LEAD BASED PAINT INSPECTION

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "LEAD BASED PAINT INSPECTION"

Marjory Bates
6 years ago
Views:

1 LEAD BASED PAINT INSPECTION 251 South Seventh Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan PREPARED FOR Norstar Development USA, LP 733 Broadway Albany, NY ON BEHALF OF The Ann Arbor Housing Commission 727 Miller Ave Ann Arbor, MI PROJECT # 8358e DATE January 22, 2014

2 LEAD BASED PAINT INSPECTION 251 South Seventh Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan PREPARED FOR PROJECT # Norstar Development USA, LP 733 Broadway Albany, NY e ON BEHALF OF The Ann Arbor Housing Commission 727 Miller Ave Ann Arbor, MI DATE January 22, 2014

3 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION LIMITATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS TESTING METHODS RESULTS SUMMARY LICENSURE...4 APPENDICES Appendix A...XRF Testing Dat Appendix B... Licensure Documentatio

4 1.0 INTRODUCTION AKT Peerless Environmental & Energy Services (AKT Peerless) was commissioned by NorStar Development USA, L.P. (NorStar) on behalf of the Ann Arbor Housing Commission (AAHC) to conduct lead-based paint (LBP) inspection on the property referred to as "South Seventh" located at South Seventh Street in Ann Arbor, Washtenaw County, Michigan (subject property). The LBP inspectois conducted on August 21-22, 2013 excluded unit 251 as access was not provided by the occupant during the dates of testing The LBP inspectoi of unit 251 was conducted on January 13, This low-rise residentia compaee coisisas of fourr, -story duplex buildings, housing eight, 1-bedroom apartments constructed in The purpose of AKT Peerless LBP testing was to identify painted surfaces that contain lead paint to comply with USEPA requirements. 1.1 LIMITATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS AKT Peerless uses trained and licensed inspectors to locate and identify LBP coatings and materials. Information and opinions obtained in this report are for the exclusive use of CLIENT. No distribution to or reliance by other parties may occur without the expressed written permission of AKT Peerless. AKT Peerless will not distribute this report without written consent or as required by law or court order. The information and opinions contained in the report are given in light of that assignment. The report must be reviewed and relied upon only in conjunction with the terms and conditions expressly agreed upon by the parties and as limited therein. Any third parties who have been extended the right to rely on the contents of this report by AKT Peerless (which is expressly required prior to any third-party release), expressly agrees to be bound by the original terms and conditions entered into by AKT Peerless and CLIENT. Subject to the above and the established terms and conditions of the contract, AKT Peerless accepts responsibility for the competent performance of its duties in executing the assignment and preparing reports in accordance with the normal standards of the profession, but disclaims any responsibility for consequential damages. 2.0 TESTING METHODS AKT Peerless performed color-by-color testing of painted interior components in the unit 251 South Seventh Street property address. Interior components tested included, but were not limited to: walls, ceilings, soffits, doors and frames, cabinets, window components, cove base and trim. Exterior testing was limited to fencing around patio areas and painted exterior wood panels and framing around unpainted windows. Mr. James Fox, a Michigan Department of Community Health (MDCH) Healthy Homes Section licensed Lead Inspector/Risk Assessor P conducted the inspection on January 13, Paint coat testing was performed using an Innovex X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analyzer. The XRF method analyzes painted surfaces for lead in a non-destructive manner. XRF equipment was operated by a MDCH licensed Lead Inspector/Risk Assessor. The survey included surface-by-surface testing of specific components within the apartment unit. 1

5 Test locations were referenced according to the orientation of each unit relative to South Seventh Street associated with the structure. In the same manner as the other units, rooms and spaces were assigned a Side, or direction, designation based on this orientation. Side A always faces South Seventh Street. Sides B, C and D follow clockwise. Where painted components were duplicated in a designated area, e.g., doors, frames, etc. with the same color and configuration, then not every component was tested, instead representative testing was performed. Field data collection included XRF reading numbers, component/surface description, testing locations, color, substrate material (e.g., wood, metal), and lead concentration. 3.0 RESULTS SUMMARY Lead-based paint is defined by the USEPA and the HUD as painted surfaces that are equal to or exceed 1.0 milligrams of lead per square centimeter (mg/cm 2 ) of sampled surface area as measured by an XRF detector. The following lead-based paint coatings were identified in the 251 South Seventh Street unit: Living room, Side B (north wall); Living room, Side C (east wall); Furnace/water heater closet, ceiling; Bedroom, Side A (west wall). All lead-based paint surfaces identified were intact and in good condition. Test results from the inspection are included on Table 1 in Appendix A. 4.0 LICENSURE LBP testing activities were performed by a MDCH Healthy Homes Section licensed Lead Inspector/Risk Assessor. Licensure documents are included in Appendix B. AKT PEERLESS ENVIRONMENTAL & ENERGY SERVICES Prepared by: James C. Fox, RPIH Senior Project Manager MDCH Healthy Homes Section Lead Inspector/Risk Assessor License No. P January 22,

