Comprehensive Asbestos and Lead Survey

Transcription

1 Report of Comprehensive Asbestos and Lead Survey Prepared for: City of Garland 200 N. 5th Street Garland, TX Building Surveyed: Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Report Date: Friday, September 16, 2016

2 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Comprehensive Asbestos and Lead Survey Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction Purpose and Scope Report Organization Field Investigation Sampling Laboratory Analysis Analytical Methods Bulk Sample Results Hazard Assessment Hazard Assessment Ratings Asbestos-Containing Material Assessments Hazard Assessment Summary Response Actions Qualifications 11 Appendices Appendix A: Site Drawings Appendix B: Lab Results Appendix C: Bulk Summary Report Appendix D: Cost Estimate For Removal Appendix E: Photographs Appendix F: Lead Report Comprehensive Asbestos Survey City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Page 2 of 11

3 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Introduction This document is a report of a Comprehensive Asbestos Survey performed by Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc.(IHST). IHST is licensed by the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS), formerly the Texas Department of Health, as an Asbestos Consultant Agency (DSHS License # Figure 1 provides a description of the assessment described by this report. Figure 1. Comprehensive Asbestos Survey Profile Client Name: City of Garland Facility/Campus Civic Theater Building: Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Survey Date(s): 8/31/2016 Inspector(s): Kristopher Girton - DSHS Asbestos Inspector License # Purpose and Scope The purpose of this project was to locate, identify, and assess the condition of asbestos containing material (ACM) present at the subject building, and to develop recommendations based on existing and potential asbestos related hazards. The following scope of work was used during the asbestos assessment for the subject property: A. Collecting and analyzing bulk samples of suspected asbestos-containing materials. B. Quantification of the suspected asbestos-containing material. C. Approximate costs of abatement, to include abatement specifications, contractor selection, and on-site management during remediation activities. D. Provide an approximate time schedule for abatement procedures. E. Make recommendations based on survey data collected to implement an Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Program or abatement procedures. F. Preparing a report discussing the findings and remedial recommendations. 3.0 Report Organization This report is divided into sections which discuss the review of available documentation, field investigation, laboratory analysis, hazard assessments, and recommendations. Illustrations, such as tables and figures follow the text. Other supporting documentation, such as laboratory reports are also included. 4.0 Field Investigation The survey was conducted to determine the amount of asbestos-containing materials present in the subject building. The survey included an observation of accessible areas and unusual conditions; and bulk sampling of suspected asbestos-containing materials. Bulk samples were collected of suspect materials and analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining, in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples (Method 600/R-93/116). Percentage estimates are based on the analyst's best Comprehensive Asbestos Survey City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Page 3 of 11

4 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: judgment following PLM/DS and examination with a stereoscope. Laboratory reports containing sample location and results are included with this report. The survey was designed to identify the presence of both friable and non-friable asbestos- containing materials present in the surveyed area. Friable means that the material, when dry, may be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Building materials suspected of containing asbestos were grouped into "Homogeneous" sampling areas. The homogeneous areas were defined based on uniform texture, color, and appearance. Additionally, homogeneous areas were further defined based on building construction date(s). Each of the items sampled were classified into one of three categories: 1.) Surfacing Material: A surfacing material is a building material which has been applied to a surface (i.e., walls or ceilings) or structural members. Examples of surfacing materials which may contain asbestos are: spray-applied fireproofing, spray-applied acoustical texture, and trowel-applied textured ceilings and walls. 2.) Thermal System Insulation: All types of insulation used on a building's mechanical system are classified into the category of thermal system insulation. Examples of thermal system materials which may contain asbestos are: boilers and related piping, or duct insulation. 3.) Miscellaneous: All remaining materials which do not fall into the two above categories are placed in the miscellaneous category. Examples of miscellaneous materials which may contain asbestos are: lay-in ceiling tile, floor tile, mastic adhesives and roofing felt. An assessment was conducted for each building material sampled. The physical assessment consists of evaluating the condition of the suspect material and the potential for future disturbance. Recommendations made for a building material which contains asbestos are based on the assessments made by the inspector during the survey. The data developed during the asbestos survey is presented in the following sections of this report. Table 1 contains the Summary of Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment and Table 2 contains the Cost Estimate Summary. Both tables present specific locations, results of additional asbestos analysis, time schedules, and quantities of asbestos. These cost estimates are based on IHST's experience and commercial estimates used by local abatement contractors. However, it should be noted that the cost estimates are not based on a written set of specifications or a confirmed scope of work, which can affect the final contract cost. 5.0 Sampling Sampling during the field investigation included the collection of bulk samples of suspected asbestos containing materials, as listed in Table 1., Summary of Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment. After sample recovery, samples were placed in secure containers, and the sampling vicinity was cleaned and sealed. Appropriate chain-of-custody protocols were initiated at that time to track handling of bulk samples. 5.1 Laboratory Analysis The samples were transported to and analyzed by the analytical laboratory specified in Figure 2., a successful participant in the Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST) National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program and licensed by the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS), formerly the Texas Department of Health. Ten percent (10%) of the bulk samples were reanalyzed independently as part of the quality assurance and quality control programs. Comprehensive Asbestos Survey City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Page 4 of 11

5 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Figure 2. Bulk Sample Laboratory Profile Laboratory Name: Steve Moody Micro Services DSHS License Number: # NVLAP Lab ID: # Expires: 5/31/ Analytical Methods Bulk samples were analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM). This technique characterizes the materials refractive indices, fiber morphology, birefringence, extinction angle, sign of elongation, and dispersion staining colors to detect asbestos. Percentage estimates are based on approximate area compositions under a stereo-microscope. 5.3 Bulk Sample Results The results of the sample analysis are presented in Table 1, and the laboratory analysis report is included as Appendix B. Figure 3. Materials with Asbestos Detected at 1% or Greater Mat'l Type Description Location ACT 2'x4' Ceiling Tile Entry, Room 1, 2 Flooring Matls Brown Linoleum Rooms 7, 8 Flooring Matls Gray 12"x12" Floor Tile/Mastic Bathroom 3 Flooring Matls White 9"x9" Floor Tile/Mastic Room 9 Flooring Matls Beige 9"x9" Floor Tile/Mastic Room 9 Flooring Matls Black 9"x9" Floor Tile/Mastic Room 9 Mastic Floor Mastic Theater Flooring Matls Linoleum Theater Roofing Perimeter Tar Roof 1, 2, 4, 5 Roofing Rolled Roof Tar Roof 1, 2, 4, 5 Caulking Penetration Caulk Roof 1, 2, 4, 5 Caulking Penetration Caulk Roof 3 Roofing Silver Perimeter Tar Roof 1, 2, 5 Caulking Exterior Window Caulk Entry, Entry 2, Dance Studio, Theater Caulking Expansion Caulk Theater Exterior Figure 4. Materials with NO Asbestos Detected (Pursuant to EPA and DSHS Definition) Mat'l Type Description Location Sheetrock Textured Sheetrock/Joint Compound - Walls/Ceilings Room 1, 2, 3, Entry, Rear Entry Hallway, Bathroom, Hallway to Bathroom PlasterSurf Plaster Walls Entry, Hallway, Hallway to Bathroom, Bathroom 1, Rear Entry, Room 1, 2, 3 Sheetrock Fiber Board Wall Room 3 Comprehensive Asbestos Survey City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Page 5 of 11

6 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: ACT 1'x1' Ceiling Tile - New Room 3, Hallway Caulking Interior Window Caulk Room 1, Room 2, Room 3 Flooring Matls Brown Linoleum Rear Entry Flooring Matls Layered Linoleum Flooring Hallway, Hallway 2, Bathroom 1, Room 1 Sheetrock Textured Sheetrock/Joint Compound - Walls Entry 2, Hall 2, HVAC 1, Bathroom 2 & 3, Dance Studio, & Rooms 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Unspecified Textured Sheetrock/Joint Compound Walls -Behind New SR/JC Walls Rooms 4, 5, 6 ACT 1'x1' Ceiling Tile - Old Entry, Room 1, Room 2 Flooring Matls Linoleum Under Sub Floor Hallway, Hallway 2, Bathroom 1, Room 1 PlasterSurf Plaster Walls Rooms 4, 5, 6, Entry 2, Dance Studio Cove Base 4" Gray Cove Base/Mastic Entry 2, Room 4, 5, Hall 2 Cove Base 4" Black Cove Base/Mastic Room 6, 7, 8 ACT 2'x4' Ceiling Tile Entry 2, Rooms 4, 5, 6 ACT 2'x4' Ceiling Tile - Pinhole Rooms 6, 7, 8, Dance Studio Undercoating White Sink Undercoating Room 8 ACT 1'x1' Ceiling Tile Dance Studio Flooring Matls White 12"x12" Floor Tile Under Carpet Rooms 4, 5, 6, Hall 2, Entry 2, Dance Studio Sheetrock Plaster Walls Theater Sheetrock Textured Sheetrock/Joint Compound - Walls & Ceilings Rear Entry 3, HVAC 3, Women's Restroom, Men's Restroom, Lounge, Theater Roofing Rolled Roof Tar Roof 3 ExTexture Exterior Stucco Theater, Hallway, Hall to Bath, Bathroom, Rooms 7, 8 Comprehensive Asbestos Survey City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Page 6 of 11

7 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Hazard Assessment Asbestos is an airborne hazard. A hazard assessment refers to the process by which we evaluate a material's potential to release fibers into the air. Fibers may be released spontaneously as part of the aging process, or as a result of sudden impact, vibration, air movement, or localized deterioration. Assessing a material's potential for fiber release, and hence its associated hazard, is based upon evaluating the material's condition and potential for further disturbance, damage, or deterioration. 6.1 Hazard Assessment Rankings Any material identified as asbestos containing that exhibits damage, should be considered a hazard to anyone who works in the area. Typically, damage is classified as minor or significant. Minor damage is characterized by small cuts, tears, scuffs, small openings, or other limited disturbance to asbestos containing materials. Areas with minor damage represent varying degrees of hazards from slight to high depending on: * The nature of the damage; * Proximity to disturbers, such as airstreams; * Location with respect to building occupants; * Activity in the immediate area; and * Frequency of maintenance in the area. Significant damage is characterized by large openings, visible flaking, loose particles, and debris on surfaces below the material. Asbestos containing materials which exhibit significant damage are either high or critical hazards, depending upon accessibility. High hazards exist where significantly damaged materials are generally inaccessible; however, where significant damage is accessible, or in the vicinity of building occupants, there is a critical hazard. The recommended action for addressing asbestos related hazards depends upon the degree of hazard. For example: * An immediate hazard or critical assessment describes a situation in which the material is exposed and friable, accessible to personnel, and is disturbed releasing fibers in the air. In this situation, immediate action should be taken. At a minimum, the area should be isolated and access restricted. * A high assessment describes a situation in which the material is in poor condition, exposed and friable, with a potential for disturbance. In this case, interim controls should be instituted, and the material should be removed when practical. Repairs should be made to the ACM if abatement is not scheduled. * A medium or moderate assessment describes a situation in which a combination of the determining factors vary, such as a material that is in good condition but has a high asbestos content and is generally accessible. In situations like this, abatement can be scheduled with future building renovation or maintenance. * A low or slight assessment describes a situation in which the material is in good condition and has a low potential for disturbance, damage, or deterioration. In this situation, an O&M program is usually all that is needed. In general, those areas that are classified as critical or high damage should be abated. These are areas where a high probability of exposure could occur. Moderately damaged areas would require an Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Program to be instituted. In addition, these areas should be considered for abatement, or at the very least repaired. Comprehensive Asbestos Survey City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Page 7 of 11

8 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Asbestos-Containing Material Assessments Figure 5 provides a summary of the asbestos identified during the survey, along with a hazard assessment for each type and condition of asbestos-containing material. Figure 5. Hazard Assessments for Asbestos-Containing Materials Acoustic Ceiling Tiles Condition: Good, Friability: F, Disturbance Potential: Low Acoustic ceiling tile in good condition presents a low potential health hazard to building occupants due to its observed good condition and intact binding matrices. Prior to building demolition, renovation or work activities that would disturb these materials, removal must be performed by a properly trained and licensed abatement contractor. The preceding hazard assessment applies to the asbestos-containing materials listed below: Area Ref# Homogeneous Area Description Quantity Location 04 2'x4' Ceiling Tile 364 s.f. Entry, Room 1, 2 Flooring Materials Condition: Good, Friability: NF I, Disturbance Potential: Low The floor tile and mastic in good condition presents a low potential health hazard to building occupants due to its observed good condition and intact binding matrices. Prior to building demolition, renovation or work activities that would disturb these materials, removal must be performed by a properly trained and TDSHS-licensed abatement contractor. Prior to building demolition, removal of any damaged or significantly damaged floor tile and linoleum flooring should be performed by a properly trained and state-licensed abatement contractor. Currently, National Emission Standards for Hazard Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations allow Category I non-friable asbestos floor tile, sheet flooring and mastic in good condition, to be left in place during structural building demolition. Buildings subject to NESHAP regulations, require that wet demolition work be conducted with no visible emissions, and the presence of a "Competent Person" trained under the provisions of NESHAP to supervise the demolition work. The asbestos-containing materials should be placed in a management program and monitored until renovation or demolition activity occurs. The preceding hazard assessment applies to the asbestos-containing materials listed below: Area Ref# Homogeneous Area Description Quantity Location 19 Brown Linoleum 1023 s.f. Rooms 7, 8 20 Gray 12"x12" Floor Tile/Mastic 64 s.f. Bathroom 3 21 White 9"x9" Floor Tile/Mastic 10 s.f. Room 9 22 Beige 9"x9" Floor Tile/Mastic 458 s.f. Room 9 23 Black 9"x9" Floor Tile/Mastic 176 s.f. Room 9 29 Linoleum 270 s.f. Theater Comprehensive Asbestos Survey City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Page 8 of 11

