Shippers meeting Maintenance Schedule

Transcription

1 Shippers meeting Maintenance Schedule February 9 th,

2 Agenda Look back at 2011 LNG terminal maintenance 2012 maintenance schedule 2012 shippers survey Communication and publication Ongoing European harmonisation Conclusion 2

3 Look back at 2011 Sophie Ménard - Marketing & Sales - GRTgaz 3

4 Where to find indicators? 4

5 Indicators published Reduced capacity available Compliance with the schedule published at the beginning of the year on the rise Compliance with the schedule as published at D-60 on the rise Compliance with the schedule published at the beginning of the year, to lower Compliance with the schedule as published at D-60, to lower 5

6 2011: A very good reliability of the maintenance schedule Over 2011, 99.74% of firm capacity made available is at least equal to firm capacity planned (this result takes only into account PIRs, PITTM and North to South link capacities). Rate (in %) Annual rate: ConfPTC- % : Conf PTC - Compliance with the annual maintenance schedule to lower 6

7 2011, a year for a record The works schedule published at the beginning of the year was closely followed in Compared to the last years, 2011 publication precision has increased. February Maintenance Schedule is reliable % % % % % margin of error divided by 10 Rate of capacity reduced below forecast levels 7

8 Rised capacities during 2011 The compliance with the annual maintenance schedule on rise is still good Rate (in %) Annual rate: ConfPTC % % % % % % Rate of capacity rised over forecast levels 8

9 Your satisfaction? Were you satisfied by our communication on maintenance schedule during 2011? 9

10 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION 10

11 LNG Terminal maintenance Pascal Fonrouge - Sales - Elengy 11

12 Summary General points Operating principle of an LNG terminal Types of maintenance works on an LNG Terminal Cargo scheduling process 12

13 General points Elengy operates and maintains three LNG Terminals Mains figures : 13

14 Operating principle Three functions which have a different impact on the managing of capacities Ship access and unloading (berthing, unloading arms) LNG storage Regasification and send-out on GRTgaz network 14

15 Types of maintenance works on a LNG terminal New fenders Mandatory inspections and tests (Ex : controlling safety devices, testing safety valves, wall thickness on equipment under pressure, ). Maintenance (Ex : LP and HP cryogenic pumps, Open Rack Vaporisers, cleaning filters on heating system, ). Berth n 2 Development and Revamping (Ex : tank revamping, cryogenic valves and piping replaced, electric power lines, upgrade of berthing capacity for Qmax vessels, ). Tank n 2 Steel frame and cryogenic pipe insulation New mooring hooks 15

16 Cargoes scheduling process Send-out Capacity Contractual commitment on the unloading slots Storage management Annual delivery program fixing process Send-out capacity December Y-1 May Y-1 Adjacent TSOs capacity The send-out capacity deducted from the terminal regasification capacity and the GRTgaz transmission capacity 16

17 Thanks for your attention

18 2012 Maintenance Schedule Carole Etienne Gas System division - GRTgaz Mathilde Stoltz Sales - Storengy Pascal Fonrouge Sales - Elengy 18

19 Agenda Key points Main figures describing 2012 maintenance program Main works Comparison of the impact of 2012 vs 2011 maintenance program Graph presenting available capacities On each contractual paths Resulting from the coordination with adjacent operators Storages filling 19

20 Key points Maintenance works planning for 2012 still under construction The filling of the underground storages is guaranteed in 2012 GRTgaz is doing its best to optimise its work schedule in cooperation with the adjacent operators 20

21 Why are maintenance works necessary? There are 3 major kinds of works: Preventive maintenance (testing, inspection, etc.) Repair works (depending on inspection results, following damage to facilities by a third party, etc.) Actions to increase future capacity (connection of new facilities to the existing system, etc.) 21

22 Main works for 2012 : pipes inspection Instrumented pigging (+ a period of repairs) on a section of the pipe between Taisnières H and Oltingue Instrumented pigging (+ a period of repairs) on the pipe used to inject in Atlantique Nord storage group 22

