APPENDIX J CRYSTAL GEYSER ONSITE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
|
|
- Andrew McLaughlin
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 APPENDIX J CRYSTAL GEYSER ONSITE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
2 DRAFT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Crystal Geyser Onsite Irrigation System PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY: Richard Weklych/CGWC Barbara Brenner/Churchwell White Kerilyn Paris/CH2M Peter Rude/CH2M DATE: August 18, 2016 PROJECT NUMBER: This technical memorandum provides details for Alternative 4 proposed in the Crystal Geyser Mt. Shasta Facility Wastewater Discharge Alternatives technical memorandum. The onsite irrigation system is discussed below and may be further evaluated in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Background Information and Assumptions The Crystal Geyser Water Company (CGWC) Mt. Shasta Facility is located on 210 Ski Village Drive in Mt. Shasta, CA. The facility includes several acres of CGWC property available for land application of treated process wastewater. Alternative 4 involves treating the industrial wastewater onsite, and discharging it to either the onsite leach field or onsite irrigation locations as shown on Figure 1. The land application will occur during the irrigation season from May through October. It is assumed that plant operations will use one bottling line during Phase 1. In Phase 2, two bottling lines will be operational. In Phase 1, the treated process wastewater can meet the irrigation requirements of approximately 6.5 acres of trees. In Phase 2, 12 acres of trees can be irrigated. Soil Conditions A custom soil resource report was downloaded from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) for the planned irrigation area. The soil is Deetz gravelly loamy sand, with 0 to 5 percent slopes. The depth to a restrictive feature is more than 80 inches and the natural drainage class is somewhat excessively drained. The hydraulic capacity of the soil is high to very high and the depth to the water table is more than 80 inches. Assumptions The tree crop is assumed to be irrigated from May through October. For the irrigation system design, plant operations are assumed to be 24 hours per day, Monday through Friday, therefore 22 days per month, on average. No irrigation is assumed to occur during any weekend operations. In Phase 1, one bottling line will produce 54,000 gallons per day of treated wastewater, a maximum flow rate of 37.5 gallons per minute (gpm) from the treatment plant. Phase 2 with two bottling lines will produce approximately 100,000 gallons per day, and a flow of 75 gpm from the treatment plant. To be conservative, an assumed flow rate of 30 gpm was used for the selection of the storage tank size. 1
3 CGWC Bottling Facility Aerial photo source: Google 2016, modified by CH2M HILL. LEGEND Dry Creekbed Exposed Rocks Eastern Field Northern Field Eastern Irrigated Area Northern Irrigated Area WT RDD Figure1_PotentialOffsiteIrrigation_V2.ai cmont 08/17/16 0 North 300 Approximate scale in feet 600 Figure 1 Potential Onsite Irrigation Locations Crystal Geyser Water Company Mt. Shasta, CA
4 Design Process CRYSTAL GEYSER ONSITE IRRIGATION SYSTEM The goal of the design is to meet crop evapotranspiration (ETc) of the crop with the land application of treated wastewater from the plant. The land application acreage of 9 and 3 acres was determined by balancing the demands of the crops with the outflow of the plant. In selecting the layout of the irrigation sets, the 50-foot buffer area for land application is included. Figure 1 shows the areas to be irrigated, along with the 50-foot buffer zones. The Eastern Field is approximately 9 acres and the Northern Field is approximately 3 acres. The ETc was obtained from the ITRC California Evapotranspiration Data for sprinkler irrigation for a typical year (ITRC, 2016). For irrigation design purposes, the crop to be grown was assumed to be similar to Christmas trees. Therefore, a peak ETc of 6.3 inches (in July) for Christmas trees is used for this design. Due to the height of the sprinklers (4 to 6-ft above ground), the spray losses are estimated to be 12- percent and the irrigation distribution uniformity of 75-percent, resulting in a 66-percent irrigation efficiency. The gross application rate determined using the irrigation efficiency is approximately 9.5 inches for the peak month of July. To meet this irrigation requirement, a flow rate of 98 gpm per acre is needed. Using the gross application rate and the maximum spacing recommendations listed above, the sprinklers and sprinkler spacing were selected. The maximum