DCR Phoenix. Type of Document 1st Submission. Project Name 256 Rideau Street Ottawa, Ontario. Project Number OTT A0. Prepared By: Nicole Ruyf

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "DCR Phoenix. Type of Document 1st Submission. Project Name 256 Rideau Street Ottawa, Ontario. Project Number OTT A0. Prepared By: Nicole Ruyf"

Transcription

1 DCR Phoenix Noise Impact Assessment Study Type of Document 1st Submission Project Name 256 Rideau Street Ottawa, Ontario Project Number OTT A0 Prepared By: Nicole Ruyf Reviewed By: Alam Ansari, M.Sc., P.Eng. exp Services Inc Queensview Drive Ottawa, ON K2B 8H6 Canada Date Submitted

2

3 exp Services Inc. DCR Phoenix 256 Rideau Street OTT A0 April 12, 2013 Legal Notification This report was prepared by exp Services Inc. for the account of DCR Phoenix. Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. Exp Services Inc. accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this project EX-ii

4 exp Services Inc. DCR Phoenix 256 Rideau Street OTT A0 April 12, 2013 Table of Contents Page 1 Background Sound Level Criteria Vehicular Traffic Noise Aircraft/Airport Noise Stationary Noise Traffic Information Noise Prediction Procedure Summary of Results Mitigation Measures Conclusions and Recommendations... 9 List of Appendices Appendix A Figures Appendix B Stamson v 5.03 Output Files Appendix C Architectural Plans i

5 exp Services Inc. DCR Phoenix 256 Rideau Street OTT A0 April 12, 2013 List of Tables Page Table 2-1: MOE and City of Ottawa Indoor and Outdoor Criteria For Noise From Traffic Table 2-2: Road Noise, Daytime ( ) - Outdoor, Ventilation, and Warning Clause Requirements... 3 Table 2-3: Road Noise, Night time ( ) - Outdoor, Ventilation and Warning Clause Requirements... 4 Table 2-4: Road Noise, Daytime ( ) - Building Component Requirements... 4 Table 2-5: Road Noise, Nighttime ( ) - Building Component Requirements... 4 Table 2-6: MOE Warning Clauses... 5 Table 3-1: Traffic and Road Parameters (AADT Traffic Volumes)... 7 Table 5-1: Summary of Results... 8 Table 6-1: Summary of Abatement Requirements... 8 ii

6 exp Services Inc. DCR Phoenix 256 Rideau Street OTT A0 April 12, Background It is proposed to construct a 183 unit, 27 storey apartment building at 256 Rideau Street in the City of Ottawa. The site is located between a 4-lane urban arterial roadway, specifically Rideau Street, and Besserer Street. However, Besserer Street is not considered a noise source by the City of Ottawa Official Plan - Schedule F. The site is also located within 100m of a 2-lane urban arterial road, Cumberland Street. As a result of this development s proximity to these noise sources, a Noise Assessment Study is required. The exact location of the site can be found in the attached Figure 1. The goal of this report is to address anticipated noise levels from road traffic and to make necessary recommendations for any noise levels exceeding acceptable guidelines as set out by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) and the City of Ottawa s Noise Control Guidelines. The specific requirements as identified in the City of Ottawa's Environmental Noise Control Guidelines are as follows: Where a new development is proposed within 100m from the right-of-way of an existing or proposed road arterial, major collector or bus Transitway, 250m of an existing of proposed highway, light rail transit corridor or a secondary main railway line, or 500m from the right-of-way of a freeway or 400-series provincial highway or a Principal Main railway line, the City will require a noise study to be prepared. 2 Sound Level Criteria The Ministry of the Environment (MOE) requirements and the City of Ottawa Noise Control Guidelines place limitations on indoor and outdoor sound levels from road traffic are summarized in Table 23-1 below. Table 2-1: MOE and City of Ottawa Indoor and Outdoor Criteria For Noise From Traffic. Location, Space & Time Period Equivalent Level Leq (dba) Indoors Sleeping quarters of residences, hospitals, schools, nursing / retirement homes, daycare centers, etc (Nightime 23:00 to 07:00) Sleeping quarters of hotels/motels (Nightime 23:00 to 07:00) 45 Living / Dining areas of residences, hospitals schools, nursing/retirement homes, daycare centers, theatre, places of worship, libraries, individual or semi-private offices, conference rooms, reading rooms. (Daytime 07:00 to 23:00) General offices, reception areas, retail stores, etc. (Daytime 07:00 to 23:00) Outdoors Outdoor Living Areas (Daytime 07:00 to 23:00) The basic physical measurement of noise used in this report is the A-weighted sound level measured in dba, which is an overall measurement of sound over a full range of frequencies. Because noise from roadway traffic fluctuates over the audible range of hearing, it is convenient to describe noise in terms of an equivalent 24-hour sound level (denoted as Leq). MOE Guidelines require that traffic noise be evaluated in relation to specific locations during certain time periods. In general, noise levels are predicted for outdoor living areas (generally the backyard of a residential home) during the day and for 1

7 exp Services Inc. DCR Phoenix 256 Rideau Street OTT A0 April 12, 2013 indoor areas (bedroom windows on each floor) during the night time. Summaries of these requirements are shown in Tables 2-2 to 2-5. However, for this particular 27 storey apartment building, no outdoor living areas have been provided. The balconies are too small to be classified as outdoor living areas. A review of the internal uses of the building was completed in order to determine the noise control requirements. Architectural floor plans and elevations of the building are provided in Appendix C. Generally, the first through third floors are comprised of commercial space, and the fourth through twentysixth are comprised of residential areas. The north face of the building include windows that face Rideau Street. Noise levels were therefore assessed on the north face of the building. Predicted noise levels were determined at the centre of the windows on the first, sixth, thirteenth, nineteenth and twenty-seventh floors. Refer to Figures 2 and 3 for noise source and receiver locations. Noise receiver locations are labeled by the face of the building on which they are located, along with a number indicating on which floor noise was analysed (i.e. N6 indicates a receiver located on the north receiver position of the building, with noise level analysed on the sixth floor). 2

8 exp Services Inc. DCR Phoenix 256 Rideau Street OTT A0 April 12, 2013 Table 2-2: Road Noise, Daytime ( ) - Outdoor, Ventilation, and Warning Clause Requirements ASSESSMENT LOCATION L eq (16 hr) (dba) VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS OUTDOOR CONTROL MEASURES WARNING CLAUSE Leq 16 hr Less than or equal to 55 dba N/A None required Not required Outdoor Living Area (OLA) Leq 16 hr Greater than 55 dba to less than or equal to 60 dba Leq 16 hr Greater than 60 dba N/A N/A Control measures (barriers) not required but should be considered Control measures (barriers) required to reduce the L eq to below 60 dba and as close to 55 dba as technically, economically and administratively feasible Required if resultant Leq exceeds 55 dba, Type A Required if resultant L eq exceeds 55 dba, Type B Leq 16 hr Less than or equal to 55 dba None required N/A Not required Plane of Living Room Window Leq 16 hr Greater than 55 dba to less than or equal to 65 dba Forced air heating with provision for central air conditioning N/A Required Type C Leq 16 hr Greater than 65 dba Central air conditioning N/A Required Type D 3

