Structural Calculations Amphitheater Middle School Building 400 AC Replacement 315 E. Prince Rd., Tucson, Arizona
|
|
- Tyler Byrd
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Structural Calculations Amphitheater Middle School Building 400 AC Replacement 315 E Prince Rd, Tucson, Arizona Prepared for: Amphitheather Public Schools SCI Project No A
2 SCI Project No A Table of Contents Design Criteria 1 RTU Crieteria 3 Existing Joist Evaluation, Enercalc 4 Existing Joist with New RTU Evaluation, Enercalc 6 Shortened Joist Evaluation, Enercalc 8 Shortened Joist Modification Design 10 Steel Column and Base Plate Anchorage Design 14 Edge Member Design (Beam at opening) 20 Appendix A: Historical Joist Information, H-series 22 Scope These calculations specifically pertain to the evaluation of existing roof framing members for the removal of an existing roof top unit and replacement with a new roof top The new unit requires modification of the existing roof framing for an 7-0 x 7-0 opening in the existing concrete roof deck Calculations include design of structural modifications to an existing open web steel joist, columns to support the shortened joist, and miscellaneous support members for framing the opening Modification and upgrades are occurring at Amphi Middle School Building 400
3 Design Criteria CONCRETE Structural Elevated Slabs Assumed Existing Slabs-on-Grade MASONRY Existing (Conservatively assumed) Concrete Masonry Units (CMU) Mortar - Type S Grout - 3/8" Max Aggregate f'c = 4000 psi f'c = 3000 psi f'm = 1500 psi f'm = 1800 psi f'm = 2000 psi REINFORCING STEEL #3& Larger Grade 60 Fy = 60,000 psi STRUCTURAL STEEL Plates, Channels, Misc Shapes - ASTM A36 Fy = 36,000 psi W-Shapes - ASTM A992 Fy = 50,000 psi Steel Pipe - ASTM A53B or A501 Fy = 42,000 psi Steel Tubing - ASTM A500 Grade B Fy = 46,000 psi Summary of Existing Conditions Concrete masonry bearing walls with open web steel joist and metal conform deck supporting concrete roof slab Existing components specific to the area of consideration are as follows: 1 CMU: nominal 8 x 16 x 4 tall Exterior walls are load bearing CMU with brick veneer, and interior walls between corridor and classrooms are CMU load bearing Visual observations indicate interior walls at the Break Room are non-load bearing 2 Existing open web steel joists are 18 deep H-series joists at 4-0 on center Joists bear on load bearing walls between corridor and classrooms Joists immediately below area of consideration could not be verified Adjacent structure was verified as 18H5 It is likely joists directly below RTU are larger Evaluation will be based on 18H5, and field verification will be requested 3 Existing metal roof deck appears to be 13 C conform deck Roof slab total thickness was not verifiable without destruction Per historical Vulcraft roof deck catalogs and industry standards for this span and structural use, the deck is likely 13C conform deck with 2 lightweight concrete topping Design Loads Dead Loads: Self-weight of structural members: Steel joist framing Roof deck with 2 LW conc topping Roof treatment C/L/M/S allowance Live Loads: Minimally sloped roof Wind Load (See below): Minimally sloped roof 20 psf 250 psf 10 psf 40 psf 200 psf 101 psf/-287 psf
4 Project No A Page 2 WIND LOAD EVALUATION IBC 2012 / ASCE 7-10 Wind Load General Requirements (ASCE 7, Chapter 26) Risk Category III Ultimate Design Wind Speed, V ULT = 120 mph (ASCE 7 Figure 265-1B) Exposure B Enclosed Bldg K zt = 10 (ASCE 7 Figure 268-1) K d = 085 (ASCE 7 Figure 266-1) G = 085 (ASCE 7 Section 2691; where applicable) K d = 085 (ASCE 7 Figure 303-1) q h = K z K zt K d V 2 = (085)(10)(085)(120) 2 = 266 psf Wind Load Components & Cladding (ASCE 7, Chapter 30) For Effective Area > 100 sf on Gable Roof θ 7 GC p = +02/-09 (ASCE 7 Figure 304-2A) Zone 1 GC pi = ± 018 (ASCE 7 Table ) Enclosed Bldg p = q h [(GC p) (GC pi)] = +101/-287 psf Zone 1
5 Page 3
6 Structural Concepts, Inc 8230 E Broadway Blvd Ste W-7 Tucson, AZ Project Title: Amphi - AMS Bldg G AC Upgrade Engineer: JMM Project ID: A Project Descr: Page 4 General Beam Analysis Lic # : KW Description : Existing Joist Evaluation - positive wind load File = \\Server\sci data\scipro~1\jennif~1\1-jobf~1\active~1\17-167~1\calcs\17-167aec6 ENERCALC, INC , Build: , Ver: Licensee : STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS INC General Beam Properties Elastic Modulus 29,0000 ksi Span #1 Span Length = ft Area = 40 in^2 Moment of Inertia = in^4 Applied Loads Service loads entered Load Factors will be applied for calculations Uniform Load : D = 00320, Lr = 0020, W = 0010 ksf, Tributary Width = 40 ft, (Typical design loads) DESIGN SUMMARY Maximum Bending = k-ft +D+Lr+H Span # where maximum occurs Span # 1 Location of maximum on span ft Maximum Deflection Max Downward Transient Deflection 0856 in 481 Max Upward Transient Deflection 0007 in Max Downward Total Deflection 2227 in 185 Max Upward Total Deflection 0013 in Maximum Shear = Span # where maximum occurs Location of maximum on span 3571 k +D+Lr+H Span # ft Maximum Forces & Stresses for s Max Stress Ratios Summary of Moment Values (k-ft) Shear Values (k) Segment Length Overall MAXimum Envelope Dsgn L = 3433 ft Span # 1 M V Mmax Mmax - Ma - Max 3065 Mnx Mnx/Omega Cb Rm Va Max 357 Vnx Vnx/Omega +D+H Dsgn L = 3433 ft D+L+H Dsgn L = 3433 ft D+Lr+H Dsgn L = 3433 ft D+S+H Dsgn L = 3433 ft D+0750Lr+0750L+H Dsgn L = 3433 ft D+0750L+0750S+H Dsgn L = 3433 ft D+060W+H Dsgn L = 3433 ft D+070E+H Dsgn L = 3433 ft D+0750Lr+0750L+0450W+H Dsgn L = 3433 ft D+0750L+0750S+0450W+H Dsgn L = 3433 ft D+0750L+0750S+05250E+H Dsgn L = 3433 ft D+060W+060H Dsgn L = 3433 ft D+070E+060H Dsgn L = 3433 ft Overall Maximum Deflections Span Max "-" Defl Location in Span Max "+" Defl Location in Span +D+Lr+H
