Summary of the 1997 Fish Habitat Risk Assessment Panel
|
|
- Winfred O’Neal’
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Tongass National Forest Forest Plan Interdisciplinary Team 8465 Old Dairy Road Juneau, Alaska (907) Reply To: RS-G-b Date: May 7, 1997 Subject: To: From: Summary of the 1997 Fish Habitat Risk Assessment Panel Tongass Land Management Plan (TLMP) Planning File Ron Dunlap, TLMP IDT; Panel Resource Specialist INTRODUCTION A panel of four fisheries experts was convened on April 7 and 8, 1997 in Juneau, Alaska to assess levels of risk to fish habitat associated with seven management alternatives from the TLMP Revision. Panel evaluators were asked to provide professional judgments regarding the effects of full implementation for 100 years of each alternative on the likelihood of maintaining habitat sufficient to support sustainable production of several fish species.l! The judgment of effects considered: the likelihood that management activities will degrade existing fish habitat 0 the likelihood that management activities will maintain current distributions of fish habitat the likelihood that currently degraded habitats will recover during the 100-year period These elements are expressed in five possible outcomes that were evaluated for each management alternative. The panel was convened primarily to examine Alternatives 10 (RSDEIS Preferred Alternative) and 11 (FEIS Preferred Alternative) that were not previously paneled. The experts participating in this assessment also participated in the previous fish habitat risk assessment panel held in November, Panel evaluators integrated their personal experience and knowledge of fish ecology with technical information and details presented on TLMP alternatives. Using this information, they developed professional judgments regarding likely outcomes related to the management scenarios inherent in each alternative. Generally the issues identified and discussed during this assessment were the same or similar to those identified and discussed during the 1995 panel assessment. (Authors note: not all issues discussed during the 1995 panel assessment were re-addressed during the 1997 panels. Some of these issues appear to have been omitted from the 1997 discussions because the issues were still fresh in the panel evaluators minds from the 1995 effort and they were simply not addressed again in detail. Important issues will be included by the author as notes where necessary to explain differences between the 1995 and 1997 panels.) The panel assessment process, including the list of participants in this assessment, is provided in Appendix 1. 1/ In this regard the fish panel is different from the various wildlife panels in that they evaluated the risk to providing habitat sufficient to support well distributed, viable populations rather than a level of sustainable harvest well distributed across the forest.
2
3 PRIMARY ISSUES OF CONCERN Roads The effect of roads on fish habitat was a paramount concern of panel evaluators across all alternatives and species. The experts believed that, of all management actions proposed, roads presented the greatest risk to degradation of fish habitat and thus effects on fishery resources. In general, the panel concluded that the risk of roads damaging habitat increased directly with the slope of the terrain being roaded. Concern was expressed that roads constructed on slopes classed as mass movement index 3 (MMI3) would cause accelerated mass and surface erosion and subsequent sedimentation in fish habitat. A reduction of road development in any alternative reduces risks to fish habitat. Panel evaluators expressed concern that stream crossing structures, especially culverts, may block movement of fish, particularly juveniles, and result in a long term reduction in available habitat to fish. Panel evaluators had concern with both upstream and downstream fish passage. Increased risk of over harvest of fish due to improved road access was a final concern that panel evaluators expressed regarding road development. Small populations (of any fish species) in general were considered to be at risk of over harvest due to improved access via roads. Particular fish spawning populations. such as steelhead trout and sockeye, and resident populations of cutthroat trout were thought to be susceptible to over harvest by anglers. even when initial populations are not small. (Authors note: panel evaluators were instructed to focus their assessment on fish habitat issues. Increased harvest due to improved road access to salmonid populations, one might argue, is an issue exogenous to fish habitat. However, because panel evaluators expressed concerns about increased access and because the location of new roads (e.g., placing them close to or farther away from riparian areas) and the management of access via roads are within the authority of the Forest Service, these panel comments are included in this report.) Prince of Wales Island, Kuprenoff Island, Kuiu Island and Chichagof Island were singled out by panel evaluators as currently having road densities sufficient to be a concern for maintaining adequate fish habitat. Timber Harvest The total acres of timber to be harvested in an alternative had the second highest influence on the panel evaluators opinions regarding risks to fish habitat. Risks to fish habitat increased as the number of acres harvested increased. Panel evaluators expressed a concern that windfirm buffers may be difficult to design and suggested monitoring and additional research to address this concern. Reserves Panel evaluators identified reserves as contributing in a general sense to the reduction in risk to stocks. The presence of reserves served to reduce the number of acres available for harvest within a given watershed and therefore may reduce risk to a specific population of fish. Panel evaluators did, however, say that a true fish reserve system should be designed around a meta-population concept. Protection of individual stocks may not insure adequate protection of fish habitats over the long run (centuries). Panel evaluators also stated that having reserves in a watershed may be better for fish than not having reserves, but reserves still may not insure protection of watershed function. In addition, panel evaluators expressed concern that to be effective in protecting fish habitat, reserves needed to encompass entire watersheds rather than only parts of watersheds. Protection of less than an entire watershed left watershed function vulnerable to changes due to management activities. 