FB3 ERFC (Greece) Corfu, Greece

Transcription

1 1. Meeting Information: 6 th Coordination Meeting (WP1) 6 th Steering Committee Meeting (WP1) 4 th CB Technical Working Group (WP5) 4 th Cross Fertilization Workshop (WP4) Organisation Responsible: FB3 ERFC (Greece) Date: 22 th -23 th September 2015 Venue: Meeting participants: Meeting agenda Corfu, Greece The participants list is displayed in Annex 1 of the current deliverable Coordination meeting agenda is displayed in Annex 2 of the current deliverable th September Coordination Meeting (morning session) The meeting starts at 9.00 Mr. Nikolas Petropulous (ERFC) accompanied by a representative of the Region of Ionian Islands welcomes the participants and stresses the importance to substantiate the results of the project and make concrete recommendations for Adriatic Ionian Macro region. Mr. Massimiliano Angelotti opens the works and communicates that FB4 (Dubrovnik Neretva Region) will not participate to the two days meeting and that FB6 and FB7 will arrive later due to flights delays. WP2 COMMUNICATION AND DISSEMINATION - Presentation is made by Mr. Angelotti on behalf of Dubrovnik Neretva County representatives that couldn t attend the meeting but sent a presentation regarding the state of art of the WP2 and points to be discussed by the partners

2 The table summarize the results and outputs achieved from the beginning of the project in the WP2. Outputs Nmb Responsible FB Deadline Achieved Communication plan 1 Dubrovnik Neretva County Website 1 Dubrovnik Neretva County Visual identity 1 Dubrovnik Neretva County Database of target groups/stakeholders 1 Dubrovnik Neretva County with all FBs Last request sent on Press conference / articles 50 All FBs Project publication 1 Dubrovnik Neretva County with all FBs Final CB conference 1 Dubrovnik Neretva County Plan 01/2016 (?) Open days to present pilot action 14 LB, FB2, 4,5,6,7,8,9,10,13,15,17,18, open days LP, FB2, FB1 (not foreseen by AF) Regional / national conference 10 FB3,4,8,9,10,11,12,13, regional conference LP FB9 Promotion materials in English and National language 9 Dubrovnik Neretva County with all FBs Website Project Partners are asked to: send info on (events, news) including images to update the website send missing info on associates Database of target groups/stakeholders Three partners didn t send the database of stakeholders FB6 Levante Port Authority FB17 Port of Split FB19 Igoumenitsa Port

3 They are asked to send info to FB4 as soon as possible. Deadlines are already passed Press conference / articles A form "press release template" to publish news has been sent by FB4 that asks to review and complete the template for press release and return it to them by in order to publish news on project website Promotional materials and project publication Promotional materials in National language have been published on the website in the section media gallery/promotional materials (missing leaflet in Albanian language, Serbian language translated text not on project template). Social networks Facebook Partners are invited to put like on project profile, share posts, promote them also through the social profiles of their organization. Youtube FB04 created a Video on project partners and published it on Youtube channel Lead partner made a tender to realize two promotional video in English (2 minutes and 5 minutes) to be presented during open days and final conference and to be used for dissemination and stresses the important to give higher visibility to the project and promote the concrete results reached and to be reached. LP has already signed the contract with the videomaker that will also collect the most representative photos to insert in a specific brochure dedicated to the Pilot projects. The videomaker has to interview all the WP responsible partners and make different photos and videos of the partner area. LP scheduled possible dates and kindly ask to partners to agree to the proposed agenda. Since the project area is big and the videomaker has not too much time to arrange all the visits, partners are asked to do their best to find the time in the proposed day and to insert in the table the exact location in which they want the photos/videos/interviews will take place and the contact of the person that will be at disposition to arrange the work with the videomaker.

