Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan. 143 rd Street and Metcalf Road (SE Corner) Overland Park, Kansas. Prepared by:

Transcription

1 Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan Lionsgate Senior Lionsgate Marketplace Multi-Family Residential and Retaill Development 143 rd Street and Metcalf Road (SE Corner) Overland Park, Kansas Prepared by: 1270 N. Winchester Olathe, KS (913) PEI # March 28, 2018 Engineering Services Manager Date

2 March 28, 2018 Pam Fortun, P.E. City of Overland Park, Kansas 8500 Santa Fe Drive Overland Park, KS Re: Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan Lionsgate Senior Lionsgate Marketplace (143 rd & Metcalf, SE Corner) PEI # Dear Ms. Fortun: Phelps Engineering, Inc. (PEI) is pleased to submit this Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan for the Lionsgate Senior Apartments development, located in the Lionsgate Marketplace at the southeast corner of 143 rd Street and Metcalf Avenue. The development is located on Lot 8, and a portion of Lots 5, 6 and 7 as shown on the plat of Lionsgate Marketplace. The proposed project consists of one multi-family residential (senior apartments) building, one retail building, and associated drive and parking areas. In the location of the proposed development, a previously approved development plan for Lionsgate Marketplace had shown three proposed retail buildings, Building E at 14,050 square feet, Building F at 29,112 square feet and Building G at 37,234 square feet, as well as associated parking and drive areas. Modifications to the previously approved parking lot layout are required due to the new configuration of the building layout. The overall impervious area for the proposed Lionsgate Senior Apartments development is less than the previously approved impervious areas. Onsite Drainage System Lionsgate Marketplace consists of approximately 33.5 acres located at the southeast corner of 143 rd Street and Metcalf Avenue in Section 5, Township 14 South, Range 25 East and shown on FEMA FIRM Map Panel #20091C0098G, revised August 3, The Lionsgate Senior Apartments development is located along the south edge, near the southeast corner of the retail development. The northwest 1/3 rd of the development drains to the northwest and is located in the Tomahawk Creek watershed, at the upstream edge of Tributary 11, according to the Tomahawk Creek Flood Study. The remaining 2/3 rd portion, which includes the Lionsgate Senior Apartments development, drains to the southeast corner of the development. This drainage area is located at the upper end of the Negro Creek Tributary C watershed (previously Negro Creek Tributary 80 at the time PHELPS ENGINEERING, INC 1270 N. Winchester Olathe, Kansas (913) Fax (913)

3 of the previously approved development plan), according to the Blue River Watershed Study. The onsite storm sewer system that serves the entire Lionsgate Marketplace, and will serve the proposed development is already in place, previously constructed with infrastructure for the Lionsgate Marketplace development. As shown on the approved Site Development Plans, Storm Lines 7, 8 and 9 will serve the drainage of the Lionsgate Senior Apartments development. These lines are in place, sized for the 5-year design storm. The 100-year overflow is served by the parking lot and street system. Relocation of portions of Line 7 and additional storm sewer lines will be required with the proposed development, and will be sized for a minimum of the 25-year storm event per current City of Overland Park standards. Storm drainage to the southeast corner of the Lionsgate Marketplace development enters the 146 th Street system, which discharge to a 4.43 acre pond located within the apartment complex development to the south of 146 th Street. Detention Requirements The Lionsgate Senior Apartments development is located within Negro Creek Tributary C, previously known as Negro Creek Tributary 80, which was a watershed requiring detention as shown on the City of Overland Park Detention Map, due to a number of possibly flooded homes at the confluence of Tributary 80 with the main channel of Negro Creek. The problem was located east of 153 rd Street and Nall, within the Ironhorse Golf Club and surrounding residential development. However, stormwater detention is not required for Lionsgate Marketplace since the developer has previously paid an in lieu fee for detention to the City of Leawood to complete a bank stabilization and flood control project for the flooded homes. This project has been completed, and there are no remaining flooding concerns along Negro Creek Tributary 80. No additional downstream flooding analysis is required for this development. Stormwater Treatment Requirements Due to the revised development plan for the property, the Lionsgate Senior Apartments development is subject to the water quality treatment requirements set forth in the APWA MARC BMP Manual and the OPMC. The pre-developed CN was calculated by evaluating the site based on existing ground cover and soil type. The existing land was determined to be a combination of grassland in good condition, and impervious are from the existing drive areas located onsite. The site consists entirely of HSG Type D soils. See enclosed soil survey printouts in Appendix A. The predevelopment CN is calculated at 82. The proposed CN was calculated by using a land type of commercial and business development. The post development CN is calculated at 95. The proposed development has increased the existing CN by 13, therefore requiring a level of service of 7 in accordance with APWA Best Management Practices for Water Quality. See Level of Service Worksheets in Appendix B for more details. The proposed development BMP mitigation required to provide a minimum water quality level of service of 7 is provided with a total of one bioretention basin, and two hydrodynamic separators which will treat both onsite and untreated offsite area from the Page 2

