Subject: Peer review of Duntroon Quarry hydrogeologic modelling: Report #1
|
|
- Erika Watts
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ENVIRONMENTAL & WATER-RESOURCE CONSULTANTS June 5, 2008 Ms. Kathryn Pounder, MA, MCIP, RPP Niagara Escarpment Commission 232 Guelph Street Georgetown, Ontario L7G 4B1 Subject: Peer review of Duntroon Quarry hydrogeologic modelling: Report #1 Dear Ms. Pounder: We have conducted a preliminary review of the groundwater modelling conducted for the proposed expansion of the Duntroon Quarry, Clearview Township, County of Simcoe. For our preliminary review we have studied the reports of the modelling and assembled a set of questions and comments that we hope will clarify the analyses of current conditions, and enable us to understand fully the work that has been conducted in anticipation of the predictive scenarios. We expect that in some instances our comments will require a simple response directing us to other parts of the extensive documentation for the application. Our preliminary review is presented in two parts: Overview comments; and Detailed technical comments/questions. For our final review, we will review the results of the predictive analyses in detail, and examine the model input and output files. Since we do not have access to the computer code that has been used for the updated modelling (MODFLOW-SURFACT), we expect that the final part of our review may require meeting with the modellers of Jagger Hims Limited. 90 FROBISHER DRIVE, UNIT 2B, WATERLOO, ON, N2V 2A1 TEL: (519) FAX: (519)
2 Page: 2 I. Overview The reporting of the groundwater modelling has been submitted in two parts: Jagger Hims Limited, 2005: Duntroon Quarry Expansion: Geological Report and Level 2 Hydrogeological Assessment, Lot 25 and Part Lot 26 Concession 12 and Part Lot 25 Concession 11, Clearview Township, County of Simcoe, prepared for Georgian Aggregates and Construction Inc., September [The groundwater model is documented in Appendix F]; and Jagger Hims Limited, 2007: Duntroon Quarry Expansion: Level 2 Hydrogeological Assessment Addendum, Proposed Expansion and Proposed MAQ Highland Quarry, Computer Groundwater Modelling, Response to Agency Review Comments, prepared for Walker Aggregates Inc., October We obtained these documents by downloading files from the Walker Industries Holdings Limited web site ( Some of the pieces of the 2005 report that are relevant to our review were missing, and Jagger Hims Limited (JHL) supplied them immediately. In particular, the missing pieces were Figures 6-11 and 6-22, and the tables in Appendix F. Mr. Andrew G. Hims, P.Eng., during a brief conversation regarding the electronic reports, indicated that the analyses described in the 2007 addendum build on the 2005 analyses. Based on our review of the two documents, it is clear that a significant additional effort has been undertaken. The analyses have been revised substantially. We note the following changes in the 2007 analyses: 1. The distribution of the specified recharge has been modified based on a reassessment of the karst features at the site; 2. The distribution of hydraulic conductivity has been revised; 3. The water level targets for the calibration to existing conditions have been supplemented with data from the proposed MAQ Highland Quarry; 4. The examination of the match between observed and calculated water levels for the calibration to existing conditions has been expanded; 5. Flow observations have been incorporated in the evaluation of the simulation of existing conditions; 6. The analysis has been extended to consider seasonal water level data rather than only long-term average conditions; and 7. The predictive scenarios consider the cumulative impact of the proposed MAQ Highland Quarry.
3 Page: 3 In our opinion, the analyses generally have been conducted at a relatively high technical level that is consistent with the state-of-the-practice. During calibration of the model for existing conditions a close match has been obtained to some of the observations. However, based on our review of the calibrated model we do have reservations regarding its application for future conditions. We are not sure how well the analysis of existing conditions has been constrained by the available data. Furthermore, we are not clear about key elements of the analysis of existing conditions. Our reservations and requests for clarification and selected additional results are presented in the following detailed technical comments.
4 Page: 4 II. Detailed technical comments/questions 1. It is not clear how well the distributions of hydraulic conductivity that have been inferred from model calibration are constrained by the available data from hydraulic testing. In the 2005 modelling, relatively simple distributions of hydraulic conductivity are considered (Figures F-5, F-6 and F-7). In contrast, the hydraulic conductivity distributions adopted for the 2007 modelling show a significant amount of detail. The reporting does not allow us to assess whether this detail is supported by the results of hydraulic testing, or whether it has been invoked in an ad-hoc manner solely to improve the matches to observed water levels on a well-by-well basis. In our opinion, the connection between the results of testing and the inferences from calibration needs to be strengthened. We recommend that maps be produced that correspond to Figures A-1 through A-4 of the 2007 report, with the estimates of hydraulic conductivity estimated from in-situ tests superimposed on the most recent interpretation of the distribution of material properties. 2. It is not clear from the reporting whether hydraulic conductivity estimates are available from slug tests conducted on all of the monitoring wells on the Walker lands (existing quarry and expansion footprint) and the site of the proposed MAQ Highland Quarry. Are these data available? If they are, we recommend that they be included in the maps recommended in Point #1. 3. It is not clear how well the calibrated model is able to match the results of controlled pumping tests conducted in the vicinity of the site. Pumping tests are discussed in JHL (2005; p ). We expect that most of these tests provide only a local impression of material properties, and may therefore be valuable additions to a compilation of the results of single-well testing. Our real interest is in tests that may have stressed a larger area, such that the observations might be appropriate for testing the calibrated model. Are any of the pumping tests suitable for this purpose? It is indicated on Page F-7 of JHL (2005) that pumping tests are typically about an order of magnitude greater than packer testing results for the same aquifer. Is this suggestion based on results from the site, or from more general experience?
