Appendix F Indirect CBR test results
|
|
- Franklin Chandler
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Appendix F Indirect CBR test results
2 depth below ground level () Causeway Geotech Ltd CBR estimated using Kleyn & Van Heerden (1983): Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) test results and estimated CBR Log CBR = Log (/blow) Project: Additional Investigation at Grangecastle Report No: Test Number: TP A Date: 16-Sep cumulative number of blows depth from to () /blow CBR (%)
3 depth below ground level () Causeway Geotech Ltd CBR estimated using Kleyn & Van Heerden (1983): Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) test results and estimated CBR Log CBR = Log (/blow) Project: Additional Investigation at Grangecastle Report No: Test Number: TP B Date: 15-Sep cumulative number of blows depth from to () /blow CBR (%)
4 depth below ground level () Causeway Geotech Ltd CBR estimated using Kleyn & Van Heerden (1983): Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) test results and estimated CBR Log CBR = Log (/blow) Project: Additional Investigation at Grangecastle Report No: Test Number: TP C Date: 15-Sep cumulative number of blows depth from to () /blow CBR (%)
5 depth below ground level () Causeway Geotech Ltd CBR estimated using Kleyn & Van Heerden (1983): Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) test results and estimated CBR Log CBR = Log (/blow) Project: Additional Investigation at Grangecastle Report No: Test Number: TP D Date: 15-Sep cumulative number of blows depth from to () /blow CBR (%)
6 depth below ground level () Causeway Geotech Ltd CBR estimated using Kleyn & Van Heerden (1983): Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) test results and estimated CBR Log CBR = Log (/blow) Project: Additional Investigation at Grangecastle Report No: Test Number: TP F Date: 16-Sep cumulative number of blows depth from to () /blow CBR (%)
7 depth below ground level () Causeway Geotech Ltd CBR estimated using Kleyn & Van Heerden (1983): Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) test results and estimated CBR Log CBR = Log (/blow) Project: Additional Investigation at Grangecastle Report No: Test Number: TP G Date: 16-Sep cumulative number of blows depth from to () /blow CBR (%)
8 APPENDIX G Infiltration test results
9 Grangecastle Report No.: Soak away 01 Soak away 01 November 2016
10 Grangecastle Report No.: Soak away 01 Soak Away 02 November 2016
11 Grangecastle Report No.: Soak away 02 Soak Away 02 November 2016
12 Grangecastle Report No.: Soak Away 01 Soak Away 01 November 2016
13 Grangecastle Report No.: Soak away 02 Soak Away 03 November 2016
14 Grangecastle Report No.: Soak Away 03 Soak Away03 November 2016
15 Grangecastle Report No.: Soak away 03 Soak Away 03 November 2016
16 depth of water in pit (m) Project No.: Causeway Geotech Ltd Site: Grangecastle Infiltration Test Test Location: SKW01 #1 Analysis using method as described in Date 28-Sep-16 BRE Digest 365 and width (m) length (m) CIRIA Report C697-The SUDS Manual test pit top dimensions test pit base dimensions test infiltration rate (q) = m/h test pit depth 1.5 m depth to groundwater before adding water (m) = dry depth of time depth to water water in pit (mins) surface (m) (m) From graph below: test start - 75% depth at m water depth time is not determined test end - 25% depth at m water depth time is minutes time depth of depth to water water in pit time elapsed Area of walls and volume of water lost base at 50% drop q q (mins) surface (m) (m) (mins) (m3) (m2) (m/min) (m/h) E time (mins)
17 depth of water in pit (m) Project No.: Causeway Geotech Ltd Site: Grangecastle Infiltration Test Test Location: SKW02 Analysis using method as described in Date 28-Sep-16 BRE Digest 365 and width (m) length (m) CIRIA Report C697-The SUDS Manual test pit top dimensions test pit base dimensions test infiltration rate (q) = m/h test pit depth 1.5 m depth to groundwater before adding water (m) = dry depth of time depth to water water in pit (mins) surface (m) (m) From graph below: test start - 75% depth at m water depth 1.5 time is not determined test end - 25% depth at m water depth 1.5 time is 1.0 minutes time depth of depth to water water in pit time elapsed Area of walls and volume of water lost base at 50% drop q q (mins) surface (m) (m) (mins) (m3) (m2) (m/min) (m/h) E time (mins)
18 depth of water in pit (m) Project No.: Causeway Geotech Ltd Site: Grangecastle Infiltration Test Test Location: SKW03 Analysis using method as described in Date 28-Sep-16 BRE Digest 365 and width (m) length (m) CIRIA Report C697-The SUDS Manual test pit top dimensions test pit base dimensions test infiltration rate (q) = m/h test pit depth 1.3 m depth to groundwater before adding water (m) = dry depth of time depth to water water in pit (mins) surface (m) (m) From graph below: test start - 75% depth at m water depth time is not determined test end - 25% depth at m water depth time is minutes depth of water in pit (m) time elapsed (mins) Area of walls and base at 50% drop (m2) time (mins) depth to water surface (m) volume of water lost (m3) q (m/min) q (m/h) E time (mins)
19 Appendix H Laboratory test results
20 SOIL AND ROCK SAMPLE ANALYSIS LABORATORY TEST REPORT Client: Edge Connex Engineer: Pinnacle Consulting Engineering From: Stephen Watson Laboratory Manager Causeway Geotech Ltd Tel: +44(0) Date: 21/10/16 Ref: Additional Land Survey at Grangecastle, Dublin We are pleased to attach the results of laboratory testing carried out for the above project. This memo and its attachments constitute a report of the results of tests as detailed in the Contents page(s). The attached results complete the testing requested and we would therefore wish to confirm that samples will be retained without charge for a period of 60 days from the above date after which they will be appropriately disposed of unless we receive written instructions to the contrary prior to that date. We trust our report meets with your approval but if you have any queries or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Approved Signatory Stephen Watson Laboratory Manager
21 Project Name Additional Land Survey at Grangecastle, Dublin Report Reference The table below details the tests carried out, the specifications used and the number of tests included in this report: Material tested Type of test/properties measured/range of measurement Standard specifications Number of test results included in the report SOIL SOIL Moisture content - oven drying method Liquid limit - cone penetrometer BS : BS : SOIL Liquid limit - cone penetrometer - one point BS : SOIL Plastic limit BS : SOIL Plasticity index and liquidity index BS : SOIL SOIL SOIL Particle size distribution - wet sieving Particle size distribution - dry sieving Particle size distribution -sedimentation hydrometer method BS : BS : BS : SOIL ph Value of Soil BS : SOIL Sulphate Content water extract BS : ROCK Point load index ISRM Coission on Testing Methods. Suggested Method for Determining Point Load Strength 1985 ROCK UCS ISRM Suggested Methods - Rock Characterization Testing and Monitoring, Ed. E T Brown
22 Suary of Classification Test Results Project No. Project Name Additional Land Survey at Grangecastle, Dublin Hole No. Ref Sample Top Base Type Soil Description Density w Passing LL PL PI Particle bulk dry 425µm density Mg/m 3 % % % % % Mg/m 3 Casagrande Classification TP A Brown slightly sandy gravelly D pt CLAY. CL TP B Light brown slightly sandy gravelly B pt CLAY. CI TP C Grey slightly sandy gravelly CLAY B pt with medium cobble content. CL TP D Light brown sandy gravelly CLAY B pt with low cobble content. CL TP E TP F Brown slightly sandy gravelly B pt CLAY with low cobble content. Brown slightly sandy fine to coarse B 9.0 GRAVEL. TP G B Brown mottled grey sandy CLAY pt CI CI All tests performed in accordance with BS1377:1990 unless specified otherwise Key Date Printed Approved By Table Density test Liquid Limit Particle density Linear measurement unless : 4pt cone unless : sp - small pyknometer wd - water displacement cas - Casagrande method gj - gas jar sheet wi - iersion in water 1pt - single point test 1 21/10/2016 Stephen.Watson 1
