Overview of the Revised Minnesota Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Plan. Bruce Montgomery and numerous staff at the MN Department of Agriculture
|
|
- Veronica Campbell
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Overview of the Revised Minnesota Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Plan Bruce Montgomery and numerous staff at the MN Department of Agriculture
2 Trends in Acres of Leaky Crop Rotations and Nitrogen Fertilizer Sales Acreages of Leaky Crops (Millions) Cumulative Acres of Corn, Soybeans, Edible Beans, and Potatoes Statewide Nitrogen Fertilizer Sales Tons of Nitrogen
3 An Outcome of the 1989 Groundwater Protection Act- Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Plan (NFMP) The NFMP is the state s blueprint for minimizing groundwater impacts from the use of nitrogen fertilizer
4 The NFMP (1990) provided the framework for a variety of activities including.. Development of voluntary Best Management Practices (BMPs); Promotion of BMPs via education and demonstration projects; Evaluation of BMP adoption and effectiveness; and A process for going to regulations if BMP implementation steps are proven ineffective
5 The NFMP Review Process The NFMP just went through an extensive two-year review process with the assistance of numerous organizations and agencies
6 NFMP Advisory Committee Agricultural Water Resources Center (MAWRC) Area II Potato Growers Council Corn Growers Association (MCGA) Crop Production Retailers (MCPR) Minnesota Independent Crop Consultant Association (MICCA) Board of Soil and Water Resources (BWSR) Department of Health (MDH) Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Quality Board (EQB) The Nature Conservatory (TNC) The Freshwater Society Dakota County Water Management Rock County Land Management Office / SWCD Fillmore SWCD UM, Department of Soil, Water and Climate UM Extension UM Water Resource Center
7 Currently in the Public Review Process Comment period August 2 November 1 View draft plan at:
8 Basic Concept of the NFMP Voluntary Regulatory Nitrate Levels Acceptable Not Acceptable BMP Adoption Acceptable Not Acceptable
9 MDA has a 20+ Year History Working with Farmers and Communities Many tools and approaches in the revised NFMP were developed from successes learned from a small number of Source Water Protection Areas (public water suppliers)
10 Revised NFMP: Clear Definition of Prevention & Mitigation Phases Prevention Phase One Phase Two Phase Three Phase Four Nitrate Levels Increasing BMP Adoption Acceptable or Undetermined Not Acceptable Regulatory Status Voluntary Regulatory
11 Prevention Designation will Cover a Vast Majority of Minnesota Phase Develop Phase a new Nitrogen Phase Phase Prevention One Fertilizer Two Education Three and Four Promotion Team to support and coordinate Develop a Nitrogen prevention Fertilizer activities Acceptable Integrate Education prevention and Promotion activities Team with to support other water and coordinate protection activities prevention such activities; as local water Undetermined plans, Integrate watershed prevention plans activities and source with other water water protection protection plans (surface waters) activities such as local water Voluntary plans, watershed plans and source water protection plans Nitrate Levels BMP Adoption Regulatory Status
12 NFMP Priorities: 1) Source Water Protection Areas (groundwater) 2) Private wells within impacted townships demonstrating local support and capacity
13 Other New Features of the NFMP Includes a process for accelerating the knowledge on the severity and magnitude of current NO 3 -N concentrations in private wells; Will use GIS data layers to help identified problematic areas; Will now operate primarily on a township scale for most activities;
14 New NFMP Feature: Clear Definition of Nitrate Criteria within the Mitigation Phases Phase One Phase Two Phase Three Phase Four Nitrate Levels Increasing % Number of Private Wells 5% or More Above 10 mg/l OR 10% or More Above 7 mg/l 10% or More Above 10 mg/l 15% or More Above 10 mg/l
15 Ambitious Nitrate Assessment Goals: Characterizing Townships Private wells within townships may be at risk; MDA and local partners will be assessing townships over the next two years; If funding continues to be available, ALL identified townships will be tested in six years (70,000 households)
16 Homeowner Participation is the Cornerstone of the Township Testing Approach Through direct mailings, we can quickly conduct a township snapshot based upon a response rate typically between 30-60%
17 Prior to Making a Phase Determination, the Data Must be Reviewed and Screened If more than 5% of the participating wells are greater than 10 mg/l then some additional investigation and data analysis is required; Wells impacted by other potential sources, such as septics and adjacent feedlots, need to be screened out of the data sets; Additional guidance provided in Appendix H
18 A Township has been found to have ambient nitrate levels exceeding the new NFMP criteria.. Now What? This township is now classified as either a Phase 1 or Phase 2 Phase One Phase Two Phase Three Phase Four % Number of Private Wells 5% or More Above 10 mg/l OR 10% or More Above 7 mg/l 10% or More Above 10 mg/l 15% or More Above 10 mg/l
19 Local Involvement is Critical in ALL Phases Local Advisory Team including local government; Participation of local farmers and their crop advisors is critical; and Site specific strategies are needed We will have more detailed discussions about the potential role of SWCD, Environmental Health Offices and Township Boards at the upcoming MN Association of SWCD Annual Meetings in December
20 Successful BMP Adoption? Additional Details A few words about BMP Adoption. Accurate Assessment is Critical in Phase One LIMITED INFO COLLECTED Based upon input from ag retailers and crop consultants Phases 2,3 and 4 Phase Two Either already YES or after successful educational efforts Benchmark Conducted and Subsequent Assessments Verify Adoption Phase Three NO Based upon Assessments in Phase Two and Current Required Reporting Phase Four NO Based upon Assessments in Phase Two and Current Required Reporting
21 The NFMP Highly Dependent on Voluntary BMPs As long as farmers readily adopt these cost effective practices, it is very unlikely regulations on nitrogen fertilizers will be developed
22 Revised NFMP. Recognition of the Limitation of BMPs in Highly Vulnerable Areas Some highly groundwater sensitive areas, despite 100% adoption of BMPs, may not be adequately protected from nitrate contamination; The concept of Alternative Management Tools should be considered;