3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 Alternative 10 Similar to alternative 5, panel evaluators believed that alternative 10 did not provide enough riparian protection. Although Option 2 riparian protection provides adequate riparian protection measures, it is applied to a relatively small portion of the landscape (FHIP I areas only). The remainder of the fish habitats (about 80%) receive only option 3 level of protection. Panel evaluators also stated that the projected level of harvest in old-growth and the associated development of roads over the next 100 years caused them to assign more likelihood points to outcomes III and IV than they might otherwise have done. Alternative 11 The relatively few miles of roads projected to be constructed and the moderate levels of timber to be harvested over the next 100 years reduce risks of degradation to fish habitat. Panel evaluators also believed that the forest-wide application of a relatively high level of riparian protection (2a) reduced the risks to fish habitat. Alternative Summary For all fish species evaluated, the order of ranking by alternative was similar. Generally, ranking from least risk to fish habitat to greatest risk to fish habitat by alternative was 1, 11, 5, 10,2, 9, 9. For steelhead and resident Dolly Varden, alternatives 11 and 5 were reversed while ratings for sockeye and chinook were the same for alternatives 11 and 5. Based on the mean sum of scores for outcomes I & II, alternatives 1, 5, 10, and 11 were grouped noticeably higher than were alternatives 2, 9, and 9 for the stream-rearing species--coho salmon, steelhead trout, cutthroat trout, and Dolly Varden char. Groupings also occur for the ocean-rearing pink salmon and chum salmon. However, in the grouping for these species, alternative 2 is included at the tail end of the higher group. This shift is likely attributed to a lower importance being placed on riparian protection for these fish as compared to stream-rearing fish. Alternatives are clustered at a relatively high level for sockeye and chinook salmon. As previously discussed this result is attributed to the freshwater habitats for these fish being more capable of buffering management impacts.. FEATURES Panel evaluators rated features used to design alternatives for their importance to maintaining fish habitat (Appendis 3.) The rating of these features provides additional insight into the panel evaluators thoughts regarding the assignment of likelihood points to different outcomes in the various alternatives. Consistent with the evaluators assignment and discussions of likelihood points, the features which represent potential negative impacts to fish habitat were rated as very detrimental. These features are timber harvesting (including acres harvested on steep slopes (MMI3) and road and access management. Features that remove acres from consideration for timber harvesting activities were considered to be important positive features in maintaining fish habitat. One exception is the small island protection feature in alternative 11. Panel evaluators indicated that small islands (<1,000 acres) do not have significant fish habitat. Longer rotations were thought to be positive features while high levels of riparian protection were critical to maintaining fish habitat. Watershed analysis was rated conceptually as a positive feature but evaluators noted that only alternative 11 included this feature. Firmness of standards and guidelines and monitoring were features which were rated as important positive features by two of the panel evaluators and as a critical feature by the other two evaluators. Generally the appraisal of the alternative features were consistent with the panel evaluators scores and the notes taken of their discussion. 11
12 Appendix 1. The Panel Assessment Process List of panel evaluators, facilitator, resource specialists, scribe, and silent observer Facilitator: Gordon Reeves, Research Fish Scientist, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA-FS, Corvalis Oregon. Evaluators: Andy Dolloff, Research Fish Scientist, Southern Research Station, USDA-FS Blacksburg, Virginia. Steve Elliott, Research Fish Biologist, Sport Fish Division, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Douglas, Alaska. Jeff Kershner, National Aquatic Ecologist, USDA-FS, Logan, Utah. Mike Murphy, Fish Biologist, National Marine Fishery Service, Auke Bay Laboratory, Juneau, Alaska. Resource Specialists: Ron Dunlap, Alaska Region Fish Habitat Relationship Coordinator, USDA-FS, Juneau, Alaska. Steve Kessler, Tongass Land Management Team - Assistant Team Leader, USDA-FS, Juneau, Alaska. Rick Woodsmith, Research Hydrologist, Pacific Northwest Research Station - Forest Sciences Laboratory, USDA-FS, Juneau, Alaska. Scribe: Cal Casipit, Alaska Regional Fish Program Leader, USDA-FS, Juneau, Alaska. Silent Observer: Lynn Humphrey, Recreation Resources Specialist, Tongass Land Management Team, USDA-FS, Juneau, Alaska. List of information provided to panel evaluators Overview video of forest planning: Bruce Rene, TLMP. Overview presentation of alternatives; Chris Iverson: TLMP (including the handout copy of overheads used Tongass Land Management Plan Framework for Alternative, Panel Assessments. Spring, 1997 ) Tongass Maps illustrating 7 alternatives and land use designations (I , and 11): 1954 productive old growth; 1995 productive old growth abundance and distribution and second growth; anticipated old growth condition in 2095 for all alternatives. Controlling Stability Characteristics of Steep Terrain with Discussion of Needed Standardization of Mass Movement Hazard Indexing: A Resource Assessment by Douglas Swanston. Evaluation of the Use of Scientific Information in Developing the Final Alternative for the Tongass Land Management Plan (Everest et. al. 1997) Conceptual Approaches for Maintaining Well-Distributed, Viable Wildlife Populations: A Resource Assessment (Iverson and Rene 1997 in GTR #392). Multivariate Geomorphic Analysis of Forest Streams: Implications for Assessment of Land Use Impacts on Channel Condition. Publication in Earth Surface Processes and Landforms by R. Woodsmith. Evaluation of the Use of Scientific Information in Developing the Final alternative for the Tongass Land Management Plan. Draft report by Everest, Swanston, Shaw, Smith, Julin, and Allen. Risk Assessment Panels as a component of the TLMP Revision Process; information on the process. 12