7 Structural Concepts, Inc 8230 E Broadway Blvd Ste W-7 Tucson, AZ Project Title: Amphi - AMS Bldg G AC Upgrade Engineer: JMM Project ID: A Project Descr: Page 5 General Beam Analysis Lic # : KW Description : Existing Joist Evaluation - positive wind load File = \\Server\sci data\scipro~1\jennif~1\1-jobf~1\active~1\17-167~1\calcs\17-167aec6 ENERCALC, INC , Build: , Ver: Licensee : STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS INC Vertical Reactions Support notation : Far left is #1 Values in KIPS Support 1 Support 2 Overall MAXimum Overall MINimum D+H D+L+H D+Lr+H D+S+H D+0750Lr+0750L+H D+0750L+0750S+H D+060W+H D+070E+H D+0750Lr+0750L+0450W+H D+0750L+0750S+0450W+H D+0750L+0750S+05250E+H D+060W+060H D+070E+060H D Only Lr Only L Only S Only W Only E Only H Only
8 Structural Concepts, Inc 8230 E Broadway Blvd Ste W-7 Tucson, AZ Project Title: Amphi - AMS Bldg G AC Upgrade Engineer: JMM Project ID: A Project Descr: Page 6 General Beam Analysis Lic # : KW Description : Existing Joist Evaluation - +W; with NEW RTU File = \\Server\sci data\scipro~1\jennif~1\1-jobf~1\active~1\17-167~1\calcs\17-167aec6 ENERCALC, INC , Build: , Ver: Licensee : STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS INC General Beam Properties Elastic Modulus 29,0000 ksi Span #1 Span Length = ft Area = 40 in^2 Moment of Inertia = in^4 Applied Loads Service loads entered Load Factors will be applied for calculations Uniform Load : D = 00320, Lr = 0020, W = 0010 ksf, Tributary Width = 40 ft, (Typical design loads) Point Load : D = ft, (Existing RTU) DESIGN SUMMARY Maximum Bending = k-ft +D+Lr+H Span # where maximum occurs Span # 1 Location of maximum on span ft Maximum Deflection Max Downward Transient Deflection 0856 in 481 Max Upward Transient Deflection 0007 in Max Downward Total Deflection 2460 in 167 Max Upward Total Deflection 0015 in Maximum Shear = Span # where maximum occurs Location of maximum on span 4206 k +D+Lr+H Span # ft Maximum Forces & Stresses for s Max Stress Ratios Summary of Moment Values (k-ft) Shear Values (k) Segment Length Overall MAXimum Envelope Dsgn L = 3433 ft Span # 1 M V Mmax Mmax - Ma - Max 3354 Mnx Mnx/Omega Cb Rm Va Max 421 Vnx Vnx/Omega +D+H Dsgn L = 3433 ft D+L+H Dsgn L = 3433 ft D+Lr+H Dsgn L = 3433 ft D+S+H Dsgn L = 3433 ft D+0750Lr+0750L+H Dsgn L = 3433 ft D+0750L+0750S+H Dsgn L = 3433 ft D+060W+H Dsgn L = 3433 ft D+070E+H Dsgn L = 3433 ft D+0750Lr+0750L+0450W+H Dsgn L = 3433 ft D+0750L+0750S+0450W+H Dsgn L = 3433 ft D+0750L+0750S+05250E+H Dsgn L = 3433 ft D+060W+060H Dsgn L = 3433 ft D+070E+060H Dsgn L = 3433 ft
9 Structural Concepts, Inc 8230 E Broadway Blvd Ste W-7 Tucson, AZ Project Title: Amphi - AMS Bldg G AC Upgrade Engineer: JMM Project ID: A Project Descr: Page 7 General Beam Analysis Lic # : KW Description : Existing Joist Evaluation - +W; with NEW RTU File = \\Server\sci data\scipro~1\jennif~1\1-jobf~1\active~1\17-167~1\calcs\17-167aec6 ENERCALC, INC , Build: , Ver: Licensee : STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS INC Overall Maximum Deflections Span Max "-" Defl Location in Span Max "+" Defl Location in Span +D+Lr+H Vertical Reactions Support notation : Far left is #1 Values in KIPS Support 1 Support 2 Overall MAXimum Overall MINimum D+H D+L+H D+Lr+H D+S+H D+0750Lr+0750L+H D+0750L+0750S+H D+060W+H D+070E+H D+0750Lr+0750L+0450W+H D+0750L+0750S+0450W+H D+0750L+0750S+05250E+H D+060W+060H D+070E+060H D Only Lr Only L Only S Only W Only E Only H Only
10 Structural Concepts, Inc 8230 E Broadway Blvd Ste W-7 Tucson, AZ Project Title: Amphi - AMS Bldg G AC Upgrade Engineer: JMM Project ID: A Project Descr: Page 8 General Beam Analysis Lic # : KW Description : Shortened Joist Evaluation - positive wind load File = \\Server\sci data\scipro~1\jennif~1\1-jobf~1\active~1\17-167~1\calcs\17-167aec6 ENERCALC, INC , Build: , Ver: Licensee : STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS INC General Beam Properties Elastic Modulus 29,0000 ksi Span #1 Span Length = ft Area = 40 in^2 Moment of Inertia = in^4 Applied Loads Service loads entered Load Factors will be applied for calculations Uniform Load : D = 00320, Lr = 0020, W = 0010 ksf, Tributary Width = 40 ft, (Typical design loads) DESIGN SUMMARY Maximum Bending = k-ft +D+Lr+H Span # where maximum occurs Span # 1 Location of maximum on span ft Maximum Deflection Max Downward Transient Deflection 0361 in 919 Max Upward Transient Deflection 0003 in Max Downward Total Deflection 0939 in 353 Max Upward Total Deflection 0006 in Maximum Shear = Span # where maximum occurs Location of maximum on span 2877 k +D+Lr+H Span # ft Maximum Forces & Stresses for s Max Stress Ratios Summary of Moment Values (k-ft) Shear Values (k) Segment Length Overall MAXimum Envelope Dsgn L = 2767 ft Span # 1 M V Mmax Mmax - Ma - Max 1990 Mnx Mnx/Omega Cb Rm Va Max 288 Vnx Vnx/Omega +D+H Dsgn L = 2767 ft D+L+H Dsgn L = 2767 ft D+Lr+H Dsgn L = 2767 ft D+S+H Dsgn L = 2767 ft D+0750Lr+0750L+H Dsgn L = 2767 ft D+0750L+0750S+H Dsgn L = 2767 ft D+060W+H Dsgn L = 2767 ft D+070E+H Dsgn L = 2767 ft D+0750Lr+0750L+0450W+H Dsgn L = 2767 ft D+0750L+0750S+0450W+H Dsgn L = 2767 ft D+0750L+0750S+05250E+H Dsgn L = 2767 ft D+060W+060H Dsgn L = 2767 ft D+070E+060H Dsgn L = 2767 ft Overall Maximum Deflections Span Max "-" Defl Location in Span Max "+" Defl Location in Span +D+Lr+H