4 OCTOBER 2015 PARTNERS ADDRESS (location for video/photo/interview) Responsable (contact: mail and phone) Thursday 15 Regione FVG - Informest Trieste porto/piazza Unità - ripresa del Molo IV - dell'aliscafo e di piazza Unità Silvia Bianchet (silvia.bianchet@regione.fvg.it ) Friday 16 Sistemi Territoriali SPA Saturday 17 Sunday 18 Monday 19 Ravenna Tuesday 20 Autorità Portuale di Ancona Wednesday 21 Regione Molise Thursday 22 Regione Abruzzo Friday 23 Saturday 24 Sunday 25 Autorità Portuale Levante Traghetto su Durazzo o Bar da Bari Monday 26 Port of Bar Tuesday 27 Ministry of Public work and transport Tirana and Teuleda Wednesday 28 Igoumenitsa and ERFC Thursday 29 Friday 30 NOVEMBER 2015 Traghetto Corfu-Brindisi- Bari-Dubrovnik Monday 2 Dubrovnik Region Tuesday 3 Port of Split Wednesday 4 Primorje Gorski Kotar Thursday 5 Istria Region Friday 6 University of Lubjana Saturday 7 Sunday 8 Volo Lubjana-Belgrado Monday 9 University of Beograd Tuesday 10 University of Sarajevo EVENTS A lot of events related to pilot activities has been postponed. Also the final conference if project extension will be approved will be moved by January to end of April/beginning of May.

5 Calendar of events 14 Open days to present pilot action LB, FB2, 4,5,6,7,8,9,10,13,15,17,18,19 More FB1 10 Regional / national conference FB3,4,8,9,10,11,12, 13,16 LB Not foreseen by AF FB1 Informest FB2 Ravenna Not foreseen by AF When OD June 2014 RC 3 December Not foreseen by AF OD 26 June 2014 Not foreseen by AF OD May 2015 FB3 ERFC Not foreseen by AF x November 2015 Notes Regional conference in Trieste 3 December RC Together with LP 3 December Probably but no info at the moment press conference depends also from extension of the project Presentation of the pilot together with Igoumenitsa regional event FB4 Dubrovnik x x November 1 st half (both) FB5 Istria x Not foreseen by AF End of November beginning of December 2015 FB6 Levante x Not foreseen by AF July 1 st half Moved? To when? FB7 Ancona x Not foreseen by AF Not decided yet FB8 Sistemi x x FB9 Molise x FB10 Abruzzo FB11 Ljubljana FB12 Belgrade February 2016 (or by the end of this year, depends on the extension) January 2015 (RG) November 1st half 2015 (OD) x x December 2015-January 2016 Not foreseen by AF End of May Not foreseen by AF November 2014 FB13 Bar x x November 2015 (2nd half) FB15 Ministry x Not foreseen by AF Missing info FB16 Sarajevo Not foreseen by AF November 2014 (RC) FB17 Split x Not foreseen by AF November 2015 (1st half) FB18 Primorje x Not foreseen by AF February or April 2016 FB19 Igoumenitsa x Not foreseen by AF 19 June 2015 See the presentation attached (Annex3) Some permission for construction work arrived late. Waiting to complete pilot action Depends on the extension February 2016 Problems with the pilot Facing problems with the pilot????

6 Ms. Bertino (FB1) explains that the tender published by Informest in order to boost promotion and monitoring the impact of communication didn t received any offer, probably because of the low budget so Partners are invited to work also in media monitoring and collecting articles to measure results of WP2. WP3 - Capitalization and sustainability ERFC Mr. Soulos presents WP3 main Activities Status Good Practices Analysis Capitalization Plan Completed Completed Joint Knowledge Management Tool Not Yet Completed proposed deadline Cross Fertilization Sustainability Plan On Going Partners are asked to send updates to define the calendar On Going Partners are asked to send their contributions (LB, FB1,FB2, FB3, FB7,FB10, FB11 already sent their SP) Regarding the Joint Knowledge Management Tool there are some difficulties to upload it to EA SEA-WAY website but it is possible to upload it on ERFC website and put a link in project website to reach the tool. JOINT KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT TOOL Taxonomy Identification ERFC prepared a proposal to be shared and approved ACTIVITY CLOSED Taxonomy Application All FBs will apply the taxonomy to the Project identified during Survey ACTIVITY CLOSED Database Setting The DB will be set in Access DONE Queries Joint Knowledge Management tool online Basing on Taxonomy ERFC will propose Queries that will be approved/integrated by FBs Joint Knowledge Management will be online via Project Website DONE SUSTAINABILITY Sustainability of the Pilot itself Sustainability of the Pilot in the Framework of Regional/National Operative Programme Sustainability from Financial, Operative and Institutional Point of View Analysis of the Pilot referring to Regional/National Strategy

