APPENDIX E PROJECT EVALUATION SUMMARY TABLE

Transcription

1 APPENDIX E PROJECT EVALUATION SUMMARY TABLE

2 This page left blank intentionally.

3 Table of Contents E.1 INTRODUCTION... E-1 E.2 SURFACE WATER STORAGE SWRP COMPONENT EVALUATION SUMMARY... E-7 E.3 WATERSHED MANAGEMENT SWRP COMPONENT EVALUATION SUMMARY... E-9 E.4 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SWRP COMPONENT EVALUATION SUMMARY... E-19 E.4.1 Structural... E-19 E.4.2 Non-Structural... E-33 LIST OF TABLES Table E.1 Example of Evaluation Summary Table... E-1 Table E.2 Example of Evaluation Summary Table - Sum of Criteria per Benefit Category... E-3 Table E.3 Overall Benefit Category Scores... E-4 Table E.4 Example of Evaluation Summary Table Overall Benefit Category Score.. E-5 Table E.5 Benefit Category Weights... E-5 Table E.6 Example of Evaluation Summary Table Weighted Score... E-6 i

4 This page left blank intentionally. ii

5 E.1 INTRODUCTION This appendix shows the summary of the project evaluation outcomes discussed in Appendix D. Table E.1 shows an example of a Evaluation Summary table. Table E.1 Example of Evaluation Summary Table Information Result Overall Benefit Category Score Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity ID Name Type Grouping Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity Weighted Score Increased filtration and/or treatment of runoff Nonpoint source pollution control Reestablished natural water drainage and treatment Water supply reliability Water conservation Conjunctive use Decreased flood risk by reducing runoff rate and/or volume Reduced sanitary sewer overflows and habitat protection and improvement Increased urban green space Reestablishment of the natural hydrograph Improved Air quality* Ecological Improvement* Energy footprint Water temperature improvements Public Education Involvement Justice* Recreational Benefit Employment opportunities provided Funding Mechanism Eligibility for External Funding Constructability Institutional Complexity Regulatory & Permitting Compliance Public Acceptance Right of Way XXX EXAMPLE XXX A, B or C E-1

6 This page left blank intentionally. E-2

7 As discussed in Appendix D, each identified project is grouped by component and given a project ID. types were also assigned. More discussion on the project types and the overall evaluation approach can be found in Section 4 of the West Slope Stormwater Resource Plan (SWRP). Table E.1 shows an example score assigned to each criterion. The criteria scores range from 0 to 3, where 0 is generally not applicable and 3 is highest benefit. Table E.2 shows the sum of criteria scores are for this example project. Table E.2 Example of Evaluation Summary Table - Sum of Criteria per Benefit Category Sum of Criteria per Benefit Category Benefit Category Water Quality Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity In order to compare the benefit category scores for a project, the summed scores were normalized to a 0 to 3 range, where 0 is the lowest score and 3 is the highest score. Normalization allows for comparison between benefit category scores that are measured using different number of criteria. If a project had no benefits in a given benefit category, it received a 0. If only one criteria was applicable in a benefit category and scored a 1, then the normalized score would be 1. If all criteria in a benefit category were applicable and all scored 3, then the normalized score was 3. Table E.3 shows the possible sum of criteria scores per benefit category and the normalized overall benefit category score for each benefit category. For example, in Table E.2 the sum of criteria scores for Water Supply and Flood is 3. Referencing Table E.3, the overall benefit category score is normalized to 1.5 for Water Supply and 1.8 for Flood. Even though the benefit category score for Water Supply and Flood is 3, Water Supply and Flood benefit categories have different number of criteria so the possible sum of criteria scores and the normalization of overall benefit category score will be different. E-3

8 Table E.3 Overall Benefit Category Scores Sum of Criteria Score per Benefit Category Water Quality Water Supply Flood Overall Benefit Category Score Cost Implementation Complexity *Gray cells represent not applicable sum of criteria scores per benefit category E-4

