BISHOP FARMSTEAD OFFICES OF PINELANDS PRESERVATION ALLIANCE ENERGY ASSESSMENT. for NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES CHA PROJECT NO.

Transcription

1 BISHOP FARMSTEAD OFFICES OF PINELANDS PRESERVATION ALLIANCE ENERGY ASSESSMENT for NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES CHA PROJECT NO NOVEMBER 2011 Prepared by: 6 Campus Drive Parsippany, NJ (973)

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXISTING CONDITIONS Building General 3.2 Utility Usage 3.3 HVAC Systems 3.4 Control Systems 3.5 Lighting/Electrical Systems 3.6 Plumbing Systems 4.0 ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES ECM-1 Insulate HHW Piping 4.2 ECM-2 Boiler Replacement 4.3 ECM-3 Replace AC Condensing Units 4.4 ECM-4 Replace Basement Windows 4.5 ECM-5 Install Seals on Storm Windows 4.6 ECM-6 Install Ceiling Insulation 4.7 ECM-7 Replace Domestic Hot Water Heater 4.8 ECM-8 Install Low-Flow Plumbing Fixtures 4.9 ECM-9 Install Energy Star Appliances 4.10 ECM-10 Lighting Replacements 4.11 ECM-11 Install Occupancy Sensors 4.12 ECM-12 Lighting Replacements with Occupancy Sensors 5.0 PROJECT INCENTIVES Incentives Overview 5.2 Building Incentives 6.0 ALTERNATIVE ENERGY EVALUATION Geothermal 6.2 Solar 6.3 Wind 6.4 Combined Heat and Power Generation (CHP) 6.5 Biomass Power Generation 6.6 Demand Response Curtailment 7.0 EPA PORTFOLIO MANAGER CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS

3 APPENDICES A Utility Usage Analysis B Project Summary C ECM-1 Insulate HHW Piping D ECM-2 Boiler Replacement E ECM-3 Replace AC Condensing Units F ECM-4 Replace Basement Windows G ECM-5 Install Storm Window Seals H ECM-6 Install Ceiling Insulation I ECM-7 Replace Domestic Hot Water Heater J ECM-8 Install Low-Flow Plumbing Fixtures K ECM-9 Install Energy Star Appliances L ECM-10 Lighting Replacements M ECM-11 Install Occupancy Sensors N ECM-12 Lighting Replacements with Occupancy Sensors O New Jersey Pay For Performance Incentive Program P Photovoltaic (PV) Rooftop Solar Power Generation Q Solar Thermal Domestic Hot Water Plant R Wind S EPA Portfolio Manager T Equipment Inventory

4 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND The Bishop Farmstead Offices of Pinelands Preservation Alliance is a 2,900 square foot facility consisting of a basement, two floors of office space, and an attic. The facility is located at 17 Pemberton Road, Southampton, NJ. The building was constructed in 1753 with an addition in the early 1800s. Pinelands purchased the facility in The Bishop Farmstead Offices operates Monday through Friday from 8:30 AM to 5:30 PM, and some weekends for special events. The facility is occupied by up to 9 people during these hours. There is also a visitor center where resources about the area, energy conservation information, and touring materials can be obtained. Pinelands was interested in considering all potential energy saving measures, regardless if payback was applicable, as a learning tool for visitors. New Jersey s Clean Energy Program, funded by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, supports energy efficiency and sustainability for Municipal and Local Government Energy Audits. Through the support of a utility trust fund, New Jersey is able to assist state and local authorities in reducing energy consumption while increasing comfort. New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 1 of 25

5 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report details the results of the Bishop Farmstead Offices of Pinelands Preservation Alliance, a 2,900 square foot facility consisting of offices and visitor center. The original building was constructed in 1753 with an addition in the early 1800s. Various potential Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) were identified for the above categories. Potential annual savings of $3,000 for the recommended ECMs may be realized with a payback of 5.4 years. The ECMs identified in this report will allow for the building to reduce its energy usage and if pursued has the opportunity to qualify for the New Jersey SmartStart Buildings Program and/or Direct Install Program. A summary of the costs, savings, and paybacks for the recommended ECMs follows: Summary of Energy Conservation Measures - Bishop Farmstead Offices Approx. Payback Payback Energy Conservation Approx. Potential Recommended For Annual w/o w/ Measure Costs Incentive* Implementation Savings Incentive Incentive ECM-1 Insulate HHW Piping $ 200 $ 1, $ X ECM-2 Boiler Replacement $ 7,900 $ $ 4, X ECM-3 Replace AC Condensing Units $ 4,700 $ $ 2, X ECM-4 Replace Basement Windows $ 1,100 $ $ ECM-5 Install Storm Window Seals $ 300 $ $ X ECM-6 Install Ceiling Insulation $ 1,700 $ $ X ECM-7 Replace Domestic Hot Water Heater $ 3,500 $ $ ECM-8 Install Low-Flow Plumbing $ 2,200 $ - - $ - - Fixtures ECM-9 Install Energy Star Appliances $ 1,100 $ $ ECM-10 Lighting Replacements $ 1,000 $ $ ECM-11 Install Occupancy Sensors $ 400 $ $ Lighting ECM-12 Replacements with Occupancy Sensors $ 1,400 $ $ X * Incentive shown is the maximum amount potentially available per the NJ SmartStart or Direct Install Programs. New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 2 of 25

6 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 Building General The Bishop Farmstead Offices of Pinelands Preservation Alliance is a 2,900 square foot facility consisting of offices and a visitor center. The original building was constructed in 1753, and spaces included a conference room, visitor room, and offices above these rooms. The kitchen, rear offices, and supplemental second floor offices above these spaces were added in the early 1800s. This facility operates Monday through Friday from 8:30 AM to 5:30 PM, and as required on weekends for special events. The facility is occupied by a maximum of nine people during office hours. There is also a visitor center area specific resources can be obtained. The occupancy of this room varies. The building envelopes of the main building and addition were constructed in the same manner. Exterior walls consist of 8 block finished with 1 plaster. The roof is constructed of pine slates, one layer of tar (felt) paper, and finished with cedar shingles. Roof assembly is covered in moss. Removal of moss and further inspection would be recommended to determine the condition of the roof assembly. The ceiling is constructed of 1 wood planks, 6 air space, and plaster. Exterior doors are solid wood. The facility received grant money from a historical preservation fund and cannot alter the exterior appearance of the building. Therefore, the doors, walls, windows, and roof must be replaced with materials pertaining to the time period they were originally installed. 3.2 Utility Usage Utilities include electricity, propane, fuel oil #2, and potable water. Electricity is delivered and supplied by Public Service Electric & Gas Company (PSE&G). Propane and fuel oil #2 is supplied and delivered by Allen s Oil & Propane. Potable water is provided at no cost by wells from an aquifer under the facility. The facility has one electric meter; from May 2009 through May 2010, the annual electric usage was 5,210 kwh at a cost of about $1,500. Review of electricity bills during this period showed that the facility was charged at the following rates: consumption unit cost of $0.168 per kwh; demand unit cost of $11.40 per kw; and blended unit cost of $0.287 per kwh. Electrical usage was generally higher in the summer months when air conditioning equipment was operational. From April 2010 through May 2011, the facility purchased 1,306 gallons of fuel oil #2 to be consumed by the oil-fired boiler. Based on the annual cost of $ , the price for fuel oil was $3.88 per gallon. Fuel oil #2 consumption was highest in winter months for heating. Utilizing two propane bills from 2011, it was determined that the propanefired domestic hot water heater consumed about 86 gallons of propane. Based on the annual cost of $280, the price for fuel oil was $3.32 per gallon. See Appendix A for a detailed utility analysis. Electricity commodity is supplied and delivered by PSE&G. The delivery component will always be the responsibility of the utility that connects the facility to the power grid; however, the supply can be purchased from a third party and is often less expensive. The electricity commodity supply entity will require submission of one to three years of past energy bills. Contract terms can vary among suppliers. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the average commercial unit cost of electricity in New Jersey during the same periods as those noted above was $0.144 per kwh. When compared to the average state values, it is recommended that a third party electricity supplier be pursued. A list of approved electrical energy commodity suppliers can be found in Appendix A. New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 3 of 25

7 An energy analysis was performed for propane, fuel oil, and electric to determine which was most cost effective for heating the facility. Natural gas was omitted from the analysis because there is currently no service available at the site. Fuel Unit Conversion Efficiency Unit Cost $/MBTU Electric 1 KW $ 0.29 $ Propane 1 Gal $ 3.32 $ #2 Oil 1 Gal $ 3.88 $ Each fuel was converted to cost per million BTU of energy to compare the three fuels. The efficiency column is the ratio of the output to input of the system that uses the fuel. The result was fuel oil #2 was the most cost-effective fuel to heat the facility. 3.3 HVAC Systems Hot water (HW) is the primary heating medium utilized in the facility. One Weil-McLain HW boiler, located in the basement, serves the building. The boiler is oil fired with an efficiency rating of 85%. The input is 40 MBh and output 34 MBh. The existing boiler is in good condition and was replaced in 2004; it is estimated that it has 17 more years of useful life. The efficiency of the heating system is standard; hydronic equipment served by the boiler includes perimeter baseboard heaters on the first and second floors. The hydronic heating system is broken up into four zones, consisting of the second floor, kitchen, backroom, and first floor. Each zone has a shutoff valve at the boiler for maintenance and a dedicated Taco 1/25 HP pump to circulate HW. There are two cooling only split system AHUs; one serving each floor of the facility. AHU-1 is located in the basement and serves the first floor of the facility; AHU-2 is located in the attic and serves the second floor. Both units, manufactured by Williamson Company, are outdated. All occupied spaces are air conditioned. Each of the AHUs are equipped with direct expansion (DX) cooling coils and connected to a dedicated remote condensing unit located outdoors. The two remote condensers serving the facility have a total cooling capacity of about 4.5 tons. Pinelands purchased the facility in 2004 and has not upgraded the HVAC system. It is estimated that these units are at least 20 years old with an estimated cooling efficiency of KW/ton. Specifics on mechanical equipment can be found within the equipment inventory located in Appendix T. 3.4 Control Systems The facility is broken into two AC control zones. Each AHU serves a dedicated floor with a programmable thermostat. The facility has five programmable thermostats; three heating, one cooling only and one heating and cooling. The boiler has four zones each controlled by separate programmable thermostats. Typical setpoints in the facility are 68 F heating and 74 F cooling during occupied times, and 58 F heating and 76 F cooling during unoccupied times; these values vary slightly between thermostats per space and occupant comfort. Each thermostat has been programmed for overnight setback. New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 4 of 25

8 3.5 Lighting/Electrical Systems Maintenance personnel began upgrading the incandescent fixtures to compact florescent lighting. There are also numerous lamps or fixtures which utilize compact fluorescent lamps in the offices, copy room, vestibule, kitchen, and restrooms. In these areas, a small percentage of lamps still had 60 W incandescent bulbs; the attic utilizes three 60 W incandescent bulbs. The conference room, which is seldom occupied, utilizes track lighting and has (10) incandescent 50 W floodlights controlled by a dimmer switch. The visitor center is also sporadically utilized. The only exception is some of the incandescent bulbs have been changed to LED lights. The totals in this room are six incandescent bulbs and four 7 W LED lights. The exterior lights are controlled by wall mounted switches. Exterior building lighting is provided by a combination of incandescent and compact florescent lighting. Additionally, parking lot and site lighting is provided by 10 light posts with high pressure sodium bulbs. The audit estimated (3) 400 W; and (7) 250 W, two of which are not operational.. These lights are controlled by a timer. The facility is also equipped with emergency backup lighting in the event of a power outage. These modules are located throughout the facility and are battery powered. 3.6 Plumbing Systems The facility utilizes a 40 gallon Bradford White 40,000 Btuh propane-fired water heater to generate domestic hot water (DHW). Located in the basement, this unit was installed prior to The DHW heater provides hot water for the sinks, dishwasher, and shower. Personnel noted that the shower is not used, and is presently utilized for storage of boxes. Since the shower is not used and the remaining DHW load is minimal, the water heater is oversized for current usage. All plumbing fixtures are standard flow typical for the 1980s, and in fair condition. More water-efficient flush valves and faucets could be installed to reduce water usage. However, since the complex uses well water supplied at no charge, there are no economic benefits from reduced usage; however, Pinelands requested that the benefits of plumbing measures be included in the audit. New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 5 of 25

9 4.0 ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES 4.1 ECM-1 Insulate HHW Piping The facility utilizes hot water for heating. The boiler is located in the basement and baseboard heaters are located in spaces throughout the first and second floors. The ¾ piping for this system runs 450 feet of exposed pipe through an unconditioned basement to the vertical penetrations in the floor of the heaters. During heating season, the exposed piping loses heat to the ambient air and the efficiency of the heating system decreases. To minimize the heat transfer between the pipes and ambient air, the exposed piping should be insulated with polyethylene pipe insulation. To compute the amount of heat lost through the uninsulated hot water piping, the exposed surface area of the piping was determined. Transmission coefficients for copper piping were then utilized in conjunction with the ambient air and hot water temperatures to generate correction factors for the heat transfer calculation. By installing 1 polyethylene insulation on the hot water piping, it is expected this ECM will reduce annual fuel oil #2 consumption by approximately 320 gallons. Installation can be performed by inhouse personnel. Hot water piping has an expected life of 20 years, according to ASHRAE, and total energy savings over the life of the project are estimated at 6,400 gallons of fuel oil #2 and $24,000. The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix C and summarized below: ECM-1 Insulate HHW Piping Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Estimated Total Potential Payback Payback Cost Maintenance Savings ROI Incentive* (without (with Electricity LPG Fuel Oil #2 Total Savings Incentive) Incentive) $ kw kwh Gals Gals $ $ $ $ Years Years , , NA 0.2 NA * There is no incentive available through the New Jersey Smart Start or Direct Install Programs for this ECM. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities This measure is recommended. 4.2 ECM-2 Boiler Replacement The boiler is oil fired with an efficiency of 85%. It was replaced in 2004, is standard within the industry, and is in good condition. Replacing the existing boiler with a newer technology condensing boiler will increase efficiency up to 95% and reduce fuel oil #2 consumption. The boiler load was calculated from the gallons used annually per utility bills, boiler efficiency, and conversion from gallons oil to MBH. The load was then compared to the fuel a new condensing boiler would use at the improved operating efficiency. The difference in fuel usage was the saving. Oil-fired boilers have an expected life of 25 years, according to ASHRAE, and total energy savings over the life of the project are estimated at 3,500 gallons of fuel oil and $15,000. New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 6 of 25

