Sustainability Assessment of NES in Thailand Using INPRO Methodology in the Area of Economics
|
|
- Brett Scott
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Sustainability Assessment of NES in Thailand Using INPRO Methodology in the Area of Economics INPRO 8 th Dialogue Forum: Toward Nuclear Energy System Sustainability: Economics, Resource Availability and Institutional Arrangements, IAEA Headquarter, August 2014 Kampanart Silva Thailand Institute of Nuclear Technology
2 Thailand INPRO Team Members Representative Organization: Thailand Institute of Nuclear Technology (TINT) Team Members Kampanart Silva Somboon Rassame Piyatida Trinuruk Jiraporn Promping Thailand Institute of Nuclear Technology Chulalongkorn University King Mongkut s University of Technology Thonburi Thailand Institute of Nuclear Technology Acknowledgment We would like to thank the Fiscal Policy Office, Ministry of Finance, Thailand, who helped us to determine the appropriate financial parameters. 2
3 Thailand and Thailand Institute of Nuclear Technology (TINT) TINT Pathumthani Taiwan? Branch TINT Bangkok Branch TINT Head Office 3
4 Thailand Power Development Plan (PDP) 2010 Long-term Plan: 20 Years Emphasize power supply security concurrently with environmental protection Give importance to public participation Supply Security Proper percentage of power generation reserve of the country Diversification of fuel sources & types for power generation - Purchase from neighboring countries - Reduce dependence on natural gas Environmental Protection Reduce GHG emission from new power generation facilities Promote RE generation in line with the 15-year RE Development Plan Improve energy efficiency Promote efficient power generation, using Cogeneration System *The content of this slide was prepared by Mr.Tanongsak Wongla, EPPO, Thailand 4
5 Summary of PDP 2010 Rev.3 Generating Capacity Unit : MW Installed Capacity at end ,395 Increased (new) Capacity 55,130* Decommissioned Plants - 16,839 Total Generating Capacity at end ,686 No. of New Power Plants during Nuclear Power Plant 1,000 MW 2,000 (2 plants) Combined Cycle 25,451 (29 plants) Clean Coal-fired 4,400 (5 plants) Gas Turbine 750 (3 plants) Cogeneration 6,475 Renewable Energy (SPP, VSPP, EGAT) 9,481 Purchase from abroad 6,572 *The content of this slide was prepared by Mr.Tanongsak Wongla, EPPO, Thailand 5
6 Need of Sustainability Assessment of NES in the Area of Economics Thailand included NES in its long-term plan (which is rather short). Nuclear power was included from the standpoints of supply security and environment protection. A more comprehensive assessment is needed to provide information on how to achieve the sustainability of the use of NES and the entire power supply scheme. The area of economics is selected as it is the area of common interest of the newcomers. 6
7 User Requirements and Criteria Selected UR 1 Cost of Energy UR 2 Ability to Finance UR 3 Investment Risk UR 4 Flexibility 7
8 UR 1 Cost of Energy CR 1.1: Cost competitiveness VS ( ) Adjustment coefficient Nuclear Assumptions Alternative source Based on PDP 2010 and documents of EGAT Comparison of LUECs MWe Gen III+ NES 600 MWe coal or gas-fired PPs Tool The modified Nuclear Economics Support Tool (NEST) 8
9 CR 1.1 Cost Competitiveness [1/9] Levelized Unit Electricity Cost (LUEC) + + = Capital cost O&M cost Fuel cost LUEC (mill/kwh) Total power generated 9
10 CR 1.1 Cost Competitiveness [2/9] Capital Cost Important inputs for calculation of capital cost Net electric power 1,000 1,400 MWe (ABWR, AP1000, ATMEA1, VVER1200, ACPR1000, APR1400) Construction period 4 6 years (Information from vendors plus 1 year) Overnight cost 1,600 5,900 $/kwe (Projected Cost of Generating Electricity 2010 Edition, OECD NEA) Contingency cost 10 20% (Projected Costs of Generating Electricity 2010 Edition recommended 15%) Owner cost Not included (Evaluator decision) Investment schedule Uniform 10
11 CR 1.1 Cost Competitiveness [3/9] O&M Cost/Fuel Cost Important inputs for calculation of O&M cost/fuel cost O&M cost mill/kwh (Projected Cost of Generating Electricity 2010 Edition, OECD NEA) Fuel back end cost 519 2,218 $/kg (The Economics of the Back End of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, OECD NEA, 2013) Core power density kw/kg (ARIS) Fuel burnup MWd/kg (Information from vendors) Uranium cost Natural uranium: 130 $/kg Conversion cost: 9 $/kg Enrichment cost: 140 $/kg Fabrication cost: 300 $/kg (A. Lokhov, 2013) U-235 concentration Average: 4.95% Refueling fuel: 4.95% Enrichment tail: 0.25% (A. Lokhov, 2013) 11
12 CR 1.1 Cost Competitiveness [4/9] Other Important Inputs for LUEC Calculation Other important inputs Real discount rate 7 11% (MLR (Minimum loan rate) of Bank in Thailand (2014 average) and MLR+4) Load factor 90% (From NEST; typical value) Plant life time 60 years (From NEST; typical value) Decommissioning cost 1 mill/kwh (From IAEA TECDOC 1575 Rev. 1 Vol. 2) 12
13 CR 1.1 Cost Competitiveness [5/9] LUEC of Coal-fired Power Plant Important inputs for calculation of LUEC of CFPP Net electric power Construction period Load factor 600 MWe (Based on plan of EGAT) years (Typical values; IEA) 75% (Taken from NEST) Overnight cost 900 2,800 $/kwe (contingency cost 10%) (Projected Cost of Generating Electricity 2010 Edition, OECD NEA) O&M Cost mill/kwh (Projected Cost of Generating Electricity 2010 Edition; Only Asian countries) Fuel price $/GJ (Purchasing price in April 2014 estimated from information in EGAT website) 13
14 CR 1.1 Cost Competitiveness [6/9] LUEC of Gas Turbine Power Plant Important inputs for calculation of LUEC of GTPP Net electric power Construction period Load factor 600 MWe (Based on plan of EGAT) years (Typical values; IEA) 75% (Taken from NEST) Overnight cost 520 1,800 $/kwe (contingency cost 10%) (Projected Cost of Generating Electricity 2010 Edition, OECD NEA) O&M Cost mill/kwh (Projected Cost of Generating Electricity 2010 Edition; Only Asian countries) Fuel price $/GJ (Purchasing price in April 2014 estimated from information in EGAT website) 14
15 CR 1.1 Cost Competitiveness [7/9] LUECs of NES, CFPP and GTPP LUECs of Nuclear, Coal and Gas Nuclear Coal Gas Median Min Max 15
16 CR 1.1 Cost Competitiveness [8/9] Discussion Issue of selection of parameter values The ranges between the minimum and the maximum LUECs of each resource are too large. There is no guarantee that the LUECs which was estimated using the median values of each parameter would be the appropriate one. The ceteris paribus sensitivity analysis might not be suitable because when a parameter is varied, others will be fixed to the median values which might not be appropriate. We decided to treat parameters which possess range as a distribution, and perform a very simple Monte Carlo calculation. Assume all uniform distributions. Number of calculations: 500 We recognize that the assumptions above may not be proper, but it is still worth to perform a trial calculation with the information we have. 16