23 Alternative Management Tools Alternative Management Tools (AMTs) go beyond BMPs in terms of reducing nitrate leaching losses; Frequently, AMTs are not economical for the producer; Will usually require external funding; and They tend to be very site specific in nature
24 Examples of Alternative Management Tools Introduction of perennials or CRP into targeted areas (Perham and Verdi); CRP/Hunting Preserve Example (Holland); Introduction of lower nitrogen use potato varieties (Perham and Park Rapids); Land swapping (Perham); Installing easements in sensitive areas
25 When Does the NFMP Go Regulatory? Phase One Phase Two Phase Three Phase Four Nitrate Levels Successful BMP Adoption? If 5% water or More of quality is not Wells Above 10 acceptable and 10% farmers or More mg/l OR have Above 10 mg/l 10% chosen Above not to adopt 7 mg/l the voluntary BMPs, MDA will take the lead in developing YES NOT DETERMINED Benchmark Conducted rules in accordance and Subsequent with Assessments the processes and guidance outlined in the Groundwater Protection Act Regulatory Status Voluntary Voluntary 10% or More Above 10 mg/l NO Based upon Assessments in Phase Two and Current Required Reporting Example: Mandatory Reporting 15% Above 10 mg/l NO Based upon Assessments in Phase Two and Current Required Reporting Example: Mandatory Reporting And Restricted Practices
26 Transition from Phase 2 to Phase 3/4 What Are the Timelines for BMP Adoption? The Revised Plan proposes that a period of not less than one crop rotation to allow for the adoption of BMPs The local advisory team will need to decide if the education/awareness was sufficient
27 In a Nutshell, Revised NFMP. Phase One Phase Two Phase Three Phase Four Nitrate Levels 5% or More of Wells Above 10 mg/l OR 10% Above 7 mg/l 10% or More Above 10 mg/l 15% Above 10 mg/l Successful BMP Adoption? NOT DETERMINED YES Benchmark Conducted and Subsequent Assessments NO Based upon Assessments in Phase Two and Current Required Reporting NO Based upon Assessments in Phase Two and Current Required Reporting Regulatory Status Voluntary Voluntary Example: Mandatory Reporting Example: Mandatory Reporting And Restricted Practices
28 Take Home Messages We believe that the Plan is a logical and flexible approach for dealing with a very complex system; The revised Plan is built upon the knowledge gained from the 20 years of experience working with farmers and communities; The Plan is heavily dependent upon education and local problem solving; and Township Testing will be the launching pad for the NFMP characterizing current nitrate conditions in private wells across townships
29 Thank You!
30 Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
31 Report finalized June 2013 Others
32 Prompted study 2010 Legislative Session Laws Ch. 361 Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia Task Force Action Plan
33 Why we did this study Minnesota waters Downstream waters Aquatic life toxicity MPCA developing standards (2015) Drinking water in streams 15 streams exceed cold water standard Gulf of Mexico - hypoxia Lake Winnipeg algae blooms Iowa Rivers drinking water
34 Total Nitrogen in Rivers Organic nitrogen Ammonium Ammonia Total Nitrate Nitrite
35 Nitrate is dominant form in high- nitrogen rivers 140 Total Nitrogen Load 20 Yr Avg Annual (Million lbs) organic N Ammonium-N Nitrite+Nitrate-N 0 Minnesota R. Jordan St. Croix R. Stillwater Miss. R. Anoka
36 Discussion areas Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
37 Stream nitrate concentrations (90 th Percentiles ) Very low: <1 mg/l Low Medium: 3-5 mg/l High Exceeds 10 mg/l Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
38 Watershed nitrogen yields ( monitoring) Very low <2.3 lbs/ac/yr Low Medium High Highest 12+ lbs/ac/yr Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
39 SPARROW model nitrogen yield Very Low <1.4 lb/ac/yr 1/3 watersheds = 3/4 load to Mississippi Low Medium High Highest 12+ lb/ac/yr Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
40 Nitrogen Loads long-term average Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
41 Twin Cities region added 3.5% to river nitrogen load Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
42 Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
43 Nitrogen Sources Cropland groundwater Cropland tile drainage Cropland runoff Domestic wastewater Industrial wastewater Urban stormwater Septic systems Forests Atmospheric deposition Barnyard runoff Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
44 Cropland Groundwater Source Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
45 Cropland Tile Drainage Source Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
46 Statewide nitrogen sources to surface waters Urban Stormwater 1% Septic 2% Forests 7% Feedlot runoff <1% Atmospheric 9% Point sources 9% Cropland groundwater 30% Cropland runoff 5% Cropland tile drainage 37% Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
47 Nitrogen sources to surface waters Annual Nitrogen Load (million lbs) WW Point Sources Atmospheric Feedlot Runoff Septic Systems Urban Runoff Forest Cropland Runoff Tile Drainage Cropland Groundwater 10 0 Cedar River Des Moines River Lake Superior Lower Minnesota Mississippi River River Missouri River Conditions Sources Trends Reductions Rainy River Red River of the North St. Croix River Upper Mississippi River
48 Nitrogen source differences between basins Atmospheric Other NPS 3% 2% Forest 1% Crop Runoff 4% Point Sources 5% Minnesota River Cropland Groundwater 18% Other NPS 2% Forest 2% Atmospheric 2% Crop Runoff 9% Point Sources 5% Lower Mississippi Cropland Tile Drainage 67% Cropland Tile Drainage 23% Cropland Groundwater 57% Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
49 Comparing nitrogen loads 200 Dry year Annual TN Load (million lbs) River Monitoring Sum of Sources - Minnesota River Red River of the North St. Croix River Upper Mississippi River 200 Ave. year Annual TN Load (million lbs) Minnesota River Red River of the North St. Croix River Upper Mississippi River 200 Wet year Annual TN Load (million lbs) Minnesota River Red River of the North St. Croix River Upper Mississippi River Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
50 N source estimates similar to other findings Urban Stormwater 1% Point sources 9% Atmospheric 9% Septic 2% Forests 7% Feedlot runoff <1% Cropland groundwater 30% 1. Watershed monitoring 2. Literature reviews Cropland runoff 5% 3. Statistical and non-statistical analyses Cropland tile drainage 37% 4. U.S. Geological Survey Model (SPARROW) 5. Modeling in Minnesota River Basin (HSPF) Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
51 Highest nitrate watersheds have the most row crops and tiling Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
52 Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
