Quantitative trait loci segregating in crosses between New Hampshire and White Leghorn chicken lines: II. Muscle weight and carcass composition
|
|
- Wilfrid Carr
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Quantitative trait loci segregating in crosses between New Hampshire and White Leghorn chicken lines: II. Muscle and carcass composition M. K. Nassar, Z. S. Goraga and G. A. Brockmann doi: /j x Breeding Biology and Molecular Genetics, Department of Crop and Animal Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstrabe 42, D-10115, Berlin, Germany Summary In order to identify genetic factors influencing muscle and carcass composition in chicken, a linkage analysis was performed with 278 F 2 males of reciprocal crosses between the extremely different inbred lines New Hampshire (NHI) and White Leghorn (WL77). The NHI line had been selected for high meat yield and the WL77 for low egg before inbreeding. Highly significant quantitative trait loci (QTL) controlling body and the s of carcass, breast muscle, drumsticks thighs and wings were identified on GGA4 between and cm and on GGA27 between 4 and 52 cm. These genomic regions explained % and % of the phenotypic F 2 variances of the corresponding traits respectively. Additional genome-wide highly significant QTL for the of drumsticks thighs were mapped on GGA1, 5 and 7. Moreover, significant QTL controlling body were found on GGA2 and 11. The data obtained in this study can be used for increasing the mapping resolution and subsequent gene targeting on GGA4 and 27 by combining data with other crosses where the same QTL were found. Keywords inbred chicken line, intercross, linkage, muscle, selection. Introduction Carcass composition and in particular muscle yield and quality are important traits that influence the nutritional and economic value of a chicken. An increased understanding of the molecular basis behind complex traits like muscle development and carcass composition, which cannot be measured directly on live chickens, helps researchers to identify genes and gene variants contributing to the trait variation and supports breeders in using this information in breeding programmes. As a first step in gene discovery, often a linkage or association study is performed to map genomic loci contributing to the trait of interest. Address for correspondence G. A. Brockmann, Breeding Biology and Molecular Genetics, Department of Crop and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Horticulture, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 42, D Berlin, Germany. gudrun.brockmann@agrar.hu-berlin.de Accepted for publication 27 November 2011 Genomic regions influencing carcass parts, such as s of breast muscle, wings, drumsticks and thighs, have been mapped in different crosses between or within diverse chicken breeds (chickenqtldb; genome.org/cgi-bin/qtldb/gg/index). Because different chicken strains or lines can harbour different variants of genes that control carcass-related traits, additional crosses between chickens that differ extremely in phenotype can add new information about genetic determinants of these traits. If inbred lines of diverse selection lines are used for gene-mapping experiments, there is a high probability that alleles contributing to the trait variation segregate in the mapping population and thus can be identified. This study aimed at the identification of additional genetic variation contributing to differences in muscle yield and carcass composition in chickens. Our study takes advantage of phenotypically extreme lines with a high degree of inbreeding. We used the dual purpose line New Hampshire (NHI), which had been selected for high meat yield at the age of 20 weeks, and the layer line White Leghorn (WL77), which had been selected for low egg during the laying period (Goraga et al. 2010). NHI chickens had about twice as heavy breast muscles and 2012 The Authors, Animal Genetics 2012 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics 1
2 2 Nassar, Goraga and Brockmann 2.4 times heavier drumsticks thighs than WL77 chickens did. In reciprocal F 2 intercrosses between NHI and WL77, we performed a linkage analysis to detect genomic loci responsible for the big differences between the two chicken lines. Recently, the same population has been used to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) for egg-laying performance (Goraga et al. 2011). Here, we present QTL for body and carcass composition in 20-week-old males. We identified QTL for muscle and different carcass parts that have not been reported before, and we could confirm several QTL from other mapping studies. Therefore, the NHI 9 WL77 chicken crosses provide another resource for fine mapping and subsequent gene discovery of economically importance genes, for example in combined analyses of several crosses, where the QTL segregate. Materials and methods Chicken lines and mapping populations The chicken lines NHI and WL77, as well as the population and pedigree structure for QTL mapping used in this study, have been described in detail previously (Goraga et al. 2010, 2011). NHI and WL77 lines were inbred after selection for either high meat yield at 20 weeks of age or low egg respectively. The inbreeding levels were about 86% and 100% in NHI and WL77 respectively. Detailed information on the population and pedigree structure is given in Table S1. In this study, we analysed all 278 F 2 males. Phenotypes We dissected the animals at 20 weeks of age, which was also the age of selection for high meat yield in the NHI line. Five to six males of the parental lines, 25 F 1 and all 278 F 2 males were weighed, slaughtered and dissected after a fasting period of 10 h. Feathers, head, feet, shanks, all inner organs and visceral white adipose tissues were removed. The carcass was defined as the remaining empty body with bones and muscles covered with skin. Afterwards, the skin and neck were removed. Left and right breast muscles were separated from the bones and weighed; the sum was named breast muscle. The summed s of the left and right wings (wings ) and the sum of the s of drumsticks and thighs (drumsticks thighs ) were recorded. After removing all mentioned parts, the residual carcass with breast bones and the dorsal part was weighed. Relative s were calculated as a percentage of carcass. Statistics All analyses were performed using SAS (SAS Institute 2008). To test significant differences either between NHI, WL77 and F 1 populations or between the reciprocal crosses, an analysis of variance was preformed. Pairwise comparisons were made using the Tukey Kramer test. Pearson s correlation coefficients between traits were estimated in the F 2 populations. Heritabilities were estimated in the F 2 generation by the analysis of sire and dam variance components (PROC VARCOMP) using the restricted maximum-likelihood (REML) method. Genotype effect plots were drawn with least square means (LSM). A Tukey Kramer test was performed to test phenotypic differences between genotype classes of the nearest marker to a QTL peak. Genotypes, linkage map construction and QTL mapping All animals of the pedigree were genotyped at 123 marker loci on 25 chromosomes. QTL