9 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Mastic for Misc Materials Condition: Good, Friability: NF I, Disturbance Potential: Low The mastic in good condition presents a low potential health hazard to building occupants due to its observed good condition and intact binding matrices. Prior to building demolition, renovation or work activities that would disturb these materials, removal must be performed by a properly trained and TDSHS-licensed abatement contractor. The asbestos-containing materials should be placed in a management program and monitored until renovation or demolition activity occurs. The preceding hazard assessment applies to the asbestos-containing materials listed below: Area Ref# Homogeneous Area Description Quantity Location 28 Floor Mastic 3965 s.f. Theater Roofing Materials Condition: Good, Friability: NF I, Disturbance Potential: Low Currently, National Emission Standards for Hazard Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations allow Category I non-friable roofing material in good condition, to be left in place during structural building demolition. Buildings subject to NESHAP regulations require that wet demolition work be conducted with no visible emissions, and the presence of a "Competent Person" trained under the provisions of NESHAP to supervise the demolition work. The preceding hazard assessment applies to the asbestos-containing materials listed below: Area Ref# Homogeneous Area Description Quantity Location 30 Perimeter Tar 324 l.f. Roof 1, 2, 4, 5 31 Rolled Roof Tar 9748 s.f. Roof 1, 2, 4, 5 35 Silver Perimeter Tar 28 l.f. Roof 1, 2, 5 Window Glazing, Caulking and Sealant Condition: Good, Friability: NF II, Disturbance Potential: Low At the time of the survey, this ACM was observed to be non-friable and in good condition. Please refer to the schematic drawings for specific material locations. The window glazing and caulking is in good condition and presents a low potential health hazard to building occupants due to its observed good condition and intact binding matrices. The preceding hazard assessment applies to the asbestos-containing materials listed below: Area Ref# Homogeneous Area Description Quantity Location 32 Penetration Caulk 10 l.f. Roof 1, 2, 4, 5 34 Penetration Caulk 5 l.f. Roof 3 37 Exterior Window Caulk 350 l.f. Entry, Entry 2, Dance Studio, Theater 38 Expansion Caulk 16 l.f. Theater Exterior Comprehensive Asbestos Survey City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Page 9 of 11

10 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Hazard Assessment Summary In the event other building materials are discovered in addition to the materials sampled in this survey, those building materials should be presumed to contain asbestos and treated as such until proven otherwise by PLM laboratory analysis. 7.1 Response Actions Asbestos Containing Materials The identified asbestos in the building should be removed by a Texas licensed asbestos abatement contractor prior to renovation or demolition plans which may disturb the material. 7.2 Explanation of Response Ratings Table 1 includes a response rating based on factors such as friability, accessibility, potential for disturbance, etc. Definitions for the response ratings are listed below: 0 = Material does not contain detectable amounts of asbestos and requires no asbestos-related abatement action. 1 = Material contains asbestos, was non-friable, and requires no abatement action unless sanded, abraded, drilled or otherwise disturbed. 2 = Material contains asbestos and was friable. Damage was not observed; no immediate abatement action is required. 3 = Material contains asbestos, was friable, and shows signs of localized damage with a potential for disturbance. 4 = Material contains friable asbestos and was significantly damaged. Comprehensive Asbestos Survey City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Page 10 of 11

11 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Qualifications Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. has attempted to observe the existing conditions within the aforementioned building utilizing generally accepted procedures. Regardless of the thoroughness of a survey, the possibility exists that some areas containing asbestos were overlooked, inaccessible or different from those at specific locations. Furthermore, renovation and/or construction may reveal altered conditions. This report describes only the conditions present at the time of the survey, in the areas surveyed. The recommendations presented apply to the conditions that were observed during the survey. IHST policies are to not perform destructive sampling unless previously authorized by the client. Therefore, IHST does not perform core sampling of roofing materials unless previously authorized and accompanied by the owner and/or his representative. Other conditions may exist in unsurveyed or inaccessible areas such as behind walls and above permanent ceilings. In addition, the conditions of asbestos-containing materials may change gradually or suddenly depending upon use, maintenance or accident. As a result, the recommendations presented should be periodically reviewed and updated. The quantity estimates presented in this report were based upon observations during the survey as well as information from building plans provided by the owner. While it is believed that the estimated quantities are reasonable, unanticipated conditions could be present in inaccessible or unsurveyed areas. Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology, Inc. do not warrant or guarantee the quantity estimates. The use of such estimates shall be at the user's own risk and shall constitute a release and agreement to defend and indemnify Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology, Inc. from and against any liability. If you have any questions or comments regarding the content of this report, I would be glad to discuss them at your convenience. Sincerely, Kristopher Girton - DSHS Asbestos Inspector License # Tracy K. Bramlett President DSHS Individual Asbestos Consultant License # Comprehensive Asbestos Survey City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Page 11 of 11

12 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Appendix: Appendix A: Site Drawings Asbestos Survey Appendix City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX

13 Rear Entry 2 T T Rear Entry 3 T T 090 T Men's Dressroom 089 NORTH BT L HVAC 3 Women's Dressroom Lounge L L L BT 1 Hallway Rear Entry Room 3 Room 2 Room 1 Entry BT L Room Room Room Room Dance Studio Room 5 Hall L L Room L Entry L L Theatre 009L L 012L ' ' NEGATIVE ASBESTOS SAMPLE POSITIVE ASBESTOS SAMPLE NEGATIVE PCB SAMPLE POSITIVE PCB SAMPLE KEY NEGATIVE LEAD SAMPLE POSITIVE LEAD SAMPLE DRAWING TITLE: Garland Civic Theatre 108 N 6th Street Garland, TX *POSITIVE ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL IS CLASSIFIED AS BEING GREATER THAN 1% ASBESTOS. (POSITIVE ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL IN CALIFORNIA IS GREATER THAN 0.1% ASBESTOS.) *POSITIVE PCB MATERIAL IS CLASSIFIED AS BEING GREATER THAN 50PPM. Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. *POSITIVE LEAD CONTAINING MATERIAL IS CLASSIFIED AS BEING GREATER THAN 0.5% LEAD BY WEIGHT. JOB NUMBER: DRAWN BY: K. Girton DATE: 09/13/2016 Scale: None Sheet: 1 of 4

14 NORTH Roof Roof Roof Roof Collapsed Roof 5 97' Roof 1 127' Roof NEGATIVE ASBESTOS SAMPLE POSITIVE ASBESTOS SAMPLE NEGATIVE PCB SAMPLE POSITIVE PCB SAMPLE KEY NEGATIVE LEAD SAMPLE POSITIVE LEAD SAMPLE DRAWING TITLE: Garland Civic Theatre 108 N 6th Street Garland, TX *POSITIVE ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL IS CLASSIFIED AS BEING GREATER THAN 1% ASBESTOS. (POSITIVE ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL IN CALIFORNIA IS GREATER THAN 0.1% ASBESTOS.) *POSITIVE PCB MATERIAL IS CLASSIFIED AS BEING GREATER THAN 50PPM. Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. *POSITIVE LEAD CONTAINING MATERIAL IS CLASSIFIED AS BEING GREATER THAN 0.5% LEAD BY WEIGHT. JOB NUMBER: DRAWN BY: K. Girton DATE: 09/13/2016 Scale: None Sheet: 2 of 4

15 T T T T NORTH Rear Entry 2 Rear Entry 3 T Men's Dressroom BT 3 HVAC 3 Women's Dressroom Lounge BT 2 Room 7 Room 9 Room 8 BT 1 97' Rear Entry Room 6 Theatre Hallway Room 3 Room 5 Hall 2 Dance Studio Room 2 Room 1 Entry Room 4 Entry 2 127' ACM 2'x4' Ceiling Tile ACM Brown Linoleum Flooring KEY ACM 12"x12" Gray Floor Tile with ACM Black Mastic and ACM Leveling Compound ACM 9"x9" Beige Floor Tile and ACM Black Mastic ACM Linoleum Flooring ACM Exterior Window Caulk DRAWING TITLE: Garland Civic Theatre 108 N 6th Street Garland, TX ACM 9"x9" White Floor Tile and ACM Black Mastic ACM 9"x9" Black Floor Tile and ACM Black Mastic ACM Floor Mastic ACM Exterior Expansion Caulk Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. *POSITIVE ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL IS CLASSIFIED AS BEING GREATER THAN 1% ASBESTOS. JOB NUMBER: DRAWN BY: K. Girton DATE: 09/13/2016 Scale: None Sheet: 3 of 4

16 NORTH Roof 4 Roof 3 Roof 2 Roof Collapsed 97' Roof 5 Roof 1 127' Roof ACM Black Perimeter Tar ACM Rolled Roof Type 1 ACM Rolled Roof Type 2 KEY DRAWING TITLE: Garland Civic Theatre 108 N 6th Street Garland, TX ACM Silver Perimeter Tar Layered over Black Perimeter Tar ACM Penetration Caulk Type 1 ACM Penetration Caulk Type 2 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. *POSITIVE ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL IS CLASSIFIED AS BEING GREATER THAN 1% ASBESTOS. JOB NUMBER: DRAWN BY: K. Girton DATE: 09/13/2016 Scale: None Sheet: 4 of 4

17 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Appendix: Appendix B: Lab Results Asbestos Survey Appendix City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX

18 2051 Valley View Lane Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) PLM Summary Report NVLAP Lab Code TDSHS License No Client : Project : Project # : Identification : Test Method : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology City of Garland, Civic Theater, 108 N 6th St, Garland Not Provided Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) EPA Method 600 / R-93 / 116 Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 09/07/2016 Sample Date : 08/31/2016 Page 1 of 9 On 9/2/2016, one hundred twenty eight (128) bulk material samples were submitted by Kristopher Girton of Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. The PLM Detail Report is attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Sample Number Client Sample Description / Location Asbestos Content Textured Sheetrock / Joint Compound Walls/Ceilings, Entry Textured Sheetrock / Joint Compound Walls/Ceilings, Room 3 Textured Sheetrock / Joint Compound Walls/Ceilings, Hallway to Bathroom Textured Sheetrock / Joint Compound Walls/Ceilings, Rear Entry Textured Sheetrock / Joint Compound Walls/Ceilings, Room 2 None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Texture / Joint Cmpd None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Texture None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Texture None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Texture None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Texture / Joint Cmpd 006 Plaster Walls, Entry None Detected - Base Plaster None Detected - Top Plaster 007 Plaster Walls, Entry None Detected - Base Plaster None Detected - Top Plaster 008 Plaster Walls, Hallway to Bathroom None Detected - Base Plaster None Detected - Top Plaster 009 Plaster Walls, Rear Entry None Detected - Base Plaster None Detected - Top Plaster 010 Plaster Walls, Room 3 None Detected - Base Plaster None Detected - Top Plaster 011 Fiber Board Wall, Room 3 None Detected - Fiber Board None Detected - Texture 012 Fiber Board Wall, Room 3 None Detected - Fiber Board None Detected - Texture 013 Fiber Board Wall, Room 3 None Detected - Fiber Board None Detected - Texture

19 2051 Valley View Lane Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) PLM Summary Report NVLAP Lab Code TDSHS License No Client : Project : Project # : Identification : Test Method : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology City of Garland, Civic Theater, 108 N 6th St, Garland Not Provided Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) EPA Method 600 / R-93 / 116 Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 09/07/2016 Sample Date : 08/31/2016 Page 2 of 9 On 9/2/2016, one hundred twenty eight (128) bulk material samples were submitted by Kristopher Girton of Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. The PLM Detail Report is attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Sample Number Client Sample Description / Location Asbestos Content 014 2' x 4' Ceiling Tile, Entry 2% Chrysotile - Acoustic Tile 015 2' x 4' Ceiling Tile, Hallway Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 016 2' x 4' Ceiling Tile, Room 2 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 017 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile (Old), Entry None Detected - Acoustic Tile None Detected - Texture 018 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile (Old), Entry None Detected - Acoustic Tile None Detected - Texture 019 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile (Old), Entry None Detected - Acoustic Tile None Detected - Texture 020 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile (New), Room 3 None Detected - Acoustic Tile 021 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile (New), Room 3 None Detected - Acoustic Tile 022 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile (New), Hallway None Detected - Acoustic Tile 023 Interior Window Caulk, Room 2 None Detected - Caulking 024 Interior Window Caulk, Room 2 None Detected - Caulking 025 Interior Window Caulk, Room 3 None Detected - Caulking 026 Linoleum (Brown), Rear Entry None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Clear Mastic 027 Linoleum Flooring (Brown), Rear Entry None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Clear Mastic 028 Linoleum Flooring (Brown), Rear Entry None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Clear Mastic 029 Layer Linoleum Flooring, Hallway None Detected - Top Tile None Detected - Clear Mastic None Detected - Bottom Tile None Detected - Clear Mastic None Detected - Leveling Compound

20 2051 Valley View Lane Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) PLM Summary Report NVLAP Lab Code TDSHS License No Client : Project : Project # : Identification : Test Method : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology City of Garland, Civic Theater, 108 N 6th St, Garland Not Provided Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) EPA Method 600 / R-93 / 116 Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 09/07/2016 Sample Date : 08/31/2016 Page 3 of 9 On 9/2/2016, one hundred twenty eight (128) bulk material samples were submitted by Kristopher Girton of Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. The PLM Detail Report is attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Sample Number Client Sample Description / Location Asbestos Content 030 Layer Linoleum Flooring, Hallway None Detected - Top Tile None Detected - Clear Mastic None Detected - Bottom Tile None Detected - Clear Mastic None Detected - Leveling Compound 031 Layer Linoleum Flooring, Room 1 None Detected - Top Tile None Detected - Clear Mastic None Detected - Bottom Tile None Detected - Clear Mastic None Detected - Leveling Compound 032 Linoleum under Subfloor, Hallway None Detected - Sheet Flooring None Detected - Fiber Backing 033 Linoleum under Subfloor, Hallway None Detected - Sheet Flooring None Detected - Fiber Backing 034 Linoleum under Subfloor, Hallway None Detected - Sheet Flooring None Detected - Fiber Backing 035 Textured Sheetrock / Joint Compound Walls, Room 4 None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Texture 036 Textured Sheetrock / Joint Compound Walls, Entry 2 None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Texture 037 Textured Sheetrock / Joint Compound Walls, Hall 2 / Dance Studio None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Texture / Joint Cmpd 038 Textured Sheetrock / Joint Compound Walls, Hall 2 None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Texture 039 Textured Sheetrock / Joint Compound Walls, HVAC 1 None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Texture