17 CR 1.1 Cost Competitiveness [9/9] LUECs of NES, CFPP and GTPP Nuclear Coal Gas 95 th percentile 80 th percentile 50 th percentile 20 th percentile 5 th percentile 17
18 UR 1 Cost of Energy: Summary Indicator (IN) Acceptance Limit (AL) Judgment IN 1.1 Cost of energy AL1.1 C N < k * C A Yes (gas) No (coal) Remarks Nuclear mills/kwh (average: 74) Coal mills/kwh (average: 54) Gas mills/kwh (average: 83) LUECs of nuclear and gas are relatively high, while that of coal is relatively low. The purchasing price of coal is very low (1 2 $/GJ), while the price of gas is very high (8 $/GJ). The carbon tax was not taken into account (as is the case in Thailand), which benefits gas and coal. This criteria could be met if the adjustment coefficient > 1.4. For example, in case of strong opposition to coal fired power plant, or; Strong desire to introduce nuclear power from some specific reasons, e.g., energy security, this criteria cannot be easily met. 18
19 User Requirements and Criteria Selected UR 1 Cost of Energy UR 2 Ability to Finance UR 3 Investment Risk UR 4 Flexibility 19
20 UR2 Ability to Finance [1/2] CR2.1 Attractiveness of investment Internal Return Rate of Of Return Investment CR2.2 Affordability of investment Nuclear VS Alternative Source Total Investment VS Investment Limit Assumptions Same as UR 1 20
21 UR2 Ability to Finance [2/2] Important inputs for calculations of IRR, ROI, Total investment Electricity selling price mill/kwh (Selling price of EGAT in 2013) Market income 16,502 M$ (EGAT Financial Report 2013) Market share 1 (EGAT is the only electricity distributor in Thailand) Profit margin 7.05% (Calculated from EGAT Financial Report 2013) Time of growth years (nuclear) 1.85 years (coal, gas) (Calculated from increase in electricity generation capacity between ) 21
22 CR 2.1 Attractiveness of Investment [1/2] IRRs Nuclear Coal Gas 95 th percentile 80 th percentile 50 th percentile 20 th percentile 5 th percentile 22
23 CR 2.1 Attractiveness of Investment [2/2] ROIs Nuclear Coal Gas 95 th percentile 80 th percentile 50 th percentile 20 th percentile 5 th percentile 23
24 CR 2.2 Investment Limit Total Investment VS Investment Limit th 80 th Nuclear Nuclear (Limit) Coal Gas Fossil (Limit) 50 th 20 th 5 th 24
25 UR 2 Ability to Finance: Summary [1/2] Indicator (IN) Acceptance Limit (AL) Judgment Remarks IN 2.1: Financial figures of merit AL2.1.1 IRR N > IRR A AL2.1.2 ROI N > ROI A No Yes (gas) No (coal) Nuclear 9 16% (average: 13) Coal 15 24% (average: 19) Gas 11 22% (average: 16) Nuclear 11 22% (average:17) Coal 18 33% (average: 25) Gas 10 20% (average: 15) Both IRR and ROI of nuclear cannot compete with those of coal. Comparing nuclear to gas, IRR of nuclear is smaller, while ROI is larger. The former is because nuclear requires large investment in the beginning, which will results in smaller profit when a relatively large discount rate is taken into account. The latter is simply because LUEC of nuclear is smaller while PUESs are the same. 25
26 UR2 Ability to Finance: Results [2/2] Indicator (IN) Acceptance Limit (AL) Judgment Remarks IN 2.2: Total investment AL2.2 Investment N < Investment LIMIT No Total investment/ investment limit Nuclear 4,400 8,800 M$/ 3,000 5,500 M$ Coal 1,100 2,000 M$/ 1,500 1,800 M$ Gas 600 1,200 M$/ 1,500 1,800 M$ The market share of EGAT is large enough to facilitate investment for coal and gas with low risk, but still too small for nuclear. A national project would be a suitable way to introduce nuclear power to Thailand, as the involvement of the government may help reduce the investment risk. 26
27 User Requirements and Criteria Selected UR 1 Cost of Energy UR 2 Ability to Finance UR 3 Investment Risk UR 4 Flexibility 27
28 UR3 Investment Risk CR3.1 Maturity of design Technical development and status of licensing of a design to be installed or developed are sufficiently mature. CR3.2 Construction schedule Times for construction and commissioning used in economic evaluation are sufficiently accurate CR3.3 Uncertainty of economic input parameters Sensitivity to changes in selected parameters is acceptable to investor CR3.4 Political environment Commitment sufficient to enable a return on investment. Assumptions Same as UR 1 28
29 UR3 Investment Risk: Results [1/2] Indicator (IN) Acceptance Limit (AL) Judgment Remarks IN 3.1 Technical and regulatory status AL3.1.1 Plants of same basic design have been constructed and operated Partial Some plants are constructed and operated, but most of them have only started the construction. IN 3.2 Project construction/ commissioning times AL3.2.1 Construction schedule times used in financial analyses are appropriate. Partial Some plants or forerunner plants were constructed within the scheduled period or with slight delays. Thailand may need to wait until NESs under consideration start their operation to ensure the technical integrity of NESs. It is likely that an NES constructed in a non-technology developing country will have a longer construction period. This must be taken into account appropriately. 29
30 UR3 Investment Risk: Results [2/2] Indicator (IN) Acceptance Limit (AL) Judgment Remarks IN 3.3 Acceptable sensitivity analysis AL3.3: Sensitivity to changes in selected parameters is acceptable to the investor N/A Additional opinions from the possible investors (EGAT or Ministry of Energy) may be needed. IN 3.4 Long term commitment to nuclear option AL3.4: Commitment sufficient to enable a return on investment No The political climate at the moment is relatively unfavorable. This assessment was done by the Thailand INPRO Team which involves only TINT, CU and KMUTT. The appropriateness of the sensitivity analysis must be discussed with EGAT or MOE. Thailand government made three revisions to the PDP 2010 (within 3 years). There were changes of the number of NESs to be introduced and the year to be introduced in these revisions. 30
31 Conclusions for Assessment on the Area of Economics Assessment on the area of infrastructure in this study should be considered as the preliminary assessment. Additional information and detailed analysis for some indicators are required. Results for many indicators identified the gaps to be fulfilled. The cost of nuclear is higher than coal but slightly lower than gas. Financial figures of merit were mostly smaller than the fossil fuels. Total investment needed for construction of a nuclear power plant is larger than the investment limit. Some of the investment risks can be averted, but some remain as important issues. 31