53 Mississippi River nitrate doubled or more since 1976 Increase Decrease No trend Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
54 Nitrate Concentrations Flow Adjusted Increase Decrease No trend to River Monitoring Sites 11 Decrease No trend Increase Recent Trends 52 River Monitoring Sites Decrease No trend Increase Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
55 Minnesota River nitrate high recent improvement Increase Decrease No trend Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
56 Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
57 Percent nitrogen reduction in treated area Riparian corn to perennials Marginal lands to perennials Crop crop (average) Cover crop (successful) Vegetative cover Extended rotations Wetlands Bioreactors Controlled drainage Tile water treatment Nitrification inhibitor Fert. timing & rate Reduced fert. Rates Fertilizer management Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
58 Percent N reduction to waters statewide Riparian corn to perennials Marginal lands to perennials Crop crop (average) Cover crop (successful) Extended rotations Wetlands Bioreactors Controlled drainage Nitrification inhibitor Fert. timing & rate Reduced fert. Rates Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
59 Reducing cropland nitrogen losses to surface waters statewide 35 % N Reduction (from cropland) Saving $77 Million Optimal fertilizer rate and timing $74 Million Saving $77 Million Fert. mgmt + tile drainage BMPs $1 Billion $74 Million Saving $77 Million Fert. mgmt + tile BMPs + vegetation BMPs Vegetation changes Tile drainage BMPs Fertilizer mgmt. optimized Cost estimates subject to change with fluctuating markets Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
60 Nitrogen reduction potential and costs vary by watershed $37 M [$4 M saved] Root River watershed $29 M $5 M [$2 M saved] LeSueur River watershed Vegetation changes Tile drainage BMPs Fertilizer mgmt optimized Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
61 Reducing nitrogen in wastewater discharges 9% of nitrogen load to rivers Can reduce by 35-65% Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
62 Conclusions 1 High nitrate in Southern Minnesota cropland nitrate leaching to tile lines and groundwater 2 Concentrations increasing in Mississippi R since mid-1970 s Minnesota River high may be stabilizing/decreasing 3 Can reduce nitrogen losses to rivers: 15-20% through fertilizer mgmt + tile water treatment More vegetative cover needed for further reductions
63 Questions?
64 Sources to soils Note: Do not equate with sources to waters Conditions Sources Trends Reductions
65 Quantifying In-stream Biological Nitrogen Uptake Amy Hansen University of Minnesota
66 Eagle Creek: Ali Khosronejad, Kris Guentzel, Jessica Kozarek, Fotis Sotiropoulos, Miki Hondzo, Peter Wilcock, Dan Baker, Jacques Finlay Minnesota River: Jacques Finlay, Christy Dolph, Brent Dalzell Funding:
67 Synthesis of 3 studies: 1. Field sampling Le Seuer River basin 2. Analysis of long term monitoring data Minnesota River Basin 3. Reach scale injection experiment Eagle Creek, Savage MN
68 Motivation: nitrogen loading is high Robertson and Saad, 2011.
69 Excess nitrate has negative consequences
70 Motivation: nitrate is increasing Nitrate (mg/l) (Shakopee) Month Nitrate flux (kg/hr) Month Randall & Mulla 2001
71 Background N out : Denitrification N in : Upstream Run-off Groundwater N out : Downstream Groundwater Assimilation
72 1. When does nitrogen uptake occur? 2. Where does N uptake occur? 3. Is N uptake significant? 4. What is controlling the rate of N uptake?
73 Le Seuer River Basin: field sampling 100 sites including: tile outlets, ditches, streams, rivers, lakes, wetlands May Aug 2013
74 N uptake at a reach scale date hydrologic storage? change in TDN (mg/l) % change in TDN 8/13/2013 lake % 6/12/2013 lake % 8/15/2013 no % 8/13/2013 no % 8/13/2013 no % 6/12/2013 no % 6/12/2013 no % 6/12/2013 no % 6/12/2013 no % 8/15/2013 no % 7/24/2013 wetland % 7/24/2013 wetland % 6/11/2013 wetland % -negative sign indicates downstream reduction in concentration
75 Field sampling: across wetlands and lakes Wetlands Percent N reduction: 73 93% Reduction in N concentration: 16-23mg/L June - August Lakes Percent N reduction: 77 93% Reduction in N concentration: 7-11 mg/l June - August
76 Field sampling: wetland complex 5.3 mg/l
77 35 30 Dissolved organic carbon Total dissolved nitrogen DOC or TDN (mg L -1 ) Proportion wetland cover
78 Influence of carbon on denitrification rates 250 Unamended Soil den rate (mg/m2/hr) FB Lk out(n limited?) DOC (mg/l)
79 Minnesota River Basin: monitoring data mass balance Data selection criteria: Date matched Less than 10% change in discharge Lateral flow outward Where: MN River Maple River Le Seuer River
80 Mass balance from monitoring data C US Q US C LAT Q LAT C DS Q DS (mass out) = (mass in) (biological uptake) C DS Q DS + C LAT Q LAT = C US Q US -B
81 Le Seuer River: St. Clair to Rapidan (~16.8 km) Maple River: Sterling Center to Rapidan (~14.5km) Fraction removed Le Seuer River: Month Fraction N removed Maple River: Month
82 Minnesota River: St Peter - Henderson 100 % nitrate removed 50 0 Aug-76 Aug-86 Aug-96 Aug-06 Henderson St Peter
83 Eagle Creek Minnesota River basin, urban Spring fed, shady, natural trout stream Sand and gravel, large woody debris present 130 m reach Tracer additions Conservative and reactive tracers Time series (dc/dt) Quantifying uptake 1-D transport model with transient storage 3-D Navier stokes solution with LES closure
84 Reactive tracer, continuous release 1-D model with advection, dispersion, reaction and storage (OTIS from USGS) 1.5 NO3-N (mg/l) Time (hrs) 30% of nitrate mass removed within reach following Runkel (2007): 39% nitrate uptake occurring in main channel 61% nitrate uptake occurring in transient storage
85 Conservation tracer CFD simulation 3D solution to Navier Stokes equations for measured topography and substrate roughness with large eddy simulation closure scheme for subgrid scales Additional data: High resolution topographic mapping Substrate characterization
86 Is in-stream biological nitrate uptake significant? From field sampling % removal within wetlands and lakes Wetlands: biological uptake rate: 21 kg/hr/km 2 (approx area) Lakes: biological uptake rate: 2.75 kg/hr/km 2 (Freeborn Lake) Measured denitrification rates up to 200 kg/hr/km 2 From mass balance on monitoring data: 0-80 % removal within ~20 km reach Biological uptake rate: 0 60 kg/hr (per reach) High temporal variability! From Eagle Creek enrichment experiment: 30% of nitrate mass removed (130m reach) Biological uptake rate: 1.24 kg/hr/km (~300 kg/hr/km 2 ) High sub-reach spatial heterogeneity Need to normalize by area to compare!
