On/Off periods Improvements Grazing System. 2 fence segments. 1 water development, 2 cattle guards
|
|
- James Osborne
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DECISION NOTICE HENRY CREEK AND SWAMP CREEK RANGE ALLOTMENT MANAGEMENT PLANS REVISION U.S. FOREST SERVICE PLAINS/THOMPSON FALLS RANGER DISTRICT LOLO NATIONAL FOREST SANDERS COUNTY, MONTANA DECISION Based upon my review of the Henry Creek and Swamp Creek Range Allotment Management Plans Revision Environmental Assessment (EA), I have decided to implement the Proposed Action. My decision allows continuation of grazing on both the Henry Creek and Swamp Creek allotments (see Figure 1) through the issuance of a 10-year term grazing permit as summarized in the following table. Existing permit requirements for each allotment Allotment Henry Creek Swamp Creek Permitted AUMs 22 cow/calf pairs, 1 bull 45 cow/calf pairs On/Off periods Improvements Grazing System July 1-September 15 June 1-September 1 3 fence segments, 1 water development, 2 cattle guards 2 fence segments 1. On/off means the cattle move between State and Forest Service lands freely throughout the season One pasture on/off with adjacent State lands 1 One pasture on/off with adjacent State lands My decision includes the following resource protection measures to address site-specific resource needs for each allotment: Henry Creek Allotment Fell small diameter trees along Henry Creek where multiple livestock trails exist to reduce trailing immediately adjacent to Henry Creek (Sections 23 and 26, T20N, R25W) and reduce stream crossings to one armored crossing (see Figure 2, Site A and between Sites A and B). Fell trees to prevent further trampling within seep area adjacent to Henry Creek (Section 23, SW of SE ¼; northwest of Site A, T20N, R25W). Page 1 of 9
2 Remove fence around the old Mill site, including where fence is in Henry Creek (Section 26, T20N, R25W). Fell small diameter trees to discourage access to creek in this area and prevent trampling (see Figure 2, Site A). Include old Mill site (Section 26, T20N, R25W) in weed spraying program to reduce weed infestations (see Figure 2, Site A). Swamp Creek Allotment Fence riparian area (see Figure 3, Site D) to eliminate grazing/trampling within riparian area, and construct a water tank to provide water away from the riparian area (SE of SW1/4, Section 14, T20N, R27W). Include Site D (see Figure 3) in weed spraying program to reduce weed infestations. Use woody materials to control cattle trailing in Sites A and C (see Figure 3). No changes to existing permit requirements will occur for either permit. These permit requirements are the result of past modifications in annual operating permits and are incorporated into this decision. All other conditions of the permits will remain the same. The Forest Service will ensure that utilization standards will be met through permit administration. DECISION RATIONALE The purpose of revising these two allotment management plans is to formally incorporate changes to grazing practices that were identified in past annual operating plans and permit reissuance procedures, and to incorporate standards and guidelines to ensure compliance with the Forest Plan. These changes were made to address resource concerns related to environmental impacts from the length of grazing season and number of animals permitted. The resource protection measures included in this decision are to respond to site-specific impacts that have the potential to affect soil and water quality, and weed spread. The Henry Creek and Swamp Creek Range Allotment Management Plans Revision EA documents the environmental analysis and conclusions upon which I am basing my decision. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT The proposed action was originally listed on the Lolo National Forest Schedule of Proposed Actions (SOPA) and updated periodically during the analysis. The public was also invited to review and comment on the proposal through direct mailings to interested parties on the Forest mailing list. The EA lists agencies and people consulted on page 23. The EA was posted on the Forest website and a legal notice announcing the availability of the EA for review and comment was published in the Missoulian, Sanders County Ledger, and Clark Fork Valley Press newspapers. Only one comment was received, which was from one of the permittees regarding implementation of the proposed action. No specific concerns or questions regarding the necessity of the proposed action were received by the Forest Service. Page 2 of 9