32 Comments to INPRO Methodology in the Area of Economics INPRO Methodology has appropriately taken into account the differences between the technology developers and the newcomers. Introduction of adjusting coefficients Introduction of options where the needs of the two parties are different Global sensitivity analysis or Monte Carlo calculation may be more suitable to take into account the uncertainties associated with LUEC, financial figure of merits, total investment, etc., than the ceteris paribus sensitivity analysis. 32
33 Thailand INPRO Team Members Representative Organization: Thailand Institute of Nuclear Technology (TINT) Team Members Kampanart Silva Somboon Rassame Piyatida Trinuruk Jiraporn Promping Thailand Institute of Nuclear Technology Chulalongkorn University King Mongkut s University of Technology Thonburi Thailand Institute of Nuclear Technology Acknowledgment We would like to thank the Fiscal Policy Office, Ministry of Finance, Thailand, who helped us to determine the appropriate financial parameters. 33
34 Backup Slides 34
35 CR1.1 Cost Competitiveness IN1.1 Cost of energy LUEC of Gen III+ NES Inputs for calculation of CI t Net electric power (P t ) 1 : 1,000 1,400 MWe Construction period 2 : 4 6 years Overnight cost 3 : 1,600 5,900 $/kwe Contingency cost 4 : 10 20% Owner cost 5 : 0 $/kwe Capital investment schedule 5 : Uniform distribution 1 ABWR, AP1000, ATMEA1, VVER1200, ACPR1000, APR1400 (Taken form the presentation of EGAT) 2 ABWR: y, AP1000: 36 m, ATMEA1: 48 m, VVER1200: < 54 m, ACPR m, APR m, and the evaluator added another year for construction in unfamiliar locations. 3 Projected Costs of Generating Electricity 2010 Edition 4 Projected Costs of Generating Electricity 2010 Edition recommended 15% 5 Evaluator decisions 35
36 CR1.1 Cost Competitiveness IN1.1 Cost of energy O&M t (Operation and maintenance cost) 1 : Mill/kWh Inputs for calculation of F t Nuclear fuel back end cost 2 : 519 2,218 $/kg Unloaded fuel average burnup 3 : MWd/kg Net thermal efficiency 4 : 34 37% Reactor first core average power density 5 : kw/kg Natural U purchase cost 6 : 130 $/kg U conversion cost 6 : 9 $/kg U enrichment cost 6 : 140 $/kg Nuclear fuel fabrication cost 6 : 300 $/kg 1 Projected Costs of Generating Electricity 2010 Edition ARIS
37 CR1.1 Cost Competitiveness IN1.1 Cost of energy Inputs for calculation of F t (cont d) First core lowest U-235 concentration 1 : 3.95% First core medium U-235 concentration 2 : 4.95% Refueling fuel U-235 concentration 2 : 4.95% Enrichment tails U-235 concentration 2 : 0.25% Others: Information in NEST was used. r (Real discount rate) 3 : 7 11% Lf t (Load factor) 4 : 90% t END (Life time of plant) 4 : 60 years Others Decommissioning cost 5 : 1 mill/kwh 1 Medium concentration MLR (Minimum loan rate) of Bank in Thailand (2014 average) and MLR+4 4 Taken from NEST 5 IAEA TECDOC 1575 Rev.1 Vol.2 6 Evaluator decision 37
38 CR1.1 Cost Competitiveness IN1.1 Cost of energy Other important inputs for calculation of LUEC of Coal-fired power plant Net electric power 1 : 600 MWe Construction period 2 : years Life time of plant 3 : 40 years Average load factor 3 : 75% Decommissioning cost 3 : 0 mill/kwh Overnight cost 4 : 900 2,800 $/kwe Contingency cost 5 : 10% Owner cost 6 : 0 $/kwe Capital investment schedule 6 : Uniform distribution Operation and maintenance cost 7 : Mill/kWh Fuel price 8 : $/GJ Real fuel price escalation rate 9 : 1%/year Net thermal efficiency 10 : 37.7% 1 Based on plan of EGAT Taken from NEST 4 Projected Costs of Generating Electricity 2010 Edition 5 Projected Costs of Generating Electricity 2010 Edition recommended 5% 6 Evaluator decisions 7 Projected Costs of Generating Electricity 2010 Edition (only Asian countries) / 9 indexmundi 10 (% GCV basis) 38
39 CR1.1 Cost Competitiveness IN1.1 Cost of energy Other important inputs for calculation of LUEC of Gas-fired power plant Net electric power 1 : 600 MWe Construction period 2 : years Life time of plant 3 : 40 years Average load factor 3 : 75% Decommissioning cost 3 : 0 mill/kwh Overnight cost 4 : 520 1,800 $/kwe Contingency cost 5 : 10% Owner cost 6 : 0 $/kwe Capital investment schedule 6 : Uniform distribution Operation and maintenance cost 7 : Mill/kWh Fuel price 8 : $/GJ Real fuel price escalation rate 9 : 1%/year Net thermal efficiency 10 : 52-60% 1 Based on plan of EGAT Taken from NEST 4 Projected Costs of Generating Electricity 2010 Edition 5 Projected Costs of Generating Electricity 2010 Edition recommended 5% 6 Evaluator decisions 7 Projected Costs of Generating Electricity 2010 Edition (only Asian countries) / 9 indexmundi
40 CR1.1 Cost Competitiveness IN1.1 Cost of energy Initial results of LUECs Case No. LUEC [mills/kwh] Nuclear Coal Gas : All median values (assume uniform distributions) 2: Use values that give the best results 3: Use values that give the worst results 40
41 CR1.1 Cost Competitiveness IN1.1 Cost of energy LUECs of Each Resource LUEC [mills/kwh] Nuclear Coal Gas Average th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile Minimum Maximum
42 CR 1.1 Cost Competitiveness LUECs of NES, CFPP (Fuel price x 3) and GTPP Nuclear Coal Gas 95 th percentile 80 th percentile 50 th percentile 20 th percentile 5 th percentile 42
43 UR2 Ability to Finance Additional input needed for calculation of IRR and ROI Price per unit of electricity sold (PUES) 1 : mills/kwh Additional inputs needed for calculation of Investment N Market income 2 : M$ Market share 3 : 1 Profit margin 2 : 7.05% Time of growth 4 : years Adjusting coefficient 5 : Additional inputs needed for calculation of Investment LIMIT Time of growth 4 : 1.85 years Adjusting coefficient 5 : =(Total Power)/(Increase in Electricity Generation Capacity between ) 5 Normally equal to 1 (TECDOC 1575 Rev. 1 Vol. 2) 43
44 CR2.1 Attractiveness of Investment IN2.1 Financial Figures of Merit IRRs of Each Resource IRR [%] Nuclear Coal Gas Average th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile Minimum Maximum
45 CR2.1 Attractiveness of Investment IN2.1 Financial Figures of Merit ROIs of Each Resource ROI [%] Nuclear Coal Gas Average th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile Minimum Maximum
46 CR2.2 Investment Limit IN2.2 Total Investment Total Investment and Investment Limit of Nuclear Nuclear Total investment [M$] Investment limit [M$] Average th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile Minimum Maximum
