If the address on this form is different than the address of the building, submit a written explanation.

Transcription

1 ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO SCHOOL DIST Chicago, IL, 6621 DATE LAST THREE YEAR REINSPECTION WAS COMPLETED 2/22/21 If the address on this form is different than the address of the building, submit a written explanation. SECTION II (Please type or print) PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLING FOR YOUR THREE YEAR REINSPECTION: DATE REINSPECTION COMPLETED: 5/9/213 ENROLLMENT IDPH INSPECTOR LICENSE NUMBER: IDPH LICENSED INSPECTOR NAME (Please Print): Rondell Adams IDPH MP LICENSE NUMBER: IDPH LICENSED MANAGEMENT PLANNER NAME (Please Print): Stephen Diblik DESIGNATED PERSON (Please Print): Ms. Lynn Crivello PHONE: (773) /9/213 Signature of Designated Person Date SECTION III PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLING INFORMATION FOR ANY CHANGES WITHIN THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. School building has been sold. Date of Sale: School has been closed. Date closed: School building has been demolished. School building is asbestos free since last reinspection: Please explain in writing why the school building is now asbestos free and include the supporting documentation. If a new school building has been added to the district, submit either and exclusionary statement or a management plan and inspection report. Include the complete name, address and city of school building. Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form: IL Revised 1.3

2 THREE YEAR REINSPECTION CHICAGO SCHOOL DIST 299 Chicago, IL, 6621 Unit: Building ID: 75 IDPH ID Number: REPORT DATE: Thursday, May 9, 213 Prepared for: 125 S. Clark Street Chicago, IL 663 Prepared by: 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone (312) Fax (312) DO NOT REMOVE FROM SCHOOL REQUIRED BY FEDERAL LAW

3 May 2, 213 Mr. R. Kent Cook Asbestos Program Illinois Department of Public Health 525 West Jefferson Street Springfield, Illinois Re: Three-Year Reinspections Dear Mr. Cook:, Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC), conducted the ThreeYear Reinspections and performed management plan updates for the (CPS) facilities in Region 3,4,5 Elementary Schools. Please update your records with the following information. School District: 299 Unit: Region: 5 School: IDPH ID: Building ID: 75 Address: Chicago, IL, 6621 Building Contact: Contact Phone: Current Building Owners: Review 5/9/213 Inspector: Rondell Adams Management Planner: Stephen Diblik Inspector IDPH License: Management Planner IDPH License: If you have any questions or comments, please contact us at (312) Sincerely, Stephen Diblik

4 Environmental tification to Occupants To: Faculty, Staff and Parents From: May 2, 213 RE:, Unit Chicago, IL, 6621 Dear Faculty, Staff and Parents, This letter is to notify you that the 213 asbestos three year re-inspection has been completed at, following the Federal Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA), 4 CFR Part 763, Subpart E and is available for your review at the main office of the school. Although asbestos-containing materials have been identified at, there is no reason to believe that any threat to the health of students or staff exists at this time. CPS will continue to carefully monitor the condition of asbestos-containing materials and if conditions warrant, all appropriate steps will be taken to maintain the health and safety of all building occupants. If you have any questions regarding this matter or require additional information, please feel free to contact Ms. Lynn Crivello, the designated Local Education Authority's Designated Person at (773)

5 Table of Contents I. School and Inspection Information II. Executive Summary III. Methodology IV. Abatement History V. Reassessments and Recommendations VI. Conclusions Table I: Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table II: Management Planner's Review APPENDICES: Appendix A: Assessment Sheets, Drawings and Photos Appendix B: Inspector and Management Planner Licenses Appendix C: Laboratory Accreditations Appendix D: Laboratory Results Appendix E: Chain of Custody Forms

6 SCHOOL AND INSPECTION INFORMATION 1. School Information School: Address: IDPH ID: Contact: 2. Unit: Chicago, IL, 6621 Building ID: 75 Phone: Description of Facility Original Construction: 1965 Total Square Footage: 378 Current Occupancy: 3. Additional Construction: of Floors: 1 LEA Designated Person Contact: Ms. Lynn Crivello Address: 125 South Clark Street, 17th Floor Chicago, IL Phone: (773) Managing Environmental Consultant MEC: Contact: Dan Juneau Address 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector Inspector Name: Rondell Adams Signature: 5/2/213 Inspector IDPH license # Region: 5 Management Planner Management Planner Name: Stephen Diblik Management Planner IDPH license # Review 5/9/ LEA Designated Person's Acknowledgement Signature: 5/9/213 The reinspection report and recommendations have been received by me and appropriate action will be taken by the School District. Signature: 5/9/213 Name: Ms. Lynn Crivello Unit : Building: 75