mapping was performed with a pedigree-specific linkage map as described previously (Goraga et al. 2011). Prior to QTL analysis, the phenotypic data were corrected for hatch (four levels in the WL77 9 NHI cross and five levels in the NHI 9 WL77 cross) and family (number of hens that were mated with the same cock; two levels in the NHI 9 WL77 cross and three levels in the WL77 9 NHI cross). Therefore, QTL effects account for phenotypic F 2 variation after correction. The standard model for the analysis of the combined reciprocal crosses included cross (two levels) as a fixed effect. To test whether the direction of cross affected the QTL, cross was included as an interactive covariate in the QTL model. The effect of cross was considered significant if the difference between the full model and the reduced model DF was 4.6. An F-value difference of 4.6 corresponds roughly to a significance level of P 0.05 at a LOD difference of 2.0 (Li et al. 2006). The QTL positions are given for the peak F-values as the cm distance from the first marker on the chromosome, which was placed at 0 cm. To translate genetic positions (cm) into physical positions (Mb), we used the Mb positions of markers according to the genomic chicken sequence ( Ensembl 60 WASHUC2 and NCBI build 2.1). The direction of genetic effects is given as NHI allele effect compared to WL77. If the NHI effect is larger than the WL77, the effect is positive; otherwise negative. Pedigree-specific significance thresholds were derived by random QTL scans with 1000 permutations of the data (Churchill & Doerge 1994). The following thresholds were taken from the resulting F-test statistic distribution: genome-wide highly significant (a = 0.01) corresponded to an F-value of 10.36, genome-wide significant (a = 0.05) corresponded to F = 8.47, and genome-wide suggestive corresponded to chromosome-wide significant (a = 0.05) and ranged between 3.3 F 6.4 for the different chromosomes. The 95% confidence interval of a single QTL was estimated using a parametric bootstrap analysis
3 QTL for muscle and carcass composition 3 with 1000 iterations (Visscher et al. 1996). The percentage of phenotypic F 2 variance explained by an identified QTL was calculated for each trait as a reduction of sums of squares in the full model compared to the reduced model. Results Phenotypic characteristics of NHI, WL77, F 1 and F 2 animals NHI chickens were about twice as heavy as WL77 were at the age of 20 weeks (Table 1). The s of breast muscle and drumsticks thighs were about 2- and 2.4-fold higher respectively in NHI chickens when compared to those of WL77 chickens. The F 1 and F 2 means of body and s of carcass, breast muscle, drumsticks thighs and residual carcass shifted towards the mean values of NHI animals, suggesting dominance components in the mode of inheritance. The F 2 variance was about 1.5- to 2.2-fold as high as the respective F 1 variance. In the comparison of the reciprocal crosses, NHI 9 WL77 had a better performance than did WL77 9 NHI. The F 2 chicken population with a NHI grand-sire showed significantly higher mean values of all measurements and had higher variances. The heritabilities for body and carcass composition traits ranged from 0.21 to 0.31, indicating genetic determinants for all traits. In both reciprocal crosses, all carcass composition traits were highly correlated with all others (r 0.74) (Table 2). QTL effects In the combined analysis of both reciprocal crosses, we detected genomic regions affecting body and carcass traits on 14 chromosomes (Table 3). Each trait was controlled by four to nine QTL, which at least surpassed the suggestive level of significance. QTL on chromosomes 1, 2, 4, 5, 7 and 27 were highly significant for at least one trait. Individual QTL accounted for % of the corresponding phenotypic F 2 variance. The most significant (20.06 F 67.56) genomic region affecting body and all carcass traits was mapped on GGA4 with peak F-value positions at 155 and 156 cm (76.93 and Mb respectively). The 95% confidence interval for the different traits (Table 3, Fig. S1) was 4 9 cm long. The nearest marker to the peak F-value position was UMA4.034 at cm (75.89 Mb). The locus accounted for % of the phenotypic F 2 variance of the corresponding traits. The genetic effect on all traits was additive (Table 3) with the NHI allele as the increasing allele. Chickens homozygous for the NHI allele at the GGA4 QTL were on average 300 g (P < ) heavier and had 34 g (P < ) more breast muscle than did homozygous WL77 chickens. The direction of the QTL effect was consistent in both reciprocal crosses, but the magnitude was higher in the NHI 9 WL77 cross direction (Figs 1 and S2). The second highest QTL effect was found on GGA27 and contributed to highly significant differences in body (F = 11.51) and the s of breast muscle (F = 13.37), drumsticks thighs (F = 16.12) and residual carcass (F = 10.61) and, to a lesser extent, wings (F = 8.48) and carcass s (F = 7.20) (Table 3, Fig. S1). The peak QTL positions were located between 46 and 52 cm (3.61 and 3.87 Mb respectively) with confidence intervals covering almost the whole chromosome. The nearest marker to the peak F-value position is ADL0376 at 52 cm (3.87 Mb) at the distal end of the chromosome. The locus explained % of the phenotypic F 2 variance of the corresponding traits. At this locus, two different high alleles, N 1 and N 2, were segregating in the NHI line at the marker closest to the peak F-value position (Figs 1 and S2). The allelic effects of both alleles were almost additive in combination with the low WL77 allele (W). When the two NHI alleles (N 1 and N 2 ) were inherited together, the effect tended to be additive for all traits, except for the of wings, where the higher allele was dominant over the lower allele in the WL77 9 NHI cross. Despite the wide F-value curve across GGA27, a scan for two QTL provided no evidence for a second QTL. The NHI line was also the origin of high alleles for additionally identified highly significant and significant QTL that influenced body on GGA2 and 11 and the of drumsticks thighs on GGA1, 5 and 7. These QTL explained % of the phenotypic F 2 variance of the corresponding traits (Table 3). Testing cross as a factor interacting with the QTL provided statistical evidence for six out of 14 genomic regions that had significantly different effects in the reciprocal crosses (Table 3). For example, the significant QTL (F = 10.28) for of drumsticks and thighs on GGA1 was detected in the NHI 9 WL77 cross, but not in the reciprocal cross. Thus, such QTL is specific to the cross in which it was identified. Discussion Owing to the large phenotypic differences between NHI and WL77 chickens and the high correlation between body and different carcass traits, we expected to detect QTL regions that had effects on more than one trait. The identified QTL clearly illustrate that many loci across the genome have responded to the selection procedure for high meat yield in the NHI line. Most alleles inherited from the NHI line were associated with higher performance for these loci. Furthermore, this study confirms that most genetic effects contributing to body and carcass traits act additively (Ikeobi et al. 2004; Hocking 2005; Jacobsson et al. 2005; Nadaf et al. 2009).