5 Page: 5 4. The model documentation refers to anisotropy of horizontal hydraulic conductivity (JHL, 2005; p. F-20). Are any maps available that indicate interpreted preferential directions of jointing and/or dissolution channels in the vicinity of the site? A horizontal anisotropy ratio of 1.67:1 is indicated on Table F-7. In our opinion, this is a subtle ratio. Can a ratio this low be inferred reliably from the calibration? Are sufficient data from hydraulic tests available to support this inference? Is there evidence that supports the assumption that the principal directions of hydraulic conductivity follow the north-south alignment of the finitedifference grid? 5. Insufficient information on the calibrated model is provided to develop independent calculations of key quantities such as the inflow to the existing quarry. In particular, we request that additional maps be prepared of the thicknesses of each model layer. These maps should include a posting of the points used to constrain the mapping. 6. The representation of the seepage face along the Niagara Escarpment is described briefly in JHL (2005; Page F-7). It is indicated that groundwater discharges from the lower section of the aquifer (Amabel Formation + Fossil Hill Formation). This is consistent with the modelling approach described on Page F-16, in which drain nodes are assigned control levels that correspond to the interface between the Fossil Hill Formation and the Cabot Head Formation. This approach is not consistent with our experience at other sites along the Niagara Escarpment. Our experience at sites in southern Ontario suggests that seepage faces form at the contact between the overburden and the Amabel Formation, at discrete depths within the Amabel Formation, and at the base of the Amabel Formation. Our experience is illustrated in Figure 1, and is consistent with the theoretical and experiment results of Rulon and Freeze (1985) and Rulon and others (1985). Is there evidence from the site that the only seepage from the escarpment is at its base? Elsewhere in southern Ontario, lines of ice that form along the walls of rock cuts and quarry walls provide visual evidence of multiple seepage faces, as do accumulations of vegetation. Have seepage faces been mapped along the face of the Escarpment? The effect of specifying drains with a control level only at the base of the Fossil Hill is a tendency of the model to predict relatively low groundwater levels and discharge rates along the Escarpment. This tendency appears to be corroborated in the updated model of existing conditions; in particular, a zone of relatively low hydraulic conductivity has been added parallel to the Escarpment in model layers 1 and 2 to keep water levels high. Is this zone of reduced hydraulic conductivity supported by data from hydraulic tests? 7. A similar approach is adopted to represent the quarry. The control levels for the drains that represent the existing quarry are set at the base of the quarry. Have seepage faces been mapped in the existing quarry?
6 Page: 6 Figure 1. Expected distribution of seepage faces along the Niagara Escarpment
7 Page: 7 8. The reporting does not indicate how the conductances have been estimated for the drains representing the Escarpment and the existing quarry. Are the conductances correlated to the properties of the rock adjacent to these features? On Page F-7 (JHL, 2005), it is indicated that the drain conductances for the quarry were assigned a value greater than the conductance of the Amabel Aquifer. Is this approach significantly different from assigning the heads directly in the quarry? 9. We are not clear how the western boundary of the model is represented. It is indicated in JHL (2005) that the boundary is represented with General-Head Boundary (GHB) conditions. However, the report does not indicate the bases for assigning the control levels and conductances for the GHBs. The conventional interpretation of the GHB Package is illustrated in Figure 2. Although the function describing GHBs is general, the application suggested in Figure 2 is the representation of a physical hydrologic boundary that is distant from the edge of the model. In this conceptual model, regional groundwater flow is roughly perpendicular to the edge of the model, L represents the distance between the edge of the model and the natural hydrologic boundary and K H represents the average hydraulic of the intervening material. C GBH = K L H bw Figure 2. Conceptual model for General-Head Boundaries
8 Page: 8 In our opinion, the application of GHBs in this particular application is unorthodox, as groundwater flow appears to be directed approximately parallel to the western boundary of the model. This is confirmed by the results of the overall water budget presented on Table F-8 for the original model (JHL, 2005). The tabulated results indicate that there are both inflows and outflows along the boundary, but both represent a relatively small portion of the water budget (about 2% and 4% of the cumulative recharge, respectively). Although the GHBs do not appear to be significant with respect to the overall water budget, and at least with respect to existing conditions, we recommend that the rationale for the assignment of the western boundary condition be described in greater detail. 10. Seasonal fluctuations in water levels in observation wells are described in both the 2005 and 2007 reports. However, neither report discusses the possibility of long-term trends. Are there sufficient data to plot long-term water level records for any of the observation wells? If there are, do the data suggest that long-term conditions are approximately stable, upon which are superimposed seasonal fluctuations? 11. The set of water level targets for the calibration is revised significantly between the 2005 and 2007 analyses. The calibration targets for the revised model are listed on Table 2-1 (JHL, 2007). The 2007 targets include water levels from 23 wells on the MAQ site. This is an important addition. Referring to the 2007 set of targets, what is the rationale for excluding five wells from the 2005 calibration (98-8, CLF5, 102-C, 104-A, OW1-4)? The 2007 targets also include an additional 4 targets (BH02-6, BH03-7-1, BH03-7-II, and Dempsey). Why have these wells been added? 12. It is indicated in JHL (2005) that wells were not used as calibration targets if less than one year of water level measurements was available. How many wells are excluded based on this criterion? 13. Are we correct in understanding that no information from MOE water well records has informed either the development of the conceptual model, or been used as a rough check on the calibration? In our opinion, what the information from MOE water well records lacks in reliability it makes up for in spatial coverage. We recommend that a map be prepared indicating the locations of MOE water well records in the regional model area. 14. The description of the calibration approach suggests that both recharge rates and hydraulic conductivities were adjusted during calibration. In our experience, recharge rates and the hydraulic conductivity of the uppermost model layer are generally correlated. How is this addressed in the calibration?
