This is a preview. Some pages have been omitted. Copyrighted by NCEES. For permission to reuse,

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "This is a preview. Some pages have been omitted. Copyrighted by NCEES. For permission to reuse,"

Transcription

1

2 Copyright 2014 by NCEES. All rights reserved. All NCEES sample questions and solutions are copyrighted under the laws of the United States. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of NCEES. Requests for permissions should be addressed in writing to permissions@ncees.org or to NCEES Exam Publications, PO Box 1686, Clemson, SC ISBN Printed in the United States of America October 2014 First Printing

3 CONTENTS Introduction to NCEES Exams... 1 About NCEES Updates on exam content and procedures Exam-day schedule Admission to the exam site Examinee Guide Scoring and reporting Staying connected Structural exam format Design Standards... 3 Vertical Forces... 5 Exam Specifications... 7 AM Practice Exam PM Buildings Practice Exam PM Bridges Practice Exam AM Solutions PM Buildings Solutions PM Bridges Solutions Lateral Forces Exam Specifications AM Practice Exam PM Buildings Practice Exam PM Bridges Practice Exam AM Solutions PM Buildings Solutions PM Bridges Solutions iii

4 About NCEES The National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES) is a nonprofit organization made up of engineering and surveying licensing boards from all U.S. states and territories. Since its founding in 1920, NCEES has been committed to advancing licensure for engineers and surveyors in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the American public. NCEES helps its member licensing boards carry out their duties to regulate the professions of engineering and surveying. It develops best-practice models for state licensure laws and regulations and promotes uniformity among the states. It develops and administers the exams used for engineering and surveying licensure throughout the country. It also provides services to help licensed engineers and surveyors practice their professions in other U.S. states and territories. Updates on exam content and procedures Visit us at ncees.org/exams for updates on everything exam-related, including specifications, exam-day policies, scoring, and corrections to published exam preparation materials. This is also where you will register for the exam and find additional steps you should follow in your state to be approved for the exam. Exam-day schedule Be sure to arrive at the exam site on time. Late-arriving examinees will not be allowed into the exam room once the proctor has begun to read the exam script. The report time for the exam will be printed on your Exam Authorization. Normally, you will be given 1 hour between morning and afternoon sessions. Admission to the exam site To be admitted to the exam, you must bring two items: (1) your Exam Authorization and (2) a current, signed, government-issued identification. Examinee Guide The NCEES Examinee Guide is the official guide to policies and procedures for all NCEES exams. All examinees are required to read this document before starting the exam registration process. You can download it at ncees.org/exams. It is your responsibility to make sure that you have the current version. NCEES exams are administered in either a computer-based format or a pencil-and-paper format. Each method of administration has specific rules. This guide describes the rules for each exam format. Refer to the appropriate section for your exam. Scoring and reporting NCEES typically releases exam results to its member licensing boards 8 10 weeks after the exam. Depending on your state, you will be notified of your exam result online through your MyNCEES account or via postal mail from your state licensing board. Detailed information on the scoring process can be found at ncees.org/exams. Staying connected To keep up to date with NCEES announcements, events, and activities, connect with us on your preferred social media network. 1

5 Structural exam format The 16-hour Structural exam is a breadth and depth exam offered in two components on successive days. The 8-hour Vertical Forces (Gravity/Other) and Incidental Lateral component is offered only on Friday. It focuses on gravity loads and includes minor lateral loads such as earth pressures. The 8-hour Lateral Forces (Wind/Earthquake) component is offered only on Saturday and focuses on wind/earthquake loads. Each component of the structural exam has a breadth (morning) module and a depth (afternoon) module. Breadth modules (AM session): These modules contain questions covering a comprehensive range of structural engineering topics. All questions are multiple-choice. Depth modules (PM session): In these modules examinees must choose either buildings or bridges problems. Examinees must work the same topic area on both components. That is, if buildings is the topic area chosen in the Vertical Forces component, then buildings must be the topic area chosen in the Lateral Forces component. All questions are constructed response (essay). Examinees must take the breadth module of each component and one of the two depth modules in each component. To pass the structural exam, you must receive acceptable results on both components. The components may be taken and passed in different exam administrations. Summary of Structural Exam Format AM Session (Breadth) PM Session (Depth) Friday Vertical Forces 40 multiple-choice questions ( ) See p. 7 for details and specifications. Choose EITHER: Buildings ( ) or Bridges ( ) See p. 11 for details and specifications. Saturday Lateral Forces 40 multiple-choice questions ( ) See p. 127 for details and specifications. Choose EITHER: Buildings ( ) or Bridges ( ) See p. 131 for details and specifications. NCEES will send a results notice to your licensing board each administration that you take a component. The notice will show the history of your performance on each component attempted. The results for each component will be listed as acceptable or unacceptable. After you have received an acceptable result on both components within a 5-year period, NCEES will notify your board that you have passed the Structural exam. 2

6 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Design Standards 1 These standards apply to the Vertical and Lateral components of the Structural Engineering exam. Changes to design standards are posted on ncees.org/exams. Effective Beginning with the April 2015 Examinations ABBREVIATION AASHTO IBC ASCE 7 ACI 318 AISC AISC AISI TMS 402/602 DESIGN STANDARD TITLE AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 6th edition, 2012, American Association of State Highway & Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. International Building Code, 2012 edition (without supplements), International Code Council, Falls Church, VA. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, 2010, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, 2011, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI. Steel Construction Manual, 14th edition, American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., Chicago, IL. Seismic Design Manual, 2nd edition, American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., Chicago, IL. North American Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members, 2007 edition with Supplement No. 2 (2010), American Iron and Steel Institute, Washington, DC. NDS National Design Specification for Wood Construction ASD/LRFD, 2012 edition & National Design Specification Supplement, Design Values for Wood Construction, 2012 edition, American Forest & Paper Association, Washington, DC. NDS Special Design Provisions for Wind and Seismic with Commentary, 2008 edition, American Forest & Paper Association, Washington, DC. PCI PCI Design Handbook: Precast and Prestressed Concrete, 7th edition, 2010, Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago, IL. Building Code Requirements and Specifications for Masonry Structures (and related commentaries), 2011; The Masonry Society, Boulder, CO; American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MI; and Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA. Notes 1. Solutions to exam questions that reference a standard of practice are scored based on this list. Solutions based on other editions or standards will not receive credit. All questions use the US Customary System (USCS) of units. 3

7 VERTICAL FORCES AM PRACTICE EXAM 13

8 Vertical Forces This is a preview. Some pages have been omitted The figure shows an elevation view of a concrete highway bridge. Design Code: AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 6th edition, Design Data: Concrete modulus of elasticity E c = 3,605 ksi Column moment of inertia 636,000 in 4 Coefficient of thermal expansion in./in./ F Concrete shrinkage after 28 days sh = in./in. Assumptions: Columns are fixed at top of footing. Superstructure is pinned at the top of the columns. Bearings at the abutments are frictionless. Columns are very flexible compared to superstructure. The unfactored horizontal load (kips) at the top of each column due to shrinkage after 28 days and a temperature fall of 40F is most nearly: (A) 14 (B) 70 (C) 159 (D) 263 ABUTMENT ABUTMENT 40'-0" 120'-0" SUPERSTRUCTURE 40'-0" 20'-0" SINGLE COLUMN TOP OF FOOTING 20'-0" ELEVATION Copyright 2014 by NCEES 14 GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE

9 AM Practice Exam 109. The beam shown is subjected to a uniform load and a moving concentrated load. Design Data: Uniform live load Concentrated live load 1 klf 10 kips Assumption: The uniform live load may extend the entire length of the beam from A to C. The maximum live load shear (kips) on the right of Support B is most nearly: (A) 32 (B) 36 (C) 40 (D) 46 HINGE A B C 48'-0" 12'-0" 60'-0" 110. The figure shows a line diagram for a continuous beam that is supported as shown. The distribution factors at Joint B for Spans BA and BC are most nearly: BA BC (A) (B) (C) (D) I = 200 I = 300 I = '-0" 15'-0" 10'-0" A B C D Copyright 2014 by NCEES 21 GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE

10 Vertical Forces This is a preview. Some pages have been omitted You are working as a quality control representative for a contractor on a project. If you discover a potentially unsafe condition at the project site, the initial action you should take is to: (A) (B) (C) (D) stop the construction of the project report the condition to the contractor report the condition to the owner report the condition to OSHA 117. A built-up column section is shown. Design Code: AISC: Steel Construction Manual, 14th edition. Design Data: Steel ASTM A 36, F y = 36 ksi Assumptions: K = 1.0 The unbraced lengths in the X and Y directions are 10 ft. The critical buckling stress F cr (ksi) is most nearly: (A) 22 (B) 26 (C) 35 (D) 48 PLATE 3/4" 14" CONTINUOUS L 4 4 1/4 CONTINUOUS (TYP.) BUILT-UP SECTION Copyright 2014 by NCEES 26 GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE

11 Vertical Forces This is a preview. Some pages have been omitted The figure shows an 8-in. reinforced concrete masonry wall. Design Code: TMS 402/602: Building Code Requirements and Specifications for Masonry Structures (and related commentaries), Design Data: Hollow concrete masonry units f m 1,500 psi with Type S mortar. Cells with reinforcement are grouted. Steel reinforcement ASTM A615 Grade 60 Assumptions: Seismic forces do not govern. The wall is reinforced with 48-in. o.c. vertically at the centerline of the wall and 32-in. o.c. horizontally. The design axial load (plf) for the masonry wall is most nearly: ASD LRFD (A) 14,200 32,400 (B) 25,500 59,400 (C) 39,300 91,500 (D) 107, , ROOF JOISTS 4 12 LEDGER 12'-0" 8" CONCRETE MASONRY WALL Copyright 2014 by NCEES 40 GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE

12 AM Practice Exam 134. The figure shows an 8-in. reinforced concrete masonry wall. Design Code: TMS 402/602: Building Code Requirements and Specifications for Masonry Structures (and related commentaries), Design Data: Hollow concrete masonry units f m 1,500 psi with Type S mortar. Cells with reinforcement are grouted. Steel reinforcement ASTM A615 Grade 60 Assumptions: Allowable stress design provisions apply. The wall is reinforced with 48-in. o.c. vertically at the centerline of the wall and 32-in. o.c. horizontally. The maximum allowable moment (ft-lb/ft) on the masonry wall based on the maximum allowable masonry flexural stress is most nearly: (A) 665 (B) 1,070 (C) 1,465 (D) 2, ROOF JOISTS 4 12 LEDGER 12'-0" 8" CONCRETE MASONRY WALL Copyright 2014 by NCEES 41 GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE

13 VERTICAL FORCES PM BUILDINGS PRACTICE EXAM 49

14 Vertical Forces This is a preview. Some pages have been omitted The first floor of a three-story apartment building is partially buried as shown in Figure 601A. Design Codes: IBC: International Building Code, 2012 edition (without supplements). ASCE 7: Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, TMS 402/602: Building Code Requirements and Specifications for Masonry Structures (and Related Commentaries), ACI 318: Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, Design Data: Masonry fm = 2,000 psi Grout fc = 2,000 psi Reinforcing ASTM A615, Grade 60 Masonry weight (per surface area) 84 psf Concrete fc = 3,000 psi Concrete density 150 pcf Soil weight 110 pcf Rankine coefficient of passive soil pressure 2.5 Rankine coefficient of active soil pressure 0.35 Allowable soil bearing pressure 3,000 psf Coefficient of static friction (concrete on soil) 0.28 Assumptions: Neglect wind and seismic loads. No hydrostatic pressure on wall. Wall is not backfilled until construction is complete. Neglect slab on grade and soil over toe side of footing. REQUIREMENTS: On the actual exam, any sketches necessary for these requirements must be neatly drawn in your solution pamphlet. (a) (b) (c) For the CMU wall design shown in Figure 601A, verify that the wall stem is adequate for vertical loads shown and provided soil information. Use IBC load combination equation 16-2 (LRFD) or (ASD). Do not use load information given in Figure 601B for this requirement. For the footing shown in Figure 601B, show by calculation whether the footing size subjected to the loads indicated is or is not adequate for bearing and stability. Do not use vertical load data provided for Requirement (a). Neatly sketch the connection of the masonry wall to the concrete footing. Show the required dimensions of the embedment and anchorage of the steel reinforcement to the footing. Copyright 2014 by NCEES 50 GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE

15 PM Buildings Practice Exam 601. (Continued) FIGURE 601A FOR REQUIREMENT (a) ONLY CONCENTRIC LOAD (P) FROM ALL ELEMENTS TOTAL DL = 980 plf FLOOR LL = 640 plf ROOF LL = 160 plf C L STUD = C L CMU = C L FTG SECOND FLOOR SHEATHING 2X STUD WALL 100 psf LL SURCHARGE P 4'-0" FINISHED GRADE 8" 8" CMU SOLID GROUTED d = 5-1/4" 32" 4'-0" C CMU L P EXPANSION MATERIAL SLAB ON GRADE 1'-0" 4" 4" FIGURE 601A H 1'-6" W SOIL SOIL LEVEL FIGURE 601B FOR REQUIREMENT (b) ONLY 1'-0" LOAD (P) AT C OF CMU L TOTAL DL = 3,000 plf (NOT INCL. FTG. WT.) 1'-4" 8" FIGURE 601B 1'-0" TOTAL HORIZONTAL FORCE DUE TO SOIL & SURCHARGE LOADS, H = 600 plf VERTICAL SOIL LOAD ON HEEL, W SOIL = 450 psf Copyright 2014 by NCEES 51 GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE

16 VERTICAL FORCES PM BRIDGES PRACTICE EXAM 61

17 Vertical Forces This is a preview. Some pages have been omitted Figure 701 shows the elevation and cross sections of an interior prestressed concrete girder for a 120-ft-long, simple single-span highway bridge. The girders spaced on 5'-6" centers are composite with a 7 1/2-in. concrete slab. Each girder is prestressed with 34 strands, 8 of which are draped as shown. All strands are 1/2-in. nominal-diameter low-relaxation strands and prestressed to their allowable limits. Live load moments and shears are shown in Table 701. Design Specification: AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 6th edition, Design Data: Concrete slab, fc 4 ksi Concrete prestressed girders, f c 6 ksi Density of concrete kcf Ductility factor 1.0 Redundancy factor 1.0 Importance factor 1.0 Low-relaxation 1/2-in.-diameter strands, f pu 270 ksi Area of 1/2-in.-diameter strands, A s in 2 per strand Reinforcing bars, f y 60 ksi Dead load of the girder and slab, DC 1.30 kips/ft per girder Superimposed dead load, DW 0.26 kips/ft per girder Prestressed Girder Properties: Cross-sectional area, A g 713 in 2 Moment of inertia, I g 392,638 in 4 Neutral axis to bottom fiber in. Neutral axis to top fiber in. Section modulus (bottom), S ncb 12,224 in 3 Section modulus (top) S nct 12,715 in 3 Composite Section Properties: Cross-sectional area, A g 1,117 in 2 Moment of inertia, I c 704,000 in 4 Neutral axis to bottom fiber in. Section modulus (bottom), S cb 15,767 in 3 Section modulus (top) S ct 38,365 in 3 Effective slab width 66 in. Assumptions: Total strand prestress loss is 40.5 ksi. For simplicity, the support centerlines are to be considered at the end faces of the girder. All strands are fully bonded. There is no nonprestressed tension or compression reinforcement. Section is in tension-controlled region. Copyright 2014 by NCEES 62 GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE

18 701. (Continued) TABLE 701 Maximum Live Load Moment per Girder (Dynamic Allowance Included) at 10th Points from a Support PM Bridges Practice Exam Location from support (ft) L 0.2L 0.3L 0.4L 0.5L Maximum live load moment (ft-kips) ,201 1,560 1,772 1,830 REQUIREMENTS: This is a preview. Some pages have been omitted. On the actual exam, any sketches necessary for these requirements must be neatly drawn in your solution pamphlet. (a) (b) Verify the flexural adequacy for Strength I Limit State of the composite girder at midspan, including checking for minimum reinforcement. Assume rectangular section behavior. Determine anchorage zone vertical web reinforcement for the girder, using #5 bars, and show them on a sketch. 2 STRANDS C L 2 STRANDS TOTAL - 34 STRANDS DRAPED - 8 STRANDS 66" (C. TO C. OF GIRDERS) 6 STRANDS 12 STRANDS 48'-0" 24'-0" 48'-0" N.A. 120'-0" GIRDER ELEVATION NOT TO SCALE 7-1/2" SLAB 30.88" 42" 8 STRANDS DRAPED ENDS OF GIRDER) 3" 3 SPACES AT 2" = 6" 44.64" #5 BARS 63" 32.12" 6" 26" N.A. 8 STRANDS DRAPED 2 1/2" 4 SPACES AT 2" = 8" MIDDLE OF GIRDER) COMPOSITE SECTION NOT TO SCALE GIRDER SECTION NOT TO SCALE FIGURE 701 Copyright 2014 by NCEES 63 GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE

19 VERTICAL FORCES AM SOLUTIONS 69

20 AM Solutions 101. Due to symmetry, the loads at each pier will be equal. pier L L sh T 2 2 pier ( ) (40)( ) in. Ph3 For fixed-pin condition, ; Solve for P 3EI 3EI h (3, 605 kips/in )(636, 000 in )(0.32 in.) P 159 kips (20 12 in.) 3 20'-0" 120'-0" THE CORRECT ANSWER IS: (C) 102. w = (0.64 kips/ft)/lane AASHTO Art MLL ft-kips/lane 8 IM = 1.33 AASHTO Table M 1.75( ft-kips 98 ft-kips) 1, 010 ft- kips LL+I THE CORRECT ANSWER IS: (C) 103. ASCE 7-10, Figure 7-9 Formula. h l p d u g p h d g 30, l 100 ft (given) u ft THE CORRECT ANSWER IS: (C) 71

21 VERTICAL FORCES PM BUILDINGS SOLUTIONS 91

22 Vertical Forces This is a preview. Some pages have been omitted (a) CMU wall design ASD solution: D + H + F L (L r or S or R) IBC Eq Vertical Loads: Given P D = 980 plf P LR = = 120 plf P LF = = 480 plf Maximum stress in wall occurs at bottom of wall: Wall weight = 84 psf (given) 4.67 ft = 392 plf P total = = 1,972 lb/ft Lateral loads: Surcharge: (surcharge load live = 100 psf) (active soil pressure coefficient = 0.35) = 35 psf Active soil pressure: (active pressure = pcf = 38.5 psf/ft) (soil ht = 4 ft) = 154 psf 1 4 ft moment at base (35 psf 4 ft) 2 ft surcharge 1544 ft (active) ft-lb/ft Check compression: k = 2.1 (fixed base and free top) r t/ / (4.67 ft)(12 in/ft) kh r Use Eq. 2-21(neglecting compressive stress in steel per Sec ): TMS 402, Sec h Pa (0.25 f m An) r f 2,000 psi (given) A m n in. 12 in/ft 91.5 in /ft 2 92

