Shear Walls. Shear Walls: Stiffness
|
|
- Caroline Dennis
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Shear Walls Load Distribtion to Shear Walls Shear wall stiffness Shear walls with openings Diaphragm tpes Tpes of Masonr Shear Walls Maxim Reinforcement Reqirements Shear Strength Example: simple bilding Shear Walls 1 Shear Walls: Stiffness Lateral Force Resisting Sstem d h h/d < < h/d < 4.0 h/d >4.0 stiffness predominates Both shear and bending stiffness are important stiffness predominates Shear Walls 2
2 Shear Wall Stiffness Deflection calclations shall be based on cracked section properties. Assmed properties shall not exceed half of gross section properties, nless a cracked-section analsis is performed. Cantileer wall cant k cant h L Emt h 4 L Fixed wall (fixed against rotation at top) fixed k fixed h L 2 Emt h L h = height of wall A = shear area; (5/6)A for a rectangle E = G = shear modls (modls of rigidit); gien as 0.4E m ( ) E =, where ν is Poisson s ratio t = thickness of wall L = length of wall Real wall is probabl between two cases; diaphragm proides some rotational restraint, bt not fll fixit. Shear Walls 3 T- or L- Shaped Shear Walls Section Wall intersections designed either to: a) : b) Connection that transfers shear: (st be in rnning bond) a) Fift percent of masonr nits interlock b) Steel connectors at max 4ft. c) Intersecting bond beams at max 4 ft. Reinforcing of at least 0.1in 2 per foot of wall Metal lath or wire screen to spport grot 2-#4 s 1 / 4 in. x 1 1 / 2 in. x 28in. with 2in. long 90 deg bends at each end to form U or Z shape Shear Walls 5
3 Effectie Flange Width ( ) Effectie flange width on either side of web shall be smaller of actal flange width, distance to a moement joint, or: Flange in compression: 6t Flange in tension: Unreinforced masonr: 6t Reinforced masonr: 0.75 times floor-to-floor wall height Shear Walls 6 Example: Flanged Shear Wall Gien: Fll groted shear wall Reqired: Stiffness of wall Soltion: Determine stiffness from basic principles. A 112in. Find centroid from oter flange srface 7.62in48in3.81in 7.62in40in20in in 2 671in I A 56in. 6t=48in. 40in. Eleation Plan Shear Walls 7
4 Example: Flanged Shear Wall P P 1 k in 3 3 Ph Ph 112in 112in in 305in 0.4E 2 3EmI n A E 3Em m E m Shear Walls 9 Shear Walls with Openings 1. Diide wall into piers. 2. Find flexibilit of each pier 3. Stiffness is reciprocal of flexibilit 4. Distribte load according to stiffness 3 h 2k t ktkb 2kb 3 12h f 1 6EI kt 2ktkb kb 5EA M M t b Vh k t Vh k t kt 1 kb 2k k k t b b kb 1 kt 2k k k t As the top spandrel decreases in height, the top approaches a fixed condition against rotation. b b k t k b h h t h h b h b h h t Top spandrel Bottom spandrel If h b = 0 3 h 2 k t 12h f 1 6EI 2kt 1 5EA M t Vh k k 1 2 t t M b 1 k t Vh 2kt 1 Qamarddin, M., Al-Oraimi, S., and Hago, A.W. (1996). Mathematical model for lateral stiffness of shear walls with openings. Proceedings, Seenth North American Masonr Conference, Shear Walls 10
5 Example - Shear Walls with Openings Gien: 4ft 4ft Reqired: A. Stiffness of wall B. Forces in each pier nder 10 kip horizontal load A B C 8ft 2ft 4ft 2ft 6ft 2ft Shear Walls 11 Example - Shear Walls with Openings Sample calclations: Pier B h = 4ft h t = 4ft h b = 8ft k t = h/h t = 4ft/4ft =.0 k b = h/h b = 4ft/8ft = tl I A tl 12 2 ftt f 3 h 2k t ktkb 2kb 3 12h 1 6EI kt 2ktkb kb 5EA k Et f 47.6 / Et 0210 Shear Walls 12
6 Example - Shear Walls with Openings Pier h (ft) h t (ft) h b (ft) k t k b I (ft 3 ) A (ft) f s f k A inf 0.667t 2t /Et Et B t 2t /Et Et C t 2t /Et Et f is flexral deformation; s is shear deformation Total stiffness is Et Aerage stiffness from finite element analsis Et Solid wall stiffness Et (free at top); 0.25Et (fixed at top) Shear Walls 14 Example - Shear Walls with Openings Sample calclations: Pier B M M b t Vh k Vh k t t kt 1 kb 2k k k t b kb 1 kt 2k k k t b b b kb Et Vb V 10k 4. 66kips k Et Pier V (kips) M t (k-ft) M b (k-ft) A B C Shear Walls 15
7 Example - Shear Walls with Openings To find axial force in piers, look at FBD of top 4ft of wall. 10k Moment direction on piers 4ft 0.68k 4.66k 4.66k 3.50k-ft 11.19k-ft 11.19k-ft 2ft 4ft 2ft 6ft 2ft This 65.9k-ft moment is carried b axial forces in the piers. Axial forces are determined from Mc/I, where each pier is considered a concentrated area. Find centroid from left end. A i A i i Shear Walls 17 Example - Shear Walls with Openings The axial force in pier A is: FBD s of piers: 4.45k 3.50k-ft 0.68k 0.45k 11.19k-ft 4.66k 4.90k 11.19k-ft 4.66k B C A 0.45k 4.66k 7.46k-ft 4.90k 4.66k 7.46k-ft 4.45k 0.68k 4.66k-ft Shear Walls 19
8 Example - Shear Walls with Openings FBD s of entire wall to obtain forces in bottom right spandrel: 10k F x 10k 0.68k Fx 0 Fx 9. 32k F 4.45k F 0 F 4. 45k x A B C M z 10k(16 ft) (4.66k ft) 4.45k(1 ft) 4.45k(11ft) Mz 0 Mz 110.8k ft Z 4.45k 0.68k 4.66k-ft F=4.45k Fx=9.32k Mz=110.8k-ft Shear Walls 21 Shear Walls: Bilding Laot 1. All elements either need to be isolated, or will participate in carring the load 2. Elements that participate in carring the load need to be properl detailed for seismic reqirements 3. Most shear walls will hae openings 4. Can design onl a portion to carr shear load, bt need to detail rest of strctre Shear Walls 23
9 Copled Shear Walls Shear Wall Shear Wall Shear Walls 24 Diaphragms Diaphragm: sstem that transmits forces to the ertical elements of the lateral load resisting sstem. Diaphragm classification: : distribtion of shear force is based on tribtar (wind) or tribtar (earthqake) : distribtion of shear force is based on relatie. Lateral Force Resisting Sstem Tpical classifications: : Precast planks withot topping, metal deck withot concrete, plwood sheathing : Cast-in-place concrete, precast concrete with concrete topping, metal deck with concrete Shear Walls 25
10 Rigid Diaphragms Direct Shear: F V RRi RR i RRid i Torsional Shear: Ftt Ve 2 RR d i i V = total shear force RR i = relatie rigidit of lateral force resisting element i d i = distance from center of stiffness e = eccentricit of load from center of stiffness Shear Walls 26 Diaphragms: Example Gien: The strctre shown is sbjected to a 0.2 kip/ft horizontal force. Relatie rigidities are gien, where the relatie rigidit is a normalized stiffness. Reqired: Distribtion of force assming: flexible diaphragm rigid diaphragm. RR = 4 50 ft 50 ft RR = kip/ft RR = 1 PLAN VIEW Shear Walls 27
