Improving tools to publish information

Transcription

1 Improving tools to publish information An European overview (study done in July & August 2015) Alexis Robin, UIC, Geographer & GIS specialist

2 Infrastructure data : Current situation Legal Related TEN-T : 2236/ /96 EurailDataMap : 1998 Network statements : 2001/ /34 (Annex 4 details the content) RailNetEurope : 2004 RINF : 2011/ /880 European Rail Infrastructure Masterplan : Improving tools to publish information

3 Network Statement 2015 Infrastructure Manager language 1 language 2 maps line ID characteristics of the line type of clearance gauge SNCF RESEAU Cartes du gabaritlimitedes obstacles hauts (fretet french voyageurs) (PDF - 892,15 KB) Annexe4.5 (thelinkon the versiondoes twork) UIC standard DB NETZ german db netz application db netz application db netz application UIC standard+ combinedtransport INFRABEL french-dutch-german yes yes yes UIC standard (page 35) + map of the combined transport PRORAIL dutch yes Appendix 12 IT system require login + maps in case of UIC + national clearance gauge (appendix 12 Reference profiles ( )) KEYRAIL dutch CFL french Map for the combined transport page 163 yes, annexe 3A annexe 3A UIC standard + combined transport (annexe 3B) ADIF spanish yes but ne for the clearance gauge yes but in a sheet page 200 RFI italian (only for version 2014) yes but ne for the clearance gauge yes in Allegati tecnici 1 Caratteristiche linee yes but the clearance gauge does t have a map Iberiangauge IG66 + page51 yes in Allegati tecnici 1 Caratteristiche linee + website with private access combined transport ne for the clearance gauge Infraestruturas de Portugal portuguese yes (forthe clearancegaugeannex 3.3.2B) Annex Annex 3.1 UIC standard+ national (Cpb & Cpb+) NETWORK RAIL french application NESA application NESA application NESA Great britain classification (W6,W7 in link the exemple for the Anglia region page 17) ZSR slovakian yes page27 but t forthe clearance page 27 du NS & AnnexeE UIC + nationalžsr G2 / NMŽSR= minimumg2 (page29) OBB german yes maps Annexe route description UIC standard + national (de3) GYSEV Annex _2015M19A Annex _2015M19A UIC standard VPE magyar Annex _2015M19A Annexe UIC GA-GB-GCannex schemadans le SZDC czech BANEDANMARK danish (annexesare onlyin danish) JERNBANEVERKET rsk yes but ne for the clearance gauge (it should be in Map number5 but itis t) yes but map for the clearance gauge (information in danish onlyin this annexe) Map M05 - Number of tracks, electrification systems and demination pursuant to the table of line conditions Oversight over TIB straekninger annexes UIC standard + national yes StandardisationCEN (EN ) which use theuic standard+ national clearance (Z-GČD + Z-GCZ3) page 33 (in czech) map combined transport banedata (rwegian database) RIV minimum + RIV GA + RIV GB + UIC standard (G1) + UIC standard506 (GA & GB) ==> pren PKP polish in a listof line (inpolish) yes on a map Annexes informationly a listthatpresent the restrictionfollowing the gauge structure (annexe 2.9) CFR romanian SLOVENSKE ZELEZNICE slovenian AZP yes but map for the clearance gauge (information in romenianlyin this annexe) yes map for clearance gauge, but one map for combined transport ifwe excepta resumeand the mapin Annexe 1 yes page 25 in NS but in a sheet yes in Annexe 3.1a Same as above "CFR wagon loading gauge the sizes of which are presented in the UICLoadingGuidelines (formerannex II RIV) + classification UIC (GA, GB, GC) ==>page 29 Following the combined transport classification + UIC TP Ferro french-spanish- annexe1 UIC 505-1UIC TSI 2002/735/CE TRAFIKVERKET swedish Sea ==> G1, GA, GBet Sec==>GC page20 du NS BLS german (french version does t work) maps page about clearance (t following the UIC classification however) yes inan excelfile : Streckendatabank (german) TRASSE.CH german schematic, one withthe linecategory (p72) few (ramp, pantograph,linecategory, maximumload) SBBCFF FFS german-french-italian mapbut t forthe clearancegauge yes inan excelfile : Streckendatabank (german) UIC + combined transport (P & C) information EBV + UIC NRIC bulgarian yes HZ INFRASTRUCTURA croatian yes forthe combiendtransport (annex3.4) but clearance gauge map yes on a map (page108 NS) unkwn (listofcharacteristicsof bridgeand tunnelintable4) list of line following clearance gauge annex 3.13 UIC standard (UIC-506GA GBGC) Freightcorridor1 (Rhine-Alpine) Freight corridor 2 (North sea - Mediterranean) yes an interractive map is proposed (and the clearance gauge + combiend transport are characteristics that can be displayed) few characteristicsare fulfilled UIC standard UIC506 + UIC french yes followingthecorridormember's Networkstatement Freightcorridor3 (ScanMed) danish onlythe one fromthe danish NS (thesame) followingthecorridormember's Networkstatement Freight corridor 4 (Atlantic) portuguese-spanish-french yes schematic (from page 25 to 29) page 29 map of the clearance gauge yes GA - GB - GB1 - IB - PTb - PTb + Freightcorridor5 (Baltic-Adriatic) G2 res. _ GB/1 _ VM -P/C 80/400 _ GC/2-VM PC80/400 _ GC _ Z- yes but very simple (page 10 of the implementation plan) page GČD _ Z-GC/ZGČD_ 80 / 410 _ Freightcorridor6 (Mediterranean) mapon the corridorwebsite index followingthecorridormember's Networkstatement Freightcorridor7 (Orient) yes, an interractive yes UIC UIC UIC Freight corridor 8 (North sea Baltic) yes but schematic on the corridor website portal information Freight corridor 9 (Czech-Slovak) czech yes but ne for the clearance gauge in the brochure information for the combined transport in the brochure 3 Improving tools to publish information

4 Clearance gauge data : display and access Amongst 37 network statements: 18 (49%) do t provide clearance gauge maps 8 (21 %) do t follow UIC 506 (interoperable gauge) 8 (21%) present data for the combined transport (UIC 596-6) 6 (16%) IMs offer GIS access to infrastructure data Clearance gauge data are in annexes, often t translated 4 Improving tools to publish information

5 Toward standard display and access RNE Standard frame, next version? Update of TSI and UIC Leaflet? Offer an interface for Railway Undertaking usage? 5 Improving tools to publish information

6 Thought and developments? How to describe railway infrastructure uniformly? Importance of the RailTopoModel (IRS 30100, Dec. 2015) to make iron network descriptions compatible How to improve data access? Do we have to change the responsibility for data quality to increase data access? Does RINF fulfill RU needs? Evolution path? 6 Improving tools to publish information

7 Thank you for your kind attention robin@uic.org 7 Improving tools to publish information