23 601. (Continued) Pa (0.25)(2,000)(91.5 in /ft) 1 38,944 lb/ft > P 140 b This is a preview. Some pages have been omitted. m 2 total PM Buildings Solutions Check flexure: Ast 2 12 in in in 32 in. Em 900 fm 1,800,000 TMS , Sec Es 29,000,000 TMS , Sec F 0.45 f 900 psi TMS , Sec Es 29 Ast n (0.116 in )( 16.11) n n Em 1.8 b d (12 in.)(5.25 in.) k 2n ( n) n k j M allow (steel) Ast Fs jd 2 in.-lb ft-lb (0.116 in /ft)(32 ksi)(0.928)(5.25 in.) 18,085 1,507 ft ft 2 2 Fb jkbd (900)(0.928)(0.216)(12)(5.25) M allow (CMU) ,834 in.-lb/ft 2,486 ft-lb/ft Steel stress controls 1,507 ft-lb > 691 ft-lb OK Check combined stresses: 2M (2)(691 ft-lb 12 in./ft) fb 250 psi 2 2 jkbd (0.928)(0.216)(12 in.)(5.25) 1,972 lb/ft fa 22psi (12 in./ft)(7.625 in.) per fa fb 0.45 fm < in., 8 in. CMU wall OK for loads 93

24 VERTICAL FORCES PM BRIDGES SOLUTIONS 111

25 Vertical Forces This is a preview. Some pages have been omitted (a) Determine flexural strength for Strength I Limit State at midspan. Check minimum steel. A ps = (34 strands) (0.153 in 2 /strand) = 5.20 in 2 c fps fpu 1 k d p Eq k fpy f pu Eq f 270 ksi pu 1 py 0.85 Art f 0.9 f Table pu Determine d p : C L = 4.74 in. 34 d C L = in. k Assume rectangular section behavior ksi c 5.20 in (270 ksi) / (0.85) 4 ksi in in in. OK Eq c 7.14 fps fpu 1 k ksi Eq d p a in. Art a Mn Apsfpsdp Art Eq Mn 5.20 in ksi ,116 ft-kips Assume tension-controlled p/s concrete Art Verify tension-controlled assumption. d c E S E S c d c 0.003(d c) ES c 0.003(65.76 in in.) > in. Tension-controlled,

26 PM Bridges Solutions 701. (Continued) DC moment: kips / ft 2,340 ft-kips 8 DW moment: kips / ft ft-kips LL+ IM = 1,830 ft-kips Strength I Tables M u = 1.25 DC DW (LL+IM) = 1.25 (2,340 ft-kips) (468 ft-kips) (1,830 ft-kips) = 6,830 ft-kips < (1.0) (7,116 ft-kips) OK Check minimum steel: Art M M n cr Sc Mcr 31fr 2fcpeSc Mdnc 1 S nc f 0.24 f r c ksi S c = 15,767 in 3 bottom of composite section S ncb = 12,224 in 3 bottom of precast section M dnc = 2,340 ft-kips Noncomposite DC moment prestress prestressec fpe A I Prestress = P jack losses = (0.75)(270 ksi) 40.5 ksi = 162 ksi Prestress force = (162 ksi)(5.202 in 2 ) = 843 kips e = = in. Eq Art

27 LATERAL FORCES AM PRACTICE EXAM 133

28 Lateral Forces This is a preview. Some pages have been omitted The following information is for a building that is located in a seismic zone. Design Code: ASCE 7: Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, Design Data: Site shear wave velocity for the top 100 ft, v s 1,100 ft/sec Mapped spectral response acceleration at 0.2-sec period, S S 1.00 Mapped spectral response acceleration at 1-sec period, S Building period, T 0.80 sec Long-period transition period, T L 8 sec Assumption: No clay, peat, or liquefiable soils The design spectral response acceleration S a is most nearly: (A) 1.10 (B) 0.73 (C) 0.58 (D) 0.47 Copyright 2014 by NCEES 134 GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE

29 AM Practice Exam 102. The figure shows a diagram for an agricultural building. Design Codes: IBC: International Building Code, 2012 edition (without supplements). ASCE 7: Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, Design Data: Basic wind speed, V Risk Category I 120 mph Risk Category II 132 mph Risk Category III-IV 143 mph Assumptions: Topographic factor, K zt = 1.0 Building is located in flat open country. The wind velocity pressure (psf) at mean roof height for MWFRS is most nearly: (A) 21.9 (B) 27.4 (C) 33.2 (D) '-0" 60'-0" 30'-0" Copyright 2014 by NCEES 135 GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE

30 AM Practice Exam 108. The figure shows the plan view of a tilt-up concrete wall warehouse roof. Design Code: ASCE 7: Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, Design Data: Roof Top of panel Roof DL Panel DL Assumption: C = 0.15 s 26 ft, A.F.F. 26 ft, A.F.F. 15 psf 70 psf The seismic chord force (kips) at Point A is most nearly: (A) 11.3 (B) 21.1 (C) 24.9 (D) '-0" A 200'-0" ROOF PLAN 100'-0" 109. The figure shows the plan for a rigid floor diaphragm. Design Codes: IBC: International Building Code, 2012 edition (without supplements). ASCE 7: Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, Design Data: There are shear walls on all four sides. The calculated story seismic shear is 75 kips. The calculated center of gravity is shown. The total torsion (ft-kips) to be distributed to the shear walls is most nearly: (A) 0 (B) 375 (C) 563 (D) '-0" 30'-0" 50'-0" CR 50'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" CG 50'-0" 5'-0" 75 kips Copyright 2014 by NCEES 141 GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE

31 AM Practice Exam 124. An office building is supported by special concentrically braced frames. Design Code: AISC: Seismic Design Manual, 2nd edition. Design Data: Seismic Design Category D A500 Grade B hollow structural section tubes. Assumption: Amplified seismic brace force = 175 kips. The required tensile strength of the bracing connection (kips) is most nearly: ASD LRFD (A) (B) (C) (D) W SIDES HSS 6 6 5/16 HSS 3 3 1/4 Copyright 2014 by NCEES 153 GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE

32 Lateral Forces This is a preview. Some pages have been omitted The roof diaphragm of a single-story building is shown in the figure. Design Code: NDS: National Design Specification for Wood Construction ASD/LRFD, 2012 edition & National Design Specification Supplement, Design Values for Wood Construction, 2012 edition. Design Data: = 1.0 if LRFD method is used. Wind load, W = 333 plf Assumption: C M = C t = C g = C = C eg = C di = C tn = 1.0 The number of 10d common nails required on each side of the splice to connect the two 2 Spruce Pine-Fir top plates together for the diaphragm chord force at Point A is most nearly: ASD LRFD (A) (B) (C) (D) '-0" 25'-0" RIDGE B A B 40'-0" W 2 TOP PLATE 2 TOP PLATE SECTION B-B TOP PLATE SPLICE Copyright 2014 by NCEES 160 GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE

33 LATERAL FORCES PM BUILDINGS PRACTICE EXAM 169

34 Lateral Forces This is a preview. Some pages have been omitted The preliminary design of a renovation of an existing single-story office building with a wood roof framing system and masonry exterior walls is shown in Figure 801. Design Codes: IBC: International Building Code, 2012 edition (without supplements). ASCE 7: Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, TMS 402/602: Building Code Requirements and Specifications for Masonry Structures (and Related Commentaries), Design Data: Wind load 142 mph, Exposure C K zt = 1.67 Seismic load S DS = 0.70 Masonry fm = 1,500 psi Weight = 60 psf f y = 60,000 psi 8" partially grouted CMU REQUIREMENTS: On the actual exam, any sketches necessary for these requirements must be neatly drawn in your solution pamphlet. (a) (b) (c) (d) During the preliminary design phase, the existing building is to be checked for compliance with the 2012 IBC wind and seismic loads. List three items to be checked at each of the following: exterior CMU wall, roof framing, and foundation system (list 9 items total). Determine the design wind pressure and seismic design force on the parapet. For wind, neglect corner zones. Consider interior zones only. For a horizontal service level wind pressure of 100 psf, check whether #5 at 48" o.c. vertical reinforcement at the centerline of the wall is adequate for the parapet. Check both the shear stress and flexural stress of the reinforced CMU parapet. The roof diaphragm requires attachment to the masonry wall for an out-of-plane anchorage force of 420 plf. Neatly sketch a complete wall anchorage connection at 48" o.c. Identify all required components but do not design. Copyright 2014 by NCEES 170 GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE

35 PM Buildings Practice Exam 801. (Continued) 2" DL ~ 180 lb/ft LL ~ 240 lb/ft 4'-0" ROOF WOOD FRAMING WITH WOOD SHEATHING 16'-0" 8" EXTERIOR PARTIALLY GROUTED CMU CONCRETE SLAB-ON-GRADE 1'-4" 1'-4" WIDE 10" UNREINFORCED FOOTING FIGURE 801 Copyright 2014 by NCEES 171 GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE

36 LATERAL FORCES PM BRIDGES PRACTICE EXAM 179

37 Lateral Forces This is a preview. Some pages have been omitted Figure 901A shows a transverse section of a bridge pier. Figure 901B is a column interaction diagram to be used for design of the column. The columns are fixed at the top and bottom in both directions. Design Specification: AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 6th edition, Design Data: Concrete strength, f c Yield strength of reinforcement, f y 3.5 ksi 60 ksi Factored loads for the Extreme Event I load combination for each column are shown below. Seismic forces have been reduced by the appropriate reduction (R) factor. M u = 4,050 ft-kips V u = 600 kips P u = 2,700 kips (compression) Seismic Zone = 4 REQUIREMENTS: On the actual exam, any sketches necessary for these requirements must be neatly drawn in your solution pamphlet. (a) (b) (c) For the Extreme Event I load combination, determine the vertical reinforcement required for the column. Neglect any slenderness effect for the column. For the Extreme Event I load combination, design the required spiral reinforcement. Sketch an elevation view of the columns showing the size and spacing of the vertical and spiral reinforcements. Copyright 2014 by NCEES 180 GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE

38 PM Bridges Practice Exam 901. (Continued) 1'-7" 4'-5" 4'-5" 1'-7" 11'-0" 11'-0" C L COL C L BOX GIRDER C L COL 5'-6" 4'-0" 4'-0" 20'-0" 2" CLEAR TRANSVERSE SECTION OF PIER f ' c f y = 3.5 ksi = 60 ksi FIGURE 901A 9,000 8,000 NOMINAL AXIAL STRENGTH, P n, kips 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 = = = = = ρ 1, ,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 NOMINAL MOMENT STRENGTH, M n, ft-kips FIGURE 901B Copyright 2014 by NCEES 181 GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE

39 LATERAL FORCES AM SOLUTIONS 187

40 AM Solutions 101. Not Site Class F or E since no clay, peat, or liquefaction ASCE 7-10, Section 20.3, and Table v 1,100 ft/sec Site Class D s F 1.1 Table a S F S (1.1)(1.00) 1.10 Eq MS DS v a s S 2/3 S 0.73 Eq M1 v 1 D1 MS F 1.55 Table S F S (1.55)(0.45) 0.70 Eq S 2/3 S 0.47 Eq M1 T 0.2 S /S 0.13 Section D1 DS T S /S S D1 DS 0.64 SD Building period > T S and < TL Sa 0.58 Eq T 0.80 THE CORRECT ANSWER IS: (C) qh KhKztKdV ASCE 7-10, Eq in. 30 ft/ h 17.5 ft 2 K K Table z h 17.5 K 1.0 zt K 0.85 Table d V 120 (Risk Category I - IBC Table ) q (0.875)(1.0)(0.85)(120) 27.4 psf THE CORRECT ANSWER IS: (B) (640)(192 ft) Force kips Note: Load factor = 1.0 for wind for strength design. 2 Force for one panel kips kips Number of connectors 3.6; use 4 connectors 8.5 kips THE CORRECT ANSWER IS: (C) 189

41 LATERAL FORCES PM BUILDINGS SOLUTIONS 207

42 Lateral Forces This is a preview. Some pages have been omitted (a) Items at exterior CMU wall: 1. Adequacy of CMU parapet for wind and seismic out-of-plane loads. 2. Adequacy of CMU wall for combined loading of vertical loads with wind and seismic out-of-plane loads. 3. Adequacy of CMU wall for wind and seismic in-plane loads (shear walls). Items at roof framing: 1. Out-of-plane anchorage for exterior CMU wall. 2. Adequacy of wood sheathing diaphragm for wind and seismic loads. 3. In-plane connection to exterior CMU wall for transfer of diaphragm forces. 4. Adequacy of struts and chords of diaphragm. 5. Uplift connection to exterior CMU wall for transfer of wind forces. Items at foundation system: 1. Adequate safety factor for overturning. 2. Adequate safety factor for sliding. 3. Adequate safety factor for uplift. 4. Adequacy of soil bearing pressure. 5. Adequacy of connection to CMU wall. (b) Design wind pressure on the parapet ASCE 7, Sec p = q p (GC p GC pi ) (Components and cladding elements of parapets) q p = K z K zt K d V 2 ASCE 7, Eq. (30.3-1) K z = 0.90 Exposure C, z = 20 ft (top of parapet) ASCE 7, Table K zt = 1.67 (given) K d = 0.85 ASCE 7, Table V = 142 mph (given) q p = = 65.9 psf GC pi = 0.00 (solid parapet, open building condition) ASCE 7, Table GC p, h 60 ft ASCE 7, Fig Effective wind area ASCE 7, Sec = span length 4-ft height span 4 ft/3 = 16/3 = 5.3 ft 2 < 10 ft 2 Use 10 ft 2 Zone 4 wall positive pressure GC p = = (Ref footnote 5 for reduction) Zone 4 wall negative pressure GC p = = 0.99 (Ref footnote 5 for reduction) Zone 2 roof negative pressure GC p = 1.8 ASCE 7 Fig A POSITIVE WALL PRESSURE ASCE 7 FIGURE NEGATIVE WALL PRESSURE NEGATIVE WALL PRESSURE POSITIVE WALL PRESSURE p 1 p 2 OR p 3 p 4 LOAD CASE A (WINDWARD) p = p 1 + p 2 = (65.9)(0.90) + (65.9)(1.8) = 178 psf 208 LOAD CASE B (LEEWARD) p = p 3 + p 4 = (65.9)(0.90) + (65.9)(0.99) = 125 psf

43 PM Buildings Solutions 801. (Continued) Seismic design force on the parapet: ASCE 7, Sec a p S DS Wp z Fp 12 R /I h P P ASCE 7, Eq. (13.3-1) where z 16' Ip 1.0 ASCE 7, Sec h 16' a 2.5; R = 2.5 (parapets unbraced) ASCE 7, Table p p F p 1250 psf Controlling design load on the parapet = 178 psf (windward pressure) (c) Check if the existing 48" o.c. vertical at centerline of wall is adequate for the parapet: V 100 psf (1')(4') 400 lb / ft wall max M max 100 psf (1')(4') ft-lb / ft wall Check shear stress: Since no shear reinforcement is provided, assume one face shell resists shear force. 3V 3(400) fv 40psi 2A 2(11/4")(12") F v shall not exceed: TMS 402 Sec (a) 1.5 f 1.5 1, psi m (b) 120 psi (c) 37 psi 0.45 N / A v n ( ) / An A n based on two face shells and one grouted cell per 48" A A n n (2)(1 1/ 4")(48") (6" 1" 1 1/ 4")(7 5 / 8" (2)1 1/ 4") 4ft in / ft (420) / psi F = 41.7 psi > f = 40 psi OK v v 209

44 LATERAL FORCES PM BRIDGES SOLUTIONS 223

45 Lateral Forces This is a preview. Some pages have been omitted (a) Vertical reinforcement required for the column Design for moment and axial force Column requirement, Art h/d c = ratio of clear height to maximum plan dimension of column = 20/4 = 5 > 2.5 The column qualifies to be designed as a column and not as a pier. Slenderness of the column, Art , may be ignored per problem statement. Vertical reinforcement, flexural strength, Art b Design for M u = 4,050 ft-kips and P u max = 2,700 kips = 0.9 M n = nominal moment = M u / = 4,050/0.9 = 4,500 ft-kips P n = nominal axial force = P u / = 2,700/0.9 = 3,000 kips From the interaction diagram for M n = 4,500 ft-kips and P n = 3,000 kips = Limits of vertical reinforcement, Art a 0.01 < = < 0.04 OK A s = (48) 2 /4 = in 2 Using 29 #11 bars with A s = = in 2 will satisfy the requirement. (b) Design of spiral reinforcement Shear stress, Art Resistance factor, Art = 1.0 where V u = 600 kips B = 48 in. D r = ( ) 1.41 = in. (assuming #7 spiral) de 37.0 in. Eq. C d v = 0.9 d e = 33.3 in. Shear carried by concrete, Art Use 2, 45 if Av min provided and no tension in column per Art Check if concrete is effective in end regions per Art c. P u = 2,700 kips P u > 0.10(3.5 ksi)(1,810 in 2 ) = 634 kips Concrete is effective Vc (2) 3.5(48 in.)(33.3 in) 189 kips Eq

46 PM Bridges Solutions 901. (Continued) Spacing of spiral reinforcement, Eq. C s = pitch = Avfyd v/v s where A v = 0.6 in 2 (Try #7 spiral) f y = 60 ksi b v = 48 in. d v = 33.3 in (1.0) Vsrequired 411 kips 1.0 and (2 0.6) s 5.83 in. Use 5.0 in. 411 Check minimum transverse reinforcing, Art bs v Av f min c in OK f 60 y Afd v y v V s = = = 480 kips The nominal shear resistance V n is the lesser of: Vn Vc Vs kips Governs, OK Eq Vn 0.25 fc bvdv 0.25(3.5)(48.0)(33.3) 1,399 kips Eq Check maximum spacing, Art d b = 6(1.41) = 8.46 in. 6 in. governs, 5.0 in. OK End regions, Art c H e = length of end region = column dimension = 48 in. or = 20 12/6 = 40 in. or = 18 in. Length of the end region = 48 in. Governs Check confinement, Art d s 0.45(A g/ac 1)f c /fyh 0.45 (1,810/1,521) 13.5/ Eq or 0.12 f f / whichever is larger Eq d-1 s c y 2 s 4A s( D c) / s Dc 4A s/sdc 4A 2 s 4(0.6 in ) s 7.8in. D 0.007(44 in.) s c 225

47 PE Practice Exams Published by NCEES Chemical Civil: Construction Civil: Geotechnical Civil: Structural Civil: Transportation Civil: Water Resources and Environmental Electrical and Computer: Computer Engineering Electrical and Computer: Electrical and Electronics Electrical and Computer: Power Environmental Mechanical: HVAC and Refrigeration Mechanical: Mechanical Systems and Materials Mechanical: Thermal and Fluids Systems For more information about these and other NCEES publications and services, visit NCEES.org or call Client Services at (800)

CIVIL BREADTH Exam Specifications

CIVIL BREADTH Exam Specifications NCEES Principles and Practice of Engineering Examination CIVIL BREADTH and STRUCTURAL DEPTH Exam Specifications Effective Beginning with the April 2015 Examinations The civil exam is a breadth and depth

More information

MASONRY WALL DATA: Wall Height = ft. Nominal Wall Thickness = 8.00 in. Depth to c.g. Steel, Wall = 3.81 in.

