Environmental Characterization Summary and Remediation Scoping Avalon Substation Property th Avenue Southwest Seattle, Washington
|
|
- Aron Wilcox
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 17, 2015 TO: FROM: RE: CC: Shannon Straws, Seattle City Light Nick Galvin and Ross Stainsby Environmental Characterization Summary and Remediation Scoping Avalon Substation Property th Avenue Southwest Seattle, Washington Tom Meyer, Seattle City Light This memorandum provides the findings of previous investigations conducted by Seattle City Light (City Light), a summary of Hart Crowser s recent soil sample investigation, and our recommendations for remediation at the City Light Avalon substation property (Site). The Site is at th Avenue SW in Seattle, Washington (Figure 1). Purpose We understand that City Light is evaluating known and unknown historical contamination on this property and would like to remove contaminated soil from the Site. A mercury cleanup was previously undertaken by City Light within the building and the drainage system leading into the former transformer yard. The objective of the recommended remedial action is to remove contaminated soil and verify that the remaining soil does not exceed Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) Method A unrestricted or MTCA Method B direct contact cleanup levels. The MTCA Method B cleanup levels referenced in this memorandum were obtained from the Washington State Department of Ecology Cleanup Level and Risk Calculation (CLARC) database. This memorandum is intended to provide general guidance for planning purposes; it is not intended to prescribe contractor means and methods. We understand that City Light plans to contract directly with a contractor to complete the remedial activities recommended in this memorandum. It is the contractor s responsibility to comply with all local, state, and federal regulations during performance of all work Westlake Avenue North, Suite 200 Seattle, Washington Fax Tel
2 Seattle City Light July 17, 2015 Page 2 Site Description The Site is in a mixed commercial and residential area bordered by residential houses to the north and east, and an alley and gas station to the south. 35th Avenue SW is to the west, and SW Genesee Street is to north. The southern portion of the Site consists of a gravel yard with concrete transformer pads used by the former substation. The gravel yard and concrete pads are surrounded by a chain link fence. An abandoned structure that formerly housed rectifiers for the Seattle trolley system sits in the center of the Site. The areas surrounding the building to the north and west are grassy and/or landscaped. A gravel driveway from SW Genesee Street is directly east of the building. City Light is using the gravel yard and portions of the building for storage. To the west, along 35th Avenue SW, there is an abandoned retail building and paved parking lot. Landscaped areas surround the south and southeast sides of the building. A site plan showing Site features is presented on Figure 2. Previous Investigations Summary Avalon Unit Substation Mercury Remediation In 2009, City Light conducted an investigation and limited cleanup of mercury at the Site. The results are presented in Attachment A and summarized below. The source of mercury is believed to be the mercury filled rectifiers formerly housed at the Site and removed in the 1960s. A Lumex RA 915 atomic absorption spectrometer was used by City Light to measure ambient and point source areas of mercury. An electrical conduit trench was found to have the highest concentrations of mercury vapors, which ranged from 500 to 17,000 nanograms per cubic meter (ng/m 3 ); the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) industrial re occupancy level is 1,300 ng/m 3. In 2010, a contractor for City Light treated the trench with repeated surficial applications of HgX, which bonds to mercury and then is removed with a mercury vacuum. A drain pipe within the trench contained the highest concentration of mercury. The drain was intercepted in the yard and plugged from both ends with concrete for future pipe removal. The trench was coated with a white epoxy to encapsulate residual mercury and distinguish it from the surrounding areas. No other areas of mercury contamination were found in this investigation. Hart Crowser Investigation Summary On behalf of City Light, Hart Crowser completed a near surface investigation to further characterize the Site for potential contamination associated with known former site operations. In March 2015, four composite concrete samples (AV CONC 1 through 4) and 14 composite soil samples (AV COMP1
3 Seattle City Light July 17, 2015 Page 3 through COMP14) were collected. On April 24, 2015, one additional composite soil sample (AV COMP15) was collected. The composite concrete samples comprised four or five subsamples collected by chiseling concrete from the surface of the pad. The composite soil samples comprised three to five subsamples collected from below surficial soil and vegetation between 0 and 6 inches below ground surface (bgs). The composite soil and concrete sample locations and constituents of concern concentrations are shown on Figure 2. The composite samples were analyzed for one or more of the following: Diesel and lube oil range petroleum hydrocarbons by NWTPH Dx; Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) by EPA Method 8082A; Organochlorine pesticides by EPA Method 8081B; Chlorinated acid herbicides by EPA Method 8151A; and MTCA 5 metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, and mercury) by EPA Methods 6010C and 7471B. A data quality review and laboratory reports are in Attachment B. Composite Concrete Sample Analytical Results Concrete composite sample locations and constituents of concern results are shown on Figure 2 and analytical results are presented on Table 1. Cadmium was above MTCA cleanup levels in the concrete samples AV CONC 1 and CONC 2 at 4.5 and 2.7 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), respectively. These samples were taken from locations in the southern portion of the concrete pad inside the former transformer yard. Lube oil was measured at the 2,000 mg/kg MTCA cleanup level in AV CONC 2. PCB results were all below the practical quantification limit (PQL). Composite Soil Sample Analytical Results Composite soil sample locations and constituents of concern results are shown on Figure 2 and analytical results are presented on Table 2. Dieldrin was above MTCA cleanup levels in five composite samples (AV COMP8, COMP9, COMP10, COMP11, and COMP 15) at concentrations ranging from 140 to 2,900 µg/kg. These composite samples were taken from locations in the grassy/landscaped areas adjacent to the remaining structure. PCBs and herbicide concentrations were either below laboratory PQLs or below MTCA unrestricted soil cleanup levels. Lead was above the MTCA Method A unrestricted cleanup level in three composite samples (AV COMP2, COMP3, and COMP5) at concentrations ranging from 270 to 510 mg/kg and at the 250 mg/kg cleanup
4 Seattle City Light July 17, 2015 Page 4 level in composite sample AV COMP7. Composite samples COMP2, COMP3, and COMP5 were taken from locations in the former transformer yard, inside the fence. AV COMP7 was taken from locations adjacent to the driveway along the east property boundary. The soil sample with the highest lead concentration (AV COMP5) was also reanalyzed for lead after being extracted through the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP). The TCLP lead result was 0.22 mg/l, which is below the characteristic hazardous waste level of 5 mg/l. Mercury was measured in composite sample AV COMP8 at 6.6 mg/kg, above the MTCA Method A cleanup level of 2 mg/kg. AV COMP8 was taken from locations adjacent to the driveway along the east side of the existing structure. Soil sample AV COMP8 was also reanalyzed for mercury after being extracted through the TCLP. The TCLP mercury result was below the PQL. Arsenic was at the 20 mg/kg MTCA cleanup level in AV COMP13. Chromium was detected in composite sample locations across the Site at concentrations between 18 and 100 mg/kg. The MTCA Method A cleanup levels for chromium III and chromium VI are 2,000 and 19 mg/kg, respectively. We assume the chromium indicates the presence of chromium III, since there are no known historical uses (such as chrome plating) of chromium VI at the Site. Composite Soil Subsample Analytical Results The composite soil subsample locations and constituents of concern results are shown on Figure 3 and analytical results are presented on Table 3. Because of the lead analytical results for samples AV COMP2, COMP3, COMP5, COMP7, and COMP11 (slightly below MTCA cleanup level), the subsamples that made up these composite samples were also analyzed for lead. Lead was above the MTCA Method A unrestricted cleanup level of 250 mg/kg in AV COMP2 SS4 (1,100 mg/kg); AV COMP3 SS1 (650 mg/kg); AV COMP5 SS1, SS2, and SS4 (670 mg/kg, 1,000 mg/kg, and 280 mg/kg, respectively); AV COMP7 SS1 and SS3 (450 mg/kg and 410 mg/kg, respectively); and AV COMP11 SS1 and SS5 (510 mg/kg and 260 mg/kg, respectively). Lead was measured below or at cleanup levels in the remaining subsamples. The soil samples AV COMP2 SS4 and AV COMP5 SS2 were also reanalyzed for lead after being extracted through the TCLP. The TCLP lead results for AV COMP2 SS4 and AV COMP5 SS2 were 0.21 and 0.52 mg/l, respectively. The subsamples that made up AV COMP2 were analyzed for cadmium. Cadmium was above the MTCA Method A cleanup level of 2.0 mg/kg in AV COMP2 SS4 (5.2 mg/kg). Cadmium was either not detected or was below cleanup levels in the remaining AV COMP2 subsamples.
5 Seattle City Light July 17, 2015 Page 5 The subsamples that made up composite samples AV COMP7 and AV COMP8 were analyzed for mercury. Mercury was above the MTCA Method A cleanup level of 2.0 mg/kg in AV COMP8 SS1 (30 mg/kg). Mercury was not detected in subsample AV COMP8 SS2 or SS3. Mercury was either not detected or was below cleanup levels in all AV COMP7 subsamples. The subsamples that made up composite sample AV COMP13 were analyzed for arsenic. Arsenic was above the MTCA Method A cleanup level of 20 mg/kg in AV COMP13 SS3 (49 mg/kg). Arsenic was below the MTCA Method A cleanup level in AV COMP13 SS1 and SS2 (17 mg/kg and 19 mg/kg, respectively). The analytical results indicate dieldrin was distributed evenly across the northwestern portion of the Site, therefore no subsamples were analyzed for pesticides. The composite subsample locations and constituents of concern are shown on Figure 3. The pesticides aldrin, endrin ketone, and 4,4 DDT (and its residues 4,4 DDD and 4,4 DDE), as well as the herbicides 2,4 D and pentachlorophenol (PCP), were detected in samples from one or more locations at concentrations below their respective MTCA cleanup levels. Hand Auger Sampling Hand auger sample locations and constituents of concern results are shown on Figure 3 and analytical results are presented on Table 4. To delineate the vertical extent of contamination at selected locations, eight hand auger samples were collected from four locations (AV CORE 1 through 4) in April At each location, one sample was collected from approximately 8 to 10 inches bgs and another from 18 to 20 inches bgs. The samples from AV CORE 1 were analyzed for mercury and lead. The samples from AV CORE 2 were analyzed for cadmium and lead. The samples from AV CORE 3 were analyzed for cadmium, lead, and PCBs. The samples from AV CORE 4 were analyzed for lead and dieldrin. Lead, cadmium, and mercury were either not detected above the PQL or were below cleanup levels in all hand auger samples. Dieldrin was not detected above the PQL in either sample from AV CORE 4. PCBs were not detected above PQLs in either sample from AV CORE 3. Remediation Work Elements As stated above, the objective of the proposed remedial action is to remove contaminated soil and verify that the remaining soil does not exceed MTCA Method A or MTCA Method B unrestricted direct contact cleanup levels. City Light is planning to remove the existing structure located in the center of the property. This work will be performed separately and is planned to pre date the excavation of contaminated soils.
6 Seattle City Light July 17, 2015 Page 6 Remediation activities to be completed by the contractor should generally consist of the following tasks (additional detail on selected tasks is provided later in this memorandum): Prepare a site specific health and safety plan. Locate public and private utilities. Prepare a temporary erosion and sediment control (TESC) plan. Obtain applicable permits, which may include (but are not limited to) fill and grading permits. City Light will coordinate street use permits. The contractor will be responsible for submitting a traffic control plan as necessary. Install temporary security fencing around the perimeter of the Site. Excavate the indicated areas of the property to a depth of approximately 10 inches. The actual depth of excavation will be determined by verification samples in each area. Proposed excavation depths are shown on Figure 2. The transformer yard fence, concrete retaining wall, and the concrete stairs will be removed during remediation work. The elevation change between upper and lower yards will need to be graded to meet Seattle Code and relevant permits. Excavation work within the drip line of trees marked for preservation will need to be completed during the rainy season and will need to adhere to procedures specified by City Light. Backfill and compact excavated areas after analytical results are received, and place organic topsoil for later reseeding, as specified by City Light, over the structural fill material. Prepare and implement all necessary documentation and labeling for proper shipment of contaminated soils and concrete. Haul soil and concrete and dispose of it at a properly permitted and authorized solid waste landfill. The contractor will coordinate with all disposal facilities. A Hart Crowser environmental representative will be present during construction activities and will be responsible for the following work elements: Collect and analyze soil samples for disposal characterization, if necessary. Observe and document field activities, including erosion control measures. Monitor on site remedial actions for compliance with applicable environmental codes and regulations. Collect confirmation samples from the excavated areas and, in coordination with City Light, identify required additional cleanup activities accordingly. Earthwork The contractor is responsible for protecting utilities, fences, pavement, structures on or adjacent to the property, and vegetation located outside the property boundary from all activities associated with remedial actions. Excavation areas and volumes provided in this report are based on available
7 Seattle City Light July 17, 2015 Page 7 information. Actual areas and volumes excavated may change, depending on field observations or the results of confirmation sampling. Excavation Arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury, and pesticide concentrations in near surface soil exceed MTCA cleanup levels in several locations, as shown on Figure 2. We recommend removing the impacted soil to a depth of approximately 10 inches across the Site (Figure 2). Additional excavation to 16 inches bgs or more may be required in locations where verification samples indicate contamination still remains above MTCA cleanup levels. Based on our review of the soil sample analytical results, we estimate that an excavation depth of 10 inches should remove the contaminated soils. This depth is assumed across the majority of the Site. The total excavation area will be approximately 9,800 square feet, and the volume of soil removed will be approximately 300 cubic yards (cy). Excavation Backfill The contractor must backfill excavations as promptly as possible, but not until confirmation sampling is complete and test results are received. We anticipate that the soil sample results will be available within three days of sample collection. Excavations must be backfilled to be even with the surrounding ground surface, or graded to avoid surface depressions that would collect water. Excavations that are left open overnight must be surrounded by safety fencing. The backfill material must be compacted to a firm condition. The backfill material must be documented clean soil acceptable to City Light, and the Site surface must be covered with acceptable organic topsoil for later re seeding, as specified by City Light. If on site or off site trees or other vegetation are to be protected, selected amended soil backfill may be required, of the type and in locations specified by City Light. Erosion Control and Wet Weather Provisions The contractor must take the following precautions to minimize erosion and saturation of Site soil: Provide erosion and sediment control to prevent transport of sediment off site. In accordance with all applicable regulations, maintain erosion and sediment control until work is completed and accepted by City Light. Develop and implement an Erosion Control Plan compliant with all applicable regulations, and retain appropriately trained and certified personnel on site.
8 Seattle City Light July 17, 2015 Page 8 Protect on site soil from becoming too wet to achieve appropriate compaction by covering stockpiles, sealing exposed soil, and so forth. Schedule earthwork to minimize the potential for erosion, siltation, and disturbance of Site soil. Compact exposed soil to seal and reduce rainwater infiltration, and grade the surface to drain at the end of each work shift. Direct surface water away from fills and excavations. Suspend work if heavy rainfall occurs. Under no circumstances allow runoff from soil to leave the Site or otherwise flow to stormwater conveyance in the street right of way. Take appropriate preventive measures to prevent track out. Grading The contractor must grade work areas, including adjacent transition areas, uniformly. At project completion, the Site must be hand raked level. Soil Disposal Excavated soil and all other materials removed from the Site must be disposed of at a properly permitted and authorized Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Subtitle D facility or at a solid waste landfill meeting the requirements of Chapter of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC), as appropriate. Before remediation activities begin, the contractor must coordinate with City Light to confirm that the disposal facility has profiled the Site soil and City Light has obtained a bill of lading to facilitate transport. The contractor must provide documentation of legal disposal to City Light. Hazardous Building Material Previous investigations have indicated there are areas containing hazardous building materials (HBM) within the existing structure at the Site. These materials will be removed as part of building removal, and are not addressed in this scope. If any additional suspected HBM is encountered, work will be stopped in this area and a certified contractor may be required to sample, handle, and dispose of the material. This contractor should be prepared to handle it according to applicable local, state, and federal guidelines The contractor must provide documentation of legal HBM removal and disposal to City Light. Verification Sampling Before backfilling the excavation, the Environmental Representative will collect verification samples. For planning purposes, assume that approximately one discrete sample will be collected from each
9 Seattle City Light July 17, 2015 Page square foot excavation section. Select sidewall samples will be collected after consultation with City Light. The soil samples will be submitted to OnSite Environmental Inc. on an expedited turnaround time. We anticipate that results will be available within three working days from the day the samples were collected. Key Personnel Role Organization Contact Telephone Number Owner City Light Tom Meyer (206) Owner representative City Light Shannon Straws (206) Contractor TBD TBD TBD Contractor field representative TBD TBD TBD Environmental representative Hart Crowser Ross Stainsby (206) Onsite environmental representative Hart Crowser Nick Galvin (206) Onsite environmental representative Hart Crowser Michael Pagel (206) Schedule The tasks and an approximate schedule for remediation activities are: 1. Obtain necessary permits before [date TBD]. 2. Coordinate soil disposal before [date TBD]. 3. Begin excavation [date TBD]. 4. Conduct confirmation sampling during or immediately following excavation activities. 5. Backfill excavation after receiving confirmation sample analytical results. 6. Project completion no later than [date TBD]. References Ecology Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) cleanup regulation, chapter WAC. Seattle City Light. Avalon Unit Substation Mercury Remediation Memorandum.