3 FINDINGS REQUIRED BY OTHER LAWS AND REGULATIONS This decision is consistent with the Lolo National Forest Plan. The project was designed in conformance with the standards and guidelines listed in the Lolo National Forest Plan. FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT After considering the environmental effects described in the EA, I have determined that these actions will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment considering the context and intensity of impacts (40 CFR ). Thus, an environmental impact statement will not be prepared. I base my finding on the following: Beneficial and adverse impacts My finding of no significant environmental effects is not biased by the beneficial effects of the action. The proposed action will protect sensitive riparian areas and enhance recovery of soils and vegetation in these areas. These beneficial impacts are disclosed in the EA on pages The degree to which the proposed action affects public health or safety The proposed action continues grazing of these areas with additional protection measures to enhance vegetation recovery of riparian areas, and reduces the potential for the establishment and spread of invasive species. There are no identified activities or effects that would adversely impact public health or safety. Unique characteristics of the geographic area There are no significant effects on unique characteristics of the area, as there are no ecologically critical areas (such as historic or cultural resources, park lands, prime farmlands, wild and scenic rivers), or designated wilderness areas within the project area. The allotment areas contain riparian areas, but they will be protected through resource protection measures. The degree to which the effects on the human environment are likely to be highly controversial The effects on the quality of the human environment are not likely to be highly controversial. There are no known scientific controversies regarding the impacts of the project. Page 3 of 9
4 The degree to which the possible effects on the human environment are highly uncertain or involve unique or unknown risks We have considerable experience with the types of activities to be implemented. The effects analysis shows the effects are not uncertain, and do not involve unique or unknown risk (see EA pages 7-22). Grazing has occurred on these allotments for numerous years, and past monitoring has not identified any impacts that were unique or unknown. The degree to which the action may establish a precedent for future actions with significant effects or represents a decision in principle about a future consideration The action is not likely to establish a precedent for future actions with significant effects because the proposed action is authorizing the continuation of an existing use which has been monitored annually. Whether the action is related to other actions with individually insignificant but cumulatively significant impacts The cumulative impacts are not significant (see EA pages 7-22). As the direct and indirect effects for each resource are either negligible or beneficial, there are no significant impacts that may, when added to other impacts within the project area, have an adverse cumulative impact. The degree to which the action may adversely affect districts, sites, highways, structures, or objects listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, or may cause loss or destruction of significant scientific, cultural, or historical resources The action will have no adverse effects on districts, sites, highways, structures, or objects listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, as determined by the field reconnaissance and analysis conducted in accordance with regulation and policy direction. The degree to which the action may adversely affect an endangered or threatened species or its habitat that has been determined to be critical under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 The action will not adversely affect any endangered or threatened species or its habitat that has been determined to be critical under the Endangered Species act of 1973, because the proposed action minimizes the potential for adverse effects (see EA pages 10-14, 16-18, and 19-22). The biological assessment for fish species determined that the proposed action would have no impact on bull trout or designated critical habitat for bull trout. The biological assessment for wildlife species concluded that the proposed project would have No Effect on either grizzly bear or Canada lynx. No consultation was required with the US Fish and Wildlife Service for Page 4 of 9
5 these species. Whether the action threatens a violation of Federal, State, or local law or other requirements imposed for the protection of the environment The action will not violate Federal, State, and local laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Conformance with applicable laws and regulations were considered in the EA (see EA pages 7-22). The action is consistent with the Lolo National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (See EA pages 7-22). FINDINGS REQUIRED BY OTHER LAWS AND REGULATIONS My decision to implement the proposed action is consistent with the intent of the Lolo Forest Plan's long term goals and objectives. The project was designed in conformance with land and resource management plan standards and incorporates appropriate land and resource management plan guidelines for grazing and resource protection (Lolo National Forest Plan, pages II-9, III-64 through III-67). ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OR APPEAL OPPORTUNITIES Only supportive comments were received during the 30-day comment period that commenced with publication of legal notice in the Missoulian newspaper on July 19, Thus, pursuant to 36 CFR 215 regulations, this decision is not subject to appeal. Implementation may begin immediately after publication of legal notice of this decision in the Missoulian newspaper. CONTACT Further information about this decision can be obtained from Dave Wrobleski, Resource Assistant, during normal office hours (weekdays, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.) at the Plains/Thompson Falls Ranger District Office (Address: 408 Clayton St, P.O. Box 429, Plains, MT 59859; Phone/voic (406) /s/ Deborah L. R. Austin 9/18/2012 DEBORAH L. R. AUSTIN Forest Supervisor Date Page 5 of 9