23 Main works for 2012 : development New pipe (50 km) in order to prepare the future connection of Dunkerque LNG terminal New devices to develop linepack capacities near Obergailbach (need for Combined Cycle Power stations) New compressor station near Paris to transit more quantities of gas to Atlantique Nord storage group Dismantling of turbo compressor station (replaced by electrical ones) New interconnection station and compressor station between Fos and north balancing zone

24 Main works for 2012 Instrumented pigging Pipe repairs Other kind of works Cleaning pigging 24

25 Key figures : accumulated available firm capacities 450 Forecast of minimum available capacities (TWh) in the summer (April to October) TOTAL Entry PIR TOTAL Exit PIR TOTAL N>S & Inj Nord Atlantique More or less the same impact than in 2011 TOTAL PITTM 25

26 Available capacities on border points GWh/d. transferred in 2011 Forecast of minimum available capacities (TWh) in the summer (April to October) Obergailbach: more impacting works (development of linepack capacities) Entry Dunkerque Entry Taisnières H Entry Taisnières B Entry Obergailbach Entry Midi Exit Oltingue Exit Midi Dunkerque: more impacting works in 2012 compared to 2011 (tie-in of a new pipe) Taisnières H: less impacting works in 2012 than in

27 Terminals capacities 80 Forecast of minimum available capacities (TWh) in the summer (April to October) PITM Fos PITM Montoir : repairs on main pipes connected to Fos LNG terminals now finished 2012: repairs on main pipes connected to Montoir LNG terminal now finished

28 Links capacities Forecast of minimum available capacities (TWh) in the summer (April to October North to South + injection in Nord Atlantique (firm capacity) 2012 : more works with impacts compared to 2011 Even if repairs on Maine pipe are finished: Instrumented pigging + a period of repairs on the main pipe used for injection (between Cherré and Chémery) More maintenance works on Cherré compressor station 28

29 Coordination with all adjacent operators Particular iterating process for coordination with Elengy, STMFC and Storengy GASSCO Dunkerque Fluxys Taisnières OGE Obergaibach Elengy Montoir Oltingue Transitgas Storengy Midi TIGF Fos Elengy STMFC 29

30 Send-out capacities from Elengy in Montoir 30

31 GRTgaz available capacities in Montoir 31

32 Results of coordination between Elengy & GRTgaz in Montoir 32

33 33

34 Send-out capacities from Elengy in Fos Tonkin 34

35 Send-out capacities from Elengy/STMFC in Fos Cavaou 35

36 Send-out capacities in Fos LNG terminals 36

37 GRTgaz available capacities in Fos 37

38 GRTgaz available capacities in Fos 38

39 Results of coordination between Elengy/STMFC & GRTgaz in Fos 39

40 Injection in Atlantique Nord storage group (Chémery-Soings-Céré) 40

41 Injection in Nord-Ouest storage group (St Illiers, Beynes supérieur + profond) 41

42 Injection in Nord-Est storage group (St Clair, Germigny, Cerville, Trois-Fontaines) 42

43 Injection in Sud-Est storage group (Etrez, Tersanne, Manosque)

44 Injection in Nord B storage group (Gournay) 44

45 Dunkerque 45

46 Taisnières H 46

47 Taisnières B 47

48 Obergailbach 48

49 Exit Midi (South zone > TIGF) 49

50 Exit Oltingue Coordination under discussion with OGE, Transitgas and Fluxys to limit the impact of works planned by OGE during summer

51 Link North to South 51

52 Filling of storages GRTgaz study carried out for every group of underground storages, taking into account: restrictions of capacities due to GRTgaz works on all the contractual paths forecasts of storages performances and the filling targets at the end of the injection campaign supplied by Storengy capacities of LNG terminals marketed by Elengy and STMFC Hypothesis: the storages are totally empty at the beginning of the injection campaign the target at the end of the injection campaign corresponds to the maximum filling (100% of available volume) The works planned in 2012 by GRTgaz do not limit the filling of the storages during the injection campaign 52

53 Filling of Atlantique Nord storage group 53

54 Filling of Nord-Ouest storage group 54

55 Filling of Nord-Est storage group 55

56 Filling of Sud-Est storage group 56

57 Filling of Nord B storage group 57

58 Next steps Reference publication of maintenance works is foreseen at the end of February 2012 Before this deadline: B2B meetings with shippers who so wish (information on works, examination of points of difficulty, etc.) Adjustment and optimisation according to forecasts 58