7 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY was retained by the (CPS) to perform a three-year asbestos reinspection of the. This inspection was conducted in accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) part (b), and the ongoing Program (O&M) originally designed in the School's Asbestos Management Plan. The purpose of this three-year reinspection is to record any condition changes in the asbestos-containing building material (ACBM) in the school since the previous three-year reinspection and the six-month periodic surveillance, to identify, assess, and include any Homogeneous Areas (HA) not identified in the Management Plan, and to recommend an appropriate response action to manage asbestos. The inspector conducted a three-year reinspection of this facility under Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) school reinspection requirements and AHERA, sections and The main building and each addition to the main building, if constructed at different dates, were inspected separately. Laboratory accreditations are included in Appendix C, laboratory results are included in Appendix D, and chain of custody forms are included in Appendix E. te: During previous inspections, some of the HA(s) were identified together as 9" x 9" floor tile (FT), mastics assoc. with 9" x 9" FT, 12" x 12" FT, mastics assoc. with 12" x 12" FT, pipe insulation, etc. Some of these HA(s) have been re-identified by areas that are uniform in color, texture, construction date, application date, and general appearance. The inspector has determined the following: A. The following HAs have changed assessment categories for Building 75: Unit: 2 12x12 ceiling tiles 3A hard plaster White coat 3B Hard Plaster 5A 12x12 taupe VAT 5B 12x12 crème VAT 5C 12x12 pink VAT 5D 12x12 white VAT 5E 12x12 beige VAT 5F 12x12 pink speckled VAT Building: 75

8 Unit: 7 spray-on acoustic plaster 12 drywall 13 vibration isolators 15F 12x12 pink speckled VAT matic 16 12x12 Acoustic ceiling tile mastic 17 vault door lining D-2 hot water holding tank insulation FTM-2 9x9 taupe vt mastic G fiberglass joints & elbows Building: 75

9 B. The following new homogenous areas have been identified for Building 75: Unit: Building: 75

10 C. This reinspection covered only physically accessible and visible areas and materials that were identified in the LEA's management plan. The following materials were concealed and/or contained in areas that were inaccessible for sampling and have been classified as Assumed: 2 3A 3B 5A 5B 5C 5D 5E 5F F M 49 CM-1 FT-1 FTM-1 FTM-2 12x12 ceiling tiles hard plaster White coat Hard Plaster 12x12 taupe VAT 12x12 crème VAT 12x12 pink VAT 12x12 white VAT 12x12 beige VAT 12x12 pink speckled VAT vinyl baseboard mastic firebrick fire doors drywall vibration isolators drywall compound 12x12 pink speckled VAT matic 12x12 Acoustic ceiling tile mastic Linoleum Linoleum mastic ceiling tile 12"x12" White w/light Brown Floor Tile 12"x12" White w/light Brown Floor Tile Mastic Redd and Tan Terrazzo brown carpet 12x12 black floor tile 12x12 black mastic 9x9 taupe vt mastic The following areas were deemed to be inaccessible: 3A 3B 19 48M D-1 D-2 FTM-1 FTM-2 G hard plaster White coat Hard Plaster Linoleum mastic 12"x12" White w/light Brown Floor Tile Mastic heat exchanger tank insulation hot water holding tank insulation 12x12 black mastic 9x9 taupe vt mastic fiberglass joints & elbows Materials were also listed as "assumed" if they were in good condition and sampling was not Unit: Building: 75

11 conducted to avoid damage. This reinspection was conducted by Rondell Adams, IDPH License # The Management Plan was updated by Stephen Diblik, IDPH License # Inspector and Management Planner Licenses are included in Appendix B. Unit: Building: 75

