8/4/2016. Technical Advisory Committee / Policy Advisory Committee. Inland Logistics Hub Case Studies COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 1

Transcription

1 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY Technical Advisory Committee / Policy Advisory Committee Inland Logistics Hub Case Studies 8/4/2016 Photo: City of Richmond COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 1

2 Agenda Welcome and roll call Barbara Nelson, Director of Transportation RRTPO Introduction to Webinar Paul Prideaux, P.E., Michael Baker International Presentation on Inland Logistics Hub Case Studies & Best Practices Paul Bingham, Economic Development Research Group Discussion / Questions on presented material - All Introduction to August 11 Workshop Scudder Wagg, AICP, Michael Baker International Next Steps / Wrap Up Paul Prideaux / Barbara Nelson 2 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 2

3 PAC & TAC Membership Stakeholder Technical Advisory Committee Policy Advisory Committee Chesterfield County Barb Smith Bill Dupler City of Richmond Amy Inman Lee Downey CTB Carlos Brown DRPT Michael Todd Pete Burrus OIPI/ Secretary s Office Kelli Nash Ronique Day POV Chris Gullickson or Jeff Florin Sarah McCoy P3 Ali Lauzon Ali Lauzon RRTPO Chris Wichman Barbara Nelson VDOT Central Office Chris Detmer Ben Mannell VDOT Richmond District Ron Svejkovsky Mark Riblett VEDP John Loftus 3 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 3

4 Status of ongoing project activity Project team interviews with stakeholders (to date) Port of Virginia Sarah McCoy VaP3 Office Ali Lauzon Guided tour of RMT Chris Gullickson VDOT Richmond District Erik Johnson Coordination with Chesterfield County regarding ongoing I-95 interchange improvements studies Development of project base maps Documentation of transportation deficiencies Congestion, safety, geometric deficiencies, bridge / pavement condition, height / width restrictions, etc. 4 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 4

5 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 5 5

6 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 6 6

7 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 7 7

8 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 8 8

9 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 9 9

10 Purpose of Conducting Case Studies Understanding successes, challenges, and best practices at select locations to inform our visioning process in the Commerce Corridor System Perspective Land Assemblage Perspective (shipper focus) 10 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 10

11 Case Studies Virginia Inland Port Front Royal, VA CenterPoint Intermodal Joliet, IL Port of Albany, NY M-87 Port of Savannah, GA Inland Port Greer Greer, SC 11 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 11

12 VIP Front Royal, VA Ownership: Size: Rail: Highway: Marine: Designation: Virginia Port Authority 161 acres Norfolk Southern I-66/I-81 None. Foreign Trade Zone Source: land_port_technical_report_final_ pdf 12 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 12

13 VIP Front Royal, VA Market: Domestic & international intermodal Container rail service to/from NIT and VIG 60 mi W of DC, 220 mi inland from Hampton Roads Associated development: Distribution centers: Home Depot, Kohl s, Rite Aid, Red Bull Front Royal-Warren County Economic Development Authority markets sites 13 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 13

14 VIP Front Royal, VA Supportive strategies/investments: State port authority invested in facility and county EDA facilitated nearby industrial sites. Federal government Customs and Free Trade Zone status encouraged use. Key points/lessons: Long timeline to success built for international container trade, but took a decade of serving more as an NS intermodal rail ramp before finding success in the international container market Success factors: Location and Port and Norfolk Southern marketing 14 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 14

15 CenterPoint Joliet, IL Ownership: Size: Rail: Highway: Marine: Designation: CenterPoint Properties 6,500 acres UP, BNSF I-55/I-80 Il. Waterway (1 mile) Foreign Trade Zone Source: 15 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 15

16 CenterPoint Joliet, IL Market: International intermodal, domestic intermodal & rail carload service Container trade West Coast (LA, Long Beach) 40 miles SW of Chicago Not a container-on-barge service facility Associated development: Built on former federal land Joliet Arsenal Ample industrial land distribution centers, logistics service facilities 16 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 16

17 CenterPoint Joliet, IL Supportive strategies/investments: Federal government transfer of closed military facility through the state and county to developer CenterPoint. Will County provides local road access to I-55 Key points/lessons: Government support was crucial to enabling development of facility well-situated for attracting business. Local road access supported by Will County has been crucial for the terminal and associated distribution facilities and labor Success factor: CenterPoint development strategy 17 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 17

18 M-87 Port of Albany, NY Ownership: Commission Rail: Albany RR Albany Port District CP, CSX, NS nearby; Port of Highway: I-87, I-787, I- 90 Marine: Prior container on barge service offered by Columbia Coastal Transport, now discontinued Source: COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 18

19 M-87 Port of Albany Market: Inland distribution for the Port of New York and New Jersey Focus: truck diversion Associated development: Not focused on logistics park functions or development 19 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 19