10 Seattle City Light July 17, 2015 Page 10 Attachments: Table 1 Analytical Results for Composite Concrete Samples Table 2 Analytical Results for Composite Soil Samples Table 3 Analytical Results for Composite Subsamples Table 4 Analytical Results for Hand Auger Samples Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Site Plan and Composite Soil Sample Results Figure 3 Site Plan and Soil Subsample Results Attachment A Avalon Unit Substation Mercury Remediation Memorandum Attachment B Chemical Data Quality Review and Laboratory Reports L:\Notebooks\ _Former Avalon Substation Site Assessment\Deliverables\Memos\Final Site Assessment\Avalon_Summary Scoping Memo.docx
11 Table 1 - Analytical Results for Composite Concrete Samples Sheet 1 of 1 Sample ID MTCA AV-CONC-1 AV-CONC-2 AV-CONC-3 AV-CONC-4 Sampling Date Method A 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 Excavation Depth Screening (inches bgs) Levels PCBs in mg/kg PCB-aroclor U 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U PCB-aroclor U 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U PCB-aroclor U 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U PCB-aroclor U 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U PCB-aroclor U 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U PCB-aroclor U 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U PCB-aroclor U 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U Total PCBs U 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U Metals in mg/kg Arsenic U 10 U Cadmium U 0.92 Chromium 19/2000 a Lead U Mercury U 0.25 U 0.25 U 0.25 U TPH in mg/kg Diesel Range Organics U 510 U U Lube Oil U 50 U Notes: a. 19 mg/kg as chromium VI; 2000 mg/kg as chromium III. U = Not detected at the reporting limit indicated. Boxed value exceeds cleanup level. Hart Crowser L:\Notebooks\ _Former Avalon Substation Site Assessment\Deliverables\Memos\Final Site Assessment\Table 1-4 ChemRslts-Avalon.xlsx
12 Table 2 - Analytical Results for Composite Soil Samples Sheet 1 of 4 Sample ID MTCA AV-COMP1 AV-COMP2 AV-COMP3 AV-COMP4 AV-COMP5 AV-COMP6 AV-COMP7 Sampling Date Method A/ 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 Excavation Depth Method B (inches bgs) Screening Levels Pesticides in µg/kg 4,4'-DDD 4,200 a 11 U 12 U 11 U 11 U U 40 4,4'-DDE 2,900 a 11 U 12 U 11 U 11 U 12 U 12 U 21 4,4'-DDT 3, Aldrin 59 a 5.7 U 5.8 U 5.7 U 5.5 U 5.9 U 5.8 U 5.7 U alpha-bhc 160 a 5.7 U 5.8 U 5.7 U 5.5 U 5.9 U 5.8 U 5.7 U beta-bhc 560 a 5.7 U 5.8 U 5.7 U 5.5 U 5.9 U 5.8 U 5.7 U delta-bhc 5.7 U 5.8 U 5.7 U 5.5 U 5.9 U 5.8 U 5.7 U Dieldrin 63 a 11 U 12 U 11 U 11 U 12 U 12 U 11 U Endosulfan I 5.7 U 5.8 U 5.7 U 5.5 U 5.9 U 5.8 U 5.7 U Endosulfan II 11 U 12 U 11 U 11 U 12 U 12 U 11 U Endosulfan Sulfate 480,000 a 11 U 12 U 11 U 11 U 12 U 12 U 11 U Endrin 24,000 a 11 U 12 U 11 U 11 U 12 U 12 U 11 U Endrin Aldehyde 11 U 12 U 11 U 11 U 12 U 12 U 11 U Endrin Ketone 11 U 12 U 11 U 11 U U 11 U gamma-bhc U 5.8 U 5.7 U 5.5 U 5.9 U 5.8 U 5.7 U alpha-chlordane 11 U 12 U 11 U 11 U 12 U 12 U 11 U gamma-chlordane 11 U 12 U 11 U 11 U 12 U 12 U 11 U Total Chlordane 2,900 a 11 U 12 U 11 U 11 U 12 U 12 U 11 U Heptachlor 220 a 5.7 U 5.8 U 5.7 U 5.5 U 5.9 U 5.8 U 5.7 U Heptachlor Epoxide 110 a 5.7 U 5.8 U 5.7 U 5.5 U 5.9 U 5.8 U 5.7 U Methoxychlor 400,000 a 11 U 12 U 11 U 11 U 12 U 12 U 11 U Toxaphene 910 a 57 U 58 U 57 U 55 U 59 U 58 U 57 U PCBs in mg/kg PCB-aroclor U U U PCB-aroclor U U U PCB-aroclor U U U PCB-aroclor U U U PCB-aroclor U U U PCB-aroclor U U U PCB-aroclor U U Total PCBs U U Hart Crowser L:\Notebooks\ _Former Avalon Substation Site Assessment\Deliverables\Memos\Final Site Assessment\Table 1-4 ChemRslts-Avalon.xlsx
13 Table 2 - Analytical Results for Composite Soil Samples Sheet 2 of 4 Sample ID MTCA AV-COMP1 AV-COMP2 AV-COMP3 AV-COMP4 AV-COMP5 AV-COMP6 AV-COMP7 Sampling Date Method A/ 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 Excavation Depth Method B (inches bgs) Screening Levels Herbicides in µg/kg 2,4,5-T 800,000 a 11 U 11 U 11 U 10 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 2,4-D 800,000 a 11 U 11 U 11 U 10 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 2,4-DB 640,000 a 11 U 11 U 11 U 10 U 11 U 11 U 11 U Dalapon (DPA) 2.4E06 a 260 U 270 U 260 U 250 U 270 U 260 U 260 U Dicamba 2.4E06 a 11 U 11 U 11 U 10 U 11 U 11 U 11 U Dichlorprop 81 U 82 U 81 U 77 U 84 U 82 U 81 U Dinoseb 80,000 a 11 U 11 U 11 U 10 U 11 U 11 U 11 U MCPA 40,000 a 1100 U 1100 U 1100 U 1000 U 1100 U 1100 U 1100 U Mecoprop 8,000 a 3000 U 3000 U 3000 U 3000 U 3000 U 3000 U 3000 U Pentachlorophenol 400,000 a 5.5 U 5.5 U U 5.4 U Silvex 640,000 a 11 U 11 U 11 U 10 U 11 U 11 U 11 U Metals in mg/kg Arsenic U U U 11 U Cadmium U Chromium 19/2000 b Lead Mercury U 0.29 U 0.29 U 0.27 U 0.3 U 0.29 U 0.47 TCLP Metals in mg/l Lead 0.22 Mercury TPH in mg/kg Diesel Range Organics U 92 U 66 U 39 U 150 U 54 U 93 Lube Oil Hart Crowser L:\Notebooks\ _Former Avalon Substation Site Assessment\Deliverables\Memos\Final Site Assessment\Table 1-4 ChemRslts-Avalon.xlsx
14 Table 2 - Analytical Results for Composite Soil Samples Sheet 3 of 4 Sample ID MTCA AV-COMP8 AV-COMP9 AV-COMP10 AV-COMP11 AV-COMP12 AV-COMP13 AV-COMP14 AV-COMP15 Sampling Date Method A/ 3/5/2015 3/5/2015 3/5/2015 3/5/2015 3/5/2015 3/5/2015 3/5/2015 4/24/2015 Excavation Depth Method B (inches bgs) Screening Levels Pesticides in µg/kg 4,4'-DDD 4,200 a 12 U 13 U 13 U U 13 U 13 U 13 U 4,4'-DDE 2,900 a 12 U U 13 U 13 U 150 4,4'-DDT 3, U 13 U 13 U 150 Aldrin 59 a 6.2 U 6.7 U 6.5 U 7.3 U 6.1 U 6.3 U 6.7 U 29 alpha-bhc 160 a 6.2 U 6.7 U 6.5 U 7.3 U 6.1 U 6.3 U 6.7 U 6.5 U beta-bhc 560 a 6.2 U 6.7 U 6.5 U 7.3 U 6.1 U 6.3 U 6.7 U 6.5 U delta-bhc 6.2 U 6.7 U 6.5 U 7.3 U 6.1 U 6.3 U 6.7 U 6.5 U Dieldrin 63 a U 13 U 13 U 2900 Endosulfan I 6.2 U 6.7 U 6.5 U 7.3 U 6.1 U 6.3 U 6.7 U 6.5 U Endosulfan II 12 U 13 U 13 U 15 U 12 U 13 U 13 U 13 U Endosulfan Sulfate 480,000 a 12 U 13 U 13 U 15 U 12 U 13 U 13 U 13 U Endrin 24,000 a 12 U 13 U 13 U 15 U 12 U 13 U 13 U 13 U Endrin Aldehyde 12 U 13 U 13 U 15 U 12 U 13 U 13 U 13 U Endrin Ketone 12 U 13 U 13 U 15 U 12 U 13 U 13 U 13 U gamma-bhc U 6.7 U 6.5 U 7.3 U 6.1 U 6.3 U 6.7 U 6.5 U alpha-chlordane 12 U 13 U 13 U 15 U 12 U 13 U 13 U 13 U gamma-chlordane 12 U 13 U 13 U 15 U 12 U 13 U 13 U 13 U Total Chlordane 2,900 a 12 U 13 U 13 U 15 U 12 U 13 U 13 U 13 U Heptachlor 220 a 6.2 U 6.7 U 6.5 U 7.3 U 6.1 U 6.3 U 6.7 U 6.5 U Heptachlor Epoxide 110 a 6.2 U 6.7 U 6.5 U 7.3 U 6.1 U 6.3 U 6.7 U 6.5 U Methoxychlor 400,000 a 12 U 13 U 13 U 15 U 12 U 13 U 13 U 13 U Toxaphene 910 a 62 U 67 U 65 U 73 U 61 U 63 U 67 U 65 U PCBs in mg/kg PCB-aroclor 1016 PCB-aroclor 1221 PCB-aroclor 1232 PCB-aroclor 1242 PCB-aroclor 1248 PCB-aroclor 1254 PCB-aroclor 1260 Total PCBs 1.0 Hart Crowser L:\Notebooks\ _Former Avalon Substation Site Assessment\Deliverables\Memos\Final Site Assessment\Table 1-4 ChemRslts-Avalon.xlsx
15 Table 2 - Analytical Results for Composite Soil Samples Sheet 4 of 4 Sample ID MTCA Sampling Date Method A/ Excavation Depth Method B (inches bgs) Screening Levels Herbicides in µg/kg 2,4,5-T 800,000 a 2,4-D 800,000 a 2,4-DB 640,000 a Dalapon (DPA) 2.4E06 a Dicamba 2.4E06 a Dichlorprop Dinoseb 80,000 a MCPA 40,000 a Mecoprop 8,000 a Pentachlorophenol 400,000 a Silvex 640,000 a Metals in mg/kg Arsenic 20 Cadmium 2 Chromium 19/2000 b Lead 250 Mercury 2 TCLP Metals in mg/l Lead Mercury TPH in mg/kg Diesel Range Organics 2000 Lube Oil 2000 AV-COMP8 AV-COMP9 AV-COMP10 AV-COMP11 AV-COMP12 AV-COMP13 AV-COMP14 AV-COMP15 3/5/2015 3/5/2015 3/5/2015 3/5/2015 3/5/2015 3/5/2015 3/5/2015 4/24/ U 13 U 12 U 14 U 12 U 12 U 13 U U U 12 U U 13 U 12 U 14 U 12 U 12 U 13 U 280 U 310 U 300 U 340 U 280 U 290 U 310 U 12 U 13 U 12 U 14 U 11 U 12 U 13 U 87 U 95 U 93 U 100 U 87 U 89 U 95 U 12 U 13 U 12 U 14 U 12 U 12 U 13 U 1200 U 1300 U 1200 U 1400 U 1100 U 1200 U 1200 U 3000 U 3000 U 3000 U 3000 U 3000 U 3000 U 3000 U U 6.2 U 7 U 5.8 U 6 U 6.3 U 12 U 13 U 12 U 14 U 12 U 12 U 13 U 12 U 13 U 13 U 15 U 12 U U 13 U U 0.65 U 0.73 U U 0.67 U U 0.33 U 0.37 U 0.31 U 0.31 U 0.33 U 0.33 U U U Notes: a. MTCA Method B screening level using the lowest direct contact cleanup level in Ecology's CLARC database. b. 19 mg/kg as chromium VI; 2000 mg/kg as chromium III. U = Not detected at the reporting limit indicated. Boxed value exceeds cleanup level. Hart Crowser L:\Notebooks\ _Former Avalon Substation Site Assessment\Deliverables\Memos\Final Site Assessment\Table 1-4 ChemRslts-Avalon.xlsx
16 Table 3 - Analytical Results for Composite Subsamples Sheet 1 of 6 Sample ID MTCA AV-COMP2-SS1 AV-COMP2-SS2 AV-COMP2-SS3 AV-COMP2-SS4 AV-COMP2-SS5 AV-COMP3-SS1 Sampling Date Method A 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 Excavation Depth Screening (inches bgs) Levels PCBs in mg/kg PCB-aroclor 1016 PCB-aroclor 1221 PCB-aroclor 1232 PCB-aroclor 1242 PCB-aroclor 1248 PCB-aroclor 1254 PCB-aroclor 1260 Total PCBs 1.0 Metals in mg/kg Arsenic 20 Cadmium U U Chromium 19/2000 a Lead Mercury 2 TCLP Metals in mg/l Lead 0.21 Hart Crowser L:\Notebooks\ _Former Avalon Substation Site Assessment\Deliverables\Memos\Final Site Assessment\Table 1-4 ChemRslts-Avalon.xlsx
17 Table 3 - Analytical Results for Composite Subsamples Sheet 2 of 6 Sample ID Sampling Date Excavation Depth (inches bgs) MTCA Method A Screening Levels AV-COMP3-SS2 AV-COMP3-SS3 AV-COMP3-SS4 AV-COMP5-SS1 AV-COMP5-SS2 AV-COMP5-SS3 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 PCBs in mg/kg PCB-aroclor 1016 PCB-aroclor 1221 PCB-aroclor 1232 PCB-aroclor 1242 PCB-aroclor 1248 PCB-aroclor 1254 PCB-aroclor 1260 Total PCBs 1.0 Metals in mg/kg Arsenic 20 Cadmium 2 Chromium 19/2000 a Lead 250 Mercury 2 TCLP Metals in mg/l Lead Hart Crowser L:\Notebooks\ _Former Avalon Substation Site Assessment\Deliverables\Memos\Final Site Assessment\Table 1-4 ChemRslts-Avalon.xlsx
18 Table 3 - Analytical Results for Composite Subsamples Sheet 3 of 6 Sample ID Sampling Date Excavation Depth (inches bgs) MTCA Method A Screening Levels AV-COMP5-SS4 AV-COMP6-SS1 AV-COMP6-SS2 AV-COMP6-SS3 AV-COMP7-SS1 AV-COMP7-SS2 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 PCBs in mg/kg PCB-aroclor 1016 PCB-aroclor 1221 PCB-aroclor 1232 PCB-aroclor 1242 PCB-aroclor 1248 PCB-aroclor 1254 PCB-aroclor 1260 Total PCBs 1.0 Metals in mg/kg Arsenic 20 Cadmium 2 Chromium 19/2000 a Lead 250 Mercury 2 TCLP Metals in mg/l Lead U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U Hart Crowser L:\Notebooks\ _Former Avalon Substation Site Assessment\Deliverables\Memos\Final Site Assessment\Table 1-4 ChemRslts-Avalon.xlsx
19 Table 3 - Analytical Results for Composite Subsamples Sheet 4 of 6 Sample ID MTCA AV-COMP7-SS3 AV-COMP7-SS4 Sampling Date Method A 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 Excavation Depth Screening (inches bgs) Levels PCBs in mg/kg PCB-aroclor 1016 PCB-aroclor 1221 PCB-aroclor 1232 PCB-aroclor 1242 PCB-aroclor 1248 PCB-aroclor 1254 PCB-aroclor 1260 Total PCBs 1.0 Metals in mg/kg Arsenic 20 Cadmium 2 Chromium 19/2000 a Lead 250 Mercury 2 TCLP Metals in mg/l Lead U 0.3 U Hart Crowser L:\Notebooks\ _Former Avalon Substation Site Assessment\Deliverables\Memos\Final Site Assessment\Table 1-4 ChemRslts-Avalon.xlsx
20 Table 3 - Analytical Results for Composite Subsamples Sheet 5 of 6 Sample ID Sampling Date Excavation Depth (inches bgs) MTCA Method A Screening Levels AV-COMP8-SS1 AV-COMP8-SS2 AV-COMP8-SS3 AV-COMP11-SS1 AV-COMP11-SS2 AV-COMP11-SS3 3/5/2015 3/5/2015 3/5/2015 3/5/2015 3/5/2015 3/5/2015 PCBs in mg/kg PCB-aroclor 1016 PCB-aroclor 1221 PCB-aroclor 1232 PCB-aroclor 1242 PCB-aroclor 1248 PCB-aroclor 1254 PCB-aroclor 1260 Total PCBs 1.0 Metals in mg/kg Arsenic 20 Cadmium 2 Chromium 19/2000 a Lead 250 Mercury 2 TCLP Metals in mg/l Lead U 0.34 U Hart Crowser L:\Notebooks\ _Former Avalon Substation Site Assessment\Deliverables\Memos\Final Site Assessment\Table 1-4 ChemRslts-Avalon.xlsx
21 Table 3 - Analytical Results for Composite Subsamples Sheet 6 of 6 Sample ID Sampling Date Excavation Depth (inches bgs) MTCA Method A Screening Levels AV-COMP11-SS4 AV-COMP11-SS5 AV-COMP13-SS1 AV-COMP13-SS2 AV-COMP13-SS3 3/5/2015 3/5/2015 3/5/2015 3/5/2015 3/5/2015 PCBs in mg/kg PCB-aroclor 1016 PCB-aroclor 1221 PCB-aroclor 1232 PCB-aroclor 1242 PCB-aroclor 1248 PCB-aroclor 1254 PCB-aroclor 1260 Total PCBs 1.0 Metals in mg/kg Arsenic 20 Cadmium 2 Chromium 19/2000 a Lead 250 Mercury 2 TCLP Metals in mg/l Lead Notes: a. 19 mg/kg as chromium VI; 2000 mg/kg as chromium III. U = Not detected at the reporting limit indicated. Boxed value exceeds cleanup level. Hart Crowser L:\Notebooks\ _Former Avalon Substation Site Assessment\Deliverables\Memos\Final Site Assessment\Table 1-4 ChemRslts-Avalon.xlsx
22 Table 4 - Analytical Results for Hand Auger Samples Sheet 1 of 2 Sample ID MTCA AV-CORE " AV-CORE " AV-CORE " AV-CORE " AV-CORE " AV-CORE " Sampling Date Method A/ 4/24/2015 4/24/2015 4/24/2015 4/24/2015 4/24/2015 4/24/2015 Excavation Depth Method B (inches bgs) Screening Levels Pesticides in µg/kg Dieldrin 63 a PCBs in mg/kg PCB-aroclor U U PCB-aroclor U U PCB-aroclor U U PCB-aroclor U U PCB-aroclor U U PCB-aroclor U U PCB-aroclor U U Total PCBs U U Metals in mg/kg Arsenic 20 Cadmium U 0.55 U 0.57 U Chromium 19/2000 b Lead U Mercury U Hart Crowser L:\Notebooks\ _Former Avalon Substation Site Assessment\Deliverables\Memos\Final Site Assessment\Table 1-4 ChemRslts-Avalon.xlsx
23 Table 4 - Analytical Results for Hand Auger Samples Sheet 2 of 2 Sample ID MTCA Sampling Date Method A/ Excavation Depth Method B (inches bgs) Screening Levels Pesticides in µg/kg Dieldrin 63 a PCBs in mg/kg PCB-aroclor 1016 PCB-aroclor 1221 PCB-aroclor 1232 PCB-aroclor 1242 PCB-aroclor 1248 PCB-aroclor 1254 PCB-aroclor 1260 Total PCBs 1.0 Metals in mg/kg Arsenic 20 Cadmium 2 Chromium 19/2000 b Lead 250 Mercury 2 AV-CORE " AV-CORE " 4/24/2015 4/24/ U 11 U U Notes: a. MTCA Method B screening level using the lowest direct contact cleanup level in Ecology's CLARC database. b. 19 mg/kg as chromium VI; 2000 mg/kg as chromium III. U = Not detected at the reporting limit indicated. Boxed value exceeds cleanup level. Hart Crowser L:\Notebooks\ _Former Avalon Substation Site Assessment\Deliverables\Memos\Final Site Assessment\Table 1-4 ChemRslts-Avalon.xlsx
24 Seattle WASHINGTON Idaho Oregon Project Location Document Path: C:\Users\melissaschweitzer\Desktop\Avalon\GIS\ _VMap-Avalon.mxd Date: 3/23/2015 User Name: melissaschweitzer 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Feet Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom, MapmyIndia, OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community N Avalon Surplus Property Seattle, Washington Vicinity Map /15 Figure 1
25 N Scale in Feet SW Genesee Street File: L:\Notebooks\ _Former Avalon Substation Site Assessment\CAD\ _SP-Avalon.dwg Layout:Composites Date: Author: melissaschweitzer 35th Avenue SW Abandoned Retail Building Abandoned City Light Building Pesticide Concentrations in µg/kg, Metals, Lube Oil, and PCB Concentrations in mg/kg Avalon Surplus Property Seattle, Washington Bold Red Value Exceeds MTCA Cleanup Level Hand Auger Characterization Sample Composite Subsample Composite Concrete Sample Composite Soil Sample Limits Composite Concrete Sample Limits Area to be Excavated from 10" BGS (minimum) to 16" BGS Site Plan and Composite Soil Sample Results /15 Figure 2
26 ATTACHMENT A Avalon Unit Substation Mercury Remediation Memorandum July 17, 2015
27 Memorandum To: From: File Larry Garcia Date: 5/1/2015 Re: Avalon Unit Substation Mercury Remediation Avalon Unit Substation formerly housed rectifiers for the trolley system in Seattle. These rectifiers were mercury filled devices and were removed in the 1960s. As part of the mercury investigations prompted by the mercury spill from a manometer at Bothell substation in 2008, an initial investigation was conducted at Avalon in October of Initial readings were taken with the Lumex RA-915 and ambient readings in the building were around 300 ng/m 3. Although this is well below the EPA reoccupancy level of 1,300 ng/m 3 or the L&I PEL (Permissible Exposure Limit) of 50,000 ng/m 3, it indicated the presence of a mercury source. Exterior readings were found to be at background levels. The building was added to the cleanup list. The building has one trench that was formerly used for conduit to connect electrical equipment. The lone trench extends nearly the entire length of the building (see diagram D and photo Avalon.trench1). Monitoring at the trench edges ranged from 500 to 17,000 ng/m 3. The remediation began in the summer of A contractor was mobilized to remove or contain the mercury in full compliance with hazardous waste site operations requirements (chemical protective clothing, mercury vapor cartridges). Although vapor concentrations never exceeded the PEL, respirators were worn as a precaution during activities that could result in mercury exposure. The highest reading recorded was 38,000 ng/m 3. Surficial contamination in the trench was treated with repeated applications of HgX. HgX bonds to the mercury and then is removed with a mercury vacuum. The HgX, liquid mercury and PPE were disposed of as dangerous waste. Some residual mercury on the trench surface was coated with epoxy paint to keep the vapor down. This area is easily recognized by the white coating that clearly differs from the natural coating. All of the surfaces coated in this manner emitted mercury below the EPA industrial reoccupancy level of 1,300 ng/m 3. A drain in the trench was the source of the highest mercury vapor concentrations. A catch basin in the yard behind the building produced no mercury vapor. Two roof drains were plumbed to drain lines that intercepted the trench drain. Both roof drains were re-plumbed to the exterior of the building. The floor drain line was intercepted behind the building. The mercury vapor readings dissipated quickly with distance from the building, indicating that the mercury was likely in a p-trap under the drain. The line was plugged on both ends and filled with concrete to solidify the mercury for any future pipe removal. Remediation of all mercury on the site (for sale of the property or demolishing of the building) would require the removal of the area under the white epoxy coating and the removal of the concrete filled drain pipe. A 1
28 May 1, 2015 Mercury vapor scrubbers were used to remove vaporized mercury in the building. Upon completion of the project, ambient concentrations of mercury were measured at 80 ng/m 3, well below the ATSDR Minimal Risk Level of 200 ng/m 3. 2
29 ATTACHMENT B Chemical Data Quality Review and Laboratory Reports July 17, 2015
30 ATTACHMENT B CHEMICAL DATA QUALITY REVIEW AND LABORATORY REPORTS Soil Sample Submittals for Avalon Substation Property In total, 85 soil or concrete samples were submitted to OnSite Environmental Inc. (OnSite) analytical laboratory in Redmond, Washington. A subset of these samples were selected for analysis; details of these as follows: Nine soil samples were collected on April 24, 2015, and submitted to OnSite on the same day. The analytical results were reported as Laboratory Reference Nos and B. Thirty soil samples were collected on March 4, 2015, and submitted to OnSite on March 5, The analytical results were reported as Laboratory Reference Nos , B, and C. Eighteen soil samples were collected on March 5, 2015, and submitted to OnSite that day. The analytical results were reported as Laboratory Reference Nos and B. The soil samples were analyzed for: Total metals (As, Cd, Cr, Pb, and Hg) by EPA 6010C/7471B; Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) for lead by EPA Method 1311/6010C; Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) for mercury by EPA Method 1311/7470A; Organochlorine pesticides by 8081B; Polychlorinated biphenyls by EPA 8082A; Diesel and lube oil range organics by NWTPH Dx; Chlorinated herbicides by 8151A; and Total moisture by Standard Method 2540B. Chemical Data Quality Review The laboratory performed ongoing quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) reviews. Hart Crowser reviewed the data to check that they met quality objectives for the project. The following criteria were evaluated: Holding times; Method blanks; Surrogate recoveries; Laboratory control sample (LCS) recoveries; Matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) recoveries; Continuing calibration verifications; July 17, 2015