23 æ m ö ç è m 1 ø Percentage Passing % 3.45 PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Job Ref Borehole/Pit No. TP A Site Name Additional Land Survey at Grangecastle, Dublin Sample No. 6 Soil Description Brown slightly sandy gravelly CLAY. Depth, m 1.30 Specimen Reference 9 Specimen Depth m Sample Type D Test Method BS1377:Part 2:1990, clauses 9.2 and 9.5 KeyLAB ID Caus CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL Fine Medium Coarse Fine Medium Coarse Fine Medium Coarse COBBLES BOULDERS Sieving Sedimentation Particle Size % Passing Particle Size % Passing Particle Size Dry Mass of sample, g Sample Proportions % dry mass Cobbles Gravel Sand Fines < Grading Analysis D100 D60 D30 D Uniformity Coefficient Curvature Coefficient Particle density 1.40 (assumed) Mg/m3 Remarks Preparation and testing in accordance with BS1377 unless noted below Approved Stephen.Watson Sheet printed 21/10/ :32 Fig 1 Sheet
24 æ m ö ç è m 1 ø Percentage Passing % 3.45 PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Job Ref Borehole/Pit No. TP B Site Name Additional Land Survey at Grangecastle, Dublin Sample No. 2 Soil Description Light brown slightly sandy gravelly CLAY. Depth, m 1.40 Specimen Reference 9 Specimen Depth m Sample Type B Test Method BS1377:Part 2:1990, clauses 9.2 and 9.5 KeyLAB ID Caus CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL Fine Medium Coarse Fine Medium Coarse Fine Medium Coarse COBBLES BOULDERS Sieving Sedimentation Particle Size % Passing Particle Size % Passing Particle Size Dry Mass of sample, g Sample Proportions % dry mass Cobbles Gravel Sand Fines < Grading Analysis D100 D60 D30 D Uniformity Coefficient Curvature Coefficient Particle density 1.40 (assumed) Mg/m3 Remarks Preparation and testing in accordance with BS1377 unless noted below Approved Stephen.Watson Sheet printed 21/10/ :32 Fig 1 Sheet
25 æ m ö ç è m 1 ø Percentage Passing % 3.45 PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Job Ref Borehole/Pit No. TP C Site Name Additional Land Survey at Grangecastle, Dublin Sample No. 4 Soil Description Grey slightly sandy gravelly CLAY with medium cobble content. Depth, m 1.50 Specimen Reference 9 Specimen Depth m Sample Type B Test Method BS1377:Part 2:1990, clauses 9.2 and 9.5 KeyLAB ID Caus CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL Fine Medium Coarse Fine Medium Coarse Fine Medium Coarse COBBLES BOULDERS Sieving Sedimentation Particle Size % Passing Particle Size % Passing Particle Size Dry Mass of sample, g Sample Proportions % dry mass Cobbles Gravel Sand Fines < Grading Analysis D100 D60 D30 D Uniformity Coefficient Curvature Coefficient Particle density 1.40 (assumed) Mg/m3 Remarks Preparation and testing in accordance with BS1377 unless noted below Approved Stephen.Watson Sheet printed 21/10/ :32 Fig 1 Sheet
26 æ m ö ç è m 1 ø Percentage Passing % 3.45 PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Job Ref Borehole/Pit No. TP D Site Name Additional Land Survey at Grangecastle, Dublin Sample No. 2 Soil Description Light brown sandy gravelly CLAY with low cobble content. Depth, m 1.70 Specimen Reference 9 Specimen Depth m Sample Type B Test Method BS1377:Part 2:1990, clauses 9.2 and 9.5 KeyLAB ID Caus CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL Fine Medium Coarse Fine Medium Coarse Fine Medium Coarse COBBLES BOULDERS Sieving Sedimentation Particle Size % Passing Particle Size % Passing Particle Size Dry Mass of sample, g Sample Proportions % dry mass Cobbles Gravel Sand Fines < Grading Analysis D100 D60 D30 D Uniformity Coefficient Curvature Coefficient Particle density 1.40 (assumed) Mg/m3 Remarks Preparation and testing in accordance with BS1377 unless noted below Approved Stephen.Watson Sheet printed 21/10/ :32 Fig 1 Sheet
27 æ m ö ç è m 1 ø Percentage Passing % 3.45 PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Job Ref Borehole/Pit No. TP E Site Name Additional Land Survey at Grangecastle, Dublin Sample No. 2 Soil Description Brown slightly sandy gravelly CLAY with low cobble content. Depth, m 1.70 Specimen Reference 9 Specimen Depth m Sample Type B Test Method BS1377:Part 2:1990, clauses 9.2 and 9.5 KeyLAB ID Caus CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL Fine Medium Coarse Fine Medium Coarse Fine Medium Coarse COBBLES BOULDERS Sieving Sedimentation Particle Size % Passing Particle Size % Passing Particle Size Dry Mass of sample, g Sample Proportions % dry mass Cobbles Gravel Sand Fines < Grading Analysis D100 D60 D30 D Uniformity Coefficient Curvature Coefficient Particle density 1.40 (assumed) Mg/m3 Remarks Preparation and testing in accordance with BS1377 unless noted below Approved Stephen.Watson Sheet printed 21/10/ :32 Fig 1 Sheet
28 æ m ö ç è m 1 ø Percentage Passing % 3.45 PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Job Ref Borehole/Pit No. TP F Site Name Additional Land Survey at Grangecastle, Dublin Sample No. 4 Soil Description Brown slightly sandy fine to coarse GRAVEL. Depth, m 2.10 Specimen Reference 9 Specimen Depth m Sample Type B Test Method BS1377:Part 2:1990, clause 9.2 KeyLAB ID Caus CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL Fine Medium Coarse Fine Medium Coarse Fine Medium Coarse COBBLES BOULDERS Sieving Sedimentation Particle Size % Passing Particle Size % Passing Particle Size Dry Mass of sample, g Sample Proportions % dry mass Cobbles Gravel Sand Fines < Grading Analysis D100 D60 D30 D Uniformity Coefficient 2 26 Curvature Coefficient Remarks Preparation and testing in accordance with BS1377 unless noted below Approved Stephen.Watson Sheet printed 21/10/ :32 Fig 1 Sheet
29 æ m ö ç è m 1 ø Percentage Passing % 3.45 PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Job Ref Borehole/Pit No. TP G Site Name Additional Land Survey at Grangecastle, Dublin Sample No. 5 Soil Description Brown mottled grey sandy CLAY. Depth, m 1.80 Specimen Reference 9 Specimen Depth m Sample Type B Test Method BS1377:Part 2:1990, clauses 9.2 and 9.5 KeyLAB ID Caus CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL Fine Medium Coarse Fine Medium Coarse Fine Medium Coarse COBBLES BOULDERS Sieving Sedimentation Particle Size % Passing Particle Size % Passing Particle Size Dry Mass of sample, g Sample Proportions % dry mass Cobbles Gravel Sand Fines < Grading Analysis D100 D60 D30 D Uniformity Coefficient 2 99 Curvature Coefficient Particle density 1.40 (assumed) Mg/m3 Remarks Preparation and testing in accordance with BS1377 unless noted below Approved Stephen.Watson Sheet printed 21/10/ :32 Fig 1 Sheet
30 Contract: Additional Investigation at Grangecastle Business Park Causeway Geotech Ltd Job No.: CHEMICAL TESTS Tests 3, 4, 5 & 9 of BS 1377 : Part 3 : 1990 EH No. Type Sample No. Sample Sheet 1 of 1 Passing Organic Mass Sulfate Content SO 4 ph Depth 2 Matter Loss on Soil/water Value Groundwater at to Sieve Content Ignition (mg/l) (m) (m) (%) * (%) # (%) $ (mg/l) TP A B TP B B TP C B TP D B TP E B TP F B TP G B * Walkley and Black's dichromate method Clause 3 # Average of 3 specimens-clause 4 $ Water soluble SO 4 from 2:1 water-soil extract-clause Average of 2/3 specimens-clause 9.5 Clause Nos. of BS1377:Part 3:1990
31 Type (D, A, I, B) Direction (L, P or U) Failure Valid (Y/N) Equivalent diameter, De Project No. Project Name Point Load Strength Index Tests Suary of Results Additional Land Survey at Grangecastle, Dublin Borehole No. Sample Specimen Depth Ref. Type Ref. Depth Rock Type Test Type see ISRM Dimensions Force P Point Load Strength Index Lne W Dps Dps' I s I s(50) Remarks (including water content if measured) m m kn MPa MPa LIMESTONE BH A 4.50 C 1 A U YES LIMESTONE BH A 5.50 C 1 A U YES LIMESTONE BH C 2.50 C 1 A U YES LIMESTONE BH C 3.50 C 1 A U YES Test Type D - Diametral, A - Axial, I - Irregular Lump, B - Block Direction L - parallel to planes of weakness P - perpendicular to planes of weakness U - unknown or random Dimensions Dps - Distance between platens ( platen separation ) Dps' - at failure ( see ISRM note 6) Lne - Length from platens to nearest free end W - Width of shortest dimension perpendicular to load, P Diametral P D ps L ne W D ps Axial W P L ne Block/irregular lump W P D ps Date Printed Approved By Table Test performed in accordance with ISRM Suggested Methods : 2007, unless noted otherwise Detailed legend for test and dimensions, based on ISRM, is shown above. 21/10/ Size factor, F = (De/50) 0.45 for all tests. sheet Stephen.Watson 1
32 UNIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST ON ROCK - SUMMARY OF RESULTS Project No. Project Name Additional Land Survey at Grangecastle, Dublin Hole No. BH A BH C Sample Ref Top Base Type Rock Type Specimen Dimensions2 Water Uniaxial Compression3 Bulk Content Density2 Dia. Length H/D 1 Condition Mode of UCS failure Mg/m3 % MPa C LIMESTONE C LIMESTONE as received as received AC 20.8 F Remarks Notes 1 ISRM p87 test 1, water content at 105 ± 3 oc, specimen as tested for UCS Mode of failure : 2 ISRM p86 clause (vii), Caliper method used for determination of bulk volume and derivation of bulk density S - Single shear MS - multiple shear 3 ISRM p153 part 1, determination of Uniaxial Compressive Strength ( UCS ) of Rock Materials AC - Axial cleavage F - Fragmented above notes apply unless annotated otherwise in the remarks Test Specification Date Printed Approved By Table International Society for Rock Mechanics, The complete ISRM suggested methods for Rock Characterization Testing and Monitoring, /10/ sheet Stephen.Watson 1