13 Map of the Tongass Scientific information and the Tongass Land Management Plan: Key Findings From the Scientific Literature, Species Assessments. Resource Analysis, Workshops, and Risk Assessment Panels. PNW GTR # 386. Summary of the Revised Supplement to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Tongass National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan - goals and objectives, fish and riparian related standards and guidelines, resource schedules, and appendix J (watershed analysis direction). Channel Type User Guide, Tongass National Forest, Southeast Alaska, (R10-TP-26, 4/92) General Information Sheet Forest Description water resources riparian resources wilderness designation mass movement index ratings total past timber harvest acres past timber harvest map past timber harvest by mass movement index estimated past harvest in riparian areas miles of existing roads Alternative components (All numbers refer only to VCU s with scheduled timber harvest unless other wise indicated.) # VCU s with timber harvest scheduled total acres of VCU s with timber harvest scheduled acres scheduled for harvest miles of existing roads miles of new roads (100 yr.) road density/sq.mi. miles of temporary roads miles of streams classed PHIP I, class 1,2 & 3 miles of streams classed FHIP I, class 1 total stream miles total class 1 stream miles total class 2 stream miles total class 3 stream miles Riparian management levels by alternative Overview of Riparian Standards and Guidelines Diagrammed examples of riparian buffers Channel type user guide Anadromous Fish Habitat Assessment Best Management Practices Harvest Threshold Summary Watershed Analysis direction FHIP Map (Forest Habitat Integrity Map - fish)
14 Fish species and possible outcomes considered The fisheries scientists rated five possible outcomes for each of eight species of fish, including both resident and anadromous life strategies for two of the species. The fish considered in the assessment were: sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha ) chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus gairdneri) cutthroat trout - anadromous (Oncorhynchus clarki) cutthroat trout - resident (Oncorhynchus clarki) Dolly Varden char - anadromous (Salvelinus malma) Dolly Varden char - resident (Salvelinus malma) The outcomes used by the fisheries scientists to predict habitat conditions, for purposes of relative comparison of Forest plan alternatives, were: Outcome L New management activities will not cause additional degradation of freshwater habitat for the species. Productive habitat will be well distributed across the Forest, or the historic range of the species within the Forest. Habitats that are currently degraded will recover or be moving toward recovery after 100 years. Outcome II. New management activities will result in minor additional degradation of freshwater habitat for the species. Productive habitat will be adequately distributed across the Tongass National Forest, or the historic range of the species within the Forest. Most habitats that are currently degraded will recover or be moving toward recovery after 100 years. Outcome III. New management activities will result in moderate additional degradation of freshwater habitat for the species. Distribution of productive habitat across the Tongass National Forest, or the historic range of the species within the Forest, will contain some gaps where the species will not occur or where populations will be severely reduced. Many habitats that are currently degraded will not recover or be moving toward recovery after 100 years. Outcome IV. New management activities will result in major additional degradation of freshwater habitat for the species. Distribution of productive habitat across the Tongass National Forest, or the historic range of the species within the Forest, will contain large gaps where the species will not occur or where populations will be severely reduced. Most habitats that are currently degraded will not recover or be moving toward recovery after 100 years. Outcome V. New management activities will result in severe additional degradation of freshwater habitat for the species. The species will be extirpated or populations will be decimated over much of its historic range on the Tongass National Forest. Habitats that are currently degraded will not recover or be moving toward recovery after 100 years. The risk assessment panel s conclusions are presented for each of the fish species (including the anadromous and resident strategies for cutthroat trout and Dolly Varden char) considered and for each of the management alternatives assessed. A discussion of elements considered by the panelist to be significant, is included. 14
15 Appendix 2. Rational for combining likelihood point assignment sums for outcomes I and II, and for outcomes III, IV and V. Outcome Sums The mean scores for outcomes I and II are combined, as are scores for outcomes III, IV and V, to assist with comparisons among alternatives. Combining these outcomes is based on the assumption that a distinction can be made between outcomes II and III (words below in bold are excerpted from outcomes II and III) regarding amount of habitat degradation, habitat distribution, and extent of habitat recovery in 100 years. Outcomes I and II define the effects of new management activities as causing no or minor degradation, describe the distribution of habitat as well distributed or adequately distributed, and currently degraded habitats will be moving toward recovery or most will be moving toward recovery at the end of 100 years. Outcomes III, IV, and V define the effects of new management activities as causing moderate to severe degradation, species population distribution will exhibit some gaps or the species will be extirpated from some parts of it s historic range, and many to all habitats will not have recovered or be moving toward recovery at the end of 100 years. Alternatives can be grouped based on distinctions observed between likelihood points distributions. Alternatives 1,5, 10, and 11 are broadly similar to each other in likelihood point distributions, as are alternatives 2, 9, and _ _ -. a. I..*-... I.
16 Appendix 3. Individual panel evaluators appraisals of important features to maintaining fish habitat. Key to appraisal s: Ratings of the contribution of fish habitat 0: Feature is Neutral DK: Don t Know +: Important Positive Feature ++: Critical Feature - : Detrimental -- : Very Detrimental > : More Than < : Less Than = : Comparable NA : Not Applicable _..a1,,..: we. -~, 16.. T..-...y.c _.?. -.u.a* m.. ;-.* * ~-C-w.-~ ~ me q... ^... - : A, _.*-----L.aD.-r &r-w ;,r I _--- \.-_ , ,. A Ir
17
18
19
20
21
Queen Charlotte Islands Project
Queen Charlotte Islands Project 1981 Introduction The Queen Charlotte Islands Fish-Forestry Interaction Program was an interdisciplinary study assessing the interactions between timber harvesting operations
More informationChehalis Basin Strategy Programmatic SEPA Draft EIS
Chehalis Basin Strategy Programmatic SEPA Draft EIS History of Flooding I-5 closed in 1990, 1996, 2007, 2009 Five largest flood events occurred since 1986 2 History of Habitat Degradation Harvest has been
More informationProject sponsors provided a brief presentation on their project(s), followed by comments from the Committee.