9 exp Services Inc. DCR Phoenix 256 Rideau Street OTT A0 April 12, 2013 Table 2-3: Road Noise, Night time ( ) - Outdoor, Ventilation and Warning Clause Requirements ASSESSMENT LOCATION L eq (8 hr) (dba) VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS WARNING CLAUSE Plane of Bedroom Window Leq 8 hr Greater than 50 dba to less or equal to 60 dba Forced air heating with provision for central air conditioning Required Type C Leq 8 hr Greater than 60 dba Central air conditioning Required Type D Table 2-4: Road Noise, Daytime ( ) - Building Component Requirements ASSESSMENT LOCATION NOISE SOURCE SOUND LEVEL (TIME AS NOTED) WARNING CLAUSE Plane of Living Room Window Road Leq 16 hr Less than or equal to 65 dba Leq 16 hr Greater than 65 dba Building compliant with the Ontario Building Code Building components (walls, windows, etc.) must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria Table 2-5: Road Noise, Nighttime ( ) - Building Component Requirements ASSESSMENT LOCATION NOISE SOURCE SOUND LEVEL (TIME AS NOTED) WARNING CLAUSE Plane of Bedroom Window Road Leq 8 hr Less than or equal to 60 dba Leq 8 hr Greater than 60 dba Building compliant with Ontario Building Code Building components (walls, windows, etc.) must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria The warning clauses referred to above are contained in Table 2-5. Ministry of Environment Warning clauses and City of Ottawa specific warning clauses (described in italics) are shown. Where applicable, these clauses are to be inserted on all Offers/Agreements of Purchase and Sale or Leases to notify potential occupants of some environmental concern. 4

10 exp Services Inc. DCR Phoenix 256 Rideau Street OTT A0 April 12, 2013 Table 2-6: MOE Warning Clauses Warning Clause Type A Purchasers/Tenants are advised that sound levels due to increasing road traffic may occasionally interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the Municipality s and the Ministry of Environment s noise criteria. Purchasers/Tenants are advised that sound levels due to increasing (road) (Transitway) (rail) (air) traffic may occasionally interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the City s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. Type B Type C Type D Type E Purchasers/Tenants are advised that despite the inclusion of noise control features in the development and within the building units, sound levels due to increasing road traffic may on occasions interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the Municipality s and the Ministry of Environment s noise criteria. Purchasers/Tenants are advised that despite the inclusion of noise control features in the development and within the building units, sound levels due to increasing (road) (Transitway) (rail) (air) traffic may on occasions interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the City s and the Ministry of Environment s noise criteria. This dwelling unit has been fitted with a forced air heating system and the ducting etc. was sized to accommodate central air-conditioning. Installation of central air-conditioning by the occupant will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the Municipality s and the Ministry of Environment s noise criteria. (Note: The location and installation of the outdoor air-conditioning device should be done as to comply with the noise criteria of MOE Publication NPC-216, Residential Air Conditioning Devices and thus minimize the noise impacts on and in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. This dwelling unit has been fitted with a forced air heating system and the ducting etc. was sized to accommodate central air-conditioning. Installation of central air-conditioning by the occupant will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the City s and the Ministry of Environment s noise criteria. (Note: The location and installation of the outdoor air-conditioning device should be done as to comply with the noise criteria of MOE Publication NPC-216, Residential Air Conditioning Devices and thus minimize the noise impacts on and in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. This dwelling unit has been supplied with a central air-conditioning system which will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the Municipality s and the Ministry of Environment s noise criteria. This dwelling unit has been supplied with a central air-conditioning system which will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the City s and the Ministry of Environment s noise criteria. Purchaser/tenants are advised that due to the proximity of the adjacent industry (facility) (utility), sound levels from the industry (facility) (utility) may at times be audible 5

11 exp Services Inc. DCR Phoenix 256 Rideau Street OTT A0 April 12, Vehicular Traffic Noise Noise emanating from roadway traffic was analyzed at the north face of the proposed apartment building. Refer to Figures 2 and 3 in Appendix A for noise source and receiver locations. In general, noise levels are predicted for outdoor living areas and indoor living areas during the day and for bedrooms during the night. This building does not include any designated outdoor living areas (OLA), so this element was removed from consideration. 2.2 Aircraft/Airport Noise This site is located outside of the Noise Exposure Forecast and Noise Exposure Projection zones of the Ottawa Airport as per the Revised Airport Noise Contours 2013 NEF and 2023 NEP. Therefore, noise from air traffic does not impact this site and will not be examined in this report. 2.3 Stationary Noise A review of the surrounding building uses and the zoning of adjacent properties was completed in order to determine if there was a potential impact or influence from stationary noise sources. Though typical residential and commercial HVAC units exist within proximity of the proposed building, these existing buildings are zoned as residential and commercial and therefore not classified as stationary noise sources. 3 Traffic Information Traffic information used for this study was obtained from the review of existing roadway conditions and reference to the City of Ottawa s Noise Control Guidelines. In proximity to the site, a total of one roadway and one railway are within the required distance for noise impact evaluation, as described in Section 1. Noise sources are as follows: Rideau Street (within 100m) Cumberland Street (within 100m) Road traffic parameters used in this analysis are summarized in Table 3-1 below. Noise levels were calculated based on the noise emanating from these segments. 6

12 exp Services Inc. DCR Phoenix 256 Rideau Street OTT A0 April 12, 2013 Table 3-1: Traffic and Road Parameters (AADT Traffic Volumes) Traffic Parameters Rideau Street Cumberland Street R.O.W. WIDTH (m) Varies Varies Roadway Classification 4-Lane Urban Arterial Undivided 2-Lane Urban Arterial A.A.D.T. (veh/day) 30,000 15,000 POSTED SPEED LIMIT (km/hr) 50 km/hr 50 km/hr Day/night split (%) 92 / 8 92 / 8 Medium trucks (%) 7 7 Heavy trucks (%) Noise Prediction Procedure All noise levels have been predicted using MOE s software and methodology. STAMSON Version 5.03 (1999), which is based on the Ontario Road Noise Analysis Method for Environment and Transportation ( ORNAMENT ) Model, was used for all calculations in this report. The output files are attached in Appendix B for reference. In addition to the traffic data (Table 3-1) that was used in the analysis, the following information was applied to the STAMSON model Intermediate surfaces between the source and receiver locations were assessed as a reflective ground surface. Topography was assessed as a flat/gentle slope. Road pavement and road gradient were assessed as typical asphalt or concrete and flat grade. 7