10 The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix D and summarized below: ECM-2 Boiler Replacement Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Estimated Total Potential Payback Payback Cost Maintenance Savings ROI Incentive* (without (with Electricity LPG Fuel Oil #2 Total Savings Incentive) Incentive) $ kw kwh Gals Gals $ $ $ $ Years Years 7, , * Incentive shown is per the New Jersey Direct Install Program. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities. This measure is recommended. 4.3 ECM-3 Replace AC Condensing Units The two AC condensing units have an energy efficiency (EER) rating of 7.2. The higher ratings signify energy efficiency. The existing units are 2 and 2.5 tons estimated to be 20 years old and in poor condition. Replacing these units with new more efficient models with EER rating is 14.0 was assessed. The BTU/Hr rating is calculated from the tonnage of the units. Bin data was utilized to obtain the annual operating hours required to maintain the current setpoint of 74 F. The annual electric usage was then calculated for the base case and proposed case using respective cooling efficiencies. The energy savings is the difference in electric usage. Condensing units have an expected life of 15 years, according to ASHRAE, and total energy savings over the life of the project are estimated at 10,350 kwh and $3,000. The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix E and summarized below: ECM-3 Replace AC Condensing Units Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Estimated Total Potential Payback Payback Cost Maintenance Savings ROI Incentive* (without (with Electricity LPG Fuel Oil #2 Total Savings Incentive) Incentive) $ kw kwh Gals Gals $ $ $ $ Years Years 4, (0.4) 2, * Incentive shown is per the New Jersey Direct Install Program. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities. This measure is recommended. 4.4 ECM-4 Replace Basement Windows The basement has five windows constructed with wood frames and single pane glazing. The window units show noticeable deterioration and rotting to the wood sash along the interior. Due to age, construction type and condition, the windows incur excess air infiltration and provide average thermal resistance to heat transfer. An assessment considered installing glass block windows to decrease heating energy losses and provide extra security from break-ins. New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 7 of 25

11 Per the building energy audit, it was found that the existing windows have a U-value of 1.05 and infiltration rate of about 0.2 CFM/LF. To calculate the savings for this measure, the baseline energy loss was found by applying these values to the total square footage and perimeter length of the existing windows in conjunction with weather bin data. The proposed energy loss was then determined using the expected U-value of 0.5 and infiltration rate of 0.05 CFM/LF, with block windows installed. The difference in heating losses through the windows resulted in an annual savings of about 20 gallons of oil. As previously noted, due to funding from a historical preservation fund, any modifications to the exterior of the building, including new windows, must be approved by the historical preservation agency prior to replacement. Glass block windows have an expected life of 30 years, according to manufacturer, and total energy savings over the life of the project are estimated at 600 gallons of oil for heating and $18,000. The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix F and summarized below: ECM-4 Replace Basement Windows Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Estimated Total Potential Payback Payback Cost Maintenance Savings ROI Incentive* (without (with Electricity LPG Fuel Oil #2 Total Savings Incentive) Incentive) $ kw kwh Gals Gals $ $ $ $ Years Years 1, NA 11.0 NA * There is no incentive available through the New Jersey Smart Start or Direct Install Programs for this ECM. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities. This measure is not recommended. 4.5 ECM-5 Replace Seals on Storm Windows All windows are constructed with wood frames, single pane glazing, and exterior storm window. Over time, the seals of the storm windows have deteriorated causing excessive air infiltration. An assessment considered installing weather-stripping to create a tight seal on existing storm windows to decrease heating and cooling energy losses as well as increasing occupant comfort. The facility received funds from a historical preservation program and it was deemed that replacing the windows was not an option; replacing the seals of the storm windows was the most cost effective way to reduce infiltration. Per the building energy audit, it was found that the existing windows have an infiltration rate of about 0.2 CFM/LF. To calculate the savings for this measure, the baseline energy loss was found by applying this value to the total perimeter length of the existing windows in conjunction with weather bin data. The proposed energy loss was then determined using the expected infiltration rate of 0.1 CFM/LF, with seals for the exterior storm windows installed. The difference in heating and cooling losses through the windows resulted in an annual savings of about 30 gallons oil and 160 kwh. Installation of storm window seals is fairly easy and could be performed by in-house personnel. Storm window seals have an expected life of 10 years, according to the manufacturer, and total energy savings over the life of the project are estimated at 1,600 kwh of electricity, 300 gals of fuel oil #2, and $2,000. The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix G and summarized as follows: New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 8 of 25

12 ECM-5 Replace Seals on Storm Windows Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Estimated Total Potential Payback Payback Cost Maintenance Savings ROI Incentive* (without (with Electricity LPG Fuel Oil #2 Total Savings Incentive) Incentive) $ kw kwh Gals Gals $ $ $ $ Years Years NA 1.5 NA * There is no incentive available through the New Jersey Smart Start or Direct Install Programs for this ECM. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities. This measure is recommended. 4.6 ECM-6 Install Ceiling Insulation The overhead roof and ceiling construction between the occupied space and outdoors is wood shingles, felt paper, pine slates, attic air space, 1 decking, 6 airspace, and 1 plaster. This ECM addressed blowing in 6 of loose-fill cellulose insulation (R-2.7/inch) between the ceiling joists of the attic to minimize heating and cooling energy losses. To calculate the savings, the heat losses through the roof assembly of the facility was found using the existing roof s R-value of 9.5 and bin weather data for nearby Philadelphia, PA. The values were totaled to determine the existing annual energy losses. Heating and cooling energy loss values were then determined with a thermal resistance which included the additional R-16.2 loose-fill insulation. The annual energy savings of blowing insulation in between the ceiling joists is expected to be about 50 gallons of fuel oil and 50 kwh. This is an annual savings of $200. Loose-fill insulation has an expected life of 24 years, according to ASHRAE, and total energy savings over the life of the project are estimated at 1,200 gallons of oil, 1,200 kwh, and $4,800. The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix H and summarized below: ECM-6 Install Ceiling Insulation Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Estimated Total Potential Payback Payback Cost Maintenance Savings ROI Incentive* (without (with Electricity LPG Fuel Oil #2 Total Savings Incentive) Incentive) $ kw kwh Gals Gals $ $ $ $ Years Years 1, NA 8.5 NA * There is no incentive available through the New Jersey Smart Start or Direct Install Programs for this ECM. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities. This measure is recommended. 4.7 ECM-7 Replace Domestic Hot Water Heater Domestic hot water for the facility is generated by a 40 gallon Bradford White, 40 Btuh propane-fired hot water heater which is oversized for current HW demand, which includes dish and hand washing. One shower in the facility is not utilized according to personnel. During periods of little or no HW use, the unit must still heat the water within the storage tank. Energy required maintaining the 40 gallons of HW New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 9 of 25

13 temperature setpoint during times of zero demand is known as standby losses; the heating required is exacerbated because the heater size is excessive for demand requirements. This measure evaluated replacing the existing DHW heater with a tankless, gas-fired, condensing HW heater to eliminate standby losses and produce DHW more efficiently. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, 2.5% of stored capacity is lost every hour during HW heater standby. This value was applied to the total volume of the existing DHW heater storage tank to determine the annual standby losses. Proposed efficiency was based on a typical tankless, condensing hot water heater; it was calculated that 59 gallons of propane would be saved per year. The new water heater will require gas and water piping modifications, venting, and electrical connections. Tankless hot water heaters have an expected life of 12 years, according to ASHRAE, and total energy savings over the life of the project are estimated at 720 gallons of propane, totaling $2,400. The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix K and summarized below: ECM-7 Replace Domestic Hot Water Heater Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Estimated Total Potential Payback Payback Cost Maintenance Savings ROI Incentive* (without (with Electricity LPG Fuel Oil #2 Total Savings Incentive) Incentive) $ kw kwh Gals Gals $ $ $ $ Years Years 3, (0.3) * Incentive shown is per the New Jersey Smart Start Program, Gas Water Heating Application. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities. This measure is not recommended. 4.8 ECM-8 Install Low Flow Plumbing Fixtures The facility has older style fixtures in the restrooms which consume more water than modern plumbing fixtures. It was determined that there are three toilets with an average water use of 3.8 gal/flush. There are also three faucets with an average flow rate of 2.3 gpm. Per the number of occupants, it was estimated that each toilet and faucet is utilized approximately nine times per day. Pinelands does not pay for water; however, it was requested that the measure be addressed. The water savings associated from replacing these fixtures with low-flow fixtures was calculated by taking the difference of the annual water usage for the proposed and base case. The basis of this calculation is the number of times each fixture is used, gallons per use, and number of fixtures. Replacing the existing fixtures in the restrooms with 1.28 gals/flush toilets and 0.5 gpm faucets would save 20 KGal annually. However, there are no monetary savings because water is cost free. Toilets and faucets have an expected life of 15 years, according to the manufacturer, and total energy savings over the life of the project are estimated at 300 KGal. The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix J and summarized as follows: New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 10 of 25

14 ECM-8 Install Low-Flow Plumbing Fixtures Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Estimated Total Potential Payback Payback Cost Maintenance Savings ROI Incentive* (without (with Electricity LPG Water Total Savings Incentive) Incentive) $ kw kwh Gals kgals $ $ $ $ Years Years 2, NA 0 NA (1.0) NA NA NA * There is no incentive available through the New Jersey Smart Start or Direct Install Programs for this ECM. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities. This measure is not recommended. 4.9 ECM-9 Install Energy Star Appliances The facility has older style appliances in the kitchen including an Amana BX2LTE refrigerator and Whirlpool dishwasher. The Energy Star webpage suggests that facilities with a dishwasher made before 1994 pays on average an extra $40 a year on utility bills and wastes more than 10 gallons of water per cycle compared to owning a new Energy Star qualified model. Energy Star qualified refrigerators are required to use 20% less energy than models not labeled with the Energy Star logo. Pinelands was interested in evaluating the replacement of the dishwasher and refrigerator with Energy Star appliances. Utilizing the Energy Star webpage, a calculation was performed; the dishwasher will save 90 kwh, 3 Kgals/year of water assuming one use per day and cycle time of 1 hour. This cost savings is $30/year for the dishwasher. The refrigerator will save 310 kwh annually which is a cost savings of $70/year. Together these appliances would save 310 kwh annually for a cost savings of approximately $100. Energy Star appliances have an expected life of 12 years, according to the website. The total energy savings over the life of the project are estimated at 3,720 Kwh, totaling $1,200. The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix K and summarized below: ECM-9 Install Energy Star Appliances Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Estimated Total Potential Payback Payback Cost Maintenance Savings ROI Incentive* (without (with Electricity LPG Water Total Savings Incentive) Incentive) $ kw kwh Gals kgals $ $ $ $ Years Years 1, NA 11.0 NA * There is no incentive available through the New Jersey Smart Start or Direct Install Programs for this ECM. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities This measure is not recommended ECM-10 Lighting Replacements A comprehensive fixture survey was conducted of the entire building. Each switch and circuit was identified, and the number of fixtures, locations, and existing wattage established (Appendix T). Inefficient lighting fixtures include those that utilize incandescent screw type bulbs, incandescent flood lighting and T-12 fluorescent lamps. Upgrading these lighting fixtures to more efficient technology provides electrical energy savings. New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 11 of 25

15 Energy savings for this measure were calculated by applying the existing and proposed fixture wattages to estimated times of operation. The difference between energy requirements resulted in a total annual savings of 1,630 kwh with an electrical demand reduction of about 2.4 kw. Supporting calculations, including assumptions for lighting hours and annual energy usage for each fixture, are provided in Appendix L. Fixtures that utilize incandescent bulbs would be replaced with compact fluorescent spiral lightbulbs, incandescent flood lamps can be replaced with LEDs, and T-12 fluorescent lighting would be upgraded to T-8 fluorescents with electronic ballasts. Lighting has an expected life of 15 years, according to the manufacturer, and total energy savings over the life of the project are estimated at 24,450 kwh and $9,000. The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix L and summarized below: ECM-10 Lighting Replacements Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Estimated Total Potential Payback Payback Cost Maintenance Savings ROI Incentive* (without (with Electricity LPG Fuel Oil #2 Total Savings Incentive) Incentive) $ kw kwh Gals Gals $ $ $ $ Years Years 1, , * Incentive shown is per the New Jersey Direct Install Program. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities. This measure is not recommended in lieu of ECM ECM-11 Install Occupancy Sensors Review of the comprehensive lighting survey determined that lighting in two rooms, the conference room and visitor center, is typically operational, regardless of occupancy. Therefore, installing an occupancy sensor in these spaces to turn off lights when the areas are unoccupied was assessed. Using a process similar to that utilized in section 4.10, the energy savings for this measure were calculated by applying the known fixture wattages in the space to the estimated existing and proposed times of operation for each fixture. The difference between the two values resulted in an annual savings of 490 kwh. Two wall-mounted occupancy sensors with dimmer control are required for this measure. Occupancy sensors have an expected life of 15 years, according to the manufacturer, and total energy savings over the life of the project are estimated at 7,350 kwh and $1,500. The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix M and summarized as follows: New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 12 of 25

16 ECM-11 Install Occupancy Sensors Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Estimated Total Potential Payback Payback Cost Maintenance Savings ROI Incentive* (without (with Electricity LPG Fuel Oil #2 Total Savings Incentive) Incentive) $ kw kwh Gals Gals $ $ $ $ Years Years * Incentive shown is per the New Jersey Direct Install Program. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities. This measure is not recommended in lieu of ECM ECM-12 Lighting Replacements with Occupancy Sensors Due to interactive effects, the energy and cost savings for occupancy sensors and lighting upgrades are not cumulative. This measure is a combination of ECMs-10 and 11 to reflect actual expected energy and demand reduction. The lighting retrofits and controls have an expected lifetime of 15 years, according to the manufacturer, and total energy savings over the life of the project are estimated at 25,050 kwh and $9,000. The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix N and summarized below: ECM-12 Lighting Replacements with Occupancy Sensors Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Estimated Total Potential Payback Payback Cost Maintenance Savings ROI Incentive* (without (with Electricity LPG Fuel Oil #2 Total Savings Incentive) Incentive) $ kw kwh Gals Gals $ $ $ $ Years Years 1, , * Incentive shown is per the New Jersey Direct Install Program. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities. This measure is recommended. New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 13 of 25

