City of Los Angeles Living Wage RFB Response Scoring Document

Transcription

1 EVALUATION CRITERIA : ' ~- - ' ~ ~ - _.:. 1. Quality, Responsiveness and Technical Solution (40 points). City of Los Angeles Living Wage RFB Response Scoring Document SCORE Models: IMPLAN COMMENTS Proposal addresses the following: Discusses how to establish a minimum wage in the City of $13.25 by 2017, and then increase the minimum wage to $15.25 an hour by 2019, to be followed by annual increases; provides comment on other timeline implementation options. Provides full analysis of economic impact of the subject minimum wage proposal including the positive and negative effects on the City. Provides an analysis of the minimum wage proposal's effects on the local economy, including the number of people who would benefit from and increased wage and the potential for additional tax revenues. Provides an analysis of unintended consequences, including the reduction of workers benefits and hours. Provides an analysis on job creation and job/business retention. Identifies specific industries, including non-profits and small businesses, that could experience negative impacts from the proposal; evaluates pros and cons of categorical exemptions or other solutions to reduce potential negative impacts; provides clear definitions of the industries identified. Provides an analysis for an option to establish a base and ceiling on automatic wage increases. Provides a review of options for the enforcement of a minimum wage ordinance. Provides a comparison of cost of living, demographics and median wage in the City versus other metropolitan areas. 2. Comparable Firm Experience (25 points). Q: 5 of 5 R: 12 of 15 TS: 14 of 20 T: 31 Nice graphics. Slim discussion on each item. D. Only a lit review? Other proposers suggest data to inform. No direct mention of small businesses and non-profits Several wage studies Proposer has demonstrated experience in performing 1 20 similar analyses. Perceived quality of experience performing similar economic and fiscal impact analysis.

2 3. Evaluation of Key Personnel (25 points). --~ , 4 staff assigned Degree to which specific staff proposed to be assigned to the project have demonstrated analytical experience relative to the requested study. Organizational structure for the project is provided with personnel functions and responsibilities identified. 4. Fee for Services (10 Points). Does the proposal clearly identify the fee, and is the fee $100,000 or less as stated in the RFP? 1 5 Consider this proposal compared to the other proposals; is the proposed level and quality of analysis higher or lower for a comparable cost? 17 Skilled staff, not enough to cover all elements of project ~ = base criteria 2=relative price... mid between high and low price TOTAL (Maximum Score = 1 00): 73 General Comments: Economic Analysis Firm's Name: Economic Roundtable _ Date: 12/16/2014 Reviewer's Name: (for internal use only)

3 City of Los Angeles Living Wage RFB Response Scoring Document - EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORE COMMENTS 1. Quality, Responsiveness and Technical Solution (40 points). Proposal addresses the following: Discusses how to establish a minimum wage in the City of $13.25 by 2017, and then increase the minimum wage to $15.25 an hour by 2019, to be followed by annual increases; provides comment on other timeline implementation options. Provides full analysis of economic impact of the subject minimum wage proposal including the positive and negative effects on the City. Provides an analysis of the minimum wage proposal's effects on the local economy, including the number of people who would benefit from and increased wage and the potential for additional tax revenues. Provides an analysis of unintended consequences, including the reduction of workers benefits and hours. Provides an analysis on job creation and job/business retention. Identifies specific industries, including non-profits and small businesses, that could experience negative impacts from the proposal; evaluates pros and cons of categorical exemptions or other solutions to reduce potential negative impacts; provides clear definitions of the industries identified. Provides an analysis for an option to establish a base and ceiling on automatic wage increases. Provides a review of options for the enforcement of a minimum wage ordinance. Provides a comparison of cost of living, demographics and median wage in the City versus other metropolitan areas. 2. Comparable Firm Experience (25 points). Q: Sources: ACS, PUMS, others Models: REMI, IMPLAN look at impact: Food stamps, consumer spending, employer profits, cost to workers Uobs/hours lost), etc. Look at inside/outside City spending. Design implementation approach for impacted industries, to be identified 3 of 5 1 All issue areas covered R: 15of15 TS: 17 of 20 T:35 Extensive research in living and minimum wage proposals Proposer has demonstrated experience in performing similar analyses. Perceived quality of experience performing similar economic and fiscal impact analysis. 25 Did work on Seattle proposal Models applied to Oakland, San Francisco, San Diego already

4 3. Evaluation of Key Personnel (25 points). Degree to which specific staff proposed to be assigned to the project have demonstrated analytical experience relative to the requested study. Organizational structure for the project is provided with personnel functions and responsibilities identified staff team Several PhD. Extensive experience in data analysis. Focus on wage issues across team. t ~ -- ~ 4. Fee for Services (10 Points). Does the proposal clearly identify the fee, and is the fee $100,000 or less as stated in the RFP? Consider this proposal compared to the other proposals; is the proposed level and quality of analysis higher or lower for a comparable cost? 7 3= base criteria 4=relative price. _. mid between high and low price t I TOTAL (Maximum Score = 1 00): 92 ~ General Comments: Economic Analysis Firm's Name: UC Berkeley Date: 12/16/2014 Reviewer's Name: (for internal use only)