6 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C , or call (800) (voice) or (202) (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Page 6 of 9
7 Figure 1 Page 7 of 9
8 Figure 2 Page 8 of 9
9 Figure 3 Page 9 of 9
DECISION NOTICE FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI)
DECISION NOTICE AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI) FOR CASA LOMA RECREATION RESIDENCE PERMIT RENEWAL U.S. FOREST SERVICE CIBOLA NATIONAL FOREST SANDIA RANGER DISTRICT BERNALILLO COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
More informationDecision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact
Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact Gold Lake Bog Research Natural Area Boundary Adjustment and Nonsignificant Forest Plan Amendment #53 USDA Forest Service Middle Fork Ranger District,
More informationDECISION NOTICE AND FINDING OF No SIGNIFICANT IMPACT HOPKINS FIRE SALVAGE
DECISION NOTICE AND FINDING OF No SIGNIFICANT IMPACT HOPKINS FIRE SALVAGE DECISION U.S. FOREST SERVICE OCALA NATIONAL FOREST SEMINOLE RANGER DISTRICT MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA Based upon my review of the
More informationDECISION MEMO Divide Creek Barrier Enhancement
Page 1 of 7 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Butte Ranger District Silver Bow County, Montana T. 2 N., R. 9 W., Section 32 The North Fork of Divide Creek is approximately 4 miles west of the
More informationDear Interested Party,
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Medicine Bow Routt National Forests and Thunder Basin National Grassland Parks Ranger District 100 Main Street, PO Box 158 Walden, CO 80480-0158 970-723-2700
More informationPROJECT INFORMATION Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project
PROJECT INFORMATION Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project The USDA Forest Service is proposing to release and prune living apple trees in the Manchester Ranger District,
More informationYankee Hill Fuel Treatment Project Decision Notice & Finding of No Significant Impact
Yankee Hill Fuel Treatment Project Decision Notice & Finding of No Significant Impact USDA Forest Service Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests And Pawnee National Grassland Clear Creek Ranger District
More informationKeefer Pasture Drift Fence Project. Challis-Yankee Fork Ranger District Salmon-Challis National Forest
Keefer Pasture Drift Fence Project Challis-Yankee Fork Ranger District Salmon-Challis National Forest PROPOSED ACTION The Challis-Yankee Fork Ranger District proposes construction of approximately.11 miles
More informationFINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT OWL CREEK GRAVEL PIT EXPANSION U.S. FOREST SERVICE
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT OWL CREEK GRAVEL PIT EXPANSION U.S. FOREST SERVICE OURAY RANGER DISTRICT OURAY COUNTY, COLORADO BACKGROUND The Owl Creek Gravel Pit, also known as the Spruce Ridge Pit,
More informationDecision Memo Tongass National Forest. Wrangell Ranger District. Pre-Commercial Thinning CE 2010
Decision Memo Tongass National Forest Pre-Commercial Thinning CE 2010 Decision It is my decision to authorize pre-commercial thinning (PCT) on approximately 7,500 acres of overstocked young-growth forest
More informationOUTREACH NOTICE 2018 TEMPORARY POSITIONS BEAVERHEAD-DEERLODGE NATIONAL FOREST HOW TO APPLY: RECREATION POSITIONS BEING HIRED:
OUTREACH NOTICE 2018 TEMPORARY POSITIONS BEAVERHEAD-DEERLODGE NATIONAL FOREST The Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest will be filling multiple temporary (seasonal) positions for the upcoming 2018 field
More informationPRELIMINARY DECISION MEMO
PRELIMINARY DECISION MEMO Snoqualmie Christmas Tree Project USDA Forest Service Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest Snoqualmie Ranger District King County, Washington Proposed Action, Purpose and Need
More informationLocally Led Conservation & The Local Work Group. Mark Habiger NRCS
Locally Led Conservation & The Local Work Group Mark Habiger NRCS 1 What Is Locally Led Conservation? Community Stakeholders 1. Assessing their natural resource conservation needs 2. Setting community
More informationWest Branch LeClerc Creek Watershed Restoration Project Environmental Assessment
West Branch LeClerc Creek Watershed Restoration Project Environmental Assessment Decision Notice, Finding of No Significant Impact, and Response to Public Comments April 2015 USDA Forest Service Colville
More informationDraft Decision Notice Maroon Bells - Snowmass Wilderness Overnight Visitor Use Management Plan