31 B-2 Attachment B Laboratory duplicate relative percent differences (RPDs); and Reporting limits (RLs). The full laboratory results are at the end of this document. Results of the QA/QC review are below. Sample Receiving Discrepancies No sample discrepancies were noted in sample receiving or on the chain of custody (COC) record. Total Metals (As, Cd, Cr, Pb, and Hg) by EPA 6010C/7471B The required holding times were met. Reporting limits were acceptable. No method blank contamination was detected. LCS recoveries were within laboratory control limits. Laboratory duplicate and LCS RPDs were within control limits, with the following exceptions: Laboratory Reference No B. The laboratory flagged the lead results with a C, indicating an exceedance of the control limit because of high result variability when analyte concentrations are within five times the quantitation limit. No results were qualified since the duplicate was a laboratory batch quality control sample and the MS/MSD was within control limits. Laboratory Reference No B. The laboratory flagged the result for chromium with a K, indicating that the sample duplicate RPD was outside control limits because of sample inhomogeneity. The sample was re extracted and re analyzed with similar results. No results were qualified since the duplicate was a laboratory batch quality control sample and the MS/MSD was within control limits. MS/MSD RPDs were within laboratory control limits. The data are acceptable for use without qualification. TCLP Lead The required holding times were met. Reporting limits were acceptable. No method blank contamination was detected. Surrogate and LCS recoveries were within laboratory control limits. Laboratory duplicate and LCS RPDs were within control limits. MS/MSD RPDs were within laboratory control limits. The data are acceptable for use without qualification. TCLP Mercury The required holding times were met. Reporting limits were acceptable. No method blank contamination was detected. Surrogate and LCS recoveries were within laboratory control limits. Laboratory duplicate and LCS RPDs were within control limits. MS/MSD RPDs were within laboratory control limits. The data are acceptable for use without qualification July 17, 2015
32 B-3 Attachment B Organochlorine Pesticides by 8081B The required holding times were met. Reporting limits were acceptable. No method blank contamination was detected. Surrogate recoveries were within laboratory control limits. Laboratory control samples were within control limits. MS/MSD and RPDs were within laboratory control limits. Continuing calibration verification recoveries were within laboratory control limits with the following exceptions: Laboratory Reference No Continuing calibration verification (CCV) results were within the control limits except the lab noted that in the CCV, (1) for samples AV COMP4 and AV COMP6, recoveries were low for 4,4 DDT and endrin aldehyde, and (2) for samples AV COMP5 and AV COMP7, recoveries were low for methoxychlor and gamma chlordane, 4,4 DDT, endrin aldehyde, and methoxychlor. The lab re injected the sample extracts with similar results and attributed the failure to the matrix of these samples. Results for these analytes for these samples were qualified with J/UJ. Laboratory Reference No CCV results were within the control limits except the lab noted that in the CCV, (1) for samples AV COMP8 and AV COMP11, recoveries were low for 4,4 DDT and endrin aldehyde, and (2) for samples AV COMP13 and AV COMP14, recoveries were low for methoxychlor and gamma chlordane, 4,4 DDT, endrin aldehyde, and methoxychlor. The lab reinjected the sample extracts with similar results and attributed the failure to the matrix of these samples. Results for these analytes for these samples were qualified with J/UJ. Polychlorinated Biphenyls by EPA 8082A The required holding times were met. Reporting limits were acceptable. No method blank contamination was detected. Surrogate recoveries were within laboratory control limits or were not available because of necessary dilution of the sample. Laboratory control sample RPD was within laboratory control limits. The data are acceptable for use without qualification. Diesel- and Lube-Oil-Range Organics by NWTPH-Dx The required holding times were met. Reporting limits were acceptable, with the following exceptions: Laboratory Reference No The reporting limits for samples AV CONC 1, AV COMP2, AV COMP3, AV COMP4, AV COMP5, and AV COMP6 were elevated because of interferences present in the sample. Laboratory Reference No The laboratory noted that the hydrocarbons in the lube range are impacting the diesel range results in sample AV COMP8. No method blank contamination was detected. Surrogate recoveries were within laboratory control limits or were not available because of necessary dilution of the sample. Laboratory control sample RPD was within laboratory control limits. The data are acceptable for use without qualification July 17, 2015
33 B-4 Attachment B Chlorinated Acid Herbicides by 8151A The required holding times were met. Reporting limits were acceptable. No method blank contamination was detected. Surrogate recoveries were within laboratory control limits. MS/MSD and LCS RPDs were within laboratory control limits. The data are acceptable for use without qualification. Total Moisture by Standard Method 2540B The required holding times were met. The data are acceptable for use without qualification July 17, 2015
34 LABORATORY REPORTS July 17, 2015
35 14648 NE 95 th Street, Redmond, WA (425) March 20, 2015 Ross Stainsby Hart Crowser, Inc Westlake Avenue North, Suite 200 Seattle, WA Re: Analytical Data for Project Laboratory Reference No Dear Ross: Enclosed are the analytical results and associated quality control data for samples submitted on March 5, The standard policy of OnSite Environmental, Inc. is to store your samples for 30 days from the date of receipt. If you require longer storage, please contact the laboratory. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions concerning the data, or need additional information, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, David Baumeister Project Manager Enclosures
36 2 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: Case Narrative Samples were collected on March 4, 2015 and received by the laboratory on March 5, They were maintained at the laboratory at a temperature of 2 o C to 6 o C. General QA/QC issues associated with the analytical data enclosed in this laboratory report will be indicated with a reference to a comment or explanation on the Data Qualifier page. More complex and involved QA/QC issues will be discussed in detail below. Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081B Analysis Due to negative effects of the matrix from samples AV-COMP4 and AV-COMP6 on the instrument, values for 4,4 - DDT, Endrin Aldehyde, and Methoxychlor in the continuing calibration verification standards (CCVs) were low. Samples AV-COMP5 and AV-COMP7 caused gamma-chlordane, 4 -DDT, Endrin Aldehyde, and Methoxychlor to be low in their closing CCV. Since the degradation of the CCV standards was reproducible after re-injecting the sample extracts, the CCV degradation problem was attributed to the matrix of these samples. Any other QA/QC issues associated with this extraction and analysis will be indicated with a footnote reference and discussed in detail on the Data Qualifier page.
37 3 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: NWTPH-Dx Matrix: Soil Units: mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-CONC-1 Laboratory ID: Diesel Range Organics ND 74 NWTPH-Dx U1 Lube Oil NWTPH-Dx Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits o-terphenyl AV-CONC-2 Laboratory ID: Diesel Range Organics ND 510 NWTPH-Dx U1 Lube Oil NWTPH-Dx Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits o-terphenyl AV-CONC-3 Laboratory ID: Diesel Range Organics NWTPH-Dx Lube Oil Range Organics ND 200 NWTPH-Dx U1 Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits o-terphenyl AV-CONC-4 Laboratory ID: Diesel Range Organics ND 25 NWTPH-Dx Lube Oil Range Organics ND 50 NWTPH-Dx Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits o-terphenyl AV-COMP1 Laboratory ID: Diesel Range Organics ND 29 NWTPH-Dx Lube Oil NWTPH-Dx Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits o-terphenyl AV-COMP2 Laboratory ID: Diesel Range Organics ND 92 NWTPH-Dx U1 Lube Oil NWTPH-Dx Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits o-terphenyl
38 4 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: NWTPH-Dx Matrix: Soil Units: mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP3 Laboratory ID: Diesel Range Organics ND 66 NWTPH-Dx U1 Lube Oil NWTPH-Dx Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits o-terphenyl AV-COMP4 Laboratory ID: Diesel Range Organics ND 39 NWTPH-Dx U1 Lube Oil NWTPH-Dx Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits o-terphenyl AV-COMP5 Laboratory ID: Diesel Range Organics ND 150 NWTPH-Dx U1 Lube Oil NWTPH-Dx Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits o-terphenyl AV-COMP6 Laboratory ID: Diesel Range Organics ND 54 NWTPH-Dx U1 Lube Oil NWTPH-Dx Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits o-terphenyl AV-COMP7 Laboratory ID: Diesel Range Organics NWTPH-Dx Lube Oil Range Organics NWTPH-Dx Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits o-terphenyl
39 5 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: NWTPH-Dx QUALITY CONTROL Matrix: Soil Units: mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags METHOD BLANK Laboratory ID: MB0310S2 Diesel Range Organics ND 25 NWTPH-Dx Lube Oil Range Organics ND 50 NWTPH-Dx Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits o-terphenyl Source Percent Recovery RPD Analyte Result Spike Level Result Recovery Limits RPD Limit Flags DUPLICATE Laboratory ID: ORIG DUP Diesel Range ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA U1 Lube Oil NA NA NA NA 17 NA Surrogate: o-terphenyl Laboratory ID: ORIG DUP Diesel Range ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA U1 Lube Oil NA NA NA NA 18 NA Surrogate: o-terphenyl SPIKE BLANK Laboratory ID: SB0310S2 Diesel Fuel # NA NA NA Surrogate: o-terphenyl
40 6 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: PCBs EPA 8082A Matrix: Concrete Units: mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-CONC-1 Laboratory ID: Aroclor 1016 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1221 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1232 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1242 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1254 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1260 ND EPA 8082A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCB AV-CONC-2 Laboratory ID: Aroclor 1016 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1221 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1232 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1242 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1254 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1260 ND EPA 8082A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCB AV-CONC-3 Laboratory ID: Aroclor 1016 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1221 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1232 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1242 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1254 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1260 ND EPA 8082A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCB
41 7 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: PCBs EPA 8082A Matrix: Concrete/Soil Units: mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-CONC-4 Laboratory ID: Aroclor 1016 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1221 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1232 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1242 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1254 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1260 ND EPA 8082A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCB AV-COMP1 Laboratory ID: Aroclor 1016 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1221 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1232 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1242 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1254 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1260 ND EPA 8082A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCB AV-COMP3 Laboratory ID: Aroclor 1016 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1221 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1232 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1242 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1254 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1260 ND EPA 8082A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCB
42 8 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: PCBs EPA 8082A Matrix: Soil Units: mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP6 Laboratory ID: Aroclor 1016 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1221 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1232 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1242 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1254 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor EPA 8082A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCB
43 9 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: PCBs EPA 8082A QUALITY CONTROL Matrix: Soil Units: mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags METHOD BLANK Laboratory ID: MB0313S2 Aroclor 1016 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1221 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1232 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1242 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1254 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1260 ND EPA 8082A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCB Source Percent Recovery RPD Analyte Result Spike Level Result Recovery Limits RPD Limit Flags MATRIX SPIKES Laboratory ID: MS MSD MS MSD MS MSD Aroclor ND Surrogate: DCB SPIKE BLANK Laboratory ID: SB0313S2 Aroclor N/A Surrogate: DCB
44 10 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES EPA 8081B Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP1 Laboratory ID: alpha-bhc ND 5.7 EPA 8081B gamma-bhc ND 5.7 EPA 8081B beta-bhc ND 5.7 EPA 8081B delta-bhc ND 5.7 EPA 8081B Heptachlor ND 5.7 EPA 8081B Aldrin ND 5.7 EPA 8081B Heptachlor Epoxide ND 5.7 EPA 8081B gamma-chlordane ND 11 EPA 8081B alpha-chlordane ND 11 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDE ND 11 EPA 8081B Endosulfan I ND 5.7 EPA 8081B Dieldrin ND 11 EPA 8081B Endrin ND 11 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDD ND 11 EPA 8081B Endosulfan II ND 11 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDT EPA 8081B Endrin Aldehyde ND 11 EPA 8081B Methoxychlor ND 11 EPA 8081B Endosulfan Sulfate ND 11 EPA 8081B Endrin Ketone ND 11 EPA 8081B Toxaphene ND 57 EPA 8081B Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits TCMX DCB
45 11 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES EPA 8081B Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP2 Laboratory ID: alpha-bhc ND 5.8 EPA 8081B gamma-bhc ND 5.8 EPA 8081B beta-bhc ND 5.8 EPA 8081B delta-bhc ND 5.8 EPA 8081B Heptachlor ND 5.8 EPA 8081B Aldrin ND 5.8 EPA 8081B Heptachlor Epoxide ND 5.8 EPA 8081B gamma-chlordane ND 12 EPA 8081B alpha-chlordane ND 12 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDE ND 12 EPA 8081B Endosulfan I ND 5.8 EPA 8081B Dieldrin ND 12 EPA 8081B Endrin ND 12 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDD ND 12 EPA 8081B Endosulfan II ND 12 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDT EPA 8081B Endrin Aldehyde ND 12 EPA 8081B Methoxychlor ND 12 EPA 8081B Endosulfan Sulfate ND 12 EPA 8081B Endrin Ketone ND 12 EPA 8081B Toxaphene ND 58 EPA 8081B Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits TCMX DCB
46 12 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES EPA 8081B Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP3 Laboratory ID: alpha-bhc ND 5.7 EPA 8081B gamma-bhc ND 5.7 EPA 8081B beta-bhc ND 5.7 EPA 8081B delta-bhc ND 5.7 EPA 8081B Heptachlor ND 5.7 EPA 8081B Aldrin ND 5.7 EPA 8081B Heptachlor Epoxide ND 5.7 EPA 8081B gamma-chlordane ND 11 EPA 8081B alpha-chlordane ND 11 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDE ND 11 EPA 8081B Endosulfan I ND 5.7 EPA 8081B Dieldrin ND 11 EPA 8081B Endrin ND 11 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDD ND 11 EPA 8081B Endosulfan II ND 11 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDT EPA 8081B Endrin Aldehyde ND 11 EPA 8081B Methoxychlor ND 11 EPA 8081B Endosulfan Sulfate ND 11 EPA 8081B Endrin Ketone ND 11 EPA 8081B Toxaphene ND 57 EPA 8081B Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits TCMX DCB
47 13 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES EPA 8081B Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP4 Laboratory ID: alpha-bhc ND 5.5 EPA 8081B gamma-bhc ND 5.5 EPA 8081B beta-bhc ND 5.5 EPA 8081B delta-bhc ND 5.5 EPA 8081B Heptachlor ND 5.5 EPA 8081B Aldrin ND 5.5 EPA 8081B Heptachlor Epoxide ND 5.5 EPA 8081B gamma-chlordane ND 11 EPA 8081B alpha-chlordane ND 11 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDE ND 11 EPA 8081B Endosulfan I ND 5.5 EPA 8081B Dieldrin ND 11 EPA 8081B Endrin ND 11 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDD ND 11 EPA 8081B Endosulfan II ND 11 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDT EPA 8081B Endrin Aldehyde ND 11 EPA 8081B Methoxychlor ND 11 EPA 8081B Endosulfan Sulfate ND 11 EPA 8081B Endrin Ketone ND 11 EPA 8081B Toxaphene ND 55 EPA 8081B Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits TCMX DCB
48 14 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES EPA 8081B Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP5 Laboratory ID: alpha-bhc ND 5.9 EPA 8081B gamma-bhc ND 5.9 EPA 8081B beta-bhc ND 5.9 EPA 8081B delta-bhc ND 5.9 EPA 8081B Heptachlor ND 5.9 EPA 8081B Aldrin ND 5.9 EPA 8081B Heptachlor Epoxide ND 5.9 EPA 8081B gamma-chlordane ND 12 EPA 8081B alpha-chlordane ND 12 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDE ND 12 EPA 8081B Endosulfan I ND 5.9 EPA 8081B Dieldrin ND 12 EPA 8081B Endrin ND 12 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDD EPA 8081B Endosulfan II ND 12 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDT EPA 8081B Endrin Aldehyde ND 12 EPA 8081B Methoxychlor ND 12 EPA 8081B Endosulfan Sulfate ND 12 EPA 8081B Endrin Ketone EPA 8081B Toxaphene ND 59 EPA 8081B Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits TCMX DCB
49 15 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES EPA 8081B Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP6 Laboratory ID: alpha-bhc ND 5.8 EPA 8081B gamma-bhc ND 5.8 EPA 8081B beta-bhc ND 5.8 EPA 8081B delta-bhc ND 5.8 EPA 8081B Heptachlor ND 5.8 EPA 8081B Aldrin ND 5.8 EPA 8081B Heptachlor Epoxide ND 5.8 EPA 8081B gamma-chlordane ND 12 EPA 8081B alpha-chlordane ND 12 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDE ND 12 EPA 8081B Endosulfan I ND 5.8 EPA 8081B Dieldrin ND 12 EPA 8081B Endrin ND 12 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDD ND 12 EPA 8081B Endosulfan II ND 12 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDT EPA 8081B Endrin Aldehyde ND 12 EPA 8081B Methoxychlor ND 12 EPA 8081B Endosulfan Sulfate ND 12 EPA 8081B Endrin Ketone ND 12 EPA 8081B Toxaphene ND 58 EPA 8081B Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits TCMX DCB
50 16 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES EPA 8081B Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP7 Laboratory ID: alpha-bhc ND 5.7 EPA 8081B gamma-bhc ND 5.7 EPA 8081B beta-bhc ND 5.7 EPA 8081B delta-bhc ND 5.7 EPA 8081B Heptachlor ND 5.7 EPA 8081B Aldrin ND 5.7 EPA 8081B Heptachlor Epoxide ND 5.7 EPA 8081B gamma-chlordane ND 11 EPA 8081B alpha-chlordane ND 11 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDE EPA 8081B Endosulfan I ND 5.7 EPA 8081B Dieldrin ND 11 EPA 8081B Endrin ND 11 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDD EPA 8081B Endosulfan II ND 11 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDT EPA 8081B Endrin Aldehyde ND 11 EPA 8081B Methoxychlor ND 11 EPA 8081B Endosulfan Sulfate ND 11 EPA 8081B Endrin Ketone ND 11 EPA 8081B Toxaphene ND 57 EPA 8081B Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits TCMX DCB
51 17 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES EPA 8081B QUALITY CONTROL Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags METHOD BLANK Laboratory ID: MB0313S1 alpha-bhc ND 5.0 EPA 8081B gamma-bhc ND 5.0 EPA 8081B beta-bhc ND 5.0 EPA 8081B delta-bhc ND 5.0 EPA 8081B Heptachlor ND 5.0 EPA 8081B Aldrin ND 5.0 EPA 8081B Heptachlor Epoxide ND 5.0 EPA 8081B gamma-chlordane ND 10 EPA 8081B alpha-chlordane ND 10 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDE ND 10 EPA 8081B Endosulfan I ND 5.0 EPA 8081B Dieldrin ND 10 EPA 8081B Endrin ND 10 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDD ND 10 EPA 8081B Endosulfan II ND 10 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDT ND 10 EPA 8081B Endrin Aldehyde ND 10 EPA 8081B Methoxychlor ND 10 EPA 8081B Endosulfan Sulfate ND 10 EPA 8081B Endrin Ketone ND 10 EPA 8081B Toxaphene ND 50 EPA 8081B Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits TCMX DCB Source Percent Recovery RPD Analyte Result Spike Level Result Recovery Limits RPD Limit Flags MATRIX SPIKES Laboratory ID: MS MSD MS MSD MS MSD gamma-bhc ND Heptachlor ND Aldrin ND Dieldrin ND Endrin ND ,4'-DDT ND Surrogate: TCMX DCB
52 18 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES EPA 8081B SPIKE BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Source Percent Recovery Analyte Result Spike Level Result Recovery Limits Flags SPIKE BLANK Laboratory ID: SB0313S1 gamma-bhc N/A Heptachlor N/A Aldrin N/A Dieldrin N/A Endrin N/A ,4'-DDT N/A Surrogate: TCMX DCB
