PROJECT INFORMATION FORM Part A - General information Please read the attached guidance before filling in the form

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "PROJECT INFORMATION FORM Part A - General information Please read the attached guidance before filling in the form"

Cassandra Douglas
6 years ago
Views:

1 PROJECT INFORMATION FORM Part A - General information Please read the attached guidance before filling in the form Country FYR Macedonia Sector Water Project submission Date Project title 13.June.2005 Project Code MA-2 Wastewater Treatment Plant for the town of Prilep A-1.1 A-1.3 A-1 Information about foreseen implementing agency Name Municipality of Prilep, Local government Phones A-1.2 A-1.4 Address "Pitu Guli" 2, 7500 Prilep, Macedonia Faxes A-1.5 s prilep@prilep.gov.mk A-1.6 Person responsible for contacts with the Ministry/Fund Katica Dimovska Taleska A-1.7 Name and function of person responsible for overall project implementation Katica Dimovska Taleska, Sector for urban planning and ecology, Local government of the Municipality of Prilep A-1.8 Legal status of the implementing agency Local government of the Municipality of Prilep A-1.9 Institutions/firms jointly implementing the project (if any) JKP Vodovod i kanalizacija - Prilep A-1.10 What is the division of responsibilities (if joint implementation) JKP Vodovod i kanalizacija - Prilep will be trained throughout the project implementation for proper management and maintenance of the facility upon completion of the project. A-2 Strategic context VH- very high; H- high; M- medium; L- low; VL very low; N- none (mark where appropriate) VH H M L VL N A2-1 What priority is allocated to the indicated sector on regional level? X A2-2 What priority is allocated to the indicated sector on country level? X A2-3 Does an up-to-date country strategy in this sector exist? Ye No A2-4 Does an up-to-date country action plan in this sector exist? Yes No A2-5 What is the project (idea) priority from the regional scale point of view? X A2-6 What priority is allocated to project (idea) on a country level? X A2-7 What is the project (idea) priority from the cross border cooperation point of view? X A2-8 What is the project (idea) priority from the local point of view? X REReP 1.2 project (idea) template 0

2 A2-9 What is the project (idea) priority from the human health protection point of view? X A2-10 What is the project (idea) priority from the country economy point of view? X A2-11 What is the project (idea) priority from the ecosystem point of view? X A-3 Information about the project A3.1 Short description of the environmental problem In Prilep the sewerage system is complete for 70% of the town. The Local Self-Government Unit currently is working to complete the remaining 30% of the system that yet is unfinished. The proposed WWTP will collect water from all completed sections of the sewerage system. The current wastewater sewerage system in Prilep consists of primary and secondary systems. These two systems work together to collect wastewater from the city of Prilep and surrounding areas and then dispose untreated wastewater in the "Prilepska" River. This problem is multi-faceted. First, the wastewater contributes to the pollution of the "Prilepska" and ultimately, the "Crna" River, of which the "Prilepska" is a tributary. This problem is again compounded by farmer's utilization of the water from both the "Prilepska" and "Crna" rivers for irrigational purposes. This situation places all regional agricultural products, and moreover the people who consume them, at risk as well. In this way, the wastewater is not only a concern of the people of Prilep but for the entire region, including cross-border areas. The Prilepska, according to water classification standards employed in Macedonia, is classified as Class IV, which is the lowest standard. With high levels of coliforms and BOD 5, the river poses a threat not only to the people of the region but to the natural habitats that can be found in the area as well. A3.2 Origins and positive environmental impact of the project A3.2.1 Description of factors that inspired the project (driving forces) Environmental pollution poses a threat to the population from the perspective of: - food production - health - natural biodiversity. Compliance with EU "Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive". Protection of local aquifers used by citizens for drinking water. A3.2.2 Project main goal and objectives A3.2.3 expected positive environmental effects Protection of water in the rivers and of the land and improved quality of life for citizens in the Municipality of Prilep and the surrounding region. 1) Improved quality of water in the Prilepska, resulting in cleaner water for irrigational purposes yielding healthier agricultural products. 2) Protection of the water for the region and cross-border areas. 3) Restore biodiversity of the river. A3.2.4 Health impact of the project A3.2.5 Size of population benefiting from the project implementation A3.2.6 Scale of impact Elimination of infectious diseases caused by organisms including, but not limited to: Salmonella, Shigella, Hepatitis A Regional Local Country Cross border (County) Local X X X X A3.3 Project status Performance [%] Start [MM/YY] End [MM/YY] A Pre-feasibility study / /1998 A Feasibility study (GIBB Ltd. and Granit Proeket) / /1999 A Detail engineering designs 0 A EIA GIBB Ltd. and Granit Proeket, Ministry of Urban N/A Planning and Construction A Permits 0 REReP 1.2 project (idea) template 1