9 Page: The reporting for the 2005 model includes maps of calculated water levels in the absence of a quarry and the inferred long-term drawdowns due to the existing quarry (Figures 6-9 and 6-10). We recommend that similar maps be prepared for the updated 2007 model. 16. In our opinion, an essential element of the reporting of the results of each simulation is a summary of the calculated overall water budget. An overall budget is presented for the initial simulation of existing conditions on JHL (2005; Table F-8). However, a similar budget is not included for the revised simulation of existing conditions. We request that a budget summary be prepared for each steady-state scenario considered. Furthermore, we request that the calculated quarry inflows and discharges to the Niagara Escarpment be reported separately. 17. To establish that the calibrated model can be used with confidence for predictive applications, it is particularly important that the model be demonstrated to be capable of matching observations of quarry inflows and stream baseflows. Limited assessments of model-calculated quarry inflows and streamflows are presented in JHL (2007; p. Tables 2-3 through 2-7). Are additional observed values presented elsewhere in the reporting? Simulated quarry inflows for existing conditions are compared against observations on JHL (2007) Table 2-3. The comparison is between the results of a steady-state analysis and inflows estimated to be between 10 and 20 L/s (these are apparently not measured). Have quarry inflow rates been monitored since the start of operations? Are time histories of quarry inflows tabulated and/or plotted? Where are the locations of the stream gauges against which the results of the calibrated model are compared on Tables 2-3 through 2-7? Are time histories of stream flows available for the stream gauges? Do the available stream flow data support the development of estimates of baseflows, for example with the code BFLOW, or with ranked-durations plots following the methodology of the Grand River Conservation Authority?
10 Page: We have compared observed and calculated flows in Figure 3, using results from JHL (2007; Tables 2-3 through 2-7). The match between the model calculations and observations appears to be relatively poor. The transient results are shown for August. In the case of SW6, it is indicated in the report (Page 24) that the observations represent an average flow, while the model calculations represent only the groundwater contribution, that is, baseflow. Is this also the case for the other gauges? Are data now being collected that would support a more appropriate check on the model results? Based on precipitation records and Environment Canada estimates of evapotranspiration, is 2006 a typical year, and therefore an appropriate measure for comparing the results from a simulation of long-term average conditions? SW6 Calculated steady flow (m 3 /d) SW6 10 Steady-state Transient (August) Observed average flow (m 3 /d) Figure 3. Comparison between observed and calculated stream flows
11 Page: 11 Closing We hope that our preliminary review comments assist in clarifying the conceptual model for the simulation of existing conditions. If you have any questions regarding our proposal, please contact Mr. Christopher Neville at (519) , or by at Sincerely, S. S. PAPADOPULOS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Christopher J. Neville, M.Sc., P.Eng. Vice President, Senior Hydrologist CJN/cjn P:\Duntroon Quarry\Reporting\Duntroon Quarry_01_Letter_Pounder_ doc
12 Page: 12 References Rulon, J.J., and R.A. Freeze, 1985: Multiple seepage faces on layered slopes and their implications for slope-stability analysis, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 22, pp Rulon, J.J., R. Rodway, and R.A. Freeze, 1985: The development of multiple seepage faces on layered slopes, Water Resources Research, 21(11), pp
Subject: Peer review of Duntroon Quarry hydrogeologic modelling: Report #2
ENVIRONMENTAL & WATER-RESOURCE CONSULTANTS November 20, 2008 Ms. Kathryn Pounder, MA, MCIP, RPP Niagara Escarpment Commission 232 Guelph Street Georgetown, Ontario L7G 4B1 kathryn.pounder@ontario.ca Subject:
More informationNovember 13, Mr. Alfred Artinger Reid s Heritage Homes 6783 Wellington Road 34, RR #22 Cambridge, Ontario N3C 2V4
November 13, 2017 Mr. Alfred Artinger Reid s Heritage Homes 6783 Wellington Road 34, RR #22 Cambridge, Ontario N3C 2V4 Subject: 19-59 Lowes Road Guelph, Ontario Our Ref.: 160-P-0010233-0-08-305-HD-L-0001-02
More informationDecember 7, 2009 Stantec File: Distribution via courier to recipients listed below:
Stantec Consulting Ltd. Suite 1-70 Southgate Drive Guelph ON N1G 4P5 Tel: (519) 836-6050 Fax: (519) 836-2493 December 7, 2009 Stantec File: 62602732 Distribution via courier to recipients listed below:
More informationT E C H N I C A L M E M O R A N D U M
INTERA Incorporated 9600 Great Hills Trail, Suite 300W Austin, Texas, USA 78759 512.425.2000 T E C H N I C A L M E M O R A N D U M To: From: Barton Springs/Edwards Aquifer Conservation District Wade Oliver,
More informationAdvice to decision maker on coal mining project
. Advice to decision maker on coal mining project IESC 2015-063: West Muswellbrook Project New Development Requesting agency The New South Wales Mining and Petroleum Gateway Panel Date of request 27 January
More informationMemorandum. Introduction. Carl Einberger Joe Morrice. Figures 1 through 7