7 Sustainability of the Pilot in the Framework of ADRION Analysis of the Pilot referring to Adriatic Ioanian MacroRegion Strategy and ADRION Programme ADRIATIC-IONIAN OBSERVATORY EVENTS/INITIATIVED ALREADY DONE: ERFC asks to FBs that have already organized Cross Fertilization Initiatives to send us information and materials about the event (i.e. agenda, photos, press releases etc..) Deadline: Deadline: EVENTS/INITIATIVED TO BE ORGANIZED: ERFC asks to FBs that are organizing Cross Fertilization Initiatives and Workshops to exchange know how and capitalize past experience, to send us a schedule (also a draft) of these initiatives/workshops. Deadline: See the presentations attached (Annex4) WP4 - Assessment of the Adriatic port system and its integration with hinterland Sanja Labinjan from Istria Region (FB5) introduces the objectives and activities carried on in the WP ELABORATED OUTPUTS: assessment of passenger behaviours and maritime/ iw traffic flows, traffic volumes, infrastructures and services assessment of integration of adriatic port system with hinterland, airports, rail network and maintourist destinations assessment of regulation and possible harmonization initiatives report on common needs and priotrities identified related to passenger maritime/ iw transport and its integration report on scenarios and investment needs linked to the development of passenger traffic, modal choices and infrastructures guidelines for a more sustainable passenger mobility See the presentations attached (Annex 5) Marina Zanne, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Maritime Studies and Transport Goes through the 1, 4, 5, 5 outputs of the WP

8 Output No. 1 Assessment of passengers behaviour and maritime traffic flows, traffic volumes & infrastructures and services: Passengers port infrastructure Passenger maritime traffic flows Ferry prices Output No. 4 Report of common needs and priorities identified related to passenger maritime transport and its integration: SWOT analysis for single ports Identification of main factors affecting cruise and ferry traffic in the Adriatic-Ionian ports Output No. 5 Assessment of the scenarios linked to the development of passenger traffic, modal choices, infrastructures General scenario for the development of cruise and ferry passenger traffic in Adriatic-Ionian region Descriptive scenarios for single ports Output No. 6 Guidelines for a more sustainable mobility Port performance She points out some conclusions Cruise shipping Adriatic-Ionian region is gaining importantance in the Mediterranean The most important success factors: Favourable position in the proximity to city centres and historical and/or touristic attractions The selection and quality of terminal services offered Ferry shipping The international ferry traffic is dropping in all analysed ports for longer period The most important success factors: Road connections Terminal infrastructure See the presentations attached (Annex 6) Ivana Čavka, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering goes through outputs 2, 5, 6 of the WP4 OUTPUT No. 2 Hinterland connections 1.Road infrastructure in the hinterland of Adriatic-Ionian region 2.Airports and air connections in Adriatic-Ionian region OUTPUT No. 5 Report on scenarios 1.Scenario analysis for road transport in Adriatic-Ionian region 2.Scenario analysis for air transport in Adriatic-Ionian region OUTPUT No. 6 Guidelines 1. Guidelines for road transport Modernization of road connections in the port area (especially completion of the modernization of road connections in the TEN-T network according to their functionality). Increasing the sustainability of the road network by: reorganizing the sector, increasing the efficiency of network maintenance, reducing the impact on the environment (particularly by