17 5.0 PROJECT INCENTIVES 5.1 Incentives Overview New Jersey Pay For Performance Program The complex will be eligible for incentives from the New Jersey Office of Clean Energy. The most significant incentives will be from the New Jersey Pay for Performance (P4P) Program. The P4P program is designed for qualified energy conservation projects in facilities whose demand in any of the preceding 12 months exceeds 200 kw. However, the 200 kw/month average minimum has been waived for buildings owned by local governments or municipalities and non-profit organizations. Facilities that meet this criterion must also achieve a minimum performance target of 15% energy reduction by using the EPA Portfolio Manager benchmarking tool before and after implementation of the measure(s). If the participant is a municipal electric company customer, and a customer of a regulated gas New Jersey Utility, only gas measures will be eligible under the Program. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funding, when available, may allow oil, propane and municipal electric customers to be eligible for the P4P Program. Available incentives are as follows: Incentive #1: Energy Reduction Plan This incentive is designed to offset the cost of services associated with the development of the Energy Reduction Plan (ERP). The standard incentive pays $0.10 per square foot, up to a maximum of $50,000, not to exceed 50% of facility annual energy cost, paid after approval of application. For building audits funded by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, which receive an initial 75% incentive toward performance of the energy audit, facilities are only eligible for an additional $0.05 per square foot, up to a maximum of $25,000, rather than the standard incentive noted above. Incentive #2: Installation of Recommended Measures This incentive is based on projected energy saving and designed to pay approximately 60% of the total performance-based incentive. Base incentives deliver $0.11/kWh and $1.10/therm not to exceed 30% of total project cost. Incentive #3: Post-Construction Benchmarking Report This incentive is paid after acceptance of a report proving energy savings over one year utilizing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Portfolio Manager benchmarking tool. Incentive #3 base incentives deliver $0.07/kWh and $0.70/therm not to exceed 20% of total project cost. Combining incentives #2 and #3 will provide a total of $0.18/ kwh and $1.8/therm not to exceed 50% of total project cost. Additional incentives for #2 and #3 are increased by $0.005/kWh and $0.05/therm for each percentage increase above the 15% minimum target to 20%, calculated with the EPA Portfolio Manager benchmarking tool, not to exceed 50% of total project cost New Jersey Smart Start Program For this program, specific incentives for energy conservation measures are calculated on an individual basis utilizing the 2011 New Jersey Smart Start incentive program. This program provides incentives dependent upon mechanical and electrical equipment. If applicable, incentives from this program are reflected in the ECM summaries and attached appendices. If the complex qualifies and enters into the New Jersey Pay for Performance Program, all energy savings will be included in the total site energy reduction, and savings will be applied towards the Pay for Performance incentive. A project is not applicable for both New Jersey incentive programs. New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 14 of 25

18 5.1.3 ARRA Initiative Energy Efficiency Programs through the Clean Energy Program The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Initiative is available to New Jersey oil, propane, cooperative and municipal electric customers who do not pay the Societal Benefits Charge. This charge can be seen on any electric bill as the line item SBC Charge. Applicants can participate in this program in conjunction with other New Jersey Clean Energy Program initiatives including Pay for Performance, Local Government Energy Audits, and Direct Install programs. Funding for this program is dispersed on a first come, first serve basis until all funds are exhausted. The program does not limit the municipality to a minimum or maximum incentive, and the availability of funding cannot be determined prior to application. If the municipality meets all qualifications, the application must be submitted to TRC Energy Solutions for review. TRC will then determine the amount of the incentive based on projected energy savings of the project. It is important to note that all applications for this incentive must be submitted before implementation of energy conservation measures. Additional information is available on New Jersey s Clean Energy Program website Direct Install Program The Direct Install Program targets small and medium sized facilities where the peak electrical demand does not exceed 200 kw in any of the previous 12 months. Buildings must be located in New Jersey and served by one of the state s public, regulated electric or natural gas utility companies. On a case-by-case basis, the program manager may accept a project for a customer that is within 10% of the 200 kw peak demand threshold. The 200 kw peak demand threshold has been waived for local government entities that receive and utilize their Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant as discussed in section in conjunction with Direct Install. Direct Install is funded through New Jersey s Clean Energy Program and is designed to provide capital for building energy upgrade projects to fast track implementation. The program will pay up to 60% of the costs for lighting, HVAC, motors, natural gas, refrigeration, and other equipment upgrades with higher efficiency alternatives. If a building is eligible for this funding, the Direct Install Program can significantly reduce the implementation cost of energy conservation projects. The program pays a maximum amount of $50,000 per building, and up to $250,000 per customer per year. Installations must be completed by a Direct Install participating contractor, a list of which can be found on the New Jersey Clean Energy Website at Contractors will coordinate with the applicant to arrange installation of recommended measures identified in a previous energy assessment, such as this document. 5.2 Building Incentives New Jersey Pay For Performance Program Under incentive #1 of the New Jersey Pay for Performance Program, the 2,900 square foot Bishop Farmstead Offices of Pinelands Preservation Alliance is eligible for about $145 toward development of an Energy Reduction Plan. When calculating the total amount under Incentives #2 and #3, all energy conservation measures are applicable as the amount received is based on site wide energy improvements. Since the overall energy reduction for the complex is estimated to exceed the 15% minimum, the facility New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 15 of 25

19 is eligible to receive monies based on Incentives #2 and #3 as discussed above in section In total, incentives through the NJ P4P program are expected to total about $600, reducing the total project payback from 4.6 years to 4.4 years. See Appendix O for calculations New Jersey Smart Start Program The Bishop Farmstead Offices of Pinelands Preservation Alliance is eligible for several incentives available under New Jersey Smart Start Programs. The total amount of all qualified incentives is about $800 and includes replacing the AC condensing units, a tankless DHW heater and making lighting system upgrades ARRA Initiative Energy Efficiency Programs through the Clean Energy Program Custom measures allows program participants the opportunity to receive an incentive for unique energyefficiency measures that are not on the prescriptive equipment Incentive list, but are project/facility specific. We cannot calculate incentives for this program but the facility can call 866-NJSMART ( ) and press option 4 for additional information and eligibility. The measures that apply are ECM-1, ECM-2, ECM-4, ECM-5, and ECM-6 due to the oil and propane reductions Direct Install Program The Bishop Farmstead Offices of Pinelands Preservation Alliance is potentially eligible to receive funding from the Direct Install Program. The total implementation cost for all ECMs potentially eligible for Direct Install funding is about $14,000 and includes the boiler, AC condensing units, and upgrades to the lighting system. The program would pay 60%, or about $8,300 of these initial costs, leaving only $5,700 to be paid out of pocket. Direct Install funding has the potential to significantly reduce the payback period of Energy Conservation Measures. For the Bishop Farmstead Offices of Pinelands Preservation Alliance, the Direct Install Program brings the simple payback of the applicable measures from about 10.0 years, to approximately 4.1 years. New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 16 of 25

20 6.0 ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SCREENING EVALUATION 6.1 Geothermal Geothermal heat pumps (GHP) transfer heat between the constant temperature of the earth and the building to maintain the building s interior space conditions. Below the surface of the earth throughout New Jersey the temperature remains in the low 50 F range throughout the year. This stable temperature provides a source for heat in the winter and a means to reject excess heat in the summer. With GHP systems, water is circulated between the building and the piping buried in the ground. The ground heat exchanger in a GHP system is made up of a closed or open loop pipe system. Most common is the closed loop in which high density polyethylene pipe is buried horizontally at 4-6 feet deep or vertically at 100 to 400 feet deep. These pipes are filled with an environmentally friendly antifreeze/water solution that acts as a heat exchanger. In the summer, the water picks up heat from the building and moves it to the ground. In the winter the system reverses and fluid picks up heat from the ground and moves it to the building. Heat pumps make collection and transfer of this heat to and from the building possible. The building uses an oil-fired hot water boiler, split system AHUs with electric DX cooling, and hot water baseboard heating units to meet the HVAC requirements. With exception to the hydronic heating system, most of the existing equipment is not compatible with a geothermal energy source. Therefore, to take advantage of a GHP system, the existing mechanical equipment would have to be removed or overhauled; and either a low temperature closed loop water source heat pump system or a water to water heat pump system would have to be installed to realize the benefit of the consistent temperature of the ground. Geothermal Heat Pump 4.5 ton System Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Total Cost* Electricity Fuel Oil #2 Total Savings New Jersey Renewable Payback Payback Energy (without Incentive* incentive) (with incentive) $ kw kwh gals $ $ $ Years Years 40, ,700 >25 >25 *28,000 quote from Geosun NRG plus 12,000 estimated costs to upgrade interior HVAC system **Smart Start Building incentive for Ground Source Heat Pumps This measure is not recommended. 6.2 Solar Photovoltaic Rooftop Solar Power Generation The facility was evaluated for the potential to install rooftop photovoltaic (PV) solar panels for power generation. Present technology incorporates the use of solar cell arrays that produce direct current (DC) electricity. This DC current is converted to alternating current (AC) with the use of an electrical device known as an inverter. The building s roof has sufficient room to install a large solar cell array. The facility received funding from a source for historical buildings and cannot change the historical appearance of the facility. Putting panels on the roof is not an option. However, building a canopy over the parking lot with PV panels is the only viable option. New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 17 of 25

21 The PVWATTS solar power generation model was utilized to calculate PV power generation. The closest city available in the model is Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and a fixed tilt array type was utilized to calculate energy production. The PVWATT solar power generation model is provided in Appendix P. Federal tax credits are also available for renewable energy projects up to 30% of installation cost. Since the facility is a non-profit organization, federal taxes are paid and this project is eligible for this incentive. Installation of (PV) arrays in the state New Jersey will allow the owner to participate in the New Jersey solar renewable energy certificates program (SREC). This is a program that has been set up to allow entities with large amounts of environmentally unfriendly emissions to purchase credits from zero emission (PV) solar-producers. An alternative compliance penalty (ACP) is paid for by the high emission producers and is set each year on a declining scale of 3% per year. One SREC credit is equivalent to 1000 kilowatt hours of PV electrical production; these credits can be traded for period of 15 years from the date of installation. The cost of the ACP penalty for 2011 is $600; this is the amount that must be paid per SREC by the high emission producers. The expected dollar amount that will be paid to the PV producer for 2012 is expected to be $700/SREC credit. Payments that will be received from the PV producer will change from year to year dependent upon supply and demand. Renewable Energy Consultants is a third party SREC broker that has been approved by the New Jersey Clean Energy Program. As stated above there is no definitive way to calculate an exact price that will be received by the PV producer per SREC over the next 15 years. Renewable Energy Consultants estimated an average of $487/ SREC per year and this number was utilized in the cash flow for this report. From May 2010 through April 2011 the Bishop Offices at Pinelands Preservation Alliance had a maximum electricity demand of 6.10 kw and a minimum of 2.7 kw. The monthly average over the observed 12 month period was 4.56 kw. The existing load justifies the use of 4.5 kw PV solar array; where incentives can be applied from a federal tax credit and a New Jersey SREC program. The system costs for PV installations were derived from contractor budgetary pricing in the state of New Jersey for estimates of total cost of system installation. It should be noted that the cost of installation is currently about $8.00 per watt or $8,000 per kw of installed system, for a 4.5 kw system. Other cost considerations will also need to be considered. PV panels have an approximate 20 year life span; however, the inverter device that converts DC electricity to AC has a life span of 10 to 12 years and will need to be replaced multiple times during the useful life of the PV system. The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix P and summarized as follows: Photovoltaic (PV) Solar Power Generation kw System Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Total New Jersey Renewable Payback Payback Cost* Savings SREC* (without incentive) (with incentive) Electricity Fuel Oil #2 Total $ kw kwh gals $ $ $ Years Years 36, , ,600 1,600 2, * Estimated Solar Renewable Energy Certificate Program (SREC) for 15 years at $487/1000 kwh At 100 square feet per kw of PV panels (rule of thumb), the proposed PV power generation system would require 450 square feet of open space. This measure is recommended because the facility can build a canopy over the parking lot to install these panels and the transmission lines will be short and have a direct route which will minimize installation cost. New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 18 of 25

22 6.2.2 Solar Thermal Hot Water Plant Active solar thermal systems use solar collectors to gather the sun s energy to heat water, another fluid, or air. An absorber in the collector converts the sun s energy into heat. The heat is then transferred by circulating water, antifreeze, or sometimes air to another location for immediate use or storage for later utilization. Applications for active solar thermal energy include providing hot water, heating swimming pools, space heating, and preheating air in residential and commercial buildings. A standard solar hot water system is typically composed of solar collectors, heat storage vessel, piping, circulators, and controls. Systems are typically integrated to work alongside a conventional heating system that provides heat when solar resources are not sufficient. The solar collectors are usually placed on the roof of the building, oriented south, and tilted around the site s latitude, to maximize the amount of radiation collected on a yearly basis. Several options exist for using active solar thermal systems for space heating. The most common method involves using glazed collectors to heat a liquid held in a storage tank (similar to an active solar hot water system). The most practical system would transfer the heat from the panels to thermal storage tanks and transfer solar produced thermal energy to use for domestic hot water production. DHW is presently produced by gas-fired water heaters and, therefore, this measure would offer natural gas utility savings. Currently, an incentive is not available for installation of thermal solar systems. A Federal tax credit of 30% of installation cost for the thermal applications is available; however, The Bishop Farmstead Offices of Pinelands Preservation Alliance does not pay Federal taxes and, therefore, would not benefit from this program. The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix Q and summarized as follows: Solar Thermal Domestic Hot Water Plant Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Total Cost* Electricity Fuel Oil #2 Total Savings New Jersey Renewable Payback Payback Energy (without Incentive* incentive) (with incentive) $ kw kwh gals $ $ $ Years Years 12, >25 >25 * No incentive is available in New Jersey at this time. This measure is not recommended. 6.3 Wind Small wind turbines use a horizontal axis propeller, or rotor, to capture the kinetic energy of the wind and convert it into rotary motion to drive a generator which usually is designed specifically for the wind turbine. The rotor consists of two or three blades, usually made from wood or fiberglass. These materials give the turbine the needed strength and flexibility, and have the added advantage of not interfering with television signals. The structural backbone of the wind turbine is the mainframe, and includes the sliprings that connect the wind turbine, which rotates as it points into changing wind directions, and the fixed tower wiring. The tail aligns the rotor into the wind. New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 19 of 25

23 To avoid turbulence and capture greater wind energy, turbines are mounted on towers. Turbines should be mounted at least 30 feet above any structure or natural feature within 300 feet of the installation. Smaller turbines can utilize shorter towers. For example, a 250-watt turbine may be mounted on a foot tower, while a 10 kw turbine will usually need a tower of feet. Tower designs include tubular or latticed, guyed or self-supporting. Wind turbine manufacturers also provide towers. The New Jersey Clean Energy Program for small wind installations has designated numerous preapproved wind turbines for installation in the State of New Jersey. Incentives for wind turbine installations are based on kilowatt hours saved in the first year. Systems sized under 16,000 kwh per year of production will receive a $3.20 per kwh incentive. Systems producing over 16,000 kwh will receive $51,200 for the first 16,000 kwh of production with an additional $0.50 per kwh up to a maximum cap of 750,000 kwh per year. Federal tax credits are also available for renewable energy projects at $1,000 per KW or maximum $4,000; however, The Bishop Farmstead Offices of Pinelands Preservation Alliance does not pay Federal taxes and, therefore, would not benefit from this program. The most important part of any small wind generation project is the mean annual wind speed at the height of which the turbine will be installed. Using Retscreen to do an analysis, a mean annual wind speed of about 4.2 miles per hour was utilized. The turbine was sized to handle 100% of the facility load, so the savings would equal the annual electrical usage. From the utility analysis this value is equal to 5,210 kwh. The implementation cost and savings related to this ECM are presented in Appendix R and summarized as follows: Wind Power Generation 4.5 kw System Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Total Cost* Electricity Fuel Oil #2 Total Savings New Jersey Renewable Payback Payback Energy (without Incentive* incentive) (with incentive) $ kw kwh gals $ $ $ Years Years 71, , ,500 1,500 16,700 >25 >25 * Estimated REIP Incentive at $3.20/KWh This measure is not recommended. 6.4 Combined Heat and Power Generation (CHP) Combined heat and power, cogeneration, is self-production of electricity on-site with beneficial recovery of the heat byproduct from the electrical generator. Common CHP equipment includes reciprocating engine-driven, micro turbines, steam turbines, and fuel cells. Typical CHP customers include industrial, commercial, institutional, educational institutions, and multifamily residential facilities. CHP systems that are commercially viable at the present time are sized approximately 50 kw and above, with numerous options in blocks grouped around 300 kw, 800 kw, 1,200 kw and larger. Typically, CHP systems are used to produce a portion of the electricity needed by a facility some or all of the time, with the balance of electric needs satisfied by purchase from the grid. Any proposed CHP project will need to consider many factors, such as existing system load, use of thermal energy produced, system size, natural gas fuel availability, and proposed plant location. The Municipal Complex has sufficient need for electrical generation and the ability to use most of the thermal byproduct during the winter, thermal usage during the summer months is low. Thermal energy produced New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 20 of 25