4 Lionsgate Marketplace development which enters the site through the existing storm sewer system. The Level of Service provided is 7.15 meeting the requirements set forth in APWA. See Level of Service Worksheet 2 and the Post Development Mitigation Exhibit in Appendix B for more details. The lowest openings of any building adjacent to a 100-year overflow will be set a minimum of one-foot above the 100-year EGL in accordance with the OPMC. All maintenance of BMP s will be the sole responsibility of the respective property owners. All BMP s are contained in a Stormwater Treatment Tract in accordance with OPMC, providing access and the required setbacks. FEMA Floodplain Requirements The proposed development is located at the upper end of the watershed to a tributary of Negro Creek in the Blue River Watershed. According to FEMA FIRM Panel #20091C0098G, dated August 3, 2009, no regulated FEMA floodplain exists within Lionsgate Marketplace. In addition, the project site is less than 160 acres of drainage area, and therefore, was not studied as part of the Blue River Watershed Study. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirements The proposed project is located in a previously disturbed and platted retail center at the top of its watershed. Notification to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is not required for the Lionsgate Senior Apartments development since no jurisdictional stream channels, ordinary high water marks, or wetlands exists onsite. Kansas DWR Requirements Permitting for the development is not required by the Kansas Division of Water Resources since the drainage area through the proposed project is less that 240 acres, the cutoff for which the Kansas Division of Water Resources has jurisdiction for either floodplain fill or stream obstruction permitting. Stream Corridor Requirements A previously approved Development Plan, prior to the Stream Corridor Ordinance, exists onsite. No stream channels are located onsite and the drainage area through the project is less than 40 acres. Therefore, stream corridors are not required on the proposed development. Page 3

5

6 ENCLOSED EXHIBITS Appendix A - - Aerial Location Map - NRCS Web Soil Survey Appendix B - - Level of Service Worksheets - BMP Sizing Calculations - Downstream Defender Hydrodynamic Separator Field and Lab Testing Analysis Appendix C - Proposed Drainage/Stormwater Treatment Plan Appendix D - FEMA FIRM Panel #20091C0098G Page 5

7 APPENDIX A

8 PROPERTY BOUNDARY t i m b u S t n a l ta c i l p p A < =><?<<@A B#$%; 4,. ),,3 C ( )3D,*,,03,! "#$%&' ()*+ (, - ), ). ++ ) ++/ (0 / -,1 * /, * (0 2,!. - -,),2 ) ++(,,22 ( 2, ) + / -,!(,,2!. 1! -,0(1 1. (3 4,. ),,! 5 ) 0 22,!!, -,1 * 1-6+().!.,)! *! 1 **! (2,!(, -,))(6+ 3 4,. ),,! )) ), +( 6(+(! 7.!), 0 )),*(! 1 7(!.!. ), () ),2 ) *. 1! / 1 1()*+ ( ) - )!!(,, 7! )!,!. ** * 1 * *,2!. 1! 3 89#:9#$%;

9 United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Johnson County, Kansas March 26, 2018

10 Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments ( portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center ( or your NRCS State Soil Scientist ( cid=nrcs142p2_053951). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2

11 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C or call (800) (voice) or (202) (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3

12 Contents Preface... 2 How Soil Surveys Are Made...5 Soil Map... 8 Soil Map...9 Legend...10 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Descriptions...11 Johnson County, Kansas Grundy silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Chillicothe silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes...14 References

13 How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA. The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5

14 Custom Soil Resource Report scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and 6

15 Custom Soil Resource Report identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. 7

16 Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 8

17 94 40' 1'' W Hydrologic Soil Group Johnson County, Kansas 94 39' 49'' W 38 52' 0'' N ' 0'' N Soil Map may not be valid at this scale ' 55'' N ' 55'' N 94 40' 1'' W N Map Scale: 1:1,270 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Meters Feet Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS ' 49'' W Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/26/2018 Page 1 of 4

18 Hydrologic Soil Group Johnson County, Kansas MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Area of Interest (AOI) Soil Rating Polygons A A/D B B/D C C/D D Soil Rating Lines Not rated or not available A A/D B B/D C C/D D Soil Rating Points Not rated or not available A A/D B B/D C C/D D Water Features Transportation Background Not rated or not available Streams and Canals Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Johnson County, Kansas Survey Area Data: Version 16, Oct 4, 2017 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jul 23, 2014 Sep 7, 2014 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/26/2018 Page 2 of 4

19 Hydrologic Soil Group Johnson County, Kansas Hydrologic Soil Group Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 7251 Grundy silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 7525 Chillicothe silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes C/D % D % Totals for Area of Interest % Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/26/2018 Page 3 of 4