4 4 Nassar, Goraga and Brockmann Table 1 Phenotypic characterization of parental lines, F 1 and F 2 males of the reciprocal crosses at the age of 20 weeks. Mean (SD) 1 Parental lines F 1 F 2 2 Measurement NHI n = 6 WL77 n = 5 NHI 9 WL77 n = 14 WL77 9 NHI n = 11 NHI 9 WL77 n = 127 WL77 9 NHI n = 151 Absolute values, g Body 2786 (162) a,a 1442 (73) b,c 2551 (122) a 2385 (141) B, 2426 (245) 2278 (198) Carcass 1915 (122) a,a 909 (23) b,c 1679 (95) a 1603 (118) B 1666 (199) 1552 (148) Breast muscle 342 (36) a,a 178 (11) b,b 312 (20) a 300 (19) B, * 310 (36) 290 (31) Drumsticks and thighs 690 (53) a,a 292 (16) b,c 554 (51) a 523 (39) B 552 (76) 509 (60) Wings 251 (18) a,a 110 (6) c,c 186 (9) b 183 (11) B 198 (20) 184 (17) Residual carcass 390 (29) a,a 187 (10) b,b 358 (31) a 349 (50) A 356 (38) 330 (30) Relative values, 3 % Breast muscle 17.8 (1.2) a,a 19.6 (1.0) b,b 18.6 (0.7) ab 18.7 (0.6) AB 18.4 (1.0) 18.7 (1.1)* Drumsticks and thighs 36.0 (1.0) a,a 32.1 (1.1) b,b 33.0 (2.1) b 32.7 (2.0) B 33.1 (1.5) 32.8 (1.4) Wings 13.1 (0.9) a,a 12.1 (0.4) b,b 11.1 (0.4) c 11.5 (0.6) B, * 11.9 (0.7) 11.9 (0.6) Residual carcass 20.3 (0.5) a,b 20.5 (0.8) a,b 21.4 (1.8) a 21.7 (2.1) A, * 21.4 (1.0) 21.3 (0.8) NHI, partially inbred New Hampshire; WL77, inbred White Leghorn. 1 SD, standard deviations were calculated for each population separately. 2 Data were corrected for hatch and family as fixed effects, in each cross separately. 3 Values relative to carcass. a,b,c Significant differences in absolute or relative trait values between parental and F 1 of the cross NHI 9 WL77 for the same trait (P 0.05). A,B,C Significant differences in absolute or relative trait values between parental and F 1 of the cross WL77 9 NHI for the same trait (P 0.05). *P 0.05, P 0.01 and P refer to significant differences between reciprocal crosses (ANOVA followed by Tukey Kramer test). Table 2 Pearson s correlation coefficients (P < ) among measurements in the F 2 populations. Measurement Body Carcass Breast muscle Drumsticks and thighs Wings Residual carcass Body Carcass Breast muscle Drumsticks and thighs Wings Residual carcass NHI 9 WL77 (above diagonal) and WL77 9 NHI (below diagonal). NHI, partially inbred New Hampshire; WL77, inbred White Leghorn. Heritability estimates are given in the diagonal for combined crosses and were estimated by analysis of sire and dam variance components (PROC VARCOMP) using the restricted maximum-likelihood method. Although most of the detected QTL explained a small part of the phenotypic F 2 variance, two genomic regions harboured strong effects on the analysed traits. The QTL on GGA4 and 27 explained % and % of the phenotypic variance respectively. These QTL affected many of the correlated traits and might represent either pleiotropic effects of the underlying gene or different genes in the QTL region that affect traits independently of each other. This is supported by the fact that if carcass was included as a covariate in the model, the QTL for breast muscle on GGA4 and 27 were lost (data not shown). In this study, the biggest effect on all traits was detected in the distal part of GGA4. This genomic region has been repeatedly mapped for body and carcass composition traits in crosses between high- and low-growth selected lines (Jacobsson et al. 2005; Park et al. 2006; Nadaf et al. 2009) and in crosses between different breeds, for example White Leghorn (layer) with either broiler (meat-type chicken) (Sewalem et al. 2002; Carlborg et al. 2004; Ikeobi et al. 2004; Schreiweis et al. 2005; Zhou et al. 2006a,b), Rhode Island Red (Tuiskula-Haavisto et al. 2002), Red Junglefowl (Kerje et al. 2003) or Oh-Shamo (native Japanese breed) (Tsudzuki et al. 2007). The same genomic segment on GGA4 was also found in crosses between broiler and Fayoumi (native Egyptian breed) (Zhou et al. 2006a,b) or layer lines (Ambo et al. 2009). Albeit the traits in our study were measured at 20 weeks of age, the coincidence of QTL intervals with those detected in many other studies, in which traits were anal-
5 QTL for muscle and carcass composition 5 Table 3 Positions and effects of QTL for body and carcass composition in 20-week-old males of the reciprocal crosses between partially inbred New Hampshire (NHI) and inbred White Leghorn (WL77). Measurement GGA cm (Mb) 1 interval (cm) Marker 2 F 3 DF 4 effect (SE) 5 95% confidence Additive Dominance effect (SE) 5 % P 6 Body (68.84) MCW (16.4) 36.0 (26.0) (57.85) MCW (16.7) 49.5 (26.2) (76.93) UMA (15.7) 9.7 (21.9) (55.40) ADL (16.7) 98.0 (28.2) (14.61) ADL * (16.8) (28.0) (14.33) MCW (18.6) (29.3) (2.26) MCW (26.5) 63.1 (62.3) (3.14) ADL (14.8) 53.0 (20.8) (3.87) ADL (14.7) 9.3 (21.0) 8.3 Carcass 2 95 (58.17) MCW (14.6) 34.4 (23.4) (77.55) UMA (13.5) 21.5 (19.3) (22.58) MCW (15.4) 0.5 (24.1) (15.91) ADL (13.5) 67.4 (21.3) (14.87) MCW (15.8) 89.2 (25.0) (3.78) ADL (12.8) 2.1 (19.3) 5.3 Breast muscle Drumsticks and thighs 2 99 (59.44) MCW (2.9) 6.9 (4.8) (76.93) UMA (2.5) 1.4 (3.6) (28.24) MCW (2.7) 6.2 (4.1) (14.61) MCW (3.0) 16.4 (4.8) (2.02) MCW (4.3) 8.1 (10.1) (3.82) ADL (2.4) 3.1 (3.6) (4.18) ADL (2.5) 2.3 (3.6) (63.48) MCW (5.1) 14.2 (9.3) (77.55) UMA (4.8) 6.5 (6.7) (55.72) ADL (5.1) 44.7 (9.1) (27.89) MCW (4.8) 4.1 (7.6) (20.08) ADL (4.5) 6.7 (6.6) (4.90) LEI (4.4) 21.1 (6.3) (13.00) MCW (5.7) 26.6 (8.5) (8.34) LEI (5.4) 29.6 (8.5) (3.82) ADL (4.5) 8.4 (6.6) 13.8 Wings (76.93) UMA (1.3) 0.3 (1.9) (19.96) MCW (1.8) 3.2 (2.8) (4.90) LEI (1.3) 3.0 (1.8) (3.66) ADL * (1.3) 1.6 (2.0) 6.0 Residual carcass (70.90) MCW (2.8) 8.6 (4.6) (77.55) UMA (2.6) 1.2 (3.7) (56.37) ADL (3.0) 17.6 (5.6) (10.10) MCW (2.4) 8.4 (3.7) (16.56) ADL (2.5) 11.0 (3.8) (14.89) MCW (3.0) 16.8 (4.7) (3.61) ADL (2.6) 4.8 (3.8) Chromosomal location is given as pedigree-specific cm position (Mb); first marker on each chromosome was set at 0 cm. 2 Marker closest to the chromosomal position with the highest F-value. 3 F-value is F-statistic for QTL using standard model. 4 DF-values are in boldface when QTL interaction with cross was considered significant if the difference between the F-value of the standard model and the cross interaction model was 4.6, which corresponded to a LOD score of 2.0 in this F 2 population. 5 The direction of QTL effects is given as NHI allele effect compared to WL77. 6 Phenotypic F 2 variance (%) explained by the QTL; QTL effect given as reduction of the residual sum of squares fitting 1 vs. 0 QTL. Highly significant at 1% genome-wide level (F 10.36), *Significant at 5% genome-wide level (F 8.47), Significant at 5% chromosome-wide level (3.3 F 6.4), which is assumed suggestive at the genome-wide level. ysed at younger ages, shows that these genomic loci affect the traits during a long developmental period. The later age analysed in our study contributed to the detection of an additional QTL effect for residual carcass that has not been reported in other crosses. The confidence interval of the QTL region on GGA4 harbours 86 genes (Ensembl release 60), among them are the genes encoding the fibroblast growth factor-binding proteins 1 and 2 (FGFBP1 and FGFBP2), which might influence carcass and muscle development.