recommended spacing is 40% of the sprinkler diameter between sprinklers, and 65% of the sprinkler diameter between lateral pipes, for wind speeds less than 7 miles per hour (Burt, 2013). The average wind speed for a typical year (1997) from May through October is 3 miles per hour in Mt. Shasta, CA, therefore the maximum recommended spacing was used (Wunderground, 2016). The spacing is 30 feet down the lateral and 45 feet between laterals for both fields, for a 78-foot sprinkler diameter. From the sprinkler sizing and spacing, the pressure loss was calculated and then the pumps were sized. The following section presents the preliminary design selections. Phase 1 Preliminary Design Layout For Phase 1, only the Eastern Field will be irrigated in four sets for two hours per set per day, for a total of 22 days per month. This results in a total daily irrigation time of 8 hours each irrigation day. The Phase 1 system will use up to 80,000 gallons per day. To compensate for fluctuations in outflow and allow for adequate flow to the sprinklers, a 100,000 gallon storage tank will be used. This storage tank will also accommodate the additional flow in Phase 2. One inline pump will supply the field with pressurized water, with a standby pump for backup. Figure 2 shows the approximate mainline locations for Phase 1. Phase 2 Preliminary Design Layout In Phase 2, both the Eastern and Northern Fields will be irrigated with up to 108,000 gallons per day. The fields can use up to 120,000 gallons to meet the ETc of the trees. On the Eastern Field, irrigation will remain the same for Phase 2 as in Phase 1. For the Northern Field, two sets will be irrigated for two hours each, also for a total of 22 days per month. Total irrigation time for the two fields will be 12 hours each day. The storage tank from Phase 1 will be adequate for the additional flows. Two separate inline pumps will be used to supply each of the fields. For redundancy, a standby pump will be provided for each of the duty pumps. Figure 3 shows the approximate mainline locations for Phase 2. 3
5 CGWC Bottling Facility Flow from Storage Tank Aerial photo source: Google 2016, modified by CH2M HILL. LEGEND Mainline Eastern Field Eastern Irrigated Area 0 North 150 Approximate scale in feet WT RDD Figure2_Phase1ApproxMainlineLayout_V2.ai cmont 08/17/ Figure 2 Phase 1 Approximate Mainline Layout for Onsite Irrigation Crystal Geyser Water Company Mt. Shasta, CA
6 CGWC Bottling Facility Flow from Storage Tank Aerial photo source: Google 2016, modified by CH2M HILL. LEGEND 0 Mainline Eastern Irrigated Area Eastern Field Exposed Rocks Eastern Irrigated Area Northern Field WT RDD Figure3_Phase2ApproxMainlineLayout_V2.ai cmont 08/17/16 North 300 Approximate scale in feet Northern Irrigated Area 600 Figure 3 Phase 2 Approximate Mainline Layout for Onsite Irrigation Crystal Geyser Water Company Mt. Shasta, CA
7 CRYSTAL GEYSER ONSITE IRRIGATION SYSTEM References Irrigation Training and Research Center (ITRC) California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo ETc Table for Irrigation Scheduling and Design, Zone 10 Monthly Evapotranspiration, Sprinkler Irrigation Typical Year. Date accessed: 27 July Website: United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Custom Soil Resource Report for Siskiyou County California, Central Part. Date accessed: 27 July Website: Burt, C Irrigation Design Manual. Irrigation and Training Research Center, California Polytechnic State University. 6
8 Appendix A Custom Soil Resource Report, Soil Description
9 Custom Soil Resource Report Siskiyou County, California, Central Part 125 Deetz gravelly loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: hdnk Elevation: 3,000 to 5,000 feet Mean annual precipitation: 30 to 45 inches Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 48 degrees F Frost-free period: 125 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Deetz and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Deetz Setting Landform: Outwash fans Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Glaciofluvial deposits derived from igneous rock Typical profile H1-0 to 7 inches: gravelly loamy sand H2-7 to 38 inches: stratified sand to gravelly loamy sand H3-38 to 65 inches: stratified very gravelly sand to gravelly loamy sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 5 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained Runoff class: Negligible Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95 to in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Very low (about 2.9 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s Hydrologic Soil Group: A Minor Components Rock outcrop Percent of map unit: 5 percent Riverwash Percent of map unit: 5 percent 12