11 Structural Concepts, Inc 8230 E Broadway Blvd Ste W-7 Tucson, AZ Project Title: Amphi - AMS Bldg G AC Upgrade Engineer: JMM Project ID: A Project Descr: Page 9 General Beam Analysis Lic # : KW Description : Shortened Joist Evaluation - positive wind load File = \\Server\sci data\scipro~1\jennif~1\1-jobf~1\active~1\17-167~1\calcs\17-167aec6 ENERCALC, INC , Build: , Ver: Licensee : STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS INC Vertical Reactions Support notation : Far left is #1 Values in KIPS Support 1 Support 2 Overall MAXimum Overall MINimum D+H D+L+H D+Lr+H D+S+H D+0750Lr+0750L+H D+0750L+0750S+H D+060W+H D+070E+H D+0750Lr+0750L+0450W+H D+0750L+0750S+0450W+H D+0750L+0750S+05250E+H D+060W+060H D+070E+060H D Only Lr Only L Only S Only W Only E Only H Only
12 Page 10
13 Page 11
14 Page 12
15 Page 13
16 Page 14
17 Structural Concepts, Inc 8230 E Broadway Blvd Ste W-7 Tucson, AZ Project Title: Amphi - AMS Bldg G AC Upgrade Engineer: JMM Project ID: A Project Descr: Page 15 Steel Column Lic # : KW Description : Steel Column File = \\Server\sci data\scipro~1\jennif~1\1-jobf~1\active~1\17-167~1\calcs\17-167aec6 ENERCALC, INC , Build: , Ver: Licensee : STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS INC Code References Calculations per AISC , IBC 2012, CBC 2013, ASCE 7-10 s Used : ASCE 7-10 General Information Steel Section Name : Analysis Method : Steel Stress Grade Fy : Steel Yield E : Elastic Bending Modulus Applied Loads HSS3x2x3/16 Allowable Strength 460 ksi 29,0000 ksi Column self weight included : lbs * Dead Load Factor AXIAL LOADS Reultant Loads * 110: Axial Load at ft, D = 1950, LR = 1220, W = k BENDING LOADS Lateral brace: Lat Point Load at 90 ft creating My-y, D = 020 k DESIGN SUMMARY Bending & Shear Check Results PASS Max Axial+Bending Stress Ratio = : 1 +D+Lr Location of maxabove base At maximum location values are Pa : Axial Pn / Omega : Allowable Ma-x : Applied 8975 ft 3233 k 7575 k 00 k-ft Mn-x / Omega : Allowable 3397 k-ft Ma-y : Applied k-ft Mn-y / Omega : Allowable 2571 k-ft PASS Maximum Shear Stress Ratio = Location of maxabove base At maximum location values are Va : Applied Vn / Omega : Allowable Results : 1 D Only 9051 ft k 8501 k Overall Column Height ft Top & Bottom Fixity Top & Bottom Pinned Brace condition for deflection (buckling) along columns : X-X (width) axis : Unbraced Length for X-X Axis buckling = ft, K = 10 Y-Y (depth) axis : Unbraced Length for Y-Y Axis buckling = ft, K = 10 Service loads entered Load Factors will be applied for calculations Maximum Load Reactions Top along X-X Bottom along X-X Top along Y-Y Bottom along Y-Y Maximum Load Deflections k k 00 k 00 k Along Y-Y 00 in at 00ft above base for load combination : Along X-X in at 6465ft above base for load combination :D Only Maximum Axial + Bending Stress Ratios Maximum Shear Ratios Stress Ratio Status Location Stress Ratio Status Location D Only 0394 PASS 898 ft 0019 PASS 905 ft +D+Lr 0555 PASS 898 ft 0019 PASS 905 ft +D+0750Lr 0514 PASS 898 ft 0019 PASS 905 ft +D+060W 0437 PASS 898 ft 0019 PASS 905 ft +D+0750Lr+0450W 0547 PASS 898 ft 0019 PASS 905 ft +D+0450W 0426 PASS 898 ft 0019 PASS 905 ft +060D+060W 0280 PASS 898 ft 0011 PASS 905 ft +060D 0166 PASS 898 ft 0011 PASS 905 ft Maximum Reactions Axial Reaction X-X Axis Top D Only D+Lr D+0750Lr D+060W k Y-Y Axis Top Note: Only non-zero reactions are listed Mx - End Moments k-ft My - End Top
18 Structural Concepts, Inc 8230 E Broadway Blvd Ste W-7 Tucson, AZ Project Title: Amphi - AMS Bldg G AC Upgrade Engineer: JMM Project ID: A Project Descr: Page 16 Steel Column Lic # : KW Description : Steel Column File = \\Server\sci data\scipro~1\jennif~1\1-jobf~1\active~1\17-167~1\calcs\17-167aec6 ENERCALC, INC , Build: , Ver: Licensee : STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS INC Maximum Reactions Axial Reaction X-X Axis Top k Y-Y Axis Top Note: Only non-zero reactions are listed Mx - End Moments k-ft My - End Top +D+0750Lr+0450W D+0450W D+060W D Lr Only 1220 W Only 0553 Extreme Reactions Axial Reaction X-X Axis Reaction k Y-Y Axis Reaction Mx - End Moments k-ft My - End Moments Item Extreme Top Base Maximum " Minimum 0553 Reaction, X-X Axis Base Maximum 1220 " Minimum Reaction, Y-Y Axis Base Maximum " Minimum Reaction, X-X Axis Top Maximum " Minimum 1220 Reaction, Y-Y Axis Top Maximum " Minimum Moment, X-X Axis Base Maximum " Minimum Moment, Y-Y Axis Base Maximum " Minimum Moment, X-X Axis Top Maximum " Minimum Moment, Y-Y Axis Top Maximum " Minimum Maximum Deflections for s Max X-X Deflection Distance Max Y-Y Deflection Distance D Only in 6465 ft 0000 in 0000 ft +D+Lr in 6465 ft 0000 in 0000 ft +D+0750Lr in 6465 ft 0000 in 0000 ft +D+060W in 6465 ft 0000 in 0000 ft +D+0750Lr+0450W in 6465 ft 0000 in 0000 ft +D+0450W in 6465 ft 0000 in 0000 ft +060D+060W in 6465 ft 0000 in 0000 ft +060D in 6465 ft 0000 in 0000 ft Lr Only in 0000 ft 0000 in 0000 ft W Only in 0000 ft 0000 in 0000 ft Steel Section Properties : HSS3x2x3/16 Depth = 3000 in I xx = 177 in^4 J = 2050 in^4 Design Thick = 0174 in S xx = 118 in^3 Cw = 178 in^6 Width = 2000 in R xx = 1070 in Wall Thick = 0187 in Zx = 1480 in^3 Area = 1540 in^2 I yy = 0932 in^4 C = 1780 in^3 Weight = 5587 plf S yy = 0932 in^3 R yy = 0778 in Zy = 1120 in^3 Ycg = 0000 in