59 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION 59

60 2012 Shipper Survey Feedback Avigaële Le Bastard - Marketing & Sales - GRTgaz 60

61 Agenda Shipper Survey Feedback Schedule reminder Results of the 2012 Shipper Survey Advices for

62 Shipper Survey Feedback & Schedule reminder 62

63 A reliable study, but yet many late answers No answers Late answers 15% 21% 64% Answers in time 80% of answers +15% increase since last year 95% of global subscribed capacities reliable study 15% late answers Warn us if specified contact in charge of the Shipper Survey As a reminder, we ask you: Prevision of monthly nominations For each contractual point For one year and/or gas season 63

64 Shipper Survey schedule Jan/Feb.2012 From Feb 12 until Mar 12 Jun/Jul.2012 From Jul.12 until Oct.12 Nov.2011 Apr.2012 Oct.2012 Winter Gas Season Summer Gas Season Winter + Summer Previsions From November 11 until October 12 Summer Previsions Precisions about Summer From April 12 until October 12 64

65 Shipper Survey Important in order to: Plan the long-term use of the network Adapt the maintenance program Contacts: Your operational contact Obligation due to the Transmission Contract At each Operator s Request, at the most one time a month, the shipper shall notify GRTgaz of its best forecasts for delivery, transport and offtake for each Network Point [ ] (Clause 34) 65

66 Results of the 2012 Shipper Survey 66

67 Results of the 2012 shipper survey Comparison between Maintenance Program sent in November actualized: CMXT (Maximum Technical Capacities) Forecasts received from shippers: smoothed monthly values Figure out difficult periods Adjust in consequence the maintenance program Focus on 3 specific contractual points Oltingue Exit Fos North - South Link 67

68 Oltingue Maintenance program close to forecasts on 1 period Maintenance of 20 days vs. monthly forecasts 68

69 Fos (Cavaou + Tonkin) Emission Maintenance program doesn t impact any more forecasts : optimisation of restrictions following your answers 69

70 North South Link Forecasts close to the maintenance program on just 1 restricted period 70

71 Advices for

72 Advices for 2012 If you meet some difficulties with the Maintenance Program: If global analysis shows no congestions Optimisation possible Daily Capacity/Auctions available UIOLI available Analysis can be done in B2B GRTgaz operational contact B2B meetings all along the year can be organized to improve the use of the network 72

73 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION 73

74 Communication & publication around the maintenance schedule Sophie Ménard - Marketing & Sales - GRTgaz 74

75 Planning publication for 2012 Update of the provisional schedule by First publication on ECT / TRANS@ctions August November February, 9 th End of D-60 D-5 D-1 February Ongoing concertation with adjacent operators B2B meetings ECT/ TRANS@ctions updates Publication of guidelines on maintenance works impacts for 2012, by Shippers' Meeting 75

76 Novelty Alert in case of more/less restrictions in D-1 New wording: CRT (Technical Restricted Capacity) CTE (Effective Technical Capacity) New data: CMNTi, CMXTi CMXTt CMXTi CTE COSf CMNTi CMNTt Annual forecast zone (PTC) D-3 D-1 76

77 Maintenance works schedule Research Results 77

78 Maintenance works schedule Detail of a publication notice Historical restrictions data At the first loading, you only visualize TRf, TRi and CTE columns. When selecting «+», you can see minimum, maximum and restrictions data. 78

79 Operational capacity with: New publications: ACO/BCO/PCO/SCO ACO : Operational capacity notice PCO : Operational capacity schedule Your last nominations Your operational subscribed capacities The restriction rates Your operational effective capacities BCO : Operational capacity statement SCO : Operational capacity synthesis Your operational allocated capacities UIOLI capacities allocated ( within and above your rights) UIOLI capacities available 79

80 Extensive support Demo sessions for business users: February 17 th March 12 th March 2 nd User guide for a quick start Special support during the first 2 weeks of the cutover Reinforced user assistance team for operational matters Dedicated hotline for connection matters Your account manager remains at your disposal for any information 80

