Regional Trends in Global Phytogenic. Feed Additives Usage. Head of CC Phytogenics, Michael Noonan, M.Agr.Sc.,MBA. Biomin GmbH, Austria June 14, 2017

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Regional Trends in Global Phytogenic. Feed Additives Usage. Head of CC Phytogenics, Michael Noonan, M.Agr.Sc.,MBA. Biomin GmbH, Austria June 14, 2017"

Brent Phillips
5 years ago
Views:

1 Regional Trends in Global Phytogenic Feed Additives Usage Michael Noonan, M.Agr.Sc.,MBA Head of CC Phytogenics, Biomin GmbH, Austria June 14, 2017

2 Regional Trends in Global PFA Usage Phytogenic Feed Additives Usage Causes of increasing demand for PFA s Animal Protein Ban/reduction in use of AGP s Volatility in raw material prices Alternative feed ingredients Changing consumer tastes/preferences BIOMIN PFA Benchmark Study goals, methodology, findings/species PFA market growth projections Opportunities/implications for global feed industry 2 2

3 Growing Demand in Animal Protein Source: Rabobank, FAO, OECD (2013) 3 3

4 Ban and Reduction in Use of AGPs Changes ongoing Legislation driven more countries committing to ban in future Canada From 2017 onwards no AGP or preventive AB in animal feed Consumer driven McDonalds is limiting the use of antibiotics in its chicken OECD Country Australia - Legislative status of country in terms of animal use of antimicrobials - Ban on antimicrobial growth promoters No, but some AGPs are banned (fluoroquinolones, avoparcin, virginiamycin, etc.) (Australian Commission on safety and quality in health care, 2013). EU Yes. All AGP banned in 2006 Japan No (Maron et al., 2013) Mexico South Korea United States Yes, AGP were banned in 2007 with some exceptions (avoparcin, vancomycin, bacitracin, tylosin, virginiamycin, etc.) (Maron et al., 2013). Yes, since 2011 the use AGP has been discontinued until a veterinary oversight system can be put in place (USDA, 2011) No. The FDA released voluntary guidelines for the industry to withdraw the use as growth promoters of medically important antibiotics (US Food and Drug Administration, 2013). Source: Adapted from Tallard (2015, OECD) 4 4

5 Volatile Raw Material prices Source: Roué (2015; 58 th FEFAC Annual General Meeting) 5 5

Alternative Feed Ingredients Alternatives

distillery co-products Source: Ravindran

6 Alternative Feed Ingredients Alternatives derived from different feedstuff Cereals and cereal milling co-products, roots and fruits Oilseed meals, grain legumes and distillery co-products Source: Ravindran (2011, FAO); Dr. Jacob (2013; Univ. of Kentucky) 6 6

7 Alternative Feed Ingredients Limitations: Low palatability High fiber contents, phytic acid Protein contents and balance of AA pattern Presence of anti-nutrients Source: Ravindran (2011, FAO); Dr. Jacob (2013; Univ. of Kentucky) 7

8 Consumer Tastes/Preferences Shifts in consumer preferences Meat & poultry brand choices More focus on food labels Food brand differentiation - opportunities Animal wellness, natural plant based ingredients, environment Safe feed, safe food 8

9 Phytogenics Feed Additives Benchmark Study Project Goal: To capture the pertinent information regarding the use of PFA s among livestock producers, including habits, motivations and trends. Methodology Invitation to online questionnaire Industry categories: poultry production (broilers, layers) pig production feed production Job title: growers production managers nutritionists veterinarians independent nutritionists & consultants Geographic Regions: North & Central America South America EMEA Asia and Oceania 9 9

10 Phytogenics Feed Additives Benchmark Study Business respresented by respondents 10 10

11 Phytogenics Feed Additives Benchmark Study Role of respondents 11 11

12 Geographic Distribution Survey respondents by region Source: Biomin, Phytogenic Feed Additives Survey,

13 Business Type Business represented by respondents Source: Biomin, Phytogenic Feed Additives Survey,

14 Phytogenic Feed Additive Use Do you use phytogenic feed additives? Source: Biomin, Phytogenic Feed Additives Survey,

15 Reasons for PFA Use Top reasons that respondents use PFAs Source: Biomin, Phytogenic Feed Additives Survey,

16 Number of PFA s Used How many different phytogenic products do you use? Source: Biomin, Phytogenic Feed Additives Survey,

17 Reasons Against PFA USE Top reasons that respondents do not use PFAs. Source: Biomin, Phytogenic Feed Additives Survey,

18 PFA Priorities - Poultry The importance of PFA benefits: poultry respondents Source: Biomin, Phytogenic Feed Additives Survey,

19 PFA Priorities - Swine The importance of PFA benefits: swine respondents Source: Biomin, Phytogenic Feed Additives Survey,

20 PFA Priorities - Feed The importance of PFA benefits: feed and other respondents Source: Biomin, Phytogenic Feed Additives Survey,

21 Phytogenics at BIOMIN 21 21

22 US $ million PFA Market Growth Projections Source: Biomin 22 22

23 Concluding remarks Currently approx. 5% of the 1,2 bn tons of feed contain PFA s. Digestibility enhancement, feed efficiency, FCR, AGP s replacement now key factors in PFA usage. More large scale livestock (global) operations now using PFA s. Global demand increasing less AGP s, reducing feed costs, emissions, improve feed efficiency. Shift in consumer tastes preferences favouring PFA s usage By 2030 PFA inclusion could reach 20% of global feed tonnage

Feed Industry Perspective on EU Protein Production Nick Major FEFAC President

Feed Industry Perspective on EU Protein Production Nick Major FEFAC President 23 November 2018 Vienna What is FEFAC? European Association of Compound Feed Manufacturers Founded in 1959 Association of associations