SEA TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT VALIDATION PROJECT

Transcription

1 SEA TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT VALIDATION PROJECT

2 MIDTERM CONFERENCE

3 Sept 12 Session 2 Management words Panel STM & the Future Something fidgety STM for Efficiency & Environment Day 1 summary

4 Sept 12 Session 2 Management words Panel STM & the Future Something fidgety STM for Efficiency & Environment Day 1 summary

5 Sept 12 Session 2 Management words Panel STM & the Future Something fidgety STM for Efficiency & Environment Day 1 summary

6 Sept 12 Session 2 Management words Panel STM & the Future Something fidgety STM for Efficiency & Environment Day 1 summary

7 ENHANCED EFFICIENCY AND REDUCED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EMPOWERED BY PORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (PORTCDM) Mikael Lind RISE Viktoria

8 PortCDM activities At a glance

9 Example of integrated service - RTA from PortCDM to ECDIS

10 SHIPS AND PORTS NEED TO BE Enabling connectivity to hinterland for sustainable transport systems Connected ports (origin) CONNECTED! Connected ships Enabling connectivity to hinterland for sustainable transport systems Connected ports (destination) Port call synchronization Port call synchronization Port call optimization Voyage optimization Port call optimization Port-to-port collaboration (optimization and synchronization)

11 Business incentives for PortCDM Savings for a large shipping line ( port calls per year) is between 65 MUSD and 130 MUSD for just-in-time arrival Assumption: The largest container vessel consumes 240 tons of fuel at full speed (23 knots) and 40 tons of fuel at 10 knots. Very many times ships do not leave in time giving rise to additional port call costs, chasing of time window to next port, and delay for arriving vessels A reduction of 17 % of TTT can take away one vessel (if not fully loaded) in a route of 5 legs, 5 ships, using 4 ports STRONG INCENTIVES FOR ENHANCED INTERACTION BETWEEN SHIPS AND PORTS

12 OBJECTIVES OF PortCDM Optimal resource utilization Precision in time of departure No unexpected waiting times Minimal waiting times Fast turnaround Just-in-time operations Optimal resource utilization High degree of predictability Minimal chasing Green Steaming High degree of predictability Port operator Port operator Port operator Port operator Port operator Ports of origin Port operator Ports of destination

13 STM supports dynamic acting Dynamic voyage optimization supported by services of Port call synchronization Weather routing Area management Traffic Synchronization Dynamic port call optimization supported by services of Port call synchronization Traffic synchronization Port flow optimization Weather forecasting

14 Inter-operable platform for sharing time stamps Ship ECDIS Shipping ERP PortCDM information service system VTMIS TOS NSW PMS FOC Previous / next port Port Community Systems (PCS) AIS Service provider s system Hinterland operator s system

15 International PortCDM council The Internationalition of PortCDM Ensuring STM and PortCDM implementation meets the needs of the international maritime community International governing body for generic PortCDM matters maintaining: Confirmed / TBC members Port call message format (PCMF) PortCDM concept definition Generic guidelines for the PortCDM concept Port call structure ontology Criteria for accreditation of PortCDM application and data services BIMCO BMVI Germany BSA Bahamas CIRM Cyprus Shipping Chamber IALA ICS IHMA IHO IMO IMPA IMSO Intertanko Marshall Island Registry Member state Australia Member state Canada Member state Singapore MOF Korea Port of Freemantle Port of Singapore SMA Valencia port foundation Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and more to come