WRIA 14 Salmon Habitat Recovery Committee Meeting April 17, 2014 Summary notes Project sponsors provided a brief presentation on their project(s), followed by comments from the Committee. Allyn Shoreline
More informationThe status of aquatic ecosystems in the Basin
AQUATIC SPECIES AND HABITATS The status of aquatic ecosystems in the Basin is influenced by both natural and human processes. The geologic and geomorphic processes described earlier formed and continue
More informationPacific Northwest Region, Forest Service Basin-scale Restoration Prioritization Process
Pacific Northwest Region, Forest Service Basin-scale Restoration Prioritization Process Pacific Northwest Region U.S.D.A. Forest Service Dave Heller, Regional Fish Program Leader Bruce McCammon, Regional
More informationTim Hayden, Yurok Tribe Natural Resources Division Mat Millenbach, Western Rivers Conservancy Sarah Beesley, Yurok Tribal Fisheries Program
BLUE CREEK FOREST SANCTUARY: RESTORING OLD GROWTH FOREST ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION, PROTECTING SALMON, WILDLIFE, AND TRADITIONAL- LIFE WAYS AND CULTURE IN THE FACE OF CLIMATE CHANGE Tim Hayden, Yurok Tribe Natural
More informationPrioritization Framework For Management Strategies in the Entiat Subbasin Plan
Prioritization Framework For Management Strategies in the Entiat Subbasin Plan November, 2004 Co-Planners: Chelan County Yakama Nation Prepared by Introduction The purpose of this report is to provide
More informationApplying Ecosystem Services to Collaborative Forest Management Elk River Public Meeting
Applying Ecosystem Services to Collaborative Forest Management Elk River Public Meeting Nikola Smith Ecologist and Ecosystem Services Specialist U.S. Forest Service Port Orford City Hall February 2, 2017
More informationJHI Sweetheart Lake: Spawning Habitat Assessment & Maintenance
Technical Memorandum JHI Sweetheart Lake: Spawning Habitat Assessment & Maintenance Date: April 4, 2014 To: Duff Mitchell Company: JHI From: Dan Miller, Lon Mikkelsen, Inter Fluve, Inc. Introduction Juneau
More informationCALFED Ecosystem Restoration Program (ERP)
CALFED Ecosystem Restoration Program (ERP) The goal of the Ecosystem Restoration Program is to improve and increase aquatic and terrestrial habitats and improve ecological functions in the Bay-Delta to
More informationAppendix I: ESA Section 7 Letters of Concurrence
Appendix I: ESA Section 7 Letters of Concurrence I1: NMFS/USFWS Letter of Concurrence dated June 25, 2008 I2: USFWS Letter of Concurrence dated May 18, 2010 I3: NMFS Letter of Concurrence dated March 28,
More informationElizabeth Camarata, Ecology Technician, USDA Forest Service, Chugach National Forest, Cordova Ranger District
Importance of pre-treatment data to accompany management of Elodea canadensis and fisheries tesources on the Copper River Delta Elizabeth Camarata, Ecology Technician, USDA Forest Service, Chugach National
More informationOverview of the Instream Flow/Fish Habitat Element of the WRIA 1 Watershed Management Project. By Jeremy Freimund, P.H.
Overview of the Instream Flow/Fish Habitat Element of the WRIA 1 Watershed Management Project By Jeremy Freimund, P.H. January 31, 2006 1 Presentation Outline General Overview Instream Flow and Fish Habitat
More informationCooperative Management of the Bald Eagle in South Coastal Alaska Fred B. Samson U.S Forest Service, Missoula, MT
Cooperative Management of the Bald Eagle in South Coastal Alaska Fred B. Samson U.S Forest Service, Missoula, MT Wildlife is abundant in the south coastal forests of Alaska and the Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus
More informationMill Creek Fisheries Monitoring Program: Ten Year Report. Final Report to Save-the-Redwoods League
Mill Creek Fisheries Monitoring Program: Ten Year Report. Final Report to Save-the-Redwoods League Christ Howard and Stillwater Sciences Recommended Citation: Stillwater Sciences. 2006. Mill Creek fisheries
More informationPlanning and Combination (Planning and Acquisition) Project Proposal
Planning and Combination (Planning and Acquisition) Project Proposal Project Number 15-1308 Project Name Asotin County Geomorphic/Watershed Assessment Sponsor Asotin County Conservation District List all
More informationDecision Memo Tongass National Forest. Wrangell Ranger District. Pre-Commercial Thinning CE 2010
Decision Memo Tongass National Forest Pre-Commercial Thinning CE 2010 Decision It is my decision to authorize pre-commercial thinning (PCT) on approximately 7,500 acres of overstocked young-growth forest
More informationScience affects the way we think together. Lewis Thomas FOOD FOR FISH, FOOD FOR THOUGHT: MANAGING THE INVISIBLE COMPONENTS OF STREAMS
PNW Pacific Northwest Research Station INSIDE Headwater Streams as Food Pipes............. 2 Nature s Band-Aid as Food Provider......... 3 The Ocean in the Forest.................... 4 Jump-Starting Ailing
More informationJuly 1, Jim Ruff -- Manager, Mainstem Passage and River Operations
Bruce A. Measure Chair Montana Rhonda Whiting Montana W. Bill Booth Idaho James A. Yost Idaho Dick Wallace Vice-Chair Washington Tom Karier Washington Melinda S. Eden Oregon Joan M. Dukes Oregon July 1,
More informationCedar River Watershed Habitat Conservation Plan
Cedar River Watershed Habitat Conservation Plan Briefing for the WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council November 21, 2013 Cyndy Holtz Seattle Public Utilities cyndy.holtz@seattle.gov What is an HCP? Habitat Conservation
More informationTurbidity Changes During Culvert to Bridge Upgrades at Carmen Creek, Idaho. Randy B. Foltz, Breann Westfall, and Ben Kopyscianski.
