Régulation de l accès et gouvernance du système pêche

Transcription

1 Session 2: Appropriation / Coordination / Institutions Régulation de l accès et gouvernance du système pêche P. Le Floc h, O. Guyader Journées UMR AMURE_ Janvier 2012, Brest 1

2 Bilan

3 Regulating access to fish resources: questions to be answered Control variable? Control method? administrative (norms / rules) or economic (incentives) Effort or Catches Non-transferable individual authorisations Taxation Transferable individual authorisations* * So-called «rights-based management»

4 Expériences internationales Hamon K., Thebaud O., Frusher S., Little L. R. (2009). A retrospective analysis of the effects of adopting individual transferable quotas in the Tasmanian red rock lobster fishery. Aquatic Living Resources, Voir aussi Marchal P., Lallemand P., Stokes K., Thebaud O. (2009). A comparative review of the fisheries resource management systems in New Zealand and in the European Union. Aquatic Living Resources,

5 Role of co-management in successful fisheries Source: Gutierrez, Hilborn, Defeo, Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries, Nature, 2011 Survey: 130 co-managed fisheries

6 Ateliers Internationaux : -Regulating access to marine living resources in the coastal zone: Brest-Janvier Paris Brest Septembre 2010 Alban, F., Boncoeur J., and P. Le Floc'h, The impact of economic and regulatory factors on the relative profitability of fishing boats (seaweed).

7 Des droits de pêche de fait transférables Valeur implicite des droits d accès capitalisée dans le prix des navires sur le marché de l occasion Guyader et al., (2006)

8 Bilan fin 2009 : peu de travaux menés à l échelle française à l aune de la réforme de la PCP, Loi de modernisation agriculture et pêche Thèse sur les droits à produire et le co-management des quotas en France (co-financée en 2010 par la Région Bretagne) Z. Larabi Enquête en cours sur le fonctionnement des Organisations de Producteurs, leur rôle dans le «co-management» (convention Ifremer DPMA partenariat Oceanic Developpement) Projet FP7 SOCIOEC Socio-economic implication of the new CFP / Co-management ( ) Projet InterregMAGDELESA sur l exploitation et la gestion des dispositif de concentration de poissons dans les petites Antilles Projet ANR Comanche

9 Perspectives

10 Socioec Socio-economic effects of the main management principles of the future Common Fishery Policy (CFP): impact of new policy framework and opportunities for the fishing sector to develop self- and co-management Call identifier Starting date Duration in months FP7-KBBE /03/

11 1. scientists from several fisheries sciences with industry partners and other key stakeholders 2. on solutions for future fisheries managementat a regional level. 3. the overarching sustainability objectives of the EU, and that can provide consensus across all stakeholders. 4. The objectives should be consistent with the aims of the CFP, MSFD* and other EU directives 5. we will examine fisher s responses and perceptions of these measures, based on historical analysisas well as direct consultation and interviews. 6. how the governancecan be changed to facilitate self-and co-management to ensure fisher buy-in to promising management measures. 7. Finally, the project will examine the impacts of the management measures that emerge from this process, particularly in terms of their economic and social impacts. *Marine Strategy Framework Directive

12 25 partners(including 7 SME) IC IOES DK IR AAU Aqua NUIG MI ML UK CEMARE NL UCPH DTU LF LEI vti BE JRC CAU Kutter GE FR IFREM UBO Nissen PMA SP AZTI MAS IT IREPA CsC GR TU HCMR KTU

13 List of work packages WP 1 Project Management WP 2 Sustainability Objectives WP 3 Management incentives and fishers behavioural responses WP 4 Governance structures and stakeholder involvement in management WP 5 Impact assessment of management measures WP 6 Transversal coordination, synthesis and information flow across case studies WP 7 Outreach, dissemination of results and stakeholder management

14 WP 2 Sustainability Objectives (32.5 person-months) 1. Definition of high level (EU wide) sustainability objectives - Based on literature overview (including commission and NGO documents), analysis of policy drivers (CFP in particular, but including other directives e.g. MSFD and IMP), and consultation with high level stakeholder groups 2. Definition of operational sustainability objectives at the local level Based on the outcome of Objective 1, and carried out through consultation with stakeholders via workshops and other media. IC IOES Objectif du RMD (MSY) en 2015 IR DK AAU NUIG DTU MI UK CEMARE vti BE JRC GE FR IFREM, 1 UBO, 1 SP AZTI IT IREPA GR TU HCMR KTU

15 WP 3 Management incentives and fishers behaviouralresponse (98 person-months) 1. Analysewhich management measures at which organizational level, create the right incentives to tackle the main structural failings mentioned in the Green Paper of the Reform of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). 2. Analyse how instrumental factors, such as technical measures(e.g. mesh sizes), command and control instruments (e.g. TACs and quotas, effort), market instruments (e.g. transferability of collective or individual rights) and social instruments (self- or co-management possibilities) influence fishermen s(compliance/incentive) behaviour. Control variable? Control method? IC IOES administrative (norms / rules) or economic (incentives) Effort or Catches Non-transferable individual authorisations Taxation Transferable individual authorisations* * So-called «rights-based management» 3. Analyse how non-instrumental factors, such as market factors, biological factors, and social factors (peer pressure, succession issues, and gender aspects) influence fishermen s (compliance/incentive) behaviour. IR Aqua NUIG MI UK CEMARE FR SP AZTI MAS DK AAU UCPH DTU LF NL LEI vti BE JRC CAU Kutter GE Nissen IFREM, 10.5 PMA, 1 IT IREPA CsC GR HCMR TU KTU

16 WP 4 Governance structures and stakeholder involvement in management (64.2 person-months) 1. Review on how EU policy frameworks like the Integrated Maritime Policy (IMP) and its environmental pillar, the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD), the Habitats Directive, the Birds Directive, the Water Framework Directive influence the possibilities for decentralisation/devolution of the CFP. 2. Investigate constraints and opportunities associated to decentralisation/devolution of governance authority to stakeholders/user-groups (self- or co-management possibilities) in general and in relation to the specific case-studies. 3. Elaborate different scenarios for decentralisation of the governance structures (regional, national or local) for the specific case-studies. IC IOES 4. Assess the acceptability of changed governance options among the key stakeholder groups covering the EU, the RACs and Member States. IR NUIG MI ML UK CEMARE BE DK AAU LF NL LEI JRC vti Kutter GE Réseau des sciences régionales SP AZTI MAS FR IFREM, 1 UBO, 2 PMA, 0.5 IT IREPA CsC GR TU HCMR KTU

17 ANR-2010-STRA-010 COMANCHE => Task 9. Economic performance of the supply chain of the king scallop Mesures de régulation de l accès Structuration de l offre Performance économique de la filière* Implications: -à CT => recommandations sur la régulation de l accès -à MT/LT => prise en compte de l aval de la filière dans la modélisation bioéconomique * des pêcheurs aux consommateurs

18 Merci de votre attention