19 Structural Concepts, Inc 8230 E Broadway Blvd Ste W-7 Tucson, AZ Project Title: Amphi - AMS Bldg G AC Upgrade Engineer: JMM Project ID: A Project Descr: Page 17 Steel Column Lic # : KW Description : Steel Column File = \\Server\sci data\scipro~1\jennif~1\1-jobf~1\active~1\17-167~1\calcs\17-167aec6 ENERCALC, INC , Build: , Ver: Licensee : STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS INC Sketches
20 Structural Concepts, Inc 8230 E Broadway Blvd Ste W-7 Tucson, AZ Project Title: Amphi - AMS Bldg G AC Upgrade Engineer: JMM Project ID: A Project Descr: Page 18 Point Load on Slab Lic # : KW Description : Column bearing on 4" Slab on grade File = \\Server\sci data\scipro~1\jennif~1\1-jobf~1\active~1\17-167~1\calcs\17-167aec6 ENERCALC, INC , Build: , Ver: Licensee : STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS INC Code References Calculations per ACI , IBC 2012, CBC 2013, ASCE 7-10 s Used : ASCE 7-10 Analytical Values d - Slab Thickness 40 in Ks - Soil Modulus of Subgrade Reaction FS - Req'd Factor of Safety 20 : 1 Ec - Concrete Elastic Modulus f'c - Concrete Compressive Strength - Poisson's Ratio , pci ksi ksi Analysis Formulas Min Adjacent Load Distance in Pn = 172 [ (Ks R1 / Ec) 10, ] Fr d^2 Min Adjacent Column Distance = 15 * ( [ Ec d^3 / (12 * ( 1- u^2 ) Ks ] ^ 1/4 ) Ks = Soil modulus of subgrade reaction Ec = Concrete elastic modulus R1 = 50% plate average dimension * sqrt( PlWid * PlLen) /2 d - Slab Thickness Ec = Concrete elastic modulus u - Poisson's ratio Fr - Concrete modulus of rupture = 75 * sqrt( f'c ) Ks = Soil modulus of subgrade reaction d - Slab Thickness Load & Capacity Table Plate (in) Load ID Wid Len R1 (in) Applied Concentrated Load on Plate - (kip) Governing Pu Pn D Lr L S W E Ld Comb (kip) (kip) Col D+Lr Pass, FS=1627 >= 2 Check
21 Page 19
22 Page 20
23 Appendix A Page 21
24 Page 22
25 Page 23
26 Page 24
27 Page 25
Visteon Village Corporate Center
Visteon Village Corporate Center Van Buren Township, MI Technical Assignment #1 Jamison Morse Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Andres Lapage Jamison Morse Structural Option Visteon Village Center Advisor:
More informationStructural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Existing Conditions
Chris Shelow Structural Advisor: M. Kevin Parfitt Koshland Integrated Natural Science Center 10/05/05 AE 481W Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Existing Conditions Executive Summary The
More informationStructural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Report
Michael A. Troxell Structural Option Advisor: Professor Parfitt College of Business Administration Oct. 5, 2005 Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Report
More informationProject ULA 120D Snow-0 Seis-IV
ULA Geometry Module Specification Sub-Array Configuration ULA Totals # Rows: 4 Column N-S Length (in): 6 # SubArrays: N-S Dim (in): 40 N-S Spacing (in): 0.25 # Columns: 5 Array E-W Dimension (in): 326
More informationStructural System. Design Criteria Fire Resistance Concrete designed for 2 HR rating (worst case) Geotechnical Report Allowable Bearing Capacity
System Codes and Criteria Design Codes and Standards The design code used is the Wisconsin Administrative Code along with the State of Wisconsin Department of Commerce-Safety & Buildings Chapters Comm
More informationStructural Technical Report #1 By Robert Whitaker
Structural Technical Report #1 By Robert Whitaker Robert Whitaker Structural ~ Parfitt Parkview at Bloomfield Station Bloomfield, NJ 10-05-05 Executive summary This report covers the structural concepts
More informationALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN OF CONCRETE MASONRY LINTELS. TEK 17-1C Structural (2009) Related TEK: Uniform load. Triangular load. Concentrated loads
An information series from the national authority on concrete masonry technology ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN OF CONCRETE MASONRY LINTELS TEK 17-1C Structural (2009) INTRODUCTION Lintels and beams are horizontal
More informationAnchor bolts ASTM F1554, Gr. 36 Wide flange beams ASTM A992, Fy = 50 ksi Misc. structural steel ASTM A36, Fy = 36 ksi
STRUCTURAL NOTES MATERIAL STRENGTHS Structural Steel Reinforcing Steel Concrete Masonry Structural Lumber Anchor bolts ASTM F1554, Gr. 36 Wide flange beams ASTM A992, Fy = 50 ksi Misc. structural steel
More informationConsiderations for Outof-Plane. Design
Considerations for Outof-Plane Wall and Uplift Design WoodWorks Texas Workshops December, 2016 Overview Uplift Wall Design Wind Loads Wind loads acting on buildings are modeled as uniform surface loads.
More informationTHE FORENSIC MEDICAL CENTER
THE FORENSIC MEDICAL CENTER Image courtesy of Gaudreau, Inc. TECHNICAL REPORT #1 OCTOBER 5, 2007 KEENAN YOHE STRUCTURAL OPTION DR. MEMARI FACULTY ADVISOR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Image courtesy of Gaudreau, Inc.
