ICAS (Enterprise Remote Monitoring)

Transcription

1 (Enterprise Remote Monitoring) DoD Maintenance Symposium 13 Nov 2007 Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is unlimited. Michael DiUlio NAVSEA 05Z3 (202)

2 Navy s CBM/RM Challenge Surface Combats Mid Life Amphibious Carriers Mid Life Platforms New acquisition Subs Mine sweeps New acquisition Automation Data Acquisition Functionality No CBM No RM Handheld PDAs (Palm Pilots) Hybrid System (Combination of Handhelds & Automated Readings) Fully Sensorized Automated Readings 13 Nov 07 2

3 OnStar Vehicle Diagnostics Subscribers receive monthly updates on the condition of the vehicle's key operating systems. Condition and time-based maintenance recommendations are included. Approximately every 30 days, the vehicle automatically transmits diagnostic data on the following systems: Emissions Systems Air Induction System Fuel Management System Engine Cooling System Throttle Control System Variable Valve Timing System Ignition System including Misfire Detection Active Fuel Management TM /Displacement on Demand Engine Electrical System Transmission Control System Antilock Braking System Traction Control System and StabiliTrak (where applicable) Supplemental Restraint System including Airbag Deployment Mechanisms and related sensors OnStar System Integrated Condition Assessment System Commercial Industry using Remote Diagnostics 13 Nov

4 CBM implementation tool Machinery Data Trending Rules based expert system Vibration Analysis Troubleshooting Aid Rules based expert system Event capture Operational Assessment Material Assessment Plant Situational Awareness Assessment Visit Support (Availability Planning) A tool to enable reduced manning ILS Access and linkage to PMS, EOSS and IETMs Electronic Logsheets Integrated Condition Assessment System Capabilities - Afloat Data Logging / Situational Awareness Continuous Analysis Expert Expert System: System: performs performs a a continuous continuous analysis analysis of of machinery machinery data. data. automatically automatically generates generates maintenance 13 Nov 07 maintenance advisory advisory 4

5 Remote Monitoring - Ashore Distance Support Data Seamless Offloaded Brings ISEA Knowledge Base to Maintenance Team Cell MELS IPARs Formats & Presents Reports Collects & Process Data ed RMC Evaluate IPAR Information " has has the the information that that Distance Support needs. VADM Sullivan, NAVSEA Nov 07 5

6 Integrated Performance Analysis Report Electronics & Database MELS RMU Ship/System Level Subject Matter Experts RMC ISEA Final Product IPAR "The right maintenance, at the right time, at the right cost." 13 Nov 07 6

7 MELS RMU RMC ISEA IPAR Ship 1 Integrated Condition Assessment System Enterprise Performance Analysis Report Fleet wide view of a system MELS RMU RMC ISEA IPAR Ship 2 MELS RMU RMC ISEA IPAR Ship n 13 Nov 07 7

8 DDG 51 Class Destroyer AUTOMATED SHIP OFFLOAD (DS + RMU) SHIPS Configured for DS HULL NIAPS Version 15-Jul Jul Jul Jun Jun Jun Jun May Nov 07 DDG 51 Class Destroyer DDG51 Class 1x

9 SWE Remote Monitoring IPAR Summary Sep 06 Aug System IPARs complete MPDE, GTM, GTG, AC, HPAC, LPAC, EVAP, RO, Refer, etc 2871 Ship data submittals High Month: Aug 07: Separate Ships 91% Surf Ships High Month: Jun 07: IPARs were released High Month: Aug 07 : 101 Business Rules Currently optimizing process via SWE Process Metrics presented to SWE BOD CT in Days Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 SWE Bridge Plot Jun-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Sep-06 Oct-06 Apr-06 May-06 Data Processing Time SME Review Time Baseline FPY RM - IPAR Report CT Mar-07 Apr-07 May-07 Jun-07 Jul-07 Aug-07 Nov-06 Dec-06 Jan-07 Feb-07 Draft Report Time Entitlement CT Total # of Reports # of Monthly Reports Remote Monitoring is an Integral Part of the Surface Warfare Enterprise 13 Nov 07 9

10 CNSF GTG Metric Study Integrated Condition Assessment System Ave Cost $k vs Non- GTG Repair Costs Non- $154.5k $90k FY 108 Non- Average Costs Non- Two-Year 1B4B Cost Averages Average Per-Ship Cost = $90k per year Non- Average Per-Ship Cost = $154.5k per year Maintenance Savings Can Be Realized Using The System 13 Nov 07 10