24 by the CHP plant in the warmer months will be wasted. An absorption chiller could be installed to utilize the heat to produce chilled water; however, there is no chilled water distribution system in the building. The most viable selection for a CHP plant at this location would be a reciprocating engine natural gasfired unit. Purchasing this system and performing modifications to the existing HVAC and electrical systems would greatly outweigh the savings over the life of the equipment. This measure is not recommended. 6.5 Biomass Power Generation Biomass power generation is a process in which waste organic materials are used to produce electricity or thermal energy. These materials would otherwise be sent to the landfill or expelled to the atmosphere. To participate in NJCEP's Customer On-Site Renewable Energy program, participants must install an on-site sustainable biomass or fuel cell energy generation system. Incentives for bio-power installations are available to support up to 1MW-dc of rated capacity. *Class I organic residues are eligible for funding through the NJCEP CORE program. Class I wastes include the following renewable supply of organic material: Wood wastes not adulterated with chemicals, glues or adhesives Agricultural residues (corn stover, rice hulls or nut shells, manures, poultry litter, horse manure, etc) and/or methane gases from landfills Food wastes Municipal tree trimming and grass clipping wastes Paper and cardboard wastes Non adulterated construction wood wastes, pallets The NJDEP evaluates biomass resources not identified in the RPS. Examples of eligible facilities for a CORE incentive include: Digestion of sewage sludge Landfill gas facilities Combustion of wood wastes to steam turbine Gasification of wood wastes to reciprocating engine Gasification or pyrolysis of bio-solid wastes to generation equipment * from NJOCE Website This measure is not recommended due to noise issues and because the facility does not have a steady waste stream to utilize as a fuel source. 6.6 Demand Response Curtailment Presently, electricity is delivered by PSE&G, which receives the electricity from regional power grid RFC. PSE&G is the regional transmission organization (RTO) that coordinates the movement of wholesale electricity in all or parts of 13 states and the District of Columbia including the State of New Jersey. New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 21 of 25

25 Utility Curtailment is an agreement with the utility provider s regional transmission organization and an approved Curtailment Service Provider (CSP) to shed electrical load by either turning major equipment off or energizing all or part of a facility utilizing an emergency generator; therefore, reducing the electrical demand on the utility grid. This program is to benefit the utility company during high demand periods and utility provider offers incentives to the CSP to participate in this program. Enrolling in the program will require program participants to drop electrical load or turn on emergency generators during high electrical demand conditions or during emergencies. Part of the program also will require that program participants reduce their required load or run emergency generators with notice to test the system. A pre-approved CSP will require a minimum of 100 kw of load reduction to participate in any curtailment program. From May 2010 through April 2011 the Bishop Offices at Pinelands Preservation Alliance had a maximum electricity demand of 6.10 kw and a minimum of 2.7 kw. The monthly average over the observed 12 month period was 4.56 kw. This measure is not recommended because the facility does not have adequate load to meet the required minimum load reduction. New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 22 of 25

26 7.0 EPA PORTFOLIO MANAGER The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is a federal agency in charge of regulating environment waste and policy in the United States. The EPA has released the EPA Portfolio Manager for public use. The program is designed to allow property owners and managers to share, compare and improve upon their facility s energy consumption. Inputting such parameters as electricity, heating fuel, building characteristics and location into the website based program generates a naturalized energy rating score out of 100. Once an account is registered, monthly utility data can be entered to track the savings progress and retrieve an updated energy rating score on a monthly basis. The Bishop Farmstead Offices of Pinelands Preservation Alliance is considered an average energy consumer per the Portfolio Manager with a Site Energy Usage Index (EUI) of 57 kbtu/ft 2 /year. This is lower than the national average of 68 KBTU/ft 2 /year. The EUI can be improved by addressing wasted energy from such sources as inefficient HVAC equipment, poor building envelope components and inefficient lighting systems. By implementing the measures discussed in this report, it is expected that the EUI can be reduced to approximately 47 kbtu/ft 2 /year. The EPA Portfolio Manager did not generate an energy rating score for this building because it is less than 5000 square feet which is required for the office category, which is not eligible for an energy star rating. A full EPA Energy Star Portfolio Manager Report is located in Appendix S. The user name and password for the building s EPA Portfolio Manager Account has been provided to Jaclyn Rhoads, Director of Conservation Policy of Bishop Farmstead Offices of Pinelands Preservation Alliance. New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 23 of 25

27 8.0 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS The energy audit conducted by CHA at Bishop Farmstead Offices of Pinelands Preservation Alliance, identified potential ECMs for insulation upgrades, boiler replacement, AC condensing unit replacement, window and storm window replacement, appliance upgrades, and lighting and occupancy sensor upgrades. Potential annual savings of $3,000 may be realized for the recommended ECMs, with a summary of the costs, savings, and paybacks as follows: ECM-1 Insulate HHW Piping Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Estimated Total Potential Payback Payback Cost Maintenance Savings ROI Incentive* (without (with Electricity LPG Fuel Oil #2 Total Savings Incentive) Incentive) $ kw kwh Gals Gals $ $ $ $ Years Years , , NA 0.2 NA * There is no incentive available through the New Jersey Smart Start or Direct Install Programs for this ECM. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities ECM-2 Boiler Replacement Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Estimated Total Potential Payback Payback Cost Maintenance Savings ROI Incentive* (without (with Electricity LPG Fuel Oil #2 Total Savings Incentive) Incentive) $ kw kwh Gals Gals $ $ $ $ Years Years 7, , * Incentive shown is per the New Jersey Direct Install Program. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities. ECM-3 Replace AC Condensing Units Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Estimated Total Potential Payback Payback Cost Maintenance Savings ROI Incentive* (without (with Electricity LPG Fuel Oil #2 Total Savings Incentive) Incentive) $ kw kwh Gals Gals $ $ $ $ Years Years 4, (0.4) 2, * Incentive shown is per the New Jersey Direct Install Program. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities. ECM-5 Install Storm Windows Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Estimated Total Potential Payback Payback Cost Maintenance Savings ROI Incentive* (without (with Electricity LPG Fuel Oil #2 Total Savings Incentive) Incentive) $ kw kwh Gals Gals $ $ $ $ Years Years NA 1.5 NA * There is no incentive available through the New Jersey Smart Start or Direct Install Programs for this ECM. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities. New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 24 of 25

28 ECM-6 Install Ceiling Insulation Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Estimated Total Potential Payback Payback Cost Maintenance Savings ROI Incentive* (without (with Electricity LPG Fuel Oil #2 Total Savings Incentive) Incentive) $ kw kwh Gals Gals $ $ $ $ Years Years 1, NA 8.5 NA * There is no incentive available through the New Jersey Smart Start or Direct Install Programs for this ECM. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities. ECM-12 Lighting Replacements with Occupancy Sensors Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Estimated Total Potential Payback Payback Cost Maintenance Savings ROI Incentive* (without (with Electricity LPG Fuel Oil #2 Total Savings Incentive) Incentive) $ kw kwh Gals Gals $ $ $ $ Years Years 1, , * Incentive shown is per the New Jersey Direct Install Program. See section 5.0 for other incentive opportunities. New Jersey BPU - Energy Audits Page 25 of 25

29 APPENDIX A Utility Usage Analysis

30 New Jersey BPU Energy Audit Program CHA Project No.: Pinelands Preservation Alliance 17 Pemberton Road, Southampton, NJ Electric Service Delivery - PSE&G Supplier - PSE&G (Starting Oct-2009) Account No.: Meter No.: Charges Unit Costs Consumption Demand Total Demand Consumption Supply Delivery Blended Rate Consumption Demand Supply Delivery Month (kwh) (kw) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($/kwh) ($/kwh) ($/kw) ($/kwh) ($/kwh) October $ $57.22 $73.62 $98.03 $32.81 $ $ $ $ $0.11 December $ $53.52 $56.45 $76.72 $33.25 $ $ $ $ $0.07 January $ $55.21 $61.76 $80.35 $36.62 $ $ $ $ $0.07 February $96.34 $55.37 $40.97 $64.02 $32.32 $ $ $ $ $0.10 March $ $56.17 $69.73 $85.73 $40.17 $ $ $ $ $0.07 April $91.62 $49.32 $42.30 $65.02 $26.60 $ $ $ $ $0.08 May $98.93 $54.96 $43.97 $66.16 $32.77 $ $ $ $ $0.10 June $ $54.62 $85.85 $65.94 $74.53 $ $ $ $ $0.21 July $ $57.26 $ $ $ $ $ $ 9.39 $ $0.14 August $ $55.59 $ $ $98.55 $ $ $ 9.75 $ $0.14 September $ $53.62 $ $77.49 $83.25 $ $ $ $ $0.18 October $87.97 $45.41 $42.56 $60.93 $27.04 $ $ $ $ $0.09 November $89.07 $48.28 $40.79 $58.92 $30.15 $ $ $ $ $0.10 December $ $50.77 $57.64 $71.29 $37.12 $ $ $ $ $0.08 January $ $52.26 $56.32 $71.29 $37.29 $ $ $ $ $0.08 February $ $54.16 $47.29 $66.16 $35.29 $ $ $ $ $0.10 March $ $45.06 $61.18 $77.58 $28.66 $ $ $ $ $0.06 April $91.38 $51.32 $40.06 $61.26 $30.12 $ $ $ $ $0.10 Most Recent Year 5, $1, $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $0.12 Total 7, $2, $ $1, $1, $ $ $ $ $ $0.11 Utility Data - Pinelands.xls Electric

31 Utility Data - Pinelands.xls Electricity Chart Usage (kwh) Dec-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Demand (kw) Electric Usage - Pinelands Preservation Alliance Total Usage (kwh) Peak Demand (kw) Month

32 New Jersey BPU Energy Audit Program CHA Project No.: Pinelands Preservation Alliance 17 Pemberton Road, Southampton, NJ Propane Gas and Oil Service - Allen's Oil & Propane Account No.: Meter No.: n/a Propane Month Gallons Charges ($) ($/Gal LPG) March $ $ 3.31 July $ $ 3.32 Total $ $ 3.32 #2 Fuel Oil Month Gallons Charges ($) ($/Gal oil) May $ 1, $ 3.99 March $ $ 3.35 February $ 1, $ 5.48 January $ 1, $ 3.28 December $ $ 3.01 July $ $ 5.38 April $ $ 2.98 Total 1, $ 5, $ 3.88 Fuel analysis Fuel Unit Conversion Unit Cost $/MBTU Electric 1 KW 3.41 $ 0.29 $ Propane 1 Gal $ 3.32 $ #2 Oil 1 Gal $ 3.88 $ Fuel Unit Conversion Efficiency Unit Cost $/MBTU Electric 1 KW $ 0.29 $ Propane 1 Gal $ 3.32 $ #2 Oil 1 Gal $ 3.88 $ Utility Data - Pinelands.xls Propane

33 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $- Utility Data - Pinelands.xls Fuel Oil #2 Chart Usage (Gal Oil #2) Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Unit cost ($/Gallon Oil) Propane Gas Usage - Pinelands Preservation Alliance Total Fuel Oil #2 Purchases (Gals) Fuel Oil #2 Unit Cost ($/Gallon Oil) Month

34 APPENDIX B Project Summary

35 Pinelands Preservation Alliance CHA #23261 Utility Costs Engineer: GRE $ $/kwh blended $ $/kwh supply Project Summary $ $/kw $ $/Gal #2 Oil Return on Investemet (ROI) = (Gain from Investment - Cost of Investment) / Cost of Investment $ $/Gal LPG Bishop Farmstead Offices Item Annual Savings Cost Simple NJ Smart Start Direct Install Direct Install Max Payback w/ Life Project Life Savings ROI kw kwh Gals kwh Gals kgals $ Payback Incentives Eligible (Y/N)* Incentives** Incentives Incentives*** Years kw kwh Gals Oil Gals LPG kgals $ demand supply #2 Oil cooling LPG water Total ECM-1 Insulate HHW Piping $ 1,200 $ $ - N $ - $ , $ 24, ECM-2 Boiler Replacement $ 600 $ 7, $ - Y $ 4,700 $ 4, , $ 15, ECM-3 Replace AC Condensing Units $ 200 $ 4, $ 400 Y $ 2,800 $ 2, , $ 3,000 (0.4) ECM-4 Replace Basement Windows $ 100 $ 1, $ - N $ - $ $ 3, ECM-5 Install Storm Window Seals $ 200 $ $ - N $ - $ , $ 2, ECM-6 Install Ceiling Insulation $ 200 $ 1, $ - N $ - $ ,200 1, $ 4, ECM-7 Replace Domestic Hot Water Heater $ 200 $ 3, $ 300 N $ - $ $ 2,400 (0.3) ECM-8 Install Low-Flow Plumbing Fixtures $ - $ 2,500 - $ - N $ - $ $ - (1.0) ECM-9 Install Energy Star Appliances $ 100 $ 1, $ - N $ - $ , $ 1, ECM-10 Lighting Replacements 2.4 1, $ 600 $ 1, $ 15 Y $ 600 $ , $ 9, ECM-11 Install Occupancy Sensors $ 100 $ $ 60 Y $ 200 $ , $ 1, ECM-12 Lighting Replacements with Occupancy Sensors 2.4 1, $ 600 $ 1, $ 75 Y $ 800 $ , $ 9, Total Does not include ECM-10 and ECM , $ 3,400 $ 24, $ 775 $ 8,300 $ 8, ,920 12, $ 64, Total Measures w/ Positive ROI only 2.4 1, $ 3,000 $ 13, $ 75 $ 5,500 $ 5, ,570 12, $ 59, * Eligibility for the Direct Install Program was estimated by the project engineer per the program guidelines. Final eligibility is determined by TRC and the qualified Direct Install participating contractor. ** Value reflects the maximum potential incentive through the NJ Direct Install Program. Amount is subject to change per TRC and the qualified Direct Install participating contractor. *** Payback calculated using the greatest incentive available through either the NJ Smart Start Program or the Direct Install Program. Other incentives may be available for this measure that are not reflected here. See Section 5.0 of the report.