11 Flexible Diaphragms: Example Soltion: Flexible diaphragm wind Distribte based on tribtar area 50 ft 50 ft For seismic, the diaphragm load wold be distribted the same (assming a niform mass distribtion), bt when wall weights were added in, the forces cold be different. RR = 4 RR = 5 RR = 1 PLAN VIEW Shear Walls 28 Rigid Diaphragms: Example Soltion: Rigid diaphragm 50 ft 50 ft Wall x RR x(rr) RR = 4 Wall 1 RR = 5 Wall 2 RR = 1 Wall 3 Total Center of stiffness = 350/10 = 35 ft x Wall RR d (ft) RR(d) RR(d 2 ) F F t F total Total Shear Walls 29
12 Soltion: Forces are shown for a rigid diaphragm. The moment is generall taken throgh chord forces, which are simpl the moment diided b the width of the diaphragm. In masonr strctres, the chord forces are often take b bond beams. Diaphragms Design Forces V (k) kip/ft 50 ft 50 ft 3.9 k 12.2 k 3.9 k 19.5 ft M (k-ft) -55 Shear Walls 30 Drag Strts and Collectors Shear forces: generall considered to be niforml distribted across the width of the diaphragm. Drag strts and collectors: transfer load from the diaphragm to the lateral force resisting sstem. PLAN VIEW w L/3 L/3 L/2 L/2 L/2 L WEST WALL ELEVATION EAST WALL ELEVATION Shear Walls 31
13 Diaphragm Behaior Three lateral force resisting sstems: Length=20 ft; Height=14 ft W24x68 W16x40 W14x68 Moment Resisting Frame k = 83.2 kip/in W14x68 L 4x4x5/16 Braced Frame k = 296 kip/in E = 1800 ksi W16x40 Face shell bedding End cells fll groted L 4x4x5/16 Masonr Shear Wall k = 1470 kip/in Lateral force resisting sstems at 24 ft o.c. Diaphragm assmed to be concrete slab, E=3120ksi, ν=0.17, ariable thickness, load of 1 kip/ft. Diaphragm Lateral Force Resisting Sstem 24 ft 24 ft Shear Walls 32 Diaphragm Behaior Shear Walls 33
14 Diaphragm Behaior Shear Walls 34 Diaphragm Behaior Shear Walls 35
15 Shear Walls (nreinforced) shear wall ( ): Unreinforced wall (nreinforced) shear wall ( ): Unreinforced wall with prescriptie reinforcement. Within 16 in. of top of wall Strctrall connected floor and roof leels 40d b or 24 in. 8 in. Corners and end of walls 8 in. Control joint 16 in. 10 ft. Joint reinforcement at 16 in. o.c. or bond beams at 10 ft. Reinforcement not reqired at openings smaller than 16 in. in either ertical or horizontal direction Reinforcement of at least 0.2 in 2 Shear Walls 36 Shear Walls reinforced shear wall ( ): Reinforced wall with prescriptie reinforcement of detailed plain shear wall. reinforced shear wall ( ): Reinforced wall with prescriptie reinforcement of detailed plain shear wall. Spacing of ertical reinforcement redced to 48 inches. reinforced shear wall ( ): 1. Maxim spacing of ertical and horizontal reinforcement is min{1/3 length of wall, 1/3 height of wall, 48 in. [24 in. for masonr in other than rnning bond]}. 2. Minim area of ertical reinforcement is 1/3 area of shear reinforcement 3. Shear reinforcement anchored arond ertical reinforcing with standard hook 4. Sm of area of ertical and horizontal reinforcement shall be times gross cross-sectional area of wall 5. Minim area of reinforcement in either direction shall be times gross cross-sectional area of wall [ for horizontal reinforcement for masonr in other than rnning bond]. Shear Walls 37
16 Minim Reinforcement of Special Shear Walls Reinforcement Ratio 8 in. CMU wall 12 in. CMU wall A s (in 2 /ft) Possibilities A s (in 2 /ft) Possibilities #4@32 #5@ #4@24 #5@32 #6@48 #4@24 #4@ #5@ #5@24 #6@40 #6@ #4@16 #5@32 #6@ #5@16 #6@24 Use specified dimensions, e.g in. for 8 in. CMU walls. Shear Walls 38 Special Shear Walls: Shear Capacit Minim shear strength ( ): Design shear strength, V n, greater than shear corresponding to 1.25 times nominal flexral strength, M n Except V n need not be greater than 2.5V. Normal design: φv n has to be greater than V. Ths, V n has to be greater than V /φ = V /0.8 = 1.25V. Ths, the reqirement approximatel dobles the shear. Shear Walls 39
17 Seismic Design Categor Seismic Design Categor A or B C D and higher Response modification factor: Seismic design force diided b response modification factor, which acconts for dctilit and energ absorption. Knoxille, Tennessee Categor C for Use Grop I and II Categor D for Use Grop III (essential facilities Allowed Shear Walls Shear Wall R Ordinar plain 1.5 Detailed plain 2 Ordinar reinforced 2 Intermediate reinforced 3.5 Special reinforced 5 Shear Walls 40 Maxim reinforcing ( ) No limits on maxim reinforcing for following case ( ): M 1 and R 1.5 Sqat walls, not designed for dctilit V d In other cases, can design b either proiding bondar elements or limiting reinforcement. Bondar element design ( ): More difficlt with masonr than concrete Bondar elements not reqired if: P P f 0.1 ma g 0.05 fma g geometricall smmetrical sections geometricall nsmmetrical sections AND M V l w 1 M OR V 3 3An f m AND V l w Shear Walls 41
18 Maxim reinforcing ( ) Reinforcement limits: Calclated sing Maxim stress in steel of f Axial forces taken from load combination D+0.75L+0.525Q E Compression reinforcement, with or withot lateral ties, permitted to be inclded for calclation of maxim flexral tensile reinforcement Uniforml distribted reinforcement = 1.5 ordinar walls = 3 intermediate walls = 4 special walls Compression steel with area eqal to tension steel As d As bd 0.64 f mb f f P d fmb 0.64 d min d P bd, Es Shear Walls 42 Maxim reinforcing Consider a wall with niforml distribted steel: f Strain Steel in tension Stress 0.8f m Steel in compression A s taken as total steel d is actal depth of masonr C m C s T s P Cm fm d b T s f As Portion of steel in tension C s Yielded steel 0.5 f As Shear Walls Elastic steel 1 f As f As
19 Shear Walls 44 Maxim reinforcing P C C T m s s s s s s s A f A f A f C T P C P b d f A f C T m m s s s m s f d P bf d A 0.64 Shear Walls 45 Maxim reinforcing, ε s = 4ε
20 Maxim reinforcing, ε s = 3ε Shear Walls 46 Maxim reinforcing, ε s = 1.5ε Shear Walls 47