MASONRY WALL DATA: Wall Height = ft. Nominal Wall Thickness = 8.00 in. Depth to c.g. Steel, Wall = 3.81 in. TIME: 10:49 AM Page: 1 DESIGN METHOD : ACI 530-99: Working Stress Design MASONRY MATERIAL : Hollow Core Concrete Masonry Units MORTAR TYPE : Type S MORTAR MATERIAL : Portland Cement Lime Mortar BLOCK PLACEMENT

More information

OVERALL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

OVERALL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The at the Pittsburgh International Airport, PA, is a 275,000 square foot multi-use building located directly adjacent to the airport s landside terminal. The building consists of an

More information

One-Way Wide Module Joist Concrete Floor Design

One-Way Wide Module Joist Concrete Floor Design One-Way Wide Module Joist Concrete Floor Design A 1 3 4 30'-0" 30'-0" 30'-0" 3' B 3' C 3' D 3' E 4" 4" (typ.) 3' F 0" 0" (typ.) Figure 1 One-Way Wide Module Joist Concrete Floor Framing System 1 Overview

More information

Flexure Design Sequence

Flexure Design Sequence Prestressed Concrete Beam Design Workshop Load and Resistance Factor Design Flexure Design Flexure Design Sequence Determine Effective flange width Determine maximum tensile beam stresses (without prestress)

More information

Rutgers University Law School Building Addition and Renovation Camden, NJ

Rutgers University Law School Building Addition and Renovation Camden, NJ Building Addition and Renovation Camden, NJ Technical Assignment 1 October 5, 2007 Nathan E. Reynolds Structural Option Senior Thesis The Pennsylvania State University Faculty Consultant: Professor M.

More information

TECHNICAL REPORT 1. Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions. Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children s Hospital. Hershey, Pennsylvania

TECHNICAL REPORT 1. Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions. Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children s Hospital. Hershey, Pennsylvania TECHNICAL REPORT 1 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children s Hospital Matthew V Vandersall The Pennsylvania State University Architectural Engineering

More information

Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Existing Conditions

Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Existing Conditions Chris Shelow Structural Advisor: M. Kevin Parfitt Koshland Integrated Natural Science Center 10/05/05 AE 481W Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Existing Conditions Executive Summary The

More information

CVEN 483. Structural System Overview

CVEN 483. Structural System Overview CVEN 483 Structural System Overview Dr. J. Bracci Fall 2001 Semester Presentation Overview 1. Building system primary function 2. Types of load 3. Building materials 4. Structural members 5. Structural

More information

The problems in this guide are from past exams, 2011 to 2016.

The problems in this guide are from past exams, 2011 to 2016. CE 311 Exam 1 Past Exam Problems, 2011 to 2016 Exam 1 (14% of the grade) THURSDY, 9/21 7 TO 9:30PM. OPTIONL Q& SESSION WED. 9/20, 8PM. COVERGE: LESSONS 1 TO 9 Exam is designed for 2 hours, but a maximum

More information

(b) Calculate the required nominal axial compression strength, Pn of the column.

(b) Calculate the required nominal axial compression strength, Pn of the column. 9 Problem 2-3 (a) Determine the factored axial load or the required axial strength, Pu of a column in an office building with a regular roof configuration. The service axial loads on the column are as

More information

Footings GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 15.2 LOADS AND REACTIONS 15.4 MOMENT IN FOOTINGS

Footings GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 15.2 LOADS AND REACTIONS 15.4 MOMENT IN FOOTINGS 4 Footings GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS Provisions of Chapter 15 apply primarily for design of footings supporting a single column (isolated footings) and do not provide specific design provisions for footings

More information

[TECHNICAL REPORT 3] Lateral System Analysis

[TECHNICAL REPORT 3] Lateral System Analysis Science Center Research Park 3711 Market St. The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis 2009-2010 Prepared by: November 30, 2009 [TECHNICAL REPORT 3] Lateral

More information

Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Report

Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Report Michael A. Troxell Structural Option Advisor: Professor Parfitt College of Business Administration Oct. 5, 2005 Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Report

More information

Simplified Building Schematic for Typical Floor (Levels 9 through 22):

Simplified Building Schematic for Typical Floor (Levels 9 through 22): Introduction to Structural System Simplified Building Schematic for Typical Floor (Levels 9 through 22): Key: - Tower Columns - Tower Shear Walls - Parking Garage Columns - Parking Garage Shear Walls Solid

More information

3.5 Tier 1 Analysis Overview Seismic Shear Forces

3.5 Tier 1 Analysis Overview Seismic Shear Forces Chapter 3.0 - Screening Phase (Tier ) 3.5 Tier Analysis 3.5. Overview Analyses performed as part of Tier of the Evaluation Process are limited to Quick Checks. Quick Checks shall be used to calculate the

More information

Structural Calculations Amphitheater Middle School Building 400 AC Replacement 315 E. Prince Rd., Tucson, Arizona

Structural Calculations Amphitheater Middle School Building 400 AC Replacement 315 E. Prince Rd., Tucson, Arizona Structural Calculations Amphitheater Middle School Building 400 AC Replacement 315 E Prince Rd, Tucson, Arizona Prepared for: Amphitheather Public Schools SCI Project No 17-167A SCI Project No 17-167A

More information

ADAPT PT7 TUTORIAL FOR ONE-WAY SLAB 1

ADAPT PT7 TUTORIAL FOR ONE-WAY SLAB 1 Structural Concrete Software System TN187_PT7_tutorial_one_way_slab 012705 ADAPT PT7 TUTORIAL FOR ONE-WAY SLAB 1 1. ONE-WAY SLAB SUPPORTED ON BEAMS The objective of this tutorial is to demonstrate the

More information

North Shore at Canton Baltimore, MD Beau Menard Technical Report 1

North Shore at Canton Baltimore, MD Beau Menard Technical Report 1 North Shore at Canton Baltimore, MD Beau Menard Technical Report 1 Structural Schneider 10/05/05 Structural Concepts Executive Summary North Shore at Canton is a 4 story town home and parking garage structure

More information

1000 CONTINENTAL SQUARE

1000 CONTINENTAL SQUARE 1000 CONTINENTAL SQUARE KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA Carter Davis Hayes Structural Option January 13, 2008 Advisor: Dr. Hanagan TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 I. STRUCTURAL

More information

STRUCTURAL TECHNICAL REPORT 1

STRUCTURAL TECHNICAL REPORT 1 Technical Report 1 Page 1 David Lee AE 481W Structural Option Advisor: Andres Lepage URS Office Building October 5, 2006 STRUCTURAL TECHNICAL REPORT 1 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions

More information

Agricultural Hall and Annex East Lansing, MI. Structural Design. Gravity Loads. 1- Based on US Standards

Agricultural Hall and Annex East Lansing, MI. Structural Design. Gravity Loads. 1- Based on US Standards Structural Design Gravity Loads 1- Based on US Standards Occupancy or Use Uniform (psf) Concentrated (lbs) Office building -Office -Lobbies and first-floor corridors -Corridor above first floor -Partitions

More information

A REPORT ON THE EFFECTS OF WIND SPEED ON TIMBER CONSTRUCTION JOSHUA HUENEFELD. B.S., Kansas State University, 2012 A REPORT

A REPORT ON THE EFFECTS OF WIND SPEED ON TIMBER CONSTRUCTION JOSHUA HUENEFELD. B.S., Kansas State University, 2012 A REPORT A REPORT ON THE EFFECTS OF WIND SPEED ON TIMBER CONSTRUCTION by JOSHUA HUENEFELD B.S., Kansas State University, 2012 A REPORT submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER

More information

TECHNICAL REPORT III LATERAL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM ANALYSIS

TECHNICAL REPORT III LATERAL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM ANALYSIS TECHNICAL REPORT III LATERAL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM ANALYSIS Chris Vanaskie Structural Peninsula Regional Medical Center Salisbury, MD January 10, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 3 Introduction...