47 CR2.2 Investment Limit IN2.2 Total Investment Total Investment and Investment Limit of Coal Coal Total investment [M$] Investment limit [M$] Average th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile Minimum Maximum
48 CR2.2 Investment Limit IN2.2 Total Investment Total Investment and Investment Limit of Gas Gas Total investment [M$] Investment limit [M$] Average th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile Minimum Maximum
49 CR3.1 Maturity of design IN3.1 Technical and regulatory status AL3.1.1 (For deployment of first few NPPs in a country): Plants of same basic design have been constructed and operated. Considerations 1 Selected NESs are all generation III+ reactors (ABWR, AP1000, ATMEA1, VVER1200, ACPR1000, APR1400). ABWR has started the commercial operation. Some of them have already started the construction (AP1000, VVER1200, ACPR1000, APR1400), or planning the construction (ATMEA1) but have no operating experience. However, some of them have forerunner plants (VVER1200, ACPR1000, APR1400) that may help ensure the experience of the technology developer
50 CR3.2 Construction schedule IN3.2 Project construction/commissioning times AL3.2.1 (For deployment of first few NPP in a country): Construction schedule times used in financial analyses have been met in previous construction projects for plants of the same basic design. Considerations 1 ABWR: 4-5 years, except for Longmen Nuclear Power Plant and Higashidori Nuclear Power Plant AP1000: Sanmen Unit 1 has approx. 1 year delay from the scheduled 3 years Others: N/A However, expected construction periods can be based on the construction period of some forerunner plants Finally, the evaluator decided to add a year to the construction period provided in the website of each technology developers
51 CR3.3 Uncertainty of economic input parameters IN3.3 Acceptable sensitivity analysis AL3.3: Sensitivity to changes in selected parameters is acceptable to the investor Considerations Monte Carlo calculation must substitute the sensitivity analysis. However, additional opinions from the possible investors (EGAT or Ministry of Energy) may be needed. 51
52 CR3.4 Political environment IN3.4 Long term commitment to nuclear option AL3.4: Commitment sufficient to enable a return on investment The issue of the political climate is presented in the area of economics primarily to ensure that an assessment in the area of infrastructure has been carried out and that this assessment has established that the political climate is favorable. Considerations The assessment in the area of infrastructure has been carried out. However, the political climate at the moment is relatively unfavorable. The detail of the assessment can be referred to in the assessment in the area of infrastructure. 52
Fast Reactor Fuel Cycle Cost Estimates for Advanced Fuel Cycle Studies
Fast Reactor Fuel Cycle Cost Estimates for Advanced Fuel Cycle Studies Technical Meeting on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycle Facilities with Improved Economic Characteristics IAEA Headquarters, Vienna,
More informationEconomic Indicators Assessment of NPP Project in Indonesia. Suparman Centre for Nuclear Energy Development
Economic Indicators Assessment of NPP Project in Indonesia Suparman Centre for Nuclear Energy Development INTRODUCTION Indonesia has performed: economics assessment using INPRO Methodology within its 2012-2014
More informationINPRO methodology in the area of economics
9th GIF/INPRO-IAEA Interface Meeting IAEA HQs, Vienna, Austria. 4-5 March 2015 INPRO methodology in the area of economics Developed by B.Dabbs, A.Korinny, J.Phillips, R.Tucci Presented by A.Korinny Introduction
More informationProspects and Challenges of Small Modular Reactor Deployments as Option to Enhance Energy Supply Security. IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency
APEC SELF-FUNDED WORKSHOP ON NUCLEAR POWER Sustainable Energy & Technology Asia 2016 (SETA 2016) 25 March 2016, Bangkok International Trade and Exhibition Centre Bangkok, THAILAND Prospects and Challenges
More informationApproaches to Assess Competitiveness of Small and Medium Sized Reactors
IAEA-CN-164-1S01 Approaches to Assess Competitiveness of Small and Medium Sized Reactors V. Kuznetsov, N. Barkatullah International Atomic Energy Agency Abstract. There is continuing interest in Member
More informationScenarios on Power Generation in Thailand
2012 International Conference on Future Environment and Energy IPCBEE vol.28(2012) (2012)IACSIT Press, Singapoore Scenarios on Power Generation in Thailand Weerin Wangjiraniran 1+, Raksanai Nidhiritdhikrai
More informationKey Performance Indicators for the. European Sustainable Nuclear Industrial Initiative
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Institute for Energy and Transport SET-Plan Information System (SETIS) Key Performance Indicators for the European Sustainable Nuclear Industrial
More informationThailand Solar Energy Overview
Thailand Solar Energy Overview Kulwaree Buranasajjawaraporn Director, Innovation Group, Bureau of Solar Energy Development Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency (DEDE) Seminar: Ilalian
More informationSolar PV in ASEAN Challenges and Opportunities. Peerapat Vithayasrichareon Centre for Energy and Environmental Markets (CEEM), UNSW Australia
Solar PV in ASEAN Challenges and Opportunities Peerapat Vithayasrichareon Centre for Energy and Environmental Markets (CEEM), UNSW Australia ESI Workshop on the value of PV in Singapore 18 February 2016
More informationEconomic Analysis of the Modular Pebble Bed Reactor
Pebble Bed Reactor Project MIT Nuclear Engineering Department Economic Analysis of the Modular Pebble Bed Reactor These slides present the conclusions of a preliminary study based d on existing cost data
More informationSharing knowledge across Mediterranean Jordan. Cost factors of nuclear electriciy. Jean-Jacques GAUTROT Special Advisor to the AREVA CEO
Sharing knowledge across Mediterranean Jordan Cost factors of nuclear electriciy Jean-Jacques GAUTROT Special Advisor to the AREVA CEO Jordan,1 st March 2010 6.7 billion people Photo composite NASA sans
More informationIndonesia s Experience in Performing a Nuclear Energy System Assessment (NESA) National Nuclear Energy Agency, BATAN - Indonesia
Indonesia s Experience in Performing a Nuclear Energy System Assessment (NESA) Dr. Ferhat Aziz National Nuclear Energy Agency, BATAN - Indonesia Presented at Joint PESS/INPRO/INIG Side Event Nuclear Energy