Rocky Mountain Research Station Research Note United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Research Note RMRS-RN-54 July 13 Turbidity Changes During Culvert to
More informationADMINISTRATIVE UNIT: Shasta Trinity National Forest, Trinity River Management Unit (TRMU)
SHASTA-TRINITY NATIONAL FOREST Fisheries Specialist Report for the Misery Hill Trail Trinity River Management Unit PROJECT NAME: MISERY HILL TRAIL PROJECT ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT: Shasta Trinity National Forest,
More informationBANFIELD #9 LODE CLAIM (Plan of Operations) Umpqua National Forest Tiller Ranger District June, 2011
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region BANFIELD #9 LODE CLAIM (Plan of Operations) Umpqua National Forest Tiller Ranger District June, 2011 ii Introduction and
More informationJUNE 20, Collaborative Initiatives: Restoring watersheds and large landscapes across boundaries through State and Federal partnerships
TESTIMONY of LESLIE WELDON DEPUTY CHIEF, NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE BEFORE THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES SUBCOMMITTEE ON PUBLIC
More informationEstimation of rearing habitat requirements of San Joaquin River Chinook salmon using the Emigrating Salmonid Habitat Estimation (ESHE) Model
Estimation of rearing habitat requirements of San Joaquin River Chinook salmon using the Emigrating Salmonid Habitat Estimation (ESHE) Model California Central Valley Cramer Fish Sciences *Draft conceptual
More informationProject # Protect and Restore the Crooked and American River Watersheds. Response to December 9, 2010 ISRP Comments
Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resource Management Administration Enforcement Habitat/Watershed Harvest Production Research Resident Fish WATERSHED DIVISION P.O. Box 365 Lapwai, Idaho 83540 Phone:
More informationOregon Coast Coho Conservation Plan For the State of Oregon
Oregon Coast Coho Conservation Plan For the State of Oregon Prepared by Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife In Partnership with State and Federal Natural Resource Agencies March 16, 2007 Table of Contents
More informationPRELIMINARY DECISION MEMO
PRELIMINARY DECISION MEMO Snoqualmie Christmas Tree Project USDA Forest Service Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest Snoqualmie Ranger District King County, Washington Proposed Action, Purpose and Need
More informationAMPHIBIANS AND FISH. Darren Fong Aquatic Ecologist, National Park Service. Emily Burns Director of Science & Education, Save the Redwoods League
REDWOOD FORESTS BIRDS Tom Gardali Director, Pacific Coast & Central Valley Group, Point Blue Conservation Science AMPHIBIANS AND FISH Darren Fong Aquatic Ecologist, National Park Service PLANTS Emily Burns
More informationNOTE(S): 1. Tongass National Forest LUD mapping from El Capitan GIS Scoping (R. Carstensen 2013).
1/31/14 BCB Figure 1 ADJACENT LAND USE DESIGNATION MAP LEGEND: Mitigation Bank Site 1. Tongass National Forest LUD mapping from El Capitan GIS Scoping (R. Carstensen 2013). 2/3/2014 10:06 AM S:\Prince
More informationNational Best Management Practices Monitoring Summary Report
United States Department of Agriculture National Best Management Practices Monitoring Summary Report Fiscal Year 2013 Forest Service FS-1042 January 2015 United States Department of Agriculture Forest
More informationExempting the Tongass and Chugach National Forests from the Roadless Areas Conservation Rule August 8, 2003
Exempting the Tongass and Chugach National Forests from the Roadless Areas Conservation Rule August 8, 2003 THE WILDLIFE SOCIETY ALASKA CHAPTER 1910 Glacier Avenue Juneau, AK 99801 Re: Exempting the Tongass
More informationLIVING LANDS Helping Land Trusts Conserve Biodiversity
LIVING LANDS Helping Land Trusts Conserve Biodiversity Habitat Restoration: Information for Land Trusts What is Habitat Restoration? Habitat restoration is defined as the process of assisting the recovery
More informationCATEGORICAL EXCLUSION REVIEW - NEPA COMPLIANCE RECORD
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT SALEM DISTRICT OFFICE Marys Peak Resource Area Lincoln County, Oregon CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION REVIEW - NEPA COMPLIANCE RECORD Project: Miami Corporation
More informationFebruary 4, Erik Merrill, ISAB Coordinator; Jim Ruff, ISAB Ex Officio; and Laura Robinson, Program Implementation and Liaison Specialist
Bill Bradbury Chair Oregon Henry Lorenzen Oregon W. Bill Booth Idaho James A. Yost Idaho Jennifer Anders Vice Chair Montana Pat Smith Montana Tom Karier Washington Phil Rockefeller Washington February
More informationCulvert Prioritization Model: Aiding Communities in the Selection of Priority Restoration Projects
Culvert Prioritization Model: Aiding Communities in the Selection of Priority Restoration Projects SNHPC Meeting January 24, 2017 1 Undersized Culverts! Culvert Sizes (~7,500 VT culverts) 6,000 5,000 69%
More informationPart 3B: Policy for the Evaluation of Conservation Efforts: The Certainty That the Conservation Effort Will Be Effective
Coho Assessment Part 3B: PECE Final Report May 6, 2005 Oregon Coastal Coho Assessment Part 3B: Policy for the Evaluation of Conservation Efforts: The Certainty That the Conservation Effort Will Be Effective
More informationA Landscape Analysis Plan 1
A Landscape Analysis Plan 1 Nancy E. Fleenor 2 Abstract A Landscape Analysis Plan (LAP) sets out broad guidelines for project development within boundaries of the Kings River Sustainable Forest Ecosystems
More informationNetMap Community Digital Watersheds & Shared Analysis Tools
NetMap Community Digital Watersheds & Shared Analysis Tools Earth Systems Institute U. S. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Experiment Station & Collaborating Agencies The NetMap Project Collaborators:
More informationV* AS AN INDEX OF SEDIMENT IMPAIRMENT TO STREAM HABITAT IN THE ARROYO CORTE MADERA DEL PRESIDIO WATERSHED MARIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 2005
KRIS edition V* AS AN INDEX OF SEDIMENT IMPAIRMENT TO STREAM HABITAT IN THE ARROYO CORTE MADERA DEL PRESIDIO WATERSHED MARIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 2005 PREPARED FOR MILL VALLEY STREAMKEEPERS PO
More informationSEA LICE MONITORING STUDY IN GOLETAS CHANNEL AND QUEEN CHARLOTTE STRAIT, BC YEAR 6. Tlatlasikwala First Nation Marine Harvest Canada Inc 2017
SEA LICE MONITORING STUDY IN GOLETAS CHANNEL AND QUEEN CHARLOTTE STRAIT, BC YEAR 6 Tlatlasikwala First Nation Marine Harvest Canada Inc 2017 SEA LICE MONITORING STUDY IN GOLETAS CHANNEL AND QUEEN CHARLOTTE