Memorandum TO: Michelle Halley, NWF DATE: October 9, 2007 FROM: Carl Einberger Joe Morrice PROJ. NO.: 9885.000 CC: Project File PROJ. NAME: National Wildlife Federation ATTACHMENTS: Tables 1 through 6
More informationInformation Request 11
Information Request 11 Information Request 11 11-1 Responses to Information Request 11 Response to Information Request 11a Response to Information Request 11b 11-2 11-6 Federal Review Panel Information
More informationNumerical Groundwater Model for the Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District
Numerical Groundwater Model for the Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District Nels Ruud and Peter Leffler Fugro West, Inc. Larry Dotson Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District Presentation Outline Background
More informationTechnical Bulletin Water Budget and Water Quantity Risk Assessment Tier 2 Subwatershed Stress Assessment Groundwater Drought Scenarios
Date: July 2009 Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Ontario Ministry of the Environment The Clean Water Act requires Source Protection Committees (SPCs) to prepare an assessment report for each source
More informationIrrigation modeling in Prairie Ronde Township, Kalamazoo County. SW Michigan Water Resources Council meeting May 15, 2012
Irrigation modeling in Prairie Ronde Township, Kalamazoo County SW Michigan Water Resources Council meeting May 15, 2012 Development of a Groundwater Flow Model INFLOWS Areal recharge from precipitation
More informationAppendix A: Performance Indicator Trigger Monitoring Program
ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN (AMP) Appendix A: Performance Indicator Trigger Monitoring Program Table of Contents A.1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND...1 A.1.1 BACKGROUND...1 A.1.2 PREVIOUS TECHNICAL STUDIES...2
More informationSan Mateo Plain Groundwater Basin Assessment Stakeholder Workshop #8 17 APRIL 2018
San Mateo Plain Groundwater Basin Assessment Stakeholder Workshop #8 17 APRIL 2018 PRESENTATION OVERVIEW Introductions Project Overview Summary of Analysis Supporting Model Development Model Development
More information6.0 USGS MODEL. 6.1 Background
6.0 USGS MODEL 6.1 Background A groundwater flow model is a simplification of a real groundwater flow system. Real groundwater flow systems are complex, and they are often simplified with a model for the
More information4.4 MODEL CODE DESCRIPTION 4.5 WATER SOURCES AND SINKS 4.6 MODEL DOMAIN AND BOUNDARIES. SLR South Africa
Page 4-18 The developed model should therefore be seen as an initial site model which should be refined and recalibrated once more groundwater monitoring and other data become available. 4.4 MODEL CODE
More informationPotential effects evaluation of dewatering an underground mine on surface water and groundwater located in a rural area
Potential effects evaluation of dewatering an underground mine on surface water and groundwater located in a rural area ITRODUCTIO Michel Mailloux* Eng. M.Sc, Vincent Boisvert, M.Sc, Denis Millette, Eng.,
More informationInvestigation of sustainable development potential for Ulubey Aquifer System, Turkey
doi:10.5194/piahs-364-513-2014 Evolving Water Resources Systems: Understanding, Predicting and Managing Water Society Interactions Proceedings of ICWRS2014, Bologna, Italy, June 2014 (IAHS Publ. 364, 2014).
More informationAquifer Science Staff, January 2007
Guidelines for Hydrogeologic Reports and Aquifer Tests Conducted Within the Jurisdictional Boundaries of the Barton Springs / Edwards Aquifer Conservation District I. Introduction Aquifer Science Staff,
More informationSimulation of Sub-Drains Performance Using Visual MODFLOW for Slope Water Seepage Problem
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering PAPER OPEN ACCESS Simulation of Sub-Drains Performance Using Visual MODFLOW for Slope Water Seepage Problem To cite this article: M F T Baharuddin
More informationDynamic groundwater-river interaction model for planning water allocation in a narrow valley aquifer system of the Upper Motueka catchment
Dynamic groundwater-river interaction model for planning water allocation in a narrow valley aquifer system of the Upper Motueka catchment Timothy Hong t.hong@gns.cri.nz Gilles Minni g.minni@gns.cri.nz
More informationSimulation of horizontal well performance using Visual MODFLOW
Environ Earth Sci (2013) 68:1119 1126 DOI 10.1007/s12665-012-1813-x ORIGINAL ARTICLE Simulation of horizontal well performance using Visual MODFLOW Wan Mohd Zamri W. Ismail Ismail Yusoff Bahaa-eldin E.
More informationVal Verde County / City of Del Rio Hydrogeological Study FINAL DRAFT REPORT
Val Verde County / City of Del Rio Hydrogeological Study FINAL DRAFT REPORT May 2014 Hydrogeological Study For Val Verde County & City of Del Rio, Texas FINAL DRAFT REPORT MAY 2014 Prepared for Val Verde
More informationNumerical Groundwater Flow Model Report. Caloosa Materials, LLC 3323 Gulf City Road Ruskin, Florida 33570
Numerical Groundwater Flow Model Report Caloosa Materials, LLC 3323 Gulf City Road Ruskin, Florida 33570 GHD 2675 Winkler Ave Suite 180 Fort Myers, FL 33901 11138224 Report July 27, 2017 Table of Contents
More informationSan Mateo Plain Groundwater Basin Assessment Stakeholder Workshop #7 9 NOVEMBER 2017
San Mateo Plain Groundwater Basin Assessment Stakeholder Workshop #7 9 NOVEMBER 2017 PRESENTATION OVERVIEW Introductions Project Overview Stakeholder Outreach Summary Phase 2 Updates Modeling Activities