21 2051 Valley View Lane Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) PLM Summary Report NVLAP Lab Code TDSHS License No Client : Project : Project # : Identification : Test Method : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology City of Garland, Civic Theater, 108 N 6th St, Garland Not Provided Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) EPA Method 600 / R-93 / 116 Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 09/07/2016 Sample Date : 08/31/2016 Page 4 of 9 On 9/2/2016, one hundred twenty eight (128) bulk material samples were submitted by Kristopher Girton of Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. The PLM Detail Report is attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Sample Number Client Sample Description / Location Asbestos Content Textured Sheetrock / Joint Compound Walls behind New Sheetrock / Joint Compound Walls, Room 6 Textured Sheetrock / Joint Compound Walls behind New Sheetrock / Joint Compound Walls, Room 6 Textured Sheetrock / Joint Compound Walls behind New Sheetrock / Joint Compound Walls, Room 4 None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Texture None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Texture None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Texture 043 Plaster Walls, Dance Studio None Detected - Base Plaster None Detected - Top Plaster 044 Plaster Walls, Dance Studio None Detected - Base Plaster None Detected - Top Plaster 045 Plaster Walls, Room 4 None Detected - Base Plaster None Detected - Top Plaster 046 Plaster Walls, Room 6 None Detected - Base Plaster None Detected - Top Plaster 047 Plaster Walls, Room 6 None Detected - Base Plaster None Detected - Top Plaster 048 4" Cove Base (Gray) / Mastic, Entry None Detected - Cove Base None Detected - Yellow Mastic 049 4" Cove Base (Gray) / Mastic, Room 5 None Detected - Cove Base None Detected - Yellow Mastic 050 4" Cove Base (Gray) / Mastic, Hall 2 None Detected - Cove Base None Detected - Yellow Mastic 051 4" Cove Base (Black) / Mastic, Room 7 None Detected - Cove Base None Detected - Yellow Mastic 052 4" Cove Base (Black) / Mastic, Room 8 None Detected - Cove Base None Detected - Yellow Mastic

22 2051 Valley View Lane Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) PLM Summary Report NVLAP Lab Code TDSHS License No Client : Project : Project # : Identification : Test Method : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology City of Garland, Civic Theater, 108 N 6th St, Garland Not Provided Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) EPA Method 600 / R-93 / 116 Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 09/07/2016 Sample Date : 08/31/2016 Page 5 of 9 On 9/2/2016, one hundred twenty eight (128) bulk material samples were submitted by Kristopher Girton of Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. The PLM Detail Report is attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Sample Number Client Sample Description / Location Asbestos Content 053 4" Cove Base (Black) / Mastic, Room 8 None Detected - Cove Base None Detected - Yellow Mastic 054 2' x 4' Ceiling Tile, Entry 2 None Detected - Acoustic Tile 055 2' x 4' Ceiling Tile, Room 4 None Detected - Acoustic Tile 056 2' x 4' Ceiling Tile, Hall 2 None Detected - Acoustic Tile 057 2' x 4' Ceiling Tile (Pinhole), Room 7 None Detected - Ceiling Tile 058 2' x 4' Ceiling Tile (Pinhole), Dance Studio None Detected - Ceiling Tile 059 2' x 4' Ceiling Tile (Pinhole), Room 8 None Detected - Ceiling Tile 060 Sink Undercoating (White), Room 8 None Detected - Sink Undercoating 061 Sink Undercoating (White), Room 8 None Detected - Sink Undercoating 062 Sink Undercoating (White), Room 8 None Detected - Sink Undercoating 063 Linoleum Flooring (Brown), Room 8 None Detected - Sheet Flooring 45% Chrysotile - Fiber Backing None Detected - Yellow Mastic None Detected - Leveling Compound 064 Linoleum Flooring (Brown), Room 8 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 065 Linoleum Flooring (Brown), Room 7 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop " x 12" Floor Tile (Gray) / Mastic, Bathroom 3 2% Chrysotile - Leveling Compound None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Yellow Mastic 5% Chrysotile - Black Mastic " x 12" Floor Tile (Gray) / Mastic, Bathroom 3 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop " x 12" Floor Tile (Gray) / Mastic, Bathroom 3 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 069 9" x 9" Floor Tile (White) / Mastic, Room 9 15% Chrysotile - Floor Tile 5% Chrysotile - Black Mastic

23 2051 Valley View Lane Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) PLM Summary Report NVLAP Lab Code TDSHS License No Client : Project : Project # : Identification : Test Method : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology City of Garland, Civic Theater, 108 N 6th St, Garland Not Provided Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) EPA Method 600 / R-93 / 116 Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 09/07/2016 Sample Date : 08/31/2016 Page 6 of 9 On 9/2/2016, one hundred twenty eight (128) bulk material samples were submitted by Kristopher Girton of Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. The PLM Detail Report is attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Sample Number Client Sample Description / Location Asbestos Content 070 9" x 9" Floor Tile (White) / Mastic, Room 9 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 071 9" x 9" Floor Tile (White) / Mastic, Room 9 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 072 9" x 9" Floor Tile (Beige) / Mastic, Room 9 10% Chrysotile - Floor Tile 5% Chrysotile - Black Mastic 073 9" x 9" Floor Tile (Beige) / Mastic, Room 9 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 074 9" x 9" Floor Tile (Beige) / Mastic, Room 9 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 075 9" x 9" Floor Tile (Black) / Mastic, Room 9 None Detected - Leveling Compound None Detected - Yellow Mastic 10% Chrysotile - Floor Tile 5% Chrysotile - Black Mastic 076 9" x 9" Floor Tile (Black) / Mastic, Room 9 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 077 9" x 9" Floor Tile (Black) / Mastic, Room 9 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 078 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile, Dance Studio None Detected - Acoustic Tile 079 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile, Dance Studio None Detected - Acoustic Tile 080 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile, Dance Studio None Detected - Acoustic Tile " x 12" Floor Tile (White) under Carpet, Room 6 None Detected - Yellow Mastic None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Yellow Mastic " x 12" Floor Tile (White) under Carpet, Hall 2 None Detected - Yellow Mastic None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Yellow Mastic None Detected - Leveling Compound " x 12" Floor Tile (White) under Carpet, Entry 2 None Detected - Yellow Mastic None Detected - Floor Tile None Detected - Yellow Mastic 084 Plaster Walls, Theatre None Detected - Plaster

24 2051 Valley View Lane Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) PLM Summary Report NVLAP Lab Code TDSHS License No Client : Project : Project # : Identification : Test Method : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology City of Garland, Civic Theater, 108 N 6th St, Garland Not Provided Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) EPA Method 600 / R-93 / 116 Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 09/07/2016 Sample Date : 08/31/2016 Page 7 of 9 On 9/2/2016, one hundred twenty eight (128) bulk material samples were submitted by Kristopher Girton of Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. The PLM Detail Report is attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Sample Number Client Sample Description / Location Asbestos Content 085 Plaster Walls, Theatre None Detected - Base Plaster None Detected - Top Plaster 086 Plaster Walls, Theatre None Detected - Plaster 087 Plaster Walls, Theatre None Detected - Base Plaster None Detected - Top Plaster 088 Plaster Walls, Theatre None Detected - Base Plaster None Detected - Top Plaster Textured Sheetrock / Joint Compound Walls / Ceilings, Lounge Textured Sheetrock / Joint Compound Walls / Ceilings, Women's Dressing Room Textured Sheetrock / Joint Compound Walls / Ceilings, Lounge Textured Sheetrock / Joint Compound Walls / Ceilings, Rear Entry 3 Textured Sheetrock / Joint Compound Walls / Ceilings, Rear Entry 3 None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Texture None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Texture / Joint Cmpd None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Acoustic Texture None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Joint Compound None Detected - Texture None Detected - Drywall Material None Detected - Texture / Joint Cmpd 094 Floor Mastic, Theatre None Detected - Yellow Mastic 5% Chrysotile - Black Mastic 095 Floor Mastic, Theatre Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 096 Floor Mastic, Theatre Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 097 Linoleum Flooring, Theatre None Detected - Sheet Flooring 65% Chrysotile - Fiber Backing 098 Linoleum Flooring, Theatre Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 099 Linoleum Flooring, Theatre Not Analyzed - Positive Stop

25 2051 Valley View Lane Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) PLM Summary Report NVLAP Lab Code TDSHS License No Client : Project : Project # : Identification : Test Method : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology City of Garland, Civic Theater, 108 N 6th St, Garland Not Provided Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) EPA Method 600 / R-93 / 116 Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 09/07/2016 Sample Date : 08/31/2016 Page 8 of 9 On 9/2/2016, one hundred twenty eight (128) bulk material samples were submitted by Kristopher Girton of Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. The PLM Detail Report is attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Sample Number Client Sample Description / Location Asbestos Content 100 Perimeter Tar, Roof 1 5% Chrysotile - Tar 101 Perimeter Tar, Roof 1 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 102 Perimeter Tar, Roof 1 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 103 Rolled Roof Tar, Roof 2 5% Chrysotile - Tar 104 Rolled Roof Tar, Roof 4 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 105 Rolled Roof Tar, Roof 4 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 106 Penetration Caulk, Roof 2 None Detected - Tar 5% Chrysotile - Flashing Material 107 Penetration Caulk, Roof 2 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 108 Penetration Caulk, Roof 2 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 109 Rolled Roof Tar, Roof 3 None Detected - Roofing Tar None Detected - Roof Membrane 110 Rolled Roof Tar, Roof 3 None Detected - Roofing Tar None Detected - Roof Membrane 111 Rolled Roof Tar, Roof 3 None Detected - Roofing Tar None Detected - Roof Membrane 112 Penetration Caulk, Roof 3 None Detected - Flashing Material None Detected - Tar 113 Penetration Caulk, Roof 3 5% Chrysotile - Flashing Material None Detected - Tar 114 Penetration Caulk, Roof 3 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 115 Perimeter Tar (Silver), Roof 2 None Detected - Silver Paint None Detected - Caulking 5% Chrysotile - Flashing Material 116 Perimeter Tar (Silver), Roof 2 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop

26 2051 Valley View Lane Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) PLM Summary Report NVLAP Lab Code TDSHS License No Client : Project : Project # : Identification : Test Method : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology City of Garland, Civic Theater, 108 N 6th St, Garland Not Provided Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) EPA Method 600 / R-93 / 116 Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 09/07/2016 Sample Date : 08/31/2016 Page 9 of 9 On 9/2/2016, one hundred twenty eight (128) bulk material samples were submitted by Kristopher Girton of Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. The PLM Detail Report is attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below: Sample Number Client Sample Description / Location Asbestos Content 117 Perimeter Tar (Silver), Roof 2 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 118 Exterior Stucco, Exterior Room 7 None Detected - Stucco 119 Exterior Stucco, Exterior Room 7 None Detected - Plaster None Detected - Stucco 120 Exterior Stucco, Exterior Room 8 None Detected - Stucco 121 Exterior Stucco, Exterior Theatre None Detected - Stucco 122 Exterior Stucco, Exterior Theatre None Detected - Stucco 123 Exterior Window Caulk, Exterior Entry 2% Chrysotile - Caulking 124 Exterior Window Caulk, Exterior Entry 2 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 125 Exterior Window Caulk, Exterior Theatre Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 126 Expansion Caulk, Exterior Theatre <1% Chrysotile - Plaster None Detected - Caulking 127 Expansion Caulk, Exterior Theatre 2% Chrysotile - Plaster None Detected - Caulking 128 Expansion Caulk, Exterior Theatre <1% Chrysotile - Plaster None Detected - Caulking These samples were analyzed by layers. Quantification, unless otherwise noted, is performed by calibrated visual estimate. The test report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The results relate only to the items tested. These test results do not imply endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program for Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis under Lab Code Analyst(s): Brian R. Schmidt, Debra O'Sullivan, Kirsten Tye, Shaun Wilkerson Lab Manager : Heather Lopez Approved Signatory : Lab Director : Bruce Crabb Approved Signatory : Thank you for choosing Moody Labs

27 This Page Left Intentionally Blank

28 Client : Project : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology City of Garland, Civic Theater, 108 N 6th St, Garland Project # : Not Provided PLM Detail Report Moody Labs NVLAP Lab Code Valley View Lane Supplement to PLM Summary Report TDSHS License No Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) % Of Sample Number Layer Components Sample Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 09/07/2016 % of Layer Page 1 of 14 Analysis Date 001 Drywall Material (Light Pink) 78% Cellulose Fibers 5% 09/07 BS 001 Drywall Material (Light Pink) 78% Gypsum / Binders 95% 09/07 BS 001 DW Paper Facing (Tan) 2% Cellulose Fibers 100% 09/07 BS 001 Texture / Joint Cmpd (White) 20% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 BS 002 Drywall Material (Light Pink) 60% Cellulose Fibers 5% 09/07 BS 002 Drywall Material (Light Pink) 60% Gypsum / Binders 95% 09/07 BS 002 DW Paper / Tape (Tan / White) 20% Cellulose Fibers 100% 09/07 BS 002 Joint Compound (White) 5% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 BS 002 Texture (White) 15% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 BS 003 Drywall Material (Light Pink) 95% Cellulose Fibers 5% 09/07 BS 003 Drywall Material (Light Pink) 95% Gypsum / Binders 95% 09/07 BS 003 DW Paper / Tape (Tan / White) 3% Cellulose Fibers 100% 09/07 BS 003 Joint Compound (White) 1% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 BS 003 Texture (White) 1% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 BS 004 Drywall Material (Light Pink) 90% Cellulose Fibers 5% 09/07 BS 004 Drywall Material (Light Pink) 90% Gypsum / Binders 95% 09/07 BS 004 DW Paper / Tape (Tan / White) 5% Cellulose Fibers 100% 09/07 BS 004 Joint Compound (Light Tan) 3% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 BS 004 Texture (White) 2% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 BS 005 Drywall Material (Light Pink) 83% Cellulose Fibers 5% 09/07 BS 005 Drywall Material (Light Pink) 83% Gypsum / Binders 95% 09/07 BS 005 DW Paper Facing (Tan) 2% Cellulose Fibers 100% 09/07 BS 005 Texture / Joint Cmpd (White) 15% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 BS 006 Base Plaster (Dark Tan) 20% Hair Fibers <1% 09/07 BS 006 Base Plaster (Dark Tan) 20% Aggregate 65% 09/07 BS 006 Base Plaster (Dark Tan) 20% Binders / Fillers 35% 09/07 BS 006 Top Plaster (White) 80% Calcite / Binders 100% 09/07 BS Analyst