87 Conclusions Surprisingly high springtime nitrate uptake rates Large reductions in nitrate concentrations across wetlands and lakes and transient storage (consistent with other studies) Potentially carbon limited denitrification at many sites Biological nitrate uptake could be enhanced through increased carbon supply and additional storage
88 Thank you. Questions? Contact information: Amy Hansen, References: OTIS: Clarke, 1924 The composition of the River and lake waters of the United States, USGS Professional paper 135 Randall GW and Mulla DJ, 2001, Nitrate nitrogen in surface waters as influenced by climatic conditions and agricultural practices, Journal of Enivronmental Quality30:2, Runkel RL, Toward a transport-based analysis of nutrient spiraling and uptake in streams, LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY-METHODS Volume: 5 Pages: Robertson, D.M. and D.A. Saad, Nutrient Inputs to the Laurentian Great Lakes by Source and Watershed Estimated Using SPARROW Watershed Models. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) 47(5): DOI: /j x
89
90 Maple River: Fraction N removed Month Uptake rate (kg/hr/km) Maple River: Month 0.9 Le Seuer River: Le Seuer River: Fraction removed Month Uptake rate (kg/hr/km) Month
Nitrate, Well Testing and Rules
Nitrate, Well Testing and Rules Where is all this heading? February 7, 2017 Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division Minnesota Department of Agriculture Outline Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Plan
More informationD1. Sources of Nitrogen Results Overview
D1. Sources of Nitrogen Results Overview Author: Dave Wall (MPCA), incorporating results from Chapters D4 by David J. Mulla et al. (UMN), Chapter D2 by Steve Weiss (MPCA), and Chapter D3 by Dave Wall and
More informationStrategies for nitrate reduction: The Cedar River Case Study
2010 Integrated Crop Management Conference - Iowa State University 195 Strategies for nitrate : The Cedar River Case Study Matthew J. Helmers, associate professor, Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering,
More informationNew Practices for Nutrient Reduction: STRIPs and Saturated Buffers. Matthew Helmers and Tom Isenhart Iowa State University
New Practices for Nutrient Reduction: STRIPs and Saturated Buffers Matthew Helmers and Tom Isenhart Iowa State University Situation Increasing concern for local and regional waters Substantial demand for
More informationB1. Monitoring Stream Nitrogen Concentrations
B1. Monitoring Stream Nitrogen Concentrations Author: David Wall, MPCA Assistance with project design, data analysis and mapping provided by: David Lorenz, Abigail Tomasek, and Chris Sanocki (U.S. Geologic
More informationGroundwater Protection Rule Framework March 2018
Groundwater Protection Rule Framework March 2018 Purpose of This Meeting We want you leave this meeting with an understanding of the rule framework, timeline, opportunities for involvement, and the tools
More informationReport on Nitrate in Groundwater
Report on Nitrate in Groundwater 625 Robert St. N., St. Paul, MN 55155 June 2016 In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, this information is available in alternative forms of communication
More information6.1 Recommended Overarching Actions to Support Nutrient Reduction Strategy Implementation
Chapter 6 Nutrient Reduction Strategies The (NRS) is intended to provide a roadmap as to the type of implementation activities that could be used to achieve the goals and milestones for reducing excess
More informationNitrate Load Reduction Strategies for the Raccoon and Des Moines Rivers. Keith Schilling, Calvin Wolter Iowa DNR Geological and Water Survey
Nitrate Load Reduction Strategies for the Raccoon and Des Moines Rivers Keith Schilling, Calvin Wolter Iowa DNR Geological and Water Survey Outline of Presentation Background of nitrate impairments Nitrate
More informationIllinois Farmers as Nutrient Stewards: Opportunities via the Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy
Illinois Farmers as Nutrient Stewards: Opportunities via the Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy IFB Commodities Conference July 30, 2014 Lauren Lurkins Director of Natural and Environmental Resources
More informationExecutive Summary Nitrogen in Minnesota Surface Waters
z c Executive Summary Nitrogen in Minnesota Surface Waters Conditions, trends, sources, and reductions June 2013 Prepared by the, in collaboration with the University of Minnesota and U.S. Geological Survey
More informationMississippi River/Gulf of Mexico Watershed Nutrient Task Force Timeline for Reassessment Revised 9/5/06. Revised 9/5/06. Symposia.
Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico Extent of Hypoxia in the Gulf Reassessment of the Science & Revision of the Action Plan Frequency of Occurrence 1985-1999 Rabalais, et al. Summer Hypoxia Dissolved Oxygen
More informationLocal Water Quality and Watersheds. Raccoon River & Des Moines River Watersheds. Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico: Implications and Strategies for Iowa
Local Water Quality and Watersheds Raccoon River & Des Moines River Watersheds Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico: Implications and Strategies for Iowa October 16, 2008 Ames, Iowa Chris Jones and Roger Wolf
More informationNorth Dakota s Nutrient Reduction Strategy. Presented to the 2016 ND Water Quality Monitoring Conference March 4, 2016
North Dakota s Nutrient Reduction Strategy Presented to the 2016 ND Water Quality Monitoring Conference March 4, 2016 Nutrients Nutrients, in appropriate amounts, are essential to the growth and health
More informationMPCA Update. Minnesota Association of County Planning and Zoning Administrators. John Linc Stine. Commissioner
Minnesota Association of County Planning and Zoning Administrators MPCA Update John Linc Stine Commissioner Our Mission: Protect and improve the environment and enhance human health October 4, 2013 Assess,
More informationNitrate-N Loss Reduction: Scale of In- Field and Edge-of-Field Practice Implementation to Reach Water Quality Goals
Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Nitrate-N Loss Reduction: Scale of In- Field and Edge-of-Field Practice Implementation to Reach Water Quality Goals Matthew Helmers Dean s Professor,
More informationNitrate in Trout Brook
Nitrate in Trout Brook Dakota County, Minnesota Prepared by Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District, March 2014 Introduction Trout Brook is a trout stream in Dakota County, Minnesota. It is
More informationIowa Senate Natural Resources Committee February 3, 2015
Iowa Senate Natural Resources Committee February 3, 2015 Dr. Matthew Helmers Dean s Professor, College of Agriculture & Life Sciences Professor, Department of Agricultural & Biosystems Engineering mhelmers@iastate.edu,
More informationNatural Resources & Environmental Stewardship
Natural Resources & Environmental Stewardship Fundamentals of Nutrient Management Melissa L. Wilson Department of Environmental Science & Technology Ag Nutrient Management Program University of Maryland,
More informationSaturated Buffer. Subsurface Drainage PURPOSE N REDUCTION LOCATION COST BARRIERS
Saturated Buffer To intercept tile drainage prior to discharging to surface waters and redistribute the water laterally in the soil profile of the streamside buffer. Subsurface drainage, also known as
More informationWater Plans. Water Plans: Houston County LWMP amended 2012 Winona County LWMP
Mississippi River La Crescent Watershed: Water Plans The Mississippi River La Crescent Watershed encompasses Houston and Winona Counties. Each county has developed a 10-year rotating comprehensive local
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
p-ear2-59b STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED HEARTLAND HUTTERIAN BRETHREN, INC. FEEDLOT
More informationA Presentation of the 2013 Drainage Research Forum. November 14, 2013 SDSU Extension Regional Center Sioux Falls, SD
A Presentation of the 2013 Drainage Research Forum November 14, 2013 SDSU Extension Regional Center Sioux Falls, SD 1 Integrated Drainage and Wetland Landscape Systems Challenges & Opportunities Shawn
More informationAgricultural/Rural Riparian Buffer Analysis
Agricultural/Rural Riparian Buffer Analysis December 2014 Executive Summary The Agricultural/Rural Riparian Buffer Analysis was developed from a 2014 analysis of current requirements for the riparian areas
More informationAppendix 12. Pollutant Load Estimates and Reductions
Appendix 12. Pollutant Load Estimates and Reductions A pollutant loading is a quantifiable amount of pollution that is being delivered to a water body. Pollutant load reductions can be calculated based
More informationComfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District Six Lakes Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan
Prepared by: for the Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District Six Lakes Total Maximum Daily Load February 16, 2010
More informationBest Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTH-CENTRAL MINNESOTA
N Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTH-CENTRAL MINNESOTA B E S T M A N AG E M E N T P R AC T I C E S F O R N I T R O G E N A P P L I C AT I O N Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use
More informationWisconsin Wastewater Operators Association. Protecting Our Water Resources: The Future Bill Hafs - NEW Water 10/2014
Wisconsin Wastewater Operators Association Protecting Our Water Resources: The Future Bill Hafs - NEW Water 10/2014 The Fox River Contributes 1/3 of All Nutrients to Lake Michigan APRIL 15, 2011 Photo
More informationNitrogen Management on Sandy Soils: Review of BMPs. Carl Rosen Department of Soil Water and Climate University of Minnesota
Nitrogen Management on Sandy Soils: Review of BMPs Carl Rosen Department of Soil Water and Climate University of Minnesota Central MN Irrigation Workshop Thumper Pond, Ottertail, MN February 25, 2014 Topics
More informationAgriculture and the Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia Issue
Agriculture and the Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia Issue Presented to the Nutrients and Environment Conference, Mankato, MN February 18, 2010 by C.S. Snyder, PhD, CCA Nitrogen Program Director EPA s Scope of fthe
More informationModeling Nutrient and Sediment Losses from Cropland D. J. Mulla Dept. Soil, Water, & Climate University of Minnesota
Modeling Nutrient and Sediment Losses from Cropland D. J. Mulla Dept. Soil, Water, & Climate University of Minnesota Watershed Management Framework Identify the problems and their extent Monitor water
More informationRegional Watershed Planning. Calumet Summit 2010: A Call to Connect Calumet Conference Center April 27, 2010
Regional Watershed Planning Calumet Summit 2010: A Call to Connect Calumet Conference Center April 27, 2010 Basins The Calumet Region Watershed Communities Land Cover- 2006 Impervious Cover 303d Listed
More informationBest Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTHWESTERN AND WEST-CENTRAL MINNESOTA
N Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTHWESTERN AND WEST-CENTRAL MINNESOTA B E S T M A N AG E M E N T P R AC T I C E S F O R N I T R O G E N A P P L I C AT I O N Best Management Practices
More informationNutrient Management in. A presentation to the West Metro Water Alliance
Nutrient Management in Developing and Agricultural Areas A presentation to the West Metro Water Alliance Chris Meehan, P.E. May 25, 2011 Agenda Physical Improvements Planning Improvements How to get it