36 APPENDIX C ECM-1 Insulate HHW Piping

37 Pinelands Preservation Alliance CHA #23261 Building: Bishop Farmstead Offices ECM-1 Insulate HHW Piping Description Insulate heating system piping which are not currently insulated to reduce heat loss from piping and heat gain to the spaces. Given Fuel Energy Cost = $ Operation (Hours/Week) = 45 Hours/Week Operation (Heating Weeks/Year) = 24 Weeks/Year Operation (Hours/Year) = 1080 Hours/Year Heating Media = 1 Piping Material = 3 Ambient Temperature = 65 o F Pipe #1 Pipe #2 Pipe #3 Pipe #4 Pipe Diameter = 2.00 inches 5.00 inches 8.00 inches 5.00 inches Pipe Length = feet 0.00 feet 0.00 feet 0.00 feet Assumption Min. Pipe Insulation Recommended = 1.00 inches 1.50 inches 1.50 inches 1.50 inches Circulating Temperature = 3 o F Heating Efficiency = 82% Pipe Insulation Conductivity = 0.29 Btu*in./(h*ft2*F) Formula Piping Correction Factor = (Current Transmission Coefficient / Reference Transmission Coefficient) Temperature Correction Factor = (Circulating Temperature - Ambient Temperature) / (Circulating Temperature - Reference Temperature) Hourly Heat Loss per pipe size and length = (Heat loss per foot [from chart]) x (Piping Correction Factor) x (Temperature Correction Factor) x (Pipe Length) Seasonal Heat Loss = (Hourly Heat Loss Total) x (Operating hours) / (Heating Efficiency) / (1,000 btu/mbtu) Energy Loss = (Seasonal Heat Loss) / (Conversion Factor [MBtu/Unit]) Energy Loss Cost = (Energy Loss) x (cost/unit) Calculation Existing Current Transmission Coefficient Reference Transmission Coefficient Piping Correction Factor = ( 2.25 / 2.00 ) = 1.13 Circulating Temp. Ambient Temp. Circulating Temp. Reference Temp. Temperature Correction Factor = ( ) / ( ) = 1.15 Heat Loss per foot Piping CF Temperature CF Pipe Length Heat Loss Pipe #1 (Hourly) = (72.50 ) x ( 1.13 ) x ( 1.15 ) x ( ) = 42,209 Btuh Heat Loss Pipe #2 (Hourly) = ( ) x ( 1.13 ) x ( 1.15 ) x ( 0.00 ) = - Btuh Heat Loss Pipe #3 (Hourly) = ( ) x ( 1.13 ) x ( 1.15 ) x ( 0.00 ) = - Btuh Heat Loss Pipe #4 (Hourly) = ( ) x ( 1.13 ) x ( 1.15 ) x ( 0.00 ) = - Btuh 42,209 Btuh Hourly Heat Loss operating Hours Heating Efficiency Factor Seasonal Heat Loss = 42,209 ) x ( 1,080 ) / ( 82% ) / ( 1,000 ) = 55,592 Mbtu Seasonal Heat Loss Btu/unit Existing Energy Loss 55,592 ) / ( 139 ) = 400 gallons Unit Cost per Unit Existing Energy Loss Cost = ( 400 ) x ( $ 3.88 ) = $ 1,551 New Heat Loss per foot Piping CF Temperature CF Pipe Length Heat Loss Pipe #1 (Hourly) = (14.00 ) x ( 1.13 ) x ( 1.15 ) x ( ) = 8,151 Btuh Heat Loss Pipe #2 (Hourly) = ( ) x ( 1.13 ) x ( 1.15 ) x ( 0.00 ) = - Btuh Heat Loss Pipe #3 (Hourly) = ( ) x ( 1.13 ) x ( 1.15 ) x ( 0.00 ) = - Btuh Heat Loss Pipe #4 (Hourly) = ( ) x ( 1.13 ) x ( 1.15 ) x ( 0.00 ) = - Btuh 8,151 Btuh Hourly Heat Loss operating Hours Heating Efficiency Factor Seasonal Heat Loss = 8,151 ) x ( 1,080 ) / ( 82% ) / ( 1,000 ) = 10,735 Mbtu Seasonal Heat Loss Btu/unit New Energy Loss 10,735 ) / ( 139 ) = 77 gallons Unit Cost per Unit New Energy Loss Cost = 77 ) x ( $ 3.88 ) = $ 299 Result Existing Heat Loss 400 gallons $ 1,551 New Heat Loss 77 gallons $ 299 Savings 100% 323 gallons $ 1, % Comment

38 Pinelands Preservation Alliance CHA #23261 Building: Bishop Farmstead Offices ECM-1 Insulate HHW Piping Multipliers Material: 0.98 Labor: 1.21 ECO-M11 Piping Insulation (Bare Pipe) Equipment: 1.09 Description QTY UNIT UNIT COSTS SUBTOTAL COSTS TOTAL MAT. LABOR EQUIP. MAT. LABOR EQUIP. COST REMARKS Polyethylene Pipe Insulation (3/4" Pipe) 450 LF $ 0.40 $ - $ - $ 176 $ - $ - $ 176 1" Thick Wall $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - *Insulation can be installed in house. $ 176 Subtotal $ 18 10% Contingency $ - Contractor O&P $ - Engineering $ 194 Total

39 APPENDIX D ECM-2 Boiler Replacement

40 Pinelands Preservation Alliance CHA #23261 Building: Bishop Farmstead Offices ECM-2 Boiler Replacement Existing Fuel Proposed Fuel Item Value Units Baseline Fuel Cost $ 3.88 Proposed Fuel Cost $ 3.88 Baseline Fuel Use 1,306 Gals #2 Existing Boiler Plant Efficiency 82% Baseline Boiler Load 148,537 Mbtu/yr Baseline Fuel Cost $ 5,064 Proposed Boiler Plant Efficiency 92% Proposed Fuel Use 1,164 Gals #2 Proposed Fuel Cost $ 4,514 Formula/Comments Based on historical utility data Estimated or Measured Baseline Fuel Use x Existing Efficiency x Mbtu/Gals #2 New Boiler Efficiency Baseline Boiler Load / Proposed Efficiency / Mbtu/Gals #2 Annual Savings 142 Gals #2 Annual Savings $ 550 /yr

41 Pinelands Preservation Alliance CHA #23261 Multipliers Building: Bishop Farmstead Offices Material: 0.98 Labor: 1.21 ECM-2 Boiler Replacement Equipment: 1.09 Description QTY UNIT UNIT COSTS SUBTOTAL COSTS TOTAL MAT. LABOR EQUIP. MAT. LABOR EQUIP. COST $ - $ - $ - $ - Boiler Removal 1 EA $ 400 $ - $ 484 $ - $ 484 $ - $ - $ - $ - 50 MBH Oil-Fired Condensing HW Boiler 1 EA $ 4,000 $ 500 $ 3,920 $ 605 $ - $ 4,525 Flue Replacement 15 LF $ 7.5 $ 6.50 $ 110 $ 118 $ - $ 228 Miscellaneous Electrical 1 LS $ 200 $ 150 $ 196 $ 182 $ - $ 378 Miscellaneous HW and Oil Piping 1 LS $ 200 $ 150 $ 196 $ 182 $ - $ 378 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - REMARKS Includes flue removal Includes freight and 4" PVC Piping $ 5,992 Subtotal $ % Contingency Contractor $ 1,318 20% O&P $ - 0% Engineering $ 7,910 Total

42 APPENDIX E ECM-3 Replace AC Condensing Units

43 Pinelands Preservation Alliance CHA #23261 Building: Bishop Farmstead Offices ECM-3 Replace AC Condensing Units ASSUMPTIONS Electric Cost $0.287 / kwh Average run hours per Week 45 Hours Space Balance Point 60 F Space Temperature Setpoint 74 deg F BTU / Hr Rating of existing AC units 54,000 Btu / Hr Cooling Efficiency kw/ton Energy Efficiency Ratio (EER) 7.2 Item Value Units Existing Annual Electric Usage 1,425 kwh Proposed EER 14.0 Proposed Annual Electric Usage 737 kwh Comments Units operate on thermostat setpoint 2 remote condensing units (4.5 tons total) Units in poor condition Comments New high-efficiency condensing units ANNUAL SAVINGS Annual Savings 687 kwh Annual Cost Savings $197 OAT - DB Cooling Hrs Assumed % Assumed Bin Annual at Temp Above of time of hrs of Temp F Hours balance point operation Operation % % % % % % % % % % % % , % % % % % % % % % % % 0 Total 8, % 191

44 Pinelands Preservation Alliance CHA #23261 Multipliers Building: Bishop Farmstead Offices Material: 0.98 Labor: 1.21 ECM-3 Replace AC Condensing Units Equipment: 1.09 Description QTY UNIT UNIT COSTS SUBTOTAL COSTS TOTAL MAT. LABOR EQUIP. MAT. LABOR EQUIP. COST $ - $ - $ - $ - Condensing Unit Removal 2 EA $ 50 $ - $ 121 $ - $ 121 $ - $ - $ - $ - 2 Ton Condensing Unit 1 EA $ 980 $ 350 $ 960 $ 424 $ - $ 1, /2 Ton Condensing Unit 1 EA $ 1,200 $ 450 $ 1,176 $ 545 $ - $ 1,721 Miscellaneous Piping 1 LS $ 250 $ 200 $ 245 $ 242 $ - $ 487 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - REMARKS High Efficiency 14.0 SEER High Efficiency 14.0 SEER $ 3,712 Subtotal $ % Contingency $ % Contractor O&P $ - Engineering $ 4,696 Total New Jersey Smart Start Incentive Program Split System HVAC <5.4 Tons QTY UNIT $ / UNIT TOTAL Cost W/O Cost W/ SAVINGS INCENTIV INCENTIV $ - $ Tons $92 $414 $ 3,104 $ 2,690 $414 $3,104 $2,690 Total ECM Cost w/ Incentives $4,282

45 APPENDIX F ECM-4 Replace Basement Windows

46 Pinelands Preservation Alliance CHA #23261 Building: Bishop Farmstead Offices ECM-4 Replace Basement Windows Existing: Windows can lead to increased energy consumption due to infiltration/exfiltration and heat gain/loss. Proposed: Replace older windows with glass block Linear Feet of window Edge 42.0 LF Cooling System Efficiency 0 kw/ton Heating System Efficiency 82% Area of window glass 21.3 SF Ex Occupied Clng Temp. 74 *F Heating On Temp. 60 *F Existing Infiltration Factor 0.20 cfm/lf Ex Unoccupied Clng Temp. 76 *F Ex Occupied Htg Temp. 68 *F Proposed Infiltration Factor 0.05 cfm/lf Cooling Occ Enthalpy Setpoint 27.5 Btu/lb Ex Unoccupied Htg Temp. 58 *F Existing U Value 1.05 Btuh/SF/ F Cooling Unocc Enthalpy Setpoint 27.5 Btu/lb Electricity $ $/kwh Proposed U Value 0.50 Btuh/SF/ F Oil $ 3.88 $/gal oil EXISTING LOADS PROPOSED LOADS COOLING ENERGY HEATING ENERGY Occupied Unoccupied Occupied Unoccupied Avg Outdoor Existing Occupied Unoccupied Window Infiltration & Window Infiltration & Window Infiltration & Window Infiltration & Existing Cooling Proposed Existing Heating Proposed Heating Air Temp. Bins Avg Outdoor Equipment Bin Equipment Bin Equipment Bin Heat Load Heat Load Heat Load Heat Load Energy Cooling Energy Energy gal Energy F Air Enthalpy Hours Hours Hours BTUH BTUH BTUH BTUH kwh kwh oil gal oil A B C D E F G H I J K L ,091-1, , , , ,428 1, ,585 1, ,742 1, ,899 1, ,056 1, ,213 1, ,370 2, ,526 2,213 1, TOTALS 8,760 2,346 6, Existing Window Infiltration 8 cfm Savings 17 Gal Oil $ 65 Existing Window Heat Transfer 22 Btuh/ F 0 kwh $ - Proposed Window Infiltration 2 cfm $ 65 Proposed Window Heat Transfer 11 Btuh/ F Window ID Location Quantity Width Height Infiltration Rate U Value Infiltration Heat Transfer Linear Feet (LF) Area (SF) (ft) (ft) (CFM/LF) (Btuh/SF/ F) (CFM) (Btuh/ F) 1 Basement Basement Total

47 Pinelands Preservation Alliance CHA #23261 Multipliers Building: Bishop Farmstead Offices Material: 0.98 Labor: 1.21 ECM-4 Replace Basement Windows Equipment: 1.09 Description QTY UNIT UNIT COSTS SUBTOTAL COSTS TOTAL MAT. LABOR EQUIP. MAT. LABOR EQUIP. COST REMARKS Glass Block Windows 5 EA $90 $ 80 $ 441 $ 484 $ - $ 925 6"x6" Glass Blocks $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 925 Subtotal $ % Contingency Contractor $ % O&P $ - Engineering $ 1,119 Total

48 APPENDIX G ECM-5 Install Storm Window Seals

49 Pinelands Preservation Alliance CHA #23261 Building: Bishop Farmstead Offices ECM-5 Install Storm Window Seals Existing: Windows have storm windows that are not properly sealed. This can lead to increased energy consumption due to infiltration/exfiltration and heat gain/loss. Proposed: Install weather strip to properly seal windows Linear Feet of window Edge LF Cooling System Efficiency kw/ton Heating System Efficiency 82% Area of window glass SF Ex Occupied Clng Temp. 74 *F Heating On Temp. 60 *F Existing Infiltration Factor 0.20 cfm/lf Ex Unoccupied Clng Temp. 76 *F Ex Occupied Htg Temp. 68 *F Proposed Infiltration Factor 0.10 cfm/lf Cooling Occ Enthalpy Setpoint 27.5 Btu/lb Ex Unoccupied Htg Temp. 58 *F Existing U Value 0.65 Btuh/SF/ F Cooling Unocc Enthalpy Setpoint 27.5 Btu/lb Electricity $ $/kwh Proposed U Value 0.65 Btuh/SF/ F Oil $ 3.88 $/gal oil EXISTING LOADS PROPOSED LOADS COOLING ENERGY HEATING ENERGY Occupied Unoccupied Occupied Unoccupied Avg Outdoor Existing Occupied Unoccupied Window Infiltration & Window Infiltration & Window Infiltration & Window Infiltration & Existing Cooling Proposed Existing Heating Proposed Heating Air Temp. Bins Avg Outdoor Equipment Bin Equipment Bin Equipment Bin Heat Load Heat Load Heat Load Heat Load Energy Cooling Energy Energy gal Energy F Air Enthalpy Hours Hours Hours BTUH BTUH BTUH BTUH kwh kwh oil gal oil A B C D E F G H I J K L ,778-8,424-6,471-6, ,969-6,615-5,124-4, ,191-4,837-3,792-3, ,506-3,151-2,506-2, ,881-1,527-1, , , ,891 1,381 3,319 1, ,146 2,636 4,389 2, ,401 3,891 5,460 3, , ,656 5,146 6,530 4, ,911 6,401 7,601 5, ,166 7,656 8,672 6, ,422 8,911 9,742 7, ,677 10,166 10,813 8, ,932 11,422 11,883 9, ,187 12,677 12,954 10, ,442 13,932 14,024 11, ,697 15,187 15,095 12, ,952 16,442 16,166 14, ,207 17,697 17,236 15, TOTALS 8,760 2,346 6, Existing Window Infiltration 68 cfm Savings 33 Gal Oil $ 129 Existing Window Heat Transfer 177 Btuh/ F 156 kwh $ 45 Proposed Window Infiltration 34 cfm $ 174 Proposed Window Heat Transfer 177 Btuh/ F Window ID Location Quantity Width Height Infiltration Rate U Value Infiltration Heat Transfer Linear Feet (LF) Area (SF) (ft) (ft) (CFM/LF) (Btuh/SF/ F) (CFM) (Btuh/ F) 1 1st floor st floor st floor st floor nd floor nd floor nd floor nd floor nd floor nd floor attic attic Total