33 Final Report Chemtest Ltd. Depot Road Newmarket CB8 0AL Tel: Report No.: Initial Date of Issue: Client Client Address: 28-Sep-2016 Causeway Geotech Ltd 8 Drumahiskey Road Balnamore Ballymoney County Antrim BT53 7QL Contact(s): Project Andy Garne Colm Hurley Darren O'Mahony Matthew Gilbert Stephen Franey Stephen Watson Paul Dunlop Neil Haggan Grangecastle Add Land Survey Quotation No.: Date Received: 20-Sep-2016 Order No.: Date Instructed: 20-Sep-2016 No. of Samples: 4 Turnaround (Wkdays): 7 Results Due: 28-Sep-2016 Date Approved: 28-Sep-2016 Approved By: Details: Martin Dyer, Laboratory Manager Page 1 of 6
34 Results - 2 Stage WAC Project: Grangecastle Add Land Survey Chemtest Job No: Chemtest Sample ID: Landflll Waste Acceptance Criteria Limits Sample Location ID: TPB Stable, Non- Sample Ref: reactive Hazardous Top Depth(m): 0.50 Inert Waste hazardous Waste Bottom Depth(m): Landfill waste in non- Landfill Sampling Date: 15-Sep-2016 hazardous Determinand SOP Accred. Units Landfill Total Organic Carbon 2625 U % Loss On Ignition 2610 U % Total BTEX 2760 U mg/kg < Total PCBs (7 Congeners) 2815 U mg/kg < TPH Total WAC (Mineral Oil) 2670 U mg/kg Total (Of 17) PAH's 2700 N mg/kg < ph 2010 U >6 -- Acid Neutralisation Capacity 2015 N mol/kg To evaluate To evaluate Eluate Analysis 2:1 8:1 2:1 Cumulative Limit values for compliance leaching test mg/l mg/l mg/kg mg/kg 10:1 using BS EN at L/S 10 l/kg Arsenic 1450 U < < < < Barium 1450 U < 0.50 < Cadmium 1450 U < < < < Chromium 1450 U < < Copper 1450 U < < < < Mercury 1450 U < < < < Molybdenum 1450 U < Nickel 1450 U < < < < Lead 1450 U < < < < Antimony 1450 U < < < < Selenium 1450 U < < < Zinc 1450 U < < 0.50 < Chloride 1220 U Fluoride 1220 U Sulphate 1220 U Total Dissolved Solids 1020 N Phenol Index 1920 U < < < 0.30 < Dissolved Organic Carbon 1610 U < Soild Information Leachate Test Information Dry mass of test portion/kg Leachant volume 1st extract/l Moisture (%) 11 Leachant volume 2nd extract/l Eluant recovered from 1st extract/l Page 2 of
35 Results - 2 Stage WAC Project: Grangecastle Add Land Survey Chemtest Job No: Chemtest Sample ID: Landflll Waste Acceptance Criteria Limits Sample Location ID: TPB Stable, Non- Sample Ref: reactive Hazardous Top Depth(m): 1.50 Inert Waste hazardous Waste Bottom Depth(m): Landfill waste in non- Landfill Sampling Date: 15-Sep-2016 hazardous Determinand SOP Accred. Units Landfill Total Organic Carbon 2625 U % Loss On Ignition 2610 U % Total BTEX 2760 U mg/kg < Total PCBs (7 Congeners) 2815 U mg/kg < TPH Total WAC (Mineral Oil) 2670 U mg/kg < Total (Of 17) PAH's 2700 N mg/kg < ph 2010 U >6 -- Acid Neutralisation Capacity 2015 N mol/kg To evaluate To evaluate Eluate Analysis 2:1 8:1 2:1 Cumulative Limit values for compliance leaching test mg/l mg/l mg/kg mg/kg 10:1 using BS EN at L/S 10 l/kg Arsenic 1450 U < < < < Barium 1450 U < 0.50 < Cadmium 1450 U < < < < Chromium 1450 U < < Copper 1450 U < < < Mercury 1450 U < < < < Molybdenum 1450 U < Nickel 1450 U < < < Lead 1450 U < < < < Antimony 1450 U < < < < Selenium 1450 U < Zinc 1450 U < < 0.50 < Chloride 1220 U Fluoride 1220 U < Sulphate 1220 U Total Dissolved Solids 1020 N Phenol Index 1920 U < < < 0.30 < Dissolved Organic Carbon 1610 U < Soild Information Leachate Test Information Dry mass of test portion/kg Leachant volume 1st extract/l Moisture (%) 14 Leachant volume 2nd extract/l Eluant recovered from 1st extract/l Page 3 of EPA Export :03:18:08
36 Results - 2 Stage WAC Project: Grangecastle Add Land Survey Chemtest Job No: Chemtest Sample ID: Landflll Waste Acceptance Criteria Limits Sample Location ID: TPD Stable, Non- Sample Ref: reactive Hazardous Top Depth(m): 0.50 Inert Waste hazardous Waste Bottom Depth(m): Landfill waste in non- Landfill Sampling Date: 15-Sep-2016 hazardous Determinand SOP Accred. Units Landfill Total Organic Carbon 2625 U % Loss On Ignition 2610 U % Total BTEX 2760 U mg/kg < Total PCBs (7 Congeners) 2815 U mg/kg < TPH Total WAC (Mineral Oil) 2670 U mg/kg < Total (Of 17) PAH's 2700 N mg/kg < ph 2010 U >6 -- Acid Neutralisation Capacity 2015 N mol/kg To evaluate To evaluate Eluate Analysis 2:1 8:1 2:1 Cumulative Limit values for compliance leaching test mg/l mg/l mg/kg mg/kg 10:1 using BS EN at L/S 10 l/kg Arsenic 1450 U < < < < Barium 1450 U < 0.50 < Cadmium 1450 U < < < < Chromium 1450 U < < < Copper 1450 U < < < Mercury 1450 U < < < < Molybdenum 1450 U < Nickel 1450 U < < < < Lead 1450 U < < < < Antimony 1450 U < < < < Selenium 1450 U < Zinc 1450 U < 0.50 < Chloride 1220 U Fluoride 1220 U Sulphate 1220 U Total Dissolved Solids 1020 N Phenol Index 1920 U < < < 0.30 < Dissolved Organic Carbon 1610 U < Soild Information Leachate Test Information Dry mass of test portion/kg Leachant volume 1st extract/l Moisture (%) 9.9 Leachant volume 2nd extract/l Eluant recovered from 1st extract/l Page 4 of EPA Export :03:18:08
37 Results - 2 Stage WAC Project: Grangecastle Add Land Survey Chemtest Job No: Chemtest Sample ID: Landflll Waste Acceptance Criteria Limits Sample Location ID: TPD Stable, Non- Sample Ref: reactive Hazardous Top Depth(m): 2.00 Inert Waste hazardous Waste Bottom Depth(m): Landfill waste in non- Landfill Sampling Date: 15-Sep-2016 hazardous Determinand SOP Accred. Units Landfill Total Organic Carbon 2625 U % Loss On Ignition 2610 U % Total BTEX 2760 U mg/kg < Total PCBs (7 Congeners) 2815 U mg/kg < TPH Total WAC (Mineral Oil) 2670 U mg/kg < Total (Of 17) PAH's 2700 N mg/kg < ph 2010 U >6 -- Acid Neutralisation Capacity 2015 N mol/kg To evaluate To evaluate Eluate Analysis 2:1 8:1 2:1 Cumulative Limit values for compliance leaching test mg/l mg/l mg/kg mg/kg 10:1 using BS EN at L/S 10 l/kg Arsenic 1450 U < < < < Barium 1450 U < 0.50 < Cadmium 1450 U < < < < Chromium 1450 U < < < Copper 1450 U < < < Mercury 1450 U < < < < Molybdenum 1450 U < < Nickel 1450 U < < < < Lead 1450 U < < < < Antimony 1450 U < < < < Selenium 1450 U < < < Zinc 1450 U < < 0.50 < Chloride 1220 U Fluoride 1220 U Sulphate 1220 U Total Dissolved Solids 1020 N Phenol Index 1920 U < < < 0.30 < Dissolved Organic Carbon 1610 U < Soild Information Leachate Test Information Dry mass of test portion/kg Leachant volume 1st extract/l Moisture (%) 12 Leachant volume 2nd extract/l Eluant recovered from 1st extract/l Page 5 of EPA Export :03:18:08
38 Report Information Key U UKAS accredited M MCERTS and UKAS accredited N Unaccredited S This analysis has been subcontracted to a UKAS accredited laboratory that is accredited for this analysis SN This analysis has been subcontracted to a UKAS accredited laboratory that is not accredited for this analysis T This analysis has been subcontracted to an unaccredited laboratory I/S Insufficient Sample U/S Unsuitable Sample N/E not evaluated < "less than" > "greater than" Coents or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation The results relate only to the items tested Uncertainty of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request None of the results in this report have been recovery corrected All results are expressed on a dry weight basis The following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently corrected to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, Phenols For all other tests the samples were dried at < 37 C prior to analysis All Asbestos testing is performed at our Coventry laboratory Issue numbers are sequential starting with 1 all subsequent reports are incremented by 1 Sample Deviation Codes A - Date of sampling not supplied B - Sample age exceeds stability time (sampling to extraction) C - Sample not received in appropriate containers D - Broken Container Sample Retention and Disposal All soil samples will be retained for a period of 45 days from the date of receipt All water samples will be retained for 14 days from the date of receipt Charges may apply to extended sample storage If you require extended retention of samples, please your requirements to: customerservices@chemtest.co.uk Page 6 of 6 EPA Export :03:18:08