12 III. METHODOLOGY Tasks performed on-site included the following: IV. 1. Review current management plan, identify HA(s) and extract appropriate information. 2. Examine and verify abatement records. 3. Touch and visually and physically reinspect and reassess the condition of all friable known or assumed ACBM. 4. Touch and visually and physically reinspect all non-friable known or assumed ACBM to determine whether these materials have become friable since the last inspection or periodic surveillance. 5. Identify any condition changes that may affect Hazard Ranking of known ACBM or Assumed ACBM, as well as any HA(s) that have become friable since the last reinspection. 6. Collect bulk samples from each newly discovered friable HA or previously assumed and submit for laboratory analysis. 7. Tabulate reinspection findings and submit for management planner review and recommendations with appropriate response actions based on the AHERA Damage Category of the ACBM. 8. Submit reinspection findings and management planner recommendations to the LEA within thirty (3) days for inclusion into the management plan. ABATEMENT HISTORY The information collected from the existing management plan and inspection report(s) and from interviews with the school official revealed that the following asbestos abatement was conducted at the school since the previous Three year Reinspection. Abatement Dates: V. REASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The reassessments and recommendations are summarized in Tables I and II on the following pages. Detailed Hazard Assessment Sheets and Drawings and Photos (if applicable) are included in Appendix A. VI. CONCLUSIONS The Building 75 Three-Year reinspection has been completed and response actions have been recommended for both friable and non-friable materials. A timely execution of the response actions recommended will enable the LEA and the Designated Person(s) to effectively manage the existing ACBM. This three-year reinspection report should be inspected in the current Management plan at the CPS Central Office, and one (1) copy should be kept at the school for use when planning any renovation and/or demolition activities in areas where ACBM has been identified. Also, periodic surveillance documentation and any summary reports from any response actions that are executed at the school should be used to update the Management Plan. Unit: Building: 75

13 Table I Inspector's Reinspection Findings

14 School Unit Building ID 75 Address Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Material Description 2 12x12 ceiling tiles 3A hard plaster White coat 3B Hard Plaster 4 9x9 VAT 5A Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Type Damage Quantity Damage Units 1, ASSUMED N NONE 1,5 library, lunchroom,corridors boiler room ceiling Change in Assessment Category Yes Damage Category ASSUMED SURFACE N NONE Yes 6, Throughout ASSUMED SURFACE N NONE Yes 2 CHR N DIST 45 12x12 taupe VAT 7, ASSUMED N NONE Yes ACBM with the potential for damage 5B 12x12 crème VAT 7, ASSUMED N NONE Yes ACBM with the potential for damage 5C 12x12 pink VAT 6 ASSUMED N NONE Yes 12x12 white VAT 6 ASSUMED N NONE Yes 5E 12x12 beige VAT 2,25 ASSUMED N NONE Yes 5F 12x12 pink speckled VAT 7 spray-on acoustic plaster 9 vinyl baseboard mastic ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM ACBM with the potential for damage 5D 2nd floor storage, 2nd floor teachers toilet janitor's closet at north hall corridor, corridors & classrooms, main office janitor's closet at north hall corridor, corridors & classrooms, main office state pre-k room 116 state pre-k room 116 2nd floor corridor 1 firebrick 11 fire doors 12 drywall 13 vibration isolators ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with potential for significant damage ACBM with the potential for damage Damage Reason Disturbance Potential 3 MODERATE 45 kitchen ASSUMED N NONE Yes 18,9 CHR SURFACE Y NONE Yes 2, LF ASSUMED N NONE ASSUMED ASSUMED N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage ASSUMED N NONE Yes ASSUMED N NONE Yes ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the 4 EA 64 classrooms throughout BLDG, gym throughout building (no baseboard or mastic was observed) boiler room incinerator (incinerator disabled) throughout building (doors are sealed, interior inaccessible) library & kitchen 1 gym fan room

15 School Unit Building ID 75 Address Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Material Description 14 drywall compound 15A Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Type Damage Quantity Damage Units Change in Assessment Category 64 ASSUMED N NONE 12x12 taupe VAT mastic 7, CHR N NONE 15B 12x12 crème VAT mastic 7, CHR N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage 15C 12x12 pink VAT mastic 6 CHR N NONE 12x12 white VAT mastic 6 CHR N NONE 15E 12x12 beige VAT mastic 2,25 CHR N NONE 15F 12x12 pink speckled VAT matic 16 12x12 Acoustic ceiling tile mastic 17 vault door lining ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage 15D lunchroom & kitchen corridors & classrooms, main office corridors & classrooms, main office State pre-k room 116 State pre-k, room 116 2nd floor corridor ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable 45 kitchen ASSUMED N NONE Yes 1, ASSUMED N NONE Yes 24 libray, lunch room, corridors school office CHR Y NONE Yes Linoleum 4,6 N NONE 4,6 ASSUMED N NONE 33 12x12 beige floor tile mastic (1959) 4,5 CHR N NONE 47 ceiling tile 2,6 ASSUMED N NONE 48 12"x12" White w/light Brown Floor Tile 75 ASSUMED N NONE 48M 12"x12" White w/light Brown Floor Tile Mastic Redd and Tan Terrazzo 75 ASSUMED N NONE 49 1,2 ASSUMED N NONE CM-1 brown carpet 57 ASSUMED N NONE D-1 heat exchanger tank insulation 45 Gym and lunchroom and library Gym and lunchroom and library classroom 124, music room, room 22, 222 basement (music room) Janitors Closet by Boiler Room Janitors Closet By Boiler Room Entrance and Stairways Principal's office, corridor, main office boiler room ASSUMED Linoleum mastic AMO TSI Y NONE D-2 hot water holding tank insulation 145 boiler room AMO TSI Y NONE Yes Damage Category potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage Damage Reason Disturbance Potential