10 Custom Soil Resource Report Landform: Drainageways Xerofluvents Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Flood plains 13
APPENDIX I LESA MODELS
APPENDIX I LESA MODELS LESA ASSESSMENT SEVILLE 4 SOLAR PROJECT HORIZONTAL SINGLE-AXIS TRACKING ARRAY (T16S, R12E, S25, SBB&M) IMPERIAL COUNTY, CALIFORNIA July 2017 EMA Report No. 2375-01 Prepared for:
More informationLESA ASSESSMENT LAUREL SOLAR PROJECT (T16S, R12E, S26, SBB&M)
LESA ASSESSMENT LAUREL SOLAR PROJECT (T16S, R12E, S26, SBB&M) IMPERIAL COUNTY, CALIFORNIA May 2017 EMA Report No. 2377-01 Prepared for: 90FI 8me LLC 111 Woodmere Road, Suite 250 Folsom, CA 95630 ENVIRONMENTAL
More informationAPPENDIX E. LESA Models
APPENDIX E LESA Models LESA ASSESSMENT CALEXICO SOLAR FARM I PHASE A PROJECT AREA CALEXICO SOLAR FARM I PHASE A PROJECT (SW/4 Section 13, S/2 Section 14, S/2 NE/4 Section 15, NW/4 Section 15, T17S, R13E,
More informationLESA ASSESSMENT MOUNT SIGNAL SOLAR FARM I PROJECT AREA
LESA ASSESSMENT MOUNT SIGNAL SOLAR FARM I PROJECT AREA MOUNT SIGNAL SOLAR FARM I PROJECT (SW/4 Section 16, S/2 Section 15, NE/4 Section 14 (portion), N/2 Section 13 (portion) and SE/4 Section 13, T17S,
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Wisconsin
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationAPPENDIX D ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
APPENDIX D ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM DRAFT FINAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Crystal Geyser Onsite Wastewater Treatment PREPARED FOR: Richard Weklych/Crystal Geyser Barbara Brenner/Churchwell
More informationTIERRA SOUTH FLORIDA, INC. Geotechnical Engineering / Material Testing / Inspection Services
TIERRA SOUTH FLORIDA, INC. Geotechnical Engineering / Material Testing / Inspection Services March 11, 2016 Kimley-Horn 1920 Wekiva Way Suite 200 West Palm Beach, Fl. 33411 Attn: Matthew B. Fursetzer,
More informationNRCS Soils Information and Maps. Appendix F
NRCS Soils Information and Maps Appendix F United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for St. Lucie County, Florida Gopherbroke Farms
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationAppendix M Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (Calipatria I, Midway I and Midway II)
Appendix M Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (Calipatria I, Midway I and Midway II) LESA ASSESSMENT CALIPATRIA SOLAR FARM I PROJECT AREA CALIPATRIA SOLAR FARM I PROJECT (Section 10 (portion), T12S, R14E,
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Okeechobee County, Florida
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Okeechobee County, Florida
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Wisconsin
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Isle of Wight County, Virginia, Southampton County, Virginia, and Surry County, Virginia
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationLand Evaluation and Site Assessment Model
Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model Citizens Imperial Solar, LLC Project Imperial County, CA June 6, 2018 This page is intentionally blank. Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model Citizens Imperial
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Dallam County, Texas
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Logan County, Oklahoma
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Columbus County, North Carolina
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for St. Lucie County, Florida
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Pamlico County, North Carolina
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Douglas County, Washington
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationSanta Clara Area, California, Western Part
Santa Clara Area, California, Western Part 101 Urban land, 0 to 2 percent slopes, basins Map Unit Setting Landscape: Alluvial plains, basins Elevation: 0 to 80 feet Mean annual precipitation: 14 to 30
More informationPlanting # Planting History Senger planting Prepared by Kim Elsenbroek Maps by: Jocelyn Frazelle
Planting # 117 2015 Planting History Senger planting Prepared by Kim Elsenbroek 11.13.2015 Maps by: Jocelyn Frazelle 30 Acres Total all in burned cornfield Mesic: 40 lbs/acre over 30 acres, total 1200
More informationWastewater System Environmental Setting Wastewater Conveyance Facilities
February 20, 2017 To: Mr. Ryan Sawyer AICP Analytical Environmental Services 1801 7 th Street Sacramento, CA 95811 Subject: Comments on the Crystal Geyser Draft EIR (DEIR) Dear Mr. Sawyer: This letter
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Douglas County, Washington
