On March 6, 2014, 17 shallow soil samples were collected along the proposed trail alignment according to
|
|
- Marianna Rhoda Parrish
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2 LAKE EWAUNA TRAIL LEVEL 2 FIELD SAMPLING ASSESSMENT the proposed alignment (Figure 1). The trail will also include the installation of a geothermal snow melt system, allowing for year round use of the trail with minimal maintenance. The geothermal supply and return lines will be constructed under the trail in excavations not expected to exceed 3 feet. Contaminants of Concern Due to historical activities of the former lumber mill, soil and groundwater may be contaminated with petroleum products, PAHs, wood treating chemicals such as pentachlorophenol (PCP), dioxins, furans, pesticides, solvents, and inorganic constituents such as lead and arsenic (DEQ, 2013a). Sampling Approach and Locations On March 6, 2014, 17 shallow soil samples were collected along the proposed trail alignment according to the Draft Sampling and Plan prepared in February 2014 (Figure 1) (CH2M HILL, 2014). Fifteen of the 17 soil samples were collected to a maximum of one foot bgs. The remaining two soil samples (SE 4 and SE 5) were collected from geotechnical test pits, excavated by backhoe, located in the general location of the proposed bridge footings. Multi incremental sampling was used to represent the soil quality for these locations. Soil was homogenized over the sample interval prior to sampling. All samples were analyzed for TPH, PAHs, PCP, and metals (arsenic, barium, chromium, cadmium, lead, mercury, selenium, and silver). Note that locations SE 8 and SE 13 are the closest sampling locations to the areas of wetland removal fill activities. These sampling locations, as well as wetland removal fill areas, are called out on Figure 1. Investigation s Soil logs and sampling details for the shallow soil samples are contained in the field notes attached as Appendix A. Dark brown soil with the presence of wood waste (sawdust) and red volcanic rock was commonly noted in the sampling excavations. Field notes indicate that sample location SE 15 was shifted in the field to avoid an area with recent placement of bark mulch. The two geotechnical test pits, SE 4 and SE 5, appeared to be completed in fill material along the bioswale. SE 4, approximately 12 feet north of the bioswale, was completed to a depth of 3.5 feet bgs. Groundwater was encountered at a depth of 3 feet bgs. Fill in this area appeared to be pumice with a green gray silt layer. SE 5, located approximately 30 feet south of the bioswale, was completed to a depth of 6 feet bgs. Fill debris was encountered in this location including bricks and logs, and a strong diesel or wood waste odor was observed. A sheen was observed in the excavation, but could not be replicated with a bag sheen test. Representative photos of the sampling locations are included as Appendix B. Analytical results for TPH, PAHs, PCP, and metals are included in Table 1 and laboratory reports are included as Appendix C. These results were evaluated in the following three step screening process: Initial Risk Based Screening (Table 1) Analytical results were compared to the most conservative DEQ risk based concentrations (RBCs) from the Table of Generic Risk Based Concentrations for Petroleum Constituents and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (DEQ, 2012). The exposure scenarios of soil ingestion, dermal contact and inhalation, and leaching to groundwater, both for residential receptors, were used for comparison. Metals concentrations were compared to the Regional 95% UPL Default Background Concentrations for Metals in Soil, the Basin and Range Region, from Development of Oregon Background Metals Concentrations in Soil (DEQ, 2013b). Risk to Site Workers (Table 2) Constituents which exceeded RBCs in the initial screening were further screened to evaluate risk to site workers. Risk receptors were selected for the exposure scenario of soil ingestion, dermal contact and inhalation from DEQ s Table of Generic Risk Based Concentrations for Petroleum Constituents and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons. These included the construction and excavation worker receptor scenarios. RBCs for the occupational receptor in the scenario of soil leaching to groundwater were also included for comparison with site data. Constituents were compared to the more conservative of these RBCs. 2
3 LAKE EWAUNA TRAIL LEVEL 2 FIELD SAMPLING ASSESSMENT Waste Screening Evaluation (Table 3) Total metals results for all soil samples were compared to 20 times the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) limits to assess whether soil will require hazardous waste handling according to EPA regulation. All samples had detected concentrations of TPH Diesel, TPH Oil, multiple PAHs, and metals. Six of 17 samples had detected concentrations of PCP, but no concentrations exceeded the associated RBCs. RBCs were exceeded for the two TPH fractions (TPH Diesel and TPH Oil) and two PAHs (naphthalene and benz(a)pyrene) in at least one sample. In addition, six metals (arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury, selenium, and silver) exceeded regional background concentrations in at least one sample. The geotechnical test pits had the most frequent exceedances of RBCs; including naphthalene and benzo(a)pyrene at SE 4, and TPH Diesel, TPH Oil, naphthalene, and benzo(a)pyrene at SE 5. All six previously listed metals were above regional background concentrations in both samples. Exceedances of the residential RBC for soil ingestion, dermal contact and inhalation for benzo(a)pyrene also occurred in SE 2, SE 7, SE 13, SE 15, and SE 17. RBC exceedances of more than one metal occurred in seven samples: SE 3, SE 4, SE 5, SE 6, SE 7, SE 13, and SE 15. The remaining 8 out of 15 metals exceedances occurred only for arsenic. Although arsenic was above the most conservative RBC in 15 of the 17 samples, only one sample (SE 4) exceeded the regional background concentration of 12 mg/kg. Two other metals concentrations lead concentrations measured in SE 4 and SE 5 exceeded both the regional background concentration and the RBC for soil ingestion, dermal contact and inhalation. Construction and excavation worker RBCs for soil ingestion, dermal contact and inhalation, as well as the occupational receptor scenario for leaching to groundwater, were used to evaluate constituents with exceedances of most conservative RBCs. Of these, lead is the only constituent with exceedances of the most conservative RBC (the occupational receptor scenario for soil leaching to groundwater), at a concentration of 30 mg/kg. However, this value was calculated assuming that all lead within the soil will leach into water during a routine leaching test, as discussed in Section B.3.4 of DEQ s 2012 Risk Based Decision Making for the Remediation of Petroleum Contaminated Sites. The lead leachate concentration must not exceed 1.5 mg/l, which is 100 times greater than the RBC for tap water (DEQ, 2012). To evaluate site specific leaching potential of the samples with lead exceedances, Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Potential (TCLP) was analyzed for those samples with the highest lead concentrations, SE 4 and SE 5, resulting in a value of 0.03 mg/l for SE 4 and a non detect for SE 5. Given that TCLP data is available for soil samples collected at the property, it is appropriate to compare these values to the lead leachate concentration limit of 1.5 mg/l. This comparison shows that the site specific TCLP is significantly lower than the maximum allowable leachate concentration, indicating that the lead concentrations observed in the site soils will not result in groundwater exceeding lead RBCs in tap water. The results of the two stage risk evaluation indicates no sitespecific protocols will be required to protect site workers. In addition to assessing risk to site workers, an evaluation of whether excavated soil will need special handling or disposal requirements was conducted (Table 3). TCLP analysis is designed to simulate landfill conditions and assesses the mobility of analytes in wastes. EPA regulated wastes are defined with TCLP limits under RCRA (40 CFR Part 261). The contaminants of concern at the site which could classify site soils as hazardous waste are metals. Therefore, total metals concentrations were evaluated using the 20 times TCLP rule. This rule described in Use of Total Waste in Toxicity Characteristic Determinations (EPA, 1994) indicates that total metals analysis can be used as a proxy for TCLP results with the limits at 20 times those used for TCLP. Lead is the only total metal with exceedances of the 20 times TCLP limits at locations SE 4 and SE 5. TCLP was analyzed as a result of these exceedances and resulting values were below the TCLP limit of 5 mg/l at 0.03 mg/l and nondetect, respectively. Consequently, soil at the site will require contaminated media management and may need to be disposed of at a Subtitle D landfill handling municipal solid waste.
4 LAKE EWAUNA TRAIL LEVEL 2 FIELD SAMPLING ASSESSMENT Conclusion and Recommendations This Level 2 Preliminary Site Investigation included the collection of 17 shallow soil samples along the proposed project alignment. A risk evaluation to site workers indicated that while soil collected at the site exceeds some of the most conservative DEQ RBCs in some areas, it does not pose an unacceptable risk to current occupational, construction, and/or excavation workers. Although the lead concentrations in soil were greater than the RBCs for soil leaching to groundwater, this value is calculated using the assumption that all lead from the soil would leach to water during a standard leaching test. Site specific TCLP data indicates that the lead leachate is significantly lower than the concentration needed to cause groundwater to exceed the lead RBC for tap water. Site soils and groundwater do not pose an unacceptable risk to site workers and no site specific protocols are required to address worker safety. An evaluation of disposal requirements of site soils was conducted using the 20 times TCLP rule established by EPA. Though lead exceeded the 20 times TCLP rule for two samples, TCLP results were below the limits requiring hazardous waste disposal. However, site soils will still require handling under a contaminated media management plan, which will include provisions for offsite disposal as a nonhazardous waste. Site groundwater was not sufficiently characterized in this investigation to assess disposal requirements; therefore, it is likely that groundwater will need to be characterized and managed during the excavations for the bridge footings and any other excavation deep enough to encounter groundwater. References CH2M HILL Hazardous Materials Corridor Study, Lake Ewauna Trail, Klamath Avenue to Spring Street, Klamath County, Klamath Falls, Oregon. February. CH2M HILL Draft Sampling and Plan, Lake Ewauna Trail. Prepared for City of Klamath Falls. February. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). 2013a. Environmental Cleanup Site Information (ECSI) Database, Site Summary Report Details for Site ID 2307, Modoc Lumber (Former) Study Area. Accessed January Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). 2013b. Development of Oregon Background Metals Concentrations in Soil. March. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Risk Based Decision Making for the Remediation of Petroleum Contaminated Sites, Table of Generic Risk Based Concentrations for Petroleum Constituents and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Updated July United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Use of Total Waste in Toxicity Characteristic Determinations. RCRA Hotline Report. January. Accessed September