5 City of Los Angeles Living Wage RFB Response Scoring Document c~. : J EVALUATION CRITERIA I SCORE ' ~ ~ 1. Quality, Responsiveness and Technical Solution (40 points). COMMENTS Data: ACS, PUMS, CPS, RS, DunBrandstreet, NAICS Proposal addresses the following: Discusses how to establish a minimum wage in the City of $13.25 by 2017, and then increase the minimum wage to $15.25 an hour by 2019, to be followed by annual increases; provides comment on other timeline implementation options. Provides full analysis of economic impact of the subject minimum wage proposal including the positive and negative effects on the City. Provides an analysis of the minimum wage proposal's effects on the local economy, including the number of people who would benefit from and increased wage and the potential for additional tax revenues. Provides an analysis of unintended consequences, including the reduction of workers benefits and hours. Provides an analysis on job creation and job/business retention. Identifies specific industries, including non-profits and small businesses, that could experience negative impacts from the proposal; evaluates pros and cons of categorical exemptions or other solutions to reduce potential negative impacts; provides clear definitions of the industries identified. Provides an analysis for an option to establish a base and ceiling on automatic wage increases. Provides a review of options for the enforcement of a minimum wage ordinance. Provides a comparison of cost of living, demographics and median wage in the City versus other metropolitan areas. 2. Comparable Firm Experience (25 points). Proposer has demonstrated experience in performing similar analyses. Perceived quality of experience performing similar economic and fiscal impact analysis. Q: 5 of 5 R: 15 of 15 TS: 18 of 20 T: year sample Impressive coverage of the key areas. Hit on all of the points in the RFP. Three wage studies Workforce studies A lot of planning work

6 Evaluation of Key Personnel (25 points). 6 team members -~ Degree to which specific staff proposed to b ~ assigned to the project have demonstrated analytica I experience relative to the requested study. Organizational structure for the project is >rovided with personnel functions and responsibilities identi 'ied. 4. Fee for Services (10 Points) TO- ~-- Does the proposal clearly identify the fee, a nd is the fee $100,000 or less as stated in the RFP? Consider this proposal compared to the other proposals; is the proposed level and quality of analysis hi ~her or lower for a comparable cost? TOTAL (Maximum Score= 100): General Comments: -- Daysog is an elected City Councilmember in the City of Alameda 18. : Most are planners 3= base criteria 4=relative price... mid between high and low price Economic Analysis Firm's Name: Applied Development. Reviewer's Name: (for internal use only) Date: 12/16/2014 _

7 City of Los Angeles Living Wage RFB Response Scoring Document EVALUATION CRITERIA I SCORE 1. Quality, Responsiveness and Technical Solution (40 points). COMMENTS Data: ACS, PUMS, CPS, OES, QCEW, EDD Proposal addresses the following: Discusses how to establish a minimum wage in the City of $13.25 by 2017, and then increase the minimum wage to $15.25 an hour by 2019, to be followed by annual increases; provides comment on other timeline implementation options. Provides full analysis of economic impact of the subject minimum wage proposal including the positive and negative effects on the City. Provides an analysis of the minimum wage proposal's effects on the local economy, including the number of people who would benefit from and increased wage and the potential for additional tax revenues. Provides an analysis of unintended consequences, including the reduction of workers benefits and hours. Provides an analysis on job creation and job/business retention. Identifies specific industries, including non-profits and small businesses, that could experience negative impacts from the proposal; evaluates pros and cons of categorical exemptions or other solutions to reduce potential negative impacts; provides clear definitions of the industries identified. Provides an analysis for an option to establish a base and ceiling on automatic wage increases. Provides a review of options for the enforcement of a minimum wage ordinance. Provides a comparison of cost of living, demographics and median wage in the City versus other metropolitan areas. 2. Comparable Firm Experience (25 points). Proposer has demonstrated experience in performing similar analyses. Perceived quality of experience performing similar economic and fiscal impact analysis. Q: 4of5 R: 10 of 15 TS: 18 of 20 T:32 17 Models: Focused on negative impacts Interesting point on business leaving Weak on small business and non-profits No mention of enforcement Consolidated points in RFP, rather than discussing each. Two studies on point Extensive experience in related economic analyses Not much on other wage studies generally

8 r --~-~- ~-~~ - - ~----~-~ Evaluation of Key Personnel (25 points). 9 staff team..., Degree to which specific staff proposed to be assigned to the project have demonstrated analytical experience relative to the requested study. Organizational structure for the project is provided with personnel functions and responsibilities identified. 21 Extensive econometric experience across team No mention of living wage or minimum wage experience 4. Fee for Services (10 Points). Does the proposal clearly identify the fee, and is the fee $100,000 or less as stated in the RFP? 1 9 Consider this proposal compared to the other proposals; is the proposed level and quality of analysis higher or lower for a comparable cost? 3= base criteria 6=relative price... lowest -~ ' TOTAL (Maximum Score = 1 00): 79 General Comments: Seems to focus on negative impacts Big team a plus to move through big volume of work Economic Analysis Firm's Name: Beacon. Date: 12/16/2014 Reviewer's Name: (for internal use only)