More informationPost-Fire BAER Assessment Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER)
November 2017 Post-Fire BAER Assessment Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER) Information Brief Diamond Creek Fire Values at Risk Matrix and Treatments CentralWashingtonFireRecovery.info EMERGENCY DETERMINATION
More informationMunicipal Class Environmental Assessment for Pottersburg Creek Slope Stability Study South of Hamilton Road, Schedule B
Municipal Class Environmental Assessment for Pottersburg Creek Slope Stability Study South of Hamilton Road, Schedule B February 13, 2013 Municipal Class EA Process We are here Purpose and Objective of
More informationTo: The Marine Stewardship Council Date: 27 April 2007 Re: Submission of comments on MSC s Quality and Consistency Project
To: The Marine Stewardship Council Date: 27 April 2007 Re: Submission of comments on MSC s Quality and Consistency Project The State of the Salmon Consortium (www.stateofthesalmon.org) is a joint program
More informationNotes of Appreciation for the Plan Amendment Summary of Audubon s concerns, followed by detailed comments Background...
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Earl Stewart Forest Supervisor Federal Building 648 Mission Street Ketchikan, Alaska 99901 comments-alaska-tongass@fs.fed.us Re: Comments Regarding the Tongass Land Management Plan
More informationLINKING FRESHWATER REARING HABITAT TO SKAGIT CHINOOK SALMON RECOVERY. Appendix C of the Skagit Chinook Recovery Plan
LINKING FRESHWATER REARING HABITAT TO SKAGIT CHINOOK SALMON RECOVERY Appendix C of the Skagit Chinook Recovery Plan November 4, 2005 Eric M. Beamer Bob Hayman Devin Smith GIS work: Kate Ramsden and Karen
More informationLIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS EXPORTS - PART 1
LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS EXPORTS - PART 1 The liquefied natural gas (LNG) industry is trying to exploit the growing interest in new alternative energy development. In this rush, Oregon has been targeted for
More informationNorthwest Forest Plan Aquatic Conservation Strategy
Northwest Forest Plan Aquatic Conservation Strategy The Implementation of the Northwest Forest Plan Aquatic Conservation Strategy on BLM and FS-administered lands within the Oregon Coastal Coho ESU Submitted
More informationThe Maybeso Experimental Forest
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service September 2004 Pacific Northwest Research Station Water and land intertwine. Introduction The Maybeso Experimental Forest is in southeast Alaska within
More informationRole of Science and Process for the Expert Regional Technical Group to Assign Survival Benefit Units for Estuary Habitat Restoration Projects
DRAFT Do Not Cite or Distribute ERTG Role of Science and Process, version June 18, 2012 Role of Science and Process for the Expert Regional Technical Group to Assign Survival Benefit Units for Estuary
More informationSNOHOMISH COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO.1. Your Northwest renewables utility
SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO.1 Your Northwest renewables utility November 1,2012 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) 888 First Street
More informationCollaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program
Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program Meg Roessing U.S.D.A. Forest Service Forest Management Staff Washington Office mroessing@fs.fed.us Background: Department and Agency Priority Our shared
More informationCOPPER SALMON WILDERNESS LEGACY ROADS PROJECT
Aquatic Biota Biological Evaluation/Assessment & Specialist Report COPPER SALMON WILDERNESS LEGACY ROADS PROJECT Prepared for the Environmental Assessment Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest Powers Ranger
More information7.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
7.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 7.1 SUMMARY This report results from a Washington State Legislature grant to study the feasibility of storing additional water in Lake Wenatchee. The Legislature acted upon
More informationLower Columbia River Pile Dike Assessment
Lower Columbia River Pile Dike Assessment David Gorman, PE August 2, 2011 Credits Hans R. Moritz, US Army Corps of Engineers Portland District Carl Kassebaum, AECOM Project Manager AECOM Coastal and Rivers
More informationLuck Creek Restoration
Luck Creek Restoration United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Tongass National Forest June 2014 Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact Thorne Bay Ranger District Thorne Bay,
More informationANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT FOR 2014 ROGUE RIVER SPRING CHINOOK SALMON CONSERVATION PLAN ROGUE WATERSHED DISTRICT OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE
ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT FOR 2014 ROGUE RIVER SPRING CHINOOK SALMON CONSERVATION PLAN ROGUE WATERSHED DISTRICT OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE INTRODUCTION In September of 2007, the Oregon Fish and
More informationPublic Notice of Application for Permit
US Army Corps of Engineers Alaska District KENAI FIELD OFFICE Regulatory Division (1145) CEPOA-RD 44669 Sterling Highway, Suite B Soldotna, Alaska 99669-7915 Public Notice of Application for Permit PUBLIC
More informationLAWSUIT TO PROTECT SALMON FROM PESTICIDES UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT
LAWSUIT TO PROTECT SALMON FROM PESTICIDES UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Background Information on Pesticides and Salmon Pesticides have profound effects on Northwest salmon and may be a serious factor
More informationLOWER WATER TEMPERATURES WITHIN A STREAMSIDE BUFFER STRIP
L USDA Forest Service Research Note SE- 193 April 1973 LOWER WATER TEMPERATURES WITHIN A STREAMSIDE BUFFER STRIP Abstract. --The removal of streamside vegetation increases the water temperature in mountain
More informationTHE QUABBIN RESERVOIR Boston s Drinking Water Supply Area Aerial Google Earth Images
THE QUABBIN RESERVOIR Boston s Drinking Water Supply Area Aerial Google Earth Images The Quabbin Reservoir is Surrounded by 58,000 Acres of Public Forest Which Protects the Drinking Water for Boston and
More informationBuilding Science and Accountability into Community-based Restoration: Can a New Funding Approach Facilitate Effective and Accountable Restoration?