Draft Decision Notice Maroon Bells - Snowmass Wilderness Overnight Visitor Use Management Plan USDA Forest Service Aspen-Sopris Ranger District, White River National Forest Gunnison Ranger District, Grand
More informationDraft Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact (DN/FONSI)
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service January 2016 Draft Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact (DN/FONSI) Rock Creek Vegetation and Fuels Healthy Forest Restoration Act
More informationFARM BILL 2002 Colorado Conservation Provisions
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service FARM BILL 2002 Colorado Conservation Provisions Conserving Natural Resources on Colorado s Privately Owned Farmland Farm Bill
More informationDECISION NOTICE & FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT OUTFITTER GUIDE MOTORIZED TOURS SPECIAL USE PERMIT ISSUANCES
Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant 1 Impact for the Outfitter Guide Motorized Tours DECISION NOTICE & FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT OUTFITTER GUIDE MOTORIZED TOURS SPECIAL USE PERMIT ISSUANCES
More informationDecision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service June 2011 Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact Vail Ski Area Forest Health Project Holy Cross Ranger District, White River National
More informationProposed Action: In response to resource specialist concerns raised during internal scoping, the following restrictions will apply:
DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Inyan Kara Riders Motorcycle Enduro Event Rocky Mountain Region Thunder Basin National Grassland Medicine Bow-Routt National Forests Douglas Ranger District April 2011
More informationDECISION MEMO. West Fork Blacktail Deer Creek Hardened Crossing
Page 1 of 6 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Madison Ranger District Madison County T12S, R4W, Section 30 The project is in the Gravelly Landscape, Snowcrest Recommended Wilderness Management
More informationPublic Rock Collection
Public Rock Collection Eagle-Holy Cross Ranger District, White River national Forest Eagle County, Colorado T7S, R80W, Section 18 & T6S, R84W, Section 16 Comments Welcome The Eagle-Holy Cross Ranger District
More informationRECORD OF DECISION BATTLE PARK C&H ALLOTMENTS FOR LIVESTOCK GRAZING ON THE AND MISTY MOON S&G. United States Department of Agriculture.
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region Bighorn National Forest RECORD OF DECISION FOR LIVESTOCK GRAZING ON THE BATTLE PARK C&H AND MISTY MOON S&G ALLOTMENTS September
More informationDECISION MEMO. Non-Commercial Thinning on the Ocala National Forest (PALS project # 39238)
Decision DECISION MEMO Non-Commercial Thinning on the Ocala National Forest (PALS project # 39238) USDA Forest Service Ocala National Forest Lake, Marion, and Putnam County, Florida Based on the analysis
More informationProposed Action for Motorized Travel Management on the North Kaibab Ranger District
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Proposed Action for Motorized Travel Management on the North Kaibab Ranger District Kaibab National Forest March 2010 The U.S. Department of Agriculture
More informationBlanche Park Reservoir Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact
Blanche Park Reservoir Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact U.S. Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests Delta County, Colorado INTRODUCTION The Grand Mesa
More informationSupervisor s Office 5162 Valleypointe Parkway Roanoke, VA
Supervisor s Office 5162 Valleypointe Parkway Roanoke, VA 24019 540-265-5100 www.fs.fed.us/r8/gwj James River Ranger District Glenwood-Pedlar Ranger District 810A East Madison Avenue 27 Ranger Lane Covington,
More informationSAN LUIS VALLEY PUBLIC LANDS CENTER
Decision Notice And Finding of No Significant Impact Watershed and Fisheries Conservation Treatments SAN LUIS VALLEY PUBLIC LANDS CENTER USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region Public Lands Center Rio
More informationDECISION MEMO. Missoula Electric Cooperative Point 118. MEC - Buried Electric Powerline (Along West Fork Butte Access Road #37 to Point 118)
DECISION MEMO Missoula Electric Cooperative Point 118 MEC - Buried Electric Powerline (Along West Fork Butte Access Road #37 to Point 118) USDA Forest Service - Lolo National Forest Missoula Ranger District
More informationNRCS Conservation Programs Update
NRCS Conservation Programs Update Opportunities for Fruit and Vegetable Growers Chad Cochrane Resource Conservationist USDA-NRCS Fruit and Vegetable Farms Fruit and Vegetable Farms Focus on Resource Concerns
More informationDECISION MEMO. USDA Forest Service. Butte District Silver Bow County T4N, R8W, Section 36
Page 1 of 5 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Butte District Silver Bow County T4N, R8W, Section 36 Northwestern Energy operates utility systems and facilities on federal lands under a Master
More informationNational Best Management Practices Monitoring Summary Report