21 V n nm ns g Shear Strength ( ) V V 0. 8 γ g = 0.75 for partiall groted shear walls and 1.0 otherwise M Vm An fm Vd P M /V d need not be taken > 1.0 P = axial load V s A 0. 5 f d s Vertical reinforcement shall not be less than onethird horizontal reinforcement; reinforcement shall be niforml distribted, max spacing of 8 ft ( ) Maxim V n is: V n A n f m g V A f Interpolate for ales of M /V d between 0.25 and 1.0 n 6 ( M / V d ) n m g 4 ( M / V d ) 1. 0 V n 4 M Vd A n f m g Shear Walls 48 Partiall Groted Walls Method Mean V exp / V n St. De. Partiall Groted Walls (Minaie et al, 2010; 60 tests) 2008 Proisions Mltipl shear strengths b A g /A n Using jst face shells Fll Groted Walls (Dais et al, 2010; 56 tests) 2008 Proisions /1.16 = 0.776; ronded to 0.75 Shear Walls 49
22 Design of Shear Walls with Single Laer of Reinforcement 1. Determine a, depth of compressie stress block a d d 2 2 P d lw / f t m sp M 2. Sole for A s A s 0.8 fm tspa P / f 3. Check axial capacit 4. Check maxim reinforcement 5. Check shear Shear Walls 50 Example Gien: 2 ft long, 8 ft high CMU pier; Tpe S masonr cement mortar; Grade 60 steel; fll groted. P = 11 kips, V = 7 kips, M = 28 k-ft Reqired: Reqired amont of steel Soltion: Choose/determine material properties. fʹm = 2000 psi; f = 60,000 psi 20 in. 24 in. a d d 2 2 P d lw / 2 M 0.8 f t m sp A s 0.8 fm tspa P f / Shear Walls 51
23 Example Tr #4 bars Consider second laer of steel: P C n m T 1 T 2 20 in. 24 in. Sole for c sch that P n = 11 kips/0.9 = 12.2 kips c = inches; C m = 29.14kips; T = 12kips; T 1 = 4.92kips M n 334k in 27.9k ft Shear Walls 53 Example 3. Check axial load 1 3 I 12 bt 1 2 r 12 t 0.289t A bt 7.625in. 2. in h r in. 8 ft 12 ft 2.20in P n f m A n A st 2.0ksi7.62in. 24in. 0 60ksi0 k k f A st 2 h 1 140r k 190. k P n k < 190k OK Applied load is 6% of axial capacit Shear Walls 55
24 Example 4. Check maxim reinforcement: Fll groted with eqal tension and As bd P f 0.64 m bd d d compression reinforcement f min, Es Assme axial force is from 0.9D, so P for maxim reinforcement is 11k/0.9 = 12.2 kips. For an ordinar wall: ksi in. 60ksi min in in. 20in. 12.2k, ksi in. 20in. 3. A s, max bd in Shear Walls 56 Example Maxim Reinforcement Axial Force, P A s,reqd Ordinar Intermed. Special 0 kips 0.32 in in in in 2 11 kips (6% of axial capacit 0.21 in in in in 2 19 kips (10% of axial capacit) 0.13 in in in in 2 38 kips (20% of axial capacit) in in in 2 Shear Walls 57
25 Example 5. Check Shear: M V d 28k ft 7k 2 ft 2 Use M /(V d ) = 1.0 V nm M Vd A in. 24in psi 1ksi k 18.4k 2.8k 21.2k n f m 0.25P 1000 psi V 21.2k 16.9k V k nm OK Shear Walls 58 Example Gien: 10 ft high x 16 ft long 8 in. CMU shear wall; Grade 60 steel, f m =2000psi; 2-#5 each end; #5 at 48in. (one space will actall be 40 in.) Reqired: Interaction diagram Soltion: Illstrate with one point, c = 54 inches, a = 0.8(54) = 43.2 in. Shear Walls 59
26 Example T 1 T 2 T 3 N.A. T 4 C 2 C in. 8 in 188 in 140 in 92 in 54 in Strain Shear Walls 60 Example P n Sm moments abot middle of wall (8 ft from end) to find M n M n Shear Walls 62
27 Mltiple Laers of Reinforcement: Design eqations for single laer of reinforcement can be sed for preliminar steel estimates Spacing of intermediate reinforcing bars often controlled b ot-of-plane loading Shear area for a partiall groted shear wall is area of face shells and groted cells Shear Walls 64 Example Gien: 10 ft high x 16 ft long 8 in. CMU shear wall; Grade 60 steel, Tpe S mortar; f m =2000psi; sperimposed dead load of 1 kip/ft. In-plane seismic load (from ASCE 7-10) of 90 kips. S DS = 0.4 Reqired: Design the shear wall; ordinar reinforced shear wall Soltion: Check sing 0.9D+1.0E load combination. Need to know weight of wall to determine P. Need to know reinforcement spacing to determine wall weight Estimate P b ignoring wall weight and seismic ertical force P = 0.9(1k/ft)(16ft) = 14.4k M = (90k)(10ft) = 900k-ft Shear Walls 65
28 Estimate reqired reinforcement: Example 1. Use eqations for single laer of reinforcement (d ~ d - 4 =188 in.): a = 6.0 in., A s = 0.95 in 2 This is abot 3.1 #5 bars; tr 2-#5 at end and 64 in. 2. Use spreadsheet/compter program and interaction diagram: oerstressed b 3.3%; ma work Shear Walls 66 Example Weight of wall: 36psf(10ft)(16ft) = 5760 lb Lightweight nits, grot at 64 in. o.c. 36 psf (estimated) P = [ (S DS )]D = [ (0.4)](1k/ft(16ft)+5.8k) = 17.8 kips With slightl higher axial force M n = 995 k-ft M n has increased to 896 k-ft Wall weight ma be slightl greater de to bond beams Shear Walls 67
29 Example Calclate net area, A n, inclding groted cells. A n M / V d Maxim V n V n Shear Walls 68 Example Top of wall (critical location): P = ( S DS )D = 0.82(1k/ft)(16ft) = 13.1 kips M Vnm An fm 0. 25P Vd V n V V V V nm ns g ns Use #5 bars in bond beams. Determine spacing. V ns A 0.5 s f d s ASD: s min{d/2, 48 in.} = min{94 in., 48 in.} = 48 in. Code In strength design, this proision onl applies to beams ( (e)) Sggest that minim spacing also be applied to shear walls. Use #5 bars at 16 inches Shear Walls 70
30 Joint Reinforcement Maxim specified ield strength of 85,000 psi (b) Minim diameter of 3/16 in. diameter Anchor arond edge reinforcing bar in the edge cell b bar placement between adjacent crosswires, or 90 bend in longitdinal wires with 3-in. bend extensions in mortar or grot Seismic Reqirements Seismic Design Categories (SDC) A and B At least two 3/16 in. wires; Maxim spacing of 16 in. SDC C, D, E, and F; partiall groted walls At least two 3/16 in. wires; Maxim spacing of 8 in. SDC C, D, E, and F; fll groted walls At least for 3/16 in. wires; Maxim spacing of 8 in. Shear Walls 72 Eqialent Joint Reinforcement Options: Joint Reinforcement Joint Reinforcement Eqialent Bar Reinforcement Replaces this Reinforcement 2-3/16 in. wires at 16 in in 2 /ft 56 in.; 80 in. 2 3/16 in. wires at 8 in in 2 /ft 32 in.; 40 in. 4 3/16 in. wires at 8 in in 2 /ft 16 in.; 24 in. Bar reinforcement ield stress = 60 ksi Joint reinforcement ield stress = 70 ksi Instead of bond beams in example, cold se 4 3/16 in. wires at 8 in. bt no manfactrer makes this Smaller distribted reinforcement generall reslts in better behaior. Shear Walls 73