More informationINPRO TM Towards Nuclear Energy System Sustainability Waste Management and Environmental Stressors
10th GIF-IAEA Interface Meeting IAEA HQs, Vienna, Austria. 11-12 April 2016 INPRO TM Towards Nuclear Energy System Sustainability Waste Management and Environmental Stressors General information 2 Title:
More informationNuScale Plant Market Competitiveness & Financeability
NuScale Plant Market Competitiveness & Financeability Jay Surina Chief Financial Officer NuScale Exposition August 20-21, 2015 TM SMR Market Potential UK NNL* calculated the potential SMR market to be
More informationNuclear Power Economics and Markets
Nuclear Power Economics and Markets IBC - Decommissioning of Nuclear Reactors & Materials 29 30 September 2014; Miami, Florida Edward Kee Disclaimer The NECG slides that follow are not a complete record
More informationExploring Real Option Analysis in Nuclear Energy Assessment Studies
Exploring Real Option Analysis in Nuclear Energy Assessment Studies U.Lauferts, L.Van Den Durpel NRG, TU Delft-Process & Energy, LISTO bvba Petten, The Netherlands Tel: +31 224 568124, Fax:+31 224 8490,
More informationL.D. Carter For USCSC
L.D. Carter For USCSC Why was a review needed? How was the analysis framed? What sources of information were used? What is the answer? What factors could significantly change the answer? What is the industry
More informationAssessment of Turkey s Nuclear Energy Policy. Mustafa YAVUZDEMIR 2017
Assessment of Turkey s Nuclear Energy Policy By Mustafa YAVUZDEMIR 2017 1 Outline 1. Introduction 2. Past and Current Energy Context 3. Challenges to Achieve Sufficient Nuclear Capacity 4. Current Legal
More informationNuclear power program in Poland
9th International School on Nuclear Power Warsaw, 15th November 2017 Dr Józef Sobolewski Director Department of Nuclear Energy Ministry, Poland Polish Power System Ministry The total maximum capacity in
More informationNuclear Innovation in Action Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)
Nuclear Innovation in Action Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) David Shropshire Planning and Economic Studies Connecting Roadmaps for Innovative Nuclear Energy to the NDC Timeline (COP23 Side IETA Pavilion)
More informationDynamic Analysis of Nuclear Energy System Strategies for Electricity and Hydrogen Production in the USA
Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Energy System Strategies for Electricity and Hydrogen Production in the USA L. Van Den Durpel, D. C. Wade, H. Khalil, A. Yacout Nuclear Engineering Division, Argonne National
More informationDevelopment of Indonesian Experimental Power Reactor Program: An Approach to Innovative R&D, Nuclear Cogeneration and Public Acceptance
Development of Indonesian Experimental Power Reactor Program: An Approach to Innovative R&D, Nuclear Cogeneration and Public Acceptance Taswanda TARYO National Nuclear Energy Agency of Indonesia (BATAN)
More informationNuclear-renewable hybrid energy systems for non-electric applications
Nuclear-renewable hybrid energy systems for non-electric applications Cost issues Saied Dardour 3E Analysis Unit Planning and Economic Studies Section Division of Planning, Information and Knowledge Management
More informationNuclear Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Avoidance in the EU
Position Paper Nuclear Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Avoidance in the EU The European Atomic Forum (FORATOM) is the Brussels-based trade association for the nuclear energy industry in Europe. The
More informationThe Economics of Nuclear Power
The Economics of Nuclear Power (April 2010) Nuclear power is cost competitive with other forms of electricity generation, except where there is direct access to low-cost fossil fuels. Fuel costs for nuclear
More informationIFIEC Position Paper on Nuclear Power
Securing competitive energy for industry IFIEC Position Paper on Nuclear Power Introduction and highlights 1. IFIEC represents the interests of industrial energy consumers in Europe for whom energy is
More informationReport of Energy Reform Committee, National Reform Council Quick Win Proposal for Solar PV Rooftops for Residential and General Buildings
Unofficial GIZ Translation of the Report of Energy Reform Committee, National Reform Council Quick Win Proposal for Solar PV Rooftops for Residential and General Buildings Original legal document: http://library2.parliament.go.th/giventake/content_nrc2557/d010558-01.pdf
More informationJordan s Nuclear Energy Programme
Technical Meeting on the Country Nuclear Power Profiles Jordan s Nuclear Energy Programme Yasmin Majali 10-13 May 2016 0 Jordan s Country Profile Total Area: 89,213 Km 2 Sea Port: Aqaba Coastline: 26 Km
More informationTHE PROGRESS OF NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAMME IN MALAYSIA
THE PROGRESS OF NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAMME IN MALAYSIA INPRO Dialogue Forum on Nuclear Energy Innovations: Common User Consideration for Small and Medium-sized Nuclear PR, Vienna, 10-14 October 2011 Ir Dr
More informationClient Name/Presentation Title
Client Name/Presentation Title MARCH 2 Introduction This presentation will address the following topics: Comparative levelized cost of energy for various technologies on a $/MWh basis, including sensitivities,
More informationAssessment of High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (HTGR) Capital and Operating Costs
Document ID: TEV-96 Revision ID: 0/09/202 Technical Evaluation Study Project No. 23843 Assessment of High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (HTGR) Capital and Operating Costs 0/09/202 TEV-96 0/09/202 Page:
More informationInnovations and Safety Ensuring in WWERs on the Base of Collaboration on the National and International Levels
IAEA INPRO DF9, Vienna 21 November 2014 Innovations and Safety Ensuring in WWERs on the Base of Collaboration on the National and International Levels Grigory Ponomarenko OKB GIDROPRESS Podolsk, Russian
More informationPotential of Distributed Generation (DG) in Thailand and a Case Study of Very Small Power Producer (VSPP) Cogeneration
Potential of Distributed Generation (DG) in Thailand and a Case Study of Very Small Power Producer (VSPP) Cogeneration POWERGEN ASIA 2015 Nicolas Leong, Business Development Manager, South East Asia, Power
More informationAn Overview of Nigeria s Nuclear Energy Programme in the INPRO Methodology area of Infrastructure
An Overview of Nigeria s Nuclear Energy Programme in the INPRO Methodology area of Infrastructure Francis Ibitoye Centre for Energy Research and Development, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife. Nigeria.