29 Client : Project : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology City of Garland, Civic Theater, 108 N 6th St, Garland Project # : Not Provided PLM Detail Report Moody Labs NVLAP Lab Code Valley View Lane Supplement to PLM Summary Report TDSHS License No Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) % Of Sample Number Layer Components Sample Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 09/07/2016 % of Layer Page 2 of 14 Analysis Date 007 Base Plaster (Dark Tan) 98% Hair Fibers <1% 09/07 BS 007 Base Plaster (Dark Tan) 98% Aggregate 65% 09/07 BS 007 Base Plaster (Dark Tan) 98% Binders / Fillers 35% 09/07 BS 007 Top Plaster (White) 2% Calcite / Binders 100% 09/07 BS 008 Base Plaster (Dark Tan) 98% Hair Fibers <1% 09/07 BS 008 Base Plaster (Dark Tan) 98% Aggregate 65% 09/07 BS 008 Base Plaster (Dark Tan) 98% Binders / Fillers 35% 09/07 BS 008 Top Plaster (White) 2% Calcite / Binders 100% 09/07 BS 009 Base Plaster (Dark Tan) 95% Hair Fibers <1% 09/07 BS 009 Base Plaster (Dark Tan) 95% Aggregate 65% 09/07 BS 009 Base Plaster (Dark Tan) 95% Binders / Fillers 35% 09/07 BS 009 Top Plaster (White) 5% Calcite / Binders 100% 09/07 BS 010 Base Plaster (Dark Tan) 55% Hair Fibers <1% 09/07 BS 010 Base Plaster (Dark Tan) 55% Aggregate 65% 09/07 BS 010 Base Plaster (Dark Tan) 55% Binders / Fillers 35% 09/07 BS 010 Top Plaster (White) 45% Calcite / Binders 100% 09/07 BS 011 Fiber Board (Brown) 95% Wood Fibers 100% 09/07 BS 011 Texture (White) 5% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 BS 012 Fiber Board (Brown) 80% Wood Fibers 100% 09/07 BS 012 Texture (White) 20% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 BS 013 Fiber Board (Brown) 95% Wood Fibers 100% 09/07 BS 013 Texture (White) 5% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 BS 014 Acoustic Tile (Off-White) 100% Chrysotile 2% 09/07 BS 014 Acoustic Tile (Off-White) 100% Mineral Wool Fibers 93% 09/07 BS 014 Acoustic Tile (Off-White) 100% Binders / Fillers 5% 09/07 BS 015 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 BS 016 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 BS 017 Acoustic Tile (Tan) 100% Wood Fibers 100% 09/07 BS 017 Texture (Off-White) <1% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 BS Analyst

30 Client : Project : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology City of Garland, Civic Theater, 108 N 6th St, Garland Project # : Not Provided PLM Detail Report Moody Labs NVLAP Lab Code Valley View Lane Supplement to PLM Summary Report TDSHS License No Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) % Of Sample Number Layer Components Sample Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 09/07/2016 % of Layer Page 3 of 14 Analysis Date 018 Acoustic Tile (Tan) 100% Wood Fibers 100% 09/07 BS 018 Texture (Off-White) <1% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 BS 019 Acoustic Tile (Tan) 100% Wood Fibers 100% 09/07 BS 019 Texture (Off-White) <1% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 BS 020 Acoustic Tile (Light Grey) 100% Cellulose Fibers 50% 09/07 BS 020 Acoustic Tile (Light Grey) 100% Mineral Wool Fibers 30% 09/07 BS 020 Acoustic Tile (Light Grey) 100% Perlite 20% 09/07 BS 021 Acoustic Tile (Light Grey) 100% Cellulose Fibers 50% 09/07 BS 021 Acoustic Tile (Light Grey) 100% Mineral Wool Fibers 30% 09/07 BS 021 Acoustic Tile (Light Grey) 100% Perlite 20% 09/07 BS 022 Acoustic Tile (Light Grey) 100% Cellulose Fibers 50% 09/07 BS 022 Acoustic Tile (Light Grey) 100% Mineral Wool Fibers 30% 09/07 BS 022 Acoustic Tile (Light Grey) 100% Perlite 20% 09/07 BS 023 Caulking (White) 100% Calcite / Binders 100% 09/07 BS 024 Caulking (White) 100% Calcite / Binders 100% 09/07 BS 025 Caulking (White) 100% Calcite / Binders 100% 09/07 BS 026 Floor Tile (Brown / Tan) 100% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 09/07 BS 026 Clear Mastic (Clear) <1% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 BS Note: used up most of mastic for analysis 027 Floor Tile (Brown / Tan) 100% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 09/07 BS 027 Clear Mastic (Clear) <1% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 BS Note: used up most of mastic for analysis 028 Floor Tile (Brown / Tan) 100% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 09/07 BS 028 Clear Mastic (Clear) <1% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 BS Note: used up most of mastic for analysis 029 Top Tile (Dark Beige) 60% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 09/07 BS 029 Clear Mastic (Clear) <1% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 BS 029 Bottom Tile (Green / White) 20% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 09/07 BS 029 Clear Mastic (Clear) <1% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 BS 029 Leveling Compound (Off-White) 20% Calcite / Binders 100% 09/07 BS Analyst

31 Client : Project : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology City of Garland, Civic Theater, 108 N 6th St, Garland Project # : Not Provided PLM Detail Report Moody Labs NVLAP Lab Code Valley View Lane Supplement to PLM Summary Report TDSHS License No Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) % Of Sample Number Layer Components Sample Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 09/07/2016 % of Layer Page 4 of 14 Analysis Date 030 Top Tile (Dark Beige) 40% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 09/07 BS 030 Clear Mastic (Clear) <1% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 BS 030 Bottom Tile (Green / White) 20% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 09/07 BS 030 Clear Mastic (Clear) <1% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 BS 030 Leveling Compound (Off-White) 40% Calcite / Binders 100% 09/07 BS 031 Top Tile (Dark Beige) 40% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 09/07 BS 031 Clear Mastic (Clear) <1% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 BS 031 Bottom Tile (Green / White) 55% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 09/07 BS 031 Clear Mastic (Clear) <1% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 BS 031 Leveling Compound (Off-White) 5% Calcite / Binders 100% 09/07 BS 032 Sheet Flooring (Tan) 50% Cellulose Fibers 50% 09/07 SW 032 Sheet Flooring (Tan) 50% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 50% 09/07 SW 032 Fiber Backing (Black) 50% Cellulose Fibers 85% 09/07 SW 032 Fiber Backing (Black) 50% Tar Binders 15% 09/07 SW 033 Sheet Flooring (Tan) 50% Cellulose Fibers 50% 09/07 SW 033 Sheet Flooring (Tan) 50% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 50% 09/07 SW 033 Fiber Backing (Black) 50% Cellulose Fibers 85% 09/07 SW 033 Fiber Backing (Black) 50% Tar Binders 15% 09/07 SW 034 Sheet Flooring (Tan) 50% Cellulose Fibers 50% 09/07 SW 034 Sheet Flooring (Tan) 50% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 50% 09/07 SW 034 Fiber Backing (Black) 50% Cellulose Fibers 85% 09/07 SW 034 Fiber Backing (Black) 50% Tar Binders 15% 09/07 SW 035 Drywall Material (White) 55% Glass Wool Fibers 2% 09/07 SW 035 Drywall Material (White) 55% Cellulose Fibers 1% 09/07 SW 035 Drywall Material (White) 55% Gypsum / Binders 97% 09/07 SW 035 DW Paper / Tape (Tan / White) 25% Cellulose Fibers 100% 09/07 SW 035 Joint Compound (White) 10% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 035 Texture (White) 10% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 SW Analyst

32 Client : Project : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology City of Garland, Civic Theater, 108 N 6th St, Garland Project # : Not Provided PLM Detail Report Moody Labs NVLAP Lab Code Valley View Lane Supplement to PLM Summary Report TDSHS License No Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) % Of Sample Number Layer Components Sample Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 09/07/2016 % of Layer Page 5 of 14 Analysis Date 036 Drywall Material (White) 55% Glass Wool Fibers 2% 09/07 SW 036 Drywall Material (White) 55% Cellulose Fibers 1% 09/07 SW 036 Drywall Material (White) 55% Gypsum / Binders 97% 09/07 SW 036 DW Paper / Tape (Tan / White) 25% Cellulose Fibers 100% 09/07 SW 036 Joint Compound (White) 10% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 036 Texture (White) 10% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 037 Drywall Material (White) 75% Cellulose Fibers 5% 09/07 SW 037 Drywall Material (White) 75% Gypsum / Binders 95% 09/07 SW 037 DW Paper Facing (Tan) 10% Cellulose Fibers 100% 09/07 SW 037 Texture / Joint Cmpd (White) 15% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 038 Drywall Material (White) 55% Cellulose Fibers 5% 09/07 SW 038 Drywall Material (White) 55% Gypsum / Binders 95% 09/07 SW 038 DW Paper / Tape (Tan / White) 25% Cellulose Fibers 100% 09/07 SW 038 Joint Compound (White) 10% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 038 Texture (White) 10% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 039 Drywall Material (White) 55% Glass Wool Fibers 2% 09/07 SW 039 Drywall Material (White) 55% Cellulose Fibers 1% 09/07 SW 039 Drywall Material (White) 55% Gypsum / Binders 97% 09/07 SW 039 DW Paper / Tape (Tan / White) 25% Cellulose Fibers 100% 09/07 SW 039 Joint Compound (White) 10% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 039 Texture (White) 10% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 040 Drywall Material (White) 55% Glass Wool Fibers 2% 09/07 SW 040 Drywall Material (White) 55% Cellulose Fibers 1% 09/07 SW 040 Drywall Material (White) 55% Gypsum / Binders 97% 09/07 SW 040 DW Paper / Tape (Tan / White) 25% Cellulose Fibers 100% 09/07 SW 040 Joint Compound (White) 10% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 040 Texture (White) 10% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 SW Analyst

33 Client : Project : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology City of Garland, Civic Theater, 108 N 6th St, Garland Project # : Not Provided PLM Detail Report Moody Labs NVLAP Lab Code Valley View Lane Supplement to PLM Summary Report TDSHS License No Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) % Of Sample Number Layer Components Sample Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 09/07/2016 % of Layer Page 6 of 14 Analysis Date 041 Drywall Material (White) 55% Glass Wool Fibers 2% 09/07 SW 041 Drywall Material (White) 55% Cellulose Fibers 1% 09/07 SW 041 Drywall Material (White) 55% Gypsum / Binders 97% 09/07 SW 041 DW Paper / Tape (Tan / White) 25% Cellulose Fibers 100% 09/07 SW 041 Joint Compound (White) 10% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 041 Texture (White) 10% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 042 Drywall Material (White) 55% Glass Wool Fibers 2% 09/07 SW 042 Drywall Material (White) 55% Cellulose Fibers 1% 09/07 SW 042 Drywall Material (White) 55% Gypsum / Binders 97% 09/07 SW 042 DW Paper / Tape (Tan / White) 25% Cellulose Fibers 100% 09/07 SW 042 Joint Compound (White) 10% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 042 Texture (White) 10% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 043 Base Plaster (Brown) 85% Aggregate 65% 09/07 SW 043 Base Plaster (Brown) 85% Binders / Fillers 35% 09/07 SW 043 Top Plaster (White) 15% Calcite / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 044 Base Plaster (Brown) 85% Aggregate 65% 09/07 SW 044 Base Plaster (Brown) 85% Binders / Fillers 35% 09/07 SW 044 Top Plaster (White) 15% Calcite / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 045 Base Plaster (Brown) 85% Aggregate 65% 09/07 SW 045 Base Plaster (Brown) 85% Binders / Fillers 35% 09/07 SW 045 Top Plaster (White) 15% Calcite / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 046 Base Plaster (Brown) 80% Hair Fibers <1% 09/07 SW 046 Base Plaster (Brown) 80% Aggregate 65% 09/07 SW 046 Base Plaster (Brown) 80% Binders / Fillers 35% 09/07 SW 046 Top Plaster (White) 20% Calcite / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 047 Base Plaster (Brown) 85% Aggregate 65% 09/07 SW 047 Base Plaster (Brown) 85% Binders / Fillers 35% 09/07 SW 047 Top Plaster (White) 15% Calcite / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 048 Cove Base (Gray) 95% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 09/07 SW 048 Yellow Mastic (Yellow) 5% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 SW Analyst