31 Detailing Sggestion Add 90 corner bar Tension Steel Tie Conentional Model Moment Diagram Strt and Tie Model Eleation of Shear Wall Shear Walls 74 Example: Special Wall Gien: 10 ft high x 16 ft long 8 in. CMU shear wall; Grade 60 steel, Tpe S mortar; f m =2000psi; sperimposed dead load of 1 kip/ft. In-plane seismic load (from ASCE 7-10) of 90 kips. S DS = 0.4 Reqired: Design the shear wall; special reinforced shear wall Soltion: Check sing 0.9D+1.0E load combination. Shear capacit design proisions (Section ) V n shear corresponding to 1.25M n. Minim increase is 1.25/0.9 = 1.39 M n = 995 k-ft; 1.25M n = 1243 k-ft; design for shear of 124 kips V n need not exceed 2.5V Normal design V n V / = V /0.8 = 1.25V Increases shear b a factor of 2 Fll grot wall (Max V n was 91.9 kips) A n 7.625in. 192in in Shear Walls 75
32 Example: Special Wall Design for shear of 124 kips Bt wait, spacing of #5 s was decreased to 48 inches M n = 1124 k-ft, 1.25M n = 1405 k-ft, Design for 140 kips Bt wait, wall is fll groted. Wall weight has increased to 75 psf For P = 23.0k, fll groted, M n = 1167 k-ft, 1.25M n = 1459 k-ft Design for 146 kips Bt wait, Section has maxim spacing reqirements: 1/3 length of wall = (192 in.)/3 = 64 in. 1/3 height of wall = (120 in.)/3 = 40 in. 48 in. for rnning bond; 24 in. for not laid in rnning bond Decrease spacing of ertical reinforcement from 48 in. to 40 in. For 2-#5 at end, and 40in., M n = 1269 k-ft (P = 23.0k) 1.25M n = 1586 k-ft; Design for 159 kips Bottom line: an change in wall will change M n, which will change design reqirement; often easier to jst se 2.5V. Shear Walls 76 Example: Special Wall V nm M Vd 0.8 A n f m 0.25P 2 1kip in 2000 psi k 154.8kips 1000lb V V V 158.6k 154.8k 0.8 nm ns 4. 7 k 0.31in60ksi192in A A f d Vns 0.5 f d s 383in s V 4.7k Use maxim spacing of 1/3(height) = 40 in. ns Use #5 bars in bond beams. Determine spacing. Section (d): Shear reinforcement shall be anchored arond ertical reinforcing bars with a standard hook. Shear Walls 77
33 Example: Special Wall Prescriptie Reinforcement Reqirements ( ) in each direction total Vertical: 8(0.31in 2 )/1464in 2 = (spacing of 40 in.) Horizontal: 3(0.31in 2 )/[120in(7.625in)] = Total = = OK Shear Walls 78 Example: Special Wall Section Maxim Reinforcement Since M /(V d ) < 1, strain gradient is based on 1.5ε. Strain c/d, CMU c/d, Cla 1.5ε ε ε c = 0.446(188in.) = 83.8 in. Calclate axial force based on c = 83.8 in. Inclde compression reinforcement P n = 732 kips Assme a lie load of 1 k/ft D L Q E = (1k/ft (1k/ft))16ft = 28 kips OK Shear Walls 79
34 Example: Special Wall Section : Maxim reinforcement proisions of do not appl if designed b this section (bondar elements) Special bondar elements not reqired if: P P f 0.1 ma g f 0.05 ma g geometricall smmetrical sections geometricall nsmmetrical sections AND M V d 1 M OR V 3 3An f m AND V d For or wall, M /V d < 1 P < 0.1fʹmA g = 0.1(2.0ksi)(1464in 2 ) = 293 kips OK Shear Walls 80 Special Walls: Smmar Prescriptie Reinforcement Reqirements ( ) in each direction total Spacing Reqirements ( ) Shear Capacit Design (Section ) V n shear corresponding to 1.25M n. V n need not exceed 2.5V Maxim Reinforcement Reqirements ( ; ) Shear Walls 81
35 Example: T-Wall Gien: 10 ft high x 16 ft long 8 in. CMU shear wall; Grade 60 steel, Tpe S mortar; f m =2000psi; sperimposed dead load of 1 kip/ft. In-plane seismic load (from ASCE 7-10) of 90 kips. S DS = 0.4; intersecting wall on one side. Reqired: Design the shear wall; ordinar reinforced shear wall Soltion: Check sing 0.9D+1.0E load combination. 16ft 1 k/ft Effectie flange width: 6t = 6(8in.) = 48 in. compression 0.75h = 0.75(120in.) = 90 in. tension Shear Walls 82 Example: T-Wall Flange in tension: Approximate as a single laer of reinforcement. Use design procedre for single laer of reinforcement with P = 18.1k, M = 900k-ft., b=7.625in., l w =200in. (16 ft + 8 in. flange); d=196in. Reqired reinforcement: a = 5.9in., A s = 0.87in 2 or 3 - #5. Flange in compression: Reinforcement will be approximatel the same as for a non-flanged wall. Increase in compression area will onl slightl redce reqired steel. Axial load on jst the web creates a moment with a small tension in the flange and compression in the web. Shear Walls 83
36 Example: T-Wall Trial Design Tension: 3 bars total; assme spacing of 48 in. for OOP 90 in. flange Compression: 3 groted cells within flange All reinforcement #5 bars Flange compression area: ( )(2.5) + 3(8)( ) = 382in 2 Eqialent thickness = 382in 2 /7.625in. = 50.1in. Compression Width Tension Width Shear Walls 84 Example: T-Wall Check maxim reinforcement with flange in tension: c/d = (α = 1.5) c = 0.446(196in.) = 87.4 in. P n = kips P = D+0.75L = (6.1+16) +0.75(16) = 34.1 kips Perhaps shold inclde steel jst otside effectie tension flange: P n = kips Shear Walls 87
37 Example: T-Wall Shear strength is based on the flange, and similar to preios example. Use 40 in. Shear Walls 88 Example: T-Wall Check shear at interface. Check sing intersecting bond beams. Reinforcement from #5@40in in 2 /ft close to 0.1in 2 /ft in 40in. 12in in / ft 1ft Shear at interface: Set eqal to tension force in reinforcement in flange. V = T = f A sf = 60000psi(3)(0.31in 2 ) = lb A n V 2 120in 3(8in)(7.62in 2.5in) in in nm M Vd 0.8 A n f in 2000psi 34050lb m 0.25P ft high wall 3 bond beams A n f m If sed γ = 0.75, 25,500 lbs Shear Walls 89
38 Example: T-Wall Need to fll grot interface: A n = 915in 2 ; V n = lb OK Additional cells to be groted Sggest adding shear straps between each bond beam (16 in. o.c.) Sggest sing bond beam nits and ctting ot half of face-shell in flange blocks to get good grot at interface. Shear Walls 90
NCMA TEK. TEK 14-11B Structural (2003) STRENGTH DESIGN OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALLS FOR AXIAL LOAD & FLEXURE
NCMA TEK National Concrete Masonry Association an information series from the national athority on concrete masonry technology STRENGTH DESIGN OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALLS FOR AXIAL LOAD & FLEXURE TEK 14-11B
More informationSEAU 5 th Annual Education Conference 1. ASCE Concrete Provisions. Concrete Provisions. Concrete Strengths. Robert Pekelnicky, PE, SE
ASCE 41-13 Concrete Provisions Robert Pekelnicky, PE, SE Principal, Degenkolb Engineers Chair, ASCE 41 Committee* *The view expressed represent those of the author, not the standard s committee as a whole.