6 6 Nassar, Goraga and Brockmann Breast muscle (g) Breast muscle (g) NHI x WL77 WL77 x NHI NN GGA4 (75.89 Mb) NHI x WL77 WL77 x NHI N 1 N 1 N 1 N 2 * N 2 N 2 N 1 N 1 The highly significant QTL affecting body and carcass traits on GGA27 in our crosses confirms QTL effects from other crosses for body (Sewalem et al. 2002; Kerje et al. 2003; Schreiweis et al. 2005; Ambo et al. 2009), drumsticks thighs (Ankra-Badu et al. 2010) and wings (Ikeobi et al. 2004). In addition, our data are the first to provide evidence that this QTL region contains a gene or genes affecting breast muscle. Effects were also found for residual carcass and carcass s. The confidence interval comprises the whole microchromosome harbouring 191 genes (Ensembl release 60). Among them is the chicken growth hormone (GH) gene, for example, which was associated with muscle fibre characteristics in a F 2 White Plymouth Rock 9 Xinghua cross (Lei et al. 2007). Other functional candidates include the type II growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor (Type II GHRHR), the membrane protein palmitoylated 3 (MAGUK NW N 1 W * WW N 2 N 2 WW N 2 W GGA27 (3.87 Mb) WW Figure 1 Exemplary genotype effect plots of the markers UMA4.034 and ADL0376 nearest to the QTL peaks on GGA4 and 27 affecting all carcass traits respectively in 20-week-old males of the F 2 populations of the reciprocal crosses between NHI and WL77. Values are LSM ± SE. N: New Hampshire allele, W: White Leghorn allele, N 1 and N 2 belong to alternative alleles in NHI chickens at marker ADL0376. In the cross NHI x WL77, genotype N 1 N 1 did not occur. *P 0.05, P 0.01 and P refer to significant differences between genotype classes (ANOVA followed by Tukey- Kramer test). See Figure S2 for other traits. p55 subfamily member 3) (MPP3), the homeobox B9 (HOXB9), and the signal transducers and activator of transcription 5B (STAT5B) genes. The fact that the QTL regions on GGA4 and 27 have been identified in many crosses between layers and meattype chickens is likely due to the joined phylogenetic origin of either layer or broiler chicken lines (Rubin et al. 2010). As the magnitudes of the genetic effects reported for the different mapping populations vary, it can be assumed that more than two alleles very likely occur in the different breeds. In our cross, we found different alleles for the QTL on GGA27 in the NHI line. Males of the NHI 9 WL77 cross with the father descending from the NHI line were heavier than those of the reciprocal cross. The phenotypic differences between the two reciprocal crosses originate in part from residual genetic variation among the NHI animals as a result of incomplete inbreeding. This could also affect potential QTL genetic background interaction effects. Evidence for this is given by different allelic effects of the QTL on GGA27. The inbreeding coefficient in the NHI line was 0.86 at the time the cross-bred experiment was performed. Additional cross differences may have been caused by genetic variation of the W chromosome and mitochondrial DNA between the parental NHI and WL77 hens. Furthermore, epigenetic effects on early growth during the embryonic development owing to different egg sizes of NHI and WL77 hens, and subsequently F 1 hens, cannot be ruled out. In addition to significant and highly significant QTL, we reported genome-wide suggestive QTL that have not been reported before in other crosses, for example the QTL for carcass on GGA11 and 13, for breast muscle on GGA14 and 28, and for drumsticks thighs on GGA8, 12 and 14. The QTL for wings on GGA12 and for residual carcass on GGA5, 10, 11 and 13 are also novel. The suggestive QTL for body and the s of carcass, breast muscle and wings on GGA1, 2, 5, 7, 13, 14 and 20 are in agreement with findings in other QTL studies (Carlborg et al. 2004; Ikeobi et al. 2004; Jacobsson et al. 2005; Nadaf et al. 2009; Terčič et al. 2009). In conclusion, this project was the initial step for discovering the genetic basis for the big phenotypic differences between the NHI and WL77 lines in muscle and carcass composition. QTL with large effects that have been reported previously in other studies could be confirmed. Furthermore, several QTL effects were detected that have not been reported before. The highly significant QTL on GGA4 and 27, which are responsible for variability in muscle and carcass composition traits, make a search for causative candidate genes feasible. The mapping resolution could be efficiently increased by combining data from two or more crosses where QTL on GGA4 and 27 were also found or by association studies in advanced intercross populations, for example.
7 QTL for muscle and carcass composition 7 Acknowledgements This work was supported by a grant from the Yousef Jameel Foundation. We acknowledge Jacob Litke of Wesleyan University in Middletown, Connecticut, for his comments. References Ambo M., Moura A.S.A.M.T., Ledur M.C. et al. (2009) Quantitative trait loci for performance traits in a broiler 9 layer cross. Animal Genetics 40, Ankra-Badu G.A., Shriner D., Le Bihan-Duval E. et al. (2010) Mapping main, epistatic and sex-specific QTL for body composition in a chicken population divergently selected for low or high growth rate. BMC Genomics 11, 107. Carlborg O., Hocking P.M., Burt D.W. & Haley C.S. (2004) Simultaneous mapping of epistatic QTL in chickens reveals clusters of QTL pairs with similar genetic effects on growth. Genetical Research 83, Churchill G.A. & Doerge R.W. (1994) Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138, Goraga Z., Nassar M., Schramm G.P. & Brockmann G.A. (2010) Phenotypic characterization of chicken inbred lines that differ extremely in growth, body composition and egg production traits. Archiv Tierzucht 53, Goraga Z.S., Nassar M.K. & Brockmann G.A. (2011) Quantitative trait loci segregating in crosses between New Hampshire and White Leghorn chicken lines: I. Egg production traits. Animal Genetics 43, Hocking P.M. (2005) Review of QTL mapping results in chickens. Worlds Poultry Science Journal 61, Ikeobi C.O.N., Woolliams J.A., Morrice D.R., Law A., Windsor D., Burt D.W. & Hocking P.M. (2004) Quantitative trait loci for meat yield and muscle distribution in a broiler layer cross. Livestock Production Science 87, Jacobsson L., Park H.B., Wahlberg P., Fredriksson R., Perez-Enciso M., Siegel P.B. & Andersson L. (2005) Many QTLs with minor additive effects are associated with a large difference in growth between two selection lines in chickens. Genetical Research 86, Kerje S., Carlborg O., Jacobsson L., Schutz K., Hartmann C., Jensen P. & Andersson L. (2003) The twofold difference in adult size between the Red Junglefowl and White Leghorn chickens is largely explained by a limited number of QTLs. Animal Genetics 34, Lei M., Luo C., Peng X., Fang M., Nie Q., Zhang D., Yang G. & Zhang X. (2007) Polymorphism of growth-correlated genes associated with fatness and muscle fiber traits in chickens. Poultry Science 86, Li R., Tsaih S.W., Shockley K., Stylianou I.M., Wergedal J., Paigen B. & Churchill G.A. (2006) Structural model analysis of multiple quantitative traits. PLoS Genetics 2, e114. Nadaf J., Pitel F., Gilbert H. et al. (2009) QTL for several metabolic traits map to loci controlling growth and body composition in an F2 intercross between high- and low-growth chicken lines. Physiological Genomics 38, Park H.-B., Jacobsson L., Wahlberg P., Siegel P.B. & Andersson L. (2006) QTL analysis of body composition and metabolic traits in an intercross between chicken lines divergently selected for growth. Physiological Genomics 25, Rubin C.J., Zody M.C., Eriksson J. et al. (2010) Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication. Nature 464, SAS Institute (2008) SAS User s Guide: Statistics, Version 9.2. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA. Schreiweis M.A., Hester P.Y. & Moody D.E. (2005) Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with bone traits and body in an F2 resource population of chickens. Genetics Selection Evolution 37, Sewalem A., Morrice D., Law A., Windsor D., Haley C., Ikeobi C., Burt D. & Hocking P. (2002) Mapping of quantitative trait loci for body at three, six, and nine weeks of age in a broiler layer cross. Poultry Science 81, Terčič D., Holcman A., Dovč P., Morrice D.R., Burt D.W., Hocking P.M. & Horvat S. (2009) Identification of chromosomal regions associated with growth and carcass traits in an F3 full sib intercross line originating from a cross of chicken lines divergently selected on body. Animal Genetics 40, Tsudzuki M., Onitsuka S., Akiyama R., Iwamizu M., Goto N., Nishibori M., Takahashi H. & Ishikawa A. (2007) Identification of quantitative trait loci affecting shank length, body and carcass from the Japanese cockfighting chicken breed, Oh-Shamo (Japanese Large Game). Cytogenetic and Genome Research 117, Tuiskula-Haavisto M., Honkatukia M., Vilkki J., de Koning D.J., Schulman N.F. & Maki-Tanila A. (2002) Mapping of quantitative trait loci affecting quality and production traits in egg layers. Poultry Science 81, Visscher P.M., Thompson R. & Haley C.S. (1996) Confidence intervals in QTL mapping by bootstrapping. Genetics 143, Zhou H., Deeb N., Evock-Clover C.M., Ashwell C.M. & Lamont S.J. (2006a) Genome-wide linkage analysis to identify chromosomal regions affecting phenotypic traits in the chicken. I. Growth and average daily gain. Poultry Science 85, Zhou H., Deeb N., Evock-Clover C.M., Ashwell C.M. & Lamont S.J. (2006b) Genome-wide linkage analysis to identify chromosomal regions affecting phenotypic traits in the chicken. II. Body composition. Poultry Science 85, Supporting information Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of this article. Figure S1 F-value curves across GGA4 (left) and 27 (right) pertaining to one QTL scans for body and carcass composition traits in 20-week-old male F 2 populations. Figure S2 Genotype effect-plots of the markers UMA4.034 and ADL0376 nearest to the QTL peaks on GGA4 (left) and 27 (right) respectively in 20-week-old male F 2 populations of the reciprocal crosses between NHI and WL77. Table S1 Population structure and number of animals in the pedigree. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer-reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
ANALYZING QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI AFFECTING EGG QUALITY TRAITS ON CHROMOSOME 1-5 OF SHIKABROWN (Gallus gallus domesticus, Linnaeus 1758) F2 CROSS
IJABR Vol. 8(1): 151-159 (2017) International Journal of Applied Biological Research 2017 Original Article ANALYZING QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI AFFECTING EGG QUALITY TRAITS ON CHROMOSOME 1-5 OF SHIKABROWN
More informationDESIGNS FOR QTL DETECTION IN LIVESTOCK AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR MAS
DESIGNS FOR QTL DETECTION IN LIVESTOCK AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR MAS D.J de Koning, J.C.M. Dekkers & C.S. Haley Roslin Institute, Roslin, EH25 9PS, United Kingdom, DJ.deKoning@BBSRC.ac.uk Iowa State University,
More informationStatistical Methods for Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) Mapping
Statistical Methods for Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) Mapping Lectures 4 Oct 10, 011 CSE 57 Computational Biology, Fall 011 Instructor: Su-In Lee TA: Christopher Miles Monday & Wednesday 1:00-1:0 Johnson
More informationHigh-density SNP Genotyping Analysis of Broiler Breeding Lines
Animal Industry Report AS 653 ASL R2219 2007 High-density SNP Genotyping Analysis of Broiler Breeding Lines Abebe T. Hassen Jack C.M. Dekkers Susan J. Lamont Rohan L. Fernando Santiago Avendano Aviagen
More informationBy the end of this lecture you should be able to explain: Some of the principles underlying the statistical analysis of QTLs
(3) QTL and GWAS methods By the end of this lecture you should be able to explain: Some of the principles underlying the statistical analysis of QTLs Under what conditions particular methods are suitable
More informationQuantitative Genetics
Quantitative Genetics Polygenic traits Quantitative Genetics 1. Controlled by several to many genes 2. Continuous variation more variation not as easily characterized into classes; individuals fall into
More informationQTL Mapping, MAS, and Genomic Selection
QTL Mapping, MAS, and Genomic Selection Dr. Ben Hayes Department of Primary Industries Victoria, Australia A short-course organized by Animal Breeding & Genetics Department of Animal Science Iowa State
More informationUnderstanding genomic selection in poultry breeding
doi:10.1017/s0043933914000324 Understanding genomic selection in poultry breeding A. WOLC 1, 2 1 Hy-Line International, Dallas Center, IA, USA; 2 Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA Corresponding author:
More informationQTL mapping in mice. Karl W Broman. Department of Biostatistics Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
QTL mapping in mice Karl W Broman Department of Biostatistics Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland, USA www.biostat.jhsph.edu/ kbroman Outline Experiments, data, and goals Models ANOVA at marker
More informationGenetic mapping of quantitative trait loci affecting body weight, egg character and egg production in F2 intercross chickens
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2052.2004.01133.x Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci affecting body weight, egg character and egg production in F2 intercross chickens O. Sasaki*, S. Odawara, H. Takahashi, K.
More informationQTL mapping in mice. Karl W Broman. Department of Biostatistics Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
QTL mapping in mice Karl W Broman Department of Biostatistics Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland, USA www.biostat.jhsph.edu/ kbroman Outline Experiments, data, and goals Models ANOVA at marker
More informationImplementing direct and indirect markers.
Chapter 16. Brian Kinghorn University of New England Some Definitions... 130 Directly and indirectly marked genes... 131 The potential commercial value of detected QTL... 132 Will the observed QTL effects
More informationGENETICS - CLUTCH CH.20 QUANTITATIVE GENETICS.
!! www.clutchprep.com CONCEPT: MATHMATICAL MEASRUMENTS Common statistical measurements are used in genetics to phenotypes The mean is an average of values - A population is all individuals within the group
More informationExperimental Design and Sample Size Requirement for QTL Mapping
Experimental Design and Sample Size Requirement for QTL Mapping Zhao-Bang Zeng Bioinformatics Research Center Departments of Statistics and Genetics North Carolina State University zeng@stat.ncsu.edu 1
More informationGenetics Effective Use of New and Existing Methods
Genetics Effective Use of New and Existing Methods Making Genetic Improvement Phenotype = Genetics + Environment = + To make genetic improvement, we want to know the Genetic value or Breeding value for
More informationGenetics of dairy production
Genetics of dairy production E-learning course from ESA Charlotte DEZETTER ZBO101R11550 Table of contents I - Genetics of dairy production 3 1. Learning objectives... 3 2. Review of Mendelian genetics...
More informationMarker Assisted Selection Where, When, and How. Lecture 18
Marker Assisted Selection Where, When, and How 1 2 Introduction Quantitative Genetics Selection Based on Phenotype and Relatives Information ε µ β + + = d Z d X Y Chuck = + Y Z Y X A Z Z X Z Z X X X d
More informationSNPs - GWAS - eqtls. Sebastian Schmeier
SNPs - GWAS - eqtls s.schmeier@gmail.com http://sschmeier.github.io/bioinf-workshop/ 17.08.2015 Overview Single nucleotide polymorphism (refresh) SNPs effect on genes (refresh) Genome-wide association
More informationSupplementary Text. eqtl mapping in the Bay x Sha recombinant population.
Supplementary Text eqtl mapping in the Bay x Sha recombinant population. Expression levels for 24,576 traits (Gene-specific Sequence Tags: GSTs, CATMA array version 2) was measured in RNA extracted from
More informationStanding genetic variation as a major contributor to adaptation in the Virginia chicken lines selection experiment
Sheng et al. Genome Biology (2015) 16:219 DOI 10.1186/s13059-015-0785-z RESEARCH Open Access Standing genetic variation as a major contributor to adaptation in the Virginia chicken lines selection experiment
More informationSNP mapping of QTL affecting growth and fatness on chicken GGA1
Genet. Sel. Evol. 39 (2007) 569 582 c INRA, EDP Sciences, 2007 DOI: 10.1051/gse:2007022 Available online at: www.gse-journal.org Original article SNP mapping of QTL affecting growth and fatness on chicken
More informationQTL Mapping Using Multiple Markers Simultaneously
SCI-PUBLICATIONS Author Manuscript American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science (3): 195-01, 007 ISSN 1557-4989 007 Science Publications QTL Mapping Using Multiple Markers Simultaneously D.