FEATURE: FISHERIES RESTORATION Building Science and Accountability into Community-based Restoration: Can a New Funding Approach Facilitate Effective and Accountable Restoration? ABSTRACT: In 2004, the
More informationDECISION MEMO. West Fork Blacktail Deer Creek Hardened Crossing
Page 1 of 6 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Madison Ranger District Madison County T12S, R4W, Section 30 The project is in the Gravelly Landscape, Snowcrest Recommended Wilderness Management
More informationCHESAPEAKE BAY COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES AND RESTORATION PLAN. Habitat GIT Meeting 9 May 2017
CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES AND 255 255 255 237 237 237 0 0 0 217 217 217 163 163 163 200 200 200 131 132 122 239 65 53 80 119 27 RESTORATION PLAN 110 135 120 252 174.59 112 92 56 62 102
More informationBlue Mountains ELK NUTRITION AND HABITAT MODELS
USFS Pacific Northwest Blue Mountains ELK NUTRITION AND HABITAT MODELS Second generation models for management Managing for elk requires compromises among economic, ecological, and recreational objectives.
More informationNESST- National Ecosystem Services Strategy Team
NESST- National Ecosystem Services Strategy Team Robert Deal, Emily Weidner, Mary Snieckus, Tommie Herbert, Jonas Epstein, Tania Ellersick, Krista Gebert, Nikola Smith, Greg Arthaud Overview Ecosystem
More informationMONITORING QUESTIONS AND TASKS FOR THE GEORGE WASHINGTON PLAN
MONITORING QUESTIONS AND TASKS FOR THE GEORGE WASHINGTON PLAN MONITORING THEME 1 CONSERVATION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY FOR ECOSYSTEMS MQ 1: How are ecological conditions maintaining or making progress toward
More informationA Summary Guide to the. Rifle River WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN. Know Your Watershed Protect Its Resources
A Summary Guide to the Rifle River WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN Know Your Watershed Protect Its Resources Table of Contents The Watershed... 3 The Management Plan... 4 Designated and Desired Uses... 5 Sources
More informationProposed New Type and Diameter (ft)* T30N, R6E, Sec. 5, NW¼ NW¼- South Fork Clear Creek. Diameter (ft)
DECISION MEMO CLEAR CREEK CULVERTS REPLACEMENTS USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Moose Creek Ranger District, Nez Perce National Forest Idaho County, Idaho I. Decision I have decided to authorize replacement
More informationCalifornia Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region. Tentative Order No. R XXXX
California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region Amending Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. R2-2008-0078 for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish
More informationCulvert Prioritization Model: Aiding Communities in the Selection of Priority Restoration Projects
Culvert Prioritization Model: Aiding Communities in the Selection of Priority Restoration Projects Meeting #1 of the Technical Advisory Committee March 18, 2016 1 Press 2 Prepared February 2016 Undersized
More informationChapter 4 - Consultation and Coordination
Chapter 4 - Consultation and Coordination Chapter 4-1 Mt. Hood Meadows Parking Improvements EIS Chapter 4-2 4.0. Consultation and Coordination Chapter 4 - Consultation and Coordination This chapter provides
More informationFacts About Pesticides, Salmon, and the Endangered Species Act
Facts About Pesticides, Salmon, and the Endangered Species Act Background Information on Pesticides and Salmon Pesticides have profound effects on Northwest salmon and may be a serious factor in their
More informationFlow-ecology relationships. Flow-ecology relationships Susitna case study
Flow-ecology relationships Flow-ecology relationships Susitna case study Flow regime Ecologically-Relevant Flow Regime Characteristics Seasonal or typical conditions Annual extreme conditions High and
More informationIn Reply Refer To: 5400/1792 (OR-120) OR Mister Slate CT Timber Sale EA OR Slater Rocks Environmental Assessment.
In Reply Refer To: United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT COOS BAY DISTRICT OFFICE 1300 AIRPORT LANE, NORTH BEND, OR 97459 Web Address: http://www.blm.gov/or/districts/coosbay
More informationSTREAM AND BUFFER AREA PROTECTION/RESTORATION
STREAM AND BUFFER AREA PROTECTION/RESTORATION AMENDMENT OPTIONS TO STRENGTHEN POLICY IN HEADWATERS AREAS DRAFT SUBSEQUENT TO THE JANUARY 25, 2007 MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE
More informationRiparian Buffers and Stream Restoration
Riparian Buffers and Stream Restoration Why focus on riparian areas? Link land and water on any given site and link landscapes together in a watershed Riparian corridors protect the circulatory system
More informationLANDSCAPE SCALE PLANNING: INNOVATIVE TOOLS USED BY MD SHA AND TX DOT
LANDSCAPE SCALE PLANNING: INNOVATIVE TOOLS USED BY MD SHA AND TX DOT AASHTO TIG Project Texas Department of Transportation Maryland State Highway Administration Sandy Hertz Deputy Director, Office of Environmental
More informationNew Jersey Forest Stewardship Program Spatial Analysis Project Map Products And Data Layers Descriptions
New Jersey Forest Stewardship Program Spatial Analysis Project 2007 Map Products And Data Layers Descriptions 01/07 NJ Forest Stewardship Program (FSP) Spatial Analysis Project (SAP) Methodology Project
More information3-13 Other Required Findings and Regulatory Compliance
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences 3-13 Other Required Findings and Regulatory Compliance 3-13.1 Short-term Uses and Long-term Productivity NEPA requires consideration of the relationship
More informationConstruction of Artificial Riffles and Pools For Freshwater Habitat Restoration
Construction of Artificial Riffles and Pools For Freshwater Habitat Restoration Kate Howe Preserving biodiversity is one of the central goals of ecologists and conservation biologists today. As human population
More informationPart Two. Some Considerations in Salmon Management
Part Two Some Considerations in Salmon Management Tom Reimchen Introduction The west coast of North America exhibits one of the richest assemblages of marine and terrestrial ecosystems on the planet. One
More informationThe project will be conducted in partnership with the Nez Perce Tribe.