9 Table E.4 shows the sum of criteria scores are calculated in Table E.2 for each benefit category normalized to an overall benefit category score for each benefit category based on Table E.3. After the overall benefit category score is calculated for the project, the weighted score for the project can be calculated using benefit category weights. Table E.4 Example of Evaluation Summary Table Overall Benefit Category Score Overall Benefit Category Score Water Quality Water Supply Flood Benefit Category Cost Implementation Complexity Benefit category weights, shown in Table E.5, were developed using a paired comparison analysis to determine the relative importance of each benefit category used in the West Slope SWRP. Development of benefit category weights is discussed in further detail in Section 4 and Appendix C of the West Slope SWRP. To calculate the project weighted score, the overall benefit category score is multiplied by the respective benefit category weight. Table E.6 shows the calculation of the example project weighted score in Table E.1. After the project weighted score are calculated, projects are organized within each component relative to their weighted score. Table E.5 Benefit Category Weights Benefit Category Water Quality Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity Benefit Category Weight* 15% 23% 11% 14% 10% 18% 9% *Reference: Development of benefit category weights is discussed in further detail in Section 4 and Appendix C of the West Slope SWRP. E-5

10 Table E.6 Example of Evaluation Summary Table Weighted Score Benefit Category Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity Weighted Score Overall Benefit Category Score Benefit Category Weight Weighted Score per Benefit Category n/a 15% 23% 11% 14% 10% 18% 9% n/a s are grouped into A, B or C group based on their weighted score within a given component. s in the A group received one of the top third weighted scores, projects in the B group received one of the middle third weighted scores, and projects in the C group received one of the bottom third weighted scores within a given component. A group projects typically have the highest potential to provide the greatest multi-benefits, B projects have moderate potential, and C projects have less potential. For a more accurate comparison between projects, the Stormwater component projects were evaluated based on whether they were Structural and Non-Structural projects. Further discussion on the types of projects identified as Structural and Non-Structural under the Stormwater Component may be found in Section 4.1 of the West Slope SWRP. The following sections summarizes the project evaluations per project type under each of the components: Surface Water Storage, Watershed and Stormwater (Structural and Non- Structural). E-6

11 E.2 SURFACE WATER STORAGE SWRP COMPONENT EVALUATION SUMMARY Surface Water Storage SWRP Component Information Result Overall Benefit Category Score Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity ID 100 Name Alder Reservoir 104 Silver Lake Dam Remediation Proponent El Dorado County Water Agency El Dorado Irrigation District Grouping Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity Weighted Score Increased filtration and/or treatment of runoff Nonpoint source pollution control Reestablished natural water drainage and treatment Water supply reliability Water conservation Conjunctive use Decreased flood risk by reducing runoff rate and/or volume Reduced sanitary sewer overflows Reservoir Creation and habitat protection and improvement A Reservoir Upgrade C Increased urban green space Reestablishment of the natural hydrograph Improved Air quality* Ecological Improvement* Energy footprint Water temperature improvements Public Education Involvement Justice* Recreational Benefit Employment opportunities provided Funding Mechanism Eligibility for External Funding Constructability Institutional Complexity Regulatory & Permitting Compliance Public Acceptance Right of Way E-7

12 This page left blank intentionally. E-8

13 E.3 WATERSHED MANAGEMENT SWRP COMPONENT EVALUATION SUMMARY Watershed SWRP Component Information Result Overall Benefit Category Score Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity ID Name 209 King Fire Watershed Restoration & Reforestation 210 Sand Fire Watershed Restoration & Reforestation 200 Biomass Plant- Union Mine 221 Camino Biomass Facility Proponent El Dorado County & Georgetown Divide Resource Conservation El Dorado County & Georgetown Divide Resource Conservation El Dorado County Water Agency El Dorado 213 Anaerobic El Digestion System Dorado at Union Mine WWTP 214 In-Vessel Composting System at Union Mine Landfill or MRF El Dorado 215 Compost Facility within El Dorado County Grouping Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity Weighted Score Increased filtration and/or treatment of runoff Nonpoint source pollution control Reestablished natural water drainage and treatment Water supply reliability Water conservation Conjunctive use Decreased flood risk by reducing runoff rate and/or volume Fire Restoration Reduced sanitary sewer overflows and habitat protection and improvement B B Renewable Energy A A B C El Dorado C Increased urban green space Reestablishment of the natural hydrograph Improved Air quality* Ecological Improvement* Energy footprint Water temperature improvements Public Education Involvement Justice* Recreational Benefit Employment opportunities provided Funding Mechanism Eligibility for External Funding Constructability Institutional Complexity Regulatory & Permitting Compliance Public Acceptance Right of Way E-9