50 Pinelands Preservation Alliance CHA #23261 Building: Bishop Farmstead Offices ECM-5 Install Storm Window Seals Multipliers Material: 0.98 Labor: 1.21 Equipment: 1.09 Description QTY UNIT UNIT COSTS SUBTOTAL COSTS TOTAL MAT. LABOR EQUIP. MAT. LABOR EQUIP. COST REMARKS Storm Window Weatherstripping 410 LF $ 0.50 $ $ - $ - $ 201 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - *Weatherstripping can be installed in house. $ 201 Subtotal $ 50 25% Contingency Contractor $ - 0% O&P $ - 0% Engineering $ 251 Total

51 APPENDIX H ECM-6 Install Ceiling Insulation

52 Pinelands Preservation Alliance CHA #23261 Building: Bishop Farmstead Offices ECM-7 Install ceiling Insulation Existing: Ceiling can lead to increased energy consumption due to infiltration/exfiltration and heat gain/loss. Proposed: Install 6" fiberglass blown-in loose-fill insulation in attic cavity to reduce heat transfer. Area of ceiling 830 SF Cooling System Efficiency kw/ton Heating System Efficiency 82% Existing Infiltration Factor 0.20 cfm/sf Ex Occupied Clng Temp. 74 *F Heating On Point 60 *F Proposed Infiltration Factor 0.20 cfm/sf Ex Unoccupied Clng Temp. 76 *F Ex Occupied Htg Temp. 68 *F Existing U Value Btuh/SF/ F Cooling Occ Enthalpy Setpoint 27.5 Btu/lb Ex Unoccupied Htg Temp. 58 *F Proposed U Value Btuh/SF/ F Cooling Unocc Enthalpy Setpoint 27.5 Btu/lb Electricity $ $/kwh (Loose-Fill R-2.7/inch) Natural Gas $ 3.88 $/gal oil Avg Outdoor Air Temp. Bins F EXISTING LOADS PROPOSED LOADS COOLING ENERGY HEATING ENERGY Occupied Unoccupied Occupied Unoccupied Wall Wall Existing Proposed Infiltration & Infiltration & Cooling Cooling Heat Load Heat Load Energy Energy Existing Occupied Unoccupied Wall Infiltration Wall Infiltration Existing Avg Outdoor Equipment Bin Equipment Bin Equipment Bin & Heat Load & Heat Load Heating Energy Air Enthalpy Hours Hours Hours BTUH BTUH BTUH BTUH kwh kwh gal oil A B C D E F G H I J K L Proposed Heating Energy gal oil ,250-13,076-11,966-11, ,574-10,400-9,563-9, ,972-7,798-7,235-7, ,595-5,421-5,131-5, ,367-3,193-3,176-3, , , ,127 1,465 3,281 1, ,459 2,796 4,339 2, ,790 4,127 5,397 3, , ,122 5,459 6,455 4, ,453 6,790 7,514 5, ,784 8,122 8,572 6, ,116 9,453 9,630 7, ,447 10,784 10,688 8, ,779 12,116 11,747 9, ,110 13,447 12,805 10, ,441 14,779 13,863 11, ,773 16,110 14,921 12, ,104 17,441 15,980 13, ,436 18,773 17,038 14, TOTALS 8,760 2,346 6, Existing Ceiling Infiltration 166 cfm Savings 49 Gal Oil $ 191 Existing Ceiling Heat Transfer 87 Btuh/ F 51 kwh $ 15 Proposed Ceiling Infiltration 166 cfm $ 206 Proposed Ceiling Heat Transfer 32 Btuh/ F

53 Pinelands Preservation Alliance CHA #23261 Multipliers Building: Bishop Farmstead Offices Material: 0.98 Labor: 1.21 ECM-7 Install ceiling Insulation Equipment: 1.09 Description QTY UNIT UNIT COSTS SUBTOTAL COSTS TOTAL MAT. LABOR EQUIP. MAT. LABOR EQUIP. COST REMARKS $ - $ - $ - $ - Fiberglass blown-in loose-fill insulation 830 SF $ 0.44 $ 0.26 $ 0.10 $ 358 $ 265 $ 90 $ 713 6" Thick Extended Effort 1 LS $ $ - $ 605 $ - $ 605 Pulling up floor boards $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,318 Subtotal $ % Contingency Contractor $ % O&P $ - Engineering $ 1,739 Total

54 APPENDIX I ECM-7 Replace Domestic Hot Water Heater

55 Township of Long Beach CHA #22349 Building: Municipal Complex ECM-7 Replace Domestic Hot Water Heater Summary * Replace Existing LPG 40 gallon DHWH w/ Instantaneous, Condensing, LPG DHW Heater Item Value Units Occupied days per week 5 days/wk Water supply Temperature 50 F Hot Water Temperature 120 F Hot Water Usage per day 15 gal/day Annual Hot Water Energy Demand 2,244 MBTU/yr Existing Tank Size 40 Gallons Hot Water Temperature 120 F Average Room Temperature 65 F Standby Losses (% by Volume) 2.5% Standby Losses (Heat Loss) 0.5 MBH Annual Standby Hot Water Load 4,015 MBTU/yr Total Annual Hot Water Demand (w/ standby losses) 6,259 Mbtu/yr Existing Water Heater Efficiency 80% Total Annual Energy Required 7,823 Mbtu/yr Total Annual Propane Required 85.4 Gal LPG/yr New Tank Size 0 Gallons Hot Water Temperature 120 F Average Room Temperature 65 F Standby Losses (% by Volume) 2.5% Standby Losses (Heat Loss) 0.0 MBH Annual Standby Hot Water Load 0 MBTU/yr Prop Annual Hot Water Demand (w/ standby losses) 2,244 MBTU/yr Proposed Avg. Hot water heater efficiency 92% Proposed Total Annual Energy Required 2,447 MBTU/yr Proposed Fuel Use 27 Gal LPG/yr Formula/Comments Termperature of water coming into building Calculated from usage below Energy required to heat annual quantity of hot water to setpoint Per manufacturer nameplate Per building personnel ( 2.5% of stored capacity per hour, per U.S. Department of Energy ) Building demand plus standby losses Per Manufacturer Per Utility Bills tankless ( 2.5% of stored capacity per hour, per U.S. Department of Energy ) Based on condensing tankless DHW Heater Standby Losses and inefficient DHW heater eliminated Proposed Fuel Savings 59 Gal LPG/yr Propane Utility Unit Cost $3.32 $/Gal LPG Existing Operating Cost of DHW $283 $/yr Proposed Operating Cost of DHW $89 $/yr Annual Utility Cost Savings $195 $/yr

56 Pinelands Preservation Alliance CHA #23261 Building: Bishop Farmstead Offices ECM-7 Replace Domestic Hot Water Heater Multipliers Material: 0.98 Labor: 1.21 Equipment: 1.09 Description QTY UNIT UNIT COSTS SUBTOTAL COSTS TOTAL MAT. LABOR EQUIP. MAT. LABOR EQUIP. COST REMARKS $ - $ - $ - $ - Gas-Fired DHW Heater Removal 1 LS $ 50 $ - $ 61 $ - $ 61 LPG $ - $ - $ - $ - Tankless Gas-Fired DHW Heater 1 EA $ 1,200 $ 300 $ 1,176 $ 363 $ - $ 1,539 LPG Miscellaneous Electrical 1 LS $ 200 $ 196 $ - $ - $ 196 Venting Kit 1 EA $ 450 $ 250 $ 441 $ 303 $ - $ 744 Miscellaneous Piping and Valves 1 LS $ 200 $ 196 $ - $ - $ 196 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - New Jersey Smart Start Incentive Program Tankless DHW Heater QTY UNIT $ / UNIT TOTAL Cost W/O Cost W/ SAVINGS INCENTIVE INCENTIVE $ - $ - 1 EA $300 $300 $ 1,539 $ 1,239 $ 2,735 Subtotal $ % Contingency Contractor $ % O&P $ - 0% Engineering $ 3,460 Total $300 $1,539 $1,239 Total ECM Cost w/ Incentives $3,160

57 APPENDIX J ECM-8 Install Low-Flow Plumbing Fixtures

58 Pinelands Preservation Alliance CHA #23261 Building: Bishop Farmstead Offices ECM-8 Install Low-Flow Plumbing Fixtures E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S Cost of Water / 1000 Gallons Toilets in Building Average Flushes / Toilet (per Day) Average Gallons / Flush P R O P O S E D C O N D I T I O N S Proposed Toilets to be Replaced Proposed Gallons / Flush Proposed Material Cost of Changing out Toilet Proposed Installation cost of Changing out Toilet Total cost of new toilets & valves Toilets $0.00 $ / kgal Gal Gal $530 Each $150 Each $2,040 S A V I N G S Current Toilet Water Use Proposed Toilet Water Use Water Savings Cost Savings* 26 kgal / year 9 kgal / year 17 kgal / year $0 / year - years Simple Payback *Pinelands currently does not pay for water and therefore will not experience any financial benefit from water reduction.

59 Pinelands Preservation Alliance CHA #23261 Building: Bishop Farmstead Offices ECM-8 Install Low-Flow Plumbing Fixtures E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S Cost of Water / 1000 Gallons Faucets in Building Average Uses / Faucet (per day) Average Time of Use Average Flowrate P R O P O S E D C O N D I T I O N S Proposed Faucets to be Replaced Proposed Flowrate Proposed Material Cost of new Faucets Proposed Installation cost of new Faucets Total cost of new faucets Faucets $0.00 $ / kgal 3 9 uses 0.25 min 2.3 gpm gpm $105 EA $56 EA $484 S A V I N G S Current Faucet Water Use Proposed Faucet Water Use Water Savings Cost Savings* 4 kgal / year 1 kgal / year 3 kgal / year $0 / year - years Simple Payback *Pinelands currently does not pay for water and therefore will not experience any financial benefit from water reduction.

60 APPENDIX K ECM-9 Install Energy Star Appliances

61 Pinelands Preservation Alliance CHA #23261 Building: Bishop Farmstead Offices ECM-9 Install Energy Star Appliances Cost of Electricty $0.29 /KWh Dishwasher *replace Whirlpool Dishwasher E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S Electrical Requirement* Cycle Time Total Annual Energy Required *Per Energy Star website. See attachment P R O P O S E D C O N D I T I O N S Electrical Requirement* Cycle Time Total Annual Energy Required Proposed Cost of New Appliance *Per Energy Star website. See attachment S A V I N G S Total Annual Energy Total Annual Savings Total Water Savings** Refrigerator *replace Amana BX2LTE 3600 W 1Hr 936 KWh/Yr 3,240 W 1Hr 842 KWh/Yr $ KWh/Yr $27 / yr 3 kgal / year 18.6 years Simple Payback **Pinelands currently does not pay for water and therefore will not experience any financial benefit from water reduction. E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S Total Annual Energy Required* Cost per Year to run Model *Per Energy Star website. See attachment P R O P O S E D C O N D I T I O N S Total Annual Energy Required* Cost per year to run model Proposed Cost of New Appliance *Per Energy Star website. See attachment S A V I N G S Total Annual Energy Total Annual Savings Simple Payback 677 KWh/Yr $194 / yr 456 KWh/Yr $131 / yr $ KWh/Yr $63 / yr 9.5 years Replacing Both Appliances S A V I N G S Total Annual Energy Total Annual Savings Simple Payback 315 KWh/Yr $90 / yr 12.2 years

62 Dishwashers : ENERGY STAR Page 1 of 1 10/20/2011 Dishwashers for Consumers (Are you a partner? For Partners) See also: Commercial Dishwashers Did You Know? ENERGY STAR qualified dishwashers are, on average, 10% more energy efficient and 12% more water efficient than standard models. About ENERGY STAR Dishwashers Overview Specifications Buying Guidance FAQs ENERGY STAR qualified dishwashers use advanced technology to get your dishes clean while using less water and energy. Trim your utility bills Do you have a dishwasher made before 1994? If so, you're paying an extra $40 a year on your utility bills compared to owning a new ENERGY STAR qualified model. Replace one of these old dishwashers with ENERGY STAR and save enough money to pay for dishwasher detergent all year. Save loads of water A dishwasher built before 1994 wastes more than 10 gallons of water per cycle. A new, ENERGY STAR qualified dishwasher will save, on average, 1,300 gallons of water over its lifetime. Save the environment Nearly 70 percent of U.S. electricity is generated by burning coal and natural gas, which releases greenhouse gasses and other air pollutants into the atmosphere, contributing to climate change and air quality problems. ENERGY STAR qualified dishwashers use less energy than conventional models, which helps reduce air pollution and combat global climate change. By reducing water consumption, ENERGY STAR qualified dishwashers also help protect our lakes, streams, and oceans. Find out more ways to save water and help protect our nation's water supply. Dishwashers Resources Find a Model Qualified Dishwashers Excel PDF Find a Store Special Offers Savings Calculator Related Products Clothes Washers Dehumidifiers Freezers Refrigerators Room Air Cleaners & Purifiers Water Coolers Products Home Improvement New Homes Buildings & Plants Partner Resources Kids Publications News Room FAQs Contact Us Privacy Site Index Recursos en Español PDF Viewer Flash Viewer PowerPoint Viewer Excel Viewer Search DOE Home DOE EPA Home EPA Search