More informationFigure 3: Refined Interpolated Groundwater Level Contours Based on Information from the MOE Water Well Information System (WWIS)
Figure 3: Refined Interpolated Groundwater Level Contours Based on Information from the MOE Water Well Information System (WWIS) Figure 4: Strahler Classes 1 through 4 Defined as Drains and Rivers Figure
More informationCHAPTER 7 GROUNDWATER FLOW MODELING
148 CHAPTER 7 GROUNDWATER FLOW MODELING 7.1 GENERAL In reality, it is not possible to see into the sub-surface and observe the geological structure and the groundwater flow processes. It is for this reason
More informationB-7. Predictive Assessment Model of Quaternary Alluvium Hydrogeology. J:\scopes\04w018\10000\FVD reports\final EIA\r-EIA app.doc
B-7 Model of Quaternary Alluvium Hydrogeology J:\scopes\04w018\10000\FVD reports\final EIA\r-EIA app.doc PREDICTIVE ASSESSMENT MODELING OF THE QUATERNARY ALLUVIUM HYDROGEOLOGY EAGLE PROJECT MARQUETTE COUNTY,
More informationREPRESENTING HYDRODYNAMIC DISPERSION IN SALTWATER INTRUSION MODELS THAT DIFFER IN TEMPORAL RESOLUTION. Alyssa Dausman 1 and Christian Langevin 1
REPRESENTING HYDRODYNAMIC DISPERSION IN SALTWATER INTRUSION MODELS THAT DIFFER IN TEMPORAL RESOLUTION Alyssa Dausman 1 and Christian Langevin 1 ABSTRACT: Variable-density groundwater flow models are often
More informationClosure Water Balance Model to Support Closure Designs for a Mine in Laos
Page 1 Closure Water Balance Model to Support Closure Designs for a Mine in Laos BR Luinstra SRK Consulting (Australasia) JT Chapman SRK Consulting (Australasia) A Hendry SRK Consulting (Australasia) A
More information5. MODEL DESCRIPTION Several models were used in combination to estimate the impacts of the proposed 100,000 acre-ft dryyear yield program. MODFLOW and MODPATH were used to estimate the groundwater and
More informationCentre Wellington Scoped Tier Three Water Budget Assessment
Centre Wellington Scoped Tier Three Water Budget Assessment Community Liaison Group Meeting #3 Aboyne Hall, Wellington County Museum Tuesday, May 15, 2018, 7:00 9:30 pm 1 MEETING PURPOSE Provide a refresh
More informationTable ES1. Review of Pebble Limited Partnership s (PLP s) Environmental Baseline Document (EBD): Hydrologic characterization
Executive Summary Table ES1. Review of Pebble Limited Partnership s (PLP s) Environmental Baseline Document (EBD): Hydrologic characterization Basic issue Does PLP have sufficient hydrologic data and an
More informationSCENARIOS AND ALTERNATIVE INITIAL CONDITIONS
REPORT GAM RUN 09-019: GROUNDWATER MODEL RUNS TO ESTIMATE MONTHLY AVERAGE DISCHARGE FROM BARTON SPRINGS UNDER ALTERNATIVE PUMPING EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: SCENARIOS AND ALTERNATIVE INITIAL CONDITIONS by William
More informationSummary of IAEA Experts Meeting on. Groundwater Modelling at TEPCO s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. Tokyo, Japan, February 2016
Summary of IAEA Experts Meeting on Groundwater Modelling at TEPCO s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Tokyo, Japan, 15 19 February 2016 An Experts Meeting on groundwater modelling at the Tokyo Electric
More informationEvaluating Potential Effects of Development on Southern Ontario Wetlands
Evaluating Potential Effects of Development on Southern Ontario Wetlands Latornell Conservation Symposium November 20 th 2014 Andrea Bradford, Ph.D., P.Eng. School of Engineering W E T L A N D L O S SE
More informationSurface Water Accounting Model, SWAc linking surface flow and recharge processes to groundwater models
Surface Water Accounting Model, SWAc linking surface flow and recharge processes to groundwater models Alastair Black 1, Marco Lagi 2 1 Groundwater Science Ltd (a.black@gwscience.co.uk) 2 New England Complex
More informationPredicting Groundwater Sustainability: What Tools, Models and Data are Available?
Predicting Groundwater Sustainability: What Tools, Models and Data are Available? Ray Wuolo Barr Engineering Company Assessing Sustainability is All About: Predicting (or describing) how potentiometric
More informationUpdated Vulnerability Assessment and Scoring of Wellhead Protection Areas Regional Municipality of York
Addendum Report Updated Vulnerability Assessment and Scoring of Wellhead Protection Areas Regional Municipality of York Prepared For: The Regional Municipality of York Environmental Services Environmental
More informationCURIS RESOURCES (ARIZONA) INC. APPLICATION TO AMEND UIC PERMIT NO. AZ ATTACHMENT A AREA OF REVIEW SWVP
SWVP-014595 CURlS RESOURCES (ARIZONA) INC. ATTACHMENT A - AREA OF REVIEW Table of Contents Table of Contents......................................................................... 1 List of Figures................................................
More informationGroundwater in the Santa Rosa Plain
. Groundwater in the Santa Rosa Plain Marcus Trotta, PG, CHg Principal Hydrogeologist Sonoma County Water Agency Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Sustainability Agency October 12, 2017 www.sonomacountywater.org
More informationHARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC. HYDROGEOLOGY ENGINEERING
HYDROGEOLOGY ENGINEERING La Jolla Gateway 9171 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 375 San Diego, California 92122 Phone: 858.455.6500 Fax: 858.455.6533 VIA E-MAIL Principal Hydrogeologist ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
More informationDEVELOPING A GOOD CONCEPTUAL MODEL FOR FEDERAL CONTAMINATED SITES COMMON SHORTFALLS AND DATA NEEDS. Presented by: Pierre Maheux, M.Sc., P.Geo.