More informationUniversity of York Department of Biology B. Sc Stage 2 Degree Examinations
Examination Candidate Number: Desk Number: University of York Department of Biology B. Sc Stage 2 Degree Examinations 2016-17 Evolutionary and Population Genetics Time allowed: 1 hour and 30 minutes Total
More informationIdentifying Genes Underlying QTLs
Identifying Genes Underlying QTLs Reading: Frary, A. et al. 2000. fw2.2: A quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 289:85-87. Paran, I. and D. Zamir. 2003. Quantitative
More informationHCS806 Summer 2010 Methods in Plant Biology: Breeding with Molecular Markers
HCS806 Summer 2010 Methods in Plant Biology: Breeding with Molecular Markers Lecture 7. Populations The foundation of any crop improvement program is built on populations. This session will explore population
More informationApplication of MAS in French dairy cattle. Guillaume F., Fritz S., Boichard D., Druet T.
Application of MAS in French dairy cattle Guillaume F., Fritz S., Boichard D., Druet T. Considerations about dairy cattle Most traits of interest are sex linked Generation interval are long Recent emphasis
More informationThe twofold difference in adult size between the red junglefowl and White Leghorn chickens is largely explained by a limited number of QTLs
The twofold difference in adult size between the red junglefowl and White Leghorn chickens is largely explained by a limited number of QTLs S. Kerje*, Ö. Carlborg*, L. Jacobsson*, K. Schütz, C. Hartmann*,
More informationEFFICIENT DESIGNS FOR FINE-MAPPING OF QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI USING LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM AND LINKAGE
EFFICIENT DESIGNS FOR FINE-MAPPING OF QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI USING LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM AND LINKAGE S.H. Lee and J.H.J. van der Werf Department of Animal Science, University of New England, Armidale,
More informationComputational Genomics
Computational Genomics 10-810/02 810/02-710, Spring 2009 Quantitative Trait Locus (QTL) Mapping Eric Xing Lecture 23, April 13, 2009 Reading: DTW book, Chap 13 Eric Xing @ CMU, 2005-2009 1 Phenotypical
More informationPOPULATION GENETICS Winter 2005 Lecture 18 Quantitative genetics and QTL mapping
POPULATION GENETICS Winter 2005 Lecture 18 Quantitative genetics and QTL mapping - from Darwin's time onward, it has been widely recognized that natural populations harbor a considerably degree of genetic
More informationWhy do we need statistics to study genetics and evolution?
Why do we need statistics to study genetics and evolution? 1. Mapping traits to the genome [Linkage maps (incl. QTLs), LOD] 2. Quantifying genetic basis of complex traits [Concordance, heritability] 3.
More informationSummary for BIOSTAT/STAT551 Statistical Genetics II: Quantitative Traits
Summary for BIOSTAT/STAT551 Statistical Genetics II: Quantitative Traits Gained an understanding of the relationship between a TRAIT, GENETICS (single locus and multilocus) and ENVIRONMENT Theoretical
More informationMonday, November 8 Shantz 242 E (the usual place) 5:00-7:00 PM
Review Session Monday, November 8 Shantz 242 E (the usual place) 5:00-7:00 PM I ll answer questions on my material, then Chad will answer questions on his material. Test Information Today s notes, the
More informationGenome-wide association analysis and genetic architecture of egg weight and egg uniformity in layer chickens
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2052.2012.02381.x Genome-wide association analysis and genetic architecture of egg weight and egg uniformity in layer chickens A. Wolc*,, J. Arango, P. Settar, J. E. Fulton,N.P.OÕSullivan,
More informationChapter 4 Lecture. Concepts of Genetics. Tenth Edition. Extensions of Mendelian Genetics. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.
Chapter 4 Lecture Concepts of Genetics Tenth Edition Extensions of Mendelian Genetics Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Factors that cause deviation from normal monohybrid and dihybrid ratios: X-linkage
More informationGenetics or Genomics?
Genetics or Genomics? genetics: study single genes or a few genes first identify mutant organism with change of interest characterize effects of mutation but only a fraction of 30k human genes directly
More informationGene Mapping in Natural Plant Populations Guilt by Association
Gene Mapping in Natural Plant Populations Guilt by Association Leif Skøt What is linkage disequilibrium? 12 Natural populations as a tool for gene mapping 13 Conclusion 15 POPULATIONS GUILT BY ASSOCIATION
More informationTraditional Genetic Improvement. Genetic variation is due to differences in DNA sequence. Adding DNA sequence data to traditional breeding.
1 Introduction What is Genomic selection and how does it work? How can we best use DNA data in the selection of cattle? Mike Goddard 5/1/9 University of Melbourne and Victorian DPI of genomic selection
More informationTrudy F C Mackay, Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh NC , USA.
Question & Answer Q&A: Genetic analysis of quantitative traits Trudy FC Mackay What are quantitative traits? Quantitative, or complex, traits are traits for which phenotypic variation is continuously distributed
More informationMapping and Mapping Populations
Mapping and Mapping Populations Types of mapping populations F 2 o Two F 1 individuals are intermated Backcross o Cross of a recurrent parent to a F 1 Recombinant Inbred Lines (RILs; F 2 -derived lines)
More informationHuman linkage analysis. fundamental concepts
Human linkage analysis fundamental concepts Genes and chromosomes Alelles of genes located on different chromosomes show independent assortment (Mendel s 2nd law) For 2 genes: 4 gamete classes with equal
More informationAssociation Mapping. Mendelian versus Complex Phenotypes. How to Perform an Association Study. Why Association Studies (Can) Work
Genome 371, 1 March 2010, Lecture 13 Association Mapping Mendelian versus Complex Phenotypes How to Perform an Association Study Why Association Studies (Can) Work Introduction to LOD score analysis Common
More informationLecture 2: Height in Plants, Animals, and Humans. Michael Gore lecture notes Tucson Winter Institute version 18 Jan 2013
Lecture 2: Height in Plants, Animals, and Humans Michael Gore lecture notes Tucson Winter Institute version 18 Jan 2013 Is height a polygenic trait? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/gregor_mendel Case Study
More informationStrategy for Applying Genome-Wide Selection in Dairy Cattle
Strategy for Applying Genome-Wide Selection in Dairy Cattle L. R. Schaeffer Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock Department of Animal & Poultry Science University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G
More informationRecent Advances Towards An Intraspecific Theory of Human Variation for Digital Models
Recent Advances Towards An Intraspecific Theory of Human Variation for Digital Models By Bradly Alicea freejumper@yahoo.com Department of Telecommunication, Information Studies, and Media and Cognitive
More informationCS273B: Deep Learning in Genomics and Biomedicine. Recitation 1 30/9/2016
CS273B: Deep Learning in Genomics and Biomedicine. Recitation 1 30/9/2016 Topics Genetic variation Population structure Linkage disequilibrium Natural disease variants Genome Wide Association Studies Gene
More informationIntroduction to Quantitative Genetics
Introduction to Quantitative Genetics Fourth Edition D. S. Falconer Trudy F. C. Mackay PREFACE TO THE THIRD EDITION PREFACE TO THE FOURTH EDITION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS INTRODUCTION ix x xi xiii f GENETIC CONSTITUTION
More informationMarker-Assisted Selection for Quantitative Traits
Marker-Assisted Selection for Quantitative Traits Readings: Bernardo, R. 2001. What if we knew all the genes for a quantitative trait in hybrid crops? Crop Sci. 41:1-4. Eathington, S.R., J.W. Dudley, and