34 Client : Project : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology City of Garland, Civic Theater, 108 N 6th St, Garland Project # : Not Provided PLM Detail Report Moody Labs NVLAP Lab Code Valley View Lane Supplement to PLM Summary Report TDSHS License No Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) % Of Sample Number Layer Components Sample Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 09/07/2016 % of Layer Page 7 of 14 Analysis Date 049 Cove Base (Gray) 95% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 09/07 SW 049 Yellow Mastic (Yellow) 5% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 SW 050 Cove Base (Gray) 95% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 09/07 SW 050 Yellow Mastic (Yellow) 5% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 SW 051 Cove Base (Black) 95% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 09/07 SW 051 Yellow Mastic (Yellow) 5% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 SW 052 Cove Base (Black) 95% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 09/07 SW 052 Yellow Mastic (Yellow) 5% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 SW 053 Cove Base (Black) 95% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 09/07 SW 053 Yellow Mastic (Yellow) 5% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 SW 054 Acoustic Tile (Tan) 100% Cellulose Fibers 50% 09/07 SW 054 Acoustic Tile (Tan) 100% Mineral Wool Fibers 30% 09/07 SW 054 Acoustic Tile (Tan) 100% Perlite 20% 09/07 SW 055 Acoustic Tile (Tan) 100% Cellulose Fibers 50% 09/07 SW 055 Acoustic Tile (Tan) 100% Mineral Wool Fibers 30% 09/07 SW 055 Acoustic Tile (Tan) 100% Perlite 20% 09/07 SW 056 Acoustic Tile (Tan) 100% Cellulose Fibers 50% 09/07 SW 056 Acoustic Tile (Tan) 100% Mineral Wool Fibers 30% 09/07 SW 056 Acoustic Tile (Tan) 100% Perlite 20% 09/07 SW 057 Ceiling Tile (Yellow) 95% Mineral Wool Fibers 95% 09/07 SW 057 Ceiling Tile (Yellow) 95% Resin Binders 5% 09/07 SW 057 Vinyl Facing (White) 5% Vinyl Binders 100% 09/07 SW 058 Ceiling Tile (Yellow) 95% Mineral Wool Fibers 95% 09/07 SW 058 Ceiling Tile (Yellow) 95% Resin Binders 5% 09/07 SW 058 Vinyl Facing (White) 5% Vinyl Binders 100% 09/07 SW 059 Ceiling Tile (Yellow) 95% Mineral Wool Fibers 95% 09/07 SW 059 Ceiling Tile (Yellow) 95% Resin Binders 5% 09/07 SW 059 Vinyl Facing (White) 5% Vinyl Binders 100% 09/07 SW Analyst

35 Client : Project : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology City of Garland, Civic Theater, 108 N 6th St, Garland Project # : Not Provided PLM Detail Report Moody Labs NVLAP Lab Code Valley View Lane Supplement to PLM Summary Report TDSHS License No Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) % Of Sample Number Layer Components Sample Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 09/07/2016 % of Layer Page 8 of 14 Analysis Date 060 Sink Undercoating (Off-White) 100% Cellulose Fibers 10% 09/07 SW 060 Sink Undercoating (Off-White) 100% Calcite / Talc 50% 09/07 SW 060 Sink Undercoating (Off-White) 100% Binders / Fillers 40% 09/07 SW 061 Sink Undercoating (Off-White) 100% Cellulose Fibers 10% 09/07 DO 061 Sink Undercoating (Off-White) 100% Calcite / Talc 50% 09/07 DO 061 Sink Undercoating (Off-White) 100% Binders / Fillers 40% 09/07 DO 062 Sink Undercoating (Off-White) 100% Cellulose Fibers 10% 09/07 DO 062 Sink Undercoating (Off-White) 100% Calcite / Talc 50% 09/07 DO 062 Sink Undercoating (Off-White) 100% Binders / Fillers 40% 09/07 DO 063 Sheet Flooring (Brown) 50% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 09/07 DO 063 Fiber Backing (Light Tan) 46% Chrysotile 45% 09/07 DO 063 Fiber Backing (Light Tan) 46% Cellulose Fibers 30% 09/07 DO 063 Fiber Backing (Light Tan) 46% Binders / Fillers 25% 09/07 DO 063 Yellow Mastic (Yellow) 2% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 DO 063 Leveling Compound (White) 2% Calcite / Binders 100% 09/07 DO 064 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 DO 065 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 DO 066 Leveling Compound (Gray) 3% Chrysotile 2% 09/07 DO 066 Leveling Compound (Gray) 3% Calcite / Binders 98% 09/07 DO 066 Floor Tile (Gray) 94% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 09/07 DO 066 Yellow Mastic (Yellow) 1% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 DO 066 Black Mastic (Black) 2% Chrysotile 5% 09/07 DO 066 Black Mastic (Black) 2% Tar Binders 95% 09/07 DO 067 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 DO 068 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 DO 069 Floor Tile (Light Gray-Green) 95% Chrysotile 15% 09/07 DO 069 Floor Tile (Light Gray-Green) 95% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 85% 09/07 DO 069 Black Mastic (Black) 5% Chrysotile 5% 09/07 DO 069 Black Mastic (Black) 5% Tar Binders 95% 09/07 DO Analyst

36 Client : Project : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology City of Garland, Civic Theater, 108 N 6th St, Garland Project # : Not Provided PLM Detail Report Moody Labs NVLAP Lab Code Valley View Lane Supplement to PLM Summary Report TDSHS License No Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) % Of Sample Number Layer Components Sample Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 09/07/2016 % of Layer Page 9 of 14 Analysis Date 070 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 DO 071 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 DO 072 Floor Tile (Beige) 97% Chrysotile 10% 09/07 DO 072 Floor Tile (Beige) 97% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 90% 09/07 DO 072 Black Mastic (Black) 3% Chrysotile 5% 09/07 DO 072 Black Mastic (Black) 3% Tar Binders 95% 09/07 DO 073 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 DO 074 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 DO 075 Leveling Compound (Gray) 1% Calcite / Binders 100% 09/07 DO 075 Yellow Mastic (Yellow) 1% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 DO 075 Floor Tile (Black) 93% Chrysotile 10% 09/07 DO 075 Floor Tile (Black) 93% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 90% 09/07 DO 075 Black Mastic (Black) 5% Chrysotile 5% 09/07 DO 075 Black Mastic (Black) 5% Tar Binders 95% 09/07 DO 076 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 DO 077 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 DO 078 Acoustic Tile (Tan) 100% Wood Fibers 100% 09/07 DO 079 Acoustic Tile (Tan) 100% Wood Fibers 100% 09/07 DO 080 Acoustic Tile (Tan) 100% Wood Fibers 100% 09/07 DO 081 Yellow Mastic (Yellow) 3% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 DO 081 Floor Tile (White) 97% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 09/07 DO 081 Yellow Mastic (Yellow) <1% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 DO 082 Yellow Mastic (Yellow) 3% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 DO 082 Floor Tile (White) 95% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 09/07 DO 082 Yellow Mastic (Yellow) 1% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 DO 082 Leveling Compound (Gray) 1% Calcite / Binders 100% 09/07 DO 083 Yellow Mastic (Yellow) 3% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 DO 083 Floor Tile (White) 97% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 09/07 DO 083 Yellow Mastic (Yellow) <1% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 DO Analyst

37 Client : Project : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology City of Garland, Civic Theater, 108 N 6th St, Garland Project # : Not Provided PLM Detail Report Moody Labs NVLAP Lab Code Valley View Lane Supplement to PLM Summary Report TDSHS License No Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) % Of Sample Number Layer Components Sample Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 09/07/2016 % of Layer Page 10 of 14 Analysis Date 084 Plaster (Tan) 100% Aggregate 65% 09/07 SW 084 Plaster (Tan) 100% Calcite / Binders 35% 09/07 SW 085 Base Plaster (Brown) 80% Hair Fibers <1% 09/07 SW 085 Base Plaster (Brown) 80% Aggregate 65% 09/07 SW 085 Base Plaster (Brown) 80% Binders / Fillers 35% 09/07 SW 085 Top Plaster (White) 20% Calcite / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 086 Plaster (Tan) 100% Aggregate 65% 09/07 SW 086 Plaster (Tan) 100% Calcite / Binders 35% 09/07 SW 087 Base Plaster (Brown) 80% Hair Fibers <1% 09/07 SW 087 Base Plaster (Brown) 80% Aggregate 65% 09/07 SW 087 Base Plaster (Brown) 80% Binders / Fillers 35% 09/07 SW 087 Top Plaster (White) 20% Calcite / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 088 Base Plaster (Brown) 80% Hair Fibers <1% 09/07 SW 088 Base Plaster (Brown) 80% Aggregate 65% 09/07 SW 088 Base Plaster (Brown) 80% Binders / Fillers 35% 09/07 SW 088 Top Plaster (White) 20% Calcite / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 089 Drywall Material (White) 55% Glass Wool Fibers 2% 09/07 SW 089 Drywall Material (White) 55% Cellulose Fibers 1% 09/07 SW 089 Drywall Material (White) 55% Gypsum / Binders 97% 09/07 SW 089 DW Paper / Tape (Tan / White) 25% Cellulose Fibers 100% 09/07 SW 089 Joint Compound (White) 10% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 089 Texture (White) 10% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 090 Drywall Material (White) 75% Cellulose Fibers 5% 09/07 SW 090 Drywall Material (White) 75% Gypsum / Binders 95% 09/07 SW 090 DW Paper Facing (Tan) 5% Cellulose Fibers 100% 09/07 SW 090 Texture / Joint Cmpd (White) 20% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 SW Analyst

38 Client : Project : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology City of Garland, Civic Theater, 108 N 6th St, Garland Project # : Not Provided PLM Detail Report Moody Labs NVLAP Lab Code Valley View Lane Supplement to PLM Summary Report TDSHS License No Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) % Of Sample Number Layer Components Sample Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 09/07/2016 % of Layer Page 11 of 14 Analysis Date 091 Drywall Material (White) 60% Cellulose Fibers 5% 09/07 SW 091 Drywall Material (White) 60% Gypsum / Binders 95% 09/07 SW 091 DW Paper Facing (Tan) 5% Cellulose Fibers 100% 09/07 SW 091 Joint Compound (White) 15% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 091 Acoustic Texture (White) 20% Vermiculite 15% 09/07 SW 091 Acoustic Texture (White) 20% Calcite / Binders 85% 09/07 SW 092 Drywall Material (White) 55% Glass Wool Fibers 2% 09/07 SW 092 Drywall Material (White) 55% Cellulose Fibers 1% 09/07 SW 092 Drywall Material (White) 55% Gypsum / Binders 97% 09/07 SW 092 DW Paper / Tape (Tan / White) 25% Cellulose Fibers 100% 09/07 SW 092 Joint Compound (White) 10% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 092 Texture (White) 10% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 093 Drywall Material (White) 75% Cellulose Fibers 5% 09/07 SW 093 Drywall Material (White) 75% Gypsum / Binders 95% 09/07 SW 093 DW Paper Facing (Tan) 5% Cellulose Fibers 100% 09/07 SW 093 Texture / Joint Cmpd (White) 20% Calcite / Talc / Binders 100% 09/07 SW 094 Yellow Mastic (Yellow) 50% Glue Binders 100% 09/07 SW 094 Black Mastic (Black) 50% Chrysotile 5% 09/07 SW 094 Black Mastic (Black) 50% Tar Binders 95% 09/07 SW 095 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 SW 096 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 SW 097 Sheet Flooring (Light Tan) 50% Calcite / Vinyl Binders 100% 09/07 SW 097 Fiber Backing (Light Grey) 50% Chrysotile 65% 09/07 SW 097 Fiber Backing (Light Grey) 50% Binders / Fillers 35% 09/07 SW 098 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 SW 099 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 SW 100 Tar (Black) 100% Chrysotile 5% 09/07 SW 100 Tar (Black) 100% Tar Binders 95% 09/07 SW 101 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 SW Analyst

39 Client : Project : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology City of Garland, Civic Theater, 108 N 6th St, Garland Project # : Not Provided PLM Detail Report Moody Labs NVLAP Lab Code Valley View Lane Supplement to PLM Summary Report TDSHS License No Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) % Of Sample Number Layer Components Sample Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 09/07/2016 % of Layer Page 12 of 14 Analysis Date 102 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 SW 103 Tar (Black) 100% Chrysotile 5% 09/07 SW 103 Tar (Black) 100% Tar Binders 95% 09/07 SW 104 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 SW 105 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 SW 106 Tar (Black) 25% Tar Binders 100% 09/07 KT 106 Flashing Material (Black) 75% Chrysotile 5% 09/07 KT 106 Flashing Material (Black) 75% Tar Binders 95% 09/07 KT 107 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 KT 108 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 KT 109 Roofing Tar (Black) 60% Tar Binders 100% 09/07 KT 109 Sand Layer (Off-White) 35% Sand 100% 09/07 KT 109 Roof Membrane (Black) 5% Synthetic Fibers 10% 09/07 KT 109 Roof Membrane (Black) 5% Calcite / Tar Binders 90% 09/07 KT 110 Roofing Tar (Black) 60% Tar Binders 100% 09/07 KT 110 Sand Layer (Off-White) 20% Sand 100% 09/07 KT 110 Roof Membrane (Black) 20% Synthetic Fibers 10% 09/07 KT 110 Roof Membrane (Black) 20% Calcite / Tar Binders 90% 09/07 KT 111 Roofing Tar (Black) 20% Tar Binders 100% 09/07 KT 111 Sand Layer (Off-White) 40% Sand 100% 09/07 KT 111 Roof Membrane (Black) 40% Synthetic Fibers 10% 09/07 KT 111 Roof Membrane (Black) 40% Calcite / Tar Binders 90% 09/07 KT 112 Flashing Material (Black) 50% Cellulose Fibers 5% 09/07 KT 112 Flashing Material (Black) 50% Tar Binders 95% 09/07 KT 112 Tar (Black) 50% Tar Binders 100% 09/07 KT 113 Flashing Material (Black) 70% Chrysotile 5% 09/07 KT 113 Flashing Material (Black) 70% Calcite / Tar Binders 95% 09/07 KT 113 Tar (Black) 30% Tar Binders 100% 09/07 KT 114 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 KT Analyst