20 Hydrologic Soil Group Johnson County, Kansas Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/26/2018 Page 4 of 4

21 Custom Soil Resource Report Johnson County, Kansas 7251 Grundy silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2w7l5 Elevation: 800 to 1,160 feet Mean annual precipitation: 31 to 47 inches Mean annual air temperature: 45 to 66 degrees F Frost-free period: 185 to 255 days Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland Map Unit Composition Grundy and similar soils: 90 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Grundy Setting Landform: Hillslopes Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Convex Parent material: Silty and clayey loess Typical profile Ap - 0 to 11 inches: silt loam BA - 11 to 16 inches: silty clay loam Btg - 16 to 48 inches: silty clay Cg - 48 to 79 inches: silty clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: 1 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 12 to 17 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 1 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: High (about 9.8 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D Ecological site: Clay Upland (PE 30-37) (R106XY007KS) Hydric soil rating: No 13

22 Custom Soil Resource Report Minor Components Kenoma Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Interfluves Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Convex Ecological site: Clay Upland (PE 35-42) (R112XY007KS) Hydric soil rating: No Newtonia Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Hillslopes Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Convex Ecological site: Loamy prairie (Northeast) PE (R112XY059OK) Hydric soil rating: No 7525 Chillicothe silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2v8zk Elevation: 730 to 1,700 feet Mean annual precipitation: 28 to 40 inches Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 55 degrees F Frost-free period: 160 to 205 days Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland Map Unit Composition Chillicothe and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Chillicothe Setting Landform: Hillslopes Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Convex Parent material: Loess over residuum weathered from shale Typical profile Ap - 0 to 6 inches: silt loam A - 6 to 10 inches: silt loam 14

23 Custom Soil Resource Report BA - 10 to 13 inches: silty clay loam Bt1-13 to 22 inches: silty clay loam Bt2-22 to 47 inches: silty clay loam 2Bt3-47 to 71 inches: silty clay Properties and qualities Slope: 2 to 5 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 69 to 73 inches to lithic bedrock Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained Runoff class: Low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately high (0.00 to 0.20 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 24 to 59 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: High (about 9.3 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e Hydrologic Soil Group: D Ecological site: Loamy Upland (PE 30-37) (R106XY015KS) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Oska Percent of map unit: 10 percent Landform: Hillslopes Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Convex Ecological site: Loamy Upland (PE 30-37) (R106XY015KS) Hydric soil rating: No Bendena Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Hillslopes Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Shallow Limy (PE 30-37) (R106XY028KS) Hydric soil rating: No 15

24 References American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Register. July 13, Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_ Soil Survey Staff Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook Soil Survey Staff Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Tiner, R.W., Jr Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. home/?cid=nrcs142p2_ United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb

25 Custom Soil Resource Report United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_ United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook cid=nrcs142p2_ United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook

26 APPENDIX B

27 WORKSHEET 1: REQUIRED LEVEL OF SERVICE - UNDEVELOPED SITE Project: Location: Lionsgate Senior Apartments By: DLM Date: 3/28/ rd Street and Metcalf Checked: DEU Date: 3/28/ Runoff Curve Number A. Predevelopment CN Area Product of Cover Description Soil HSG CN (ac.) CN x Area Grassland (good) D Impervious Area D Totals: Area-Weighted CN = total product/total area = 82 (Round) B. Postdevelopment CN Area Product of Cover Description Soil HSG 1 CN (ac.) CN x Area Commercial and Business D Totals: Postdevelopment CN is one HSG higher for all cover types except preserved vegetation, absent documentation showing how postdevelopment soil structure will be preserved. Area-Weighted CN = total product/total area = 95 (Round) C. Level of Service (LOS) Calculation Change in CN LS Predevelopment CN: 82 7 to to 6 6 Postdevelopment CN: 95 1 to Difference: 13-7 to to LOS Required: 7-18 to Total VR Required: 39.41

28 WORKSHEET 2: DEVELOP MITGATION PACKAGE(S) THAT MEETS REQUIRED LOS Project: Location: Sheet: Lionsgate Senior Apartments By: DLM Date: 3/28/ rd Street and Metcalf Checked: DEU Date: 3/28/ Required LOS (from Table 1 or 1A or Worksheet 1 or 1A, as appropriate): 7 Required VR Note: Various BMPs may alter CN of proposed development, and LS; recalculate both if applicable. 2. Proposed BMP Option Package No. 1 Treatment Product of ID BMP / Cover Description Area, ac. VR1 VR x Area HDS-1 Hydrodynamic Separator HDS-2 Hydrodynamic Separator BIO-1 Bioretention Total Treated Area (onsite + offsite): 9.5 Total VR: VR calculated for final BMP only in Treatment Train. Total treatment area cannot exceed 100 percent of the actual site area ) Meets required LOS (Yes/No)? YES (If No, or if additional options are being tested, move to next sheet.)