More informationChapter 14: Mendel and the Gene Idea
Chapter 4: Mendel and the Gene Idea. The Experiments of Gregor Mendel 2. Beyond Mendelian Genetics 3. Human Genetics . The Experiments of Gregor Mendel Chapter Reading pp. 268-276 TECHNIQUE Parental generation
More informationlatestdevelopments relevant for the Ag sector André Eggen Agriculture Segment Manager, Europe
Overviewof Illumina s latestdevelopments relevant for the Ag sector André Eggen Agriculture Segment Manager, Europe Seminar der Studienrichtung Tierwissenschaften, TÜM, July 1, 2009 Overviewof Illumina
More informationDetection of major genes affecting growth-related traits in a broiler chicken line
2015 NPPC ISSN 1337-9984 Detection of major genes affecting growth-related traits in a broiler chicken line F. SARBAZSHENDI 1, A. PAKDEL 2, H. MEHRABANI YEGANEH 1, S. ALIJANI 3 * 1 Department of Animal
More informationChicken Genomics - Linkage and QTL mapping
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine 409 Chicken Genomics - Linkage and QTL mapping PER WAHLBERG ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS UPPSALA 2009 ISSN 1651-6206
More informationQuantitative Genetics, Genetical Genomics, and Plant Improvement
Quantitative Genetics, Genetical Genomics, and Plant Improvement Bruce Walsh. jbwalsh@u.arizona.edu. University of Arizona. Notes from a short course taught June 2008 at the Summer Institute in Plant Sciences
More informationAssociation studies (Linkage disequilibrium)
Positional cloning: statistical approaches to gene mapping, i.e. locating genes on the genome Linkage analysis Association studies (Linkage disequilibrium) Linkage analysis Uses a genetic marker map (a
More informationQTL mapping in domesticated and natural fish populations
QTL mapping in domesticated and natural fish populations A. TRIANTAFYLLIDIS & A. VASEMÄGI Quantitative trait locus QTL Trait with measurable phenotypic variation influenced by multiple polymorphic genes
More informationHuman linkage analysis. fundamental concepts
Human linkage analysis fundamental concepts Genes and chromosomes Alelles of genes located on different chromosomes show independent assortment (Mendel s 2nd law) For 2 genes: 4 gamete classes with equal
More informationBICD100 Midterm (10/27/10) KEY
BICD100 Midterm (10/27/10) KEY 1. Variation in tail length is characteristic of some dog breeds, such as Pembroke Welsh Corgis, which sometimes show a bob tail (short tail) phenotype (see illustration
More informationUsing Mapmaker/QTL for QTL mapping
Using Mapmaker/QTL for QTL mapping M. Maheswaran Tamil Nadu Agriculture University, Coimbatore Mapmaker/QTL overview A number of methods have been developed to map genes controlling quantitatively measured
More informationModule 1 Principles of plant breeding
Covered topics, Distance Learning course Plant Breeding M1-M5 V2.0 Dr. Jan-Kees Goud, Wageningen University & Research The five main modules consist of the following content: Module 1 Principles of plant
More informationChapter 3: Evolutionary genetics of natural populations
Chapter 3: Evolutionary genetics of natural populations What is Evolution? Change in the frequency of an allele within a population Evolution acts on DIVERSITY to cause adaptive change Ex. Light vs. Dark
More informationA simple and rapid method for calculating identity-by-descent matrices using multiple markers
Genet. Sel. Evol. 33 (21) 453 471 453 INRA, EDP Sciences, 21 Original article A simple and rapid method for calculating identity-by-descent matrices using multiple markers Ricardo PONG-WONG, Andrew Winston
More informationTHE STUDY OF GENETICS is extremely
Exploring Animal Genetics and Probability THE STUDY OF GENETICS is extremely valuable to several areas of science. From medical to agricultural applications, the development of new techniques in studying
More informationGenetic dissection of complex traits, crop improvement through markerassisted selection, and genomic selection
Genetic dissection of complex traits, crop improvement through markerassisted selection, and genomic selection Awais Khan Adaptation and Abiotic Stress Genetics, Potato and sweetpotato International Potato
More informationAssociation Mapping in Plants PLSC 731 Plant Molecular Genetics Phil McClean April, 2010
Association Mapping in Plants PLSC 731 Plant Molecular Genetics Phil McClean April, 2010 Traditional QTL approach Uses standard bi-parental mapping populations o F2 or RI These have a limited number of
More informationGenome-wide association studies (GWAS) Part 1
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) Part 1 Matti Pirinen FIMM, University of Helsinki 03.12.2013, Kumpula Campus FIMM - Institiute for Molecular Medicine Finland www.fimm.fi Published Genome-Wide Associations
More informationIdentification and reciprocal introgression of a QTL affectingbodymassinmice
Genet. Sel. Evol. 36 (2004) 577 591 577 c INRA, EDP Sciences, 2004 DOI: 10.1051/gse:2004018 Original article Identification and reciprocal introgression of a QTL affectingbodymassinmice Julian K. CHRISTIANS
More informationConifer Translational Genomics Network Coordinated Agricultural Project
Conifer Translational Genomics Network Coordinated Agricultural Project Genomics in Tree Breeding and Forest Ecosystem Management ----- Module 4 Quantitative Genetics Nicholas Wheeler & David Harry Oregon
More informationMarker types. Potato Association of America Frederiction August 9, Allen Van Deynze
Marker types Potato Association of America Frederiction August 9, 2009 Allen Van Deynze Use of DNA Markers in Breeding Germplasm Analysis Fingerprinting of germplasm Arrangement of diversity (clustering,
More informationIntroduction to Quantitative Genomics / Genetics
Introduction to Quantitative Genomics / Genetics BTRY 7210: Topics in Quantitative Genomics and Genetics September 10, 2008 Jason G. Mezey Outline History and Intuition. Statistical Framework. Current
More informationBiology Genetics Practice Quiz
Biology Genetics Practice Quiz Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1. The table above shows information related to blood types. What genotype(s)
More informationPart I: Predicting Genetic Outcomes
Part I: Predicting Genetic Outcomes Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is found in every cell of living organisms, and all of the cells in each organism contain the exact same copy of that organism s DNA. Because
More informationThis is DUE: Tuesday, March 1, 2011 Come prepared to share your findings with your group.
Biology 160 NAME: Reading Guide 12: Population Dynamics, Humans, Part II This is DUE: Tuesday, March 1, 2011 Come prepared to share your findings with your group. *As before, please turn in only the Critical
More informationA region on chicken chromosome 2 affects both egg white thinning and egg weight
Genet. Sel. Evol. 37 (2005) 563 577 563 c INRA, EDP Sciences, 2005 DOI: 10.1051/gse:2005016 Original article A region on chicken chromosome 2 affects both egg white thinning and egg weight Mervi HONKATUKIA
More informationGenetics of extreme body size evolution in mice from Gough Island
Genetics of extreme body size evolution in mice from Gough Island Karl Broman Biostatistics & Medical Informatics, UW Madison kbroman.org github.com/kbroman @kwbroman bit.ly/bds2017-07 This is a collaboration
More informationBST227 Introduction to Statistical Genetics. Lecture 3: Introduction to population genetics
BST227 Introduction to Statistical Genetics Lecture 3: Introduction to population genetics!1 Housekeeping HW1 will be posted on course website tonight 1st lab will be on Wednesday TA office hours have
More informationVariation Chapter 9 10/6/2014. Some terms. Variation in phenotype can be due to genes AND environment: Is variation genetic, environmental, or both?