More informationRole of Nuclear Cogeneration in a Low Carbon Energy Future?
Role of Nuclear Cogeneration in a Low Carbon Energy Future? Dr. Henri PAILLERE Senior Nuclear Analyst, Nuclear Development Division henri.paillere@oecd.org NC2I Conference, Brussels, 14-15 September 2015
More informationFrom Market Uncertainty to Policy Uncertainty for Investment in LTO of NPP on Electricity Market
IAEA Fourth International Conference on Nuclear Power Plant Life Management Lyon, France 23-27 October 2017 From Market Uncertainty to Policy Uncertainty for Investment in LTO of NPP on Electricity Market
More informationRosatom Global Development, International Cooperation Perspective
ROSATOM STATE ATOMIC ENERGY CORPORATION ROSATOM Rosatom Global Development, International Cooperation Perspective Atomex-Europe 013 Forum Nikolay Drozdov Director, International Business State Corporation
More informationLessons from Fukushima
Lessons from Fukushima October 11, 2011 The Institute of Energy Economics, Japan Masakazu Toyoda, Chairman & CEO, Outline : Lessons from Fukushima 1. One NPP accident could stop other plants as well 2.
More informationIEA Flagship Publication, Energy Technology Perspectives
OECD/IEA - OECD/NEA IEA Flagship Publication, Energy Technology Perspectives 60 Sectors 60 Technologies 50 50 40 40 Gt CO2 30 20 10 0 2011 2020 2030 2040 2050 Power generation 41% Industry 19% Transport
More informationNEW POWER REACTOR DESIGNS
NUCLEAR ENERGY RENAISSANCE: ADDRESSING THE CHALLENGES OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND SUSTAINABILITY NCSR DEMOKRITOS Athens May 8, 2008 NEW POWER REACTOR DESIGNS Dimitrios Cokinos Brookhaven National Laboratory
More informationBest Practices and Experiences on Thailand s Energy Policy for Sustainable Development
Best Practices and Experiences on Thailand s Energy Policy for Sustainable Development Dr. Poonpat Leesombatpiboon Chief, Strategic International Energy Cooperation Ministry of Energy, Thailand Policy
More informationHigh Temperature Reactors in the Nuclear Energy System from position of the Hydrogen Economy
High Temperature Reactors in the Nuclear Energy System from position of the Hydrogen Economy P.N. Alekseev, A.L. Balanin, P.A. Fomichenko, E.I. Grishanin, D.A. Krylov, V.A. Nevinitsa, T.D. Schepetina,
More informationTABLE 1. Number of Member States considering or planning a nuclear power programme, according to their official statements (as of 31 December 2016)
Objective To assist Member States embarking on new nuclear power programmes in planning and building their national nuclear infrastructures. To provide integrated support to Member States with existing
More informationU.S. Nuclear Energy Program
Office of Nuclear Energy U.S. Nuclear Energy Program Bradley Williams Senior Advisor, Office of Nuclear Energy U.S. Department of Energy October 13, 2016 Nuclear Energy Tribal Working Group Trends in Nuclear
More informationMonte-Carlo Optimization Framework for Assessing Electricity Generation Portfolios
Monte-Carlo Optimization Framework for Assessing Electricity Generation Portfolios Peerapat Vithayasrichareon 1, Iain MacGill 1,2, and Fushuan Wen 1,2 1 School of Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications
More informationMethodology for calculating subsidies to renewables
1 Introduction Each of the World Energy Outlook scenarios envisages growth in the use of renewable energy sources over the Outlook period. World Energy Outlook 2012 includes estimates of the subsidies
More informationSmall Modular Reactors. Kristiina Söderholm, PhD Head of Nuclear Technology & Innovation Fortum, Finland
Small Modular Reactors Kristiina Söderholm, PhD Head of Nuclear Technology & Innovation Fortum, Finland 2016 Content What are SMRs? What are challenges for SMRs? Why do SMRs play a role in the future?
More informationThailand s Past Success and Future outlook of its Solar Energy Policy. Mr. Phongkarn Piamsuttitam 15 th June 2015
Thailand s Past Success and Future outlook of its Solar Energy Policy Mr. Phongkarn Piamsuttitam 15 th June 2015 Content Past Success Policy, Regulations and Plan in Thailand Solar Farm Proposed and COD
More informationOverview for a feasibility study
Overview for a feasibility study What, Why & Objectives of Feasibility Study? International Atomic Energy Agency Nuclear power option included within the national energy strategy MILESTONE 1 Ready to
More informationNuclear Power and Sustainable Development
Nuclear Power and Sustainable Development H-Holger Rogner International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm IX International School on Nuclear
More informationŁukasz Koszuk Atomic Forum Foundation
Łukasz Koszuk Atomic Forum Foundation Short introduction The Atomic Forum Foundation is a Polish non-profit organization, which was established in 2008. Our main aim is to inform and educate about the
More informationU.S. Nuclear Energy Program
Office of Nuclear Energy U.S. Nuclear Energy Program Bradley Williams Senior Advisor, Office of Nuclear Energy U.S. Department of Energy November 16, 2016 Trends in Nuclear Recognition of importance of
More informationHigh Temperature Gas Cooled Reactors
High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactors Frederik Reitsma Gas-Cooled Reactors Technology Nuclear Power Technology Development Section Division of Nuclear Power Department of Nuclear Energy 11th GIF-IAEA Interface
More informationThailand Power Development Plan (PDP 2007)
Thailand Power Development Plan (PDP 2007) By Mr. Prutichai Chonglertvanichkul Assistant Governor - Planning Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT) Presented to High Level Forum on Lao-Thai
More informationClean Power: Now and in the Future
Clean Power: Now and in the Future Defining Clean Power Only zero-emissions resources? Can fossil fuels be considered clean? Can a resource be defined as clean if it requires mining? Is clean used only
More informationMultiple approaches on supporting nuclear program development and contracting of NPPs
Multiple approaches on supporting nuclear program development and contracting of NPPs STATE NUCLEAR ENERGY CORPORATION ROSATOM Technical Meeting Topical Issues on Infrastructure Development: Development
More informationRenewable Energy Plan in Thailand Karnnalin Theerarattananoon