63 ENERGY STAR Page 1 of 1 10/3/2011 Refrigerator Retirement Savings Calculator BX21T 20.5 cubic feet Bottom Freezer $0.287 $ kwh You can save more than $315 over five years by replacing your old refrigerator or freezer with a new ENERGY STAR qualified model! Your model costs... An ENERGY STAR qualified model costs... $194 per year to run $131 per year to run Note: If your refrigerator or freezer is a newer, ENERGY STAR qualified model your results may not display significant savings. If you have trouble using this tool or have questions about the calculations, please contact efficiencyrebates@energystar.gov Products Home Improvement New Homes Buildings & Plants Partner Resources Kids Publications News Room FAQs Contact Us Privacy Site Index Recursos en Español PDF Viewer Flash Viewer PowerPoint Viewer Excel Viewer DOE Home DOE Search EPA Home EPA Search

64 APPENDIX L ECM-10 Lighting Replacements

65 Energy Audit of Pinelands Preservation Alliance CHA Project No Cost of Electricity: $0.168 $/kwh ECM-10 Lighting Replacements $ $/kw Field Code Area Description Unique description of the location - Room number/room No. of fixtures name: Floor number (if applicable) before the retrofit No. of Watts per Fixtures Standard Fixture Code NYSERDA Fixture Code Fixture "Lighting Fixture Code" Example 2T 40 R F(U) = 2'x2' Troff 40 w Recess. Floor 2 lamps U shape EXISTING CONDITIONS Code from Table of Standard Fixture Wattages Value from Table of Standard Fixture Wattages kw/space (Watts/Fixt) * (Fixt No.) Exist Control Pre-inst. control device Annual Hours Annual kwh Estimated daily (kw/space) * hours for the (Annual Hours) usage group Number of Fixtures Standard Fixture Code Fixture Code No. of fixtures after the retrofit "Lighting Fixture Code" Example 2T 40 R F(U) = 2'x2' Troff 40 w Recess. Floor 2 lamps U shape RETROFIT CONDITIONS Code from Table of Standard Fixture Wattages Watts per Fixture Value from Table of Standard Fixture Wattages kw/space (Watts/Fixt) * (Number of Fixtures) Retrofit Control Retrofit control device Annual Hours Estimated annual hours for the usage group Annual kwh (kw/space) * (Annual Hours) Annual kwh Saved (Original Annual kwh) - (Retrofit Annual kwh) Annual kw Saved COST & SAVINGS ANALYSIS Annual $ Saved Retrofit Cost (Original Annual (kwh Saved) * Cost for kw) - (Retrofit ($/kwh) Annual kw) renovations to lighting system NJ Smart Start Lighting Incentive Prescriptive Lighting Measures Simple Payback With Out Incentive Simple Payback Length of time Length of time for for renovations renovations cost to cost to be be recovered recovered 117 Basement 3 CF 23 CFS23/ SW CF 23 CFS23/ SW $ - $ - $0 71 Basement 1 I 60 I60/ SW CF 26 CFQ26/1-L SW $ 5.20 $ 6.75 $ st Floor restroom 1 CF 15 CFS15/ SW CF 15 CFS15/ SW $ - $ - $ nd floor center office 1 CF 15 CFS15/ SW CF 15 CFS15/ SW 2, $ - $ - $ nd floor center office 1 I 65 I65/ SW CF 26 CFQ26/1-L SW 2, $ $ 6.75 $ nd floor hallway 1 CF 15 CFS15/ SW CF 15 CFS15/ SW $ - $ - $ nd floor large office 4 CF 23 CFS23/ SW CF 23 CFS23/ SW 2, $ - $ - $ nd floor office restroom 1 T 30 W F 2 (MAG) RL/RB F32SS SW W 28 W F 2 F42SSILL SW $ 7.28 $ $ st floor single office 1 CF 23 CFS23/ SW CF 23 CFS23/ SW 2, $ - $ - $ st floor 3 person office 4 CF 23 CFS23/ SW CF 23 CFS23/ SW 2, $ - $ - $ st floor copy room 2 CF 23 CFS23/ SW CF 23 CFS23/ SW $ - $ - $ st floor rear vestibule 3 CF 23 CFS23/ SW CF 23 CFS23/ SW $ - $ - $0 122 kitchen - 1st floor 8 CF 15 CFS15/ SW CF 15 CFS15/ SW 2, $ - $ - $0 65 kitchen - 1st floor 2 I 100 I100/ SW CF 26 CFQ26/1-L SW 2, $ $ $ st floor conference room 10 I 120 I120/ SW LED Flood light SW $ $ $ st floor visitor room 6 I 120 I120/ SW LED Flood light SW $ $ $ st floor visitor room 4 LED Flood light SW LED Flood light SW $ - $ - $ nd floor end 2 person office 1 WP200 I 1 i200/ SW WP 42 2 CF42/1-L SW 2, $ $ $ nd floor end 2 person office 1 CF 23 CFS23/ SW CF 23 CFS23/ SW 2, $ - $ - $ nd floor restroom 1 CF 23 CFS23/ SW CF 23 CFS23/ SW $ - $ - $0 71 Attic 3 I 60 I60/ SW CF 26 CFQ26/1-L SW $ $ $ Outside Porch Lights 3 I 60 I60/ SW CF 26 CFQ26/1-L SW $ $ $ Parking Lot Lights 3 WP 400 Po HPS hps400/ Timer WP 400 Po HPS hps400/ Timer $ - $ - $0 141 Parking Lot Lights 3 HPS 250 HPS250/ Timer HPS 250 HPS250/ Timer $ - $ - $0 Total , , ,798 1, $603 $979 $15 Demand Savings kwh Savings Total savings 2.4 $329 1,635 $274 $ /9/2011 Page 1, ECM-10

66 APPENDIX M ECM-11 Install Occupancy Sensors

67 Energy Audit of Pinelands Preservation Alliance CHA Project No Cost of Electricity: $0.168 $/kwh ECM-11 Install Occupancy Sensors $11.40 $/kw Field Code Area Description Unique description of the location - Room number/room name: Floor number (if applicable) No. of Watts per Fixtures Standard Fixture Code NYSERDA Fixture Code Fixture No. of fixtures before the retrofit "Lighting Fixture Code" Example 2T 40 R F(U) = 2'x2' Troff 40 w Recess. Floor 2 lamps U shape EXISTING CONDITIONS Code from Table of Standard Fixture Wattages Value from Table of Standard Fixture Wattages kw/space (Watts/Fixt) * (Fixt No.) Exist Control Pre-inst. control device Annual Hours Estimated annual hours for the usage group Annual kwh (kw/space) * (Annual Hours) Number of Fixtures Standard Fixture Code Fixture Code No. of fixtures after the retrofit "Lighting Fixture Code" Example 2T 40 R F(U) = 2'x2' Troff 40 w Recess. Floor 2 lamps U shape RETROFIT CONDITIONS Code from Table of Standard Fixture Wattages Watts per Fixture Value from Table of Standard Fixture Wattages kw/space (Watts/Fixt) * (Number of Fixtures) Retrofit Control Retrofit control device Annual Hours Estimated annual hours for the usage group Annual kwh (kw/space) * (Annual Hours) Annual kwh Saved (Original Annual kwh) - (Retrofit Annual kwh) Annual kw Saved COST & SAVINGS ANALYSIS Annual $ Saved (Original Annual (kw Saved) * kw) - (Retrofit ($/kwh) Annual kw) Retrofit Cost Cost for renovations to lighting system NJ Smart Start Lighting Incentive Simple Payback With Out Incentive Simple Payback Length of time Length of time for for renovations renovations cost to cost to be be recovered recovered 117 Basement 3 CF 23 CFS23/ SW CF 23 CFS23/ None $0.00 $0.00 $ Basement 1 I 60 I60/ SW I 60 I60/ None $0.00 $0.00 $ st Floor restroom 1 CF 15 CFS15/ SW CF 15 CFS15/ OCC $0.63 $ $ nd floor center office 1 CF 15 CFS15/ SW CF 15 CFS15/ None $0.00 $0.00 $ nd floor center office 1 I 65 I65/ SW I 65 I65/ None $0.00 $0.00 $ nd floor hallway 1 CF 15 CFS15/ SW CF 15 CFS15/ None $0.00 $0.00 $ nd floor large office 4 CF 23 CFS23/ SW CF 23 CFS23/ None $0.00 $0.00 $ nd floor office restroom 1 T 30 W F 2 (MAG) RL/RB F32SS SW T 30 W F 2 (MAG) RL/RB F32SS None $0.00 $0.00 $ st floor single office 1 CF 23 CFS23/ SW CF 23 CFS23/ None $0.00 $0.00 $ st floor 3 person office 4 CF 23 CFS23/ SW CF 23 CFS23/ None $0.00 $0.00 $ st floor copy room 2 CF 23 CFS23/ SW CF 23 CFS23/ None $0.00 $0.00 $ st floor rear vestibule 3 CF 23 CFS23/ SW CF 23 CFS23/ None $0.00 $0.00 $ kitchen - 1st floor 8 CF 15 CFS15/ SW CF 15 CFS15/ None $0.00 $0.00 $ kitchen - 1st floor 2 I 100 I100/ SW I 100 I100/ None $0.00 $0.00 $ st floor conference room 10 I 120 I120/ SW I 120 I120/ D-OCC $50.27 $ $ st floor visitor room 6 I 120 I120/ SW I 120 I120/ D-OCC $ st floor visitor room 4 LED Flood light SW LED Flood light D-OCC $1.17 $ $ nd floor end 2 person office 1 WP200 I 1 i200/ SW WP200 I 1 i200/ None $0.00 $0.00 $ nd floor end 2 person office 1 CF 23 CFS23/ SW CF 23 CFS23/ None $0.00 $0.00 $ nd floor restroom 1 CF 23 CFS23/ SW CF 23 CFS23/ None $0.00 $0.00 $ Attic 3 I 60 I60/ SW I 60 I60/ None $0.00 $0.00 $ Outside Porch Lights 3 I 60 I60/ SW I 60 I60/ None $0.00 $0.00 $ Parking Lot Lights 3 WP 400 Po HPS hps400/ Timer WP 400 Po HPS hps400/ None $0.00 $0.00 $ Parking Lot Lights 3 HPS 250 HPS250/ Timer HPS 250 HPS250/ None $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total , , $ Demand Savings 0.0 $0 kwh Savings 491 $82 Total Savings $ /9/2011 Page 1, ECM-11

68 APPENDIX N ECM-12 Lighting Replacements with Occupancy Sensors

69 Energy Audit of Pinelands Preservation Alliance CHA Project No Cost of Electricity: $0.168 $/kwh ECM-12 Lighting Replacements with Occupancy Sensors $11.40 $/kw Field Code Area Description Unique description of the location - Room number/roomno. of fixtures name: Floor number (if applicable) before the retrofit No. of Watts per Fixtures Standard Fixture Code NYSERDA Fixture Code Fixture "Lighting Fixture Code" Example 2T 40 R F(U) = 2'x2' Troff 40 w Recess. Floor 2 lamps U shape EXISTING CONDITIONS Code from Table of Standard Fixture Wattages Value from Table of Standard Fixture Wattages kw/space (Watts/Fixt) * (Fixt No.) Exist Control Pre-inst. control device Annual Hours Annual kwh Estimated daily (kw/space) * hours for the (Annual Hours) usage group Number of Fixtures Standard Fixture Code Fixture Code No. of fixtures after the retrofit "Lighting Fixture Code" Example 2T 40 R F(U) = 2'x2' Troff 40 w Recess. Floor 2 lamps U shape RETROFIT CONDITIONS Code from Table of Standard Fixture Wattages Watts per Fixture Value from Table of Standard Fixture Wattages kw/space (Watts/Fixt) * (Number of Fixtures) Retrofit Control Retrofit control device Annual Hours Estimated annual hours for the usage group Annual kwh (kw/space) * (Annual Hours) Annual kwh Saved (Original Annual kwh) - (Retrofit Annual kwh) Annual kw Saved COST & SAVINGS ANALYSIS Annual $ Saved (Original Annual (kwh Saved) * kw) - (Retrofit ($/kwh) Annual kw) Retrofit Cost Cost for renovations to lighting system NJ Smart Start Lighting Incentive Prescriptive Lighting Measures Simple Payback With Out Incentive Simple Payback Length of time Length of time for for renovations renovations cost to cost to be be recovered recovered 117 Basement 3 CF 23 CFS23/ SW CF 23 CFS23/ None $ - $ - $ - 71 Basement 1 I 60 I60/ SW CF 26 CFQ26/1-L None $ 5.20 $ 6.75 $ st Floor restroom 1 CF 15 CFS15/ SW CF 15 CFS15/ OCC $ 0.63 $ $ nd floor center office 1 CF 15 CFS15/ SW CF 15 CFS15/ None 2, $ - $ - $ nd floor center office 1 I 65 I65/ SW CF 26 CFQ26/1-L None 2, $ $ 6.75 $ nd floor hallway 1 CF 15 CFS15/ SW CF 15 CFS15/ None $ - $ - $ nd floor large office 4 CF 23 CFS23/ SW CF 23 CFS23/ None 2, $ - $ - $ nd floor office restroom 1 T 30 W F 2 (MAG) RL/RB F32SS SW W 28 W F 2 F42SSILL None $ 7.28 $ $ st floor single office 1 CF 23 CFS23/ SW CF 23 CFS23/ None 2, $ - $ - $ st floor 3 person office 4 CF 23 CFS23/ SW CF 23 CFS23/ None 2, $ - $ - $ st floor copy room 2 CF 23 CFS23/ SW CF 23 CFS23/ None $ - $ - $ st floor rear vestibule 3 CF 23 CFS23/ SW CF 23 CFS23/ None $ - $ - $ kitchen - 1st floor 8 CF 15 CFS15/ SW CF 15 CFS15/ None 2, $ - $ - $ - 65 kitchen - 1st floor 2 I 100 I100/ SW CF 26 CFQ26/1-L None 2, $ $ $ st floor conference room 10 I 120 I120/ SW LED Flood light D-OCC $ $ $ st floor visitor room 6 I 120 I120/ SW LED Flood light D-OCC $ $ $ st floor visitor room 4 LED Flood light SW LED Flood light D-OCC $ 1.17 $ - $ nd floor end 2 person office 1 WP200 I 1 i200/ SW WP 42 2 CF42/1-L None 2, $ $ $ nd floor end 2 person office 1 CF 23 CFS23/ SW CF 23 CFS23/ None 2, $ - $ - $ nd floor restroom 1 CF 23 CFS23/ SW CF 23 CFS23/ None $ - $ - $ - 71 Attic 3 I 60 I60/ SW CF 26 CFQ26/1-L None $ $ $ Outside Porch Lights 3 I 60 I60/ SW CF 26 CFQ26/1-L None $ $ $ Parking Lot Lights 3 WP 400 Po HPS hps400/ Timer WP 400 Po HPS hps400/ None $ - $ - $ Parking Lot Lights 3 HPS 250 HPS250/ Timer HPS 250 HPS250/ None $ - $ - $ - Total , , , Demand Savings 2.4 $329 kwh Savings 1,673 $280 Total Savings $ /9/2011 Page 1, ECM-12