9 reducing greenhouse gases) and the implementation of measures to increase traffic safety and reduce seasonal obstacles. Improving access to ports, with regard to local and regional needs for transport services. Establishment of integrated transport systems in major ports and their suburban and/or regional areas. Establishment of adequate alternative of public transport service in smaller ports. Development of measures to increase the share of public transport subsystems with zero emission rate of air pollution and GH gases, "Park and Ride" facilities, limits for individual transport (passenger cars) in the narrow area of the ports, giving the priority to public transportation including the establishment of intelligent transport systems. Increasing the sustainability of the urban transport system by reorganizing the sector in the organization and legislative terms (in particular, implementation of public service contracts in accordance with Regulation (EC) No. 1370/2007, by improving the efficiency of system maintenance, reducing the impact on the environment and the use of measures to increase the safety in the system. Changing the structure of traffic flows by eliminating bottlenecks in other transport modes, especially in waterway and railway sector (legislative, regulatory and administrative bottlenecks, organizational bottlenecks, technical and technological bottlenecks, bottlenecks of monitoring and data collection, bottlenecks caused by inappropriate state of transport infrastructure, bottlenecks caused by lack of adequate personnel staff). Implementation of the measures and activities that are based on an approach to solving transport problems to the EU documents (EU strategies, policies and programs) among which the most important are: White Paper 2011 Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area-Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system-transport 2020; Maritime Transport Strategic goals until 2018; Europe 2020: A Digital Agenda for Europe: Intelligent Transport Systems for efficient transport and better mobility etc. 2. Guidelines for air transport Enhancing cooperation between air traffic stakeholders in order to prepare a plan to implement shorter plane routes. Better coordination between the Functional Airspace Blocks can ensure a needed transition from domestic air traffic management arrangements to a more integrated European dimension. Developing further nodal planning for multimodality. The overlap of different freight and person transport leads in many nodes to congestion and loss of productivity. Terminal infrastructure is also missing or little developed to combine the different modes. In this context air transport can play a key role in allowing access to remote regions. This would at the same time improve the conditions for location development on the spot and for shifting transport volumes to more energy efficient and environmentally friendly transport modes like rail and water. Networks between relevant stakeholders should be set up in order to improve the quality of the transport system and logistic chains between the nodes and within the nodes with a focus on sustainable transport modes such as railways and waterways. New air connections within the Adriatic region could considerably improve mobility and accelerate economic integrations and touristic potential of regional development. Small aircraft transport system in Europe/Adriatic region is a solution to improve transport infrastructure (accessibility). GA revitalization in Europe needs cooperation and support from ACARE, SESAR, FP7/Horizon 2020 funding.

10 Heliports development (for SAR on sea and passenger traffic within the ports). Traffic with hydroplanes improvements (due to the easiest of infrastructure utilization). Airport connections with other transport modes and with city centers. Identification of highest priority airport capacity limitations. See the presentations attached (Annex 7) Azra Ferizovic, Faculty of transport and communications, University of Sarajevo focuses the presentation on some questions Could the railways be sustainable ports connection with the hinterlands? ECONOMIC: Reducing costs and arising competitiveness by increasing accessibility for the passengers providing the more reliable and efficient service ENVIROMENTAL: Reducing negative externalities But, what is wrong with the railways in the Adriatic-Ionian region? In general, one of the main obstacles facing the majority railways in the Adriatic-Ionian railways is the low quality of rail infrastructure. Pessimistic scenario - Worst Decline of railways networks maintenance due to the limited public funds Realistic scenario - Modest Existing dynamics of railway sector reforms and maintenance funding Optimistic scenario Best Modernization and harmonization of railways and better connection with the Adriatic-Ionian ports Steps further Harmonized renewals and modernization of A-I railways - supported by EU instruments Higher level of harmonisation of the access prices system - in order to prevent border-crossing barriers and to improve the efficiency of the railways Providing new services with attractive fares and better information systems - in order to attract more passengers from the Adriatic-Ionian region Promoting the better connection of railways with other transport modes and hinterland connections with Adriatic ports - in order to offer seamless cross-border and cross-modal transport connections on a local, national and regional level to allow end-to-end journeys within and across modes higher satisfaction levels See the presentations attached (Annex 8)