More information

Earth and Engineering Sciences Building University Park, Pennsylvania

Earth and Engineering Sciences Building University Park, Pennsylvania Executive Summary The Earth and Engineering Sciences building is a 4 story educational and laboratory facility. An additional basement level is located below grade and provides the foundation for the East

More information

Ce 479 Reinforced Masonry Fall 2005

Ce 479 Reinforced Masonry Fall 2005 INTRODUCTION TO STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF REINFORCED MASONRY In the preceding lecture on structural design of masonry, we have seen examples of unreinforced masonry bearing walls. In bearing walls, when the

More information

ADAPT PT7 TUTORIAL FOR BEAM FRAME 1

ADAPT PT7 TUTORIAL FOR BEAM FRAME 1 ADAPT PT7 TUTORIAL FOR BEAM FRAME 1 Technical Note Structural Concrete Software System TN189_PT7_tutorial_beam_frame 012705 1 BEAM FRAME The objective of this tutorial is to demonstrate the step-by-step

More information

Danielle Shetler - Structural option Courtyard by Marriott Lancaster, PA

Danielle Shetler - Structural option Courtyard by Marriott Lancaster, PA Structural Analysis Overview: During the structural analysis of the in Lancaster, Pa, a redesign of the lateral and gravity system from masonry bearing and shear walls to a staggered truss system was performed.

More information

Structural Engineering, Mechanics, and Materials. Preliminary Exam - Structural Design

Structural Engineering, Mechanics, and Materials. Preliminary Exam - Structural Design Fall Semester 2018 Preliminary Exam - Structural Design A small building is located in downtown Berkeley. The structural system, either structural steel or reinforced concrete, comprises gravity framing

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS DESIGN EXAMPLES NOTATION 9.0 INTRODUCTION

TABLE OF CONTENTS DESIGN EXAMPLES NOTATION 9.0 INTRODUCTION PCI BRIDGE DESIGN MANUAL CHAPTER 9 NOTATION TABLE OF CONTENTS DESIGN EXAMPLES 9.0 INTRODUCTION 9.1 DESIGN EXAMPLE - AASHTO BOX BEAM, BIII-48, SINGLE SPAN WITH NON-COMPOSITE WEARING SURFACE. DESIGNED IN

More information

Technical Report 1. Seneca Allegany Casino Hotel Addition. Salamanca, NY

Technical Report 1. Seneca Allegany Casino Hotel Addition. Salamanca, NY Technical Report 1 Seneca Allegany Casino Hotel Addition Salamanca, NY Nicholas Reed Structural Option Advisor: Prof. Parfitt Executive Summary The purpose of this technical report was to analyze the existing

More information

American Eagle Outfitters: Quantum III Pittsburgh, PA October 5, Samuel M. P. Jannotti Structural Professor M. Kevin Parfitt Technical Report I

American Eagle Outfitters: Quantum III Pittsburgh, PA October 5, Samuel M. P. Jannotti Structural Professor M. Kevin Parfitt Technical Report I Executive Summary is a steel framed office building located in the South Side Works of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. This report analyzes the structure of this building and it s adequacy on the basis of currently

More information

Jackson Crossing Located in Alexandria, VA. Technical Report 1 Michael Bologna

Jackson Crossing Located in Alexandria, VA. Technical Report 1 Michael Bologna Jackson Crossing Located in Alexandria, VA Technical Report 1 Michael Bologna Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Linda Hanagan September 11, 2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary.3 Introduction 4 Purpose..4

More information

Visteon Village Corporate Center

Visteon Village Corporate Center Visteon Village Corporate Center Van Buren Township, MI Technical Assignment #1 Jamison Morse Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Andres Lapage Jamison Morse Structural Option Visteon Village Center Advisor:

More information

Table of Contents 2. Structural Systems.4 Foundations.4 Floor System...4 Columns..5 Lateral System...5

Table of Contents 2. Structural Systems.4 Foundations.4 Floor System...4 Columns..5 Lateral System...5 WISCONSIN PLACE RESIDENTIAL TECHNICAL ASSIGNMENT 1 OCTOBER 5, 2007 KURT KRASAVAGE THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY STRUCTURAL OPTION FACULTY ADVISOR: DR. ALI MEMARI Table of Contents Table of Contents

More information

Executive Summary...2 Introduction...3 Structural System Overview Buffalo,...4 Foundation...4 Floor System...4 Gravity System...4 Lateral System...

Executive Summary...2 Introduction...3 Structural System Overview Buffalo,...4 Foundation...4 Floor System...4 Gravity System...4 Lateral System... Table of Contents University at Buffalo CTRC/Incubator Executive Summary...2 Introduction...3 Structural System Overview Buffalo,...4 New York Foundation...4 Floor System...4 Gravity System...4 Lateral

More information

Simplified Building Schematic for Typical Floor (Levels 9 through 22):

Simplified Building Schematic for Typical Floor (Levels 9 through 22): Introduction to Structural System Simplified Building Schematic for Typical Floor (Levels 9 through 22): Key: - Tower Columns - Tower Shear Walls - Parking Garage Columns - Parking Garage Shear Walls Solid

More information

Cantilever or Restrained Retaining Wall Calculations

Cantilever or Restrained Retaining Wall Calculations Cantilever or Restrained Retaining Wall Calculations Organization: F.E.C. Project Name: Example Report Design by: LAA Job #: 9876 Date: 10/21/2013 Codes used: 2010 & 2013 CBC, 2009 & 2012 IBC, ACI 318-08

More information

Project ULA 120D Snow-0 Seis-IV

Project ULA 120D Snow-0 Seis-IV ULA Geometry Module Specification Sub-Array Configuration ULA Totals # Rows: 4 Column N-S Length (in): 6 # SubArrays: N-S Dim (in): 40 N-S Spacing (in): 0.25 # Columns: 5 Array E-W Dimension (in): 326

More information

Belmont Executive Center; Building A

Belmont Executive Center; Building A Nicholas L. Ziegler: Structural Advisor: Professor M. Kevin Parfitt December 1, 2009 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary...3 Introduction...3 Structural System...4 Foundation System... 4 Column System...

More information

Cantilever or Restrained Retaining Wall Design Calculations

Cantilever or Restrained Retaining Wall Design Calculations Cantilever or Restrained Retaining Wall Design Calculations Organization: F.E.C. Project Name: Ex 4 Fence Wall Design by: LAA Job #: Date: 7/5/2016 Codes used: 2012 + 2015 IBC, ACI 318-14, ACI 530-11 NOTES:

More information

MOUNTAIN STATE BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD HEADQUARTERS

MOUNTAIN STATE BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD HEADQUARTERS MOUNTAIN STATE BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD HEADQUARTERS PARKERSBURG, WEST VIRGINIA DOMINIC MANNO STRUCTURAL OPTION FACULTY CONSULTANT: DR. ANDRES LEPAGE Technical Report 3 11-21-08 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF

More information

Technical Report #1. Matthew R Peyton

Technical Report #1. Matthew R Peyton Technical Report #1 This Document is Technical Report #1 for 5th year senior thesis in the Architectural Engineering Departments at The Pennsylvania State University. This Report will include structural

More information

ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS For HiPower/Himoinsa - UL2-D10-E10

ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS For HiPower/Himoinsa - UL2-D10-E10 ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS For HiPower/Himoinsa UL2D10E10 November 16, 2016 AMPS Project Number: 20160200 Designed in compliance with: 2014 Florida Building Code 5th Edition with 2016 Supplements

More information

Table 3. Detailed Comparison of Structural Provisions of IRC 2000 and 1997 NEHRP (Continued)

Table 3. Detailed Comparison of Structural Provisions of IRC 2000 and 1997 NEHRP (Continued) 2000 IRC 1997 NEHRP Section Provision Section Provision Comments CHAPTER 3 BUILDING PLANNING R301 DESIGN CRITERIA R301.2.2 Seismic Provisions R301.2.2.1 Determination of Seismic Design Category R301.2.2.1.1

More information

CE 4460 Bridge Project Spring By: Megan Allain Bryan Beyer Paul Kocke Anna Wheeler

CE 4460 Bridge Project Spring By: Megan Allain Bryan Beyer Paul Kocke Anna Wheeler CE 4460 Bridge Project Spring 2006 By: Megan Allain Bryan Beyer Paul Kocke Anna Wheeler Objective: Design a new I-10 bridge across Lake Ponchartrain Design according to LRFD and AASHTO 4 span segment design

More information

Cantilever or Restrained Retaining Wall Design Calculations

Cantilever or Restrained Retaining Wall Design Calculations Cantilever or Restrained Retaining Wall Design Calculations Organization: F.E.C. Project Name: Ex 3 Driveway Short Wall Design by: LAA Job #: Date: 7/5/2016 Codes used: 2012 + 2015 IBC, ACI 318-14, ACI

More information

Calculation of Wind Loads on Structures according to ASCE 7-10

Calculation of Wind Loads on Structures according to ASCE 7-10 Calculation of Wind Loads on Structures according to ASCE 7-10 Permitted Procedures The design wind loads for buildings and other structures, including the Main Wind-Force Resisting System (MWFRS) and

More information

Structural Technical Report #1 By Robert Whitaker

Structural Technical Report #1 By Robert Whitaker Structural Technical Report #1 By Robert Whitaker Robert Whitaker Structural ~ Parfitt Parkview at Bloomfield Station Bloomfield, NJ 10-05-05 Executive summary This report covers the structural concepts

More information

Chapter 2 Notation and Terminology

Chapter 2 Notation and Terminology Reorganized 318 Chapter Titles Chapter 1 General 1.1 Scope 1.2 Purpose 1.3 Interpretation 1.4 Drawings and Specifications 1.5 Testing and Inspection 1.6 Administatration and Enforcement 1.6.1 Retention

More information

Technical Assignment 3 December 3, 2007

Technical Assignment 3 December 3, 2007 Technical Assignment 3 December 3, 2007 101 Eola Drive, Orlando, FL Justin Raducha Pennsylvania State University Faculty Advisor: M. Kevin Parfitt Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 Executive Summary...