More informationA Guide for the Interpretation of Structural Design Options for Residential Concrete Structures
CFA Technical Note: 008-2010 A Guide for the Interpretation of Structural Design Options for Residential Concrete Structures CFA Technical This CFA Technical Note is intended to serve as a guide to assist
More informationDesign Aids for Unreinforced Web Openings in Steel and Composite Beams with W-Shapes
Design Aids for Unreinforced Web Openings in Steel and Composite Beams with W-Shapes GUSTAVO DE SOUZA VERÍSSIMO Assistant professor in the Civil Engineering Department Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa,
More informationREINFORCED ENGINEERING HANDBOOK CLAY AND CONCRETE MASONRY SEVENTH EDITION. John M. Hochwalt, PE, SE KPFF Consulting Engineers
REINFORCED MASONRY ENGINEERING HANDBOOK CLAY AND CONCRETE MASONRY SEVENTH EDITION John M. Hochwalt, PE, SE KPFF Consulting Engineers James E. Amrhein Original Author Published by MASONRY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA
More informationMASONRY WALL DATA: Wall Height = ft. Nominal Wall Thickness = 8.00 in. Depth to c.g. Steel, Wall = 3.81 in.
TIME: 10:49 AM Page: 1 DESIGN METHOD : ACI 530-99: Working Stress Design MASONRY MATERIAL : Hollow Core Concrete Masonry Units MORTAR TYPE : Type S MORTAR MATERIAL : Portland Cement Lime Mortar BLOCK PLACEMENT
More informationW. Mark McGinley March 3, 2016 ISEA MEETINGS 1
J.B. SPEED SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING Design of s for Masonry Veneers W. Mark McGinley, Ph. D., PE FASTM MASONRY DAY Indianapolis March 3, 2016 Objectives Present a Brief Overview of: Masonry Veneer Wall systems
More informationAnalysis and Design of One-way Slab System (Part-I)
Lecture-02 Analysis and Design of One-way Slab System (Part-I) By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Addressed Concrete Floor Systems Analysis and
More informationTable 3. Detailed Comparison of Structural Provisions of IRC 2000 and 1997 NEHRP (Continued)
2000 IRC 1997 NEHRP Section Provision Section Provision Comments CHAPTER 3 BUILDING PLANNING R301 DESIGN CRITERIA R301.2.2 Seismic Provisions R301.2.2.1 Determination of Seismic Design Category R301.2.2.1.1
More information3.4 Analysis of Members under Flexure (Part III)
3.4 Analysis of Members nder Flexre (Part III) This section covers the following topics Analysis for Ultimate Strength Analysis of a Rectanglar Section 3.4.1 Analysis for Ultimate Strength Introdction
More informationMasonry and Cold-Formed Steel Requirements
PC UFC Briefing September 21-22, 2004 Masonry and Cold-Formed Steel Requirements David Stevens, ARA Masonry Requirements Composite Construction Masonry is often used in composite construction, such as
More informationINVESTIGATION ON THE LOAD TRANSFER MECHANISM FOR THE JOINT OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMN AND STEEL BEAM
INVESTIGATION ON THE LOAD TRANSFER MECHANISM FOR THE JOINT OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMN AND STEEL BEAM Seng Hn KIM 1, Sang Whan HAN 2 And Li Hng LEE SUMMARY The composite framed strctres, which consist
More informationFootings GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 15.2 LOADS AND REACTIONS 15.4 MOMENT IN FOOTINGS
4 Footings GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS Provisions of Chapter 15 apply primarily for design of footings supporting a single column (isolated footings) and do not provide specific design provisions for footings
More informationExecutive Summary Building Description: Introduction... 13
Table of Contents Executive Summary... 2 Building Description:... 2 Report Summary:... 2 Introduction... 3 Building Description:... 3 Current Framing Layout... 4 Report Topics:... 4 Loads and Load Cases...
More informationAlexis Pacella Structural Option Dr. Schneider Lexington II, Washington D.C. Technical Report #3 November 21,
1 Executive Summary: Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design is an depth look at the lateral system of Lexington II and the loads of which it must carry. The structural system of Lexington II is
More informationAdvanced Precast Concrete Dual-Shell Steel Columns
Advanced Precast Concrete Dal-Shell Steel Colmns Gabriele Gerrini Gradate Stdent Researcher Jose' I. Restrepo Professor, Principal Investigator Universit of California, San Diego Strctral Engineering Department
More informationIF SECOND-ORDER EFFECTS NEED TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS EXAM, ASSUME A B1 MOMENT-MAGNIFIER OF 1.05.
Name: Cack Zoleman CE311 FINAL EXAM Tuesday, December 12, 2017, 8am to Noon, Room 200 You may use the Steel Manual, Calculator, Drawing Supplies, only 100 points Given Steel Properties: E = 29000 ksi,
More informationtwenty three Masonry Construction 1 APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS FALL 2018 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS ARCH 631
APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS DR. ANNE NICHOLS FALL 2018 lecture twenty three masonry construction Bright Football Complex www.tamu.edu Masonry Construction 1 Learning
More informationtwenty three Masonry Construction 1 APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2018 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS ARCH 631
APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2018 lecture twenty three masonry construction Bright Football Complex www.tamu.edu Masonry Construction 1 Learning
More informationtwenty three Masonry Construction 1 APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2019 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS ARCH 631
APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2019 lecture twenty three masonry construction Bright Football Complex www.tamu.edu Masonry Construction 1 Learning
More informationOverview of Masonry Codes. Description
Overview of Masonry Codes Richard Bennett, PhD, PE The University of Tennessee Chair, 2016 TMS 402/602 Committee 2 nd Vice-chair, 2022 TMS 402/602 Committee TMS Provider Number: 50119857 Course Number:
More informationTechnical Notes 24C - The Contemporary Bearing Wall - Introduction to Shear Wall Design [Sept./Oct. 1970] (Reissued May 1988)
Technical Notes 24C - The Contemporary Bearing Wall - Introduction to Shear Wall Design [Sept./Oct. 1970] (Reissued May 1988) INTRODUCTION The general design concept of the contemporary bearing wall building
More informationDIVISION: METALS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: EPIC METALS CORPORATION 11 TALBOT AVENUE RANKIN, PENNSYLVANIA 15104
0 Most Widely Accepted and Trusted ICC ES Evaluation Report ICC ES 000 (800) 423 6587 (562) 699 0543 www.icc es.org ESR 2047 Reissued 07/207 This report is subject to renewal 07/209. DIVISION: 05 00 00
More informationCheck the strength of each type of member in the one story steel frame building below.