More informationWilliam W. Wilkins Professional Building
STRUCTURAL REDESIGN The alternate structural system evaluated is a one-way slab with reinforced concrete skip-joists. The alternate lateral system investigated is reinforced concrete moment frames. Skip-joists
More informationLIFE SCIENCES BUILDING STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS
Structural Technical Report 1 LIFE SCIENCES BUILDING STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS Prepared for: Dr. Aly M. Said Dr. Thomas Boothby Professor Kevin Parfitt Dr. Charles D. Cox Prepared by:
More informationDESIGN CALCULATIONS INSTA-FOOTING LOAD BEARING CAPACITIES ON CONCRETE SLAB. January 14, 2017 Rev -
DESIGN CALCULATIONS INSTA-FOOTING LOAD BEARING CAPACITIES ON CONCRETE SLAB January 14, 2017 Rev - Projection Name: Owner: Prepared by: Insta-Footing Design Calculations Insta-footing, LLC Richard Nolan,
More information80 Fy (ksi)= 50 2 nd Floor = 61. Length (ft) Plan View. Penthouse
SUBJECT: CORNER SHEET 62 of 131 Design Columns for the lightest W10's and W12's section. Columns are to be sized for two options: Option I Continuous, Option II with Splices. Then prices are to be compared
More informationStructural Redesign Gravity System
Redesign Gravity System Design Considerations A composite floor system was used for this design to maximize the efficiency of the material being used. This type of system requires less material and provides
More information111 MORGAN ST. Ryan Friis
Technical Report No. 1 September 30, 2002 Executive Summary: 111 Morgan St. is a 9 story cast-in-place concrete condominium building being constructed in Chicago, Illinois. The building s floor system
More informationLVL Product Guide 2.0E LVL 1.5E LVL
LVL Product Guide 2.0E LVL 1.5E LVL Our Company Anthony Forest Products Company, a family-owned business founded in 1916, is headquartered in El Dorado, Arkansas. The company operates a southern pine lumber
More informationCVEN 483. Structural System Overview
CVEN 483 Structural System Overview Dr. J. Bracci Fall 2001 Semester Presentation Overview 1. Building system primary function 2. Types of load 3. Building materials 4. Structural members 5. Structural
More informationSJI Updates Expanded Load Tables for Noncomposite Joists / Joist Girders and Development of New Composite Joist Series
SJI Updates Expanded Load Tables for Noncomposite Joists / Joist Girders and Development of New Composite Joist Series SUMMARY David Samuelson Steel joists are growing in recognition as being a very economical
More information90% Design Submittal Structural Calculations Parking Garage CDRL
NORTH METRO RAIL LINE PROJECT Thornton Crossroads at 104 th Avenue Station 90% Design Submittal Structural Calculations Parking Garage CDRL 03-037.11.06 June 2, 2017 Prepared by: Regional Rail Partners
More informationPrecast Concrete Bearing Wall Panel Design (Alternative Analysis Method) (Using ACI )
Precast Concrete Bearing Wall Panel Design (Alternative Analysis ethod) (Using ACI 318-14) Precast Concrete Bearing Wall Panel Design (Alternative Analysis ethod) (Using ACI 318-14) A structural precast
More informationCantilever or Restrained Retaining Wall Calculations
Cantilever or Restrained Retaining Wall Calculations Organization: F.E.C. Project Name: Example Report Design by: LAA Job #: 9876 Date: 10/21/2013 Codes used: 2010 & 2013 CBC, 2009 & 2012 IBC, ACI 318-08
More informationSteel Joist Floor Systems Best Practices
Steel Joist Floor Systems Best Practices APRIL 20, 2016 Copyright 2016 Steel Joist Institute. All Rights Reserved. Presented by: Michael A. West, P.E., F.ASCE David Samuelson, P.E. Learning Objectives
More informationADAPT PT7 TUTORIAL FOR ONE-WAY SLAB 1
Structural Concrete Software System TN187_PT7_tutorial_one_way_slab 012705 ADAPT PT7 TUTORIAL FOR ONE-WAY SLAB 1 1. ONE-WAY SLAB SUPPORTED ON BEAMS The objective of this tutorial is to demonstrate the
More informationSteel Beam Analysis and Design
Architecture 324 Structures II Steel Beam Analysis and Design Steel Properties Steel Profiles Steel Codes: ASD vs. LRFD Analysis Method Design Method University of Michigan, TCAUP Structures II Slide 1/35
More informationAppendix I ESTIMATED DESIGN WIND PRESSURE AND STRENGTHS OF CONNECTIONS OF JOPLIN HOME DEPOT BUILDING
ESTIMATED DESIGN WIND PRESSURE AND STRENGTHS OF CONNECTIONS OF JOPLIN HOME DEPOT BUILDING I.1 ESTIMATED DESIGN WIND PRESSURE BASED ON BOCA NBC/1996 Basic design wind speed: V = 90 mph (3 s gust) Exposure
More informationDIVISION: METALS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: EPIC METALS CORPORATION 11 TALBOT AVENUE RANKIN, PENNSYLVANIA 15104
0 Most Widely Accepted and Trusted ICC ES Evaluation Report ICC ES 000 (800) 423 6587 (562) 699 0543 www.icc es.org ESR 2047 Reissued 07/207 This report is subject to renewal 07/209. DIVISION: 05 00 00
More informationNorth Mountain IMS Medical Office Building
North Mountain IMS Medical Office Building Phoenix, Arizona Michael Hopple Technical Assignment 2 October 29 th, 2007 AE 481W-Senior Thesis The Pennsylvania State University Faculty Adviser: Dr. Ali Memari,
More informationINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS UNIFORM EVALUATION SERVICE EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS UNIFORM EVALUATION SERVICE EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR HELICAL PILES FOR USE UNDER THE INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE EC027-2017 (Adopted November
More informationFootings GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 15.2 LOADS AND REACTIONS 15.4 MOMENT IN FOOTINGS
4 Footings GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS Provisions of Chapter 15 apply primarily for design of footings supporting a single column (isolated footings) and do not provide specific design provisions for footings
More informationOne-Way Wide Module Joist Concrete Floor Design
One-Way Wide Module Joist Concrete Floor Design A 1 3 4 30'-0" 30'-0" 30'-0" 3' B 3' C 3' D 3' E 4" 4" (typ.) 3' F 0" 0" (typ.) Figure 1 One-Way Wide Module Joist Concrete Floor Framing System 1 Overview
More informationStructural Option April 7 th, 2010
Gravity System (Depth Topic I) Post Tensioned Slab A new floor system was designed in an attempt to create a more consistent flooring system throughout the entire building. This new design consists of
More informationSEAU 5 th Annual Education Conference 1. ASCE Concrete Provisions. Concrete Provisions. Concrete Strengths. Robert Pekelnicky, PE, SE
ASCE 41-13 Concrete Provisions Robert Pekelnicky, PE, SE Principal, Degenkolb Engineers Chair, ASCE 41 Committee* *The view expressed represent those of the author, not the standard s committee as a whole.