DEVELOPING A GOOD CONCEPTUAL MODEL FOR FEDERAL CONTAMINATED SITES COMMON SHORTFALLS AND DATA NEEDS Presented by: Pierre Maheux, M.Sc., P.Geo. Technical contributors: Francois Lauzon, M.Eng., P.Eng., David
More informationDYNFLOW accepts various types of boundary conditions on the groundwater flow system including:
Section 6 Groundwater Flow Model A groundwater flow model was developed to evaluate groundwater flow patterns in the site area and to provide a basis for contaminant transport modeling. 6.1 Model Code
More informationriver modelling keeping low flows in mind
Incorporating surfacegroundwater interactions into river modelling keeping low flows in mind David Rassam 11 February 2013 CSIRO LAND WATER; WATER FOR A HEALTHY COUNTRY FLAGSHIP Outline of presentation
More informationNumerical Modeling of Groundwater Flow in the Navajo Sandstone Aquifer at the Tuba City, Arizona, Disposal Site 15167
Numerical Modeling of Groundwater Flow in the Navajo Sandstone Aquifer at the Tuba City, Arizona, Disposal Site 15167 ABSTRACT Richard Bush*, Timothy Bartlett** *US DOE, Office of Legacy Management **Stoller
More informationDocumentation of Groundwater Agent-based Model
Documentation of Groundwater Agent-based Model Comments or suggestions to 1. Introduction In environmental resources management there is the recognition of need for combined socio-environmental
More information221 Woolwich Street AND 1 First Canadian Place, Suite 5300
October 28, 2008 Garrod Pickfield LLP Davis & Company 221 Woolwich Street AND 1 First Canadian Place, Suite 5300 Guelph, Ontario 100 King Street West N1H 3V4 Toronto, Ontario M5X 1E2 Attention: Mr. Stephen
More informationGroundwater Flow Model Development for Cumulative Effects Management within the Athabasca Oil Sands
Groundwater Flow Model Development for Cumulative Effects Management within the Athabasca Oil Sands Margaret Scott, MASc, EIT Jos Beckers, PhD, P Geoph Matthew Webb, MSc Overview Groundwater Management
More informationHigh-Resolution Groundwater Models for the Assessment of Riparian Restoration Options and River Conveyance Efficiency
High-Resolution Groundwater Models for the Assessment of Riparian Restoration Options and River Conveyance Efficiency Karen L. MacClune 1, Gilbert Barth 1, Nabil Shafike 2, Deborah Hathaway 1 1 S. S. Papadopulos
More informationGroundwater Recharge
Groundwater Recharge Techniques and Challenges Troy E. Gilmore, Assistant Professor/Extension Specialist Conservation and Survey Division SNR Biological Systems Engineering Vadose Zone Workshop, March
More informationAPPENDIX A HYDROLOGIC EVALUATION OF LANDFILL PERFORMANCE (HELP) MODEL RESULTS (20)
APPENDIX A HYDROLOGIC EVALUATION OF LANDFILL PERFORMANCE (HELP) MODEL RESULTS 044985 (20) 44985-5m CLAY COVER ASSESSMENT.txt ******************************************************************************
More informationMunicipal Groundwater Flow Modelling Study. Town of Torbay, NL
Municipal Groundwater Flow Modelling Study Town of Torbay, NL October 19, 2015 Agenda 1 Purpose 2 What is a Groundwater Model 3 Approach 4 Conceptual Model & GW Flow Model Construction 5 Model Predictions
More informationIntegrated Water Management Modeling Framework in Nebraska
Integrated Water Management Modeling Framework in Nebraska Association of Western State Engineers Spring Workshop Salt Lake City, Utah June 9, 2015 Mahesh Pun, EIT Integrated Water Management Analyst Nebraska
More informationNumerical Simulation of Basal Aquifer Depressurization in the Presence of Dissolved Gas
Numerical Simulation of Basal Aquifer Depressurization in the Presence of Dissolved Gas Karl P. Lawrence, Ph.D. Rock Engineering Division Golder Associates Mississauga, Ontario, Canada Outline Motivation:
More informationHYDROGEOLOGY OF THE HUMBOLDT RIVER BASIN, IMPACTS OF OPEN-PIT MINE DEWATERING AND PIT LAKE FORMATION
HYDROGEOLOGY OF THE HUMBOLDT RIVER BASIN, IMPACTS OF OPEN-PIT MINE DEWATERING AND PIT LAKE FORMATION June, 2015 Tom Myers, Ph.D., Hydrologic Consultant, Reno NV tom_myers@charter.net Prepared for: Progressive
More informationTechnical Rules: Assessment Report. Clean Water Act, 2006
Technical Rules: Assessment Report Clean Water Act, 2006 November 20, 2008 Amended on: December 12, 2008 (administrative amendments) November 16, 2009 (EBR Posting Number EBRO10-7573) Clean Water Act,
More informationLinking Soil Water and Groundwater Models to Investigate Salinity Management Options
Linking Soil Water and Groundwater s to Investigate Salinity Management Options Carl C. Daamen a and Greg P. Hoxley a a Sinclair Kight Merz, P.O.Box 25, Malvern, VIC 3162, Australia. Abstract: Salinisation
More informationFebruary 7 th, Background
February 7 th, 2014 Dr. Reagan Waskom, Director Colorado Water Institute E-102 Engineering Building Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523-2033 This memo serves as a final assessment by the Independent
More informationAQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY EVALUATION REPORT
AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY EVALUATION REPORT Prepared for: CLALLAM COUNTY 228 East 4 th Street, Port Angeles, WA 98362 Prepared by: 12100 NE 195 th Street, Suite 200, Bothell, WA 99011 July 2003 TABLE
More informationOversized quarry sumps can be used to store run-off during
Oversized quarry sumps can be used to store run-off during large events Paved quarry yard with channels routing run-off to attenuation 3 The Hydrogeology of Quarry Dewatering Extraction below the water
More informationCumulative Effects Assessment Best Practices Paper for Below Water Table Aggregate Operations within the Grand River Watershed
Cumulative Effects Assessment Best Practices Paper for Below Water Table Aggregate Operations within the Grand River Watershed Preamble May 07, 2009 In Ontario, aggregate extraction is governed by the
More informationOctober 1, 2014 Project No
October 1, 2014 Project No. 13-1193-0016 Leigh Mugford Quality Control and Project Manager James Dick Construction Ltd. P.O. Box 470 Bolton, Ontario L7E 5T4 FOLLOW-UP TO TECHNICAL PEER REVIEW BLAST IMPACT
More informationRESPONSIBLE PLANNING FOR FUTURE GROUND WATER USE FROM THE GREAT FLATS AQUIFER : TWO CASE STUDIES: THE GEP ENERGY
RESPONSIBLE PLANNING FOR FUTURE GROUND WATER USE FROM THE GREAT FLATS AQUIFER : TWO CASE STUDIES: THE GEP ENERGY Introduction PROJECT AND THE SI GREEN FUELS BOILER PROJECT Thomas M. Johnson Hydrogeologist,
More informationIs it time for us to go to fully integrated models for stream-aquifer management?