11 WP1 - FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES Informest & Friuli Venezia Giulia Region Mrs. Andreea Sava (FB1) informs that she will not more involved in the project, so the partners have to refer to Cinzia Bertino for WP1 issues and remove the address andreea.sava@informest.it from their mailing lists. Mr. Angelotti informs that the third budget change request is ready to be sent to MA, but excel file to be filled and submit has not yet been sent by Mr.Kuzmic (Project manager) since MIS system was still not updated. Once again Mrs. Andreea Sava (FB1) explains that the project has to improve financial reporting and that there are a lot of partners under 20-30% of the forecasted expenditures and that only 6 partners are in line. Port of Split explains that JTS sent the password for MIS and it has been received just two days before the meeting and will start finally to upload the expenses. Money from 2 nd and 3 rd Application for reimbursement have been received. It is important to know that if a partner doesn t spend the 30% it has to give it back to LP and that this is an issues to be arranged between LP &PP. Partners are asked to detail the situation when producing the activity report that is important to complete the Project Progress Report. Also the delays has to be listed to request a prolongation. Mr. Angelotti proposes that if there will be the prolongation an additional CM and SCM has to be organized in the second half of January (for example in Ravenna) and also a WP leader meeting will be useful in the second part of November. See the presentation attached (Annex 9) nd September afternoon session WP6 Pilot Actions: Improvement of Adriatic port system, its integration with hinterland and strengthening of intra-adriatic connections Ravenna Province Ms. Simona Melchiorri points out the underspending really high in the WP Spending forecast cumulated up to 31/06/2015: ,19 Reported amount: ,19 GAP: ,49 She explains the importance of Position papers with lessons learnt and aspects that are transferred to partnership/cbboard/agreementsposition papers (PP) and goes through the state of art of PP. Many parts of Position Paper are not fulfilled, in particular

12 E. **Problems and/or opportunities encountered during the project implementation, deviation from original plans (operational, financial, work plan, other) and solution found. Please refer also to cases/challenges not solved and/or further achievements not originally planned F. ** Success and constraint factors individuated G. ** Achievements/results I. ** lessons learnt and aspects that can be transferred to other partners (technical, methodological, other) So it is difficult to fulfil joint chapters Description of pilot actions per partner will lead to define 1. Overview of the constraint and success factors individuated and/or experienced 2. Achievements 3. Summary of lessons learnt and transferrable aspects 4. Conclusions ALL FBs INVOLVED HAVE TO ACTIVELY COOPERATE TO THE PREPARATION OF THE PP BY PROVIDING REQUESTED INFORMATION > JOINT OUTPUT In PP Act. 6.1 Realisation / modernisation of physical infrastructure and planning Updates are missing from: FB6 Levante Port Authority FB17 Port of Split Authority FB18 County of Promorie Gorski Kotar Overview of the constraint and success factors individuated and/or experienced number of administrative actors having integrated specific competences necessary to be matched to achieve the result complexity of public procurement complex authorization procedures Constraint: risk of delay Opportunity: added value in terms of quality of the output; possible widening of the action; sustainability of the action PP Act. 6.2 establishment of new fast sea-lines Updates are missing from: FB6 Levante Port Authority

13 Overview of the constraint and success factors individuated and/or experienced Success factor: conclusion of subcontracting procedure (EU level open procedure) concluded before the project approval, supported by legal framework set up before launching the service composed by a regional regulation submitted to and approved by UE Commission Constraints: not enough funds to cover the full season and therefore to properly improve the use and knowledge of the service Lessons and transferrable solutions The main transferable solution is represented by the legal framework set up for launching a crossborder passenger transport service, which could be used as example for at least all the EU countries, represented in the project partnership by regional and port authorities, giving the green light received from the EU Commission with reference to the EU State aid rules PP Act. 6.3 improvement of connections of ports with inland and services provided to travelers Updates are missing from: FB6 Levante Port Authority FB9 Molise Region - FB17 Port of Split Authority Overview of the constraint and success factors individuated and/or experienced cooperation with stakeholders to get the necessary information to fill in contents of infomobility systems public procurement in general not particularly complex comparing to experiences remarked within Act. 6.1 Constraint: risk of delay Opportunity: quality and sustainability of the service Overview of the achievements, lessons learnt and transferrable solutions Upgrade of the services provided by the Adriatic ports - nr. 1 connection port-inland implemented: Ravenna - nr. 1 ICT systems developed: Ancona - nr. 6?? infomobility systems developed: ERFC, Sistemi Territoriali, Levante PA??; Molise Region, Slipt Port Authority???, Abruzzo Region lessons and transferrable solutions technical details and structure of the infomobility systems described in the document can be valuable examples to be adapted and tested also in other areas