16 Analysis of reasons for being delayed from berth * Arrival * DepartureOK (Not * Arrival * presented Arrival (Not OK (Not OK. presented in (Not presented this sheet) presented in this in this Latest sheet) in sheet) this ETD sheet) = 05:00 from MSW-SMA & 05:30 from PortitSEGOT. Reported ATD 06:25. Concequences of this * Arrival * Departure OK. No * Arrival delays OK. No OK (actually delays delay: no delays. (interesting the other But interesting way is that around, PortitSEGOT is that the vessel ETA had was arrived latest ETD earlier than estimated. ) Departure: Arrival: Departure: Departue: 13:00 but ATD reported was 14:38, 05:00 * Pilotage but Pilotage ATA fee based berth was ordered was on time, ~06:00. for payed 14:30). (Pilotage for Why? 1 hr was extra pilotage time (Extra Pilotage cost approximately 4697 SEK) * Definite * Vessel Pilotage * Definite was * Pilotage at Departure: changed anchor Pilotage from waiting changed ordered 00:30 for to available from for Commenced = 14:35 02:00 * Another 05:00 10:00 at berth 23:48 and (35 minutes tovessel 13:00 was (511). This not with at 09:24 delayed). delayed). 2 pilots This Pilotage and ETA? late 2 usually tugboats What does take inbound that for that berth. Pilotage time 04:00-07:20 = 1hr extra late change resulted change approximately * resulted Definite Arrival: a penalty in Pilotage a fee penalty mean 1 hour ofchanged 2490SEK. in fee MSW-SMA/PortitSEGOT? for this pilotage oftype 2490SEK. from of and 16:00 vessel tugboat-time. tofor departure. (Extra 13:52. But Pilotage This because late cost change ofapproximately the resulted delay in 8701SEK, a penaltythis fee of excludes the extra hour of * No ETA from pilotage 1490SEK. MSW-SMA * Vessel was(not billed was after a significant for at anchor 1,5 hours tugboat waiting amount, instead 10:47 assistance) for but because of available another 1 hour RAMONA which berth vessel (511). is suffered an extra from fee of: this 3049SEK. delay, please see the * Cause was ofscheduled delay: * Cause Bunker SONGA of for delay: berth Operations RUBY Cargo 511 sheet) Departure: after Operations and SMERALDO Sludge * Safety delayed Operations -(see in this + sheet ready example 8), toand sail the the inbound vessel had to execute a "turn-around manouver" (See picture) close were delayed. agent told operations (SludgeOp the * Cause pilotage *(paperwork) Pilotage of requested * delay: administration ordered ETD Cargo (00:05) delayed. 07:00 Operations for to for to15:30. and Trubaduren coordinate 00:30 Pilotage delayed. The and departing was (to Lighthouse ordered keep vessel for the (at 07:00. the Bonito same ATA was was time: scheduled 07:37. TTAM (Trubaduren Traffic Area Management) is an initiative to finished preliminary 01:10). pilotage * Cargo to depart order Operations updated 16:00 was but in was increase completed linedelayed withthe SMERALDOs and safety (see the Bonito in delay those sheet) was highly due to 17:30. to trafficked thatpilotage the waters.) paper work and testing of the departure). * Interesting * No cargo digital was was is accordingly that information delayed. MSW-SMA * Pilotage (Ready-to-sail changed between * usually got Environment updated 10:07 17:00 take operations approximately 07:06 and for - 1 Songa 14:00 hour towere ETD of were Ruby extra 12:00, delayed). 1 hour which found. emissions for resulted this Somewhere in type the in a of archipelago in of Gothenburg * Bunker and this Sludge did between not took penalty change place the delay fee after the vessel of Pilotage occurred. Cargo 1990SEK. for departure. Operations order. (Pilotage But because Definite of was the delay at pilotage was Completed. * Pilotage 07:06 (definite) ordered * Interesting ordered for 10:00). is billed that for 22:30 PortitSEGOT for 1,5 *(SMERALDO At hours 02:11 had instead PortitSEGOT at 23:00) the of time 1 hour then changed of which the definite ETD is an to extra pilotage 05:30 fee = indication order of: ETD that estimated there was to 17:00 information that suggested that it changed to 23:30 and * not (SMERALDO Cause to 16:00. of 2610SEK. delay 00:00) Why? = berth could (Could and availability then be not delays? changed find. (BONITO Why answer to 23:59 did not was to that.) the delayed, Pilotage Ideally seerequest ETD separate and change Pilotageaccordingly? Confirmed should If so information could be sent to (SMERALDO * With00:30). be a front-end the sheet). These same. this changes wouldresulted have inbound been in vessel a visible penalty tofor be fee all at of the Pilot actors Boarding Station later. (Pilotage Requested 04:00 which is normal when ETD is 1490SEK and for action RAMONA. could have * been Cause taken of 05:00 delay: already for Cargo the at departing Operations 07:06 when vessel). delayed. there When the was an indication * The pilot that pilotage was there idle could arrived for 1,5 be to hours a delay. the vessel in vain, approximatly waiting at pilot 5-10 station lifts to board * SMERALDO wasat then 17:00 further instead remained. delayed of 15:30. * Cause (late change) of delay to:when 02:00 the butpilot came onboard the vessel was not ready to sail, approximately 30 "lifts" the pilot was already on its way to RAMONA remained and = started 1-1,5h delay. the pilotage Due to lack of information terminal<--->agent/gotapp. at 23:59 as ordered. Because of the delay ==> Cargo pilotage Operations was billed Delayed. for 3,5 hours instead of 2 hours which is an extra fee of: 7046SEK * Cause of delay = berth availability. (SMERALDO was delayed, see sheet 8). Dependencies between time stamps Cost drivers

