The COLA Experience. A Partnership to Save the Lake

Transcription

1 The COLA Experience A Partnership to Save the Lake

2 State Map

3 County map

4 Lake map Lac Courte Oreilles Watershed 68,990 ac Lac Courte Oreilles

5 Hayward Round L Grindstone L LCO Sand L Whitefish L

6 Lac Courte Oreilles A very sensitive lake 5,039 acre --8 th largest natural drainage lake in Wisconsin, Classified: oligotrophic, Outstanding Resource Water (ORW) Max. depth 95 ft, Avg. depth ft, stratified two-story cold/cool/warm water fishery 68,990 acre watershed--84% forest /water/wetland 4% urban, 4% animal/crop agriculture Current condition: TP 10 ppb, Chl-a --2 ppb, Secchi--14 feet

7 WATER QUALITY # 1 THE 8 TH LARGEST LAKE IN THE STATE IS ON THE VERGE OF IRREVERSIBLE DECLINE OF ITS WATER QUALITY WHY? EXCESSIVE IN-FLOW OF NUTRIENTS PRIMARILY PHOSPHORUS

8

9

10

11

12

13

14 History of COLA In the early 1960 s Lac Courte Oreilles Protective Association formed Concerned about water quality, clarity, water levels, native plants and animals Funded first lake study of water quality BARR study (1996) est. base line nutrient study In 1995 COLA established as the official lake organization

15 History of LCOFI The Lac Courte Oreilles Foundation Inc. was founded in 2009 as a 501 (c) (3) non-profit Primary purpose is the protection, preservation, and restoration of the water quality of LCO COFI raises and uses funds to stop pollution, restore habitat, research and study water quality issues, combat AIS, and educate people about proper lake stewardship

16 LCO Tribe Tribe monitors water quality on all lakes within the reservation COLA partners with the Tribe Conservation Dept Water quality testing - Major input Tribe hired to complete grant funded studies on the lake On-going and detailed monitoring of Musky Bay water quality

17 Tribal boundary line LCO TRIBAL LANDS

18 COLA Actions Staff and fund Clean Boats inspection program at DNR boat landing Monitor and treat AIS Purchase and maintain buoys Fish stocking Purchase and place fish cribs Water quality/clarity testing Lakes studies, grants, and plans Shoreland monitoring COLA officially supported previous litigation COLA e-blasts members on important issues affecting the lake Annual picnic for members and guests

19 COFI Activities Raise funds for COLA activities Promote the education and awareness of lake issues to restore water quality Fund outside studies of lake i.e.. Turtle study Fund AIS treatments K per year

20 COFI Fund Raising Brochure

21 COFI Fund Raising Brochure

22 CHALLENGES FOR LCO THE 8 TH LARGEST LAKE IN THE STATE IS ON THE VERGE OF IRREVERSIBLE DECLINE OF ITS WATER QUALITY WHY? EXCESSIVE IN-FLOW OF NUTRIENTS PRIMARILY PHOSPHORUS THE PRIMARY SOURCE? CRANBERRY BOG DISCHARGES Effect of phosphorus on AIS in LCO

23

24 AIS in LCO 2009 CLP 2010 CLP

25 AIS in LCO untreated

26 POINTS OF INFLOW

27 SOURCES OF PHOSPHORUS 78% OF THE CONTROLLABLE PHOPHORUS IN-FLOW INTO MUSKY BAY IS FROM CRANBERRY BOGS

28

29

30

31

32

33

34 May 19, P levels times normal

35

36

37 May, 2010 Point source discharge pipe into the lake 40 +/- dia.

38

39

40 Major Concerns for LCO Slow degradation of water quality Explosive growth of Curly Leaf Pondweed (AIS) Fueled by excessive phosphorus inflow Changes in land use with LCO watershed Shoreland development and buffers

41 LCO and Cranberry bogs Cranberry bog discharges have the single greatest detrimental impact upon the water quality of Musky Bay and impacts LCO 15+ years of water testing, water studies, and legal action have proven this Bog discharges account for 78% of the controllable P inflow into Musky Bay Lack of meaningful regulation at local, regional, state, and federal levels

42 Cranberry Fun Facts Cranberry farms are exempt from DNR regulations related to water use cranberry law - NO regulations from DNR Cranberry farms do not report pesticide use only ag crop in State that does not (Lake Tides, Vol. 34, No.2 spring 2009) Cran Assoc advocates BMP #447 Tail water recovery system- 250 farms - only 12 use this BMP (2009). Their marketing leads you to believe all do NOT sustainable farming environmental impacts to surface waters

43 Cranberry Fun Facts pg 2 Cran Assoc has its own in-house liaison to NRCS Why does no other ag entity have a liaison? Great for marketing? OR do they have special conservation needs?

44 If we can t eliminate the controllable phosphorus inputs into the lake How will this affect us? Property Values Water Quality Watershed degradation Regional economics

45 The Lake Economy

46 WATER QUALITY- PROPERTY VALUES AS WATER QUALITY DEGRADES PROPERTY VALUES DECLINE AS LAKEFRONT PROPERTY VALUES DECLINE NON-LAKEFRONT TAXES GO UP

47 Competition for Travel and Tourism $ Travel and tourism relies upon discretionary dollars that can be spent in other competing areas for better (1) quality products and (2) quality of experience. Water Quality is Job #1. Northwood Charm product must compete against other states & Canada. Survey Respondents: 28% WI, 49% MN, 11% IL, OH, FL, KY, AZ, KS, GA, TX, HI, Mexico

48 Economic Survey (2009) 219 Respondents (out of 650) Northwood Charm has economic value Real estate value linked to clarity ~84,000 Visitor Days ~$11 to $15 million per year to local economy Average Family Spends ~$16,000/year

49 COLA Resident Expenditures: Significant (and Shouldn t Be Takenfor-Granted!) Dollars largely generated from out-of-region sources

50 COLA Real-Estate & Taxes(2009) $331 million tabulated Fair Market Value ~ 85% seasonal, 15% year-round residents $2.9 million local taxes ~ $ 2 million cranberry - FMV ~ $ 15,000 + cranberry taxes Watershed estimates - ~ 1.18 Billion dollars FMV ~10.4 million local taxes

51 Survey Results 93% Pursue Water-Based Recreation Boat, swim, fish strongly related to water quality 77% Perceived Excellent Water Quality at purchase 59% Perceive Water Quality Worse Today

52 Long-Term Considerations: Community Stability: 57% Long-term Family Ownership, 11% Plan Retirement Water quality strongly influences long-term ownership intent, based on loss of clarity 20% would not stay if lost avg 2-3 feet 49% would not stay if lost avg 4-6 feet 61% would not stay if lost avg 7-10 feet

53 LCO Lake Management Plan To achieve the water goals, COLA must address the following five management areas over the coming years and decades: 1. Cranberry Discharge 2. Changing land use in the LCO Watershed 3. LCO Shore Land Development and buffer areas 4. Invasive Species Management 5. Lake and Stream Monitoring 6. Establish a watershed coalition of all lake Assoc.

54 The Solution? Best Management Practice #447 Tail Water Recovery Systems

55 YOUR LAKE Do you have degraded water quality/clarity on your Lake? Is there excessive growth of native and invasive plants? Look around - is there a cranberry bog draining into your lake? Is there a bog upstream in your watershed? Grindstone Lake examples (1700 ppb measured)