Is it time for us to go to fully integrated models for stream-aquifer management? Tissa H. Illangasekare, PhD, PE, P.Hyd, BCEE,DWRE AMAX Distinguished Chair and Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS GUELPH/GUELPH-ERAMOSA TIER 3 WATER BUDGET AND LOCAL AREA RISK ASSESSMENT STUDY
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS GUELPH/GUELPH-ERAMOSA TIER 3 WATER BUDGET AND LOCAL AREA RISK ASSESSMENT STUDY Contents Overview... 3 1. What is a Tier 3 Water Budget Study?... 3 2. How does a Tier 3 Water
More informationMODELING INVESTIGATION ON THE SUSTAINABLE GROUNDWATER YIELD FOR WIANG PA PAO AQUIFERS SYSTEM
MODELING INVESTIGATION ON THE SUSTAINABLE GROUNDWATER YIELD FOR WIANG PA PAO AQUIFERS SYSTEM Phatcharasak Arlai 1*, Manfred Koch 2, Sitisak Munyu 3, Kriangsak Pirarai 3 and Arun Lukjan 1 1 Research Unit
More informationAPPENDIX 5: SAMPLE MODEL RESULTS
APPENDIX 5: SAMPLE MODEL RESULTS A. Evaluation of Groundwater Sustainability in the Ramsey Area B. Evaluation of Groundwater Sustainability in the Woodbury Area C. Evaluation of Future Drawdown Conditions
More informationGroundwater modelling study for sustainable water management in Town of High River. Han Sang-Yoon WaterTech, April 12, 2013
Groundwater modelling study for sustainable water management in Town of High River Han Sang-Yoon WaterTech, April 12, 2013 Acknowledgements Town of High River: Reiley McKerracher Jasen Craigie Project
More informationReview of the Hydrologic Cycle & Streamflow Generation
Quantitative Elements of Physical Hydrology Review of the Hydrologic Cycle & Streamflow Generation (Review) Contact information: Jack Hermance Environmental Geophysics/Hydrology Department of Geological
More information2.3 Water Budget Data In Ontario
2.3 Water Budget Data In Ontario Water budget data available for Ontario includes meteorologic data, hydrometric data and groundwater data. Geological and physiographical data provide information to describe
More informationTier 2 Water Quantity Stress Assessment Report
Tier 2 Water Quantity Stress Assessment Report Grand River Watershed Final Report December 2009 Prepared by Executive Summary The Grand River Watershed is 6,800 km 2 in size and currently has 900,000 residents.
More informationGROUND WATER/SURFACE WATER INTERACTIONS 1-3 AWRA SUMMER SPECIALTY CONFERENCE 2002
JULY,. I GROUND WATER/SURFACE WATER INTERACTIONS 1-3 AWRA SUMMER SPECIALTY CONFERENCE 2002 MODELING FLOW AT THE STREAM-AQUIFER INTERFACE A REVIEW OF THIS FEATURE IN TOOLS OF THE TRADE Varda S. Blum', Deborah
More informationSouth Platte Decision Support System Alluvial Groundwater Model Update Documentation
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prepared for The Colorado Water Conservation Board and Division of Water Resources South Platte Decision Support System Alluvial Groundwater Model Update Documentation June 2017 All cover
More informationS OUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER
S OUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER Telephone 615-921-9470 1033 DEMONBREUN STREET, SUITE 205 NASHVILLE, TN 37203 Facsimile 615-921-8011 Steve Goins, Director Jamie Woods, Environmental Specialist Division
More informationAppendix I. Groundwater Modeling
Appendix I. Groundwater Modeling This appendix describes current and future groundwater modeling efforts associated with the. 0 I. Current Objectives of Groundwater Modeling Efforts The objectives of groundwater
More informationStreamflow Generation: An Introduction
Quantitative Elements of Physical Hydrology Streamflow Generation: An Introduction Contact information: Jack Hermance Environmental Geophysics/Hydrology Department of Geological Sciences Brown University
More informationList of Tables... ii. List of Figures... ii. Executive Summary... ES - 1. Section 1: Introduction
Table of Contents List of Tables... ii List of Figures... ii Executive Summary... ES - 1 Section 1: Introduction... 1-1 1.1 Modeling Objective... 1-1 1.2 Work Flow... 1-2 Section 2: Develop Hydrogeological
More information3 May 2016 FILE: Twin Lakes: Water Management Guidance for Phase 1 of TLGR DVP
FILE: 15-048-01 Regional District Okanagan Similkameen 101 Martin Street Penticton, B.C. V2A 5J9 Attn.: Mr. Stephen Juch, AScT, Subdivision Supervisor Via email: sjuch@rdos.bc.ca Re: Twin Lakes: Water
More informationGroundwater Modeling Guidance
Groundwater Modeling Guidance Richard J. Mandle Groundwater Modeling Program Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Draft 1.0 10/16/02 Executive Summary The use of groundwater models is prevalent
More informationAddendum to Groundwater Flow Modeling Conducted for Simulation of Rosemont Copper's Proposed Mine Supply Pumping Sahuarita, Arizona
November 11, 2010 REPORT ADDENDUM Addendum to Groundwater Flow Modeling Conducted for Simulation of Rosemont Copper's Proposed Mine Supply Pumping Sahuarita, Arizona Prepared for: Prepared by: Errol L.