DECISION MEMO Tributary to Brushy Fork Culvert Replacements Private Land USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Powell Ranger District Nez Perce Clearwater National Forests Idaho County, Idaho I. Decision
More informationChapter 10 Natural Environment
Chapter 10 Natural Environment Existing Conditions The Natural Environment Element addresses the protection, conservation, preservation, and restoration of the natural resources the Bayview Ridge Subarea,
More informationIntroduction. Methodology for Analysis
1 Medicine Lake Caldera Vegetation Treatment Project Scenic Report Prepared by: /s/gary Kedish Natural Resources Specialist for: Big Valley and Doublehead Ranger Districts Modoc National Forest February
More informationChapter 4 Agencies and Persons Consulted
Chapter 4 Agencies and Persons Consulted The Forest Service consulted the following individuals, Federal, State, and local agencies, tribes and non-forest Service persons during the development of this
More informationWater and Environment. Monterey Peninsula, Carmel Bay and South Monterey Bay Integrated Regional Water Management Draft Plan
Water and Environment Monterey Peninsula, Carmel Bay and South Monterey Bay Integrated Regional Water Management Draft Plan December 11, 2006 Presentation Outline Purpose of IRWM Planning Status of Plan
More informationScenario Narratives Case Study: KBNERR
Scenario Narratives Case Study: KBNERR Each of the following 4 scenario narratives was developed through one on one informational interviews with local leaders and researchers through the KBNERR Coastal
More informationSBEADMR Priority Treatment Areas Process and Results
SBEADMR Priority Treatment Areas Process and Results GIS Optimization & Interdisciplinary Validation, September & October 2015 Purpose Use GIS to focus and prioritize potential treatment areas within the
More informationAre Juvenile Chinook Salmon Entrained at Unscreened Diversions in Direct Proportion to the Volume of Water Diverted?
Are Juvenile Chinook Salmon Entrained at Unscreened Diversions in Direct Proportion to the Volume of Water Diverted? Charles H. Hanson Abstract Mark-recapture experiments were used to test the null hypothesis
More informationThe Galton Project Kootenai National Forest. The Galton Project
Introduction The Galton Project The Fortine Ranger District of the Kootenai National Forest is in the early stages of developing a project entitled Galton, named for the mountain range dominating the eastern
More informationSitka Access and Travel Management
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Tongass National Forest Alaska Region R10-MB-554 January 2006 Sitka Access and Travel Management Sitka Ranger District, Tongass National Forest, Alaska
More informationCATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS Developed Recreation/Trails, Wilderness & Roadless Jasper Mountain Priest Lake Ranger District Idaho Panhandle National Forest Description of the
More informationEnvironmental Assessment Sandy River Delta Section 536 Ecosystem Restoration Project Multnomah County, Oregon
Environmental Assessment Sandy River Delta Section 536 Ecosystem Restoration Project Multnomah County, Oregon East Channel Dam under Construction, Sandy River Delta, 1930s February 2013 Table of Contents
More informationEnvironmental and Natural Resource Management Consultants
Channel migration, big trees, side channels and the Sockeye (Blueback) Salmon: Design and implementation of a comprehensive sustainable restoration plan for the Upper Quinault River Valley, Washington
More informationOVERVIEW OF RESERVOIR OPERATIONS AND FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT
OVERVIEW OF RESERVOIR OPERATIONS AND FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT 255 255 255 237 237 237 0 0 0 217 217 217 163 163 163 200 200 200 COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN 131 132 122 239 65 53 80 119 27 110 135 120 252 174.59
More informationThe Chesapeake Bay Blueprint:
PHASE II The Chesapeake Bay Blueprint: THE BEST HOPE FOR RESTORING CLEAN WATER THIS NATION HAS EVER SEEN Peter McGowan/U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Strategic Plan 2016-2020 The Chesapeake Bay Foundation
More informationOregon Spatial Analysis Project
Oregon Spatial Analysis Project Oregon Department of Forestry June 2006 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 1 Introduction... 3 Background... 3 History of Forest Stewardship and Spatial Analysis Projects...
More informationPennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission State & Tribal Wildlife Grants Annual Summary-2016
Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission State & Tribal Wildlife Grants Annual Summary-2016 Divers in the Allegheny River (left); Pistol grip (Quadrula verrucosa), a large-river mussel (below). Images: Western
More informationECOSYSTEM HEALTH AND SALMON RESTORATION: A BROADER PERSPECTIVE
Orr 1 ECOSYSTEM HEALTH AND SALMON RESTORATION: A BROADER PERSPECTIVE BRUCE K. ORR Stillwater Sciences, Berkeley, California, USA ABSTRACT An understanding of healthy, naturally functioning riverine and
More information