More informationSpring Nutrient Flux to the Gulf of Mexico and Nutrient Balance in the Mississippi River Basin
Spring Nutrient Flux to the Gulf of Mexico and Nutrient Balance in the Mississippi River Basin C.S. Snyder, PhD, CCA Nitrogen Program Director, Conway, AR T. Scott Murrell, PhD Director, North American
More informationImplementation of Priority CRP Conservation Practices and Estimated Nutrient Load Reductions
1 Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy Agricultural Sector/FSA CRP Program Measures Implementation of Priority CRP Conservation Practices and Estimated Nutrient Load Reductions Measure Background Visual
More informationMud Lake Lakeshed Assessment
Mud Lake Lakeshed Assessment The lakeshed vitals table identifies where to focus organizational and management efforts for each lake. Criteria were developed using limnological concepts to determine the
More informationGood Morning! Bruce Gilman Department of Environmental Conservation and Horticulture Finger Lakes Community College 3325 Marvin Sands Drive Canandaigua, New York 14424 585-785- 1255 gilmanba@flcc.edu Northern
More informationFor the full report Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy go to
For the full report Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy go to www.nutrientstrategy.iastate.edu Section 2.1 Executive Summary Iowa Science Assessment of Nonpoint Source Practices to Reduce Nitrogen and Phosphorus
More informationOtter Creek Watershed TMDL Project. Stakeholder Meeting June 6, 2013
Otter Creek Watershed TMDL Project Stakeholder Meeting June 6, 2013 1 Meeting Purpose Meet with watershed & technical advisory group members and watershed landowners to provide basic Otter Creek TMDL project
More informationLinking Water Quality and Migratory Fish Passage to Economic Contributions of Fisheries and Water Use
Insert Your Image Here Linking Water Quality and Migratory Fish Passage to Economic Contributions of Fisheries and Water Use Project/Grant Objective 1. Delineate impacts to drinking water quality from
More informationUsing Basic Chemistry in Interpreting Water Source, Age, and Trends KIMM CRAWFORD
Using Basic Chemistry in Interpreting Water Source, Age, and Trends KIMM CRAWFORD Inver Grove Heights Galena Aquifer Prairie du Chien Aquifer Inver Grove Heights Manganese Study - 2015 Almost three-quarters
More informationFertilizer Management for Plant Health and Environmental Water Quality Protection
Fertilizer Management for Plant Health and Environmental Water Quality Protection Florida and California are different but we share some problems, and solutions Nitrogen and phosphorus management for horticultural
More informationIIHR s Continuous Monitoring Network and Water Quality Information System. Chris Jones University of Iowa-IIHR
IIHR s Continuous Monitoring Network and Water Quality Information System Chris Jones University of Iowa-IIHR Unit of the College of Engineering Director: Larry Weber 90 Graduate Students from 16 countries
More informationProtecting Utah s Water Resources. Nutrient Issues
Protecting Utah s Water Resources Nutrient Issues Nutrient Issues Questions What are they? Why are they important? Nationally Locally What are the impact on my community Costs Timing What are Nutrients?
More informationSustainable Use of Groundwater in the Little Rock Creek Area. A DNR Action Plan
Sustainable Use of Groundwater in the Little Rock Creek Area A DNR Action Plan November 2017 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155-4040 888-646-6367 or 651-296-6157 mndnr.gov This information can be made
More informationRiparian Buffers and Stream Restoration
Riparian Buffers and Stream Restoration Why focus on riparian areas? Link land and water on any given site and link landscapes together in a watershed Riparian corridors protect the circulatory system
More informationHydrology and Water Quality. Water. Water 9/13/2016. Molecular Water a great solvent. Molecular Water
Hydrology and Water Quality Water Molecular Water Exists as an equilibrium But equilibrium altered by what is dissolved in it Water Molecular Water a great solvent In reality, water in the environment
More informationElm Creek Watershed (Upper Mississippi River Basin) Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy Report
Elm Creek Watershed (Upper Mississippi River Basin) Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy Report August 2015 MPCA REVIEW DRAFT Elm Creek Watershed Report Z:\Elm Creek\TMDLs\WRAPS\Elm Creek WRAPS
More informationWater Resources on PEI: an overview and brief discussion of challenges
Water Resources on PEI: an overview and brief discussion of challenges Components: Components and links Atmospheric water Surface water (including glacial water) Groundwater Links: Precipitation (atm(
More informationThe Regulatory Framework
The Regulatory Framework Water reuse project objectives How Do MN Agencies Currently Manage Water Reuse? Agency Roles Regulation by Source What Have We Heard? Agency roles and responsibilities Department
More informationWalnut Creek Watershed Management Authority. Project Kick Off March 18, 2015
Walnut Creek Watershed Management Authority Project Kick Off March 18, 2015 Agenda Schedule & Meeting Purpose Meeting Purpose TMDL Raccoon River TMDL Impaired by Nitrate and E.coli Includes Walnut Creek
More informationCover Crops and Nitrogen in Water
Cover Crops and Nitrogen in Water Minnesota Nutrient Management Conference Morton, MN February 9, 2016 USDA-ARS National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment Ames, Iowa Tom Kaspar Ben Knutson
More informationHYPOXIA IN THE GULF OF MEXICO: IMPLICATIONS AND STRATEGIES FOR IOWA
HYPOXIA IN THE GULF OF MEXICO: IMPLICATIONS AND STRATEGIES FOR IOWA October 16, 2008, Gateway Hotel and Conference Center, Iowa State University SUMMARIES OF SESSIONS Overview of Hypoxia Action Plan and
More informationWater Quality Study In the Streams of Flint Creek and Flint River Watersheds For TMDL Development
Water Quality Study In the Streams of Flint Creek and Flint River Watersheds For TMDL Development Idris Abdi Doctoral Dissertation Presentation Major Advisor: Dr. Teferi Tsegaye April 18, 2005 Alabama
More informationLake Pepin Watershed TMDL: Looking Ahead. August 2008 Sector Meetings. Lake Pepin Photo by Guy Schmickle
Lake Pepin Watershed TMDL: Looking Ahead August 2008 Sector Meetings Lake Pepin Photo by Guy Schmickle Three Questions What are the critical issues to face moving forward? How can we as a sector address
More informationAquaculture Effluents and the Environment. CS Tucker, Mississippi State University
Aquaculture Effluents and the Environment CS Tucker, Mississippi State University Characteristics of catfish pond effluents Impacts of catfish pond effluents Ways to reduce impacts of effluents What is
More informationTo 4R or Not to 4R Is There an Option?