14 This page left blank intentionally. E-10

15 Watershed SWRP Component Information Result Overall Benefit Category Score Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity ID Name 220 Caples Watershed Improvement Proponent Grouping Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity Weighted Score Increased filtration and/or treatment of runoff Nonpoint source pollution control Reestablished natural water drainage and treatment Water supply reliability Water conservation Conjunctive use Decreased flood risk by reducing runoff rate and/or volume Forest Reduced sanitary sewer overflows U.S. Forest Service A and habitat protection and improvement Increased urban green space Reestablishment of the natural hydrograph Improved Air quality* Ecological Improvement* Energy footprint Water temperature improvements Public Education Involvement Justice* Recreational Benefit Employment opportunities provided Funding Mechanism Eligibility for External Funding Constructability Institutional Complexity Regulatory & Permitting Compliance Public Acceptance Right of Way 219 Fire Adaptive along Highway 50-Fuels Reduction U.S. Forest Service A Pompeii Fire Salvage Stewardship 232 Quidazoic Fire Salvage Stewardship 234 King Fire Pile Burning 229 Cesar Fire Salvage Stewardship U.S. Forest Service A U.S. Forest Service A U.S. Forest Service A U.S. Forest Service A John Don t Fuels Reduction U.S. Forest Service 226 Western U.S. Forest Georgetown Fuel Service Reduction Integrated Resource Timber Contract-Timber Sale A B Georgetown U.S. Forest Divide Fuelbreak Service B Jenkinson Lake Fuels Reduction U.S. Forest Service 235 Tobacco Gulch Integrated U.S. Forest Service Resource Timber Contract-Timber Sale & Thinning B B E-11

16 This page left blank intentionally. E-12

17 Watershed SWRP Component Information Result Overall Benefit Category Score Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity ID Name Proponent Grouping Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity Weighted Score Increased filtration and/or treatment of runoff Nonpoint source pollution control Reestablished natural water drainage and treatment Water supply reliability Water conservation Conjunctive use Decreased flood risk by reducing runoff rate and/or volume Reduced sanitary sewer overflows Forest (contd.) and habitat protection and improvement Increased urban green space Reestablishment of the natural hydrograph Improved Air quality* Ecological Improvement* Energy footprint Water temperature improvements Public Education Involvement Justice* Recreational Benefit Employment opportunities provided Funding Mechanism Eligibility for External Funding Constructability Institutional Complexity Regulatory & Permitting Compliance Public Acceptance Right of Way Chaix Fire Thinning U.S. Forest Service 223 Two-fer Integrated U.S. Forest Service Resource Timber Contract-Timber Sale B B Fred s Noxious U.S. Forest Weed Treatment-Service Vegetation C Reservoir Thinning Integrated U.S. Forest Service Resource Timber Contract 225 Quintette U.S. Forest Integrated Service Resource Timber Contract Supplemental Information Report-Timber Sale 238 Trestle Integrated U.S. Forest Service Resource Timber Contract-Timber Sale C C C E-13

18 This page left blank intentionally. E-14

19 Information Result Overall Benefit Category Score Water Supply Watershed SWRP Component Flood Cost Implementation Complexity ID Name Proponent 237 O leary Cow Integrated Resource U.S. Forest Service Service Contract/ Integrated Resource Timber Contract-Timber Sale & Thinning 239 Georgetown Insect Salvage Timber Sale 222 General Sherman Integrated U.S. Forest Service Resource Timber Contract-Timber Sale 240 Middle Creek U.S. Forest Integrated Service Resource Timber Contract-Timber Sale & Fuels Reduction Grouping Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity Weighted Score Increased filtration and/or treatment of runoff Nonpoint source pollution control Reestablished natural water drainage and treatment Water supply reliability Water conservation Conjunctive use Decreased flood risk by reducing runoff rate and/or volume Reduced sanitary sewer overflows Forest (contd.) and habitat protection and improvement C U.S. Forest Service C C C Increased urban green space Reestablishment of the natural hydrograph Improved Air quality* Ecological Improvement* Energy footprint Water temperature improvements Public Education Involvement Justice* Recreational Benefit Employment opportunities provided Funding Mechanism Eligibility for External Funding Constructability Institutional Complexity Regulatory & Permitting Compliance Public Acceptance Right of Way E-15