40 Client : Project : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology City of Garland, Civic Theater, 108 N 6th St, Garland Project # : Not Provided PLM Detail Report Moody Labs NVLAP Lab Code Valley View Lane Supplement to PLM Summary Report TDSHS License No Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) % Of Sample Number Layer Components Sample Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 09/07/2016 % of Layer Page 13 of 14 Analysis Date 115 Silver Paint (Silver) 2% Pigment / Binders 100% 09/07 KT 115 Caulking (Yellow) 90% Binders / Fillers 100% 09/07 KT 115 Flashing Material (Black) 8% Chrysotile 5% 09/07 KT 115 Flashing Material (Black) 8% Calcite / Tar Binders 95% 09/07 KT 116 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 KT 117 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 KT 118 Stucco (Off-White) 100% Aggregate 65% 09/07 KT 118 Stucco (Off-White) 100% Binders / Fillers 35% 09/07 KT 119 Plaster (Grey) 3% Aggregate 65% 09/07 KT 119 Plaster (Grey) 3% Cement Binders 35% 09/07 KT 119 Stucco (Off-White) 97% Aggregate 65% 09/07 KT 119 Stucco (Off-White) 97% Binders / Fillers 35% 09/07 KT 120 Stucco (Off-White) 100% Aggregate 65% 09/07 KT 120 Stucco (Off-White) 100% Binders / Fillers 35% 09/07 KT 121 Stucco (Tan) 100% Aggregate 65% 09/07 KT 121 Stucco (Tan) 100% Binders / Fillers 35% 09/07 KT 122 Stucco (Off-White) 100% Aggregate 65% 09/07 KT 122 Stucco (Off-White) 100% Binders / Fillers 35% 09/07 KT 123 Caulking (Grey) 100% Chrysotile 2% 09/07 KT 123 Caulking (Grey) 100% Calcite / Binders 98% 09/07 KT 124 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 KT 125 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop 100% 09/07 KT 126 Plaster (Orange) 15% Chrysotile <1% 09/07 KT 126 Plaster (Orange) 15% Aggregate 65% 09/07 KT 126 Plaster (Orange) 15% Calcite / Binders 35% 09/07 KT 126 Caulking (Grey) 85% Binders / Fillers 100% 09/07 KT Analyst

41 Client : Project : Industrial Hygiene & Safety Technology City of Garland, Civic Theater, 108 N 6th St, Garland Project # : Not Provided PLM Detail Report Moody Labs NVLAP Lab Code Valley View Lane Supplement to PLM Summary Report TDSHS License No Farmers Branch, TX Phone: (972) % Of Sample Number Layer Components Sample Lab Job No. : 16B Report Date : 09/07/2016 % of Layer Page 14 of 14 Analysis Date 127 Plaster (Orange) 15% Chrysotile 2% 09/07 KT 127 Plaster (Orange) 15% Aggregate 63% 09/07 KT 127 Plaster (Orange) 15% Calcite / Binders 35% 09/07 KT 127 Caulking (Grey) 85% Binders / Fillers 100% 09/07 KT 128 Plaster (Orange/Light Grey) 15% Chrysotile <1% 09/07 KT 128 Plaster (Orange/Light Grey) 15% Aggregate 65% 09/07 KT 128 Plaster (Orange/Light Grey) 15% Calcite / Binders 35% 09/07 KT 128 Caulking (Grey) 85% Polyethylene Fibers <1% 09/07 KT 128 Caulking (Grey) 85% Binders / Fillers 100% 09/07 KT Analyst

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Appendix: Appendix C: Bulk Summary Report Asbestos Survey Appendix City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX

53 Table 1. Summary of Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment City of Garland Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Survey Date(s): 8/31/2016 through 8/31/2016 Sample ID# Sample Description Material Location Percent & Type of Asbestos Detected (a) Estimated Quantity Type of ACM (b) Friability (c) Physical Condition Potential for Disturbance Response Rating 001 Textured Sheetrock/Joint Compound - Walls/Ceilings (homogeneous area # 01) Room 1, 2, 3, Entry, Rear Entry Hallway, Bathroom, Hallway to Bathroom NAD - Drywall Material NAD - Texture/Joint Compound 2435 s.f. Misc NF II Good Low Textured Sheetrock/Joint Compound - Walls/Ceilings (homogeneous area # 01) Room 1, 2, 3, Entry, Rear Entry Hallway, Bathroom, Hallway to Bathroom NAD - Drywall Material NAD - Joint Compound NAD - Texture see 001 Misc NF II Good Low Textured Sheetrock/Joint Compound - Walls/Ceilings (homogeneous area # 01) Room 1, 2, 3, Entry, Rear Entry Hallway, Bathroom, Hallway to Bathroom NAD - Drywall Material NAD - Joint Compound NAD - Texture see 001 Misc NF II Good Low Textured Sheetrock/Joint Compound - Walls/Ceilings (homogeneous area # 01) Room 1, 2, 3, Entry, Rear Entry Hallway, Bathroom, Hallway to Bathroom NAD - Drywall Material NAD - Joint Compound NAD - Texture see 001 Misc NF II Good Low Textured Sheetrock/Joint Compound - Walls/Ceilings (homogeneous area # 01) Room 1, 2, 3, Entry, Rear Entry Hallway, Bathroom, Hallway to Bathroom NAD - Drywall Material NAD - Texture/Joint Compound see 001 Misc NF II Good Low Plaster Walls (homogeneous area # 02) Entry, Hallway, Hallway to Bathroom, Bathroom 1, Rear Entry, Room 1, 2, 3 NAD - Base Plaster NAD - Top Plaster 1152 s.f. Surfacing NF II Good Low 0 Asbestos Survey - IHST City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment Summary Page 1 of 17

54 Sample ID# Sample Description Material Location Percent & Type of Asbestos Detected (a) Estimated Quantity Type of ACM (b) Friability (c) Physical Condition Potential for Disturbance Response Rating 007 Plaster Walls (homogeneous area # 02) Entry, Hallway, Hallway to Bathroom, Bathroom 1, Rear Entry, Room 1, 2, 3 NAD - Base Plaster NAD - Top Plaster see 006 Surfacing NF II Good Low Plaster Walls (homogeneous area # 02) Entry, Hallway, Hallway to Bathroom, Bathroom 1, Rear Entry, Room 1, 2, 3 NAD - Base Plaster NAD - Top Plaster see 006 Surfacing NF II Good Low Plaster Walls (homogeneous area # 02) Entry, Hallway, Hallway to Bathroom, Bathroom 1, Rear Entry, Room 1, 2, 3 NAD - Base Plaster NAD - Top Plaster see 006 Surfacing NF II Good Low Plaster Walls (homogeneous area # 02) Entry, Hallway, Hallway to Bathroom, Bathroom 1, Rear Entry, Room 1, 2, 3 NAD - Base Plaster NAD - Top Plaster see 006 Surfacing NF II Good Low Fiber Board Wall (homogeneous area # 03) Room 3 NAD - Fiber Board NAD - Texture 117 s.f. Misc NF II Good Low Fiber Board Wall (homogeneous area # 03) Room 3 NAD - Fiber Board NAD - Texture see 011 Misc NF II Good Low Fiber Board Wall (homogeneous area # 03) Room 3 NAD - Fiber Board NAD - Texture see 011 Misc NF II Good Low 'x4' Ceiling Tile (homogeneous area # 04) Entry, Room 1, 2 2% CH - Acoustic Tile 364 s.f. Misc F Good Low 1 Asbestos Survey - IHST City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment Summary Page 2 of 17

55 Sample ID# Sample Description Material Location Percent & Type of Asbestos Detected (a) Estimated Quantity Type of ACM (b) Friability (c) Physical Condition Potential for Disturbance Response Rating 015 2'x4' Ceiling Tile (homogeneous area # 04) Entry, Room 1, 2 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 014 Misc F Good Low 'x4' Ceiling Tile (homogeneous area # 04) Entry, Room 1, 2 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 014 Misc F Good Low 'x1' Ceiling Tile - Old (homogeneous area # 05) Entry, Room 1, Room 2 NAD - Acoustic Tile NAD - Texture 364 s.f. Misc F Good Low 'x1' Ceiling Tile - Old (homogeneous area # 05) Entry, Room 1, Room 2 NAD - Acoustic Tile NAD - Texture see 017 Misc F Good Low 'x1' Ceiling Tile - Old (homogeneous area # 05) Entry, Room 1, Room 2 NAD - Acoustic Tile NAD - Texture see 017 Misc F Good Low 'x1' Ceiling Tile - New (homogeneous area # 06) Room 3, Hallway NAD - Acoustic Tile 195 s.f. Misc F Good Low 'x1' Ceiling Tile - New (homogeneous area # 06) Room 3, Hallway NAD - Acoustic Tile see 020 Misc F Good Low 'x1' Ceiling Tile - New (homogeneous area # 06) Room 3, Hallway NAD - Acoustic Tile see 020 Misc F Good Low 0 Asbestos Survey - IHST City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment Summary Page 3 of 17

56 Sample ID# Sample Description Material Location Percent & Type of Asbestos Detected (a) Estimated Quantity Type of ACM (b) Friability (c) Physical Condition Potential for Disturbance Response Rating 023 Interior Window Caulk (homogeneous area # 07) Room 1, Room 2, Room 3 NAD - Caulking 24 l.f. Misc NF II Good Low Interior Window Caulk (homogeneous area # 07) Room 1, Room 2, Room 3 NAD - Caulking see 023 Misc NF II Good Low Interior Window Caulk (homogeneous area # 07) Room 1, Room 2, Room 3 NAD - Caulking see 023 Misc NF II Good Low Brown Linoleum (homogeneous area # 08) Rear Entry NAD - Floor Tile NAD - Clear Mastic 72 s.f. Misc NF I Damaged Low Brown Linoleum (homogeneous area # 08) Rear Entry NAD - Floor Tile NAD - Clear Mastic see 026 Misc NF I Damaged Low Brown Linoleum (homogeneous area # 08) Rear Entry NAD - Floor Tile NAD - Clear Mastic see 026 Misc NF I Damaged Low Layered Linoleum Flooring (homogeneous area # 09) Hallway, Hallway 2, Bathroom 1, Room 1 NAD - Top Tile NAD - Clear Mastic NAD - Bottom Tile NAD - Clear Mastic 190 s.f. Misc NF I Good Low Layered Linoleum Flooring (homogeneous area # 09) Hallway, Hallway 2, Bathroom 1, Room 1 NAD - Leveling Compound see 029 Misc NF I Good Low 0 Asbestos Survey - IHST City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment Summary Page 4 of 17

57 Sample ID# Sample Description Material Location Percent & Type of Asbestos Detected (a) Estimated Quantity Type of ACM (b) Friability (c) Physical Condition Potential for Disturbance Response Rating 030 Layered Linoleum Flooring (homogeneous area # 09) Hallway, Hallway 2, Bathroom 1, Room 1 NAD - Top Tile NAD - Clear Mastic NAD - Bottom Tile NAD - Clear Mastic see 029 Misc NF I Good Low Layered Linoleum Flooring (homogeneous area # 09) Hallway, Hallway 2, Bathroom 1, Room 1 NAD - Leveling Compound see 029 Misc NF I Good Low Layered Linoleum Flooring (homogeneous area # 09) Hallway, Hallway 2, Bathroom 1, Room 1 NAD - Top Tile NAD - Clear Mastic NAD - Bottom Tile NAD - Clear Mastic see 029 Misc NF I Good Low Layered Linoleum Flooring (homogeneous area # 09) Hallway, Hallway 2, Bathroom 1, Room 1 NAD - Leveling Compound see 029 Misc NF I Good Low Linoleum Under Sub Floor (homogeneous area # 10) Hallway, Hallway 2, Bathroom 1, Room 1 NAD - Sheet Flooring NAD - Fiber Backing 190 s.f. Misc NF I Good Low Linoleum Under Sub Floor (homogeneous area # 10) Hallway, Hallway 2, Bathroom 1, Room 1 NAD - Sheet Flooring NAD - Fiber Backing see 032 Misc NF I Good Low Linoleum Under Sub Floor (homogeneous area # 10) Hallway, Hallway 2, Bathroom 1, Room 1 NAD - Sheet Flooring NAD - Fiber Backing see 032 Misc NF I Good Low Textured Sheetrock/Joint Compound - Walls (homogeneous area # 11) Entry 2, Hall 2, HVAC 1, Bathroom 2 & 3, Dance Studio, & Rooms 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 NAD - Drywall Material NAD - Joint Compound NAD - Texture 4770 s.f. Misc NF II Good Low 0 Asbestos Survey - IHST City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment Summary Page 5 of 17

58 Sample ID# Sample Description Material Location Percent & Type of Asbestos Detected (a) Estimated Quantity Type of ACM (b) Friability (c) Physical Condition Potential for Disturbance Response Rating 036 Textured Sheetrock/Joint Compound - Walls (homogeneous area # 11) Entry 2, Hall 2, HVAC 1, Bathroom 2 & 3, Dance Studio, & Rooms 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 NAD - Drywall Material NAD - Joint Compound NAD - Texture see 035 Misc NF II Good Low Textured Sheetrock/Joint Compound - Walls (homogeneous area # 11) Entry 2, Hall 2, HVAC 1, Bathroom 2 & 3, Dance Studio, & Rooms 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 NAD - Drywall Material NAD - Texture/Joint Compound see 035 Misc NF II Good Low Textured Sheetrock/Joint Compound - Walls (homogeneous area # 11) Entry 2, Hall 2, HVAC 1, Bathroom 2 & 3, Dance Studio, & Rooms 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 NAD - Drywall Material NAD - Joint Compound NAD - Texture see 035 Misc NF II Good Low Textured Sheetrock/Joint Compound - Walls (homogeneous area # 11) Entry 2, Hall 2, HVAC 1, Bathroom 2 & 3, Dance Studio, & Rooms 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 NAD - Drywall Material NAD - Joint Compound NAD - Texture see 035 Misc NF II Good Low Textured Sheetrock/Joint Compound Walls -Behind New SR/JC Walls (homogeneous area # 12) Rooms 4, 5, 6 NAD - Drywall Material NAD - Joint Compound NAD - Texture 480 s.f. Surfacing NF II Good Low Textured Sheetrock/Joint Compound Walls -Behind New SR/JC Walls (homogeneous area # 12) Rooms 4, 5, 6 NAD - Drywall Material NAD - Joint Compound NAD - Texture see 040 Surfacing NF II Good Low Textured Sheetrock/Joint Compound Walls -Behind New SR/JC Walls (homogeneous area # 12) Rooms 4, 5, 6 NAD - Drywall Material NAD - Joint Compound NAD - Texture see 040 Surfacing NF II Good Low Plaster Walls (homogeneous area # 13) Rooms 4, 5, 6, Entry 2, Dance Studio NAD - Base Plaster NAD - Top Plaster 2052 s.f. Surfacing NF II Good Low 0 Asbestos Survey - IHST City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment Summary Page 6 of 17