United States Department of Agriculture National Best Management Practices Monitoring Summary Report Fiscal Year 2013 Forest Service FS-1042 January 2015 United States Department of Agriculture Forest
More informationHuron-Manistee National Forests Mio Ranger District 107 McKinley Road Mio, MI 48647
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Huron-Manistee National Forests Mio Ranger District 107 McKinley Road Mio, MI 48647 989-826-3252 (Voice) 989-826-6073 (Fax) Dial 711 for relay service
More informationMississippi River Basin Healthy Watershed Initiative
Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watershed Initiative A Progress Report for Arkansas Presented by: Mike Sullivan, State Conservationist FY 2010 12 States 41 Focus Areas FY 2011 Added two focus areas: SD/MS
More informationCHEAT MOUNTAIN WILDLIFE HABITAT ENHANCEMENT
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Monongahela National Forest Greenbrier Ranger District Box 67 Bartow, WV 24920 304-456-3335 CHEAT MOUNTAIN WILDLIFE HABITAT ENHANCEMENT USDA Forest
More informationCorn Objective Yield Survey Data,
Washington, D.C. Corn Objective Yield Survey Data, 1992-2006 Released May 18, 2007, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),, U.S. Department of Agriculture. For information on call Ty Kalaus
More informationPuerto Rico - Various
United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service Puerto Rico Various Agricultural Statistics 2011 Summary April 2012 ISSN: 21548692 Summary Milk production decreased 1
More informationBUDGET BASICS TRAINING TOPIC: DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS. Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP)
BUDGET BASICS TRAINING TOPIC: DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) Acknowledgment Statement 2 You understand and acknowledge that: the training you are about to take does
More informationEnvironmental Assessment
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Stanislaus National Forest Pedro Flat Campground (27121) Environmental Assessment Stanislaus National Forest Summit Ranger District Tuolumne County,
More informationDust Bowl and USDA - NRCS. Kim Wright USDA-NRCS Program Liaison Bryan, Texas
Dust Bowl and USDA - NRCS Kim Wright USDA-NRCS Program Liaison Bryan, Texas Who is the NRCS? The Natural Resources Conservation Service is a Federal agency that works in partnership with the American people
More informationEffect of Cattle Grazing, Seeded Grass, and an Herbicide on Ponderosa Pine Seedling Survival and Growth
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station http://www.psw.fs.fed.us/ Research Paper PSW-RP-242 Effect of Cattle Grazing, Seeded Grass, and an Herbicide on
More informationDECISION MEMO CATARACT CREEK-MOUNTAIN MEADOW PLAN OF OPERATIONS
Page 1 of 8 DECISION MEMO CATARACT CREEK-MOUNTAIN MEADOW PLAN OF OPERATIONS USDA Forest Service Madison Ranger District Madison County, Montana T2S, R3W, sections 16 & 21 Background Moen Excavation of
More informationNon-Ambulatory Cattle and Calves
Washington, D.C. Non-Ambulatory Cattle and Calves Released May 5, 2005, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),, U.S. Department of Agriculture. For information on Non-ambulatory Cattle
More informationCOUNTY, OREGON T20 S R14E SECTIONS 25 AND 36; T20S R15E SECTIONS 19-34; AND T21S R15E SECTIONS 3-9 AND
PINE MOUNTAIN SAGE GROUSE HABITAT RESTORATION PROJECT Bend/ Fort Rock Ranger District Deschutes National Forest DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON T20 S R14E SECTIONS 25 AND 36; T20S R15E SECTIONS 19-34; AND T21S
More informationTelegraph Forest Management Project
Telegraph Forest Management Project Black Hills National Forest Northern Hills Ranger District Lawrence and Pennington Counties, South Dakota Proposed Action and Request for Comments March 2008 Table of
More informationConger Rock Harvesting Project
Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact Conger Rock Harvesting Project Aspen-Sopris Ranger District White River National Forest Gunnison County, Colorado T11S, R88W, Section 21 and 22 Decision
More informationDraft Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact. Pack II Road Decommissioning Project. United States Department of Agriculture
Draft Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact United States Department of Agriculture Pack II Road Decommissioning Project Powell Ranger District, Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests Idaho
More informationInvasive Dandelion Removal in the Alpine Zone. Decision Memo. White Mountain National Forest, NH and ME
United States Department of Agriculture Invasive Dandelion Removal in the Alpine Zone White Mountain National Forest, NH and ME Decision Memo For Information Contact: Dan Sperduto Supervisor s Office 71
More informationCattle on Feed. U.S. Cattle on Feed Up 4 Percent
Washington, D.C. Cattle on Feed Released December 9, 003, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),, U.S. Department of Agriculture. For information on "" call Steve Anderson at (0) 70-40,
More informationSeasonal High Tunnels. Conservation Benefits Interim Practice Standard Financial Assistance Guidance