More information

Letter of Transmittal

Letter of Transmittal Letter of Transmittal November 17, 2014 Ali Said Structural Thesis Advisor The Pennsylvania State University aus59@psu.edu Dear Doctor Said, The following technical report fulfills the fourth Technical

More information

ADAPT-PT 2010 Tutorial Idealization of Design Strip in ADAPT-PT

ADAPT-PT 2010 Tutorial Idealization of Design Strip in ADAPT-PT ADAPT-PT 2010 Tutorial Idealization of Design Strip in ADAPT-PT Update: April 2010 Copyright ADAPT Corporation all rights reserved ADAPT-PT 2010-Tutorial- 1 Main Toolbar Menu Bar View Toolbar Structure

More information

RCKW Kneewall Connectors

RCKW Kneewall Connectors This product is preferable to similar connectors because of a) easier installation, b) higher loads, c) lower installed cost, or a combination of these features. The Simpson Strong-Tie RCKW rigid connectors

More information

SEAU 5 th Annual Education Conference 1. ASCE Concrete Provisions. Concrete Provisions. Concrete Strengths. Robert Pekelnicky, PE, SE

SEAU 5 th Annual Education Conference 1. ASCE Concrete Provisions. Concrete Provisions. Concrete Strengths. Robert Pekelnicky, PE, SE ASCE 41-13 Concrete Provisions Robert Pekelnicky, PE, SE Principal, Degenkolb Engineers Chair, ASCE 41 Committee* *The view expressed represent those of the author, not the standard s committee as a whole.

More information

Precast Concrete Bearing Wall Panel Design (Alternative Analysis Method) (Using ACI )

Precast Concrete Bearing Wall Panel Design (Alternative Analysis Method) (Using ACI ) Precast Concrete Bearing Wall Panel Design (Alternative Analysis ethod) (Using ACI 318-14) Precast Concrete Bearing Wall Panel Design (Alternative Analysis ethod) (Using ACI 318-14) A structural precast

More information

Executive Summary Building Description: Introduction... 13

Executive Summary Building Description: Introduction... 13 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 2 Building Description:... 2 Report Summary:... 2 Introduction... 3 Building Description:... 3 Current Framing Layout... 4 Report Topics:... 4 Loads and Load Cases...

More information

REINFORCED ENGINEERING HANDBOOK CLAY AND CONCRETE MASONRY SEVENTH EDITION. John M. Hochwalt, PE, SE KPFF Consulting Engineers

REINFORCED ENGINEERING HANDBOOK CLAY AND CONCRETE MASONRY SEVENTH EDITION. John M. Hochwalt, PE, SE KPFF Consulting Engineers REINFORCED MASONRY ENGINEERING HANDBOOK CLAY AND CONCRETE MASONRY SEVENTH EDITION John M. Hochwalt, PE, SE KPFF Consulting Engineers James E. Amrhein Original Author Published by MASONRY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA

More information

REINFORCED CONCRETE WALL BOUNDARY ELEMENT LONGITUDINAL REINFORCING TERMINATION

REINFORCED CONCRETE WALL BOUNDARY ELEMENT LONGITUDINAL REINFORCING TERMINATION 1NCEE Tenth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering July 1-, 1 Anchorage, Alaska REINFORCED CONCRETE WALL BOUNDARY ELEMENT LONGITUDINAL REINFORCING TERMINATION

More information

Park Potomac Office Building E

Park Potomac Office Building E Technical Assignment 1 Kyle Wagner (IP) AE Consultant: Professor Kevin Parfitt October 05, 2009 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary 3 II. Introduction... 4 III. Structural System Overview..... 4 Foundation

More information

Fundamentals of Post Tensioned Concrete Design for Buildings

Fundamentals of Post Tensioned Concrete Design for Buildings Fundamentals of Post Tensioned Concrete Design for Buildings Part Three by John P. Miller Overview of This Course This is Part Two of a two-part course that covers the fundamentals of post-tensioned concrete

More information

Prestressed Concrete Girder Continuity Connection

Prestressed Concrete Girder Continuity Connection Report No: Title: Developing Organization: Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute Technical Committee Phone - 888-700-5670 Email contact@pcine.org Website- www.pcine.org Report Date: Revision Date: Status

More information

Tables with Allowable ASD Seismic Values For Design at R = 6.5. Special Moment Frame MF1-12

Tables with Allowable ASD Seismic Values For Design at R = 6.5. Special Moment Frame MF1-12 Tables with Allowable ASD Seismic Values For Design at R = 6.5 Special Moment Frame MF1-12 Hardy Frames, Inc manufactures and markets pre-fabricated shear wall systems. We have been the innovative leader

More information

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS CRANBERRY, PA

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS CRANBERRY, PA WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS CRANBERRY, PA Technical Assignment 3 November 21, 2008 Advisor: Dr. Linda Hanagan Page 2 of 57 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 INTRODUCTION...

More information

CALCULATING WIND LOADS ON LOW-RISE STRUCTURES PER 2015 WFCM ENGINEERING PROVISIONS (STD342-1)

CALCULATING WIND LOADS ON LOW-RISE STRUCTURES PER 2015 WFCM ENGINEERING PROVISIONS (STD342-1) CALCULATING WIND LOADS ON LOW-RISE STRUCTURES PER 015 WFCM ENGINEERING PROVISIONS (STD34-1) John Buddy Showalter, P.E. Vice President, Technology Transfer American Wood Council Description The Wood Frame

More information

Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts/ Structural Existing Conditions Report

Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts/ Structural Existing Conditions Report Kelly M. Sadusky The Food Science Building Oct. 6, 2004 Professor Parfitt University Park, PA Structural Option Executive Summery: Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts/ Structural Existing

More information

111 MORGAN ST. Ryan Friis

111 MORGAN ST. Ryan Friis Technical Report No. 1 September 30, 2002 Executive Summary: 111 Morgan St. is a 9 story cast-in-place concrete condominium building being constructed in Chicago, Illinois. The building s floor system

More information

Executive Summary. Greg Kochalski. JW Marriott, Grand Rapids, MI

Executive Summary. Greg Kochalski. JW Marriott, Grand Rapids, MI Executive Summary JW Marriott, Grand Rapids, MI November 21, 2006 Greg Kochalski Structural Advisor: Boothby The JW Marriott is a 24 story hotel currently under construction in Grand Rapids, Michigan and

More information

ADAPT-PTRC 2016 Getting Started Tutorial ADAPT-PT mode

ADAPT-PTRC 2016 Getting Started Tutorial ADAPT-PT mode ADAPT-PTRC 2016 Getting Started Tutorial ADAPT-PT mode Update: August 2016 Copyright ADAPT Corporation all rights reserved ADAPT-PT/RC 2016-Tutorial- 1 This ADAPT-PTRC 2016 Getting Started Tutorial is

More information

Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design November 15, 2004

Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design November 15, 2004 Jonathan Hill Structural AE Faculty Consultant Dr. Hanagan Lynde and Harry Bradley School of Technology & Trade Milwaukee, Wisconsin Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design November 15, 2004 Executive

More information

Xyston Inn. NY. Proposal. Xiaodong Jiang. Structure Option. Advisor: Dr. Linda Hanagan

Xyston Inn. NY. Proposal. Xiaodong Jiang. Structure Option. Advisor: Dr. Linda Hanagan Proposal Xiaodong Jiang Structure Option Advisor: Dr. Linda Hanagan December 12, 2014 Executive Summary Xyston Inn is a 17-story hotel building that will be located in Brooklyn, New York. The design of

More information

Composite Steel/Concrete

Composite Steel/Concrete Composite Steel/Concrete Composite Steel and Concrete Clinton O. Rex, P.E., PhD Originally developed by James Robert Harris, P.E., PhD, and Frederick R. Rutz, P.E., PhD Disclaimer Instructional Material

More information

COMPARISON OF STRUCTURAL STEEL LATERAL FORCE RESISTING SYSTEMS FOR A THEORETICAL HOSPITAL GRID SYSTEM GRANT BUELL. B.S., Kansas State University, 2009

COMPARISON OF STRUCTURAL STEEL LATERAL FORCE RESISTING SYSTEMS FOR A THEORETICAL HOSPITAL GRID SYSTEM GRANT BUELL. B.S., Kansas State University, 2009 COMPARISON OF STRUCTURAL STEEL LATERAL FORCE RESISTING SYSTEMS FOR A THEORETICAL HOSPITAL GRID SYSTEM by GRANT BUELL B.S., Kansas State University, 2009 A REPORT submitted in partial fulfillment of the

More information

Technical Report 1. Residence Inn By Marriott. Structural Option September 29, Existing Conditions / Structural Concepts.