53 19 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: CHLORINATED ACID HERBICIDES EPA 8151A Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP1 Laboratory ID: Dalapon ND 260 EPA 8151A Dicamba ND 11 EPA 8151A MCPP ND 3000 EPA 8151A MCPA ND 1100 EPA 8151A Dichlorprop ND 81 EPA 8151A ,4-D ND 11 EPA 8151A Pentachlorophenol ND 5.5 EPA 8151A ,4,5-TP (Silvex) ND 11 EPA 8151A ,4,5-T ND 11 EPA 8151A ,4-DB ND 11 EPA 8151A Dinoseb ND 11 EPA 8151A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCAA AV-COMP2 Laboratory ID: Dalapon ND 270 EPA 8151A Dicamba ND 11 EPA 8151A MCPP ND 3000 EPA 8151A MCPA ND 1100 EPA 8151A Dichlorprop ND 82 EPA 8151A ,4-D ND 11 EPA 8151A Pentachlorophenol ND 5.5 EPA 8151A ,4,5-TP (Silvex) ND 11 EPA 8151A ,4,5-T ND 11 EPA 8151A ,4-DB ND 11 EPA 8151A Dinoseb ND 11 EPA 8151A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCAA
54 20 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: CHLORINATED ACID HERBICIDES EPA 8151A Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP3 Laboratory ID: Dalapon ND 260 EPA 8151A Dicamba ND 11 EPA 8151A MCPP ND 3000 EPA 8151A MCPA ND 1100 EPA 8151A Dichlorprop ND 81 EPA 8151A ,4-D ND 11 EPA 8151A Pentachlorophenol EPA 8151A ,4,5-TP (Silvex) ND 11 EPA 8151A ,4,5-T ND 11 EPA 8151A ,4-DB ND 11 EPA 8151A Dinoseb ND 11 EPA 8151A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCAA AV-COMP4 Laboratory ID: Dalapon ND 250 EPA 8151A Dicamba ND 10 EPA 8151A MCPP ND 3000 EPA 8151A MCPA ND 1000 EPA 8151A Dichlorprop ND 77 EPA 8151A ,4-D ND 10 EPA 8151A Pentachlorophenol EPA 8151A ,4,5-TP (Silvex) ND 10 EPA 8151A ,4,5-T ND 10 EPA 8151A ,4-DB ND 10 EPA 8151A Dinoseb ND 10 EPA 8151A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCAA
55 21 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: CHLORINATED ACID HERBICIDES EPA 8151A Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP5 Laboratory ID: Dalapon ND 270 EPA 8151A Dicamba ND 11 EPA 8151A MCPP ND 3000 EPA 8151A MCPA ND 1100 EPA 8151A Dichlorprop ND 84 EPA 8151A ,4-D ND 11 EPA 8151A Pentachlorophenol EPA 8151A ,4,5-TP (Silvex) ND 11 EPA 8151A ,4,5-T ND 11 EPA 8151A ,4-DB ND 11 EPA 8151A Dinoseb ND 11 EPA 8151A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCAA AV-COMP6 Laboratory ID: Dalapon ND 260 EPA 8151A Dicamba ND 11 EPA 8151A MCPP ND 3000 EPA 8151A MCPA ND 1100 EPA 8151A Dichlorprop ND 82 EPA 8151A ,4-D ND 11 EPA 8151A Pentachlorophenol ND 5.5 EPA 8151A ,4,5-TP (Silvex) ND 11 EPA 8151A ,4,5-T ND 11 EPA 8151A ,4-DB ND 11 EPA 8151A Dinoseb ND 11 EPA 8151A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCAA
56 22 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: CHLORINATED ACID HERBICIDES EPA 8151A Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP7 Laboratory ID: Dalapon ND 260 EPA 8151A Dicamba ND 11 EPA 8151A MCPP ND 3000 EPA 8151A MCPA ND 1100 EPA 8151A Dichlorprop ND 81 EPA 8151A ,4-D ND 11 EPA 8151A Pentachlorophenol ND 5.4 EPA 8151A ,4,5-TP (Silvex) ND 11 EPA 8151A ,4,5-T ND 11 EPA 8151A ,4-DB ND 11 EPA 8151A Dinoseb ND 11 EPA 8151A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCAA
57 23 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: CHLORINATED ACID HERBICIDES EPA 8151A QUALITY CONTROL Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags METHOD BLANK Laboratory ID: MB0316S1 Dalapon ND 230 EPA 8151A Dicamba ND 9.4 EPA 8151A MCPP ND 2800 EPA 8151A MCPA ND 940 EPA 8151A Dichlorprop ND 71 EPA 8151A ,4-D ND 9.4 EPA 8151A Pentachlorophenol ND 4.8 EPA 8151A ,4,5-TP (Silvex) ND 9.5 EPA 8151A ,4,5-T ND 9.5 EPA 8151A ,4-DB ND 9.5 EPA 8151A Dinoseb ND 9.5 EPA 8151A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCAA Source Percent Recovery RPD Analyte Result Spike Level Result Recovery Limits RPD Limit Flags SPIKE BLANKS Laboratory ID: SB0316S1 SB SBD SB SBD SB SBD Dicamba N/A ,4-D N/A Pentachlorophenol N/A ,4,5-T N/A ,4-DB N/A Surrogate: DCAA
58 24 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B Matrix: Units: Concrete mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL EPA Method Prepared Analyzed Flags Lab ID: AV-CONC-1 Arsenic C Cadmium C Chromium C Lead C Mercury ND B Lab ID: AV-CONC-2 Arsenic C Cadmium C Chromium C Lead C Mercury ND B Lab ID: AV-CONC-3 Arsenic ND C Cadmium ND C Chromium C Lead C Mercury ND B
59 25 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B Matrix: Units: Concrete mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL EPA Method Prepared Analyzed Flags Lab ID: AV-CONC-4 Arsenic ND C Cadmium C Chromium C Lead ND C Mercury ND B
60 26 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL EPA Method Prepared Analyzed Flags Lab ID: AV-COMP1 Arsenic ND C Cadmium C Chromium C Lead C Mercury ND B Lab ID: AV-COMP2 Arsenic C Cadmium C Chromium C Lead C Mercury ND B Lab ID: AV-COMP3 Arsenic C Cadmium C Chromium C Lead C Mercury ND B
61 27 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL EPA Method Prepared Analyzed Flags Lab ID: AV-COMP4 Arsenic ND C Cadmium ND C Chromium C Lead C Mercury ND B Lab ID: AV-COMP5 Arsenic C Cadmium C Chromium C Lead C Mercury ND B Lab ID: AV-COMP6 Arsenic ND C Cadmium C Chromium C Lead C Mercury ND B
62 28 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL EPA Method Prepared Analyzed Flags Lab ID: AV-COMP7 Arsenic ND C Cadmium C Chromium C Lead C Mercury B
63 29 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: 3-12& &16-15 Matrix: Units: Concrete mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: MB0316SM1&MB0312S1 Analyte Method Result PQL Arsenic 6010C ND 10 Cadmium 6010C ND 0.50 Chromium 6010C ND 0.50 Lead 6010C ND 5.0 Mercury 7471B ND 0.25
64 30 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: MB0312SM2&MB0312S2 Analyte Method Result PQL Arsenic 6010C ND 10 Cadmium 6010C ND 0.50 Chromium 6010C ND 0.50 Lead 6010C ND 5.0 Mercury 7471B ND 0.25
65 31 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B DUPLICATE QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: 3-12& &16-15 Matrix: Units: Concrete mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: Sample Duplicate Analyte Result Result RPD PQL Flags Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Lead Mercury ND ND NA 0.25
66 32 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B DUPLICATE QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: Sample Duplicate Analyte Result Result RPD PQL Flags Arsenic ND ND NA 10 Cadmium ND ND NA 0.50 Chromium Lead Mercury ND ND NA 0.25
67 33 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B MS/MSD QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: 3-12& &16-15 Matrix: Units: Concrete mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: Spike Percent Percent Analyte Level MS Recovery MSD Recovery RPD Flags Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Lead Mercury
68 34 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B MS/MSD QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: Spike Percent Percent Analyte Level MS Recovery MSD Recovery RPD Flags Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Lead Mercury
69 35 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B SPIKE BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: 3-12& &16-15 Matrix: Units: Concrete mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: SB0316SM1&SB0312S1 Spike SB Percent Analyte Method Level Result Recovery Arsenic 6010C Cadmium 6010C Chromium 6010C Lead 6010C Mercury 7471B
70 36 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B SPIKE BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: SB0312SM2&SB0312S2 Spike SB Percent Analyte Method Level Result Recovery Arsenic 6010C Cadmium 6010C Chromium 6010C Lead 6010C Mercury 7471B
71 37 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: % MOISTURE Date Analyzed: Client ID Lab ID % Moisture AV-COMP AV-COMP AV-COMP AV-COMP AV-COMP AV-COMP AV-COMP
72 38 Data Qualifiers and Abbreviations A - Due to a high sample concentration, the amount spiked is insufficient for meaningful MS/MSD recovery data. B - The analyte indicated was also found in the blank sample. C - The duplicate RPD is outside control limits due to high result variability when analyte concentrations are within five times the quantitation limit. E - The value reported exceeds the quantitation range and is an estimate. F - Surrogate recovery data is not available due to the high concentration of coeluting target compounds. H - The analyte indicated is a common laboratory solvent and may have been introduced during sample preparation, and be impacting the sample result. I - Compound recovery is outside of the control limits. J - The value reported was below the practical quantitation limit. The value is an estimate. K - Sample duplicate RPD is outside control limits due to sample inhomogeneity. The sample was re-extracted and re-analyzed with similar results. L - The RPD is outside of the control limits. M - Hydrocarbons in the gasoline range are impacting the diesel range result. M1 - Hydrocarbons in the gasoline range (toluene-napthalene) are present in the sample. N - Hydrocarbons in the lube oil range are impacting the diesel range result. N1 - Hydrocarbons in diesel range are impacting lube oil range results. O - Hydrocarbons indicative of heavier fuels are present in the sample and are impacting the gasoline result. P - The RPD of the detected concentrations between the two columns is greater than 40. Q - Surrogate recovery is outside of the control limits. S - Surrogate recovery data is not available due to the necessary dilution of the sample. T - The sample chromatogram is not similar to a typical. U - The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported sample quantitation limit. U1 - The practical quantitation limit is elevated due to interferences present in the sample. V - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate recoveries are outside control limits due to matrix effects. W - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate RPD are outside control limits due to matrix effects. X - Sample extract treated with a mercury cleanup procedure. X1- Sample extract treated with a Sulfuric acid/silica gel cleanup procedure. Y - The calibration verification for this analyte exceeded the 20% drift specified in method 8260C, and therefore the reported result should be considered an estimate. The overall performance of the calibration verification standard met the acceptance criteria of the method. Z - ND - Not Detected at PQL PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference
73
74
75
76
77 14648 NE 95 th Street, Redmond, WA (425) April 1, 2015 Ross Stainsby Hart Crowser, Inc Westlake Avenue North, Suite 200 Seattle, WA Re: Analytical Data for Project Laboratory Reference No B Dear Ross: Enclosed are the analytical results and associated quality control data for samples submitted on March 5, The standard policy of OnSite Environmental, Inc. is to store your samples for 30 days from the date of receipt. If you require longer storage, please contact the laboratory. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions concerning the data, or need additional information, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, David Baumeister Project Manager Enclosures
78 2 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B Case Narrative Samples were collected on March 4, 2015 and received by the laboratory on March 5, They were maintained at the laboratory at a temperature of 2 o C to 6 o C. General QA/QC issues associated with the analytical data enclosed in this laboratory report will be indicated with a reference to a comment or explanation on the Data Qualifier page. More complex and involved QA/QC issues will be discussed in detail below.
79 3 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL EPA Method Prepared Analyzed Flags Lab ID: AV-COMP2-SS1 Cadmium ND C Lead C Lab ID: AV-COMP2-SS2 Cadmium C Lead C Lab ID: AV-COMP2-SS3 Cadmium ND C Lead C Lab ID: AV-COMP2-SS4 Cadmium C Lead C Lab ID: AV-COMP2-SS5 Cadmium C Lead C Lab ID: AV-COMP3-SS1 Lead C
80 4 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL EPA Method Prepared Analyzed Flags Lab ID: AV-COMP3-SS2 Lead C Lab ID: AV-COMP3-SS3 Lead C Lab ID: AV-COMP3-SS4 Lead C Lab ID: AV-COMP5-SS1 Lead C Lab ID: AV-COMP5-SS2 Lead C Lab ID: AV-COMP5-SS3 Lead C
81 5 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL EPA Method Prepared Analyzed Flags Lab ID: AV-COMP5-SS4 Lead C Lab ID: AV-COMP7-SS1 Lead C Mercury B Lab ID: AV-COMP7-SS2 Lead C Mercury B Lab ID: AV-COMP7-SS3 Lead C Mercury ND B Lab ID: AV-COMP7-SS4 Lead C Mercury ND B
82 6 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: MB0330SM1&MB0330S1 Analyte Method Result PQL Cadmium 6010C ND 0.50 Lead 6010C ND 5.0 Mercury 7471B ND 0.25
83 7 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B DUPLICATE QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: Sample Duplicate Analyte Result Result RPD PQL Flags Cadmium ND ND NA 0.50 Lead Mercury ND ND NA 0.25
84 8 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B MS/MSD QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: Spike Percent Percent Analyte Level MS Recovery MSD Recovery RPD Flags Cadmium Lead Mercury
85 9 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B SPIKE BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: SB0330SM1&SB0330S1 Spike SB Percent Analyte Method Level Result Recovery Cadmium 6010C Lead 6010C Mercury 7471B
86 10 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TCLP LEAD EPA 1311/6010C Matrix: Units: TCLP Extract mg/l (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL EPA Method Prepared Analyzed Flags Lab ID: AV-COMP5 Lead C
87 11 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TCLP LEAD EPA 1311/6010C METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Date Prepared: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: TCLP Extract mg/l (ppm) Lab ID: MB0326TM1 Analyte Method Result PQL Lead 6010C ND 0.20
88 12 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TCLP LEAD EPA 1311/6010C DUPLICATE QUALITY CONTROL Date Prepared: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: TCLP Extract mg/l (ppm) Lab ID: Sample Duplicate Analyte Result Result RPD PQL Flags Lead ND ND NA 0.20
89 13 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TCLP LEAD EPA 1311/6010C MS/MSD QUALITY CONTROL Date Prepared: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: TCLP Extract mg/l (ppm) Lab ID: Spike Percent Percent Analyte Level MS Recovery MSD Recovery RPD Flags Lead
90 14 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TCLP LEAD EPA 1311/6010C SPIKE BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Date Prepared: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: TCLP Extract mg/l (ppm) Lab ID: SB0326TM1 Spike Percent Analyte Method Level SB Recovery Lead 6010C
91 15 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B PCBs EPA 8082A Matrix: Soil Units: mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP6-SS1 Laboratory ID: Aroclor 1016 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1221 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1232 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1242 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1254 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1260 ND EPA 8082A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCB AV-COMP6-SS2 Laboratory ID: Aroclor 1016 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1221 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1232 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1242 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1254 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor EPA 8082A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCB AV-COMP6-SS3 Laboratory ID: Aroclor 1016 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1221 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1232 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1242 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1254 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1260 ND EPA 8082A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCB
92 16 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B PCBs EPA 8082A QUALITY CONTROL Matrix: Soil Units: mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags METHOD BLANK Laboratory ID: MB0325S1 Aroclor 1016 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1221 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1232 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1242 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1254 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1260 ND EPA 8082A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCB Source Percent Recovery RPD Analyte Result Spike Level Result Recovery Limits RPD Limit Flags MATRIX SPIKES Laboratory ID: MS MSD MS MSD MS MSD Aroclor ND Surrogate: DCB
93 17 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B % MOISTURE Date Analyzed: 3-25&30-15 Client ID Lab ID % Moisture AV-COMP2-SS AV-COMP2-SS AV-COMP2-SS AV-COMP2-SS AV-COMP2-SS AV-COMP3-SS AV-COMP3-SS AV-COMP3-SS AV-COMP3-SS AV-COMP5-SS AV-COMP5-SS AV-COMP5-SS AV-COMP5-SS AV-COMP6-SS AV-COMP6-SS AV-COMP6-SS AV-COMP7-SS AV-COMP7-SS AV-COMP7-SS AV-COMP7-SS
94 18 Data Qualifiers and Abbreviations A - Due to a high sample concentration, the amount spiked is insufficient for meaningful MS/MSD recovery data. B - The analyte indicated was also found in the blank sample. C - The duplicate RPD is outside control limits due to high result variability when analyte concentrations are within five times the quantitation limit. E - The value reported exceeds the quantitation range and is an estimate. F - Surrogate recovery data is not available due to the high concentration of coeluting target compounds. H - The analyte indicated is a common laboratory solvent and may have been introduced during sample preparation, and be impacting the sample result. I - Compound recovery is outside of the control limits. J - The value reported was below the practical quantitation limit. The value is an estimate. K - Sample duplicate RPD is outside control limits due to sample inhomogeneity. The sample was re-extracted and re-analyzed with similar results. L - The RPD is outside of the control limits. M - Hydrocarbons in the gasoline range are impacting the diesel range result. M1 - Hydrocarbons in the gasoline range (toluene-napthalene) are present in the sample. N - Hydrocarbons in the lube oil range are impacting the diesel range result. N1 - Hydrocarbons in diesel range are impacting lube oil range results. O - Hydrocarbons indicative of heavier fuels are present in the sample and are impacting the gasoline result. P - The RPD of the detected concentrations between the two columns is greater than 40. Q - Surrogate recovery is outside of the control limits. S - Surrogate recovery data is not available due to the necessary dilution of the sample. T - The sample chromatogram is not similar to a typical. U - The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported sample quantitation limit. U1 - The practical quantitation limit is elevated due to interferences present in the sample. V - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate recoveries are outside control limits due to matrix effects. W - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate RPD are outside control limits due to matrix effects. X - Sample extract treated with a mercury cleanup procedure. X1- Sample extract treated with a Sulfuric acid/silica gel cleanup procedure. Y - The calibration verification for this analyte exceeded the 20% drift specified in method 8260C, and therefore the reported result should be considered an estimate. The overall performance of the calibration verification standard met the acceptance criteria of the method. Z - ND - Not Detected at PQL PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference
95
96
97
98
99 14648 NE 95 th Street, Redmond, WA (425) April 14, 2015 Ross Stainsby Hart Crowser, Inc Westlake Avenue North, Suite 200 Seattle, WA Re: Analytical Data for Project Laboratory Reference No C Dear Ross: Enclosed are the analytical results and associated quality control data for samples submitted on March 5, The standard policy of OnSite Environmental, Inc. is to store your samples for 30 days from the date of receipt. If you require longer storage, please contact the laboratory. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions concerning the data, or need additional information, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, David Baumeister Project Manager Enclosures
100 2 Date of Report: April 14, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: C Case Narrative Samples were collected on March 4, 2015 and received by the laboratory on March 5, They were maintained at the laboratory at a temperature of 2 o C to 6 o C. Please note that all soil sample results are reported on a dry-weight basis, unless otherwise noted below. General QA/QC issues associated with the analytical data enclosed in this laboratory report will be indicated with a reference to a comment or explanation on the Data Qualifier page. More complex and involved QA/QC issues will be discussed in detail below.