Seasonal High Tunnels Conservation Benefits Interim Practice Standard Financial Assistance Guidance Financial Assistance Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) Today s Focus Conservation Benefits
More informationNRCS Standards and Criteria for Dead Animal Composting
Helping People Help the Land NRCS Standards and Criteria for Dead Animal Composting Matthew Robert, PE Agricultural Engineer Champaign, Illinois www.il.nrcs.usda.gov Matthew.Robert@il.usda.gov Following
More informationEffects of All-Terrain Vehicles on Forested Lands and Grasslands
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service National Technology & Development Program Recreation Management 0823 1811 SDTDC December 2008 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration
More informationUnited States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service
Jericho Winter, USDA NRCS Resource Soil Scientist Jeremy Baker, Rural Conservationist, East Multnomah SWCD Kim Galland, Multnomah Co. District Conservationist United States Department of Agriculture Natural
More informationMARTIN BASIN RANGELAND
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Intermountain Region Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Santa Rosa Ranger District RECORD OF DECISION FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
More informationSalmon River Recreation Sites Renovation Decision Notice and FONSI
SALMON RIVER RECREATIONAL SITES RENOVATION PROJECT DECISION NOTICE & FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT USDA FOREST SERVICE SALMON RIVER RANGER DISTRICT, NEZ PERCE NATIONAL FOREST IDAHO COUNTY, IDAHO 1.1
More informationRecreation. Crosscut Saw Underbucking Tool Chuck Whitlock, Project Leader, and Chuck Harding, Mechanical Engineering Technician
Recreation United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Technology & Development Program December 2002 2300 0223-2330P MTDC Crosscut Saw Underbucking Tool Chuck Whitlock, Project Leader, and
More informationScenery Report Salmon Reforestation Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service May 12, 2014 Scenery Report Salmon/Scott River Ranger District, Klamath National Forest Siskiyou County, California For Information Contact: Bob Talley
More informationPayette National Forest
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Payette National Forest 800 W Lakeside Ave McCall ID 83638-3602 208-634-0700 File Code: 1570 Date: December 20, 2010 Debra K. Ellers Western Idaho
More informationDECISION MEMO Besson Special Use Permit Ottawa National Forest
I DECISION DECISION MEMO Besson Special Use Permit Ottawa National Forest T49N R37W Section 19, 30 Houghton County; T49N R38W Sections 24,25 Ontonagon County Forest Roads 1157, 1157-G, and spur road in
More informationConservation Practices. Conservation Choices. These five icons will show the benefits each practice offers... 6/4/2014
Conservation Choices Your guide to conservation and environmental farming practices. Conservation Choices These five icons will show the benefits each practice offers... The practice reduces soil erosion
More informationRECORD OF DECISION for
RECORD OF DECISION for SCHOOL FIRE SALVAGE RECOVERY PROJECT [Forest Plan Amendment to modify Eastside Screens' wildlife standard at 6d. (2) (a)] and FINDING OF NON-SIGNIFICANT AMENDMENT USDA Forest Service
More informationU.S. Broiler Industry Structure
U.S. Broiler Industry Structure Washington, D.C. Released November 27, 2002, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, U.S. Department of Agriculture. For information
More informationWater Talk Series
Kansas Water Talk Series - 2017 Joel A. Willhoft, NRCS Resource Conservationist 785.624.3127 joel.willhoft@ks.usda.gov NRCS Conservation Programs NRCS provides eligible producers financial assistance to
More informationManchester Ranger District. Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service February 2009 Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project Decision Memo USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region Green Mountain
More informationChase Red Pine Fuels Project
United States Department of Agriculture Chase Red Pine Fuels Project Draft Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact USDA Forest Service, Huron-Manistee National Forests Lake and Newaygo Counties,
More informationSmall Project Proposal
Combined Scoping and Notice and Comment Document Small Project Proposal USDA Forest Service Fishlake National Forest Beaver Ranger District Sevier County, Utah The purpose of this document is to inform
More informationPreliminary Decision Memo 2015 Recreation Residence Projects Odell Lake
2015 Recreation Residence Projects Odell Lake USDA Forest Service Crescent Ranger District, Deschutes National Forest Klamath County, Oregon Background The Crescent Ranger District maintains 66 recreation
More informationAnnouncement of Class and Component Prices United States Department of Agriculture
Announcement of Class and Component s United States Department of Agriculture Dairy Programs Market Information Branch CLS-0917 September 2017 Highlights Class II was $16.80 per hundredweight for the month
More informationThe project will be conducted in partnership with the Nez Perce Tribe.