CE 331, Summer 2015 nalysis of Steel Braced Frame Bldg 1 / 9 Check the strength of each type of member in the one story steel frame building below. 4 @ 8 ft B 20 f 1 2 3 @ 25 ft Side Elevation 3 4 Plan
More informationM.S. Comprehensive Examination: Design
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering Spring Semester 2017 M.S. Comprehensive Examination: Design Consider the shown frame and the cross-section of the column
More informationComprehensive Examinations- Spring DESIGN Question
Universit of California, Berkele Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Materials Comprehensive Eaminations- Spring 2014 DESIGN Question Consider ONLY one
More informationVARIOUS TYPES OF SLABS
VARIOUS TYPES OF SLABS 1 CHOICE OF TYPE OF SLAB FLOOR The choice of type of slab for a particular floor depends on many factors. Economy of construction is obviously an important consideration, but this
More informationALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN OF CONCRETE MASONRY LINTELS. TEK 17-1C Structural (2009) Related TEK: Uniform load. Triangular load. Concentrated loads
An information series from the national authority on concrete masonry technology ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN OF CONCRETE MASONRY LINTELS TEK 17-1C Structural (2009) INTRODUCTION Lintels and beams are horizontal
More informationDesign Example 2 Reinforced Concrete Wall with Coupling Beams
Design Example 2 Reinforced Concrete Wall with Coupling Beams OVERVIEW The structure in this design example is a six story office building with reinforced concrete walls as its seismic force resisting
More informationThe problems in this guide are from past exams, 2011 to 2016.
CE 311 Exam 1 Past Exam Problems, 2011 to 2016 Exam 1 (14% of the grade) THURSDY, 9/21 7 TO 9:30PM. OPTIONL Q& SESSION WED. 9/20, 8PM. COVERGE: LESSONS 1 TO 9 Exam is designed for 2 hours, but a maximum
More informationVERIFICATION OF MASONRY DESIGN SOFTWARE NATIONAL CONCRETE MASONRY INSTITUTE PHASE III
VERIFICATION OF MASONRY DESIGN SOFTWARE NATIONAL CONCRETE MASONRY INSTITUTE PHASE III A Special Project Report Presented to: The College of Engineering and Science Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment
More informationEarth and Engineering Sciences Building University Park, Pennsylvania
Executive Summary The Earth and Engineering Sciences building is a 4 story educational and laboratory facility. An additional basement level is located below grade and provides the foundation for the East
More informationPage 1 of 46 Exam 1. Exam 1 Past Exam Problems without Solutions NAME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: C. Law of Sines:
NAME: EXAM 1 PAST PROBLEMS WITHOUT SOLUTIONS 100 points Tuesday, September 26, 2017, 7pm to 9:30 You are allowed to use a calculator and drawing equipment, only. Formulae provided 2.5 hour time limit This
More informationBS EN :2004 EN :2004 (E)
Contents List 1. General 1.1 Scope 1.1.1 Scope of Eurocode 2 1.1.2 Scope of Part 1-1 of Eurocode 2 1.2 Normative references 1.2.1 General reference standards 1.2.2 Other reference standards 1.3 Assumptions
More informationOVERALL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The at the Pittsburgh International Airport, PA, is a 275,000 square foot multi-use building located directly adjacent to the airport s landside terminal. The building consists of an
More informationOffice Building-G. Thesis Proposal. Carl Hubben. Structural Option. Advisor: Dr. Ali Memari
Office Building-G Thesis Proposal Structural Option December 10, 2010 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 3 Introduction... 4 Gravity System...4 Lateral System:...6 Foundation System:...6 Problem Statement...
More informationDiaphragms 2. Design Process. Design Process. Diaphragms are the roofs and floors of the upper stories
Diaphragms 2 Design Process Diaphragms are the roofs and floors of the upper stories They are assumed to act as a beam (usually a deep beam with substantial shear deformation) Design Process Sheathing
More informationStructural Engineering, Mechanics, and Materials. Preliminary Exam - Structural Design
Fall Semester 2018 Preliminary Exam - Structural Design A small building is located in downtown Berkeley. The structural system, either structural steel or reinforced concrete, comprises gravity framing
More information4.2 Tier 2 Analysis General Analysis Procedures for LSP & LDP
4.2 Tier 2 Analysis 4.2.1 General Four analysis procedures are provided in this section: Linear Static Procedure (LSP), Linear Dynamic Procedure (LDP), Special Procedure, and Procedure for Nonstructural
More informationBEAMS: COMPOSITE BEAMS; STRESS CONCENTRATIONS
BEAMS: COMPOSITE BEAMS; STRESS CONCENTRATIONS Slide No. 1 Bending of In the previous discussion, we have considered only those beams that are fabricated from a single material such as steel. However, in
More informationPrecast Concrete Bearing Wall Panel Design (Alternative Analysis Method) (Using ACI )
Precast Concrete Bearing Wall Panel Design (Alternative Analysis ethod) (Using ACI 318-14) Precast Concrete Bearing Wall Panel Design (Alternative Analysis ethod) (Using ACI 318-14) A structural precast
More informationRCKW Kneewall Connectors
This product is preferable to similar connectors because of a) easier installation, b) higher loads, c) lower installed cost, or a combination of these features. The Simpson Strong-Tie RCKW rigid connectors
More informationChapter 2 Notation and Terminology
Reorganized 318 Chapter Titles Chapter 1 General 1.1 Scope 1.2 Purpose 1.3 Interpretation 1.4 Drawings and Specifications 1.5 Testing and Inspection 1.6 Administatration and Enforcement 1.6.1 Retention
More informationSupplemental Plan Check List for Concrete Special Moment Resisting Frame
Plan Check / PCIS Application Number: Your feedback is important, please visit our website to complete a Customer Survey at /LADBSWeb/customer-survey.jsf. If you have any questions or need clarification
More informationFoundation Design. π = pi ( radians or 180 ) ρ = reinforcement ratio in concrete beam design = A s /bd µ = coefficient of static friction
Foundation Design Notation: a = name for width dimension A = name for area b = width of retaining wall stem at base = width resisting shear stress b o = perimeter length for two-way shear in concrete footing
More informationStructural Technical Report #1 By Robert Whitaker
Structural Technical Report #1 By Robert Whitaker Robert Whitaker Structural ~ Parfitt Parkview at Bloomfield Station Bloomfield, NJ 10-05-05 Executive summary This report covers the structural concepts
More information> 0. 1 f, they are treated as beam-columns.
223 A- Flexural Members (Beams) of Special Moment Frames Requirements of ACI 21.5 are applicable for special moment frame members proportioned primarily to resist flexure with factored axial forces 0.
More informationQuestion 8 of 55. y 24' 45 kips. 30 kips. 39 kips. 15 kips x 14' 26 kips 14' 13 kips 14' 20' Practice Exam II 77
Question 8 of 55 A concrete moment frame building assigned to SDC = D is shown in the Figure. Equivalent lateral force analysis procedure is used to obtain the seismic lateral loads, E h, as shown. Assume
More informationAppendix A Proposed LRFD Specifications and Commentary
NCHRP Project 12-71 Design Specifications and Commentary for Horizontally Curved Concrete Box-Girder Highway Bridges Appendix A Proposed LRFD Specifications and Commentary A-1 A-2 4.2 DEFINITIONS (Additional)
More informationISSUE A Code Change # 2 Class 3 and Class 4 Buildings
ISSUE A Code Change # 2 Class 3 and Class 4 Buildings (new) Section 1604.9 Disproportionate Collapse. Design for structural integrity of new buildings to protect against disproportionate collapse shall
More informationSeismic Performance of Knee Braced Frame
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 5 9 Seismic Performance of Knee Braced Frame Mina Naeemi and Majid Bozorg Abstract In order to dissipate inpt earthqake energy in the Moment Resisting
More informationCase Study in Steel adapted from Structural Design Guide, Hoffman, Gouwens, Gustafson & Rice., 2 nd ed.