To 4R or Not to 4R Is There an Option? August 3, 2014 Setting the Stage for 4R Nutrient Stewardship in Ontario Phosphorus in the Great Lakes with the focus on the western basin of Lake Erie. Multiple Point
More informationIIHR s Continuous Monitoring Network and Water Quality Information System. Chris Jones University of Iowa-IIHR
IIHR s Continuous Monitoring Network and Water Quality Information System Chris Jones University of Iowa-IIHR Unit of the College of Engineering Director: Larry Weber 90 Graduate Students from 16 countries
More information(including Slides from Dick Schwer & Michelle Thompson)
Updated: 17 April 2013 Print version Lecture #38 TMDLs (including Slides from Dick Schwer & Michelle Thompson) David Reckhow CEE 577 #38 1 David Reckhow CEE 577 #38 2 What is a TMDL? Total Maximum Daily
More informationMaintaining and Improving the Health of All Minnesotans
Protecting, Maintaining and Improving the Health of All Minnesotans 7/10/17 Stephanie Adams 12 Hwy 28 E St 2 Morris, MN 56267 Dear Stephanie: Subject: Initial Comment Letter, One Watershed One Plan Thank
More informationStreaming to Cleaner Water
Streaming to Cleaner Water A look at the past, present and future Doug Wetzstein Watershed Division February 23, 2013 Clean Water Act Federal Clean Water Act 72 Goal fishable/swimmable by 1983 Framework
More informationNutrients and Water Quality in the East Souris River Watershed
Nutrients and Water Quality in the East Souris River Watershed Phosphorus and nitrogen occur naturally and are important plant nutrient sources in water bodies. However, several human factors have created
More informationUMD Storm Water Program Construction Requirements. Greg Archer, MBA Environmental Compliance Specialist
UMD Storm Water Program Construction Requirements Greg Archer, MBA Environmental Compliance Specialist Phase 2 Regulatory Overview Dec. 1999 EPA issues Phase 2 Federal Register Municipalities (MS4) from
More informationA Presentation of the 2012 Drainage Research Forum. November 20, 2012 Farmamerica, Waseca MN
A Presentation of the 2012 Drainage Research Forum November 20, 2012 Farmamerica, Waseca MN 1 Evaluating water quality and quantity outcomes of switching from row crops to perennial biomass crops in a
More informationAcknowledgments. Cover photo: Blue Earth River
STATE OF THE MINNESOTA RIVER Summary of Surface Water Quality Monitoring 2000-2005 Acknowledgments The State of the River Report is a joint venture between Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota
More informationAPPENDIX H Guidance for Preparing/Reviewing CEQA Initial Studies and Environmental Impact Reports
APPENDIX H H.1 Guidance for Preparing and Reviewing CEQA Initial Studies Step 1: Consider the Project Characteristics as Provided by the Project Applicant Review the project application and draft plan
More informationWater Resources Element Appendix
Appendix Housing Unit Projection Methodology The following assumptions were used to develop the housing unit projections for each Water Resources Element. All projections described in the and this Appendix
More informationEnvironmental Information Worksheet
Environmental Information Worksheet Water System Owner (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Needs and Alternatives Provide a brief narrative that describes: Current drinking water system needs. Project
More informationStreamlines V2, n2 (May 1997) A Newsletter for North Carolina Water Supply Watershed Administrators
Page 1 of 5 STREAMLINES A Newsletter for North Carolina Water Supply Watershed Administrators Volume 2, Number 2 May 1997 Non-Point Source (NPS) Pollution This issue of Streamlines provides basic information
More informationThe national-level nutrient loading estimation tool for Finland: Watershed Simulation and Forecasting System WSFS-Vemala
The national-level nutrient loading estimation tool for Finland: Watershed Simulation and Forecasting System WSFS-Vemala Markus Huttunen, Finnish Environment Institute SYKE, HELCOM workshop on transboundary
More informationMODELING SEDIMENT AND PHOSPHORUS YIELDS USING THE HSPF MODEL IN THE DEEP HOLLOW WATERSHED, MISSISSIPPI
MODELING SEDIMENT AND PHOSPHORUS YIELDS USING THE HSPF MODEL IN THE DEEP HOLLOW WATERSHED, MISSISSIPPI Jairo Diaz-Ramirez, James Martin, William McAnally, and Richard A. Rebich Outline Background Objectives
More informationIA NRS Cost Tool Overview Tyndall & Bowman, 2016 Draft
IA NRS Cost Tool Overview Tyndall & Bowman, 2016 Draft Edge of Field Practices Riparian Forest Buffers and Vegetative Filter Strips: Riparian buffers and filter strips are strategically located vegetated
More informationMinnesota River Basin Interagency Study
650 Minnesota River Basin Interagency Study Agencies collaborate for basin water quality and ecosystem restoration in Minnesota, Iowa, North Dakota, and South Dakota A multi-state effort is underway to
More informationPhosphorus Dynamics and Mitigation in Soils
Phosphorus Dynamics and Mitigation in Soils Umass Extension - Managing Phosphorus in Organic Residuals Applied to Soils: Composts, Biosolids, Manures and Others November 2, 2016 - Marlborough, MA Jennifer
More informationLand Application and Nutrient Management
MODULE D Land Application and Nutrient Management Figure 34-13. Relationship between the concentration of dissolved P in subsurface drainage from 30 cm deep lysimeters and the Mehlich-3 extractable soil
More informationof Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico
of Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico hile information gaps still exist and several factors discussed below may contribute to hypoxia, the overwhelming scientific evidence indicates that excess nitrogen
More informationMunicipal Stormwater Management Planning
Municipal Stormwater Management Planning Christopher C. Obropta, Ph.D., P.E. Water Resources Extension Specialist with Rutgers Cooperative Extension Assistant Professor with Department of Environmental
More informationDAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2011-2015 4100 220 th Street West, Suite 102 Farmington, MN 55024 651-480-7777 www.dakotacountyswcd.org I. INTRODUCTION A. Purpose
More informationThe Clean Water Act Waters of the US Proposed Rule -- What is it and what are the implications for agriculture?