39 Final Report Chemtest Ltd. Depot Road Newmarket CB8 0AL Tel: Report No.: Initial Date of Issue: Client Client Address: 28-Sep-2016 Causeway Geotech Ltd 8 Drumahiskey Road Balnamore Ballymoney County Antrim BT53 7QL Contact(s): Project Andy Garne Darren O'Mahony Matthew Gilbert Paul Dunlop Stephen Franey Stephen Watson Colm Hurley Neil Haggan Grangecastle Additional Land Survey Quotation No.: Date Received: 20-Sep-2016 Order No.: Date Instructed: 20-Sep-2016 No. of Samples: 12 Turnaround (Wkdays): 5 Results Due: 26-Sep-2016 Date Approved: 28-Sep-2016 Approved By: Details: Robert Monk, Technical Development Chemist Page 1 of 6 EPA Export :03:18:08
40 Results - Soil Project: Grangecastle Additional Land Survey Client: Causeway Geotech Ltd Chemtest Job No.: Quotation No.: Chemtest Sample ID.: Order No.: Client Location ID.: TPA TPB TPC TPC TPC TPD TPE TPE TPF Sample Type: SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL Top Depth (m): Date Sampled: 16-Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep-2016 Determinand Accred. SOP Units LOD Moisture N 2030 % Stones N 2030 % < < < < < < < < < ph U 2010 N/A Boron (Hot Water Soluble) U 2120 mg/kg 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 Total Sulphur U 2175 % Cyanide (Free) U 2300 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 Cyanide (Total) U 2300 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 Thiocyanate U 2300 mg/kg 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 Sulphide (Easily Liberatable) U 2325 mg/kg Sulphate (Total) U 2430 % Arsenic U 2450 mg/kg Cadmium U 2450 mg/kg Chromium U 2450 mg/kg Copper U 2450 mg/kg Mercury U 2450 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Nickel U 2450 mg/kg Lead U 2450 mg/kg Selenium U 2450 mg/kg 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 Zinc U 2450 mg/kg Chromium (Hexavalent) N 2490 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 Organic Matter U 2625 % Aliphatic TPH >C5-C6 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aliphatic TPH >C6-C8 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aliphatic TPH >C8-C10 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aliphatic TPH >C10-C12 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aliphatic TPH >C12-C16 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aliphatic TPH >C16-C21 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aliphatic TPH >C21-C35 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aliphatic TPH >C35-C44 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Total Aliphatic Hydrocarbons N 2680 mg/kg 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 Aromatic TPH >C5-C7 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aromatic TPH >C7-C8 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aromatic TPH >C8-C10 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aromatic TPH >C10-C12 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aromatic TPH >C12-C16 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aromatic TPH >C16-C21 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aromatic TPH >C21-C35 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Aromatic TPH >C35-C44 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 Total Aromatic Hydrocarbons N 2680 mg/kg 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 Page 2 of 6 EPA Export :03:18:08
41 Results - Soil Project: Grangecastle Additional Land Survey Client: Causeway Geotech Ltd Chemtest Job No.: Quotation No.: Chemtest Sample ID.: Order No.: Client Location ID.: TPA TPB TPC TPC TPC TPD TPE TPE TPF Sample Type: SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL Top Depth (m): Date Sampled: 16-Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep-2016 Determinand Accred. SOP Units LOD Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons N 2680 mg/kg 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Naphthalene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Acenaphthylene N 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Acenaphthene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Fluorene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Phenanthrene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Anthracene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Fluoranthene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Pyrene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Benzo[a]anthracene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Chrysene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene N 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Benzo[k]fluoranthene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Benzo[a]pyrene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)Pyrene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene N 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 Total Of 16 PAH's N 2800 mg/kg 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 Resorcinol U 2920 mg/kg < < < < < < < < < Phenol U 2920 mg/kg < < < < < < < < < Cresols U 2920 mg/kg < < < < < < < < < Xylenols U 2920 mg/kg < < < < < < < < < Naphthol N 2920 mg/kg < < < < < < < < < Trimethylphenols U 2920 mg/kg < < < < < < < < < Total Phenols U 2920 mg/kg 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 Page 3 of 6 EPA Export :03:18:08
42 Results - Soil Project: Grangecastle Additional Land Survey Client: Causeway Geotech Ltd Quotation No.: Order No.: Chemtest Job No.: Chemtest Sample ID.: Client Location ID.: Sample Type: Top Depth (m): Date Sampled: Determinand Accred. SOP Units LOD Moisture N 2030 % Stones N 2030 % ph U 2010 N/A Boron (Hot Water Soluble) U 2120 mg/kg 0.40 Total Sulphur U 2175 % Cyanide (Free) U 2300 mg/kg 0.50 Cyanide (Total) U 2300 mg/kg 0.50 Thiocyanate U 2300 mg/kg 5.0 Sulphide (Easily Liberatable) U 2325 mg/kg 0.50 Sulphate (Total) U 2430 % Arsenic U 2450 mg/kg 1.0 Cadmium U 2450 mg/kg 0.10 Chromium U 2450 mg/kg 1.0 Copper U 2450 mg/kg 0.50 Mercury U 2450 mg/kg 0.10 Nickel U 2450 mg/kg 0.50 Lead U 2450 mg/kg 0.50 Selenium U 2450 mg/kg 0.20 Zinc U 2450 mg/kg 0.50 Chromium (Hexavalent) N 2490 mg/kg 0.50 Organic Matter U 2625 % 0.40 Aliphatic TPH >C5-C6 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 Aliphatic TPH >C6-C8 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 Aliphatic TPH >C8-C10 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 Aliphatic TPH >C10-C12 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 Aliphatic TPH >C12-C16 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 Aliphatic TPH >C16-C21 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 Aliphatic TPH >C21-C35 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 Aliphatic TPH >C35-C44 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 Total Aliphatic Hydrocarbons N 2680 mg/kg 5.0 Aromatic TPH >C5-C7 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 Aromatic TPH >C7-C8 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 Aromatic TPH >C8-C10 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 Aromatic TPH >C10-C12 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 Aromatic TPH >C12-C16 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 Aromatic TPH >C16-C21 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 Aromatic TPH >C21-C35 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 Aromatic TPH >C35-C44 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 Total Aromatic Hydrocarbons N 2680 mg/kg TPG TPG TPG SOIL SOIL SOIL Sep Sep Sep < < < < 0.40 < 0.40 < < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 5.0 < 5.0 < < < 0.50 < 0.50 < < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 Page 4 of 6 EPA Export :03:18:08
43 Results - Soil Project: Grangecastle Additional Land Survey Client: Causeway Geotech Ltd Quotation No.: Order No.: Chemtest Job No.: Chemtest Sample ID.: Client Location ID.: TPG TPG TPG Sample Type: SOIL SOIL SOIL Top Depth (m): Date Sampled: Sep Sep Sep-2016 Determinand Accred. SOP Units LOD Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons N 2680 mg/kg 10 Naphthalene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 Acenaphthylene N 2800 mg/kg 0.10 Acenaphthene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 Fluorene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 Phenanthrene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 Anthracene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 Fluoranthene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 Pyrene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 Benzo[a]anthracene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 Chrysene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene N 2800 mg/kg 0.10 Benzo[k]fluoranthene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 Benzo[a]pyrene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)Pyrene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene N 2800 mg/kg 0.10 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene U 2800 mg/kg 0.10 Total Of 16 PAH's N 2800 mg/kg 2.0 Resorcinol U 2920 mg/kg Phenol U 2920 mg/kg Cresols U 2920 mg/kg Xylenols U 2920 mg/kg Naphthol N 2920 mg/kg Trimethylphenols U 2920 mg/kg Total Phenols U 2920 mg/kg 0.30 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 Page 5 of 6 EPA Export :03:18:08