81 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION 81

82 Ongoing European harmonisation Marc Tancré - Gas System division - GRTgaz 82

83 Scope Define a minimum set of requirements TSOs may give additional info (visual timetable, details on nature of work) Has to be in line with: Regulation 715/2009 Annex 1 Chapter 3 ENTSOG s proposal 83

84 Regulation 715/2009 Annex 1 Chapter Form of publication (a) on a website accessible to the public, free of charge and without any need to register or otherwise sign on with the transmission system operator; (e) in downloadable format that allows for quantitative analyses; (f) in consistent units, in particular kwh (with a combustion reference temperature of 298,15 K) shall be the unit for energy content and m 3 (at 273,15 K and 1,01325 bar) shall be the unit for volume (i.e. Nm 3 ); (g) in the official language(s) of the Member State and in English Information to be published at all relevant points and the time schedule according to which this information should be published (f) planned and actual interruption of interruptible capacity; (g) planned and unplanned interruptions to firm services as well as the information on restoration of the firm services (in particular, maintenance of the system and the likely duration of any interruption due to maintenance). Planned interruptions shall be published at least 42 days in advance. 84

85 Monthly Annual ENTSOG s proposal Specify contents for planned maintenance publication: Cross border interconnection point affected Impact on the available capacity (% and amount) Nature of planned maintenance on-line inspection; pipeline works; installation works Planning period and duration Specify different conditions for annual and monthly publications: before 15/11/Y-1, publication of periods of preliminary planned maintenance scheduled Y with impact on firm and interruptible capacity at least 42 days before the start of a planned maintenance, publication of the planning and duration (from and to date) and impact on available capacity 85

86 Annual publication proposal Before 15/11 for the following year.xls file ( downloadable + allowing for quantitative analyses ) Interconnection Point*: XXXXXXXX Units of measurements: kwh (based on GCV; combustion reference temperature: K) AND/OR Nm 3 (plus additional units if requested/suitable for national purposes, better if in separated spreadsheets) Month TECHNICAL AVAILABLE CAPACITY FIRM capacity PLANNED INTERRUPTION % AVAILABLE CAPACITY AVAILABLE CAPACITY TECHNICAL AVAILABLE CAPACITY INTERRUPTIBLE capacity (one sub-table for each category: first, second, third class etc) PLANNED INTERRUPTION % AVAILABLE CAPACITY AVAILABLE CAPACITY PERIOD (i.e. number of days during the month affected by the detailed maintenance) # % % % % NATURE OF PLANNED MAINTENANCE (on-line inspection; pipeline works; installation works) % % installation works % % installation works % % pipeline works # % % on-line inspection * Please consult also the adjacent TSO's website 86

87 Monthly publication proposal At least 42 days before related month.xls file ( downloadable + allowing for quantitative analyses ) Interconnection Point*: XXXXXXXX Units of measurements: kwh (based on GCV; combustion reference temperature: K) AND/OR Nm 3 (plus additional units if requested/suitable for national purposes, better if in separated spreadsheets) Day TECHNICAL AVAILABLE CAPACITY FIRM capacity PLANNED INTERRUPTION % AVAILABLE CAPACITY AVAILABLE CAPACITY TECHNICAL AVAILABLE CAPACITY INTERRUPTIBLE capacity (one sub-table for each category: first, second, third class etc) PLANNED INTERRUPTION % AVAILABLE CAPACITY AVAILABLE CAPACITY # % % 2 NATURE OF PLANNED MAINTENANCE (on-line inspection; pipeline works; installation works) % % 0 Installation works % % 1.7 Pipeline works % % 0 On-line inspection % % 0 Installation works #31 (or 30 or 28) % % 0 Installation works * Please consult also the adjacent TSO's website 87

88 To be continued 88

89 A few words to conclude Sylvain Lemelletier Marketing & Sales - GRTgaz 89

90 Let s go on working together... First presentation with Elengy and Storengy We will still progress European harmonisation New tools (Trans@ctions) Thank you to send us your forecasts You can contact us for a B2B meeting Call your usual operational contact 90