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Wright County, Minnesota
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationPARKER GROUNDWATER w Technology, Innovation, Management
Hydrogeologic Consulting in Groundwater Resources Technical Memorandum September 16, 2017 To: W.A.T.E.R. & Gateway Neighborhood Association (GNA) From: Timothy K. Parker, PG, CEG, CHG, Parker Groundwater
More informationPRELIMINARY WASTEWATER CAPACITY STUDY
PRELIMINARY WASTEWATER CAPACITY STUDY Tentative Tract Map No. 18955 CITY OF HESPERIA Prepared for: HESPERIA VENTURES I, LLC 10410 Roberts Road Calimesa, CA 92320 Tel (714) 785 2381 Mr. John Ohanian Prepared
More informationLow Pressure Drip/Micro System Design Analysis of Potential Rebate
Low Pressure Drip/Micro System Design Analysis of Potential Rebate Prepared by: Dr. Charles Burt, ITRC Dr. Dan Howes, ITRC Drip/micro irrigation systems are often referred to as low pressure systems because
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Colquitt and Cook Counties, Georgia
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. Part PLANT MCINTOSH ASH POND 1 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. Part 257.82 PLANT MCINTOSH ASH POND 1 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R. Part
More informationDecember 4, Hingham School Building Committee Hingham Town Hall 210 Central Street Hingham, MA 02043
P a r e C O R P. C O M E n g i n e e r s S c i e n t i s t s P l a n n e r s December 4, 2017 Hingham School Building Committee Hingham Town Hall 210 Central Street Hingham, MA 02043 Re: Foster Elementary
More informationAt its December 14, 2017 meeting, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the voluntary agricultural and forestal district.
SOUTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Regular Session i January 22, 2018 11B. PUBLIC HEARING AG & FORESTAL DISTRICT DARDEN, FALLS, BROWN, WIDMEYER AND BELTRAMI OPENING STATEMENT This public hearing is
More informationThe Big Picture SOILS, WETLANDS AND DEVELOPMENT SOILS OVERVIEW BRUCE BARBER. PWS, Soil Scientist Certified Ecologist CORNERSTONE ASSOCIATES
SOILS, WETLANDS AND DEVELOPMENT BRUCE BARBER PWS, Soil Scientist Certified Ecologist CORNERSTONE ASSOCIATES 1770 CENTRAL STREET YORKTOWN HEIGHTS NY 10598 PHONE: (914) 962-7733 FAX: (914) 962-0330 EMAIL:
More informationVIRGINIA POLLUTION ABATEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION
VIRGINIA POLLUTION ABATEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM B ANIMAL WASTE Department of Environmental Quality VPA FORM B ANIMAL WASTE INSTRUCTIONS This form is to be completed by applicants requesting a VPA
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GREENE COUNTY ASH POND ALABMA POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GREENE COUNTY ASH POND ALABMA POWER COMPANY Section 257.82 of EPA s regulations requires the owner or operator of an existing or new CCR surface impoundment
More informationAt its November 8, 2018 meeting, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the voluntary agricultural and forestal district.
SOUTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Regular Session December 17, 2018 11G. PUBLIC HEARING AG & FORESTAL DISTRICT CARTER A. SMITH. ET ALS OPENING STATEMENT This public hearing is held pursuant to Section
More informationVariable Frequency Drive (VFD) Controlled Irrigation Pumps Analysis of Potential Rebate
Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) Controlled Irrigation Pumps Analysis of Potential Rebate Well pumps, booster pumps, and a combination of the two are used throughout the agricultural sector to provide water
More informationAPPENDIX A. Hydraulic Investigations: Cascade Mall at Burlington
APPENDIX A m SUMMARY REPORT FOR E.I.S. Hydraulic Investigations: Cascade Mall at Burlington July 12, 1982 John E. Norman, P.E. 14779 Northeast 32nd, #A201 Bellevue, WA 98007 (206) 882-1767 92 General A
More informationHydrologic Study Report for Single Lot Detention Basin Analysis
Hydrologic Study Report for Single Lot Detention Basin Analysis Prepared for: City of Vista, California August 18, 2006 Tory R. Walker, R.C.E. 45005 President W.O. 116-01 01/23/2007 Table of Contents Page
More informationLoam Ridge Almond Orchard
AG-LAND Investment Brokers 645 Antelope Blvd., Suite 17 PO Box 896 Red Bluff, CA 96080 530-529-4400 Fax 530-527-5042 Loam Ridge Almond Orchard Contact: AG-LAND Investment Brokers Prepared by FSA Date:
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND B (AP-B ) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.82 PLANT YATES ASH POND B (AP-B ) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R.