Case Study in Steel adapted from Structural Design Guide, Hoffman, Gouwens, Gustafson & Rice., 2 nd ed. Building description The building is a one-story steel structure, typical of an office building.
More informationStructural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Existing Conditions
Chris Shelow Structural Advisor: M. Kevin Parfitt Koshland Integrated Natural Science Center 10/05/05 AE 481W Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Existing Conditions Executive Summary The
More informationANNEX 10. Special requirements recommended for structures subject to seismic actions. 1 Scope. 2 Basis of design. 2.1 Fundamental requirements
ANNEX 10 Special requirements recommended for structures subject to seismic actions 1 Scope This Annex sets out the special requirements which are recommended for structural concrete structures subject
More informationBijan Khaleghi, Ph, D. P.E., S.E.
0 Submission date: July, 0 Word count: 0 Author Name: Bijan Khaleghi Affiliations: Washington State D.O.T. Address: Linderson Way SW, Tumwater WA 0 INTEGRAL BENT CAP FOR CONTINUOUS PRECAST PRESTRESSED
More informationEVALUATION OF COLLECTOR DESIGN FOR CONCRETE DIAPHRAGMS
10NCEE Tenth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering July 21-25, 2014 Anchorage, Alaska EVALUATION OF COLLECTOR DESIGN FOR CONCRETE DIAPHRAGMS J. S. LeGrue
More informationMandatory Wood Frame Soft-story Retrofit Program STRUCTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
INFORMATION BULLETIN / PUBLIC - BUILDING CODE REFERENCE NO.: LAMC Division 93 Effective: 11/22/15 DOCUMENT NO.: P/BC 2014-137 Revised: 06/07/16 Previously Issued As: N/A Mandatory Wood Frame Soft-story
More informationVOLUNTARY - EARTHQUAKE HAZARD REDUCTION IN EXISTING HILLSIDE BUILDINGS (Division 94 Added by Ord. No. 171,258, Eff. 8/30/96.)
DIVISION 94 VOLUNTARY - EARTHQUAKE HAZARD REDUCTION IN EXISTING HILLSIDE BUILDINGS (Division 94 Added by Ord. No. 171,258, Eff. 8/30/96.) SEC. 91.9401. PURPOSE. (Amended by Ord. No. 172,592, Eff. 6/28/99,
More informationRutgers University Law School Building Addition and Renovation Camden, NJ
Building Addition and Renovation Camden, NJ Technical Assignment 1 October 5, 2007 Nathan E. Reynolds Structural Option Senior Thesis The Pennsylvania State University Faculty Consultant: Professor M.
More informationTable of Contents 2. Structural Systems.4 Foundations.4 Floor System...4 Columns..5 Lateral System...5
WISCONSIN PLACE RESIDENTIAL TECHNICAL ASSIGNMENT 1 OCTOBER 5, 2007 KURT KRASAVAGE THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY STRUCTURAL OPTION FACULTY ADVISOR: DR. ALI MEMARI Table of Contents Table of Contents
More informationStructural Option Indiana Regional Medical Center Indiana, PA
West View of IRMC Southeast View of IRMC Structural Option Indiana Regional Medical Center Indiana, PA West View of IRMC Southeast View of IRMC Arial View of IRMC Project Information N Location: Occupancy
More informationHow Loads Are Distributed
LOAD DISTRIBUTION 1 LOAD DISTRIBUTION This section illustrate how load will transmit from the deck to the stringers. Determining the fraction of load carried by a loaded member and the remainder distributed
More informationMasonry Structures James Robert Harris, PE, PhD, and Fredrick R. Rutz, PE, PhD
Masonry Structures James Robert Harris, PE, PhD, and Fredrick R. Rutz, PE, PhD Edited by David Sommer, PE, SE Includes materials originally developed by Richard Klingner, PE, PhD Disclaimer Instructional
More informationSeismic Design of Precast Concrete Structures
Seismic Design of Precast Concrete Structures S. K. Ghosh S. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. Palatine, IL and Aliso Viejo, CA Instructional Material Complementing FEMA 1052, Design Examples Diaphragms Analysis
More informationInvestigation for the Removal of Steel Tie Rods in a Historic Segmental Arch Floor
Investigation for the Removal of Steel Tie Rods in a Historic Segmental Arch Floor J. Lan 1, R. Gilsanz 2, and M. Lo 3 1 Gilsanz Murray Steficek, LLP, 129 West 27 th St., 5 th Floor, New York, NY 10001
More informationReinforced Concrete Spread Footing (Isolated Footing) Analysis and Design. Design Footing
Reinforced Concrete Spread Footing (Isolated Footing) Analysis and Design Design Footing Reinforced Concrete Spread Footing (Isolated Footing) Analysis and Design A square spread footing supports an 18
More informationSystem Assemblies & Load Tracing
System Assemblies & Load Tracing Notation: a = name for a dimension C = symbol for compression DL = shorthand for dead load F horizontal-resisting = total force resisting horizontal sliding F sliding =
More informationOne-Way Wide Module Joist Concrete Floor Design
One-Way Wide Module Joist Concrete Floor Design A 1 3 4 30'-0" 30'-0" 30'-0" 3' B 3' C 3' D 3' E 4" 4" (typ.) 3' F 0" 0" (typ.) Figure 1 One-Way Wide Module Joist Concrete Floor Framing System 1 Overview
More informationDanielle Shetler - Structural option Courtyard by Marriott Lancaster, PA
Structural Analysis Overview: During the structural analysis of the in Lancaster, Pa, a redesign of the lateral and gravity system from masonry bearing and shear walls to a staggered truss system was performed.
More informationCADS A3D MAX. How to model shear walls
CADS A3D MAX How to model shear walls Modelling shear walls in A3D MAX Introduction and synopsis This paper explains how to model shear walls in A3D MAX using the `wide column rigid arm sub-frame described
More informationReinforced Concrete Design. A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition
CHAPTER REINFORCED CONCRETE Reinforced Concrete Design A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition Fifth Edition REINFORCED CONCRETE A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
More informationJohn Jay College Expansion Project
Technical Report #1 Michael Hopper Mike AE Consultant: Dr. Lepage [Type the company name] September 29 th, 2008 Technical Report #1 Table of Contents Executive Summary.3 Introduction.4 Structural System.6
More informationLateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design
Andrew Covely Structural Dr. Linda Hanagan The Helena New York City, NY November 15, 2004 Pictures courtesy of Fox & Fowle Architects Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design Executive Summary This
More informationDESIGN INFORMATION WAFFLE-CRETE. FOR MORE INFORMATION, WRITE OR CALL International, Inc.