16 School Unit Building ID 75 Address Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Material Description FT-1 12x12 black floor tile FTM-1 Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Type Damage Quantity Damage Units Change in Assessment Category Damage Category 25 ASSUMED N NONE 12x12 black mastic 25 ASSUMED N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage FTM-2 9x9 taupe vt mastic 45 2nd floor ladies toilet, room 116 toilet, 1st floor staff toilet 2nd floor ladies toilet, rm 116 toilet, 1st floor staff toilet vault, room 116 closet ASSUMED Y NONE Yes G fiberglass joints & elbows 85 LF boiler room & crawl space AMO TSI Y NONE Yes Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM suspect ACBM ACBM with the potential for damage Damage Reason Disturbance Potential

17 School Unit Building ID 75 Address Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report Reinspection Date 5/2/213 Inspector Name Inspector's Comments Rondell Adams /15/214 Inspector's IDPH License Number / Expiration Date HA Number: 2 3A 3B 4 5A 5B 5C 5D 5E 5F A 15B 15C 15D 15E 15F 16 Inspector Comments: Material t Observed 213

18 School Unit Building ID 75 Address Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number: M 49 CM-1 D-1 D-2 FT-1 FTM-1 FTM-2 G Inspector Comments:

19 Table II Management Planner's Review

20 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Num Material Description Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Quantity Damage Units Damage Category Response 2 3A 3B 12x12 ceiling tiles hard plaster White coat Hard Plaster 1, 1,5 6, library, lunchroom,corridors boiler room ceiling Throughout Assumed Assumed Assumed SURFACE SURFACE 4 9x9 VAT 2 Chrysotile 45 5A 12x12 taupe VAT 7, Assumed 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 5B 12x12 crème VAT 7, Assumed 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 5C 5D 5E 5F 7 12x12 pink VAT 12x12 white VAT 12x12 beige VAT 12x12 pink speckled VAT spray-on acoustic plaster 6 6 2, ,9 2nd floor storage, 2nd floor teachers toilet janitor's closet at north hall corridor, corridors & classrooms, main office janitor's closet at north hall corridor, corridors & classrooms, main office state pre-k room 116 state pre-k room 116 2nd floor corridor kitchen classrooms throughout BLDG, gym 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 5 ACBM with potential for significant damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Chrysotile SURFACE Yes 9 vinyl baseboard mastic 2, LF Assumed LF 1 firebrick Assumed 11 fire doors 4 EA Assumed EA 6 ACBM with the potential for damage A 15B 15C 15D 15E 15F drywall vibration isolators drywall compound 12x12 taupe VAT mastic 12x12 crème VAT mastic 12x12 pink VAT mastic 12x12 white VAT mastic 12x12 beige VAT mastic 12x12 pink speckled VAT matic 12x12 Acoustic ceiling tile mastic vault door lining , 7, 6 6 2, , 24 throughout building (no baseboard or mastic was observed) boiler room - incinerator (incinerator disabled) throughout building (doors are sealed, interior inaccessible) library & kitchen gym fan room lunchroom & kitchen corridors & classrooms, main office corridors & classrooms, main office State pre-k room 116 State pre-k, room 116 2nd floor corridor kitchen libray, lunch room, corridors school office 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Assumed Assumed Assumed Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Assumed Assumed Chrysotile Yes 18 Linoleum 4,6 Gym and lunchroom and library Assumed 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Repair