14 interesting to check and share customer satisfaction?? Next steps 1. FB2 will send the 2 draft documents right after the meeting 1 week time to send remarks 2. Collection of information from Bs by mid November 3. Preparation of final documents by December to be presented in next meeting See the presentations attached (Annex 10) Abruzzo Region presents its pilots: test of new ICT solutions and pilot interventions in ports by adopting light infrastructures Covered Area with Interactive Totem touch screen close to the terminal ACTIVITIES DONE: Next Activities Preliminary Project Public Tender Publication -Offers Acquired -Offers evaluation -Construction phase Infomobility Software easy passengers ACTIVITIES DONE: Public Transport Data Standard definition OPEN DATA, GTFS Software interface and structure Backend, Travel Planner (draft) Point Of Interest data collected GTFS transport data collected (30 %) ONGOING ACTIVITIES: NEXT STEPS: Public transport Data collection in GTFS Standard; DB FILLING VALIDATION SHARING PHASE: If a partner is interested in replicate the software it is possible thanks to the replicable structure See the presentations attached (Annex 11)

15 WP5 Development of sustainable passenger transport models for the Adriatic basin and capacity building - Informest The WP5 coordinator, Mr. Goruppi, introduces to the Partnership the state of art of WP activities. He reminds to PPs that the Project is approaching the end. As the Project Steering Committee is due to discuss the possibility of Project prolongation, it is advanced the proposal to separate last CBB meeting (the third one) and the Project Final Conference, confirming the date for the CBB3 in end-january Possible online conferences will be organised to better tune the activities. 5.2 activities saw the completion of LWG works, while some delays are registered in the outlining Road Map & Action Plan at Local/Regional level by FB4, FB6, FB8, FB16 and FB17 Partners (a list of received contributions is presented). These are invited to proceed to fill up the sent template and return them; at the same time, to some other PP will be asked for some integrations of their contributions. It is highlighted that the contributions have to be coherent with previous activities (LWGs, TWGs, Survey), a circumstance not always confirmed in the received works. Partners are invited to respect the indicated deadlines for their contributions, as the WP coordinator is in charge of redacting the Action Plan at CB level emerging from local Road Maps & Action Plans. Already some delay is announced, as the draft should have been prepared in September. Mr. Goruppi reminds to the Partners that CB Road Map and Action Plans together with Sustainability Plans (WP3) and Guidelines for a more sustainable passenger mobility (WP4) are fundamental outputs for the draft of the Adriatic Sustainable Passenger Transport Strategy. Mr. Goruppi explains that today s TWG is the fourth and last meeting; now it is the WP5 coordinator duty to collect all the elements and summarise TWG results to be presented to PP. Possible online conferences will be organised to better tune the activity. The WP5 coordinator informs that WP deliverables are in progress and starting with October they will be progressively uploaded on Project Intranet (documents page) for validation. He reminds that first outputs are in fact the proceedings of already held CBBs, LWGs and TWGs plus member/participant lists. These outputs already have been sent to project Partners and validated shortly after the project meetings and now they attend the final validation. CBA issues on drafting and adopting Cross-border Agreements for the optimization and the sustainability of passenger transport are to be treated during next TWG4. See the presentation attached (Annex 12) 4 th CB Technical Working Group (CBB) See the presentation attached (Annex 13-14) See separate minutes and presentation produced by Walter Goruppi 6th Steering Committee meeting See the presentation attached (Annex 15) See separate minutes sent by LP The meeting ends at 18.30