More informationSaul Montoya Heredia M.Sc. Senior Hidrogeologist Numerical Modeler Gidahatari
Profile: Mr. Montoya is a Civil Engineer graduated from the Peruvian Catholic University in Lima with postgraduate studies in Management and Engineering of Water Resources (WAREM Program) from Stuttgart
More informationPredicting seasonal variation and mounding of groundwater in shallow groundwater systems
Predicting seasonal variation and mounding of groundwater in shallow groundwater systems Mr Kelly Norris Senior Engineer, Essential Environmental, Perth, Australia E-mail: kelly@essentialenvironmental.com.au
More informationGAM RUN : IRION COUNTY WATER
GAM RUN 12-017: IRION COUNTY WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT MANAGEMENT PLAN by William Kohlrenken Texas Water Development Board Groundwater Resources Division Groundwater Availability Modeling Section (512)
More information4. Groundwater Resources
4. Groundwater Resources 4-1 Majority (97 %) of unfrozen fresh water on earth exists as groundwater. In comparison to surface water, - groundwater is available all year around - groundwater is mostly invisible
More informationThe Permissible Yield in Mae Sai multilayered Aquifers System
The Permissible Yield in Mae Sai multilayered Aquifers System Arlai, P. 1, Sitisak Manyu 2, Kriangsak Pirarai 2, Arun Lukjan 1 and Monthon Yongprawat 1 Abstract Chaingrai is an important province in the
More informationFortescue Metals Group Ltd. Peer review and model appraisal. Hydrogeological Assessment for the. Cloudbreak Water Management Scheme
Fortescue Metals Group Ltd Peer review and model appraisal Hydrogeological Assessment for the Cloudbreak Water Management Scheme 14 th October 2010 HydroConcept Pty Ltd ABN: 42 143 302 201 PO Box 4231,
More informationReport on Effects of Groundwater Withdrawal from the Doghouse Meadow, Yosemite National Park
Report on Effects of Groundwater Withdrawal from the Doghouse Meadow, Yosemite National Park William E. Sanford Department of Geosciences Colorado State University 03 March 2006 1 Purpose The purpose of
More informationNumerical Modeling of Groundwater Flow in Karst Aquifer, Makeng Mining Area
American Journal of Environmental Sciences 6 (1): 78-82, 2010 ISSN 1553-345X 2010 Science Publications Numerical Modeling of Groundwater Flow in Karst Aquifer, Makeng Mining Area 1,2 F.M. Rani and 1 Z.H.
More informationSubject: Groundwater Model Update and Scope for Fiscal Year
1814 Franklin St, Suite 501 Oakland, CA 94612 Mr. Ron Duncan General Manager, Soquel Creek Water District On behalf of Santa Cruz Mid County Groundwater Agency Executive Staff PO Box 1550 Capitola, CA
More informationSimulation of Groundwater Conditions in the Upper San Pedro Basin for the. Evaluation of Alternative Futures. Tomas Charles Goode. Thomas Maddock III
Simulation of Groundwater Conditions in the Upper San Pedro Basin for the Evaluation of Alternative Futures by Tomas Charles Goode and Thomas Maddock III Alternative Futures 1 Alternative Futures Study
More information8. Regional groundwater system
8. Regional groundwater system 8-1 We have learned basic principles governing the flow and storage of groundwater. We will now use these principles to understand groundwater in the regional context. Flow
More informationJuly 31, 2012
www.knightpiesold.com July 31, 212 Mr. Scott Jones Vice President Engineering Taseko Mines Limited 15th Floor, 14 West Georgia Street Vancouver, BC V6E 4H8 File No.:VA11-266/25-A.1 Cont. No.:VA12-743 Dear
More informationMODELLING THE GROUNDWATER FLOW FOR ESTIMATING THE PUMPING COST OF IRRIGATION IN THE AQUIFER OF N. MOUDANIA, GREECE
Proceedings of the 13 th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology Athens, Greece, 5-7 September 2013 MODELLING THE GROUNDWATER FLOW FOR ESTIMATING THE PUMPING COST OF IRRIGATION
More informationCoupling of MODFLOW and WATFLOOD in hydrological modelling of a small watershed
294 Weather Radar Information and Distributed Hydrological Modelling (Proceedings of symposium HS03 held during IUGG2003 at Sapporo, July 2003). IAHS Publ. no. 282. 2003. Coupling of MODFLOW and WATFLOOD
More informationComparative analysis of SWAT model with Coupled SWAT-MODFLOW model for Gibbs Farm Watershed in Georgia
2018 SWAT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, JAN 10-12, CHENNAI 1 Comparative analysis of SWAT model with Coupled SWAT-MODFLOW model for Gibbs Farm Watershed in Georgia Presented By K.Sangeetha B.Narasimhan D.D.Bosch
More informationFigure 5.7 Histogram of calibrated residuals of the difference in calculated versus observed heads in the White Limestone aquifer of the Rio Cobre
Figure 5.7 Histogram of calibrated residuals of the difference in calculated versus observed heads in the White Limestone aquifer of the Rio Cobre and Rio Minho-Milk river basins. 141 142 EXPLANATION RIO
More informationAdaptive Management Plan. Highland Quarry. Prepared for: M.A.Q. Aggregates Inc. Prepared by: Azimuth Environmental Consulting, Inc.
Adaptive Management Plan Highland Quarry Prepared for: M.A.Q. Aggregates Inc. Prepared by: Azimuth Environmental Consulting, Inc. December 2009 AEC 04-015g December 2, 2009 AEC 04-015g Ontario Ministry
More informationTask 4.2 Technical Memorandum on Pumping Impacts on Squaw Creek
Task 4.2 Technical Memorandum on Pumping Impacts on Squaw Creek Aquifer Test 1 Aquifer Test 2 Prepared for: Squaw Valley Public Service District April 2013 Prepared by: This page left intentionally blank
More informationCOPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. Contents PART ONE: THEORY...1. Preface to the Third Edition xiii. About the Authors xv. Acknowledgements xvii
Preface to the Third Edition xiii About the Authors xv Acknowledgements xvii Contents PART ONE: THEORY...1 1. Groundwater in Construction...3 1.1 Groundwater in the Hydrologic Cycle 3 1.2 Origins of Dewatering
More informationGroundwater Recharge from Wala Dam Reservoir in Jordan
Groundwater Recharge from Wala Dam Reservoir in Jordan Abbas Z. Ijam Hamed Raja Alnaimat Civil and Environmental Engineering Department Faculty of Engineering, Mutah University, Mutah, Jordan e-mail: abbasa@mutah.edu.jo
More informationBrannen Lake Storage Feasibility Potential Effects on Water Levels
Brannen Lake Storage Feasibility Potential Effects on Water Levels Brannen Lake Storage Feasibility Potential Effects on Water Levels Prepared for: BC Conservation Foundation #3, 1200 Princess Royal Avenue
More information