The Clean Water Act Waters of the US Proposed Rule -- What is it and what are the implications for agriculture? August 1, 2014 1 Acronyms and Terms Agencies CWA WOTUS Rule FEMA USGS Environmental Protection
More informationEUTROPHICATION. Student Lab Workbook
EUTROPHICATION Student Lab Workbook THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD 1. Research Background literature research about a topic of interest 2. Identification of a problem Determine a problem (with regards to the topic)
More informationEnvironmental Geography
Environmental Geography Lecture 13 Water Pollution Lecture 13: Water Pollution I. Water Pollution A. Groundwater B. Surface Water C. Regulation II. Water Use in California 1 I. Water Pollution Types of
More informationENHANCING AND PROTECTING WATER QUALITY, QUANTITY, AND SUPPLY
FLORIDA EXTENSION INITIATIVE #2: ENHANCING AND PROTECTING WATER QUALITY, QUANTITY, AND SUPPLY STATEWIDE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS IN URBAN WATER QUALITY SITUATION Florida is uniquely characterized by its numerous
More informationLake of the Woods TMDL: Update and Next Steps November 21, 2017
Lake of the Woods TMDL: Update and Next Steps November 21, 2017 Outline Where we ve been (2016) HSPF Bathtub Internal loading estimation Progress in 2017 Development of TMDL load allocation table Next
More informationMissouri Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation Nutrient Management Technical Standard
Missouri Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation Nutrient Management Technical Standard March 4, 2009 Division of Environmental Quality Water Protection Program I Introduction A. Authority and Purpose Missouri
More informationC O M P R E H E N S I V E P R O T E C T I O N & R E S T O R AT I O N P L A N. f or th e
C O M P R E H E N S I V E P R O T E C T I O N & R E S T O R AT I O N P L A N f or th e R O S S B A R NE T T R E SERV O I R WATERS HED, MI S S I S S I P P I E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y O C T O B E R
More informationCentral Sands Private Well Network 2011 Nitrate-N Sampling Results. Kimberly Kaiser 2012
Central Sands Private Well Network 2011 Nitrate-N Sampling Results Kimberly Kaiser 2012 High value crops such as edible beans, corn and potatoes dominate the landscape. Intensely irrigated. MDA Monitoring
More informationStatewide Ranking of Ecological Value of CRP and other Critical Lands
Statewide Ranking of Ecological Value of CRP and other Critical Lands Funded by ENRTF as recommended by LCCMR 2008 2009 D. J. Mulla, S. J. Taff, G. Host, J. Galzki, T. Brown, A. Lewandowski, and J. Nelson
More informationWatercourses and Wetlands and Agricultural Activities
Watercourses and Wetlands and Agricultural Activities Watercourses and regulated wetlands can be found throughout New Brunswick, including on agricultural lands. The Clean Water Act defines a watercourse
More informationPembina River Watershed Water Quality Report
Pembina River Watershed Water Quality Report January 29 Prepared by: Manitoba Water Stewardship 16-123 Main St. Winnipeg, MB. Canada State of the Watershed Report 5OA and 5OB Pembina River Watershed -
More informationPennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. Chapter 3. Stormwater Management Principles and Recommended Control Guidelines
Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual Chapter 3 Stormwater Management Principles and Recommended Control Guidelines 363-0300-002 / December 30, 2006 Chapter 3 Stormwater Management Principles
More informationMississippi River Basin Healthy Watersheds Initiative
Helping People Help the Land www.nrcs.usda.gov Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watersheds Initiative Overview To improve the health of the Mississippi River Basin, including water quality and wildlife
More informationUsing Paired Edge of Field Data to Assess Impacts of Management on Surface and Subsurface P Loss
Using Paired Edge of Field Data to Assess Impacts of Management on Surface and Subsurface P Loss Kevin W. King, Mark R. Williams, and Norm R. Fausey USDA ARS Soil Drainage Research Unit Columbus, OH Edge-of-field
More informationTa r-pa m l i c o Ri v e r
Ta r-pa m l i c o Ri v e r Basinwide Wat e r Qu a l i t y Ma n a g e m e n t Pl a n 2010 Su m m a ry Introduc tion This 2010 document is the fourth five-year update of the Tar-Pamlico River Basinwide Water
More informationCh. 5 - Nutrient Cycles and Soils
Ch. 5 - Nutrient Cycles and Soils What are Nutrient (biogeochemical) Cycles? a process by which nutrients are recycled between living organisms and nonliving environment. The three general types of nutrient
More informationCEPUDER Peter (1), SHUKLA Manoj Kumar (1), LIEBHARD Peter (2), TULLER Markus (1)
Scientific registration n : 1315 Symposium n : 14 Presentation : poster Optimizing soil fertility and plant nutrition to prevent groundwater pollution Prévenir la pollution de la nappe des sols en optimisant
More informationPre-Treatment Bioretention Cells Bioswales IOWA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL DECEMBER 16, 2015
Pre-Treatment Bioretention Cells Bioswales IOWA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL DECEMBER 16, 2015 Urban Runoff Background How we got here What Problem?? Provenance of the Problem Unified Sizing Criteria What
More information