DECISION MEMO Tributary to Brushy Fork Culvert Replacements Private Land USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Powell Ranger District Nez Perce Clearwater National Forests Idaho County, Idaho I. Decision
More informationCATEGORICAL EXCLUSION REVIEW - NEPA COMPLIANCE RECORD
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT SALEM DISTRICT OFFICE Marys Peak Resource Area Lincoln County, Oregon CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION REVIEW - NEPA COMPLIANCE RECORD Project: Miami Corporation
More informationEVOLUTION OF A MEETING: 20+ YEARS OF RESEARCH COMMUNICATION AND COORDINATION
EVOLUTION OF A MEETING: 20+ YEARS OF RESEARCH COMMUNICATION AND COORDINATION Michael L. McManus 1 (retired) and Kurt W. Gottschalk 2 1 USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Hamden CT 06514 2
More informationSugarbush Valley House Lift Replacement Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Eastern Region Sugarbush Valley House Lift Replacement Project Decision Memo March 2014 Green Mountain National Forest Rochester Ranger District Town
More informationFacts on Direct-to-Consumer Food Marketing
United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Marketing Service May 2009 Facts on Direct-to-Consumer Food Marketing Incorporating Data from the 2007 Census of Agriculture Written by: Adam Diamond
More informationEnvironmental Assessment for Road Diobsud Road Repairs
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region Environmental Assessment for Road Diobsud Road Repairs Contents Chapter 1 purpose of and need for action... 3 Introduction...
More informationAll Mushroom Sales Virtually Unchanged, Value Down 1 Percent
Washington, D.C. Released August 6, 005, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),, U.S. Department Agriculture. For information on call Debbie Flippin at (0) 70-350, fice hours 7:30 a.m.
More informationTree Survival 15 Years after the Ice Storm of January 1998
United States Department of Agriculture Tree Survival 15 Years after the Ice Storm of January 1998 Walter C. Shortle Kevin T. Smith Kenneth R. Dudzik Forest Service Northern Research Paper Research Station
More informationSheep and Goats Predator Loss
and Goats Predator Loss Washington, D.C. Released May 5, 0, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),, U.S. Department of Agriculture. For information on "" call Steve Anderson at 0-690-336,
More informationEfficiency and Conservation in Agricultural Water Use
Efficiency and Conservation in Agricultural Water Use Scott D. Edwards Assistant State Conservationist for Programs, June 10, 2017 As the Nation s largest water user, agriculture accounts for about 80
More informationCarson National Forest El Rito Ranger District El Rito, New Mexico Outreach Response due by close of business on March 26, 2013.
Carson National Forest El Rito, New Mexico Outreach Response due by close of business on March 26, 2013. Outreach Notice: Forestry Technician Silviculture Technician (GS-0462-05/06/07) This notification
More informationUnited States and Canadian Hogs and Pigs
United States and Canadian Hogs and Pigs Released October 28, 2004, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),, U.S. Department of Agriculture. For information on call Dan Lofthus at 202-720-3106
More informationWORKFORCE CONNECTIONS, INC. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES
WORKFORCE CONNECTIONS, INC. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES Updated 10/31/16 Workforce Connections, Inc. employment applicants, employees, program applicants and program participants have the right to enter into
More informationNRCS Progress in the Great Lakes Basin (Past, Present and Future)
NRCS Progress in the Great Lakes Basin (Past, Present and Future) 5 th National Conference for Ecosystem Restoration July 31, 2013 Mike Moorman Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Coordinator (Past) The
More informationWind Energy Development Specialist Report
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southwestern Region Cibola National Forest and National Grasslands Wind Energy Development Specialist Report Kiowa, Rita Blanca, Black Kettle and
More informationDECISION MEMO. Fall Creek Trail Reroute
DECISION MEMO Fall Creek Trail Reroute USDA Forest Service Willamette National Forest Middle Fork Ranger District Lane County, OR Township 18S, Range 3E, Section 21, Willamette Meridian DECISION It is
More informationMANTI-LA SAL NATIONAL FOREST