Renewable Energy Plan in Thailand Karnnalin Theerarattananoon November 12, 2014 1 Content 1. Thailand s Energy Situation 2. Thailand s Energy Policy 3. Renewable Energy Development 2 Thailand s Energy
More informationEconomics of the Fuel Cycle. Guillaume De Roo & John E. Parsons May 1, 2009
Economics of the Fuel Cycle Guillaume De Roo & John E. Parsons May 1, 2009 Outline Part 1: The Fuel Cycle in Economic Perspective 2 strategic issues 3+ key alternative cycles Part 2: The Cost of the Fuel
More informationJapan s Nuclear Power Program -Trends and Issues-
Japan s Nuclear Power Program -Trends and Issues- Asia Energy Security Workshop Beijing, May 12-17, 2005 Tatsujiro Suzuki Senior Research Scientist Central Research Institute of Electric Power Company
More informationSMALL MODULAR REACTORS: CONTOURS OF PROLIFERATION/SECURIT Y RISKS
SMALL MODULAR REACTORS: CONTOURS OF PROLIFERATION/SECURIT Y RISKS Sharon Squassoni Director, Proliferation Prevention Program Center for Strategic & International Studies Platts 4 th Annual Small Modular
More informationNuclear Energy Agency
Nuclear Energy Agency Defining Plant-level Costs The Full Costs of Electricity Provision Nuclear Energy Agency International Workshop, OECD, Paris 20 January 2016 Geoffrey ROTHWELL, PhD geoffrey.rothwell@oecd.org
More informationIAEA SUPPORT OF GLOBAL DECOMMISSIONING ACTIVITIES
International Conference ECED 2015 Eastern and Central European Decommissioning, 23-25 June 2015, Trnava, Slovakia IAEA SUPPORT OF GLOBAL DECOMMISSIONING ACTIVITIES Ian Gordon Head of Waste Technology
More informationCurrent Government Policy on the Usage of Coal in Thailand
Current Government Policy on the Usage of Coal in Thailand Mr. Paramaet Payattapin Chief, Coal Management Department Fuel Management Division September 6 th, 2017 Agenda 1. Introduction to EGAT 2. The
More informationThe Commission's Energy Roadmap 2050
MEMO/11/914 Brussels, 15 December 2011 The Commission's Energy Roadmap 2050 Why is there a need for the Roadmap 2050? The EU has set itself the goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 80%-95% below
More informationRESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF TECHNICAL - ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY STUDY OF LTO DUKOVANY NPP
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF TECHNICAL - ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY STUDY OF LTO DUKOVANY NPP ČEZ, a.s. Dušan Pluhař 23.10.2017 Lyon 4th International Conference on NPP Life Management TECHNICAL-ECONOMIC STUDY
More information27 June 2013 Warsaw, Poland. Platts 8 th Annual European Nuclear Power 2013 Procurement for New Nuclear Programs
27 June 2013 Warsaw, Poland Platts 8 th Annual European Nuclear Power 2013 Procurement for New Nuclear Programs 1 Procurement for New Nuclear Programs Nuclear power programs risk and opportunity Supplier
More informationThe Cost of New Generating Capacity in Perspective
October 2009 The Cost of New Generating Capacity in Perspective Executive Summary Like all new generating capacity, there is uncertainty about the capital cost of new nuclear power plants. Estimates range
More informationCCS - Commercially Viable but a Political Priority?
CCS - Commercially Viable but a Political Priority? Presentation to the United States Energy Association Joan MacNaughton, Senior Vice President, Power & Environmental Policies August 4, 2011 Agenda Alstom
More informationEgyptian Nuclear Power Plant Program History and Status
Egyptian Nuclear Power Plant Program History and Status Nuclear Power Plant Authority (NPPA) WorleyParsons Nuclear Services 1 Egyptian Nuclear Program History Milestones Establishment of Atomic Energy
More informationSystem Effects and electricity generation costs in low-carbon electricity systems
System Effects and electricity generation costs in low-carbon electricity systems Marco Cometto, CFA Nuclear Energy Analyst, OECD/NEA Division of Nuclear Development Outline of the presentation A. COP
More informationTECHNICAL MEETING ON TECHNICAL SUPPORT ORGANIZATION (TSO) ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES May 2013
TECHNICAL MEETING ON TECHNICAL SUPPORT ORGANIZATION (TSO) ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES May 2013 1 MARCH 13 What is TSO? What do we understand as a Technical Support Organization (TSO) in the nuclear business?
More informationLAZARD'S LEVELIZED COST OF ENERGY ANALYSIS VERSION 10.0 DECEMBER 2016
LAZARD'S LEVELIZED COST OF ENERGY ANALYSIS VERSION 10.0 DECEMBER 2016 Introduction Lazard s Levelized Cost of Energy Analysis ( LCOE ) addresses the following topics: Comparative levelized cost of energy
More informationPOTENCY AND CHALLENGES OF NUCLEAR COGENERATION FOR INDONESIA EXPERIMENTAL POWER REACTOR DESIGN
POTENCY AND CHALLENGES OF NUCLEAR COGENERATION FOR INDONESIA EXPERIMENTAL POWER REACTOR DESIGN ERLAN DEWITA NATIONAL NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY OF INDONESIA (BATAN) 21 23 November 2016 Background The Republic
More informationDEVELOPMENT OF INDONESIA S NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE ROADMAP
11 th INPRO Dialogue Forum Roadmaps for a Transition to Globally Sustainable Nuclear Energy Systems 20-23 October 2015, IAEA, Vienna, Austria DEVELOPMENT OF INDONESIA S NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE ROADMAP OUTLINE
More informationGeneration Technology Options in a Carbon- Constrained World
Generation Technology Options in a Carbon- Constrained World Prepared by the Energy Technology Assessment Center (Reference: EPRI Report 1022782) Levelized Cost of Electricity Analysis Objectives Provide
More informationThe Economics of Small Modular Reactors
The Economics of Small Modular Reactors September 14, 2017 Executive Summary This report evaluates the market opportunities, commercialization timeframe, and cost competitiveness of light water small modular
More informationAdvances in Small Modular Reactor Design and Technology Development for Near-term Deployment
ESI-CIL Nuclear Governance Project Conference Series Small Modular Nuclear Reactors: The Outlook for Deployment Jen Tanglin Hotel, Singapore, 8 th November 2017 Advances in Small Modular Reactor Design
More informationDesign Features, Economics and Licensing of the 4S Reactor
PSN Number: PSN-2010-0577 Document Number: AFT-2010-000133 rev.000(2) Design Features, Economics and Licensing of the 4S Reactor ANS Annual Meeting June 13 17, 2010 San Diego, California Toshiba Corporation:
More informationIndonesia energy efficiency report
Indonesia energy efficiency report Latest update: March 211 Objectives: - slower energy consumption growth than GDP growth by 22 - industrial energy intensity reduction target of about 1% per year until
More information14 August 08
We vegotthepower After thirty years treading water, the nuclear power industry in the US is undergoing a renaissance. Paul Hinnenkamp, vice president of nuclear business development for Entergy Corporation,
More informationNetherlands Energy efficiency report
Netherlands Energy efficiency report Objectives: 51 TWh of end-use energy savings by 216 2%/year of energy savings over 211-22 Overview - (% / year) Primary intensity (EU=1) 1 18 - -.6% -- CO 2 intensity
More informationENERGY FORUM Consumers Perspective on Energy Issues By Philip Tan Representing FMM August 9, 2010 Sheraton Imperial Hotel, KL
ENERGY FORUM Consumers Perspective on Energy Issues By Philip Tan Representing FMM August 9, 2010 Sheraton Imperial Hotel, KL Industry s Concerns Benchmark for energy pricing Efficiencies in power sector
More informationAvailable online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 71 (2015 ) 22 32
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Energy Procedia 71 (2015 ) 22 32 The Fourth International Symposium on Innovative Nuclear Energy Systems, INES-4 Particle-type Burnable Poisons for
More informationSAFETY, SITTING, EMERGENCY PLANNING ISUES FOR SMR DEPLOYMENT IN INDONESIA
SAFETY, SITTING, EMERGENCY PLANNING ISUES FOR SMR DEPLOYMENT IN INDONESIA PANDE Made Udiyani National Nuclear Energy Agency (BATAN) Republic of Indonesia INPRO Dialogue Forum on Legal and Institutional
More informationOff-Grid Case Study: Bandung Polytechnic. Hendrik Bohne 4 November 2010
Off-Grid Case Study: Bandung Polytechnic Hendrik Bohne 4 November 2010 AGENDA Trends on solar energy Key Success Factors and Risks in developing PV Power Plants Off-grid Case study Overview Conergy Group
More informationUncertainties in the Uranium and Enrichment Markets: a Stochastic Approach
Uncertainties in the Uranium and Enrichment Markets: a Stochastic Approach Erich Schneider, Birdy Phathanapirom The University of Texas at Austin Roderick Eggert, Eric Segal Colorado School of Mines 31st
More informationThe Zero Emission Power Plant Concept
International Conference 2nd South East Europe Energy Dialogue Thessaloniki, 21-22 May 2008 The Zero Emission Power Plant Concept Dr. E. Kakaras, Professor Dr. A. Doukelis National Technical University
More informationindustrialized countries will be nuclear-powered, but in developing countries nuclear power will account for only about 20 per cent.
nuclear power and developing countries The IAEA has begun a world-wide survey of the market for nuclear power in developing countries. Technical, economic and other factors associated with the introduction
More informationSmall Modular Reactors Liz Ramsay Office of Nuclear Energy U.S. Department of Energy
Small Modular Reactors Liz Ramsay Office of Nuclear Energy U.S. Department of Energy National Conference of State Legislatures Nuclear Legislative Working Group October 28, 2013 All of the Above Clean
More informationNuclear Energy Systems Economic Evaluations: Capital Cost Operations & Maintenance Cost
Nuclear Energy Systems Economic Evaluations: Capital Cost Operations & Maintenance Cost Course 22.39, Lecture 18 11/13/06 Professor Neil Todreas Professor Neil Todreas 1 How to Think about Economics (and
More informationRosatom Integrated Offer for Africa
STATE ATOMIC ENERGY CORPORATION ROSATOM Rosatom Integrated Offer for Africa JSC Rusatom Overseas March, 2016 WORLD TOWARDS CO 2 REDUCTIONS «Can you actually get the amount of CO 2 put out per each unit
More informationThe Economics of Nuclear Energy
The Economics of Nuclear Energy April 3, 2009 Kazutomo Irie (Senior Research Fellow, the Institute of Energy Economics, Japan / Visiting Professor, Department of Nuclear Engineering and Management, Graduate
More informationResponse to NERSA REFIT Review Consultation Paper. 6 th May 2011
Response to NERSA REFIT Review Consultation Paper 6 th May 2011 Introduction to PAMSA Represents Pulp & Paper Industry (P&P) Members: Mondi, Sappi, Kimberly-Clark & Nampak The forest and forest product
More informationGeothermal Hot Water Supply of Saburtalo District in Tbilisi, Georgia
Geothermal Hot Water Supply of Saburtalo District in Tbilisi, Georgia 1. Project brief The project proposal Geothermal hot water supply of Saburtalo district in Tbilisi, Georgia has been developed in order
More informationIAEA Safety Standards for Research Reactors
Safety Standards for Research Reactors David Sears Research Reactor Safety Section Division of Nuclear Installation Safety ANSN Workshop on Periodic Safety Review of RRs 2-6 December 2013, BAPETEN Training
More informationConcepts and Features of ATMEA1 TM as the latest 1100 MWe-class 3-Loop PWR Plant
8 Concepts and Features of ATMEA1 TM as the latest 1100 MWe-class 3-Loop PWR Plant KOZO TABUCHI *1 MASAYUKI TAKEDA *2 KAZUO TANAKA *2 JUNICHI IMAIZUMI *2 TAKASHI KANAGAWA *3 ATMEA1 TM is a 3-loop 1100
More informationGenIII/III+ Nuclear Reactors
OL1&2 GenII GenIII OL3 TVO s Olkiluoto Nuclear Power Plant in Finland GenIII/III+ Nuclear Reactors RESEARCH NEEDES AND CHALLENGES FISA 2009, Prague Contents What are the GenIII features Evolutionary development
More informationSustainable Energy Roadmap & Implementation Plan (SERIP) Alexander Ochs Senior Director of Climate and Energy
Sustainable Energy Roadmap & Implementation Plan (SERIP) Alexander Ochs Senior Director of Climate and Energy Goal An energy system that is socially, economically and environmentally sustainable Our role
More informationResearch Article An Evaluation of SMR Economic Attractiveness
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, Article ID 3698, 8 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/3698 Research Article An Evaluation of SMR Economic Attractiveness Sara Boarin and Marco E. Ricotti
More informationNuclear Power Plant Safety Basics. Construction Principles and Safety Features on the Nuclear Power Plant Level
Nuclear Power Plant Safety Basics Construction Principles and Safety Features on the Nuclear Power Plant Level Safety of Nuclear Power Plants Overview of the Nuclear Safety Features on the Power Plant
More information