21 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Num Material Description Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Quantity Damage Units Damage Category Response Linoleum mastic 12x12 beige floor tile mastic (1959) 4,6 4,5 Assumed Chrysotile 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage M 49 CM-1 D-1 ceiling tile 12"x12" White w/light Brown Floor Tile 12"x12" White w/light Brown Floor Tile Mastic Redd and Tan Terrazzo brown carpet heat exchanger tank insulation 2, , Gym and lunchroom and library classroom 124, music room, room 22, 222 basement (music room) Janitors Closet by Boiler Room Janitors Closet By Boiler Room Entrance and Stairways Principal's office, corridor, main office boiler room Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Amosite TSI Yes D-2 hot water holding tank insulation 145 boiler room Amosite TSI Yes FT-1 12x12 black floor tile 25 Assumed FTM-1 12x12 black mastic 25 Assumed 6 ACBM with the potential for damage FTM-2 9x9 taupe vt mastic 45 2nd floor ladies toilet, room 116 toilet, 1st floor staff toilet 2nd floor ladies toilet, rm 116 toilet, 1st floor staff toilet vault, room 116 closet 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Assumed Yes G fiberglass joints & elbows 85 LF boiler room & crawl space Amosite TSI Yes LF 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM

22 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, 6621 Region 75 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report 5/9/213 Review Date Manager Planner Name Stephen Diblik /15/213 Manager IDPH License /Expiration HA Number 2 3A 3B 4 5A 5B 5C 5D 5E 5F A Management Comments Repair damaged material and continue O&M

23 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, 6621 Region 75 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number 15B 15C 15D 15E 15F M 49 CM-1 D-1 D-2 FT-1 FTM-1 FTM-2 G Management Comments

24 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 2 12x12 ceiling tiles HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: library, lunchroom,corridors 1 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

25 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ x12 ceiling tiles library, lunchroom,corridors 1 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

26 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 3A hard plaster White coat HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: boiler room ceiling 15 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

27 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ A hard plaster White coat boiler room ceiling 15 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

28 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 3B Hard Plaster HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 5 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 5. ACBM with potential for significant damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Throughout 6 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

29 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ B Hard Plaster Throughout 6 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

30 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 4 9x9 VAT HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: Deterioration HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: Repair ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: Deterioration DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: MODERATE 2nd floor storage, 2nd floor teachers toilet 2 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

31 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ x9 VAT 2nd floor storage, 2nd floor teachers toilet 2 45 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Repair Comments: Repair damaged material and continue O&M Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

32 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 5A 12x12 taupe VAT HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: janitor's closet at north hall corridor, corridors & classrooms, main office 7 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

33 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ A 12x12 taupe VAT janitor's closet at north hall corridor, corridors & classrooms, main office 7 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

34 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 5B 12x12 crème VAT HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: janitor's closet at north hall corridor, corridors & classrooms, main office 7 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

35 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ B 12x12 crème VAT janitor's closet at north hall corridor, corridors & classrooms, main office 7 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

36 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 5C 12x12 pink VAT HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: state pre-k room COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

37 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ C 12x12 pink VAT state pre-k room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

38 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 5D 12x12 white VAT HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: state pre-k room COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

39 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ D 12x12 white VAT state pre-k room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

40 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 5E 12x12 beige VAT HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 2nd floor corridor 225 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

41 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ E 12x12 beige VAT 2nd floor corridor 225 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

42 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 5F 12x12 pink speckled VAT HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: kitchen 45 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

43 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ F 12x12 pink speckled VAT kitchen 45 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

44 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 7 spray-on acoustic plaster HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: classrooms throughout BLDG, gym 189 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

45 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ spray-on acoustic plaster classrooms throughout BLDG, gym 189 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

46 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 9 vinyl baseboard mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: throughout building (no baseboard or mastic was observed) 2 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

47 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ vinyl baseboard mastic throughout building (no baseboard or mastic was observed) 2 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

48 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 1 firebrick HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: FRIABLE: Assumed RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: boiler room - incinerator (incinerator disabled) COMMENTS: Material t Observed 213 Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

49 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ firebrick boiler room - incinerator (incinerator disabled) 75 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

50 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 11 fire doors HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: throughout building (doors are sealed, interior inaccessible) 4 EA EA COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

51 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ fire doors throughout building (doors are sealed, interior inaccessible) 4 EA EA In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

52 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 12 drywall HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: library & kitchen 64 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

53 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ drywall library & kitchen 64 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