5 Appendix A Field Notes
6 Appendix B Representative Photographs
7 Appendix C Laboratory Reports
8 Bioswale Bioswale SE-2 SE-3 SE-4 SE-5 SE-6 SE-7 SE-8 Wetland Removal-Fill Area (Close Up 1) SE-9 SE-1 SE-10 SE-8 Close Up 1 Close Up 2 SE-11 SE-13 SE-13 SE-12 SE-16 Wetland Removal-Fill Area (Close Up 2) SE-14 SE-15 SE-17 Site Location LEGEND Soil Sample Location Proposed Trail Alignment Wetland Removal-Fill Permanent Temporary Feet Vicinity road map source: Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, TomTom, USGS, Intermap, ipc, NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand) Figure 1 Soil Sample Locations and Removal-Fill along Proposed Trail Alignment Lake Ewauna Trail Level 2 Field Sampling Assessment Klamath Falls, Klamath County \\ROSA\PROJ\ODOT\462902LAKEEWAUNA\TASK 2 - SURVEY\GIS\MAPFILES\SAMPLELOCATIONS2.MXD GGEE 6/24/2015 4:00:18 PM
9 TABLE 1 Initial Risk Based Screening of Soil Analytical s for PAHs, SVOCs, and Metals Lake Ewauna Trail Level 2 Field Sampling Assessment Sample Location RBC (Soil ingestion, SE 1 SE 2 SE 3 SE 4 SE 5 SE 6 SE 7 SE 8 SE 9 SE 10 SE 11 SE 12 SE 13 SE 14 SE 15 SE 16 SE 17 RBC Background dermal contact and Sample (Leaching to Metals 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 inhalation) 1 groundwater) 2 Concentrations 3 Sample Depth (ft bgs) Residential Scenario Moisture (%) Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) (mg/kg) TPH Diesel 1,100 9, J 13.5 J 13.6 J 331 J 2, J 116 J 18.5 J J 113 J 15 J 37.2 J 7.86 J 7.87 J TPH Oil 2,800 > 1,000, J 104 J 93.2 J 2,300 10, J 1,750 J ,580 J J 64.6 J Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) (µg/kg) Naphthalene 4, J 2.85 J 0.34 J J 7.37 J Methylnaphthalene 0.11 U J J J 2.74 J 1.37 J 1.34 J 0.2 J J 4.5 J Methylnaphthalene 0.12 U U J 4.92 J 1.37 J 1.43 J 0.65 U 0.89 J 0.11 U 3.6 J 1.12 J 3.12 J 1.79 J 5.4 Acenaphthylene 0.56 J U J J 0.86 J 0.12 J J 5.18 J Acenaphthene 4,700, U J U 0.89 U 0.41 U 0.45 U 0.51 U 0.45 U U 0.88 J 0.45 U 1.45 U 0.7 J 3.16 Fluorene 3,100, U J J 1.6 J 0.6 J 0.95 J 0.4 J 0.32 U J 1.24 J 0.5 J 1.91 J 0.69 J 2.92 Phenanthrene 0.49 J J Anthracene 23,000, J J J 0.54 J 0.1 J 5.02 J 1.07 J 5.85 J Fluoranthene 2,300, J 0.46 J Pyrene 1,700, Benz(a)anthracene 150 3, J J 0.45 U U J Chrysene 14, J J 1 J U J Benzo(b)fluoranthene 150 4, J 0.48 U Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1, J J U 0.42 U U 0.81 U 1.08 J Benzo(a)pyrene J U 0.47 U J Indeno(1,2,3 c,d)pyrene U J 0.55 U 0.1 U U 8.87 J Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 15 3, U U 0.44 U U 1.05 U 0.49 U 0.53 U 0.6 U 0.54 U 0.1 U 1.04 U 0.53 U 1.73 U 0.51 U 4.31 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene U 0.49 U J Semi volatile Organic Compounds (µg/kg) Dibenzofuran 0.1 U J J 2.27 J 0.76 J 0.95 J 0.84 J 1.13 J U 1.48 J 0.76 J 2.5 J 1.79 J 15 Pentachlorophenol J U 2.56 U 2.32 U 1.07 U 1.17 U 1.33 U 1.18 U 0.61 J 2.29 U 4.61 J 3.8 U 1.13 U 1.08 U Metals, dry weight (mg/kg) Arsenic J J J J 0.37 J J J Barium 15, Cadmium U 0.18 J 1.18 U J 0.67 J U 0.24 J 0.33 J 0.33 J J 0.35 J 0.11 J 0.7 J 0.45 J 0.23 J Chromium 120, Lead J Mercury J J J J Selenium J 0.21 U 1.88 U 0.91 J 0.44 J 0.36 U 0.25 J 0.16 U 0.21 J 0.25 J 0.21 J 0.14 U 0.26 U 0.17 J 0.46 J 0.32 U 0.33 U Silver J 0.13 U 1.18 U 1.5 J 1.53 J 0.22 U 0.11 U U U 0.12 U 0.12 U U 0.16 U U 0.23 U 0.2 U 0.22 J Metals, TCLP (µg/l) Lead U NOTES: (1) = Table of Generic Risk Based Concentrations for Petroleum Constituents and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Generic Remedy for Simple Risk Based Sites. Oregon DEQ. (Updated July, 2012) Residential receptor for soil ingestion, dermal contact and inhalation. (2) = Table of Generic Risk Based Concentrations for Petroleum Constituents and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Generic Remedy for Simple Risk Based Sites. Oregon DEQ. (Updated July, 2012) Residential receptor for leaching to groundwater. (3) = Regional 95% UPL Default Background Concentrations for Metals in Soil (Basin and Range), from Oregon DEQ Development of Oregon Background Metals Concentrations in Soil. March. Bold = Analyte Detected mg/kg = milligram per kilogram µg/kg = microgram per kilogram Shaded = Exceeds risk based concentration (RBC) value or background metals concentration. U = Not detected at specified detection limit J = Estimated value below reporting limit = not analyzed
10 TABLE 2 Soil Analytical s for Selected PAHs and Metals Evaluated for Risk to Site Workers Lake Ewauna Trail Level 2 Field Sampling Assessment Sample Location RBC (Soil ingestion, RBC (Leaching to SE 1 SE 2 SE 3 SE 4 SE 5 SE 6 SE 7 SE 8 SE 9 SE 10 SE 11 SE 12 SE 13 SE 14 SE 15 SE 16 SE 17 Sample dermal contact and inhalation) groundwater) 3 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 Sample Depth (ft bgs) Construction Worker 1 Excavation Worker 2 Occupational Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) (mg/kg) TPH Diesel 4,600 >Max >Max 10 J 13.5 J 13.6 J 331 J 2, J 116 J 18.5 J J 113 J 15 J 37.2 J 7.86 J 7.87 J TPH Oil 11,000 >Max >Max 64.1 J 104 J 93.2 J 2,300 10, J 1,750 J ,580 J J 64.6 J Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) (µg/kg) Naphthalene 580,000 16,000, J 2.85 J 0.34 J J 7.37 J Benzo(a)pyrene 2,100 59,000 >Csat J U 0.47 U J Metals, dry weight (mg/kg) Arsenic J J J J 0.37 J J J Cadmium 150 4, U 0.18 J 1.18 U J 0.67 J U 0.24 J 0.33 J 0.33 J J 0.35 J 0.11 J 0.7 J 0.45 J 0.23 J Lead J Mercury 93 2, J J J J Selenium 0.24 J 0.21 U 1.88 U 0.91 J 0.44 J 0.36 U 0.25 J 0.16 U 0.21 J 0.25 J 0.21 J 0.14 U 0.26 U 0.17 J 0.46 J 0.32 U 0.33 U Silver 1,500 43, J 0.13 U 1.18 U 1.5 J 1.53 J 0.22 U 0.11 U U U 0.12 U 0.12 U U 0.16 U U 0.23 U 0.2 U 0.22 J NOTES: (1) = Table of Generic Risk Based Concentrations for Petroleum Constituents and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Generic Remedy for Simple Risk Based Sites. Oregon DEQ. (Updated July, 2012) Construction Worker receptor for soil ingestion, dermal contact and inhalation. (2) = Table of Generic Risk Based Concentrations for Petroleum Constituents and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Generic Remedy for Simple Risk Based Sites. Oregon DEQ. (Updated July, 2012) Excavation Worker receptor for soil ingestion, dermal contact and inhalation. (3) = Table of Generic Risk Based Concentrations for Petroleum Constituents and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Generic Remedy for Simple Risk Based Sites. Oregon DEQ. (Updated July, 2012) Residential receptor for leaching to groundwater. Bold = Analyte Detected mg/kg = milligram per kilogram µg/kg = microgram per kilogram Shaded = Exceeds risk based concentration (RBC) value. U = Not detected at specified detection limit J = Estimated value below reporting limit = not analyzed
11 TABLE 3 Waste Screening Evaluation of Soil Analytical s for Metals Lake Ewauna Trail Level 2 Field Sampling Assessment Metals, dry weight (mg/kg) Sample Location SE 1 SE 2 SE 3 SE 4 SE 5 SE 6 SE 7 SE 8 SE 9 SE 10 SE 11 SE 12 SE 13 SE 14 SE 15 SE 16 SE 17 Sample TCLP Limit 1 20 x TCLP Limit (mg/l) (mg/kg) 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 3/6/2014 Sample Depth (ft bgs) Arsenic J J J J 0.37 J J J Barium 100 2, Cadmium U 0.18 J 1.18 U J 0.67 J U 0.24 J 0.33 J 0.33 J J 0.35 J 0.11 J 0.7 J 0.45 J 0.23 J Chromium Lead J Mercury J J J J Selenium J 0.21 U 1.88 U 0.91 J 0.44 J 0.36 U 0.25 J 0.16 U 0.21 J 0.25 J 0.21 J 0.14 U 0.26 U 0.17 J 0.46 J 0.32 U 0.33 U Silver J 0.13 U 1.18 U 1.5 J 1.53 J 0.22 U 0.11 U U U 0.12 U 0.12 U U 0.16 U U 0.23 U 0.2 U 0.22 J Metals, TCLP (mg/l) Lead U NOTES: (1) = EPA regulatory levels for Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) meeting the definition of EPA toxicity under RCRA (40 CFR Part 261) of D004 through D052. Bold = Analyte Detected mg/kg = milligram per kilogram mg/l = milligrams per Liter Shaded = Exceeds waste screening limit. U = Not detected at specified detection limit J = Estimated value below reporting limit = not analyzed
12 Appendix A Field Notes
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 Appendix B Representative Photographs
25 Appendix B Representative Shallow Soil Sampling Photographs March 2014 Lake Ewauna Trail Level 2 Preliminary Site Investigation Photograph B 1. Shallow soil sample location SE 1 (3/6/2014). Photograph B 2. Shallow soil sample location SE 2 (3/6/2014). Photograph B 3. Shallow soil sample location SE 3 (3/6/2014). Photograph B 4. Test pit location SE 4 (3/6/2014), near western pedestrian bridge footing.
26 Appendix B Representative Shallow Soil Sampling Photographs March 2014 Lake Ewauna Trail Level 2 Preliminary Site Investigation Photograph B 5. Excavation spoils from test pit location SE 5 (3/6/2014), near eastern pedestrian bridge footing. Photograph B 6. Shallow soil sample location SE 6 (3/6/2014). Photograph B 7. Shallow soil sample location SE 7 (3/6/2014). Photograph B 8. Shallow soil sample location SE 8 (3/6/2014). Location is adjacent to wetland removal fill area.
27 Appendix B Representative Shallow Soil Sampling Photographs March 2014 Lake Ewauna Trail Level 2 Preliminary Site Investigation Photograph B 9. Shallow soil sample location SE 9 (3/6/2014). Photograph B 10. Shallow soil sample location SE 10 (3/6/2014). Photograph B 11. Shallow soil sample location SE 11 (3/6/2014). Photograph B 12. Shallow soil sample location SE 12 (3/6/2014).
28 Appendix B Representative Shallow Soil Sampling Photographs March 2014 Lake Ewauna Trail Level 2 Preliminary Site Investigation Photograph B 13. Shallow soil sample location SE 13 (3/6/2014). Location is adjacent to wetland removal fill area. Photograph B 14. Shallow soil sample location SE 14 (3/6/2014). Photograph B 15. Shallow soil sample location SE 15 (3/6/2014). Photograph B 16. Shallow soil sample location SE 16 (3/6/2014).
29 Appendix B Representative Shallow Soil Sampling Photographs March 2014 Lake Ewauna Trail Level 2 Preliminary Site Investigation Photograph B 17. Shallow soil sample location SE 17 (3/6/2014).
