ESSS Dashboard. Strategic Goal #4: Partnerships and Community Collaboration

Transcription

1 ESSS Dashboard Strategic Goal #4: Partnerships and Community Collaboration March 2016 Source: MATC COSMO Data. 1

2 Graduate Job Placement Number WI OBF Criteria #1 50% Ranked #3 1, FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 Note: Number employed related to training among employed graduates.

3 Graduate Job Placement Rate WI OBF Criteria #1 50% Ranked #14 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 Note: Placement rate is percent employed related to training among employed graduates

4 Degree Awarded in High Demand Areas WI OBF Criteria #2 Ranked #5 2,000 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1, FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 Note: Number of degrees awarded in programs linked to the Top 50 occupations.

5 Workforce Training Credits Total WI OBF Criteria #7 Ranked #3 18,000 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 Note: Credits Earned in Employer Paid Training, Apprenticeship, Prof Dev Seminars and Customized Instruction.

6 Workforce Training Credits Employer Paid Training WI OBF Criteria #7 1 Ranked #1 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 Note: Credits Earned in Employer Paid Training.

7 Workforce Training Credits Apprenticeship WI OBF Criteria #7 2 Ranked #3 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1, Note: Credits Earned in Apprenticeship. FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014

8 Workforce Training Credits All Customized Instruction WI OBF Criteria #7 3 Ranked #9 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 Note: Credits Earned in Customized Instruction. FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014

9 Workforce Training Credits Professional Development Seminars WI OBF Criteria #7 4 Ranked # FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 Note: Credits Earned in Prof Dev Seminars.

10 Industry Validated Curriculum WI OBF Criteria #3 Ranked # FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 Program with Enrollment Program with TSA Note: 75% based on active programs; 25% based on programs with Technical Skill Attainment (Phase 2 approval) assessments.

11 Direct from High School Enrollment 20% 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 Note: % of HS graduates from service area who attend MATC the following year.

12 Advisory Committee Membership 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 % of Minority % of Female

13 ESSS Dashboard Presentation Strategic Goal #2 Workplace Engagement and Innovation May

14 Strategic Goal #2: Focused Scorecard Performance Measures 2011 Baseline Employee Development 2013 Score 2015 Target 2015 Actual PACE Score #22 (motivate performance) (+) PACE Score #38 (opportunity for advancement) ( ) Transparency Leadership: PACE Score #48 (data improves college) (+) PACE Scores #4 (decisions are made at app level) (+)* PACE Score #15 (I am able to influence direction of (+) college) PACE Score# 32 (institution appropriately organized) (+) PACE Score #56(leaders review perf measures) NA Quality Culture PACE Scores #11 (teams use problem solving (+)** techniques) PACE Score #25 (cooperation exists at the institution) (+)*** PACE Score #47 (AQIP influence on college) (+) Communications PACE Scores #16 (open & ethical communication) (+)* PACE Score #44 (clear admin processes) (+) PACE Score #54 (leaders communicate key decisions) (+)*** Diversity PACE Score #49 (diverse leadership team) (+)* PACE Score #50 (employee prog for underrep. groups) NA 14

15 Strategic Plan Scorecard Key Results with Subsets (Updated for President Cabinet) 15

16 PACE: Communication Leadership (+) *** MATC Q#54 Leaders effectively communicate key decisions (+)***MATC 2015 score is significantly higher than MATC 2013 score at level. No Norm Base data is available for comparison. 16

17 PACE: Communication Ethical (+)* MATC Norm Base Q#16 Open and ethical communication is practiced at this institution (+)*MATC 2015 score is significantly higher than MATC 2013 score at 0.01 level. 17

18 PACE: Cooperation (+) *** MATC Norm Base Q#25 A spirit of cooperation exists at this institution (+)***MATC 2015 score is significantly higher than MATC 2013 score at level. 18

19 PACE: Motivation (+) Q#22 This institution has been successful in positively motivating my performance (+) MATC 2015 score is higher than MATC 2013 score. 19

20 MATC Employee Diversity 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 32% 32% 32% 24% 24% 24% MATC Employees MATC Faculty Community Note: Percentage of minority among MATC employees, faculty and district community residents. 20

21 What Worked? Employee Development/Diversity Recruitment Process developed/implemented one efficient, transparent and inclusive process New Employee Onboarding Process developed/implemented one year formal onboarding program customized by employee type to orientate all new employees Faculty Quality Assurance System/Updating Credentials/Professional Development Mentoring Programs Quality Culture All College CDM Training MATC Day Staff/Faculty Coordination Days CDM Facilitator Training CQI/Collaboration Tool Communications Quarterly Leadership Meetings On Campus Publication MyMATC Employee Portal 21

22 What s Next? Employee Development Competency Based Workforce Planning/Talent Management Processes Faculty Quality Assurance System Staff Quality Assurance System Quality Culture Expanded CDM Facilitator Training Communication Internal Communications Plan Implementation Diversity College Wide Diversity and Inclusion Plan 22