More informationBIG HORN BASIN IRRIGATION WATER MANAGEMENT P ROGRAM
BIG HORN BASIN IRRIGATION WATER MANAGEMENT P ROGRAM Lateral Move Sprinkler System B I G H O R N B A S I N I R R I G A T I O N W A T E R M A N A G E M E N T P R O G R A M Looking at a New System: The Systems
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL ASH POND B MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.82 PLANT DANIEL ASH POND B MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R.
More informationBENEFITS FROM IMPROVING FLOOD IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY
BENEFITS FROM IMPROVING FLOOD IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY Report of Progress 544 Agricultural Experiment Station Kansas State University, Manhattan Walter R. Woods, Director BENEFITS FROM IMPROVING FLOOD IRRIGATION
More informationUse of Irrigation in East Texas - Pastures and Forages
Use of Irrigation in East Texas - Pastures and Forages Pineywoods Cattle Congress April 13, 2012 Guy Fipps, P.E. Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Charles Swanson Extension Program Specialist
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Kent County, Michigan
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationSAMPLE DRAINAGE STATEMENT
Firm Name & Logo Hidalgo County Drainage District No. 1 Drainage Statement Subdivision Name Hidalgo County, Texas Prepared By: Firm's Name Address City, State, Zip Telephone Fax Email Date SAMPLE DRAINAGE
More informationIRRIGATION SYSTEM EVALUATION
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 645 Main Street, Suite F, Morro Bay, CA 93442 (805) 772-4391 www.coastalrcd.org IRRIGATION SYSTEM EVALUATION For Grower DATE EVALUATOR G.W. Bates, PE, CPESC
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY Section 257.82 of EPA s regulations requires the owner or operator of an existing or new CCR surface impoundment or any
More informationMOLOAʻA VALLEY FARMS SUBDIVISION
MOLOAʻA VALLEY FARMS SUBDIVISION TAX MAP KEY (4) 4-9-011-013 Agricultural Master Plan - 1 - Introduction:...3 Parcel-wide Agricultural Considerations...3 Agricultural Use Details by Unit:...6 Unit 1:...6
More informationFINAL DRAINAGE REPORT FOR LOT 2 BECKETT AT WOODMEN HILLS FILING NO MCLAUGHLIN ROAD COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO
FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT FOR LOT 2 BECKETT AT WOODMEN HILLS FILING NO. 3 7368 MCLAUGHLIN ROAD COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO October 4, 2017 Revised November 2018 Prepared For: TBONE CONSTRUCTION 1310 FORD STREET
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT BOWEN ASH POND 1 (AP-1) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.82 PLANT BOWEN ASH POND 1 (AP-1) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R.
More informationIMPROVED WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT USING AN ACOUSTIC PULSED DOPPLER SENSOR IN A SHALLOW OPEN CHANNEL
IMPROVED WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT USING AN ACOUSTIC PULSED DOPPLER SENSOR IN A SHALLOW OPEN CHANNEL Mike Cook 1, PhD Craig Huhta 1 SonTek/YSI Inc., San Diego, California, USA Abstract. Over the years
More informationMichael Cahn and Barry Farrara, UC Cooperative Extension, Monterey Tom Bottoms and Tim Hartz, UC Davis
Water Use of Strawberries on the Central Coast Michael Cahn and Barry Farrara, UC Cooperative Extension, Monterey Tom Bottoms and Tim Hartz, UC Davis As acreage of strawberries has steadily increased in
More informationINITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257
INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.81 PLANT BOWEN PRIVATE INDUSTRY SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY (ASH LANDFILL) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals
More informationIRRIGATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHECK LIST Project Name: Project No: Project Date: Client Name: Ph:
ATTACHMENT A IRRIGATION AUSTRALIA LIMITED IRRIGATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHECK LIST Project Name: Project No: Project Date: Client Name: Ph: Email: Project Address: General Aim of the Irrigation System:
More informationSprinkler System Capacity. AE-91 (Revised), August 2005 Tom Scherer, Extension Agricultural Engineer
AE-91 (Revised), August 2005 Tom Scherer, Extension Agricultural Engineer Click here for an Adobe Acrobat PDF file suitable for printing. (220KB) The four basic methods of irrigation are: subsurface irrigation