30 Appendix C Laboratory Reports
31 ANALYTICAL REPORT For: Klamath Lake Ewauna ASL Report #: N1415 Project ID: Attn: Darren Hippenstiel/PDX cc: Bruce Pratt/CVO Pat Heins/PDX Authorized and Released By: Laboratory Project Manager Kathy McKinley (541) ext April 01, 2014 All analyses performed by CH2M HILL are clearly indicated. Any subcontracted analyses are included as appended reports as received from the subcontracted laboratory. The results included in this report only relate to the samples listed on the following Sample Cross Reference page. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory. Any unusual difficulties encountered during the analysis of your samples are discussed in the attached case narratives. Accredited in accordance with NELAP: Oregon (100022) Arizona (0771) Louisiana (05031) Page 1 of 74
32 ASL Report #: N1415 Sample Receipt Comments We certify that the test results meet all NELAP requirements. Sample Cross Reference ASL Sample ID Client Sample ID /Time Collected Received N SE 1 03/06/14 14:57 03/07/14 N SE 2 03/06/14 15:18 03/07/14 N SE 3 03/06/14 15:33 03/07/14 N SE 4 03/06/14 13:22 03/07/14 N SE 5 03/06/14 13:40 03/07/14 N SE 6 03/06/14 16:45 03/07/14 N SE 7 03/06/14 16:30 03/07/14 N SE 8 03/06/14 16:10 03/07/14 N SE 9 03/06/14 11:55 03/07/14 N SE 10 03/06/14 11:36 03/07/14 N SE 11 03/06/14 11:20 03/07/14 N SE 12 03/06/14 10:48 03/07/14 N SE 13 03/06/14 10:20 03/07/14 N SE 14 03/06/14 09:55 03/07/14 N SE 15 03/06/14 09:00 03/07/14 N SE 16 03/06/14 08:28 03/07/14 N SE 17 03/06/14 08:00 03/07/14 Page 2 of 74
33 CASE NARRATIVE GC/MS SEMI-VOLATILES ANALYSIS Lab Name: ASL SDG#: N1415 Project: Klamath--Lake Ewauna Project #: With the exceptions noted as flags, footnotes, or detailed in the section below; standard operating procedures were followed in the analysis of the samples and no problems were encountered or anomalies observed. All laboratory quality control samples were within established control limits, with any exceptions noted below, or in the associated QC summary forms. Each sample was analyzed to achieve the lowest possible reporting limit within the constraints of the method. For diluted samples, the reporting limits are adjusted for the dilution required. Calculations are performed before rounding to minimize errors in calculated values. All holding times were met and proper preservation noted for the methods performed on these samples, unless otherwise detailed in the section below, or in the sample receipt documentation. (s): SW8270C-SIM: SW3550 Surrogate Standard(s): Surrogate recovery of Terphenyl-d14(153%) in SE-5 did not meet acceptance criteria of %. Analytical Exception(s): Multi-incremental sampling was performed on N and N Many samples required dilutions due to heavy matrix interferences. Page 3 of 74 TH :02-N1415-S
34 Client Sample ID: SE-1 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 14:57 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 1 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC/MS Semi-Volatiles Naphthalene Methylnaphthalene U 1-Methylnaphthalene U Acenaphthylene J Acenaphthene U Dibenzofuran U Fluorene U Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene J Anthracene J Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo(a)anthracene Chrysene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene U Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Terphenyl-d14 % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier HM :50-N1415-S Page 4 of 74
35 Client Sample ID: SE-2 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 15:18 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 1 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC/MS Semi-Volatiles Naphthalene Methylnaphthalene Methylnaphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Dibenzofuran Fluorene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo(a)anthracene Chrysene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Terphenyl-d14 % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier HM :50-N1415-S Page 5 of 74
36 Client Sample ID: SE-3 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 15:33 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 1 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC/MS Semi-Volatiles Naphthalene Methylnaphthalene J 1-Methylnaphthalene U Acenaphthylene U Acenaphthene J Dibenzofuran J Fluorene J Pentachlorophenol J Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo(a)anthracene Chrysene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene U Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Terphenyl-d14 % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier HM :50-N1415-S Page 6 of 74
37 Client Sample ID: SE-4 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 13:22 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 5 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC/MS Semi-Volatiles Naphthalene Methylnaphthalene Methylnaphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Dibenzofuran Fluorene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo(a)anthracene Chrysene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene U Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Terphenyl-d14 % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier HM :50-N1415-S Page 7 of 74
38 Client Sample ID: SE-5 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 13:40 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 10 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC/MS Semi-Volatiles Naphthalene Methylnaphthalene Methylnaphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Dibenzofuran Fluorene Pentachlorophenol U Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo(a)anthracene Chrysene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Terphenyl-d14 % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier * HM :50-N1415-S Page 8 of 74
39 Client Sample ID: SE-6 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 16:45 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 10 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC/MS Semi-Volatiles Naphthalene Methylnaphthalene J 1-Methylnaphthalene J Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene U Dibenzofuran J Fluorene J Pentachlorophenol U Phenanthrene Anthracene J Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo(a)anthracene Chrysene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene J Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene U Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Terphenyl-d14 % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier HM :50-N1415-S Page 9 of 74
40 Client Sample ID: SE-7 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 16:30 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 10 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC/MS Semi-Volatiles Naphthalene Methylnaphthalene Methylnaphthalene J Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene U Dibenzofuran J Fluorene J Pentachlorophenol U Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo(a)anthracene Chrysene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene U Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Terphenyl-d14 % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier HM :50-N1415-S Page 10 of 74
41 Client Sample ID: SE-8 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 16:10 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 5 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC/MS Semi-Volatiles Naphthalene Methylnaphthalene J 1-Methylnaphthalene J Acenaphthylene J Acenaphthene U Dibenzofuran J Fluorene J Pentachlorophenol U Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo(a)anthracene J Chrysene J Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene J Benzo(a)pyrene J Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene U Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene U Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Terphenyl-d14 % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier HM :50-N1415-S Page 11 of 74
42 Client Sample ID: SE-9 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 11:55 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 5 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC/MS Semi-Volatiles Naphthalene Methylnaphthalene J 1-Methylnaphthalene J Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene U Dibenzofuran J Fluorene J Pentachlorophenol U Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo(a)anthracene Chrysene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene U Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Terphenyl-d14 % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier HM :50-N1415-S Page 12 of 74
43 Client Sample ID: SE-10 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 11:36 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 5 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC/MS Semi-Volatiles Naphthalene J 2-Methylnaphthalene J 1-Methylnaphthalene U Acenaphthylene J Acenaphthene U Dibenzofuran J Fluorene J Pentachlorophenol U Phenanthrene Anthracene J Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo(a)anthracene J Chrysene J Benzo[b]fluoranthene J Benzo(k)fluoranthene U Benzo(a)pyrene U Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene J Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene U Benzo(g,h,i)perylene U Surrogate Terphenyl-d14 % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier HM :50-N1415-S Page 13 of 74
44 Client Sample ID: SE-11 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 11:20 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 5 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC/MS Semi-Volatiles Naphthalene J 2-Methylnaphthalene J 1-Methylnaphthalene J Acenaphthylene J Acenaphthene U Dibenzofuran J Fluorene U Pentachlorophenol U Phenanthrene Anthracene J Fluoranthene J Pyrene Benzo(a)anthracene U Chrysene J Benzo[b]fluoranthene U Benzo(k)fluoranthene U Benzo(a)pyrene U Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene U Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene U Benzo(g,h,i)perylene U Surrogate Terphenyl-d14 % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier HM :50-N1415-S Page 14 of 74
45 Client Sample ID: SE-12 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 10:48 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 1 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC/MS Semi-Volatiles Naphthalene J 2-Methylnaphthalene J 1-Methylnaphthalene U Acenaphthylene J Acenaphthene U Dibenzofuran U Fluorene J Pentachlorophenol J Phenanthrene J Anthracene J Fluoranthene J Pyrene Benzo(a)anthracene U Chrysene U Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene U Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene U Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene U Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Terphenyl-d14 % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier HM :50-N1415-S Page 15 of 74
46 Client Sample ID: SE-13 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 10:20 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 10 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC/MS Semi-Volatiles Naphthalene Methylnaphthalene Methylnaphthalene J Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene U Dibenzofuran J Fluorene J Pentachlorophenol U Phenanthrene Anthracene J Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo(a)anthracene Chrysene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene U Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene U Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Terphenyl-d14 % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier HM :50-N1415-S Page 16 of 74
47 Client Sample ID: SE-14 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 09:55 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 5 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC/MS Semi-Volatiles Naphthalene J 2-Methylnaphthalene J 1-Methylnaphthalene J Acenaphthylene J Acenaphthene U Dibenzofuran J Fluorene J Pentachlorophenol J Phenanthrene Anthracene J Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo(a)anthracene J Chrysene J Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene J Benzo(a)pyrene J Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene U Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene U Benzo(g,h,i)perylene J Surrogate Terphenyl-d14 % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier HM :50-N1415-S Page 17 of 74