Technical Report 1. Residence Inn By Marriott. Structural Option September 29, Existing Conditions / Structural Concepts. Katie Ritter Advisor: Dr. Ali Memari Structural Option September 29, 2008 Technical Report 1 Existing Conditions / Structural Concepts Residence Inn By Marriott Norfolk, Virginia 1 P age TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

Masonry and Cold-Formed Steel Requirements

Masonry and Cold-Formed Steel Requirements PC UFC Briefing September 21-22, 2004 Masonry and Cold-Formed Steel Requirements David Stevens, ARA Masonry Requirements Composite Construction Masonry is often used in composite construction, such as

More information

Continuous Beam Design with Moment Redistribution (ACI )

Continuous Beam Design with Moment Redistribution (ACI ) Continuous Beam Design with Moment Redistribution (ACI 318-14) Continuous Beam Design with Moment Redistribution (ACI 318-14) A structural reinforced concrete continuous beam at an intermediate floor level

More information

VARIOUS TYPES OF SLABS

VARIOUS TYPES OF SLABS VARIOUS TYPES OF SLABS 1 CHOICE OF TYPE OF SLAB FLOOR The choice of type of slab for a particular floor depends on many factors. Economy of construction is obviously an important consideration, but this

More information

Steel Design Guide Series. Steel and Composite Beams with. Web Openings

Steel Design Guide Series. Steel and Composite Beams with. Web Openings Steel Design Guide Series Steel and Composite Beams with Web Openings Steel Design Guide Series Steel and Composite Beams with Web Openings Design of Steel and Composite Beams with Web Openings David Darwin

More information

AC R1 # Triangle Parkway Suite 100 Norcross, Ga Phone: Fax: AC R1. September 11, 2012

AC R1 # Triangle Parkway Suite 100 Norcross, Ga Phone: Fax: AC R1. September 11, 2012 AC70-1012-R1 #12 AC70-1012-R1 #12 AC70-1012-R1 September 11, 2012 Mr. Brian Gerber Ms. Elyse Levy International Code Council Evaluation Service (ICC ES) 5360 Workman Mill Road Whittier, CA 90601 2256 RE:

More information

Technical Report 1. Kingstowne Section 36A 5680 King Center Drive Kingstowne, VA James Chavanic. Structural Option. Advisor: Dr.

Technical Report 1. Kingstowne Section 36A 5680 King Center Drive Kingstowne, VA James Chavanic. Structural Option. Advisor: Dr. Technical Report 1 Rendering provided by DCS Design 5680 King Center Drive Kingstowne, VA 22315 Advisor: Dr. Boothby September 17, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 3 Building Introduction 4 Structural

More information

ARCH 331. Study Guide for Final Examination

ARCH 331. Study Guide for Final Examination ARCH 331. Study Guide for Final Examination This guide is not providing answers for the conceptual questions. It is a list of topical concepts and their application you should be familiar with. It is an

More information

STRUCTURAL EDGE ENGINEERING, PLLC

STRUCTURAL EDGE ENGINEERING, PLLC JEREMY PARRISH Registered Professional Engineer In Partners with STRUCTURAL EDGE ENGINEERING, PLLC STRUCTURAL EDGE ENGINEERING, PLLC HINES PARK BUILDING A NAMPA, ID SE PROJECT NO: SE16-177 PREPARED FOR:

More information

CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION PRECAST, PRESTRESSED HOLLOW CORE SLABS DESIGN CRITERIA & SPAN-LOAD CHARTS FOR STORM WATER DETENTION VAULT LIDS (CHARTS REVISED /18/08) Introduction Design Criteria for Development of the Span-Load Charts

More information

Considerations for Outof-Plane. Design

Considerations for Outof-Plane. Design Considerations for Outof-Plane Wall and Uplift Design WoodWorks Texas Workshops December, 2016 Overview Uplift Wall Design Wind Loads Wind loads acting on buildings are modeled as uniform surface loads.

More information

VOLUNTARY - EARTHQUAKE HAZARD REDUCTION IN EXISTING HILLSIDE BUILDINGS (Division 94 Added by Ord. No. 171,258, Eff. 8/30/96.)

VOLUNTARY - EARTHQUAKE HAZARD REDUCTION IN EXISTING HILLSIDE BUILDINGS (Division 94 Added by Ord. No. 171,258, Eff. 8/30/96.) DIVISION 94 VOLUNTARY - EARTHQUAKE HAZARD REDUCTION IN EXISTING HILLSIDE BUILDINGS (Division 94 Added by Ord. No. 171,258, Eff. 8/30/96.) SEC. 91.9401. PURPOSE. (Amended by Ord. No. 172,592, Eff. 6/28/99,

More information

A Guide for the Interpretation of Structural Design Options for Residential Concrete Structures

A Guide for the Interpretation of Structural Design Options for Residential Concrete Structures CFA Technical Note: 008-2010 A Guide for the Interpretation of Structural Design Options for Residential Concrete Structures CFA Technical This CFA Technical Note is intended to serve as a guide to assist

More information

ACI Code Revisions Impact on StructurePoint Software

ACI Code Revisions Impact on StructurePoint Software ACI 318-19 Code Revisions Impact on StructurePoint Software General Themes & Summary ACI 318-19 continues to unify and simplify code provisions started in 2014 reorganization of chapters by members. Nearly

More information

Alexis Pacella Structural Option Dr. Schneider Lexington II, Washington D.C. Technical Report #3 November 21,

Alexis Pacella Structural Option Dr. Schneider Lexington II, Washington D.C. Technical Report #3 November 21, 1 Executive Summary: Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design is an depth look at the lateral system of Lexington II and the loads of which it must carry. The structural system of Lexington II is

More information

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS NEW WINDOW OPENING IN EXISTING PERIMETER LOAD BEARING WOOD FRAMED WALL Project Address: Job #: 80167

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS NEW WINDOW OPENING IN EXISTING PERIMETER LOAD BEARING WOOD FRAMED WALL Project Address: Job #: 80167 4533 MacArthur Blvd., Ste A-2003 Newport Beach, CA 92660 949-478-4026 cell www.ocstructurecheck.com jeremy@ocstructurecheck.com STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS NEW WINDOW OPENING IN EXISTING PERIMETER

More information

twenty three Masonry Construction 1 APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS FALL 2018 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS ARCH 631

twenty three Masonry Construction 1 APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS FALL 2018 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS ARCH 631 APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS DR. ANNE NICHOLS FALL 2018 lecture twenty three masonry construction Bright Football Complex www.tamu.edu Masonry Construction 1 Learning

More information

S T R U C T U R. Technology. magazine. Software for the Structural Design of Masonry. The Design Basis. Copyright

S T R U C T U R. Technology. magazine. Software for the Structural Design of Masonry. The Design Basis. Copyright Software for the Structural Design of Masonry By Russell H. Brown, James K. Nelson, Jr. and Dennis Graber Using software can free the design engineer from the drudgery of routine calculations and enable

More information

Seismic Design of Precast Concrete Structures

Seismic Design of Precast Concrete Structures Seismic Design of Precast Concrete Structures S. K. Ghosh S. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. Palatine, IL and Aliso Viejo, CA Instructional Material Complementing FEMA 1052, Design Examples Diaphragms Analysis

More information

Structural Calculations Site Features. Casey s General Store W. Cottage Grove Rd. & Sandpiper Trail Cottage Grove, WI 53527

Structural Calculations Site Features. Casey s General Store W. Cottage Grove Rd. & Sandpiper Trail Cottage Grove, WI 53527 Structural Calculations Site Features Casey s General Store W. Cottage Grove Rd. & Sandpiper Trail Cottage Grove, WI 53527 Prepared By: 201 S. Maple Ave. Suite 300, November 7, 2017 Project #: CGS.23260

More information

Dead Loads. Load Resistance ηγ i Q i ΦR n. Design Criteria. EGCE 406 Bridge Design III. Loads on Bridge Summary of Concepts.

Dead Loads. Load Resistance ηγ i Q i ΦR n. Design Criteria. EGCE 406 Bridge Design III. Loads on Bridge Summary of Concepts. Design Criteria We want the load effects to be less than the resistance EGCE 406 Bridge Design III. Loads on Bridge Summary of Concepts This Section Load Resistance ηγ i Q i ΦR n Load Multiplier Nominal

More information

twenty three Masonry Construction 1 APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2018 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS ARCH 631

twenty three Masonry Construction 1 APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2018 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS ARCH 631 APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2018 lecture twenty three masonry construction Bright Football Complex www.tamu.edu Masonry Construction 1 Learning

More information

twenty three Masonry Construction 1 APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2019 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS ARCH 631

twenty three Masonry Construction 1 APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2019 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS ARCH 631 APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2019 lecture twenty three masonry construction Bright Football Complex www.tamu.edu Masonry Construction 1 Learning

More information

Structural Technical Report I October 5, 2006 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Report

Structural Technical Report I October 5, 2006 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Report 1 THE ODYSSEY ARLINGTON, VA Aaron Snyder Structural Option Advisor: M. Kevin Parfitt, PE Structural Technical Report I October 5, 2006 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Report Executive

More information

David A. Walenga Technical Assignment #1

David A. Walenga Technical Assignment #1 Executive Summary Contained in this report is design information related to the structural system of the Residence Inn by Marriot located in Stamford, Connecticut. Specifically, this report covers: code

More information

Lateral load basics Code acceptance of Standard. Standard Overview 2008 Wind & Seismic Standard. Wind. Wind Load Path. IBC Section 1604.

Lateral load basics Code acceptance of Standard. Standard Overview 2008 Wind & Seismic Standard. Wind. Wind Load Path. IBC Section 1604. Outline 2005/2008 Special Design Provisions for Wind & Seismic Standard Lateral load basics Code acceptance of Standard 2005/2008 Wind & Seismic Standard Overview 2008 Wind & Seismic Standard John Buddy

More information

North Mountain IMS Medical Office Building

North Mountain IMS Medical Office Building North Mountain IMS Medical Office Building Phoenix, Arizona Michael Hopple Technical Assignment 1 October 5 th, 2007 AE 481W-Senior Thesis The Pennsylvania State University Faculty Adviser: Dr. Ali Memari,

More information