MANTI-LA SAL NATIONAL FOREST FERRON RANGER DISTRICT CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION REVIEW FILE NUMBER: 2240 PROJECT TITLE: Olsen-McCadden Livestock Water Development PROJECT LEAD: Steven Cox ESTIMATED DATE FOR
More informationProposed New Type and Diameter (ft)* T30N, R6E, Sec. 5, NW¼ NW¼- South Fork Clear Creek. Diameter (ft)
DECISION MEMO CLEAR CREEK CULVERTS REPLACEMENTS USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Moose Creek Ranger District, Nez Perce National Forest Idaho County, Idaho I. Decision I have decided to authorize replacement
More informationForest Resources of the Black Hills National Forest
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station August 22 Forest Resources of the Black Hills National Forest Larry T. DeBlander About the author Larry T. DeBlander
More informationANALYSIS OF MILK MOVEMENTS FROM DAIRY FARMS TO MILK PROCESSING PLANTS: MAY 2016 PACIFIC NORTHWEST ORDER. Staff Paper John Mykrantz.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service 1930-220 th Street SE, Ste. 102 Dairy Programs Bothell, WA 98021 Phone: (425) 487-6009 FEDERAL MILK ORDERS 124 & 131 Fax: (425) 487-2775
More informationRocky Mountain Regional Office
Forest Service File Code: 1570 Route To: Rocky Mountain Regional Office 740 Simms Street Golden, CO 80401-4702 Voice: 303-275-5350 TDD: 303-275-5367 Date: June 13, 2013 Subject: To: Recommendation Memorandum
More informationLand Values and Cash Rents
United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service Land Values and Cash Rents 2009 Summary August 2009 ISSN: 19491867 Contents Agricultural Land Values Highlights... 4 U.
More informationPROPOSED ACTION Cooperative Horse Removal with Fort McDermitt Paiute-Shoshone Tribe
PROPOSED ACTION Cooperative Horse Removal with Fort McDermitt Paiute-Shoshone Tribe Proposed Action The Santa Rosa Ranger District of the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest is proposing to remove all unauthorized
More informationLYLE FREES Water Quality Specialist, NRCS Phone:
Water Issues in Kansas Lyle Frees Water Quality Specialist, NRCS 2007 Insurance Workshop Policy and Structural Changes Affecting Agricultural Risk November 8, 2007 Courtyard by Marriott Salina, Kansas
More informationARTIN BASIN RANGELAND
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Intermountain Region Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Santa Rosa Ranger District RECORD OF DECISION FOR THE MARTIN BASIN RANGELAND MANAGEMENT PROJECT
More informationDecision Memo. National Ecological Observatory Network Long Term Research Project
National Ecological Observatory Network Long Term Research Project USDA, Forest Service National Forests in Alabama Talladega National Forest Oakmulgee District Bibb and Hale County, Alabama Summary I
More informationCOMMERCIAL ITEM DESCRIPTION SUGAR, REFINED, WHITE AND SUGAR, BROWN
METRIC A-A-20135D December 30, 2009 SUPERSEDING A-A-20135C August 20, 2003 COMMERCIAL ITEM DESCRIPTION SUGAR, REFINED, WHITE AND SUGAR, BROWN The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has authorized the
More informationA Comparison of Two Estimates of Standard Error for a Ratio-of-Means Estimator for a Mapped-Plot Sample Design in Southeast Alaska
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Research Note PNW-RN-532 June 2002 A Comparison of Two Estimates of Standard Error for a Ratio-of-Means Estimator
More informationDECISION MEMO IDAHO DREAM PLAN OF OPERATIONS
Page 1 of 7 BACKGROUND DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Dillon Ranger District Beaverhead County The project area is included in the Ermont Mining District in T5S R11W Section 36 and T6S R11W Section
More informationStream Reaches and Hydrologic Units
Chapter United States 6 Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Chapter 6 Stream Reaches and Hydrologic Units Rain clouds Cloud formation Precipitation Surface runoff Evaporation
More informationUsers Guide for Noble Fir Bough Cruiser
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Report PNW-GTR-644 July 2005 Users Guide for Noble Fir Bough Cruiser Roger D. Fight, Keith A.
More informationScoping Document. Precious Minerals Mining and Refining Corporation East Walker Clay Mine Expansion Project Lyon County, Nevada
Scoping Document Precious Minerals Mining and Refining Corporation East Walker Clay Mine Expansion Project Lyon County, Nevada United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service USDA Forest Service
More information