6 APPENDIX A XRF Test Data Tables

7 CLIENT: Norstar PROJECT NO: 8358e PROJECT NAME: INSPEC TOR: 251 S. Seventh Street, Ann Arbor, MI J. Fox DATE: January 13, 2014 TABLE 1 LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION RESULTS Reading Reading Type Units Component Substrate Condition Color Test Location Results Action Level Lead Results mg/cm 2 First Calibration Check #1 mg / cm ^2 NA NA NA Orange NIST SRM Standard 1.08 NA Second Calibration Check #1 mg / cm ^2 NA NA NA Orange NIST SRM Standard 1.11 NA 1.08 Avg. Third Calibration Check #1 mg / cm ^2 NA NA NA Orange NIST SRM Standard 1.04 NA 1 PAINT mg / cm ^2 Wall Drywall Good Beige Laundry, Side A, Center Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Bathroom Door Wood Good Beige Laundry, Side A, at Center Hinge Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Door Trim Wood Good Beige Laundry, Side A, at Center Hinge Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Ceiling Drywall Good Beige Laundry, at heat diffuser Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Wall Drywall Good Beige Laundry, Side C, at wall protector Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Cove base Wood Good Beige Laundry, Side A, south of bathroom door Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Cove base Wood Good Beige Laundry, Side C, below wall protector Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Entry Door Trim Wood Good Beige Laundry, Side D, at security chain Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Entry Door Metal Good Beige Laundry, Side D, at knob Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Wall Drywall Good Beige Laundry, Side D, at light switch Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Wall Drywall Good Beige Bathroom, Side A, above receptacle Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Wall Drywall Good Beige Bathroom, Side B, at paper holder Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Wall Drywall Good Beige Bathroom, Side C, by light switch Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Wall Drywall Good Beige Bathroom, Side D, below mirrow Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Ceiling Drywall Good Beige Bathroom at heat diffuser Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Door Wood Good Beige Bathroom, Side C, at knob Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Trim Wood Good Beige Bathroom, Side C, at door knob Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Door Frame Metal Good Beige Bathroom, Side C, at center hinge Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Wall Drywall Good Beige Kitchen, Side A, above light switch Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Wall Drywall Good Beige Kitchen, Side C, at receptacle Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Pantry Door Trim Wood Good Beige Kitchen, Side A, by knob Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Pantry Door Wood Good Beige Kitchen, Side A, at knob Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Cupboard Wood Good Clear Kitchen/Dining, Side A at exhaust fan Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Cove base Wood Good Beige Kitchen, Side A, at pantry door Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Cove base Wood Good Beige Kitchen, Side C, below receptacle Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Wtr Htr Access Door Trim Wood Good Beige Kitchen, Side C, at center hinge Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Water Heater Access Door Wood Good Beige Kitchen, Side C, at knob Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Wtr Htr Access Door Jamb Wood Good Tan Kitchen, Side C, at center hinge Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Wtr Htr Access Door Stop Wood Good Tan Kitchen, Side C, by knob Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Wall Drywall Good Beige Kitchen, Side D, at light switch Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Cove base Wood Good Beige Kitchen, Side D, center Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Attic Access Hatch Trim Wood Good Beige Kitchen, ceiling, west side Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Ceiling Drywall Good Beige Kitchen, at light fixture Negative 1 0 Page 1 of 3