13 exp Services Inc. DCR Phoenix 256 Rideau Street OTT A0 April 12, Summary of Results The predicted noise levels for the east, south and north face of the proposed building are summarized below in Table 5-1. Detailed results and output from Stamson v 5.03 are contained in Appendix B. Table 5-1: Summary of Results Building Face Receiver Locations Equivalent Noise Level Leq (dba) Day Time (7:00 23:00) Night Time (23:00 7:00) N N North N N N Mitigation Measures Table 6-1: Summary of Abatement Requirements Assessment Location Building Face Receiver Location Outdoor Control measures (OLA) Ventilation Requirements 1 Building Components Requirements North N1 n/a Type D Required N6 n/a Type D Required N13 n/a Type D Required N19 n/a Type D Required N27 n/a Type D Required Note 1 Compliant - Building compliant with Ontario Building Code. Required - Building components must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria. 8

14 exp Services Inc. DCR Phoenix 256 Rideau Street OTT A0 April 12, 2013 Table 6-1 summarizes the noise abatement requirements for the units that have building components facing north. Based on the results summarized above, all north facing units require Central Air Conditioning (Warning Type D). The building components (walls, windows, etc.) for these units must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria as follows: North façade components: Reduce predicted outdoor sound levels of dba to 45 dba for living/dining areas and 50 dba for commercial areas. 7 Conclusions and Recommendations It is recommended that this development be approved with respect to Noise Assessment based on the following: Notices on Title: 1. It is recommended that the following Notices on Title for all the units facing Rideau Street on the north should be included in all Agreements of Purchase and Sale in accordance with the terms specified by the Development Agreement. a. This dwelling unit has been supplied with a central air-conditioning system which will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the City s and the Ministry of Environment s noise criteria. b. The Transferee covenants with the Transfer or that the above clause, verbatim, shall be included in all subsequent agreements of Purchase and sale and deeds conveying the lands described herein, which covenant shall run with the said lands and is for the benefit of subsequent owners of the said lands and the owner of the adjacent road. In addition, the building components should be reviewed by a qualified acoustical engineer to determine the sound insulation requirements for building components (walls, windows, doors). 9

15 exp Services Inc. DCR Phoenix 256 Rideau Street OTT A0 April 12, 2013 Appendix A Figures

16 SITE LOCATION 256 RIDEAU STREET exp Services Inc. t: f: Queensview Drive, Unit 100 Ottawa, ON K2B 8H6 Canada BUILDINGS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT ENERGY INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE SUSTAINABILITY DCR PHOENIX 18A Bentley Avenue, Ottawa, ON K2E 6T8 SITE LOCATION

17 RIDEAU STREET AADT: 30,000 Vehicles/day m 60.9m AADT: 15,000 Vehicles/day CUMBERLAND STREET PROPOSED 27 STOREY TOWER 256 RIDEAU PROPOSED 27 STOREY TOWER KING EDWARD AVENUR BESSERER STREET exp Services Inc. t: f: Queensview Drive, Unit 100 Ottawa, ON K2B 8H6 Canada BUILDINGS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT ENERGY INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE SUSTAINABILITY DCR PHOENIX 18A Bentley Avenue, Ottawa, ON K2E 6T8 NOISE SOURCE - RECEIVER LOCATIONS PLAN VIEW

18 N27: +78.1m N19: +57.8m 256 RIDEAU CLARIDGE PLAZA 3 N13: +40.5m N6: +20.1m N1: +1.7m exp Services Inc. t: f: Queensview Drive, Unit 100 Ottawa, ON K2B 8H6 Canada BUILDINGS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT ENERGY INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE SUSTAINABILITY DCR PHOENIX 18A Bentley Avenue, Ottawa, ON K2E 6T8 NOISE SOURCE - RECEIVER LOCATIONS ELEVATION VIEW

19 exp Services Inc. DCR Phoenix 256 Rideau Street OTT A0 April 12, 2013 Appendix B Stamson v 5.03 Output Files

20 N1 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :05:30 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: n1.te Description: n1 Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Rideau (day/night) Car traffic volume : 24288/2112 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1932/168 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1380/120 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Rideau (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.70 / 1.70 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Road data, segment # 2: Cumberland (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: Cumberland (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 0.00 deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.70 / 1.70 m Page 1

21 N1 Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: Rideau (day) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: Cumberland (day) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Results segment # 1: Rideau (night) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: Cumberland (night) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Page 2

22 N1 TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): Page 3

23 N6 STAMSON 5.0 COMPREHENSIVE REPORT Date: :14:22 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: n6.te Description: n6 Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Rideau (day/night) Car traffic volume : 24288/2112 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1932/168 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1380/120 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Rideau (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : / m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Road data, segment # 2: Cumberland (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: Cumberland (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 0.00 deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : / m Page 1

24 N6 Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Segment # 1: Rideau (day) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Segment # 2: Cumberland (day) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Segment # 1: Rideau (night) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Segment # 2: Cumberland (night) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Page 2

25 N6 TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): Page 3

26 N13 STAMSON 5.0 COMPREHENSIVE REPORT Date: :15:40 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: n13.te Description: n13 Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Rideau (day/night) Car traffic volume : 24288/2112 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1932/168 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1380/120 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Rideau (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : / m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Road data, segment # 2: Cumberland (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: Cumberland (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 0.00 deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : / m Page 1

27 N13 Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Segment # 1: Rideau (day) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Segment # 2: Cumberland (day) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Segment # 1: Rideau (night) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Segment # 2: Cumberland (night) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Page 2

28 N13 TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): Page 3

29 N19 STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: :17:44 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: n19.te Description: n19 Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Rideau (day/night) Car traffic volume : 24288/2112 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1932/168 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1380/120 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Rideau (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : / m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Road data, segment # 2: Cumberland (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: Cumberland (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 0.00 deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : / m Page 1

30 N19 Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Result summary (day) ! source! Road! Total! height! Leq! Leq! (m)! (dba)! (dba) Rideau! 1.50! 70.82! Cumberland! 1.50! 56.37! Total dba Result summary (night) ! source! Road! Total! height! Leq! Leq! (m)! (dba)! (dba) Rideau! 1.50! 63.22! Cumberland! 1.50! 48.78! Total dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): Page 2

31 N27 STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: :19:31 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: n27.te Description: n27 Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Rideau (day/night) Car traffic volume : 24288/2112 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1932/168 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1380/120 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Rideau (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : / m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Road data, segment # 2: Cumberland (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: Cumberland (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 0.00 deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : / m Page 1

32 N27 Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Result summary (day) ! source! Road! Total! height! Leq! Leq! (m)! (dba)! (dba) Rideau! 1.50! 70.82! Cumberland! 1.50! 56.37! Total dba Result summary (night) ! source! Road! Total! height! Leq! Leq! (m)! (dba)! (dba) Rideau! 1.50! 63.22! Cumberland! 1.50! 48.78! Total dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): Page 2

33 exp Services Inc. DCR Phoenix 256 Rideau Street OTT A0 April 12, 2013 Appendix C Architectural Plans