59 Sample ID# Sample Description Material Location Percent & Type of Asbestos Detected (a) Estimated Quantity Type of ACM (b) Friability (c) Physical Condition Potential for Disturbance Response Rating 044 Plaster Walls (homogeneous area # 13) Rooms 4, 5, 6, Entry 2, Dance Studio NAD - Base Plaster NAD - Top Plaster see 043 Surfacing NF II Good Low Plaster Walls (homogeneous area # 13) Rooms 4, 5, 6, Entry 2, Dance Studio NAD - Base Plaster NAD - Top Plaster see 043 Surfacing NF II Good Low Plaster Walls (homogeneous area # 13) Rooms 4, 5, 6, Entry 2, Dance Studio NAD - Base Plaster NAD - Top Plaster see 043 Surfacing NF II Good Low Plaster Walls (homogeneous area # 13) Rooms 4, 5, 6, Entry 2, Dance Studio NAD - Base Plaster NAD - Top Plaster see 043 Surfacing NF II Good Low " Gray Cove Base/Mastic (homogeneous area # 14) Entry 2, Room 4, 5, Hall 2 NAD - Cove Base NAD - Yellow Mastic 201 l.f. Misc NF II Good Low " Gray Cove Base/Mastic (homogeneous area # 14) Entry 2, Room 4, 5, Hall 2 NAD - Cove Base NAD - Yellow Mastic see 048 Misc NF II Good Low " Gray Cove Base/Mastic (homogeneous area # 14) Entry 2, Room 4, 5, Hall 2 NAD - Cove Base NAD - Yellow Mastic see 048 Misc NF II Good Low " Black Cove Base/Mastic (homogeneous area # 15) Room 6, 7, 8 NAD - Cove Base NAD - Yellow Mastic 55 l.f. Misc NF II Good Low 0 Asbestos Survey - IHST City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment Summary Page 7 of 17

60 Sample ID# Sample Description Material Location Percent & Type of Asbestos Detected (a) Estimated Quantity Type of ACM (b) Friability (c) Physical Condition Potential for Disturbance Response Rating 052 4" Black Cove Base/Mastic (homogeneous area # 15) Room 6, 7, 8 NAD - Cove Base NAD - Yellow Mastic see 051 Misc NF II Good Low " Black Cove Base/Mastic (homogeneous area # 15) Room 6, 7, 8 NAD - Cove Base NAD - Yellow Mastic see 051 Misc NF II Good Low 'x4' Ceiling Tile (homogeneous area # 16) Entry 2, Rooms 4, 5, 6 NAD - Acoustic Tile 810 s.f. Misc F Good Low 'x4' Ceiling Tile (homogeneous area # 16) Entry 2, Rooms 4, 5, 6 NAD - Acoustic Tile see 054 Misc F Good Low 'x4' Ceiling Tile (homogeneous area # 16) Entry 2, Rooms 4, 5, 6 NAD - Acoustic Tile see 054 Misc F Good Low 'x4' Ceiling Tile - Pinhole (homogeneous area # 17) Rooms 6, 7, 8, Dance Studio NAD - Ceiling Tile 3919 s.f. Misc F Good Low 'x4' Ceiling Tile - Pinhole (homogeneous area # 17) Rooms 6, 7, 8, Dance Studio NAD - Ceiling Tile see 057 Misc F Good Low 'x4' Ceiling Tile - Pinhole (homogeneous area # 17) Rooms 6, 7, 8, Dance Studio NAD - Ceiling Tile see 057 Misc F Good Low 0 Asbestos Survey - IHST City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment Summary Page 8 of 17

61 Sample ID# Sample Description Material Location Percent & Type of Asbestos Detected (a) Estimated Quantity Type of ACM (b) Friability (c) Physical Condition Potential for Disturbance Response Rating 060 White Sink Undercoating (homogeneous area # 18) Room 8 NAD - Sink Undercoating 4 s.f. Misc NF II Good Low White Sink Undercoating (homogeneous area # 18) Room 8 NAD - Sink Undercoating see 060 Misc NF II Good Low White Sink Undercoating (homogeneous area # 18) Room 8 NAD - Sink Undercoating see 060 Misc NF II Good Low Brown Linoleum (homogeneous area # 19) Rooms 7, 8 NAD - Sheet Flooring 45% CH - Fiber Backing NAD - Yellow Mastic NAD - Leveling Compound 1023 s.f. Misc NF I Good Low Brown Linoleum (homogeneous area # 19) Rooms 7, 8 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 063 Misc NF I Good Low Brown Linoleum (homogeneous area # 19) Rooms 7, 8 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 063 Misc NF I Good Low Gray 12"x12" Floor Tile/Mastic (homogeneous area # 20) Bathroom 3 2% CH - Leveling Compound NAD - Floor Tile NAD - Yellow Mastic 5% CH - Black Mastic 64 s.f. Misc NF I Good Low Gray 12"x12" Floor Tile/Mastic (homogeneous area # 20) Bathroom 3 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 066 Misc NF I Good Low 1 Asbestos Survey - IHST City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment Summary Page 9 of 17

62 Sample ID# Sample Description Material Location Percent & Type of Asbestos Detected (a) Estimated Quantity Type of ACM (b) Friability (c) Physical Condition Potential for Disturbance Response Rating 068 Gray 12"x12" Floor Tile/Mastic (homogeneous area # 20) Bathroom 3 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 066 Misc NF I Good Low White 9"x9" Floor Tile/Mastic (homogeneous area # 21) Room 9 15% CH - Floor Tile 5% CH - Black Mastic 10 s.f. Misc NF I Good Low White 9"x9" Floor Tile/Mastic (homogeneous area # 21) Room 9 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 069 Misc NF I Good Low White 9"x9" Floor Tile/Mastic (homogeneous area # 21) Room 9 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 069 Misc NF I Good Low Beige 9"x9" Floor Tile/Mastic (homogeneous area # 22) Room 9 10% CH - Floor Tile 5% CH - Black Mastic 458 s.f. Misc NF I Good Low Beige 9"x9" Floor Tile/Mastic (homogeneous area # 22) Room 9 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 072 Misc NF I Good Low Beige 9"x9" Floor Tile/Mastic (homogeneous area # 22) Room 9 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 072 Misc NF I Good Low Black 9"x9" Floor Tile/Mastic (homogeneous area # 23) Room 9 NAD - Leveling Compound NAD - Yellow Mastic 10% CH - Floor Tile 5% CH - Black Mastic 176 s.f. Misc NF I Good Low 1 Asbestos Survey - IHST City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment Summary Page 10 of 17

63 Sample ID# Sample Description Material Location Percent & Type of Asbestos Detected (a) Estimated Quantity Type of ACM (b) Friability (c) Physical Condition Potential for Disturbance Response Rating 076 Black 9"x9" Floor Tile/Mastic (homogeneous area # 23) Room 9 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 075 Misc NF I Good Low Black 9"x9" Floor Tile/Mastic (homogeneous area # 23) Room 9 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 075 Misc NF I Good Low 'x1' Ceiling Tile (homogeneous area # 24) Dance Studio NAD - Acoustic Tile 1200 s.f. Misc F Good Low 'x1' Ceiling Tile (homogeneous area # 24) Dance Studio NAD - Acoustic Tile see 078 Misc F Good Low 'x1' Ceiling Tile (homogeneous area # 24) Dance Studio NAD - Acoustic Tile see 078 Misc F Good Low White 12"x12" Floor Tile Under Carpet (homogeneous area # 25) Rooms 4, 5, 6, Hall 2, Entry 2, Dance Studio NAD - Yellow Mastic NAD - Floor Tile NAD - Yellow Mastic 1584 s.f. Misc NF I Good Low White 12"x12" Floor Tile Under Carpet (homogeneous area # 25) Rooms 4, 5, 6, Hall 2, Entry 2, Dance Studio NAD - Yellow Mastic NAD - Floor Tile NAD - Yellow Mastic NAD - Leveling Compound see 081 Misc NF I Good Low White 12"x12" Floor Tile Under Carpet (homogeneous area # 25) Rooms 4, 5, 6, Hall 2, Entry 2, Dance Studio NAD - Yellow Mastic NAD - Floor Tile NAD - Yellow Mastic see 081 Misc NF I Good Low 0 Asbestos Survey - IHST City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment Summary Page 11 of 17

64 Sample ID# Sample Description Material Location Percent & Type of Asbestos Detected (a) Estimated Quantity Type of ACM (b) Friability (c) Physical Condition Potential for Disturbance Response Rating 084 Plaster Walls (homogeneous area # 26) Theater NAD - Plaster 1540 s.f. Surfacing NF II Good Low Plaster Walls (homogeneous area # 26) Theater NAD - Base Plaster NAD - Top Plaster see 084 Surfacing NF II Good Low Plaster Walls (homogeneous area # 26) Theater NAD - Plaster see 084 Surfacing NF II Good Low Plaster Walls (homogeneous area # 26) Theater NAD - Base Plaster NAD - Top Plaster see 084 Surfacing NF II Good Low Plaster Walls (homogeneous area # 26) Theater NAD - Base Plaster NAD - Top Plaster see 084 Surfacing NF II Good Low Textured Sheetrock/Joint Compound - Walls & Ceilings (homogeneous area # 27) Rear Entry 3, HVAC 3, Women's Restroom, Men's Restroom, Lounge, Theater NAD - Drywall Material NAD - Joint Compound NAD - Texture 3900 s.f. Misc NF II Good Low Textured Sheetrock/Joint Compound - Walls & Ceilings (homogeneous area # 27) Rear Entry 3, HVAC 3, Women's Restroom, Men's Restroom, Lounge, Theater NAD - Drywall Material NAD - Texture/Joint Compound see 089 Misc NF II Good Low Textured Sheetrock/Joint Compound - Walls & Ceilings (homogeneous area # 27) Rear Entry 3, HVAC 3, Women's Restroom, Men's Restroom, Lounge, Theater NAD - Drywall Material NAD - Joint Compound NAD - Texture see 089 Misc NF II Good Low 0 Asbestos Survey - IHST City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment Summary Page 12 of 17

65 Sample ID# Sample Description Material Location Percent & Type of Asbestos Detected (a) Estimated Quantity Type of ACM (b) Friability (c) Physical Condition Potential for Disturbance Response Rating 092 Textured Sheetrock/Joint Compound - Walls & Ceilings (homogeneous area # 27) Rear Entry 3, HVAC 3, Women's Restroom, Men's Restroom, Lounge, Theater NAD - Drywall Material NAD - Joint Compound NAD - Texture see 089 Misc NF II Good Low Textured Sheetrock/Joint Compound - Walls & Ceilings (homogeneous area # 27) Rear Entry 3, HVAC 3, Women's Restroom, Men's Restroom, Lounge, Theater NAD - Drywall Material NAD - Texture/Joint Compound see 089 Misc NF II Good Low Floor Mastic (homogeneous area # 28) Theater NAD - Yellow Mastic 5% CH - Black Mastic 3965 s.f. Misc NF I Good Low Floor Mastic (homogeneous area # 28) Theater Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 094 Misc NF I Good Low Floor Mastic (homogeneous area # 28) Theater Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 094 Misc NF I Good Low Linoleum (homogeneous area # 29) Theater NAD - Sheet Flooring 65% CH - Fiber Backing 270 s.f. Misc NF I Good Low Linoleum (homogeneous area # 29) Theater Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 097 Misc NF I Good Low Linoleum (homogeneous area # 29) Theater Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 097 Misc NF I Good Low 1 Asbestos Survey - IHST City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment Summary Page 13 of 17

66 Sample ID# Sample Description Material Location Percent & Type of Asbestos Detected (a) Estimated Quantity Type of ACM (b) Friability (c) Physical Condition Potential for Disturbance Response Rating 100 Perimeter Tar (homogeneous area # 30) Roof 1, 2, 4, 5 5% CH - Tar 324 l.f. Misc NF I Good Low Perimeter Tar (homogeneous area # 30) Roof 1, 2, 4, 5 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 100 Misc NF I Good Low Perimeter Tar (homogeneous area # 30) Roof 1, 2, 4, 5 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 100 Misc NF I Good Low Rolled Roof Tar (homogeneous area # 31) Roof 1, 2, 4, 5 5% CH - Tar 9748 s.f. Misc NF I Good Low Rolled Roof Tar (homogeneous area # 31) Roof 1, 2, 4, 5 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 103 Misc NF I Good Low Rolled Roof Tar (homogeneous area # 31) Roof 1, 2, 4, 5 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 103 Misc NF I Good Low Penetration Caulk (homogeneous area # 32) Roof 1, 2, 4, 5 NAD - Tar 5% CH - Flashing Material 10 l.f. Misc NF II Good Low Penetration Caulk (homogeneous area # 32) Roof 1, 2, 4, 5 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 106 Misc NF II Good Low 1 Asbestos Survey - IHST City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment Summary Page 14 of 17