70 APPENDIX O New Jersey Pay For Performance Incentive Program

71 Pinelands Preservation Alliance CHA #23261 Building: Bishop Farmstead Offices New Jersey Pay For Performance Incentive Program Note: The following calculation is based on the New Jersey Pay For Performance Incentive Program per 2011 Building must have a minimum average electric demand of 200 kw. This minimum is waived for buildings owned by local governements or non-profit organizations. Incentive #1 Total Building Area (Square Feet) 2,900 Audit not funded by NJ BPU $0.10 $/sqft Is this audit funded by the NJ BPU (Y/N) Yes Audit is funded by NJ BPU $0.05 $/sqft Board of Public Utilites (BPU) Annual Utilities kwh Therms #2 Fuel Oil LPG Existing Cost (from utility) $1,500 $0 $5,100 $300 Existing Usage (from utility) 5, , Proposed Savings 2, Existing Total MMBtus Proposed Savings MMBtus % Energy Reduction Proposed Annual Savings % $3,000 Min (Savings = 15%) Increase (Savings > 15%) Max Incentive Achieved Incentive $/kwh $/therm $/kwh $/therm $/kwh $/therm $/kwh $/therm Incentive #2 $0.09 $0.90 $0.005 $0.05 $0.11 $1.25 $0.11 $1.25 Incentive #3 $0.09 $0.90 $0.005 $0.05 $0.11 $1.25 $0.11 $1.25 Incentives $ Elec Gas Total Incentive #1 $0 $0 $145 Incentive #2 $241 $0 $241 Incentive #3 $241 $0 $241 Total All Incentives $482 $0 $627 Total Project Cost $13,700 Allowable Incentive % Incentives #1 of Utility Cost* 9.7% $145 % Incentives #2 of Project Cost** 1.8% $241 % Incentives #3 of Project Cost** 1.8% $241 Project Payback (years) Total Eligible Incentives*** $627 w/o Incentives w/ Incentives Project Cost w/ Incentives $13, * Maximum allowable incentive is 50% of annual utility cost if not funded by NJ BPU, and %25 if it is. ** Maximum allowable amount of Incentive #2 is 25% of total project cost. Maximum allowable amount of Incentive #3 is 25% of total project cost. *** Maximum allowable amount of Incentive #1 is $50,000 if not funded by NJ BPU, and $25,000 if it is. Maximum allowable amount of Incentive #2 & #3 is $1 million per gas account and $1 million per electric account

72 APPENDIX P Photovoltaic (PV) Rooftop Solar Power Generation

73 Pinelands Preservation Alliance Building: Bishop Farmstead Offices Cost of Electricity $0.287 /kwh System Capacity 4.5 kw System Unit Cost $8,000 /kw Photovoltaic (PV) Rooftop Solar Power Generation Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Estimated Total * Federal Tax Credit New Jersey Renewable Payback Payback (without incentive) (with incentive) Cost Maintenance Savings ** SREC Savings $ kw kwh therms $ $ $ $ $ Years Years $36, ,430 0 $1,600 0 $1,600 $0 $2, ** Estimated Solar Renewable Energy Certificate Program (SREC) SREC for 15 Years= $487/1000kwh Estimated Solar Renewable Energy Certificate Program (SREC) payments for 15 Years from RR Renewable Energy Consultants Year SREC AVG /9/2011 Page 1, Summary

74 PVWATTS: Cautions for Interpreting the Results Cautions for Interpreting the Results The monthly and yearly energy production are modeled using the PV system parameters you selected and weather data that are typical or representative of long-term averages. For reference, or comparison with local information, the solar radiation values modeled for the PV array are included in the performance results. Because weather patterns vary from year-to-year, the values in the tables are better indicators of long-term performance than performance for a particular month or year. PV performance is largely proportional to the amount of solar radiation received, which may vary from the long-term average by ± 30% for monthly values and ± 10% for yearly values. How the solar radiation might vary for your location may be evaluated by examining the tables in the Solar Radiation Data Manual for Flat-Plate and Concentrating Collectors ( For these variations and the uncertainties associated with the weather data and the model used to model the PV performance, future months and years may be encountered where the actual PV performance is less than or greater than the values shown in the table. The variations may be as much as 40% for individual months and up to 20% for individual years. Compared to long-term performance over many years, the values in the table are accurate to within 10% to 12%. If the default overall DC to AC derate factor is used, the energy values in the table will overestimate the actual energy production if nearby buildings, objects, or other PV modules and array structure shade the PV modules; if tracking mechanisms for one- and two-axis tracking systems do not keep the PV arrays at the optimum orientation with respect to the sun's position; if soiling or snow cover related losses exceed 5%; or if the system performance has degraded from new. (PV performance typically degrades 1% per year.) If any of these situations exist, an overall DC to AC derate factor should be used with PVWATTS that was calculated using system specific component derate factors for shading, sun-tracking, soiling, and age. The PV system size is the nameplate DC power rating. The energy production values in the table are valid only for crystalline silicon PV systems. The cost savings are determined as the product of the number of kilowatt hours (kwh) and the cost of electricity per kwh. These cost savings occur if the owner uses all the electricity produced by the PV system, or if the owner has a net-metering agreement with the utility. With net-metering, the utility bills the owner for the net electricity consumed. When electricity flows from the utility to the owner, the meter spins forward. When electricity flows from the PV system to the utility, the meter spins backwards. If net-metering isn t available and the PV system sends surplus electricity to the utility grid, the utility generally buys the electricity from the owner at a lower price than the owner pays the utility for electricity. In this case, the cost savings shown in the table should be reduced. Besides the cost savings shown in the table, other benefits of PV systems include greater energy independence and a reduction in fossil fuel usage and air pollution. For commercial customers, additional cost savings may come from reducing demand charges. Homeowners can often include the cost of the PV system in their home mortgage as a way of accommodating the PV system s initial cost. To accelerate the use of PV systems, many state and local governments offer financial incentives and programs. Go to for more information. Please send questions and comments to Webmaster Disclaimer and copyright notice. Return to RREDC Home Page ( ) 10:52:14 AM]

75 PVWATTS: AC Energy and Cost Savings * * * AC Energy & Cost Savings Station Identification City: Philadelphia State: Pennsylvania Latitude: N Longitude: W Elevation: 9 m PV System Specifications DC Rating: 4.5 kw DC to AC Derate Factor: AC Rating: 3.5 kw Array Type: Fixed Tilt Array Tilt: 39.9 Array Azimuth: Energy Specifications Cost of Electricity: 28.7 /kwh Month Solar Radiation (kwh/m 2 /day) Results AC Energy (kwh) Energy Value ($) Year About the Hourly Performance Data * Saving Text from a Browser Run PVWATTS v.1 for another US location or an International location Run PVWATTS v.2 (US only) Please send questions and comments regarding PVWATTS to Webmaster Disclaimer and copyright notice Return to RReDC home page ( ) 10:06:59 AM]

76 APPENDIX Q Solar Thermal Domestic Hot Water Plant

77 NJBPU Energy Audits Multipliers CHA #23261 Material: 0.98 Pinelands Preservation Alliance Labor: 1.21 Bishop Farmstead Offices Equipment: 1.09 Description QTY UNIT UNIT COSTS SUBTOTAL COSTS TOTAL MAT. LABOR EQUIP. MAT. LABOR EQUIP. COST Synergy Solar Thermal System 1 EA $ 2,400 $ 1,200 $ 2,352 $ 1,452 $ - $ 3,804 Piping modifications 1 LS $ 1,500 $ 2,000 $ 1,470 $ 2,420 $ - $ 3,890 Electrical modifications 1 LS $ 400 $ 500 $ 392 $ 605 $ - $ 997 REMARKS 65 GallonStorage Tank 10 Gallon Drip Tank 1 EA $ 300 $ 200 $ 300 $ 200 $ - $ EA $ 100 $ 80 $ 100 $ 80 $ - $ 180 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,371 $ 937 Subtotal 10% Contingency $ % Contractor O&P $ % Engineering $ 12,182 Total

78 Interactive Energy Calculators Home What Can I Do? Electric Choice Home Energy FAQs LEARN Fact Sheets Lesson Plans PLAY Calculators NETWORK Organizations Businesses Events Calendar BROWSE Resources Solar Wind Biomass Geothermal Water Projects TX Energy - Past and Present Financial Help About Us About SECO Interactive Energy Calculators Our calculators help you understand energy production and consumption in a whole new way. Use them to develop a personal profile of your own energy use. Carbon Pollution Calculator Electric Power Pollution Calculator PV System Economics Solar Water Heating What's a Watt? Solar Water Heating Calculator Water heating is a major energy consumer. Although the energy consumed daily is often less than for air conditioning or heating, it is required year round, making it a good application of solar energy. Use this calculator to explore the energy usage of your water heater, and to estimate whether a solar water heater could save you money. Physical Water Heater Characteristics Thermal Diameter (feet) Water Inlet Temperature (Degrees F) Capacity (gallons) Ambient Temperature (Degrees F) Surface Area (calculated - sq ft) Hot Water Temperature (Degrees F) Effective R-value Hot Water Usage (Gallons per Day) Energy Use Heat Delivered in Hot Water (BTU/hr) Heat loss through insulation (BTU/hr) RARE Gas vs. Electric Water Heating Gas Electric Overall Efficiency Conversion Efficiency 0.98 BTU/hr Power Into Water Heater BTU/hr 10:41:18 AM]

79 Interactive Energy Calculators Cost $ /Therm Utility Rates $ /kwh $ Yearly Water Heating Cost $ How Does Solar Compare? Solar Water Heater Cost: $ Percentage Solar: years for gas Payback Time for Solar System years for electric More information on solar water heating: Fact sheet - Solar Water Heaters Fact sheet - Solar Water Heaters for Swimming Pools Kids fact sheet - Heat from the Sun Return to Top of Page Send comments, questions, and suggestions to website manager. Window on State Government Privacy and Security Policy Accessibility Policy State Energy Conservation Office (SECO) 10:41:18 AM]

80 APPENDIX R Wind

81 Pinelands Preservation Alliance Building: Bishop Farmstead Offices Cost of Electricity $0.287 /kwh System Capacity 4.5 kw Wind Generation Budgetary Annual Utility Savings Estimated Total New Jersey REIP Federal Tax Break Payback Payback (without incentive) (with incentive) Cost Maintenance Savings Incentive** Incentive* Savings $ kw kwh therms $ $ $ $ $ Years Years $71, ,208 0 $1,500 0 $1,500 $16,700 $ ** Estimated Renewable Energy Incentive Program $3.20/KWh Estimated Solar Renewable Energy Certificate Program (SREC) payments for 15 Years from RR Renewable Energy Consultants Year SREC AVG /9/2011 Page 1, Summary

82 75 30'0"W '0"W '0"W '0"W 73 30'0"W '0"W Connecticut New York Vernon 41 0'0"N Crandon Lakes Sussex Bergen Morris Clifton Passaic Tabor Essex Union Flemington Somerset Zarephath Edison Middlesex 40 30'0"N Hunterdon New York NewarkHudson Jersey City ElizabethBayonne Pennsylvania Union City 40 30'0"N Warren Vienna Paterson 41 0'0"N Passaic Colts Neck Monmouth Mercer 40 0'0"N New Egypt Camden Kresson Burlington '0"N Trenton Ocean Chatsworth Camden Salem 39 30'0"N Atlantic Ocean Atlantic Vineland 39 30'0"N Fenwick Beach Haven West Gloucester Cumberland Delaware '0"W 75 30'0"W '0"W '0"W 74 0'0"W Miles Kilometers 73 30'0"W '0"N 39 0'0"N Maryland Dennisville Cape May Wind Resource of New Jersey Mean Annual Wind Speed at 30 Meters Features City Interstate Highway County Boundary Water Body Generalized Transmission Line Category Under 100 kv 100 kv-161 kv 230 kv-287 kv 345 kv 500 kv 735 kv + Step-Up DC Line Mean Speed at 30 m mph m/s < 10.1 < > 19.0 > 8.5 Projection: Tranverse Mercator, UTM Zone 17 WGS84 Spatial Resolution of Wind Resource Data: 200m This map was created by AWS Truewind using the MesoMap system and historical weather data. Although it is believed to represent an accurate overall picture of the wind energy resource, estimates at any location should be confirmed by measurement. The transmission line information was obtained by AWS Truewind from the Global Energy Decisions Velocity Suite. AWS does not warrant the accuracy of the transmission line information. AWS Truewind, LCC

83 APPENDIX S EPA Portfolio Manager

84 OMB No STATEMENT OF ENERGY PERFORMANCE Pinelands Preservation Building ID: For 12-month Period Ending: February 28, Date SEP becomes ineligible: N/A Date SEP Generated: November 07, 2011 Facility Pinelands Preservation 17 Pemberton Road Southampton, NJ Year Built: 1753 Gross Floor Area (ft 2 ): 2,900 Facility Owner Pinelands Preservation 17 Pemberton Road Southampton, NJ Primary Contact for this Facility Jaclyn Rhoads 17 Pemberton Road Southampton, NJ Energy Performance Rating 2 (1-100) N/A Site Energy Use Summary 3 Electricity - Grid Purchase(kBtu) 17,872 Fuel Oil (No. 2) (kbtu) 147,895 Natural Gas - (kbtu) 4 0 Total Energy (kbtu) 165,767 Energy Intensity 5 Site (kbtu/ft 2 /yr) 57 Source (kbtu/ft 2 /yr) 72 Emissions (based on site energy use) Greenhouse Gas Emissions (MtCO 2 e/year) 13 Electric Distribution Utility Public Service Electric & Gas Co National Median Comparison National Median Site EUI 68 National Median Source EUI 164 % Difference from National Median Source EUI -56% Building Type Office Stamp of Certifying Professional Based on the conditions observed at the time of my visit to this building, I certify that the information contained within this statement is accurate. Meets Industry Standards 6 for Indoor Environmental Conditions: Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality N/A Acceptable Thermal Environmental Conditions N/A Adequate Illumination N/A Certifying Professional Jaclyn Rhoads 17 Pemberton Road Southampton, NJ Notes: 1. Application for the ENERGY STAR must be submitted to EPA within 4 months of the Period Ending date. Award of the ENERGY STAR is not final until approval is received from EPA. 2. The EPA Energy Performance Rating is based on total source energy. A rating of 75 is the minimum to be eligible for the ENERGY STAR. 3. Values represent energy consumption, annualized to a 12-month period. 4. Values represent energy intensity, annualized to a 12-month period. 5. Based on Meeting ASHRAE Standard 62 for ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality, ASHRAE Standard 55 for thermal comfort, and IESNA Lighting Handbook for lighting quality. The government estimates the average time needed to fill out this form is 6 hours (includes the time for entering energy data, Licensed Professional facility inspection, and notarizing the SEP) and welcomes suggestions for reducing this level of effort. Send comments (referencing OMB control number) to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S., EPA (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C EPA Form