101 3 Date of Report: April 14, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: C TCLP LEAD EPA 1311/6010C Matrix: Units: TCLP Extract mg/l (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL EPA Method Prepared Analyzed Flags Lab ID: AV-COMP2-SS4 Lead C Lab ID: AV-COMP5-SS2 Lead C
102 4 Date of Report: April 14, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: C TCLP LEAD EPA 1311/6010C METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Date Prepared: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: TCLP Extract mg/l (ppm) Lab ID: MB0410TM1 Analyte Method Result PQL Lead 6010C ND 0.20
103 5 Date of Report: April 14, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: C TCLP LEAD EPA 1311/6010C DUPLICATE QUALITY CONTROL Date Prepared: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: TCLP Extract mg/l (ppm) Lab ID: Sample Duplicate Analyte Result Result RPD PQL Flags Lead ND NA 0.20
104 6 Date of Report: April 14, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: C TCLP LEAD EPA 1311/6010C MS/MSD QUALITY CONTROL Date Prepared: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: TCLP Extract mg/l (ppm) Lab ID: Spike Percent Percent Analyte Level MS Recovery MSD Recovery RPD Flags Lead
105 7 Date of Report: April 14, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: C TCLP LEAD EPA 1311/6010C SPIKE BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Date Prepared: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: TCLP Extract mg/l (ppm) Lab ID: Spike Percent Analyte Method Level SB Recovery Lead 6010C
106 8 Data Qualifiers and Abbreviations A - Due to a high sample concentration, the amount spiked is insufficient for meaningful MS/MSD recovery data. B - The analyte indicated was also found in the blank sample. C - The duplicate RPD is outside control limits due to high result variability when analyte concentrations are within five times the quantitation limit. E - The value reported exceeds the quantitation range and is an estimate. F - Surrogate recovery data is not available due to the high concentration of coeluting target compounds. H - The analyte indicated is a common laboratory solvent and may have been introduced during sample preparation, and be impacting the sample result. I - Compound recovery is outside of the control limits. J - The value reported was below the practical quantitation limit. The value is an estimate. K - Sample duplicate RPD is outside control limits due to sample inhomogeneity. The sample was re-extracted and re-analyzed with similar results. L - The RPD is outside of the control limits. M - Hydrocarbons in the gasoline range are impacting the diesel range result. M1 - Hydrocarbons in the gasoline range (toluene-napthalene) are present in the sample. N - Hydrocarbons in the lube oil range are impacting the diesel range result. N1 - Hydrocarbons in diesel range are impacting lube oil range results. O - Hydrocarbons indicative of heavier fuels are present in the sample and are impacting the gasoline result. P - The RPD of the detected concentrations between the two columns is greater than 40. Q - Surrogate recovery is outside of the control limits. S - Surrogate recovery data is not available due to the necessary dilution of the sample. T - The sample chromatogram is not similar to a typical. U - The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported sample quantitation limit. U1 - The practical quantitation limit is elevated due to interferences present in the sample. V - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate recoveries are outside control limits due to matrix effects. W - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate RPD are outside control limits due to matrix effects. X - Sample extract treated with a mercury cleanup procedure. X1- Sample extract treated with a Sulfuric acid/silica gel cleanup procedure. Y - The calibration verification for this analyte exceeded the 20% drift specified in method 8260C, and therefore the reported result should be considered an estimate. The overall performance of the calibration verification standard met the acceptance criteria of the method. Z - ND - Not Detected at PQL PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference
107
108
109
110
111 14648 NE 95 th Street, Redmond, WA (425) March 20, 2015 Ross Stainsby Hart Crowser, Inc Westlake Avenue North, Suite 200 Seattle, WA Re: Analytical Data for Project Laboratory Reference No Dear Ross: Enclosed are the analytical results and associated quality control data for samples submitted on March 5, The standard policy of OnSite Environmental, Inc. is to store your samples for 30 days from the date of receipt. If you require longer storage, please contact the laboratory. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions concerning the data, or need additional information, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, David Baumeister Project Manager Enclosures
112 2 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: Case Narrative Samples were collected on March 5, 2015 and received by the laboratory on March 5, They were maintained at the laboratory at a temperature of 2 o C to 6 o C. General QA/QC issues associated with the analytical data enclosed in this laboratory report will be indicated with a reference to a comment or explanation on the Data Qualifier page. More complex and involved QA/QC issues will be discussed in detail below. Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA 8081B Analysis Due to negative effects of the matrix from samples AV-COMP8 and AV-COMP11 on the instrument, values for 4,4 - DDT, Endrin Aldehyde, and Methoxychlor in the continuing calibration verification standards (CCVs) were low. Samples AV-COMP13 and AV-COMP14 caused gamma-chlordane, 4 -DDT, Endrin Aldehyde, and Methoxychlor to be low in their closing CCV. Since the degradation of the CCV standards was reproducible after re-injecting the sample extracts, the CCV degradation problem was attributed to the matrix of these samples. Any other QA/QC issues associated with this extraction and analysis will be indicated with a footnote reference and discussed in detail on the Data Qualifier page.
113 3 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: NWTPH-Dx Matrix: Soil Units: mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP8 Laboratory ID: Diesel Range Organics NWTPH-Dx N Lube Oil NWTPH-Dx Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits o-terphenyl AV-COMP12 Laboratory ID: Diesel Range Organics NWTPH-Dx Lube Oil NWTPH-Dx Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits o-terphenyl AV-COMP13 Laboratory ID: Diesel Range Organics NWTPH-Dx Lube Oil NWTPH-Dx Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits o-terphenyl
114 4 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: NWTPH-Dx QUALITY CONTROL Matrix: Soil Units: mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags METHOD BLANK Laboratory ID: MB0310S1 Diesel Range Organics ND 25 NWTPH-Dx Lube Oil Range Organics ND 50 NWTPH-Dx Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits o-terphenyl Source Percent Recovery RPD Analyte Result Spike Level Result Recovery Limits RPD Limit Flags DUPLICATE Laboratory ID: ORIG DUP Diesel Range ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA Lube Oil NA NA NA NA 28 NA Surrogate: o-terphenyl SPIKE BLANK Laboratory ID: SB0310S1 Diesel Fuel # NA NA NA Surrogate: o-terphenyl
115 5 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES EPA 8081B Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP8 Laboratory ID: alpha-bhc ND 6.2 EPA 8081B gamma-bhc ND 6.2 EPA 8081B beta-bhc ND 6.2 EPA 8081B delta-bhc ND 6.2 EPA 8081B Heptachlor ND 6.2 EPA 8081B Aldrin ND 6.2 EPA 8081B Heptachlor Epoxide ND 6.2 EPA 8081B gamma-chlordane ND 12 EPA 8081B alpha-chlordane ND 12 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDE ND 12 EPA 8081B Endosulfan I ND 6.2 EPA 8081B Dieldrin EPA 8081B Endrin ND 12 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDD ND 12 EPA 8081B Endosulfan II ND 12 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDT EPA 8081B Endrin Aldehyde ND 12 EPA 8081B Methoxychlor ND 12 EPA 8081B Endosulfan Sulfate ND 12 EPA 8081B Endrin Ketone ND 12 EPA 8081B Toxaphene ND 62 EPA 8081B Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits TCMX DCB
116 6 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES EPA 8081B Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP9 Laboratory ID: alpha-bhc ND 6.7 EPA 8081B gamma-bhc ND 6.7 EPA 8081B beta-bhc ND 6.7 EPA 8081B delta-bhc ND 6.7 EPA 8081B Heptachlor ND 6.7 EPA 8081B Aldrin ND 6.7 EPA 8081B Heptachlor Epoxide ND 6.7 EPA 8081B gamma-chlordane ND 13 EPA 8081B alpha-chlordane ND 13 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDE EPA 8081B Endosulfan I ND 6.7 EPA 8081B Dieldrin EPA 8081B Endrin ND 13 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDD ND 13 EPA 8081B Endosulfan II ND 13 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDT EPA 8081B Endrin Aldehyde ND 13 EPA 8081B Methoxychlor ND 13 EPA 8081B Endosulfan Sulfate ND 13 EPA 8081B Endrin Ketone ND 13 EPA 8081B Toxaphene ND 67 EPA 8081B Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits TCMX DCB
117 7 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES EPA 8081B Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP10 Laboratory ID: alpha-bhc ND 6.5 EPA 8081B gamma-bhc ND 6.5 EPA 8081B beta-bhc ND 6.5 EPA 8081B delta-bhc ND 6.5 EPA 8081B Heptachlor ND 6.5 EPA 8081B Aldrin ND 6.5 EPA 8081B Heptachlor Epoxide ND 6.5 EPA 8081B gamma-chlordane ND 13 EPA 8081B alpha-chlordane ND 13 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDE EPA 8081B Endosulfan I ND 6.5 EPA 8081B Dieldrin EPA 8081B Endrin ND 13 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDD ND 13 EPA 8081B Endosulfan II ND 13 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDT EPA 8081B Endrin Aldehyde ND 13 EPA 8081B Methoxychlor ND 13 EPA 8081B Endosulfan Sulfate ND 13 EPA 8081B Endrin Ketone ND 13 EPA 8081B Toxaphene ND 65 EPA 8081B Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits TCMX DCB
118 8 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES EPA 8081B Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP11 Laboratory ID: alpha-bhc ND 7.3 EPA 8081B gamma-bhc ND 7.3 EPA 8081B beta-bhc ND 7.3 EPA 8081B delta-bhc ND 7.3 EPA 8081B Heptachlor ND 7.3 EPA 8081B Aldrin ND 7.3 EPA 8081B Heptachlor Epoxide ND 7.3 EPA 8081B gamma-chlordane ND 15 EPA 8081B alpha-chlordane ND 15 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDE EPA 8081B Endosulfan I ND 7.3 EPA 8081B Dieldrin EPA 8081B Endrin ND 15 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDD EPA 8081B Endosulfan II ND 15 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDT EPA 8081B Endrin Aldehyde ND 15 EPA 8081B Methoxychlor ND 15 EPA 8081B Endosulfan Sulfate ND 15 EPA 8081B Endrin Ketone ND 15 EPA 8081B Toxaphene ND 73 EPA 8081B Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits TCMX DCB
119 9 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES EPA 8081B Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP12 Laboratory ID: alpha-bhc ND 6.1 EPA 8081B gamma-bhc ND 6.1 EPA 8081B beta-bhc ND 6.1 EPA 8081B delta-bhc ND 6.1 EPA 8081B Heptachlor ND 6.1 EPA 8081B Aldrin ND 6.1 EPA 8081B Heptachlor Epoxide ND 6.1 EPA 8081B gamma-chlordane ND 12 EPA 8081B alpha-chlordane ND 12 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDE ND 12 EPA 8081B Endosulfan I ND 6.1 EPA 8081B Dieldrin ND 12 EPA 8081B Endrin ND 12 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDD ND 12 EPA 8081B Endosulfan II ND 12 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDT ND 12 EPA 8081B Endrin Aldehyde ND 12 EPA 8081B Methoxychlor ND 12 EPA 8081B Endosulfan Sulfate ND 12 EPA 8081B Endrin Ketone ND 12 EPA 8081B Toxaphene ND 61 EPA 8081B Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits TCMX DCB
120 10 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES EPA 8081B Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP13 Laboratory ID: alpha-bhc ND 6.3 EPA 8081B gamma-bhc ND 6.3 EPA 8081B beta-bhc ND 6.3 EPA 8081B delta-bhc ND 6.3 EPA 8081B Heptachlor ND 6.3 EPA 8081B Aldrin ND 6.3 EPA 8081B Heptachlor Epoxide ND 6.3 EPA 8081B gamma-chlordane ND 13 EPA 8081B alpha-chlordane ND 13 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDE ND 13 EPA 8081B Endosulfan I ND 6.3 EPA 8081B Dieldrin ND 13 EPA 8081B Endrin ND 13 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDD ND 13 EPA 8081B Endosulfan II ND 13 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDT ND 13 EPA 8081B Endrin Aldehyde ND 13 EPA 8081B Methoxychlor ND 13 EPA 8081B Endosulfan Sulfate ND 13 EPA 8081B Endrin Ketone ND 13 EPA 8081B Toxaphene ND 63 EPA 8081B Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits TCMX DCB
121 11 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES EPA 8081B Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP14 Laboratory ID: alpha-bhc ND 6.7 EPA 8081B gamma-bhc ND 6.7 EPA 8081B beta-bhc ND 6.7 EPA 8081B delta-bhc ND 6.7 EPA 8081B Heptachlor ND 6.7 EPA 8081B Aldrin ND 6.7 EPA 8081B Heptachlor Epoxide ND 6.7 EPA 8081B gamma-chlordane ND 13 EPA 8081B alpha-chlordane ND 13 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDE ND 13 EPA 8081B Endosulfan I ND 6.7 EPA 8081B Dieldrin ND 13 EPA 8081B Endrin ND 13 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDD ND 13 EPA 8081B Endosulfan II ND 13 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDT ND 13 EPA 8081B Endrin Aldehyde ND 13 EPA 8081B Methoxychlor ND 13 EPA 8081B Endosulfan Sulfate ND 13 EPA 8081B Endrin Ketone ND 13 EPA 8081B Toxaphene ND 67 EPA 8081B Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits TCMX DCB
122 12 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES EPA 8081B QUALITY CONTROL Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags METHOD BLANK Laboratory ID: MB0312S2 alpha-bhc ND 5.0 EPA 8081B gamma-bhc ND 5.0 EPA 8081B beta-bhc ND 5.0 EPA 8081B delta-bhc ND 5.0 EPA 8081B Heptachlor ND 5.0 EPA 8081B Aldrin ND 5.0 EPA 8081B Heptachlor Epoxide ND 5.0 EPA 8081B gamma-chlordane ND 10 EPA 8081B alpha-chlordane ND 10 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDE ND 10 EPA 8081B Endosulfan I ND 5.0 EPA 8081B Dieldrin ND 10 EPA 8081B Endrin ND 10 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDD ND 10 EPA 8081B Endosulfan II ND 10 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDT ND 10 EPA 8081B Endrin Aldehyde ND 10 EPA 8081B Methoxychlor ND 10 EPA 8081B Endosulfan Sulfate ND 10 EPA 8081B Endrin Ketone ND 10 EPA 8081B Toxaphene ND 50 EPA 8081B Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits TCMX DCB Source Percent Recovery RPD Analyte Result Spike Level Result Recovery Limits RPD Limit Flags SPIKE BLANKS Laboratory ID: SB0312S2 SB SBD SB SBD SB SBD gamma-bhc N/A Heptachlor N/A Aldrin N/A Dieldrin N/A Endrin N/A ,4'-DDT N/A Surrogate: TCMX DCB
123 13 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: CHLORINATED ACID HERBICIDES EPA 8151A Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP8 Laboratory ID: Dalapon ND 280 EPA 8151A Dicamba ND 12 EPA 8151A MCPP ND 3000 EPA 8151A MCPA ND 1200 EPA 8151A Dichlorprop ND 87 EPA 8151A ,4-D EPA 8151A Pentachlorophenol EPA 8151A ,4,5-TP (Silvex) ND 12 EPA 8151A ,4,5-T ND 12 EPA 8151A ,4-DB ND 12 EPA 8151A Dinoseb ND 12 EPA 8151A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCAA AV-COMP9 Laboratory ID: Dalapon ND 310 EPA 8151A Dicamba ND 13 EPA 8151A MCPP ND 3000 EPA 8151A MCPA ND 1300 EPA 8151A Dichlorprop ND 95 EPA 8151A ,4-D EPA 8151A Pentachlorophenol ND 6.4 EPA 8151A ,4,5-TP (Silvex) ND 13 EPA 8151A ,4,5-T ND 13 EPA 8151A ,4-DB ND 13 EPA 8151A Dinoseb ND 13 EPA 8151A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCAA
124 14 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: CHLORINATED ACID HERBICIDES EPA 8151A Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP10 Laboratory ID: Dalapon ND 300 EPA 8151A Dicamba ND 12 EPA 8151A MCPP ND 3000 EPA 8151A MCPA ND 1200 EPA 8151A Dichlorprop ND 93 EPA 8151A ,4-D ND 12 EPA 8151A Pentachlorophenol ND 6.2 EPA 8151A ,4,5-TP (Silvex) ND 12 EPA 8151A ,4,5-T ND 12 EPA 8151A ,4-DB ND 12 EPA 8151A Dinoseb ND 12 EPA 8151A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCAA AV-COMP11 Laboratory ID: Dalapon ND 340 EPA 8151A Dicamba ND 14 EPA 8151A MCPP ND 3000 EPA 8151A MCPA ND 1400 EPA 8151A Dichlorprop ND 100 EPA 8151A ,4-D EPA 8151A Pentachlorophenol ND 7.0 EPA 8151A ,4,5-TP (Silvex) ND 14 EPA 8151A ,4,5-T ND 14 EPA 8151A ,4-DB ND 14 EPA 8151A Dinoseb ND 14 EPA 8151A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCAA
125 15 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: CHLORINATED ACID HERBICIDES EPA 8151A Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP12 Laboratory ID: Dalapon ND 280 EPA 8151A Dicamba ND 11 EPA 8151A MCPP ND 3000 EPA 8151A MCPA ND 1100 EPA 8151A Dichlorprop ND 87 EPA 8151A ,4-D ND 11 EPA 8151A Pentachlorophenol ND 5.8 EPA 8151A ,4,5-TP (Silvex) ND 12 EPA 8151A ,4,5-T ND 12 EPA 8151A ,4-DB ND 12 EPA 8151A Dinoseb ND 12 EPA 8151A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCAA AV-COMP13 Laboratory ID: Dalapon ND 290 EPA 8151A Dicamba ND 12 EPA 8151A MCPP ND 3000 EPA 8151A MCPA ND 1200 EPA 8151A Dichlorprop ND 89 EPA 8151A ,4-D ND 12 EPA 8151A Pentachlorophenol ND 6.0 EPA 8151A ,4,5-TP (Silvex) ND 12 EPA 8151A ,4,5-T ND 12 EPA 8151A ,4-DB ND 12 EPA 8151A Dinoseb ND 12 EPA 8151A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCAA
126 16 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: CHLORINATED ACID HERBICIDES EPA 8151A Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP14 Laboratory ID: Dalapon ND 310 EPA 8151A Dicamba ND 13 EPA 8151A MCPP ND 3000 EPA 8151A MCPA ND 1200 EPA 8151A Dichlorprop ND 95 EPA 8151A ,4-D EPA 8151A Pentachlorophenol ND 6.3 EPA 8151A ,4,5-TP (Silvex) ND 13 EPA 8151A ,4,5-T ND 13 EPA 8151A ,4-DB ND 13 EPA 8151A Dinoseb ND 13 EPA 8151A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCAA
127 17 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: CHLORINATED ACID HERBICIDES EPA 8151A QUALITY CONTROL Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags METHOD BLANK Laboratory ID: MB0316S1 Dalapon ND 230 EPA 8151A Dicamba ND 9.4 EPA 8151A MCPP ND 2800 EPA 8151A MCPA ND 940 EPA 8151A Dichlorprop ND 71 EPA 8151A ,4-D ND 9.4 EPA 8151A Pentachlorophenol ND 4.8 EPA 8151A ,4,5-TP (Silvex) ND 9.5 EPA 8151A ,4,5-T ND 9.5 EPA 8151A ,4-DB ND 9.5 EPA 8151A Dinoseb ND 9.5 EPA 8151A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCAA Source Percent Recovery RPD Analyte Result Spike Level Result Recovery Limits RPD Limit Flags SPIKE BLANKS Laboratory ID: SB0316S1 SB SBD SB SBD SB SBD Dicamba N/A ,4-D N/A Pentachlorophenol N/A ,4,5-T N/A ,4-DB N/A Surrogate: DCAA
128 18 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL EPA Method Prepared Analyzed Flags Lab ID: AV-COMP8 Arsenic ND C Cadmium C Chromium C Lead C Mercury B Lab ID: AV-COMP9 Arsenic ND C Cadmium ND C Chromium C Lead C Mercury ND B Lab ID: AV-COMP10 Arsenic ND C Cadmium ND C Chromium C Lead C Mercury ND B
129 19 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL EPA Method Prepared Analyzed Flags Lab ID: AV-COMP11 Arsenic ND C Cadmium ND C Chromium C Lead C Mercury ND B Lab ID: AV-COMP12 Arsenic ND C Cadmium C Chromium C Lead C Mercury ND B Lab ID: AV-COMP13 Arsenic C Cadmium ND C Chromium C Lead C Mercury ND B
130 20 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL EPA Method Prepared Analyzed Flags Lab ID: AV-COMP14 Arsenic ND C Cadmium ND C Chromium C Lead C Mercury ND B
131 21 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: MB0310SM1&MB0310S1 Analyte Method Result PQL Arsenic 6010C ND 10 Cadmium 6010C ND 0.50 Chromium 6010C ND 0.50 Lead 6010C ND 5.0 Mercury 7471B ND 0.25
132 22 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B DUPLICATE QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: Sample Duplicate Analyte Result Result RPD PQL Flags Arsenic ND ND NA 10 Cadmium ND ND NA 0.50 Chromium Lead ND ND NA 5.0 Mercury ND ND NA 0.25
133 23 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B MS/MSD QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: Spike Percent Percent Analyte Level MS Recovery MSD Recovery RPD Flags Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Lead Mercury
134 24 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B SPIKE BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: SB0310SM1&SB0310S1 Spike SB Percent Analyte Method Level Result Recovery Arsenic 6010C Cadmium 6010C Chromium 6010C Lead 6010C Mercury 7471B
135 25 Date of Report: March 20, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: % MOISTURE Date Analyzed: 3-10&12-15 Client ID Lab ID % Moisture AV-COMP AV-COMP AV-COMP AV-COMP AV-COMP AV-COMP AV-COMP