67 Sample ID# Sample Description Material Location Percent & Type of Asbestos Detected (a) Estimated Quantity Type of ACM (b) Friability (c) Physical Condition Potential for Disturbance Response Rating 108 Penetration Caulk (homogeneous area # 32) Roof 1, 2, 4, 5 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 106 Misc NF II Good Low Rolled Roof Tar (homogeneous area # 33) Roof 3 NAD - Roofing Tar NAD - Roof Membrane 325 s.f. Misc NF I Good Low Rolled Roof Tar (homogeneous area # 33) Roof 3 NAD - Roofing Tar NAD - Roof Membrane see 109 Misc NF I Good Low Rolled Roof Tar (homogeneous area # 33) Roof 3 NAD - Roofing Tar NAD - Roof Membrane see 109 Misc NF I Good Low Penetration Caulk (homogeneous area # 34) Roof 3 NAD - Flashing Material NAD - Tar 5 l.f. Misc NF II Good Low Penetration Caulk (homogeneous area # 34) Roof 3 5% CH - Flashing Material NAD - Tar see 112 Misc NF II Good Low Penetration Caulk (homogeneous area # 34) Roof 3 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 112 Misc NF II Good Low Silver Perimeter Tar (homogeneous area # 35) Roof 1, 2, 5 NAD - Silver Paint NAD - Caulking 5% CH - Flashing Material 28 l.f. Misc NF I Good Low 1 Asbestos Survey - IHST City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment Summary Page 15 of 17

68 Sample ID# Sample Description Material Location Percent & Type of Asbestos Detected (a) Estimated Quantity Type of ACM (b) Friability (c) Physical Condition Potential for Disturbance Response Rating 116 Silver Perimeter Tar (homogeneous area # 35) Roof 1, 2, 5 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 115 Misc NF I Good Low Silver Perimeter Tar (homogeneous area # 35) Roof 1, 2, 5 Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 115 Misc NF I Good Low Exterior Stucco (homogeneous area # 36) Theater, Hallway, Hall to Bath, Bathroom, Rooms 7, 8 NAD - Stucco 3312 s.f. Surfacing NF II Good Low Exterior Stucco (homogeneous area # 36) Theater, Hallway, Hall to Bath, Bathroom, Rooms 7, 8 NAD - Plaster NAD - Stucco see 118 Surfacing NF II Good Low Exterior Stucco (homogeneous area # 36) Theater, Hallway, Hall to Bath, Bathroom, Rooms 7, 8 NAD - Stucco see 118 Surfacing NF II Good Low Exterior Stucco (homogeneous area # 36) Theater, Hallway, Hall to Bath, Bathroom, Rooms 7, 8 NAD - Stucco see 118 Surfacing NF II Good Low Exterior Stucco (homogeneous area # 36) Theater, Hallway, Hall to Bath, Bathroom, Rooms 7, 8 NAD - Stucco see 118 Surfacing NF II Good Low Exterior Window Caulk (homogeneous area # 37) Entry, Entry 2, Dance Studio, Theater 2% CH - Caulking 350 l.f. Misc NF II Good Low 1 Asbestos Survey - IHST City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment Summary Page 16 of 17

69 Sample ID# Sample Description Material Location Percent & Type of Asbestos Detected (a) Estimated Quantity Type of ACM (b) Friability (c) Physical Condition Potential for Disturbance Response Rating 124 Exterior Window Caulk (homogeneous area # 37) Entry, Entry 2, Dance Studio, Theater Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 123 Misc NF II Good Low Exterior Window Caulk (homogeneous area # 37) Entry, Entry 2, Dance Studio, Theater Not Analyzed - Positive Stop see 123 Misc NF II Good Low Expansion Caulk (homogeneous area # 38) Theater Exterior <1% CH - Plaster NAD - Caulking 16 l.f. Misc NF II Good Low Expansion Caulk (homogeneous area # 38) Theater Exterior 2% CH - Plaster NAD - Caulking see 126 Misc NF II Good Low Expansion Caulk (homogeneous area # 38) Theater Exterior <1% CH - Plaster NAD - Caulking see 126 Misc NF II Good Low 1 Table Key: (a) CH = Chrysotile; AM = Amosite; CR = Crocidolite; AN = Anthophyllite; AC = Actinolite; NAD = NAD = No Asbestos Detected (b) Misc = Miscellaneous; TSI = Thermal Systems Insulation (c) F = Friable; NF I = Non-Friable Category I; NF II = Non-Friable Category II Asbestos Survey - IHST City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Bulk Sample Analysis and Assessment Summary Page 17 of 17

70 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Appendix: Appendix D: Cost Estimate For Removal Asbestos Survey Appendix City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX

71 Table 2. Approximate Cost to Remove Asbestos City of Garland Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Survey Date(s): 8/31/2016 through 8/31/2016 Material Description Location(s) Approx. Quantity Unit Cost # Days to Abate Removal Cost Air Monitoring (per day) Line Item Subtotal 2 x 4 Acoustic Tile Entry, Room 1 and s.f. $ $1, $ $2, Linoleum See drawings 1293 s.f. $ $2, $ $3, Floor Tile and Mastic See drawings 4673 s.f. $ $9, $ $11, Caulks Windows and Expansion Joints 51 s.f. $ $ $ $ Roofing Tars Roof s.f. $ $30, $ $34, Removal Costs Subtotal: $51, Abatement Specifications: $ Total Abatement Cost: $52, Approximate Cost to Remove Asbestos City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Page 1 of 2

72 Material Description Location(s) Approx. Quantity Unit Cost # Days to Abate Removal Cost Air Monitoring (per day) Line Item Subtotal 1. The price estimates were derived from current estimates from asbestos abatement contractors. 2. Price does not include replacement costs with non-asbestos materials. 3. Air monitoring costs do not include final air clearance by Transmission Electron Microscopy. 4. Price estimates listed above are intended as a guide for budget estimating only. To determine the total abatement costs for the project, asbestos removal specifications should be prepared and the project bid by professional asbestos abatement contractors. 5. Prices could be reduced if all abatement activities are performed at one time. 6. Prices may be slightly higher for small abatement projects due to mobilization costs. 7. Prices do not include the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) fee for asbestos regulated units generated for the removal of ACM quantified in Table Time schedule includes air clearance monitoring and contractor demobilization from site. Time schedule for abatement will also vary depending on the size of the contractor's work force and the specified scope of work. Approximate Cost to Remove Asbestos City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX Page 2 of 2

73 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Appendix: Appendix E: Photographs Asbestos Survey Appendix City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX

74 Garland Civic Theater Garland, Texas Building Sample 001L Sample 002L Sample 003L

75 Garland Civic Theater Garland, Texas Sample 004L Sample 005L Sample 006L Sample 007L

76 Garland Civic Theater Garland, Texas Sample 008L Sample 009L Sample 010L Sample 011L

77 Garland Civic Theater Garland, Texas Sample 012L Sample 013L Samples Samples

78 Garland Civic Theater Garland, Texas Samples Samples Samples Samples

79 Garland Civic Theater Garland, Texas Samples Samples Samples Samples

80 Garland Civic Theater Garland, Texas Samples Samples Samples Samples

81 Garland Civic Theater Garland, Texas Samples Samples Samples Samples

82 Garland Civic Theater Garland, Texas Samples Samples Samples Samples

83 Garland Civic Theater Garland, Texas Samples Samples Samples Samples

84 Garland Civic Theater Garland, Texas Samples Samples Samples Samples

85 Garland Civic Theater Garland, Texas Samples Samples Samples Samples

86 Garland Civic Theater Garland, Texas Samples Samples Samples Samples

87 Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. IHST Project Number: Appendix: Appendix F: Lead Report Asbestos Survey Appendix City of Garland - Garland Civic Theater Garland, TX

88 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AND SAFETY TECHNOLOGY, INC. September 12, 2016 Ms. Ginny Holliday City of Garland P.O. Box Garland, TX RE: Lead Building Materials Survey Location: City of Garland, Civic Theater Sample Date: August 31, 2016 IHST Job #: Dear Ms. Holliday, Mr. Kris Girton representing Industrial Hygiene and Safety Technology, Inc. performed a visual inspection and collected bulk samples of suspect lead based paint at address listed above. Thirteen (13) suspect lead based painted materials were identified during the visual inspection of the structures. Table 1 list the materials sampled and the results of the lead based paint analysis. Fiberquant Analytical Services was contracted to perform the laboratory analysis. A copy of the original laboratory report is included as Appendix A to this report. The samples were analyzed utilizing EPA 7420 method for lead analysis. Table 1, Results of Lead Based Paint Testing Sample ID Material Tested Location Results 001L White Paint Sheetrock - Room 114 <28 ppm 002L Green Paint Plaster Wall - Room ppm 003L Yellow Paint Plaster Wall - Room ppm 004L Old White Paint Sheetrock Walls - Room 108 <22 ppm 005L New White Paint Sheetrock Walls - Room 108 <21 ppm 006L White Paint Brick - Room ppm 007L Green Paint Sheetrock - Room ppm 008L Beige Paint Plaster - Room 102 3,000 ppm 009L Brown Paint Plaster - Room 102 <11 ppm 010L Black Paint Sheetrock - Room 102 <16 ppm 011L White Paint Sheetrock - Room 102 < 19 ppm 012L Beige Paint Exterior 16 ppm 013L Green Paint Exterior - Awning <99 ppm In reviewing the results of the lead based paint sampling, all of the paint samples were less than the HUD guidelines of 5,000 ppm. Should you or your staff have any questions regarding the content of this report, please do not hesitate to contact our office at your convenience. Cordially, Tracy Bramlett, CIH, CSP President Appendix A 2235 Keller Way Carrollton, Texas (972) FAX (972)

89 Appendix A Laboratory Report

90 Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (AAS) Analysis of Paint JobNumber: Client: IHST 2235 KELLER WY CARROLLTON, TX Office Phone: (972) FAX: (972) # Samples: 13 AA Client Job: Garland Civic Theatre PO Number: Method and Analysis Information: Rec: 9/6/2016 Report Date: 9/9/2016 Date Analyzed: 9/9/2016 Method: Modified SW b/7420 AApw Pb in paint by weight AA Analysis Routing Number: - The received samples were analyzed for Pb (total) using "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste" (SW 846, December 1996 updates). The extraction/digestion method was SW 3050b. The analytical method is "flame atomic absorption, direct aspiration", SW Briefly the procedures are as follows. The incoming paint samples are first homogenized by mixing and crushing. A sub-sample is weighed to gm into a 50ml centrifuge tube. To the run stream are added the quality assurance samples described below. Six mls of concentrated HNO3 and one ml of 30% H2O2 are added to each container. The tubes are caped and heated for 1 hour at 95 deg. C. After cooling, the contents of the centrifuge tube are brought up to exactly 25 mls, completing the digestion/extraction. The sample and quality assurance extractions are then analyzed on a TJA M5 flame atomic absorption spectrometer. The wavelengths and other instrumental settings are set according to the manufacturer's recommendations, or as otherwise specified in the published method. Absorptions are recorded from sample and standard solutions. A calibration curve is fitted to at least three standard solutions, and the concentrations of the sample extracts are calculated from the curve. The ppm (ug/gm) and weight percent for each sample is calculated from the sub-sample weight, extract volume, and extract concentration. The results from this analysis is generally compared to either the HUD guidelines, in which a sample is positive if it contains >0.5% (5000 ppm) Pb, or the Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC) limit, in which a paint or surface coating containing greater than 90 ppm is defined as leadcontaining. The expected coefficient of variation for this method is approximately 20-30%. The results are reported to two significant figures. The Sample Reporting Limit (RL) listed below is twice the Sample Detection Limit, which is calculated for each sample from the experimentally determined Method Detection Limit. The limit of reliable quantitatiion is generally regarded as five to ten times the limit of detection. Therefore, samples smaller than 0.1 gm may give results too near the CPSC standard to be reliable. Problems in analysis or other information is provided in the "Analytical Notes" below. Blanks, if analyzed, are treated the same as samples and are not used for correcting non-blank results. The following on-going quality assurance program was followed to ensure reproducible and dependable results: All analysts are degreed chemists trained extensively in-house for at least six months prior to un-supervised runs. Blank matrix samples are analyzed at a rate of 5% (at least one per run). Reference standards are analyzed at a rate of 5% (at least one per run), and compared to statistical records via control charts. Spiked matrix samples are analyzed at a rate of 5% (at least one per run), and compared to statistical records via control charts. Duplicate samples are analyzed at a rate of 5% (at least one per run), and compared to statistical records via control charts. For each instrumental run, the spectrometer is checked for sensitivity and stability. The calibration standards are made fresh weekly, and checked each run against a calibration verification standard from another source. All calculations are performed twice - once in a calibration spreadsheet, and once during the report generation, and also checked by hand. All quality checks performed for these samples were in control except as detailed in the "Analytical Notes" below. Fiberquant participates in the Environmental Lead Proficiency Analytical Testing (ELPAT) program, is accredited by AIHA-LAP, LLC for environmental lead in paint (Lab # ), and is recognized by the National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP) for the analysis of Pb in paint. Accreditation does not imply endorsement by the EPA, any other United States governmental agency or any private agency or association. Each lab analysis refers only to the sample tested, and may not, due to the sampling process, be representative of the material sampled. This report may not be reproduced except in full, without the approval of Fiberquant Analytical Services. Job Analysis Notes: Fiberquant Internal SOP: Some results may have been calculated using client supplied data, such as volume or area sampled, for which Fiberquant assumes no liability for accuracy. Page 1 of S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona Phone: FAX: Fiberquant, Inc.

91 Calibration Curve: Pb Run # Instrument: M5-2 Standards: /8/2016 ppm avg. mabs ax bx c R ppm AA Calibration Curve abs Analysis Results: Job Number: AApw Lab Number Client Number Date Condition Weight (gm) ug/ml ml Dil Analyte wt % ppm RL(ppm) L 8/31/2016 acceptable Pb < < L 8/31/2016 acceptable Pb L 8/31/2016 acceptable Pb L 8/31/2016 acceptable Pb < < L 8/31/2016 acceptable Pb < < L 8/31/2016 acceptable Pb L 8/31/2016 acceptable Pb L 8/31/2016 acceptable Pb L 8/31/2016 acceptable Pb < < L 8/31/2016 acceptable Pb < < L 8/31/2016 acceptable Pb < < L 8/31/2016 acceptable Pb L 8/31/2016 acceptable Pb < <99 99 Analyst: MARTIN A. ESQUER Printed: 09-Sep-16 Original Print Date: 09-Sep-16 Larry S. Pierce, Approved Accreditation Signatory Page 2 of S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona Phone: FAX: Fiberquant, Inc.

92