44 Report Information Key U UKAS accredited M MCERTS and UKAS accredited N Unaccredited S This analysis has been subcontracted to a UKAS accredited laboratory that is accredited for this analysis SN This analysis has been subcontracted to a UKAS accredited laboratory that is not accredited for this analysis T This analysis has been subcontracted to an unaccredited laboratory I/S Insufficient Sample U/S Unsuitable Sample N/E not evaluated < "less than" > "greater than" Coents or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation The results relate only to the items tested Uncertainty of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request None of the results in this report have been recovery corrected All results are expressed on a dry weight basis The following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently corrected to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, Phenols For all other tests the samples were dried at < 37 C prior to analysis All Asbestos testing is performed at our Coventry laboratory Issue numbers are sequential starting with 1 all subsequent reports are incremented by 1 Sample Deviation Codes A - Date of sampling not supplied B - Sample age exceeds stability time (sampling to extraction) C - Sample not received in appropriate containers D - Broken Container Sample Retention and Disposal All soil samples will be retained for a period of 45 days from the date of receipt All water samples will be retained for 14 days from the date of receipt Charges may apply to extended sample storage If you require extended retention of samples, please your requirements to: customerservices@chemtest.co.uk Page 6 of 6 EPA Export :03:18:08
45 Appendix I SPT haer energy measurement report EPA Export :03:18:08
46 Acceleration a (m/s 2 ) Energy Ratio (%) Force F (kn) Velocity v (m/s) SPT Calibration Report Haer Energy Measurement Report Type of Haer Client Test No Test Depth (m) 7.85 SPT HAMMER CAUSEWAY GEOTECH EQU1428 Date of Test 09 January 2016 Valid until 08 January 2017 Haer ID CG205/3 Mass of the haer m = 63.5kg Falling height h = 0.76m E theor = m x g x h = 473J Characteristics of the instrumented rod Diameter d r = m Length of the instrumented rod m Area A = cm 2 Modulus E a = MPa f d r d a Fig. B.1 and B.2 BS EN ISO : A1 : 2011 F Key Equipe Group 1 Anvil 2 Part of instrumented rod 3 Drive Rod 4 Strain Gauge 5 Accelerometer 6 Ground F Force d r Diameter of rod Force Time t (µs) Acceleration Particle Velocity Time t (µs) Energy Ratio per Blow Blow 1 Blow 2 Blow 3 Blow 4 Blow 5 Blow 6 Blow 7 Blow 8 Blow 9 Blow 10 Time t (µs) Maximum Force (Fmax) Observations: 1. E meas = kn-m E theor = kn-m E meas Energy Ratio = = (E r ) E theor 70.10% Equipe SPT Analyzer Operators: MH Prepared by: Checked by: Date 15/01/2016 Copyright 2016 Equipe Group, The Paddocks, Home Farm Offices, The Upton Estate, Banbury, Oxfordshire, OX15 6HU Tel: +44 (0) Fax: +44 (0) info@equipegroup.com EPA Export :03:18:08
47 APPENDIX B WYG SI REPORT EPA Export :03:18:08
WASTE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA AND DEVELOPMENT OF SOIL TRIGGER VALUES FOR EPA-LICENSED SOIL RECOVERY FACILITIES
WASTE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA AND DEVELOPMENT OF SOIL TRIGGER VALUES FOR EPA-LICENSED SOIL RECOVERY FACILITIES 1. Introduction This guidance document applies to soil recovery facilities which exceed the operational
More informationOn March 6, 2014, 17 shallow soil samples were collected along the proposed trail alignment according to
LAKE EWAUNA TRAIL LEVEL 2 FIELD SAMPLING ASSESSMENT the proposed alignment (Figure 1). The trail will also include the installation of a geothermal snow melt system, allowing for year round use of the
More informationUrban Area Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Study Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives
Urban Area Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Study Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives Two background studies were recently completed investigating certain polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAHs)
More informationGround investigation. 69 Merrion Road, Dublin. Client: The Embassy of India, Dublin. Engineer: Albert Fry Associates. Report No.
Ground investigation 69 Merrion Road, Dublin Report No. 11-152 Rev A 8 Drumahiskey Road Balnamore Ballymoney Co. Antrim N. Ireland BT53 7QL Tel: +44 (0)28 2766 2083 Fax: +44 (0)28 2766 4875 Email: admin@glover-si.com
More informationCLEAN WATER Clean Water PT Scheme Schedule Clean Water PT Scheme Schedule. Schedule subject to change see ERA s website at
For International purchase only: Synthetic drinking water matrices with low concentrations of analytes for testing water supply, drinking water, or ground water. Standards are designed to meet the requirements
More informationTECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Date: February 26, 2016 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To: From: Re: Brian Ross, USEPA Region 9, Dredging & Sediment Management Team Beth Christian, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board Don Yee
More informationMasse Environmental Consultants Ltd 1
Masse Environmental Consultants Ltd. 812 Vernon St. Nelson, BC, V1L 4G4 Tel.: 250-352-1147 Fax: 250-352-0422 www.masseenvironmental.com Fred Bullen May 5, 2017 Western Pacific Marine Ltd. 7721 Upper Balfour
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Pavement Subgrade Survey State Highway 125 over Hudson Creek Ottawa County, Oklahoma September 23, 21 Terracon Project No. 415121 Prepared for: Guy Engineering Services,
More informationUpdated Ambient Concentrations of Toxic Chemicals in San Francisco Bay Sediments
CLEAN WATER / RMP NUMBER 749 JULY 2015 Updated Ambient Concentrations of Toxic Chemicals in San Francisco Bay Sediments July 2015 By: Don Yee, Philip Trowbridge and Jennifer Sun SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY INSTITUTE
More informationRegulations to deal with the reuse of excvated (polluted) soil in Germany
Regulations to deal with the reuse of excvated (polluted) soil in Germany Andreas Bieber Federal Ministry for the Environment Ad Hoc Int. WG on Contaminated Land, Paris, Sept. 30, 05 Soil: Definition Material
More informationPetcoke-Coal Test. David L. MacIntosh, Sc.D., C.I.H., Chief Science Officer. January 13, 2014
Petcoke-Coal Test Results David L. MacIntosh, Sc.D., C.I.H., Chief Science Officer January 13, 2014 Findings No evidence of petcoke or coal on surfaces or in soil of East Side and South Deering neighborhoods
More informationAutomated Solid Phase Extraction of PAH Compounds Utilizing the SPE-DEX 5000
Automated Solid Phase Extraction of PAH Compounds Utilizing the SPE-DEX 5000 Melissa Lever, Horizon Technology, Inc., Salem, NH USA Key Words PAH, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, EPA 870, water extraction,
More informationPAHs in Surface Water by PDA and Fluorescence Detection
A P P L I C AT I O N N O T E Liquid Chromatography Authors: Catharine Layton Wilhad M. Reuter PerkinElmer, Inc. Shelton, CT PAHs in Surface Water by PDA and Fluorescence Detection Introduction Heightened
More informationApplicant: JOOLZ Date: Jan 30, 2015 NIEUWE HERENGRACHT 51-53, AMSTERDAM, THE NETHERLANS
Applicant: JOOLZ Date: Jan 30, 2015 NIEUWE HERENGRACHT 51-53, AMSTERDAM, THE NETHERLANS Attn: THEO SZARAFINSKI This is to supersede Report No. SZHH00933753 dated Jan 28, 2015 Sample Description: One (1)
More informationLABORATORY TURNAROUND TIMES AND CHARGES
LABORATORY TURNAROUND TIMES AND CHARGES The enclosed prices reflect a 5 business day turnaround time. There will be a $25.00 minimum charge per report. Same Day Rush 24 Hour Rush 48 Hour Rush 72 Hour Rush
More informationPart 1: Property Ownership, Property Information and Owner s Certifications
Part 1: Property Ownership, Property Information and Owner s Certifications Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the record of site condition Owner name Owner
More informationSOIL MECHANICS Assignment #2: Soil Classification Solution.