136 26 Data Qualifiers and Abbreviations A - Due to a high sample concentration, the amount spiked is insufficient for meaningful MS/MSD recovery data. B - The analyte indicated was also found in the blank sample. C - The duplicate RPD is outside control limits due to high result variability when analyte concentrations are within five times the quantitation limit. E - The value reported exceeds the quantitation range and is an estimate. F - Surrogate recovery data is not available due to the high concentration of coeluting target compounds. H - The analyte indicated is a common laboratory solvent and may have been introduced during sample preparation, and be impacting the sample result. I - Compound recovery is outside of the control limits. J - The value reported was below the practical quantitation limit. The value is an estimate. K - Sample duplicate RPD is outside control limits due to sample inhomogeneity. The sample was re-extracted and re-analyzed with similar results. L - The RPD is outside of the control limits. M - Hydrocarbons in the gasoline range are impacting the diesel range result. M1 - Hydrocarbons in the gasoline range (toluene-napthalene) are present in the sample. N - Hydrocarbons in the lube oil range are impacting the diesel range result. N1 - Hydrocarbons in diesel range are impacting lube oil range results. O - Hydrocarbons indicative of heavier fuels are present in the sample and are impacting the gasoline result. P - The RPD of the detected concentrations between the two columns is greater than 40. Q - Surrogate recovery is outside of the control limits. S - Surrogate recovery data is not available due to the necessary dilution of the sample. T - The sample chromatogram is not similar to a typical. U - The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported sample quantitation limit. U1 - The practical quantitation limit is elevated due to interferences present in the sample. V - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate recoveries are outside control limits due to matrix effects. W - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate RPD are outside control limits due to matrix effects. X - Sample extract treated with a mercury cleanup procedure. X1- Sample extract treated with a Sulfuric acid/silica gel cleanup procedure. Y - The calibration verification for this analyte exceeded the 20% drift specified in method 8260C, and therefore the reported result should be considered an estimate. The overall performance of the calibration verification standard met the acceptance criteria of the method. Z - ND - Not Detected at PQL PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference
137
138
139
140
141 14648 NE 95 th Street, Redmond, WA (425) April 1, 2015 Ross Stainsby Hart Crowser, Inc Westlake Avenue North, Suite 200 Seattle, WA Re: Analytical Data for Project Laboratory Reference No B Dear Ross: Enclosed are the analytical results and associated quality control data for samples submitted on March 5, The standard policy of OnSite Environmental, Inc. is to store your samples for 30 days from the date of receipt. If you require longer storage, please contact the laboratory. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions concerning the data, or need additional information, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, David Baumeister Project Manager Enclosures
142 2 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B Case Narrative Samples were collected on March 5, 2015 and received by the laboratory on March 5, They were maintained at the laboratory at a temperature of 2 o C to 6 o C. General QA/QC issues associated with the analytical data enclosed in this laboratory report will be indicated with a reference to a comment or explanation on the Data Qualifier page. More complex and involved QA/QC issues will be discussed in detail below.
143 3 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL EPA Method Prepared Analyzed Flags Lab ID: AV-COMP8-SS1 Mercury B Lab ID: AV-COMP8-SS2 Mercury ND B Lab ID: AV-COMP8-SS3 Mercury ND B Lab ID: AV-COMP11-SS1 Lead C Lab ID: AV-COMP11-SS2 Lead C Lab ID: AV-COMP11-SS3 Lead C
144 4 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL EPA Method Prepared Analyzed Flags Lab ID: AV-COMP11-SS4 Lead C Lab ID: AV-COMP11-SS5 Lead C Lab ID: AV-COMP13-SS1 Arsenic C Lab ID: AV-COMP13-SS2 Arsenic C Lab ID: AV-COMP13-SS3 Arsenic C
145 5 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: 3-26& &27-15 Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: MB0326SM1&MB0327S1 Analyte Method Result PQL Arsenic 6010C ND 10 Lead 6010C ND 5.0 Mercury 7471B ND 0.25
146 6 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B DUPLICATE QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: 3-26& &27-15 Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: Sample Duplicate Analyte Result Result RPD PQL Flags Arsenic ND ND NA 10 Lead C Mercury ND ND NA 0.25
147 7 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B MS/MSD QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: 3-26& &27-15 Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: Spike Percent Percent Analyte Level MS Recovery MSD Recovery RPD Flags Arsenic Lead Mercury
148 8 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B SPIKE BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: 3-26& &27-15 Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: SB0326SM1&SB0327S1 Spike SB Percent Analyte Method Level Result Recovery Arsenic 6010C Lead 6010C Mercury 7471B
149 9 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TCLP MERCURY EPA 1311/7470A Matrix: Units: TCLP Extract mg/l (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL EPA Method Prepared Analyzed Flags Lab ID: AV-COMP8 Mercury ND A
150 10 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TCLP MERCURY EPA 1311/7470A METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Date Prepared: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: TCLP Extract mg/l (ppm) Lab ID: MB0325T1 Analyte Method Result PQL Mercury 7470A ND
151 11 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TCLP MERCURY EPA 1311/7470A DUPLICATE QUALITY CONTROL Date Prepared: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: TCLP Extract mg/l (ppm) Lab ID: Sample Duplicate Analyte Result Result RPD PQL Flags Mercury ND ND NA
152 12 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TCLP MERCURY EPA 1311/7470A MS/MSD QUALITY CONTROL Date Prepared: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: TCLP Extract mg/l (ppm) Lab ID: Spike Percent Percent Analyte Level MS Recovery MSD Recovery RPD Flags Mercury
153 13 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TCLP MERCURY EPA 1311/7470A SPIKE BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Date Prepared: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: TCLP Extract mg/l (ppm) Lab ID: SB0325T1 Spike Percent Analyte Method Level SB Recovery Mercury 7470A
154 14 Date of Report: April 1, 2015 Samples Submitted: March 5, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B % MOISTURE Date Analyzed: Client ID Lab ID % Moisture AV-COMP8-SS AV-COMP8-SS AV-COMP8-SS AV-COMP11-SS AV-COMP11-SS AV-COMP11-SS AV-COMP11-SS AV-COMP11-SS AV-COMP13-SS AV-COMP13-SS AV-COMP13-SS
155 15 Data Qualifiers and Abbreviations A - Due to a high sample concentration, the amount spiked is insufficient for meaningful MS/MSD recovery data. B - The analyte indicated was also found in the blank sample. C - The duplicate RPD is outside control limits due to high result variability when analyte concentrations are within five times the quantitation limit. E - The value reported exceeds the quantitation range and is an estimate. F - Surrogate recovery data is not available due to the high concentration of coeluting target compounds. H - The analyte indicated is a common laboratory solvent and may have been introduced during sample preparation, and be impacting the sample result. I - Compound recovery is outside of the control limits. J - The value reported was below the practical quantitation limit. The value is an estimate. K - Sample duplicate RPD is outside control limits due to sample inhomogeneity. The sample was re-extracted and re-analyzed with similar results. L - The RPD is outside of the control limits. M - Hydrocarbons in the gasoline range are impacting the diesel range result. M1 - Hydrocarbons in the gasoline range (toluene-napthalene) are present in the sample. N - Hydrocarbons in the lube oil range are impacting the diesel range result. N1 - Hydrocarbons in diesel range are impacting lube oil range results. O - Hydrocarbons indicative of heavier fuels are present in the sample and are impacting the gasoline result. P - The RPD of the detected concentrations between the two columns is greater than 40. Q - Surrogate recovery is outside of the control limits. S - Surrogate recovery data is not available due to the necessary dilution of the sample. T - The sample chromatogram is not similar to a typical. U - The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported sample quantitation limit. U1 - The practical quantitation limit is elevated due to interferences present in the sample. V - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate recoveries are outside control limits due to matrix effects. W - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate RPD are outside control limits due to matrix effects. X - Sample extract treated with a mercury cleanup procedure. X1- Sample extract treated with a Sulfuric acid/silica gel cleanup procedure. Y - The calibration verification for this analyte exceeded the 20% drift specified in method 8260C, and therefore the reported result should be considered an estimate. The overall performance of the calibration verification standard met the acceptance criteria of the method. Z - ND - Not Detected at PQL PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference
156
157
158
159
160 14648 NE 95 th Street, Redmond, WA (425) May 6, 2015 Ross Stainsby Hart Crowser, Inc Westlake Avenue North, Suite 200 Seattle, WA Re: Analytical Data for Project Laboratory Reference No Dear Ross: Enclosed are the analytical results and associated quality control data for samples submitted on April 24, The standard policy of OnSite Environmental, Inc. is to store your samples for 30 days from the date of receipt. If you require longer storage, please contact the laboratory. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions concerning the data, or need additional information, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, David Baumeister Project Manager Enclosures
161 2 Date of Report: May 6, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: Case Narrative Samples were collected on April 24, 2015 and received by the laboratory on April 24, They were maintained at the laboratory at a temperature of 2 o C to 6 o C. Please note that all soil sample results are reported on a dry-weight basis, unless otherwise noted below. General QA/QC issues associated with the analytical data enclosed in this laboratory report will be indicated with a reference to a comment or explanation on the Data Qualifier page. More complex and involved QA/QC issues will be discussed in detail below.
162 3 Date of Report: May 6, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES EPA 8081B Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-CORE " Laboratory ID: Dieldrin ND 11 EPA 8081B Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits TCMX DCB
163 4 Date of Report: May 6, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES EPA 8081B Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-CORE " Laboratory ID: Dieldrin ND 11 EPA 8081B Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits TCMX DCB
164 5 Date of Report: May 6, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES EPA 8081B QUALITY CONTROL Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags METHOD BLANK Laboratory ID: MB0427S1 Dieldrin ND 10 EPA 8081B Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits TCMX DCB Source Percent Recovery RPD Analyte Result Spike Level Result Recovery Limits RPD Limit Flags SPIKE BLANKS Laboratory ID: SB0427S1 SB SBD SB SBD SB SBD Dieldrin N/A Surrogate: TCMX DCB
165 6 Date of Report: May 6, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES EPA 8081B Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP-15 Laboratory ID: alpha-bhc ND 6.5 EPA 8081B gamma-bhc ND 6.5 EPA 8081B beta-bhc ND 6.5 EPA 8081B delta-bhc ND 6.5 EPA 8081B Heptachlor ND 6.5 EPA 8081B Aldrin EPA 8081B Heptachlor Epoxide ND 6.5 EPA 8081B gamma-chlordane ND 13 EPA 8081B alpha-chlordane ND 13 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDE EPA 8081B Endosulfan I ND 6.5 EPA 8081B Dieldrin EPA 8081B Endrin ND 13 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDD ND 13 EPA 8081B Endosulfan II ND 13 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDT EPA 8081B Endrin Aldehyde ND 13 EPA 8081B Methoxychlor ND 13 EPA 8081B Endosulfan Sulfate ND 13 EPA 8081B Endrin Ketone ND 13 EPA 8081B Toxaphene ND 65 EPA 8081B Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits TCMX DCB
166 7 Date of Report: May 6, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES EPA 8081B QUALITY CONTROL Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags METHOD BLANK Laboratory ID: MB0505S1 alpha-bhc ND 5.0 EPA 8081B gamma-bhc ND 5.0 EPA 8081B beta-bhc ND 5.0 EPA 8081B delta-bhc ND 5.0 EPA 8081B Heptachlor ND 5.0 EPA 8081B Aldrin ND 5.0 EPA 8081B Heptachlor Epoxide ND 5.0 EPA 8081B gamma-chlordane ND 10 EPA 8081B alpha-chlordane ND 10 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDE ND 10 EPA 8081B Endosulfan I ND 5.0 EPA 8081B Dieldrin ND 10 EPA 8081B Endrin ND 10 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDD ND 10 EPA 8081B Endosulfan II ND 10 EPA 8081B ,4'-DDT ND 10 EPA 8081B Endrin Aldehyde ND 10 EPA 8081B Methoxychlor ND 10 EPA 8081B Endosulfan Sulfate ND 10 EPA 8081B Endrin Ketone ND 10 EPA 8081B Toxaphene ND 50 EPA 8081B Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits TCMX DCB Source Percent Recovery RPD Analyte Result Spike Level Result Recovery Limits RPD Limit Flags MATRIX SPIKES Laboratory ID: MS MSD MS MSD MS MSD gamma-bhc ND Heptachlor ND Aldrin Dieldrin NA NA NA NA NA 21 Endrin ND ,4'-DDT Surrogate: TCMX DCB
167 8 Date of Report: May 6, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES EPA 8081B SPIKE BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Matrix: Soil Units: ug/kg (ppb) Source Percent Recovery RPD Analyte Result Spike Level Result Recovery Limits RPD Limit Flags SPIKE BLANKS Laboratory ID: SB0505S1 SB SBD SB SBD SB SBD gamma-bhc N/A Heptachlor N/A Aldrin N/A Dieldrin N/A Endrin N/A ,4'-DDT N/A Surrogate: TCMX DCB
168 9 Date of Report: May 6, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL EPA Method Prepared Analyzed Flags Lab ID: AV-CORE " Lead C Mercury B Lab ID: AV-CORE " Lead C Mercury ND B Lab ID: AV-CORE " Cadmium C Lead C Lab ID: AV-CORE Cadmium ND C Lead C Lab ID: AV-CORE " Cadmium ND C Lead C
169 10 Date of Report: May 6, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL EPA Method Prepared Analyzed Flags Lab ID: AV-CORE " Cadmium ND C Lead ND C Lab ID: AV-CORE " Lead C Lab ID: AV-CORE " Lead ND C
170 11 Date of Report: May 6, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: MB0427SM1 Analyte Method Result PQL Cadmium 6010C ND 0.50 Lead 6010C ND 5.0
171 12 Date of Report: May 6, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL MERCURY EPA 7471B METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: MB0430S1 Analyte Method Result PQL Mercury 7471B ND 0.25
172 13 Date of Report: May 6, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C DUPLICATE QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: Sample Duplicate Analyte Result Result RPD PQL Flags Cadmium ND ND NA 0.50 Lead
173 14 Date of Report: May 6, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL MERCURY EPA 7471B DUPLICATE QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: Sample Duplicate Analyte Result Result RPD PQL Flags Mercury ND ND NA 0.25
174 15 Date of Report: May 6, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C MS/MSD QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: Spike Percent Percent Analyte Level MS Recovery MSD Recovery RPD Flags Cadmium Lead
175 16 Date of Report: May 6, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL MERCURY EPA 7471B MS/MSD QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: Spike Percent Percent Analyte Level MS Recovery MSD Recovery RPD Flags Mercury
176 17 Date of Report: May 6, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C SPIKE BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: SB0427SM1 Spike SB Percent Analyte Method Level Result Recovery Cadmium 6010C Lead 6010C
177 18 Date of Report: May 6, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: TOTAL MERCURY EPA 7471B SPIKE BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: SB0430S1 Spike SB Percent Analyte Method Level Result Recovery Mercury 7471B
178 19 Date of Report: May 6, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: PCBs EPA 8082A Matrix: Soil Units: mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-CORE " Laboratory ID: Aroclor 1016 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1221 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1232 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1242 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1254 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1260 ND EPA 8082A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCB AV-CORE " Laboratory ID: Aroclor 1016 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1221 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1232 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1242 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1254 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1260 ND EPA 8082A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCB
179 20 Date of Report: May 6, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: PCBs EPA 8082A QUALITY CONTROL Matrix: Soil Units: mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags METHOD BLANK Laboratory ID: MB0501S1 Aroclor 1016 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1221 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1232 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1242 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1254 ND EPA 8082A Aroclor 1260 ND EPA 8082A Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits DCB Source Percent Recovery RPD Analyte Result Spike Level Result Recovery Limits RPD Limit Flags SPIKE BLANKS Laboratory ID: SB0501S1 SB SBD SB SBD SB SBD Aroclor N/A Surrogate: DCB
180 21 Date of Report: May 6, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: % MOISTURE Date Analyzed: 4-27&5-4&5-15 Client ID Lab ID % Moisture AV-CORE " AV-CORE " AV-CORE " AV-CORE AV-CORE " AV-CORE " AV-CORE " AV-CORE " AV-COMP
181 22 Data Qualifiers and Abbreviations A - Due to a high sample concentration, the amount spiked is insufficient for meaningful MS/MSD recovery data. B - The analyte indicated was also found in the blank sample. C - The duplicate RPD is outside control limits due to high result variability when analyte concentrations are within five times the quantitation limit. E - The value reported exceeds the quantitation range and is an estimate. F - Surrogate recovery data is not available due to the high concentration of coeluting target compounds. H - The analyte indicated is a common laboratory solvent and may have been introduced during sample preparation, and be impacting the sample result. I - Compound recovery is outside of the control limits. J - The value reported was below the practical quantitation limit. The value is an estimate. K - Sample duplicate RPD is outside control limits due to sample inhomogeneity. The sample was re-extracted and re-analyzed with similar results. L - The RPD is outside of the control limits. M - Hydrocarbons in the gasoline range are impacting the diesel range result. M1 - Hydrocarbons in the gasoline range (toluene-napthalene) are present in the sample. N - Hydrocarbons in the lube oil range are impacting the diesel range result. N1 - Hydrocarbons in diesel range are impacting lube oil range results. O - Hydrocarbons indicative of heavier fuels are present in the sample and are impacting the gasoline result. P - The RPD of the detected concentrations between the two columns is greater than 40. Q - Surrogate recovery is outside of the control limits. S - Surrogate recovery data is not available due to the necessary dilution of the sample. T - The sample chromatogram is not similar to a typical. U - The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported sample quantitation limit. U1 - The practical quantitation limit is elevated due to interferences present in the sample. V - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate recoveries are outside control limits due to matrix effects. W - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate RPD are outside control limits due to matrix effects. X - Sample extract treated with a mercury cleanup procedure. X1- Sample extract treated with a Sulfuric acid/silica gel cleanup procedure. Y - The calibration verification for this analyte exceeded the 20% drift specified in method 8260C, and therefore the reported result should be considered an estimate. The overall performance of the calibration verification standard met the acceptance criteria of the method. Z - ND - Not Detected at PQL PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference
182
183
184 14648 NE 95 th Street, Redmond, WA (425) May 18, 2015 Ross Stainsby Hart Crowser, Inc Westlake Avenue North, Suite 200 Seattle, WA Re: Analytical Data for Project Laboratory Reference No B Dear Ross: Enclosed are the analytical results and associated quality control data for samples submitted on April 24, The standard policy of OnSite Environmental, Inc. is to store your samples for 30 days from the date of receipt. If you require longer storage, please contact the laboratory. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions concerning the data, or need additional information, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, David Baumeister Project Manager Enclosures
185 2 Date of Report: May 18, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B Case Narrative Samples were collected on April 24, 2015 and received by the laboratory on April 24, They were maintained at the laboratory at a temperature of 2 o C to 6 o C. Please note that all soil sample results are reported on a dry-weight basis, unless otherwise noted below. General QA/QC issues associated with the analytical data enclosed in this laboratory report will be indicated with a reference to a comment or explanation on the Data Qualifier page. More complex and involved QA/QC issues will be discussed in detail below. Total Metals EPA 6010C/7471B Analysis The duplicate RPD for Chromium is outside control limits due to sample inhomogeneity. The sample was re-extracted and re-analyzed with similar results. Any other QA/QC issues associated with this extraction and analysis will be indicated with a footnote reference and discussed in detail on the Data Qualifier page.