48 Client Sample ID: SE-15 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 09:00 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 10 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC/MS Semi-Volatiles Naphthalene J 2-Methylnaphthalene J 1-Methylnaphthalene J Acenaphthylene J Acenaphthene U Dibenzofuran J Fluorene J Pentachlorophenol U Phenanthrene Anthracene J Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo(a)anthracene Chrysene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene J Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene U Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Terphenyl-d14 % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier HM :50-N1415-S Page 18 of 74
49 Client Sample ID: SE-16 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 08:28 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 5 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC/MS Semi-Volatiles Naphthalene Methylnaphthalene Methylnaphthalene J Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene J Dibenzofuran J Fluorene J Pentachlorophenol U Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo(a)anthracene Chrysene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene U Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Terphenyl-d14 % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier HM :50-N1415-S Page 19 of 74
50 Client Sample ID: SE-17 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 08:00 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 5 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC/MS Semi-Volatiles Naphthalene Methylnaphthalene Methylnaphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Dibenzofuran Fluorene Pentachlorophenol U Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo(a)anthracene Chrysene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Terphenyl-d14 % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier HM :50-N1415-S Page 20 of 74
51 Client Sample ID: SB Sample : N/A Sample Time: N/A Type: QC Lab Sample ID: SB Received: N/A Dilution Factor: 1 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC/MS Semi-Volatiles Naphthalene U 2-Methylnaphthalene U 1-Methylnaphthalene U Acenaphthylene U Acenaphthene U Dibenzofuran U Fluorene U Pentachlorophenol U Phenanthrene U Anthracene U Fluoranthene U Pyrene U Benzo(a)anthracene U Chrysene U Benzo[b]fluoranthene U Benzo(k)fluoranthene U Benzo(a)pyrene U Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene U Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene U Benzo(g,h,i)perylene U Surrogate Terphenyl-d14 % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier HM :50-N1415-S Page 21 of 74
52 Client Sample ID: SB Sample : N/A Sample Time: N/A Type: QC Lab Sample ID: SB Received: N/A Dilution Factor: 1 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC/MS Semi-Volatiles Naphthalene U 2-Methylnaphthalene U 1-Methylnaphthalene U Acenaphthylene U Acenaphthene U Dibenzofuran U Fluorene U Pentachlorophenol U Phenanthrene U Anthracene J Fluoranthene U Pyrene U Benzo(a)anthracene U Chrysene U Benzo[b]fluoranthene U Benzo(k)fluoranthene J Benzo(a)pyrene U Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene U Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene U Benzo(g,h,i)perylene U Surrogate Terphenyl-d14 % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier HM :50-N1415-S Page 22 of 74
53 LCS ID: BS1S0312 Report Revision No.: 0 Type: QC Dilution Factor: 1 Spike Sample Analyte CAS# Amount %Recovery GC/MS Semi-Volatiles Naphthalene ug/kg 86 SW8270C-SI 2-Methylnaphthalene ug/kg 77 SW8270C-SI 1-Methylnaphthalene ug/kg 74 SW8270C-SI Acenaphthylene ug/kg 88 SW8270C-SI Acenaphthene ug/kg 90 SW8270C-SI Dibenzofuran ug/kg 75 SW8270C-SI Fluorene ug/kg 82 SW8270C-SI Pentachlorophenol ug/kg 80 SW8270C-SI Phenanthrene ug/kg 83 SW8270C-SI Anthracene ug/kg 89 SW8270C-SI Fluoranthene ug/kg 99 SW8270C-SI Pyrene ug/kg 94 SW8270C-SI Benzo(a)anthracene ug/kg 94 SW8270C-SI Chrysene ug/kg 91 SW8270C-SI Benzo(b)fluoroanthene ug/kg 87 SW8270C-SI Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/kg 91 SW8270C-SI Benzo(a)pyrene ug/kg 94 SW8270C-SI Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene ug/kg 86 SW8270C-SI Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ug/kg 87 SW8270C-SI Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/kg 87 SW8270C-SI Surrogate Terphenyl-d14 % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier HM :50-N1415-S Page 23 of 74
54 LCS ID: BS1S0318 Report Revision No.: 0 Type: QC Dilution Factor: 1 Spike Sample Analyte CAS# Amount %Recovery GC/MS Semi-Volatiles Naphthalene ug/kg 82 SW8270C-SI 2-Methylnaphthalene ug/kg 80 SW8270C-SI 1-Methylnaphthalene ug/kg 76 SW8270C-SI Acenaphthylene ug/kg 93 SW8270C-SI Acenaphthene ug/kg 95 SW8270C-SI Dibenzofuran ug/kg 80 SW8270C-SI Fluorene ug/kg 83 SW8270C-SI Pentachlorophenol ug/kg 91 SW8270C-SI Phenanthrene ug/kg 90 SW8270C-SI Anthracene ug/kg 93 SW8270C-SI Fluoranthene ug/kg 100 SW8270C-SI Pyrene ug/kg 108 SW8270C-SI Benzo(a)anthracene ug/kg 101 SW8270C-SI Chrysene ug/kg 99 SW8270C-SI Benzo(b)fluoroanthene ug/kg 91 SW8270C-SI Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/kg 96 SW8270C-SI Benzo(a)pyrene ug/kg 94 SW8270C-SI Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene ug/kg 100 SW8270C-SI Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ug/kg 102 SW8270C-SI Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/kg 99 SW8270C-SI Surrogate Terphenyl-d14 % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier HM :50-N1415-S Page 24 of 74
55 CASE NARRATIVE GC SEMI-VOLATILES ANALYSIS Lab Name: ASL SDG#: N1415 Project: Klamath--Lake Ewauna Project #: With the exceptions noted as flags, footnotes, or detailed in the section below; standard operating procedures were followed in the analysis of the samples and no problems were encountered or anomalies observed. All laboratory quality control samples were within established control limits, with any exceptions noted below, or in the associated QC summary forms. Each sample was analyzed to achieve the lowest possible reporting limit within the constraints of the method. For diluted samples, the reporting limits are adjusted for the dilution required. Calculations are performed before rounding to minimize errors in calculated values. All holding times were met and proper preservation noted for the methods performed on these samples, unless otherwise detailed in the section below, or in the sample receipt documentation. (s): NWTPH-DX: SW3550 Surrogate Standard(s): Surrogate o-terphenyl in SE-5 was diluted out. Surrogate Octacosane in SE-5 was diluted out. Surrogate o-terphenyl in SE-7 was diluted out. Surrogate Octacosane in SE-7 was diluted out. Surrogate o-terphenyl in SE-13 was diluted out. Surrogate Octacosane in SE-13 was diluted out. Analytical Exception(s): Multi-incremental sampling was performed on N and N Page 25 of 74 TH :04-N1415-D
56 Client Sample ID: SE-1 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 14:57 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 1 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC Semi-Volatiles TPH-Oil TPH-Oil J mg/kg NWTPH-DX TPH-Diesel TPH-Diesel J mg/kg NWTPH-DX 03/17/14 03/17/14 Surrogate % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier o-terphenyl Octacosane CH :06-N1415-D Page 26 of 74
57 Client Sample ID: SE-2 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 15:18 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 1 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC Semi-Volatiles TPH-Oil TPH-Oil J mg/kg NWTPH-DX TPH-Diesel TPH-Diesel J mg/kg NWTPH-DX 03/17/14 03/17/14 Surrogate % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier o-terphenyl Octacosane CH :06-N1415-D Page 27 of 74
58 Client Sample ID: SE-3 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 15:33 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 1 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC Semi-Volatiles TPH-Oil TPH-Oil J mg/kg NWTPH-DX TPH-Diesel TPH-Diesel J mg/kg NWTPH-DX 03/17/14 03/17/14 Surrogate % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier o-terphenyl Octacosane CH :06-N1415-D Page 28 of 74
59 Client Sample ID: SE-4 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 13:22 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 10 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC Semi-Volatiles TPH-Oil TPH-Oil mg/kg NWTPH-DX TPH-Diesel TPH-Diesel J mg/kg NWTPH-DX 03/18/14 03/18/14 Surrogate % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier o-terphenyl Octacosane CH :06-N1415-D Page 29 of 74
60 Client Sample ID: SE-5 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 13:40 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 50 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC Semi-Volatiles TPH-Oil TPH-Oil mg/kg NWTPH-DX TPH-Diesel TPH-Diesel mg/kg NWTPH-DX 03/18/14 03/18/14 Surrogate % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier o-terphenyl * Octacosane * CH :06-N1415-D Page 30 of 74
61 Client Sample ID: SE-6 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 16:45 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 1 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC Semi-Volatiles TPH-Oil TPH-Oil J mg/kg NWTPH-DX TPH-Diesel TPH-Diesel J mg/kg NWTPH-DX 03/18/14 03/18/14 Surrogate % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier o-terphenyl Octacosane CH :06-N1415-D Page 31 of 74
62 Client Sample ID: SE-7 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 16:30 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 20 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC Semi-Volatiles TPH-Oil TPH-Oil J mg/kg NWTPH-DX TPH-Diesel TPH-Diesel J mg/kg NWTPH-DX 03/18/14 03/18/14 Surrogate % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier o-terphenyl * Octacosane * CH :06-N1415-D Page 32 of 74
63 Client Sample ID: SE-8 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 16:10 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 1 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC Semi-Volatiles TPH-Oil TPH-Oil J mg/kg NWTPH-DX TPH-Diesel TPH-Diesel J mg/kg NWTPH-DX 03/18/14 03/18/14 Surrogate % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier o-terphenyl Octacosane CH :06-N1415-D Page 33 of 74
64 Client Sample ID: SE-9 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 11:55 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 1 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC Semi-Volatiles TPH-Oil TPH-Oil mg/kg NWTPH-DX TPH-Diesel TPH-Diesel mg/kg NWTPH-DX 03/18/14 03/18/14 Surrogate % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier o-terphenyl Octacosane CH :06-N1415-D Page 34 of 74
65 Client Sample ID: SE-10 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 11:36 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 1 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC Semi-Volatiles TPH-Oil TPH-Oil mg/kg NWTPH-DX TPH-Diesel TPH-Diesel mg/kg NWTPH-DX 03/18/14 03/18/14 Surrogate % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier o-terphenyl Octacosane CH :06-N1415-D Page 35 of 74
66 Client Sample ID: SE-11 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 11:20 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 1 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC Semi-Volatiles TPH-Oil TPH-Oil mg/kg NWTPH-DX TPH-Diesel TPH-Diesel mg/kg NWTPH-DX 03/18/14 03/18/14 Surrogate % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier o-terphenyl Octacosane CH :06-N1415-D Page 36 of 74
67 Client Sample ID: SE-12 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 10:48 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 1 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC Semi-Volatiles TPH-Oil TPH-Oil mg/kg NWTPH-DX TPH-Diesel TPH-Diesel J mg/kg NWTPH-DX 03/18/14 03/18/14 Surrogate % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier o-terphenyl Octacosane CH :06-N1415-D Page 37 of 74
68 Client Sample ID: SE-13 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 10:20 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 20 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC Semi-Volatiles TPH-Oil TPH-Oil J mg/kg NWTPH-DX TPH-Diesel TPH-Diesel J mg/kg NWTPH-DX 03/18/14 03/18/14 Surrogate % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier o-terphenyl * Octacosane * CH :06-N1415-D Page 38 of 74
69 Client Sample ID: SE-14 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 09:55 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 1 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC Semi-Volatiles TPH-Oil TPH-Oil mg/kg NWTPH-DX TPH-Diesel TPH-Diesel J mg/kg NWTPH-DX 03/18/14 03/18/14 Surrogate % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier o-terphenyl Octacosane CH :06-N1415-D Page 39 of 74