Geotechnical Engineering Research Laboratory One University Avenue Lowell, Massachusetts 01854 Edward L. Hajduk, D.Eng, PE Lecturer PA105D Tel: (978) 934 2621 Fax: (978) 934 3052 e mail: Edward_Hajduk@uml.edu
More informationGEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION I-15 SIGN BRIDGES LAS VEGAS EA JANUARY
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION I-15 SIGN BRIDGES LAS VEGAS EA 73171 JANUARY 06 MATERIALS DIVISION STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MATERIALS DIVISION GEOTECHNICAL SECTION GEOTECHNICAL REPORT I-15
More informationTypical Subsurface Profile. November 28, 2016
November 28, 2016 RSCCD Facility Planning, District Construction and Support Services 2323 N. Broadway, Suite 112, Santa Ana, CA 92706 Attn: Re: Ms. Allison Coburn Facilities Project Manager P: (714) 480-7530
More informationSchedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service High Street, Feltham, Middlesex, TW13 4UN, UK
ccredited to Laboratory locations: Schedule of ccreditation United Kingdom ccreditation Service 21-47 High Street, Feltham, Middlesex, TW13 4UN, UK 18 Halcyon Court St Margaret's Way Huntingdon PE29 6DG
More informationTUV TESTING REPORT CHINA TRADE
TUV TESTING REPORT CHINA TRADE Reference No. : TRHZ1411850 Date : Oct.27, 2014 Page No.: 1 of 10 Client: Address : Dodavatel ověřený firmou Olsson Europe, s.r.o. The following merchandise was (were) submitted
More informationCERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS REVISED REPORT
Your C.O.C. #: A122303 Attention: STEPHEN LEGAREE EDMONTON 9331 9331-48 Street EDMONTON, AB CANADA T6B 2R4 Report #: R1787645 Version: 2R CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS REVISED REPORT MAXXAM JOB #: B4B4991 Received:
More informationP02-04 CALA Program Description - PT Catalogue Revision 1.19 October,
Revision 1.19 October, 20 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 2 2.0 REFERENCES... 2 3.0 2018 SHIPPING SCHEDULE... 3 4.0 REGISTRATION... 3 5.0 TESTS OFFERED IN THE CALA PT PROGRAM... 4 5.1 INORGANICS
More informationSOIL CLASSIFICATION BASICS Commonly based on grain size and soil consistency. Several classification systems exist:
SOIL CLASSIFICATION BASICS Commonly based on grain size and soil consistency. Several classification systems exist: 1. Unified System (USCS) (ASTM D2487-11). 2. American Association of State Highway and
More informationPhase II Environmental Site Assessment
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 8 No. 3 Sideroad Milton, Ontario Royal Park Homes c/o Shad & Associates Inc. 83 Citation Drive, Unit 9 Vaughan, ON, L4K 2Z6 Attention: Mr. Doug Skeffington May 6,
More informationIn 2016, Sarnia chemical plant prepared a new plan for the following substance:
D. Luecke Sarnia Chemical Plant Manager 519.339.2757 December 2016 Sarnia Chemical Plant Reduction plan summary (OR 455/09) Provincial regulations set out requirements for business owners to inform Ontarians
More informationSchedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK
Schedule of ccreditation United Kingdom ccreditation Service ccredited to skern Road Carcroft Doncaster South Yorkshire DN6 8DG Contact: Jason Charles Tel: +44 (0)1302 723456 Fax: +44 (0)1302 725240 E-Mail:
More informationEvaluation of Pollutants in Wastewater Generated by Mobile Car Washing Operations
Evaluation of Pollutants in Wastewater Generated by Mobile Car Washing Operations City of Durham Public Works, Stormwater t Services Maverick Raber, Matt Smith, John Cox, Michelle Woolfolk Public Works
More information33101 TAMPERE.
Measurement of odours and hazardous gaseous emissions from steel foundry 16.-17..5.2013 Project 10745Y12A 15.10.2013 Kuokkamaantie 4 P.O. BOX 428 33101 TAMPERE Tel +358 3 2680 111 Fax +358 3 2110 106 www.ax.fi
More informationGENERAL PERMIT WMGR098 BENEFICIAL USE OF WASTE FOUNDRY SAND AND SAND SYSTEM DUSTS
A. Description: The approval herein granted is limited to the beneficial use of waste foundry system sand and sand system dusts (hereinafter referred to as waste foundry sand) generated by ferrous metal
More informationGEOTECHNICAL REPORT B-1942
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT TUSCARORA BRIDGE REPLACEMENT B-1942 E.A. 73561 March 2011 MATERIALS DIVISION STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MATERIALS DIVISION GEOTECHNICAL SECTION GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
More informationPrepared by: Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc Albemarle Point Place, Suite 115 Chantilly, VA 20151
INITIAL ABATEMENT REPORT ALLIED AVIATION RONALD REAGAN WASHINGTON NATIONAL AIRPORT FUEL FARM FACILITY Pollution Complaint # 2016-3082 11 Air Cargo Road ARLINGTON, VA 22202 Prepared for: Mr. Randy Chapman,
More informationKKB Micro Testing Labs Pvt. Ltd., , 2 nd Floor, Tarun Plaza, NFC Main Road, Krishna Nagar Colony, Moula Ali, Hyderabad, Telangana
Last Amended on - Page 1 of 7 I. AIR, GASES & ATMOSPHERE 1. Ambient Air Monitoring RSPM ( PM 10) IS 5182 (Part 23): 2006 (RA ) 5 µg/m 3 to 750 µg/m 3 PM 2.5 SOP 11 dated 17.11.2014 12.5 µg/m 3 to 500 µg/m
More informationMaterial Characterization Report
SSI-Metro12 Facility Carteret, NJ Page 1 of 3 Please complete all sections of the form, sign where indicated and return completed form to: Soil Safe, Inc. 6700 Alexander Bell Dr., Suite 300, Columbia MD
More informationENGINEERING CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS
ENGINEERING CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS An engineer often considers a soil as any cemented or weakly cemented accumulation of mineral or rock particles formed by the weathering of rocks. The void space separating
More informationPHASE II LIMITED SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT OF FINDINGS
20 YEARS 1991-2011 PHASE II LIMITED SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT OF FINDINGS SITECH Germantown 4301 NYS Route 9G Germantown, Columbia County, New York PES Project No. 15-012 Report Completed: August
More informationAnnual Groundwater Monitoring Report 2016
Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report 2016 for KMK Metals Recycling Ltd. Cappincur Industrial Estate, Daingean Road, Tullamore, Co. Offaly Waste Licence No. W0113-04 by Q.E.D. Engineering Ltd M-TEK Building
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Shaw AFB East Gate Entrance Control Facility Amendment Sumter, South Carolina September 13, 2010 Terracon Project No. 73105020A Prepared for: TranSystems North Charleston,
More informationApril 7, Webster Street Sub-Surface Stormwater Storage System Bid No Bid Date: 4/13/17 ADDENDUM NO 1
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT David A. Jones, P.E., Director April 7, 2017 Webster Street Sub-Surface Stormwater Storage System Bid No. 2017-022 Bid Date: 4/13/17 ADDENDUM NO 1 Please make the following changes
More informationLGC Science and Innovation Division. LGC-produced Reference Materials Catalogue. June 2016
LGC Science and Innovation Division LGC-produced Reference Materials Catalogue June 2016 Contents Code... Batch...Description... Page Number Melting Point Materials ERM-FC021... a... Carbazole... 9 ERM-FC022...
More informationAPPENDIX I GROUND INVESTIGATION REPORT. I PB Ltd Phase 2 Intrusive Site Investigation
APPENDIX I GROUND INVESTIGATION REPORT I.4 2009 PB Ltd Phase 2 Intrusive Site Investigation Damhead Creek 2 ES Volume 2 June 2009 SCOTTISH POWER ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, UNITS 2B & 3 AT DAMHEAD CREEK
More informationYou also requested information regarding a sieve analysis at each boring locations. The test results are attached.
FORENSICS CONSULTANTS ENVIRONMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL MATERIALS October 4, 2016 Washington County Public Works 11660 Myeron Road Stillwater, MN 55082 Attn: Mr. Marc Briese Re: Additional Borings CSAH 22 (70
More informationGeotech Services, X-18, MIDC, Hingna, Nagpur, Maharashtra. Discipline Mechanical Testing Issue Date
Last Amended on 11.01.2014 Page 1 of 14 I. BUILDING MATERIALS 1. Soil / Rock Plate Load Test IS 1888 1982 (Reaffirmed-2007) Cyclic Plate Load Test IS 5249 1992 Clause 6 (Reaffirmed-2010) Load Test On In-Situ
More informationTest Report No. F690101/LF-CTSAYHA Issued Date : August 20, 2013 Page 1 of 5
Test Report No. F690101/LF-CTSAYHA13-05147 Issued Date : August 20, 2013 Page 1 of 5 To: 3M Korea 27-3, Yoido-dong Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Korea The following sample(s) was/were submitted and identified
More informationPHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT BURKHART ESTATE MATAGORDA COUNTY, TEXAS
FINAL REPORT PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT BURKHART ESTATE MATAGORDA COUNTY, TEXAS PREPARED FOR: TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY PREPARED BY: AUSTIN, TEXAS MAY 26, 2011 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Phase II Environmental
More informationInspection according ENplus
Audit and Test Report: Date: 2015-10-12 BEA2015127 Inspection according ENplus Client: Velpel d.o.o. Attn.: Industrijska bb 10310 Ivanić Grad Croatia Subject: Wood pellets production Velpel d.o.o. plant
More informationLuas Broombridge. Annex J Surface Water Sampling Report. St. Stephen s Green to Broombridge (Line BXD) Broombridge. Cabra. Phibsborough.