20 This page left blank intentionally. E-16

21 Information Result Overall Benefit Category Score Water Supply Watershed SWRP Component Flood Cost Implementation Complexity ID Name Residual Lime Remediation near El Dorado Trail Slate Creek Monitoring Cosumnes River Monitoring Program Countywide Monitoring 208 Weber Creek Restoration 206 Carson Creek Restoration 207 New York Creek Restoration Proponent El Dorado El Dorado American River Conservancy El Dorado El Dorado El Dorado El Dorado Grouping Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity Weighted Score Increased filtration and/or treatment of runoff Nonpoint source pollution control Reestablished natural water drainage and treatment Water supply reliability Water conservation Conjunctive use Decreased flood risk by reducing runoff rate and/or volume Reduced sanitary sewer overflows and habitat protection and improvement B B C C Creek Restoration A A A Increased urban green space Reestablishment of the natural hydrograph Improved Air quality* Ecological Improvement* Energy footprint Water temperature improvements Public Education Involvement Justice* Recreational Benefit Employment opportunities provided Funding Mechanism Eligibility for External Funding Constructability Institutional Complexity Regulatory & Permitting Compliance Public Acceptance Right of Way E-17

22 This page left blank intentionally. E-18

23 E.4 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SWRP COMPONENT EVALUATION SUMMARY E.4.1 Structural Stormwater SWRP Component Structural Information Result Overall Benefit Category Score Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity ID Name Fairgrounds Improvements Countywide Park BMP Retrofit Improvements Sly Park Portal Subdivision Flood Canal Street LID s Town of El Dorado Green Street Stormwater Detention Basin- Hangtown Creek Flood Damage Reduction South East Connector- Expressway LID s Proponent Planning Area El Commu Dorado nities Grouping Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity Weighted Score Increased filtration and/or treatment of runoff Nonpoint source pollution control Reestablished natural water drainage and treatment Water supply reliability Water conservation Conjunctive use Decreased flood risk by reducing runoff rate and/or volume Water Capture Reduced sanitary sewer overflows and habitat protection and improvement A El Other A Dorado Farm El Trail Dorado East City of Placerville Commu nities El Commu Dorado nities City of Placerville Commu nities El El Dorado Dorado Hills South A A A A B Increased urban green space Reestablishment of the natural hydrograph Improved Air quality* Ecological Improvement* Energy footprint Water temperature improvements Public Education Involvement Justice* Recreational Benefit Employment opportunities provided Funding Mechanism Eligibility for External Funding Constructability Institutional Complexity Regulatory & Permitting Compliance Public Acceptance Right of Way E-19

24 This page left blank intentionally. E-20

25 Stormwater SWRP Component Structural Information Resul t Overall Benefit Category Score Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity ID Name Union Mine Landfill Retention Ponds Diamond Springs Parkway- Roadway and Drainage Improvement Sand Road Paving Urban Roadway Improvement - Western Placerville Interchange Proponent Planning Area El Dorado Farm Trail South El Dorado Farm Trail El Dorado South City of Placerville Grouping Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity Weighted Score Increased filtration and/or treatment of runoff Nonpoint source pollution control Reestablished natural water drainage and treatment Water supply reliability Water conservation Conjunctive use Decreased flood risk by reducing runoff rate and/or volume Water Capture (contd.) Reduced sanitary sewer overflows and habitat protection and improvement B Improvement A B B Mosquito Road City of Sewer Main Other B Placerville Replacement Increased urban green space Reestablishment of the natural hydrograph Improved Air quality* Ecological Improvement* Energy footprint Water temperature improvements Public Education Involvement Justice* Recreational Benefit Employment opportunities provided Funding Mechanism Eligibility for External Funding Constructability Institutional Complexity Regulatory & Permitting Compliance Public Acceptance Right of Way E-21