34

35

36

37

38

Noise Assessment Report

Noise Assessment Report Noise Assessment Report 19 & 23 Bachman Terrace Prepared for: Tega Homes Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. March 24, 2014 Draft Mar 7 2014 Final Mar 24, 2014 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Table of Contents

More information

Noise Assessment Report Main Street, Residential Site Cambridge, ON

Noise Assessment Report Main Street, Residential Site Cambridge, ON Noise Assessment Report 825-875 Main Street, Residential Site Cambridge, ON Prepared for: 2536546 Ontario Inc. Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 100-300 Hagey Boulevard Waterloo, ON N2L 0A4 Project:

More information

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Old Barber House 5155 Mississauga Road City of Mississauga, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Old Barber House 5155 Mississauga Road City of Mississauga, Ontario Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Old Barber ouse 5155 Mississauga Road City of Mississauga, Ontario Prepared for: City Park (Old Barber) omes Inc. 950 Nashville Road Kleinburg,

More information

Noise Assessment Report

Noise Assessment Report Noise Assessment Report 176 Greenfield Avenue Prepared for: TC United Group Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. February 8, 2016 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Introduction February 8, 2016 Table of Contents

More information

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Brock Road Pickering, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Brock Road Pickering, Ontario Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Brock Road Pickering, Ontario Prepared for: Madison Brock Limited 369 Rimrock Road Toronto, Ontario M3J 3G2 Prepared by: Jingyi Guo Reviewed by:

More information

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT STONEPAY - PICKERING WEST OF BROCK ROAD AND SOUTH OF DERSAN STREET PART OF LOTS 19 AND 20, CONCESSION 3 PLAN 40R-28764 CITY OF PICKERING PREPARED FOR: STONEPAY 7603860 CANADA

More information

NOISE CONTROL STUDY FOR PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND...

NOISE CONTROL STUDY FOR PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND... NOISE CONTROL STUDY PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 NOISE CONTROL STUDY FOR PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...

More information

Place Vanier Édifice AEFO

Place Vanier Édifice AEFO Place Vanier Édifice AEFO Martineau Architecture Inc. + Smith Carter Architects & Engineers Inc. TRAFFIC NOISE ASSESSMENT 250 Montreal Road Gradient Microclimate Engineering Inc. Prepared by Thomas Couper,

More information

Merivale Road Residential Development 1683 Merivale Road Noise Control Study

Merivale Road Residential Development 1683 Merivale Road Noise Control Study Merivale Road Residential Development 1683 Merivale Road Noise Control Study Prepared By: NOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6 Submitted:

More information

UAL URBAN AERODYNAMICS LTD

UAL URBAN AERODYNAMICS LTD UAL URBAN AERODYNAMICS LTD 23 Waterford Drive Telephone (613) 225-6362 Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Facsimile (613) 225-3022 K2E 7V4 e-mail standen.ual@sympatico.ca website: http://www.urban-noise.ca 1.0 Background

More information

Appendix K. Environmental Noise Assessment

Appendix K. Environmental Noise Assessment Appendix K Environmental Noise Assessment ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT THORNTON ROAD NORTH TAUNTON ROAD WEST TO WINCHESTER ROAD WEST SCEDULE 'C' MUNICIPAL CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF OSHAWA

More information

NOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY. MINTO COMMUNITIES INC. Clarke Lands CITY OF OTTAWA

NOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY. MINTO COMMUNITIES INC. Clarke Lands CITY OF OTTAWA NOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY MINTO COMMUNITIES INC. Clarke Lands CITY OF OTTAWA March 2016 Prepared for: Minto Communities Inc. 200-180 Kent Street Ottawa, Ontario K1P 0B6 Prepared by: J.L. RICHARDS

More information

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD BETWEEN POPLAR AVENUE AND MAPLE AVENUE TOWN OF AJAX PREPARED FOR: TMIG February 2017 Y1610 TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

Traffic Noise Assessment. 333 Montreal Road. Ottawa, Ontario

Traffic Noise Assessment. 333 Montreal Road. Ottawa, Ontario Traffic Noise Assessment 333 Montreal Road Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17-045 - Traffic Noise Prepared For: Michaela Jones The Salvation Army 2 Overlea Blvd Toronto, ON M4H 1P4 Prepared By: Joshua Foster,

More information

NOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6

NOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6 RESIDENTIAL / HOTEL DEVELOPMENT 141 GEORGE STREET / 325 DALHOUSIE STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO Prepared By: NOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6

More information

Environmental Noise Assessment Feasibility Assessment 92 Plains Road East

Environmental Noise Assessment Feasibility Assessment 92 Plains Road East Environmental Noise Assessment Feasibility Assessment 92 Plains Road East Novus Reference No. 16-0006 Version No. 1.1 (Final) February 26, 2016 NOVUS PROJECT TEAM: Specialist: Marcus Li, P.Eng. 16/02/26

More information

Noise Feasibility Study Framgard Apartments (South Block) NW corner of Britannia Road and Regional Road 25 Town of Milton, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Framgard Apartments (South Block) NW corner of Britannia Road and Regional Road 25 Town of Milton, Ontario Noise Feasibility Study Framgard Apartments (South Block) NW corner of Britannia Road and Regional Road 25 Town of Milton, Ontario Prepared for: Mattamy Homes Ltd. 433 Steeles Avenue East, Suite 110 Milton,

More information

SS WILSON ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers

SS WILSON ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers SS WILSON ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers REPORT NO. WA10-089 DETAILED NOISE CONTROL STUDY PROPOSED 6-STOREY APARTMENT BUILDING 17, 19 & 23 ROBINSON AVENUE OTTAWA, ONTARIO SUBMITTED TO: ROBINSON PARK DEVELOPMENT

More information

Noise Feasibility Study 2480 Old Bronte Road, Oakville, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study 2480 Old Bronte Road, Oakville, Ontario Noise Feasibility Study 2480 Old Bronte Road, Oakville, Ontario Prepared for: New Horizon Development Group (Bronte) Inc. 69 John Street South, Suite 400 Hamilton, Ontario L8N 2B9 Prepared by Sheeba Paul,

More information

Road and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario

Road and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario Road and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario Prepared for: Attn: Nancy Shoemaker Black, Shoemaker, Robinson & Donaldson Limited 351 Speedvale Ave. West Guelph,

More information

Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study 1 and 15 Stevenson St & 8 William St Guelph, Ontario

Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study 1 and 15 Stevenson St & 8 William St Guelph, Ontario Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study 1 and 15 Stevenson St & 8 William St Guelph, Ontario Prepared for: Jennark Homes 66 Wellington Road 7, Unit #1 Elora, Ontario N0B 1S0 Prepared by Rajjot Arora, BASc

More information

ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ON THE PROPOSED AVALON CATHOLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ON THE PROPOSED AVALON CATHOLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Ottawa Ontario Canada ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ON THE PROPOSED AVALON CATHOLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CITY OF OTTAWA Prepared for Bryden Martel Architects Inc. Prepared by Hugh Williamson