More informationCopyright Materials. American Wood Council
2012 Wood Frame Construction Manual: Foundation Design to Resist Flood Loads and WFCM Calculated Wind Loads Presented by: William L. Coulbourne, PE 2 Copyright Materials This presentation is protected
More informationTechnical Assignment 1 10/8/03
Executive Summary Technical Assignment 1 10/8/03 The is 55 story high-rise condominium being built off the northern Miami coast. The structural design presented in this building is a direct result of its
More informationProduct Designation As specified in the AISI standard for cold formed steel framing General provisions A5.2.
Steel Structural Systems (TRI-S) was founded in 2004 to meet the service needs of a growing industry. The company is a world-class manufacturer of light gauge steel framing components for the commercial
More informationADAPT-PTRC 2016 Getting Started Tutorial ADAPT-PT mode
ADAPT-PTRC 2016 Getting Started Tutorial ADAPT-PT mode Update: August 2016 Copyright ADAPT Corporation all rights reserved ADAPT-PT/RC 2016-Tutorial- 1 This ADAPT-PTRC 2016 Getting Started Tutorial is
More informationPro-Con Structural Study for Alternative Floor Systems October 27, 2004
Ismail Al-Hadhrami Structural Option Faculty Consultant: Dr. Thomas Boothby Agricultural Hall and Annex East Lansing, MI Pro-Con Structural Study for Alternative Floor Systems October 27, 2004 Executive
More informationStructural vs Nonstructural Members. Roger LaBoube, Ph.D., P.E. Wei-Wen Yu Center for Cold-Formed Steel Structures
Structural vs Nonstructural Members Roger LaBoube, Ph.D., P.E. Wei-Wen Yu Center for Cold-Formed Steel Structures Behavior of Cold-Formed Steel Members STEEL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS Type of steel Specification
More informationCORPORATE HEADQUARTERS
TECHNICAL REPORT 1 `` CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS Great Lakes Region, U.S.A. M. JULIA HAVERTY STRUCTURAL OPTION ADVISOR: H. SUSTERSIC 12 SEPTEMBER 2014 Contents Executive Summary... 2 Purpose and Scope... 3
More informationThe Structural Redesign of Boyds Bear Country and its Related Systems. Boyds Bear Country, Pigeon Forge, Tennessee
The Structural Redesign of Boyds Bear Country and its Related Systems Included in this Presentation: Background and Existing System Proposal Problem / Solution Structural System Redesigns Pre-cast Concrete
More informationTables with Allowable ASD Seismic Values For Design at R = 6.5. Special Moment Frame MF1-12
Tables with Allowable ASD Seismic Values For Design at R = 6.5 Special Moment Frame MF1-12 Hardy Frames, Inc manufactures and markets pre-fabricated shear wall systems. We have been the innovative leader
More informationAASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Steel Tutorial STL6 Two Span Plate Girder Example
AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Steel Tutorial STL6 Two Span Plate Girder Example STL6 - Two Span Plate Girder Example (BrDR 6.5) 1'-6" 37'-0" 34'-0" 1'-6" 8 1/2" including 1/2" integral wearing surface FWS @ 25 psf
More informationTable of Contents.2. Introduction...3 Gravity Loading and Deflections..4. Existing Structural System..8
WISCONSIN PLACE RESIDENTIAL TECHNICAL ASSIGNMENT 2 OCTOBER 29, 2007 KURT KRASAVAGE THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY STRUCTURAL OPTION FACULTY ADVISOR: DR. ALI MEMARI 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents.2
More informationGlobal Village Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester, New York
Presentation Outline Welcome Introduction Architecture Existing Structure Problem Statement Arch. Breadth Structural Depth Conclusion Questions Global Village Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester,
More informationLateral Design of Mid- Rise Wood Structures
Lateral Design of Mid- Rise Wood Structures Presented by Ricky McLain, MS, PE, SE Technical Director WoodWorks Texas Workshops December, 2016 Insert picture of me graduating college Follow the load Following
More informationSupplemental Plan Check List for Concrete Special Moment Resisting Frame
Plan Check / PCIS Application Number: Your feedback is important, please visit our website to complete a Customer Survey at /LADBSWeb/customer-survey.jsf. If you have any questions or need clarification
More informationHilton Baltimore Convention Center Hotel Western Podium
Hilton Baltimore Convention Center Hotel Western Podium CHRIS SIMMONS Structural Option Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali M. Memari Technical Report 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Page 3 INTRODUCTION..
More informationCBC SECTION/TABLE NUMBER NEW -CHANGE COMMENTARY. X Flexible and Rigid definitions removed and found in ASCE 7-10
2016 Chapter 16 Structural Design- Changes include new plan content requirements for Photovoltaic Panel Systems as well as guidance on how to determine the dead and live loads. For mid- and high-rise designs
More informationNorth Mountain IMS Medical Office Building
North Mountain IMS Medical Office Building Phoenix, Arizona Michael Hopple Technical Assignment 1 October 5 th, 2007 AE 481W-Senior Thesis The Pennsylvania State University Faculty Adviser: Dr. Ali Memari,
More informationUNIVERSITY OF BOLTON WESTERN INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FZE. BEng (HONS) CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER ONE EXAMINATION 2015/2016
OCD59 UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON WESTERN INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FZE BEng (HONS) CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER ONE EXAMINATION 2015/2016 ADVANCED STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN MODULE NO: CIE6001 Date: Tuesday 12
More informationAPPENDIX. WOOD JOIST/RAFTER MAXIMUM SPANS ( for 16 o.c. spacing) WITH SINGLE ROW OF PV PANELS AT MIDSPAN (ft.) AND PANEL SUPPORT AT 32 o.c.
1 Span Tables The following Wood Joist/Rafter Maximum Span Tables can be used to determine the adequacy of an existing wood framed roof structure to support the additional dead load created by PV panel
More informationLightweight Steel Framing. Composite DeltaStud Load Tables
Lightweight Steel Framing Composite DeltaStud Load Tables January 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and Scope...3 Design Responsibility...3 Design Criteria and Technical Data...3 Composite Action / Materials
More informationSpring Hill Suites Marriott
Spring Hill Suites Marriott Project Location: Amarillo, TX Prepared for: Girder Slab Technologies Contact: Daniel Fisher, Sr. January 15, 2008 Prepared by: Monica Stockmann Regional Engineer: Erika Winters-Downey
More informationFigure: Grid or Waffle slab
Two Way Beam Supported Slab References: 1. Design of. Reinforced Concrete, 2014, 9 th Edition, ACI 318-11 Code Edition, by Jack C. McCormac. Clemson University. Russell H. Brown. Clemson University 2.
