PARENT REPORT. Tables and Graphs Report for WNV and WIAT-II. Copyright 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliate(s). All rights reserved.

Transcription

1 PARENT REPORT Tables and Graphs Report for WNV and WIAT-II

2 EXAMINEE: WNV Age REPORT DATE: 10/5/2006 AGE: 6 years GRADE: Not Specified DATE OF BIRTH: 10/5/2000 ETHNICITY: Not Specified EXAMINEE ID: Not Specified EXAMINER: Tester Examiner GENDER: Not Specified Tests Administered: WNV (10/5/2006) WIAT-II (10/5/2006) Age at Testing: (6 years 0 months) (6 years 0 months) Is this a retest? Comments: No Full Scale Score Summary Scale Sum of T-Scores Full Scale Score Percentile Rank 95%Conf. Interval Qualitative Description Full Scale Score Very Superior

3 Vertical bar represents the Standard Error of Measurement. Score SEM Full Scale Score

4 Subtest Scores Summary Subtests Raw Score T-Score Test Age Equiv. Percentile Rank Matrices >21:00 >99.9 Coding >7:10 96 Object Assembly >7:10 95 Recognition >7:10 99

5 Vertical bar represents the Standard Error of Measurement. Subtest Score SEM Subtest Score SEM Matrices (MA) Object Assembly (OA) Coding (CD) 68 4 Recognition (RG)

6 Difference Between Subtest and Mean of Subtest Scores Subtest Subtest T-Score Mean T-Score Diff. Critical Value S/W Base Rate Matrices S 1.0 Coding Object Assembly Recognition Overall Mean = 74, Scatter = 23, Base Rate = 18.2% Statistical Significance (Critical Values) at the.05 level WNV Total Raw Scores Subtest Matrices Total Raw Score (0 to 41) Coding Total Raw Score (0 to 72) Object Assembly Total Raw Score (0 to 56) Recognition Total Raw Score (0 to 21) Total Raw Score Summary of WIAT-II Subtest Scores SUBTESTS* RAW STD 95% INTERVAL PR NCE S9 AGE EQU GRADE EQU Word Reading :0 PreK5:1 Reading Comprehension 0** <1 1 <6:0 <1:0 Numerical Operations :0 K:0 Math Reasoning :0 PreK5:1 Spelling :4 K:3 Listening Comprehension :0 K:9 Oral Expression :8 PreK5:2 * WIAT-II age-based normative information was used in the calculation of subtest and composite scores. ** Represents Reading Comprehension weighted raw score.

7 Summary of WIAT-II Composite and Total Scores 95% COMPOSITES* RAW STD INTERVAL PR NCE S9 Mathematics Oral Language * WIAT-II age-based normative information was used in the calculation of subtest and composite scores Differences Between Composite Standard Scores COMPOSITES DIFFERENCE SIGNIF. FREQUENCY Mathematics/Oral Language * 11.1% * significant at the.05 level

8 Subtest SS SEM Subtest SS SEM Word Reading (WR) 69 1 Spelling (SP) 88 3 Reading Comprehension (RC) 64 2 Written Expression (WE) Pseudoword Decoding (PD) Listening Comprehension (LC) Numerical Operations (NO) 84 5 Oral Expression (OE) 90 4 Math Reasoning (MR) 70 3

9 Ability-Achievement Discrepancy Analysis Date of Ability Testing: 10/5/2006 Ability Score Type: Full Scale Ability Score: 146 Predicted-Difference Method Predicted Score Actual Score Expected Diff. Critical Value WIAT-II SUBTEST Word Reading Y <1% Reading Comprehension Y <1% Numerical Operations Y <1% Math Reasoning Y <1% Spelling Y 1-2% Listening Comprehension Y 4% Oral Expression Y 5-10% COMPOSITES Mathematics Y <1% Oral Language Y 1-2% Statistical Significance (Critical Values) at the.01 level Sig. Diff. Y/N Base Rate