More information

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed 6-storey Seniors Condominium 7480 Derry Road West Milton, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed 6-storey Seniors Condominium 7480 Derry Road West Milton, Ontario Noise Feasibility Study Proposed 6-srey Seniors Condominium 7480 Derry Road West Miln, Ontario Prepared for: FGL Derry Inc. 5400 Yonge Street, Suite 300 Toron, Ontario M2N 5R5 Prepared by Vicr Garcia,

More information

Road and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario

Road and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario Road and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario For Attn: Nancy Shoemaker Black, Shoemaker, Robinson & Donaldson Limited 351 Speedvale Ave. West Guelph, Ontario N1H

More information

Draft Noise Abatement Guidelines

Draft Noise Abatement Guidelines Document under Separate Cover refer to IMLC01-13 Draft Noise Abatement Guidelines April 2013 Legislative & Planning Services Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction...1 1.1 Key Definitions...1 2.0 Existing

More information

Noise Impact Assessment 1158 Second Line Road Ottawa, Ontario

Noise Impact Assessment 1158 Second Line Road Ottawa, Ontario Noise Impact Assessment 1158 Second Line Road Ottawa, Ontario Type of Document: Site Plan Submission Client: Theberge Homes Project Number: OTT-00245003-A0 Prepared By: M. Ghadban, EIT. Reviewed By: B.

More information

Section O Noise Criteria

Section O Noise Criteria 01 INTRODUCTION Noise is recognized as an environmental impact and a type of pollution that can negatively affect public health and a community s quality of life. It can impact property values, disrupt

More information

Policy for the Assessment and Mitigation of Traffic Noise on County Roads

Policy for the Assessment and Mitigation of Traffic Noise on County Roads Lanark County Policy for the Assessment and Mitigation of Traffic Noise on County Roads d r a f t f o r d i s c u s s i o n Prepared by: AECOM Canada Ltd. 302 1150 Morrison Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada K2H

More information

Environmental Noise Feasibility Assessment Proposed Guelph Woods Development Guelph, ON

Environmental Noise Feasibility Assessment Proposed Guelph Woods Development Guelph, ON Environmental Noise Feasibility Assessment Proposed Guelph Woods Development Guelph, ON Novus Reference No. 12-0292C DRAFT (v2.2) February 7, 2014 NOVUS PROJECT TEAM: Specialist: Marcus Li, B.Sc., B.Eng.Sc.

More information

For The Regional Municipality of Waterloo 150 Frederick Street, 8 th Floor Kitchener, Ontario, N2G 4J3. Prepared by. Sheeba Paul, MEng, PEng

For The Regional Municipality of Waterloo 150 Frederick Street, 8 th Floor Kitchener, Ontario, N2G 4J3. Prepared by. Sheeba Paul, MEng, PEng Noise and Vibration Compatibility Feasibility Assessment Residential Component Proposed RMOW Transit Hub King Street West and Victoria Street North, Kitchener, ON For The Regional Municipality of Waterloo

More information

Appendix M. Noise Assessment

Appendix M. Noise Assessment Appendix M Noise Assessment 610 Chartwell Road, Suite 300 Oakville, ON Canada L6J 4A5 t: 905.823.8500 f: 905.823.8503 www.mmmgrouplimited.com www.wspgroup.ca MEMO RE: FROM: DATE: March 27, 2017 COPIES:

More information

Rail Traffic Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Proposed Zone Change for 6 Residential Lots Inkerman Street Guelph, Ontario

Rail Traffic Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Proposed Zone Change for 6 Residential Lots Inkerman Street Guelph, Ontario Rail Traffic Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Proposed Zone Change for 6 Residential Lots Inkerman Street Guelph, Ontario For Granite Holdings Ontario Limited 160 Southgate Drive Guelph, Ontario N1G

More information

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE CONTROL GUIDELINES: Introduction and Glossary

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE CONTROL GUIDELINES: Introduction and Glossary ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE CONTROL GUIDELINES: Introduction and Glossary January 2016 Visit us: Ottawa.ca/planning Contents Introduction 1 Implementation and Interpretation 1 Structure of the Environmental Noise

More information

NOISE AND VIBRATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 316 BLOOR STREET WEST CITY OF TORONTO, ONTARIO

NOISE AND VIBRATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 316 BLOOR STREET WEST CITY OF TORONTO, ONTARIO NOISE AND VIBRATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 316 BLOOR STREET WEST CITY OF TORONTO, ONTARIO Prepared for: State Building Group Attn.: John Guanti 27 Dufferin Street, Unit 34 Toronto, Ontario M6B 4J3 Prepared

More information

The content of this supplement is based upon the that described in our letter of May 28, 2012.

The content of this supplement is based upon the that described in our letter of May 28, 2012. September 20, 2012 30 Wertheim Court, Unit 25 Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada L4B 1B9 email solutions@valcoustics.com web www.valcoustics.com telephone 905 764-5223 fax 905 764-6813 Davis Howe Partners

More information

Stationary Noise Assessment. Orléans Gardens. Ottawa, Ontario

Stationary Noise Assessment. Orléans Gardens. Ottawa, Ontario Stationary Noise Assessment Orléans Gardens Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-053 Stationary Noise Prepared For: Prepared By: Michael Lafortune, Environmental Technologist Joshua Foster, P.Eng., Associate

More information

Traffic Noise Presentation

Traffic Noise Presentation Traffic Noise Presentation 1.- Basic Noise Concepts 2.- The Nature and Measurement of Traffic Noise 3.- Measurement Definition and Noise Units 4.- Acceptable Noise Levels 5.- Variables that Contribute

More information

Compatible Use Odour, Dust, and Noise Assessment

Compatible Use Odour, Dust, and Noise Assessment Compatible Use Odour, Dust, and Noise Assessment Northridge Property Management Inc. 1101 2nd Avenue East, Suite 200 P.O. Box 325, Owen Sound, Ontario, N4K 5P5 3195 East Bayshore Road, Owen Sound, Ontario

More information

Environmental Noise Assessment Feasibility Assessment 939 Eglinton Avenue Development

Environmental Noise Assessment Feasibility Assessment 939 Eglinton Avenue Development Environmental Noise Assessment Feasibility Assessment 939 Eglinton Avenue Development Novus Reference No. 12-0253 Version No. 1.1 (DRAFT) May 1, 2015 NOVUS PROJECT TEAM: Scientist: Specialist: Project

More information

APPENDIX 'G' Noise Attenuation Analysis

APPENDIX 'G' Noise Attenuation Analysis Our File: 6552 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY REPORT ADDENDUM APPENDIX 'G' Noise Attenuation Analysis March 2008 McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION 2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905)823-8500

More information

BAY MEADOWS PHASE II SPAR 2 SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA

BAY MEADOWS PHASE II SPAR 2 SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA Charles M Salter Associates Inc BAY MEADOWS PHASE II SPAR 2 SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL INTERIOR NOISE ANALYSIS Prepared for: Kim Havens Wilson Meany Sullivan Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3330