More informationStructural Engineering Library
Structural Engineering Library Version 5.8 by Michael D. Brooks, S.E., P.E. A product of ENERCALC, INC. ENERCALC All rights reserved. No parts of this work may be reproduced in any form or by any means
More informationADAPT-PT 2010 Tutorial Idealization of Design Strip in ADAPT-PT
ADAPT-PT 2010 Tutorial Idealization of Design Strip in ADAPT-PT Update: April 2010 Copyright ADAPT Corporation all rights reserved ADAPT-PT 2010-Tutorial- 1 Main Toolbar Menu Bar View Toolbar Structure
More informationPricewaterhouseCoopers Building Oslo, Norway
PricewaterhouseCoopers Building Oslo, Norway James Wilson Structural Option Senior Thesis Presentation 2009 The Pennsylvania State University Location Bjørvika B10 A Oslo, Norway BARCODE Building Data
More informationAnalysis and Design of One-way Slab System (Part-I)
Lecture-02 Analysis and Design of One-way Slab System (Part-I) By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Addressed Concrete Floor Systems Analysis and
More informationNATIONAL HARBOR BUILDING M OXON HILL, MARYLAND. Ryan Sarazen Structural Option Technical Report 3 Faculty Consultant: Dr.
NATIONAL HARBOR BUILDING M OXON HILL, MARYLAND Ryan Sarazen Structural Option Technical Report 3 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Andres Lepage Table of Contents Executive Summary.. 3 Structural Systems Overview...
More informationHILLCREST MANOR Palo Verde, California
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS TN358_MAT_RC_desogm_example_040110 HILLCREST MANOR Palo Verde, California Structural Design of Mat (Raft) Foundation First draft ADAPT Corporation Redwood City, CA, USA
More informationCH. 9 WOOD CONSTRUCTION
CH. 9 WOOD CONSTRUCTION PROPERTIES OF STRUCTURAL LUMBER Grading Load carrying capacity effected by: - Size and number of knots, splits & other defects - Direction of grain - Specific gravity of wood Grading
More informationOutput Parameters - Results. Company
Ver 2013.09.21 STEEL BEAM FLOOR VIBRATION ANALYSIS www.struware.com Input Parameters Description: Example 4.4 Ex 4.6 Revised Example 4.8 Example 4.10 Floor Width (perp to beams) ft 90 60 30 90 Floor Length
More informationSJI Code of Standard Practice
Standard Practice CODE OF STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STEEL JOISTS AND JOIST GIRDERS SECTION 1 GENERAL 1.1 SCOPE Adopted by the Steel Joist Institute April 7, 1931 Revised to May 18, 2010 - Effective December
More informationThis is a preview. Some pages have been omitted. Copyrighted by NCEES. For permission to reuse,
Copyright 2014 by NCEES. All rights reserved. All NCEES sample questions and solutions are copyrighted under the laws of the United States. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval
More informationKevin Wigton Structural Option. Technical Report III. Simmons College School of Management, Boston, Ma
Kevin Wigton Structural Option Technical Report III Simmons College School of Management, Boston, Ma Advisor: Professor Parfitt 12/1/2009 Table of Contents Executive Summary: Technical Report III... 3
More informationSection A A: Slab & Beam Elevation
CE 331, Spring 2011 Flexure Strength of Reinforced Concrete s 1 / 5 A typical reinforced concrete floor system is shown in the sketches below. The floor is supported by the beams, which in turn are supported
More informationfifteen steel construction: materials & beams ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2016 lecture
ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2016 lecture fifteen steel construction: materials & beams Steel Beams 1 Steel Beam Design American Institute of Steel Construction
More informationCASE STUDY OF A 40 STORY BRBF BUILDING LOCATED IN LOS ANEGELES
DESIGN INVESTIGATE REHABILITATE CASE STUDY OF A 40 STORY BRBF BUILDING LOCATED IN LOS ANEGELES Anindya Dutta, Ph.D., S.E. Ronald O. Hamburger, S.E., SECB www.sgh.com Background Study performed on behalf
More informationWeill Cornell Medical Research Building 413 E. 69 th Street New York, NY
Weill Cornell Medical Research Building 413 E. 69 th Street New York, NY Structural Option Technical Report 1 9/23/11 Table of Contents Executive Summary..3 Introduction.4 Structural Systems...5 Foundation
More informationCopyright. magazine. CFS Load Bearing Construction
Progressive Collapse Requirements Cold-Formed Steel Load Bearing Construction By Nabil A. Rahman, Ph.D., P.E., Michael Booth and Gary Bennett Figure 1: Cold formed steel load bearing mid-rise construction.
More informationS T R U C T U R. Technology. magazine. Software for the Structural Design of Masonry. The Design Basis. Copyright
Software for the Structural Design of Masonry By Russell H. Brown, James K. Nelson, Jr. and Dennis Graber Using software can free the design engineer from the drudgery of routine calculations and enable
More informationContents. Tables. Notation xii Latin upper case letters Latin lower case letters Greek upper case letters Greek lower case letters. Foreword.
Tables x Notation xii Latin upper case letters Latin lower case letters Greek upper case letters Greek lower case letters xii xiv xvi xvi Foreword xviii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Aims of the Manual 1 1.2 Eurocode
More informationStructural Requirements
Structural (for the design Engineer of Record) Presented by: Lindsay Anderson Consultant Structural Plan Examiner and Dixit Patel Structural Plan Examiner 1 Overview 1. Department Clarification Memorandums
More informationOn Cold-Formed Steel Construction. Light Gauge Steel Engineers Association Washington, D.C Toll Free (866)
TECHNICAL NOTE On Cold-Formed Steel Construction $5.00 Light Gauge Steel Engineers Association Washington, D.C. 20005 Toll Free (866) 465-4732 www.lgsea.com DESIGN OF BY-PASS SLIP CONNECTORS IN COLD-FORMED
More informationDesign Example 2 Reinforced Concrete Wall with Coupling Beams
Design Example 2 Reinforced Concrete Wall with Coupling Beams OVERVIEW The structure in this design example is a six story office building with reinforced concrete walls as its seismic force resisting
More informationThe designer shall also submit additional information required by the University as described and underlined below.
I. Structural Engineering Submissions The designer shall submit all information required by the State Construction Office (SCO) as described in the State Construction Manual Chapter 300 - Project Design
More informationSTRUCTURAL ISSUES IN RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION. Presented by: Susan L. Lasecki P.E., S.E.