70 Client Sample ID: SE-15 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 09:00 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 1 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC Semi-Volatiles TPH-Oil TPH-Oil mg/kg NWTPH-DX TPH-Diesel TPH-Diesel J mg/kg NWTPH-DX 03/18/14 03/18/14 Surrogate % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier o-terphenyl Octacosane CH :06-N1415-D Page 40 of 74
71 Client Sample ID: SE-16 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 08:28 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 1 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC Semi-Volatiles TPH-Oil TPH-Oil J mg/kg NWTPH-DX TPH-Diesel TPH-Diesel J mg/kg NWTPH-DX 03/18/14 03/18/14 Surrogate % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier o-terphenyl Octacosane CH :06-N1415-D Page 41 of 74
72 Client Sample ID: SE-17 Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 08:00 Type: Grab Lab Sample ID: N Received: 03/07/14 Dilution Factor: 1 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC Semi-Volatiles TPH-Oil TPH-Oil J mg/kg NWTPH-DX TPH-Diesel TPH-Diesel J mg/kg NWTPH-DX 03/18/14 03/18/14 Surrogate % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier o-terphenyl Octacosane CH :06-N1415-D Page 42 of 74
73 Client Sample ID: SB Sample : N/A Sample Time: N/A Type: QC Lab Sample ID: SB Received: N/A Dilution Factor: 1 Report Revision No.: 0 Analyte CAS# Sample Qualifier GC Semi-Volatiles TPH-Oil TPH-Oil U mg/kg NWTPH-DX TPH-Diesel TPH-Diesel J mg/kg NWTPH-DX 03/17/14 03/17/14 Surrogate % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier o-terphenyl Octacosane CH :06-N1415-D Page 43 of 74
74 LCS ID: BS1S0314 Report Revision No.: 0 Type: QC Dilution Factor: 1 Spike Sample Analyte CAS# Amount %Recovery GC Semi-Volatiles TPH-Diesel TPH-Diesel mg/kg 67 NWTPH-DX 03/17/14 Surrogate % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier o-terphenyl Octacosane CH :06-N1415-D Page 44 of 74
75 LCS ID: BS2S0314 Report Revision No.: 0 Type: QC Dilution Factor: 1 Spike Sample Analyte CAS# Amount %Recovery GC Semi-Volatiles TPH-Oil TPH-Oil mg/kg 71 NWTPH-DX 03/17/14 Surrogate % Recovery Control Limits Qualifier o-terphenyl Octacosane CH :06-N1415-D Page 45 of 74
76 CASE NARRATIVE METALS ANALYSIS Lab Name: ASL SDG#: N1415 Project: Klamath--Lake Ewauna Project #: With the exceptions noted as flags, footnotes, or detailed in the section below; standard operating procedures were followed in the analysis of the samples and no problems were encountered or anomalies observed. All laboratory quality control samples were within established control limits, with any exceptions noted below, or in the associated QC summary forms. Each sample was analyzed to achieve the lowest possible reporting limit within the constraints of the method. For diluted samples, the reporting limits are adjusted for the dilution required. Calculations are performed before rounding to minimize errors in calculated values. All holding times were met and proper preservation noted for the methods performed on these samples, unless otherwise detailed in the section below, or in the sample receipt documentation. (s): SW6020: SW3050 SW7471A Analytical Exception(s): SW6020: Client samples required dilution. Internal standards failed at lower dilutions. Multi-incremental sampling was performed on N and N SW7471A: Multi-incremental sampling was performed on N and N Page 46 of 74 JG :01-N1415-M
77 Client Sample ID: SE-1 Lab Sample ID: N Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 14:57 Type: Grab Received: 03/07/14 Report Revision No: 0 Analyte Metals Dilution Factor Qual Prep Arsenic J Barium Cadmium U Chromium Lead Mercury J mg/kg SW7471A METHOD Selenium J Silver J 03/12/14 JG :01-N1415-M Page 47 of 74
78 Client Sample ID: SE-2 Lab Sample ID: N Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 15:18 Type: Grab Received: 03/07/14 Report Revision No: 0 Analyte Metals Dilution Factor Qual Prep Arsenic Barium Cadmium J Chromium Lead Mercury mg/kg SW7471A METHOD Selenium U Silver U 03/12/14 JG :01-N1415-M Page 48 of 74
79 Client Sample ID: SE-3 Lab Sample ID: N Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 15:33 Type: Grab Received: 03/07/14 Report Revision No: 0 Analyte Metals Dilution Factor Qual Prep Arsenic J Barium Cadmium U Chromium Lead J Mercury mg/kg SW7471A METHOD Selenium U Silver U 03/12/14 JG :01-N1415-M Page 49 of 74
80 Client Sample ID: SE-4 Lab Sample ID: N Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 13:22 Type: Grab Received: 03/07/14 Report Revision No: 0 Analyte Metals Dilution Factor Qual Prep Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium Lead Mercury mg/kg SW7471A METHOD Selenium J Silver J 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/19/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 JG :01-N1415-M Page 50 of 74
81 Client Sample ID: SE-5 Lab Sample ID: N Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 13:40 Type: Grab Received: 03/07/14 Report Revision No: 0 Analyte Metals Dilution Factor Qual Prep Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium Lead Mercury mg/kg SW7471A METHOD Selenium J Silver J 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/19/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 JG :01-N1415-M Page 51 of 74
82 Client Sample ID: SE-6 Lab Sample ID: N Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 16:45 Type: Grab Received: 03/07/14 Report Revision No: 0 Analyte Metals Dilution Factor Qual Prep Arsenic Barium Cadmium J Chromium Lead Mercury mg/kg SW7471A METHOD Selenium U Silver U 03/12/14 JG :01-N1415-M Page 52 of 74
83 Client Sample ID: SE-7 Lab Sample ID: N Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 16:30 Type: Grab Received: 03/07/14 Report Revision No: 0 Analyte Metals Dilution Factor Qual Prep Arsenic Barium Cadmium J Chromium Lead Mercury mg/kg SW7471A METHOD Selenium J Silver U 03/12/14 JG :01-N1415-M Page 53 of 74
84 Client Sample ID: SE-8 Lab Sample ID: N Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 16:10 Type: Grab Received: 03/07/14 Report Revision No: 0 Analyte Metals Dilution Factor Qual Prep Arsenic J Barium Cadmium U Chromium Lead Mercury mg/kg SW7471A METHOD Selenium U Silver U 03/12/14 JG :01-N1415-M Page 54 of 74
85 Client Sample ID: SE-9 Lab Sample ID: N Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 11:55 Type: Grab Received: 03/07/14 Report Revision No: 0 Analyte Metals Dilution Factor Qual Prep Arsenic Barium Cadmium J Chromium Lead Mercury mg/kg SW7471A METHOD Selenium J Silver U 03/12/14 JG :01-N1415-M Page 55 of 74
86 Client Sample ID: SE-10 Lab Sample ID: N Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 11:36 Type: Grab Received: 03/07/14 Report Revision No: 0 Analyte Metals Dilution Factor Qual Prep Arsenic J Barium Cadmium J Chromium Lead Mercury J mg/kg SW7471A METHOD Selenium J Silver U 03/12/14 JG :01-N1415-M Page 56 of 74
87 Client Sample ID: SE-11 Lab Sample ID: N Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 11:20 Type: Grab Received: 03/07/14 Report Revision No: 0 Analyte Metals Dilution Factor Qual Prep Arsenic J Barium Cadmium J Chromium Lead Mercury J mg/kg SW7471A METHOD Selenium J Silver U 03/12/14 JG :01-N1415-M Page 57 of 74
88 Client Sample ID: SE-12 Lab Sample ID: N Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 10:48 Type: Grab Received: 03/07/14 Report Revision No: 0 Analyte Metals Dilution Factor Qual Prep Arsenic Barium Cadmium J Chromium Lead Mercury J mg/kg SW7471A METHOD Selenium U Silver U 03/12/14 JG :01-N1415-M Page 58 of 74
89 Client Sample ID: SE-13 Lab Sample ID: N Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 10:20 Type: Grab Received: 03/07/14 Report Revision No: 0 Analyte Metals Dilution Factor Qual Prep Arsenic Barium Cadmium J Chromium Lead Mercury mg/kg SW7471A METHOD Selenium U Silver U 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/12/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 JG :01-N1415-M Page 59 of 74
90 Client Sample ID: SE-14 Lab Sample ID: N Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 09:55 Type: Grab Received: 03/07/14 Report Revision No: 0 Analyte Metals Dilution Factor Qual Prep Arsenic J Barium Cadmium J Chromium Lead Mercury mg/kg SW7471A METHOD Selenium J Silver U 03/12/14 JG :01-N1415-M Page 60 of 74
91 Client Sample ID: SE-15 Lab Sample ID: N Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 09:00 Type: Grab Received: 03/07/14 Report Revision No: 0 Analyte Metals Dilution Factor Qual Prep Arsenic Barium Cadmium J Chromium Lead Mercury mg/kg SW7471A METHOD Selenium J Silver U 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/19/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 JG :01-N1415-M Page 61 of 74
92 Client Sample ID: SE-16 Lab Sample ID: N Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 08:28 Type: Grab Received: 03/07/14 Report Revision No: 0 Analyte Metals Dilution Factor Qual Prep Arsenic Barium Cadmium J Chromium Lead Mercury mg/kg SW7471A METHOD Selenium U Silver U 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/19/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 JG :01-N1415-M Page 62 of 74
93 Client Sample ID: SE-17 Lab Sample ID: N Sample : 03/06/14 Sample Time: 08:00 Type: Grab Received: 03/07/14 Report Revision No: 0 Analyte Metals Dilution Factor Qual Prep Arsenic J Barium Cadmium J Chromium Lead Mercury mg/kg SW7471A METHOD Selenium U Silver J 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/19/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 JG :01-N1415-M Page 63 of 74
94 Blank ID: SB Sample : N/A Sample Time: N/A Type: QC Received: N/A Report Revision No: 0 Analyte Metals Dilution Factor Qual Prep Arsenic U Barium U Cadmium U Chromium J Lead U Mercury U mg/kg SW7471A METHOD Selenium U Silver U 03/12/14 JG :01-N1415-M Page 64 of 74
95 Blank ID: SB Sample : N/A Sample Time: N/A Type: QC Received: N/A Report Revision No: 0 Analyte Metals Dilution Factor Qual Prep Mercury U mg/kg SW7471A METHOD 03/19/14 JG :01-N1415-M Page 65 of 74
96 Blank ID: SB Sample : N/A Sample Time: N/A Type: QC Received: N/A Report Revision No: 0 Analyte Metals Dilution Factor Qual Prep Arsenic U Barium U Cadmium U Chromium U Lead U Selenium U Silver U 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 JG :01-N1415-M Page 66 of 74
97 Blank Spike ID: BS1S0311 Report Revision No: 0 Type: QC Dilution Factor: 1 Spike Analyte Amount %Recovery Metals Prep Arsenic mg/kg 107 SW6020 SW3050 Barium mg/kg 105 SW6020 SW3050 Cadmium mg/kg 111 SW6020 SW3050 Chromium mg/kg 111 SW6020 SW3050 Lead mg/kg 103 SW6020 SW3050 Mercury mg/kg 93 SW7471A METHOD Selenium mg/kg 111 SW6020 SW3050 Silver mg/kg 101 SW6020 SW /12/14 JG :01-N1415-M Page 67 of 74
98 Blank Spike ID: BS1S0319 Report Revision No: 0 Type: QC Dilution Factor: 1 Spike Analyte Amount %Recovery Metals Prep Mercury mg/kg 102 SW7471A METHOD 03/19/14 JG :01-N1415-M Page 68 of 74
99 Blank Spike ID: BS2S0317 Report Revision No: 0 Type: QC Dilution Factor: 1 Spike Analyte Amount %Recovery Metals Prep Arsenic mg/kg 101 SW6020 SW3050 Barium mg/kg 100 SW6020 SW3050 Cadmium mg/kg 102 SW6020 SW3050 Chromium mg/kg 99 SW6020 SW3050 Lead mg/kg 99 SW6020 SW3050 Selenium mg/kg 100 SW6020 SW3050 Silver mg/kg 95 SW6020 SW /21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 03/21/14 JG :01-N1415-M Page 69 of 74
100 CASE NARRATIVE GENERAL CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS Lab Name: ASL SDG#: N1415 Project: Klamath--Lake Ewauna Project #: With the exceptions noted as flags, footnotes, or detailed in the section below; standard operating procedures were followed in the analysis of the samples and no problems were encountered or anomalies observed. All laboratory quality control samples were within established control limits, with any exceptions noted below, or in the associated QC summary forms. Each sample was analyzed to achieve the lowest possible reporting limit within the constraints of the method. For diluted samples, the reporting limits are adjusted for the dilution required. Calculations are performed before rounding to minimize errors in calculated values. All holding times were met and proper preservation noted for the methods performed on these samples, unless otherwise detailed in the section below, or in the sample receipt documentation. (s): SM2540G Page 70 of 74 BS :30-N1415-W
101 Received: 03/07/14 Type: See C.O.C. Lab Batch ID: N1415 : SM2540G : Percent Report Revision No.: 0 Client Sample ID General Chemistry Lab Sample ID Dilution Factor Moisture Qualifier SE-1 N N/A N/A /11/14 SE-2 N N/A N/A /11/14 SE-3 N N/A N/A /11/14 SE-4 N N/A N/A /12/14 SE-5 N N/A N/A /12/14 SE-6 N N/A N/A /11/14 SE-7 N N/A N/A /11/14 SE-8 N N/A N/A /11/14 SE-9 N N/A N/A /11/14 SE-10 N N/A N/A /11/14 SE-11 N N/A N/A /11/14 SE-12 N N/A N/A /11/14 SE-13 N N/A N/A /11/14 SE-14 N N/A N/A /11/14 SE-15 N N/A N/A /11/14 SE-16 N N/A N/A /11/14 SE-17 N N/A N/A /11/14 BS :30-N1415-W Page 71 of 74