More information

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Mixed-Use Development 3385 Dundas Street West City of Toronto, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Mixed-Use Development 3385 Dundas Street West City of Toronto, Ontario Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Mixed-Use Development 8 Dundas Street West City of Toronto, Ontario Prepared for: Terra Firma Homes Corp High Park Ave, Suite Toronto, Ontario M6P S7 Prepared by Rajjot

More information

FIGURE N-1 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT NEAR TRANSPORTATION NOISE SOURCES

FIGURE N-1 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT NEAR TRANSPORTATION NOISE SOURCES NOISE ELEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES Noise Standards N1. To protect the citizens of Arroyo Grande from the harmful and annoying effects of exposure to excessive noise. Policy N1-1 The noise standards

More information

MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION. Environmental Guide for Noise

MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION. Environmental Guide for Noise MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION Version: October 2006 MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION Part of the Environmental Standards and Practices ISSUED BY: PROVINCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING OFFICE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION

More information

Chapter 21. Noise BACKGROUND

Chapter 21. Noise BACKGROUND Chapter 21. Noise BACKGROUND The major noise sources in the Planning Area are: roadway noise from traffic on Interstate 80, Highway 113 and arterial streets; railroad noise from the Union Pacific and California

More information

Noise Feasibility Study Commercial Building, 65 Denzil Doyle Court Ottawa, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Commercial Building, 65 Denzil Doyle Court Ottawa, Ontario Noise Feasibility Study Commercial Building, 65 Denzil Doyle Court Ottawa, Ontario Prepared for: 8214221 Canada Inc. c/o LRL Associates Ltd. 1-2884 Chamerland Street Rockland, Ontario K4K 1M6 Prepared

More information

2.2. The intent of the Surface Transportation Noise Policy is to provide the following: The responsibility for providing noise attenuation.

2.2. The intent of the Surface Transportation Noise Policy is to provide the following: The responsibility for providing noise attenuation. Council Policy Policy Title: Policy Number: Report Number: Adopted by/date: Council / 2017 July 31 Effective Date: 2017 July 31 Surface Transportation Noise Policy TP003 TT2017-0512 Last Amended: 2000

More information

Why does MnDOT build noise barriers? What is a Type I project? What is an impacted location?

Why does MnDOT build noise barriers? What is a Type I project? What is an impacted location? Why does MnDOT build noise barriers? Noise barriers generally prove to be quite effective in providing noise reduction at receptors near transportation facilities. In 1972, the U.S. Congress passed legislation

More information

BRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY FOR ASSESSING AND MITIGATING NOISE IMPACTS

BRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY FOR ASSESSING AND MITIGATING NOISE IMPACTS BRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY FOR ASSESSING AND MITIGATING NOISE IMPACTS FROM NEW AND UPGRADED NUMBERED HIGHWAYS April, 2014 Prepared for; B.C. Ministry of Transportation

More information

Noise Analysis Study along I Tim Bjorneberg Project Development Program Manager SDDOT

Noise Analysis Study along I Tim Bjorneberg Project Development Program Manager SDDOT Noise Analysis Study along I - 29 Tim Bjorneberg Project Development Program Manager SDDOT Meeting Format Very informal Meeting is not recorded General questions after presentations Specific questions

More information

Why does MnDOT build noise barriers? What is a Type I project?

Why does MnDOT build noise barriers? What is a Type I project? Why does MnDOT build noise barriers? Noise barriers generally prove to be quite effective in providing noise reduction at receptors near transportation facilities. In 1972, the U.S. Congress passed legislation

More information

NOISE GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES

NOISE GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES NOISE GOALS / POLICIES GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES Authority The Government Code (Section 65302(f)) (GC) requires the preparation and adoption of "a Noise Element which shall identify and appraise noise

More information

NOISE GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES

NOISE GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES NOISE GOALS / POLICIES GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES Authority The Government Code (Section 65302(f)) (GC) requires the preparation and adoption of "a Noise Element which shall identify and appraise noise

More information

MnDOT GREATER MN STAND ALONE NOISE BARRIER PROGRAM

MnDOT GREATER MN STAND ALONE NOISE BARRIER PROGRAM MnDOT GREATER MN STAND ALONE NOISE BARRIER PROGRAM 7 November 2017 MINNESOTA S EXPERIENCE WITH HIGHWAY NOISE MITIGATION The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has been constructing noise walls

More information

SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL. QLDC PROPOSED DISTRICT PLAN [PART THREE] DECISIONS VERSION 7 lower density SUBURBAN residential

SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL. QLDC PROPOSED DISTRICT PLAN [PART THREE] DECISIONS VERSION 7 lower density SUBURBAN residential 7 LOWER DENSITY SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL 7.1 Zone Purpose The Lower Density Suburban Residential Zone is the largest residential zone in the District. The District Plan includes such zoning that is within

More information

APPENDIX 7 - AIRPORT NOISE AND DE VE LOPMENT CONTROL

APPENDIX 7 - AIRPORT NOISE AND DE VE LOPMENT CONTROL JUNE 2 016 A7.1 APPENDIX 7 AIRPORT NOISE AND DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS A7.1 INTRODUCTION The Rotorua Airport is an important resource for the Rotorua district and wider Bay of Plenty, East Coast and Central

More information

NOISE IMPACT STUDY - HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILLING FOR BLUEWATER RIVER CROSSING REPLACEMENT PROJECT

NOISE IMPACT STUDY - HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILLING FOR BLUEWATER RIVER CROSSING REPLACEMENT PROJECT Stantec Consulting Ltd. 300-675 Cochrane Drive West Tower Markham ON L3R 0B8 Tel: (905) 944-7777 Fax: (905) 474-9889 August 9, 2012 File: 160960699 NOISE IMPACT STUDY - HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILLING

More information

Draft Dulles Toll Road Highway Noise Policy

Draft Dulles Toll Road Highway Noise Policy Draft Dulles Toll Road Highway Noise Policy 1. Purpose The Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (the Authority) strives to be a good neighbor to adjacent communities and endeavors to address traffic

More information

Dulles Toll Road Highway Traffic Noise Policy. February 2, 2011

Dulles Toll Road Highway Traffic Noise Policy. February 2, 2011 Dulles Toll Road Highway Traffic Noise Policy February 2, 2011 as revised February 1, 2012 Table of Contents 1. Purpose... 1 2. Definitions... 1 3. Applicability... 5 4. Sound Fundamentals... 6 5. Highway

More information

CITY OF AIRDRIE. Transportation Noise Policy

CITY OF AIRDRIE. Transportation Noise Policy Page 1 of6 CITY OF AIRDRIE Transportation Noise Policy Effective Date: Approved By: May 7. 2001 City Council Approved On: May 7, 2001 Resolution #: 2001-C-192 Revision Date: July 4. 2016 Resolution #:

More information

Buffer distances for surface roads and elevated highways correlated with pre-existing ambient noise

Buffer distances for surface roads and elevated highways correlated with pre-existing ambient noise Buffer distances for surface s and elevated highways correlated with pre-existing ambient noise Jiping ZHANG 1 ;MarcBURET 2 ; Shuoxian WU 3 ;Yuezhe ZHAO 3 ; Saiyan SHEN 1 ;Xin ZHANG 1 1 Zhejiang Research

More information

Assessment. Assessment. Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages ROL Phase. Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages ROL Phase

Assessment. Assessment. Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages ROL Phase. Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages ROL Phase Road Traffic Traffic Noise Noise Impact Impact Assessment Assessment Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 15-19 ROL Phase Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 15-19 ROL Phase A038_790400_02

More information

You have applied in accordance with Section 9 of the Environmental Protection Act for approval of:

You have applied in accordance with Section 9 of the Environmental Protection Act for approval of: Ministry of the Environment Ministère de l Environnement CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL AIR NUMBER 7970-7QNRDJ Issue Date: April 2, 2009 William Day Construction Limited 2500 Elm Street, P.O. Box 700 Copper Cliff,

More information

Assessment - Draft. Assessment - Draft. Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages ROL Phase

Assessment - Draft. Assessment - Draft. Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages ROL Phase Road Traffic Traffic Noise Noise Impact Impact Assessment - Draft Assessment - Draft Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 33-37 ROL Phase Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 33-37 ROL Phase

More information

Traffic Noise Introduction to Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement

Traffic Noise Introduction to Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement Traffic Noise Introduction to Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement NW Bethany Blvd Improvement Project Michael Minor, President Michael Minor & Associates Inc. Introduction to Acoustics What is Noise?

More information

ASSESSMENT OF INWARD TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT AT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, WONDERFUL BARN, LEIXLIP, CO. KILDARE

ASSESSMENT OF INWARD TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT AT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, WONDERFUL BARN, LEIXLIP, CO. KILDARE ASSESSMENT OF INWARD TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT AT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, WONDERFUL BARN, LEIXLIP, CO. KILDARE Technical Report Prepared For Ardstone Capital Ltd. 48 Fitzwilliam Square Dublin Technical Report

More information

1. Introduction Noise Analysis Results Figures. List of Tables

1. Introduction Noise Analysis Results Figures. List of Tables Traffic Noise Technical Report FM 2218 Widening (From US 59 to SH 36) Fort Bend County Prepared by: Houston District Date: July 2017 CSJ: 2093-01-010 The environmental review, consultation, and other actions

More information

Lot 12 Honeywood Ave, Wandi Traffic Noise Assessment Report

Lot 12 Honeywood Ave, Wandi Traffic Noise Assessment Report Lot 12 Honeywood Ave, Wandi Traffic Noise Assessment Report Wandi Developments Pty Ltd c/- Terranovis 11 February 2014 Revision No. 1 Prepared by Andreas Lejholm Project Number: 25264-PER-N Ground Floor,

More information

COMPONENTS OF THE NOISE ELEMENT

COMPONENTS OF THE NOISE ELEMENT COMPONENTS OF THE NOISE ELEMENT Definitions Following is a list of commonly used terms and abbreviations that may be found within this element or when discussing the topic of noise. This is an abbreviated

More information

RS-1 District Schedule

RS-1 District Schedule District Schedule 1 Intent The intent of this Schedule is generally to maintain the single-family residential character of the District, but also to permit conditionally one-family dwellings with secondary

More information

RS-2 District Schedule

RS-2 District Schedule District Schedule 1 Intent The intent of this Schedule is primarily to maintain the single-family residential character of the District, but also to conditionally permit laneway houses and in some instances

More information

Attachment E2 Noise Technical Memorandum SR 520

Attachment E2 Noise Technical Memorandum SR 520 Attachment E2 Noise Technical Memorandum SR 520 Prepared for: Prepared by: Jodi Ketelsen Michael A. Minor Date: November 4, 2012 Subject: Project: Noise Modeling Results: NE 51st Street to NE 65th Street

More information

Constructing SoundPLAN Models for Noise Studies That Are Consistent With the HUD Noise Guidebook

Constructing SoundPLAN Models for Noise Studies That Are Consistent With the HUD Noise Guidebook Portland, Oregon NOISE-CON 2011 2011 July 25-27 Constructing SoundPLAN Models for Noise Studies That Are Consistent With the HUD Noise Guidebook Joshua D Leasure JEAcoustics 1705 W Koenig Lane Austin,

More information

Assessment - Draft. Assessment - Draft. Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 42A ROL Phase

Assessment - Draft. Assessment - Draft. Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 42A ROL Phase Road Traffic Traffic Noise Noise Impact Impact Assessment - Draft Assessment - Draft Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 42A ROL Phase Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 42A ROL Phase A038_790147

More information

APPENDIX H COMPARISON OF FUTURE NOISE BARRIER OPTIONS

APPENDIX H COMPARISON OF FUTURE NOISE BARRIER OPTIONS APPENDIX H COMPARISON OF FUTURE NOISE BARRIER OPTIONS July 27, 2010 Robert Hunton McCormick Rankin Corporation 1145 Hunt Club Road, Suite 300 Ottawa, Ontario K1V 0Y3 FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY Mr. Hunton,

More information

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT Noise Study Technical Report Watertown South Connector US 81 to 29 th Street SE Watertown, South Dakota HDR Project No. 39319 Prepared by 6300 So. Old Village Place

More information

SECTION 7: INDUSTRIAL ZONE RULES

SECTION 7: INDUSTRIAL ZONE RULES SECTION 7: INDUSTRIAL ZONE RULES 7.1 CATEGORIES OF ACTIVITIES 7.1.1 PERMITTED ACTIVITIES The following activities are permitted activities in the Industrial Zone, provided activities comply with all relevant

More information

Gisborne District Council

Gisborne District Council 11.0 NOISE AND VIBRATION... 1 11.1 STRUCTURE OF THIS CHAPTER... 1 11.2 INTRODUCTION... 1 11.3 ISSUES... 2 11.4 OBJECTIVES (NOISE INCLUDING VIBRATION)... 2 11.5 POLICIES (NOISE INCLUDING VIBRATION)... 2

More information

Appendix F. Environmental Noise Assessment

Appendix F. Environmental Noise Assessment Appendix F Environmental Noise Assessment FINAL REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT TRENT RIVER CROSSING CAMPBELLFORD, ONTARIO Project Number: # W08-5292A June 3, 2009 SUBMITTED TO: Garry Pappin, B.E.S.,

More information

Stantec. Allenby Court Extension, Waterloo Noise Impact Assessment. Prepared for: BU Holdings Inc Ontario Limited Waterloo ON.