3 A Financing 0 A Procurements 0 A Construction 0 A Start of operation and training staff 0 A Operation 0 A Description of critical factors affecting project implementation: There is no main project up to date. There are no financial resources of the Local Self-Government. PROJECT INFORMATION FORM Part B Water & Waste water B Technical and environmental information on project B-1 Project type B1.1 Project type The project is the construction of a completely new facility for wastewater treatment. B1.2 Technical description Through the feasibility study, the most appropriate solution was found to be the extended aeration process. This process comprises an oxidation ditch together with final clarifiers and pumps to re-circulate sludge to the ditch or aeration tank. The retention period in the aeration stage is at least 18 hours. The end-product of the process is a high quality, nitrified effluent however de-nitrification can also be achieved if necessary. Advantages of this process include simple construction, relatively simple operation, and no requirement for primary settlement. The sludge produced does not require further treatment apart from dewatering. This process also requires less electro-mechanical equipment than conventional activated sludge. The purifying process begins with the wastewater flowing through a coarse screen to an inlet pumping station, with an option for overflow on high-peak days. The effluent then passes through fine screens, or alternatively, a screen bypass, followed by grit chambers. The effluent is stored in aeration tanks, after which it proceeds to final settling tanks. From there the stabilized sludge is ready for mechanical dewatering through belt presses, plate presses or centrifuges. The preferred disposal of the sludge is to farmland, a practice already used in Macedonia. The detailed engineering designs will include the highest level of detail for the proposed facility. B1.3 Project location(s) (exact address) Place Called "Kriva River" (southwest of Prilep) B1.4 Location from the environmental impact point of view (mark where appropriate) Hot spots Downtown area and/or specially protected areas X Other densely populated areas Loosely populated areas B-2 Status of the ownership title to land and buildings (mark where appropriate)) B2.1 Settled X B2.2 Not settled B2.3 Under settlement (describe status) B-3 Category of a technological solution proposed (mark where appropriate) B3.1 Modern B3.2 Modern, not widely implemented B3.3 Traditional X B3.4 Old REReP 1.2 project (idea) template 2

4 B-4 Pressure on environment Type of result Unit Before project After project B4.1 Population served (water supply) [-] B4.2 Quality of drinking water ( or equivalent according to local [-] law) B4.3 Population served (wastewater) [-] 50,000 75,000 B4.4 WWTP capacity m 3 /d B4.5 Collected wastewater m 3 /d 43,228 56,196 B4.6 Treated wastewater m 3 /d B4.7 Avg. BOD 5 ( (c) permitted = 4.0 mg/l O 2 ) mg/l B4.8 Avg. COD 5 ( (c) permitted = for Class II ) mg/l N/A 2.0 B4.9 Avg. Suspension ( (c) permitted = ) mg/l B4.10 Avg. N total ( (c) permitted = ) mg/l N/A 25 B4.11 Avg. P total ( (c) permitted = ) mg/l N/A N/A B4.12 Sludge amount after the stabilization and drainage m 3 /a 0 B4.13 Waste and sludge management/treatment Yes/N o No Yes B-5 Evidence of the reduction of pressure on environment (mark where appropriate) B5.1 By direct emission monitoring X B5.2 By technical specification of equipment X B5.3 Other, e.g. input characteristics (give a description) B5.4 None B-6 Stakeholders opinion (mark where appropriate) B6.1 Positive attitude of authorities, local population and NGOs X B6.2 Positive attitude of authorities, public protests B6.3 Public opinion not informed B6.4 Project known, attitudes neutral B6.5 Negative attitude of authorities, local population and NGOs B6.6 Opinions not known PROJECT INFORMATION FORM Part C - Financial information C Financial information on project C-1 Investment outlays [ ] 9, EUR C-2 Operating costs and revenues due to project implementation [ ] Before project After project Total operating costs Total operating revenues C-3 Operating capital [ ] After project Demand for working capital 20 C-4 Financing sources [ ] Total C4.1 Own sources C4.2 Grants (source: _EU ) C4.3 Soft Loans Disbursed Committed Planned % 9, , REReP 1.2 project (idea) template 3

5 C4.4 Loans with subsidized interest C4.5 Private sector C4.6 Other (please specify) C4.7 Total 9, , C.5 Financing schedule [ ] Planned Sources Own Other Total Year Activity C.4.1 C42- C Total C4.6 Preparation phase Construction 9, , , , , Total 9, , , , , REC PEIP project reference number What is the project (idea) priority from addressing an environmental threat of regional importance? Is the project linked to the EU acquis? If yes, which EU directive? MA-2 Treatment of waste water Compliance with EU "Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive" C-4 Need for financing C-4.1 C-4.2 C-4.3 C-4.4 Technical Assistance: describe the technical assistance needed give the estimated cost Investment co-financing: describe the elements for which grant financing is needed give the amount of grant needed Loan financing: specify the capital investment elements for which loan financing is sought give the amount of loan needed Describe the implementation schedule by years none Preparation of technical documentation (project) Estimated cost EUR Complete project, buildings and infrastructure. Estimated cost 9, EUR Year 2005: Preparation of the technical documentation Years 2006 and 2007: Building and construction of the wastewater treatment plant C-5 If the loan is foreseen, please provide information indicated below C-5.1 C-5.2 C-5.3 C-5.4 Who will be the borrower? Who will guarantee the loan (if relevant)? Describe the borrower: key activities, current tariffs structure, plans for tariffs increase, accounts for the previous 2 years and budget for next year Describe the municipality (if relevant): accounts for the previous 2 years and REReP 1.2 project (idea) template 4

6 C-5.5 budget for next year, existing long-term obligations, city budget, current surplus etc. Affordability forecast REReP 1.2 project (idea) template 5

PROJECT INFORMATION FORM Part A - General information Please read the attached guidance before filling in the form

PROJECT INFORMATION FORM Part A - General information Please read the attached guidance before filling in the form Part A - General information Please read the attached guidance before filling in the form Country Macedonia Sector WATER Project submission Date Project title 28 February 2003 Project Code MA-2 WASTEWATER