STRUCTURAL ISSUES IN RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION Presented by: Susan L. Lasecki P.E., S.E. Presentation Outline Gravity Design Load Paths from Roof to Foundation Roof Framing Floor Framing Wall Framing Lateral
More informationAIA St. Louis January 4 th, 2017 Phillip Shinn, PE Jacobs Engineering Washington University in St. Louis, Sam Fox School of Design and Visual Arts
AIA St. Louis January 4 th, 2017 Phillip Shinn, PE Jacobs Engineering Washington University in St. Louis, Sam Fox School of Design and Visual Arts Owners are NOT Architects (but they ARE the Owners) Steel
More informationADAPT Floor Pro 2009/2010 Tutorial Export Design Strip to ADAPT PT or ADAPT RC
ADAPT Floor Pro 2009/2010 Tutorial Export Design Strip to ADAPT PT or ADAPT RC Update: May 2010 Copyright ADAPT Corporation all rights reserved ADAPT PT 2010/RC 2010 to ADAPT Floor Pro 2009/2010 Strip
More informationLecture-06 Analysis and Design of Slab Systems
Lecture-06 Analysis and Design of Slab Systems By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Addressed Organization of the
More informationStructural Tests and Special Inspections Form. Inspection of Fabricators (1704.2)
Inspection of Fabricators (1704.2) Furnish inspection reports (1704.2.1) - Fabricators that have not been approved Provide a Certificate of Compliance (1704.2.2) - Approved Fabricators Steel Construction
More informationDIVISION: EARTHWORK SECTION: BORED PILES REPORT HOLDER: CANTSINK MANUFACTURING, INC. 71 FIRST AVENUE LILBURN, GEORGIA 30047
0 Most Widely Accepted and Trusted ICC-ES Evaluation Report ICC-ES 000 (800) 423-6587 (562) 699-0543 www.icc-es.org ESR-1559 Reissued 12/2016 This report is subject to renewal 12/2018. DIVISION: 31 00
More informationASD OF CONCRETE MASONRY LINTELS BASED ON THE 2012 IBC/2011 MSJC. TEK 17-1D Structural (2011) Related TEK: 14-7C, 14-13B, 17-1C, 17-2A
n information series from the national authority on concrete masonry technology SD OF CONCRETE MSONRY LINTELS BSED ON THE 2012 IBC/2011 MSJC TEK 17-1D Structural (2011) INTRODUCTION Lintels and beams are
More informationEffect of Edge Beam and Shear Wall on the Structural Behavior of Flat Plate Multistoried Building: A Computing Modeling for lateral load Analysis
Effect of Edge Beam and Shear Wall on the Structural Behavior of Flat Plate Multistoried Building: A Computing Modeling for lateral load Analysis Zasiah Tafheem 1, A.S.M Rubaiat Nahid 2, Tanzeelur Rahman
More informationREINFORCING TABLES INSTALLATION MANUAL
REINFORCING TABLES 201 REINFORCING TABLES Design Limitations Introduction The structural wall reinforcing and lintel design tables contained within the Appendix of NUDURA s Installation Manual have been
More informationCODE OF STANDARD PRACTICE
CODE OF STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STEEL JOISTS AND JOIST GIRDERS SECTION 1. GENERAL 1.1 SCOPE Adopted by the Steel Joist Institute April 7, 1931 Revised to Nov. 10, 2014 - Effective Jan.1, 2015 The practices
More informationParapet/railing terminal walls shall be located on the superstructure.
GENERAL INFORMATION: This section of the chapter establishes the practices and requirements necessary for the design and detailing of deck slab extensions at abutments. For general requirements and guidelines
More informationDIVISION: EARTHWORK SECTION: BORED PILES REPORT HOLDER: GEOTECH ENTERPRISES, INC.
0 Most Widely Accepted and Trusted ICC ES Report ICC ES 000 (800) 423 6587 (562) 699 0543 www.icc es.org ESR 3623 Reissued 04/2017 This report is subject to renewal 04/2018. DIVISION: 31 00 00 EARTHWORK
More informationLight Steel Framing Members. Table of Contents
Light Steel Framing Members Table of Contents About The Steel Network, Inc.: The Steel Network, Inc. (TSN) provides solu ons for all standard light steel framing applica ons, including load-bearing mid-rise
More informationESR ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Reissued September 1, 2008 This report is subject to re-examination in one year.
ESR- Reissued September, 00 This report is subject to re-examination in one year. ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. www.icc-es.org Business/Regional Office # 0 Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California 900 #
More informationFlexure Design Sequence
Prestressed Concrete Beam Design Workshop Load and Resistance Factor Design Flexure Design Flexure Design Sequence Determine Effective flange width Determine maximum tensile beam stresses (without prestress)
More informationREPORT HOLDER: AEROSMITH FASTENING SYSTEMS 5621 DIVIDEND ROAD INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA EVALUATION SUBJECT: AEROSMITH 3000 SERIES FASTENERS
0 Most Widely Accepted and Trusted ICC-ES Evaluation Report ICC-ES 000 (800) 423-6587 (562) 699-0543 www.icc-es.org ESR-3833 Reissued 08/2017 This report is subject to renewal 08/2018. DIVISION: 03 00
More informationCE 3150 Reinforced Concrete Design Design Project
Problem Description For this design project you will work in your project groups to complete a partial design of an office building. Specifically, you will design and fully detail three components: 1.
More information3.5 Tier 1 Analysis Overview Seismic Shear Forces
Chapter 3.0 - Screening Phase (Tier ) 3.5 Tier Analysis 3.5. Overview Analyses performed as part of Tier of the Evaluation Process are limited to Quick Checks. Quick Checks shall be used to calculate the
More informationCOLUMNS 1- Definition: The Egyptian code defines columns as : 2- Types of concrete columns
COLUMNS 1- Definition: Columns are vertical compression members which carry primarily axial compression load; the axial load may be associated with bending moments in one or two directions, as shown in
More informationShear Wall Analysis. Introduction. The Medical Office Building Malvern, PA 7
The Medical Office Building Malvern, PA 7 Shear Wall Analysis Introduction The current lateral system in the Medical Office Building consists of cast-in-place (CIP) concrete moment frames and torsion beams.
More informationFASTRAK Composite Beam Design
Chk'd by 1 FASTRAK Calculation FASTRAK is a design tool for composite and non-composite beams with flexible loading options, design criteria, and stud optimization and placement. This powerful tool is
More informationW. Mark McGinley March 3, 2016 ISEA MEETINGS 1
J.B. SPEED SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING Design of s for Masonry Veneers W. Mark McGinley, Ph. D., PE FASTM MASONRY DAY Indianapolis March 3, 2016 Objectives Present a Brief Overview of: Masonry Veneer Wall systems
More informationReinforced Concrete Design. Lecture no. 1
Reinforced Concrete Design Lecture no. 1 Mechanics of RC Concrete is strong in compression but week in tension. Therefore, steel bars in RC members resist the tension forces. RC Members Reinforced concrete
More information