Stantec. Allenby Court Extension, Waterloo Noise Impact Assessment. Prepared for: BU Holdings Inc Ontario Limited Waterloo ON. Allenby Court Extension, Waterloo Noise Impact Assessment Stantec Prepared for: BU Holdings Inc. 907248 Ontario Limited Waterloo ON Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 49 Frederick Street Kitchener ON

More information

Peak noise levels during any time period can be characterized with statistical terms.

Peak noise levels during any time period can be characterized with statistical terms. 3.11 NOISE Introduction This Noise section provides a discussion of applicable noise policies and standards, the results of ambient noise measurements, an evaluation of the projects compatibility with

More information

3.1 Noise Overlay District

3.1 Noise Overlay District 3.1 A. Purpose The purpose of this District is to establish a Noise Overlay Zoning District within the. B. Special Definitions As used in this Article only, the following terms shall be defined as set

More information

Section 1 OBC FADS /13 Access to Parking Areas

Section 1 OBC FADS /13 Access to Parking Areas Section 1 OBC 3.8.2.2 4.3.12/13 Access to Parking Areas A barrier-free path of travel is provided from: a) the entrance to the exterior parking area b) at least one parking level where a passenger elevator

More information

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT 1) 9/25/06 Noise Study Technical Report; revised 05/08 2) 9/4/09 Memo Regarding Option 3 Noise Impacts to Pelican Lake Game Production Area Noise Study Technical

More information

4.13 NOISE AND VIBRATION

4.13 NOISE AND VIBRATION 4.13 NOISE AND VIBRATION 4.13.1 INTRODUCTION This section describes and analyzes the current noise environment in the areas where project facilities will be located, and evaluates the potential impacts

More information

Appendix D Environmental Noise Assessment

Appendix D Environmental Noise Assessment Appendix D Environmental Noise Assessment AREAS 3 AND 4 SPECIFIC PLAN EIR NOISE AND VIBRATION ASSESSMENT NEWARK, CALIFORNIA January 30, 2009 Prepared for: Julie Mier David J. Powers and Associates, Inc.

More information

6 Noise. Transient noise events may be described by their maximum A weighted noise level (dba) Hourly Leq values are called Hourly Noise Levels.

6 Noise. Transient noise events may be described by their maximum A weighted noise level (dba) Hourly Leq values are called Hourly Noise Levels. 6 Noise The purpose of the Noise Element is to identify the noise sources that exist within the city, and to establish guiding policies and implementing actions to mitigate their potential impacts through

More information

STANDARDS FOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. (in the Low Density Residential zone)

STANDARDS FOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. (in the Low Density Residential zone) STANDARDS FOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (in the Low Density Residential zone) Hauraki Section (not former Franklin Area) of Hauraki District Plan This pamphlet sets out the main performance standards

More information

ARTICLE VII - OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING Section 7-10

ARTICLE VII - OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING Section 7-10 ARTICLE VII - OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING Section 7-10 Section 7-10.1 Off Street Parking. Off-street parking spaces, with proper access from a street, alley or driveway shall be provided in all districts

More information

Neighborhood Suburban Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

Neighborhood Suburban Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations Section 16.20.020 - Neighborhood Suburban Single-Family Districts ( NS ) Sections: Typical Block in a Neighborhood Suburban District 16.20.020.1 History and Composition of Suburban Neighborhoods 16.20.020.2

More information

24 CFR Part 51 Noise Abatement and Control as part of a Part 58 HUD Environmental Review. November 19, 2013

24 CFR Part 51 Noise Abatement and Control as part of a Part 58 HUD Environmental Review. November 19, 2013 24 CFR Part 51 Noise Abatement and Control as part of a Part 58 HUD Environmental Review November 19, 2013 1 Noise Control HUD Noise Standards Noise Evaluation Process Conducting a Noise Analysis Responsibilities

More information

MCKENZIE INTERCHANGE PROJECT

MCKENZIE INTERCHANGE PROJECT BKL CONSULTANTS LTD acoustics noise vibration MCKENZIE INTERCHANGE PROJECT PREPARED FOR: MAY 2016 REVISION 1 NOTICE BKL Consultants Ltd. (BKL) has prepared this report for the sole and exclusive benefit

More information

MOUNTAIN VISTA SUBAREA PLAN FORT COLLINS, COLORADO TRAFFIC NOISE EVALUATION REPORT

MOUNTAIN VISTA SUBAREA PLAN FORT COLLINS, COLORADO TRAFFIC NOISE EVALUATION REPORT MOUNTAIN VISTA SUBAREA PLAN FORT COLLINS, COLORADO TRAFFIC NOISE EVALUATION REPORT Prepared for: City of Fort Collins 250 N. Mason Street Fort Collins, CO 80522 Prepared by: Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 6300

More information

Chapter 4 NOISE ELEMENT

Chapter 4 NOISE ELEMENT Chapter 4 NOISE ELEMENT 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Authority The purpose of the noise element is to limit the exposure of the community to excessive noise levels. 1 The 2003 Noise Element Guidelines requires

More information

POLICY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NOISE BARRIERS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS

POLICY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NOISE BARRIERS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS POLICY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NOISE BARRIERS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS I. Introduction Effective Date: October 31, 2006 The New Jersey Turnpike Authority (the Authority ) has reviewed and reexamined its current

More information

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS Chapter 20: Noise A. INTRODUCTION This chapter assesses the potential noise effects of the Proposed Actions, and includes: (1) the noise effects of project-generated vehicular trips on existing and future

More information

Rural-Residential Rural-Residential Explanatory Statement Significant Issues Objectives and Policies...

Rural-Residential Rural-Residential Explanatory Statement Significant Issues Objectives and Policies... Section Contents Rural-Residential... 2 16. Rural-Residential... 2 Explanatory Statement... 2 16.1 Significant Issues... 2 16.2 Objectives and Policies... 3 16.3 Activity Lists... 3 16.4 Activity Performance

More information

Noise Impact Study for Hyatt House in Davis, California

Noise Impact Study for Hyatt House in Davis, California Noise Impact Study for Hyatt House in Davis, California Prepared for The HR Group Architects 2277 Fair Oaks Boulevard, Studio 220 Sacramento, CA 95825 Prepared by Brian R. Smith, Principal INCE Board Certified

More information

Impact Assessment Methodology for the. Somerville Public Library August 4, 2008 Jason Ross, P.E. Harris Miller Miller & Hanson Inc.

Impact Assessment Methodology for the. Somerville Public Library August 4, 2008 Jason Ross, P.E. Harris Miller Miller & Hanson Inc. Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Methodology for the MBTA Green Line Extension P j t Project Presentation to the Advisory Group Meeting Meeting Somerville Public Library August 4, 2008 Jason Ross,

More information

PLANNING FOR CHILDCARE IN THE GATEWAY DISTRICT NODE: CITY OF MISSISSAUGA

PLANNING FOR CHILDCARE IN THE GATEWAY DISTRICT NODE: CITY OF MISSISSAUGA APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX H PROPOSED DRAFT AMENDMENT NO. TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL 1.0 Statutory Provisions This Amendment No. to the Official Plan for

More information