186 3 Date of Report: May 18, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL EPA Method Prepared Analyzed Flags Lab ID: AV-COMP-15 Arsenic ND C Cadmium C Chromium C Lead C Mercury ND B
187 4 Date of Report: May 18, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: 5-11& &14-15 Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: MB0513SM2&MB0511S1 Analyte Method Result PQL Arsenic 6010C ND 10 Cadmium 6010C ND 0.50 Chromium 6010C ND 0.50 Lead 6010C ND 5.0 Mercury 7471B ND 0.25
188 5 Date of Report: May 18, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B DUPLICATE QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: 5-11& &14-15 Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: Sample Duplicate Analyte Result Result RPD PQL Flags Arsenic ND ND NA 10 Cadmium ND ND NA 0.50 Chromium K Lead ND ND NA 5.0 Mercury ND ND NA 0.25
189 6 Date of Report: May 18, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B MS/MSD QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: 5-11& &14-15 Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: Spike Percent Percent Analyte Level MS Recovery MSD Recovery RPD Flags Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Lead Mercury
190 7 Date of Report: May 18, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B TOTAL METALS EPA 6010C/7471B SPIKE BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: 5-11& &14-15 Matrix: Units: Soil mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: SB0513SM2&SB0511S1 Spike SB Percent Analyte Method Level Result Recovery Arsenic 6010C Cadmium 6010C Chromium 6010C Lead 6010C Mercury 7471B
191 8 Date of Report: May 18, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B NWTPH-Dx Matrix: Soil Units: mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags AV-COMP-15 Laboratory ID: Diesel Range Organics ND 33 NWTPH-Dx Lube Oil Range Organics NWTPH-Dx Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits o-terphenyl
192 9 Date of Report: May 18, 2015 Samples Submitted: April 24, 2015 Laboratory Reference: B NWTPH-Dx QUALITY CONTROL Matrix: Soil Units: mg/kg (ppm) Date Date Analyte Result PQL Method Prepared Analyzed Flags METHOD BLANK Laboratory ID: MB0508S1 Diesel Range Organics ND 25 NWTPH-Dx Lube Oil Range Organics ND 50 NWTPH-Dx Surrogate: Percent Recovery Control Limits o-terphenyl Source Percent Recovery RPD Analyte Result Spike Level Result Recovery Limits RPD Limit Flags DUPLICATE Laboratory ID: ORIG DUP Diesel Range ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA Lube Oil Range Organics NA NA NA NA 18 NA Surrogate: o-terphenyl SPIKE BLANK Laboratory ID: SB0508S1 Diesel Fuel # NA NA NA Surrogate: o-terphenyl
193 10 Data Qualifiers and Abbreviations A - Due to a high sample concentration, the amount spiked is insufficient for meaningful MS/MSD recovery data. B - The analyte indicated was also found in the blank sample. C - The duplicate RPD is outside control limits due to high result variability when analyte concentrations are within five times the quantitation limit. E - The value reported exceeds the quantitation range and is an estimate. F - Surrogate recovery data is not available due to the high concentration of coeluting target compounds. H - The analyte indicated is a common laboratory solvent and may have been introduced during sample preparation, and be impacting the sample result. I - Compound recovery is outside of the control limits. J - The value reported was below the practical quantitation limit. The value is an estimate. K - Sample duplicate RPD is outside control limits due to sample inhomogeneity. The sample was re-extracted and re-analyzed with similar results. L - The RPD is outside of the control limits. M - Hydrocarbons in the gasoline range are impacting the diesel range result. M1 - Hydrocarbons in the gasoline range (toluene-napthalene) are present in the sample. N - Hydrocarbons in the lube oil range are impacting the diesel range result. N1 - Hydrocarbons in diesel range are impacting lube oil range results. O - Hydrocarbons indicative of heavier fuels are present in the sample and are impacting the gasoline result. P - The RPD of the detected concentrations between the two columns is greater than 40. Q - Surrogate recovery is outside of the control limits. S - Surrogate recovery data is not available due to the necessary dilution of the sample. T - The sample chromatogram is not similar to a typical. U - The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported sample quantitation limit. U1 - The practical quantitation limit is elevated due to interferences present in the sample. V - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate recoveries are outside control limits due to matrix effects. W - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate RPD are outside control limits due to matrix effects. X - Sample extract treated with a mercury cleanup procedure. X1- Sample extract treated with a Sulfuric acid/silica gel cleanup procedure. Y - The calibration verification for this analyte exceeded the 20% drift specified in method 8260C, and therefore the reported result should be considered an estimate. The overall performance of the calibration verification standard met the acceptance criteria of the method. Z - ND - Not Detected at PQL PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference
194
George s Used Equipment Removal Action Report Laboratory analytical results were compared to the cleanup objectives outlined in the previously approve
July 10, 2015 Ed Olson MPCA 520 Lafayette Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55115 RE: George s Used Equipment Response Action Report UMore Park OU2 and OU3 Rosemount, MN Bay West Proposal J140651 Dear Mr. Olson:
More informationEXPORT SOIL-MATERIAL QUALITY REQUIREMENTS
EXPORT SOIL-MATERIAL QUALITY REQUIREMENTS GENERAL Industrial operations have been conducted on Port of Long Beach property since the 1930s. Though it is unlikely that hazardous substances will be encountered
More informationSURPLUS SOIL-MATERIAL REUSE REQUIREMENTS
SURPLUS SOIL-MATERIAL REUSE REQUIREMENTS GENERAL Surplus soil-materials generated from most, if not all, Long Beach Harbor Department projects are unlikely to meet established Port Export Soil-material
More informationFigure 1. PEER Footings Excavation Area
Figure 1. PEER Footings Excavation Area Black = new footing Red = approximate clean new footing excavation area, DU-1 Green = existing pad or footing to be left in place Blue = approximate TPH-e excavation
More informationResidual Pesticide Screening Evaluation 218 Mount Parnassus Road, East Haddam, Connecticut
October 28, 2014 Mr. Craig Mansfield Director of Facilities and Emergency Management Town of East Haddam/Board of Education 7 Main Street, PO Box K East Haddam, CT 06423 RE: Residual Pesticide Screening
More informationShallow Interval Soil Metal Sampling Platte to Park Hill 39 th Avenue Channel Project Area City and County of Denver, Colorado
Page intentionally left blank to accommodate double-sided printing July 31, 2017 Shallow Interval Soil Metal Sampling Platte to Park Hill 39 th Avenue Channel Project Area City and County of Denver, Colorado
More informationLIMITED SCOPE PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 7224 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST MILTON, WASHINGTON FARALLON PN:
DRAFT Issued for Client Review April 21, 2017 Mr. Cameron Coltharp Telecare Corporation 1080 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 100 Alameda, California 94501 BY E-MAIL ONLY RE: LIMITED SCOPE PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL
More informationTo: Dave Favero (RACER) Ref. No.:
February, 0 To: ave Favero (RACER) Ref. No.: 00 From: Subject: John-eric Pardys/wg/ Topsoil Characterization JSS identified a potential source of topsoil to be used at RACER's Saginaw Malleable Industrial
More informationAPPENDIX I-3 Air and Fugitive Dust Monitoring and Mitigation
APPENDIX I-3 Air and Fugitive Dust Monitoring and Mitigation (Tetra Tech 2014) MEMO To: Cc: From: Jason Han, New Urban West, Inc. Keith Walker, Cox, Castle & Nicholson, LLP Carl Lenker, Senior Project
More informationOn March 6, 2014, 17 shallow soil samples were collected along the proposed trail alignment according to
LAKE EWAUNA TRAIL LEVEL 2 FIELD SAMPLING ASSESSMENT the proposed alignment (Figure 1). The trail will also include the installation of a geothermal snow melt system, allowing for year round use of the
More informationTETRA TECH, INC. April 11, 2014
TETRA TECH, INC. April 11, 2014 Greg Haet EH&S Associate Director, Environmental Protection Office of Environment, Health & Safety University of California, Berkeley University Hall, 3rd Floor #1150 Berkeley,
More informationSoil Sampling and Analysis Report
Soil Sampling and Analysis Report between Webber Street and Bee Ridge Road Bank Stabilization Project Sarasota County, Florida Prepared for: HDR, Inc. 2621 Cattlemen Road, Suite 106 Sarasota, Florida 34232
More informationDate: November 17, 2017 Project No.:
ate: November, 0 Project No.: -- For: Mr. James Wilson UTRA ENTERPRISES, INC 0 Mission Boulevard, Suite 0 Fremont, California ear Mr. Wilson: Re: Additional Soil Quality Evaluation anville Boulevard Alamo,
More informationCoachella Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District Trader Place Indio, California 92201
Coachella Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District 43420 Trader Place Indio, California 92201 Report of Additional Soil Sampling Along Avenue 55 and in the Unpaved Storage Area Former CVMVCD Offices
More informationOVERVIEW SCOPE OF WORK (SOW)
Site Description The subject property is occupied by the former Parker Service Station, which contained a former Service Garage (now called Former Garage) and Filling Station Store (now called Storage
More informationREPORT OF LIMITED DRINKING WATER TESTING FOR LEAD AND COPPER CONTENT. SKY VALLEY EDUCATIONAL CENTER Monroe, Washington
REPORT OF LIMITED DRINKING WATER TESTING FOR LEAD AND COPPER CONTENT SKY VALLEY EDUCATIONAL CENTER Monroe, Washington Prepared for MONROE SCHOOL DISTRICT 200 East Fremont Monroe, WA 98272 Prepared by PBS
More informationApril 3, 2008; Revised October 1, Port of Seattle - Terminal 117 Soil and Water QC Samples Analytical Resources, Inc. data February 2008
Prepared for: Terminal 117 Port of Seattle April 3, 2008; Revised October 1, 2008 Organic Data Validation Report Port of Seattle - Terminal 117 Soil and Water QC Samples Analytical Resources, Inc. data
More informationWORK PLAN AND SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN ADDENDUM
WORK PLAN AND SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN ADDENDUM RANGE MANAGEMENT UNIT 3 Prepared for: Camp Stanley Storage Activity Boerne, Texas PREPARED BY: PARSONS Austin, TX November 20 ADDENDUM TO WORK PLAN AND
More informationCost Estimate for Removal and Disposal of Contaminated Soil
14432 SE Eastgate Way, Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98007 tel: 425-519-8300 Mr. Mark Menard Sound Transit 401 South Jackson Street Seattle, Washington 98104-2820 Subject: Cost Estimate for Disposal of Contaminant-Impacted
More informationLimited Site Investigation
RED Limited Site Investigation Proposed Chick-fil-A #04046 6602 19th Street West Tacoma, Pierce County, Washington February 16, 2018 Project No. 81177692 Prepared for: Chick-fil-A, Inc. Atlanta, Georgia
More informationUniversity of Massachusetts. Lederle Graduate Research Center Amherst, Massachusetts New England Business Center Andover, MA
Self-implementing On-Site Cleanup and Disposal Plan University of Massachusetts Lederle Graduate Research Center Amherst, Massachusetts 1.866.702.6371 35 New England Business Center Andover, MA 210918.00
More informationTable 1 Ken Malloy Harbor Regional Park - Previous Sampling Results
TABLES Table 1 Ken Malloy Harbor Regional Park - Previous Sampling Results Soluble Threshold Total Threshold Sample Location, I.D., and Sample Depth (ft bgs) Limit Concentration Limit Concentration FWM-01
More informationDepartment of Toxic Substances Control
Matthew Rodriquez Secretary for Environmental Protection Department of Toxic Substances Control Barbara A. Lee, Director 8800 Cal Center Drive Sacramento, California 95826-3200 Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor
More informationTemporary Erosion and Sediment Control (TESC) Report and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan For Construction Activities
Development Services 1775 12 th Ave. NW P.O. Box 1307 Issaquah, WA 98027 425-837-3100 issaquahwa.gov Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control (TESC) Report and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan For Construction
More informationASH MANAGEMENT PLAN. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4, Atlanta, GA. Mr. Joe Alfano, Remedial Project Manager
ASH MANAGEMENT PLAN U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4, Atlanta, GA Mr. Joe Alfano, Remedial Project Manager 404-562-8933 City of Jacksonville Environmental and Compliance Department Site Investigation
More informationAppendix G Phase 2 Environmental Site Investigation
Appendix G Phase 2 Environmental Site Investigation PHASE II: ENVIRONMENTAL SITE INVESTIGATION BCAG Property Acquisition APN: 039-060-125 Project Number: NOR103-PII Prepared for Northstar Engineering
More informationREPORT FOR LEAD TESTING IN DRINKING WATER
REPORT FOR LEAD TESTING IN DRINKING WATER for WHITMAN COLLEGE CAMPUS AND INTEREST HOUSES Walla Walla, WA 99362 Project #E2016/0706 August 2, 2016 prepared for: Whitman College Attn: Fred Miller 345 Boyer
More informationWORK PLAN AND SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN ADDENDUM
WORK PLAN AND SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN ADDENDUM RANGE MANAGEMENT UNIT 2 Prepared for: Camp Stanley Storage Activity Boerne, Texas PREPARED BY: PARSONS Austin, TX May 2011 ADDENDUM TO WORK PLAN AND SAMPLING
More informationECSI Number: Responsible Party: Klamath County. QTime Number: Entry Date: 9/22/04 (VCP)
ECSI Number: 1213 Responsible Party: Klamath County QTime Number: 37941 Entry Date: 9/22/04 (VCP) Proposed Remedial Action Staff Report - Addendum Chiloquin Forest Products Chiloquin, Klamath County, Oregon
More informationSAUGERTIES HARBOR, NY ESOPUS CREEK, NEW YORK FEDERAL NAVIGATION PROJECT MAINTENANCE DREDGING
Public Notice In replying refer to: Public Notice No. SH-AFO-15 Published: March 23, 2015 Expires: April 21, 2015 New York District Albany Field Office 1 Bond Street Troy, N.Y. 12180 ATTN: CENAN-OP-A SAUGERTIES
More informationCOMMON WORK RESULTS FOR EXISTING CONDITIONS SCHEDULES FOR EXISTING CONDITIONS
DIVISION 02 EXISTING CONDITIONS 02 01 00 MAINTENANCE OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Maintenance of site remediation, underground storage tank removal, facility remediation, and hazardous waste drum handling
More informationCalifornia Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region
California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region Linda S. Adams Secretary for Environmental Protection 1515 Clay Street, Suite 1400, Oakland, California 94612 (510) 622-2300 Fax
More informationAnalysis of Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Chlorinated Pesticides by Gas Chromatography with Electron Capture Detection
Analysis of Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Chlorinated Pesticides by Gas Chromatography with Electron Capture Detection Patricia Van Hoof and Jui-Lan Hsieh Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory
More informationSampling Results: Uptown/Carrollton
Page 1 of 5 Environment & Health: Health Effects of Pollution: In Depth: Analysis New Orleans Environmental Quality Test Results Contents page Sampling Results: Uptown/Carrollton Results for: Mold Endotoxin
More information1.01 GENERAL. l.02 PIPELINE TRENCH EXCAVATION PIPELINES AND STRUCTURES REVISION: SECTION 1 PAGE : 1-1
1.01 GENERAL A. The Contractor shall perform all excavation, backfilling, grubbing and grading required for construction and installation of pipelines, structures and appurtenances. Excavation shall include
More informationFOR THE HARPER-THIEL SITE 3201 MILLER ROAD WILMINGTON, DELAWARE
DRAFT ANALYSIS OF BROWNFIELDS CLEANUP ALTERNATIVES FOR THE HARPER-THIEL SITE 3201 MILLER ROAD WILMINGTON, DELAWARE The objective of performing a remedial action is to reduce risk associated with contaminants
More informationSummary of Spill Event
Spill Event and Cleanup Report April 10, 2005 Spill Event at IM-2 Batch Treatment Plant Pacific Gas and Electric Company Topock Compressor Station, Needles, California Pacific Gas and Electric Company
More informationLIMITED PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SOIL CHARACTERIZATION EVALUATION 312 SOUTH EUCLID STREET, ANAHEIM, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APNS AND 03
LIMITED PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SOIL CHARACTERIZATION EVALUATION 312 SOUTH EUCLID STREET, ANAHEIM, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APNS 250-051-02 AND 03 FOR KB HOME 36310 INLAND VALLEY DR. WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA
More informationImagine the result. Capital City Bike Path Excavation Work Plan. Madison-Kipp Corporation Madison, Wisconsin
Imagine the result Capital City Bike Path Excavation Work Plan BRRTS No. 02-13-558625 Facility ID No. 113125320 August 2015 Trenna J. Seilheimer Project Scientist Christopher D. Kubacki, PE Senior Engineer
More informationFebruary 8, Mr. Jeff Vanderdasson, P.E. PACLAND 6400 SE Lake Road, Suite 300 Portland, Oregon 97222
Mr. Jeff Vanderdasson, P.E. PACLAND 6400 SE Lake Road, Suite 300 Portland, Oregon 97222 Re: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Recommendations Letter NW 9th Street and NW Spruce Avenue Corvallis, Benton
More informationGRADING PERMIT CITY OF RAPID CITY 300 SIXITH STREET RAPID CITY, SD ID NO: (605) PIN NO:
PERMIT NUMBER: GRADING PERMIT CITY OF RAPID CITY 300 SIXITH STREET RAPID CITY, SD 57701 ID NO: (605) 394-4157 PIN NO: APPLICATION DATE: DATE ISSUED: PROPERTY INFORMATION CONTRACTOR INFORMATION LOT ADDRESS
More informationANALYTICAL REPORT. Attn: Richard Boelter
ANALYTICAL REPORT TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 0 Community Drive Suite South Burlington, VT 00 Tel: (0)0- TestAmerica Job ID: 00-- TestAmerica Sample Delivery Group: 00- Client For: ARCADIS U.S. Inc