26 This page left blank intentionally. E-22

27 Stormwater SWRP Component Structural Information Result Overall Benefit Category Score Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity ID Name Proponent Planning Area Grouping Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity Weighted Score Increased filtration and/or treatment of runoff Nonpoint source pollution control Reestablished natural water drainage and treatment Water supply reliability Water conservation Conjunctive use Decreased flood risk by reducing runoff rate and/or volume Reduced sanitary sewer overflows and habitat protection and improvement Increased urban green space Reestablishment of the natural hydrograph Improved Air quality* Ecological Improvement* Energy footprint Water temperature improvements Public Education Involvement Justice* Recreational Benefit Employment opportunities provided Funding Mechanism Eligibility for External Funding Constructability Institutional Complexity Regulatory & Permitting Compliance Public Acceptance Right of Way Improvement (contd.) 305 Urban Roadway Improvement - City of Woodridge Placerville Court, Grind & Overlay C Urban Roadway Improvement City of - Martin Placerville Lane, Grind & Overlay Urban Roadway Improvement - City of Mosquito Road Placerville Stabilization, Grind & Overlay Sewer City of Relocation-Clay Placerville to Locust Placerville Station II-Park and Ride Facility Improvements City of Placerville C C C C E-23

28 This page left blank intentionally. E-24

29 Stormwater SWRP Component Structural Information Result Overall Benefit Category Score Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity ID Name Proponent Planning Area Grouping Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity Weighted Score Increased filtration and/or treatment of runoff Nonpoint source pollution control Reestablished natural water drainage and treatment Water supply reliability Water conservation Conjunctive use Decreased flood risk by reducing runoff rate and/or volume Reduced sanitary sewer overflows and habitat protection and improvement Increased urban green space Reestablishment of the natural hydrograph Improved Air quality* Ecological Improvement* Energy footprint Water temperature improvements Public Education Involvement Justice* Recreational Benefit Employment opportunities provided Funding Mechanism Eligibility for External Funding Constructability Institutional Complexity Regulatory & Permitting Compliance Public Acceptance Right of Way Improvement (contd.) 323 Urban Roadway Improvement -Ray City of Lawyer Drive, Placerville Grind & Overlay C Non-Point Source Pollution Control 309 Headington Yard Wash Rack El Dorado A Future Bass Lake Maintenance Station El Dorado El Dorado Hills South A Maintenance Material El Dorado Storage Buildings at Missouri Flat Rd and Somerset Sand Mine & Farm Trail South B Facility Upgrades for the El Dorado Disposal MRF El Dorado B Street Sweeping Program El Dorado Other B Forni Road Slope Stabilization El Dorado C E-25

30 This page left blank intentionally. E-26

31 Stormwater SWRP Component Structural Information Result Overall Benefit Category Score Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity ID Name Trash Amendments - TMDL Implementation Vactor Truck Program Proponent Planning Area Grouping Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity Weighted Score Increased filtration and/or treatment of runoff Nonpoint source pollution control Reestablished natural water drainage and treatment Water supply reliability Water conservation Conjunctive use Decreased flood risk by reducing runoff rate and/or volume Reduced sanitary sewer overflows and habitat protection and improvement Non-Point Source Pollution Control (contd.) El Other C Dorado El Dorado Other C Increased urban green space Reestablishment of the natural hydrograph Improved Air quality* Ecological Improvement* Energy footprint Water temperature improvements Public Education Involvement Justice* Recreational Benefit Employment opportunities provided Funding Mechanism Eligibility for External Funding Constructability Institutional Complexity Regulatory & Permitting Compliance Public Acceptance Right of Way Flood Damage Reduction 345 Cameron Park Drainage Improvements El Dorado Cameron Park A Fish and Wildlife Routine Maintenance Agreement El Dorado Other A Priority County Culvert Replacements Town of El Dorado Drainage Improvements Upper Main Ditch Stormwater Improvements El Dorado Other A El Dorado El Dorado Farm Trail Irrigation East District A A E-27

32 This page left blank intentionally. E-28

33 Stormwater SWRP Component Structural Information Result Overall Benefit Category Score Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity ID Name Proponent Planning Area Grouping Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity Weighted Score Increased filtration and/or treatment of runoff Nonpoint source pollution control Reestablished natural water drainage and treatment Water supply reliability Water conservation Conjunctive use Decreased flood risk by reducing runoff rate and/or volume Reduced sanitary sewer overflows and habitat protection and improvement Increased urban green space Reestablishment of the natural hydrograph Improved Air quality* Ecological Improvement* Energy footprint Water temperature improvements Public Education Involvement Justice* Recreational Benefit Employment opportunities provided Funding Mechanism Eligibility for External Funding Constructability Institutional Complexity Regulatory & Permitting Compliance Public Acceptance Right of Way Flood Damage Reduction (contd.) 343 Culvert California Rehabilitation Department Farm Trail along Highway of North & 50 near the City Transportati of Placerville on B Headington Yard to Weber Creek Conveyance El Dorado B Culvert Rehabilitation along Highway 50 near Cameron Park and Shingle Springs Cedar Ravine Road Drainage Improvement California Department of Transportati on City of Placerville Airport Road/Broadway City of Culvert Storm Placerville Drain Improvement Debby Lane/Green Valley Road Culvert Improvement City of Placerville Cameron Park & B B B B E-29