WAFFLE-CRETE DESIGN INFORMATION STRUCTURAL PRECAST PRECAST CONCRETE CONCRETE BUILDING BUILDING SYSTEMS SYSTEMS FOR MORE INFORMATION, WRITE OR CALL WAFFLE-CRETE International, Inc. P.O. BOX 1008 Hays, Kansas
More informationASD OF CONCRETE MASONRY LINTELS BASED ON THE 2012 IBC/2011 MSJC. TEK 17-1D Structural (2011) Related TEK: 14-7C, 14-13B, 17-1C, 17-2A
n information series from the national authority on concrete masonry technology SD OF CONCRETE MSONRY LINTELS BSED ON THE 2012 IBC/2011 MSJC TEK 17-1D Structural (2011) INTRODUCTION Lintels and beams are
More informationTECHNICAL REPORT 1. Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions. Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children s Hospital. Hershey, Pennsylvania
TECHNICAL REPORT 1 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children s Hospital Matthew V Vandersall The Pennsylvania State University Architectural Engineering
More informationCHAPTER 3 BUILDINGS WITH WOOD FRAMED EXTERIOR WALLS 301 SCOPE
CHAPTER 3 BUILDINGS WITH WOOD FRAMED EXTERIOR WALLS WOOD CHAPTER 3 301 SCOPE This chapter prescribes construction requirements for buildings where all exterior walls above the foundation are wood framed
More informationTraci Peterson Option: Structural Faculty Consultant: Memari. Executive Summary
1 Traci Peterson Option: Structural Faculty Consultant: Memari The Del Monte Center at The North Shore Pittsburgh, PA Structural Technical Report 3 Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design Date
More informationModjeski and Masters, Inc. Consulting Engineers 04/18/06 St. Croix River Bridge 3D Analysis Report Introduction
Introduction This memo presents a summary of a three dimensional (3D) analysis of the Organic concept for the proposed St. Croix River bridge project. The Organic concept has several attributes that are
More informationPrestressed Steel Reinforced Concrete Frame Applied to Outer-jacketing Structure and its Restoring Force Model Based on IDARC
Research Jornal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technolog 6(11): 045-051, 013 ISSN: 040-7459; e-issn: 040-7467 axwell Scientific Organization, 013 Sbmitted: November 7, 01 Accepted: Janar 07, 013
More information[TECHNICAL REPORT 3] Lateral System Analysis
Science Center Research Park 3711 Market St. The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis 2009-2010 Prepared by: November 30, 2009 [TECHNICAL REPORT 3] Lateral
More informationStructural Study of the Existing Lateral System
Daniel Chwastyk F.W. Olin Center Louis Geschwindner Advisor Structural Study of the Existing Lateral System Executive Summary Technical assignment 3 deals with discussing the lateral system used in the
More informationUNION STATION EXPANSION AND RESTORATION TECHNICAL REPORT I
UNION STATION EXPANSION AND RESTORATION WASHINGTON DC TECHNICAL REPORT I Joseph W. Wilcher III Adviser: M.K. Parfitt September 29, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 2 Structural Systems Foundation...
More informationSteel Design Guide Series. Steel and Composite Beams with. Web Openings
Steel Design Guide Series Steel and Composite Beams with Web Openings Steel Design Guide Series Steel and Composite Beams with Web Openings Design of Steel and Composite Beams with Web Openings David Darwin
More informationInteraction between ductile RC perimeter frames and floor slabs containing precast units
Interaction between ductile RC perimeter frames and floor slabs containing precast units R. C Fenwick,. J. Davidson and D.. N. Lau Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of uckland.
More information2012 IBC/2011 MSJC MASONRY CODE COMPILATION
2012 IBC/2011 MSJC MASONRY CODE COMPILATION 2012 IBC CHAPTER 21 MASONRY Merged IBC/MSJC 2011 MSJC CODE CHAPTER 1 BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATION FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES SECTION 2101 GENERAL
More informationSchöck Isokorb Type CM
Schöck Isokorb Type Schöck Isokorb Type The Schöck Isokorb Type is suitable for cantilevered reinforced concrete slabs. (C for concrete slab) It transmits negative moment (M) and positive shear force.
More informationLevel 6 Graduate Diploma in Engineering Structural analysis
9210-111 Level 6 Graduate Diploma in Engineering Structural analysis Sample Paper You should have the following for this examination one answer book non-programmable calculator pen, pencil, ruler, drawing
More informationCalculation of Wind Loads on Structures according to ASCE 7-10
Calculation of Wind Loads on Structures according to ASCE 7-10 Permitted Procedures The design wind loads for buildings and other structures, including the Main Wind-Force Resisting System (MWFRS) and
More information3.5 Tier 1 Analysis Overview Seismic Shear Forces
Chapter 3.0 - Screening Phase (Tier ) 3.5 Tier Analysis 3.5. Overview Analyses performed as part of Tier of the Evaluation Process are limited to Quick Checks. Quick Checks shall be used to calculate the
More informationSchöck Isokorb Type CV
Schöck Isokorb Type The Schöck Isokorb type is suitable for supported reinforced concrete slabs (C for concrete slab). It transmits positive and negative vertical shear force. 1 Assembly Section Details
More informationACI Code Revisions Impact on StructurePoint Software
ACI 318-19 Code Revisions Impact on StructurePoint Software General Themes & Summary ACI 318-19 continues to unify and simplify code provisions started in 2014 reorganization of chapters by members. Nearly
More informationCOMPARISON OF MULTISTORY WALL RESULTS BETWEEN ADAPT-EDGE 1 AND ETABS 2 CONCRETE FRAME WITH SHEARWALLS
Your Partner in Structural Concrete Design TN500_EDGE_Etabs_Comp_06132016 COMPARISON OF MULTISTORY WALL RESULTS BETWEEN ADAPT-EDGE 1 AND ETABS 2 CONCRETE FRAME WITH SHEARWALLS INTRODUCTION This Technical
More informationPlan Check No. Checked by: An Appointment Is Required for Verification
SUPPLEMENTAL CORRECTION SHEET UNREINFORCED MASONRY (URM) RETROFIT ( 2002 LABC ) Plan Check No. Checked by: Permit Appl. # An Appointment Is Required for Verification Job Address: For appt. call: APPLICATION
More informationTHE FORENSIC MEDICAL CENTER
THE FORENSIC MEDICAL CENTER Image courtesy of Gaudreau, Inc. TECHNICAL REPORT #2 OCTOBER 26, 2007 KEENAN YOHE STRUCTURAL OPTION DR. MEMARI FACULTY ADVISOR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Image courtesy of Gaudreau,
More information48.5% Throughput. 6 Connector 51.5% Plastic. 45.7% Throughput. 4 Connector 54.3% Plastic. 51.0% Throughput. 2 Connector 49.
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Percentage Hollow Areas Vs. Plastic Areas (Concrete Throughput) 2 Axial Loading / Bending Moment Interaction Diagrams 6 Concrete Wall 8 Concrete Wall 10 Concrete Wall 3 3 5 7 EZ Form
More informationFairfield Inn and Suites Pittsburgh, PA
Existing Building Information Presentation Outline Construction Management Breadth Study Existing Building Information Location: Downtown Pittsburgh 228 Federal St, Building Statistics: Occupancy - Hotel
More informationSouthwest Housing, Arizona State University
Prepared by KSENIA TRETIAKOVA Structural Option 01.09.2012 Architectural Engineering Pennsylvania State University 2012 Southwest Housing, Arizona State University Technical Report #3 Lateral System 01.09.2012
More informationModelling of RC moment resisting frames with precast-prestressed flooring system
Modelling of RC moment resisting frames with precast-prestressed flooring system B.H.H. Peng, R.P. Dhakal, R.C. Fenwick & A.J. Carr Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch.
More information