Broombridge Luas Broombridge St. Stephen s Green to Broombridge (Line BXD) Annex J Surface Water Sampling Report Cabra Phibsborough Grangegorman Broadstone - DIT Parnell Dominick O Connell Upper Marlborough
More information310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
40.0530: continued (3) An RP, PRP or Other Person may downgrade a Tier I disposal site classification if upon re-evaluation of the disposal site pursuant to the Tier I Criteria at 310 CMR 40.0520(2) the
More informationNewmont Mining Corporation Water Management Standard
Page No: Page 1 of 5 1 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES This Global Standard sets the minimum Newmont requirements to proactively plan and manage water from exploration to post-closure in accordance with Newmont
More informationBorough of Hopewell, New Jersey
Pilot Study Report for Z-92 Uranium and Z-88 Radium Treatment Processes conducted for Borough of Hopewell, New Jersey February 22, 2010 9500 West 49 th Ave., Suite D100, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 TEL:
More informationClassification of Soils
Classification of Soils Soils - What are they? Particulate materials - Sedimentary origins (usually) - Residual Wide range of particle sizes - larger particles: quartz, feldspar - very small particles:
More informationInspection according ENplus
Audit and Test Report: Date: 2016-04-01 BEA 2016025 k Replaces report BEA 2016025 from 2016-03-24 Inspection according ENplus Client: R.Y.L Greenwood Energy LTD 20 Hachashmal St. Karmiel Israel Subject:
More informationFORM 26R CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF RESIDUAL WASTE ANNUAL REPORT BY THE GENERATOR INSTRUCTIONS GENERAL INFORMATION
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF WASTE MANAGEMENT FORM 26R CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF RESIDUAL WASTE ANNUAL REPORT BY THE GENERATOR INSTRUCTIONS GENERAL INFORMATION
More informationCo-composting of Petroleum Refinery Waste Sludge With Manures
Co-composting of Petroleum Refinery Waste Sludge With Manures Presented at The US Composting Council (USCC) 17 th Annual Conference & Tradeshow Westin Galleria, Houston, Texas January 26-29, 2009 By Harrison
More informationCALA Directory of Laboratories
CALA Directory of Laboratories Membership Number: 3588 Laboratory Name: AGAT Laboratories (Dartmouth) Parent Institution: AGAT Laboratories Ltd. Address: 11 Morris Drive Unit 122 Dartmouth NS B3B 1M2 Contact:
More informationSITE INVESTIGATION SUMMARY REPORT CONSOLIDATED EDISON FORMER KENT AVENUE GENERATING STATION 500 KENT AVENUE BROOKLYN, NEW YORK.
SITE INVESTIGATION SUMMARY REPORT CONSOLIDATED EDISON FORMER KENT AVENUE GENERATING STATION 500 KENT AVENUE BROOKLYN, NEW YORK Prepared for Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 31-01 20 th Avenue
More informationSPECIFICATION FOR ENGINEERED FILLS
SPECIFICATION FOR ENGINEERED FILLS This specification is intended to be used for the engineered fill. The specification is suitable for most purposes but there may be special conditions existing at some
More informationTechnical Memo. Groundwater Science Corp. To : Mal Wensierski Date : 2/10/2015. Lafarge Canada Inc. Re. : 2014 Monitoring Summary
Groundwater Science Corp. 328 Daleview Place, Waterloo, ON N2L 5M5 Phone: (519) 746-6916 groundwaterscience.ca Technical Memo To : Mal Wensierski Date : 2/10/2015 Lafarge Canada Inc. Re. : 2014 Monitoring
More informationt ghi yr Cop
In many situations, soil itself is used as a construction material Highway embankments Railway embankments Earth dams Highway / Airfield pavements Backfilled trenches Landfills When soil is used as foundation
More informationNew 13 C PACs. (Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds) Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc. isotope.com ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINANT STANDARDS
Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc. isotope.com New 13 C PACs (Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds) Benzo[j]fluoranthene CLM-9590-1.2 Benzo[c]fluorene CLM-9363-1.2 The advantages of 13 C-labeled over deuterated
More informationContaminated Extraction Pit treated to allow dewatering for continuation of mining works
Contaminated Extraction Pit treated to allow dewatering for continuation of mining works Name Customer name withheld Site Location South East Queensland Site Problem ph, Acidity and Dissolved Metals Water
More informationBULK UNLOAD AREA INVESTIGATION WORK PLAN
BULK UNLOAD AREA INVESTIGATION WORK PLAN GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION GRAND RAPIDS METAL PLANT WYOMING, MICHIGAN FEBRUARY 2007 REF. NO. 17360 (14) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...1 1.1 BACKGROUND...1
More informationAPPENDIX I GROUND INVESTIGATION REPORT. I Terra Tek Ltd Phase 2 Intrusive Site Investigation
APPENDIX I GROUND INVESTIGATION REPORT I.3 2007 Terra Tek Ltd Phase 2 Intrusive Site Investigation Damhead Creek 2 ES Volume 2 June 2009 SCOTTISHPOWER GENERATION LIMITED DAMHEAD CREEK POWER STATION KINGSNORTH,
More informationSGE Environmental GC Columns The Suite for Environmental GC Analysis
The Suite for Environmental GC Analysis SGE Environmental GC Columns Performance Selectivity Delivery Promise SGE Environmental GC Columns The Suite for Environmental GC Analysis SGE GC Columns have a
More informationColourants and pigments
Colourants and pigments (including printing inks) provisions in NL Bianca van de Ven RIVM Content 1. Regulation of FCM in NL 2. Provisions on colourants and pigments FCM Regulation in NL - Packaging and
More informationBEST PRACTICE DESIGN FOR CONCRETE PAVERS FOR CANADIAN MUNICIPAL APPLICATIONS
BEST PRACTICE DESIGN FOR CONCRETE PAVERS FOR CANADIAN MUNICIPAL APPLICATIONS David Hein, P.Eng.,* Patrick Leong and Dr. Susan Tighe, P.Eng.** *Applied Research Associates Inc. 5401 Eglinton Avenue West,
More informationDioxin/Furan Air Emissions, General Emissions, and Fuel Composition of Duraflame Firelogs and Douglas Fir Cordwood
Dioxin/Furan Air Emissions, General Emissions, and Fuel Composition of Duraflame Firelogs and Douglas Fir Cordwood Prepared for: Jim Nolan Puget Sound Clean Air Agency 110 Union Street Suite 500 Seattle,
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Turner Turnpike Widening Milepost 210 to 218 Drainage Structure Pipe Jacking Creek County, Oklahoma July 1, 2016 Terracon Project No. 04165017 Prepared for: Benham Tulsa,
More informationRestricted Substance List (RSL) Medical Devices
Restricted Substance List (RSL) Medical Devices Table of Contents General... 2 Commitment... 2 Definitions... 3 Abbreviations... 3 Requirements All Medical Devices... 4 Product Standards... 5 Additional
More informationCOUNTY OF NEVADA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY NEVADA COUNTY CDA GUIDELINES FOR ASH AND BURN DEBRIS CLEAN UP AND REMOVAL AFTER A FIRE
COUNTY OF NEVADA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY Environmental Health Department 950 MAIDU AVENUE, SUITE 170 NEVADA CITY, CA 95959-8617 (530) 265-1222 FAX (530) 265-9853 http://mynevadacounty.com Amy Irani,
More informationANNEXE QC-84. Procédure pour la valorisation des stériles
ANNEXE QC-84 Procédure pour la valorisation des stériles MEMO To:, Canadian Malartic From: Sarah Barabash Ron Nicholson Ref: Procedure for Valorisation des stériles for the Foundation Aggregate Required
More informationGeogrid-Reinforced Segmental Block Retaining Wall Design Computations (Keystone Retaining Wall Systems) D Street Improvements. Purcellville, Virginia
Geogrid-Reinforced Segmental Block Retaining Wall Design Computations (Keystone Retaining Wall Systems) D Street Improvements Purcellville, Virginia 19955 Highland Vista Drive, Suite 170, Ashburn, Virginia
More informationDRAFT ANALYSIS OF BROWNFIELDS CLEANUP ALTERNATIVES CITY OF MICHIGAN CITY, INDIANA S BROWNFIELDS CLEANUP PROJECT FOR THE FORMER ERINCRAFT FACILITY TH
DECEMBER 22, 2008 DRAFT ANALYSIS OF BROWNFIELDS CLEANUP ALTERNATIVES CITY OF MICHIGAN CITY, INDIANA S BROWNFIELDS CLEANUP PROJECT FOR THE FORMER ERINCRAFT FACILITY TH 742 EAST 8 STREET MICHIGAN CITY, INDIANA
More informationAPPENDIX 3-VII REGIONAL DATA ANALYSIS
APPENDIX 3-VII REGIONAL DATA ANALYSIS Cenovus FCCL Ltd. - i - Appendix 3-VII TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1 OBJECTIVES OF ANALYSIS... 1 2 METHODS... 4 2.1 SOIL REGIONAL ANALYSIS... 4 2.1.1 Soil Regional
More informationLaboratory 2 Hydrometer Analysis Atterberg Limits Sand Equivalent Test
Laboratory 2 Hydrometer Analysis Atterberg Limits Sand Equivalent Test INTRODUCTION Grain size analysis is widely used for the classification of soils and for specifications of soil for airfields, roads,
More informationSTATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENT 1120 MIXTURE DESIGN FOR CHEMICALLY STABILIZED SOILS. June 13, 2011
STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENT 1120 MIXTURE DESIGN FOR CHEMICALLY STABILIZED SOILS June 13, 2011 1120.01 Description 1120.02 Testing Laboratory 1120.03 Sampling and Testing of Untreated
More informationToxic and non-toxic disturbances PNEC estimation and validation. Tone Frost, Statoil
Toxic and nontoxic disturbances PNEC estimation and validation Tone Frost, Statoil EIF DD framework Release information 1. Hazard identification Literature information 2. Exposure Modeling (PEC) 3. Effect
More information1. What is the cleanup level look-up table and where can I find it?