More informationSOP 21: Evaluation of design and operation of a micro-sprinkler system
SOP 21: Evaluation of design and operation of a micro-sprinkler system Updated 7/28/14 Estimated completion time: 8 hours Materials and equipment needed: 1. Data sheet 2. Clipboard 3. Sharpie pen 4. Flags
More informationExecutive Summary. 164 South Quaker Lane Hyde Park, Dutchess County, New York Tax parcel identification number:
Executive Summary 164 South Quaker Lane Hyde Park, Dutchess County, New York Tax parcel identification number: 1332-6264-2-73765 South Quaker Lane (Dutchess County Route 16) divides this 8.5 acre parcel
More informationUpper Lightning Lake Water Level Management Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Attachment D Design Report for Upper Lightning Lake
Upper Lightning Lake Water Level Management Environmental Assessment Worksheet Attachment D Design Report for Upper Lightning Lake DESIGN REPORT for Upper Lightning Lake Wetland Enhancement MN-332-2 I
More informationEmbedded Energy in Water Studies Study 1: Statewide and Regional Water-Energy Relationship
Embedded Energy in Water Studies Study 1: Statewide and Regional Water-Energy Relationship Prepared by GEI Consultants/Navigant Consulting, Inc. Prepared for the California Public Utilities Commission
More informationDESIGN OF A DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEM FOR 80 ACRES OF ALMONDS IN ARBUCKLE, CALIFORNIA. Alexander E. Marsh
DESIGN OF A DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEM FOR 80 ACRES OF ALMONDS IN ARBUCKLE, CALIFORNIA. by Alexander E. Marsh BioResource and Agricultural Engineering BioResource and Agricultural Engineering Department California
More informationTechnical Memorandum
Tucson Office 3031 West Ina Road Tucson, AZ 85741 Tel 520.297.7723 Fax 520.297.7724 www.tetratech.com Technical Memorandum To: Joel Carrasco From: Monica Salguero Company: Tetra Tech Date: August 10, 2010
More informationErosion Control Through the Application of Gypsum. Erick Osorno. College of The Sequoias. July Sept Advisors
1 Erosion Control Through the Application of Gypsum Erick Osorno College of The Sequoias July 1 2016 - Sept 15 2016 Advisors Kelli Woods, NRCS Visalia Bradley Pannett, NRCS Visalia Dr. Larry Owens, College
More informationFor the Irrigation Association Annual Technical Conference Phoenix, AZ. November, 1995
FERTIGATION TECHNIQUES FOR DIFFERENT IRRIGATION METHODS For the Irrigation Association Annual Technical Conference Phoenix, AZ. November, 1995 by Dr. Charles M. Burt, Director Irrigation Training and Research
More informationAppendix G Soils Characterization Report
Appendix G Soils Characterization Report Draft Environmental Impact Report Beacon Photovoltaic Project July 2012 AECOM (805)388-3775 tel 1220 Avenida Acaso (805)388-3577 fax Camarillo, CA 93012 Memorandum
More informationSOP 20: Evaluation of design and operation of a surface drip system
SOP 20: Evaluation of design and operation of a surface drip system Updated 7/1/2010 Estimated completion time: field: 8 person hours, data analysis: 4 person hours Materials and equipment needed: 1. Data
More informationMichael Cahn, Barry Farrara, Tim Hartz, Tom Bottoms, and Mark Bolda
Strawberry water use on the Central Coast Michael Cahn, Barry Farrara, Tim Hartz, Tom Bottoms, and Mark Bolda With few options for importing water from other areas of the state, water supplies on the Central
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GASTON GYPSUM POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GASTON GYPSUM POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY Section 257.82 of EPA s regulations requires the owner or operator of an existing or new CCR surface impoundment or
More informationIrrigation Management Practices Cropping A*Syst Katie L. Droscha 01/14/ /15/2013 minor edits by Linda Zabik
Irrigation Management Practices Cropping A*Syst Katie L. Droscha 01/14/2013-01/15/2013 minor edits by Linda Zabik 7.01) Have all irrigation systems been evaluated for application of uniformity? Low Risk
More informationTechnical Memorandum Mine Plan of Operations Stormwater Assessment
Tucson Office 3031 West Ina Road Tucson, AZ 85741 Tel 520.297.7723 Fax 520.297.7724 www.tetratech.com Technical Memorandum Mine Plan of Operations Stormwater Assessment To: Kathy Arnold From: David R.