29 WORKSHEET: Bioretention Design Sizing Calculations Project: Lionsgate Senior Apartments By: DLM Date: 3/28/2018 Location: 143rd Street and Metcalf Check: DEU Date: 3/28/2018 ^ Volumetric Runoff Coefficient Rv1 = 0.87 (Flat roofs and unpaved parking lots) Rv2 = 0.98 (Paved parking lots) Rv3 = 0.23 (clayey soils) ** Pretreatment Options iib = Vegetated Filter Strip iic = Vegetated Channel iid = Other * Pretreatment Inflow Type *** Land Cover Type Type 1 = sheet flow Type 1 = Impervious (i.e., parking lot) Type 2 = concentrated or channelized Type 2 = Pervious (i.e., residential lawn) WQv Calculations Pretreatment WQv Infiltration Basin Design Bioretention AT I Rv WQv WQv Inflow Pre- Cover Lapproach Sfs Lfs df k hmax havg tf Af Ap Lf Wf Ab Basin ID# (ac) (%) (in) (ac-ft) Type** Treatment*** Type**** (ft) (%) (ft) (ft) (ft/day) (ft) (ft) (days) (sq ft) (sq ft) (ft) (ft) (sq ft) BR iib ,

30 Stormwater Solutions Downstream Defender Turning Water Around Sizing for MARC Manual Level of Service Score for TSS Rating 1 to 4 Sizing the Downstream Defender There is limited data available that relates TSS removal and effluent control. Traditionally all sizing has been based on TSS reduction (typically 60% to 80% removal) and there has been little focus on sizing manhole based systems on effluent concentration control. In order to gain some reasonable insight and develop guidance for sizing for effluent control for the Downstream Defender there are two reasonable sources of information. OK-110- Testing Results for NJDEP Performance Evaluation Report 2011 Environmental Technology Verification Report 2007 The NJDEP report used controlled lab based testing and measured both TSS reduction and effluent concentration for a range of flow rates, using a 4 ft. unit. The ETV report was a field test that measured a range of particle sizes and their removal over an extended period, using a 6 ft. unit. It is very difficult to extract any direct comparison between the two reports due to the significant variables of field studies. However taken as a whole there is some agreement that indicates that sizing based on the OK110 lab data is reasonable. Figure 1 is a plot of the OK110 lab test data for both TSS removal and the corresponding effluent level achieved. Table 1 gives a flow rate from Figure 1 for the required Level of Service 1 to 4. Table 1 OK110 NJDEP Test Data 4 Downstream Defender MARC Manual Level of Service Level of Service Effluent Concentration Max Flow Rate TSS Reduction (Rating) (mg/l) (cfs) (%) < Hydro International (Stormwater), 94 Hutchins Drive, Portland ME Tel: (207) Fax: (207) Web:

31 Page 2 Based on this data Table 2. gives the calculated unit sizing based on flow using the standard scaling equation: Where: Qs = flow rate of the unit to be scaled Qt = flow rate of the tested unit Ds = diameter of the scaled unit Dt = diameter of the tested unit Qs = Qt ( Ds Dt ) 2.85 Downstream Defender Model Effluent Conc. (mg/l) Table 2 Downstream Defender Unit Sizing Level of Service Diameter (ft) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) Figure ft. Downstream Defender - NJDEP Performance Evaluation Test Data - OK110 Test Sand TSS Reduction (%) Eff Conc. (mg/l) TSS (%) Hydro International (Stormwater), 94 Hutchins Drive, Portland ME Tel: (207) Fax: (207) Web:

32 Page 3 ETV Field Study Correlation Figure 2 shows the long term effluent control plotted against particle size. This is a 6 ft. Downstream Defender selected to treat 3 cfs. Looking at OK110 (D50 = 110 µm) the 110 µm particle generally coincides with the 20 mg/l limit, approximating the flow rate for LOS 3 in Table 2. The ETV study also acknowledged that the Downstream Defender was exposed to a significant amount of organic material over the study period. This material tends to be lighter and harder to remove than the inorganic sands usually targeted. For this reason the data used in Figure 2 is considered to be conservative. Conclusion The NJDEP lab testing and ETV Field testing does indicate general agreement even though it is difficult to conclusively correlate the data given the different unit sizes and data collection methods. Overall the data supports that sizing the Downstream Defender as per Table 2, should result in the intended Level of Service requirements under the MARC Stormwater Manual. Hydro International (Stormwater), 94 Hutchins Drive, Portland ME Tel: (207) Fax: (207) Web:

33 APPENDIX C

34 ti l a t A p p a c il t n m b u S

35 APPENDIX D

36 LIONSGATE MARKETPLACE PROPERTY BOUNDARY ti l a t A p p a c il t n m b u S