102 Page 72 of 74
103 CH2M HILL Applied Sciences Laboratory (ASL) 1100 NE Circle Blvd, Suite 300 Tel Amended Report : 04/18/14 Client: Klamath Lake Ewauna SDG No.: N1415 Project/Task: Revision No.: 1 Completed by: K. Fordyce Affected (s): SW3010A/SW6010 Approved by: KM Amendment(s) Completed and Reason(s): Additional analyses requested by client. Amendment(s) Justification: X Reporting error Calculation error Missing information/data Wrong information/data Analytical problem/correction Client change/request Subcontracted laboratory error Other (define) Edata Required: X Yes No G:\ASLRTool\PDF_Fractions\N1415\N1415-M-AR.docx Doc Control ID: ASL
104 ANALYTICAL REPORT For: Klamath Lake Ewauna ASL Report #: N1415 Project ID: Attn: Darren Hippenstiel/PDX cc: Bruce Pratt/CVO Pat Heins/PDX Authorized and Released By: Laboratory Project Manager Kathy McKinley (541) ext April 18, 2014 All analyses performed by CH2M HILL are clearly indicated. Any subcontracted analyses are included as appended reports as received from the subcontracted laboratory. The results included in this report only relate to the samples listed on the following Sample Cross Reference page. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory. Any unusual difficulties encountered during the analysis of your samples are discussed in the attached case narratives. Accredited in accordance with NELAP: Oregon (100022) Arizona (0771) Louisiana (05031) Page 1 of 10
105 ASL Report #: N1415 Sample Receipt Comments We certify that the test results meet all NELAP requirements. Sample Cross Reference ASL Sample ID Client Sample ID /Time Collected Received N SE 1 03/06/14 14:57 03/07/14 N SE 2 03/06/14 15:18 03/07/14 N SE 3 03/06/14 15:33 03/07/14 N SE 4 03/06/14 13:22 03/07/14 N SE 5 03/06/14 13:40 03/07/14 N SE 6 03/06/14 16:45 03/07/14 N SE 7 03/06/14 16:30 03/07/14 N SE 8 03/06/14 16:10 03/07/14 N SE 9 03/06/14 11:55 03/07/14 N SE 10 03/06/14 11:36 03/07/14 N SE 11 03/06/14 11:20 03/07/14 N SE 12 03/06/14 10:48 03/07/14 N SE 13 03/06/14 10:20 03/07/14 N SE 14 03/06/14 09:55 03/07/14 N SE 15 03/06/14 09:00 03/07/14 N SE 16 03/06/14 08:28 03/07/14 N SE 17 03/06/14 08:00 03/07/14 Page 2 of 10
106 Page 3 of 10
WASTE CHARACTERIZATION: IN-SITU SOIL LOCATED AT ISRA OUTFALL 009 PLANNED EXCAVATION B1-1D
B1-1D WASTE CHARACTERIZATION: IN-SITU SOIL LOCATED AT ISRA OUTFALL 009 PLANNED EXCAVATION B1-1D Introduction This report presents supporting detailed information for the April 27, 2010 in-situ characterization
More informationENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS WEBER SIGN SERVICE, INC. th 730 EAST 8 STREET MICHIGAN CITY, INDIANA 46360
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS WEBER SIGN SERVICE, INC. th 730 EAST 8 STREET MICHIGAN CITY, INDIANA 46360 Prepared for: THE MICHIGAN CITY REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 100 EAST MICHIGAN BOULEVARD
More informationToledo Botanical Gardens Hill Ditch Stream Restoration and Dam Removal Project Sediment Feasibility Study
1800 Indian Wood Circle * Maumee, Ohio 43537 P: 419-891-2222 * F: 419-891-1595 * www.manniksmithgroup.com March 7, 2012 Ms. Jessica Hickey Davey Resource Group A Division of the Davey Tree Expert Company
More informationUrban Area Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Study Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives
Urban Area Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Study Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives Two background studies were recently completed investigating certain polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAHs)
More informationCalifornia Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region
California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region Linda S. Adams Secretary for Environmental Protection 1515 Clay Street, Suite 1400, Oakland, California 94612 (510) 622-2300 Fax
More informationTable 1 Ken Malloy Harbor Regional Park - Previous Sampling Results
TABLES Table 1 Ken Malloy Harbor Regional Park - Previous Sampling Results Soluble Threshold Total Threshold Sample Location, I.D., and Sample Depth (ft bgs) Limit Concentration Limit Concentration FWM-01
More informationTennessee Cleanup Standards for Hydrocarbon Contaminated Groundwater
Tennessee Cleanup Standards f Hydrocarbon Contaminated Groundwater Product (Residential) 0.001 mg/l 0.005 mg/l 0.072 mg/l Toluene 0.001 mg/l 1.0 mg/l 4.31 mg/l Gasoline Ethylbenzene 0.002 mg/l 0.7 mg/l
More informationEXPORT SOIL-MATERIAL QUALITY REQUIREMENTS
EXPORT SOIL-MATERIAL QUALITY REQUIREMENTS GENERAL Industrial operations have been conducted on Port of Long Beach property since the 1930s. Though it is unlikely that hazardous substances will be encountered
More informationTo: Ken Kerns and Janet Dalgleish, University of Minnesota From: Jim Eidem and Kristen Schimpke Subject: Oiled Roads Investigation Summary, Delisted U
Technical Memorandum To: Ken Kerns and Janet Dalgleish, University of Minnesota From: Jim Eidem and Kristen Schimpke Subject: Oiled Roads Investigation Summary Delisted UMRRC Superfund Site Date: December
More informationScope of Work for Water Sampling
Scope of Work for Water Sampling From: Meghan Betcher, Environmental Scientist Downstream Strategies, LLC 100 Railroad Ave. 304-445-7200 mbetcher@downstreamstrategies.com Date: June 26, 2017 Downstream
More informationTEKLAB, INC ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT. TestCode: SV_8310S_W. CLIENT: Kelron Environmental Work Order: Project: CHMGP/
TEKLAB, INC CLIENT: Kelron Environmental Date: 16-Jun-5 Sample ID: MB-25734 MBLK SeqNo: 12673 Acenaphthene ND.1.3 Acenaphthylene ND.5.15 Anthracene ND.1.3 Benzo(a)anthracene ND.3.9 Benzo(a)pyrene ND.4.12
More informationUpdated Ambient Concentrations of Toxic Chemicals in San Francisco Bay Sediments
CLEAN WATER / RMP NUMBER 749 JULY 2015 Updated Ambient Concentrations of Toxic Chemicals in San Francisco Bay Sediments July 2015 By: Don Yee, Philip Trowbridge and Jennifer Sun SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY INSTITUTE
More informationSubmittal Guidelines for Imported Soil. Soil Review & Acceptance Process
The following guidelines are provided as a prescriptive step process to ensure the contractual and regulatory requirements for Baylands Soil Processing are met and the appropriate quality control documentation
More informationTECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Date: February 26, 2016 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To: From: Re: Brian Ross, USEPA Region 9, Dredging & Sediment Management Team Beth Christian, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board Don Yee
More informationAppendix D - Geotechnical Report
Appendix D - Geotechnical Report CHUNG AND VANDER DOELEN ATTN: ERIC CHUNG 311 VICTORIA ST. N. KITCHENER ON N2H 5E1 Date Received: Report Date: Version: 18-AUG-15 25-AUG-15 :35
More informationSURPLUS SOIL-MATERIAL REUSE REQUIREMENTS
SURPLUS SOIL-MATERIAL REUSE REQUIREMENTS GENERAL Surplus soil-materials generated from most, if not all, Long Beach Harbor Department projects are unlikely to meet established Port Export Soil-material
More informationFIELD INVESTIGATION The Field work was completed on March 12, Specifically, the field work included the following tasks:
September 2, 204 Mr. Donald Webb President City of Beech Grove Redevelopment Commission 806 Main Street Beech Grove, Indiana 4607 RE: Letter Report Documenting Additional Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
More informationWASTE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA AND DEVELOPMENT OF SOIL TRIGGER VALUES FOR EPA-LICENSED SOIL RECOVERY FACILITIES
WASTE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA AND DEVELOPMENT OF SOIL TRIGGER VALUES FOR EPA-LICENSED SOIL RECOVERY FACILITIES 1. Introduction This guidance document applies to soil recovery facilities which exceed the operational
More informationLevels. 1.0 Screening. ntal Quality. Salt Lake. Dear Chris, health to. collected. Based on. the Liberty. Park Lake. Red Butte. sources, in.
December 8, 2011 Christopher Bittner Project Manager Utah Department of Environmen ntal Quality 195 North 1950 West Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 Subject: Risk-based Health Screening Levels in Support of
More informationPhase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Update. Bernard Benoit Project Management (BBPM) 2212 Gladwin Crescent, Unit B4 Ottawa, Ontario K1B 5N1
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Update 2720 Richmond Road Bernard Benoit Project Management (BBPM) 2212 Gladwin Crescent, Unit B4 K1B 5N1 Centre Multiservices Francophone de l Ouest d Ottawa
More informationWaste Classification Assessment Report for Soils. C Spencer Ltd. Energy Works Dalton Street Hull
1 Waste Classification Assessment Report for Soils C Spencer Ltd Energy Works Dalton Street Hull 2 Report Reference: 65445 Date of Report: 23.06.2017 Client: Site Address: C Spencer Ltd Energy Works Dalton
More informationPHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
A ANDERSON G GEOLOGICAL PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT SADRI PROPERTY TAX LOT 200, MAP 1S1025 TILLAMOOK, OREGON Prepared for TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON P.O. Box 649 Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 (503)
More informationPetcoke-Coal Test. David L. MacIntosh, Sc.D., C.I.H., Chief Science Officer. January 13, 2014
Petcoke-Coal Test Results David L. MacIntosh, Sc.D., C.I.H., Chief Science Officer January 13, 2014 Findings No evidence of petcoke or coal on surfaces or in soil of East Side and South Deering neighborhoods
More informationShallow Interval Soil Metal Sampling Platte to Park Hill 39 th Avenue Channel Project Area City and County of Denver, Colorado
Page intentionally left blank to accommodate double-sided printing July 31, 2017 Shallow Interval Soil Metal Sampling Platte to Park Hill 39 th Avenue Channel Project Area City and County of Denver, Colorado
More informationSOIL SAMPLING REPORT FOR BUILDING 1056 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT 24B, OLD RADIATOR SHOP/PAINT BOOTH FORT STEWART, GEORGIA
IMA SOIL SAMPLING REPORT FOR BUILDING 1056 AT SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT 24B, OLD RADIATOR SHOP/PAINT BOOTH AT FORT STEWART, GEORGIA FINAL Prepared for U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS SAVANNAH DISTRICT Contract
More informationSite Investigation Report. Don Miller 802 and 854 East Washington Avenue Madison, Wisconsin. Presented to:
Site Investigation Report Don Miller 802 and 854 East Washington Avenue Madison, Wisconsin Presented to: C i t y o f M a d i s o n City of Madison Engineering Department 210 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard
More informationTECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
NEWTON GEO-HYDROLOGY CONSULTING SERVICES P.O. BOX 0 SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA 0 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Citizens For Responsible Oil And Gas (CFROG) Brad Newton, Ph.D., P.G. 0 0 0 RE: Summary Review
More informationPLEASANT PARK LIMITED PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT TONKA BAY, MINNESOTA. January 14, 2016
LIMITED PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PLEASANT PARK TONKA BAY, MINNESOTA January 14, 2016 for City of Tonka Bay 1901 Manitou Road Tonka Bay, MN 55331 WSB PROJECT NO. 1987-570 701 Xenia Avenue
More informationCity of Sarnia. 255 Christina Street South Sarnia, Ontario N7T 7N2. Attention.: Mr. Pratt Rawat, Manager of Design and Infrastructure
City of Sarnia 255 Christina Street South Sarnia, Ontario N7T 7N2 Attention.: Mr. Pratt Rawat, Manager of Design and Infrastructure Environmental Subsurface Investigation Project Name 1541 Blackwell Road,
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT COMMAND HEADQUARTERS, UNITED STATES ARMY GARRISON, PICATINNY PICATINNY ARSENAL, NEW JERSEY
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT COMMAND HEADQUARTERS, UNITED STATES ARMY GARRISON, PICATINNY PICATINNY ARSENAL, NEW JERSEY 07806-5000 March 9, 017 SUBJECT: Comprehensive Environmental Response,
More informationLIMITED PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
REPORT ON LIMITED PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 2005 Greenwood Road Shreveport, Louisiana October 2012 Prepared for: Biomedical Research Foundation of Northwest Louisiana 1505 Kings Highway Shreveport,
More informationQuES&T Quality Environmental Solutions & Technologies, Inc.