More informationPHYSICAL SOIL PROPERTIES
PHYSICAL SOIL PROPERTIES Physical Soil Properties Santa Cruz County, California Scotts Valley Target Physical Soil Properties This table shows estimates of some physical characteristics and features that
More informationAPPENDIX J-3. Orcem Stormwater Management and Treatment Facilities Design Summary
APPENDIX J-3 Orcem Stormwater Management and Treatment Facilities Design Summary Stormwater Management & Treatment Facilities Design Summary INTRODUCTION KPFF Consulting Engineers has compiled this report
More informationWaller Ranch SANTA MARIA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA. West Side Santa Maria Berry Ground. 39± Useable Acres ($64,000± per acre) Available for $2,503,000
Waller Ranch SANTA MARIA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA West Side Santa Maria Berry Ground 39± Useable Acres ($64,000± per acre) Available for $2,503,000 Presented by: Rincon corporation WALLER Ranch, Santa Maria
More informationSOUTH HADLEY HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC CAMPUS IMPROVEMENTS SOUTH HADLEY, MASSACHUSETTS
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT SOUTH HADLEY HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC CAMPUS IMPROVEMENTS SOUTH HADLEY, MASSACHUSETTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 CHECKLIST FOR STORMWATER REPORT 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.0 EXISTING
More informationManure Management Milk Shake Dairy Ken Johnson Cache County, Utah
Manure Management Milk Shake Dairy Ken Johnson Cache County, Utah Purpose: To provide the site specifications necessary to properly utilize manure generated on the Milk Shake Diary owned and operated by
More information2015 ANNUAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION REPORT ENTERGY INDEPENDENCE PLANT CLASS 3N LANDFILL PERMIT NO S3N-R2 AFIN:
2015 ANNUAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION REPORT ENTERGY INDEPENDENCE PLANT CLASS 3N LANDFILL PERMIT NO. 0200-S3N-R2 AFIN: 32-00042 JANUARY 15, 2016 ENTERGY INDEPENDENCE PLANT CLASS 3N LANDFILL 2015 ANNUAL ENGINEERING
More informationZEBRA MUSSEL PROJECT STATUS
ZEBRA MUSSEL PROJECT STATUS San Benito County Water District July 8, 2008 Reviewed by: Prepared by: Ali Hasan Christopher Dinsmore, PE Introduction HDR has been contracted with San Benito County Water
More informationPRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY FOR BIG ROCK CLUSTER SOLAR FARMS PREPARED FOR: Daniel Kolta 90FI 8me LLC & 92JT 8me LLC 211 Sutter Street, Fl. 6 San Francisco, CA. 94108 Prepared 5 15 17 Revised 5 26 17 Revised
More information2017 ANNUAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION REPORT ENTERGY INDEPENDENCE PLANT CLASS 3N LANDFILL PERMIT NO S3N-R2 AFIN:
217 ANNUAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION REPORT ENTERGY INDEPENDENCE PLANT CLASS 3N LANDFILL PERMIT NO. 2-S3N-R2 AFIN: 32-42 JANUARY 17, 218 217 Landfill Inspection Report Entergy Independence Plant Class 3N
More informationInflow Design Flood Control System Plan for Louisa Generating Station CCR Impoundment. MidAmerican Energy Company
Control System Plan for Louisa Generating Station CCR Impoundment MidAmerican Energy Company October 10, 2016 Control System Plan for Louisa Generating Station CCR Impoundment Prepared for MidAmerican
More informationUSING CPNOZZLE FOR SPRINKLER PACKAGE SELECTION
USING CPNOZZLE FOR SPRINKLER PACKAGE SELECTION Bill Kranz Associate Professor Biological Systems Engineering University of Nebraska Northeast Research and Extension Center Norfolk, Nebraska VOICE: 402-370-4012
More informationAppendix J Effluent Pump Station
Appendix J Effluent Pump Station TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Salmon Creek Treatment Plant Effluent Pump Station Hydraulics and Phasing Analysis for the Phase 5A Project Columbia River Outfall and Effluent Pipeline
More informationVIRGINIA POLLUTION ABATEMENT (VPA) PERMIT APPLICATION. FORM B - ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS (AFOs)
VIRGINIA POLLUTION ABATEMENT (VPA) PERMIT APPLICATION FORM B - ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS (AFOs) Department of Environmental Quality Rev. 02-2013 VIRGINIA POLLUTION ABATEMENT (VPA) PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
More informationUsing Evapotranspiration Reports for Furrow Irrigation Scheduling IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT S E R I E S
IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT S E R I E S Using Evapotranspiration Reports for Furrow Irrigation Scheduling Danny H. Rogers Extension Agricultural Engineer Cooperative Extension Service Manhattan, Kansas Efficient
More informationHydromodification Management Measures
Chapter 7 Hydromodification Management Measures This Chapter summarizes the requirements for controlling erosive flows from development projects. 7.1 Why Require Hydromodification Management? Changes in
More informationHydromodification Management Measures
Chapter 7 Hydromodification Management Measures This Chapter summarizes the requirements for controlling erosive flows from development projects. 7.1 Why Require Hydromodification Management? Changes in
More informationRETENTION BASIN EXAMPLE
-7 Given: Total Tributary Area = 7.5 ac o Tributary Area within Existing R/W = 5.8 ac o Tributary Area, Impervious, Outside of R/W = 0.0 ac o Tributary Area, Pervious, Outside of R/W = 1.7 ac o Tributary
More informationCentral Oregon Irrigation District
Central Oregon Irrigation District On-Farm Water Conservation Report Prepared by: Black Rock Consulting 320 SW Upper Terrace Drive, Suite #102, Bend, Oregon 97702 (541) 480-6257 & Farmers Conservation
More informationLong-Term Salinity Buildup on Drip/Micro Irrigated Trees in California
Long-Term Salinity Buildup on Drip/Micro Irrigated Trees in California Charles M. Burt 1, Brett Isbell 2, and Lisa Burt 3 Executive Summary The Irrigation Training and Research Center (ITRC) of Cal Poly
More informationMBARI Sanitary Sewer Analysis Report
Revised 9-10-08 MBARI Sanitary Sewer Analysis Report Executive Summary: This Sanitary Sewer Analysis Report has been prepared for the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI) located on Moss Landing
More informationMcColl Fence Addition GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT
McColl Fence Addition GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT Prepared For: Stuart McColl 1038 Hooker Road Sequim, WA 98382 SEPTEMBER 2012 Prepared By: Trent T. Adams, EIT Justin C. Wilson, PE NTI ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING
More informationTOOLS FOR BETTER IRRIGATION. Room December
TOOLS FOR BETTER IRRIGATION Room 308-309 December 6 2017 CEUs New Process Certified Crop Advisor (CCA) Sign in and out of each session you attend. Pickup verification sheet at conclusion of each session.
More informationSizing Calculations and Design Considerations for LID Treatment Measures
SCVURPPP C.3 Workshop December 18, 2012 Sizing Calculations and Design Considerations for LID Treatment Measures Jill Bicknell, P.E., EOA, Inc. Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program
More informationAppendix J: The Project Stormwater Control Plan by Lea & Braze Engineering, Inc.
Appendix J: The Project Stormwater Control Plan by Lea & Braze Engineering, Inc. STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN 23 LOT SUBDIVISION ON PROCTOR ROAD CASTRO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA Owner/Developer: Hue Tran 4584 Ewing
More informationPonds. Pond A water impoundment made by excavating a pit, or constructing a dam or an embankment.
POND SITE SELECTION AND CONSTRUCTION Uses, Planning, & Design David Krietemeyer Area Engineer USDA-NRCS June 20, 2008 Uses Considerations for Location of Commonly Used Terms Pond A water impoundment made
More informationDRIP EMITTER SYSTEM STUDY GUIDE
DRIP EMITTER SYSTEM STUDY GUIDE Minimum Criteria for Pressurized Subsurface Absorption Fields Utilizing Emitters. Subsurface systems utilizing emitters may be used in lieu of conventional or other alternative
More informationIRRIGATION DESIGN & MAINTENANCE FOR MAXIMUM EFFCIENCY
IRRIGATION DESIGN & MAINTENANCE FOR MAXIMUM EFFCIENCY Donald D. Franklin CID, CLIA, don.franklin@hunterindustries.com (916) 899-9437 What Are The Goals Of Irrigation Design? Provide adequate soil moisture
More informationStandards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey May 2012 STANDARD FOR SLOPE PROTECTION STRUCTURES. Definition
STANDARD FOR SLOPE PROTECTION STRUCTURES Definition Structures to safely conduct surface runoff from the top of a slope to the bottom of the slope. Purpose The purpose of this practice is to convey storm
More information