8 CLIENT: Norstar PROJECT NO: 8358e PROJECT NAME: INSPEC TOR: 251 S. Seventh Street, Ann Arbor, MI J. Fox DATE: January 13, 2014 TABLE 1 LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION RESULTS Reading Reading Type Units Component Substrate Condition Color Test Location Results 34 PAINT mg / cm ^2 Ceiling Drywall Good Beige Living Room, at west heat diffuser Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Wall Drywall Good Beige Living Room, Side B, at entry door security chain Positive 1 > PAINT mg / cm ^2 Entry Door Trim Wood Good Beige Living Room, Side B, at entry door security chain Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Entry Door Metal Good Beige Living Room, Side B, at knob Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Window Sill Wood Good Beige Living Room, Side B, west window by receptacle Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Cove base Wood Good Beige Living Room, Side B, below west window Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Wall Drywall Good Beige Living Room, Side C, Center Positive 1 > PAINT mg / cm ^2 Trim Wood Good Beige Living Room, Side C, 4' from south corner Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Wall Drywall Good Beige Living Room, Side D, at furnace register Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Trim Wood Good Beige Living Room, Side D, at furnace access closet Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Furnace Closet Door Wood Good Beige Living Room, Side D, center Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Furnace Closet Door Jamb Metal Good Tan Side D at latch Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Furnace Closet Door Stop Metal Good Tan Side D at latch Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Wall Drywall Good Tan Furnace Closet, Side A, by latch Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Wall Drywall Good Tan Furnace Closet, Side C, above light switch Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Wall Drywall Good Tan Furnace Closet, Side D, above water heater Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Ceiling Drywall Good Tan Furnace Closet, by flue Positive 1 > PAINT mg / cm ^2 Ceiling Drywall Good Beige Bedroom, at light fixture Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Wall Drywall Good Beige Bedroom, Side A, at light switch Positive 1 > PAINT mg / cm ^2 Wall Drywall Good Beige Bedroom, Side B, at phone jack Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Wall Drywall Good Beige Bedroom, Side C, center Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Wall Drywall Good Beige Bedroom, Side D, below window Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Window Sill Wood Good Beige Bedroom, Side D, center Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Cove base Wood Good Beige Bedroom, Side A, at closet Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Cove base Wood Good Beige Bedroom, Side B, below phone jack Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Cove base Wood Good Beige Bedroom, Side C, center Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Cove base Wood Good Beige Bedroom, Side D, by door stop Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Closet Door Trim Wood Good Beige Bedroom, Side A, above closet center Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Closet Door Wood Good Clear Bedroom, Side A, at knob Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Bedroom Door Wood Good Beige Bedroom, Side A, at knob Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Bedroom Door Jamb Wood Good Beige Bedroom, Side A, at center hinge Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Bedroom Door Stop Wood Good Beige Bedroom, Side A, at center hinge Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Bedroom Door Trim Wood Good Beige Bedroom, Side A, at center hinge Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 Exterior Patio Enclosure Wood Good Tan Center Post Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 S. Entry Door, Exterior Metal Good Beige At knob Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 S. Entry Door, Ext. Stop Wood Good Beige At knob Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 S. Entry Door, Ext. Jamb Wood Good Beige At knob Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 S. Side, Trim Wood Good Beige At Storm Door Trim Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 S. Side Ext. In-fill Panel Wood Good Gray E. Window at phone service line Negative 1 0 Action Level Lead Results mg/cm 2 Page 2 of 3

9 CLIENT: Norstar PROJECT NO: 8358e PROJECT NAME: INSPEC TOR: 251 S. Seventh Street, Ann Arbor, MI J. Fox DATE: January 13, 2014 TABLE 1 LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION RESULTS Reading Reading Type Units Component Substrate Condition Color Test Location Results Action Level Lead Results mg/cm 2 73 PAINT mg / cm ^2 N. Side Ext. Door Metal Good Beige At knob Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 N. Side Ext. Door Stop Wood Good Beige At knob Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 N. Side Ext. Door Jamb Wood Good Beige At knob Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 N. Side Trim Wood Good Beige At Storm Door Latch Negative PAINT mg / cm ^2 N. Side Ext. In-fill Panel Wood Good Beige W. Window, upper east corner Negative 1 0 First Calibration Check #2 mg / cm ^2 NA NA NA Orange NIST SRM Standard 1.04 NA Second Calibration Check #2 mg / cm ^2 NA NA NA Orange NIST SRM Standard 1.04 NA 1.04 Avg. Third Calibration Check #2 mg / cm ^2 NA NA NA Orange NIST SRM Standard 1.04 NA NA = Not Applicable Bold = Lead Based Paint mg/cm 2 = milligrams per square centimeter Page 3 of 3

10 Appendix B MDCH Licensure DocumeiaDtio

Work Write Up / Specification of Repairs HUD DIVISION 1. MASONRY HUD DIVISION 2. SIDING. Toll Free

/ / Paperport 2000 official estimating report Work Write Up / Specification of Repairs Toll Free 1-877-932-7177 Clients Name. GREAT CLIENT Property Address. NUMBER ONE GOOD ROAD METRO, VA 20000 Primary