11 COMMONALITY Integrated Condition Assessment System The Integrated Condition Assessment System () is the poster child for Fleet Commonality Surface Combatants (60/100) Amphib & Minesweeps (24/34) Carriers (6/11) The same software is utilized on all installations Enterprise class based system training Shared logistics costs Shared system support costs Shared implementation costs 13 Nov 07 11

12 A Cross Platform, Common Solution Legacy Fleet Log Sheets Trends Events. Various Sources of Requirements DDG Mod Client Sever Thin Client SEA 08 Relational Database 10,000 Sensors DDG 1000 TSCEI Diagnostics LCS Data Qualification Remote Monitoring Enterprise Remote Monitoring (erm) Commonality Reduced Life Cycle Costs Shared/Reduced Development Costs Reduced Installation Costs Reduced In Service Costs 13 Nov 07 12

13 Enterprise Remote Monitoring The Path to the Vision MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE FACILITIES FACILITIES Fully Autonomous Enterprise Remote Monitoring IPAR Virtual Subject Matter Expert Shipboard Generated IPAR s (w/ rec s) 2 Hour IPAR Turn Around IPAR Case Based Reasoning Tiered Remote Monitoring Team (Upside Down Pyramid of Support) IPARs Delivered to Ship via Web Service Electronic Data Submittals Integrated Performance Analysis Reports (IPARs) PMS Identified & Scheduled Remotely IPAR Standard Statements Remote Monitored 2 Kilos Generated Shore Side uploaded Shipboard Remote Real-Time Tech Assist Machinery Control System LAN Secure Interface High Security Firewall Multi Level Network Card Shipboard Generated IPAR s (w/o SME rec s) Interface with ISNS LAN Dedicated erm Response Center Status Further Planning Required Planned & Estimated Shipboard Automated Diagnostics Shipboard Data Storage Manual Data Submittals Shipboard data qualification (trends, events, transient analysis, alarms) Under Development Development Complete, Deployment Underway Shipboard Monitoring & Alarming 13 Nov 07 13

14 Navy s CBM/RM Challenge Surface Combats Mid Life Amphibious Carriers Mid Life Platforms New acquisition Subs Mine sweeps New acquisition Automation Data Acquisition Functionality No CBM No RM Handheld PDAs (Palm Pilots) Hybrid System (Combination of Handhelds & Automated Readings) Fully Sensorized Automated Readings 13 Nov 07 14

15 Backup Slides Integrated Condition Assessment System

16 Reverse Distance Support Timeline Integrated Condition Assessment System DDG 66 GTG High Startup Vibrations MARMC Change out request First data offload received First RDS Event for Ship Install MILS 10.0 DDG80 GTG3 and DDG66 GTG1 VIBS vs RPM DDG66 TG1 VIBS 9.5 DDG80 TG3 VIBS THIS IS A COMPARISON BETWEEN DDG GTG1 VIBS WITH DDG80 GTG3 VIBS, BOTH VERSUS RPM. DDG80 GTG3 WAS REPLACED 7.5 DUE TO 4TH STAGE TURBINE DAMAGE FROM 7.0 2ND AND 3RD STAGE SHROUD FAILURE. BOTH 6.5 GTG'S EXHIBIT PEAK VIBS IN THE SAME RPM ZONE. COULD THIS INDICATE TURBINE 6.0 DAMAGE ON DDG66 GTG1? RPM Data Verified by SME and compared to failure library Recommendations documented in pdf Ship contacted and begins troubleshooting (waterwash, transducer inspection, etc) MARMC SME performed borescope inspection. Damage found on 4 th stage blade + SME SME Performance Performance review review complete complete Feb 5, 2005 March 4, 2005 Time: + 1 day Time: + 3 days Time: + 11 days Time: +11days Problem Description High Startup Vibes on GTG#1 Identified During RDS event 4 March 2005 This is the first data offload and first RDS event for ship Analysis performed High vibes compared to DDG80 GTG high vibe problem that resulted in engine replacement due to 4 th Stage turbine blade damage Vibe signature matched and suspected 4 th stage turbine damage on GTG#1 Action Taken Ship notified (in POM period) and begins troubleshooting MARMC visits ship after water wash and troubleshooting complete MARMC performs borescope inspection during connection of independent vibration gear Results\Benefits Borescope revealed, (as suspected), 4 th stage turbine blade damage MARMC recommended engine replacement based on damage and ship schedule 13 Nov 07 16