Frequency 10/6/2014 Variation Chapter 9 Some terms Genotype Allele form of a gene, distinguished by effect on phenotype Haplotype form of a gene, distinguished by DNA sequence Gene copy number of copies
More informationOptimizing Traditional and Marker Assisted Evaluation in Beef Cattle
Optimizing Traditional and Marker Assisted Evaluation in Beef Cattle D. H. Denny Crews, Jr., 1,2,3 Stephen S. Moore, 2 and R. Mark Enns 3 1 Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Research Centre, Lethbridge,
More informationEPIB 668 Introduction to linkage analysis. Aurélie LABBE - Winter 2011
EPIB 668 Introduction to linkage analysis Aurélie LABBE - Winter 2011 1 / 49 OUTLINE Meiosis and recombination Linkage: basic idea Linkage between 2 locis Model based linkage analysis (parametric) Example
More informationLet s call the recessive allele r and the dominant allele R. The allele and genotype frequencies in the next generation are:
Problem Set 8 Genetics 371 Winter 2010 1. In a population exhibiting Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, 23% of the individuals are homozygous for a recessive character. What will the genotypic, phenotypic and
More informationOutline of lectures 9-11
GENOME 453 J. Felsenstein Evolutionary Genetics Autumn, 2011 Genetics of quantitative characters Outline of lectures 9-11 1. When we have a measurable (quantitative) character, we may not be able to discern
More informationQuantitative Trait Loci for some of Behavior and Performance Traits on Chromosome 4 of Japanese Quail
Research Article Quantitative Trait Loci for some of Behavior and Performance Traits on Chromosome 4 of Japanese Quail E. Rezvannejad 1* and E. Nasirifar 1 1 Department of Biotechnology, Institute Science
More informationA transmission disequilibrium test approach to screen for quantitative trait loci in two selected lines of Large White pigs
Genet. Res., Camb. (2000), 75, pp. 115 121. With 2 figures. Printed in the United Kingdom 2000 Cambridge University Press 115 A transmission disequilibrium test approach to screen for quantitative trait
More informationDanika Bannasch DVM PhD. School of Veterinary Medicine University of California Davis
Genetics 101 Danika Bannasch DVM PhD Maxine Adler Endowed Chair in Genetics School of Veterinary Medicine University of California Davis Outline Basic genetics: The Rules Not so basic genetics: The exceptions
More informationA systematic approach to breeding programs for game PART 1
A systematic approach to breeding programs for game PART 1 Japie van der Westhuizen South African Stud Book and Animal Improvement Association japie@studbook.co.za As with many other things in life, the
More informationDomestic animal genomes meet animal breeding translational biology in the ag-biotech sector. Jerry Taylor University of Missouri-Columbia
Domestic animal genomes meet animal breeding translational biology in the ag-biotech sector Jerry Taylor University of Missouri-Columbia Worldwide distribution and use of cattle A brief history of cattle
More informationUse of marker information in PIGBLUP v5.20
Use of marker information in PIGBLUP v5.20 Ron Crump and Bruce Tier Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit, a joint venture of NSW Department of Primary Industries and The University of New England. Introduction
More informationLecture 1 Introduction to Modern Plant Breeding. Bruce Walsh lecture notes Tucson Winter Institute 7-9 Jan 2013
Lecture 1 Introduction to Modern Plant Breeding Bruce Walsh lecture notes Tucson Winter Institute 7-9 Jan 2013 1 Importance of Plant breeding Plant breeding is the most important technology developed by
More informationGenomic Selection in Sheep Breeding Programs
Proceedings, 10 th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production Genomic Selection in Sheep Breeding Programs J.H.J. van der Werf 1,2, R.G. Banks 1,3, S.A. Clark 1,2, S.J. Lee 1,4, H.D. Daetwyler
More informationGenetics. Ms. Gunjan M. Chaudhari
Genetics Ms. Gunjan M. Chaudhari UNIT 1 Introduction to genetics Genetics:: The scientific study of heredity Heredity : The passing on of characteristics (traits) from parents to offspring Importance of
More informationDesign and Construction of Recombinant Inbred Lines
Chapter 3 Design and Construction of Recombinant Inbred Lines Daniel A. Pollard Abstract Recombinant inbred lines (RILs) are a collection of strains that can be used to map quantitative trait loci. Parent
More informationGeneration of a multi-locus chicken introgression line to study the effects of genetic interactions on metabolic phenotypes in chickens
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE published: 02 March 2012 doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00029 Generation of a multi-locus chicken introgression line to study the effects of genetic interactions on metabolic phenotypes
More informationANIMAL SCIENCE (ANSI)
Animal Science (ANSI) 1 ANIMAL SCIENCE (ANSI) ANSI 1111 Animal and Food Science Experience Description: Student development through connections among the student s major curriculum, career goals specific
More informationCourse Announcements
Statistical Methods for Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) Mapping II Lectures 5 Oct 2, 2 SE 527 omputational Biology, Fall 2 Instructor Su-In Lee T hristopher Miles Monday & Wednesday 2-2 Johnson Hall (JHN)
More informationBREEDING AND GENETICS. Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci Affecting Quality and Production Traits in Egg Layers
BREEDING AND GENETICS Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci Affecting Quality and Production Traits in Egg Layers M. Tuiskula-Haavisto,*,1 M. Honkatukia,* J. Vilkki,* D.-J. de Koning,,2 N. F. Schulman,* and
More informationB) You can conclude that A 1 is identical by descent. Notice that A2 had to come from the father (and therefore, A1 is maternal in both cases).
Homework questions. Please provide your answers on a separate sheet. Examine the following pedigree. A 1,2 B 1,2 A 1,3 B 1,3 A 1,2 B 1,2 A 1,2 B 1,3 1. (1 point) The A 1 alleles in the two brothers are
More informationAlireza Khadem, Hassan Hafezian and Ghodrat Rahimi-Mianji*
African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 9 (6), pp. 805-810, 8 February, 2010 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/ajb ISSN 1684 5315 2010 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Association
More informationThe principles of QTL analysis (a minimal mathematics approach)
Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 49, No. 37, pp. 69 63, October 998 The principles of QTL analysis (a minimal mathematics approach) M.J. Kearsey Plant Genetics Group, School of Biological Sciences,
More informationMidterm 1 Results. Midterm 1 Akey/ Fields Median Number of Students. Exam Score
Midterm 1 Results 10 Midterm 1 Akey/ Fields Median - 69 8 Number of Students 6 4 2 0 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 101 Exam Score Quick review of where we left off Parental type: the
More informationThe 150+ Tomato Genome (re-)sequence Project; Lessons Learned and Potential
The 150+ Tomato Genome (re-)sequence Project; Lessons Learned and Potential Applications Richard Finkers Researcher Plant Breeding, Wageningen UR Plant Breeding, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands,
More informationGENOME WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY OF INSECT BITE HYPERSENSITIVITY IN TWO POPULATION OF ICELANDIC HORSES
GENOME WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY OF INSECT BITE HYPERSENSITIVITY IN TWO POPULATION OF ICELANDIC HORSES Merina Shrestha, Anouk Schurink, Susanne Eriksson, Lisa Andersson, Tomas Bergström, Bart Ducro, Gabriella
More information