More informationIf you have any questions during the review of the enclosed materials, please call me at (207) or me at
October 21, 2016 Ms. Amanda Lessard Town Planner Town of Windham 8 School Road 04062 RE: Response to Comments - Minor Site Plan Application Dear Ms. Lessard: St.Germain Collins has prepared responses to
More informationCONTAMINATED MEDIA MANAGEMENT PLAN MIDLAND MARKET RAIL YARD KLAMATH FALLS, OREGON DEQ ECSI SITE #1732 MAY 4, 2009 FOR BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
CONTAMINATED MEDIA MANAGEMENT PLAN MIDLAND MARKET RAIL YARD KLAMATH FALLS, OREGON DEQ ECSI SITE #1732 MAY 4, 2009 FOR BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY File No. 0506-013-07 Contaminated Media Management Plan Midland
More informationTETRA TECH EM INC. February 13, 2008
TETRA TECH EM INC. February 13, 2008 Greg Haet EH&S Associate Director, Environmental Protection Office of Environment, Health & Safety University of California, Berkeley University Hall, 3rd Floor #1150
More informationEPA North Meadow Field Sampling Plan University of California, Berkeley Richmond Field Station, Richmond, CA October 25, 2017
EPA North Meadow Field Sampling Plan University of California, Berkeley Richmond Field Station, Richmond, CA October 25, 2017 Introduction Field sampling investigations conducted in 2014 and 2015 discovered
More informationAR No. IR No. EIELSON AFB ALASKA. Administrative Record Cover Sheet NOTES:
AR No. IR No. EIELSON AFB ALASKA NOTES: Administrative Record Cover Sheet Aaron Lambert 2013.03.06 14:20:30-08'00' DEC/EPA Comments Dated 14 December 2012 on Draft QAPP, Phase 2 Source Evaluation at SS085
More informationSOIL MANAGEMENT PLAN
SOIL MANAGEMENT PLAN BELFAST BOATYARD 39 & 41 FRONT STREET BELFAST, MAINE Prepared by: Ransom Consulting, Inc. 400 Commercial Street, Suite 404 Portland, Maine 04101 (207) 772-2891 March 22, 2013 1.0 INTRODUCTION
More informationFACTS ABOUT: Former GE Power Systems Apparatus Service Center (Voluntary Cleanup Program) Site Location
Maryland Department of the Environment Site Location FACTS ABOUT: Former GE Power Systems Apparatus Service Center (Voluntary Cleanup Program) This 2.4581-acres site (Site) consists of four parcels of
More informationMaterial Characterization Report
SSI-Metro12 Facility Carteret, NJ Page 1 of 3 Please complete all sections of the form, sign where indicated and return completed form to: Soil Safe, Inc. 6700 Alexander Bell Dr., Suite 300, Columbia MD
More informationRE: Phase II Site Assessment Report, Borello Property, Morgan Hill
October 10, 2014 Ms. Anessa Espinosa Morgan Hill Unified School District 15600 Concord Circle Morgan Hill, California 95037 RE: Phase II Site Assessment Report, Borello Property, Morgan Hill Dear Ms. Espinosa,
More informationCUMBERLAND COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY CUMBERLAND COUNTY SOLID WASTE COMPLEX SOIL ACCEPTANCE PROTOCOL
CUMBERLAND COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY CUMBERLAND COUNTY SOLID WASTE COMPLEX SOIL ACCEPTANCE PROTOCOL This protocol establishes procedures to be followed by waste generators petitioning the Cumberland
More informationGRADING, EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
SECTION 500 GRADING, EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL 501 Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan All engineering plans for projects that propose to construct new, or modify existing drainage facilities,
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS 4. PREPARATION, COMMUNICATIONS, AND CONTROLS
TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO. 1. INTRODUCTION... 1-1 1.1 Background... 1-1 1.2 Conceptual Site Model... 1-1 1.3 Plan Organization... 1-2 1.4 Certification... 1-3 2. SAMPLE COLLECTION, ANALYSIS, AND
More informationState of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Memorandum To: Rich Muza, US Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 Date: April 5, 2013 Through: From: Subject: Keith Johnson, NWR Cleanup Manager
More informationPROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM. June 2013
Report No. 810 SOILS (CHEMICAL) (ROUND 7) PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM June 2013 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS PTA wishes to gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance provided for this program by Mr C Wood from
More informationBuilding Better Storm Water Quality
Building Better Storm Water Quality s Storm Water Pollution Prevention Guidelines for Development Construction Projects City of El Segundo 350 Main Street (310) 524-2380 El Segundo, California 90245 Introduction
More informationSOIL INVESTIGATION McLAREN BIKE SKILLS PARK SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
FUGRO CONSULTANTS, INC. SOIL INVESTIGATION McLAREN BIKE SKILLS PARK SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO RECREATION AND PARKS DEPARTMENT JUNE 2013 Fugro Project No. 04.72130038
More informationRemediation Approach. W-3839 July 6, 2009
W-3839 July 6, 2009 Scott Alfonse City of New Bedford Department of Environmental Stewardship 133 William Street, Room 304 New Bedford, MA 02740 Re: Opinion of Probable Remediation Costs Former Polymerine
More informationGROUNDWATER MONITORING QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL PLAN LOWER YAKIMA VALLEY GWMA INITIAL CHARACTERIZATION
GROUNDWATER MONITORING QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL PLAN LOWER YAKIMA VALLEY GWMA INITIAL CHARACTERIZATION September 16, 2013 GROUNDWATER MONITORING QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL PLAN LOWER YAKIMA
More informationNJDEP Site Investigation for Historic Farm Use and Unknown Source Soil Stockpile
Site Investigation for Historic Farm Use and Unknown Source Soil Stockpile 1084-1092 Route 83 Dennis Township, Cape May County, NJ MJW Consulting prepares factual data to support our clients Environmental
More informationWASTE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
KIRBY CANYON RECYCLING & DISPOSAL FACILITY WASTE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Kirby Canyon Recycling & Disposal Facility Highway 101 at Coyote Creek Golf Drive Exit 910 Coyote Creek Golf Drive Morgan Hill, CA 95037
More informationTETRA TECH EM INC. March 18, Lynn Nakashima Project Manager Department of Toxic Substances Control 700 Heinz Avenue Berkeley, CA 94710
TETRA TECH EM INC. March 18, 2008 Lynn Nakashima Project Manager Department of Toxic Substances Control 700 Heinz Avenue Berkeley, CA 94710 Subject: Sampling Results for Surface Soil in the Pampas Grass
More informationSt. John the Baptist Parish Business Waste Water Use Permitting Procedure.
St. John the Baptist Parish Business Waste Water Use Permitting Procedure. For commercial, industrial or renewal applicants contact Planning and Zoning for Permit Application Package. Package contains
More informationQuestion Your Data. Jim Hays EXPERIMENT:
Question Your Data EXPERIMENT: A SCIENTIFIC PROCEDURE UNDERTAKEN TO MAKE A DISCOVERY, TEST A HYPOTHESIS OR DEMONSTRATE A KNOWN FACT. Jim Hays JHays@encolabs.com 2 Laboratory Certification 3 HTTP://NELAC-
More informationSECTION UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REMOVAL
SECTION 02 65 00 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REMOVAL SPEC WRITER NOTE: 1. Delete text between // // not applicable to project. Edit remaining text to suit project. 2. Consider including unit prices for additional
More informationLEAD TCLP REPORT Fabens Caseta Bridge Fabens, Texas
LEAD TCLP REPORT Fabens Caseta Bridge Fabens, Texas Prepared for: Sidney A. Mielke, P.E. Senior Project Manager Structural Engineering Associates, Inc. 3838 NW Loop 410 San Antonio, TX 78229 Prepared by:
More informationB. Borrow: Satisfactory soil imported from off-site for use as fill or backfill.
SECTION 312000- EARTHWORK PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS Drawings and general provisions of the Contract, including General and Special Conditions, apply to this Section. 1.2 SUMMARY This Section
More informationSubmittal Guidelines for Imported Soil. Soil Review & Acceptance Process
The following guidelines are provided as a prescriptive step process to ensure the contractual and regulatory requirements for Baylands Soil Processing are met and the appropriate quality control documentation
More informationRIMINI ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RESTORATION OF ABANDONED MINE SITES PROJECT DRAFT REPORT
RIMINI ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RESTORATION OF ABANDONED MINE SITES PROJECT DRAFT REPORT Prepared by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Omaha, Nebraska August 2004 Table of Contents 1 Introduction...
More informationAnalysis of Drinking Waters for a Suite of Pesticides using GC with dual ECD (US EPA Method 508.1) after SPE Concentration
Analysis of Drinking Waters for a Suite of Pesticides using GC with dual ECD (US EPA Method 508.1) after SPE Concentration Eric Scott and Keith Ewing, Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection,
More informationSoil Removal Report. Site: 93 rd Street Elementary School 330 East 93 rd Street Los Angeles, California 90003
Soil Removal Report Site: 93 rd Street Elementary School 330 East 93 rd Street Los Angeles, California 90003 Prepared for Los Angeles Unified School District Los Angeles Unified School District Office
More informationCertificate of Analysis
Certificate of Analysis Multiquip Aggregates P/L 260 Tenth Ave Austral NSW 2179 NATA Accredited Accreditation Number 1261 Site Number 1254 Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 Testing The results
More informationEROSION CONTROL AND GRADING PERMIT APPLICATION
EROSION CONTROL AND GRADING PERMIT APPLICATION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1735 MONTGOMERY STREET OROVILLE, CA 95965 530-538-2420 FAX (530) 5382426 www.cityoforoville.org APPLICATION DATE PERMIT FEE
More informationAugust Prepared by:
Case Study: Use of a Decision Support Tool: Using FIELDS and SADA to Develop Contour Maps of Contaminant Concentrations and Estimate Removal Volumes for Cleanup of Soil at the Marino Brothers Scrapyard
More informationSECTION SITE PREPARATION. A. PART A and DIVISION 1 of PART B are hereby made a part of this SECTION.
SECTION 311000 PART 1 GENERAL 1.01 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A. PART A and DIVISION 1 of PART B are hereby made a part of this SECTION. B. Examine all conditions as they exist at the project prior to submitting
More informationOrder of road works and servicing construction to be carried out in accordance with the staged contract construction sequence specified below.
SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES 1.0 GENERAL 1.1 The Developer and Contractor shall comply with the requirements of all regulatory authorities, federal, provincial and municipal government departments including
More informationPROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM. June 2014
Report No. 859 SOILS (CHEMICAL) ROUND 9 PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM June 2014 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS PTA wishes to gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance provided for this program by Mr M Blades from
More informationWA Recreational Sites Starr Road and Island Complex. Field Sampling Report. Final
WA Recreational Sites Starr Road and Island Complex Field Sampling Report Final Prepared for: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 1200 6th Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 Prepared by: U.S.
More informationAPPLICATION FOR RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT
City of Danville Department of Engineering & Urban Services APPLICATION FOR RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT PROJECT LOCATION: CONTRACTOR S BUSINESS NAME: CONTRACTOR'S ADDRESS: CONTRACTOR'S PHONE: OWNER S NAME: OWNER
More informationSECTION EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
SECTION 02160 EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. The Contractor shall be held to have read all Bidding Requirements; all of the General Conditions and Supplementary
More informationRemediation Plan. for. Creek County Landfill Site. E/2 SE NW 28-18N-12E Creek County, OK
Remediation Plan for Creek County Landfill Site in E/2 SE NW 28-18N-12E Creek County, OK Draft Remediation Plan Table of Contents 1.0 GENERAL... 3 1.1 Location... 3 1.2 Site Boundaries... 3 1.3 Background...
More informationStormwater Management Permit Application LESS Than One Acre. Public Works Department st Ave East Kalispell, Montana (406)
Public Works Department 201 1 st Ave East Kalispell, Montana 59901 (406) 758-7720 Note: This permit is separate from any permits required by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. A State Stormwater
More informationTECHNICAL MEMORANDUM OCEANA SALVAGE YARD BURIAL UNIT AND DEBRIS PILE SAMPLING PLAN NAS OCEANA VA 04/01/2011 CH2M HILL
N60191.AR.000181 NAS OCEANA 5090.3a TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM OCEANA SALVAGE YARD BURIAL UNIT AND DEBRIS PILE SAMPLING PLAN NAS OCEANA VA 04/01/2011 CH2M HILL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Oceana Salvage Yard Burial
More informationAppendices. Appendix H Quality Assurance Project Plan
Appendices Appendix H Quality Assurance Project Plan High School #5 PEA Irvine Unified School District Appendices The Planning Center DC&E January 2014 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR: PROPOSED IRVINE
More informationLower Duwamish Waterway Superfund Site
Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund Site Terminal 117 Early Action Area THIRD QUARTER 2008 INTERIM GROUNDWATER MONITORING DATA RESULTS NON-TIME CRITICAL REMOVAL ACTION Prepared for The Port of Seattle and
More informationPrepared for. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, California 92530
YELLOW PAINT AND THERMOPLASTIC TRAFFIC STRIPING INVESTIGATION TEMESCAL CANYON ROAD OVER TEMESCAL WASH BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA BRLS 5074(05) Prepared for CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
More informationAnacostia River Sediment Project Current Status. September 28, 2017
Anacostia River Sediment Project Current Status September 28, 2017 2 Topics Introduction Conceptual Site Model (CSM) Phase 2 RI Data Human Health Risk Assessment Draft Summary Ecological Risk Assessment
More informationADDENDUM NUMBER TWO. A. SECTION ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS 1. REVISE Sealed Bid Date/Time/Location paragraph to read as follows:
DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS SECTION 00 91 11.02 ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO June 22, 2016 TO: PLANHOLDERS SUBJECT: PCT TRUCK STAGING PROJECT PROJECT NO. 091606 CONTRACT NO. 070287 This
More informationRock Fill Layer Management and Maintenance Plan Former BNSF Site 13 Highway 99 Eugene, Oregon
Rock Fill Layer Management and Maintenance Plan 13 Highway 99 Prepared for: Half Moon LLC P.O. Box 25112 97402 PBS Project No. 51833.000 Rock Fill Layer Management and Maintenance Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationOther Study Objectives
Other Study Objectives Other study objectives in the project grant proposal that were addressed, are: 1) compare whitefish consumption advice used by each state (Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin) for
More informationCOUNTY OF NEVADA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY NEVADA COUNTY CDA GUIDELINES FOR ASH AND BURN DEBRIS CLEAN UP AND REMOVAL AFTER A FIRE
COUNTY OF NEVADA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY Environmental Health Department 950 MAIDU AVENUE, SUITE 170 NEVADA CITY, CA 95959-8617 (530) 265-1222 FAX (530) 265-9853 http://mynevadacounty.com Amy Irani,
More informationSampling Results for Western Transition Area Surface Soil Samples University of California, Berkeley, Richmond Field Station, Richmond, California
TETRA TECH EM INC. February 13, 2008 Greg Haet EH&S Associate Director, Environmental Protection Office of Environment, Health & Safety University of California, Berkeley University Hall, 3rd Floor #1150
More informationMicrobac Laboratories, Inc.
April 4, 2018 224 W. Buffalo New Buffalo, MI 49117 Work Order.: 18D0182 Re: CR6 testing Water Filtration Plant Dear Ken Anderson: - Chicagoland Division received 2 sample(s) on 4/4/2018 12:15:00PM for
More informationCOST AND PERFORMANCE REPORT
May 2000 COST AND PERFORMANCE REPORT Expedited Characterization and Soil Remediation At the Test Plot Area Wenatchee Tree Fruit Research Center Wenatchee, Washington May 2000 Hazardous, Toxic, Radioactive
More informationFINAL PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION FOR THE NVF-NEWARK COMPANY SITE NEWARK, DELAWARE
FINAL PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION FOR THE NVF-NEWARK COMPANY SITE NEWARK, DELAWARE May, 1999 DNREC Project DE-199 Prepared by: Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control Division of
More informationHomeowner Incentive Program
Homeowner Incentive Program Lake Whatcom Watershed Stormwater Considerations Applicable to HIP-Eligible projects within Basin One of the Lake Whatcom Watershed, under the jurisdiction of the City of Bellingham
More informationAERIALLY DEPOSITED LEAD INVESTIGATION REPORT LATROBE ROAD NORTH OF RYAN RANCH ROAD EL DORADO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA (MILEPOST 7.0 7
AERIALLY DEPOSITED LEAD INVESTIGATION REPORT LATROBE ROAD NORTH OF RYAN RANCH ROAD EL DORADO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA (MILEPOST 7.0 7.35) WIDENING AND REALIGNMENT (APNS 117-020-15 AND 118-110-03) Task Order
More informationC. Foundation stabilization for pipe and utility structures.
PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 SECTION INCLUDES A. Excavating, backfilling, and compacting for utilities, including pipe, structures, and appurtenances. B. Control of water in trenches. C. Foundation stabilization
More informationDPS CORP. April 14, 2011
DPS CORP. April 14, 2011 Jeffrey A. Smith Lead Environmental Scientist South Florida Water Management District Infrastructure Systems Section, Dept. 5332 3301 Gun Club Road West Palm Beach, Florida 33406
More information