16 4. 23 rd September Coordination Meeting (morning session) 4 th Cross Fertilization Workshop The meeting starts at 9.00 Mr. Petropoulos welcomes the participants and illustrates the agenda. The invited participants illustrated past, ongoing and future planned project and activities trying to explain which are the possible connections with EA SEA-WAY. Andrea Condotta Venice Port Authority explains that Port of Venice didn t manage many projects related to passengers in last years. Venice has 1 harbour and 2 ports: 1. Marittima (passengers), Marghera (cargo) LogIS is Venice Port Authority Community System AIS: automatic Identification System to optimize operations. APC: one of the first to face the maritime single window, not national but transnational an aims to extension of single window. Training: improvement of social dialogue, health and security. Students were trained about courses and initiative for entering a professional life ( This projects were presented during the fertilization workshop: Project GIFT 2.0 (Greece Italy Facilities for Transport 2.0) Project ONMEST 2.0 (Open Network for Mediterranean Sustainable Tourism 2.0) Project SMART-INNO (Towards a smart Adriatic Ionian macroregion) Project AdriHealthMob (Adriatic Health Mobility) Project Green AgriChains (Agrifood Supply Chain Management &Logistics in Igoumenitsa Port. Knowledge transfer & Innovation with GREEN-AgriChains project) See the presentation attached (Annex 16-21) The meeting ends at 11.30

17 Annexes Annex 1_1_EA SEA-WAY_Corfu_23_Sept_2015_Participants List.pdf Annex 1_2_EA SEA-WAY_Corfu_23_Sept_2015_Participants List.pdf Annex 2_EA SEA-WAY_Corfu_22-23_September 2015_Agenda.pdf Annex 3_WP2_EA SEA-WAY_Corfu_22_Sept_2015.pdf Annex 4_WP3_EA SEA-WAY_Corfu_22_Sept_Corfu 2015_ERFC_Soulos.pdf Annex 5_WP4_EA SEA-WAY_Corfu_22_Sept_2015_FB5_Labinjan.pdf Annex 6_WP4_EA SEA-WAY_Corfu_22_Sept_2015_FB11_Zanne.pdf Annex 7_WP4_EA SEA-WAY_Corfu_22_Sept_2015_FB12_Cavka.pdf Annex 8_WP4_EA SEA-WAY_Corfu_22_Sept_2015_FB16_Ferizovic.pdf Annex 9_WP1_EA SEA-WAY_Corfu_22_Sept_2015_FB1_Financial_management.pdf Annex 10_WP6_EA SEA-WAY_Corfu_22_Sept_2015_FB2_Melchiorri.pdf Annex 11_WP6_EA SEA-WAY_Corfu_22_Sept_2015_FB10_Abruzzo.pdf Annex 12_WP5_EA SEA-WAY_Corfu_22_Sept_2015_FB1_Goruppi.pdf Annex 13_WP5_EA SEA-WAY_Corfu_22_Sept_2015_FB1_ TWG4_PRESENTATION.pdf Annex 14_WP5_EA SEA-WAY_Corfu_22_Sept_2015_FB3_ ERFC AGREEMENT.pdf Annex 15_WP1_EA SEA-WAY_Corfu_22_Sept_2015_FB1_ SCM Presentation.pdf Annex 16_EA SEA-WAY_Corfu_23_Sept_2015_CrossFertilization_EASEAWAY.pdf Annex 17_EA SEA-WAY_Corfu_23_Sept_2015_CrossFertilization_ONMEST2.pdf Annex 18_EA SEA-WAY_Corfu_23_Sept_2015_CrossFertilization_Adrihealthmob.pdf Annex 19_EA SEA-WAY_Corfu_23_Sept_2015_CrossFertilization_GIFT2.pdf Annex 20_EA SEA-WAY_Corfu_23_Sept_2015_CrossFertilization_Green AgriChains.pdf Annex 21_EA SEA-WAY_Corfu_23_Sept_2015_CrossFertilization_Smartinno.pdf