34 This page left blank intentionally. E-30

35 Stormwater SWRP Component Structural Information Result Overall Benefit Category Score Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity ID Name 351 Full Capture Storm Drain Inlet Replacements in Placerville Proponent City of Placerville Planning Area Grouping Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity Weighted Score Increased filtration and/or treatment of runoff Nonpoint source pollution control Reestablished natural water drainage and treatment Water supply reliability Water conservation Conjunctive use Decreased flood risk by reducing runoff rate and/or volume Reduced sanitary sewer overflows Flood Damage Reduction (contd.) and habitat protection and improvement C Increased urban green space Reestablishment of the natural hydrograph Improved Air quality* Ecological Improvement* Energy footprint Water temperature improvements Public Education Involvement Justice* Recreational Benefit Employment opportunities provided Funding Mechanism Eligibility for External Funding Constructability Institutional Complexity Regulatory & Permitting Compliance Public Acceptance Right of Way 352 Lions Park Drainage Improvement City of Placerville C Pleasant Street Storm Drain Improvement City of Placerville C Wiltse Road Storm Drain Improvement City of Placerville C Pierroz Road at Hangtown Creek, Drainage Improvement City of Placerville C E-31

36 This page left blank intentionally. E-32

37 E.4.2 Non-Structural Stormwater SWRP Component Non-Structural Information Result Overall Benefit Category Score Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity 320 ID 327* Name BMP Countywide Demonstration s El Dorado Hills Library Water Conservation Splash in the Class - Outreach Program Our Water Our World - Outreach Program Countywide Awareness Campaign Proponent El Dorado Planning Area El Dorado County & Georgetow El Dorado n Divide Hills South Resource Conservati on El Dorado El Dorado El Dorado Grouping Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity Weighted Score Increased filtration and/or treatment of runoff Nonpoint source pollution control Reestablished natural water drainage and treatment Water supply reliability Water conservation Conjunctive use Decreased flood risk by reducing runoff rate and/or volume Outreach Reduced sanitary sewer overflows Other A and habitat protection and improvement A Other A Other B Other B * 327 is classified as two project types: Outreach and Water Capture. Increased urban green space Reestablishment of the natural hydrograph Improved Air quality* Ecological Improvement* Energy footprint Water temperature improvements Public Education Involvement Justice* Recreational Benefit Employment opportunities provided Funding Mechanism Eligibility for External Funding Constructability Institutional Complexity Regulatory & Permitting Compliance Public Acceptance Right of Way E-33

38 This page left blank intentionally. E-34

39 Stormwater SWRP Component Non-Structural Information Result Overall Benefit Category Score Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity ID Name Countywide Stormwater Asset Program West Slope BMP Manual Proponent El Dorado El Dorado BMP for Agricultural Erosion and El Dorado Sediment Control Manual County Water Quality Standards Improvement El Dorado West Slope Watershed and Pollutant El Dorado Generation Study Outingdale Stormwater Study/Pre- Design Planning Area American River Farm Trail Conservan South cy Grouping Water Supply Flood Cost Implementation Complexity Weighted Score Increased filtration and/or treatment of runoff Nonpoint source pollution control Reestablished natural water drainage and treatment Water supply reliability Water conservation Conjunctive use Decreased flood risk by reducing runoff rate and/or volume Programs Reduced sanitary sewer overflows Other A Other C Other C Other C Other C and habitat protection and improvement C Increased urban green space Reestablishment of the natural hydrograph Improved Air quality* Ecological Improvement* Energy footprint Water temperature improvements Public Education Involvement Justice* Recreational Benefit Employment opportunities provided Funding Mechanism Eligibility for External Funding Constructability Institutional Complexity Regulatory & Permitting Compliance Public Acceptance Right of Way E-35

40 This page left blank intentionally. E-36