54 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 13 vibration isolators HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: gym fan room 1 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

55 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ vibration isolators gym fan room 1 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

56 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 14 drywall compound HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: lunchroom & kitchen 64 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

57 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ drywall compound lunchroom & kitchen 64 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

58 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 15A 12x12 taupe VAT mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: corridors & classrooms, main office 7 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

59 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ A 12x12 taupe VAT mastic corridors & classrooms, main office 7 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

60 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 15B 12x12 crème VAT mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: corridors & classrooms, main office 7 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

61 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ B 12x12 crème VAT mastic corridors & classrooms, main office 7 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

62 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 15C 12x12 pink VAT mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: State pre-k room COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

63 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ C 12x12 pink VAT mastic State pre-k room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

64 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 15D 12x12 white VAT mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: State pre-k, room COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

65 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ D 12x12 white VAT mastic State pre-k, room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

66 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 15E 12x12 beige VAT mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 2nd floor corridor 225 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

67 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ E 12x12 beige VAT mastic 2nd floor corridor 225 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

68 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 15F 12x12 pink speckled VAT matic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: kitchen 45 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

69 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ F 12x12 pink speckled VAT matic kitchen 45 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

70 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 16 12x12 Acoustic ceiling tile mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: libray, lunch room, corridors 1 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

71 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ x12 Acoustic ceiling tile mastic libray, lunch room, corridors 1 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

72 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 17 vault door lining HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: school office 24 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

73 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ vault door lining school office 24 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

74 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 18 Linoleum HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Gym and lunchroom and library 46 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

75 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ Linoleum Gym and lunchroom and library 46 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

76 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 19 Linoleum mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Gym and lunchroom and library 46 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

77 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ Linoleum mastic Gym and lunchroom and library 46 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

78 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 33 12x12 beige floor tile mastic (1959) HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: classroom 124, music room, room 22, COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

79 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ x12 beige floor tile mastic (1959) classroom 124, music room, room 22, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

80 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 47 ceiling tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: basement (music room) 26 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

81 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ ceiling tile basement (music room) 26 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

82 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 48 12"x12" White w/light Brown Floor Tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Janitors Closet by Boiler Room 75 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

83 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ "x12" White w/light Brown Floor Tile Janitors Closet by Boiler Room 75 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

84 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 48M 12"x12" White w/light Brown Floor Tile Mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Janitors Closet By Boiler Room 75 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

85 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ M 12"x12" White w/light Brown Floor Tile Mastic Janitors Closet By Boiler Room 75 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

86 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 49 Redd and Tan Terrazzo HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Entrance and Stairways 12 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

87 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ Redd and Tan Terrazzo Entrance and Stairways 12 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

88 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION CM-1 brown carpet HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Principal's office, corridor, main office 57 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

89 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ CM-1 brown carpet Principal's office, corridor, main office 57 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

90 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION D-1 heat exchanger tank insulation HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Amosite FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: boiler room 45 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

91 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ D-1 heat exchanger tank insulation boiler room 45 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

92 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION D-2 hot water holding tank insulation HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Amosite FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: boiler room 145 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

93 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ D-2 hot water holding tank insulation boiler room 145 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

94 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION FT-1 12x12 black floor tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 2nd floor ladies toilet, room 116 toilet, 1st floor staff toilet 25 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

95 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ FT-1 12x12 black floor tile 2nd floor ladies toilet, room 116 toilet, 1st floor staff toilet 25 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

96 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION FTM-1 12x12 black mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 2nd floor ladies toilet, rm 116 toilet, 1st floor staff toilet 25 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

97 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ FTM-1 12x12 black mastic 2nd floor ladies toilet, rm 116 toilet, 1st floor staff toilet 25 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

98 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION FTM-2 9x9 taupe vt mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: vault, room 116 closet 45 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

99 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ FTM-2 9x9 taupe vt mastic vault, room 116 closet 45 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

100 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 75 AHERA INSPECTOR: Rondell Adams INSPECTION DATE: 5/2/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION G fiberglass joints & elbows HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Amosite FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: boiler room & crawl space 85 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 5/2/213

101 213 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Stephen Diblik REVIEW DATE: 5/9/ G fiberglass joints & elbows boiler room & crawl space 85 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 5/9/213

102 213 AHERA REINSPECTION

103 APPENDIX B Inspector and Management Planner Licenses

104

105

106

107

108

109

110