/4) Scheme Parakankidang istrict Tegal & Kodia Tegal Technical Level Technical Registered rea 1,697 ha Year of onstruction 1994 Intake and Scouring Sluice B Require minor repair for civil and gate works Fixed Wir, Rear View B Require minor repair for civil and gate works Intake B Require provision of settling basin : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-135

57 Scheme Parakankidang istrict Tegal & Kodia Tegal entral Java Province 34. Parakankidang Scheme (4/4) Technical Level Technical Registered rea 1,697 ha Year of onstruction Irrigation (Secondary anal) Lined anal B Require total rehabilitation 1994 Irrigation (Secondary anal) Lined anal B Under repairing of canal lining Irrigation (Secondary anal) anal B Require removal of sediments and provision of inspection road : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-136

58 35. Kumisik Scheme (1/4) I. PROJET FUNMENTLS I.1 General (1) ode Number : (7) Number of Farmers : 15,112 (2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Kumisik (8) Water Resource River : Kali Kumisik (3) istrict (Kabupaten) : Tegal & Kodia Tegal (9) atchment rea (km 2 ) : - (4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Balapulang (1) ompletion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1997/1998 (5) Registered rea (ha) : 3,736 (6) Technical Level : Technical I.2 vailability of Reports/ocuments & References ( : vailable, B : vailable but partially, : Not available/ No plan) a. esign Reports of Existing System(Full set) b. Irrigation diagram c. s-built drawings d. lists & diagram e. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. rops and yield data g. ropping alender h. WUs data 1 II. SUBJET RE FOR REHBILITTION PLN II.1 Present and Planned Land Use Present (ha) Plan (ha) Increment (ha) a. Irrigated paddy field 3,778 3,788 1 b. Rainfed paddy field c. Upland field d. Uncultivated land e. Non-irrigable land Total 3,778 3,788 1 III. GRIULTURE III.1 Present/Before Project (1) Irrigation Performance and rop Production Season ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) 3, ,757 99% 5. 17,665 14,56 Season II (dry I) 1,225 2, ,492 92% 5. 6,125 6,126 14,625 Season III (dry II) 1,921 1,921 51% 2,35 Total/nnual 4,758 3, ,17 243% 5. 23,79 8,431 29,185 (2) and onstraints. Irrigation & griculture Performances - High irrigation performances achieved; however, intensity of paddy is limited & water shortage in dry season reported - Single cropping of paddy prevailing; paddy yield levels high; palawija cropped area extensive B. Primary onstraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JI Study - Irrigation & rainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: Low marketing prices - gronomic Issues: Farmers not following recommended practices - Farmers Organizations: Most members are not active - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited III.2 evelopment Plan (1) evelopment pproaches - Expansion of irrigated area of paddy & ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Expansion of double cropping of paddy; productivity increase through further intensification - Extension activities toward improvement of post-harvest & marketing; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs (2) Planned Irrigation Performances and rop Production ropped rea in Irrigated Paddy Field (ha) nnual Irrigated Paddy Yield (GKG rop Production (ton) Season Paddy Palawija Sugarcane Total Intensity ton/ha) Paddy Palawija Others Season I (wet) Season II (dry I) Season III (dry II) Total/nnual nnual Increment 3, ,778 1% ,547 14,56 3, ,554 94% ,31 14,625 2,645 2,645 7% 3,73 6,883 2, , % ,857 3,73 29,185 2,125-1, %.5 14,67-4,728 IV. WUs IV.1 Existing (1) Number a. Target; 31 b. Established; 28 c. Not yet; 3 Registered Performance a. eveloped; 1 b. Under developing; 27 c. Not yet; Not yet registered 28 (2) and onstraints Operation Maintenance Management (3) auses of and onstraints - Not so active members - Low collection level of membership fee. IV.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures - Encouragement of members to involve positively in O&M works. - alling attention of WU members to their obligation. (2) evelopment Plan - WU O&M training and WU management training 3-137

59 35. Kumisik Scheme (2/4) V. IRRIGTION FILITY V.1 Existing (1) Overall Irrigation System : (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) Water Resources Facility : Main anal System : Secondary anal System : On-farm : (2) Water Resources Facilty a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 1 nos. i. : b. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 3 nos. (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not c. Length of weir : 24 m g. Settling basin : provided functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) d. esign intake discharge : 5.4 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : no info. (no info.: no information) (3) Irrigation anal and Inspection Road anal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m) Main 4,5 1,7 15,2 Secondary 5,2 12,77 17,277 (4) Major and onstrains Washed away of ripraps or blocks after stilling basin Problem on management for flood/scouring sluice gate(s) operation Insufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intake - Irrigation anal and Related Leakage from canal ollapse of canal Lower function of regulating structure on canal ifficulty on O&M (nos) Inspection road (m) ,2 17,277 (: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation) (5) auses of Major and onstraints Insufficient weight of ripraps or blocks for stilling basin, insufficient length of protection work after stilling basin Improper maintenance of flood or scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks (no greasing and anti-rust painting) Sedimentation in front of intake - Irrigation anal and Related Improper regular maintenance of canal, settlement of canal then insufficient freeboard and overtopping Improper maintenance; insufficient nos. of cross drain, berm width, or catch drain; and/or steep slope of canal eterioration of regulating structure on canal, especially gate and metal works No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken V.2 evelopment Plan (1) Proposed ountermeasures for Major Provision of additional ripraps or blocks after stilling basin of weir as required Replacement of control system or damaged equipment of flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworks redging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intake - Irrigation anal and Related Repair of leakage from canal, widen canal wide, recompaction of embankment Redesign of canal section; provision of cross drain, proper width of berm, catch drain, and/or proper slope Replacement and reconstruction of regulating structure on canal Provision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement (2) Water Resources Facility am/headworks body : minor rehabilitation Intake, civil : minor rehabilitation Intake, mechanical : large rehabilitation Settling basin : large rehabilitation (3) Irrigation anal and Related Works No rehabilitaion Rehabilitation New construction Total anal (m) Main 15,2 15,2 Secondary 17,277 17,277 (nos) Main Secondary (4) On-farm evelopment (Unit: ha) a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 3,778 d. Non-potential paddy field b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field c. Potential non-paddy field Total 3,778 (5) Rehabilitation ost (irect ost) (Unit: Million Rp.) On-Farm Project ost W.R.F Irrigation rainage Total evelop. Facility per ha 2,595 41,115 4,112 7,745 1,57 57, (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, evelop.: evelopment) VI.1 EIRR 13.5% VI. PROJET EVLUTION VI.2 Prioritization Scoring Evaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score Irrigation Utilization of Irrigation Potential gricultural Productivity System Urgency Social Problem Sustainability Economic Impact VI.3 Priority Group Group I: First priority group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province

60 35. Kumisik Scheme (3/4) Scheme Kumisik istrict Tegal & Kodia Tegal Technical Level Technical Registered rea 3,736 ha Year of onstruction 1997/1998 Fixed Weir, Bar-screen Type B Require total repair or replacement Intake Gate, Rear View B Require major repair of civil and gate works Masonry Lined anal and Settling Basin B Require provision of inspection road : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-139

61 35. Kumisik Scheme (4/4) Scheme Kumisik istrict Tegal & Kodia Tegal Technical Level Technical Registered rea 3,736 ha Year of onstruction Irrigation (Main anal) Masonry Lined anal 1997/1998 B Require canal lining and provision of inspection road Irrigation (Tertiary anal) anal B Require provision of gates and farm road Irrigation (Paddy Field) Tertiary anal and Paddy Field B Require tertiary development : : Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, : Not functioning well, : Serious condition for operation 3-14