Voluntary Remediation Program (VRP) (307) 777-7752 http://deq.state.wy.us/volremedi/index.asp Soil Cleanup Levels In its 2000 session, the Wyoming Legislature created new opportunities, procedures, and
More informationSILLIKER, Inc. Southern California Laboratory 6360 Gateway Drive, Cypress, CA Tel. 209/ Fax. 714/
6360 Gateway Drive, 90630 95073 Page 1 of 8 CI-516 Cistanche 361439388 ICP MS Full Mineral Screen EPA 3050/6020 USP730 BRN Aluminum 2.2 ppm (w/w) Antimony Arsenic 0.06 ppm (w/w) Barium 0.09 ppm (w/w) Beryllium
More informationAppendix C. Chemical Extraction Bench-Scale Study Evaluation
Appendix C Chemical Extraction Bench-Scale Appendix C Chemical Extraction Bench-Scale Response to EPA Interim Comments on CMS Report Appendix C Chemical Extraction Bench-Scale Housatonic River Rest of
More informationManaging a MGP Site Containing 121,000 Tons of Soils Containing Highly Impacted and Multiple Contaminates Of Concern (COC) Clinton, Iowa
Managing a MGP Site Containing 121,000 Tons of Soils Containing Highly Impacted and Multiple Contaminates Of Concern (COC) Clinton, Iowa Dean Hargens, Alliant Energy Frank Kellogg, DCI Environmental. Inc.
More informationCDS CONSULTANTS BWLCH TOCYN FARMHOUSE BWLCH TOCYN ABERSOCH PWLLHELI GWYNEDD LL53 7BN
CDS CONSULTANTS BWLCH TOCYN FARMHOUSE BWLCH TOCYN ABERSOCH PWLLHELI GWYNEDD LL53 7BN TEL 01758 712245 FAX 01758 712014 MOBILE O7887 513614 E MAIL Cdsconsultants@btinternet.com COPPER SLAG ABRASIVE HEALTH
More informationStormwater Standards. Clackamas County Service District No. 1. Infiltration Testing Guide
Stormwater Standards Clackamas County Service District No. 1 APPENDIX E Infiltration Testing Guide Table of Contents Appendix E - Infiltration Testing Guide... Page E.1 General... 1 E.2 Basic Method -
More informationSWELL AND SWELLING POTENTAL PRESSURE TESTS
SWELL AND SWELLING POTENTAL PRESSURE TESTS When geotechnical engineers refer to expansive soils, we usually are thinking about clays, and the volume changes that occur as a result of changes in moisture
More information2013 PROJECT REPORT FOR METALLURGICAL TESTING ON THE SAN ALBINO PROJECT
213 PROJECT REPORT FOR METALLURGICAL TESTING ON THE SAN ALBINO PROJECT Prepared for: GOLDEN REIGN RESOURCES CORP. 51 595 Howe Street Vancouver, BC V6C 2T5 Attention: Mr. Zoran Pudar, VP Exploration Mr.
More informationMidwest Analytical Services, Inc. "Where industry comes for answers." PRICE LIST 2009
PRICE LIST 2009 Midwest Analytical Services, Inc. (MAS) takes pride in its commitment to provide reliable and valid analytical data to customers. Our staff at MAS is active in a comprehensive QA/QC program
More informationRE: Split Ash Sample Results October 2017 Charah Brickhaven Facility
November 7, 2017 Mr. Brian Burkhart, P.E. Environmental Quality Director Chatham County 720 Renaissance Drive Pittsboro, North Carolina RE: Split Ash Sample s October 2017 Charah Brickhaven Facility Dear
More informationKate Brown, Governor Portland, Oregon (800)
June 15, 2017 Department of Environmental Quality Northwest Region 700 NE Multnomah St. Suite 600 Kate Brown, Governor Portland, Oregon 97232 (800)452-4100 Boni Halton Halton Company P.O. Box 3377 Portland,
More informationTex-121-E, Soil-Lime Testing
Overview Effective dates: August 1999 - July 2002. This method consists of two parts. 'Part I, Compressive Strength Test Methods (Laboratory Mixed)' determines the unconfined compressive strength as an
More informationMicro Methods Laboratory Quality Assurance Manual
15.2 List of Approved Methods Petroleum Analysis Methodology Reference Table Method ASTM 977 ASTM C25 ASTM C39 ASTM D129 ASTM D1298 ASTM D156 ASTM D1744 ASTM D189 ASTM D2159 ASTM D2270 ASTM D2276 ASTM
More informationCompost Utilization Quality Guidelines in Tomato Production. Monica Ozores-Hampton, Ph.D University of Florida/IFAS/SWFREC
Compost Utilization Quality Guidelines in Tomato Production Monica Ozores-Hampton, Ph.D University of Florida/IFAS/SWFREC What is Composting? It s a biological decomposition process where microorganisms
More informationSTRENGTH OF MATERIALS laboratory manual
STRENGTH OF MATERIALS laboratory manual By Prof. Shaikh Ibrahim Ismail M.H. Saboo Siddik College of Engineering, MUMBAI TABLE OF CONTENT Sr. No. Title of Experiment page no. 1. Study of Universal Testing
More informationDetermination of Design Infiltration Rates for the Sizing of Infiltration based Green Infrastructure Facilities
Determination of Design Infiltration Rates for the Sizing of Infiltration based Green Infrastructure Facilities 1 Introduction This document, developed by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission
More informationDEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS. No May 2014 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT: WASTE ACT, 2008 (ACT NO. 59 OF 2008)
STAATSKOERANT, 2 MEI 2014 No. 37603 3 GOVERNMENT NOTICE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS No. 331 2 May 2014 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT: WASTE ACT, 2008 (ACT NO. 59 OF 2008) NATIONAL NORMS AND
More informationNo.: CQTC /CHEM Date: January 5, 2012 Page 1 of 18
No.: CQTC1200011/CHEM Date: January 5, 2012 Page 1 of 18 EXCELITE PLASTIC CO.,LTD. LANE 60,MUDAN ROAD,SHAGNHAI,CHINA THIS REPORT IS TO SUPERSEDE TEST REPORT NO. CQTC1105141/CHEM The following sample(s)
More informationCERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Your Project #: 001\DRINKABLE WATER Your C.O.C. #: na Attention: Michael Bourgon 7111 Syntex Dr Suite 354 Mississauga, ON CANADA L5B 4P5 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS MAXXAM JOB #: B2H1428 Received: 2012/11/01,
More informationWASTE INCINERATION PLANTS IN AUSTRIA WITH DATA ON WASTE MANAGEMENT IN VIENNA
WASTE INCINERATION PLANTS IN AUSTRIA WITH DATA ON WASTE MANAGEMENT IN VIENNA Herwig Schuster Vienna, June 1999 1 WASTE INCINERATION PLANTS IN AUSTRIA 3 AIR POLLUTION 4 Air emissions of the Austrian incineration
More informationInorganic Chemicals (IOCs)
Burlington WA Corporate Office 1620 S Walnut St - 98233 800.755.9295 $ 360.757.1400 Bellingham WA Microbiology 805 Orchard Dr Ste 4-98225 360.671.0688 Portland OR Microbiology/Chemistry 9150 SW Pioneer
More informationHAZARDOUS WASTE ( MANAGEMENT, HANDLING AND TRANSBOUNDARY MOVEMENT) RULES 2008 AMENDMENTS MADE THERE OF
HAZARDOUS WASTE ( MANAGEMENT, HANDLING AND TRANSBOUNDARY MOVEMENT) RULES 2008 AMENDMENTS MADE THERE OF DEFINITION OF HAZARDOUS WASTES-ITS APPLICABILITY Waste substance is solid, semi-solid or non -aqueous
More informationMisclassification of waste and how you can avoid it
Misclassification of waste and how you can avoid it Misclassification is common not only amongst waste producers but also amongst waste receivers, carriers, brokers, laboratories and consultancies. Some
More information