20 M-87 Port of Albany Supportive strategies/investments: CMAQ funds for subsidy Key points/lessons: Lack of shipper focus Frequency of service competitive with truck Volumes were far below capacity; empty returns Port of Albany is now reconsidering the service Panama Canal Expansion-related new volume 20 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 20

21 Port of Savannah, GA Ownership: Georgia Ports Authority Rail: NS, CSX Highway: I-16, I-95 Marine: Deep-sea port Designation: Foreign Trade Zone Site marketing focused on 4 corridors, 3 that connect directly to Port of Savannah Sources: (1) 4en/appl4en/savannah_logistics_cluster.html; (2) 21 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 21

22 Port of Savannah, GA Market: Less than one-day drive to major South Atlantic markets: Atlanta, Orlando and Charlotte 2 nd largest container exporter by volume after LA Associated development: >3 million ft 2 of warehouse space available within 30 miles of port Exporter as well as import logistics services 22 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 22

23 Port of Savannah, GA Supportive strategies/investments: Crossroad Business Park, owned by the Savannah Economic Development Agency Savannah River International Trade Park, owned by Georgia Port Authority Key points/lessons: Customer at the doorstep model of growth, attract the shipper; carriers will follow model. Part of a comprehensive state logistics strategy 23 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 23

24 Inland Port Greer, SC Ownership: Size: Rail: Highway: I-85 Marine: SC Port Authority 40 acres (on 100 acre site) Norfolk Southern None. Designation: Can be in FTZ 38 Source: 24 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 24

25 SC Inland Port Greer, SC Market: 212 miles inland from Port of Charleston I-85 Corridor between Charlotte & Atlanta Overnight express NS rail service to/from Charlotte Cargo owner contracts directly with ocean carriers Launch customer: BMW auto manufacturing plant Associated development: New Dollar Tree distribution center; 2 nd inland port under consideration in Dillon, SC 25 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 25

26 SC Inland Port Greer, SC Supportive strategies/investments: PPP between Port & NS Substantial Port marketing with launch customers Key points/lessons: Daily overnight service helped attract volume Available land less important than I-85 location 26 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 26

27 Summary Front Royal Joliet Albany Savannah Greer Richmond Class I rail NS UP, BNSF CP/CSX/NS near Port RR Interstate I-66/I-81 I-55/I-80 I-87, I-787, I- 90 CSX, NS NS CSX; NS via switch I-16, I-95 I-85 I-95 Maritime None Illinois Waterway (incidental) Prior: M-87 container on barge Deep Draft Ocean Port None M-645 Container on barge Econ. Dev. Distribution centers Distribution, logistics Transport jobs only Port: warehouses Distribution Centers Available land Takeaway RR-Truck Diversion Land and rail access Lack of shipper focus Shipperfocused DC development key to success RR-truck diversion to/from ocean port Location advantage maritimetruck 27 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 27

28 Case Studies Discussion 28 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 28

29 Look ahead to August 11 Vision Workshop Purpose of Vision Workshop Introduce the market opportunity scenarios and transportation issues in the corridor Develop a clear and unified vision for the economic and transportation systems development of the Commerce Corridor Example questions for consideration What lessons learned from the case studies do you think apply to the economic vision for the corridor? the transportation needs for the corridor? 29 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 29

30 Project Communication Meeting coordination and information sharing through RRTPO staff. Primary contact: Chris Wichman (804) Project website: 30 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 30

31 Next Steps Post / Circulate materials from today s Webinar, including recording Hold Visioning Workshop on August 11 Additional Stakeholder interviews Microscale connectivity and operations assessment of selected redevelopment sites Development & analysis of market opportunity growth scenarios & future needs assessment 31 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 31

32 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY Technical Advisory Committee / Policy Advisory Committee Inland Logistics Hub Case Studies 8/4/2016 Photo: City of Richmond COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 32

33 Extra slides beyond this point 33 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 33

34 Introduction to Commerce Corridor 34 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 34

35 35 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 35

36 36 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 36

37 37 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 37

38 38 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 38

39 39 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 39

40 Scope Overview Task 1: Existing Conditions & Asset Inventory Task 2: Existing Deficiency & Needs Identification Task 3: Visioning & Focus Groups Task 4: Market Opportunity Scenario Analysis & Future Needs Assessment Task 5: Needs Prioritization Task 6: Solution Identification 40 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 40

41 Scope Overview, Cont d Task 7: Assessment of Solutions Task 8: Identification of Short, Medium, & Long- Term Solutions Task 9: Implementation Plan/Roadmap Task 10: Project Coordination Task 11: Project Management 41 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 41

42 PAC & TAC Responsibilities Policy Advisory Committee Provides high level policy input Steers direction of the study Reviews final deliverables Technical Advisory Committee Participates more directly in technical approaches Provides mode-specific expertise Reviews draft deliverables 42 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 42

43 Project Timeline Notice to Proceed June 9, month schedule Anticipated completion February PAC Meetings 5 TAC Meetings 43 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 43

44 COMMERCE CORRIDOR STUDY 44