QuES&T Quality Environmental Solutions & Technologies, Inc. May 11, 2012 White Plains City School District Facilities Building 580 North Street White Plains, NY 10605 Attn: Frank Stefanelli, Director of
More informationSAUGERTIES HARBOR, NY ESOPUS CREEK, NEW YORK FEDERAL NAVIGATION PROJECT MAINTENANCE DREDGING
Public Notice In replying refer to: Public Notice No. SH-AFO-15 Published: March 23, 2015 Expires: April 21, 2015 New York District Albany Field Office 1 Bond Street Troy, N.Y. 12180 ATTN: CENAN-OP-A SAUGERTIES
More informationNB: Unofficial translation, legally binding texts are those in Finnish and Swedish Ministry of the Environment, Finland. Government Decree 591/2006
NB: Unofficial translation, legally binding texts are those in Finnish and Swedish Ministry of the Environment, Finland Government Decree 591/2006 concerning the recovery of certain wastes in earth construction
More informationSoil Sampling and Analysis Report
Soil Sampling and Analysis Report between Webber Street and Bee Ridge Road Bank Stabilization Project Sarasota County, Florida Prepared for: HDR, Inc. 2621 Cattlemen Road, Suite 106 Sarasota, Florida 34232
More informationAPPENDIX B. Soil Sample Certificate of Analysis
APPENDIX B Soil Sample Certificate of Analysis 5 SHOREHAM DR DOWNSVIEW, ON M3N1S4 SOIL ANALYSIS REVIEWED BY: Mike Muneswar, BSc (Chem), Senior Inorganic Analyst TRACE ORGANICS REVIEWED BY: Jacky Takeuchi,
More informationPAHs in Surface Water by PDA and Fluorescence Detection
A P P L I C AT I O N N O T E Liquid Chromatography Authors: Catharine Layton Wilhad M. Reuter PerkinElmer, Inc. Shelton, CT PAHs in Surface Water by PDA and Fluorescence Detection Introduction Heightened
More informationFINAL PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION
FINAL PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION DRAVO SHIPYARD Operable Unit II RDC/Harbor Associates Properties Wilmington, Delaware DNREC Projects No. DE-1092 & DE-1096 February 2001 Department of Natural Resources and
More informationJune 2017 Port of Stockton Maintenance Dredging Sediment Characterization. Notice of Intent. Prepared for the Port of Stockton
June 2017 Port of Stockton 2017-2021 Maintenance Dredging Sediment Characterization Notice of Intent Prepared for the Port of Stockton June 2017 Port of Stockton 2017-2021 Maintenance Dredging Sediment
More informationTETRA TECH EM INC. March 18, Lynn Nakashima Project Manager Department of Toxic Substances Control 700 Heinz Avenue Berkeley, CA 94710
TETRA TECH EM INC. March 18, 2008 Lynn Nakashima Project Manager Department of Toxic Substances Control 700 Heinz Avenue Berkeley, CA 94710 Subject: Sampling Results for Surface Soil in the Pampas Grass
More informationFINAL REPORT. Environmental Monitoring Services during the Underground Storage Tank Removal at Fire Hall # Nicola Street
FINAL REPORT Environmental Monitoring Services during the Underground Storage Tank Removal at Fire Hall #6 1001 Nicola Street Prepared for: City of Vancouver 453 West 12 th Avenue Vancouver, BC V5Y 1V4
More informationTETRA TECH EM INC. February 13, 2008
TETRA TECH EM INC. February 13, 2008 Greg Haet EH&S Associate Director, Environmental Protection Office of Environment, Health & Safety University of California, Berkeley University Hall, 3rd Floor #1150
More informationStudy Summary. Evaluation of Soil Rx For Crude Oil Impacted Soil
Study Summary Evaluation of Soil Rx For Crude Oil Impacted Soil Study Completed In Cooperation With OES Industries Vinland Energy 3 Tier Technologies LLC June 2010 William M. Mitchell, PG, OES Industries
More informationFigure 1. PEER Footings Excavation Area
Figure 1. PEER Footings Excavation Area Black = new footing Red = approximate clean new footing excavation area, DU-1 Green = existing pad or footing to be left in place Blue = approximate TPH-e excavation
More informationAPPENDIX B SUPPLEMENTAL SAMPLING (SEDIMENT CORES)
APPENDIX B SUPPLEMENTAL SAMPLING (SEDIMENT CORES) March 2017 1776663-7045 Table 1 Summary of Sediment Analytical Results - Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons IOCO Former Refinery and Active Distribution
More informationApplicant: JOOLZ Date: Jan 30, 2015 NIEUWE HERENGRACHT 51-53, AMSTERDAM, THE NETHERLANS
Applicant: JOOLZ Date: Jan 30, 2015 NIEUWE HERENGRACHT 51-53, AMSTERDAM, THE NETHERLANS Attn: THEO SZARAFINSKI This is to supersede Report No. SZHH00933753 dated Jan 28, 2015 Sample Description: One (1)
More informationPrepared by: Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc Albemarle Point Place, Suite 115 Chantilly, VA 20151
INITIAL ABATEMENT REPORT ALLIED AVIATION RONALD REAGAN WASHINGTON NATIONAL AIRPORT FUEL FARM FACILITY Pollution Complaint # 2016-3082 11 Air Cargo Road ARLINGTON, VA 22202 Prepared for: Mr. Randy Chapman,
More informationFebruary 8, Mr. Jeff Vanderdasson, P.E. PACLAND 6400 SE Lake Road, Suite 300 Portland, Oregon 97222
Mr. Jeff Vanderdasson, P.E. PACLAND 6400 SE Lake Road, Suite 300 Portland, Oregon 97222 Re: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Recommendations Letter NW 9th Street and NW Spruce Avenue Corvallis, Benton
More informationPROPOSED REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN. NYSEG - Ithaca First St. MGP Ithaca, Tompkins County Site No February 2011
PROPOSED REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN NYSEG - Ithaca First St. MGP Ithaca, Tompkins County Site No. 755006 February 2011 Prepared by Division of Environmental Remediation New York State Department of Environmental
More informationBrownfields Assessment and Assistance
Analysiss of Brownfields Cleanup Alternatives Former Pike Utilities Property 4220 Charleston Street, Lake Worth Palm Beach County, Florida Brownfields Assessment and Cleanup Cooperative Agreement Assistance
More informationCHAR CHARACTERIZATION OF THERMOCHEMICAL TREATED KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS SEED SCREENINGS
CHAR CHARACTERIZATION OF THERMOCHEMICAL TREATED KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS SEED SCREENINGS S.M. Griffith and G.M. Banowetz The on-farm production of bioenergy from straw and seed screenings and the recycling of
More informationPennsylvania Clean-up Standards for Hydrocarbon Contaminated Groundwater
Pennsylvania Clean-up Standards for Hydrocarbon Contaminated Groundwater Product Parameter/ Constituent Lab Test Protocol & Number Water Standard / Action Level Leaded Gasoline, Aviation Gasoline, Jet
More informationMasse Environmental Consultants Ltd 1
Masse Environmental Consultants Ltd. 812 Vernon St. Nelson, BC, V1L 4G4 Tel.: 250-352-1147 Fax: 250-352-0422 www.masseenvironmental.com Fred Bullen May 5, 2017 Western Pacific Marine Ltd. 7721 Upper Balfour
More information1. What is the cleanup level look-up table and where can I find it?
Voluntary Remediation Program (VRP) (307) 777-7752 http://deq.state.wy.us/volremedi/index.asp Soil Cleanup Levels In its 2000 session, the Wyoming Legislature created new opportunities, procedures, and
More informationPROPOSED/FINAL PLAN ROUTING SLIP DNREC-SIRB. Routing and Approvals Required Prior to Submission:
PROPOSED/FINAL PLAN ROUTING SLIP DNREC-SIRB Site Name & No.: Project Officer: Stage/Activity: Due Date: Former BABS Real Estate Property (DE-1277) Lindsay J. Hall Routing and Approvals Required Prior to
More informationTable B1: Analytical Results for Nutrients in Surface Water
Table B1: Analytical Results for Nutrients in Surface Water Sample ID 1 2 Physical Tests Colour, True (Colour Units) 15 (4) units absolute, or 5 units above background (30-day average)
More informationGuidance Document Risk-Based Corrective Action (RBCA) For Residential and Commercial Heating Oil Systems. National Oilheat Research Alliance (NORA)
Guidance Document Risk-Based Corrective Action (RBCA) For Residential and Commercial National Oilheat Research Alliance (NORA) Forward Heating oil is used to heat many private homes as well as small commercial
More informationIOWA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT FINAL PROPOSED PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SITES CC-IAAP-001 AND CC-IAAP-002 OPERABLE UNIT NINE
IOWA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT FINAL FOR CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SITES CC-IAAP-001 AND CC-IAAP-002 OPERABLE UNIT NINE INTRODUCTION This Proposed Plan identifies the Preferred Remedial Alternatives for the closure
More informationMONTHLY UPDATE REPORT - PRIMROSE SOUTH W4M SEPTEMBER 22 TO OCTOBER 19, 2015
MONTHLY UPDATE REPORT - PRIMROSE SOUTH 09-21-067-04 W4M SEPTEMBER 22 TO OCTOBER 19, 2015 1 Introduction The Canadian Natural Resources Limited Primrose South in situ oil sands project is located in the
More informationSampling Strategy and Risk Evaluation of PAHs in Soil Near a Former Pipeline in Maine
Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Soils, Sediments, Water and Energy Volume 17 Article 10 May 2012 Sampling Strategy and Risk Evaluation of PAHs in Soil Near a Former Pipeline in Maine
More informationConceptual Site Mode and Phase 2 Work Plan
Conceptual Site Mode and Phase 2 Work Plan Pacific Property Holdings Site 1512 NE 67th Ave Portland, Oregon DEQ Site ID 6142 HydroCon Project Number: 2016-041 Prepared for: Tronghuy Pham Pacific Property
More informationECSI Number: Responsible Party: Klamath County. QTime Number: Entry Date: 9/22/04 (VCP)
ECSI Number: 1213 Responsible Party: Klamath County QTime Number: 37941 Entry Date: 9/22/04 (VCP) Proposed Remedial Action Staff Report - Addendum Chiloquin Forest Products Chiloquin, Klamath County, Oregon
More informationDrinking Water Quality and Compliance SaskWater Codette Lake Potable Water Supply System 2017 Notification to Consumers
Drinking Water Quality and Compliance SaskWater Codette Lake Potable Water Supply System 2017 Notification to Consumers The Water Security Agency (WSA) requires that, at least once each year, waterworks
More informationBorehole Logging Record
Borehole Logging Record Drilling Date: 24.2.16 Drilling Company: LIS Ltd 0.00 7 Bore Diameter: (mm) Ground Elevation: (mamsl) Soil or Rock Field Material Description Grass over dark grey silty sandy TOPSOIL
More informationSOIL INVESTIGATION McLAREN BIKE SKILLS PARK SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
FUGRO CONSULTANTS, INC. SOIL INVESTIGATION McLAREN BIKE SKILLS PARK SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO RECREATION AND PARKS DEPARTMENT JUNE 2013 Fugro Project No. 04.72130038
More informationMaterial Characterization Report
SSI-Metro12 Facility Carteret, NJ Page 1 of 3 Please complete all sections of the form, sign where indicated and return completed form to: Soil Safe, Inc. 6700 Alexander Bell Dr., Suite 300, Columbia MD
More informationAutomated Solid Phase Extraction of PAH Compounds Utilizing the SPE-DEX 5000
Automated Solid Phase Extraction of PAH Compounds Utilizing the SPE-DEX 5000 Melissa Lever, Horizon Technology, Inc., Salem, NH USA Key Words PAH, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, EPA 870, water extraction,
More informationPhase 2 Environmental Site Assessment of the Fuel Station Located at (& 11509)Wyoming Street, Detroit MI 48204
Timmermans Environmental Services, Inc. Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment of the Fuel Station Located at 11511 (& 1159)Wyoming Street, Detroit MI 4824 Prepared For: Fast Track Ventures 2541 Ecorse
More informationBrent D. Mawdsley, B.Sc. ASL Analytical Service Laboratories Ltd Triumph St., Vancouver, BC V5L 1K5
SPECIALIZED TESTING REQUIREMENTS TO MEET THE BC CONTAMINATED SITES REGULATION Brent D. Mawdsley, B.Sc. ASL Analytical Service Laboratories Ltd. 1988 Triumph St., Vancouver, BC V5L 1K5 ABSTRACT British
More informationPAH Analysis in Drinking Water using Disk SPE Automated with the SPE-DEX 5000
PAH Analysis in Drinking Water using Disk SPE Automated with the SPE-DEX 5000 Alicia Cannon, Horizon Technology, Salem, NH USA Key Words PAH, Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, USEPA 550.1 Introduction
More informationMonterey Dam Impoundment Sediment Report
Monterey Dam Impoundment Sediment Report SUBMITTED TO City of Janesville Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources PREPARED BY M. Beth Wentzel, P.E., Inter Fluve, Inc Ben Swanson, Ph.D., Inter Fluve, Inc.