17 THINK DIFFERENT MAKE THINGS HAPPEN MAKE A DIFFERENCE For questions do not hesitate to contact: Mikael Lind RISE Viktoria Mikael.Lind@ri.se

18 EFFICIENCY & ENVIRONMENT GAINS FROM BETTER INFORMATION SHARING AND STANDARDIZED INFORMATION SERVICES BJÖRN ANDREASSON, SMA

19 What is it STM is an integration project STM Route Shoreside services Service provider Shore Centre/VTS Ports Fleet operations Ice breaking services SAR MSW catalogue services

20 What kind of benefits More effective work onboard and ashore better services Generalisability new services More information, accurate and up do date, available better services

21 Achievements The cogwheel metaphor

22 How to describe and specify it?

23 Is the specification enough?

24 Achieved! Application services, e.g. route optimization SeaSWIM STM ship system e.g. ECDIS Information services

25 Goals in this project From goals to validated effects!

26 Next steps in project

27 STM next steps Maintenance and refinement of arcitecture Services that provides cost savings Regional pilot implementations

28 STM FOR EFFICIENCY & ENVIRONMENT José Andrés Giménez

29 STM for Efficiency & Environment Source: The Guardian

30 STM for Efficiency & Environment

31 STM for Efficiency & Environment Maritime transport emits around 1,000 million tonnes of CO 2 annually and is responsible for about 2.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions (3 rd IMO GHG study). Shipping emissions are predicted to increase between 50% and 250% by 2050 depending on future economic and energy developments.

32 STM Goals STM DRIVER FOR TRANSFORMATION SHIP TO PORT - Enabling just-intime operations - Improving port efficiency - Reducing turnaround times Efficiency ( ) Emissions (CO2) SHIP TO SHIP/SHORE - Optimising route navigation - Reducing navigation times - Reducing fuel consumption

33 STM for Efficiency & Environment

34 STM for Efficiency & Environment STM Test Bed Selected Ships No. Of ships per type of Service (Total 275 ships) No. of Vessels per type of service OTHER SERVICES CRUISE SERVICES REGULAR SERVICES TRAMP

35 STM for Efficiency & Environment STM Monitoring Routes

36 06 CONTAINERSHIP Deep-sea service VALENCIA CRISTOBAL MANZANILLO LONG BEACH OAKLAND VANCOUVER SEATTLE OAKLAND LONG BEACH MANZANILLO BALBOA CRISTOBAL - - BARCELONA GIOIA TAURO CIVITAVECCHIA LA SPEZIA FOS - VALENCIA California Express service Frequency: Weekly 10 ships operating the service

37 STM for Efficiency & Environment 13 EU Ports PortCDM Test Beds ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION Validated Results Macro Analysis Voyage Management Test Beds 300 Ships 5 Shore Centers Use cases: Regular Services Tramp Services Cruise Services Berth-to-berth VESSL DataBase +1,000 Maritime Services +200 EU Ports +2,500 Ships

38 STM Expected Benefits Benefits for Shipping Companies (M ) Nautical Miles Saved Fuel Consumption Saved Optmised Navigation Waiting Time Saved Safety Increase Benefits for EU Ports (M ) Just-in-Time Operations Improved Predictability and Planning Resource Optimisation Safety Increase Benefits for all Reduced GHG Emissions Improved Air Quality Improved Social Perception Efficient and Sustainable Maritime Transport

39 PORT OPTIMIZATION, LOGISTICS, CRUISE TROND ANDERSEN, PORT OF STAVANGER

40 What is PortCDM - cruise

41 Goals in PortCDM cruise Punctuality Predictability Berth productivity

42 Achievements Better understanding of situations. Time-related information reaches actors. Better cooperation and understanding of roles.

43 Next steps in project Port-to-port/Ship-to-port collaboration All ships, not just cruise More connectors

44 Vision

45 Sept 12 Session 2 Management words Panel STM & the Future Something fidgety STM for Efficiency & Environment Day 1 summary

46 Demos Italian STM solutions PortCDM applications Transas STM ship & shore centre solutions Carmenta SAR solution for Rescue Centres Analysis tools