@ORNinja. Can sustainable forest management help fight climate change? SSAFR 2015 Sweden

Transcription

1 Can sustainable forest management help fight climate change? SSAFR 2015 Marc-André Carle Martin Simard Sophie D Amours Mathieu Bouchard Steve Vallerand Alexandre Morneau Guillaume Cyr Achille-B. Laurent Université Laval

2 Context Canada emits 15.3 tons of CO 2 per capita In Quebec province, it s around 10.2 t To help fight climate change, these numbers need to go down. Yet lowering standards of living to reduce carbon footprint isn t very popular Forests can help in capturing carbon 2

3 Context Yet Canada s forest sector is a huge part of canadian economy. Shutting down the industry to use forests as carbon sinks = not very clever Can we capture more carbon in our forets while still getting wood the industry needs? Research question 3

4 Context 4

5 Methodology 1. Build a strategic forest management model incorporating carbon sequestration and wood supply. 2. Use the models to assess trade-offs (if any) between wood supply and sequestration. 5

6 Methodology: SFM AAC in Quebec is determined by the Chief Forester We use their models from two different regions A mixed forest from SW Quebec A boreal forest from NE Quebec Allows to work within parameters of current regulation Wikipedia 6

7 Methodology: carbon accounting Yield-to-carbon conversion, while easy, isn t appropriate. Living biomass accounts for 31,5% of carbon stocks in forests and achieves only 50% of sequestration potential Better approach: Canadian carbon budget model CBM- CFS3 by Kurz et al. (2009) updated in Shaw et al. (2014) State of the art for Canada 7

8 Foliage CBM-CFS3 Other Snag stems Snag branches Medium Merch AG very fast AG fast AG slow Fine roots BG very fast BG fast BG slow Coarse roots Biomass & carbon pools 8

9 Snag stems Snag branches Medium AG slow AG very fast AG fast BG very fast BG slow BG fast Decomposing the emissions based on origin

10 Relative size of pools 37,38 24,96 25,43 6,06 6,17 Living biomass represents 31,5% of carbon stocks in studied forest Aérien Souterrain Bois mort Litière Carbone du sol 1. Données de simulation tirées du Modèle du bilan du carbone du secteur forestier canadien (MBC-SFC3); données d une unité d aménagement de la région de l Outaouais de hectares / peuplements 10

11 Modeling slow carbon pools Objective = delay release into the atmosphere Metric: carbon-ton-year (CTY) 1 ton of carbon stocked 1 year Carbon is considered sequestered until released in the atmosphere Each forest activity/perturbation will generate a carbon sequestration activity for the next couple hundred years Wikipedia 11

12 Modeling slow carbon pools Sample clearcut: 4042 CTY/ha Dead organic matter Living Biomass

13 Forest Model Model-III implementation 5-year periods, 150 year planning horizon Maximize non-declining yield (in volume, per species group) Subject to: Flow constraints Habitat/cover constraints Budget constraints (for silviculture) Other contextual constraints (fire recuperation, etc.) Wikipedia 13

14 Studied Area Courtesy of Google Maps CORS/INFORMS 2015 Montreal, Qc, Canada 14

15

16 Case Study #1: Mixed forest 485,000 hectares Mixed forest Public owned (crown land) 4 different companies use the wood from that area Only allow actions / treatments that are allowed by regulation 16

17 Forest Model Treatments (19) 1 plantation 3 thinnings 6 partial cuts 9 clear cuts Availability: Age Basal area / ha Volume / ha 17

18 What if we just let the forest grow? Considering all carbon pools (living, AG, BG) Model AAC (m 3 /year) Carbon (CTY/ha) Natural Growth (100%) Max Non-declining yield (89.4%) Max carbon storage (101.9%) Removing habitat constraints -> AAC 18

19 19

20 What is different with max carbon versus max volume? Silvicultural budget shifts Less thinnings (-25%), more plantations (+14%) during first 30 years. Progressively less plantations Longer rotations for softwood 9800 ha / year harvested, 8.8% less Shorter rotations for hardwood ha / year harvested, 4% more Model pushes more carbon into the slow decaying pools 20

21 Case Study #2: Boreal forest 21

22 Case Study #2: Boreal forest 2,984,600 hectares Boreal forest (mostly softwood) Public owned (crown land) 3 companies use the wood from that area Only allow actions / treatments that are allowed by regulation 22

23 Forest Model Treatments (3) 1 plantation 1 partial cut 1 clear cut Availability: Age Volume / ha 23

24 What if we just let the forest grow? Considering all carbon pools (living, AG, BG) Model AAC (m 3 /year) Carbon (CTY/ha) Natural Growth (100%) Max Non-declining yield (92.2%) Max carbon storage (101.9%) 24

25 Perspective Mixed forest Comparison with land use change (over 150 years) 1 ha reverted to forest 23,800 CTY Equivalent impact of 15,000 ha reverted to forest Boreal forest Calculation not as straightforward as it depends where on the landscape and most land is already forest. 25

26 Conclusion Forests can help sequestrate carbon, but impact is limited without changing allowed prescriptions Yield-to-carbon modelling approach accounts for 25% of carbon stocks and achieves only 50% of carbon sequestration potential Implies less thinnings, more plantations, shorter rotation for hardwood & longer for softwood Feel free to follow me 26

27 Future research: treatments! What if we extended what is currently allowable? What are the impacts of habitat constraints? Land use impact has a lot more impact than forest management strategies Feel free to follow me 27

28 28

29 29

30 Age distribution for boreal forest 30