More informationNorth Carolina Cleanup Standards for Hydrocarbon Contaminated Groundwater
North Carolina Cleanup Standards for Hydrocarbon Contaminated Groundwater The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources has adopted Risk-Based Assessment and Corrective Action procedures
More informationFINAL PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION. Burns and McBride. South Market and A Streets August 19, 2008
FINAL PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION Burns and McBride South Market and A Streets August 19, 2008 Wilmington, Delaware DNREC Project No. DE-0325 This Revised Final Plan of Remedial Action (Final Plan) presents
More informationCompilation and Assessment of Lab Samples from EGCS Washwater Discharge on Carnival ships. February 2019
Compilation and Assessment of Lab Samples from EGCS Washwater Discharge on Carnival ships February 2019 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background to the work In 2016 Carnival Corporation collected an initial set
More informationPlease find information regarding the Leachate reporting requirements for the July 15, 2018
From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: SPOMO1701@outlook.com Monday, July 16, 2018 10:16 PM Environmental Compliance ENV:EX; marty@chholdings.ca SPO MO1701 20180715 Status Update July 15, 2018 CHH Progress
More informationRock Fill Layer Management and Maintenance Plan Former BNSF Site 13 Highway 99 Eugene, Oregon
Rock Fill Layer Management and Maintenance Plan 13 Highway 99 Prepared for: Half Moon LLC P.O. Box 25112 97402 PBS Project No. 51833.000 Rock Fill Layer Management and Maintenance Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationRisk Mitigation Work Plan for the Proposed Fairfield Jail/Public Safety Facility 334 West Wheeling Street Lancaster, Ohio
Risk Mitigation Work Plan for the Proposed Fairfield Jail/Public Safety Facility 334 West Wheeling Street Lancaster, Ohio Submitted to: Fairfield County Board of Commissioners 210 East Main Street Lancaster,
More informationSanta Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Report Group 10 Southern Undeveloped Area
Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Report Group 10 Southern Undeveloped Area Chatsworth August 3, 2009 Doug Sheeks, R.G. Engineering Geologist DTSC, Sacramento 1 But First CERCLA
More informationAPPENDIX 19A-10. Biological Uptake Factors
APPENDIX 19A-10 Biological Uptake Factors Table of Contents 1.0 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT... 3 1.1 Biological Uptake Factors... 3 1.1.1 Soil to Terrestrial Invertebrates UP SI... 4 1.1.1.1 Organics... 4 1.1.1.2
More informationApril USING POLYETHYLENE PASSIVE SAMPLERS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF DISSOLVED PAHs IN GROUND WATER. Terry Obal, Ph.D., C.Chem.
April 2012 USING POLYETHYLENE PASSIVE SAMPLERS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF DISSOLVED PAHs IN GROUND WATER Terry Obal, Ph.D., C.Chem. Acknowledgments Dillon Consulting Limited Ontario MOE Maxxam Analytics
More informationTotal Leachate Collected= 9.45 m^3 Total Leachate Stored= m^3 Total Leachate Transported= 0 m^3
From: spomo1701@outlook.com To: Environmental Compliance ENV:EX; marty@chholdings.ca Subject: SPO MO1701-Status Update March 15, 2018 Date: Thursday, March 15, 2018 10:20:27 PM Attachments: Feb 2018-CHH
More informationGeorge s Used Equipment Removal Action Report Laboratory analytical results were compared to the cleanup objectives outlined in the previously approve
July 10, 2015 Ed Olson MPCA 520 Lafayette Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55115 RE: George s Used Equipment Response Action Report UMore Park OU2 and OU3 Rosemount, MN Bay West Proposal J140651 Dear Mr. Olson:
More informationDRAFT. Prepared for: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY-REGION 5 SUPERFUND DIVISION 77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD CHICAGO, ILLINOIS
DECEMBER 22, 2008 DRAFT ANALYSIS OF BROWNFIELDS CLEANUP ALTERNATIVES CITY OF MICHIGAN CITY, INDIANA S BROWNFIELDS CLEANUP PROJECT FOR THE FORMER NORFOLK & WESTERN RAILROAD PROPERTY E STREET AND TRAIL CREEK
More informationSOIL MANAGEMENT PLAN THE CITY OF KNOXVILLE
SOIL MANAGEMENT PLAN SOUTH WATERFRONT RIVER PLAIN PARK Prepared For: THE CITY OF KNOXVILLE Knoxville, TN Prepared By: MACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING, INC. January 11, 2010 MACTEC Project 3043-08-1018
More informationSampling Results for Western Transition Area Surface Soil Samples University of California, Berkeley, Richmond Field Station, Richmond, California
TETRA TECH EM INC. February 13, 2008 Greg Haet EH&S Associate Director, Environmental Protection Office of Environment, Health & Safety University of California, Berkeley University Hall, 3rd Floor #1150
More informationFinal Plan of Remedial Action
Final Plan of Remedial Action Peninsula Park LLC Operating Unit -1 (OU-1) East Seventh Street Peninsula Wilmington, Delaware DNREC Project No. DE-1147 February 2000 Department of Natural Resources and
More informationQuantifying the First Flush in Rainwater Harvesting Through Continuous Monitoring & Analysis of Stormwater Runoff
Quantifying the First Flush in Rainwater Harvesting Through Continuous Monitoring & Analysis of Stormwater Runoff Jessica Lay, M.S. Student Dr. Jason Vogel, P.E.; Dr. Jason Belden; Dr. Glenn Brown, P.E.
More informationAPPENDIX I TARGETED DUE-DILIGENCE TESTING TRITON ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., OCTOBER 2013 LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC.
APPENDIX I TARGETED DUE-DILIGENCE TESTING TRITON ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., OCTOBER 2013 LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC. TARGETED DUE DILIGENCE TESTING Proposed Harding High School Parcel Bond Street Bridgeport,
More informationHamilton Works 2017 Annual Toxic Substances Reduction Report (O. Reg. 455/09)
Hamilton Works 2017 Annual Toxic Substances Reduction Report (O. Reg. 455/09) Issued June 1, 2018 Basic Facility Information Section 1 Facility Information Owner Stelco Inc. Facility name Hamilton Works
More informationPhase I Environmental Site Assessment
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 97204 Prepared for: Multnomah County 401 NE Dixon Avenue, Suite 274 97227 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 1 2.0 PROPERTY AND REPORT INFORMATION... 3 2.1
More informationSt. Maries Creosote Site. February 2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS St. Maries Creosote Site February 2014 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 Site Name and Location... 1 1.2 Lead and Support Agencies... 1 1.3 Statement of Purpose... 1 1.4 Administrative Record...
More informationFINAL PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION. Deemer Steel Site - Operable Unit-I New Castle, DE
FINAL PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION Deemer Steel Site - Operable Unit-I New Castle, DE DNREC Project No. DE 1243 March 2002 Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control Division of Air
More informationN00216.AR NAS CORPUS CHRISTI a
N00216.AR.00478 NAS CORPUS CHRISTI 5090.3a SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN AMENDMENT FOR REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION AND FEASIBILITY STUDY AT THE GUNNERY TRAINING COMPLEX, NAS CORPUS CHRISTI TX 3/1/2015 RESOLUTION
More informationTRAFALGAR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
TRAFALGAR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS March 28, 2018 MacEwen Petroleum Inc. 18 Adelaide Street, P.O. Box 100 Maxville, Ontario K0C 1T0 Attention: Mr. Larry Duchscher Dear Sir: RE: Sampling Analytical Summary
More informationOntario Soil Standards (other than sediment) II (mg/kg) Potable Ground Water Non-Potable Ground Water. Industrial/ Commercial
T3 Table 3 Soil quality benchmarks I Substance Ontario Soil Standards (other than sediment) II (mg/kg) Potable Ground Water Non-Potable Ground Water Canadian Environmental Quality Criteria and Guidelines
More informationHazardous Materials December 9, Hazardous Materials Existing Conditions
3.11 3.11.1 Existing Conditions A description of the Project Site can be found in the Section 2.0, Project Description, of this DEIS. Specific properties constituting the subject property are included
More informationAPPENDIX M. HHERA Chemical Analysis Data Baseline Soil and Vegetation Samples
Hangingstone Expansion Project Supplemental Submission Part 4 - Appendices Appendix M: HHERA Chemical Analysis Data Baseline Soil and Vegetation Samples February 2011 APPENDIX M HHERA Chemical Analysis
More informationCadmium B ug/l HRL Chromium B ug/l MCL 100
Appendix 4, Table A4-1 Inorganics/Metals Arsenic 7440-38-2 6010B ug/l 25 4.41 10 MCL 2 Barium 7440-39-3 6010B ug/l 10 1.04 2000 HRL Use Tier 2 5 (or hardnessspecific value if lower) Cadmium 7440-43-9 6010B
More informationPotential contaminants in rainwater after a bushfire
Potential contaminants in rainwater after a bushfire Kirstin Ross 1, Harriet Whiley 1, Emmanuel Chubaka 1, Malinda Steenkamp 2, Paul Arbon 2 1. Environmental Health, College of Science and Engineering,
More informationSUPPLEMENTAL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
SUPPLEMENTAL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT For the: CLIFTON OU-2 OFF-SITE AREA (89 WILLOW AVE) Former Manufactured Gas Plant Site Staten Island, Richmond County, New York Site No. 2-43-023 Prepared for:
More information